HomeMy WebLinkAboutIV(b)_Subcommittee Memo with EnclosuresAttachment No. 2
Subcommittee Memo with Enclosures
Community Development Department
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, California 92660
949 644-3200
newportbeachca.gov/communitydevelopment
Memorandum
To: Co-Chairs Evans and Greer, and GPAC Members
From: Benjamin M. Zdeba, AICP, Principal Planner
Date: March 14, 2024
Re: GPAC Arts and Cultural/Historical Resources Subcommittee Efforts
________________________________________________________________
The GPAC Arts and Cultural/Historical Resources Subcommittee met on Tuesday,
February 27, to identify a chairperson and to review the Historical Resources
Existing Conditions and Background Analysis Report. GPAC Member Arlene
Greer was identified as the Chair of this Subcommittee and will provide an
overview of the Subcommittee’s discussion and any actions at your upcoming
meeting on March 20, 2024.
Enclosed for your reference are the following materials:
1. Action Minutes from the Subcommittee Meeting on February 27;
2. PowerPoint Presentation from the Subcommittee Meeting on February 27;
and
3. Dudek’s Historical Resources Existing Conditions and Background Analysis
Report.
The GPAC Arts and Cultural/Historical Resources Subcommittee will be seeking
feedback on initial considerations for outreach and visioning related to Historical
Resources. The information contained in the report and supplemented by the
action minutes will be used as a tool to seek community input through the outreach
and engagement efforts.
Action Minutes: GPAC Arts and Cultural/Historical Resources Subcommittee
Meeting Date: Tuesday, February 27, 2024, at 4:00 p.m.
Location: Balboa Island Meeting Room and Teams
GPAC and GPUSC Members in Attendance: Arlene Greer, Dennis Baker, Paul Watkins, Nancy Gardner
City Staff in Attendance: Jaime Murillo, Ben Zdeba, Liz Westmoreland, Laura Rodriguez, Jenny Tran, and
Elizabeth Dickson (Consultant)
Brief Discussion Recap and Action Minutes
City staff initiated the meeting and provided the following basic objectives for the meeting: 1) to determine
the Chairperson of the GPAC Arts & Cultural/Historical Resources Subcommittee; 2) to provide feedback
on the Historical Resources Existing Conditions and Background document; and 4) to move the document
(Existing Conditions and Background Report) forward for GPAC consideration.
Identifying the GPAC Vision Statement Subcommittee Chairperson
After brief discussion, GPAC Member Arlene Greer was selected as the Chairperson.
✓ Action: GPAC Member Arlene Greer will serve as the Chair of the GPAC Arts and Cultural/Historical
Resources Subcommittee.
Discussing the Historic Resources Element
Elizabeth Dickson (Consultant) of Dudek provided a PowerPoint presentation. She shared how the Historical
Resources Element was added to the General Plan in 2006 and emphasized it is not a mandated General
Plan Element. However, its goal is to protect historically significant landmarks, structures, and sites,
including archeological and paleontological resources. She also shared several databases that are used for
historic resources and presented a map of historical resources located in the City. Lastly, she listed the steps
required to prepare a draft with the respective GPAC subcommittee and to consider several outreach
opportunities and policy considerations. Several examples included public education opportunities, types
of properties that should be considered (i.e., beach cottages), and a legacy business program.
Once she concluded her presentation, the Subcommittee provided the following input:
General Input
• GPAC member Dennis Baker shared his experience in creating/using an app, specifically designed
for Corona del Mar since it already has a group that represents historical interests. The app is called
“Pocketsites” and is free to use and pinpoints specific sites throughout Corona del Mar. The app is
intended to be used by visitors and residents. He also noted how several historical societies and
groups are already working on these types of efforts independently.
• GPAC Member Greer recommended a few properties be included in the map Elizabeth had
presented in her power point presentation of Historical Resources.
• The group noted that there is an existing website that catalogs existing and former cottages in
Corona del Mar.
GPAC Arts and Cultural/Historical Resources Subcommittee
Action Minutes for February 27, 2024
• Discussion took place surrounding funding for historic preservation. It was noted that “Certified
Local Government” and the “Mills Act Program”1 were referenced in the Dudek report. More
information was requested by the committee and may be forthcoming in a future meeting of the
GPAC Arts and Culture and Historical Resources Subcommittee.
• There was a suggestion to consider wayfinding signs for significant sites. However, there is a
concern of sign pollution. Being able to use an app, like Pocketsites, will be help minimize the usage
of signs and vandalism.
• The group discussed the possibility of reaching out to Gary Sherwin of Visit Newport Beach. There
may be a policy to recommend some method of unifying and coordinating outreach and marketing
efforts.
• Consider a policy to recommend a federation to cover all historical groups so they can maintain
independence.
• Finding a way to incorporate historical sites on the MyNBapp in addition to the existing arts
functionality.
• Due to Balboa Island having a significant historical group, there was emphasis from the
Subcommittee to not pursue a competing interest that could damage foot traffic for the Balboa
Island museum.
• The idea of having a policy involving the encouragement of curating oral history. In addition, a
consideration to have professional staff or volunteers dedicated to historic resources and obtaining
oral history. It would be important to consider how that can be promoted to the public and how oral
history contributors would be identified.
• Creating a committee for a master plan like the effort done regarding arts. It was emphasized that
everything needs an advocate with objectives to accomplish for the program to be successful.
• Discussing the City/staff’s role in terms of policy considerations – e.g. using City Hall or other City
facilities at limited to no cost to host events.
• The group discussed the importance of acknowledging Newport Beach as a year-round destination
without any season.
✓ Action: The GPAC Arts and Cultural/Historical Resources Subcommittee supported moving the existing
conditions and background analysis report forward with consideration of these action minutes for the
larger GPAC to review at the March 20, 2024 meeting.
1 The Mills Act encourages the restoration and preservation of historic properties by allowing interested owners to
receive a break on their property taxes in exchange for their historic preservation and restoration efforts. See Section
7.3.2 (Develop a Mills Act Program) on page 36 of the Dudek report for more information.
GPAC ARTS & CULTURAL/HISTORIC RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE
FEBRUARY 27, 2024
Purpose of Background Analyses
Understand the
issues and
opportunities,
according to data
and experts
Establish a
baseline
Understand
Inform interested
parties and City
staff of key
findings
Provide initial
recommendations
based on findings
Inform Guide discussions
with community
members during
outreach and
engagement
Inform future
policy
development
Guide
Why are Background Analyses Important?
Historic Resources in Newport Beach
Overview
•Not a mandated General Plan
Element
•Historic Resources Element added to
General Plan in 2006
•Goals to:
•Protect historically significant
landmarks, sites, and structures.
•Protect archeological and
paleontological resources.
Identifying Historic Resources
•Several data bases
•CHRIS –Not Used
•Most current and detailed but takes significant time and resources
•Not typical of a comprehensive plan.
•NRHP –Used
•Legal protections, preservation funds, and federal tax credits may be available to property owners
•CRHR –Used
•Regulatory protections from State actions and potential eligibility for tax benefits
•CHLs –Used
•Statewide significance
•Processed through the Office of Historic Preservation
•Considered for NRHP
•BERD –Used
•Cultural Resources (non-archaeological)
•Processed through the Office of Historic Preservation
•Includes NRHP and CHLs
•City of Newport Beach Historic Resource Inventory -Used
•City Council designates historical properties that have importance to the history or architecture of Newport Beach
Known Historic Resources in Newport Beach
GPAC Subcommittee Feedback
Process for GPAC Feedback
•Acts as liaison to City staff
•Reports to larger GPAC
Subcommittee
Chairperson
•Shared with respective
GPAC subcommittee
•Optional meeting and
taskforce
•“Big picture” and
recommendations feedback
Draft Document
Review •Share draft documents
•Share subcommittee
feedback
o Actionable meeting
minutes
Full GPAC
Next Steps
•GPAC ARTS & CULTURAL/HISTORIC RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE
INPUT
•Support this document for March 20th GPAC
•Outreach and Policy Considerations
•Public Education Opportunities
•Types of Properties that Should be Considered
•i.e. Beach Cottages
•Legacy Business Program
Click to edit Master title style
Contact
NAME
TITLE
NAME
TITLE
P:
Email:
Website:
P:
Email:
Website:
Thank you!
Benjamin Zdeba, AICP
Principal Planner
P: 949-644-3253
Email: bzdeba@newportbeachca.gov
Jaime Murillo, AICP
Planning Manager
P:949-644-3209
Email:jmurillo@newportbeachca.gov
Historical Resources Element Existing
Conditions and Background Analysis
General Plan Update
JANUARY 2023
Prepared for:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, California 92660
Prepared by:
27372 Calle Arroyo
San Juan Capistrano, California 92675
Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material.
15443 i JANUARY 2023
Table of Contents
SECTION PAGE NO.
Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................ iii
1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 1
2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 1
3 General Plan Review ............................................................................................................................................ 3
3.1 Adopted Historical Resources Element ................................................................................................. 3
3.2 Other Adopted Elements Related to Historical Resources .................................................................. 4
3.2.1 Adopted Arts and Cultural Element ......................................................................................... 4
3.2.2 Adopted Land Use Element ...................................................................................................... 4
3.2.3 Adopted Housing Element ........................................................................................................ 5
3.2.4 Adopted Natural Resources Element ...................................................................................... 5
4 Regulatory Review ................................................................................................................................................ 7
4.1 Federal .................................................................................................................................................... 7
4.1.1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and National Register of Historic
Places ........................................................................................................................................ 7
4.2 State ........................................................................................................................................................ 8
4.2.1 California Register of Historical Resources ............................................................................. 9
4.2.2 California Environmental Quality Act ....................................................................................... 9
4.2.3 Government Code Sections 6254(r) and 6254.10 ............................................................. 12
4.2.4 California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act .................................. 13
4.2.5 California Health and Safety Code Sections 7050 and 7052 ............................................ 13
4.2.6 California Penal Code Section 622.5 ................................................................................... 13
4.2.7 Senate Bill 297 ...................................................................................................................... 13
4.2.8 Senate Bill 18 ........................................................................................................................ 14
4.2.9 Assembly Bill 52 ..................................................................................................................... 14
4.3 Local ..................................................................................................................................................... 15
4.3.1 Newport Beach City Council Policy Manual .......................................................................... 15
4.3.2 Newport Beach Municipal Code ............................................................................................ 16
5 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................................ 19
5.1 Prehistoric and Ethnographic Overview ............................................................................................. 19
5.2 Historic Era Overview .......................................................................................................................... 19
5.3 Previously Recorded Historic Resources ........................................................................................... 22
6 Issues and Opportunities .................................................................................................................................. 28
7 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 30
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 ii DECEMBER 2023
7.1 Short-Term Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 30
7.1.1 Dedicated Preservation Staff ................................................................................................ 30
7.1.2 Streamline and Clarify Landmarking Process ...................................................................... 31
7.1.3 Sensitivity Analysis and Development of Assessment Thresholds for Archaeological and
Tribal Resources .................................................................................................................... 32
7.1.4 Separate Paleontology from Historical Resources Element................................................ 32
7.1.5 Provide Public Education Opportunities ............................................................................... 32
7.2 Medium-Term Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 33
7.2.1 Develop a Citywide Historic Context Statement and Survey ............................................... 33
7.2.2 Develop a Citywide Prehistoric and Ethnohistoric Context Statement ............................... 34
7.2.3 Increase City Destinations ..................................................................................................... 34
7.2.4 Identify and Preserve Legacy Businesses ............................................................................ 35
7.3 Long-Term Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 35
7.3.1 Become a Certified Local Government ................................................................................. 35
7.3.2 Develop a Mills Act Program ................................................................................................. 36
FIGURE
Figure 1. Historic Resources Located in the City of Newport
Beach……………………………………………………………………Error! Bookmark not defined.
TABLE
Table 1. Historic Resources Located in the City of Newport Beach ............................................................................ 26
EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1. Pacific Electric’s Red Car Line taking visitors to the Balboa Pavilion, 1910. ............................................. 20
Exhibit 2. Construction of Fashion Island, 1967. ......................................................................................................... 22
15443 iii JANUARY 2023
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Acronym/Abbreviation Expanded Form
BERD Built Environment Resource Directory
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CHBC California Historical Building Code
CLG Certified Local Government
CRHR California Register of Historical Resources
HBC Historical Building Code
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NBMC Newport Beach Municipal Code
NHPA National Historic Preservation Act
NPS National Park Service
NRHP National Register of Historic Places
OHP California Office of Historic Preservation
PRC California Public Resources Code
SB Senate Bill
SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 iv DECEMBER 2023
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
15443 1 JANUARY 2023
1 Executive Summary
As is evidenced by the City’s existing commitments and processes, the protection and preservation of historic
landmarks, sites, and structures in Newport Beach is of great importance to the City of Newport Beach (City) and
community as a whole. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of how the City currently plans for and
supports the protection of historic resources (archaeology and historic built environment) and includes suggestions
on how to address paleontological resources. This report highlights pathways to ensure continuity between goals
and policies that may appear in other elements, discusses relevant federal, state, and local regulations for how
cultural resources are evaluated, and provides an updated inventory of previously recorded historic resources.
Based on an analysis conducted as part of this report, recommendations are provided to strengthen and enhance
the updated Historical Resources Element as part of the comprehensive General Plan Update.
The City actively works to preserve and protect historical resources through existing policies, practices, and
programs that aim to recognize, maintain, and protect Newport Beach’s unique historical, cultural, and
archeological sites and structures. Notably, the Newport Beach City Council Policy Manual includes two policies that
focus on the selection and designation of historical property within the City (Policy K-2), and the evaluation and
mitigation of paleontological and archaeological resources (Policy K-5), respectively. In particular, Policy K-5
establishes a local Register of Historical Property, and outlines the evaluation criteria and designation process to
identify existing and potential future resources. The Newport Beach Municipal Code also includes land use
regulations and definitions for historical resources that aim to protect and preserve historical resources throughout
the City. Additionally, the City maintains sound internal development review procedures that are mindful of the
presence of potential significant historical sites.
The City has a strong foundation in place for an effective and fully integrated historical resources program. This
report includes several recommendations ranging from short-term actions (implementable within two years) to long-
term commitments (actions that may take five or more years to implement) that, if implemented, would provide the
City with opportunities to strengthen its role as a leader in historic, archaeological, and tribal cultural resource
preservation. By taking a comprehensive approach to historic preservation, the City can: enhance the identification
and assessment of historical assets in order to continue to honor the heritage of Newport Beach; streamline the
protection and preservation of cultural resources; offer educational experiences for residents, businessowners,
employees, students, and visitors; and bolster Newport Beach’s economic well-being. Combined, these
recommendations can provide the City with clearer guidance for property owners, developers, City staff, and the
community at large on the importance of historic preservation and the specific actions needed to achieve it. The
updated Historical Resources Element will build upon the adopted Historical Resources Element's goal to prioritize
the protection of Newport Beach’s valued landmarks, sites, and structures that are representative of the community
and region and will reinforce current preservation efforts, fostering a sense of pride and appreciation for Newport
Beach’s rich history.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 2 DECEMBER 2023
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
15443 1 JANUARY 2023
2 Introduction
The protection and preservation of historic landmarks, sites, and structures in the City of Newport Beach (City) is of
great importance and is reflected in the Historical Resources Element of the General Plan. The Historical Resources
Element is one of four optional elements the City included in the 2006 comprehensive General Plan in response to
the demolition and alteration of many of Newport Beach’s historical sites and buildings. The intent of the adopted
Historical Resources Element is to provide a high-level historic context of Newport Beach, outline relevant and
related preservation programs, identify known historical resources with a focus on buildings and structures, and
state goals for protecting these resources.
The City is currently undertaking a General Plan Update. This report serves as initial technical support for the City’s
update to the Historical Resources Element. The document provides a high-level overview of the adopted Historical
Resources Element, discusses goals and polices that address protective measures for cultural resources
(archaeological and historic buildings and structures), and briefly addresses paleontological resources. This report
provides pathways to ensure continuity between goals and policies that may appear in other elements and
concludes with recommendations to strengthen and enhance the updated Historical Resources Element as part of
the comprehensive General Plan Update. The updated Historical Resources Element will build upon the adopted
Historical Resources Element's goal to prioritize the protection of Newport Beach’s valued landmarks, sites, and
structures that are representative of the community and region and will reinforce current preservation efforts.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 2 DECEMBER 2023
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
15443 3 JANUARY 2023
3 General Plan Review
This section provides a summary of findings from review of the adopted Historical Resources Element, as well as
an overview of the following adopted General Plan elements that relate to historic preservation: Arts and Cultural,
Land Use, Housing, and Natural Resources. Ensuring consistency and coordination between each of the General
Plan elements is paramount in developing and implementing sound, cohesive, and actionable policies. The section
below identifies how and where historical resources are discussed throughout the General Plan.
3.1 Adopted Historical Resources Element
First adopted in 2006 as part of the City’s comprehensive General Plan, the Historical Resources Element outlines
the City’s commitment to recognizing, maintaining, and protecting Newport Beach’s historic, archeological, and
paleontological resources. The primary objective of the element is to preserve and maintain Newport Beach’s
resources to create an awareness and appreciation for its rich history. The intention is to ensure that future
development respects and protects the history of Newport Beach.
The adopted Historical Resources Element includes four main components:
Introduction: The introduction includes the purpose and overall objectives of a Historical Resources Element.
Historic Context: The historic context begins with a brief overview of Newport Beach’s early history starting
with aboriginal hunters and gathers. The context then discusses the development of Newport Beach into
the present day (2006 at the time of adoption) and the patterns that shaped the commerce, character, and
community of Newport Beach. The historic context presented within the element briefly discusses the early
history of Newport Beach and does not discuss the area’s paleontological background.
Relevant and Related Programs: This section outlines the pertinent Federal, State, and local programs,
legislation, and policies that create a regulatory framework for identifying and safeguarding
Newport Beach’s historic and paleontological resources. This section also lists what historic resources have
been listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), on the California Register of Historical
Resources (CRHR), in the California Historic Resources Information System, and on the local City Register
of Historical Property. Additionally, it provides context for any previous citywide surveys conducted including
the 1992 unadopted Ad Hoc Historic Preservation Advisory Committee survey. The designated historical
resources listed in this section are only built environment resources, implying that the City does not have
anything designated under paleontology or archaeology.
Goals and Policies: The element contains two goals (with accompanying polices) that aim to identify and
protect (1) historically significant landmarks, sites, and structures and (2) archeological and paleontological
resources. Associated policies include, among other topics, discussions surrounding regular inventorying,
encouraging preservation via incentives (grading reductions, waiving fees, liens for preservation
easements), adaptive re-use, requiring physical links to the past on/related to historical property with new
development, adherence to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and donating scientifically
valuable paleontological or archaeological materials.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 4 DECEMBER 2023
3.2 Other Adopted Elements Related to
Historical Resources
Other elements of the City’s General Plan that include components related to historical resources include the
following: Arts and Cultural Element, Land Use Element, Housing Element, and Natural Resources Element. These
elements were reviewed to provide further context in the update to the City’s Historical Resources Element.
3.2.1 Adopted Arts and Cultural Element
The adopted Arts and Cultural Element includes an overview of the organizations, resources, attractions, activities,
and facilities that support an active arts and culture program. While the Arts and Cultural Element is distinguished
from historical resources in that its primary focus is on public art and events, it does overlap with historical
resources in a number of ways. The element primarily relates to historical resources through the role of the Arts
Commission in the designation of historical landmarks. The element also discusses the role that libraries and
museums play within the City as a link to Newport Beach’s past, in addition to the rebuilding of a local historical
resource to the community, the Balboa Theater. As it relates to historic preservation, the adopted Arts and Cultural
Element includes specific policies relating to the promotion of cultural tourism as a way of attracting visitors and
tourists (CA 3.4), which can connect visitors to key historical resources.
Policy CA 3.4: Cultural Tourism: Promote cultural tourism in Newport Beach to attract visitors and
tourists interested in cultural events.
3.2.2 Adopted Land Use Element
The adopted Land Use Element serves as the central organizing element for the 2006 General Plan and includes
goals and policies for the integration and coordination of all of the General Plan elements. Seeing as Newport Beach
is almost fully developed, the Land Use Element focuses on how population and employment growth can be
accommodated and still preserve Newport Beach’s distinguishing and valued qualities. The element highlights how
existing neighborhoods can be maintained and preserved, where potential areas can accommodate growth, and
which neighborhoods can be enhanced and revitalized. The element also proposes creative strategies for the re-use
of land and outlines how development can complement Newport Beach’s character and livability.
The Land Use Element identifies several tools and resources to help maintain and preserve Newport Beach’s
neighborhoods and districts. The relevant policies include the following:
Policy LU 4.3: Transfer of Development Rights: Permit the transfer of development rights from a property
to one or more other properties when: a. The donor and receiver sites are within the same Statistical
Area. b. The reduced density/intensity on the donor site provides benefits to the City such as, but not
limited to, the (1) provision of extraordinary open space, public visual corridor(s), parking or other
amenities; (2) preservation of an historic building or property or natural landscapes; (3) improvement of
the area’s scale and development character; (4) consolidation of lots to achieve a better architectural
design than could be achieved without lot consolidation; and/or (5) reduction of local vehicle trips and
traffic congestion; c. The increment of growth transferred to the receiver site complements and is in
scale with surrounding development, complies with community character and design policies contained
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 5 DECEMBER 2023
in this Plan, and does not materially degrade local traffic conditions and environmental quality. d.
Transfer of Development Rights in Newport Center is governed by Policy 6.14.3.
Policy LU 5.1.4: Neighborhood Maintenance: Promote the maintenance of existing residential units
through code enforcement and promotion of County and local rehabilitation programs, and public
education. This may include providing information, guidance, and assistance where feasible.
Policy LU 6.8.6: Historic Character: Preserve the historic character of Balboa Peninsula’s districts by
offering incentives for the preservation of historic buildings and requiring new development to be
compatible with the scale, mass, and materials of existing structures, while allowing opportunities for
architectural diversity.
Policy LU 6.10.3: Specific Plan Guidelines: Utilize design and development guidelines for Cannery Village
identified in Cannery Village/McFadden Square Specific Plan.
Policy LU 6.12.2: Specific Plan Guidelines: Utilize design and development guidelines for
McFadden Square identified in Cannery Village/McFadden Square Specific Plan.
3.2.3 Adopted Housing Element
The City’s current 6th Cycle Housing Element (2021–2029) was adopted by City Council and certified by the State
in 2022. The Housing Element identifies goals, policies, quantified objectives, and programs aimed at providing
additional housing opportunities, removing governmental constraints to affordable housing, improving the condition
of existing housing, and providing equal housing opportunities for all residents. While historic preservation is not
discussed directly, the Housing Element does include a policy relating to preserving neighborhood character through
the enforcement of applicable City codes, including the City’s Historical Building Code (HBC).
Housing Policy 2.1: Support all reasonable efforts to preserve, maintain, and improve availability and
quality of existing housing and residential neighborhoods, and ensure full utilization of existing City
housing resources for as long into the future as physically and economically feasible.
The purpose of the HBC is to provide regulations for the preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, relocation, or
reconstruction of buildings or properties designated as qualified historical buildings or properties. The HBC is
intended to provide solutions for the preservation of qualified historical buildings or properties, to promote
sustainability, to provide access for persons with disabilities, to provide a cost-effective approach to preservation,
and to provide for the reasonable safety of the occupants or users.
3.2.4 Adopted Natural Resources Element
The City’s adopted Natural Resources Element identifies goals and policies to guide the conservation and
consumption of Newport Beach’s natural resources, including but not limited to its water supply, biological resources,
open space, energy, and archaeological and paleontological resources, among other related topics. Within the
element, a brief and high-level summary of archaeological and paleontological resources is included. The element
includes focused goals and policies related to archaeological and paleontological resources. Goal 18 of the
Natural Resources Element calls for the protection and preservation of important paleontological and archaeological
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 6 DECEMBER 2023
resources and is followed by four related policies that are relevant to the adopted Historical Resources Element. All
policies under Goal 18 are largely replicated in the adopted Historical Resources Element as such:
Policy NR 18.1: New Development: Require new development to protect and preserve paleontological
and archaeological resources from destruction, and avoid and minimize impacts to such resources in
accordance with the requirements of CEQA. Through planning policies and permit conditions, ensure the
preservation of significant archeological and paleontological resources and require that the impact
caused by any development be mitigated in accordance with CEQA.1
Policy NR 18.2: Maintenance of Database Information: Prepare and maintain sources of information
regarding paleontological or archaeological sites and the names and addresses of responsible
organizations and qualified individuals who can analyze, classify, record, and preserve paleontological
and archaeological findings.2
Policy NR 18.3: Potential for New Development to Impact Resources: Notify cultural organizations,
including Native American organizations, of proposed developments that have the potential to adversely
impact cultural resources. Allow qualified representatives of such groups to monitor grading and/or
excavation of development sites.3
Policy NR 18.4: Donation of Materials: Require new development, where on site preservation and
avoidance are not feasible, to donate scientifically valuable paleontological or archaeological materials
to a responsible public or private institution with a suitable repository, located within Newport Beach or
Orange County, whenever possible.4
1 Policy NR 18.1: New Development replicates Policy HR 2.1: New Development Activities within the adopted Historical Resources Element.
2 Policy NR 18.2: Maintenance of Database Information largely replicates Policy HR 2.2: Grading and Excavation Activities within
the adopted Historical Resources Element. Policy HR 2.2 also contains a requirement for a qualified paleontologist/archaeologist
to monitor all grading and/or excavation, which is not included in Policy NR 18.2.
3 Policy NR 18.3: Potential for New Development to Impact Resources replicates Policy HR 2.3: Cultural Organizations within the adopted Historical Resources Element.
4 Policy NR 18.4: Donation of Materials replicates Policy HR 2.4: Paleontological or Archaeological Materials within the adopted
Historical Resources Element.
15443 7 JANUARY 2023
4 Regulatory Review
Federal, State, and local historic preservation programs provide specific criteria for evaluating the potential historic
significance of a resource. Although the criteria used by the NRHP, the CRHR, and the City Register of Historical
Property for the designation of historical and architectural significance vary in their specifics, they focus on many
of the same general themes.
Another area of similarity is the concept of integrity—generally defined as the survival of physical characteristics
that existed during the resource’s period of significance. Federal, State, and local historical preservation programs
require that resources maintain integrity in order to be identified as eligible for listing as historical. However, the
NRHP maintains a higher, more rigid threshold for integrity than the CRHR, noting that properties either retain
integrity or they do not.
4.1 Federal
Federal regulations pertaining to historical resources include the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and the
NRHP, as further discussed below.
4.1.1 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and
National Register of Historic Places
NHPA Section 106 (54 USC Section 306108) necessitates that Federal undertakings consider potential effects to
historic properties. Historic properties are defined by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as “any prehistoric or
historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP) maintained by the Secretary of the Interior. This term includes artifacts, records, and remains
that are related to and located within such properties. The term includes properties of traditional religious and
cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization that meet the NRHP Criteria” (36 CFR
Part 800.16[l]). Regulations under 36 CFR Part 800 provide a framework for the process for Federal agencies, in
consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and other consulting parties, to identify historic
properties within the area of potential effects for an undertaking and to determine effects. Adverse effects to
historic properties require resolution through consultation between the Federal agency, SHPO, and the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation. The following phases provide an outline of the NHPA Section 106 process:
Initiation of the Section 106 process, including the identification of consulting parties, such as
Native American tribes.
Establishment of the area of potential effects, in consultation with the SHPO and other consulting parties.
Identification of historic properties located in a project’s area of potential effects.
If historic properties are identified in the area of potential effects, assessment of effects of the undertaking.
Should adverse effects to historic properties be identified, consultation between the Federal agency, SHPO,
and any other identified consulting parties (including Native American tribes and the Advisory Council of
Historic Preservation) need to proceed to find ways to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the adverse effect. All
parties may determine that preparation of an agreement document, such as a Memorandum of Agreement
or Programmatic Agreement, is necessary to resolve adverse effects or effectively manage complex
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 8 DECEMBER 2023
undertakings where a project’s actions are proposed over several years and/or where the undertaking’s
effects on historic properties cannot be clearly defined during the initial project planning phase.
Implementation of the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Agreement or Programmatic Agreement.
While the listing of a site in the NRHP is significant, the regulatory powers of NHPA to protect these are limited.
There are various incentives – including legal protections, preservation funds, and federal tax credits – to encourage
property owners whose property has been listed in the NRHP to preserve historic resources their property. However,
they are not required to preserve historic resources on their property or make them publicly accessible.
Criteria for Eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places
Cultural resources are eligible for the NRHP if they retain integrity to reflect significant associations as defined in
the regulations for the NRHP. A property must meet one or more of the following key criteria to be considered
significant (36 CFR 60.4):
It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history; or
It is associated with the lives of people significant in our past; or
It embodies the distinct characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represents the
work of a master, or that possesses high artistic values, or it represents a significant and distinguishable
entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
It has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
A property must have significance and integrity to be considered eligible for listing in the NRHP. Integrity is assessed
through seven key aspects: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association (36 CFR 60.4).
Resources that are not commonly found eligible for listing in the NRHP are cemeteries, birthplaces, graves of
historical figures, properties owned by religious institutions or used for religious purposes, structures that have
been moved from their original locations, properties that have been reconstructed, properties principally
commemorative in nature, and properties that are not yet 50 years of age. However, these types of properties may
be eligible for the NRHP if they are essential features of eligible districts or resources or meet the criteria
considerations described in 36 CFR 60.4.
4.2 State
A historical resources element is not a required element of a General Plan. State regulations regarding historical
resources take shape through the CRHR and regulations under CEQA. These are further defined below.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 9 DECEMBER 2023
4.2.1 California Register of Historical Resources
In California, the term “historical resource” includes but is not limited to “any object, building, structure, site, area,
place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural,
engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California”
(California Public Resources Code [PRC], Section 5020.1[j]). In 1992, the California Legislature established the
CRHR “to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify the state’s historical resources
and to indicate what properties are to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse
change” (PRC Section 5024.1[a]). This means that property owners of sites listed in the CRHR– unlike the property
owners of sites listed in the NRHP – may be legally required to protect historic resources on their property.
Additionally, CRHP listed property owners may be eligible for state tax benefits and incentives. Under CEQA, a
cultural resource may qualify as a significant historical resource if it falls within the following at least one of the
three categories:
The resource is listed in or determined eligible for listing in the CRHR.
The resource is included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Section 5020.1(k) of the
PRC, or identified as significant in a historical resource survey meeting the requirements of
Section 5024.1(g) of the PRC, unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically
or culturally significant.
The lead agency determines the resource to be significant as supported by substantial evidence in light of
the whole record (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Section 15064.5[a]).
The criteria for listing resources in the CRHR were expressly developed to be in accordance with previously
established criteria developed for listing in the NRHP and are enumerated below. According to PRC
Section 5024.1(c)(1–4), a resource is considered historically significant if it (i) retains “substantial integrity,”
and (ii) meets at least one of the following criteria:
is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s
history and cultural heritage;
is associated with the lives of persons important in our past;
embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction; represents the
work of an important creative individual; or possesses high artistic values; or
has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
NRHP listed or eligible properties are considered eligible for listing in the CRHR, and thus are significant historical
resources for the purpose of CEQA (PRC Section 5024.1[d][1]).
4.2.2 California Environmental Quality Act
Public or private projects funded or approved by public agencies are required to comply with regulations outlined
under CEQA to assess the impacts of the project on archeological, historical and tribal cultural resources.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 10 DECEMBER 2023
Archaeological Resources
The following CEQA statutes and CEQA Guidelines are of relevance to the analysis of archaeological, historical, and
tribal cultural resources:
PRC Section 21083.2(g), defines “unique archaeological resource.”
If it can be demonstrated that a project would cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead
agency may require that reasonable efforts be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserved
in place or left in an undisturbed state. To the extent that they cannot be left undisturbed, mitigation
measures are required (PRC Sections 21083.2[a], [b], and [c]).
PRC Section 21084.1, and CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(a), define “historical resources.” In addition,
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(b), defines the phrase “substantial adverse change in the significance
of an historical resource.” It also defines the circumstances when a project would materially impair the
significance of a historical resource.
PRC Section 5097.98, and CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(e), set forth standards and steps to be employed
following the accidental discovery of human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery.
PRC Sections 21083.2(b) and (c), and CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126.4, provide information regarding
the mitigation framework for archaeological and historical resources, including examples of preservation in
place mitigation measures. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to
significant archaeological sites because it maintains the relationship between artifacts and the
archaeological context and may also help avoid conflict with religious or cultural values of groups
associated with the archaeological site(s).
Impacts to non-unique archaeological resources are generally not considered a significant environmental
impact (PRC Section 21083.2[a]; 14 CCR 15064.5[c][4]). However, if a non-unique archaeological resource
qualifies as Tribal cultural resource (PRC Sections 21074[c] and 21083.2[h]), further consideration of
significant impacts is required.
CEQA Section 15064.5 outlines the protocols to be followed in the case of a discovery of Native American
human remains including the roles and responsibilities of the coroner, Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC), the individual identified by the NAHC as the most likely descended from the deceased
Native American, and the landowner of whose land the discovery was made.
Historical Resources
Under CEQA, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it may cause “a substantial adverse change
in the significance of an historical resource” (PRC Section 21084.1; 14 CCR 15064.5[b]). If a site is either listed or
eligible for listing in the CRHR, or if it is included in a local register of historical resources or identified as significant in
a historical resources survey (meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1[q]), it is a “historical resource” and is
presumed to be historically or culturally significant for purposes of CEQA (PRC Section 21084.1; 14 CCR 15064.5[a]).
The lead agency is not precluded from determining that a resource is a historical resource even if it does not fall within
this presumption (PRC Section 21084.1; 14 CCR 15064.5[a]).
A “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” reflecting a significant effect under
CEQA means “physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate
surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired”
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 11 DECEMBER 2023
(14 CCR 15064.5[b][1]; PRC Section 5020.1[q]). In turn, CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.5(b)(2), states that the
significance of an historical resource is materially impaired when a project:
1. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical
resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in
the California Register of Historical Resources; or
2. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its
inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources
Code or its identification in an historical resources survey meeting the requirements of section 5024.1(g)
of the Public Resources Code, unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by
a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or
3. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource
that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the California Register of
Historical Resources as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA.
Pursuant to these sections, the CEQA inquiry begins with evaluating whether a project site contains any historical
resources, then evaluates whether the project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource such that the resource’s historical significance would be materially impaired.
Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Where a project has been determined
to conform with the Standards, the project’s impact on historical resources would be considered mitigated to below
a level of significance and, thus, not significant (14 CCR 15126.4[b][1]). In most cases, a project that demonstrates
conformance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards is categorically exempt from CEQA (14 CCR 15331), as
described in the CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR 15126.4[b][1]):
Where maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation or
reconstruction of the historical resource will be conducted in a manner consistent with the
Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for
Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings (Weeks and Grimmer
1995), the project’s impact on the historical resource shall generally be considered mitigated below
a level of significance and thus is not significant.
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards are a series of concepts focused on maintaining, repairing, and replacing
historic materials, as well as designing new additions or making alterations. They function as common-sense
historic preservation principles that promote historic preservation best practices. There are four distinct approaches
that may be applied to the treatment of historical resources:
Preservation focuses on the maintenance and repair of existing historic materials and retention of a
property’s form as it has evolved over time.
Rehabilitation acknowledges the need to alter or add to a historic property to meet continuing or
changing uses while retaining the property’s historic character.
Restoration depicts a property at a particular period of time in its history, while removing evidence of
other periods.
Reconstruction recreates vanished or non-surviving portions of a property for interpretive purposes.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 12 DECEMBER 2023
The choice of treatment depends on a variety of factors, including the property’s historical significance, physical
condition, proposed use, and intended interpretation. The Guidelines provide general design and technical
recommendations to assist in applying the Standards to a specific property. Together, the Standards and Guidelines
provide a framework that guides important decisions concerning proposed changes to a historic property.
The following 10 standards for rehabilitation are used to determine if a project is in conformance with the Standards
for a rehabilitation. To be in conformance, a project must be consistent with the historic character of the structure(s)
and, where applicable, the district in which it is located. The following standards are to be applied to specific
rehabilitation projects in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility:
1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to
the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment.
2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or
alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.
3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a
false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from
other buildings, shall not be undertaken.
4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right
shall be retained and preserved.
5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize
a historic property shall be preserved.
6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration
requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture,
and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be
substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.
7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be
used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.
8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources
must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.
9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that
characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible
with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property
and its environment.
10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if
removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would
be unimpaired.
4.2.3 Government Code Sections 6254(r) and 6254.10
Government Code Sections 6254(r) and 6254.10 of the California Public Records Act were enacted to protect
archaeological sites from unauthorized excavation, looting, or vandalism. Section 6254(r) explicitly authorizes
public agencies to withhold information from the public relating to “Native American graves, cemeteries, and sacred
places maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission.” Section 6254.10 specifically exempts from
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 13 DECEMBER 2023
disclosure requests for “records that relate to archaeological site information and reports, maintained by, or in the
possession of the Department of Parks and Recreation, the State Historical Resources Commission, the State Lands
Commission, the NAHC, another state agency, or a local agency, including the records that the agency obtains
through a consultation process between a Native American tribe and a state or local agency.”
4.2.4 California Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act
Codified in California Health and Safety Code Sections 8010–8030, the California Native American Graves
Protection Act of 2001 is consistent with the Federal Native American Graves Protection Act. Intended to “provide
a seamless and consistent State policy to ensure that all California Indian human remains, and cultural items be
treated with dignity and respect,” the California Native American Graves Protection Act also encourages and
provides a mechanism for the return of remains and cultural items to lineal descendants. California Health and
Safety Code Section 8025 established a Repatriation Oversight Commission to oversee this process. The act also
provides a process for non–Federally recognized tribes to file claims with agencies and museums for repatriation
of human remains and cultural items.
4.2.5 California Health and Safety Code Sections 7050 and 7052
California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 declares that, in the event of the discovery of human remains
outside a dedicated cemetery, all ground disturbances must cease, and the County Coroner must be notified.
California Health and Safety Code Section 7052 establishes a felony penalty for mutilating, disinterring, or
otherwise disturbing human remains, except by relatives.
4.2.6 California Penal Code Section 622.5
California Penal Code Section 622.5 provides misdemeanor penalties for injuring or destroying objects of historical
or archaeological interest located on public or private lands but specifically excludes the landowner.
4.2.7 Senate Bill 297
Senate Bill (SB) 297 (1982) addresses the disposition of Native American burials in archaeological sites and
protects such remains from disturbance, vandalism, or inadvertent destruction; establishes procedures to be
implemented if Native American skeletal remains are discovered during construction of a project; and establishes
the NAHC to resolve disputes regarding the disposition of such remains. It has been incorporated into CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5(e).
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 14 DECEMBER 2023
4.2.8 Senate Bill 18
The Local and Tribal Intergovernmental Consultation Process, commonly known as SB 18, was signed into law
September 2004 and took effect March 1, 2005. SB 18 refers to PRC Sections 5097.9 and 5097.995, which
defines cultural places as follows:
Native American sanctified cemetery place of worship, religious or ceremonial site, or sacred shrine
(PRC Section 5097.9)
Native American historic, cultural, or sacred site that is listed or may be eligible for listing in the CRHR
pursuant to Section 5024.1, including any historic or prehistoric ruins, any burial ground, any
archaeological or historic site (PRC Section 5097.993).
SB 18 established responsibilities for local governments to contact, provide notice to, refer plans to, and consult
with California Native American tribes that have been identified by the NAHC and tribes that have requested
consultation after local government outreach as stipulated in Government Code Section 65352.3. The purpose of
this consultation process is to protect the identity of the cultural place and to develop appropriate and dignified
treatment of the cultural place in any subsequent project. The consultation is required whenever a general plan,
specific plan, or open space designation is proposed for adoption or to be amended. Once local governments have
sent notification, tribes are responsible for requesting consultation. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 65352.3(a)(2), each tribe has 90 days from the date on which they receive notification to respond and
request consultation.
In addition to the requirements stipulated previously, SB 18 amended Government Code Section 65560 to “allow
the protection of cultural places in open space element of the general plan” and amended Civil Code
Section 815.3 to add “California Native American tribes to the list of entities that can acquire and hold conservation
easements for the purpose of protecting their cultural places.”
4.2.9 Assembly Bill 52
Assembly Bill 52 of 2014 amended PRC Section 5097.94 and added PRC Sections 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1,
21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2, and 21084.3. Assembly Bill 52 established that tribal cultural
resources must be considered under CEQA and also provided for additional Native American consultation
requirements for the lead agency. PRC Section 21074 describes a tribal cultural resource as a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape, sacred place, or object that is considered of cultural value to a California Native American tribe
and that is either:
On or determined to be eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or a local historical register; or
A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of PRC Section 5024.1.
Assembly Bill 52 formalizes the lead agency–tribal consultation process. Specifically, it requires the lead agency to
notify a California Native American tribe of proposed projects in the geographic area that is traditionally and
culturally affiliated with the tribe if that tribe has requested such notification, in writing, to the lead agency
(PRC Section 21080.3.1[b]). Additionally, prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 15 DECEMBER 2023
declaration, or environmental impact report, the lead agency is required to begin consultation with a California
Native American tribe that requested consultation within 30 days of receipt of project notification
(PRC Section 21080.3.1[e]).
PRC Section 21084.2 establishes that “A project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment.” Effects
on tribal cultural resources should be considered under CEQA. PRC Section 21080.3.2 states that parties may
propose mitigation measures “capable of avoiding or substantially lessening potential significant impacts to a tribal
cultural resource or alternatives that would avoid significant impacts to a tribal cultural resource.” Further, if a
California Native American tribe requests consultation regarding project alternatives, mitigation measures, or
significant effects to tribal cultural resources, the consultation shall include those topics
(PRC Section 21080.3.2[a]). The environmental document and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program
(where applicable) shall include any mitigation measures that are adopted (PRC Section 21082.3[a]).
4.3 Local
Local regulations pertaining to historical resources exist within the City Council Policy Manual and the
Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC), as further discussed below.
4.3.1 Newport Beach City Council Policy Manual
The Newport Beach City Council Policy Manual contains all the City policy statements adopted by resolution of the
City Council. Council policies are statements pertaining to how the City conducts its business. The following City
Council policies relate to historical resources.
4.3.1.1 Places of Historical and Architectural Significance (K-2)
Council Policy K-2, last amended August 2017, states the Newport Beach City Council may designate as historical
property any building or part thereof, object, structure, monument, or collection thereof having importance to the
history or architecture of the City of Newport Beach in accordance with the criteria set forth below. The policy states
that the City Clerk shall maintain a register, referred to as the City of Newport Beach Register of Historical Property.
The City Council retains authority to repeal, revise, or modify any designation upon reconsideration of the historical
or architectural importance.
The policy includes selection criteria for both architectural and historical significance and outlines a classification system
for designated historical property. According to the policy, historical property shall be categorized in relation to its
significance and condition in the City Register of Historical Property under the following hierarchical classification system:
Class 1. Major Historic Landmark. A building, structure, object, site, or natural feature of major historical
significance. The property exemplifies historic/architectural themes of local and statewide
importance and serves as a significant part of the heritage of Newport Beach.
Class 2. Historic Landmark. A building, structure, object, site, or natural feature of historical significance.
The property is representative of historic/architectural themes of local and statewide importance
and serves as a physical link to the historical past of Newport Beach.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 16 DECEMBER 2023
Class 3. Local Historic Site. A building, structure, object, site, or natural feature of local significance only.
The property is representative of historic/architectural themes of local importance.
Class 4. Structure of Historic Interest. A building, structure, object, site, or natural feature that has been
altered to the extent that the historic/architectural integrity has been substantially compromised
but is still worthy of recognition.
Class 5. Point of Historic Interest. A site of a building, structure, or object that no longer exists, but is
associated with historic events or persons, or architecturally significant structures.
The policy outlines when the City’s HBC (contained in Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 15.13) applies.
Additionally, the policy includes the application procedures for a property owner; City Council; Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Commission; the Arts Commission; or the Newport Beach Historical Society to nominate a
structure for consideration to be included in the City Register of Historical Property. The policy also includes
incentives that may be granted to protect existing properties on the City’s Register of Historical Property in
exchange for preservation easements.5
4.3.1.2 Paleontological and Archaeological Resource Protection
Guidelines (K-5)
Council Policy K-5, last amended by in August 2017, states that the City will ensure that potential public or private
development impacts to paleontological and archaeological resources are properly evaluated and mitigated in
accordance with the General Plan, Local Coastal Program, and CEQA. The policy outlines the procedures the City
shall take to evaluate and mitigate potential impacts to such resources, which includes determination of
paleontological or archaeological resources at the initial study level, a preliminary investigation report if resources
are known to exist, and an impact assessment report if resources are known to exist, as well as what to do if
resources are found on a construction site.6
4.3.2 Newport Beach Municipal Code
The Newport Beach City Council adopted and incorporated the 2022 Edition of the California Historical Building
Code (CHBC), California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 8, and all national codes and standards referenced
therein to the prescribed extent of each such reference. The purpose of the CHBC is to provide regulations for the
preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, relocation, or reconstruction of buildings or properties designated as
qualified historical buildings or properties. The CHBC is intended to provide solutions for the preservation of
qualified historical buildings or properties, to promote sustainability, to provide access for persons with disabilities,
to provide a cost-effective approach to preservation, and to provide for the reasonable safety of the occupants or
users. The CHBC requires enforcing agencies to accept solutions that are reasonably equivalent to the regular code
when dealing with qualified historical buildings or properties.
5 City of Newport Beach. 2017a. “Places of Historical and Architectural Significance (K-2).” In Newport Beach City Council Policy
Manual. Accessed October 9, 2023.
6 City of Newport Beach. 2017b. “Paleontological and Archaeological Resource Protection Guidelines (K-5).” In Newport Beach City Council Policy Manual. Last updated August 8, 2017. Accessed October 9, 2023. https://www.newportbeachca.gov/home/
showpublisheddocument/2437/636385647487800000.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 17 DECEMBER 2023
The NBMC regulates historical resources throughout the code. In particular, Section 20.38.070 (Landmark
Structures), of the NBMC outlines how the City intends to preserve historic structures, encourage adaptive reuse,
and revitalize older commercial areas. The NBMC offers relief from restrictions on nonconforming structures and
uses with the intent of preserving the principal use and minimizing impacts to the surrounding areas. The NBMC
includes exemptions regarding the change of use and alterations made to the landmark, as well as conditions to
which the exemptions apply. Landmark theaters are defined as structures principally used as a theater, with a
single screen or stage, designed to fit 300 people, and constructed on or before December 12, 1950. Landmark
structures must be listed on the NRHP.
Chapter 21.70 (Definitions) sites a historical resource as “any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record,
or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or which is significant in the architectural,
engineering, scientific, economic, agriculture, educational, social, political, military, or cultural history of the City of
Newport Beach and/or California and/or the United States.” Section 15.50..050 (Definitions) describes a historic
structure as one that is listed on the NRHP, certified or preliminary determined by the Secretary of Interior’s as
historically significant, listed on a State inventory of historic places, or listed on a certified local inventory.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 18 DECEMBER 2023
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
15443 19 JANUARY 2023
5 Existing Conditions
The following section provides context for archaeology and the historic built environment, touching on relevant
themes concerning the history and development in Newport Beach. It begins with a prehistoric and ethnographic
overview, followed by historic-era developments, and then discusses known sources of previously recorded historic
era resources.
5.1 Prehistoric and Ethnographic Overview
Evidence for continuous human occupation in Southern California spans the last 10,000 years. Various attempts
to parse out variability in archaeological assemblages over this broad period have led to the development of several
cultural chronologies; some of these are based on geologic time, most are based on temporal trends in
archaeological assemblages, and others are interpretive reconstructions. Each of these reconstructions describes
essentially similar trends in assemblage composition in more or less detail. However, given the direction of research
and differential timing of archaeological study following intensive development in Orange County, chronology
building for the general area of Newport Beach must rely on data from neighboring cities and regions to fill the gaps.
To be more inclusive, this research requires a common set of generalized terms used to describe chronological
trends in assemblage composition: Paleoindian (before 7500 BP), Archaic (10,000–1500 BP), Late Prehistoric
(1500 BP–AD 1769), and Ethnohistoric (after AD 1769). In order to create an effective prehistoric and ethnohistoric
context that incorporates tribal information and is consumable by the general public, additional research is
required. Recommendations provided in Section 7, Recommendations, include a task for developing an appropriate
prehistoric and ethnographic context.
5.2 Historic Era Overview
Spanish settlement of Orange County began in 1769, with the Gaspar de Portolà Expedition, which sailed along
California’s coastline. Members of these early expeditions were often awarded land grants for their service.
Jose Antonio Yorba, a Spanish soldier in the expedition, was given a 63,414-acre land grant, Rancho Santiago de
Santa Ana in 1801, which included most of present-day Orange County including Newport Beach. Ranchos operated
as early trading hubs and traded hides with merchants from around the world. In 1810, a civil war erupted in Mexico
and as a result California was cut off from Mexico and all its trade. The Mexican War of Independence was won
against the Spanish Crown in 1821 and the Mexican government began dividing up land that was once owned by
the Catholic Church to the highest bidder. The land that would become Newport Beach was predominantly owned
by Don Sepulveda and Don Bernardo Yorba, who later sold most of their holdings to American entrepreneurs Flint,
Bixby, and Irvine McFadden, also known as the McFadden brothers.7
The area’s coastline was described as treacherous and swamp-like with land being sold for $1 an acre. The
McFadden brothers looked to develop the area into a “new port” for their shipping business between the hubs of
Los Angeles and San Diego and the name Newport stuck. Their shipping company became the largest business in
the newly created Ocean County. Problems continued with gaining access to the bay, so the McFadden brothers
developed McFadden Wharf (present day location of Newport Pier) in 1888. In order to efficiently move more
7 Baker, G. 2004. Newport Beach, A HarborTown History. Santa Barbara, California: HarborTown Histories.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 20 DECEMBER 2023
products, a railroad was built on the wharf in 1891, called the Santa Ana & Newport Railroad.8 Despite the
improvements, the neighboring port of San Pedro became Sothern California’s dominant seaport, not Newport as
the McFadden brothers had hoped. In 1899, the McFadden Wharf and railroad were sold to the Southern Pacific
Railroad, transitioning the area from a commercial shipping hub to a resort and vacation destination.9
The early 1900s brought new subdivisions to Newport Beach, including Corona del Mar, East Newport, Balboa, and
Balboa Island. This was after the establishment of the Pacific Electric’s “surf line,” which ran along the coastline
from Long Beach (nicknamed the Red Cars). Local developers dredged the bay and created human-made islands
to establish land adequate for new residential developments. With the increase in residences came civic
improvements.10 In 1906, the City of Newport Beach was incorporated, claiming to have 700 residents, though the
majority were only summertime residents. Development during this period included small hotels, beach cottages,
and tourist attractions such as the Balboa Pavilion and the Balboa Pier (Exhibit 1). Improvements to the area
continued, including jetty construction and further dredging of the harbor. Development was slowed by the start of
World War I and an economic depression.11
Exhibit 1. Pacific Electric’s Red Car Line taking visitors to the Balboa Pavilion, 1910.
Source: City of Newport Beach, Historic Photos: A Look Back in Time, https://nbgis.newportbeachca.gov/gispub/NewportStoryMaps/HistoricPhotos/.
The City’s first organized effort for harbor development began in the 1920s and lasted into 1936, when the harbor
reopened with a thoroughly dredged entrance and bay. Newport Bay became a pleasure boat harbor rather than a
8 Cassis, C. 2022. “Vibrant Figures in Newport Beach History: From ‘Swamp’ to ‘New Port.’” The Epoch Times. September 8, 2022.
9 Brigandi, P. 2009. “Early Newport Beach.” OC Historyland. https://www.ochistoryland.com/earlynb.
10 Brigandi 2009.
11 Gray, P.L. 2003. Images of America: Newport Beach. Chicago, Illinois: Arcadia Publishing.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 21 DECEMBER 2023
commercial port, resulting in a lack of year-round permanent residents. Earlier industries such as salt mines,
canning, and fishing gave way to sport fishing, yacht building, and yacht sales. Development during this period
continued to be focused along the ocean and on the Balboa Peninsula, with new human-made islands such as
Lido Isle constructed into the 1930s.12 Newport Boulevard (State Route 55) and Pacific Coast Highway (State
Route 1) provided access to Newport Beach from the north, east, and west. The start of World War II brought a new
need for industries to the area that allowed for the construction of more year-round residences. During the 1940s,
Newport Beach became a hub for naval ship construction and repair, with shipyards working on a nonstop schedule.
The Federal government assisted in new development by setting up military installations and developing the area
as an unofficial “Army Air Corps rest and relaxation site.”13
After World War II, many veterans returned to the area to build new homes in developments such as
Newport Heights. These residences were predominantly small-scale, one-story in height, and constructed in popular
architectural styles of the period such as Minimal Traditional and Ranch. The area also attracted upscale
developments such as luxury hotels, sail and yacht clubs, and remodeled beach cottages turned into estates. -Blue-
collar jobs from earlier decades such as fishing and canning were gradually replaced with new white-collar
industries such as communications, research, electronics, and medicine. Retail shopping centers, such as
Fashion Island, which opened in 1967, became a major draw to the area and helped push further growth of hotels,
restaurants, office buildings, and residential developments (Exhibit 2).14 Smaller homes constructed in the 1940s
and 1950s were gradually replaced in the 1990s and 2000s by larger, two-story residences in some instances
constructed to fill almost the entire lot. Tourism remains an integral part of Newport Beach’s economy and the
population is still divided into two categories, permanent and summer. As of 2022, Newport Beach’s permanent
population is 86,453 and the summer population is approximately 100,000. The area is known for its beaches and
recreational activities such as golf, sailing, and swimming.15
12 Gray 2003.
13 Brigandi 2009.
14 NBCC (Newport Beach Chamber of Commerce). 2022. “About Newport Beach.” Accessed October 10, 2023. https://www.newportbeach.com/about-newport-beach/#:~:text=Home%20to%20a%20world%2Dfamous,%2C%20science%2C%20medicine%20and%20development.
15 Gray 2003.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 22 DECEMBER 2023
Exhibit 2. Construction of Fashion Island, 1967.
Source: City of Newport Beach, Historic Photos: A Look Back in Time,
https://nbgis.newportbeachca.gov/gispub/NewportStoryMaps/HistoricPhotos/.
5.3 Previously Recorded Historic Resources
As discussed in Section 4, Regulatory Review, there are many laws and agencies that designate and regulate
historic resources at all levels of government. For this reason, there are several methods to identifying historic sites
and multiple databases with information regarding them. The most comprehensive and up to date database is the
California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS). However, the information in CHIRIS is not publicly
available and conducting a CHRIS records search requires significantly more time and funding than other methods.
Moreover, a CHRIS records search is not typical or necessary for a General Plan update. For these reasons, this
analysis relies on a review of sites formally listed in the NRHP, CRHR, or as California Historical Landmarks (CHLs),
as well as sites included in the Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD). BERD provides information on historic
resources in the Office of Historic Preservation’s (OHP) inventory. The OHP inventory contains information only for
cultural resources that have been processed through OHP. This includes resources reviewed for eligibility to the
NRHP and the California Historical Landmarks programs through federal and state environmental compliance laws,
and resources nominated under federal and state registration programs. Because the BERD only includes
information that has been processed through the OHP office, it is not a completely comprehensive and up to date
listing of all eligible and designated properties. Nonetheless, it provides a good sense of significant and potentially
significant historical sites in the City.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 23 DECEMBER 2023
Current listings were reviewed from the NRHP (2023), California Historical Landmarks (2023), and BERD to obtain
information about historical resources in Newport Beach that have either been listed or determined eligible for the
NRHP, CRHR, and/or local listing. According to the BERD, 24 historical resources have been recorded in Newport
Beach (the Stuft Shirt building (also known as A’maree’s or the Windows by the Bay building at 2241 West Coast
Highway is not listed on the BERD as of November 2023). See Figure 1, Historical Resources in Newport Beach, for
all listed historical resources within Newport Beach. The Crystal Cove Historic District is listed on the OHP website as
located within the City of Laguna Beach and therefore is not included in the below analysis, despite being previously
listed in the 2006 City of Newport Beach General Plan.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 24 DECEMBER 2023
15443 25 DECEMBER 2023
Federal and State
Four historical resources were formally listed in the NRHP as individual properties and are also listed in the CRHR
(Status Code 1S). Those properties are the Balboa Inn (intact), Bank of Balboa-Bank of America site (intact), Lovell
Beach House (intact), and Wild Goose (yacht) (intact). The Balboa Inn and the Bank of Balboa-Bank of America are
also locally listed in the City Register of Historical Property.
Eight resources were determined eligible for the NRHP by a consensus through Section 106 process and are also
listed in the CRHR (Status Code 2S2). Those properties are the Newport Bay West Jetty/Mission Bay Jetty (intact),
Newport Bay East Jetty/Mission Jetty (intact), First Republic of Newport (intact), MacArthur Centre/Verizon
Candidate "The Duke" (intact), Irvine Company (intact), Bloomingdale's Fashion Island (intact), Newport Beach
Marriott Hotel & Spa (partially demolished), and B K Stone Building (McFadden Building) (intact). None of these
properties are also locally listed.
One property, the Stuft Shirt building (intact), also known as A’maree’s or the Windows by the Bay building, was
submitted for nomination by Federal Preservation Officers, but has not been formally listed on the NRHP. The
property is listed on the CRHR.
The Balboa Island Fire House #4 (demolished) was determined eligible for listing in the CRHR by the State Historical
Resources Commission (Status Code 2CS). . This property was not locally listed.
A search of the Orange County California Historical Landmarks identified seven properties in Newport Beach. Three
of those properties were identified in the Built Environment Resource Directory including the Balboa Inn, Bank of
Balboa-Bank of America, and Lovell Beach House. Three properties are listed as California Historical Landmarks
including the McFadden Wharf (replaced by Newport Pier), Old Landing site (demolished—plaque at corner of Pacific
Coast Highway and Bayshore Drive), and the Site of First Water-to-Water Flight (plaque at foot of Balboa Pier).
Local
Newport Beach has 10 designated Register of Historical Property properties with various classifications (Table 1).
Those include the Balboa Pavilion (Class 1; intact), Rendezvous Ballroom Site (Class 5; building lost to fire—plaque
in place), Jolly Roger (Dippy’s)/Wilma’s Patio (Class 4; intact), Balboa Inn (Class 1; intact), Bank of America Site
(Class 5; intact), Balboa Theater (No Classification Listed; partially demolished), Dory Fishing Fleet (Class 1; intact),
Balboa Saloon (Class 3; intact), Solar House (Class 2; intact), and Goldenrod Avenue Footbridge (Class 3; intact).
The Mariner’s Medical Arts complex (also known as The Neutra Building) at 1901 Westcliff Drive, has not been
formally designated by the City but is eligible for listing. In 2009, the building was slated for demolition prior to the
City becoming aware of its potential significance as work of renowned architect, Richard Neutra. The property was
purchased in 2021 for rehabilitation and the new owners are working closely with the City to complete the project.
According to the current City Register of Historical Property classification system, only buildings or structures rated
as Class 1,2,3, or 4 shall be deemed a “qualified historical building or structure” for purposes of applying the HBC
contained in NBMC Chapter 15.13, or any successor chapter. Therefore, the Rendezvous Ballroom Site and the
Bank of America Site are not considered locally qualified historical buildings or structures.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 26 DECEMBER 2023
Table 1. Historic Resources Located in the City of Newport Beach
Name Address NRHP CRHR CHL CNB
B K Stone Building (McFadden
Building; intact)
2100 Ocean Front — X — —
Bank of Balboa/Bank of
America Site (intact)1
611 E Balboa Blvd. X X — X
Balboa Inn (intact) 105 Main St. X X — X
Balboa Pavilion (intact) 400 Main St. — — — X
Balboa Saloon (intact) 700 E. Bay Ave. — — — X
Balboa Theater (partially
demolished)
707 E. Balboa Blvd. — — — X
Bloomingdale's Fashion Island
(intact)
701 Newport Center Dr. — X — —
Dory Fishing Fleet (intact) 110 McFadden Pl. — — — X
First Republic of Newport 3991 Macarthur Blvd. — X — —
Goldenrod Avenue Footbridge
(intact)
Corona Del Mar, links the
300 and 400 blocks of
Goldenrod Ave.
— — — X
Irvine Company (intact) 500 and 520 Newport Center Dr. — X — —
Jolly Roger (Dippy's)/
Wilma's Patio (intact)
203 Marine Ave. — — — X
Lovell Beach House (intact) 1242 West Ocean Front X X — —
MacArthur Centre/Verizon
Candidate "The Duke" (intact)
4667 MacArthur Blvd. — X — —
McFadden Wharf (replaced by
Newport Pier)
Newport Pier — — X —
Newport Bay East
Jetty/Mission Jetty (intact)
— — X — —
Newport Bay West
Jetty/Mission Bay Jetty (intact)
— — X — —
Newport Beach Marriott Hotel
& Spa (partially demolished)
900 Newport Center Dr. — X — —
Old Landing Site (demolished—
plaque in place)
Pacific Coast Hwy. and
Bayshore Dr.
— — X —
Rendezvous Ballroom Site1
(building lost to fire—plaque in
place)
600 Ocean Front — — — X
Site of First Water-to-Water Fight
(plaque)
Balboa Pier — — X —
Solar House (intact) 804 S. Bay Front — — — X
Stuft Shirt (intact) 2241 West Coast Hwy. X — —
Wild Goose (yacht; intact) 2431 West Coast Hwy. X X — —
Notes: NRHP = The property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places; CRHR = The property is listed on
the California Register of Historic Resources; CHL = The property is listed as a California Historical Landmark;
CNB = The property is listed on the City Register of Historical Property.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 27 DECEMBER 2023
1 According to the current City Register of Historical Property classification system, only buildings or structures
rated as Class 1,2,3, or 4 shall be deemed a “qualified historical building or structure” for purposes of applying
the HBC contained in Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 15.13, or any successor chapter. Therefore, the
Rendezvous Ballroom Site and the Bank of America Site are not considered locally qualified historical buildings
or structures.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 28 DECEMBER 2023
6 Issues and Opportunities
The City has multiple documents guiding the treatment of historic properties, including a process for listing a
property on the City Register of Historical Property and the adopted Historical Resources Element, Arts and Cultural
Element, Land Use Element, Housing Element, and Natural Resources Element. These documents provide a
valuable base for the City’s historic preservation program. Building upon this base will help the City achieve its goals
of recognizing, maintaining, and protecting Newport Beach’s unique historical, cultural, and archeological sites and
structures. By updating the Historical Resources Element, the City can provide clearer guidance to property owners,
developers, City staff, and the community at large on the importance of historic preservation and the specific actions
needed to achieve it. Section 7, Recommendations, serves to help guide the City in optimizing all available options
to achieve the goals in terms of historical resources. This reinforcement will not only ensure the protection of
Newport Beach’s historical and cultural assets but will also foster a stronger sense of pride and appreciation for
Newport Beach’s rich history.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 29 DECEMBER 2023
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
15443 30 DECEMBER 2023
7 Recommendations
The City has a strong foundation in place for an effective and fully integrated historical resources program. The
following recommendations are presented for consideration to provide the City with opportunities to strengthen its
role as a leader in historic, archaeological, and tribal cultural resource preservation. Recommended solutions range
from short-term actions to longer-term commitments by the City. As goals and policies are crafted for consideration
in the updated Historical Resources Element, feedback from staff members from across the different departments
should be incorporated, in addition to feedback from the Newport Beach Historical Society, for example. Taking a
comprehensive approach to historic preservation will enhance the identification and assessment of historical
assets and will also aid in honoring the heritage of Newport Beach; offering educational experiences for residents,
businessowners, employees, and visitors; and bolstering Newport Beach’s economic well-being. The following
recommendations have been organized into three categories: short-term (less than two years), medium-term (two
to five years), and long-term (five years or more). This organizational structure is intended to help the City prioritize
the implementation of recommendations and layout a clear path to building upon the City’s historical resources
program.
7.1 Short-Term Recommendations
7.1.1 Dedicated Preservation Staff
Preservation staff or local commissions typically review permits for demolition or alteration of historical resources,
administer Mills Act programs (see Section 7.3.2, Develop a Mills Act Program), and designate new landmarks (see
Section 7.2.3, Increase City Destinations). They are often responsible for commenting during the CEQA process
regarding known historic resources or properties that require consideration as historic resources. In many
communities, they are also important advocates for historic preservation and a great resource for property owners
on preservation techniques and practices.16 The goal of having embedded dedicated preservation staff is to provide
support to all other recommended solutions within this report and guide the City through those processes.
Additionally, preservation staff and applicable City staff should also be trained on the prehistoric and ethnographic
background of Newport Beach to ensure staff are prepared to make appropriate decisions related to applications
and permits.
Currently, historic preservation is administered through CEQA by community development staff. It is recommended
that the City hire or train a current staff member to be a preservation planner, whose job is to provide guidance and
assistance to the City Council and potential Historical Resources Commission. The preservation planner should
meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Architectural History or have a degree
in Historic Preservation Planning.17 Staff may assist in register applications and create a more streamlined and
consistent application process. Additionally, by becoming a Certified Local Government (CLG), the City’s
preservation staff would have access to a listserv hosted by OHP (see Section 7.3.1, Become a Certified Local
Government). It is a communication tool that offers OHP and CLGs the opportunity to submit suggestions or
16 Los Angeles Conservancy. 2023. “Dedicated Historic Preservation Staff and/or Commission.” Accessed October 9, 2023. https://www.laconservancy.org/dedicated-historic-preservation-staff-and-or-commission/.
17 More information on the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards can be found here:
https://www.nps.gov/articles/sec-standards-prof-quals.htm.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 31 DECEMBER 2023
questions to other members of the listserv. OHP staff also use the listserv to forward information about training
opportunities, publications, grants, and a variety of technical assistance to CLGs.18
7.1.2 Streamline and Clarify Landmarking Process
Under the current City Register of Historical Property landmarking process, the City Council may designate historical
properties that have importance to the history or architecture of Newport Beach. Under this process, an owner
applies to the City Council, requesting historical review of their property. The City Manager then submits the
applications to the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Commission; the Arts Commission; and the Newport Beach
Historical Society for review and recommendation before submitting the application to the City Council for
consideration. The City Council, itself or on the recommendation of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission;
the Arts Commission; or the Newport Beach Historical Society, may initiate submission of an application for
designation of a structure or site as a historic property. Submitting applications to three separate
committees/interested parties slows down the application process and removes the opportunity for unbiased input.
By streamlining this process and developing a Historical Resources Commission, the City could increase the speed
in which applications are reviewed and create a board of specialized personnel that have experience, interest, and
a deeper understanding of the landmarking process.
The City places historical properties into five different classes; however, this classification system came from the
1992 Ad Hoc Historic Preservation Advisory Committee's Historic Resource Inventory, an unadopted City survey.
Due to the high number of class options and the lack of detail distinguishing the differences between the classes,
this system is likely to cause additional confusion with potential applicants as to which historic properties are under
local protection and which are not. These five classes could be consolidated into fewer, more streamlined
categories. As an alternative, the City could provide further explanation of what the classes mean and how to
distinguish their differences. This would assist in the public’s understanding of the City’s classification system and
what those classes mean for the City’s long-term preservation goals.
Additionally, in the NBMC (Section 20.38.070, Landmark Structures), a “landmark structure” is defined as a
structure listed on the NRHP, constructed on or before December 12, 1950. It is unknown where the date of
December 12, 1950, came from, and it appears to be arbitrary in relation to historic properties. In order to
streamline and clarify the landmarking process, it is recommended that the City apply the standard age-based
threshold used by the NRHP and the CRHR that considers the historical significance of resources that are 50 years
of age and older for potential listing in Federal and State registration programs. Setting this standard would allow
for properties of the more recent past to be considered a “landmark structure,” in addition to those on the NRHP.
18 OHP. 2023b. “Why Become a Certified Local Government (CLG).” Accessed October 9, 2023. https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/
?page_id=23581.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 32 DECEMBER 2023
7.1.3 Sensitivity Analysis and Development of
Assessment Thresholds for Archaeological and Tribal
Resources
Contrary to built environment resources, archaeological and tribal cultural resources are often unidentified and are
inadvertently encountered during ground disturbing activities. The 2006 General Plan provides expectations for City
staff to determine when archaeological assessments would be required but does not include specific thresholds to
guide staff regarding under what circumstances an assessment is appropriate. Sensitivity zones and the
development of thresholds and protocols would provide City staff with guidance to determine the need for additional
assessments customized to project conditions. A sensitivity analysis would involve a records search of the
California Historical Resources Information System and NAHC’s Sacred Land File, as well as a review of literature
and archival documents related to the natural and cultural landscapes of Newport Beach. The result would include
the identification of archaeological sensitivity zones based on analysis of the data collected and any information
provided by consulting tribes during the SB 18 process and a set of clear assessment thresholds and protocols
communicated in a narrative and flow chart form.
7.1.4 Separate Paleontology from Historical Resources Element
At the time the City’s policies and procedures related to archaeological and paleontological resources were written,
CEQA was organized to include the guidelines for paleontological resources with cultural resources. Since then,
CEQA has reorganized to include paleontological resources within the geological and soils section. Opportunity
exists for the City to organize the General Plan consistent with CEQA by editing the policies and procedures to
remove paleontological resources from the Historical Resources Element and place them within the
Natural Resources Element. This recommendation would impact the following adopted Historical Resources
Element policies: Policy HR 2.1: New Development Activities (largely replicated in adopted Policy NR 18.1: New
Development), Policy HR 2.2: Grading and Excavation Activities (largely replicated in adopted Policy NR 18.2:
Maintenance of Database Information), and Policy HR 2.4: Paleontological or Archaeological Materials (largely
replicated in adopted Policy NR 18.4: Donation of Materials).
7.1.5 Provide Public Education Opportunities
The adopted Historical Resources Element includes Policy HR 1.3: Historical Landmarks, which encourages the
placement of historical landmarks, photographs, markers, or plaques at areas of historical interest or value. While
historical landmarks exist within Newport Beach, there appears to be no accessible way to locate them online. In
order to properly create a sense of placemaking, it is recommended that the City advertise any existing plaques to
better connect the public with culturally important heritage sites.
Educating residents, businessowners, and visitors alike is an essential component to an effective historical resources
program and Historical Resources Element. Additional opportunities exist for the City to engage the public and provide
education on historic preservation and the history of Newport Beach. As a key local interested party, the Newport
Beach Historical Society can be helpful in implementing these public outreach efforts. Recommendations that can
assist in the resolution of this issue within the General Plan include policies that require the training/hiring of
dedicated preservation staff to assist in public outreach and education efforts, identifying and preserving landmark
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 33 DECEMBER 2023
businesses that could assist in the placemaking of the City, and developing a citywide survey and historic context
statement, which would generate more opportunities for public outreach and conversations about historic
preservation.
The City should consider incorporating a separate goal and set of policies related to public awareness within the
updated Historical Resources Element. Outreach and education should include the history of Newport Beach, as
well as the City’s processes and practices to preserve and protect cultural resources. Policies in support of this
recommended goal could include the following:
Expand resources such as historic landmarks, photographs, markers, and plaques or self-guided walking
tours as a means to promote and celebrate historic preservation in Newport Beach. Publish such
information on the City’s website to encourage thoughtful conversation about the history of Newport Beach.
Coordinate with local preservation organizations, like the Newport Beach Historical Society, to research, conduct
outreach, and develop programs and activities to encourage and support historic preservation and cultural tourism.
Encourage local interested parties and historical societies to partner together, consolidate, and share
materials such as historic photographs, firsthand historical accounts and interviews, and any additional
archival information. This could be done through the establishment of a City-recognized historical society
or platform that welcomes representatives from various existing groups to share resources and collectively
provide input to the City on historical resources. If the City were to pursue a CLG, as described in Section
7.3.1, the City could do this through the establishment of an adequate and qualified historic preservation
review commission.
Promote extensive public participation in the identification and designation of historically or culturally
significant buildings, structures, sites, areas, and/or places to update and maintain the City’s Register of
Historical Property.
Collaborate with academic institutions and jurisdictions that share a common history to gain access to a
wider range of information and diversify the ways in which Newport Beach provides outreach and public
education.
Explore establishing a grant program for historic preservation, potentially partnering with local historic
preservations organizations like the Newport Beach Historical Society.
7.2 Medium-Term Recommendations
7.2.1 Develop a Citywide Historic Context Statement and Survey
Jurisdictions throughout the state are embracing historic context statements as the foundation for preservation
planning. Contexts are typically used to describe the broad patterns of historical development of a community or
region represented by the physical development and character of the built environment. Currently the City’s Criteria
for Selection for a City Register of Historical Property includes mention of rare structures displaying a building type,
design, or indigenous building form; outstanding examples of structures displaying original architectural integrity,
structurally or stylistically, or both; and unique structures or places that act as focal or pivotal points important as
a key to the character or visual quality of an area. A citywide historic context statement and survey would assist in
determining if a structure is rare, outstanding, or unique by providing valuable background information for
identifying and evaluating resources. A historic context statement would identify important themes, events, patterns
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 34 DECEMBER 2023
of development, and describe the different property types, styles, builders, and architects associated with these
periods and themes. It would provide the basis for evaluating significance and integrity by providing registration
requirements for the evaluation of historical resources in consideration of both historical significance and integrity
requirements specific to the eligibility requirements criteria established by the City for historical resources. A context
statement would be the template for identifying, evaluating, and developing plans for the treatment of historical
resources, which is currently lacking in the City’s historic preservation program.
Following the development of a historic context statement, a citywide survey is also recommended for Newport
Beach. A citywide survey is the process of identifying and gathering data on a community’s historical resources and
maintaining an inventory of this data. Citywide surveys are typically updated every 5 to 10 years. A survey will provide
the City with essential tools for making informed planning and zoning decisions with respect to historical resources
and assist with CEQA findings by providing 'substantial evidence' required for defensible documents. The data will
help to identify potentially significant properties, prioritize preservation goals and objectives, and increase the
public's understanding of and appreciation for the built environment. The survey aspect of this recommendation
would likely be most efficiently managed in conjunction with implementation of long-term recommendations noted
in Section 7.3 (Long-Term Recommendations) as maintaining a system for the survey and inventory of historic
properties is a requirement for participating in the CLG Program (see Section 7.3.1, Become a Certified Local
Government). Additionally, CLG grant funding could be utilized to help support the development of a citywide historic
context statement and survey.
7.2.2 Develop a Citywide Prehistoric and Ethnohistoric
Context Statement
Prehistoric and ethnocentric context statements have become increasingly important to jurisdictions across
California, to acknowledge the tribal past of a given area. For similar reasons provided for the creation of a historic
context statement, it is recommended that the City create a prehistoric and ethnohistoric context statement.
Development of a prehistoric and ethnohistoric context would establish the foundation for the revised policies and
procedures. The context statement would identify important themes, events, and general sensitivity zones and
would provide the basis for determining the necessity of archaeological assessments. A context statement would
be the template for identifying, evaluating, and developing plans for the treatment of archaeological resources,
which is currently lacking in the City’s historic preservation program. This effort should also include an update to
the City’s current policies and procedures to ensure they are consistent with current State regulations and
professional standards.
7.2.3 Increase City Destinations
As of 2023, the Newport Beach has 10 properties listed in the City Register of Historical Property. Due to the City’s
rich development history, it is likely that there are other properties within Newport Beach that would meet any of
the designation standards for architectural significance. Due to the lack of designations, there is an overall lack of
protections for historic properties. This includes smaller residential properties such as cottages (as defined in
Section 20.38.060.A.3. (Exception for Cottage Preservation) of the NBMC, which were integral in the development
of Newport Beach. Special attention should be given to properties of this type and their protection as distinctive
elements of the City’s history.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 35 DECEMBER 2023
Opportunities exist for the City to encourage the public to nominate properties for designation. The first step towards
this is through becoming a CLG (see Section 7.3.1, Become a Certified Local Government), which would provide the
City with technical assistance, credibility and consistency with the NRHP and CRHR, streamlining with the Secretary
of the Interior’s Standards, and access to funding for preservation activities. Additional recommendations that can
assist in the resolution of this issue include developing a citywide survey and historic context statement, which
would identify potential historic landmarks; developing a Mills Act Program as an economic incentive; and
streamlining the landmarking process to create more opportunities for future designations.
7.2.4 Identify and Preserve Legacy Businesses
The preservation of long-operating local small businesses preserves community character. The City has not yet
created a program to preserve legacy businesses, and identified legacy businesses could benefit from the
development of a citywide legacy business program. A legacy business program is an initiative to recognize, honor,
and support longstanding businesses within a community that have made significant contributions to its history,
culture, and identify. These programs typically aim to preserve and celebrate businesses that have operated for a
substantial period of time, often multiple generations.
Upon considering a legacy business program, implementation of a legacy business program could include grant
funding support, legacy business establishment criteria, technical and logistical assistance to identified legacy
businesses, and marketing support.
7.3 Long-Term Recommendations
7.3.1 Become a Certified Local Government
The City could apply to become a CLG. By becoming a CLG, the City would have access to multiple benefits including
technical assistance, credibility and consistency with the NRHP and CRHR, streamlining with the Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards, and access to funding for preservation activities. Becoming a CLG would also assist the City with
subsequent recommendations including development of a citywide survey and historic context statement, technical
assistance for dedicated preservation staff, and consistency with Federal and State standards and regulations through
streamlining the landmarking process. As a CLG, the City would gain access to new funding opportunities including
CLG grants, which would help support important activities such as a citywide survey, preparation of an NRHP district
application, or the update of an ordinance. Despite the CLG Program assisting in standardization, it allows for City
autonomy to dictate the content of historic preservation plans or ordinances and select and appoint individual local
preservation commissioners by local government officials.
The 1980 amendments to the NHPA of 1966, as amended, provided for the establishment of a Certified Local
Government (CLG) Program to encourage the direct participation of local governments in the identification,
evaluation, registration, and preservation of historic properties within their jurisdictions and to promote the
integration of local preservation interests and concerns into local planning and decision-making processes.19 In
order to apply to become a CLG, the City must first ensure the following requirements are met:
19 OHP (Office of Historic Preservation). 2023a. “Certified Local Government Program (CLG).” Accessed October 9, 2023.
https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=21239.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 36 DECEMBER 2023
1. Enforce appropriate State or local legislation for the designation and protection of historic properties.
2. Establish an adequate and qualified historic preservation review commission by local law.
3. Maintain a system for the survey and inventory of historic properties.
4. Provide for adequate public participation in the local historic preservation program.
5. Satisfactorily perform the responsibilities delegated to the CLG.
After ensuring that the above five basic requirements are met, the City may complete an application signed by the
chief elected official of the applying local government, which will be reviewed by OHP. If the applicant meets the
criteria, OHP will forward the application and recommend certification to the National Park Service (NPS) who makes
the final certification decision. When the NPS is in agreement with OHP's recommendation, a certification
agreement is signed by OHP and the local government, completing the certification process. There does not appear
to be a cost for the application. The Certified Local Government Program Application & Procedures can be found on
the OHP’s website here: https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/1072/files/CLG%20Manual%202010r2.pdf. For any
additional information the City may contact the NPS at CLG_info@nps.gov.
As of 2023, there are 69 CLGs in the State of California and three located within Orange County: Santa Ana, Tustin,
and San Clemente.20 OHP is required to sub grant a minimum of 10% of its yearly allocation of Federal funds from
the Historic Preservation Fund Grants Program to CLGs. These are local governments where the NPS has certified
their preservation programs. The OHP awards CLG grants on a competitive basis; the local government must provide
a 40% match that can be a combination of public funds, private funds, and allowable in-kind donations. The grants
support local preservation efforts and result in highly valuable documents for residents and planning staff.
As such, the updated Historical Resources Element could consider a policy that the City apply to become a CLG and
maintain status in accordance with OHP requirements. Although the recommendation has been identified as long-
term due to its multi-step implementation process, the City should consider committing to becoming a CLG on a
more short- or medium-term basis to plan for and accomplish some of the medium-term actions, such as the
development of citywide historic context statement and survey (see Section 7.2.1 Develop a Citywide Historic
Context Statement and Survey).
7.3.2 Develop a Mills Act Program
The Mills Act encourages the restoration and preservation of historic properties by allowing interested owners to receive
a break on their property taxes in exchange for their historic preservation and restoration efforts. As such, the Mills Act is
the single most important economic incentive program in California for the restoration and preservation of qualified
historic buildings by private property owners. The Mills Act Program is administered and implemented by local
governments. Mills Act contracts are between the property owner and the local government granting the tax abatement.
Each participating local government establishes a Mills Act program through a formal ordinance or less formal resolution,
sets its own criteria, and determines how many contracts will be allowed in its jurisdiction.21 This would encourage the
protection of Newport Beach’s heritage and assist in the identification and safeguard of historical resources.
20 NPS (National Parks Service). 2023. “Certified Local Governments.” Accessed October 17, 2023. https://grantsdev.cr.nps.gov/CLG_Review/search.cfmhttps://grantsdev.cr.nps.gov/CLG_Review/Results.cfm.
21 OHP. 2023c. “Mills Act Program.” Accessed October 9, 2023. https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=21412.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE / HISTORICAL RESOURCES ELEMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
15443 37 DECEMBER 2023