Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout13 - Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of the OCSD's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project at 250 East Coast Highway (PA2023-0076)Q SEW Pp�T CITY OF z NEWPORT BEACH c�<,FORN'P City Council Staff Report April 23, 2024 Agenda Item No. 13 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Seimone Jurjis, Assistant City Manager/Community Development Director - 949-644-3232, sjurjis@newportbeachca.gov PREPARED BY: David Lee, Senior Planner - 949-644-3225, dlee@newportbeachca.gov TITLE: Resolution No. 2024-28: Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of the Orange County Sanitation District's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project at 250 East Coast Highway (PA2023-0076) ABSTRACT: For the City Council's consideration is an appeal of the Planning Commission's January 18, 2024, decision to approve a major site development review and coastal development permit to allow the demolition of an existing pump station and construction of a new, larger pump station and associated force mains for the Orange County Sanitation District's Bay Bridge Pump Station at 250 East Coast Highway. RECOMMENDATIONS: a) Conduct a de novo public hearing: b) Find this project complies with the California Environmental Quality Act as it is consistent with the certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Project No. 5-67, also known as the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project, as approved by the Orange County Sanitation District, and the subsequent certified Addendum to the EIR; and c) Adopt Resolution No. 2024-28, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, California, Denying an Appeal and Upholding the Decision of the Planning Commission to Approve a Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit to Demolish an Existing Pump Station and Construct a New Pump Station and Associated Force Mains at the Property Located at 250 East Coast Highway (PA2022- 0076). DISCUSSION: The subject property is located on East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Bay Bridge. Adjacent to the property is the Bayside Village Marina, which includes visitor - serving uses (i.e. Pearson's Port seafood market and Southwind Kayak rentals), recreational vehicle and boat storage, and marina parking lot. This adjacent property is intended to be developed with a future mixed -use waterfront village in accordance with Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9). 13-1 Resolution No. 2024-28: Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of the Orange County Sanitation District's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project at 250 East Coast Highway (PA2023-0076) April 23, 2024 Page 2 Additional surrounding uses include the Bayside Village Mobile Home Park to the north and east across Bayside Drive, a restaurant (Sol Mexican Cocina), and the Balboa Marina to the south across East Coast Highway, and various commercial uses to the southeast including a gas station, shopping center, and automobile dealerships. The property consists of an existing wastewater pump station known as the Bay Bridge Pump Station (Pump Station), which was constructed in 1966 and is operated by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) (Figure 1). The existing Pump Station includes two single -story buildings, a perimeter wall with a vehicular access gate from East Coast Highway, and outdoor mechanical equipment that is not screened from public view. The Pump Station also includes force mains which tunnel under the bay to the western side of the Bay Bridge into an existing vault that straddles the public right-of-way and private property. The station pumps wastewater flow generated by residents and businesses east of Newport Bay, including Balboa Island and Crystal Cove, and ultimately to a wastewater treatment facility located in Huntington Beach. OCSD has aging infrastructure throughout Newport Beach and frequently undertakes projects to repair or replace sewer main lines, pump stations, and other equipment. The proposed project includes a temporary construction staging area at Lower Castaways Park at 1100 Dover Drive. Lower Castaways is a City of Newport Beach owned park that is approximately four acres, located directly north of West Coast Highway and directly east of Dover Drive. Castaways Park, which is a larger, approximately 16-acre park, is located directly to the north. Lower Castaways is improved with public parking spaces and is used as access to the bay for the launching of vehicles, but it is also utilized for temporary construction staging and parking to accommodate public works and/or large construction projects. Figure I. Existing Bay Bridge Pump Station PC-9 was amended by the City Council on Amended 26, 2016 through Ordinance No. 2016-8. Since the approval of the City Council was legislative only, a future site development review and coastal development permit is required for the Back Bay Landing mixed -use village project to be implemented. 13-2 Resolution No. 2024-28: Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of the Orange County Sanitation District's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project at 250 East Coast Highway (PA2023-0076) April 23, 2024 Page 3 While the existing property is 4,879 square feet in area, OCSD is acquiring an additional 9,713 square feet of land from the adjacent property at 100 Bayside Drive, which is the site of the future Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Village. The acquisition, which is for the purpose of constructing a larger pump station facility, is a result of an eminent domain case wherein OCSD has secured an order of immediate possession expanding the property to a total area of 14,592 square feet. A lot line adjustment is not required, as OCSD will record a final order of condemnation at the end of the eminent domain case, which will have the effect of creating the new parcel boundaries and will be recorded with the County Assessor's Office. Project Description In order to upgrade the aging Pump Station, OCSD requests a major site development review and coastal development permit for the following: The demolition of an existing pump station and construction of a new pump station (total of approximately 7,500 square feet) that includes a new underground pump room (3,616 square feet), electrical room (1,175 square feet), odor control facility (1,781 square feet), and a generator room (672 square feet) (Figure 2); Figure 2: Proposed Pump Station Site Uses (above) and Rendering from East Coast Highway (below) 13-3 Resolution No. 2024-28: Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of the Orange County Sanitation District's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project at 250 East Coast Highway (PA2023-0076) April 23, 2024 Page 4 2. The installation of new, 25-inch dual force mains by micro -tunneling beneath East Coast Highway from the Project across the Newport Bay Channel, to a new valve vault located below grade in the public right-of-way at the southeast corner of the intersection of West Coast Highway and Dover Drive, where the existing force mains are to be abandoned in place (Figure 3); and RoElectrical � om ,i Underground _ p a i 4 ­ Figure 3: Location of Proposed Force Mains in Red Generator 1 Room 3. The temporary use of a portion of the City -owned Lower Castaways Park as a construction staging yard. OCSD proposes to use approximately 18,000 square feet of the southwest corner of Lower Castaways Park, which is to be fenced and screened. This allows the OCSD to temporarily locate office trailers, stage and store construction equipment and materials, and provide vehicle parking. The project is subject to review and permitting approval by numerous agencies including OCSD, Caltrans, California Coastal Commission (CCC), California State Lands Commission, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, National Marine Fisheries Service, Army Corps of Engineers, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, private property owners, and the City. Since a significant portion of the new force mains are proposed to be constructed in tidelands and in CCC permit jurisdiction, OCSD must obtain a separate coastal development permit from the CCC. All portions of the Project located in the City's permitting jurisdiction, including the pump station site at 250 East Coast Highway and the proposed temporary construction staging area at 100 Dover Drive, are located within the coastal zone and therefore, the project requires a coastal development permit. Project plans are provided in Attachment M. The draft resolution, which addresses all required findings, is included as Attachment A. Additionally, the January 18, 2024, Planning Commission staff report has been included in Attachment D. The report includes a detailed analysis of all applicable project components. 13-4 Resolution No. 2024-28: Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of the Orange County Sanitation District's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project at 250 East Coast Highway (PA2023-0076) April 23, 2024 Page 5 January 18, 2024, Planning Commission Hearing On January 18, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the project. During the hearing, the Planning Commission discussed the design of the new facility, status of the eminent domain case, and the Environmental Impact Report. The applicant also provided a presentation and provided details of the project followed by questions from the commissioners. Two members of the public, representing the adjacent property owner Bayside Village Marina LLC (BVM), spoke in opposition of the project. The representatives argued that the project is not consistent with the Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan and asked the Commission to require the applicant to redesign the project appropriately. Two additional members of the public also spoke on the project, including one from the mobile home park who expressed concerns regarding truck traffic to the site. Based on direction from the Planning Commission, the applicant agreed to an additional condition of approval that would require potential alterations to the exterior facade for consistency and compatibility with the architecture of the future Back Bay Landing mixed -use project. After considering all public comments and findings, both written and oral, the Planning Commission voted to approve Resolution No. PC2024-002 (Attachment C) by a vote of 4-2-1. The meeting minutes are included as Attachment E. eal of the Plannina Commission Decision and Staff's Resaonse On January 31, 2024, John Erskine, representing BVM, owners of the Bayside Village Marina and related recreational marine commercial uses at 300 East Coast Highway (ECH and Bayside), as well as the Bayside Village Marina Mobile Home Park, and developers of the Back Bay Landing project proposed for the adjacent property, filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision. The appeal letter (Attachment F) includes the following reasons: 1. Contrary to the Planning Commission's January 18, 2024, discussion, and based on misleading and unsupported testimony from OCSD, the eminent domain process does not prevent the City Council from assessing all of the impacts of the OCSD project and rejecting it or selecting an alternative location. 2. The expanded Pump Station is too massive, too tall, and is an unnecessary industrial -type facility that can easily be located in a less conspicuous site elsewhere on BVM's property (e.g., immediately adjacent to and on either side of and partly underneath the East Coast Highway Bridge). 3. The Pump Station expansion, as proposed, will triple its current size (4,800 sf to 14,500 sf), and as stated by prior commenters on the three prior versions of the Bay Bridge Pump Station EIR, is inconsistent with the City's and Coastal Commission's unanimously approved Coastal Land Use Plan, the Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9) and key provisions of the California Coastal Act. 13-5 Resolution No. 2024-28: Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of the Orange County Sanitation District's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project at 250 East Coast Highway (PA2023-0076) April 23, 2024 Page 6 The Pump Station expansion does not protect LCP-mandated coastal view corridors from Coast Highway toward Upper Newport Bay and Castaway's Bluffs, and is not in compliance with the City's General Plan scenic highway policies, and does not comply with the requirements or the intent of the PC-9 Architectural Provisions (Section 10, page 26 of PC-9), that the pump station essentially be camouflaged, and incorporated within the overall Back Bay Landing mixed -use development. 4. Staff and the applicant failed to adequately address or explain why the alternate site south of the Bay Bridge and East Coast Highway - .62 acres owned by BVM — is not superior to the expanded site north of East Coast Highway. This southern alternative avoids numerous operational and aesthetic issues, and poses far less construction risks, including minimizing sub -surface micro tunneling (boring of a 6- to 7-foot-wide tunnel) beneath East Coast Highway. 5. Contrary to Planning staff's assertions (page 9) in the January 18, 2024, Planning Commission staff report, the proposed expanded, 22-foot-high pump station is neither "aesthetically pleasing as a stand-alone development," appropriate for this central Newport Harbor coastal location, or visually/architecturally compatible with the PC-9. 6. The recirculated EIR, and subsequent evidence obtained in depositions in the pending Eminent Domain case (OCSD v. BVM, case no. 30-2022-01251890-CU-EI- CXC) of four different Bay Bridge Pump Station project managers, indicates that this massively disruptive OCSD project will be under construction, with upwards of 1,200 truck trips on Coast Highway, Bayside Drive and Dover Drive per year for 4-5 years+. There is no need for the City to rush the approvals of this ill-advised, risky and poorly management project while the City Council works with OCSD and BVM to identify an alternative location and design of the project. Staff has prepared detailed responses to each reason for the appeal in Attachment G. Staff believes that the findings previously made by the Planning Commission are valid, and has conducted a thorough evaluation of the project, including the proposed location, size and aesthetic design of the new Pump Station. The requirements of the Coastal Land Use Plan and PC-9 have been evaluated, including the requirements for public view corridors through the site. According to OCSD, the existing Pump Station has less than five years of useful life and needs to be replaced for improved operation and protection against potential sewage spills. Regarding concerns with the proposed architectural design, it is important to note that at the time PC-9 was adopted by the City Council and certified by the California Coastal Commission, it was assumed the Pump Station reconstruction would likely occur after the development of the Back Bay Landing mixed -use project. 13-6 Resolution No. 2024-28: Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of the Orange County Sanitation District's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project at 250 East Coast Highway (PA2023-0076) April 23, 2024 Page 7 The fact that the Pump Station is now proposed to be reconstructed first and there is not currently a proposed or approved Back Bay Landing mixed -use project to compare the proposed architecture of the Pump Station to only complicates matters. Furthermore, PC-9 does not mandate a particular architectural style, but it merely stipulates that development be designed with a "coastal architectural theme with the intent that no particular historically specific or rigid architectural style be selected for the project." The proposed Pump Station design incorporates a modern design with a cantilevered roof overhang and an integration of materials and details inspired by the surrounding coastal context. The buildings avoid long, continuous blank walls with a simple fagade composition of a base and top separated by different colors. There is a mixture of heights and roof types (sloping and flat) to create visual interest, as well as provide rhythm, dynamic building forms, and shadows. To resolve the concern about the Pump Station design's potential inconsistency with the future and undetermined design of the Back Bay Landing mixed -use project, Condition No. 31 of the draft resolution requires that the applicant make future alterations to the exterior fagade to the satisfaction of the Community Development director for consistency and compatibility with the architecture of a future approved Back Bay Landing mixed -use project. Applicant's Response to Appeal To assist the City Council with its discussion, the applicant has prepared a letter (Attachment H) that thoroughly responds to the appellant's letter. The letter responds to appellant's remarks regarding the EIR, the eminent domain matter and to the seven items listed in the appellant's letter of appeal. The applicant's letter discusses the court's ruling that denied all the challenges brought by the appellant except for a minor issue concerning the location of construction staging areas. The letter mentions that on December 16, 2022, the court ruled that OCSD may continue to pursue and secure the necessary permits from the City and the CCC because the issue concerning the location of the construction staging area could be readily correctable. The response letter also discusses the eminent domain lawsuit and mentions that the only issue still under discussion is the amount of just compensation and not the matter of the actual eminent domain. Additionally, the applicant has provided a subsequent letter addressing trucks and vehicles that will be using the proposed access easement to enter the Pump Station (Attachment L). FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact related to this item. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: In February of 2021, the applicant, as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), approved the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) and certified an EIR for Project No. 5-67. 13-7 Resolution No. 2024-28: Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of the Orange County Sanitation District's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project at 250 East Coast Highway (PA2023-0076) April 23, 2024 Page 8 On April 1, 2021, Bayside Village Marina (the appellant) filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate against the applicant in Orange County Superior Court alleging that the EIR failed to comply with CEQA on numerous grounds (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238.) On December 16, 2022, the Court issued a ruling that upheld the EIR in all respects except one (not having identified project construction staging area). Thereafter, the Court issued a limited writ directing OCSD to sufficiently identify project construction staging areas. Pursuant to Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR is required unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: a. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. Substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or c. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable due diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; iii. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerable different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the lead agency shall prepare an Addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but one of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. 13-8 Resolution No. 2024-28: Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of the Orange County Sanitation District's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project at 250 East Coast Highway (PA2023-0076) April 23, 2024 Page 9 In response to the court ruling, OCSD prepared an Addendum to the EIR for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Addendum) which was certified by the OCSD Board on July 23, 2023. Specifically, the Addendum clarifies the use of the Lower Castaways Park in the city as a construction staging area and adds a new construction staging area at OCSD's Plant No. 2, located in Huntington Beach, for soil storage/drying activities and determined that Project No. 5-67, as modified by the Addendum, would not result in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts in accordance with Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. A link to both the EIR and subsequent Addendum to the EIR are included in Attachment B to this staff report. NOTICING: Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to all owners of property within 300 feet of the boundaries of the affected sites (excluding intervening rights -of -way and waterways) including the applicant and appellant, and posted on the subject property at least 10 days before the scheduled meeting, consistent with the provisions of the Municipal Code. Additionally, the item appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the City website. Furthermore, the agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item). ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A — Resolution No. 2024-28 Attachment B — Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Addendum Attachment C — Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Attachment D — Planning Commission Staff Report from January 18, 2024 Attachment E — Planning Commission Meeting Minutes from January 18, 2024 Attachment F — Appellant's Appeal Application dated January 31, 2024 Attachment G — Staff Response to Appellant Letter Attachment H — Applicant's Response to Appellant's Appeal dated February 14, 2024 Attachment I — Coastal Hazards Report Attachment J — Public View Analysis Attachment K — Applicant's Project Description Attachment L — Applicant's Letter Regarding Vehicle Access dated March 22, 2024 Attachment M — Project Plans 13-9 Attachment A Resolution No. 2024-28 13-10 RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A MAJOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING PUMP STATION AND CONSTRUCT A NEW PUMP STATION AND ASSOCIATED FORCE MAINS AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 250 EAST COAST HIGHWAY (PA2023-0076) WHEREAS, Section 200 of the City of Newport Beach ("City") Charter vests the City Council with the authority to make and enforce all laws, rules, and regulations with respect to municipal affairs subject only to the restrictions and limitations contained in the Charter and the State Constitution, and the power to exercise, or act pursuant to any and all rights, powers and privileges, or procedures granted or prescribed by any law of the State of California; WHEREAS, an application was filed by Orange County Sanitation District ("Applicant'), with respect to property located at 250 East Coast Highway, and legally described in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Property"); WHEREAS, the Property is operated by the Applicant with an existing 4,800 square foot pump station, known as the Bay Bridge Pump Station, which is a part of its wastewater collection system; WHEREAS, the Applicant requests a major site development review and coastal development permit for the following: • demolition of an existing pump station and construction of a new approximately 7,500 square foot pump station that includes a new underground pump room, electrical room, odor control facility, and a generator room; • installation of new 25-inch dual force mains by micro -tunneling beneath East Coast Highway from the Project across the Newport Bay Channel, to a new valve vault located below grade in the public right-of-way at the southeast comer of the intersection of West Coast Highway and Dover Drive; and 13-11 Resolution No. 2024- Page 2 of 18 • temporary use of approximately 18,000 square feet of Lower Castaways Park as a temporary construction staging area ("Staging Area") ("Project"); WHEREAS, the Project is subject to review and permitting approval by numerous agencies including the Orange County Sanitation District, Caltrans, California Coastal Commission ("CCC"), California State Lands Commission, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, private property owners, and the City; WHEREAS, the Property is designated Mixed -Use Water 2 (MU-W2) by the General Plan Land Use Element and located within the Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Staging Area is designated Recreational and Marine Commercial (CM) by the General Plan Land Use Element and located in the Castaways Marina Planned Community (PC-37) Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Property and Staging Area are located within the coastal zone and therefore, the Project requires a coastal development permit; WHEREAS, the Property is designated Mixed -Use Water Related (MU-W) by the Coastal Land Use Plan ("CLUP") and located within the Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Staging Area is designated Recreational and Marine Commercial (CM -A) — (0.0 — 0.30 FAR) by the CLUP and is located within the Castaways Marina Planned Community (PC-37) Coastal Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Property is comprised of approximately 14,592 square feet which consists of the Applicant's existing 4,879 square foot property along with an additional 9,713 square feet being acquired from the adjacent property; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on January 18, 2024, in the Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with California Government Code Section 54950 et seq. ("Ralph M. Brown Act") and Chapters 20.62 and 21.62 (Public Hearings) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("NBMC"). Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this public hearing; 13-12 Resolution No. 2024- Page 3 of 18 WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC2024-002 by a majority vote (4 ayes, 2 nays, 1 recusal) approving the Project; WHEREAS, on January 31, 2024, John Erskine, representing the Bayside Village Marina LLC ("BVM"), owners of the Bayside Village Marina and related recreational marine commercial uses at 300 E. Coast Highway, as well as the Bayside Village Marina Mobilehome Park, filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision on January 31, 2024; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the City Council on April 23, 2024, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and Chapters 20.62 and 21.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as follows: Section 1: The City Council has considered the decision of the Planning Commission and determined that modifications to the Project made by the City Council, if any, are not major changes that require referral back to the Planning Commission for consideration and recommendation. Section 2: The City Council does hereby uphold the Planning Commission's approval of a major site development review and coastal development permit subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: In accordance with Subsection VII (C) (Back Bay Landing PCDP Implementation/Site Development Review — Findings) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth for the Project: Findinq of Consistency with Section VII(C)(1): The development shall be in compliance with the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan, including design guidelines, and any other applicable plan or criteria related to the development. 13-13 Resolution No. 2024- Page 4 of 18 Facts in Support of Finding with Section VII(C)(1): 1. The Property is categorized as Mixed -Use Water 2 (MU-W2) by the General Plan Land Use Element, which is applied to waterfront locations in which marine related uses may be intermixed with buildings that provide residential on the upper floors. For nonresidential buildings, the MU-W2 has a maximum floor area to land ratio ("FAR") of 0.5. The Property is 14,592 square feet in area and the Project is 7,244 square feet, resulting in a FAR of 0.49. Additionally, the Property is a part of Anomaly 80 of the General Plan Land Use Plan. Anomaly 80 includes the Property as well as 100 Bayside Drive, which is the site of the future Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Village and sets a development limit of 131,290 square feet for nonresidential development within the Anomaly. The Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Zoning District sets additional nonresidential development limits for the future Back Bay Landing development, which is 61,534 square feet for commercial and 32,500 square feet for dry stack boat storage, for a total of 94,034 square feet of future nonresidential development. The addition of the 7,244 square foot pump station results in a total of 101,278 square feet, which is within the development limit of Anomaly 80. The Project is a replacement of an existing pump station, which has existed at the Property since 1966, and provides essential infrastructure to adjacent neighborhoods. The replacement facility is designed in part to ensure continued safe operation of the facility with modern equipment meeting current code standards to safeguard against sewage spills. 2. The Property is categorized as Mixed -Use Water Related (MU-W) by the CLUP, which is intended to provide for commercial development on or near the bay in a manner that will encourage the continuation of coastal dependent and coastal - related uses and visitor -serving uses, as well as allow for the development of mixed -use structures with residential uses above the ground floor. For nonresidential buildings, the Mixed -Use Water Related (MU-W) has a maximum FAR of 0.5. Additionally, CLUP Policy 2.1.9.1 limits the maximum floor area to what is established in General Plan Land Use Element Anomaly 80, as discussed in Fact 1 in support of Finding VII(C)(1) above. Furthermore, the additional size of the proposed station, including the new odor control building is necessary to meet current functional requirements of a modem pump station. 3. The Property is located in the Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Zoning and Coastal Zoning District. Specifically, the Property is categorized by PC- 9 as Planning Area 1 (Mixed -Use Area) where a wastewater pump station is a permitted use. Per Section 2 of PC-9 (Development Limits and Land Use Plan), 13-14 Resolution No. 2024- Page 5 of 18 the Orange County Sanitation District wastewater pump station shall not be counted towards square footage development limits of the PC. Per Section 3 of PC-9 (Permitted Uses), the initial construction of any new structure, or the significant reconstruction or major addition to an existing structure requires a Site Development Review pursuant to Section VII of PC-9. 4. Per Section IV (B) (Development Standards — Permitted Height of Structures), the maximum building height within Planning Area 1 shall not exceed 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs. The height of the buildings is measured from a baseline elevation of 14 feet NAVD 88, as required by Exhibit 3 of PC-9. The proposed electrical and generator building features a sloped roof design with parapet walls which is 22 feet. The proposed odor control building features a flat roof design with parapet walls which is 15.5 feet. All proposed buildings comply with the required height requirements of PC-9. Furthermore, the proposed height of the building accounts for the raised floor to floor protection, electrical and mechanical equipment for station operation, and screening for rooftop HVAC equipment. 5. Per Section IV (A) (Development Standards — Setback Requirements), a minimum 10-foot landscape buffer is required to be provided to the back of sidewalk. Additionally, in Section IV (E) (Development Standards — Landscaping), a detailed landscape and irrigation plan is required which demonstrates compliance with applicable landscaping requirements specified in the NBMC. Furthermore, landscaped areas shall only consist of native plants or non-native drought tolerant plants which are non-invasive. Per Section A.4.d of Section IV, encroachments may be permitted through a Site Development Review. While the Project provides a 10-foot landscaping buffer on a small portion of the East Coast Highway frontage, the remaining landscape along East Coast Highway varies between approximately 9 feet and 6 feet in depth. However, the proposed landscaping meets the intent of PC-9, which includes reflecting the Project's coastal marine location, providing creative plant combinations, installing an efficient irrigation system, and preserving and enhancing view corridors. The Project includes low-water, drought tolerant plants which includes a mixture of deer grass, slipper plant, foxtail agave, and red yucca plant types located at the East Coast Highway frontage of the Project. Since the Project includes property line walls along East Coast Highway for security purposes, the proposed landscape is appropriate to break up the mass of the walls and improve the overall aesthetics of the Project as viewed from East Coast Highway. The proposed plants are relatively low profile in height and will not diminish any view corridors as identified in PC-9. 13-15 Resolution No. 2024- Page 6 of 18 Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(2): The development shall not be incompatible with the character of the neighboring uses and surrounding sites. Facts in Support of Finding with Section VII(C)(2): 1. The Property is located on East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Bay Bridge. Adjacent to the Property is the Bayside Village Marina, which includes visitor serving uses and a recreational vehicle storage parking lot. This adjacent property is intended to be developed with a future mixed -use waterfront village in accordance with PC-9. Additional surrounding uses include the Bayside Village Mobile Home Park to the north and east across Bayside Drive, a restaurant and the Balboa Marina to the south across East Coast Highway, and various commercial uses to the southeast including a gas station, shopping center, and automobile dealerships. 2. The existing Bay Bridge Pump Station structure was constructed in 1966, and consequently upgraded with new pumps, piping, and ventilation in 1995. In 2014, an additional pump was added for increased capacity and reliability. The existing pump station is over 50 years old and requires replacement to serve the City, which pumps wastewater flow generated by residents and businesses west of Newport Bay, including Balboa Island and Crystal Cove. The pump station receives wastewater from a pump station in Crystal Cove, and pumps wastewater to another treatment facility located in the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed pump station has modernized architecture which improves the neighborhood aesthetics. 3. The construction of replacement force mains located on the western side of the Bay Bridge is not incompatible with neighboring uses, which includes the Bayshore Apartments to the south, a boat marina directly east, and the end of the Bay Bridge to the north. The construction of a new vault to house the force mains is a necessary part of the pump station. The new force mains are an upgrade to aging infrastructure that will better serve the surrounding area and is screened from public view within an existing vault. The existing vault, which is located on both the public right-of-way and private property, is to be abandoned in place. The public right-of-way area where the new vault is proposed includes new landscaping to further enhance the area for pedestrians, motorists, and nearby residents. 13-16 Resolution No. 2024- Page 7 of 18 4. The Project includes structures that are 22 feet and 15.5 feet tall. While it is taller and larger in area than the existing pump station, it is not out of scale with the existing and potential future surrounding uses. The architectural design utilizes a cantilevered roof overhang with a low profile and integrates materials and details which are consistent with surrounding coastal uses. The design includes a variety of colors and finishes such as stone and stucco to create architectural interest. Furthermore, to ensure architectural compatibility with the potential future Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Project, a condition of approval stipulates that at the request and to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, the Applicant shall make future alterations to the exterior facade for consistency and compatibility with the architecture of a future approved Back Bay Landing Mixed - Use Project. Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(3): The development shall be sited and designed to maximize the aesthetic quality of the project as viewed from surrounding roadways, properties, and waterfront, with special consideration given to providing a variety of building heights, massing, and architectural treatments to provide public views through the site. Facts in Support of Finding with Section VII(C)(3): 1. Fact 4 in support of Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(1) is hereby incorporated by reference. 2. Fact 4 in support of Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(2) is hereby incorporated by reference. 3. Section 5 (Design Guidelines) of PC-9 provide guidelines intended to express the desired character of the future mixed -use waterfront village that helps achieve overall consistency of architectural quality. The guidelines call for a "coastal architectural theme" and flexible design, provided a project follows principles of quality design and exhibits a high level of architectural standards and compatibility with surrounding area. The Project is designed with a modern coastal architectural theme, incorporating a modern design with a cantilevered roof overhang and an integration of materials and details that is compatible the surrounding coastal context. The buildings avoid long, continuous blank walls with a simple fagade composition of a base and top separated by different colors. There is a mixture of heights and roof types (sloping and flat) to create visual interest. 13-17 Resolution No. 2024- Page 8 of 18 4. The Project emphasizes clean lines, simplicity and avoids excessive ornamentation, which will more easily allow for future modifications per PC-9 design guidelines so that it would be visually consistent with the future Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Village. Per Section 5.D.10, the building exterior will be aesthetically improved with entirely new buildings and perimeter walls to reflect PC-9 design standards. The Project considers future residents, businesses, and patrons of the Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Village by including louvers which are designed to conceal the odor control facility, and screening for on -site mechanical equipment. The simple clean lines and avoidance of excessive ornamentation allows the coast's natural beauty to be prominent which is consistent with the concept of coastal architectural design. 5. Landscaping is proposed along the East Coast Highway frontage, which further reduces the massing of the property walls. The landscape buffer also enhances the appearance of the public right-of-way so that the Project does not appear walled off from public viewsheds. The landscape buffer will improve the overall aesthetic of the Project from East Coast Highway, which is identified as a coastal view road by the CLUP. 6. The Project is designed to preserve the six view corridors conceptually identified by PC-9. The existing view of the Back Bay bluff to the north of the Project, as well as views of the bay through other portions of the future Back Bay Landing, are not obstructed by the Project. Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(4): Site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas, pedestrian and vehicular access ways, landscaping and other site features shall give proper consideration to functional aspects of site development. Facts in Support of Finding with Section VII(C)(4): 1. The Property is located on East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Bay Bridge. This adjacent property is the site of the future Back Bay Landing project, which is a mixed -use waterfront village which has not yet been constructed. Currently, vehicular access to the existing pump station is through a curb cut on East Coast Highway, followed by gates that are opened for vehicles to 13-18 Resolution No. 2024- Page 9 of 18 access. The existing access is challenging due to traffic on East Coast Highway and the necessity for vehicles to drive across the public right-of-way. 2. While an access gate will remain adjacent to East Coast Highway, it will be used only for when access at the Bayside Drive entrance is temporarily hindered. To improve access, the Applicant proposes access through a permanent access easement taken through Bayside Drive and into the Back Bay Landing property at 100 Bayside Drive. As described by the certified environmental impact report ("ElR"), the Project would require a maximum of approximately 15 vehicle trips per week for staff to perform period maintenance, inspections of facilities and equipment, and/or chemical deliveries. Since a similar number of trips are required for the existing pump station, the Project is not expected to result in additional vehicle trips. 3. The overall layout of structures is efficiently arranged on a constrained lot and is designed to accommodate service vehicle access and maneuvering requirements. 4. Fact 5 in support of Finding of Consistency with Section VI I(C)(1) is hereby incorporated by reference. Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(5): The development shall not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. Facts in Support of Finding with Section VII(C)(5): 1. The Project provides essential infrastructure to the surrounding community for waste management and a pump station has existed in this location for many decades. Orange County Sanitation District has aging infrastructure throughout the City and it is typical for utilities such as the Project to be replaced and upgraded. The Project improves an existing pump station, which serves the overall community as part of a larger wastewater collection system. 2. The Project includes a new odor control room, which the existing facility currently lacks. The odor control room is included to mitigate odors from the Property to the surrounding neighborhood and includes treatment for both liquid and vapor phase 13-19 Resolution No. 2024- Page 10 of 18 waste. The odor control room accounts for a significant portion of the expanded footprint of the Project. 3. The Project includes buildings both below and above grade which are larger in area than the existing pump station. The above -grade structures include an electrical room, generator room, and odor control structure. The electrical room includes increased clearances between electrical equipment per Orange County Sanitation District standards which provides safety for electricians while performing maintenance. The new underground pump also requires a larger underground footprint to meet current industry standards. Since the existing pump station was constructed nearly 60 years ago, increases in working clearances and equipment types and sizes is expected which leads to the overall increase in the Project footprint. 4. The Project uses equipment with lower noise. The highest noise producer of the Project is the standby generator, which is to be used in emergency situation if there is a power outage. The generator is proposed to be enclosed in a building with sound attenuation panels and is not expected to negatively affect surrounding uses. 5. The Applicant has provided a Site Photometric Plan and Lighting Plans which describe the Project's lighting around the Property. There are lights proposed to be attached to the Electrical Room, Generator Room, and Odor Control Area, with minimal lighting around the interior of the perimeter security walls. The Project's lighting is conditioned to comply with the outdoor lighting standards of the NBMC and will not negatively affect surrounding uses. As conditioned, the Director may order the dimming of light sources or other remediation upon finding that the site is excessively illuminated. 6. If the pump station facility were to fail, sewage would build up in upstream sewers and could result in an overflow from the lowest elevation manhole upstream from the Property. Furthermore, backups and/or spills could occur at specific residences or businesses that have sewer laterals lower than the lowest elevation manhole. If the force mains in the bay were to fail, a sewage spill could occur into the bay. The Project seeks to upgrade the existing pump station and provide improvements to an existing utility which serves a large portion of the city. 13-20 Resolution No. 2024- Page 11 of 18 Section 4: In accordance with Section 21.52.015(F) (Coastal Development Permits - Findings and Decision) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings as set forth: Finding of Consistency with Section 21.52.015(F)(1): The development shall not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. Facts in Support of Finding with 21.52.015(F)(1): 1. Facts 2 through 5 in support of Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(1) are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. Facts 1 and 2 in support of Finding of Consistency with Section VII(C)(2) are hereby incorporated by reference. 3. A Coastal Hazards Report and Sea Level Rise Analysis was prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc. dated October 1, 2023, for the Project. The current maximum bay water elevation is 7.7 NAVD 88 (North American Vertical Datum of 1988 ("NAVD88") Based on the State of California's Sea Level Rise Guidance, the sea level rise for the Los Angeles region is 6.6 feet NAVD 88, under the H++ scenario. Since the life expectancy of the new pump station is approximately 50 years, the 6.6-foot sea level rise for the year 2080 is appropriate to use for evaluation of the Project. Therefore, the sea level is estimated to reach approximately 14.3 feet NAVD88 (7.7 + 6.6 feet NAVD 88). The finished floor elevation of the electrical room and entrance to the dry well is 15.5 feet, which provides more than adequate protection from sea level rise. The generator room has a finished floor elevation of 14.17 feet. While slightly under the 14.3-footsea level rise elevation projection, the generator is proposed to be mounted on a 2-foot-high fuel tank and the generator panels will be mounted 3.5 feet above the finished floor, which will provide adequate protection from flooding. For the Odor Control area, there is a proposed finished floor elevation of 14 feet. Equipment within the area is proposed to be mounted on pads higher than 14.3 feet NAVD 88, to protect from cases of flooding. Additionally, temporary flood barriers such as sandbags can be deployed for openings during flooding situations. Finally, the Applicant is proposing to waterproof a portion of the Odor Control area's block walls to provide additional protection from flooding. 13-21 Resolution No. 2024- Page 12 of 18 4. The Project includes the construction of upgraded replacement force mains, which run from the Property onto the western side of the Bay Bridge through micro - tunneling. The new force mains are an upgrade to aging infrastructure that will better serve the surrounding area and is screened from public view within an existing vault. The existing vault, which is located on both the public right-of-way and private property, is to be abandoned in place. The public right-of-way area where the new vault is proposed includes new landscaping to further enhance the area for pedestrians, motorists, and nearby residents. 5. The Applicant submitted a Construction Management Plan ("CMP") prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc., dated October 2023, which documents the construction phase implementation, construction requirements and quality control, and traffic control associated with the construction of the Project. The CMP discusses construction easements at the Property for construction access as well as offsite staging areas at Lower Castaways Park and the Orange County Sanitation District Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. A Temporary License Agreement was approved by City Council on September 12, 2023, allowing for the siting of office trailers, temporary staging and storage of construction equipment and materials, and the parking of vehicles to support the Project during construction. The agreement is for a limited basis only and includes a term until December 31, 2028, or the completion of the Project, whichever first occurs. The CMP also includes a Traffic Control Plan which includes closing of necessary sidewalks during construction hours and re -opening during non -working hours. The Traffic Control Plan has been reviewed by the City's Public Works department and has been determined to be sufficient to minimize traffic impacts during the construction period. 6. The Property is located in an area known for the potential of seismic activity and liquefaction and is required to comply with the California Building Code ("CBC") and City's Building Division standards and policies. Geotechnical investigations specifically addressing liquefaction are required to be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. Permit issuance is also contingent on the inclusion of design mitigation identified in the investigations. Construction plans are reviewed for compliance with approved investigations and CBC requirements prior to building permit issuance. 7. The Property is located on East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Back Bay Bridge. East Coast Highway and Bayside Drive (south of East Coast Highway) are identified as a Coastal View Roads by the CLUP. The Property 13-22 Resolution No. 2024- Page 13 of 18 currently includes multiple pump station buildings, visible mechanical equipment, security block walls and vegetation which impair the view of the back bay. This specific pump station has existed since its original construction in 1966. Additionally, the adjacent Recreational Vehicle Storage parking lot includes many recreational vehicles which also impair the view of the bay. The Project includes a 22-foot high electrical and generator room above a subterranean pump room on the west of the property. There is also a 15.5-foot-high odor control building to the east of the property. Site walls are proposed for security purposes but do not exceed the height of the proposed buildings. From East Coast Highway, the Project does not impair the existing view of the bay and maintains a view of the Back Bay bluff to the north. Two nearby Public Viewpoints are identified as part of a pedestrian trail at Castaways Park, located approximately 1,500 feet northwest of the Property. When viewing the Property from Castaways Park, East Coast Highway, the Back Bay Channel and marina, and Recreational Vehicle Storage are within immediate view, while a commercial shopping center and Promontory Point residences are located further east across East Coast Highway. Although the Project proposes to replace the existing pump station buildings with taller buildings, the views from Castaways Park are mostly unchanged. Parts of East Coast Highway may be impaired by the new structures, but the marina, commercial shopping center, and Promontory Point are not affected by the Project. The Project does not interfere with any of the identified Public Viewpoints due to the large distances from them. The Project may be in the distant viewshed of the Public Viewpoints but will not interfere with the public views that are currently provided. 8. Under Section 21.35.050 (Water Quality and Hydrology Plan) of the NBMC, due to the proximity of the development to the shoreline and the development containing more than 75% of impervious surface area, a Water Quality and Management Plan ("WQMP") is required. The Applicant submitted a Non -Priority Project Water Quality Plan ("NPP"), prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc., and dated October 17, 2023. An NPP is required for new development or significant redevelopment projects that do not meet the criteria for Priority Projects as defined by the County's Model WQMP, but instead qualify as Non -Priority Projects as defined in the Drainage Area Management Plan. The NPP provides stormwater Best Management Practices ("BMPs") that are planned for controlling discharges of pollutants from the Project. Finding of Consistency with Section 21.52.015(F)(2): Conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act if the project is located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of 13-23 Resolution No. 2024- Page 14 of 18 any body of water located within the coastal zone. Facts in Support of Finding with 21.52.015(F)(2): 1. The Property does not currently provide nor inhibit public coastal access. The Property is located in close proximity to potential lateral access to the Back Bay Channel, as designated by the CLUP. The lateral access is a small beach located along the Back Bay Landing property, which ranges from 250 feet north and 550 feet west from the Property. The Project consists of the replacement of an existing pump station with an upgraded pump station. Access to the bay remains available Back Bay Landing. Therefore, the Project will not impact public access to local coastal resources. 2. The Project includes installation of force mains in a new subterranean utility vault within a small portion of the public right-of-way area on the southwestern side of the Bay Bridge. This public -right-of-way includes an existing fence which leads to a walkway to the north side of the bridge. There is no direct access to the water in the area of the vault and therefore the Project does not affect public access in this location. 3. The Project includes temporary construction staging at Lower Castaways Park, which is approximately 1,100 feet west of the Property, and across the Bay Bridge. Lower Castaways Park is not identified as a Public Park by the CLUP. The construction staging is temporary for the duration of construction for the Project, as stipulated by the Temporary Lease Agreement between the City and the Applicant. The temporary construction staging does not alter access to the bay. The Applicant is only using a portion of the park, which has been historically used for construction staging and off -site parking since the City acquired the property. The staging site is buffered and screened from adjacent right of ways by existing landscaping which is to remain. The portion of the Staging Area that is open and available for public parking and access is not affected by the Project. The public access for small vessel launching into the bay is also unaffected. Section 5: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are incorporated into the operative part of this resolution. 13-24 Resolution No. 2024- Page 15 of 18 Section 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 7: On the basis of the entire environmental review record, the Project (inclusive of recommended conditions of approval) will not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously analyzed in the EIR and Addendum, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" adopted by OC Sanitation District for the Project. In February of 2021, the Applicant, as the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act, approved the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) and certified an EIR for Project No. 5-67 pursuant to CEQA set forth in the California Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. and its implementing State regulations set forth in the California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 ("CEQA Guidelines"). On April 1, 2021, Bayside Village Marina filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate against the Applicant in Orange County Superior Court alleging that the EIR failed to comply with CEQA on numerous grounds (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30- 2021-01194238.) On December 16, 2022, the Court issued a ruling that upheld the EIR in all respects except one (not having identified project construction staging area). Thereafter, the Court issued a limited writ directing OC Sanitation District to sufficiently identify project construction staging areas. In response to the Court ruling, OC Sanitation District prepared an Addendum to the EIR for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project which was certified by OC Sanitation District Board on July 23, 2023 pursuant to Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines which authorizes a lead agency to prepare an Addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but one of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have not occurred. The Addendum clarifies the use of the Lower Castaways Park in the City as a construction Staging Area and adds a new construction staging area at OC Sanitation District's Plant No. 2, located in the City of Huntington Beach, for soil storage/drying activities and determined that Project No. 5-67, as modified by the Addendum, would not result in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in 13-25 Resolution No. 2024- Page 16 of 18 the severity of previously identified significant impacts in accordance with Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 8: Pursuant to Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR is required unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: a. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. Substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or C. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable due diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; ii. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; iii. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerable different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. 13-26 Resolution No. 2024- Page 17 of 18 The Addendum analyzed the impacts associated with temporary use of the Staging Area for construction of the Project. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in either the EIR or the Addendum nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, the previously adopted Addendum addresses all environmental impacts associated with the Project. Section 9: The City Council finds that judicial challenges to the City's CEQA determinations and approvals of land use projects are costly and time consuming. In addition, project opponents often seek an award of attorneys' fees in such challenges. As project applicants are the primary beneficiaries of such approvals, it is appropriate that such applicants should bear the expense of defending against any such judicial challenge, and bear the responsibility for any costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which may be awarded to a successful challenger. 13-27 Resolution No. 2024- Page 18 of 18 Section 10: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution. ADOPTED this 23rd day of April, 2024. Will O'Neill Mayor ATTEST: Leilani I. Brown City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Aar n C. Harp City Attorney Attachment(s): Exhibit "A" — Legal Description Exhibit "B" — Conditions of Approval Exhibit "C" — Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Addendum 13-28 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description 13-29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 EXHIBIT "A -I" LEGAL. DESCRIPTION PARCEL. 5-67-01 (FEE) ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange State of California, being that portion of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 93-1 1 1 filed in Book 278, Pages 40 through 45 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Orange County, described as follows: COMMENCING at the easterly terminus of that certain course in the centerline of the East Coast l lighway shown as "North 87'36'58" West 160.15 feet" on said Parcel Map No. 93-111. said point also being marked with a "spike and washer tagged DOH per Caltrans F.B. SR. 81-115,111" per said Parcel Map No. 93-11 l: thence along said centerline North 87'36'58" West 160.15 feet to the northwesterly terminus thereof, said point also being marked with a "spike and washer tagged DO11 per Caltrans F.B. SR. 81-115/1 l" per said Parcel \lap No. 93-11 I: thence leaving said centerline at right angles North 02'23'02" East 85.94 feet to a line shown as "North 87'36' 16" West 123.34 feet" in the southerly boundary of said Parcel 3. said line also being the northerly Right -of -Way line of the East Coast Highway as shown on said Parcel Map No. 93-11 and also shown on a Caltrans Right -of -Way Map No. 25491-C for 07-ORA-1 l 8.3; thence along said southerly line of Parcel 3 North 87' 36' 16" West 65.10 feet to the intersection of the southerly boundary of said Parcel 3 and the easterly line of Parcel 1 Dedicated to the Orange County Sanitation District in a document recorded September 10, 1965 in Book 7661. Page 741 of Official Records, in the Office of said Orange County Recorder, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 13'39'41" East 71.32 feet; thence North 76'24'23" West 173.32 feet; thence South 13139'46" West 79.83 feet to a line shown as '\orth 66124'24" West 284.74 feet" in said southerly boundary of Parcel 3; thence along said southerly boundary of Parcel 3 the following, six (6) courses: (1) South 66'24'24" East 8.72 feet to an angle point therein: (2) South 73'06'54" East 43.65 feet to an angle point therein; (3) South 83 06'23" East 60.83 feet to an angle point therein; (4) North 01 `40 10" West 60.00 feet to an angle point therein; (5) North 88` 1314" East 60.00 feet to an angle point therein; Page 1 of 2 OC SAN 22-03-8 13-30 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION PARCEL 5-67-01 (FEE) (6) South 01 °46'46" East 70.87 feet to an angle point therein to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 9,713 Square Feet more or less. EXHIBIT "A-2" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. 14, 08/17/2021 Stev6if C. Slocum, P.L.S. 9044 Date Michael Baker International 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, California 92707 Project No. 163755 li:Npdatakl63755tC.4DDNappictg%ExhibttslPump Station Legals and Exhibs1s%L.ega1'd0755-00A1 - Legal Fee Parcel.docx Page 2 of 2 OC SAN 22-03-9 13-31 RECORD REFERENCES: RI CALTRAtS RIGfT-CF-NAY MAP NO. 25491-C. R2 PARCEL uAP NO. 93-ill. P.M.B. 278/40-45. ` NEWPORT BAY HARBOR CHANNEL UPPER BAY N \ 90 x Oa, 9 II '� •\ at7'a3't9'; *'W� R-1014.00' < ds o L-313.64' n F (R2) SPIKE AND NASFfR \ \ 'DOH' PER CALTRANS FB. 81-115/11 AND PM `• 93-111. P.M.B. 278/40-45 N87' 36' 58'1t 160.15' (R2) P.O.C. PARCEL 1 I� \ EXHIBIT 'A-01 811EMMACCO PANYA LEGAL OESCR PL10N FOR ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION PARCEL 567 I MM) CONTAINING: 9,713 S.F. MORE OR LESS SHEET INDEX ODINDICATES SFET %A65t PARCEL 5-67-01(FEE) C,F SPIFFY 1 OF 2 SHEM INTERNATIONAL 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, CA 92707 (949) 472-3505 • MBAKERIN7L COM AUGUST 13. 2021 .N 163755 \1��s+.�aawm►.mMmNnu�umAa�r►o6bo�+nVwrT�atLmu.00®mwngma-v��.,u.+..,.�.. ,....»......, OC SAN 22-03-10 ywm..a ti 13-32 A N ^ A sa oo, j � TA re 513^3946 M S66'24'24'E 8.72' •- 79.Bi' 1 s? 9 0 c� I vs vAR1E5 vARIES I (R2) S73-06'54'_ 43.65'�� 1 /� v n cn (R2) S83'06'23'E 60.83'<- i „1 399 \s LFEE _ �( S'LY LINE OF PARCEL 3 OF P.Y. NO. 93-111, P.M.B.cn 278140-45 AND N'LY R.O.MLINE OF EAST COAST HIGHMAY PER CALTRANS R.O.M. MAPo. 40 25491-C cr E �— N13'3941'E 71.32' T.P.O.B. — S'LY LINg OF PARCEL 3 OF PM 93-111, P.M.B. 278/40-45 AND N'LY RIGHT -OF -NAY LINE 5 OF EAST COAS' H[GF10AY PER o CALTRANS R[GHT CF NAY YAP NO. 25491-C o+, V AR1ES N q'0- !\ SPIKE AND MASFER -DOH' PER s>02 23'02 , CALTRANS FB. SR-81-115/11 r AND P.M. NO. 93-111. P.M.B. 278/40-45 EXHIBIT 'A-2A N SKUMMACCWNNYA = P.O.C. LEGAL DESCRFnON FOR PARCEL 1 _ ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SPIKE AND MASHER PER BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION _ CALTRANS F8. SR-8 ;-115/ 11 PARCEL S47-01FEE) AND P.M. NO. 93-111. CONTAINM 9,713 S.F. MORE OR LESS P . M. B. 278/40-45 C;l SHEET 2OF2SHEETS e Lvw4 E .. I ikV--d INTERNATIONAL 5 Hutton Cenbv Drive, Su3e 500 Santa Ana. CA 92707 (9491472.3505- MBAKERINTLCOM ALGLGI 13, 2D21 .N 163755 UNm3.ea�b�9m�.mNWofVO.T+���nsV�Y sine tows ro o�u.mwomv-.w..�......,.,.. —... OC SAN 22-03-11 13-33 Exhibit "B" Conditions of Approval Planning Division 1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plans, and building elevations stamped and dated with the date of this approval (except as modified by applicable conditions of approval). 2. The Project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. A material violation of any of those laws in connection with the use may be caused the revocation of this Major Site Development Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. 4. The major site development review and coastal development permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Sections 20.54.060 and 21.54.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code unless an extension is otherwise granted. 5. Any change in operational characteristics, expansion in the area, or other modification to the approved plans, shall require an amendment to this Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit or the processing of a new Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit. 6. A copy of the Resolution, including conditions of approval Exhibit "A" shall be incorporated into the Building Division and field sets of plans before issuance of the building permits. 7. Before the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect. These plans shall incorporate drought -tolerant plantings and water -efficient irrigation practices, and the plans shall be approved by the Planning Division. 8. All landscape materials and irrigation systems shall be maintained by the approved landscape plan. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and growing condition and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. All landscaped areas shall be kept free of weeds and debris. All irrigation systems shall be kept operable, including adjustments, replacements, repairs, and cleaning as part of regular maintenance. 9. The site shall not be excessively illuminated based on the luminance recommendations of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, or, in the opinion of the Director of Community Development, the illumination creates an 13-34 unacceptable negative impact on surrounding land uses or environmental resources. The Director may order the dimming of light sources or other remediation upon finding that the site is excessively illuminated. 10. Before the issuance of a building permit,. the applicant shall prepare a photometric study in conjunction with a final lighting plan for approval by the Planning Division. The survey shall show that lighting values are "1" or less at all property lines. 11. All exterior lighting shall be shielded with light rays confined within the boundaries of the Property. Site lighting shall not create a public nuisance by shining onto public streets or adjacent sites. 12. All mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be fully screened from view from East Coast Highway, Bayside Drive, and the surrounding properties (including from above) and shall be sound attenuated in accordance with Chapter 10.26 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 13. The odor control room shall be screened with louvers. The mechanical equipment shall be screened from view of future adjacent residents. 14. Site lighting shall be designed so light generated on -site does not spill on to adjoining properties or rights -of -way. On -site lighting shall be designed so that light sources are not visible from East Coast Highway, Bayside Drive, or from adjacent properties. 15. Before the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay any unpaid administrative costs associated with the processing of this application to the Planning Division. 16. All noise generated by the proposed use shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 10.26 and other applicable noise control requirements of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. The maximum noise shall be limited to no more than depicted below for the specified periods unless the ambient noise level is higher: Between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM Between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM Location Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Residential Property 45dBA 55dBA 40dBA 50dBA Residential Property located within 100 feet of a commercial ro ert 45dBA 60dBA 45dBA 50dBA Mixed Use Property 45dBA 60dBA 45dBA 50dBA Commercial Property NIA 65dBA N/A 60dBA 17. All trash shall be stored within the building or within dumpsters stored in the trash enclosure (three walls and a self -latching gate) or otherwise screened from view of neighboring properties, except when placed for pick-up by refuse collection 13-35 agencies. The trash enclosure shall have a decorative solid roof for aesthetic and screening purposes. 18. The exterior of the Project shall be always maintained free of litter and graffiti. The owner or operator shall provide for daily removal of trash, litter debris, and graffiti from the premises and on all abutting sidewalks within 20 feet of the premises. 19. The applicant shall ensure that the trash dumpsters and/or receptacles are maintained to control odors. This may include the provision of either fully self- contained dumpsters or periodic steam cleaning of the dumpsters if deemed necessary by the Planning Division. Cleaning and maintenance of trash dumpsters shall be done in compliance with the provisions of Title 14, including all future amendments (including Water Quality related requirements). 20. Deliveries and refuse collection for the facility shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and Saturdays and between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on Sundays and Federal holidays unless otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development and may require an amendment to this approval. 21. Prior to construction a waterproofing curb or similar design feature shall be constructed around the proposed structures as an adaptive flood protection device based on the State of California's Sea Level Rise Guidance H++ Scenario, per the approved plans and Coastal Hazards Report dated October 2023. Flood shields (sandbags and other methods) can be deployed across the openings to protect and prevent flooding to the structure. 22. Prior to construction. the orwertv owner shall submit a notarized signed letter acknowledging all hazards present at the site, assuming the risk of injury or damage from such hazards unconditionally waiving any claims of damage against the City from such hazards and to indemnify and hold harmless City, its City Council its boards and commissions officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claims demands obligations damages, actions, causes of action, suits losses iudgments fines penalties, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including without limitation attorney's fees, disbursements, and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City's approval of the development. 23. This approval does not authorize any new or existing improvements (including landscaping) on California Coastal Permit Jurisdiction, State tidelands, or public beaches. Any improvements located on tidelands, submerged lands, and/or lands that may be subiect to the public trust shall require a coastal development permit (CDP) approved by the California Coastal Commission (Coastal Commission). Prior to construction the applicant shall provide a copy of said coastal development permit or CDP waiver or documentation from the Coastal Commission that subject improvements are not subiect to the permit requirements 13-36 of the Coastal Act and/or not located within the permit jurisdiction of the Coastal Commission. 24. No demolition or construction materials. equipment debris, or waste, shall be placed or stored in a location that would enter the sensitive habitat, receiving waters, or storm drains or result in impacts to environmentally sensitive habitat areas, streams, the beach, wetlands or their buffers. No demolition or construction materials shall be stored on public property. 25. The applicant is responsible for compliance with the Miaratory Bird Treatv Act (MBTA). In compliance with the MBTA, grading, brush removal, building demolition, tree trimming, and similar construction activities shall occur between August 16 and January 31, outside of the peak nesting period. If such activities must occur inside the peak nesting season from February 1 to August 15, compliance with the following is required to prevent the taking of native birds under MBTA: A. The construction area shall be inspected for active nests. If birds are observed flying from a nest or sitting on a nest, it can be assumed that the nest is active. Construction activity within 300 feet of an active nest shall be delayed until the nest is no longer active. Continue to observe the nest until the chicks have left the nest and activity is no longer observed. When the nest is no longer active, construction activity can continue in the nest area. B. It is a violation of state and federal law to kill or harm a native bird. To ensure compliance, consider hiring a biologist to assist with the survey for nesting birds, and to determine when it is safe to commence construction activities. If an active nest is found, one or two short follow-up surveys will be necessary to check on the nest and determine when the nest is no longer active. 26. Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Good Housekeeping Practices (GHPs) shall be implemented before and throughout the duration of construction activity as designated in the Construction Erosion Control Plan. 27. The discharae of anv hazardous materials into storm sewer systems or receivin waters shall be prohibited. Machinery and equipment shall be maintained and washed in confined areas specifically designed to control runoff. A designated fueling and vehicle maintenance area with appropriate berms and protection to prevent spillage shall be provided as far away from storm drain systems or receiving waters as possible. 28. Debris from demolition shall be removed from work areas each day and removed from the protect site within 24 hours of the completion of the project. Stockpiles and construction materials shall be covered, enclosed on all sites, not stored in contact with the soil, and located as far awav as possible from drain inlets and anv waterway. 13-37 29. Trash and debris shall be disposed of in proper trash and recycling receptacles at the end of each construction day. Solid waste, including excess concrete, shall be disposed of in adequate disposal facilities at a legal disposal site or recycled at a recycling facility. 30. The Applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program of the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Proiect Environmental Impact Report No.5- 67 (SCH2O16111031). 31. At the request and to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, the Applicant shall make future alterations to the exterior facade for consistency and compatibility with the architecture of a future approved Back Bay Landing mixed - use protect. 32. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements, and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City's approval of Back Bay Pump Station Replacement including, but not limited to, a major site development review, conditional use permit, and coastal development permit (PA2023-0076). This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorney's fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit, or proceeding whether incurred by the applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing the such proceeding. The applicant shall indemnify the City for all the City's costs, attomeys' fees, and damages that which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions outlined in this condition. The applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City under the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. Fire Department 33. Premise identification shall be provided per the Newport Beach Fire Department guidelines. 34. A knox box for emergency access shall be provided. 35. NFPA 704 Placarding for onsite hazards shall be provided. 13-38 Public Works Department 36. The Traffic Control Plan shall be further review and approved by the City of Newport Beach and Caltrans prior to construction. 37. All work within Caltrans right-of-way requires an encroachment permit from Caltrans. 38. The Applicant shall comply with the approved Construction Management Plan and Traffic Control Plan. Any deviations to these plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director prior to implementation. 39. The Applicant shall maintain all landscaping in the public right-of-way adjacent to East Coast Highway, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 40. Construction activities shall comply with Section 10.28.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Noise -generating construction activities shall be consistent with a Traffic Management Plan and Construction Management Plan approved by the Public Works Director. 41. All conditions and provisions stated in the Temporary, Non -Exclusive and Revocable License Agreement Between the City of Newport Beach and the Orange County Sanitation District for Use of City Property shall be adhered to. 42. The construction staging area at Lower Castaways park shall not impact the public's ability to access designated public parking. 13-39 EXHIBIT "C" Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Addendum EIR No. 5-67 Available separately due to bulk at: https:llwww. ocsan.gov/about-us/transparency/eir-documents/-folder-807 Addendum to EIR No. 5-67 Available separately due to bulk at: httsa/www.ocsan. ov/homelshow ublisheddocument/34145/638253730131970000 13-40 Attachment B Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Addendum 13-41 EIR No. 5-67 Available separately due to bulk at: https://www.ocsan.gov/about-us/transparency/eir-documents/-folder-807 Addendum to EIR No. 5-67 Available separately due to bulk at: https://www.ocsan.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/34145/638253730131970000 13-42 Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. SP-178) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FINAL I DECEMBER 2017 �� w r FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT SCH NO. 2016111031 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Contact: Mr. Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst 714.962.2411 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Contact: Mr. Alan Ashimine 949.472.3505 December 2017 JN 143698 This document is designed for double -sided printing to conserve natural resources. Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Section1.0: Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1-1 Section 2.0: Comments and Responses................................................................................................ 2-1 Section3.0: Errata.................................................................................................................................... 3-1 Section 4.0: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program............................................................. 4-1 Final 9 December 2017 i Table of Contents Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final 9 December 2017 ii Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project 1.0 INTRODUCTION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) Section 15088, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), as the lead agency, has evaluated the comments received on the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). The DEIR for the proposed Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (herein referenced as the project) was distributed to responsible and trustee agencies, interested groups, and organizations. The DEIR was made available for public review and comment for a period of 45 days. The public review period for the DEIR (established by the CEQA Guidelines Section 15105) commenced on June 21, 2017 and ended August 4, 2017. The Final EIR (FEIR) consists of the following components: • Section 1.0 — Introduction • Section 2.0 — Responses to Comments • Section 3.0 — Errata • Section 4.0 — Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Due to its length, the text of the DEIR is not included with this document; however, it is included by reference in this FEIR. None of the corrections or clarifications to the DEIR identified in this document constitutes "significant new information" pursuant to Section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. As a result, recirculation of the DEIR is not required. Final . December 2017 1-1 Introduction Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 1-2 Introduction 2.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project 2.0 RESPONSES TO COMMENTS 2.1 CEQA REQUIREMENTS Before approving a project, the California EnvironmentalQuality Act (CEQA) requires the Lead Agency to prepare and certify a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15120 through 15132 and Section 15161, the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (SCH #2016111031). This Responses to Comments section, combined with the DEIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and errata sheet comprise the FEIR. This Responses to Comments section includes all components required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15120 and is included in the FEIR. 2.2 PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS - DRAFT EIR The DEIR was circulated for review and comment to the public, agencies, and organizations. The DEIR was also circulated to State agencies for review through the State Clearinghouse, Office of Planning and Research. The 45-day public review period ran from June 21, 2017 to August 4, 2017. Comments regarding the DEIR received in writing during the 45-day public review period from the public, local, and State agencies have been incorporated into this section. 2.3 FINAL EIR The FEIR allows the public and Lead Agency an opportunity to review revisions to the DEIR, the responses to comments, and other components of the EIR, such as the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, before project approval. The FEIR serves as the environmental document to support a decision on the proposed project. After completing the FEIR, and before approving the project, the Lead Agency must make the following three certifications as required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15090: • That the FEIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA; • That the FEIR was presented to the decision -making body of the Lead Agency, and that the decision -making body reviewed and considered the information in the FEIR prior to approving the project; and • That the FEIR reflects the Lead Agency's independent judgment and analysis. These certifications, the Findings of Fact, are included in a separate Findings document. Both the FEIR and the Findings will be submitted to the Lead Agency for consideration of the proposed project. Final . December 2017 2-1 Responses to Comments v SAN7 r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 2.4 WRITTEN COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES All written correspondence from those agencies or individuals commenting on the DEIR is reproduced on the following pages. The individual comments on each letter have been consecutively numbered for ease of reference. Following each comment letter are responses to each numbered comment. A response is provided for each comment raising substantive environmental issues. Added or modified text is underlined, while deleted text will have a ,.`..�tt through the text, and is included in a box, as the following example shows: "Text from EIR" COMMENT LETTERS A total of 14 comment letters were received by OCSD, as outlined below. State Agencies 1. Scott Morgan, Director, State Clearinghouse, State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit, August 7, 2017. 2. Gayle Totton, B.S., M.A., Ph.D., Associate Governmental Project Analyst, Native American Heritage Commission, July 14, 2017. 3. Johnson P. Abraham, Project Manager, Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation Branch, Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress, Department of Toxic Substances Control, July 11, 2017. 4. Yatman Kwan, AICP, Branch Chief, Regional-IGR-Transit Planning, State of California Department of Transportation District 12, August 4, 2017. Regional/Local Agencies 5. Patrick Alford, Planning Program Manager, City of Newport Beach, August 4, 2017. 6. Richard Vuong, Manager, Planning Division, Orange County Public Works, August 2, 2017. 7. Tamera Rivers, Management Analyst, Orange County Fire Authority, July 25, 2017. Interested Parties and Individuals 8. Allyson Presta, Partner, Palmo Investments, GP, June 22, 2017. 9. Andrew Salas, Chairman, Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizhnation, July 18, 2017. Final . December 2017 2-2 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 10. Dan Miller, Senior Vice President, Irvine Company, August 3, 2017. 11. James Chuang, Senior Environmental Specialist, Southern California Gas Company, August 4, 2017. 12. John Erskine, Nossaman LLP, August 4, 2017. 13. Patricia Martz, Ph.D., President, California Cultural Resources Preservation Alliance, Inc., July 8, 2017. 14. Rebecca Robles, United Coalition to Protect Panhe, July 5, 2017. Final . December 2017 2-3 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-4 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 7 rL ur rN STATE OF CALIFORNIA a ° Governor's Office of Planning and Research • .o w,. State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor August 7, 2017 Kevin Hadden Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Subject: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project SCH#: 2016111031 Dear Kevin Hadden: d m 4 T P � L'1 2 �OF CAI.* Ken Alex Director The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Draft EIR to selected state agencies for review. On the enclosed Document Details Report please note that the Clearinghouse has listed the state agencies that reviewed your document. The review period closed on August 4, 2017, and the continents from the responding agency (ies) is (are) enclosed. If this comment package is not in order, please notify the State Clearinghouse immediately. Please refer to the project's ten -digit State Clearinghouse number in future correspondence so that we may respond promptly. Please note that Section 21 l04(c) of the California Public Resources Code states that: "A responsible or other public agency shall only make substantive comments regarding those activities involved in a project which are within an area of expertise of the agency or which are required to be carried out or approved by the agency. Those comments shall be supported by specific documentation." These comments are forwarded for use in preparing your final environmental document. Should you need more infonnation or clarification of the enclosed comments, we recommend that you contact the commenting agency directly. This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Please contact the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. Sincerely, colt Morgan Director, State Clearinghouse Enclosures cc: Resources Agency 11 1400 TENTH STREET P.G. BOX 30.14 SACRAAIENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-3044 TEL (91G)445-OG13 FAX (91G) 32:1-3018 www.opr.ca.gov Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base 5CH# 2016111031 Project Title Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project Lead Agency Orange County Sanitation District Type EIR Draft EIR Description The proposed project would replace the Bay Bridge Pump Station and associated force mains. The project would bring the pump station facility and force mains to current design and reliability standards to ensure continuous service for the Newport Coast service area. The primary project components consist of: 1) pump station improvements; 2) Newport Bay Channel crossing force main improvements; and 3) West Coast Hwy crossing force main improvements. Lead Agency Contact Name Kevin Hadden Agency Orange County Sanitation District Phone 714-962-2411 email Address 10844 Ellis Avenue City Fountain Vai[ey Fax State CA Zip 92708-7018 Project Location County Orange City Newport Beach Region I -at 1 Long 33' 37' 00.58" N 1 117' 54' 03.7" W Crass Streets East Coast Hwy and Bayside Dr Parcel No. 4410-132-60, 117-801-10 Township 6S Range 10W Section 26 Base SBM Proximity to: Highways 1 Airports Railways Waterways Newport Bay Channel Schools Numerous Land Use Bayside Village Boat Launch and Storage and Multi -Unit Residential/recreational and Marine Commercial and Mixed Use - Water 2 Project Issues Agricultural Land; Air Quality; Archaeologic -Historic; Biological Resources; Coastal Zone; Drainage/Absorption,, Flood Plain/Flooding; Forest Land/Fire Hazard; Geologic/Seismic; Minerals; Noise; Population/Housing Balance; Public Services; Recreation/Parks; Schools/Universities; Septic System; Sewer Capacity; Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading; Solid Waste; Toxic/Hazardous-, Traffic/Circulation; Vegetation; WaterQuality; Water Supply; Wetland/Riparian; Wildlife; Growth Inducing; Landuse; Cumulative Effects; Other Issues; Aesthetic/Visual; Tribal Cultural Resources Reviewing Resources Agency; California Coastal Commission; Department of Conservation; Department of Fish Agencies and Wildlife, Region 5; Office of Historic Preservation; Department of Parks and Recreation; Department of Water Resources; California Highway Patrol; Caltrans, District 12; Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 8; Department of Toxic Substances Control; State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality; Air Resources Board, Major Industrial Projects; Native American Heritage Commission; State lands Commission Date Received 06121/2017 Start of Review 06/21/2017 End of Review 08104/2017 12 Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency. �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 1 Scott Morgan, Director, State Clearinghouse State of California Governor's Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse and Planning Unit August 7, 2017 1-1 This letter acknowledges that the State Clearinghouse submitted the DEIR to selected State agencies for review and that the DEIR review period closed on August 4, 2017. The comment states that the Lead Agency (OCSD) complied with the public review requirements for draft environmental documents pursuant to CEQA. As such, no further response is necessary. 1-2 This comment includes the State Clearinghouse Document Details Report and does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. It should be noted that attached to this letter from the State Clearinghouse was correspondence related to the project from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). These comment letters from the NAHC and DTSC are included as Response to Comment Letter No. 2 and No. 3, below. Final . December 2017 2-7 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-8 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 2 STATE OF CALIFOR IA _ _ EdmundG. Brown Jr. Goyam-r NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION`S Environmental and Cultural Department -v 1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95691 Phone (916) 373-3710 July 14, 2017 Kevin Madden Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 sent via e-mail: khadden@ocsd.com Re: SCH# 2016111031, Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project, Community of Newport Beach; Orange County, California Dear Mr. Hadden: The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project referenced above. The review included the Introduction and Project Description, and the Environmental Analysis, section 5.4 Cultural Resources, and section 5.12 Tribal Cultural Resources prepared by Duke C R M and Michael Baker Z 1 International For the Orange County Sanitation District. We have the following concerns: 1. There are no mitigation measures specifically addressing Tribal Cultural Resources separately. Mitigation measures must take Tribal Cultural Resources into consideration as required under AB-52, with or without consultation occurring. Mitigation language for archaeological resources is not always appropriate for or similar to measures specifically for handling Tribal Cultural Resources. For sample mitigation measures, please refer to the 2-2 California Natural Resources Agency (2016) "Final Text for tribal cultural resources update to Appendix G: Environmental Checklist Form," http:llresources-ca.gov/cega/docs/ab52/Clean-final-AB-52-App-G-text-Submi"go.pdt The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)', specifically Public Resources Code section 21084.1, states that a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment If there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before a lead agency, that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report (EIR) shall he prepared. In order to determine whether a project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, a lead agency will need to determine whether there are historical resources with the area of project effect (APE). CEQA was amended in 2014 by Assembly BI11 52. (AB 52).' AB 52 applies to any project for which a notice of preparation or a notice of negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration is filed on or after July 1, 2015. AB 52 created a separate category for "tribal cultural resources"5, that now includes "a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environments Public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource-7 Your project may also be subject to Senate Bill 18 (SB 18) (Burton, Chapter 905. Statutes of 2004), Government Code 65352.3, if it also involves the adoption of or amendment to a general plan or a specific plan, or the designation or proposed designation of open space- Both SB 18 and AB 52 have tribal consultation requirements. Additionally, if your project is also subject to the federal National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.) (NEPA), the tribal consultation requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 19664 may also apply. Consult your legal counsel about compliance with AB 52 and SB 18 as well as compliance with any other applicable laws. Agencies should be aware that AB 52 does not preclude agencies from initiating tribal consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with their jurisdictions before the timeframes provided in AB 52, For that reason, we urge you to continue to request Native American Tribal Consultation Lists and Sacred Lands File searches from the NAHC- The request forms can be found online at: http:llnahc-ca._gov/resourcesYtorms/. Additional information regarding AB 52 can be found online ' Pub- Resources Code § 21000 et seq- z Pub. Resources Code § 21484-1; Cal- Cade Regs-, 111.14, § 15064,5 (b); CEQA Guidelines Section 15064-5 (b) Pub. Resources Code § 21080 (d); Cai. Code Regs-, tit- 14. § 1b064 subd.(a)(1); CLUA Guidelines § 15064 (a)(1) Government Code 65352.3 s Pub- Resources Code § 21074 s Pub. Resources Cade § 21084.2 ' Pub. Resources Code § 21084.3 (a) 8 154 U-S.C- 300101. 36 C-F.R. § 800 et seq 23 at http://nahe.ca.gov/wo-content/uploads/2015/10/AB52TribalConsultation CalEPAPDF pdf, entitled "Tribal Consultation Under AB 52: Requirements and Best Practices". The NAHC recommends lead agencies consult with all California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of your proposed project as early as possible in order to avoid inadvertent discoveries of Native American human remains and best protect tribal cultural resources. A brief summary of portions of AB 52 and SB 18 as well as the NAHC's recommendations for conducting cultural resources assessments is also attached. Please contact me at gayle.totton@nahc.ca.gov or call (916) 373-3710 if you have any questions Sincerely, �41 � ey.le2ttor. B.S., M.A., Ph.Q ciate overnmental Project Analyst Attachment cc: State Clearinghouse 2-3 Pertinent. StptgJQry IRformatlon: Under AS 52. AB 52 has added to CFQA the additional requirements listed below, along with many other requirements: Within fourteen (14) days of determining that an application for a project is complete or of a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, a lead agency shall provide formal notification to a designated contact of, or tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice. A lead agency shall begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving a request for consultation from a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project-9 and prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration or environmental Impact report. For purposes of AB 52, "consultation shall have the same meaning as provided in Gov. Code § 65352.4 (Se 18)." The following topics of consultation, if a tribe requests to discuss them, are mandatory topics of consultation: a. Alternatives to the project. b. Recommended mitigation measures. c. Significant effects.' 1. The following topics are discretionary topics of consultation: a. Type of environmental review necessary. b. Significance of the tribal cultural resources. c. Significance of the project's impacts on tribal cultural resources. If necessary, project alternatives or appropriate measures for preservation or mitigation that the tribe may recommend to the lead agency. 11 With some exceptions, any information, including but not limited to, the location, description, and use of tribal cultural resources submitted by a California Native American tribe during the environmental review process shall not be Included in the environmental document or otherwise disclosed by the lead agency or any other public agency to the public, consistent with Government Code sections 6254 (r) and 6254.10. Any information submitted by a California Native American tribe during the consultation or environmental review process shall be published in a confidential appendix to the environmental document unless the tribe that provided the information consents, in writing, to the disclosure of some or all of the information to the public." ff a project may have a significant impact on a tribal cultural resource, the lead agency's environmental document shall discuss both of the following: a. Whether the proposed project has a significant impart on an identified tribal cultural resource. b. Whether feasible alternatives or mitigation measures, including those measures that may be agreed to pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21082.3, subdivision (a), avoid or substantially lessen the impact on the identified tribal cultural resource.14 Consultation with a tribe shall be considered concluded when either of the following occurs: a. The parties agree to measures to mitigate or avoid a significant effect, if a significant effect exists, on a tribal cultural resource; or b. A party, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached.15 Any mitigation measures agreed upon in the consultation conducted pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2 shall be recommended for inclusion in the environmental document and in an adopted mttigation monitoring and reporting program, if determined to avoid or lessen the impact pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21082.3, subdivision (h), paragraph 2, and shall be fully enforceable. "' If mitigation measures recommended by the staff of the lead agency as a result of the consultation process are not included in the environmental document or if there are no agreed upon mitigation measures at the conclusion of consultation, or if consultation does not occur, and if substantial evidence demonstrates that a project will cause a significant effect to a tribal cultural resource, the lead agency shall consider feasible mitigation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21084.3 (b).17 An environmental impact report may not be certlfled, nor may a mitigated negative declaration or a negative declaration be adopted unless one of the following occurs: a. The consultation process between the tribes and the lead agency has occurred as provided in Public Resources Code sections 2108D.3.1 and 21080.3.2 and concluded pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2. b. The tribe that requested consultation failed to provide comments to the lead agency or otherwise failed to engage in the consultation process. s Pula. Resources Coda § 21080.3.1, subds. (d) and (e) ° Pub Resources Code § 21080.3.1 (b) 1i Pub_ Resources Code § 21(18G-3.2 (ay 12 Pub. Resources Code § 21080.3.2 (a) "Pub_ Resouroes Cade § 23082.3 (c)(1) d Pub. Resources Code § 21082.3 (b) 5 Pub. Resources Code § 21080.3.2 (b) Pub_ Resources Code § 21082.3 (a) " Pub. Resources Code § 21082.3 (e) 2-4 c. The lead agency provided notice of the project to the tribe in compliance with Public Resources Code section 210t30.3.1 (d) and the tribe failed to request consultation within 30 days.19 This process should be documented in the Tribal Cultural Resources section of your environmental document. Under SB 18: Government Code § 65352.3 (a) (1) requires consultation with Native Americans on general plan proposals for the purposes of "preserving or mitigating impacts to places, features, and objects described § 5097.9 and § 5091.993 of the Public Resources Code that are located within the city or county's jurisdiction. Govemment Code § 65560 (a), (b), and (c) provides far consultation with Native American tribes on the open -space element of a county or city general plan for the purposes of protecting places, features, and objects described in Sections 5097.9 and 5097.993 of the Public Resources Code. • SS 18 appfie s to local governments and requires them to contact, provide notice to, refer plans to, and consult with tribes prior to the adoption or amendment of a general plan or a specific plan, or the designation of open space. Local governments should consult the Governor's Office of Planning and Research's "Tribal Consultation Guidelines," which can be found online at: https:/Avww.opr.ca.gov/docs/09_14 05 Updated -Guidelines 922.pdf • Tribal Consultation: If a local government considers a proposal to adopt or amend a general plan or a specific plan, or to designate open space it is required to contact the appropriate tribes identified by the NAHC by requesting a "Tribal Consultation List." If a tribe, once contacted, requests consultation the local government must consult with the tribe on the plan proposal. A tribe has 90 days from the date of receipt of notification to request consultation unless a shorter timeframe has been agreed to by the tribe.le • There is no Statutory Time Limit on Tribal Consultation under the law. • Confidentiality: Consistent with the guidelines developed and adopted by the Office of Planning and Research,20 the city or county shall protect the confidentiality of the information concerning the specific identity, location, character, and use of places, features and objects described in Public Resources Code sections 50 97. 9 and 5097.993 that are within the city's or county's jurisdiction.21 • Conclusion Tribal Consultation: Consultation should be concluded at the point in which: o The parties to the consultation come to a mutual agreement concerning the appropriate measures for preservation or mitigation; or o Either the local government or the tribe, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached concerning the appropriate measures of preservation or mitigation.22 NAHC Recommendations for Cultural Resources Assessments: Contact the NAHC for: o A Sacred Lands File search. Remember that tribes do not always record their sacred sites in the Sacred Lands File, nor are they required to do so. A Sacred Lands File search is not a substitute for consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project's APE. o A Native American Tribal Contact List of appropriate tribes for consultation concerning the project site and to assist in planning for avoidance, preservation in place, or, failing both, mitigation measures. The request form can be found at http://nahc.ca.gov/resourcestforms/. Contact the appropriate regional California Historical Research Information System (CHRIS) Center (hltp://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?paue_id=1058) for an archaeological records search. The records search will determine: v If part or the entire APE has been previously surveyed for cultural resources. a If any known cultural resources have been already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE- * If the probability is low, moderate, or high that cultural resources are located in the APE. o If a survey is required to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present. If an archaeological inventory survey is required, the final stage is the preparation of a professional report detailing the findings and recommendations of the records search and field survey. o The final report containing site forms, site significance, and mitigation measures should be submitted immediately to the planning department. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum and not be made available for public disclosure. o The final written report should be submitted within 3 months after work has been completed to the appropriate regional CHRIS center. 1B Pub. Resources Code § 21082.3 (d) 1e (Gov. Code § 65352.3 (a)(2)). p pursuant to Gov. Code section 65040.2, 21 (Gov. Code § 65352.3 (b)). (Tribal Consultation Guidelines, Governor's Office of Planning and Research (2005) at p. 18). 4 2-4 examples of Mitigation Measures That May Be Considered to Avoid or Minimize Significant Adverse Irnpots to Tdi Cultural Resources: a Avoidance and preservatlon of the resources in place, including, but not limited to: ■ Planning and construction to avoid the resources and protect the cultural and natural context. ■ Planning greenspace, parks, or other open space, to incorporate the resources with culturally appropriate protection and management criteria. c Treating the resource with culturally appropriate dignity, taking into account the tribal cultural values and meaning of the resource, including, but not limited to, the following: ■ Protecting the cuitural character and integrity of the resource. ■ Protecting the traditional use of the resource. ■ Protecting the confidentiality of the resource. c Permanent conservation easements or other interests in real property, with culturally appropriate management criteria for the purposes of preserving or utilizing the resources or places. o Please note that a federally recognized California Native American tribe or a non -federally recognized California Native American tribe that is on the contact list maintained by the NAHC to protect a California prehistoric, archaeological; cultural, spiritual, or ceremonial place may acquire and mold conservation easements if the conservation easement is voluntarily conveyed. a Please note that it is the policy of the state that Native American remains and associated grave artifacts shall be repairiated.24 The lack of surface evidence of archaeological resources (including tribal cultural resources) does not preclude their subsurface existence. o Lead agencies should_ include in their mitigation and monitoring reporting program plan provisions for the identification and evaluation of inadvertent) discovered archaeological resources.25 In areas of identified archaeological sensitivity, a certified archaeologist and a culturally affiliated Native American with knowledge of cultural resources should monitor all ground -disturbing activities. o Lead agencies should Include in their mitigation and monitoring mporting_12mgram plans provisions for the disposition of recovered cultural items that are not burial associated in consultation with culturally affiliated dative Americans. o Lead agencies should include in their mitigation and monitoring reporyngprogram plans provisions for the treatment gngi dlspo ition of inadvertentIy discovered Native American human remains. Health and Safety Code section 7050.5, Public Resources Cade section 5097.98, and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, section 15064.5, subdivislons (d) and (e) (CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5, subds. (d) and (e)) address the processes to be tollowed in the event of an inadvertent discovery of any Native American human remains and associated grave goods in a location other than a dedicated cemetery- 2'(CM Code § 015.3 (c)). za (Pub. Resources Code § 5097,991). par Cal. Codo Hegs., tit. 14, sectior1 15064.5(f) (C EQA (iuKlatines section 15064.50)). 5 2-4 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 2 Gayle Totton, B.S., M.A., Ph.D., Associate Governmental Project Analyst Native American Heritage Commission July 14, 2017 2-1 This is an introductory comment outlining the items reviewed by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 2-2 The comment indicates that there are no mitigation measures specifically addressing Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). Based on Section 5.12, Tribal Cultural Resources, of the DEIR, based on the cultural resources investigation, the findings of the records search and field survey, and the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) consultation process, OCSD has determined that no TCRs are known to exist on the project site. However, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 was included to minimize impacts in the event unknown TCRs are discovered during on -site ground disturbing activities. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 includes provisions related to the identification of TCRs and protocol to be followed in the event TCRs are discovered. As such, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 was determined to be sufficient to minimize impacts in this regard to a less than significant level (minor editorial revisions to CUL-1 are noted below to provide clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process). Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure CUL-1 on DEIR page 5.4-16 have been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure CUL- 1 has been revised as follows: CUL-1 Prior to ground -disturbing activities, a qualified archaeologist shall provide an Archaeological Monitoring Protocol Plan for the project. The archaeologist shall provide training to a Contractor's Representative regarding the Archaeological Monitoring Protocol Plan and the identification of archaeological resources. The training shall be open to Native American tribal representative(s), to assist the Contractor's Representative in identifying potential tribal cultural resources. The plan shall identify procedures for the event that potential resources are discovered by the Construction Contractor. If evidence of potential subsurface archaeological resources is found during site disturbance/excavation activities, these activities shall cease within 50 feet of that area and the construction contractor shall contact the Orange County Sanitation District Resident L'ngiffeef. Construction activities shall be allowed to continue in other areas of the site. The Resident Engineer shall then retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the discovery prior to resuming grading/construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find. If warranted, the archaeologist shall collect the resource, and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of the significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resource), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. Final . December 2017 2-14 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project If the archaeologist determines that the find is prehistoric or includes Native American materials, affiliated Native American groups shall be invited to contribute to the assessment and recovery of the resource, as applicable. The archaeologist and any applicable Native American contacts shall collect the resource and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resources), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines shall be followed. Work within the area of discovery shall resume only after the resource has been appropriately inventoried, documented, and recovered, as applicable. 2-3 This comment discusses CEQA requirements pertaining to historical resources, AB 52, and Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), as well as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) guidelines pertaining to tribal consultation requirements. The project is not subject to the requirements of SB 18 or NEPA. As noted within Section 5.12, of the DEIR, OCSD fully complied with the requirements of AB 52 during preparation of the DEIR. 2-4 This comment provides a brief summary of portions of AB 52 and SB 18 and NAHC's recommendation for conducting cultural resources assessments, and does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. Final . December 2017 2-15 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-16 Responses to Comments Matthew Rodriquez Secretary for Environmental Protection July 11, 2017 Department of Toxic Substances Contro Barbara A. Lee, Director 5796 Corporate Avenue Cypress, California 90630 Mr. Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 khaddenaocsd.com & CEQA(a7ocsd.om COMMENT LETTER 3 Edmund G. Brawn Jr. Governor DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT (SCH# 2016111031) Dear Mr. Hadden: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has reviewed the subject EIR. The following project description is stated in the EIR: "Locally, the project site includes sewer pump station improvements located within a property located at 300 East Coast Highway. The project also includes sewer force main improvements that would extend from the proposed pump station, proceed westerly beneath the Newport Bay Channel to a disturbed area within the southern portion of Castaways Park, and extend south beneath West Coast Highway to connect to the existing Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) force main system; refer to Exhibit 3-2, Site Vicinity." Based on the review of the submitted document DTSC has the following comments - The EIR states, "As noted in Section 5.7.1, Existing Environmental Setting, elevated levels of DDT/DDE pesticide contamination have been reported in the Newport Bay Channel. However, these contaminates are anticipated to be present in topsoils along the channel as a result of deposition. As such, proposed HDDlmicrotunneling force main crossing beneath the Newport Bay Channel would occur in deeper soils and is not anticipated to involve these contaminated topsoils." However, the EIR states, "The proposed pump station site is entirely disturbed, and is currently occupied by RV storage facilities and a driveway providing access to the facility." DTSC recommends investigation and mitigation, as necessary, to address potential impact to human health and environment from residual pesticides. 31 32 0 Printed on Recycled Paoer Mr. Kevin Hadden July 11, 2017 Page 2 2. The EIR further states a number of facilities in the vicinity of the project site that have been known to handle, store, and/or transport hazardous materials, especially gasoline. DTSC is unable to evaluate whether vapor sampling and/or potential vapor intrusion risk was adequately addressed due to lack of relevant detailed information in the EIR. DTSC recommends soil gas sampling and vapor intrusion risk evaluation on sites with releases of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). 3. If Pump Station Electrical Room or Pump Station Generator Facility currently exist on the project site, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination related to transformers may be a possibility. DTSC recommends evaluation, proper investigation and mitigation, if necessary, on onsite areas with current or historic PCB -containing transformers. 4. If soil contamination is suspected or observed in the project area, then excavated soil should be sampled prior to export/disposal. If the soil is contaminated, it should be disposed of properly in accordance with all applicable and relevant laws and regulations. In addition, if the project proposes to import soil to backfill the excavated areas, proper evaluation and/or sampling should be conducted to make sure that the imported soil is free of contamination. 5. If during construction/demolition of the project, soil and/or groundwater contamination is suspected, construction/demolition in the area should cease and appropriate health and safety procedures should be implemented. If it is determined that contaminated soil and/or groundwater exist, the EIR should identify how any required investigation and/or remediation will be conducted, and the appropriate government agency to provide regulatory oversight. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (714) 484-5380 or email at Johnson.Abraham(cDdtsc.ca.gov. Sincerely, Johnson P. Abraham Project Manager Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation Branch Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress kl/sh/ja cc: See next page_ 33 3-4 3-5 M 3i Mr. Kevin Hadden July 11, 2017 Page 3 cc: Governor's Office of Planning and Research (via e-mail) State Clearinghouse P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812-3044 State.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov Mr. Dave Kereazis (via e-mail) Office of Planning & Environmental Analysis Department of Toxic Substances Control Dave. Ke_reazisa-d_tsc. ca. gov Mr. Shahir Haddad, Chief (via e-mail) Schools Evaluation and Brownfields Cleanup Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress Shah ir. H addad(cOtsc. ca.gov CEQA# 2016111031 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 3 Johnson P. Abraham, Project Manager, Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation Branch, Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress Department of Toxic Substances Control July 11, 2017 3-1 This is an introductory comment with a brief project description. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 3-2 The commenter suggests that the topsoil at the proposed pump station site could have residual pesticides, since the DEIR identifies it along the channel. Based on the Back Bay Landing Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), sediment within the bay reported elevated levels of dichlorodiphenyl trichloroethane (DDT) and dichlorodiphenyl dichloroethylene (DDE) pesticide contamination. This material is anticipated to come from upstream sources that have resulted in runoff and transport of sediment to the project site through the Newport Bay Channel. The proposed pump station site is located outside of the channel's ordinary high water mark and is not anticipated to involve this channel deposit material. Further, the pump station site was not historically developed with agricultural or other uses associated with the potential application of DDT/DDE-related pesticides. Thus, the pesticide contamination is limited to the Newport Bay Channel and not the pump station site. 3-3 This comment indicated that there is potential for release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and vapor encroachment at the project site due to reported contamination in the project vicinity. However, the DEIR Section 5.7, Ha,-ards and Hazardous Materials, does consider potential off -site sources to impact soil gas at the project site. The DEIR identifies the following off -site facilities, which have been known to handle, store, and/or transport hazardous materials: • Mobil #18HGK 301 CoastHighway: The facility adjoins the project site to the southeast across East Coast Highway. This off -site property released gasoline to the groundwater. However, this facility received case closure by the Regional Water Quality Control Board on July 28, 2005. Further, the Back Bay Landing Phase I ESA indicated that groundwater direction was to the west-southwest (away from the proposed pump station site). Groundwater contamination remained at the site upon receiving case closure, including methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) at 224 parts per million (ppm). However, the plume was reported to be stable and limited to the area beneath the facility and a portion of Bayside Drive, to the south of East Coast Highway (which is greater than 200 feet from the proposed pump station). According to the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB's) online database (GeoTracker), confirmation soil borings and sampling were conducted in 2003 and (according to the assessment results) concentrations of contamination in the soil were not present that would warrant a vapor hazard survey. Thus, this off -site facility is not anticipated to present a vapor encroachment concern. Final . December 2017 2-20 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project X"ort Beach Cars LLC, 445 East Coast Highwq : The facility is located approximately 380 feet to the southeast of the project site. This off -site property released gasoline to the groundwater. The Back Bay Landing Phase I ESA indicated that groundwater direction was to the southwest (cross gradient from the proposed pump station site) and that contaminant concentrations at the facility are low. According to the GeoTracker database, a Plume Time Travel report (prepared on October 20, 2005, and updated on September 1, 2006 and January 10, 2008) estimated the plume to be approximately 100 feet long by 20 feet wide. The model demonstrated a maximum plume distance of 100 to 150 feet from the source area by the year 2012, and predicted that the contamination migration would not extend offsite. This facility received case closure by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) on November 22, 2010. With the project site more than 380 feet away and assuming that vapor does not typically travel further than 100 feet from the edge -of -plume, this off -site release has not resulted in a vapor encroachment concern to the proposed pump station site. FormerARCO Service Station Site, 200 Coast Hi bwa : The facility is situated off -site to the west of the project site (at 200 West Coast Highway). This off -site property released gasoline to the groundwater. According to the GeoTracker database, this site achieved case closure by the RWQCB on May 5,1998. Based on the Back Bay Landing Phase I ESA historical aerials, the facility is located at the northwest corner of West Coast Highway and Dover Drive. Given the distance of the facility from the proposed pump station site (greater than 1,500 feet cross -gradient), this off -site release has not resulted in a vapor encroachment concern to the proposed pump station site. Shell Oil (Formerj, 990 Coast Highayaj: The facility is located approximately 0.47-mile southeast of the project site. Based on the distance of this facility to the proposed pump station site (greater than 0.45 mile), this off -site release has not resulted in a vapor encroachment concern to the proposed pump station site. 3-4 This comment indicates a possibility of polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination due to the presence of on -site transformers. Based on the Back Bay Landing Phase I ESA, PCB was not observed on, or around, the project site, including the existing pump station facility. Several dry transformers, free of internal cooling fluids, were observed on -site and had no indications of leaks or spills. PCB -containing equipment is not anticipated with regard to the existing pump station facility. 3-5 This comment discusses the proper sampling and disposal of contaminated soil. No soil import/export is proposed as part of the grading activities for the pump station site. Proposed drilling activities would involve channel materials. The DEIR Mitigation Measures HAZ-3 and HAZ-4 are recommended to reduce impacts regarding potential contaminated channel materials prior to disposal. Thus, as concluded in the DEIR, impacts regarding contaminated soils as a result of soil import/export would be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of the recommended mitigation. 3-6 As discussed on DEIR page 5.7-14, site disturbance and demolition activities could expose construction workers to a variety of unknown hazardous materials. However, Mitigation Measure HAZ-4 would reduce potential impacts from unknown hazardous materials that Final . December 2017 2-21 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE could result in accidental conditions at the project site. If unknown wastes or suspect materials are discovered during construction by the contractor, which he/she believes may involve hazardous wastes/materials, the contractor would be required to complete the following (Mitigation Measure HAZ-4): • Immediately stop work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, removing workers and the public from the area; • Notify the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Engineering; • Secure the areas as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Engineering; and • Notify the Orange County Health Care Agency's Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator. 3-7 This comment is a closing statement providing contact information for questions. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-22 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 4 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ❑ISTRICT 12 1750 EAST FOURTH STREET, SUITE 100 SANTA ARIA, CA 92705 PHONE (657) 328-6267 FAX (657) 328-6510 TTY 711 www.dot.ca.go►+ August 4, 2017 Mr. Kevin Hadden Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA f92708 Dear Mr. Hadden, Making Con.servarion a California Way of Life. File: IGRICEQA SCH#: 2016111031 12-ORA-2017-00621 SR 1 Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the review of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the proposed Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project. The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability. The project consists of upgrading the Bay Bridge Pump station, Newport Bay Channel, and West 4-1 Coast Highway crossing force main improvements to design and reliability standards. The project is located between Dover Drive and Bayside Drive in the City of Newport Beach and in proximity of Caltrans Right -of -Way (ROW) on State Route 1 (SR 1). Caltrans is a responsible agency and has the following comments: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 1Stormwater 1. Section 3 of the DEIR states that a Caltrans Encroachment Permit will be required for work that encroaches or discharges onto State right of way. A Waster Quality Management Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required for Caltrans 4 2 review prior to encroachment permit approval. For specific details for Encroachment Permits procedure, please refer to the Caltrans' Encroachment Permits Manual at: http://www.dot-ca.gov/hg/traffops/developsenv Mrmitsl 2. Due to the close proximity of the project to the Newport Channel, a separate dewatering permit may be needed from. the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Groundwater extraction and similar waste discharges from construction, remediation, and 4.3 permanent groundwater extraction projects to surface waters are regulated under the general permit, Order No. R8-2007-0041, NPDES No. CAG918002, as amended by Order No. R8-2009-0045. 3. Please be advised that Caltrans Encroachment Permit prohibits the discharge of groundwater onto State facilities. 4-4 "Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and livability" Orange County Sanitation District August 4, 2017 Page 2 Please continue to coordinate with Caltrans for any future developments that could potentially impact State transportation facilities. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact 4-5 Maryam Molavi at (657) 328-6280 or mar_yam_molavi(ddot.ca.gov. Sincerely, 7'�a t n a Kwan, AICP Branch hief, Regional-IGR-Transit Planning District "Provide a safe, sustainable, Integraled and efficient transportation system to enhance California's economy and ltvability" �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 4 Yatman Kwan, AICP, Branch Chief, Regional-IGR-Transit Planning State of California Department of Transportation District 12 August 4, 2017 4-1 This is an introductory comment with a brief project description. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 4-2 This comment acknowledges the inclusion of the required Caltrans Encroachment Permit in the DEIR. The commenter states that a Water Quality Management Plan and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is required for Caltrans review prior to Encroachment Permit approval and provides a link to the Caltrans' Encroachment Permits Manual for more details regarding Encroachment Permits procedures. OCSD would adhere to the Caltrans Encroachment Permit approval requirements. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. 4-3 This comment discusses the potential requirement of a separate dewatering permit due to the close proximity of the project to the Newport Channel. The project requires a General Construction Permit through the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board as required under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ [as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-006-DWQ], NPDES Number CAS000002). Section 5.7, Ha,-ards and Hazardous Materials, page 5.7-13 of the DEIR discusses potential impacts related to dewatering. As stated in the DEIR, the General Construction Permit would ensure that any harmful pollutants or hazardous materials contained within the Newport Bay Channel would be properly handled and disposed of to prevent unsafe exposure to construction workers. Thus, compliance with General Construction Permit would reduce a potential dewatering impact to a less than significant level. 4-4 This comment states that the Caltrans Encroachment Permit prohibits the discharge of groundwater onto State facilities. The Caltrans Encroachment Permit process would ensure that all permit approval requirements are met. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. 4-5 This comment is a closing statement requesting continued coordination with Caltrans for future developments that could impact State transportation facilities and provides contact information for questions. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. Thus, no further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-25 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-26 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 5 CITY OF NEWPORT REACH 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 949 644-3200 newportbeachca.gov/communitydevelopment August 4, 2017 Via Electronic & Regular Marl khadden(a-)ocsd.com Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Re: Comments on Public Review Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project Dear Mr. Hadden, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Public Review Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project (the "Project"). 5-1 The City of Newport Beach ("City") submits the following comments: 1. Project Description a. The project description does not include the gravity sewer construction on East Coast Highway adjacent to the Balboa Marina West property. This construction would significantly impact traffic flow on Coast Highway and could necessitate nighttime work, thus resulting in noise impacts to adjacent residences. The City does not support this project component due these impacts. Relocation of this construction to the south and outside of the Coast Highway right-of-way would significantly reduce these potential impacts. 2. Mitigation Measures a. AES-2: Revise Mitigation Measure language to accurately reflect approval process. As currently written, it states that the pump station plans shall be submitted to City for review, but approval is required by OCSD Director in consideration of comments received from City. However, the pump station is located in the Back Bay Landing Planned Community Zoning District, 5-Z I-V 011 which requires review and approval of Site Development Review permit by 5 5 the City's Planning Commission. b. AES-4: Lighting Plan will require review and approval by the City through the required Site Development Review permit.-4 c. N-1: Revise Mitigation Measure language "City" instead of "Town". ! 5-5 d. TRA-1: The Construction Management Plan will also require review and approval by Caltrans for closures and impacts to their jurisdictional roadways and by the City Public Works Department for road closures, staging, and impacts to City roadways. The Construction Management Plan needs to ensure bike trails remain open during construction or re-routed to ensure connectivity. 3. Page 2-8, the reference to Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PCDP) requires correction to the most current version (November 22, 2016) adopted and included with the City's certified Local Coastal Program (LCP) Implementation Plan. The Back Bay Landing PCDP included in the LCP is similar to the original version adopted by the City on February 25, 2014; however, there are slight changes, including the elimination of the 65-foot public view tower. Any reference to the PCDP should be the November 22, 2016 version. 4. Page 5.1-12, the building height limitation referenced as subsection b) describes a 65-foot height limit for a public view tower; however, that height limit allowance was eliminated from the final Back Bay Landing PCDP version adopted by the City as part of the LCP on November 22, 2016. Please revise height limit references to match the November 22, 2016 adopted version. 57 5-S 5. Page 5.1-13, the Architectural Theme Design Guidelines referenced is from the old PCDP version and has been revised as part of the final November 22, 2016 5-9 adopted version. Please use the most current version. Lower Castawa Lower Castaways is a 4-acre open space area owned by the City located at the northeast corner of West Coast Highway and Dover Drive. This site will be developed as a public park. Exhibit 3-4 (Conceptual Site Plan) and Exhibit 3-6 illustrate the force mains and temp pipe staging impacting a large portion of the City's Lower Castaways site, with the force mains running through the middle of the site. However, exhibit is not consistent with paragraph on Page 3-11 project description that states preferred location of force mains is on southern portion of the Lower Castaways site. 510 I a. The location of the force mains and pipe staging as illustrated on the exhibits is not acceptable to the City as it would severely encumber the site and limit future use of the site. b. Although the project description narrative acknowledges the City,s preferred location on the southern portion of the site, the DER does not analyze 510 potential biological impacts that could result from placing the force mains in that location. Environmental analysis must take into account potential impacts associated with constructing the force mains on the southern portion of the site. c. The City is not acceptable to utilizing Dover Drive for pipe staging and instead would request that Bayside Drive be utilized for pipe staging as that would result in less traffic impacts associated with road closures. The DER 511 should analyze potential environmental impacts associated with the alternative pipe staging area and illustrate on an exhibit. 2. Force Main Improvements (Page 3-12) description states that work would occur within existing disturbed area and pipe staging would occur along Bayside Drive. 512 The work area described and shown on Exhibit would preclude use of the entire site for any other purpose during construction. Cumulative Projects List The cumulative project list included in Table 4-1 (Page 4-2) is out of date and includes projects that have been denied, including AutoNation and 150 Newport Center ❑r. Also, other projects listed as under construction are complete, such as Santa Barbara Condos, Newport Marina ETCO, Newport Beach Country Club. The most current version is attached. Biological Resources Analysis Table 5.3-1 includes policy analysis related to potential biological impacts, concluding that since the project would not affect ESA or ESHA, no survey/analysis would be required. However, as discussed in the project description, the City preferred force main alignment is to be located as closely as possible to the southernmost edge of the Lower Castaways site. That portion of the property is currently vegetated. A biological assessment shall be conducted to ensure potential biological impacts are adequately avoided or mitigated. The policy analysis should be updated to reflect the additional analysis. 513 544 Land Use and Relevant Planning On Page 5.9-8, the second paragraph of LCP summary is outdated. The LCP was certified by the California Coastal Commission on January 13, 2017 and become effective on January 31, 2017. The City's certified LCP will be the standard of review for the coastal development permit. Transportation/Traffic 1. Construction related traffic impacts associated with staging and pipe stringing is discussed related to Dover Drive; however, the City preferred location for pipe stringing is to occur on Bayside Drive. Therefore, please include an alternative analysis of potential construction related impacts on Bayside Drive related to pipe stringing. 515 516 2. East Coast Highway is incorrectly referenced as Pacific Coast Highway throughout the document. The highway is East Coast Highway east of the bridge and West Coast 517 Highway west of the bridge. 3. Pages 1-2, 2-14, 3-2, required permits from the City include a Site Development Review permit for the construction of the pump station. The Site Development 5-18 Review Permit requires Planning Commission approval. Please feel free to contact me at (949) 644-3232 or PAlfordenewportbeachca.gov if you have 5 ,19 any questions. Sincerely, Patrick J. Alford Planning Program Manager Attachment: Cumulative Projects List Cumulative Projects List This list has three parts: Reasonably Foreseeable Projects, CIP (Capital Improvements Program) Reasonably Foreseeable Projects, and Approved Projects Reasonably Foreseeable Discretionary Projects with CEQA review or Traffic Study: Legend: Projects Pending Coastal Commission Review Project Proposed Land UseFdProject Description Location DeterminatioWStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner A conditional use permit, minor site development review, tentative tract ■ Coastal Development map, and coastal development permit Permit No. CD2017-D25 to demolish an existing 9,%2-square- • Site Development and foot commercial building and Construct Application submitted on March 9, Permit Na PerNa. SD2D17- Makana Ullman Sail Lofts a new mixed -use structure with 1,171 d10 and 4i2 291n Street Class incomplete status. Anticipated D03 (PA2017-059) square feet of retail moor area and one Class 32 CEOA Exemption. . Conditional Use Permit Nova 2,347 square foot dwehling unit on Lot No. UP2017-D05 17 and construct three residential a Tract Map No. NT2017- dwelling units ranging from 2,484 D01 (County Tentative square feet to 2,515 square feet over Parcel Map No. 16108) Lots 18 and 19, Newport Pointes A Site Development Review for the development of a mixed -use residential project consisting of 350 rental units 1701 Corinthian Way, 4251, Application submitted on May 31, ■ Site Development Review and 7.500 square feet of retail use on a 4253 & 4255 Martingale Way, 2017. Under review for application No. SD2017-004 Rosalinh 5.7-acre property known as MacArthur 420D, 4220 & 4250 Scott Completeness. Anticipated EIR and . Tentative Tract Map No. Ung Square. The application includes requests for building height adjustment Drive and 1660 Dave Street Traffic Study (TBDj NT2017-002 and a Tentative Tract Map for future condominium purposes. Rev- 2017-06-13-ru F:V lx eVCpp gne edWdm MP. m ❑ y epn CEOP Gmule np_P gJ.p_Li. pumulel m� a eW Cu rentd— ur N G Project Proposed Land UseslProject Location DeterminationlStatus Disrretionary Actions Project Description Planner Harbor Pointe General Plan Amendment, Planned a General Plan Senior Living Community Text Amendment, Amendment No. (PA2015-210) Conditional Use Permit, and Major Site GP2015-004 Development Review for a new a Planned Community approximately 90,000-square-foot Scoping meeting held on August 15, Text Amendment No. convalescent and congregate rare 201& Project being revisited and PD2015-006 Benjamin facility with 121 beds (about 108 care 101 Bayview Place redesigned by appica nl1developer. Site Development Zdeha units). As proposed, the facility will be EIR preparation on hold as of June 6, developed with one level of 2017_ Review No. SD2015-007 subterranean parking and four levels of a Conditional Use Permit Irving area. The project site is currently No. UP2015-047 developed with a sini restaurant a Mitigated Negative and supporting surface parking area. Declaration Benjamin zdeba Little Corona Final MND adopted on March 22. a Mitigated Negative Infiltration (PA2015- Installation of a diversion and infiltration Little Corona Beach 2016. Project is on hold due to Declaration John 096) (15X14) device an a public beach area. difficulties presented at Coastal a Capital Improvement Kappeler, Commission review. Program. City Council Public Works a Planned Community Development Plan Amendment ■ Site Development Plan . Transfer of Koll Newport Development of mixed use residential Application submitted and deemed Development Right Rosalinh Residential of up to 260 units, 3,000 sf.. retail and 4400 Von Karman Ave. complete. EIR preparation is a Traffic Study (PA2015-024j one -acre park. underway_ a Tentative Tract Map Ling a Development Agreement a Environmental Impact Report Rev! 2017-06-13-ru F'WNf61CD0�SMrcEKdmInWYMXny_nnAYon�CEUA+AumaNlw_PloJed_LiMCurtMuiVf�roJWe curcantaocx w AI C Project Proposed Land tlsesfPro)eCt Description Location DeterminationlStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner • General Plan Amendment • Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment Demolition of an existing one-story, • Zoning Code Amendment (Zone 26,219 square foot commercial building Change) and a 55-space subterranean parking • Planned Community garage; and the construction of a Development Plan 70,295 square -foot, 4-story ocean Adoption literacy facility located on the 600 East • Transfer Development Bay parcel; removal of a 63- metered 600 East Bay, 209 Allocation ExplcpDcean space surface parking lot (aka: Palm Washington Street, 600 and Application submitted 0412212014. On . Site Development Rasalinh (PA2014-069) Street Parking Ii located on the 209 608 Balboa Avenue, and 200 hold per applicant's request. Review . Conditional Use Permit Ung Washington Street, 600 and 608 Palm . Traffic Study pursuant to Balboa Avenue, and 200 Palm parcels City's Traff€c Phasing and the construction of a 31 Ordinance (TPO) 141,000 square foot, 5-level off -site Tentative Parcel Map parking structure; and a 6,500 square and Alley Vacation footage Floating classroom to be located • Harbor Development on the waterside of the project, Permit • Coastal Development Permit (by California Coastal Commission) . Environmental Impact Report Rev: 2017-01 F ipepff'.CUpIShm•QrWmin,p��nn�np_pros;cmpEpA+CumuYAire_Progecl_L:alkumukltire-praJxm_wrcanl.aocx Project Proposed Land UseslProject Location DeterminationIStatus Discretionary Actions Project Description Planner . General Plan Amendment, Coastal Land Use Plan Request for legislative approvals to Amendment. Code accommodate the future redevelopment The project was approved by City Amendment, Planned of a portion of the property with a Council on February 11. 2014. The Community mixed -use waterfront project. The 300 E. Coast Highway Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment Development Plan, Lot Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan Generally located at the for the project was approved by the Line Adjustment, Traffic Jaime (PA2011-218) would allow for the development of a northwesterly corner of east California Coastal Commission on Study, and Murillo new enclosed dry stack boat storage Coast Highway and Bayside December 10, 2015 Environmental Impact facility for 140 boats. 61,534 square Drive Site Development Review and Report —approved feet of visitor -serving retail and Coastal Development Permit . CLUP Amendment recreational marine facilities, and up to anticipated to be filed in 2018. approved 49 attached residential units. . Site Development Review B Coastal Development Permit required City of Newport Beach Public Access Balboa Marina and Transient Docks and Expansion of ISIMND was approved by City • ISIMND Expansion Balboa Marina Council on November 25. 2014. SDR . Site Development (PA2012-1Q3j 201 E. Coast Highway and CUP were approved by the City Review Patrick (PA2015-113) 24 boat slips in February 2016. The CDP was . Conditional Use Permit Alford 14.252 SF restaurant approved by the CCC in February CDP (Coastal • 664 SF marina restroom 2017 Commission) Project approved by the City ■ General Plan February 2014- Coastal Land Use Amendment Demolition of the approximately 20,500 720 West Bay Avenue, 800 Plan Amendment application • Coastal Land Use Plan Newport Harbor square foot yacht club facility and West Say Avenue, 711-721 withdrawn from California Coastal Amendment Jim Yacht Club construction of a new 23.163 square West Bay Avenue, and 710- Commission in September 2015, • Zoning Code Campbell (PA2012-091) foot facility. The yacht club use will 720 Balboa Boulevard Coastal Commission considers a Amendment remain on the subject property. Coastal Development Permit for the . Planned Development repiacement yacht club on Marchl0. Permit 2016. Under construction ■ Conditional Use Permit PC Development Plan A 275-room, 201,498-square-foot, hotel • Site Development on 14.3 acres. Amenities include a West side of the Newport Review Newport Dunes coffee shop, gift/sundry shop, business Dunes Resort Swimming APPlication incomplete. . Conditional Use Permit Patrick Hotel (PA2016-175) center, function rooms, spaMtness Lagoon at 1131 Back Bay . Coastal Development Alford facilities, restaurant, pool, tennis courts, Drive. Permit sand volleyball courts and picnic area. . Environmental Impact Report Rev_ 2017-06-13-ru F:wsersiCooVSn.re6V.dmmWlannng_oinvo�ICEoniCum�lewe_Projmt_Lise—muim—_prove &_wrrenl.do w 14 t' Project Proposed Land UseslProject Location DeterrninationlStatus Discretionary Actions Project Description Planner AELUP: Airport Environs Land Use Plan; COP: Coastal Development Permit; CUP: Conditional Use Permit; cy: cubic yards; DA: Development Agreement: DTSP: Downtown Specifx Plan: EIR: Environmental Impact Report; FAA: Federal Aviation Adminislratlon: GP& General Plan Amendment: gsC gross square feet; HOGS: Huntington Beach Generating Station; I- 405: Interstate 405 freeway; IBC, Irvine Business Complex: IS: Wiat Study: ITC: Irvine Technology Center: LAFCO: Local Agency Formatlan Commission; LCP: Local Coastal Program: MCAS: Marine Corps Air Station; MND: Mitigated Negative Declaration; ND: Negative Declaration; PA: Planning Area; PC: Planned Community; sf; squarefeet; SP7 Specific Plan: SR-73: State Route 73; TDR: transfer of development rights; TPM: Tentative Parcel Map; TTM: Tentative Tract Map; VTTM: Vesting Tentative Tract Map; ZC: Zone Change Rev' 2017-06-13-ru F:1Lfx CDDlSbar�m )Pranning_DeeWi lCEgA%CumuleWe_Prcpa _wrremktl� CIP Projects with CEQA review: Project Proposed Land Uses/Project Location Determinationlstatus Discretionary Project Description Planner Benjamin Zdeba Little Corona Final MND adapted an March 22. • Mitigated Negative Infiltration (PA2015 Installation of a diversion and infiltration Little Carona Beach 2016. Project is on hold due to Declaration John 096){75X14) device on a public beach area. difficulties presented at Coastal . Capital Improvement Kappeler, Commission review. Program, City Council Public Works Widens the westbound side of West . IS/Negative Declaration Coast Highway at Old Newport . Capital Improvement Old Newport Boulevard to accommodate a third Consultant was selected for project Program, City Council Patrick BIvd.NUest Coast through lane, a right turn pocket and a g 9 Intersection of Old Newport design in March of 2016, Negative g 9 Arciniega, Hwy Widening bike lane. Realignment of Old Newport Boulevard and West Coast Declaration draft is completed. City is Public [t5R19j Boulevard maximizes the right turn Highway requesting lead agency status from Works pocket storage length and improves Cal Trans. roadway geometries. Lower Sunset View Possible pedestrian overcrossings, An RFP for design services was sent . Capital Improvement And Fan, y Park Bridge, Parking parking and park uses for Lower Sunset Intersection of West Coast in December of 2015, CEQA Program, City Council Public Lot and Park View Park. Highway and SuperiorAvenue determination TBD. Works (15R09) • Mitigated Negative Balboa Island Project initiated in 2011. A consultant Declaration Bob Stein, Seawall New seawall along the Grand Canal Balboa Island has been selected for the project • Capital Improvement Public Reconstruction and on the west end of Balboa Island, design. The RFP process has not yet Program, City Council Works (151-111 ) been initiated for the MND. Arches drain outlet is the endpoint for . Capital Improvement two large storm drains that collect and Program, City Council deliver runoff from neighboring areas to Newport Harbor. The west storm drain collects runoff from Hoag Hospital and Arches Storm Drain areas upstream and the east storm Project initiated in 2015. CEOA John Diversion drain runs along Old Newport Newport Boulevard north of determination TBD (exemption?). Kappeler, {t6X11] Boulevard and into Costa Mesa Coast Highway Anticipated project start date, Public upstream of 151h Street. A conceptual September 2016. Works plan to divert dry weather flows from these two subwatersheds to the sanitary sewer system has been prepared. Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F:LLlae.alCf]O'Sheied41dmi0Nannug_D:rieio.r+CEalilCumulelrve_Pmjed�Lialkumufa6ueyraje Cta_U-4.d— Project Proposed Land Uses/Project Location DeterminatlordStatus Discretionary Actions Project Description Planner Restores a drainage reach subject to City Council authorized project in • Capital Improvement John Bayview Heights erosion and creates a wetland at the Headlands area of Li Upper Bay May of 2015. Agency permit Program, City Council I(appeler, Drainage Treatment and of the reach to benefit downstream of Mesa Drive applications were submitted March of Public (15xil) environmental water q ual ity. 2016. CEQA determination TBD (exemption?) Works Divert about one third of the dry- . Mitigated Negative weather flow from the creek into a Declaration bioreactor. The bioreactor strips . Capital Improvement selenium and other impurities from the Program, City Council flaw. Clean flow is returned to the creek Big Canyon Rehab to reduce the concentration of pollutants within the stream by 30-35 Big Canyon, downstream of Resource agency applications John Kappeier, Project percent. Storm flows from Jamboree Jamboree Road and south of submitted March of 2016. Draft MND Public 115XI12j Road also will be directed to the top Big Canyon Creek issued for public comment March 4, 2016. Works level of this bioreactortwetlands to strip roadway pollutants from the flow before the flow rejoins the creek. Partial streambed and canyon restoration are components of this project. • Capital Improvement Patrick Bay Crossings Replaces deteriorating water Program, City Council Arciniega, Water Main transmission mains pursuant to the Newport Harbor A consultant has been selected for Public Replacement Water Master Plan and Bay Crossing the project design. CEQA TBD Works (16W12) Water Transmission Study. Rev: 2017-06-13-ru FiV� CDDZhamd45dminWiann-g_Diviw ICEQAWumutaf m PWJvd_LiwbwmWa0m_ projws_cu.ronl da IN ca Discretionary Projects with CEQA review and Traffic Study Approved by the City and Percent Occupied: Project Proposed Land Uses Location DeterminatlonfStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied Planning Commission . Minor Use Permit No. ENC Preschool Environmental Nature Center 745 Dover Drive Approved 01l2112016. Class 32 CEQA Exemption. Plans UP2015.020 Makana Nova Yes 0 (PA2015.079) Preschool have not been submitted for Traffic Study No. plan check at this time. TS2015-001 Park Avenue Demolish and replace Park Avenue MND adopted/approved by . Mitigated Negative Bridge bridge that connects Balboa Island Balboa Island City Council November 25. Declaration No. Gregg Ramirez No 00A Replacement (PA2014-135) and Little Balboa Island. 2014' Under construction NQ201d-OD2 • Site Development Review No. S02014- 005 The project includes the re- Application submitted on Minor Use Permit No. subdivision of four lots into three 1cts 20350 & 2036D 08lD512014. UP2014-032 Birch Newport for commercial development and for Birch Street Application and Addendum to • Traffic Study No. Executive condominium purposes, and the M N D approved by Planning TS2014-006 Jaime Murillo Yes 0% Center construction of two, 2-story medical [Formerly 20352 — Commission on • Parcel Map No. PA2014-121 I } office buildings totaling 64,000 9 9 20412 Birch St} permit issued bough grading permits issued Np2014-D17 square feet in gross floor area and a February 25, 2016. 324-space surface parking lot. • Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration (PA2006- 2&0) Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F xJmra%CD11ShawdV%dmimP1enmg_DivmnICE0AC—kllre_PrDjae Llsticum MmpmJecla_cu .do AI ca Project Proposed land Uses Location DaterminationlStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied The project irid udes a Tentative Tract Map application to subdivide a 4.7-acre site for 83 residential lots and a Site Development Review Application submitted on • Tentative Tract Map application for the construction of 83 0612012014. No. NT2014-002 single -unit residences, private An MN was prepared. The . Tragic Study No. streets, common open space, and project was approved and the TS2014-007 Ebb Tide landscaping. The Planned 1560 Placentia MND was adapted by the Planned Development (PA2014-110) Community Development Plan is Drive Planning Commission on Permit No. PL2015- Jim Campbell Yes 01 proposed to establish guidelines for August 6, 2015. development of the project site Under construction. 001 consistent with the General Plan. Completion of initial phases • Mitigated Negative The Code Amendment is proposed to anticipated in late 2017 or Declaration No. amend the Zoning Map to change the early 2018. ND2015-002 Zoning District from Multiple -Unit Residential (RM) to Planned Community [PC]. . General Plan Project approved by the City Amendment General Plan Amendment, Coastal September 2014. • Coastal Land Use Land Use Plan Amendment, and Plan Amendment Lido House Zoning Amendment to change site Coastal Development Permit . Zoning Code Hotel from Public Facilities to Visitor- 3300 Newport issued February 2016- Amendment at the former serving commercial and increase the Boulevard and • Site Development Jim Campbell Yes 0% city hall allowable building height. Demolition 475 32"1 Street Demolition complete and new Review complex of former city hall buildings and the construction underway. . Conditional Jse {PA2013-217} construction of a 13C1-room upscale Permit hotel. Fire Station ill to remain at Completion of construction • Ground Lease current location. anticipated by summer of . Environmental Impact 2018. Report Construction of two building and a 2011, 2043, 2121. Class 32 CEQA exemption, three -level parking structure, an and 2131 June 19. 2014: Planning Site Development WesYcliif addition to an existing building, and Westcliff Drive. Commission Approved. Review Medical the demolition of 25,339 square feet Bounded by Demolition complete and Jim Campbell Yes Q I (PA2013 154) of building area. The project would Westctiff Drive, construction underway. Traffic Study result to four buildings totaling 7 Irvine Avenue, Completion by the end of Lot Merger square feet. The total amount off off- off- and Sheringtan 2018- street parking would be 382 spaces. Place. Rev: 2017-06-13-ru r+u:eacornsnarnawdm. �nni� ion ceoa cumuuuw_Prged_wncvm�uawyrq•as_wmnr.aax Project Proposed Land Uses Location Determinationf5tatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied • General Plan Building permits have expired Amendment and require a new plan check . Coastal Land Use submittal and updates to the Plan Amendment Request for the demolition of an 3303 and 3355 Building Code. Discretionary applications are still valid since Zoning Code Lida Villas existing church and office building Via Lida tract map was submitted to Amendment (DART) and legislative approvals for the Generally Public Works for recordation. . Planned Community Makana Nova No 0% (PA2012-148) development of 23 attached three- bounded by Via Application approved Development Plan story townhome condominiums. Lido. Via Oporto, and Via Malaga. November 12. 2013. CLUP Site Development Amendment approved by CCC Review on March 12. 2014. CDP application Approved by CCC • IS/Mitigated Negative on 10/0912014. Declaration . Tentative Tract Map Amendment to the North Newport Center Planned Community (NNCPC), which is the zoning document that establishes land uses, Villas Fashion development standards, and • Transfer of Island procedures for development within The project was approved by Development {Formerly San seven sub -areas of the Newport 1101 San Joaquin the City Council on August 14, Planned Community Jaime Murillo Joaquin Plaza Center Area of the City. Primarily the Hills Road 2012. Text Amendment Yes 10% Apartments) request involves increasing the e Development Benjamin Zdeba (PA2612-020) residential development allocation Under construction. Agreement within the NNCPC from 430 dwelling . Traffic Study units to a total of 524 dwelling units (increase of 94 units) and allocating the units to the San Joaquin Plaza sub -area - Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F:lUaeraYCt)dShmedAdmin0eming_DideionKEQMOumWabw Prged_Lisfi mulavve j r jack_—n[ dmx Project Proposed Land Uses Location Determination/Status Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied • PC Development Plan EIR, Tentative Tract Map, Amendment and Traffic Study, and AHIP were Adoption Uptown approved by City Council on • Tentative Tract Map Newport Development of 1.244 residential Jamb 4a21ree 212612013. The PC • Traffic Study (TPG) Mixed Use units and 11.500 sf, of commercial o Rd Jamboree Development Plan and • AHIP Rasalinh Ung Yes 0°/': Development retail Development Agreement were . DA (PA2011-434) approved on 311212013. ■ Airport Land Use Construction for Phase 1 Commission development is underway ■ Environmental Impact Repo rt • PC Development Plan Amendment Approved by the City Council Transfer of MacArthur at on October 25. 2011. PC Development Rights Dolphin -Striker Demolition of a 7,9K-sf restaurant 4221 Dolphin- Development Plan approved • c Study (TPO) Way and development of 12,351 sf Sinker Way on November 22, 2D11, The CUP CUP Rvsalinh Ung Yes 901c (PA2010-135) commercial retail. project is completed. The - Waiver of DA freestanding building pad is constructed but not occupied. . Modification Permit • Mitigated Negative Declaration 10 Big Canyon Mitigated Negative Declaration for ISIMND approved 12/2012011, (PA2010-D92] rough grading for development of a 10 Big Canyon Project has not been . ISIMND Makana Nava No 0% single-family residence. constructed. Amendment to Sayview Planned On June 22, 2010 City Council Community (PC-32) text to add approved Resolution Nv. D.I.S.C. 3507 outpatient surgery and medical office 2010-070 finding that Traffic Jamboree Rd as permitted uses and to add a Parking requirement of 11200 square 3501 Jamboree Study No. TS201D-002 . PC Amendment and 361 for such uses. Includes Traffic Rd. and 301 complies with the TPO and on . Traffic Study complies Melinda Whelan Yes 100% Bayfeet Circle study pursuant to TPO for conversion Bayview Circle July approved with TPO (PIA20w (PA2D1D Oli2] of 38. 759 square feet of general a ce 0-12 Ordinance No. office and retail to outpatient surgical ne Co approving Planned Community center, Amendment No- PD2010004. Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F:Hhan�CODt4n�©AWWm+�Wwnnie�GvalamCEn+1+.Cumul�Y.n Pmkc�LhKumuGeVayrgecn wnens.¢acx Project Proposed Land Uses Location DeterminationlStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied Building permits for residential portion issued 0311712017. Commercial portion submitted for plan check June 30, 2014. Application approved by • Site Development Planning Commission on Review Plaza Corona Development of 1,750 sf new office 1103113, Stair Approval No. • Variance del Mar space and six (6) detached ig hwaEast Coast Highway Coast y SA2013-015 (PA2C13-245) . Conditional Use Makana Nova No 0 (PA2010-081 ) townhomes. approved December 10, 2013 Permit and Staff Approval No. Tentative Tract Map SA2014-April 10, 2015 to allow . Modification Permit the reconstruction of Gallo's and reduction of commercial scope. CEQA Class 32 exemption. Modification Permit Old Newport Demolition of 3 existing buildings to ISIMN❑ and project approved ■ Traffic Study PA Project construct a new 25,000 sf medical 328. 332, and 340 on March 9, 2010. Demolition ■ Use Permit Jaime Murillo Yes 0°h ( 047] office building. building. Old Newport Blvd and grading permits issued . GP Amendment March 6, 2015. . Mitigated Negative Declaration ■ EIR Hoag • GP Amendment Memorial Reallocation of up to 225,000 sf of 1 Hoag Dr, Final EIR certified and project . Planned Community Hospital previously approved (but not northwest of West approved on May 13, 2008- No Development Plan Presbyterian yt constructed ]square footage from the Coast Hwy and new major development has (PC) Tex! Amendment Jim Campbell Yes 0°Io Master Plan Lower Campus to the Upper Newport Blvd been constructed or is planned . Development Update Project Campus. in the near future. Agreement (PA2007 073] Amendment COP {CCC) Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F wwm+CDashaadwdminwia--,N_DiOsimICEGACumuW m Proj.d Livb Lah a prq.u._w�I.d= Project Proposed Land Uses location Determination)Status Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent Occupied Residanti ai development including 201--207 EIR the following: (a) the demolition of the Camation Ave Final EIR was certified and • GP Amendment existing residential structures on the and 101 Bayside project approved by the City • Coastal Lard Use Poject AERIE r AERI 1.4-acre site; (b) the development of PI; southwest of on July 14, 2009, A CDP has Plan (CLOP) 5-198) 8 residential condominium units; and Bayside Drive been approved by the Coastal Amendment Jim Campbell No 0% (c) the replacement, reconfiguration, between Bayside Commission. Project is under . Zone Change and expansion of the existing PI and Carnation construction with completion . Tract Map gangway platform, pier walkway, and Ave, Corona del anticipated by mid 2018. . Modification Permit dark facilities on the site. Mar ■ CDP (CCC) Newport FOR certified in February Site Plan Review Mar Manna — A mixed use development consisting 23t70 Newport 2006. TentaWe Tract Map extended in October 2Q10. The Use Permit ETCO of 27 residential units and Boulevard project is under construction . Tentative Tract Map Jim Campbell 0% Development approximately 36,000 square feet of and is anticipated to be • Environmental Impact (PA2Q01-210) retail and office uses complete by summer 2017. Report An ISIMND was released for public review on April 11. ■ GP Amendment 2011. The MN❑ was certified • Code Amendment and the project approved by ■ CUP Mariners A 19,905-sr, two-story commercial 100 West Coast the City Council on August 9, ■ Variance Pointe building and a three-story parking Highway 2011. Construction completed . Site Development Jaime MuIllo Yes 66% (PA2010-114) structure. on October 30, 2014, and Review tenants are beginning to . Traffic Study occupy suites. (43% occupied, . Mitigated Negative 23% TI in process, 34% Declaration vacant). Newport Demolition of 2 existing connected 4699 Jamboree The City Council approved the ' GP Amendment • PC text amendment Business Plaza Project buildings to construct a new 46.044 Road and 5190 project on January 25, 2011. The project has not been . Tentative Parcel Map Janet Brown o 01 (PA2008-164) gross square foot business plaza. Campus Drive constructed.Declaration Mitigated Negative Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F.wwalcoovshmeduaminwiu�i,LoMmmceon+cumum. we Proj. Project Proposed Land Uses Location DeterminationlStatus Discretionary Actions Project Planner Traffic Study Percent occupied Increase the maximum allowable An ISIMND was released for PRIES Office entitlement by 11,544 gross sT; public review on May 19, 2070. • GP Amendment Building B increase the maximum allowable 4300 Von Kerman The MIND was certifled and the ■ PC Text Amendment Project entitlement in office suite B by 9.917 Ave project approved by the City ■ Parcel Map Janet Brown ❑ I (PA2007-213) net sf to allow for development of a Council on February 22. 2011. ■ Mitigated Negative now 2-lave€ office building over a Project has not been Declaration ground -level parking structure. constructed. AELUP: Airport Environs Land Use Plan: CDP: Coastal Development Permit; CLIP: Conditional Use Permit; cy: cubic yards: DA: Development Agreement; DTSP: Downtown Speeiftc Plan: FIR- Environmental Impact Report: FAA Federal Aviation Administration: GPA- General Plan Amendment: gsf: gross square feel; HBGS: Huntington Beach Generating Station; 1-405: Interstate 405 freeway; IBC: Irvine Business Complex; IS: initial Study; ITC: Irvine Technology Center; LAFCO: Local Agency Formation Commission; LCP: Local Coastal Program; MCAS: Marine Corps Air Station; MNO: Mitigated Negative Declaration; NO: Negative Declaration: PA: Planning Area; PC: Planned Community; sT: square feet: SP: Specific Plan: SR-73: State Route 73: TOR: transfer of development rights; TPM: Tentative Parcel Map; TTM: Tenlafve Tract Map; VTTM: Vesting Tentative Tract Map: ZC! Zone Change Rev: 2017-06-13-ru F.WserelCDDYShamdlAdminTlenning_DmmniCEORiG-149re_ProleaLigt Aabm_prulepe_wnem.do flit N 40 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 5 Patrick Alford, Planning Program Manager City of Newport Beach August 4, 2017 5-1 This is an introductory comment. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 5-2 The City of Newport Beach expressed concern regarding the construction of the proposed gravity sewer improvements along East Coast Highway. In response to the City's concerns, OCSD has provided a potential option to construct the new gravity sewer on the Balboa Marina West property, which is owned by the Irvine Company. The optional alignment would traverse the property from a west to east direction, beginning at the gravity sewer connection within Bayside Drive and terminating approximately 645 feet within the Balboa Marina West property parking lot; refer to Exhibit 1, Gravity Sewer Alignment Obtion. OCSD is currently discussing this option with affected property owners (including the Irvine Company). If the property owners agree to this optional alignment, the construction of the gravity sewer would occur in conjunction with the construction of the Balboa Marina West Expansion project. As shown in Exhibit 1, the optional alignment would occur within a previously disturbed area (i.e., a paved parking lot) associated with the Balboa Marina West facility. As noted in the City's comment, this optional alignment would occur at a slightly greater distance from the nearest sensitive receptors (residential uses northeast of the intersection of East Coast Highway/Bayside Drive). As such, it is not anticipated that implementation of this optional alignment would result in a new significant impact or substantially increase the severity of an impact that has been identified in the DEIR. If the affected property owners do not agree to this optional alignment, the gravity sewer improvements would be required to remain along East Coast Highway, as described on DEIR pages 3-7, 3-10, and 3-12. However, as noted in Section 5.11, Transbortation/Trac, of the DEIR, short-term impacts along East Coast Highway would be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-1. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would require engineering drawings and specifications that would implement a variety of measures to minimize traffic impacts. The engineering drawings and specifications would be subject to approval by OCSD, Caltrans, and the City to ensure that impacts would be minimized to a level below significance. 5-3 To address this comment, Mitigation Measure AES-2 has been revised as follows. In addition, minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure AES-2 on DEIR page 5.1-17 have been included to provide additional clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process. AES-2 Prior to construction of the new pump station facility, OCSD shall submit design plans of the proposed pump station to the City of Newport Beach Director 0 Gaffiffitifiky Development for review and approval the City's Planning Commission or delegated authority for Site Development Review and to determine consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP design guidelines. Tke Orange County Safikation District Difeefor of R*neer-i� shall pfovide I—ew afid approval of design plans, in consideration of coffiments received Final . December 2017 2-45 Responses to Comments v v x Al fill J mom ®� menial-. - _. $ r r *Coast.Hlgh�quilr A r - 9' } # ♦ �i elm lipIlk Michael Baker �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 5-4 Comment noted. To address this comment, Mitigation Measure AES-4 has been revised as follows. In addition, minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure AES-4 on DEIR page 5.1- 19 have been included to provide additional clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process AES-4 Prior to construction of the proposed pump station, the eantraetor sh&U provide lighting plans shall be provided to the Orange County Sanitation District r,.reeto f of LfMif ee for review and approval, and to the City of Newport Beach for review and approval the City's Planning Commission for Site Development Review. The lightinplan shall mating illustrate consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP regulations for lighting. Per these requirements, all outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, shielded, aimed, located, and maintained to minimize impacts to adjacent sites and to not produce glare onto adjacent sites or roadways. 5-5 To address this comment, Mitigation Measure NOI-1 has been revised as follows. In addition, minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure NOI-1 on DEIR page 5.10-16 have been included to provide additional clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process. NOI-1 Prior to the initiation of construction, the Orange County Sanitation District shall confirm that the Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications stipulate that: • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. The Orange County Sanitation District shall provide a qttftli€ieel "Noise Disturbance Coordinator." The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall complaint and determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement rye measures to comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. The een aet naffie and th construction hotline telephone number d Dii-st.l-r-Lb flee Geor-dinato shall be clearly posted on -site. • When feasible, construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals, etc.). • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • T ical construction activities that produce noise shall not take place outside of the allowable hours specified by the City of Newport Beach Final . December 2017 2-47 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Municipal Code Section 10.28.040 (7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays; construction is prohibited on Sundays and/or federal holidays). Alternative work hours may be designated by the City to reduce other impacts, such as traffic. 5-6 To address this comment, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 has been revised as follows. In addition, minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure TRA-1 on DEIR page 5.11-6 through 5.11-8 have been included to provide additional clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process. TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, en6neering drawings and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District D -_ _fer of Maine_ r-_�� California Department of Transportation_ and the City Public Works Department. The Gaiistfuetieft Manageffient Pla These documents shall, at a minimum, address the following: • Traffic control for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open during construction or re-routed to ensure continued connectivity, OGTA Bus stop access imp shall be mined coordinated with OCTA. At least three business days before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the Newport Befteh Fire Depaftment, Departffient, and City of Newport Beach Public Works Department, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for uninterrupted emergency access. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project. • Identify any off -site construction staging or material storage sites. • Specify the hours during which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets. • Require the Contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited, to, gravel and dirt resulting from its operations. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange Final . December 2017 2-48 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project County Sanitation District, of any material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent streets or areas. • Hauling or transport of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited, except what is required to provide direct access to the project site. • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All constructed -related parking and staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on -site or within other off-street areas. • Construction -related lane closures will would only occur between the hours of 9tGO 8:30 a.m. and 3 00 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City. • Use of a construction flagperson to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions, particularly during peak travel hours, and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway, Dover Drive, and Bayside Drive are affected. •This Genstimuetion Alanageffient Plaft The engineering drawings and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). 5-7 The comment states that the most recent version of the Bay Back Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PDCP) was adopted on November 22, 2016. However, after further dialogue with City of Newport Beach staff, it was confirmed that the Aprl 26, 2016 version is indeed the latest document. The DEIR has been revised to reflect this version of the PCDP. Paragraph one on DEIR page 2-8 has been revised as follows: Final . December 2017 2-49 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9) (adopted February 25, 2014, Ordinance No. 2014-4(PA2011-216) and Amended April 26, 2016, Ordinance No. 2016-8). The Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9) (Back Bay Landing PCDP) is a redevelopment plan involving a mixed -use waterfront project. This project would construct a dry stack boat storage facility for 140 boats, 61,534 square feet of visitor -serving retail and recreational marine facilities, and up to 49 attached residential units. The Back Bay Landing PCDP establishes appropriate zoning regulations governing land use and development of the Planned Community site, consistent with the General Plan and CLUP. The Back Bay Landing PCDP provides a vision for the land uses on the site, sets the development standards and design guidelines for specific project approvals at the Site Development Review and Community Development Plan approval stage, and regulates the long term operation of the developed site. Section 10.0, page 10-2 of the DEIR has been revised as follows: City of Newport Beach, Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9), Adopted February 25, 2014 and Amended April 26. 2016. 5-8 As explained in the previous response, the most recent version of the PCDP was adopted on April 26, 2016. The following revisions were made to reflect this amended version of the PCDP. DEIR pages 5.1-11 and 5.1-12, Subsection B, Permitted Height of Structures has been revised as follows: B. Permitted Height of Structures 1. Building Height The maximum allowable building height shall be 35 feet for structures with flat roofs and 40 feet for structures with sloped roofs (minimum 3:12 pitch), except as follows: a) As illustrated on Exhibit 3, Building Heights, 100 feet from back of curb along Bayside Drive within the eastern portion of Planning Area 1, maximum allowable building height shall not exceed 26 feet for flat roofs and 31 feet for sloped roofs. Final . December 2017 2-50 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project e- b) Within Planning Area 1, maximum allowable height for any parking structure shall not exceed 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs. 4} e) All other exceptions to height shall be regulated pursuant to Section 20.30.060.D of the Municipal Code. 5-9 Comment noted. DEIR pages 5.1-13, Subsection A, Architectural Theme has been revised as follows: A. Architectural Theme The development shall be designed with a Coastal Mediterranean architectural theme. This architectural theme is influenced by the elifnate of the comes froffi, and appli— rovided. Thick and textured > buH nose borders, terraeott e0lors Lh —s. --al and stofie details are discussed. The style is marked by the us windows and doors, e ;s, and decoraeve ir-on tfim. The intent fis flat to select a histofically specific or rigid architectural style for the project, but to help shap the ehar-aeter- of the area and r-eflee, ill_ _. The development shall be designed with a Coastal architectural theme. This architectural theme is influenced by the marine climate of the California coastline. with varied historical vernacular and casually elegant palette, with building forms and massing that define and create unique and often seamless indoor/outdoor spaces. The project would follow principles of quah�n. exhibitinga high level of architectural standards and shall be compatible with the surrounding area, sensitive to scale. proportion, and identity with a focus on place -making. Massing offsets. variation of roof lines, varied textures, openings, recesses, and design accents on all building elevations shall be provided to enhance the architectural design. The intent is not to select a historicall�pecific or rigid architectural style for the project, but to create an active, mixed -use village. 5-10 This comment states that the location of the force mains within the Lower Castaways Park site and pipe staging along Dover Drive is not acceptable to the City as it would severely encumber the site and limit future use of the site. The City expresses a preference that the force mains be constructed in the southerly portion of the Lower Castaways Park site. As a means of resolving this concern, OCSD has investigated the possibility of shifting the force main improvements to be within the southerly portion of the site; refer to Exhibit 2, Conce tual Site Plan. The temporary construction staging area would encompass the entire Lower Castaways Park site as analyzed in the DEIR. The shift of the force mains further south would move the borehole locations and work areas further to the south, in addition to the force main alignment that would occur via horizontal directional drilling (HDD) or microtunneling. Final . December 2017 2-51 Responses to Comments F�...GOABT HIGFPNAV Source: Michael Baker International, August 29 2017, Note: This plan is considered conceptual and subject to minor refinement during the final design phase. LEGEND ALIEEN VE 9A FACILmf51PUMP STATION. ELEGTULAL. I GOMiAOL GENEEA.ri OPEN CUr AEEA IALT $1 PIPELINES I FM TUNNEL GREENING NEW— EUANNPL BY HWW I MN'EOTUNNr1 0 EECAYA . O—UEANGE F.NN00 MICEONNNELING ACROSS I -- CALrEANO MIR OF WAY a• o �� / �p / a.m rs.Po i FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NOT TO SCALE E=-Pl1 Cog BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT INTEENAlIOConceptual Site Plan C6/17 dN 143698 Exhibit 2 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE By shifting the alignment south, construction activities would encroach into a vegetated area within the southerly extent of the Lower Castaways site (whereas the DEIR assumed the work area would be limited to unvegetated areas only). Based on a review of site conditions, the southern half of Lower Castaways Park is entirely disturbed, primarily consisting of bare ground and gravel, with the western and southern perimeters dominated by non-native ornamental trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Dominants include eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.), acacia (Acacia sp.), ngaio tree (1Vlyoporum laetum), giant cane (Arundo donax), Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis), and Hottentot fig (Carpobrotus edulis), with patches of native saltgrass (Disticblis spicata) scattered throughout. The eastern portion of the Lower Castaways site consists of bare ground where recreational water craft parking and access to Newport Bay waters is located. Special - status species with the potential to occur within this area are primarily limited to nesting birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code, particularly during the bird breeding season (typically January through July for raptors and February through August for other birds). Mitigation Measure BIO-1 of the DEIR would implement requirements to minimize impacts to nesting birds consistent with the MBTA, and would reduce impacts to a level below significance (minor editorial revisions to BIO-1 are noted below to provide clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process). A small drainage feature is located in the northwest portion of Lower Castaways Park where off -site storm flows surface from a heavily -buried culvert and re-enter another heavily -buried culvert approximately 40 feet to the west before being conveyed off -site; however, this feature is outside of the area proposed for development. Based on analysis provided within the DEIR and a review of on - site conditions, the slight shift of the force main facilities to the southerly portion of Lower Castaways Park would not result in any new significant impact or substantially increase the severity of an impact that has been identified in the DEIR. Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure BIO-1 on DEIR page 5.3-10 has been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 has been revised as follows: BIO-1 To the extent feasible, construction activities shall be scheduled outside of the nesting season (typically February 15 to August 15) to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds. However, if construction must occur during the nesting season, all suitable habitat surrounding the project site shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist prior to commencement of site disturbance activities. If an active avian nest is discovered in proximity to the project site during the nesting bird survey, construction activities shall stay outside of a 300-foot buffer around the active nest. For raptor species, this buffer shall be expanded to 500 feet. A biological monitor shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest in order to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. The buffer area and limitations on construction may be reduced upon coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, provided the nesting behaviors are not disrupted by construction activities. Once the young have fledged, normal construction activities shall be allowed to occur. Final . December 2017 2-53 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 5-11 In response to the City's concerns regarding pipe staging, OCSD has provided a potential option for pipe staging activities along Bayside Drive as shown on Exhibit 3, Temporary Pipe Stringinn Alignment Option. The optional construction pipe staging alignment would be approximately 1,457 feet in length and would extend approximately 250 feet from the HDD/microtunneling pit to Bayside Drive, continue approximately 990 feet east along Bayside Drive, and would terminate approximately 220 feet northeast of the guard shack associated with the Newport Dunes Resort Marina. The pipe staging areas would encompass proposed pipe stringing activites, which would involve placing piping above ground within existing roadway right-of-way and below ground, using a steel casing sleeve, within the existing driveways in order to maintain traffic flow. If this optional alignment is selected, the pipe stringing activities would occur for approximately 4 to 6 weeks in conjunction with the construction of the proposed force mains. During this time, existing street parking and sidewalk access would be affected. However, these temporary impacts would be short-term and would cease upon completion of pipe stringing activities. As parking and sidewalk access would remain on the other side of Bayside Drive during this time, these temporary impacts would be less than significant. This potential pipe stringing option would occur entirely within disturbed areas (existing roadway) and would not involve substantial ground disturbance, aside from driveway locations to maintain access to adjacent properties. In addition, Mitigation Measures AES-1, which would ensure staging areas are sited and screened to minimize visual impacts (minor editorial revisions to AES-1 are noted below to provide clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process), NOI-1 (refer to Response 5-5 above), and TRA-1 (refer to Response 5-2 above) would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. If this optional alignment is not selected, the pipe stringing would occur along Dover Drive as analyzed in the DEIR. Based on analysis provided within the DEIR and a review of the proposed optional pipe stringing alignment, this option would not result in any new significant impact or substantially increase the severity of an impact that has been identified in the DEIR. Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure AES-1 on DEIR page 5.1-16 has been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure AES-1 has been revised as follows: AES-1 Prior to issuance of any grading and/or demolition permits, whichever occurs first, ft Gefistfuefien Alftnftgefnent Pla engineering drawings a�pecifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation DistrictDi_____ ofFng ______ These documents shall, at a minimum, indicate the equipment and vehicle staging areas, stockpiling of materials, fencing (i.e., temporary fencing with opaque material), and haul route(s). Staging areas shall be sited and/or screened in order to minimize public views to the maximum extent practicable. Construction haul routes shall minimize impacts to sensitive uses in the project area by avoiding local residential streets, as feasible. Final . December 2017 2-54 Responses to Comments J ♦:- � ":\ >> ` - f � jL, ;,cam. wr `m y Bayside Cave J�ft •�..� ti lob IPA lo � oar_ _ �� " �—� � � ! �/ � �� - �j. �� .� � .� . 9• -East Coast Highwj ay. Michael Baker Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project 5-12 Refer to Response 5-10, above. 5-13 Comment noted. The list of cumulative projects provided in Section 4.0, Basis of Cumulative Anal sis, Table 4-1, Cumulative PraLects List was derived based on information provided by the cities of Newport Beach and Costa Mesa. The geographic areas were determined based upon the project's scope and anticipated area in which the project could contribute to an incremental increase in cumulatively considerable impacts. DEIR pages 4-2 through 4-5, have been revised as follows: Table 4-1 Cumulative Projects List Location Proposed Land Use Status City of Newport Beach 2 Dncirinn+iol Tower 850 con Clemente Drove ' mp h �"�rr `'' Deyelepmen+ of o 100 uni+ Dod+i d-enol TPA D.nnoro+inn of CIA 2 Auden ghway, Newport BeaGh and Qnniinn Conility. planning nfT CnyOrommPn+;;l Docent. Traffie GeRsultant to be k4Rt #ie� 3 150 Newport Genter Newport Beash Drnnoratinn of CID 4 ad � �� nlnninn r+ Rai &VAr d from � — .rnn+ onrl ` 3201 nln,.,nnr+Rn��ln„nr,+ improvements; southbound through lane aleRg to 32nd C+rnn+ terminating as o gdStree �d. Coastal �°"�'"'�'� DeyelepmeR+ Permot Ossued Newport BeaGh 1 Ullman Sail Lofts 410 and 412 29th Street Development of a mixed -use Anticipated CEQA structure with 1.171 square feet of retail floor area, one 2.347 square foot dwelling unit and Exemption. three residential dwelling units ranging from 2.484 square feet to 2,515 square feet. 2 = Newport Dunes Hotel 1131 Back Bay Drive Development of a 275-room. Application incomplete. 201,498 square -foot hotel on 14.3 acres. Amenities include a coffee shop_giftlsundry shop. business center, function room spa/fitness facilities, restaurant. pool, tennis courts, sand volleyball courts and picnic area. Final . December 2017 2-56 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status Construction of a 70,295 square - foot, 4-story Ocean Literacy Facility. This project would 600 East Bay, 209 include removal of 63-metered Application 53 ExplorOcean3 Washington Street, 600 and space surface parking lot; submitted April - 608 Balboa Avenue, and construction of 388 spaces; 2014. On hold per 200 Palm, Newport Beach construction of a 141,000 applicant's request. square -foot, 5-level off -site parking structure and 6,500 square -foot floating classroom. Redevelopment project involving Approved. a mixed -use waterfront project. °meets This project would construct a proposed Site 300 East Coast Highway, dry stack boat storage facility for Development 64 Back Bay Landing Newport Beach 140 boats, 61,534 square feet of Review and visitor -serving retail and Coastal recreational marine facilities, Development and up to 49 attached residential Permit anticipated to be filed in 2018. units. City of Newport Beach public access and transient dock and expansion of balboa marina 201 East Coast Highway, including 14,252 square feet of 75 Balboa Marina West Expansion Newport Beach restaurant, 12 transient boat Approved. slips, 26 24 private boat slips, 664 square feet of marina restroom, and reconfiguration of a 294-space parking lot. 720 West Bay Avenue, 800 Awaiting Coastal West Bay Avenue, 711-721 Construction of a 23,163 square- Developmen 96 Newport Harbor Yacht Club West Bay Avenue, and foot Yacht Club Facility. Permit Approval 710-720 Balboa Boulevard, Under Newport Beach Construction. s A- -;; s t H g h w a y, Development of 1,375 residential dwelling a 75e Awaiting Go units resort uses, 75,000 square feet approximately 51 A none„elm Permit App l. gress of and approximately parklands, 257 3 gross of aGFeS permanent open spaG.- OR held at the 4..0 Gente Newport BeaGh GUFFeRt+he West Newpei4 Gemmi inifii �tho Got �} Manager's Offioe Y Widening of westbound West Old Newport Boulevard/West Intersection of Old Newport Coast Highway at Old Newport 1-Ind-e-F review ND 417 = Coast Highway Widening Boulevard and West Coast Boulevard to accommodate a draft complete. Highway, Newport Beach third through lane, a right -turn pocket, and a bike lane. Final . December 2017 2-57 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status Intersection of West Coast Construction of a pedestrian 8 Lower Sunset View Park Highway and Superior overcrossings, parking, and park CEQA Bridge, Parking Lot, and Park Avenue, Newport Beach uses for lower Sunset View determination TBD. Park. Balboa Island Seawall Balboa Island, Newport New seawall along the Grand Awaiting City's 43 9 Reconstruction Beach Canal and on the west end of Request for Balboa Island. Proposal (RFP). Newport Boulevard north of Divert dry weather flows from 44 Arches Storm Drain Diversion Coast Highway, Newport west and east storm drains CEQA 10 Beach (subwatersheds) to the sanitary determination TBD. sewer system. Big Canyon, downstream of 4-5 Big Canyon Rehab Project Jamboree Road and south Divert dry weather flows from Final MIND in 11 of Big Canyon Creek, the creek into a bioreactor. Progress. Newport Beach Replaces deteriorating water 46 Bay Crossings Water Main Newport Harbor, Newport transmission mains pursuant to CEQA 12 Replacement Beach the Water Master Plan and Bay determination TBD. — Crossing Water Transmission Study. 4-7ENC 745 Dover Drive, Newport Construction of an Approved. 13 Preschool Beach Environmental Nature Center CEQA Exemption. Preschool. U Park Avenue Bridge Balboa Island, Newport Replacement of Park Avenue Under 14 Replacement Beach Bridge. construction. Construction of 83 single -unit residences, private streets, common open space, and 4-9 1560 Placentia Drive, landscaping. Proposed Zoning Approved Under 15 Ebb Tide Newport Beach Code Amendment from Multiple- construction. — Unit Residential (RM) to Planned Community (PC). A Planned Community Development Plan is proposed. Construction of a 130-room 3300 Newport Boulevard upscale hotel. General Plan 20 Lido House Hotel and 475 32Nd Street, Amendment, Coastal Land Use Under 16 Newport Beach Plan Amendment, and Zoning construction. Amendment to change zoning from Public Facilities to Visitor. Construction of four buildings CEQA exemption. 2011, 2043, 2121, and (two buildings, three -level Approved. 24 Westcliff Medical 2131 Westcliff Drive, parking structure, and an Demolition permit 17 — Newport Beach existing building) totaling 73,722 +sued Under square feet with 382 spaces of construction. off-street parking. Final . December 2017 2-58 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status Building permit apprEwal; p'1 2-2 3303 and 3355 Via Lido Construction of 23 attached regorrda+inn of +ran+ � expired. 18 Lido Villas , Newport Beach three-story townhome Application, CLUP — condominiums. Amendment, and CDP application approved. Amendment to the North Newport Center Planned Community (NNCPC) increasing Villas Fashion Island (Formerly the residential development 23 1101 San Joaquin Hills allocation with the NNCPC from Under San Joaquin Plaza 19 Apartments) Road, Newport Beach 430 dwelling units to a total of construction. 524 dwelling units (increase of 94 units) and allocating the units to the San Joaquin Plaza sub- area. 24 10 Big Canyon 10 Big Canyon, Newport Rough grading for development Approved. Not yet 20 Beach of a single-family residence. constructed. 2-5 Newport 138aGh Country Club 1600 Goo+ Ggas+ Highway, Go.nstrur-,tion of 213 square- Under ' and hag storage 328, 332, and 340 Old Approved. 26 Old Newport GPA Project Newport Boulevard, Construction of 25,000 square- Demolition and 21 Newport Beach foot medical office building. grading permits are issued. Reallocation of up to 225,000 2 Hoag Memorial Hospital 1 Hoag Drive, Newport square feet of previously 2 Presbyterian Master Plan Beach approved (but not constructed) Approved. Update Project square footage from the Lower Campus to the Upper Campus. Construction of 8 residential condominium units and 29 AERIE Project 301-207 Carnation Avenue replacement, reconfiguration, Under 23 and 101 Bayside Place, and expansion of the existing construction. gangway platform, pier walkway, and dock facilities. Can+a Rarhara Drive, Under GonstFUGtion. units totaling approximately 205,232 netsquare feet, apprEWmately 97,231 gmss square feet of subterranean west Drive. Newport bGaGn ')(11 no rking spagec on_Ae ma+ely 79,140 square fgg+ of open snag and Final . December 2017 2-59 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status 30 Newport n a—€TGQ no""^t Mixed Use deyelopmen 27 13Rder GORMFUGti GORSiStiRg of residential and mately 36,000 Newport 138 square 4ses- City of Costa Mesa 4 Improvements to Lions Park; new signage, library building, IS/MND public 3 Lions Park, 570 West 18th and caf6; and renovation and review period 24 Lions Park Projects Street, 1845 and 1855 Park repurposing of the existing ended March 4, — Avenue, Costa Mesa Donald Dungan Library building 2017. to the Neighborhood Community Center. Proposes a new mixed -use development. Phase I has IS/MND Addendum 32 Westside Lofts Mixed -Use 1640 Monrovia Avenue, constructed a 185-unit assisted prepared July 25 Development Project Costa Mesa living facility. Phase II would 2016. construct 42,000 square feet of commercial office uses. Notes: 1. Refer to Exhibit 4-1, Cumulative Proiect Locations. 2. City of Newport Beach, Cumulative Projects List, http://www.newportbeachca.gov/Pln/CEQA_Cumulative/cumulative projects _current.pdf, accessed March 27, 2017. 3. For projects with multiple addresses, the address with the nearest proximity to the project site was depicted in Exhibit 4-1. Written Correspondence: Minoo Ashabi, Principal Planner, City of Costa Mesa, March 27, 2017. 5-14 5-15 5-16 Refer to Response 5-10, above. Comment noted. Section 5.9, Land Use and Relevant Planning, DEIR page 5.9-8, second paragraph, has been revised as follows: The City's LCP and associated Coastal Land Use Plan (CLUP) were apprave certifie by the CCC on January 13. 2017, and are &tpeeted to be..,._.. _ becam effective in on lanuaxy 31 2017. The CLUP sets forth goals, objectives, and policies that govern the use of land and water in the coastal zone within the City of Newport Beach and its sphere of influence consistent with the General Plan. The City's CLUP identifies the Coastal Act coastal resources planning and management policies that are relevant to Newport Beach. The CLUP addresses Coastal Act policies within three chapters: Land Use and Development; Public Access and Recreation; and Coastal Resource Protection. Each section or subsection begins with the identification of the Coastal Act sections that are relevant to Newport Beach, followed by a narrative of the local setting and policy direction adopted by the City to address the requirements of the Costal Act and a listing of specific policies. Refer to Response 5-11, above. Final . December 2017 2-60 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 5-17 Comment noted. DEIR pages 5.2-6 and 5.10-6, Tables 5.2-2 and 5.10-2, Sensitive Receptors have been revised as follows: Table 5.2-2 Sensitive Receptors Type Name Approximate Distance from Project Site (feet) Orientation from Project Site Location/Description Residential Residential Uses 25 North Single Family Residences 25 East Single Family Residences 25 South Single Family Residences 50 West Single Family Residences Hyatt Regency Newport Beach 3,705 East 1107 Jamboree Road Hotels Balboa Inn 5,269 South 105 Main Street Newport Harbor High School 1,925 Northwest 600 Irvine Avenue Horace Ensign Intermediate School 2,765 Northwest 2000 Cliff Drive Harper Elementary School 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Schools Mariners Elementary School 4,785 North 2100 Mariners Drive Newport Elementary School 4,850 Southwest 1327 West Balboa Boulevard Children's Center By the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Newport Heights Elementary 4,981 Northwest 300 E 15th Street Newport Harbor Lutheran Church 910 North 798 Dover Drive St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church 2,047 Northwest 600 St Andrews Road Places of Worship St. John Vianney Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314 Marine Avenue Christ Church by the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church 5,172 Southwest 1441 West Balboa Boulevard Hospitals Newport Bay Hospital 1,265 North 1501 East 16th Street Balboa Branch Library 4,277 South 100 East Balboa Boulevard Libraries Mariners Library 5,182 North 1300 Irvine Avenue Bob Henry Park 1,370 North 900 Dover Drive Back Bay View Park 2,904 Southeast Jamboree Road and Ranifis Eat Coast Highway Back Bay Golf & Fitness 3,724 Northeast 1107 Jamboree Road Recreation/Parks Genoa Park 3,791 West 232 Via Genoa Harper Park 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Galaxie View Park 4,750 Northeast 1554 Galaxy Drive Pinkley Park 4,794 Northwest 360 Ogle Street, Costa Mesa Cliff Drive Park 4,840 Northwest 298 Riverside Avenue Note: 1. Distances are measured from the exterior project boundary only and not from individual constructionprojects/areas within the interior of the project site. Source: Goo le Earth, 2017. Final . December 2017 2-61 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 5.10-2 Sensitive Receptors Type Name Approximate Distance from Project Site (feet) Orientation from Project Site Location/Description Residential Residential Uses 25 North Single Family Residences 25 East Single Family Residences 25 South Single Family Residences 50 West Single Family Residences Hyatt Regency Newport Beach 3,705 East 1107 Jamboree Road Hotels Balboa Inn 5,269 South 105 Main Street Newport Harbor High School 1,925 Northwest 600 Irvine Avenue Horace Ensign Intermediate School 2,765 Northwest 2000 Cliff Drive Harper Elementary School 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Schools Mariners Elementary School 4,785 North 2100 Mariners Drive Newport Elementary School 4,850 Southwest 1327 West Balboa Boulevard Children's Center By the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Newport Heights Elementary 4,981 Northwest 300 E 15th Street Newport Harbor Lutheran Church 910 North 798 Dover Drive St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church 2,047 Northwest 600 St Andrews Road Places of Worship St. John Vianney Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314 Marine Avenue Christ Church by the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church 5,172 Southwest 1441 West Balboa Boulevard Hospitals Newport Bay Hospital 1,265 North 1501 East 16th Street Balboa Branch Library 4,277 South 100 East Balboa Boulevard Libraries Mariners Library 5,182 North 1300 Irvine Avenue Bob Henry Park 1,370 North 900 Dover Drive Back Bay View Park 2,904 Southeast Jamboree Road and Pasifis East Coast Highway Back Bay Golf & Fitness 3,724 Northeast 1107 Jamboree Road Recreation/Parks Genoa Park 3,791 West 232 Via Genoa Harper Park 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Galaxie View Park 4,750 Northeast 1554 Galaxy Drive Pinkley Park 4,794 Northwest 360 Ogle Street, Costa Mesa Cliff Drive Park 4,840 Northwest 298 Riverside Avenue Note: 1. Distances are measured from the exterior project boundary only and not from individual constructionprojects/areas within the interior of the project site. Source: Google Earth, 2017. 5-18 Mitigation Measure AES-2 on DEIR page 1-2 has been revised, as noted within Response 5- 3. DEIR page 2-14 does not exist and DEIR page 3-2 is an exhibit. DEIR pages 3-16 and 3- 17 discusses permits and approvals, and the City's Site Development Review process is cited as a required permit/approval. As such, no further response is necessary. 5-19 This comment is a closing statement providing contact information for questions. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-62 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE 5-20 The commenter attached an updated cumulative projects list, which has been incorporated as part of Response 5-13. Thus, no further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-63 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-64 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 6 ■ PubhcWorks Integrity, Accountability, Service, Trust Shane L. Silsby, Director August 2, 2017 NCI.-15-043 Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92709 Subject: Notice of Availability for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Dear Mr. Hadden: The County of Orange has reviewed the Notice of Availability for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project and has no comments at this time. We would like to be advised of any further developments on the project. Please continue to keep us on the distribution list for future notifications related to the project. Richard Vuo anager, Plan ' sion OC Public Works Service Area/OC Development Services 300 North Flower Street Santa Ana, California 92702-4048 Richard.Vuong@ocpw.ocgov.com 300 N. Flower Street. Santa Ana. CA 92703 P.C. Box 4048. Santa Ana. CA 92702.4048 www.ocpublicworkr,.com 714,667,8800 1 Info@0CPW.00gov.carn 61 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 6 Richard Vuong, Manager, Planning Division Orange County Public Works August 2, 2017 6-1 This letter acknowledges that the Orange County Public Works received and reviewed the DEIR and has no comments. The commenter requests continued communication of further developments and future notifications related to the project. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-66 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 7 From: Rivers, Tamy (mailto:TamyRivers@ocfa.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 7:29 AM To: CEQA <cega@ocsd.com> Subject: Draft Environmental Impact Report - Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project To whom it may concern: Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document. Orange County Fire Authority has no comments. Y+HF Tamera Rivers Management Analyst { Orange County Fire Authority Office: 714-573-6199 We visualize problems and solutions through the eyes of those we serve. 71 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 7 Tamera Rivers, Management Analyst Orange County Fire Authority July 25, 2017 7-1 This letter acknowledges that the Orange County Fire Authority received and reviewed the DEIR and has no comments. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-68 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 8 From: ALRON7099@aol.com [mailto:alron7099@aol.com Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 5:23 PM To: CEOA <cega@ocsd.com> Cc: Dix, Martin <MDIX@OCSD.COM>; msinacori@newportbeachca.go� Subject: BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION Hello: I am the property owner at 2888 Bayshore Drive; Newport Beach, CA 92663 Could you please tell me exactly how this might impact my property (both land side and water side) as we are 8_1 reconfiguring the marina, and bringing in new power and a transformer to our north property side? I look forward to hearing from you Thank you, Allyson Presta, partner PALM❑ INVESTMENTS, GP phone 949-759-1275 fax 949-759-1288 mobile 949-874-1725 email: ALRON70992AOL.COM or accounting(a7prestaproperties.com �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 8 Allyson Presta, Partner Palmo Investments, GP June 22, 2017 8-1 This commenter requests additional information pertaining to project implementation and potential impact to the property located at 2888 Bayshore Drive and the property's planned improvements. The DEIR analyzes temporary and permanent impacts within the existing OCSD easement adjacent to the 2888 Bayshore Drive property. Construction activities associated with this project are not anticipated to occur on the 2888 Bayshore Drive property. The project is not anticipated to result in any potential conflicts with planned improvements on the 2888 Bayshore Drive property. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. Thus, no further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-70 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 9 GAMIELENO SAND OF M15510N INDIAN5 --- ICIZ.H NATION historieallm }mown as The San Ga6riel F)and of Mission f ndians recognized by the State of California as the aboriginal tribe of the Los Angeles basin Orange County Sanitation District July 18, 2017 Re: AB52 Consultation request for the Bay Bridge Pump station and Force mains replacement project located: 300 East Coast Highway Dear Kevin Hadden, Please find this letter as a written request for consultation regarding the above -mentioned project pursuant to Public Resources Code § 21080.3.1, subd. (d). Your project lies within our ancestral tribal territory, meaning descending from, or a higher degree of kinship than traditional or cultural affiliation. Your project is located within a sensitive area and may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of our tribal cultural resources. Most often, a records search for our tribal cultural resources will result in a "no records found" for the project area. The Native American Heritage Commission, ethnographers, historians, and professional archaeologists can only provide limited information that has been previously documented about California Native Tribes. This is the reason the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) will always refer the lead agency to the respective Native American Tribe of the area because the NAHC. is only aware of general information and are not the experts on each California Tribe. Our Elder Committee & tribal historians are the experts for our Tribe and are able to provide a more complete history (both written and oral) regarding the location of historic villages, trade routes, cemeteries and sacred/ religious sites in the project area. Therefore, to avoid adverse effects to our tribal cultural resources, we would like to consult with you and your staff to provide you with a more complete understanding of the prehistoric use(s) of the project area and the potential risks for causing a substantial adverse change to the significance of our tribal cultural resources. Consultation appointments are available on Wednesdays and Thursdays at our offices at 901 N. Citrus Ave. Covina, CA 91722 or over the phone. Please call toll free 1-844-390-0787 or email gabrielenoindians@yahoo.com to schedule an appointment. ** Prior to the first consultation with our Tribe, we ask all those individuals participating in the consultation to view a video produced and provided by CalEPA and the NAHC for sensitivity and understanding of AB52. You can view the video at: http: nahc.ca.gov/2015/ 12/ab-52-tribai- trainingn With Respect, Andrew Salas, Chairman Andrew rjalas. Chairman Nadine 5alas. Vice -Chairman C�ristina5windall Martinez.secretary Al6crt Peru, lrcasurer � Mactha Gor¢alez Le treasurer 1) Richard Gradias, Chairman of !tic council of L18ers rQ P5x 59i, Covina, CA 9 r 7x3 www.gga6HeIenoindians.org ga6Helenoin+ians@yakoo.com 91 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 9 Andrew Salas, Chairman Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation July 18, 2017 9-1 This comment from the Gabrielino Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation requests consultation with OCSD in accordance with AB 52. However, as discussed on pages 5.12-2 and 5.12-3 of the DEIR, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation and OCSD completed the AB 52 consultation process in early 2017. Based on the DEIR, impacts related to tribal cultural resources were determined to be less than significant with implementation of recommended mitigation. Thus, no further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-72 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 10 G"Ok IRVINE COMPANY Since 1864 August 3, 2017 Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) - Bay Bridge Pump Station Draft Environmental Impact Report Comments Dear Mr. Hadden: Irvine Company appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the Bay Bridge Pump Station Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). Irvine Company previously submitted a comment letter, dated December 8, 2016, during the review period for the Notice of Preparation and Initial Study/Environmental Checklist which included a number of concerns related to the proposed alignment of the new dual force mains and the proposed work areas on the Balboa Marina parking lot, among others. During subsequent meetings between Irvine Company, OCSD and other parties, Irvine Company requested that the DEIR analyze a project that would traverse the Back Bay Landing site and cross the Newport Bay channel north of Coast Highway in order to reduce impacts to Balboa Marina. We note that the proposed project identified in the DEIR is for the northern alignment of the pump station and force mains, of which Irvine Company is generally supportive. The Conceptual Site Plan in the DEIR presents a project that is significantly improved with a northern alignment (north of Coast Highway) for the dual force main placement and channel crossing, the relocation of the pump station 300' northeast of the existing pump station location, and the identification of alternative work areas that will not impact the Balboa Marina project site. This alignment provides significantly fewer impacts to Irvine Company property. We do note that the originally proposed alignment south of Coast Highway is included as a project Alternative in the DEIR and do not support that Alternative for the reasons stated in our meetings and our comment letter of December 8, 2016. We would like to take this opportunity to comment on additional components of the proposed project and request additional information or clarification on the following: Construction Schedule - While the DEIR does provide construction duration (weeks) for some segments of the project, such as gravity sewer improvements, it does not include a detailed construction schedule. Please provide estimated timeframes for all project components. We note that the total project timeline is 44 months. 10 1 102 10-3 550 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 949.720.2000 Mr. Kevin Hadden August 3, 2017 Page 2 of 2 2. Section 3.3 of the Project Description notes that the existing force mains would be abandoned once the new pump station facilities are complete. We assume this directly relates to the existing force mains which run adjacent to and beneath the Balboa Marina parking lot. Please provide detail about the process for such "abandonment" including the timing for the process, anticipated environmental impacts, and whether any equipment staging on the Balboa Marina site will be required to effectuate the abandonment. 3. With respect to the issue of the sewer lines on Balboa Marina property, the DEIR does not identify the impacts that will occur on the Balboa Marina site related to the existing sewer lines. In recent correspondence with Adam Nazaroff, OCSD Project Manager, Mr. Nazaroff confirmed that no provision has been made to address the impact on Balboa Marina if the existing sewer must be redesigned and installed in order to reach Bayside Drive before connecting to a City sewer. We appreciate Mr. Nazaroff s coordination and look forward to meeting with OCSD to discuss this issue on August 15. We request that the Responses to Comments identify the potential significant impact to Balboa Marina and provide an analysis of the proposed sewer system and how it impacts the existing sewer serving the marina. We are concerned that impacts will be extensive and may include the need to build a new on -site sewer system to take the discharge from the existing Balboa Marina, Yacht Broker office, marina restrooms, SOL restaurant and the future Balboa Marina restaurant to Bayside Drive. Based on engineering review, it appears that the proposed on -site system will be lower than the existing or proposed sewer on Bayside Drive requiring additional equipment in order to connect to OCSD's sewer. Please note that once we have met with OSCD, we anticipate submitting additional comments. 10-4 90-5 We appreciate OCSD's communication and coordination with Irvine Company over the past two years and are pleased with the new alignment analyzed in the DEIR. Thank you in advance for your 10-6 responses to the above -requested information. Sincerely, IRVINE COMPANY Dan Miller Sr. Vice President Entitlement and Public Affairs c: Shawna Schaffner, CAA Planning, Inc, �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 10 Dan Miller, Senior Vice President Irvine Company August 3, 2017 10-1 This is an introductory comment that summarizes a comment letter provided by the Irvine Company during the review period for the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the proposed project. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 10-2 This comment includes a summary of the project description and notes that the Irvine Company is not supportive of the "Existing Pump Station Site Rehabilitation" alternative presented in Section 7.0, Alternatives to the Proposed Prot. This comment is noted; since it does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue, no further response is necessary. 10-3 The proposed project conservatively assumes a total of 44 months for the completion of construction, and the analysis of the DEIR related to air quality, noise, traffic, and other topical areas is similarly considered to be conservative in nature. While durations for primary components of the construction process have been estimated with the DEIR, a detailed construction schedule for all project components would be determined during Final Design, and shared by OCSD with affected stakeholders and property owners. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 10-4 The existing force mains that traverse the Balboa Marina property and cross the Newport Bay Channel would be abandoned in place and filled with slurry. This method of abandonment would minimize potential impacts (ground disturbance, trenching, etc.) to the Balboa Marina and Newport Bay Channel. The existing force mains would be filled and abandoned following completion and operation of the new force mains. Equipment and activities associated with abandonment of the existing force mains would occur within areas previously analyzed in the DEIR, and would not affect the Balboa Marina property. 10-5 Refer to Response 5-2, above. 10-6 This comment is a closing statement. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-75 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-76 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 11 soCalGas A Sempra Energy utoity 08/04/2017 Mr. Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Re., Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force stains Replacement Project Dear Mr. Hadden: 1 a m es Chu ang Senior Environmental Specialist Southern California Gas Company Sempra Energy utilities GT17E2 555 Fifth Street Los Angeles, Ca. 80013 Tel: 213.244-5817 Fax: 323 518 2324 Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) appreciates the opportunity to review and respond to the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project. SaCalGas understands that the proposed project would replace the existing Bay Bridge pump station and associated force mains and include improvements to the pump station, the Newport Bay Channel crossing force main and the West Coast Highway crossing force main. Activities for the pump station improvements would involve construction of new pump station facilities and replacement of several portions of the existing OCSD gravity sewer system. Activities for the force main improvements would involve construction of 3,985 linear feet of force mains for the Newport Bay channel crossing to connect the new pump station to the existing OCSD force main system, and further force main alignment extension to connect the an existing OCSD valve vault near West Coast Highway. We respectfully request that the following comments be incorporated in the administrative record. 111 • SaCalGas has a 5-inch distribution pipeline that runs along the southbound lanes of North Bayside Drive at its intersection with East Coast Highway, and a medium pressure distribution line that runs along the 11 2 eastbound on State Highway 1 just beginning after the Bay Bridge. ■ SaCalGas recommends that the project proponent call Underground Service Alert at 811 at least two business days prior to performing any excavation work for the proposed project. Underground Service Alert will coordinate with SaCalGas and other Utility owners in the area to mark the locations of buried 11-3 utility -owned lines. Once again, we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (213) 244-5817 or 11-4 Envreview((Dsemprautil ities.com. Sincerely, Joes Chuang Senior Environmental Specialist Southern California Gas Company cc. Jennifer Pezda, SoCalGas �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 11 James Chuang, Senior Environmental Specialist Southern California Gas Company August 4, 2017 11-1 This is an introductory comment that provides a brief summary of the project description. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 11-2 The location of the 5-inch distribution pipeline and the medium pressure distribution line are noted along the southbound lanes of North Bayside Drive at its intersection with East Coast Highway and along the eastbound on State Highway 1 just beginning after the Bay Bridge, respectively. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. 11-3 This comment recommends that the project proponent contact Underground Service Alert to mark the locations of buried utility -owned lines. The project contractor would adhere to State and local regulations including utility coordination prior to construction. 11-4 This comment is a closing statement providing contact information for questions. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-78 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 12 UJ NOSSAMAN «P VIA EMAIL AN❑ U.S. MAIL August 4, 2017 Kevin Hadden, Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Email: CEQA[a)QCSD.com 18101 Von Karman Avenue Suite 1800 Irvine, CA 92612 T 949.833.7800 F 949.833.7878 John P. Erskine a 949.477.7633 jerskine@ncssaman.com Refer To File #: 400244-0001 Re: Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Main Project (Project No. SP-178) Dear Mr. Hadden: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD") Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") for the Bay Bridge Pump Station ("BBPS") and Force Main Project ("the Project"), As noted in Section 3.0 Project Description of the DEIR, the Project is proposed to be relocated on approximately 10,000 square feet of the 31.4 acre Back Bay Landing Project ("BBL Project") near the entrance to our client's property, approximately 300 feet northeast of the pump station's current location on East Coast Highway. The following comments are primarily focused on compatibility of the Project with the BBL project, particularly as it pertains to OCSD's Regulatory Review and Permitting Schedule and Construction and Disassembly / Site Restoration Schedule and Process. We are also providing several needed corrections to the Project Description and requests for additional clarification of the exact nature of various components of the Project. Our comments are as follows: 1.3 Goals and Objectives OCSD should explain the relationship between the "peak wet weather flow conveyance capacity" and the increase in the BBPS from 15 MGD to 18.5 MGD. If the existing BBPS location poses a safety issue in terms of the current direct access from East Coast Highway (as described in Goals and Objectives #3), how will the "Existing Pump Station Site Rehabilitation Alternative" avoid significant conflicts with access through the BBPS project from Bayside Drive, similar to the safety issues currently experienced at the East Coast Highway access point? 121 122 12-3 56118840.v1 nossaman.com August 4, 2017 Page 2 3.2.1 Project Setting (Existing Conditions Project Description Issues) The proposed BBPS (relocation) site is "disturbed," but to be clear should be described as a fully improved and partially paved facility, providing storage for RV's and trailered boats, as well as parking for the Bayside Village Marina, a coastal -dependent use. The site also includes 12-4 areas leased for kayak and SUP rentals and launching, and parking for and access to Pearson's Port Fish Market. As commented below, the proposed OCSD project, which includes construction staging areas, as well as unidentified additional staging areas that are foreseeably needed, will create 12-5 significant disruption of the current BBL recreational and marine commercial uses and our proposed BBL Project. 3.3 Project Characteristics The Project's new pump station facility was previously identified in the Notice of Preparation issued on November 10, 2016, as being located on approximately 9,500 square feet to accommodate a state-of-the-art odor control facility and other equipment. The current proposal is for the facility to be on 10,000 square feet. Could OCS❑ construct the necessary facilities and equipment on a smaller footprint, including partial or complete undergrounding of pump station equipment and has this been done on other pump stations in California? Could the two 10-foot diameter tanks included in the vapor -phase odor control system be undergrounded? Pg 3-10 provides an indication that the proposed pump station building would include features, architecture, and screening consistent with the Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PCDP), and Section 5.1 Aesthetics (pg. 5.1-17) states that the new pump station structures would be required to be generally consistent with the BBL PCDP. We would expect that all of the project components be completely consistent with the PCDP, and request that Mitigation Measure AES-Z be modified to include concurrent submittal of design plans to bath the City Community Development Director, and to BBL representatives for review and approval. 3.4 Construction 12-5 Construction of the proposed Project is scheduled to take almost four (4) years, exclusive of demolition 1 disassembly of the existing pump station and site cleanup. Can construction be expedited and how long will the disassembly process take (the DER does not 12.7 describe this process or the timeline for same)? Pump Station Improvements and Force Main Improvements generally describe construction activities that require significant, long-term disruption of current and proposed uses on the BBL Project site, the City's Castaways Park, Pearson's Port Fish Market in the County tidelands area of the Newport Harbor Channel, as well as lane closures on East Coast Highway and Bayside Drive. Please provide more specific information on impacts created by: — 80,000 sq. ft. of staging area (Exhibit 3-6) and potential impacts to marina access and parking; — 20,000 sq. ft. of Castaway's Park; 12-S 56118840-0 August 4, 2017 Page 3 — Additional temporary construction easements needed for heavy equipment associated with microtunneling that will occur on the bayfront and potential impacts to Pearson's Port, our existing kayak and SUP rental businesses, public access to tidelands area, marina gangways and docks, etc.; — Impacts to street parking currently available on Bayside Drive caused by expected lane closures; — Additional staging areas west of the staging area shown in Exhibit 3-6 needed during the relocated pump station buildings construction. 12-9 This Construction section 3.4 (see also 5.2-12) does not provide sufficient clarity with respect to full remediation of the existing pump station and force mains. OCSD must clarify that all existing facilities, including the existing force mains and particularly the existing pump station 12-9 facility will be removed and a fully remediated, compacted site clean to residential standards, be provided. 5.11 Traffic As outlined above, the potential four -and -a -half year occupation of the BBL Project site will not only disrupt existing uses but proposed project development of the BBL Project. In addition, lane closures, particularly on Bayside Drive, will adversely impact access to existing recreational and marine commercial businesses. Traffic Mitigation Measure TRA-1 (pg. 5.11-6) requires CCSD to prepare a Construction Management Plan ("CMP") to be submitted for review and approval by OCSD's Director of 12-10 Engineering, containing fairly standard and non-specific elements. TRA-1 should be expanded and should identify, prior to issuance of construction permits, identification of specific lane closures, as well as timing and duration of same, identification of all OCSD-related construction, engineering and management parking, alternative BBL Project site access, and, a requirement that the CMP be provided to and reviewed by the BBL Project representatives and reviewed and approved by the City of Newport Beach Public Works Director. Thank you for your review and response on these comments. 1 12-11 Sincerel J P. Erskine of Nossaman LLP JPE.dif 56118840. v 1 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 12 John Erskine Nossaman LLP August 4, 2017 12-1 This is an introductory comment that provides a brief project description and summary of the nature of the comments provided in the letter. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. As such, no further response is necessary. 12-2 Since 2003 OCSD has conducted several studies evaluating hydraulics within the Newport Force Main Network (NFMN). OCSD's Technical Memorandum No. 3 Hydraulic Assessment, prepared by Malcom Pirnie, Inc., dated December 2010 (2010 Hydraulic Assessment) documents the hydraulic assessment of current and future NFMN configuration and flows, identifying hydraulic deficiencies and recommending solutions to contain flows within the collection system under both normal and adverse operating conditions. Based on the 2010 Hydraulic Assessment, current peak wet -weather flows for the Bay Bridge pump station is 16.9 MGD and projected peak wet -weather flows for year 2030 is 18.5 MGD. The 2010 Hydraulic Assessment concluded that the Bay Bridge Pump Station is hydraulically deficient under all existing and future scenarios for peak wet -weather flow conditions and recommended upsizing the pump station to convey year 2030 peak wet -weather flow of 18.5 MGD. 12-3 This comment is related to the safety risk of the existing driveway access to the site as proposed in the "Existing Pump Station Site Rehabilitation" Alternative. The existing driveway has been used since the existence of the current site and OCSD has no record of vehicular accidents with pedestrians or oncoming traffic. OCSD can continue to use the existing site and driveway access. However, the preferred alternative site off of Bayside Drive contains a reconfigured pump station that would allow improved maneuverability for OCSD operations and maintenance vehicles. In addition, traffic volumes along Bayside Drive are considerably lower than volumes along East Coast Highway. 12-4 Comment noted. DEIR page 3-1, paragraph 3, has been revised as follows: The proposed pump station would be located on the same 31.4-acre parcel, approximately 300 feet to the northeast. The proposed pump station site is efitirely disturbed full improved and partially b�, and is currently occupied by RV storage facilities, which includes trailered boats, parking for the Bayside Village Marina, parking and access to Pearson's Port Fish Market_ area for kayak and stand-up naddleboard (SUP) rentals and 1 u and a driveway providing access to the facility. An existing fence that serves as the northerly boundary of the RV storage facility also bisects the proposed pump station site in an east/west orientation. 12-5 As explained in DEIR Section 5.9, Land Use and Relevant Planninga, the existing and proposed pump station sites are located within Planning Area 1 of the PCDP, which is currently occupied by an RV storage facility, trailered boats, parking for the Bayside Village Marina, parking and access to Pearson's Port Fish Market, and an area for kayak and stand-up paddleboard rentals and launching. Due to the duration and scope of the project, the project Final . December 2017 2-82 Responses to Comments �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE may involve some disruption to the current BBL recreation and marine commercial uses. These impacts would be mitigated to the extent possible by minimizing construction, hauling, transport, and lane closures during evening hours, holidays, and weekends. The project would further minimize interference with recreational opportunities in the Newport Channel by implementing microtunneling processes rather than conventional dredging. Alternate routes can be provided for access to the west end of the Back Bay Landing property. 12-6 A 10,000 square -foot site is preferred. Facilities can be designed on smaller footprints and possibly be located underground, but this would add to construction costs, decrease maintenance access, increase maintenance costs, and decrease equipment reliability. A smaller site would make the option of relocating the pump station less attractive. OCSD is willing to submit design plans concurrently with BBL to the City. Please note that OCSD is exempt from Uniform Building Code review. OCSD is willing to submit plans to BLL for review and comment. 12-7 Construction can be expedited. OCSD is committed to streamlining and minimizing the duration of construction activities to the extent possible, but the complexity and scale of the project would be more expensive and would have greater public impacts (i.e., nighttime construction activities). Additionally, deconstruction of the existing pump station facility would occur once the new pump station facilities are completed. OCSD has estimated the duration of this project component, but a detailed construction schedule for all project components would be determined during Final Design and shared with affected stakeholders and property owners. 12-8 The disassembly process can be a minimum of four months. However, it can take a year longer if the existing pump station deep foundations require removal. Impacts to property owners and their tenants due to construction easements would be addressed when they are being negotiated. Specific impacts to street parking on Bayside Drive would be coordinated with the City of Newport Beach Public Works and advanced communications would be sent to the surrounding public. 12-9 The project would comply with all Federal, State, and local rules and regulations including those pertaining to site remediation of hazardous materials, if necessary. The DEIR includes Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-4, which relate to asbestos -containing materials, lead -based paints, force main construction, and the discovery of unknown wastes (minor editorial revisions to HAZ-1, HAZ-2, and HAZ-4 are noted below to provide clarity regarding the monitoring and reporting process). The existing force mains would be abandoned in place and filled with slurry to minimize potential impacts to affected properties and the Newport Bay Channel (refer to Response 10-4, above). The pump station and associated structures are planned to be removed a maximum of five feet below the ground surface. Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 on DEIR page 5.7-15 have been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure HAZ- 1 has been revised as follows: HAZ-1 Prior to demolition activities, an asbestos survey shall be conducted by an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and California Division of Final . December 2017 2-83 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) certified building inspector to determine the presence or absence of asbestos containing -materials (ACMs). If ACMs are located, abatement of asbestos shall be completed prior to any activities that would disturb ACMs or create an airborne asbestos hazard. Asbestos removal shall be performed by a State certified asbestos containment contractor in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403. Contractors performing ACM removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District of Hfigifleer-i • Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure HAZ-2 on DEIR page 5.7-16 have been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure HAZ- 2 has been revised as follows: HAZ-2 If paint is separated from building materials (chemically or physically) during demolition of the structures, the paint waste shall be evaluated independently from the building material by a qualified Environmental Professional. If lead -based paint is found, abatement shall be completed by a qualified Lead Specialist prior to any activities that would create lead dust or fume hazard. Lead -based paint removal and disposal shall be performed in accordance with California Code of Regulation Title 8, Section 1532.1, which specifies exposure limits, exposure monitoring and respiratory protection, and mandates good worker practices by workers exposed to lead. Contractors performing lead -based paint removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Rngiiieerin . Minor editorial revisions to Mitigation Measure HAZ-4 on DEIR page 5.7-16 have been included to provide additional monitoring and reporting clarification. Mitigation Measure HAZ- 4 has been revised as follows: HAZ-4 If unknown wastes are discovered during construction by the contractor that are believed to involve hazardous waste or materials, the contractor shall comply with the following: • Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, and remove workers and the public from the area; • Notify the Orange County Sanitation District T_'ir-eeter- of Eftg4 ee~ • Secure the area as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District and • Notify the Orange County Health Care Agency's Hazardous Materials Division's Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator (or other appropriate agency specified by the Director of Engineering). The Final . December 2017 2-84 Responses to Comments `OJN�Y SA NI T4I�oN � � O Z 9 9 2 OtF Off? THE Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator shall advise the responsible party of further actions that shall be taken, if required. 12-10 As noted above in Response 5-6, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 has been modified to note that engineering drawings and specifications would be subject to approval by Caltrans and the City of Newport Beach, in addition to OCSD. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 includes a range of minimum requirements that would be necessary within the engineering drawings and specifications, and OCSD acknowledges that additional provisions related to items such as access and parking (developed in consultation with the City and Caltrans, and based on final design) may be required. Based on the analysis provided within the DEIR, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would reduce short-term project -related traffic impacts to a level below significance. 12-11 This comment is a closing statement. This comment does not address the DEIR's adequacy or involve an environmental issue. No further comment is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-85 Responses to Comments Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 2-86 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 13 �m C- L K. P.A. California Cultural Resource Preservation Alliance, inc. P.O. Box 54132 An alliance of American Indian and scientific communities working for Irvine, CA 92619-4132 the preservation of archaeological sites and other cultural resources. July 8, 2017 Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District Re: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the DEIR for the above -mentioned project. We appreciate that the City of Newport Beach and Orange Sanitation District acknowledges the fact that the City of Newport Beach has a long cultural history and is culturally sensitive. Based on the information provided 13-1 in the Cultural Resources Appendix, we agree that the project has a low potential to impact intact archaeological materials and concur with Mitigation Measure CUL-1. Sincerely, Patricia Martz, Ph.D. President �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 13 Patricia Martz, Ph.D., President California Cultural Resources Preservation Alliance, Inc. July 8, 2017 13-1 This letter acknowledges that the California Cultural Resources Preservation Alliance, Inc. received and reviewed the DEIR and agrees with the findings related to cultural resources and recommended Mitigation Measure CUL-1 in the DEIR. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-88 Responses to Comments COMMENT LETTER 14 From: Rececca Robles [mailto:rebroblesl@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 9:19 PM To: CEQA <cega@ocsd.com> Subject: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project DEIR Report July 5,2017 Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst Orange County Sanitation District Re: Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Rehabilitation Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the DEIR for the above -mentioned project. We appreciate that the City of Newport Beach and Orange Sanitation District acknowledge the fact that the City of Newport Beach has a long cultural history and was home to our ancestors prior to settlement by Euro-Americans. Based on the information provided in the Cultural Resources Appendix, we agree that the project has a low potential to impact intact archaeological materials and concur with Mitigation Measure CUL-1. In the event that buried cultural materials are discovered during construction, we wish to be notified. Sincerely, 14-1 �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE RESPONSE TO COMMENT LETTER NO. 14 Rebecca Robles United Coalition to Protect Panhe July 5, 2017 14-1 This letter acknowledges that the United Coalition to Protect Panhe received and reviewed the DEIR and agrees with the findings related to cultural resources and recommended Mitigation Measure CUL-1 in the DEIR. OCSD has noted that the United Coalition to Protect Panhe requested notification in the event buried cultural materials are discovered during project construction. No further response is necessary. Final . December 2017 2-90 Responses to Comments 3.0 ERRATA This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project 3.0 ERRATA Changes to the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) are noted below. A double -underline indicates additions to the text; strikeout indicates deletions to the text. These changes are considered minor and editorial in nature, and do not affect the conclusions of the environmental document or require recirculation of the EIR. Section 2.0, page 2-8, 1st paragraph • Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9) adopted February 25, 2014, Ordinance No. 2014-4 A20ll-216 and Amended A ril 26 2016 Ordinance No. 2016-8 . The Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9) (Back Bay Landing PCDP) is a redevelopment plan involving a mixed -use waterfront project. This project would construct a dry stack boat storage facility for 140 boats, 61,534 square feet of visitor -serving retail and recreational marine facilities, and up to 49 attached residential units. The Back Bay Landing PCDP establishes appropriate zoning regulations governing land use and development of the Planned Community site, consistent with the General Plan and CLUP. The Back Bay Landing PCDP provides a vision for the land uses on the site, sets the development standards and design guidelines for specific project approvals at the Site Development Review and Community Development Plan approval stage, and regulates the long term operation of the developed site. Section 3.0, page 3-1, 3rd paragraph The proposed pump station would be located on the same 31.4-acre parcel, approximately 300 feet to the northeast. The proposed pump station site is entirely distu fully improved and partiallpaved, and is currently occupied by RV storage facilities, which includes trailered boats_ parking for the Bayside Village Marina marking and access to Pearson's Port Fish Market_ area for kayak and stand- up ^naddleboard (SUErentals and launching3 and a driveway providing access to the facility. An existing fence that serves as the northerly boundary of the RV storage facility also bisects the proposed pump station site in an east/west orientation. Section 4.0, pages 4-2 — 4-5, Table 4-1, Cumulative Projects List Table 4-1 Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status City of Newport Beach 2 Recirlential Tn�nier Drive, Recirlential Tnuier Preparation of CIR Klownnd Pont, 2 41teNatiom Highway, Newport BeaGh Development of a 33,926 square feet ALitemobile Sales arSer�tise basil PapAing of Cn4onmenta1 DOGUrnent. Tr Ss.ns,_ltartte he I rJen� tiff 3 150 Newport renter NewW_Be Preparation of CIR M_RM9Fe&s: UPA&- Final . December 2017 3-1 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status 4 NewperN32Rd MedifisatigR Newport Boulevard frorn Via Lode to30�, a 3201 Newport RA, dpw;rd Roadway imnr onto; Newport Boulevard from Via L do Approved. Coastal novel n rad C+roo+ terming+'nn as o PeFmot issued ' Aloumnr+ Roonh Newport Beach nd StFee Development of a mixed -use structure with 1,171 square feet of retail floor area. one 2,347 1 Ullman Sail Lofts 410 and 412 291h Street Anticipated CEQA square foot dwelling unit and Exemption. three residential dwelling units ranging from 2,484 square feet to 2,515 square feet. Development of a 275-room, 201,498 square -foot hotel on 14.3 acres. Amenities include a coffee shop, gift/sundry shop. 2 = Newport Dunes Hotel 1131 Back Bay Drive Application incomplete. business center, function room spa/fitness facilities, restaurant, pool, tennis courts, sand volleyball courts and picnic area. Construction of a 70,295 square - foot, 4-story Ocean Literacy Facility. This project would 600 East Bay, 209 include removal of 63-metered Application 53 ExplorOcean3 Washington Street, 600 and 608 Balboa Avenue, and space surface parking lot; construction of 388 spaces; submitted April 2014. On hold per 200 Palm, Newport Beach construction of a 141,000 applicant's request. square -foot, 5-level off -site parking structure and 6,500 square -foot floating classroom. Redevelopment project involving Approved. a mixed -use waterfront project. Amendments This project would construct a pmpesed Site 64 Back Bay Landing 300 East Coast Highway, Newport Beach dry stack boat storage facility for 140 boats, 61,534 square feet of visitor -serving retail and Development Review and Coastal recreational marine facilities, Development and up to 49 attached residential Permit anticipated to be filed in 2018. units. City of Newport Beach public access and transient dock and expansion of balboa marina 7-5 Balboa Marina West Expansion 201 East Coast Highway, Newport Beach including 14,252 square feet of restaurant, 12 transient boat slips, 26 24 private boat slips, Approved. 664 square feet of marina restroom, and reconfiguration of a 294-s ace parking lot. Final . December 2017 3-2 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status 720 West Bay Avenue, 800 Awaiting Coastal West Bay Avenue, 711-721 Construction of a 23,163 square- DevelopmeRt 96 Newport Harbor Yacht Club West Bay Avenue, and foot Yacht Club Facility. 710-720 Balboa Boulevard, Under Newport Beach Construction. -9 Newport Banning RanGh Development of 1,375 residential dwelling a 75_ Awaiting Development Permit nnnrn„al units resort uses, 75,000 square fee of nOMmernial Y&e_ approximately 51 n Newport-BeaGh gross of and approximately parklands, 252.3 aGF86 of gross permanent West NeWPE)14 Community 9-9-2- 15t"&Fee OR hold at the 4-0 Gente or+ Reaoh (G urren+ the West Newport Community Qenter-. direr+ion of the -riff, Managers Offi, e lesat♦en-) Widening of westbound West Old Newport Boulevard/West Intersection of Old Newport Coast Highway at Old Newport ceder %view ND 447 = Coast Highway Widening Boulevard and West Coast Boulevard to accommodate a draft complete. Highway, Newport Beach third through lane, aright -turn pocket, and a bike lane. Intersection of West Coast Construction of a pedestrian 8 Lower Sunset View Park Highway and Superior overcrossings, parking, and park CEQA Bridge, Parking Lot, and Park Avenue, Newport Beach uses for lower Sunset View determination TBD. Park. Balboa Island Seawall Balboa Island, Newport New seawall along the Grand Awaiting City's 4-3 9 Reconstruction Beach Canal and on the west end of Request for Balboa Island. Proposal (RFP). Newport Boulevard north of Divert dry weather flows from Arches Storm Drain Diversion Coast Highway, Newport west and east storm drains CEQA 10 Beach (subwatersheds) to the sanitary determination TBD. sewers stem. Big Canyon, downstream of 4-5 Big Canyon Rehab Project Jamboree Road and south Divert dry weather flows from Final MND in 11 of Big Canyon Creek, the creek into a bioreactor. Progress. Newport Beach Replaces deteriorating water 46 Bay Crossings Water Main Newport Harbor, Newport transmission mains pursuant to CEQA 12 Replacement Beach the Water Master Plan and Bay determination TBD. Crossing Water Transmission Study. 4-7 745 Dover Drive, Newport Construction of an Approved. 13 13 ENC Preschool Beach Environmental Nature Center CEQA Exemption. Preschool. 4 Park Avenue Bridge Balboa Island, Newport Replacement of Park Avenue Under 14 Replacement Beach Bridge. construction. Final e December 2017 3-3 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status Construction of 83 single -unit residences, private streets, common open space, and 49 1560 Placentia Drive, landscaping. Proposed Zoning AppFeved Under 15 Ebb Tide Newport Beach Code Amendment from Multiple- construction. = Unit Residential (RM) to Planned Community (PC). A Planned Community Development Plan is proposed. Construction of a 130-room 3300 Newport Boulevard upscale hotel. General Plan 20 Lido House Hotel and 475 32nd Street, Amendment, Coastal Land Use Under 16 Newport Beach Plan Amendment, and Zoning construction. Amendment to change zoning from Public Facilities to Visitor. Construction of four buildings CEQA exemption. 2011, 2043, 2121, and (two buildings, three -level Approved. 24 Westcliff Medical 2131 Westcliff Drive, parking structure, and an Dornlition permit 17 — Newport Beach existing building) totaling 73,722 issued Under square feet with 382 spaces of construction. off-street parking. Building permit approval; PGR 2-2 3355 Via Lido, Construction of 23 attached � expired 18 Lidoand Lido Villas Newport Beach three-story townhome Application, CLUP — condominiums. Amendment, and CDP application a roved. Amendment to the North Newport Center Planned Community (NNCPC) increasing Villas Fashion Island (Formerly the residential development 23 1101 San Joaquin Hills allocation with the NNCPC from Under San Joaquin Plaza 19 Apartments) Road, Newport Beach 430 dwelling units to a total of construction. 524 dwelling units (increase of 94 units) and allocating the units to the San Joaquin Plaza sub- area. 24 10 Big Canyon 10 Big Canyon, Newport Rough grading for development Approved. Not yet 20 Beach of a single-family residence. constructed. Newport BeaGh Country Club 16-0606 East Ge-ast Highway, GeRstrur-AeR of 51,213 square rnnc� MFUGfOOT f0Gt Glubho, se. And April lRC—. NewportGh gGlf f-Anilifioc a Dorf horn 328, 332, and 340 Old Approved. 26, Old Newport GPA Project Newport Boulevard, Construction of 25,000 square- Demolition and 21 Newport Beach foot medical office building. grading permits are issued. Final . December 2017 3-4 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 4-1 [continued] Cumulative Projects List No.' Name Location Proposed Land Use Status Reallocation of up to 225,000 22 Hoag Memorial Hospital 1 Hoag Drive, Newport square feet of previously �� Presbyterian Master Plan Beach approved (but not constructed) Approved. Update Project square footage from the Lower Campus to the Upper Campus. Construction of 8 residential condominium units and 28 AERIE Project 301-207 Carnation Avenue replacement, reconfiguration, Under 23 and 101 Bayside Place, and expansion of the existing construction. gangway platform, pier walkway, and dock facilities. miniurnS Pf9j �g �e r rnnc n.^� units totaling approximate! 205,232 not square foot foot of wes squareDrive, subterranean parking otn Unfiirn o for a total of ')!11 enoroc nn_cito �Beatrtt parking approximately 79,140 square feet of epen spaGe and foot of rooreationol area. n 30 Newport Marina _ GTC-0- Development Newport BeaGh Mixed Use development nnncictinn of 277 rocirlontiol unite Unde rnnet T and approximately ,000 uSe� City of Costa Mesa 4 Improvements to Lions Park; new signage, library building, ISIMND ublili c 34 Lions Park, 570 West 18t" and cafe; and renovation and review period 24 Lions Park Project3 Street, 1845 and 1855 Park repurposing of the existing ended March 4, Avenue, Costa Mesa Donald Dungan Library building 2017. to the Neighborhood Community Center. Proposes a new mixed -use development. Phase I has IS/MND Addendum 32 Westside Lofts Mixed -Use 1640 Monrovia Avenue, constructed a 185-unit assisted prepared July 25 Development Project Costa Mesa living facility. Phase II would 2016. construct 42,000 square feet of commercial office uses. Notes: 1. Refer to Exhibit 4-1, Cumulative Protect Locations. 2. City of Newport Beach, Cumulative Projects List, http://www.newportbeachca.gov/Pln/CEQA_Cumulative/cumulative projects _current.pdf, accessed March 27, 2017. 3. For projects with multiple addresses, the address with the nearest proximity to the project site was depicted in Exhibit 4-1. Written Correspondence: Minoo Ashabi, Principal Planner, City of Costa Mesa, March 27, 2017. Final . December 2017 3-5 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Section 5.0, pages 5.1-11- 5.1-12, Subsection B B. Permitted Height of Structures 1. Building Height The maximum allowable building height shall be 35 feet for structures with flat roofs and 40 feet for structures with sloped roofs (minimum 3:12 pitch), except as follows: a) As illustrated on Exhibit 3, Building Heights,100 feet from back of curb along Bayside Drive within the eastern portion of Planning Area 1, maximum allowable building height shall not exceed 26 feet for flat roofs and 31 feet for sloped roofs. e- b) Within Planning Area 1, maximum allowable height for any parking structure shall not exceed 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs. 4} e) All other exceptions to height shall be regulated pursuant to Section 20.30.060.D of the Municipal Code. Section 5.0, page 5.1-13, Subsection A A. Architectural Theme ..�•_��r_�_w_�!essr��i!��asr�•_��.�s��,�� _ . _ _. _ �e�ss�er����.�_ The development shall be designed with a Coastal architectural theme. This architectural theme is influenced by the marine climate of the California coastline_ with varied historical vernacular and casually elegant palette_ with building forms and massing that define and create unique and often seamless indoorloutdoor spaces. The project would follow principles of quality designer exhibiting a high level of architectural standards and shall be compatible with the surrounding area; sensitive to scale, proportion, and identity with a focus on places. Massing offsets. variation of roof lines, varied textures, openings, recesses- and design accents on all building elevations shall be provided to enhance the architectural design. The intent is not to select a historicallv specific or rigid architectural stvle for the nroiect_ but to create an active. mixed -use iv lla�e• Final . December 2017 3-6 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Section 5.0, page 5.1-16, Mitigation Measure AES-1 AES-1 Prior to issuance of any grading and/or demolition permits, whichever occurs first, ft engineering drawings and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Engineering. The Gens"etion " anage~~e~~ Plaii These documents shall, at a minimum, indicate the equipment and vehicle staging areas, stockpiling of materials, fencing (i.e., temporary fencing with opaque material), and haul route(s). Staging areas shall be sited and/or screened in order to minimize public views to the maximum extent practicable. Construction haul routes shall minimize impacts to sensitive uses in the project area by avoiding local residential streets, as feasible. Section 5.0, page 5.1-17, Mitigation Measure AES-2 AES-2 Prior to construction of the new pump station facility, OCSD shall submit design plans of the proposed pump station to the City of Newport Beach Direetor of Community for review and approval by the City's Planning Commission or delegated authori for Site Development Review and to determine consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP design guidelines. The Orange County Sanitation District Director ef Engineer-ing sha4l provide final review and approval of design plans, in Consideration of Section 5.0, page 5.1-19, Mitigation Measure AES-3 AES-3 All construction -related lighting fixtures (including portable fixtures) shall be oriented downward and away from adjacent sensitive areas (including residential and biologically sensitive areas). Lighting shall consist of the minimal wattage necessary to provide safety at the construction site. A construction safety lighting plan shall be submitted to the Orange County Sanitation District r,...,,, tef of E~~iiieer n for review and approval prior to any nighttime construction activities. Section 5.0, page 5.1-19, Mitigation Measure AES-4 AES-4 Prior to construction of the proposed pump station, lighting plans shall be provided to the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Efigineerin for review and approval_ and to the City of Newport Beach for review and aPnroval by the City's Planning Commission for Site Development Review. The lighting=plan shall Kati illustrate consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP regulations for lighting. Per these requirements, all outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, shielded, aimed, located, and maintained to minimize impacts to adjacent sites and to not produce glare onto adjacent sites or roadways. Final . December 2017 3-7 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Section 5.0, pages 5.2-6 and 5.10-6, Tables 5.2-2 and 5.10-2, Sensitive Receptors Table 5.2-2 Sensitive Receptors Type N2MA Approximate Distance from Project Site (feet) Orientation from Project Site Location/Description Residential Residential Uses 25 North Single Family Residences 25 East Single Family Residences 25 South Single Family Residences 50 West Single Family Residences Hyatt Regency Newport Beach 3,705 East 1107 Jamboree Road Hotels Balboa Inn 5,269 South 105 Main Street Newport Harbor High School 1,925 Northwest 600 Irvine Avenue Horace Ensign Intermediate School 2,765 Northwest 2000 Cliff Drive Harper Elementary School 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Schools Mariners Elementary School 4,785 North 2100 Mariners Drive Newport Elementary School 4,850 Southwest 1327 West Balboa Boulevard Children's Center By the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Newport Heights Elementary 4,981 Northwest 300 E 15th Street Newport Harbor Lutheran Church 910 North 798 Dover Drive St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church 2,047 Northwest 600 St Andrews Road Places of Worship St. John Vianney Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314 Marine Avenue Christ Church by the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church 5,172 Southwest 1441 West Balboa Boulevard Hospitals Newport Bay Hospital 1,265 North 1501 East 16th Street Balboa Branch Library 4,277 South 100 East Balboa Boulevard Libraries Mariners Library 5,182 North 1300 Irvine Avenue Bob Henry Park 1,370 North 900 Dover Drive Back Bay View Park 2,904 Southeast Jamboree Road and P-ad& Est Coast Highway Back Bay Golf & Fitness 3,724 Northeast 1107 Jamboree Road Recreation/Parks Genoa Park 3,791 West 232 Via Genoa Harper Park 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Galaxie View Park 4,750 Northeast 1554 Galaxy Drive Pinkley Park 4,794 Northwest 360 Ogle Street, Costa Mesa Cliff Drive Park 4,840 Northwest 298 Riverside Avenue Note: 1. Distances are measured from the exterior project boundary only and not from individual construction projects/areas within the interior of the project site. Source: Google Earth, 2017. Final . December 2017 3-8 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Table 5.10-2 Sensitive Receptors Type Name Approximate Distance from Project Site (feet) Orientation from Project Site Location/Description Residential Residential Uses 25 North Single Family Residences 25 East Single Family Residences 25 South Single Family Residences 50 West Single Family Residences Hyatt Regency Newport Beach 3,705 East 1107 Jamboree Road Hotels Balboa Inn 5,269 South 105 Main Street Newport Harbor High School 1,925 Northwest 600 Irvine Avenue Horace Ensign Intermediate School 2,765 Northwest 2000 Cliff Drive Harper Elementary School 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Schools Mariners Elementary School 4,785 North 2100 Mariners Drive Newport Elementary School 4,850 Southwest 1327 West Balboa Boulevard Children's Center By the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Newport Heights Elementary 4,981 Northwest 300 E 15th Street Newport Harbor Lutheran Church 910 North 798 Dover Drive St. Andrew's Presbyterian Church 2,047 Northwest 600 St Andrews Road Places of Worship St. John Vianney Chapel 4,480 Southeast 314 Marine Avenue Christ Church by the Sea 4,910 Southwest 1400 West Balboa Boulevard Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church 5,172 Southwest 1441 West Balboa Boulevard Hospitals Newport Bay Hospital 1,265 North 1501 East 16th Street Balboa Branch Library 4,277 South 100 East Balboa Boulevard Libraries Mariners Library 5,182 North 1300 Irvine Avenue Bob Henry Park 1,370 North 900 Dover Drive Back Bay View Park 2,904 Southeast Jamboree Road and Pasifis Est Coast Highway Back Bay Golf & Fitness 3,724 Northeast 1107 Jamboree Road Recreation/Parks Genoa Park 3,791 West 232 Via Genoa Harper Park 4,546 North 452 E 18th Street, Costa Mesa Galaxie View Park 4,750 Northeast 1554 Galaxy Drive Pinkley Park 4,794 Northwest 360 Ogle Street, Costa Mesa Cliff Drive Park 4,840 Northwest 298 Riverside Avenue Note: 1. Distances are measured from the exterior project boundary only and not from individual construction projects/areas within the interior of the project site. Source: Google Earth, 2017. Section 5.0, page 5.3-10, Mitigation Measure BI0-1 BI0-1 To the extent feasible, construction activities shall be scheduled outside of the nesting season (typically February 15 to August 15) to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds. However, if construction must occur during the nesting season, all suitable habitat surrounding the project site shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist prior to commencement of site disturbance activities. Final . December 2017 3-9 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project If an active avian nest is discovered in proximity to the project site during the nesting bird survey, construction activities shall stay outside of a 300-foot buffer around the active nest. For raptor species, this buffer shall be expanded to 500 feet. A biological monitor shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest in order to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. The buffer area and limitations on construction may be reduced upon coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife_ provided the nesting behaviors are not dim ted by construction activities. Once the young have fledged, normal construction activities shall be allowed to occur. Section 5.0, page 5.4-16, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 CUL-1 Prior to ground -disturbing activities, a qualified archaeologist shall provide an Archaeological Monitoring Protocol Plan for the project. The archaeologist shall provide training to a Contractor's Representative regarding the Archaeological Monitoring Protocol Plan and the identification of archaeological resources. The training shall be open to Native American tribal representative(s), to assist the Contractor's Representative in identifying potential tribal cultural resources. The plan shall identify procedures for the event that potential resources are discovered by the Construction Contractor. If evidence of potential subsurface archaeological resources is found during site disturbance/excavation activities, these activities shall cease within 50 feet of that area and the construction contractor shall contact the Orange County Sanitation District Resideiit €ngifteer. Construction activities shall be allowed to continue in other areas of the site. The Resident Engineer shall then retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the discovery prior to resuming grading/construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find. If warranted, the archaeologist shall collect the resource, and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of the significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resource), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. If the archaeologist determines that the find is prehistoric or includes Native American materials, affiliated Native American groups shall be invited to contribute to the assessment and recovery of the resource, as applicable. The archaeologist and any applicable Native American contacts shall collect the resource and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resources), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines shall be followed. Work within the area of discovery shall resume only after the resource has been appropriately inventoried, documented, and recovered, as applicable. Section 5.0, page 5.7-15, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 HAZ-1 Prior to demolition activities, an asbestos survey shall be conducted by an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) certified building inspector to determine the presence or absence of Final . December 2017 3-10 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project asbestos containing -materials (ACMs). If ACMs are located, abatement of asbestos shall be completed prior to any activities that would disturb ACMs or create an airborne asbestos hazard. Asbestos removal shall be performed by a State certified asbestos containment contractor in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403. Contractors performing ACM removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District Direete- of L'. fTin .er-i ~ Section 5.0, page 5.7-16, Mitigation Measure HAZ-2 HAZ-2 If paint is separated from building materials (chemically or physically) during demolition of the structures, the paint waste shall be evaluated independently from the building material by a qualified Environmental Professional. If lead -based paint is found, abatement shall be completed by a qualified Lead Specialist prior to any activities that would create lead dust or fume hazard. Lead -based paint removal and disposal shall be performed in accordance with California Code of Regulation Title 8, Section 1532.1, which specifies exposure limits, exposure monitoring and respiratory protection, and mandates good worker practices by workers exposed to lead. Contractors performing lead -based paint removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District a Engifleer-in • Section 5.0, page 5.7-16, Mitigation Measure HAZ-4 HAZ-4 If unknown wastes are discovered during construction by the contractor that are believed to involve hazardous waste or materials, the contractor shall comply with the following: • Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the suspected contaminant, and remove workers and the public from the area; • Notify the Orange County Sanitation District Dire_~_r o_`Efig-~--r--~a; • Secure the area as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District oaf Efigiiaeer-i ; and • Notify the Orange County Health Care Agency's Hazardous Materials Division's Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator (or other appropriate agency specified by the Director of Engineering). The Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator shall advise the responsible party of further actions that shall be taken, if required. Section 5.0, page 5.9-8, 2nd paragraph The City's LCP and associated Coastal Land Use Plan (CLUP) were Vpreved certified by the CCC on Septeffiber 8 January 13, 2017, and became effective iia on anua 3-1 2017. The CLUP sets forth goals, objectives, and policies that govern the use of land and water in the coastal zone within the City of Newport Beach and its sphere of influence consistent with the General Plan. The City's CLUP identifies the Coastal Act coastal resources planning and management policies that are relevant to Newport Beach. The CLUP addresses Coastal Act policies within three chapters: Land Use and Development; Public Access and Recreation; and Coastal Resource Protection. Each section or subsection begins with the identification of the Coastal Act sections that are relevant to Newport Beach, followed by a narrative of the local setting and policy direction adopted by the City to address the requirements of the Costal Act and a listing of specific policies. Final . December 2017 3-11 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Section 5.0, page 5.10-16, Mitigation Measure N0I-1 NOI-1 Prior to the initiation of construction, the Orange County Sanitation District shall confirm that the Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications stipulate that: • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. • The Gontraeto Orange County Sanitation District shall provide a qttahfied "Noise Disturbance Coordinator." The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement reasonable measures to resolve the complaint as deemed aeeeptable by the Iubliee Works Dir-eeter, or deli itee and comply with the City Noise Ordinance. The contact name and fhe construction h lin telephone number For- the shall be clearly posted on -site. • When feasible, construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals, etc.). • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Typical construction activities that produce noise shall not take place outside of the allowable hours specified by the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 10.28.040 (7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays; construction is prohibited on Sundays and/or federal holidays). Alternative work hours may be designated by the Citv to reduce other impacts_ such as traffic. Section 5.0, page 5.10-16, Mitigation Measure N0I-2 NOI-2 Prior to initiation of construction of the Newport Bay Channel force main crossing, the Orange County Sanitation District shall verify that all construction plans and specifications include temporary barriers (noise attenuating panels) around the horizontal directional drilling (HDD)/microtunneling equipment (launch and receiving sites) with at least the following specifications-. Alternate specifications and/or materials may be utilized provided they demonstrate an equivalent level of noise attenuation. • Noise -producing equipment shall be shielded from nearby areas of human occupancy by erecting sound barriers of at least 24-feet in height which completely surround the work site and break the line -of -sight between the noise source and the receptors. Equipment shall be located in positions that direct the greatest noise emissions away from sensitive areas. Final . December 2017 3-12 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project The frame of the barrier shall be located around the HDD/microtunneling eaui ment and consist of 3-inch by 3- inch by 0.065-inch thick steel tubing with welded joints. Alternatively, the frame can be constructed from lumber, but must be of sufficient strength to be structurally stable. The temporary construction noise barrier shall consist of four layers of material attached to the frame with metal screws: — 18 ounce tarp; — 2-inch thick fiberglass blanket R-7.5; 1/2 -inch thick weatherwood asphalt sheathing; and 7/16-inch sturdy board siding. The temporary construction noise barrier shall have a surface density of 4.84 pounds per square foot. Section 5.0, pages 5.11-6 — 5.11-8, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, ft Ganstruction Management Pla engineering drawings and specifications shall be submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District D eeteref l ee ing, California Department of Transportation_ and the Citv Public Works Department. Plan These documents shall, at a minimum, address the following: Traffic control for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open during; construction or re-routed to ensure continued connectivity. 04;T-,4,Bus stop access im acts shall be ffiaiiitaine coordinated with OCTA. At least three business days before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the Ne"ert City of Newport Beach Public Works Department, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for uninterrupted emergency access. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project. • Identify any off -site construction staging or material storage sites. Specify the hours during which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets. Final . December 2017 3-13 Errata Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project • Require the Contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited; to,, gravel and dirt resulting from its operations. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District D .. c E.. gi g ( o f the D v of any material which -------- -----a-------tea �--�r�'--------- - -- ------------i� may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent streets or areas. • Hauling or transport of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited,except what is required to provide direct access to the pro'ect site. • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All constructed -related parking and staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on -site or within other off-street areas. • Construction -related lane closures will would only occur between the hours of 9:-00 8:30 a.m. and 3-:00 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the Citv. • Use of a construction flagperson to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions, particularly during peak travel hours, and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway, Dover Drive, and Bayside Drive are affected. •This Construction Management Pla Th�ine�g dregs and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). Section 10.0, page 10-2 City of Newport Beach, Back Bay I unding Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9), Adopted February 25, 2014 and Amended April 26. 2016. Final . December 2017 3-14 Errata 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CEQA requires that when a public agency completes an environmental document which includes measures to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects, the public agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring plan. This requirement ensures that environmental impacts found to be significant will be mitigated. The reporting or monitoring plan must be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6). In compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for the proposed Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is intended to provide verification that all mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project are monitored and reported. Monitoring will include 1) verification that each mitigation measure has been implemented; 2) recordation of the actions taken to implement each mitigation; and 3) retention of records in the project file. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program delineates responsibilities for monitoring the project, but also allows the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) flexibility and discretion in determining how best to monitor implementation. Monitoring procedures will vary according to the type of mitigation measure. Adequate monitoring consists of demonstrating that monitoring procedures took place and that mitigation measures were implemented. Reporting consists of establishing a record that a mitigation measure is being implemented, and generally involves the following steps: • OCSD distributes reporting forms to the appropriate entities for verification of compliance. • Departments/agencies with reporting responsibilities will review the Environmental Impact Report, which provides general background information on the reasons for including specified mitigation measures. • Problems or exceptions to compliance will be addressed to OCSD as appropriate. • Periodic meetings may be held during project implementation to report on compliance of mitigation measures. • Responsible parties provide OCSD with verification that monitoring has been conducted and ensure, as applicable, that mitigation measures have been implemented. Monitoring compliance may be documented through existing review and approval programs such as field inspection reports and plan review. • OCSD prepares a reporting form periodically during the construction phase and an annual report summarizing all project mitigation monitoring efforts. Final . December 2017 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program �y SAW r Environmental Impact Report .p Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project a XE • Appropriate mitigation measures will be included in construction documents and/or conditions of permits/approvals. Minor changes to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, if required, would be made in accordance with CEQA and would be permitted after further review and approval by OCSD. Such changes could include reassignment of monitoring and reporting responsibilities, plan redesign to make any appropriate improvements, and/or modification, substitution or deletion of mitigation measures subject to conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. No change will be permitted unless the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program fails to satisfy the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. Final • December 2017 4-2 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING CHECKLIST Mitigation Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks AESTHETICS AES-1 Prior to issuance of any grading and/or demolition Review and Prior to Issuance Orange County permits, whichever occurs first, engineering Approval of of Grading/ Sanitation District drawings and specifications shall be submitted for Construction Demolition review and approval by the Orange County Management Plan Permits Sanitation District. These documents shall, at a minimum, indicate the equipment and vehicle staging areas, stockpiling of materials, fencing (i.e., temporary fencing with opaque material), and haul route(s). Staging areas shall be sited and/or screened in order to minimize public views to the maximum extent practicable. Construction haul routes shall minimize impacts to sensitive uses in the project area by avoiding local residential streets, as feasible. AES-2 Prior to construction of the new pump station facility, Site Development Prior to Orange County OCSD shall submit design plans of the proposed Review; Final Construction of Sanitation District pump station to the City of Newport Beach for review Review and Pump Station and approval by the City's Planning Commission or Approval of Facility delegated authority for Site Development Review Design Plans and to determine consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP design guidelines. AES-3 All construction -related lighting fixtures (including Review and Prior to Nighttime Orange County portable fixtures) shall be oriented downward and Approval of Construction Sanitation District away from adjacent sensitive areas (including Construction Activities residential and biologically sensitive areas). Safety Lighting Lighting shall consist of the minimal wattage Plan necessary to provide safety at the construction site. A construction safety lighting plan shall be submitted to the Orange County Sanitation District for review and approval prior to any nighttime construction activities. Final . December 2017 4-3 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation -Ogg Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks AES-4 Prior to construction of the proposed pump station, Review and Prior to Orange County lighting plans shall be provided to the Orange Approval of Construction of Sanitation District County Sanitation District for review and approval, Outdoor Lighting the Pump Station and to the City of Newport Beach for review and Plan approval by the City's Planning Commission for Site Development Review. The lighting plan shall illustrate consistency with the Back Bay Landing PCDP regulations for lighting. Per these requirements, all outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, shielded, aimed, located, and maintained to minimize impacts to adjacent sites and to not produce glare onto adjacent sites or roadways. AIR QUALITY AQ-1 Prior to ground disturbance associated with the Review of Project Prior to Issuance Orange County project, the Orange County Sanitation District shall Plans and of any Grading Sanitation District confirm that the Grading Plan, Building Plans, and Specifications; Permit; During specifications stipulate that, in compliance with Construction Construction SCAQMD Rule 403, excessive fugitive dust Inspections emissions shall be controlled by regular watering or other dust prevention measures, as specified in the SCAQMD's Rules and Regulations. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off -site. Implementation of the following measures would reduce short-term fugitive dust impacts on nearby sensitive receptors: • All active portions of the construction site shall be watered every three hours during daily construction activities when dust is observed migrating from the project site to prevent excessive amounts of dust; • Apply non -toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging Final • December 2017 4-4 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Process Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks areas to reduce the need for watering a er dust is observed to be migrating from the site. More frequent watering shall occur if dust is observed migrating from the site during site disturbance; • Any on -site stockpiles of debris, dirt, or other dusty material shall be enclosed, covered, or watered twice daily, or non -toxic soil binders shall be applied; • All grading and excavation operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour; • Disturbed areas shall be replaced with ground cover or paved immediately after construction is completed in the affected area; • Track -out devices such as gravel bed track - out aprons (3 inches deep, 25 feet long, 12 feet wide per lane and edged by rock berm or row of stakes) shall be installed to reduce mud/dirt trackout from unpaved truck exit routes. Alternatively, a wheel washer shall be used at truck exit routes; • On -site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 miles per hour; • All material transported off -site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust prior to departing the job site; and Final • December 2017 4-5 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks • Trucks associated with soil -hauling activities shall avoid residential streets and utilize City - designated truck routes to the extent feasible. AQ-2 Prior to the initiation of construction, the Orange Review of Project Prior to Orange County County Sanitation District shall ensure that all trucks Plans and Construction; Sanitation District that are to haul excavated or graded material on -site Specifications; During shall comply with State Vehicle Code Section 23114 Construction Construction (Spilling Loads on Highways), with special attention Inspections to Sections 23114(b)(F) and (e)(4) as amended, regarding the prevention of such material spilling onto public streets and roads. This requirement shall be indicated on plans and specifications for the proposed project. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO-1 To the extent feasible, construction activities shall Completion of Within 3 Days Orange County be scheduled outside of the nesting season Pre -Construction Prior to Initiation Sanitation District; (typically February 15 to August 15) to avoid Clearance Survey of Ground Project Biologist potential impacts to nesting birds. However, if for Nesting Birds Disturbing construction must occur during the nesting season, Activities all suitable habitat surrounding the project site shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist prior to commencement of site disturbance activities. If an active avian nest is discovered in proximity to the project site during the nesting bird survey, construction activities shall stay outside of a 300- foot buffer around the active nest. For raptor species, this buffer shall be expanded to 500 feet. A biological monitor shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest in order to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. The buffer area and limitations on construction may be reduced upon coordination with the California Final • December 2017 4-6 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure In Reporting Monitoring and Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number L Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks Department of Fish and Wildlife, provided the nesting behaviors are not disrupted by construction activities. Once the young have fledged, normal construction activities shall be allowed to occur. CULTURAL RESOURCES CUL-1 Prior to ground -disturbing activities, a qualified Review of and Prior to Issuance Orange County archaeologist shall provide an Archaeological Training of any Grading Sanitation District; Monitoring Protocol Plan for the project. The Regarding Permit; During Project archaeologist shall provide training to a Contractor's Archaeological Construction Archaeologist; Representative regarding the Archaeological Monitoring Construction Monitoring Protocol Plan and the identification of Protocol Plan; Contractor archaeological resources. The training shall be During open to Native American tribal representative(s) to Construction assist the Contractor's Representative in identifying potential tribal cultural resources. The plan shall identify procedures for the event that potential resources are discovered by the Construction Contractor. If evidence of potential subsurface archaeological resources is found during site disturbance/excavation activities, these activities shall cease within 50 feet of that area and the construction contractor shall contact the Orange County Sanitation District. Construction activities shall be allowed to continue in other areas of the site. The Resident Engineer shall then retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the discovery prior to resuming grading/construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find. If warranted, the archaeologist shall collect the resource, and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of the significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resource), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. Final . December 2017 4-7 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks If the archaeologist determines that the find is prehistoric or includes Native American materials, affiliated Native American groups shall be invited to contribute to the assessment and recovery of the resource, as applicable. The archaeologist and any applicable Native American contacts shall collect the resource and prepare a test -level report describing the results of the investigation. The test -level report shall evaluate the site including discussion of significance (depth, nature, condition, and extent of the resources), final mitigation recommendations, and cost estimates. Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines shall be followed. Work within the area of discovery shall resume only after the resource has been appropriately inventoried, documented, and recovered, as applicable. CUL-2 Prior to ground -disturbing activities, a qualified Review of and Prior to Issuance Orange County paleontologist shall provide a Monitoring Protocol Training of any Grading Sanitation District; Plan for the project. The plan shall identify Regarding Permit; During Project procedures for the event that potential recoverable Monitoring Construction Paleontologist; fossils are discovered by the Construction Protocol Plan; Construction Contractor. The qualified paleontologist shall have During Contractor a B.S. or B.A. in geology and/or paleontology with Construction demonstrated competence in research, fieldwork, reporting, and curation. The paleontologist shall provide training to a Contractor's Representative regarding the Monitoring Protocol Plan and the identification of paleontological resources. If during initial ground -disturbing activities, the Contractor's Representative determines that sediments encountered are unlikely to contain recoverable fossils, no further monitoring shall be required. Final . December 2017 4-8 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure -difProcess Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks owever, a ossi or -suspected ossi is encountered during ground disturbing activities, the following steps shall be taken: • The fossil site shall not be touched, moved, or disturbed in any way. • Work shall stop in the immediate area, and a minimum 50-foot buffer shall be marked with brightly colored flagging. No further disturbance in the flagged area shall occur until the Contractor has cleared the area. • The Contractor's Representative, construction foreman or supervisor shall be immediately notified. • The Contractors Representative shall quickly examine the find and make a determination of significance. If the find is not significant, the foreman shall be informed when it is acceptable to resume work in the area. • If the Contractor's Representative is unable to make a recommendation regarding the find, the qualified paleontologist shall be notified to assess the find. As necessary, the qualified paleontologist shall develop a plan of mitigation which would likely include salvage excavation and removal of the find, removal of sediment from around the specimen, research to identify and categorize the find, curation of the find in a local qualified repository, and preparation of a report summarizing the find. Final • December 2017 4-9 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks IALS HAZ-1 Prior to demolition activities, an asbestos survey shall Asbestos Survey; Prior to Orange County be conducted by an Asbestos Hazard Emergency Asbestos Demolition of Sanitation District Response Act (AHERA) and California Division of Abatement (if Existing Pump Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) certified necessary) Station building inspector to determine the presence or absence of asbestos containing -materials (ACMs). If ACMs are located, abatement of asbestos shall be completed prior to any activities that would disturb ACMs or create an airborne asbestos hazard. Asbestos removal shall be performed by a State certified asbestos containment contractor in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403. Contractors performing ACM removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District. HAZ-2 If paint is separated from building materials Review of Paint Prior to any Orange County (chemically or physically) during demolition of the Waste Evaluation Demolition Sanitation District structures, the paint waste shall be evaluated Activities; During independently from the building material by a Demolition qualified Environmental Professional. If lead -based paint is found, abatement shall be completed by a qualified Lead Specialist prior to any activities that would create lead dust orfume hazard. Lead -based paint removal and disposal shall be performed in accordance with California Code of Regulation Title 8, Section 1532.1, which specifies exposure limits, exposure monitoring and respiratory protection, and mandates good worker practices by workers exposed to lead. Contractors performing lead - based paint removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the Orange County Sanitation District. Final . December 2017 4-10 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure 71 Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks HAZ-3 The construction contractor shall retain a Phase Spoils Sampling During Orange County II/Site Characterization Specialist to conduct During Construction Sanitation District; sampling of spoils associated with horizontal Construction Phase II/Site directional drilling/ microtunneling activities for force Characterization main construction prior to proper disposal of soil Specialist; materials off -site. The sampling shall determine Construction whether the spoils contain hazardous wastes, and if Contractor so, the spoils shall be disposed of in accordance with Federal and State requirements. HAZ-4 If unknown wastes are discovered during Observation During Construction construction by the contractor that are believed to During Construction Contractor; Orange involve hazardous waste or materials, the contractor Construction County Sanitation shall comply with the following: District; Hazardous Waste/Materials • Immediately cease work in the vicinity of the Coordinator suspected contaminant, and remove workers and the public from the area; • Notify the Orange County Sanitation District; • Secure the area as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District; and • Notify the Orange County Health Care Agency's Hazardous Materials Division's Hazardous Waste/ Materials Coordinator (or other appropriate agency specified by the Director of Engineering). The Hazardous Waste/Materials Coordinator shall advise the responsible party of further actions that shall be taken, if required. Final • December 2017 4-11 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure9 Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY HWQ-1 Prior to site disturbance activities and as part of the Preparation and Prior to Orange County project's compliance with the NPDES requirements, submittal of a Construction; Sanitation District; a Notice of Intent (NO1) shall be prepared and Notice of Intent Construction Construction submitted to the State Water Resources Quality (NOI) General Permit Contractor Control Board (SWRCB), providing notification and intent to comply with the State of California Construction General Permit. HWQ-2 The proposed project shall conform to the Review and During Orange County requirements of an approved Storm Water Pollution Compliance with Construction Sanitation District; Prevention Plan (SWPPP) (to be applied for prior to Approved SWPPP Construction site disturbance) and the NPDES Permit for General and NPDES Contractor Construction Activities No. CAS000002, Order No. Permit; 2009-0009-DWQ (as amended by 2010-014-DWQ Construction and 2012-006-DWQ), including implementation of Inspections all recommended Best Management Practices (BMPs), as approved by the State Water Resources Quality Control Board (SWRCB). HWQ-3 Upon completion of project construction, the Orange Notice of Following Orange County County Sanitation District shall submit a Notice of Termination Completion of Sanitation District Termination (NOT) to the State Water Resources (NOT) Construction Quality Control Board (SWRCB) to indicate that construction is completed. NOISE NOI-1 Prior to the initiation of construction, the Orange Review of Grading Prior to Initiation Orange County County Sanitation District shall confirm that the Plan, Building of Construction; Sanitation District Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications Plans, and During stipulate that: Specifications; Construction Construction • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, Inspections shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. Final • December 2017 4-12 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number -gigs Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Process Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks • The Orange County Sanitation District shall provide a "Noise Disturbance Coordinator." The Disturbance Coordinator shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Disturbance Coordinator shall determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement measures to resolve the complaint and comply with the City Noise Ordinance. The construction hotline telephone number shall be clearly posted on - site. • When feasible, construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals, etc.). • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Typical construction activities that produce noise shall not take place outside of the allowable hours specified by the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 10.28.040 (7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. on weekdays, 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays; construction is prohibited on Sundays and/or federal holidays). Alternative work hours may be designated by the City to reduce other impacts, such as traffic. Final • December 2017 4-13 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Process Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks NO1-2 Prior to issuance of Demolition or Building Permits, Review of Plans Prior to Issuance Orange County the Orange County Sanitation District shall verify that and Specifications of Demolition or Sanitation District all construction plans and specifications include Building Permits; temporary barriers (noise attenuating panels) around During the horizontal directional drilling Construction (HDD)/microtunneling equipment (launch and receiving sites) with at least the following specifications. Alternate specifications and/or materials may be utilitzed provided they demonstrate an equivalent level of noise attenuation. • Noise -producing equipment shall be shielded from nearby areas of human occupancy by erecting sound barriers of at least 24-feet height which completely surround the work site and break the line -of - sight between the noise source and the receptors. Equipment shall be located in positions that direct the greatest noise emissions away from sensitive areas. • The frame of the barrier shall be located around the HDD/microtunneling equipment and consist of 3-inch by 3-inch by 0.065-inch thick steel tubing with welded joints. Alternatively, the frame can be constructed from lumber, but must be of sufficient strength to be structurally stable. • The temporary construction noise barrier shall consist of four layers of material attached to the frame with metal screws: — 18 ounce tarp; — 2-inch thick fiberglass blanket R-7.5; Final • December 2017 4-14 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Monitoring Party Responsible VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Number Process Milestones for Monitoring Initials Date Remarks — /z-inch thick weatherwood asphalt sheathing; and — 7116-inch sturdy board siding. • The temporary construction noise barrier shall have a surface density of 4.84 pounds per square foot. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, engineering Review and Prior to Orange County drawings and specifications shall be submitted for Approval of the Construction Sanitation District; review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation Construction Caltrans; City of District, California Department of Transportation, and Management Plan Newport Beach the City Public Works Department. These documents Public Works shall, at a minimum, address the following: Department • Traffic control for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open during construction or re-routed to ensure continued connectivity. • Bus stop access impacts shall be coordinated with OCTA. • At least three business days before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for uninterrupted emergency access. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. Final • December 2017 4-15 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Process Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project. • Identify any off -site construction staging or material storage sites. • Specify the hours during which transport activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets. • Require the Contractorto keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited to, gravel and dirt resulting from its operations. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District , of any material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent streets or areas. • Hauling or transport of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited, except what is required to provide direct access to the project site. Final • December 2017 4-16 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Mitigation Number Mitigation Measure Monitoring and Reporting Process Monitoring Milestones Party Responsible for Monitoring VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE Initials Date Remarks • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All constructed -related parking and staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on -site or within other off-street areas. • Construction -related lane closures would only occur between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City. • Use of a construction flagperson to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions, particularly during peak travel hours, and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway, Dover Drive, and Bayside Drive are affected. • The engineering drawings and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device MUTCD . Final • December 2017 4-17 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project This page intentionally left blank. Final . December 2017 4-18 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program • !! WIJ', .s Bay Bridge Pump Station an�c Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. R"r ''der i J U LY 2023 Pre ared far. `p < Orange County i=tation Distr41Ict- Prepared by: _ Michael Baker International Bay Bridge Addendum I. Summary As Lead Agency, the Orange County Sanitation District ("OC San") prepared an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (the "previously analyzed project"). The OC San's Board of Directors ultimately certified an EIR for the previously analyzed project on February 24, 2021. On March 1, 2021, OC San submitted a Notice of Determination ("NOD") for the Final EIR to both the State Clearinghouse and the Orange County Clerk's Office ("County Clerk's Office"). The County Clerk's Office posted the NOD on March 1, 2021, and the State Clearinghouse posted the NOD on March 2, 2021. On April 1, 2021, Bayside Village Marina filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate against OC San in Orange County Superior Court alleging that the EIR failed to comply with CEQA on numerous grounds. (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238.) On December 16, 2022, Judge William Claster of the Orange County Superior Court issued a ruling that upheld the EIR in all respects except one. The Court issued a limited writ directing OC San to correct deficiencies in the EIR's description of the project's proposed construction staging areas. (Minute Order, pp. 1, 16.) The Court's December 16, 2022, ruling is attached hereto as Attachment I (the "Ruling"). The EIR explained that construction staging will occur somewhere in the "Adjacent Pump Station Work Area" ("Adjacent Area") shown in yellow on Exhibit 3-6 of the EIR. The EIR considered all potential impacts that could occur in the Adjacent Area including, among others, impacts on biological resources, aesthetics, cultural resources, archeological resources, transportation, noise, land use plan consistency, and emergency response. Lower Castaways Park is within the Adjacent Area. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 5.1-17, 5.3-2, 5.3-15, 5.3-21, 5.4-14, 5.5- 1, 5.5-3, 5.9-8, 5.9-9, 5.9-12, 5.9-14, 5.9-15, 5.9-16, 5.9-17, 8-9.) The City of Newport Beach submitted a comment letter to OC San stating that the "City will likely neither support a permanent nor temporary easement through Lower Castaways Park" because the City plans to develop the site with park facilities. In responses to comments, OC San stated that, should Lower Castaways not be available, construction staging would occur elsewhere within the Adjacent Area. The Court found that, assuming Lower Castaways is not available, "it is unclear whether creating a staging area in the limited, designated space is even possible." (Ruling, p. 7.) The Court concluded that no specific location with adequate square footage had been identified in the EIR, nor was there any analysis as to whether Mitigation Measures AES-1 and TRA-I would apply to any area other than the Lower Castaways. (Ruling, p. 7.) The Court also noted that Mitigation Measure TRA-I implies that construction staging could occur outside the Adjacent Areas. Mitigation Measure TRA-I states in relevant part, "[construction drawings shall] identify any and all construction staging or material storage sites located outside of the project area." (Ruling, p. 7.) The Court further noted that counsel for the District stated in a prior hearing that the lowest responsible bidder will have complete discretion 1 1780344.1 to decide where staging will occur and how many staging sites will be necessary. (Ruling, p. 7.) The Court explained that because the EIR's analysis failed to account for impacts that could occur elsewhere, and the low bidder could place the project elsewhere, it would make Mitigation Measure AES-1 "toothless." (Ruling, p. 8.) The Court also questioned whether AES-1 imposes enforceable standards. (Ruling, p. 8.) OC San has prepared this Addendum to the EIR in response to the Ruling. This Addendum provides additional information regarding the proposed use of the Lower Castaways as a construction staging area and adds a new construction staging area at OC San Plant No. 2 located in the City of Huntington Beach for soil storage/drying activities. The Addendum also modifies TRA-I to eliminate any reference to additional construction staging or material storage areas and, per a new condition of project approval, states that the construction contractor will not have discretion to select staging areas. Finally, the Addendum modifies and addresses the enforceability of Mitigation Measure AES-1. Mitigation measures for public projects are considered enforceable when they are incorporated into the project design. (Public Resources Code § 21081.6(b); 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15126.4(a)(2).) A resolution incorporating AES-I into the project design will be considered contemporaneously with this Addendum. Collectively, these clarifications and additions are referred to as the "Modified Project." As set forth in detail below, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts. As a result, an addendum is appropriate. (CEQA Guidelines §§ 15162, 15164.) II. Applicable CEQA Principles When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent or supplemental environmental review documentation shall be required unless one or more of the following events occurs: 1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; 2 1780344.1 B. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or D. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. When none of the above events has occurred, yet minor technical changes or additions to the previously adopted negative declaration are necessary, an addendum may be prepared (CEQA Guidelines § 15164(b).) Circulation of an addendum for public review is not necessary (CEQA Guidelines § 15164(c)); however, the addendum must be considered in conjunction with the adopted Final EIR by the agency's decision -making body (CEQA Guidelines § 15164(d).) III. Project Description: The Modified Project A. Construction Staging 1. Lower Castaways Park On May 22, 2023, the City of Newport Beach ("City") signed a Letter of Intent For Entering Into a Licensing Agreement — Lower Castaways Park ("Letter of Intent") attached hereto as Attachment 2. Per the Letter of Intent, OC San would lease 18,000 square feet of the lower portion of Castaways Park, located at 100 Dover Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660, from the City for use as a construction staging area in connection with the project. The City and OC San intend to memorialize these details in a licensing agreement at a future date. OC San will use a designated staging area at Lower Castaways Park, shown on Exhibit 1, for the following activities: staff parking; construction office trailers; storage, loading, and unloading of equipment and material; and refueling. The staged construction materials would include piping, conduits, shoring, formwork, rebar, and other materials necessary for construction. Equipment such as pumps, HVAC equipment, cranes, and electrical panels will be stored on raised mobile platforms, pallets, or other protective barriers to protect the equipment and prevent spills or the spread of materials. Staged construction equipment at this location may include trucks, lifts, excavators, loaders, cranes, and other equipment necessary for the construction. In addition, it is anticipated that the contractor will use a mobile diesel storage unit onsite to refuel the construction equipment. Soil and dredged materials will not be stored on the property. 2. OC San Plant No. 2 The Modified Project will utilize an approximately 30,000 square foot portion of OC San's Plant No. 2 as an additional construction staging area (Plant No. 2.). Plant No.2 is located 1780344.1 at 22212 Brookhurst Street, in the southernmost part of the City of Huntington Beach, and adjacent to Huntington State Beach. Plant No. 2 is triangular in shape and bounded by Brookhurst Street on the west, the Santa Ana River Channel on the east, and a lagoon on the South where Talbert Channel discharges into the Pacific Ocean. Residential development is located west and north of the site across Brookhurst Street. The Talbert Regional Park and Banning Ranch are located east of the site across the Santa Ana River channel. Plant No. 2 is approximately 111 acres in size and is developed with facilities related to various aspects of the wastewater treatment and disposal process, offices, and internal access roads. Under the Modified Project, excavated soil will be hauled from the project site to Plant No. 2 where it will be stockpiled and dried. Once dried, loaders would be utilized to stow stockpiles onto hauling trucks and either be hauled back to the project site or to a permitted landfill for disposal. Construction materials/equipment at Plant No. 2 would include, but not be limited to, hauling trucks, construction worker vehicles, loaders, and soil stockpiles. It should be noted that hauling trucks would not typically be stored overnight at Plant No. 2. Exhibit 2 shows the Plant No. 2 construction staging area. 11A4 PRIME PIUMPSTAnOH AND FORCE AUIfISREP1ACE1lENr PROJECT JFDOER IAM THE EIYL.N.. IAFACT FEPOEFT Proposed Lower Castaways Paris Staging Area f 0r E A wx Tf OMA EsMhk 1 The Modified Project's soil hauling assumptions, based on the addition of a construction staging area at Plant No. 2, are set forth in Tables 1-1 through 1-3. Hauling is anticipated to commence in the Fall of 2025 and conclude in the Fall of 2028. 4 1780344.1 Table 1-1 Soil Hauling Schedule From Project Site to OC San Plant No. 2 Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Soil Hauling Schedule Number Duration Activity Quantity Unit of Trucks' Start Complete (Calendar Days) Pump Station 8,281 cy 828 913/2 121912025 97 025 Existing Pump 4112/ Station Demolition 89 cy 9 2028 5/28/2028 46 and Odor Control TOTAL 8,370 cy 837 Note: 1. Assume each truck carries 10 cubic yards. 2. CalEEMod included assumption of construction commencement in the Fall of 2024. This is a conservative assumption, as the model assumes tha as time progresses, technology improves, reducing emissions. Table 1-2 Soil Hauling Schedule From OC San Plant No. 2 Back to the Project Site for Backfill Soil Hauled from Plant Number 2 Back to the Project Site for Backfill Soil Hauling Schedule Number Duration Activity Quantity Unit of Start Complete (Calendar Trucks' Days) Station 200 cy 20 9/19/2025 9/26/2025 7 -Pump Existing Pump Station Demolition and Odor 219 cy 22 1111/2027 121312027 32 Control TOTAL 419 cy 42 Note: 1. Assume each truck carries 10 cubic yards. 2. CalEEMod included assumption of construction commencement in the Fall of 2024. This is a conservative assumption, as the model assumes that as time progresses, technology improves, reducing emissions. 1780344.1 Score° Gaay: Earn Rn Ua0 Ma MKDGE NMP STATION AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONWIVAL IMPACT REPORT Proposed Plant No. 2 Staging Area I N T E R M A T 1 0 M A L fxh I bit 2 1780344.1 Table 1-3 Soil Hauling Schedule From OC San Plant No. 2 to Olinda Alpha Landfill ff Soil Hauling from Plant Number 2 Off -Site for Disposal Soil Hauling Schedule Number Duration Activity Quantity Unit of Start Complete (Calendar Trucks' Days) Pump Station 7,863 cy 786 6/2/2025 9/19/2025 109 Existing Pump Station Demolition and 9 cy 9 12/20/2027 1 /28/2028 39 Odor Control TOTAL 7,872 cy 795 Note: 1. Assume each truck carries 10 cubic yards. 2. CalEEMod included assumption of construction commencement in the Fall of 2024. This is a conservative assumption, as the model assumes that as time progresses, technology improves, reducing emissions. 3. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 In response to the Ruling, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 is modified below to: (1) eliminate the previous reference to, "Identify any and all construction staging or material storage sites located outside of the project site;" and (2) to add references to the "City of Huntington Beach" due to the addition of a construction staging area at Plant No. 2 which is located in the City of Huntington Beach. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 appeared in full on pages 1-20 to 23 and 5.11-7 to 9 of the EIR. TRA-1 is hereby edited as reflected below in each of the places it appeared in the EIR. Strikethrough indicates deleted text and double underline indicates an addition: TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, engineering drawings and specifications, and/or contractor shop drawings shall be prepared by the Project Engineer, or designee, and submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, and the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department. These documents shall, at a minimum, address the following: • Traffic control protocols shall be specified for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation, including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Disruption to traffic circulation shall be minimized to the greatest extent feasible. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open, to the greatest extent feasible, during construction or shall be re- routed to ensure continued connectivity. 7 1780344.1 • Bus stop access impacts shall be coordinated with, and approved by, the Orange County Transportation Authority. • At least one week before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, City of Newport Beach Public Works Department and Caltrans, as applicable, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for planning temporary detours or identifying alternative emergency access routes where appropriate. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project to reduce impacts to local streets and plan for traffic control signage and detours along identified haul routes to minimize impacts to existing traffic flow. • Specify the hours during which hauling activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets such as traffic control barricades, cones, flaggers, and warning signs. • Require the contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited, to gravel and dirt resulting from project construction. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District, of any project material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent City of Newport Beach} City of Huntington Beach, and Caltrans streets or areas. • Hauling of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited, except when required to provide direct access to the project site and in compliance with the approved project haul routes. • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. 8 1780344.1 • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All construction -related staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on the project site or within additional off-street staging areas previously identified and arranged. • Construction -related lane closures would only occur between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City. • Use of a construction flagperson (as deemed appropriate by the Orange County Sanitation District) to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions (particularly during peak travel hours) and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway are affected. • The engineering drawings and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). 4. Condition of Approval: the Construction Contractor Does Not Have Discretion to Select Staging Areas In response to the Ruling, OC San has prepared a condition of approval for the Modified Project ("Condition"). The Condition will be considered for approval contemporaneously with this Addendum. The Condition states, "The constructor contractor will not have discretion to select any construction staging or material storage sites. The construction staging or material storage sites for this project are identified in the Addendum to the certified Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Environmental Impact Report." B. Mitigation Measure AES-1 The EIR for the previously analyzed project included the following mitigation measure to address potentially significant short-term visual impacts. (EIR, p. 1-2.) Specifically, the EIR concluded that project construction activities could temporarily degrade the visual character/ quality of the site and its surroundings. (EIR, p. 1-2.) The EIR concluded that these impacts would ultimately be less than significant with incorporation of Mitigation Measure AES-1. AES-1 is modified for clarity below. Mitigation Measure AES-1 appeared in full on pages 1-2 tc 3 and 5.1-16 of the EIR. AES-1 is hereby edited as reflected below in each of the places it appeared in the EIR. Strikethrough indicates deleted text and double underline indicates an addition: 9 1780344.1 AES-1 Prior to issuance of any grading and/or demolition permits, whichever occurs first, engineering drawings and specifications shall be prepared by the Project Engineer, or their designee, and submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District Director of Engineering. These documents shall, at a minimum, indicate the equipment and vehicle staging areas, stockpiling of materials, screening/fencing (, and haul route(s). Staging areas shall be sited away from public views, to the extent feasible and reasonable. afid4 r- Sere o� utilizing temporary fencing with opaque ter-i-aConstruction haul routes shall minimize impacts to sensitive uses in the project area by avoiding local residential streets. Staging areas shall be screened utilizing temporary fencing with opaque materials to buffer views of construction equipment and materials for the duration of construction. In response to the Ruling, AES-1 will be incorporated into the project's design pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(b) and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15126.4(a)(2). (See Corresponding Resolution of the Orange County Sanitation District Receiving and Filing the Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project No. 5-67 and Approving the Modified Project.) IV. Environmental Assessment A. Aesthetics/Light and Glare The potential aesthetic/visual impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.1-16, 5.1-17, 5.1-18.). Plant No. 2 is a fully developed utility facility which contains numerous structures that vary in height, mass, and function. The tallest structure at Plant No. 2 is Surge Tower 2, which stands at 86 feet above -grade, located on the southeast portion of Plant No. 2, adjacent to the Santa Ana River trail. Residential communities with views of Plant No. 2 are located in the cities of Huntington Beach to the northwest and Newport Beach to the southeast. Long distance views of Plant No. 2 can also be seen from the east in the City of Costa Mesa. Under existing conditions, Plant No. 2 is generally screened by fencing and landscaping, including trees, partially blocking views into Plant No. 2 from the surrounding areas. As a result of these visual barriers and the relatively flat topography of the landscape surrounding Plant No. 2, the majority of the facilities within Plant No. 2. are not publicly visible, beyond those facilities that are located along the Plant's frontages or that are multiple stories tall. 10 1780344.1 A 17-mile portion of SR-1 from Jamboree Road in Newport Beach to the northern city limit of Seal Beach is an eligible state scenic highway but has not been officially designated. (Caltrans 2019). This portion of SR-1 provides prominent views of the Pacific Ocean in the south, and occasional views of marshland and wetlands in the north, when not interrupted by the urban development within the cities of Huntington Beach and Seal Beach. Plant No. 2 is located approximately 500 feet north of SR-1. The Modified Project would utilize an approximately 30,000 square foot portion of Plant No. 2 as a construction staging area for soil stockpiling and drying. Construction materials/equipment at Plant No. 2 would include, but not be limited to, hauling trucks, construction worker vehicles, loaders, and soil stockpiles. It should be noted that hauling trucks would not typically be stored overnight at Plant No. 2. Although the proposed soil stockpiles may be visible from outside of Plant No. 2, the staging and drying of these soils would be temporary and would cease upon completion of construction. Further, pursuant to AES-1, construction materials/equipment would be screened utilizing temporary fencing with opaque materials at the designated staging areas to limit public views of staging activities. No nighttime lighting would be required for the soil stockpiling/storage at Plant No. 2. The Modified Project would also require the operation of hauling vehicles that would be visible during hauling between the project site and Plant No. 2. These hauling vehicles, however, would only operate temporarily during construction. At the completion of construction, these vehicles would cease operations. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project, none of which would be located at Plant No. 2. Based on AES-1 and the short-term duration of hauling and storage activities at OC San's fully developed Plant No. 2, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to aesthetics. B. Air Quality The potential air quality impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.2-13, 5.2-14, 5.2-15, 5.2-16, 5.2-17, 5.2-19, 5.2-20, 5.2-24, 5.2-25.) Plant No. 2 is located within the South Coast Air Basin and thus is within the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District ("Air District"). The Modified Project would be subject to the Air District's rules and regulations including, without limitation, Rule 401 (visible emissions); Rule 402 (nuisance); Rule 403 (fugitive dust); and Rule 431.2 (sulfur content of liquid fuels). The Modified Project's soil hauling schedule is anticipated to commence in Fall of 2025 and conclude in Winter of 2028. Soil hauling would include 8,370 cubic yards of export from the project site to Plant No. 2. Approximately 419 cubic yards of the 11 1780344.1 exported soil would be hauled back to the project site to be used for backfilling purposes. The remaining 7,872 cubic yards of exported soil would be hauled from Plant No. 2 to a permitted landfill facility for disposal. This would result in a total of 1,674 soil hauling truck trips. These trips, however, would be temporary and would cease upon completion of construction. The Modified Project's potential air quality impacts were modeled and compared to the applicable Air District thresholds as set forth in Table 1-4. Table 1-4 Modified Project -Generated Construction Emissions Emissions Source Pollutant (pounds/day)',z ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Year 1 4.50 40.7 40.0 0.08 2.36 1.75 Year 2 18.0 31.6 33.6 0.07 2.21 1.31 Year 3 2.70 23.2 25.4 0.05 1.83 0.99 Year 4 2.61 22.4 25.0 0.05 1.77 0.93 Year 5 0.33 2.90 3.85 0.01 0.31 0.09 Maximum Daily 18.0 40.7 40.0 0.08 Z36 1.75 Emissions SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Notes: 1. Emissions were calculated using CalEEMod version 2022.1. Emissions shown represent worst -case during summer and winter. 2. The reduction/credits for construction emissions are based on "mitigation" included in CalEEMod and are required by the SCAQMD Rules. The adjustments applied in CalEEMod includes the following: properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surfaces three times daily; cover stockpiles with tarps; and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. The emissions results in this table represent the "mitigated" emissions shown in Attachment 3. 3. CalEEMod included assumption of construction commencement in the Fall of 2024. This is a conservative assumption, as the model assumes that as time progresses, technology improves reducing emissions. Source: Refer to Attachment 3 for assumptions used in this analysis. As indicated in Table 1-4, criteria pollutant emissions for ROG, NOx, CO, S02, PM10, and PM2.5 during construction of the Modified Project would not exceed the Air District's significance thresholds. Although odors could potentially be generated by vehicle exhaust emissions during construction staging activities, such odors would disperse rapidly and would not occur at magnitudes that would affect substantial numbers of people. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to air quality. 12 1780344.1 C. Biological Resources The potential biological resources impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.3-13, 5.3-14, 5.3-15, 5.3-16, 5.3-17, 5.3-19, 5.3-20, 5.3-21, 5.3-23, 5.3-24, 5.3-25.) Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. The vast majority of the soils on site have been significantly altered due to compaction and construction of the facility. There is no native or natural vegetation within Plant No. 2; the only vegetation that exists on site consists of ornamental grass, shrubs, and trees. Thus, Plant No. 2 does not present suitable habitat for sensitive/special-status biological resources and the proposed soil drying and stockpiling at Plant No. 2 would not adversely impact any sensitive/special-status biological resources. Due to the presence of ornamental trees at Plant No. 2, there is a potential for nesting birds to be present during the soil drying / stockpiling activities. As a result, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 would apply to the Modified Project, with the following modifications: BI0-2 Should construction activities occur within the nesting season, all suitable habitat surrounding the project site and Orange County Sanitation District OC San) Plant No. 2 shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist, defined as an individual with a bachelor's degree or above in a biological science field and demonstrated field experience, within three days prior to commencement of site disturbance activities. If an active avian nest is discovered in proximity to the project site or OC San Plant No. 2 during the nesting bird survey, construction activities (those activities that could result in direct or indirect impacts to active nests either through noise, light, or physical contact) shall stay outside of a 300- foot buffer around the active nest. For raptor species, this buffer shall be expanded to 500 feet. The qualified biologist shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest in order to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines that nesting behavior is adversely affected by construction activities, the qualified biologist shall halt construction activities that result in the adverse effect and file a written report to OCSDOC San and the construction contractor stating the recommended course of action. The buffer area and limitations on construction may be reduced upon approval by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and only if the nesting behaviors are not disrupted by construction activities, as determined by the qualified biologist. Once the young have fledged, normal construction activities shall be allowed to occur. 13 1780344.1 There are no riparian habitats or wetlands on Plant No. 2. While the Santa Ana River Trail adjacent to Plant No. 2 is a significant movement corridor for multiple species, all of the Modified Project's soil drying and stockpiling activities would be located exclusively within Plant No. 2. The ornamental trees within Plant No. 2 are not located on public rights of way and, therefore, would not be subject to any tree preservation ordinances. Although Plant No. 2 is located with the Orange County Transportation Authority Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP), the site is designated as "Developed" in the NCCP, and is not within an area designated as Permit Area, Natural Habitats, or Agriculture. (NCCP figure 1-2.) The NCCP does not impose any requirements on areas designated as "Developed." Further, Plant No. 2 is not located within the plan areas of any habitat conservation plans other than the NCCP. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. Based on BIO-2 and the short-term duration of hauling and storage activities at Plant No. 2, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to biological resources. D. Cultural Resources The potential cultural resources impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.4-15, 5.4-16.) No cultural resources, including historic or archeological resources, have been recorded at Plant No. 2. Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. The vast majority of the soils on site have been significantly altered due to compaction and construction of the facility. The Modified Project's soil drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction, would cease when construction is completed, and would not require any ground disturbing activities that could impact previously undiscovered cultural resources or human remains. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to cultural resources. 14 1780344.1 E. Geology and Soils The potential geology and soils impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.4-15, 5.4-16.) Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. The vast majority of the soils on site have been significantly altered due to compaction and construction of the facility. No paleontological resources have been documented within Plant No. 2. Further, Plant No. 2 is not within a designated Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or within potential earthquake -induced landslide zones as designated by the California Geological Survey. The proposed soil drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 under the Modified Project would be temporary during construction, would cease when construction is completed, and would not require any ground disturbing activities that could impact previously undiscovered paleontological resources. The proposed soil drying / stockpiling would not directly or indirectly exacerbate the existing potential for fault rupture, ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. The Modified Project would be required to comply with Air District Rule 403. This Rule requires that excessive fugitive dust emissions be controlled with regular watering or other dust prevention measures. Further, compliance with OC San established protocols and existing regulations, including the implementation of stormwater best management practices (BMPs) per the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Construction Stormwater standards (e.g., sediment traps, straw bale barriers, wind erosion/dust control, and filter berms, among others) would minimize the potential of erosion at Plant No. 2 during construction. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to geology and soils. F. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The potential greenhouse gas emissions impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.6-11, 5.6-12, 5.6-13.). The Modified Project calls for hauling of soils both to and from Plant No. 2 during project construction. These proposed hauling activities are summarized in Tables 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3. Additionally, the Modified Project calls for soil drying / stockpiling at 15 1780344.1 Plant No. 2 during project construction. The Modified Project's soil haul trips and drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction and would cease when construction is completed. The Modified Project's GHG emissions would be created by off -road construction equipment and on -road vehicles (haul trucks and worker vehicles). The Modified Project would generate a total of 1,743 MTCO2eq during construction, which is equivalent to approximately 5 8. 11 MTCO2eq/yr when amortized over 30 years; refer to Attachment 3, Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Data. As such, the Modified Project would not result in GHG emissions in exceedance of the Air District's 3,000 MTCO2eq/yr significance threshold. Consequently, the Modified Project would not result in any potentially adverse construction related GHG impacts. The Modified Project would not interfere with implementation of any GHG reduction goals for 2030 or 2050 set forth in Assembly Bill (AB) 32, Senate Bill (SB) 32, Executive Order (EO) B-30-15, and EO 5-3-05 because the Modified Project would not exceed the Air District's 3,000 MTCO2eq/yr significance threshold. Therefore, the Modified Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to greenhouse gas emissions. G. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The potential hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.5-15, 5.7-13, 5.7-14, 5.7-15, 4.7-16, 5.7-17, 5.7- 20.). Plant No. 2 is located within the City of Huntington Beach. The Huntington Beach Fire Department includes the Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division, which is responsible for coordinating the City's emergency preparedness and response activities. Additionally, Plant No. 2 is located within a Tsunami Hazard Zone. Evacuation routes for the Tsunami Hazard Zone near Plant No. 2 include northbound Bushard Street and northbound Brookhurst Street. It should be noted that no existing or proposed K-12 schools are located within 0.25-mile of Plant No. 2. Also, Plant No. 2 is not located within a wildland fire hazard area or within an airport land use plan or within two miles of an airport. Five underground storage tanks (USTs) are currently in use at Plant No. 2. Further, multiple structures at Plant No. 2 contain asbestos -containing materials (ACM) 16 1780344.1 and lead -based paint (LBP). In addition to ACM and LBPs, universal waste may be present on -site including, but not limited to, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury thermometers, and fluorescent light bulbs. Storage of hazardous materials on -site for Plant No. 2 operations also include, but are not limited to, compressed gasses, diesel fuel, and water treatment chemicals (hydrogen peroxide, sulfuric acid, salts, and flocculants). Plant No. 2 is not listed on the California Environmental Protection Agency's Cortese List pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5. However, multiple closed leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) cases and UST removals have been documented with the Orange County Health Care Agency, Environmental Health Department. Multiple plugged oil and gas wells are located within the Plant No. 2 boundary. Additionally, multiple active oil and gas wells are located within 0.25-mile of Plant No. 2. The Modified Project's proposed soil drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction, would cease when construction is completed, and would not involve any demolition of on -site structures or ground disturbing activities. Further, the Modified Project's use of potentially hazardous materials associated with truck hauling operations, including oils, lubricants, and vehicle fuels, would comply with applicable Federal, State and local regulatory requirements. It is acknowledged, however, that Plant No. 2 is situated in the proximity of identified evacuation routes for the Tsunami Hazard Zone, and there is a potential for impacts related to interference with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan due to hauling activities. As a result, Draft EIR Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would apply to the Modified Project, with the following modifications: TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, engineering drawings and specifications, and/or contractor shop drawings shall be prepared by the Project Engineer, or designee, and submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, and the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department. These documents shall, at a minimum, address the following: • Traffic control protocols shall be specified for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation, including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Disruption to traffic circulation shall be minimized to the greatest extent feasible. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open, to the greatest extent feasible, during construction or shall be re- routed to ensure continued connectivity. • Bus stop access impacts shall be coordinated with, and approved by, the Orange County Transportation Authority. 17 1780344.1 • At least one week before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, City of Newport Beach Public Works Department and Caltrans, as applicable, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for planning temporary detours or identifying alternative emergency access routes where appropriate. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project to reduce impacts to local streets and plan for traffic control signage and detours along identified haul routes to minimize impacts to existing traffic flow. • Specify the hours during which hauling activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets such as traffic control barricades, cones, flaggers, and warning signs. • Require the contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited, to gravel and dirt resulting from project construction. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District, of any project material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent City of Newport Beach,, City of Huntington Beach and Caltrans streets or areas. • Hauling of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited, except when required to provide direct access to the project site and in compliance with the approved project haul routes. • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully 18 1780344.1 responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All construction -related staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on the project site or within additional off-street staging areas previously identified and arranged. • Construction -related lane closures would only occur between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City. • Use of a construction flagperson (as deemed appropriate by the Orange County Sanitation District) to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions (particularly during peak travel hours) and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway are affected. • The engineering drawings and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). With compliance with TRA-1, temporary construction -related impacts would be less than significant. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. Based on TRA-1 and the short-term duration of hauling and storage activities at Plant No. 2, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to hazards and hazardous materials. H. Hydrology & Water Quality The potential hydrology and water quality impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.8-16, 5.8-17, 5.8-18, 5.8-19.). Plant No. 2 is located within the Santa Ana Region Basin Plan ("Basin Plan") and, thus, is within the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board ("RWQCB"). The Modified Project would be subject to the Basin Plan's water quality objectives, plans, and policies for surface water quality. Additionally, Plant No. 2 is located within the Orange County Groundwater Basin and, therefore, is within the jurisdiction of the Orange County Water District ("OCWD"). As such, the Modified Project would also be subject to the OCWD Management Plan's goals to protect and enhance the groundwater quality of the Orange County Groundwater Basin, protect and increase the sustainable yield of the basin in a cost-effective manner, and increase the efficiency of OCWD's operation. 19 1780344.1 Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. The vast majority of the soils on site have been significantly altered due to compaction and construction of the facility. Plant No. 2 is located in a 500-year flood zone or an area protected from the 100-year flood by an adjoining levee or dike, thus, the Modified Project would be located outside a Special Flood Hazard Area and would not impede or redirect flood flows. The Modified Project's soil drying / stockpiling activities would be temporary during construction, cease when construction is completed, and would not require any ground disturbing activities that could interfere with groundwater recharge or substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area. Nevertheless, compliance with OC San's established protocols and existing regulations, including the implementation of stormwater best management practices (BMPs) per the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Construction Stormwater standards (e.g., sediment traps, straw bale barriers, wind erosion/dust control, and filter berms, among others) would ensure the Modified Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, or otherwise substantially degrade surface quality from construction activities. No new significant impacts pertaining to potential soil erosion/runoff would result in this regard. The Modified Project would not result in any new significant impacts pertaining to increased water demand during construction, compared to that considered in the Draft EIR. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to hydrology and water quality. I. Land Use and Planning The potential land use and planning impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.9-8., 5.9-9, 5.9-12, 5.9-14, 5.9-15, 5.9-16, 5.9-17). Plant No. 2 is designated as Public (P) land use and zoned Industrial Limited (IL) and Residential Agriculture with an Oil Overlay (RA-0). (City of Huntington Beach 2015). The Public land use designation provides for government administrative and related facilities, such as public utilities, public parking lots, and similar uses. The IL zoning designation allows for sites of moderate- to low -intensity industrial uses, commercial services, and light manufacturing. The RA-0 zoning designation is intended to serve as a transition or holding zone for property with current agricultural activities and as a zone where restricted residential development is permitted. The RA-0 also provides areas to accommodate oil operations without drilling. 20 1780344.1 The Modified Project's proposed soil drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction, would cease when construction is completed, would not require or result in changes to land uses or zoning designations at Plant No. 2, and would not physically divide an established community. Additionally, the proposed soil drying / stockpiling activities are a permitted activity/use within the RA-0 zone and, as such, would not conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies outlined in the City of Huntington Beach's Local Coastal Program and General Plan Coastal Element Land Use Plan. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. Overall, the Modified Project would be consistent with applicable land use plans, policies, and regulations, including the Local Coastal Program, General Plan and Municipal Code. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to land use and planning. I Noise The potential noise impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3- 13, 5.10-12, 5.10-13, 5.10-14, 5.10-15, 5.10-16, 5.10-17, 5.10-18). Also, Plant No. 2 is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of an airport. The Modified Project calls for hauling of soils both to and from Plant No. 2 during project construction. These proposed hauling activities are summarized in Tables 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3. Additionally, the Modified Project calls for soil drying / stockpiling at Plant No. 2 during project construction. Construction hauling activities at Plant No. 2 would occur between 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM and no activities would occur in the nighttime hours. As such, these activities would not result in substantial noise increases in the vicinity, compared to the existing condition. The hauling / soil drying / and stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 will not call for any equipment that could result in vibration impacts (such as pile driving equipment). The Modified Project, however, could result in short-term construction noise impacts associated with off -road construction equipment and on -road vehicles (haul trucks and worker vehicles). The Modified Project would generate up to 40 hauling trips per day; refer to Attachment 3, Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Data. Hauling trips involving the placement at, and removal of, soil from Plant No. 2 would avoid sensitive residential communities and would be along freeways and major roadways, except when directly accessing Plant No. 2. Hauling trips would occur during daytime hours (and would cease after 5:00 PM), would not significantly increase existing traffic noise levels along the hauling routes, and would not result in a substantive temporary or long-term increase in noise. Further, implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would require 21 1780344.1 all construction equipment, including haul trucks, to be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers to reduce noise. Overall, noise impacts associated with the additional haul truck trips would be temporary and cease upon completion of construction. Mitigation Measures NOI-1 would apply to the Modified Project, with the following modifications: N0I-1 Prior to the initiation of construction, the Orange County Sanitation District shall confirm that the Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications require that: • All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. • The Orange County Sanitation District shall provide a "Community Liaison'`Teise Dist ,,.t,. nee !'',.,.«,ainate " The Community LiaisonNeiFse Distur-bance Geer-,aina4e shall be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. When a complaint is received, the Community Liaison'`Teise Dist ,,a,, nee r-v,,,,,.,ainate shall determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and shall implement measures to resolve the complaint and comply with the City of Huntington Beach and City of Newport Beach Noise Ordinances. The construction hotline telephone number shall be clearly posted on -site. • Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals, etc.) to the greatest extent possible. • During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. • Construction activities that produce noise shall not take place outside of the allowable hours specified by the City of Huntington Beach and City of Newport Beach Municipal Codes, with the exception of the 24 hour per day operation of microtunneling (pursuant to Mitigation Measure NOI-2). Alternative work hours may be designated by the City to reduce other impacts, such as traffic. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. 22 1780344.1 The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to noise. K. Population and Housing The potential population and housing impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 8-1). Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. OC San staff provide operational and maintenance activities at Plant No. 2. Additionally, there are no existing residents or housing at Plant No. 2. The Modified Project would require construction workers to haul soil, and to both place and remove soil from Plant No. 2. It is anticipated that these construction workers would be located within the greater Orange County / Los Angeles area. As a result, the Modified Project would not cause a substantial change in the labor force resulting in unplanned population growth in the area. Soil drying and stockpiling within Plant No. 2 would not require the relocation or displacement of any people or housing. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to population and housing. L. Public Services The public facilities impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 8-1). Plant No. 2 is located within the City of Huntington Beach. The Huntington Beach Fire Department and Huntington Beach Police Department provide fire and police services to the City of Huntington Beach, respectively. The Modified Project would require construction workers to haul soil, and to both place and remove soil from Plant No. 2. It is anticipated that these construction workers would be located within the greater Orange County / Los Angeles area. As a result, the Modified Project would not cause a substantial change in the labor force resulting in unplanned population growth in the area. Soil drying and stockpiling within Plant No. 2 would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire, police, school, parks and recreational, or other public service facilities. 23 1780344.1 The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to public :Y�irfsK�� M. Recreation The potential recreation impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 8-1). Plant No. 2 is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. There are no recreational, educational, or visitor -oriented opportunities at Plant No. 2. It is anticipated that these construction workers would be located within the greater Orange County / Los Angeles area. As a result, the Modified Project would not cause a substantial change in the labor force that could result in new residents using existing recreational facilities or requiring additional recreational facilities. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to recreation. N. Transportation The potential transportation impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.11-6, 5.11-7, 5.11-8, 5.11-9, 5.11-10, 5.11-11). Plant No. 2 is located within the City of Huntington Beach. Transit services near Plant No. 2 are provided by the Orange County Transit Authority with the closest bus stop approximately 0.5-mile north of Plant No. 2 at the intersection of Hamilton Avenue and Brookhurst Street. Plant No. 2 is located near existing roadway facilities including Brookhurst Street, Bushard Street, and Banning Street. Existing bicycle facilities include Class 1 multi -use bike paths along the Santa Ana River Trail and Class 2 bike lanes along Bushard Street and Banning Street. It should be noted that an additional Class 2 bike lane is proposed along Brookhurst Street. Existing pedestrian facilities are provided along the Santa Ana River Trail, Huntington Beach Bike Trail, Brookhurst Street, Bushard Street, and Banning Street. The Modified Project calls for hauling of soils both to and from Plant No. 2 during project construction. These proposed hauling activities are summarized in Tables 24 1780344.1 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3. Additionally, the Modified Project calls for soil drying / stockpiling at Plant No. 2 during project construction. The proposed soil haul trips and drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 under the Modified Project would be temporary during construction and would cease when construction is completed. The Modified Project would include a total of 1,674 truck trips from soil hauling activities, which would generate an increase in short-term vehicle trips on the circulation system during construction. Such hauling activities are not anticipated to require lane closures or to interfere with existing pedestrian/transit/bike access. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would apply to the Modified Project, with the following modifications: TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, engineering drawings and specifications, and/or contractor shop drawings shall be prepared by the Project Engineer, or designee, and submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, and the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department. These documents shall, at a minimum, address the following: • Traffic control protocols shall be specified for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation, including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Disruption to traffic circulation shall be minimized to the greatest extent feasible. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open, to the greatest extent feasible, during construction or shall be re- routed to ensure continued connectivity. • Bus stop access impacts shall be coordinated with, and approved by, the Orange County Transportation Authority. • At least one week before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the City of Huntington Beach Public Works Department, City of Newport Beach Public Works Department and Caltrans, as applicable, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for planning temporary detours or identifying alternative emergency access routes where appropriate. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. • Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project to reduce impacts to local streets and plan for traffic control signage and detours along identified haul routes to minimize impacts to existing traffic flow. 25 1780344.1 •lden4i y any and all eens motion staging or— fnater-ial star -age loeated outside of the pr-qjeet site. • Specify the hours during which hauling activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets such as traffic control barricades, cones, flaggers, and warning signs. • Require the contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited, to gravel and dirt resulting from project construction. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District, of any project material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent City of Newport Beach., City of Huntington Beach. and Caltrans streets or areas. • Hauling of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited, except when required to provide direct access to the project site and in compliance with the approved project haul routes. • Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All construction -related staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on the project site or within additional off-street staging areas previously identified and arranged. • Construction -related lane closures would only occur between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City. • Use of a construction flagperson (as deemed appropriate by the Orange County Sanitation District) to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions (particularly during peak travel hours) and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway are affected. Pill 1780344.1 • The engineering drawings and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). As required by Mitigation Measure TRA-1, the project's construction management plan (CMP) would identify construction vehicle hauling routes, necessary traffic controls and detours, and a construction phasing plan to reduce impacts to local streets and plan for traffic control signage and detours along identified haul routes. The CMP would also specify the hours during which hauling activities could occur and would require traffic control barricades, cones, flaggers, and/or warning signs to reduce construction -related impacts to adjacent streets. Hauling of oversized loads would be limited between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday, and no hauling would be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Further, use of local streets within residential communities for truck hauling activities would be prohibited, except when required to provide direct access to the project site or Plant No. 2. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. Based on TRA-I and the short-term duration of hauling and storage activities at Plant No. 2, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to transportation. O. Tribal Cultural Resources The potential tribal cultural resources impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 5.12-12, 5.12-13). No tribal cultural resources have been identified within Plant No. 2 which is fully developed with buildings, utility infrastructure, and access roads. The vast majority of the soils on site have been significantly altered due to compaction and construction of the facility. The Modified Project's proposed soil drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction, would cease when construction is completed, and would not require any ground disturbing activities that could lead to the discovery of previously unknown or undiscovered tribal cultural resources. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to tribal cultural resources. 27 1780344.1 P. Utilities The potential utilities impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR. (Draft EIR, p. 3-12, 3-13, 6.1, 6.2, 6-14). Plant No. 2 is serviced by existing infrastructure operated by various public and private entities. Existing infrastructure includes OC San pipelines that run parallel to or intersect with existing water transmission and delivery pipelines, stormwater drainage pipelines and channels, overhead electrical wires and underground electrical conduit, underground natural gas pipelines, and overhead and underground telecommunications lines. The Modified Project calls for hauling of soils both to and from Plant No. 2 during project construction. These proposed hauling activities are summarized in Tables 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3. Additionally, the Modified Project calls for soil drying / stockpiling at Plant No. 2 during project construction. The Modified Project's proposed soil haul trips and drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 would be temporary during construction and would cease when construction is completed. Such activities would not require any increases in the use of water, electrical, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, compared to that analyzed in the EIR. As such, no new physical changes to the environment would result in this regard. Further, these activities would not result in an increase in the generation of wastewater or solid waste. Last, these activities would not result in any changes in impervious surfaces or the need for additional stormwater facilities. It is anticipated that these construction workers would be located within the greater Orange County / Los Angeles area. Therefore, the Modified Project would not result in population growth that could increase demand on utilities and service systems, including demand for water, wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage, electricity, natural gas, telecommunications, or solid waste services. The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to utilities. Q. Wildfire Wildland fire hazards were analyzed in the EIR (Draft EIR p. 8-11 and 8-12). Plant No. 2 and surrounding areas are not located within very high, high, or moderate fire hazard severity zones. 28 1780344.1 Therefore, the Modified Project would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts pertaining to wildfires. R. Other CEQA Considerations / Energy The potential energy impacts associated with the temporary use of Lower Castaways Park for construction staging purposes were analyzed in the EIR (Draft EIR p. 6-1, 6-2, and 6-7 through 6-18). Plant No. 2 is located within the City of Huntington Beach. Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company provide electricity and natural gas services to the City of Huntington Beach, respectively. Construction -related energy usage at Plant No. 2 would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of energy, electricity, natural gas, or petroleum. The Modified Project calls for hauling of soils both to and from Plant No. 2 during project construction. These proposed hauling activities are summarized in Tables 1-1, 1-2, and 1-3. Additionally, the Modified Project calls for soil drying / stockpiling at Plant No. 2 during project construction. The proposed soil haul trips and drying / stockpiling activities at Plant No. 2 under the Modified Project would be temporary during construction and would cease when construction is completed. The Modified Project would include a total of 1,674 truck trips from soil hauling activities, which would generate an increase in short-term vehicle trips on the circulation system during construction. However, the total fuel consumption of the Modified Project is estimated to increase the County's annual energy consumption by less than 0.01 percent, which would have a nominal effect on the local and regional energy supplies. Further, the Modified Project would adhere to all Federal, State, and local requirements for fuel efficiency (e.g., low carbon fuel standards, as applicable). The Modified Project would not change any operational aspects of the previously analyzed project. The Modified Project, therefore, would not result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in previously identified significant impacts pertaining to energy. 29 1780344.1 Attachment 1 ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO.30-2021-01194238 RULING 30 1780172.1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE Civil Complex Center 751 W. Santa Ana Blvd Santa Ana, CA 92701 SHORT TITLE: BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC vs. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING/ELECTRONIC CASE NUMBER: SERVICE 130-2021-01194238-CU-WM-CXC I certify that I am not a party to this cause. I certify that the following document(s), dated, have been transmitted electronically by Orange County Superior Court at Santa Ana, CA. The transmission originated from Orange County Superior Court email address on December 16, 2022, at 2:21:32 PM PST. The electronically transmitted document(s) is in accordance with rule 2.251 of the California Rules of Court, addressed as shown above. The list of electronically served recipients are listed below: NOSSAMAN LLP NOSSAMAN LLP JERSKINE@NOSSAMAN.COM JFLYNN@NOSSAMAN.COM WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, APC WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, APC BHOGIN@WSS-LAW.COM BPATTERSON@WSS-LAW.COM WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, APC RHAGER@WSS-LAW.COM Clerk of the Court, by: .". , Deputy CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING/ELECTRONIC SERVICE V3 1013a (June 2004) Code of Civ. Procedure, § CCP1013(a) DATE: 12/16/2022 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL COMPLEX CENTER MINUTE ORDER TIME: 02:16:00 PM DEPT: CX104 JUDICIAL OFFICER PRESIDING: William Claster CLERK: G. Hernandez REPORTER/ERM: None BAILIFF/COURT ATTENDANT:. None CASE NO: 30-2021-01194238-CU-WM-CXC CASE INIT.DATE: 04/01/2021 CASE TITLE: BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC vs. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CASE CATEGORY: Civil - Unlimited CASE TYPE: Writ of Mandate EVENT ID/DOCUMENT ID: 73909236 EVENT TYPE: Under Submission Ruling APPEARANCES RE PETITIONER'S WRIT OF MANDATE There are no appearances by any party. The Court, having taken the above -entitled matter under submission on 12/14/2022 and having fully considered the arguments of all parties, both written and oral, as well as the evidence presented, now issues its ruling. The Court's ruling is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Court orders clerk to give notice. DATE: 12/16/2022 MINUTE ORDER Page 1 DEPT: CX104 Calendar No. BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Petitioner Bayside Village Marina LLC (Bayside) seeks a writ of mandate compelling Respondent Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD" or the "District") to vacate and set aside its approval of (1) the OCSD's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains ("BBPS") replacement project ("Project") located on East Coast Highway in Newport Beach, and (2) the certification of the Recirculated Environmental Impact Report ("REIR") for the Project. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS a limited writ as set forth below. I. BACKGROUND Bayside is the owner of 31.4 acres of property located at East Coast Highway in the City of Newport Beach, California between Newport Channel and Bayside Drive. (ROA 25, First Amended Verified Petition (Petition), ¶ 9; AR230.) Approximately 24 acres of Bayside's property are developed with mobile homes, and the remaining seven acres contain an outdoor storage space of RVs and small boats, parking and restrooms facilities for the Bayside Marina, a kayak rental and launch facility, parking and access to Pearson's Port seafood market, and marine service equipment storage under the Coast Highway Bridge ("BVM Property"). (AR230, 011290.) The seven acres are being developed as the "Back Bay Landing" Project, which is a mixed -use development that will be implemented pursuant to the Newport Beach- and Coastal Commission -approved Back Bay Planned Community Development Plan ("PCDP"). It will have a boat storage facility, retail stores and recreational marine -related facilities and residential units. (AR226, 230, 3274, 7539-97; Petition, ¶ 9.) Bayside is also the developer of this Back Bay project. (Petition, ¶ 9.) OCSD owns and operates the BBPS, which is located at 300 East Coast Highway in Newport Beach, just east of the Newport Bay Channel. (ROA 103, Opp., p. 8; AR186.) BBPS transports sewage or wastewater through pipelines to OCSD's Ruling Page 1 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 sewage treatment plant in Huntington Beach and is a piece of critical infrastructures that conveys 50-60% of the total wastewater flow generated in Newport Beach. (ROA 103, Opp., p. 8; AR186.) BBPS is located on the southern boundary of Bayside's property, is surrounded on three sides by that property, and is adjacent to the Back Bay Landing Project. (AR230, 3206.) The District's Project involves the construction of a new, larger pump station extending 100 feet to the west of the existing pump station and the installation of new force mains. (AR186 and 237.) The new pump station facilities will include a pump station, generator and odor control facilities. (AR186, 230.) Planning on the Project started in 2013. (AR3206.) Since the Bayside Property, and particularly the Back Bay Landing Project, surrounds the Project, from 2014-2016, Bayside and OCSD exchanged information and worked together to discuss alternatives for the Project. (See e.g., AR3206, 6371-72, 7040-43,7090, 7324, 7342-43, 15667, 16128-131.) In June 2017, OCSD published a draft EIR that analyzed a version of the Project involving the demolition of the existing facility, construction of a new and larger facility adjacent to Bayside Drive and installation of force main improvements beneath the Newport Bay Channel north of the Bay Bridge. (AR236, AR9383-84.) The District never presented the 2017 Final EIR to its Board of Directors for approval due to conflicts with the planned development of the Back Bay Landing Project. (AR236, AR1501-1506.) In July 2019, OCSD published a recirculated EIR with three alternatives for the Project. (AR236, AR11613-14.) During the public comment period, there were concerns regarding the three conceptual site plans, including confusion about one of the alternatives known as the South Pump Station. (AR236.) OCSD did not present the 2019 EIR to the OCSD Board. Ruling Page 2 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Instead, OCSD decided to select one conceptual site plan and construction method and update the EIR in its entirety. (AR236.) The concept chosen and analyzed in the 2020 recirculated EIR (REIR) is the Adjacent Pump Station, which is essentially the South Pump Station alternative in the 2019 REIR. (AR237.) The Final EIR (FEIR) was published in January 2021 and approved on March 1, 2021. (AR1-3.) II. OVERVIEW OF CEQA PROCESS "CEQA is a comprehensive scheme designed to provide long-term protection to the environment. [Citation.]" (Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105, 112.) It applies to "discretionary projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies." (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080(a).) "In enacting CEQA, the Legislature declared its intention that all public agencies responsible for regulating activities affecting the environment give prime consideration to preventing environmental damage when carrying out their duties. [Citations.] CEQA is to be interpreted 'to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language.' [Citation.]" (Mountain Lion Foundation, supra, 16 Cal.4th at p. 112.) An EIR, which has been described as "the heart of CEQA" (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564), "is required for any project that a public agency proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment. [Citations.] An EIR must describe the proposed project and its environmental setting, state the objectives sought to be achieved, identify and analyze the significant effects on the environment, state how those impacts can be mitigated or avoided, and identify and analyze alternatives to the project, Ruling Page 3 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 among other requirements. [Citations.]" (Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 465-66 (Ballona).) Once a draft EIR is prepared, the public must be notified, and the draft and all documents it references must be made available for public review and comment. (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21091(a), 21092; CEQA Guidelines, § 15087. 1) The public agency acting as the lead agency then prepares a final EIR, which must include comments received from the public and from other agencies concerning the draft EIR, responses to those comments, and any revisions to the draft EIR. (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15088, 15132; Ballona, supra, 201 Cal.App.4th at p. 466.) III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Overview Bayside asserts that the EIR description of the Project and its environmental setting is "inaccurate and unstable." "The fundamental goal of an EIR is to inform decision makers and the public of any significant adverse effects a project is likely to have on the physical environment. [Citations.] To make such an assessment, an EIR must delineate environmental conditions prevailing absent the project, defining a baseline against which predicted effects can be described and quantified. [Citation.]" (Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (2013) 57 Ca1.4th 439, 447.) This generally includes providing "a description of the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the project, as they exist at the time the notice of preparation is published, or if no notice of preparation is published, at the time environmental analysis is commenced, from both a local and regional perspective." (Id., at p. 448; see CEQA Guidelines, § 15125(a).) 1 References to the CEQA Guidelines are to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq. Ruling Page 4 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 "Without accurate and complete information pertaining to the setting of the project and surrounding uses, it cannot be found that the [EIR] adequately investigated and discussed the environmental impacts of the development project." (San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 713, 729 (San Joaquin Raptor).) Thus, [i]f the description of the environmental setting of the project site and surrounding area is inaccurate, incomplete or misleading, the EIR does not comply with CEQA." (Cadiz Land Co. v. Rail Cycle (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 74, 87.) B. Failure to Identifv Neighboring Commercial Operations Bayside contends that repeated use of the phrase "RV Storage facility" obscures "the site's coastal -dependent, visitor serving uses." (Pet. Supp. Br. at p. 16.) Indeed, a number of businesses on the west side of the Project site (e.g., Southwind Kayaks, Gondola Adventures) are not mentioned by name anywhere in any EIR. While it is true that these businesses are not referenced by name and that the site is referred to as an RV Storage facility (presumably since RVs are stored near where the actual construction will take place), those references do not create an inaccurate picture of the Project. In fact, the EIR refers to these businesses on the west side of the Project as "commercial" or "commercial recreation marine uses" in a number of places. (AR230, 234, 260, 392, 436.) The businesses also are listed on Table 3-1 under "General Commercial." (AR235.) The fact that the site is called an RV Storage facility is not misleading when considering the EIR as a whole. The above -cited references to commercial activity and the various maps/photos of the Project site overcome this alleged shortcoming. Ruling Page 5 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 A related purported flaw in the EIR's Project description is the failure to address the potential adverse physical impacts Project construction would have on these businesses. On the contrary, such analysis is found at AR 473-482 regarding noise and vibrations during construction, and at AR 302-305 with respect to air quality. In terms of traffic, the EIR makes clear that access to the Project site will be shared via Bayside Drive by construction vehicles and users of the commercial facilities. As to the added construction and operational traffic, the EIR addresses these issues at AR499 and in Impact Statement TRA-4. C. Construction Staging Area Description Bayside contends that the Project description is inaccurate and, indeed, is an "unstable moving target" by virtue of the failure to describe and evaluate a construction staging area. The Court agrees. The 2020 REIR includes several references to construction staging. Page 3-11 states: "Portions of the adjacent private property (currently a RV storage area) and Lower Castaways Park could be temporarily utilized for construction staging, if these areas are available during construction of the proposed project." (AR241.) Then, in response to a letter from the City of Newport Beach stating that the Lower Castaways would not be available (AR1120), the 2021 FEIR noted: "Should Lower Castaways not be available, construction staging would occur within other proposed areas of disturbance (as identified in the project boundary shown on 2020 Recirculated Draft EIR Exhibit 3-4)." (AR1127.) Exhibit 3-4 is a Proposed Conceptual Site Plan that shows the areas (highlighted in yellow) where the proposed project construction will take place as well as the Lower Castaways. (AR238.) A virtually identical site plan (also highlighted in yellow) is found at Exhibit 3-6 which is entitled Adjacent Pump Station Work Areas. (AR243.) According to OCSD's supplemental brief, based on the unavailability of the Lower Castaways, "the construction staging will occur Ruling Page 6 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 somewhere in this Adjacent Pump Station Work Area." (OCSD Supp. Br. at p. 12.) Based on this statement, the District argues in its supplemental brief that it satisfied CEQA since the EIR "considered all potential impacts that could occur in the Adjacent Area." However, based on a review of Exhibits 3-4 and 3-6, it is unclear whether creating a staging area in the limited designated space is even possible. With the exception of the Lower Castaways, the Coast Highway and the Newport channel, it appears that the areas highlighted in yellow are where virtually all of the construction actually will take place. Certainly, no specific location with adequate square footage is identified, nor is there any analysis as to whether Mitigation Measures AES-1 and TRA-1 would apply to any area other than the Lower Castaways. Perhaps a more significant problem with the statements in both the FEIR and supplemental brief about an alternative site in the project area is that they may well be inaccurate. Indeed, TRA-1 tends to contradict OCSD's supplemental brief by virtue of acknowledging that future staging areas may be located off -site: "[construction drawings shall] identify any and all construction staging or material storage sites located outside of the project site." (AR206 [emphasis added].) Compounding this problem, counsel for the District told the Court at an earlier hearing that the lowest responsible bidder on the Project will have complete discretion to decide where staging will occur and how many staging sites will be necessary. (August 4, 2022 Transcript at pp. 11-12.) Importantly, by not limiting that comment to sites within the yellow -highlighted boundaries of Exhibits 3-4 or 3-6, the District appears to acknowledge that staging sites not identified in either the REIR or FEIR might be utilized. Given that uncertainty, Bayside's argument regarding a lack of a complete, accurate and stable project description has merit. More specifically, the District's argument (OCSD Supp. Br. at p. 12) that the EIR considered all environmental impacts (biological, noise, aesthetics, etc.) in the Ruling Page 7 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Adjacent Area fails to account for any potential impacts that might occur if the construction staging area occurs elsewhere. Without identifying the area or areas where staging will occur, the public is left in the dark about whether that staging will have any effects on the environment at location(s) yet to be identified. Counsel's statement that the lowest responsible bidder will have complete discretion with regard to construction staging also renders the mitigation measures of AES-1 toothless. AES-1 purports to minimize aesthetic impacts of construction by requiring the District's Director of Engineering to personally approve construction staging areas, transport routes, etc. before grading or demolition permits are issued. To the extent AES-1 actually imposes enforceable standards (which the Court questions), it cannot be reconciled with the vesting of complete discretion in the lowest responsible bidder. IV. CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES "An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decisionmaking and public participation. An EIR is not required to consider alternatives which are infeasible. The lead agency is responsible for selecting a range of project alternatives for examination and must publicly disclose its reasoning for selecting those alternatives. There is no ironclad rule governing the nature or scope of the alternatives to be discussed other than the rule of reason." (CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.6(a).) The EIR identified five alternatives to the Project to analyze in detail: the "no project" scenario, the "adjacent project/microtunneling" scenario, the "origina Ruling Page 8 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 northeast pump station with horizontal directional drilling" scenario, the "rehabilitate in place with microtunneling" scenario, and the "pump station south relocation with microtunneling" scenario. (AR539-540.) Nearly 40 pages of analysis are devoted to comparing each of these alternatives to the Project. (AR540-578.) Bayside does not challenge the analysis presented. Rather, it faults the EIR for failing to discuss two additional alternatives: the "Expand -in -Place" scenario and alternative alignments for the dual force mains south of East Coast Highway. "Courts will defer to an agency's selection of alternatives unless the petitioners (1) demonstrate that the chosen alternatives are " "'manifestly unreasonable and ... do not contribute to a reasonable range of alternatives,"' " and (2) submit evidence showing the rejected alternative was both "feasible" and "adequate," because it was capable of attaining most of the basic objectives of the project, taking into account site suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, general plan consistency, and other relevant factors. [Citation.]" (South of Market Community Action Network v. City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.Sth 321, 345.) The Court assumes for the sake of argument that the "Expand -in -Place" scenario and the alternative alignments for the dual force mains are both feasible and adequate. That is, the Court assumes Bayside has met the second prong of its burden. However, Bayside fails to meet the first prong of its burden. "The 'key issue' is whether the range of alternatives discussed fosters informed decisionmaking and public participation. [Citation.]" (Cherry Valley Pass Acres & Neighbors v. City of Beaumont (190 Cal.App.4th 316, 354.) Bayside complains that two alternatives were not considered, but it identifies no authority holding that the failure to consider a specific alternative or alternatives automatically renders the range of Ruling Page 9 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 alternatives considered "manifestly unreasonable" or insufficient to "foster informed decision ma king." (Compare id., at p. 355 ["Though one or more of these 328 imaginable alternatives may have represented the optimum number of residences that could have profitably been built while minimizing the agricultural impacts of the project to the fullest extent possible, the range of alternatives discussed in the EIR was sufficient to foster informed decisionmaking on this very question."].) V. INCONSISTENCIES WITH PLANS A. Overview Bayside contends the EIR is fatally flawed because it fails to disclose the Project's inconsistencies with the PCDP, the Newport Beach Local Coastal Program ("LCP"), and the Coastal Act. An EIR must discuss "any inconsistencies between the proposed project and applicable general plans, specific plans and regional plan." (CEQA Guidelines § 15125(d).) This includes inconsistencies with the Coastal Act. (Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1209, 1233.) A determination of consistency "comes to this [C]ourt with a strong presumption of regularity. [Citation.] To overcome that presumption, an abuse of discretion must be shown. [Citations.] An abuse of discretion is established only if the city council has not proceeded in a manner required by law, its decision is not supported by findings, or the findings are not supported by substantial evidence. [Citation]." (Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.App.4th 704, 717.) "It is, emphatically, not the role of the courts to micro -manage these development decisions. Our function is simply to decide whether the city officials considered the applicable policies and the extent to which the proposed project conforms with those policies, whether the city officials made appropriate Ruling Page 10 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 findings on this issue, and whether those findings are supported by substantial evidence." (Id., at pp. 719-20 [emphasis in original].) In addition, Bayside's opening brief suggests the EIR is inadequate to the extent it fails to explain why the District found the Project consistent with applicable plans. (Pet. Opening Br. at p. 19, lines 6-8.) Because EIRs need only evaluate inconsistencies with plans, no analysis is required if the project is consistent with plans. (North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Morin Municipal Water Dist. Bd. of Directors (2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 614, 632 [citing City of Long Beach v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 889, 918-19].) Insofar as Bayside argues the explanation of consistency is inadequate (as opposed to arguing the finding of consistency is an abuse of discretion), this challenge fails. B. PCDP Inconsistency The PCDP contains zoning regulations that dictate acceptable land uses in each "Planning Area" it covers. It is undisputed that both the current pump station and the new pump station to be built as part of the Project are in Planning Area 1. According to the PCDP, "Wastewater Pump Station" is a permitted land use in Planning Area 1. (AR7615.) Bayside nevertheless contends the Project is inconsistent with the PCDP. It argues that the PCDP "identifies the existence of the BBPS, however, only at its current size and location, not the expanded size and altered location contemplated by the Final EIR." (Pet. Opening Br. at p. 18.) The claimed inconsistency apparently arises from conceptual drawings attached to the PCDP (for parking plans, public spaces, etc.) that show the BBPS in its current location in the context of the larger planning area. (See AR7650-7663.) That is, as the Court understands the argument, because the conceptual drawings show the current BBPS, any deviation is an inconsistency. Ruling Page 11 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 As the District points out in opposition, the PCDP imposes specific numeric limits on the square footage of commercial, residential, marina, and dry dock use in Planning Area 1, but not wastewater pump use. (AR7612.) The conceptual drawings do not on their face appear to limit the size or the location of the pumping station, only to show it in relation to other then -existing uses for planning purposes. The only explicit limitation placed on a wastewater pump station by the PCDP is that it must be in Planning Area 1. As to Bayside's contention that AR7549 allows the pump station also to be in Planning Area 2 (a contention that the Court will accept even though it does not appear that AR7549 is in the record filed with the Court), that fact does not establish PCDP inconsistency. Accordingly, the Court cannot say the finding of consistency is unsupported by substantial evidence. C. LCP Consistency Bayside contends the Project is inconsistent with policy 2.1.9 of the LCP because that policy "mandate[s] protection and expansion of coastal -dependent over commercial/industrial uses." (Pet.'s Opening Br. at p. 17.) As the District points out, nothing in policy 2.1.9 or its associated sub -policies discusses the relative priority of coastal -dependent uses vis-a-vis utility uses like the Project. (Furthermore, it appears the only hard-and-fast priority is that coastal -dependent uses are prioritized over residential uses, not over commercial/industrial uses. See policy 2.1.9-1, at AR11289.) In any event, the City correctly notes that relative priority matters only if the Back Bay Landing development and the Project are a zero -sum game in terms of developed square footage. Under the PCDP, square footage for a wastewater pump station does not count against commercial, residential, marina, or dry dock square footage. (See AR7612.) The Court cannot say the finding of consistency is unsupported by substantial evidence. Ruling Page 12 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 D. Coastal Act Consisten Bayside contends the Project is inconsistent with multiple sections of the Coastal Act, in particular Pub. Resources Code §§ 30213, 30221, 30222, 30224, and 30253(e), and policy 3.2.1-1 of the LCP, which similarly requires protection of coastal recreation opportunities. The Court agrees with the District that § 30222 is inapplicable. On its face, that statute prioritizes "visitor -serving commercial recreational facilities designed to enhance public opportunities for coastal recreation ... over private residential, general industrial, or general commercial development, but not over agriculture or coastal -dependent industry." Again, the Project is a utility use, not one of the categories enumerated in this statute. Of the remaining provisions, the only one discussed in any detail in Bayside's briefing (opening, reply, or supplemental) is § 30253(e) of the Coastal Act. The remainder are simply referred to in laundry lists without discussion of any particular alleged inconsistencies. Because Bayside bears the burden of showing an abuse of discretion, the Court finds the failure to specifically discuss §§ 30123, 30221, and 30224 of the Coastal Act, as well as policy 3.2.1-1 of the LCP, means Bayside has not shown an abuse of discretion in the District's finding of consistency. As to § 30253(e), it provides: "New development shall ... [w]here appropriate, protect special communities and neighborhoods that, because of their unique characteristics, are popular visitor destination points for recreational use." "Where appropriate" is an important qualifier here, as the District flags a competing provision of the Coastal Act, § 30231, which provides: "The biological productivity and the quality of coastal waters, streams, wetlands, estuaries, and lakes appropriate to maintain optimum populations of marine organisms and for the protection of human health shall be maintained and, where feasible, restored Ruling Page 13 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 through, among other means, minimizing adverse effects of waste water discharges and entrainment ...." The administrative record contains evidence that the current pump station is deteriorating and does not meet current standards for construction, electrical equipment, or maintenance. (AR187.) The record also contains evidence that failure of the system could result in the release of sewage into Newport Bay. (AR187, 245.) Section 30231 of the Coastal Act imposes a mandatory policy for protecting water quality (it "shall be maintained"), while § 30253(e) only imposes a duty to protect recreational use "where appropriate." On this record, the Court cannot say the District lacked substantial evidence to conclude its duties under § 30231 prevailed over its duties under § 30253(e), and thereby to conclude the Project is consistent with the Coastal Act. Put another way, Bayside must show the District abused its discretion in finding the "where appropriate" qualifier in § 30253(e) inapplicable here, and it has not met its burden to do so. VI. ADEQUACY OF RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Bayside contends the District's response to comments prior to certification of the FEIR is inadequate. The Court agrees with the District that Bayside failed to exhaust its administrative remedies on this issue. "[T]he time for complaining about the inadequacy of [the District's] responses was when the issue was before the agency and any alleged deficiency could be explained or corrected." (Towards Responsibility in Planning v. City Council (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 671, 682.) Bayside points to nothing in the record indicating that the alleged inadequacy of the District's responses was raised at the administrative stage. As a result, this challenge is barred. Bayside responds that the foregoing statement from Towards Responsibility is dictum unnecessary to the holding. This is true enough, as the Court of Appeal in that case found the agency's response to comments adequate on the merits. But Ruling Page 14 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 "[t]o say that dicta are not controlling [citation] does not mean that they are to be ignored; on the contrary, dicta are often followed." (9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (6th ed. 2022) Appeal § 532.) And while Bayside cites a number of cases on page 21 of its supplemental brief holding that inadequate responses to comments may render an EIR defective, none of those cases discusses the effect of the challenger's failure to raise the inadequacy issue before the agency. VII. REMEDIES AND CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, Bayside's petition is GRANTED on the ground that the description of the construction staging area is inadequate, and for the related reason that AES-1 is a toothless mitigation measure as a result. Bayside asks the Court to set aside the District's Project approvals and EIR certification. Public Resources Code § 21168.9 gives the Court discretion to fashion a narrower remedy. "The 1993 amendments to section 21168.9 expanded the trial court's authority and 'expressly authorized the court to fashion a remedy that permits some part of the project to go forward while an agency seeks to remedy its CEQA violations. In other words, the issuance of a writ need not always halt all work on a project.' [Citation.]" (San Bernardino Valley Audubon Soc. V. Metropolitan Water Dist. of Southern California (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 1097, 1104- 1105.) "The choice of a lesser remedy involves the trial court's consideration of equitable principles." (Id., at p. 1104.) As discussed above, Bayside's challenge is largely unsuccessful. And the vast majority of Bayside's challenge has little, if anything, to do with construction staging issues. The Court therefore finds the remainder of the Project severable from the construction staging issues. The Court further finds severance will not prejudice full and complete compliance with CEQA, because the remainder of the Project is CEQA-compliant. (Pub. Resources Code § 21168.9(b).) Ruling Page 15 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 In considering equitable principles to fashion a remedy, the Court is especially mindful of the severe risk to the environment that would be posed by the outdated pumping station and force mains failing and spilling raw sewage into Newport Bay. Furthermore, as explained in the District's filings in the companion eminent domain case, permitting from the relevant authorities is expected to take 9-12 months, with construction not starting for another six months after that. (See OC Superior Court case no. 2022-01251890, ROA 92, at pp. 2-3.) Based on representations made at the hearing, it appears that the City will not allow the permitting process to start without OCSD approval of the Project and its certification of the EIR. Of course, stalling that already lengthy process increases the risk of the very sewage spill the Project seeks to prevent. Because the issues with construction staging are both severable and appear to be readily correctable, and given the overriding need for the Project, OCSD will not be required to withdraw its approvals for the Project and certification of the EIR. As explained by the court in Preserve Wild Santee v. City of Santee (2012) 210 Cal. App. 4t" 260, 287-88: In our view, a reasonable, commonsense reading of section 21168.9 plainly forecloses plaintiffs' assertion that a trial court must mandate a public agency decertify the EIR and void all related project approvals in every instance where the court finds an EIR violates CEQA. Such a rigid requirement directly conflicts with the "in part" language in section 21168.9, subdivision (a)(1), which specifically allows a court to direct its mandates to parts of determinations, parts of findings, or parts of decisions. Such a rigid requirement also conflicts with the language in section 21168.9, subdivision (bl, limiting the court's mandates to only those necessary to achieve CEQA compliance and, if the court makes specified findings, to only "that portion of a determination, finding, or decision" violating CEQA. (Italics added.) Ruling Page 16 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Accordingly, the Court will impose the limited remedy of requiring OCSD to bring the EIR into CEQA compliance with respect to the construction staging issue and the related question of the enforceability of AES-1. Because the District's CEQA noncompliance involves construction issues, this means no construction or other physical activity may take place at the Project site until the District is in compliance with CEQA. Whether bringing the EIR into compliance can be accomplished via a supplemental EIR (CEQA Guidelines § 15163) or an addendum (CEQA Guidelines § 15164) will be left to OCSD to decide. Note that the Court's order includes only these mandates, which are necessary to achieve compliance with CEQA. (See Pub. Resources Code § 21168.9(b).) In order to avoid unnecessary delay that increases the risk of a sewage spill, the District may continue to seek the necessary permits from the City, Coastal Commission, etc. to move forward with the Project, and it may continue to pursue the companion eminent domain action. Bayside shall prepare a proposed order in accordance with this ruling and provide it to OCSD for comments before submitting it to the Court. Ruling Page 17 Attachment 2 LETTER OF INTENT FOR ENTERING INTO A LICENSING AGREEMENT — LOWER CASTAWAYS PARK ("LETTER OF INTENT") 31 1780172.1 ti 1A P0'4� O U }. _ C'�CI fi0 May 22, 2023 Orange County Sanitation District Rob Thompson, General Manager 10844 Ellis Ave Fountain Valley, CA 92708 100 Civic Center ©rive Newport Beach, California 92660 949 644-3001 1949 644-3020 FAX newportbeachca.gov Re: Letter of Intent for Entering Into a Licensing Agreement — Lower Castaways Park Dear Mr. Thompson: This Letter of Intent reflects the City of Newport Beach (City) intent to enter into a Licensing Agreement with the Orange County Sanitation District (OC SAN) to utilize portions of Lower Castaways Park as construction staging area for the Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement project. The City understands as follows: o WHEREAS, the City is the owner of the real property located at 700 Dover Drive, Newport Beach, California, 92660 (the "Property"), known as "Castaways Park" and depicted in yellow on Exhibit "A" attached hereto; o WHEREAS, OC San wishes to lease 18,000 square feet of the lower portion of the Property etas depicted on Exhibit "B" attached hereto) for use as a staging area in connection with the future construction of the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project ("Project"), a public infrastructure project; and o WHEREAS, the City desires to lease the Property to OC SAN for the sole purpose of such use. e WHEREAS, the parties intend to enter into a licensing agreement at a future date to memorialize the duties and obligations of each respective party for the use of the Property, Based on this understanding and the mutual covenants and intentions stated herein, the City intends as follows: 1. The City is preparing a licensing agreement for use of the Property as construction staging area for the Project. The term of the licensing agreement will cover the construction period. This document is a Letter of Intent only. It is not intended to be, and shall not constitute in any way, a binding or legal agreement, or impose any legal obligation or duty on either of us. If this document is not replaced by a valid binding contract signed by authorized representatives from each company, it shall have no force or effect whatsoever. Letter to OC Sanitation District May 15, 2023 Page 2 If the foregoing reflects our mutual statement of intention, please sign, and return the enclosed copy of this Letter of Intent. Sincerely, race K. Leung City Manager City of Newport Beach Orange County Sanitation District Confirmed this Z3'" day of M.y 2023 By: / % /� Title: C9Pv�a✓ft / / tG�n�LJ!'f . D� �5'1" WS MAP WAS r'RLPAHLV FtW ORAWF =iirr Assnsvd ov r. Y,um 13E5 trx.Y. Rft ASSE550h MAKES RU CUARANT:F AS 15 ! IS ACCfI!fACY kLFt 45S0ai'S ANY T fAdIL ! IF f'uH ,�idtR USES- Alu -0 Rt HDIRL'Df!CED. ATL RICHTS RFSEHY19, O.COP WGHT PRANCE -rDWrr 4SM.55LV 2002 POR. E. 112, S.E. 114. SEC. 27. T 6 S. R 10 W Exhibit A Castaways Park Q LAH X[Y i 425 - 03 i 1 - PARCEL MAP P.M. 001-50 Noll - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK d MARCH 1966 TRACT NO. 1125 M.M. 39-7.8 PARCEL_ NUMBERS TRACT NO. 15012(omended) M.M. 753-23 to 32 inc. SHOWN IN ClRCVS ASSESSOR'S MAP 800K 117 PAGE 80 COUNTY OF ORANGE I " - 3E,�, 117- 80 PAGE 1 OF 3 Exhibit B Lease of Property — Castaways Park Attachment 3 AIR QUALITY / GREENHOUSE GAS / ENERGY DATA 32 1780172.1 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report Table of Contents 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information 1.2. Land Use Types 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated 2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated 2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated 3.2. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated 1 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.3. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated 3.4. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated 3.5. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated 3.6. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated 3.7. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated 3.8. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated 3.9. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated 3.10. Demolition (2028) - Mitigated 3.11. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated 3.12. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated 3.13. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated 3.14. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated 3.15. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated 3.16. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated 3.17. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated 3.18. Demolition (2028) - Mitigated 3.19. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated 2/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.20. Grading (2024) - Mitigated 3.21. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.22. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.23. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated 3.24. Grading (2024) - Mitigated 3.25. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.26. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.27. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated 3.28. Grading (2024) - Mitigated 3.29. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.30. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.31. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.32. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.33. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.34. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.35. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.36. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.37. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 3.38. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 3.39. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated 3.40. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated 3.41. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated 3.42. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated 3.43. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated 3.44. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated 3.45. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated 3.46. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated 3.47. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated 3.48. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated 3.49. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated 3.50. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated 3.51. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated 3.52. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated 3.53. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated 4/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.54. Architectural Coating (2025) - Mitigated 3.55. Trenching (2024) - Unmitigated 3.56. Trenching (2024) - Mitigated 3.57. Trenching (2024) - Unmitigated 3.58. Trenching (2024) - Mitigated 3.59. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated 3.60. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated 3.61. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated 3.62. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated 3.63. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated 3.64. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated 3.65. Trenching (2026) - Unmitigated 3.66. Trenching (2026) - Mitigated 3.67. Trenching (2027) - Unmitigated 3.68. Trenching (2027) - Mitigated 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 5/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.1.1. Unmitigated 4.1.2. Mitigated 4.2. Energy 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated 4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated 4.3.1. Mitigated 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated 4.4.1. Mitigated 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated 4.5.1. Mitigated 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 6/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.6.1. Unmitigated 4.6.2. Mitigated 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated 4.7.2. Mitigated 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated 4.8.2. Mitigated 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated 4.9.2. Mitigated 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated 4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated 7 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated 5.2.2. Mitigated 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated 5.3.2. Mitigated 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies 5.5. Architectural Coatings 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies 5.7. Construction Paving 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors 8/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated 5.9.2. Mitigated 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.1.2. Mitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment 5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated 5.11.2. Mitigated 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated 5.12.2. Mitigated 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 9/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.13.1. Unmitigated 5.13.2. Mitigated 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated 5.14.2. Mitigated 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 5.15.2. Mitigated 5.16. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps 5.16.2. Process Boilers 5.17. User Defined 5.18. Vegetation 5.18.1. Land Use Change 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 10/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2.2. Mitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores [. ���fl"�Fi�:�7:Z�[1C�i[�Ti1f•C�11T-��. 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores 7.4. Health & Equity Measures 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures 11 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 8. User Changes to Default Data 12/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 1. Basic Project Information 1.1. Basic Project Information Project Name Construction Start Date Operational Year Lead Agency Land Use Scale Analysis Level for Defaults Windspeed (m/s) Precipitation (days) Location County City Air District Air Basin TAZ EDFZ Electric Utility Gas Utility App Version 1.2. Land Use Types Bay Bridge (with Dredging) 7/1 /2023 2028 Project/site County 2.50 16.2 33.61636544504624,-117.90701330233207 Orange Newport Beach South Coast AQMD South Coast 5917 7 Southern California Edison Southern California Gas 2022.1.1.13 13/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 General Light 14.5 1000sgft 0.33 14,500 1,000 Industry Other Asphalt 16.0 1000sgft 0.37 0.00 0.09 Surfaces 1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Construction C-2* Construction C-10-A Construction C-10-C Construction C-11 Construction C-12 Energy E-1 Waste S-1 /S-2 Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results 2. Emissions Summary 2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Unmit. 5.37 4.50 40.7 40.0 0.08 1.74 0.96 2.36 1.60 0.21 1.75 - Mit. 5.37 4.50 40.7 40.0 0.08 1.74 0.96 2.36 1.60 0.21 1.75 - % - - - <0.5% - - - - Reduced Limit Heavy -Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Water Exposed Surfaces Water Unpaved Construction Roads Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Sweep Paved Roads Buildings Exceed 2019 Title 24 Building Envelope Energy Efficiency Standards Implement Waste Reduction Plan 9,573 9,573 0.39 0.30 4.72 9,624 9,573 9,573 0.39 0.30 4.72 9,624 14 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Unmit. 4.53 18.0 34.0 33.6 0.07 1.39 0.99 2.21 1.28 0.20 1.42 - 8,134 8,134 0.34 0.20 0.09 8,177 Mit. 4.53 18.0 34.0 33.6 0.07 1.39 0.99 2.21 1.28 0.20 1.42 - 8,134 8,134 0.34 0.20 0.09 8,177 Reduced Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily (Max) Unmit. 2.39 2.18 17.6 18.2 0.04 0.68 0.51 1.19 0.62 0.12 0.74 - 5,011 5,011 0.21 0.11 0.92 5,051 Mit. 2.39 2.18 17.6 18.2 0.04 0.68 0.51 1.18 0.62 0.12 0.74 - 5,011 5,011 0.21 0.11 0.92 5,051 % - - - - - - <0.5% <0.5% - - - - - Reduced Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Max) Unmit. 0.44 0.40 3.22 3.32 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.22 0.11 0.02 0.14 - 830 830 0.04 0.02 0.15 836 Mit. 0.44 0.40 3.22 3.32 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.22 0.11 0.02 0.14 - 830 830 0.04 0.02 0.15 836 % - - - - - - <0.5% <0.5% - <0.5% <0.5% - - - - - - - Reduced Exceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Daily Max) Threshol - 75.0 100 550 150 - - 150 - - 55.0 - - - - - - - d Unmit. Yes No No No No Yes - No Yes - No - - - - - - - Mit. Yes No No No No Yes - No Yes - No - - - - - - - Exceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Average Daily) Threshol - 75.0 100 550 150 - - 150 - - 55.0 - - - - - - - d Unmit. Yes No No No No Yes - No Yes - No - - - - - - - 15/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Mit. Yes No No No No Yes - No Yes - No 2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 2024 5.37 4.50 40.7 40.0 0.08 1.74 0.62 2.36 1.60 0.15 1.75 - 2025 3.33 2.78 24.5 26.8 0.07 0.92 0.96 1.88 0.84 0.21 1.05 - 2026 0.67 0.55 4.64 5.95 0.01 0.11 0.57 0.68 0.10 0.10 0.20 - 2027 0.64 0.52 4.51 5.89 0.01 0.09 0.57 0.66 0.08 0.10 0.18 - Daily - Winter (Max) 2024 4.53 3.79 34.0 31.2 0.07 1.39 0.59 1.98 1.28 0.14 1.42 - 2025 4.35 18.0 31.6 33.6 0.07 1.21 0.99 2.21 1.11 0.20 1.31 - 2026 3.22 2.70 23.2 25.4 0.05 0.87 0.96 1.83 0.80 0.19 0.99 - 2027 3.13 2.61 22.4 25.0 0.05 0.81 0.96 1.77 0.74 0.19 0.93 - 2028 0.40 0.33 2.90 3.85 0.01 0.05 0.26 0.31 0.05 0.05 0.09 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 2024 1.74 1.46 13.1 12.3 0.03 0.54 0.21 0.76 0.50 0.05 0.55 - 2025 2.39 2.18 17.6 18.2 0.04 0.68 0.51 1.19 0.62 0.12 0.74 - 2026 0.82 0.68 5.80 6.92 0.01 0.18 0.46 0.64 0.16 0.08 0.25 - 2027 0.66 0.54 4.71 5.93 0.01 0.12 0.42 0.55 0.11 0.08 0.19 - 2028 0.02 0.02 0.16 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - 2024 0.32 0.27 2.39 2.25 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 0.14 0.09 0.01 0.10 - 16/194 9,573 9,573 0.38 0.13 2.88 9,624 8,543 8,543 0.39 0.30 4.72 8,646 931 931 0.04 0.03 0.54 940 928 928 0.04 0.03 0.49 937 8,134 8,134 0.33 0.12 0.07 8,177 7,892 7,892 0.34 0.20 0.09 7,959 5,212 5,212 0.20 0.08 0.05 5,241 5,201 5,201 0.20 0.08 0.05 5,230 587 587 0.02 0.01 0.01 592 3,112 3,112 0.12 0.04 0.43 3,128 5,011 5,011 0.21 0.11 0.92 5,051 1,253 1,253 0.05 0.03 0.26 1,262 1,050 1,050 0.04 0.02 0.20 1,058 32.2 32.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 32.5 515 515 0.02 0.01 0.07 518 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 2025 0.44 0.40 3.22 3.32 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.22 0.11 0.02 0.14 - 2026 0.15 0.12 1.06 1.26 < 0.005 0.03 0.08 0.12 0.03 0.01 0.04 - 2027 0.12 0.10 0.86 1.08 < 0.005 0.02 0.08 0.10 0.02 0.01 0.03 - 2028 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 2024 5.37 4.50 40.7 40.0 0.08 1.74 0.62 2.36 1.60 0.15 1.75 - 2025 3.33 2.78 24.5 26.8 0.07 0.92 0.96 1.88 0.84 0.21 1.05 - 2026 0.67 0.55 4.64 5.95 0.01 0.11 0.57 0.68 0.10 0.10 0.20 - 2027 0.64 0.52 4.51 5.89 0.01 0.09 0.57 0.66 0.08 0.10 0.18 - Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) 2024 4.53 3.79 34.0 31.2 0.07 1.39 0.59 1.98 1.28 0.14 1.42 - 2025 4.35 18.0 31.6 33.6 0.07 1.21 0.99 2.21 1.11 0.20 1.31 - 2026 3.22 2.70 23.2 25.4 0.05 0.87 0.96 1.83 0.80 0.19 0.99 - 2027 3.13 2.61 22.4 25.0 0.05 0.81 0.96 1.77 0.74 0.19 0.93 - 2028 0.40 0.33 2.90 3.85 0.01 0.05 0.26 0.31 0.05 0.05 0.09 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 2024 1.74 1.46 13.1 12.3 0.03 0.54 0.21 0.76 0.50 0.05 0.55 - 2025 2.39 2.18 17.6 18.2 0.04 0.68 0.51 1.18 0.62 0.12 0.74 - 2026 0.82 0.68 5.80 6.92 0.01 0.18 0.46 0.64 0.16 0.08 0.25 - 2027 0.66 0.54 4.71 5.93 0.01 0.12 0.42 0.55 0.11 0.08 0.19 - 17/194 830 830 0.04 0.02 0.15 836 207 207 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 209 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 0.03 175 5.34 5.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.38 9,573 9,573 0.38 0.13 2.88 9,624 8,543 8,543 0.39 0.30 4.72 8,646 931 931 0.04 0.03 0.54 940 928 928 0.04 0.03 0.49 937 8,134 8,134 0.33 0.12 0.07 8,177 7,892 7,892 0.34 0.20 0.09 7,959 5,212 5,212 0.20 0.08 0.05 5,241 5,201 5,201 0.20 0.08 0.05 5,230 587 587 0.02 0.01 0.01 592 3,112 3,112 0.12 0.04 0.43 3,128 5,011 5,011 0.21 0.11 0.92 5,051 1,253 1,253 0.05 0.03 0.26 1,262 1,050 1,050 0.04 0.02 0.20 1,058 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 2028 0.02 0.02 0.16 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - 2024 0.32 0.27 2.39 2.25 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 0.14 0.09 0.01 0.10 - 2025 0.44 0.40 3.22 3.32 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.22 0.11 0.02 0.14 - 2026 0.15 0.12 1.06 1.26 < 0.005 0.03 0.08 0.12 0.03 0.01 0.04 - 2027 0.12 0.10 0.86 1.08 < 0.005 0.02 0.08 0.10 0.02 0.01 0.03 - 2028 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 32.2 32.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 32.5 515 515 0.02 0.01 0.07 518 830 830 0.04 0.02 0.15 836 207 207 0.01 < 0.005 0.04 209 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 0.03 175 5.34 5.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.38 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Unmit. 0.13 0.44 0.17 0.77 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 438 454 1.66 0.02 3.77 504 Mit. 0.13 0.44 0.16 0.76 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 385 396 1.17 0.02 3.77 434 % - - 4% 1% - - - - - - - 30% 12% 13% 29% - - 14% Reduced Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Unmit. 0.02 0.34 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 435 451 1.66 0.02 3.77 502 Mit. 0.02 0.34 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 382 394 1.17 0.02 3.77 432 % - - 4% 4% - - - - - - - 30% 12% 13% 29% - - 14% Reduced Average - - - - - Daily (Max) Unmit. 0.10 0.41 0.17 0.57 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 437 453 1.66 0.02 3.77 503 Mit. 0.09 0.41 0.16 0.57 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 384 395 1.17 0.02 3.77 434 18/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 % - - 4% 1% - - - - - - - 30% 12% 13% 29% - - 14% Reduced Annual (Max) Unmit. 0.02 0.08 0.03 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 2.67 72.3 75.0 0.27 < 0.005 0.62 83.4 Mit. 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 1.87 63.6 65.5 0.19 < 0.005 0.62 71.8 % 1 % < 0.5% 4% 1 % 4% 4% - 4% 4% - 4% 30% 12% 13% 29% 2% - 14% Reduced Exceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Daily Max) Threshol - 55.0 55.0 550 150 - - 150 55.0 - - - - - d Unmit. - No No No No - - No - - No - - - - - - - Mit. - No No No No - - No - - No - - - - - - - Exceeds - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Average Daily) Threshol - 55.0 55.0 550 150 - - 150 - - 55.0 - - - - - - - d Unmit. - No No No No - - No - - No - - - - - - - Mit. - No No No No - - No - - No - - - - - - - 2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.11 0.43 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.60 19/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 402 402 0.03 < 0.005 - 403 Water - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Refrig. - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.13 0.44 0.17 0.77 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 438 454 1.66 0.02 3.77 504 Daily, - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area - 0.33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Energy 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 402 402 0.03 < 0.005 - 403 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.02 0.34 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 435 451 1.66 0.02 3.77 502 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.08 0.40 < 0.005 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.78 1.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.78 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 402 402 0.03 < 0.005 - 403 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.10 0.41 0.17 0.57 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 16.1 437 453 1.66 0.02 3.77 503 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.01 0.07 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 66.5 66.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 66.7 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 20 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Waste - - - - - - - - 1.60 0.00 1.60 0.16 0.00 - 5.61 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0.62 0.62 Total 0.02 0.08 0.03 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 2.67 72.3 75.0 0.27 < 0.005 0.62 83.4 2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) ��II Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.11 0.43 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.60 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 349 349 0.03 < 0.005 - 350 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.13 0.44 0.16 0.76 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 385 396 1.17 0.02 3.77 434 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area - 0.33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 349 349 0.03 < 0.005 - 350 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.02 0.34 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 382 394 1.17 0.02 3.77 432 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 21 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.08 0.40 < 0.005 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.78 1.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.78 Energy 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 349 349 0.03 < 0.005 - 350 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Refrig. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Total 0.09 0.41 0.16 0.57 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 11.3 384 395 1.17 0.02 3.77 434 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 0.01 0.07 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 57.8 57.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 58.0 Water - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 Waste - - - - - - - - - - - 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.08 0.00 - 2.81 Refrig. 0.62 0.62 Total 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 1.87 63.6 65.5 0.19 < 0.005 0.62 71.8 3. Construction Emissions Details 3.1. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 22 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - Winter (Max) Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 23 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.2. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Demolitio - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.3. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for daily. MT/vr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.4. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 22.0 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.0 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.93 3.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.13 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 27 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n 28 / 194 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.5. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - 29 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 22.0 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.0 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.93 3.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.13 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 / 194 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.6. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.6 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.6 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.7 14.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.4 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.43 2.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.55 31 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.7. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n 33 / 194 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.6 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.6 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.7 14.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.4 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.43 2.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.55 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.14 0.12 1.04 1.30 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.19 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 34 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.2 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.8. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.2 22.1 22.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.4 14.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.1 3.65 3.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.38 2.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.51 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.14 0.12 1.04 1.30 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.19 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.2 36 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.9. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.42 1.81 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.2 22.1 22.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.4 14.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.1 3.65 3.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.38 2.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.51 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 37 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 38 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.4 13.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 2.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.9 29.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 20.7 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 1.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.13 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.10. Demolition (2028) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.42 1.81 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment 39 / 194 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.4 13.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 2.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.22 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.11. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - Daily, - - - - Summer (Max) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.9 29.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 20.7 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 1.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.13 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 40/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.12. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n 42/194 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 22.0 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.0 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.93 3.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.13 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.02 0.02 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 43/194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 22.0 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.13. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.9 20.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.0 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.93 3.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.13 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.6 45/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.14. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.6 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.7 14.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.4 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.43 2.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.55 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 46/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.6 47/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.15. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.6 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.7 14.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.4 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.43 2.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.55 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.14 0.12 1.04 1.30 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.19 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.2 49/194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.16. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.2 22.1 22.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.4 14.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.1 3.65 3.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.38 2.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.51 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.14 0.12 1.04 1.30 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.06 0.06 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.19 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 21.2 51 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.17. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.42 1.81 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 21.2 22.1 22.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.4 14.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 15.1 3.65 3.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.38 2.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.51 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 52 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 53 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.4 13.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 2.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.9 29.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 20.7 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 1.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.13 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.18. Demolition (2028) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.42 1.81 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.09 0.09 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment 54 / 194 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.4 13.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 2.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.22 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Demolitio - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.19. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - Daily, - - - - Summer (Max) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.9 29.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 20.7 1.66 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.08 1.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.13 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.19 55 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 1.46 1.22 10.9 9.21 0.03 0.43 - 0.43 0.40 - 0.40 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.46 1.22 10.9 9.21 0.03 0.43 - 0.43 0.40 - 0.40 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.52 0.44 3.92 3.32 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.14 - 0.14 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.10 0.08 0.71 0.61 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,843 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,843 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,020 1,020 0.04 0.01 - 1,024 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 169 169 0.01 < 0.005 - 170 56 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.20. Grading (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - 57 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 237 237 < 0.005 0.01 0.97 241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 226 226 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 228 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.4 82.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 83.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.6 13.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 13.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.46 1.22 10.9 9.21 0.03 0.43 - 0.43 0.40 - 0.40 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movement Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.46 1.22 10.9 9.21 0.03 0.43 - 0.43 0.40 - 0.40 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.52 0.44 3.92 3.32 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.14 - 0.14 - Equipment Dust - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.10 0.08 0.71 0.61 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,843 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,843 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,020 1,020 0.04 0.01 - 1,024 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 169 169 0.01 < 0.005 - 170 58 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.21. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 237 237 < 0.005 0.01 0.97 241 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 226 226 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 228 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.4 82.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 83.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.6 13.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 13.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.39 1.17 10.1 9.05 0.03 0.40 - 0.40 0.37 - 0.37 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.39 1.17 10.1 9.05 0.03 0.40 - 0.40 0.37 - 0.37 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.49 0.41 3.58 3.21 0.01 0.14 - 0.14 0.13 - 0.13 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 60 / 194 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,844 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,844 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,004 1,004 0.04 0.01 - 1,007 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.65 0.59 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - Daily, - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 61 / 194 166 166 0.01 < 0.005 - 167 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.88 236 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 221 221 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 224 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.4 79.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 80.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.22. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.39 1.17 10.1 9.05 0.03 0.40 - 0.40 0.37 - 0.37 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.39 1.17 10.1 9.05 0.03 0.40 - 0.40 0.37 - 0.37 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.49 0.41 3.58 3.21 0.01 0.14 - 0.14 0.13 - 0.13 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - From Material Movemen 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,844 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,834 2,834 0.11 0.02 - 2,844 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,004 1,004 0.04 0.01 - 1,007 62 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.65 0.59 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Dust - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 63 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166 166 0.01 < 0.005 - 167 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.88 236 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 221 221 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 224 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.4 79.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 80.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.23. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 64 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.24. Grading (2024) - Mitigated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166 166 0.01 0.03 0.35 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166 166 0.01 0.03 0.01 174 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.8 59.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 62.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.90 9.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.4 65 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) �l Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - Dust - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen 66 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.25. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - 67 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166 166 0.01 0.03 0.35 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166 166 0.01 0.03 0.01 174 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.8 59.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 62.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.90 9.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.4 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movement Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.26. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 163 163 0.01 0.03 0.01 171 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 19.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.12 3.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.21 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 70 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 163 163 0.01 0.03 0.01 171 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.8 18.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 19.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.12 3.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.28 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.27. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual 71 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.28. Grading (2024) - Mitigated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.7 80.7 0.01 0.01 0.17 84.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.7 80.7 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 84.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.9 27.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 29.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.63 4.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.86 72 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) �l Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - Dust - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen 73 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.29. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - 74 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.7 80.7 0.01 0.01 0.17 84.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.7 80.7 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 84.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.9 27.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 29.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.63 4.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.86 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movement Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.30. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.3 79.3 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 83.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.2 10.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.70 1.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.10 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 77 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.3 79.3 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 83.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.2 10.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 10.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.70 1.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.78 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.31. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual 78 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.08 0.02 0.95 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.06 0.07 - Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.07 0.02 0.98 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.06 0.07 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.32. Grading (2025) - Mitigated 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 778 778 0.06 0.13 1.64 819 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 778 778 0.06 0.13 0.04 818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.5 40.5 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 42.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.71 6.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.05 79 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) �l Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - Dust - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen 80 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.08 0.02 0.95 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.06 0.07 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.07 0.02 0.98 0.42 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.06 0.07 - Average - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.33. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - 81 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 778 778 0.06 0.13 1.64 819 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 778 778 0.06 0.13 0.04 818 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.5 40.5 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 42.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.71 6.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.05 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.07 0.02 0.88 0.39 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 - 722 722 0.06 0.12 1.52 760 82 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.20 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 158 158 0.01 0.03 0.14 166 Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 26.2 26.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 27.5 3.34. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 83 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.07 0.02 0.88 0.39 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.20 0.01 0.05 0.06 - Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.20 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 84 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 722 722 0.06 0.12 1.52 760 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 158 158 0.01 0.03 0.14 166 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.2 26.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 27.5 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.35. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite 85 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.07 0.01 0.83 0.37 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.19 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.36. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 From Material Movemen : 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 685 685 0.06 0.11 1.44 721 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150 150 0.01 0.02 0.14 158 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.9 24.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 26.1 86 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.07 0.01 0.83 0.37 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 87 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 685 685 0.06 0.11 1.44 721 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.19 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Annual - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.37. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen : Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - 150 150 0.01 0.02 0.14 158 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.9 24.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 26.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dust - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.28 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 - Daily, Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.38. Grading (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - 89 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 233 233 0.02 0.04 0.49 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.83 3.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.67 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - Summer (Max) Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen: Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Daily, Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dust - - - - - - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - - - - - - From Material Movemen Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.28 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 - 233 233 0.02 0.04 0.49 245 90 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.39. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.83 3.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.67 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 91 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.05 0.05 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.4 61.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 64.6 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.4 61.4 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 64.5 92 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.40. Demolition (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.54 1.85 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.5 11.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 12.1 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.91 1.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.01 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 93 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.35 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.05 0.05 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.01 0.01 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 46.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.60 7.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 7.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 33.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.4 61.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 64.6 31.6 31.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.4 61.4 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 64.5 94 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.41. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.5 11.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 12.1 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.91 1.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.01 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.19 0.19 - 0.03 0.03 n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.03 0.03 - 0.01 0.01 n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 96 / 194 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.3 60.3 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 63.4 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.3 60.3 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 63.3 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.42. Demolition (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.21 0.18 1.50 1.83 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.15 0.13 1.07 1.31 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment 97 / 194 43.1 43.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 45.2 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.13 7.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.49 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 174 174 0.01 < 0.005 - 175 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Demolitio - - - - - - 0.19 0.19 - 0.03 0.03 - Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Off -Road 0.03 0.02 0.20 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.03 0.03 - 0.01 0.01 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 98 / 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 29.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.6 32.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 33.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.3 60.3 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 63.4 31.0 31.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.3 60.3 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 63.3 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43.1 43.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.04 45.2 3.71 3.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.43. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.13 0.11 0.96 1.20 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.17 0.17 - 0.03 0.03 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 7.13 7.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.49 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 161 161 0.01 < 0.005 - 161 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.18 0.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.03 0.03 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 26.6 26.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 26.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.1 59.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 62.2 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.2 59.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 62.1 20.4 20.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 20.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 41.0 3.37 3.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.46 6.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.79 100 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.44. Demolition (2027) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for daily. MT/vr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.46 1.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.26 0.26 - 0.04 0.04 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.13 0.11 0.96 1.20 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.17 0.17 - 0.03 0.03 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 244 244 0.01 < 0.005 - 245 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 161 161 0.01 < 0.005 - 161 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 101 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.18 0.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Demolitio - - - - - - 0.03 0.03 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - n Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 3.45. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated 26.6 26.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 26.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.0 32.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 32.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.1 59.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 62.2 30.5 30.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 30.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.2 59.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 62.1 20.4 20.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 20.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 41.0 3.37 3.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.46 6.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.79 102 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.56 0.47 4.50 5.70 0.01 0.18 - 0.18 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.56 0.47 4.50 5.70 0.01 0.18 - 0.18 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.62 2.05 < 0.005 0.06 - 0.06 0.06 - 0.06 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.04 0.03 0.30 0.37 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 409 409 0.02 < 0.005 - 411 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.8 67.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 68.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 103 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.46. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.56 0.47 4.50 5.70 0.01 0.18 - 0.18 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 75.8 75.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.21 79.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.9 76.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 77.8 75.8 75.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 79.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.1 28.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 28.4 27.3 27.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 28.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.65 4.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.71 4.52 4.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 104 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.56 0.47 4.50 5.70 0.01 0.18 - 0.18 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.20 0.17 1.62 2.05 < 0.005 0.06 - 0.06 0.06 - 0.06 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.04 0.03 0.30 0.37 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 105 / 194 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 409 409 0.02 < 0.005 - 411 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.8 67.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 68.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.8 80.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 82.0 75.8 75.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.21 79.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.9 76.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 77.8 75.8 75.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 79.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.47. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.53 0.45 4.25 5.68 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.03 0.03 0.26 0.34 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment 106 / 194 28.1 28.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 28.4 27.3 27.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 28.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.65 4.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.71 4.52 4.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.0 69.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 69.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.4 11.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 11.5 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.48. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.5 75.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 76.4 74.6 74.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 77.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.64 4.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.70 4.52 4.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.75 0.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 107 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.53 0.45 4.25 5.68 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.03 0.03 0.26 0.34 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 108/ 194 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 69.0 69.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 69.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.4 11.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 11.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.5 75.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 76.4 74.6 74.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 77.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.64 4.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.70 4.52 4.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.49. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.53 0.45 4.25 5.68 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.06 0.05 0.51 0.68 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - 109 / 194 0.77 0.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.75 0.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136 136 0.01 < 0.005 - 136 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.5 22.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 22.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - 75.5 75.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 76.4 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - 74.6 74.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 77.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 9.13 9.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.25 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 8.90 8.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.30 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.51 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.53 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.47 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.54 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.53 0.45 4.25 5.68 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 Equipment 110 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.06 0.05 0.51 0.68 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 111/ 194 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136 136 0.01 < 0.005 - 136 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.5 22.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 22.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.5 75.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 76.4 74.6 74.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 77.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.13 9.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.25 8.90 8.90 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.51 1.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.53 1.47 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.51. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.52 0.44 4.08 5.67 0.01 0.15 - 0.15 0.13 - 0.13 - 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - Daily Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.72 1.00 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - 200 200 0.01 < 0.005 - 201 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 33.3 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - Daily, - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - Winter (Max) 112 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.52. Building Construction (2027) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.52 0.44 4.08 5.67 0.01 0.15 - 0.15 0.13 - 0.13 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 74.2 74.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 75.1 73.2 73.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 76.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.2 13.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.4 12.9 12.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.19 2.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.22 2.13 2.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,137 1,137 0.05 0.01 - 1,141 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 113 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.72 1.00 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.53. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated 200 200 0.01 < 0.005 - 201 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.2 33.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 33.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.2 74.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 75.1 73.2 73.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 76.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.2 13.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.4 12.9 12.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 13.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.19 2.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.22 2.13 2.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 114 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 - 134 Equipment Architect - 14.3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 1.83 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.84 Equipment Architect - 0.20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 Equipment Architect - 0.04 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite - - - - - 115 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - 30.8 30.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.43 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.43 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.54. Architectural Coating (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) �l Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 - 134 Equipment 116 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Architect - 14.3 - - - Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Architect - 0.20 - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - Equipment Architect - 0.04 - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - Daily 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.83 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 1.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.8 30.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 117 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.55. Trenching (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 2.89 2.42 22.7 19.8 0.04 0.96 - 0.96 0.88 - 0.88 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 2.89 2.42 22.7 19.8 0.04 0.96 - 0.96 0.88 - 0.88 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 1.04 0.88 8.20 7.16 0.02 0.35 - 0.35 0.32 - 0.32 - Equipment 0.43 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,537 4,537 0.18 0.04 - 4,553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,537 4,537 0.18 0.04 - 4,553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,641 1,641 0.07 0.01 - 1,647 118 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.50 1.31 < 0.005 0.06 - 0.06 0.06 - 0.06 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.10 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 272 272 0.01 < 0.005 - 273 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 305 305 < 0.005 0.01 1.25 309 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 290 290 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 294 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106 106 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 108 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.6 17.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 119 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.56. Trenching (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for daily. MT/vr for annual Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 2.89 2.42 22.7 19.8 0.04 0.96 - 0.96 0.88 - 0.88 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 2.89 2.42 22.7 19.8 0.04 0.96 - 0.96 0.88 - 0.88 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 1.04 0.88 8.20 7.16 0.02 0.35 - 0.35 0.32 - 0.32 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.19 0.16 1.50 1.31 < 0.005 0.06 - 0.06 0.06 - 0.06 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - 4,537 4,537 0.18 0.04 - 4,553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,537 4,537 0.18 0.04 - 4,553 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,641 1,641 0.07 0.01 - 1,647 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 272 272 0.01 < 0.005 - 273 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 120 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Summer (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.10 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.57. Trenching (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 305 305 < 0.005 0.01 1.25 309 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 290 290 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 294 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 106 106 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 108 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.6 17.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 17.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.82 0.69 6.67 8.28 0.01 0.35 - 0.35 0.32 - 0.32 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.10 0.09 0.82 1.02 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 122/ 194 1,379 1,379 0.06 0.01 - 1,384 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170 170 0.01 < 0.005 - 171 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.1 28.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 28.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.9 33.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 34.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.03 4.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.58. Trenching (2024) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 0.82 0.69 6.67 8.28 0.01 0.35 - 0.35 0.32 - 0.32 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.10 0.09 0.82 1.02 < 0.005 0.04 - 0.04 0.04 - 0.04 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - 123 / 194 0.67 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,379 1,379 0.06 0.01 - 1,384 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170 170 0.01 < 0.005 - 171 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.1 28.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 28.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - Summer (Max) Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.59. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.64 1.37 12.6 12.7 0.04 0.49 - 0.49 0.45 - 0.45 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck 33.9 33.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 34.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.03 4.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,837 3,837 0.16 0.03 - 3,850 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 124 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.64 1.37 12.6 12.7 0.04 0.49 - 0.49 0.45 - 0.45 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.58 0.48 4.44 4.50 0.01 0.17 - 0.17 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.11 0.09 0.81 0.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily 125 / 194 3,837 3,837 0.16 0.03 - 3,850 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,356 1,356 0.06 0.01 - 1,361 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 225 225 0.01 < 0.005 - 225 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.88 236 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 221 221 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 224 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.60. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite Daily, Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.64 1.37 12.6 12.7 0.04 0.49 - 0.49 0.45 - 0.45 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.64 1.37 12.6 12.7 0.04 0.49 - 0.49 0.45 - 0.45 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.58 0.48 4.44 4.50 0.01 0.17 - 0.17 0.16 - 0.16 - Equipment 79.2 79.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 80.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,837 3,837 0.16 0.03 - 3,850 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,837 3,837 0.16 0.03 - 3,850 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,356 1,356 0.06 0.01 - 1,361 126 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Off -Road 0.11 0.09 0.81 0.82 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.02 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 225 225 0.01 < 0.005 - 225 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 232 232 < 0.005 0.01 0.88 236 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 221 221 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 224 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.2 79.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 80.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.1 13.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 127 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 3.61. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.94 1.62 14.6 13.5 0.03 0.61 - 0.61 0.56 - 0.56 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.35 0.29 2.64 2.44 < 0.005 0.11 - 0.11 0.10 - 0.10 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.06 0.05 0.48 0.44 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.08 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 128/ 194 2,781 2,781 0.11 0.02 - 2,790 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 503 503 0.02 < 0.005 - 505 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.2 83.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 83.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 299 299 < 0.005 0.01 1.13 303 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.62. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Off -Road 1.94 1.62 14.6 13.5 0.03 0.61 - 0.61 0.56 - 0.56 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Daily, Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.35 0.29 2.64 2.44 < 0.005 0.11 - 0.11 0.10 - 0.10 - Equipment 129 / 194 52.1 52.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 52.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.63 8.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,781 2,781 0.11 0.02 - 2,790 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 503 503 0.02 < 0.005 - 505 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual Off -Road 0.06 0.05 0.48 0.44 < 0.005 0.02 - 0.02 0.02 - 0.02 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.08 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Daily, - - - - - Winter (Max) Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.63. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.2 83.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 83.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 299 299 < 0.005 0.01 1.13 303 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.1 52.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 52.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.63 8.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 130 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 2.80 2.35 21.3 19.3 0.05 0.87 - 0.87 0.80 - 0.80 - 4,763 4,763 0.19 0.04 - 4,779 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.51 0.42 3.84 3.49 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - 861 861 0.03 0.01 - 864 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.70 0.64 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - 143 143 0.01 < 0.005 - 143 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - 284 284 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 288 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 131 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average Daily Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.64. Trenching (2025) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - Daily, - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 2.80 2.35 21.3 19.3 0.05 0.87 - 0.87 0.80 - 0.80 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.51 0.42 3.84 3.49 0.01 0.16 - 0.16 0.15 - 0.15 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - 132/ 194 52.1 52.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 52.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.63 8.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,763 4,763 0.19 0.04 - 4,779 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 861 861 0.03 0.01 - 864 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Off -Road 0.09 0.08 0.70 0.64 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.09 0.08 0.09 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - Daily Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.65. Trenching (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - 143 143 0.01 < 0.005 - 143 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 284 284 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 288 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.1 52.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 52.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.63 8.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 133 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.91 1.60 14.1 12.5 0.03 0.60 - 0.60 0.55 - 0.55 - 2,720 2,720 0.11 0.02 - 2,729 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Average Daily Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.69 1.49 < 0.005 0.07 - 0.07 0.07 - 0.07 - 325 325 0.01 < 0.005 - 326 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Annual- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.04 0.03 0.31 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 53.8 53.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 53.9 Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.08 0.08 0.08 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - 279 279 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 282 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average - - - - - Daily 134 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.66. Trenching (2026) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.91 1.60 14.1 12.5 0.03 0.60 - 0.60 0.55 - 0.55 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.23 0.19 1.69 1.49 < 0.005 0.07 - 0.07 0.07 - 0.07 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.04 0.03 0.31 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment 135 / 194 33.7 33.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 34.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.59 5.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,720 2,720 0.11 0.02 - 21729 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 325 325 0.01 < 0.005 - 326 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.8 53.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 53.9 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite Daily, Summer (Max) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.08 0.08 0.08 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - Daily Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.67. Trenching (2027) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 279 279 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 282 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.7 33.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 34.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.59 5.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.87 1.57 13.6 12.3 0.03 0.57 - 0.57 0.52 - 0.52 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.11 0.10 0.83 0.74 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 137/ 194 2,720 2,720 0.11 0.02 - 2,729 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 165 165 0.01 < 0.005 - 166 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.3 27.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 27.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 274 274 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 277 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.9 16.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 17.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Annual Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.68. Trenching (2027) - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Daily, Winter (Max) Off -Road 1.87 1.57 13.6 12.3 0.03 0.57 - 0.57 0.52 - 0.52 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Average - - - - - - - - Daily Off -Road 0.11 0.10 0.83 0.74 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Off -Road 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - Equipment Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - truck Offsite - - - - - - - - - - 138 / 194 2.79 2.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,720 2,720 0.11 0.02 - 2,729 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 165 165 0.01 < 0.005 - 166 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.3 27.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 27.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - Summer (Max) Daily, - - - Winter (Max) Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.07 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Average - - - - - - - - - - - - Daily Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 - Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 4. Operations Emissions Details 4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use 4.1.1. Unmitigated Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.6. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available. 4.1.2. Mitigated Mobile source emissions results are presented in Sections 2.5. No further detailed breakdown of emissions is available. 4.2. Energy 274 274 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 277 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.9 16.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 17.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.79 2.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 139 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 203 203 0.01 < 0.005 — 203 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 203 203 0.01 < 0.005 — 203 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 203 203 0.01 < 0.005 — 203 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — 203 203 0.01 < 0.005 — 203 Annual — — — — — — — General — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.6 33.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.7 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 33.6 33.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.7 140 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 158 158 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 158 158 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — 158 158 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — 158 158 0.01 < 0.005 — 159 Annual General — — — — — — — — — — — — 26.2 26.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 26.3 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 26.2 26.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 26.3 141 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 199 199 0.02 < 0.005 - 199 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 199 199 0.02 < 0.005 - 199 Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 199 199 0.02 < 0.005 - 199 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total 0.02 0.01 0.17 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 199 199 0.02 < 0.005 - 199 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 32.9 32.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 33.0 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 32.9 32.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 33.0 142 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 - 191 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 - 191 Daily, - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 - 191 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.13 < 0.005 0.01 - 0.01 0.01 - 0.01 - 190 190 0.02 < 0.005 - 191 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 31.6 Light Industry Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 31.6 143 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 4.3. Area Emissions by Source 4.3.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Consum — 0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings Landsca 0.11 0.10 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.60 pe Equipme nt Total 0.11 0.43 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.60 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Consum — 0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings Total — 0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Consum — 0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — er Products 144 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Architect - < 0.005 - - - - ural Landsca 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 pe Equipme nt Total 0.01 0.07 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.30 4.3.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) Consum - 0.31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - er Products Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings Landsca 0.11 0.10 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.60 pe Equipme nt Total 0.11 0.43 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 2.59 2.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 2.60 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) Consum - 0.31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - er Products Architect - 0.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ural Coatings 145 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Total — 0.33 Annual — — Consum — 0.06 — — — — — — — — — — er Products Architect — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — ural Coatings Landsca 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 pe Equipme nt Total 0.01 0.07 < 0.005 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use 4.4.2. Unmitigated Daily, Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 — 61.1 Light Industry Other — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total — — — — — — — — — — — 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 — 61.1 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) 146 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 General - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 4.4.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) 147 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 General - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 6.43 33.4 39.8 0.66 0.02 - 61.1 Annual - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 1.06 5.52 6.59 0.11 < 0.005 - 10.1 4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use 4.5.2. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 148 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 9.69 0.00 9.69 0.97 0.00 - 33.9 Annual General - - - - - - - - - - - 1.60 0.00 1.60 0.16 0.00 - 5.61 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 1.60 0.00 1.60 0.16 0.00 - 5.61 4.5.1. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 149 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, - - - - - - - Winter (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - - - - - - - 4.85 0.00 4.85 0.48 0.00 - 17.0 Annual General - - - - - - - - - - - 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.08 0.00 - 2.81 Light Industry Other - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Asphalt Surfaces Total - - - - - 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.08 0.00 - 2.81 4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use 4.6.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Summer (Max) General - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 Light Industry Total - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.77 3.77 150 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Light Industry Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — General — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.62 0.62 Light Industry Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.62 0.62 4.6.2. Mitigated Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Light Industry Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) General — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Light Industry Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 3.77 3.77 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 151 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 General — — 0.62 0.62 Light Industry Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.62 0.62 4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type 4.7.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for daily. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual Total 4.7.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 152 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type 4.8.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.8.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 153 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type 4.9.1. Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.9.2. Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 154 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type 4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Daily, — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 155 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal 156 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, Winter (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequest ered Subtotal Remove d Subtotal Annual— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Avoided — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 157 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Daily, — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated i Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Winter (Max) Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Summer (Max) Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 158 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Sequest Subtotal Remove d Subtotal Daily, Winter (Max) Avoided Subtotal Sequest ered Subtotal Remove d Subtotal Annual — — — — — — — — — — — Avoided Subtotal Sequest ered Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — d Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 159 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5. Activity Data 5.1. Construction Schedule Pump Station Demolition Demolition 7/1/2026 10/31/2026 5.00 88.0 — Exist. PS Demolition & Demolition 9/27/2025 01/28/2028 5.00 30.0 — Odor Control - Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Demolition 9/27/2025 1/28/2028 5.00 30.0 — Odor Control - Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station Earthwork & Grading 7/1/2024 06/30/2025 5.00 261 — Below Grade Concrete Construction Micro tunneling - Soil Grading 07/01/2024 02/28/2025 5.00 175 — Hauling to Plant Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Grading 07/08/2024 03/07/2025 5.00 175 — Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Grading 03/25/2025 04/18/2025 5.00 19.0 — Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauling Grading 05/26/2025 09/12/2025 5.00 80.0 — to Plant Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauled Grading 06/02/2025 09/19/2025 5.00 80.0 — from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled Grading 09/19/2025 09/26/2025 5.00 6.00 — from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 160 / 194 Exist. PS Demolition & Demolition 9/27/2025 Odor Control - Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station Above Grade Building Construction 07/1/2025 Building Construction including MEP Generator and Odor Building Construction 11/01/2026 Control Building Construction Pump Station Architectural Architectural Coating 11/1/2025 Coating Force Main Pipeline Trenching 7/1/2024 Trenching East of Newport Bay Micro tunneling Only Trenching 07/01/2024 Dredging Only Trenching 01/01/2025 Force Main Pipeline Trenching 07/01/2025 Trenching West of Newport Bay Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching 10/1/2025 Trenching Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching 11/01/2026 Trenching 5.2. Off -Road Equipment 5.2.1. Unmitigated Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauling to Plant Number 2 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 12/3/2027 5.00 25.0 — 1 /31 /2026 5.00 154 — 3/31 /2027 5.00 108 — 11 /7/2025 5.00 5.00 — 12/31 /2024 5.00 132 — 9/1 /2024 5.00 45.0 — 6/30/2025 5.00 129 — 9/30/2025 5.00 66.0 — 12/31 /2025 5.00 66.0 — 1 /31 /2027 5.00 65.0 — Average 1.00 e 33.0 0.73 161 / 194 Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station Cranes Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Excavators Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Other Construction Diesel Earthwork & Below Equipment Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Pumps Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Rollers Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station Above Cranes Diesel Grade Building Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Grade Building oes Construction including MEP Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 6.00 475 0.50 Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 162 / 194 Pump Station Above Pumps Diesel Grade Building Construction including MEP Generator and Odor Cranes Diesel Control Building Construction Generator and Odor Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Control Building oes Construction Generator and Odor Pumps Diesel Control Building Construction Pump Station Air Compressors Diesel Architectural Coating Force Main Pipeline Other Construction Diesel Trenching East of Equipment Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Pumps Diesel Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rollers Diesel Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Cranes Diesel Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Excavators Diesel Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Trenching East of oes Newport Bay Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average 1.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Average 1.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Average 1.00 6.00 475 0.50 Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 163 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Micro tunneling Only Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 24.0 118 0.42 Equipment Dredging Only Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Dredging Only Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 500 0.50 Equipment Dredging Only Pumps Diesel Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Dredging Only Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 oes Force Main Pipeline Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 475 0.05 Trenching West of Equipment Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Pumps Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 11.0 0.74 Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Trenching West of oes Newport Bay Temporary Gravity Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 475 0.42 Sewer Trenching Equipment 164 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Temporary Gravity Pumps Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 11.0 0.74 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Sewer Trenching oes Permanent Gravity Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 475 0.05 Sewer Trenching Equipment Permanent Gravity Pumps Diesel Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 84.0 0.37 Sewer Trenching oes 5.2.2. Mitigated Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal 165/194 Pump Station Cranes Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Excavators Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Other Construction Diesel Earthwork & Below Equipment Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Pumps Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Rollers Diesel Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Exist. PS Demolition & Concrete/Industrial Diesel Odor Control - Soil Saws Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station Above Cranes Diesel Grade Building Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Grade Building oes Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Pumps Diesel Grade Building Construction including MEP Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 6.00 475 0.50 Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73 Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Average 1.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 166 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Generator and Odor Cranes Diesel Average Control Building Construction Generator and Odor Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average Control Building oes Construction Generator and Odor Pumps Diesel Average Control Building Construction Pump Station Air Compressors Diesel Average Architectural Coating Force Main Pipeline Other Construction Diesel Average Trenching East of Equipment Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Pumps Diesel Average Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rollers Diesel Average Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Cranes Diesel Average Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Excavators Diesel Average Trenching East of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average Trenching East of oes Newport Bay Micro tunneling Only Other Construction Diesel Average Equipment Dredging Only Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 4.00 367 0.29 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 1.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 1.00 6.00 475 0.50 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 1.00 24.0 118 0.42 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 167 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Dredging Only Other Construction Diesel Average Equipment Dredging Only Pumps Diesel Average Dredging Only Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average oes Force Main Pipeline Cranes Diesel Average Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Excavators Diesel Average Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Other Construction Diesel Average Trenching West of Equipment Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Pumps Diesel Average Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rollers Diesel Average Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average Trenching West of Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average Trenching West of oes Newport Bay Temporary Gravity Cranes Diesel Average Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Excavators Diesel Average Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Other Construction Diesel Average Sewer Trenching Equipment Temporary Gravity Pumps Diesel Average Sewer Trenching 1.00 8.00 500 0.50 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 1.00 8.00 475 0.05 3.00 8.00 11.0 0.74 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 1.00 6.00 367 0.40 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 1.00 8.00 475 0.42 3.00 8.00 11.0 0.74 168 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Temporary Gravity Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Sewer Trenching Temporary Gravity Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37 Sewer Trenching oes Permanent Gravity Cranes Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 367 0.29 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Other Construction Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 475 0.05 Sewer Trenching Equipment Permanent Gravity Pumps Diesel Average 3.00 6.00 11.0 0.74 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Rollers Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 36.0 0.38 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Sewer Trenching Permanent Gravity Tractors/Loaders/Backh Diesel Average 1.00 1.00 84.0 0.37 Sewer Trenching oes 5.3. Construction Vehicles 5.3.1. Unmitigated One -Way Trips per Day Pump Station Earthwork & Below - - - - Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Vendor - 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Grade Concrete Construction 169 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Pump Station Earthwork & Below Onsite truck Grade Concrete Construction Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of — Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Worker Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Vendor Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Hauling Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Onsite truck Newport Bay Pump Station Demolition — Pump Station Demolition Worker Pump Station Demolition Vendor Pump Station Demolition Hauling Pump Station Demolition Onsite truck Pump Station Above Grade Building — Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Worker Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Vendor Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Hauling Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Onsite truck Construction including MEP Generator and Odor Control Building — Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Worker Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Vendor Construction HHDT 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 6.09 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2.38 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 6.09 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2.38 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 170 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Generator and Odor Control Building Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Onsite truck — — HHDT Construction Pump Station Architectural Coating — — — — Pump Station Architectural Coating Worker 2.44 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Pump Station Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Pump Station Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Pump Station Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT Micro tunneling Only — — — — Micro tunneling Only Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Micro tunneling Only Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Micro tunneling Only Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Micro tunneling Only Onsite truck — — HHDT Dredging Only — — — — Dredging Only Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Dredging Only Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Dredging Only Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Dredging Only Onsite truck — — HHDT Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of — — — — Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Worker 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Onsite truck — — HHDT Newport Bay Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching — — — — 171 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Worker 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Onsite truck — — HHDT Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching — — — — Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Worker 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Onsite truck — — HHDT Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant — — — — Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Hauling 2.34 20.0 HHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 1.14 20.0 HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 172 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 11.2 20.0 HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant — — — — Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Hauling 10.3 20.0 HHDT Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 9.82 20.0 HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 173 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 3.34 20.0 HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.30 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.30 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 174 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.88 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 5.3.2. Mitigated Pump Station Earthwork & Below Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Grade Concrete Construction Pump Station Earthwork & Below Onsite truck — — HHDT Grade Concrete Construction Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of — — — — Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Worker 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching East of Onsite truck — — HHDT Newport Bay Pump Station Demolition — — — — 175 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Pump Station Demolition Worker Pump Station Demolition Vendor Pump Station Demolition Hauling Pump Station Demolition Onsite truck Pump Station Above Grade Building — Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Worker Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Vendor Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Hauling Construction including MEP Pump Station Above Grade Building Onsite truck Construction including MEP Generator and Odor Control Building — Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Worker Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Vendor Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Hauling Construction Generator and Odor Control Building Onsite truck Construction Pump Station Architectural Coating — Pump Station Architectural Coating Worker Pump Station Architectural Coating Vendor Pump Station Architectural Coating Hauling Pump Station Architectural Coating Onsite truck Micro tunneling Only — Micro tunneling Only Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 6.09 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2.38 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 6.09 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2.38 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT HHDT 2.44 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 176 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Micro tunneling Only Vendor Micro tunneling Only Hauling Micro tunneling Only Onsite truck Dredging Only — Dredging Only Worker Dredging Only Vendor Dredging Only Hauling Dredging Only Onsite truck Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of — Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Worker Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Vendor Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Hauling Newport Bay Force Main Pipeline Trenching West of Onsite truck Newport Bay Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching — Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Worker Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Vendor Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Hauling Temporary Gravity Sewer Trenching Onsite truck Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching — Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Worker Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Vendor Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Hauling Permanent Gravity Sewer Trenching Onsite truck Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant — Number 2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 22.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 0.00 20.0 HHDT — — HHDT 177 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Hauling 2.34 20.0 HHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 1.14 20.0 HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 11.2 20.0 HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant — — — — Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Number 2 178 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Hauling 10.3 20.0 HHDT Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauling to Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 9.82 20.0 HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant — — — — 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Worker 0.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Hauling 3.34 20.0 HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauled from Plant Onsite truck — — HHDT 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.30 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 179 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.30 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - — — — — Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Hauling 0.88 20.0 HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor Control - Onsite truck — — HHDT Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 5.4. Vehicles 5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies Non -applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 180 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.5. Architectural Coatings Pump Station Architectural 0.00 Coating 5.6. Dust Mitigation 5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities Pump Station Demolition 0.00 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor 0.00 Control - Soil Hauling to Plant Number 2 Exist. PS Demolition & Odor 0.00 Control - Soil Hauled from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Pump Station Earthwork & 0.00 Below Grade Concrete Construction Micro tunneling - Soil Hauling to — Plant Number 2 Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled — from Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal Micro tunneling - Soil Hauled 2,120 from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Pump Station - Soil Hauling to — Plant Number 2 Pump Station - Soil Hauled from — Plant 2 Offsite for Disposal MX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,114 1,994 0.00 8,281 7,863 21,750 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 181 / 194 7,250 0.00 125 125 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 •& Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Pump Station - Soil Hauled from 200 — 0.00 0.00 — Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill Exist. PS Demolition & Odor 0.00 0.00 0.00 307 — Control - Soil Hauled from Plant 2 back to Project Site for Backfill 5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies Non -applicable. No control strategies activated by user. 5.7. Construction Paving General Light Industry 0.00 0% Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.37 100% 5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh) kWh per -. • 2025 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005 2024 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005 2026 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005 2027 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005 2028 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005 5.9. Operational Mobile Sources 5.9.1. Unmitigated Total all Land Uses 0.00 0.00 e �� 0.00 0.00 182 / 194 1 �� 1 �� 1 �� Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.9.2. Mitigated Total all Land Uses 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.10. Operational Area Sources 5.10.1. Hearths 5.10.1.1. Unmitigated 5.10.1.2. Mitigated 5.10.2. Architectural Coatings 0 0.00 5.10.3. Landscape Equipment Snow Days day/yr Summer Days day/yr 5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated Snow Days day/yr Summer Days day/yr 21,750 M M 7,250 M 0.00 250 0.00 250 M M 183 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.11. Operational Energy Consumption 5.11.1. Unmitigated Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) General Light Industry 139,095 532 0.0330 0.0040 620,628 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 5.11.2. Mitigated Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) .. - • - • General Light Industry 108,730 532 0.0330 0.0040 594,240 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption 5.12.1. Unmitigated General Light Industry 3,353,125 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 5.12.2. Mitigated General Light Industry 3,353,125 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 12,960 1.10 12,960 1.10 184 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.13. Operational Waste Generation 5.13.1. Unmitigated General Light Industry 18.0 — Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 — 5.13.2. Mitigated General Light Industry 8.99 — Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 — 5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 5.14.1. Unmitigated EquipmentLand Use Type .- Refrigerant Quantity (kg)•. - General Light Industry Other commercial A/C R-410A 2,088 0.30 4.00 and heat pumps 5.14.2. Mitigated General Light Industry Other commercial A/C R-410A and heat pumps 5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment 5.15.1. Unmitigated 2,088 0.30 4.00 18.0 Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced 185 / 194 Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Mitigated Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor •. Stationary Sources 5.16.1. Emergency• • Fire Pumps Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor •.2. Process Boilers Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr) E Equipment Type l Fuel Type Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres Mitigated Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres •. Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type 5.18.1.1. Unmitigated 5.18.1.2. Mitigated 5.18.2. Sequestration 5.18.2.1. Unmitigated 5.18.2.2. Mitigated 6. Climate Risk Detailed Report 6.1. Climate Risk Summary Cal -Adapt midcentury 2040-2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100. Temperature and Extreme Heat 8.66 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 3.25 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned 187 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal -Adapt, 2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about 1/4 an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft. Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. 6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 0 0 N/A Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores Temperature and Extreme Heat Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A 188 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2 Wildfire 1 1 1 2 Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2 The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure. The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt. The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures. 6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures 7. Health and Equity Details 7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. Exposure Indicators AQ-Ozone 51.9 AQ-PM 53.4 AQ-DPM 21.9 Drinking Water 32.3 Lead Risk Housing 27.7 Pesticides 0.00 Toxic Releases 82.9 Traffic 53.1 Effect Indicators — 189 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 CleanUp Sites Groundwater Haz Waste Facilities/Generators Impaired Water Bodies Solid Waste Sensitive Population Asthma Cardio-vascular Low Birth Weights Socioeconomic Factor Indicators Education Housing Linguistic Poverty Unemployment 7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A Economic Above Poverty Employed Median HI Education Bachelor's or higher High school enrollment Preschool enrollment 17.1 22.1 22.0 77.3 2.52 2.59 0.54 39.9 3.87 50.7 13.3 14.0 51.3 score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions 88.70781471 45.27139741 83.11305017 92.82689593 100 20.87771077 to other census tracts in the state. 190 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Transportation Auto Access 72.44963429 Active commuting 16.25818042 Social — 2-parent households 66.14910817 Voting 61.02912871 Neighborhood — Alcohol availability 47.26036186 Park access 81.35506224 Retail density 67.93276017 Supermarket access 57.84678558 Tree canopy 26.26716284 Housing — Homeownership 40.39522649 Housing habitability 62.49197998 Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 49.21083023 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 59.77158989 Uncrowded housing 82.07365584 Health Outcomes — Insured adults 70.40934172 Arthritis 71.8 Asthma ER Admissions 92.4 High Blood Pressure 71.3 Cancer (excluding skin) 17.3 Asthma 83.3 Coronary Heart Disease 74.7 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 89.8 191 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Diagnosed Diabetes 95.3 Life Expectancy at Birth 88.6 Cognitively Disabled 87.2 Physically Disabled 84.3 Heart Attack ER Admissions 98.1 Mental Health Not Good 92.6 Chronic Kidney Disease 85.5 Obesity 92.8 Pedestrian Injuries 42.0 Physical Health Not Good 95.9 Stroke 84.7 Health Risk Behaviors — Binge Drinking 3.2 Current Smoker 92.8 No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 97.5 Climate Change Exposures — Wildfire Risk 0.0 SLR Inundation Area 61.5 Children 92.8 Elderly 46.6 English Speaking 88.0 Foreign -born 9.9 Outdoor Workers 81.8 Climate Change Adaptive Capacity — Impervious Surface Cover 37.9 Traffic Density 39.9 Traffic Access 23.0 192 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Other Indices — Hardship 9.2 Other Decision Support — 2016 Voting 81.5 7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 12.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 76.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low -Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 7.4. Health & Equity Measures No Health & Equity Measures selected. 7.5. Evaluation Scorecard Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed. 7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures No Health & Equity Custom Measures created. 8. User Changes to Default Data Land Use Construction: Construction Phases Provided by the applicant As provided by the applicant Construction: Off -Road Equipment Per construction questionnaire. "Other Construction Equipment" = vibratory hammer pile driver 193 / 194 Bay Bridge (with Dredging) Detailed Report, 6/8/2023 Construction: Dust From Material Movement Construction: Trips and VMT Construction: Architectural Coatings Operations: Architectural Coatings As per the information provided by the applicant. As per the information provided by the applicant. As per SCAQMD Rule 1113. As per SCAQMD Rule 1113 194 / 194 Attachment C Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 13-43 RESOLUTION NO. PC2024-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A MAJOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION OF AN EXISTING PUMP STATION BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PUMP STATION AND ASSOCIATED FORCE MAINS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 250 EAST COAST HIGHWAY (PA2023-0076) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS. An application was filed by Orange County Sanitation District ("Applicant"), with respect to property located at 250 East Coast Highway, and legally described as Parcel 1 of Document Recorded in Book 7661, Page 741 of Official Records, as well as land acquired from the adjacent parcel (see Exhibit "A" forfull legal description) ("Property"). The Property is operated by the Applicant with an existing 4,800-square-foot pump station, known as the Bay Bridge Pump Station, which is a part of its wastewater collection system. Additionally, the proposed project includes temporary construction staging area at Lower Castaways Park at 100 Dover Drive, legally described as Lot 1 of Tract 1125 ("Staging Area"). 2. The Applicant requests a major site development review and coastal development permit for the following: a. The demolition of an existing pump station and construction a new pump station (total of approximately 7,500 square feet) that includes a new underground pump room (3,616 square feet), electrical room (1,175 square feet), odor control facility (1,781 square feet), and a generator room (672 square feet); b. The installation of new, 25-inch dual force mains by micro -tunneling beneath East Coast Highway from the Project across the Newport Bay Channel, to a new valve vault located below grade in the public right-of-way at the southeast corner of the intersection of West Coast Highway and Dover Drive; and c. The temporary use of a portion of the City -owned Lower Castaways Park as a construction staging yard. The Applicant proposes to use approximately 18,000 square feet of the southwest corner of Lower Castaways Park, which is to be fenced and screened. This allows the Applicant to temporary locate office trailers, stage and store construction equipment and materials, and provide vehicle parking ("Project"). The Project is subject to review and permitting approval by numerous agencies including the Orange County Sanitation District, Caltrans, California Coastal Commission ("CCC"), California State Lands Commission, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, National 13-44 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 2 of 28 Marine Fisheries Service, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, private property owners, and the City. Since a significant portion of the new force mains are proposed to be constructed in tidelands and in CCC permit jurisdiction, the Applicant must obtain a separate coastal development permit from the CCC. All portions of the Project located in the City's permitting jurisdiction, including the Property and Staging Area, are located within the coastal zone and therefore, the Project requires a coastal development permit. 3. The Property is designated Mixed -Use Water 2 (MU-W2) by the General Plan Land Use Element and is located within the Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Zoning District. The Staging Area is designated Recreational and Marine Commercial (CM) by the General Plan Land Use Element and is located in the Castaways Marina Planned Community (PC-37) Zoning District. 4. The Property is located within the coastal zone. The Coastal Land Use Plan ("CLUP") designation is Mixed -Use Water Related (MU-W) and is located within the Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Coastal Zoning District. The Staging Area is also located in the coastal zone, is designated as Recreational and Marine Commercial (CM - A) — (0.0 — 0.30 FAR) by the CLUP and is located within the Castaways Marina Planned Community (PC-37) Coastal Zoning District. 5. While the existing property is 4,879 square feet in area, OCSD is acquiring an additional 9,713 square feet of land from the adjacent property at 100 Bayside Drive, which is the site of the future Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Village. The acquisition, which is for the purpose of constructing a larger pump station facility, is a result of an eminent domain case wherein OCSD has secured an order of immediate possession, and therefore expands the Property to a total area of 14,592 square feet. A lot line adjustment is not required, as OCSD will record a final order of condemnation at the end of the eminent domain case, which will have the effect of creating the new parcel boundaries and be recorded with the County Assessor's Office. 6. A public hearing was held on January 18, 2024, in the Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and purpose of the hearing was given in accordance with California Government Code Section 54950 et seq. ("Ralph M. Brown Act") and Chapters 20.62 and 21.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this public hearing. SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION. 1. Pursuant to Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR is required unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: 13-45 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 3 of 28 a. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. Substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or c. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable due diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; ii. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; iii. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerable different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. 2. In February of 2021, the Applicant approved the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) and certified an EIR for Project No. 5-67 which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B," and incorporated herein by reference. On April 1, 2021, Bayside Village Marina filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate against the Applicant in Orange County Superior Court alleging that the EIR failed to comply with CEQA on numerous grounds (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021- 01194238.) On December 16, 2022, the Court issued a ruling that upheld the EIR in all respects except the construction staging for the project and thereby issued a limited writ directing OC San to sufficiently identify project construction staging areas which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C," and incorporated herein by reference. 3. In response to the Court ruling, OC San has prepared an Addendum to the EIR for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project ("Addendum"), attached hereto as Exhibit "D," and incorporated herein by reference which was certified by OC Sanitation District Board on July 23, 2023. Specifically, the Addendum clarifies the use of the Lower Castaways Park in the City as a construction staging area and adds a new construction staging area at OC Sanitation District's Plant No. 2, located in the City of Huntington Beach, for soil storage/drying activities and determines that 13-46 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 4 of 28 Project No. 5-67, as modified by the Addendum, would not result in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts in accordance with Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. No additional legal challenges to the Addendum were brought and Bayside Marina Village and OCSD filed a Stipulation Discharging the Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Dismissing Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, attached hereto as Exhibit "E," and incorporated herein by reference, on August 8, 2023. Therefore, the Addendum is final is determined to comply with CEQA. SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS. Major Site Development Review In accordance with Subsection VII (C) (Back Bay Landing PCDP Implementation/Site Development Review — Findings) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth for the Project: Finding: A. The development shall be in compliance with the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan, including design guidelines, and any other applicable plan or criteria related to the development. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The Property is categorized as Mixed -Use Water 2 (MU-W2) by the General Plan Land Use Element, which is applied to waterfront locations in which marine related uses may be intermixed with buildings that provide residential on the upper floors. For nonresidential buildings, the MU-W2 has a maximum floor area to land ratio ("FAR") of 0.5. The Property is 14,592 square feet in area and the Project is 7,244 square feet, resulting in a FAR of 0.49. Additionally, the Property is a part of Anomaly 80 of the General Plan Land Use Plan. Anomaly 80 includes the Property as well as 100 Bayside Drive, which is the site of the future Back Bay Landing mixed -use village project and sets a development limit of 131,290 square feet for nonresidential development within the Anomaly. PC-9 sets additional nonresidential development limits for the future Back Bay Landing development, which is 61,534 square feet for commercial and 32,500 square feet for dry stack boat storage, for a total of 94,034 square feet of future nonresidential development. The addition of the 7,244-square-foot pump station results in a total of 101,278 square feet, which is within the development limit of Anomaly 80. The Project is a replacement of an existing pump station, which has existed at the Property since 1966, and provides essential infrastructure to adjacent neighborhoods. 2. The Property is categorized as Mixed -Use Water Related (MU-W) by the Coastal Land Use Plan, which is intended to provide for commercial development on or near the bay in a manner that will encourage the continuation of coastal dependent and coastal - related uses and visitor -serving uses, as well as allow for the development of mixed -use 13-47 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 5 of 28 structures with residential uses above the ground floor. For nonresidential buildings, the MU-W has a maximum FAR of 0.5. Additionally, CLUP Policy 2.1.9.1 limits the maximum floor area to what is established in General Plan Land Use Element Anomaly 80, as discussed in Fact A.1 above. 3. The Property is located in the Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Zoning and Coastal Zoning District. Specifically, the Property is categorized by PC-9 as Planning Area 1 (Mixed -Use Area) where a wastewater pump station is a permitted use. Per Section 2 of PC-9 (Development Limits and Land Use Plan), the Orange County Sanitation District wastewater pump station shall not be counted towards square footage development limits of the PC. Per Section 3 of PC-9 (Permitted Uses), the initial construction of any new structure, or the significant reconstruction or major addition to an existing structure requires a Site Development Review pursuant to Section VII of PC- 9. 4. Per Section IV (B) (Development Standards — Permitted Height of Structures), the maximum building height within Planning Area 1 shall not exceed 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs. The height of the buildings is measured from a baseline elevation of 14 feet NAVD 88, as required by Exhibit 3 of PC-9. The proposed electrical and generator building features a sloped roof design with parapet walls which is 22 feet. The proposed odor control building features a flat roof design with parapet walls which is 15.5 feet. All proposed buildings comply with the required height requirements of PC- 9. 5. Per Section IV (A) (Development Standards — Setback Requirements), a minimum 10- foot landscape buffer is required to be provided to the back of sidewalk. Additionally, in Section IV (E) (Development Standards — Landscaping), a detailed landscape and irrigation plan is required which demonstrates compliance with applicable landscaping requirements specified in the NBMC. Furthermore, landscaped areas shall only consist of native plants or non-native drought tolerant plants which are non-invasive. Per Section A.4.d of Section IV, encroachments may be permitted through a Site Development Review. While the Project provides a 10-foot landscaping buffer on a small portion of the East Coast Highway frontage, the remaining landscape along East Coast Highway varies between approximately 9 feet and 6 feet in depth. However, the proposed landscaping meets the intent of PC-9, which includes reflecting the Project's coastal marine location, providing creative plant combinations, installing a highly efficient irrigation system, and preserving and enhancing view corridors. The Project includes low-water, drought tolerant plants which includes a mixture of deer grass, slipper plant, foxtail agave, and red yucca plant types located at the East Coast Highway frontage of the Project. Since the Project includes property line walls along East Coast Highway for security purposes, the proposed landscape is appropriate to break up the mass of the walls and improve the overall aesthetics of the project as viewed from East Coast Highway. The proposed plants are relatively low profile in height and will not diminish any view corridors as identified in PC-9. Finding: 13-48 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 6 of 28 B. The development shall not be incompatible with the character of the neighboring uses and surrounding sites. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The Property is located on East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Bay Bridge. Adjacent to the Property is the Bayside Village Marina, which is adjacent to the Property and includes visitor serving uses and a recreational vehicle storage parking lot. This adjacent property is intended to be developed with a future mixed -use waterfront village in accordance with PC-9. Additional surrounding uses include the Bayside Village Mobile Home Park to the north and east across Bayside Drive, a restaurant and the Balboa Marina to the south across East Coast Highway, and various commercial uses to the southeast including a gas station, shopping center, and automobile dealerships. 2. The existing Bay Bridge Pump Station structure was constructed in 1966, and consequently upgraded with new pumps, piping, and ventilation in 1995. In 2014, an additional pump was added for increased capacity and reliability. The existing pump station is over 50 years old and requires replacement to serve the city, which pumps wastewater flow generated by residents and businesses west of Newport Bay, including Balboa Island and Crystal Cove. The pump station receives wastewater from a pump station in Crystal Cove, and pumps wastewater to another treatment facility located in the City of Huntington Beach. The proposed pump station has modernized architecture which improves the neighborhood aesthetics. 3. The construction of replacement force mains located on the western side of the Bay Bridge is not incompatible with neighboring uses, which includes the Bayshore Apartments to the south, a boat marina directly east, and the end of the Bay Bridge to the north. The construction of a new vault to house the force mains is a necessary part of the pump station. The new force mains are an upgrade to aging infrastructure that will better serve the surrounding area and is screened from public view within an existing vault. The existing vault, which is located on both the public right-of-way and private property, is to be abandoned in place. The public right-of-way area where the new vault is proposed includes new landscaping to further enhance the area for pedestrians, motorists, and nearby residents. Finding: C. The development shall be sited and designed to maximize the aesthetic quality of the project as viewed from surrounding roadways, properties, and waterfront, with special consideration given to providing a variety of building heights, massing, and architectural treatments to provide public views through the site. Facts in Support of Finding- 1 . Fact 4 in support of Finding A is hereby incorporated by reference. 13-49 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 7 of 28 2. Section 5 (Design Guidelines) of PC-9 provide guidelines intended to express the desired character of the future mixed -use waterfront village that helps achieve overall consistency of architectural quality. The Project is designed with a coastal architectural theme, incorporating a modern design with a cantilevered roof overhang and an integration of materials and details inspired by the surrounding coastal context. The buildings avoid long, continuous blank walls with a simple fagade composition of a base and top separated by different colors. There is a mixture of heights and roof types (sloping and flat) to create visual interest, as well as provide rhythm, dynamic building forms, and shadows. 3. While the Project is aesthetically pleasing as a standalone development, it has been designed per PC-9 design guidelines so that it would be visually consistent with the future Back Bay Landing mixed -use village. Per Section 5.D.10, the building exterior will be aesthetically improved with entirely new buildings and perimeter walls to reflect PC- 9 design standards. The Project considers future residents, businesses, and patrons of the Back Bay Landing mixed -use village by including louvers which are designed to conceal the odor control facility, and screening for on -site mechanical equipment. 4. The Project includes structures that are 22 feet and 15.5 feet tall. While it is taller and larger in area than the existing pump station, is not out of scale with the surrounding uses. The architectural design utilizes a cantilevered roof overhang with a low profile and integrates materials and details which are consistent with surrounding coastal uses. The design includes a variety of colors and finishes such as stone and stucco which reduces the bulk and scale of the building facade. 5. Landscaping is proposed along the East Coast Highway frontage, which further reduces the massing of the property walls. The landscape buffer also enhances the appearance of the public right-of-way so that the Project does not appear walled off from public viewsheds. The landscape buffer will improve the overall aesthetic of the Project from East Coast Highway, which is identified as a coastal view road by the CLUP. 6. The Project is designed to maintain the six view corridors identified by PC-9 which are to be preserved. The existing view of the Back Bay bluff to the north of the Project, as well as views of the bay through other portions of the future Back Bay Landing, are not obstructed by the Project. Finding: D. Site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas, pedestrian and vehicular access ways, landscaping and other site features shall give proper consideration to functional aspects of site development. Facts in SuDDort of Findina: The Property is located on East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Bay Bridge. This adjacent property is the site of the future Back Bay Landing project, which is a mixed -use waterfront village which has not yet been constructed. Currently, 13-50 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 8 of 28 vehicular access to the existing pump station is through a curb cut on East Coast Highway, followed by gates that are opened for vehicles to access. The existing access is challenging due to traffic on East Coast Highway and the necessity for vehicles to drive across the public right-of-way. While an access gate will remain adjacent to East Coast Highway, it will be used only for when access at the Bayside Drive entrance is temporarily hindered. To improve access, the Applicant proposes access through a permanent access easement taken through Bayside Drive and into the Back Bay Landing property at 100 Bayside Drive. 2. The overall layout of structures is efficiently arranged on a constrained lot and is designed to accommodate service vehicle access and maneuvering requirements. 3. Fact 5 in support of Finding A is hereby incorporated by reference. Finding: E. The development shall not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. The Project provides essential infrastructure to the surrounding community for waste management and a pump station has existed in this location for many decades. Orange County Sanitation District has aging infrastructure throughout the City and it is typical for utilities such as the Project to be replaced and upgraded. The Project improves an existing pump station, which serves the overall community as part of a larger wastewater collection system. 2. The Project includes an odor control room, which is included to mitigate odors from the Property. The odor control room includes treatment for both liquid and vapor phase waste. 3. The Project uses equipment with lower noise. The highest noise producer of the Project is the standby generator, which is to be used in emergency situation if there is a power outage. The generator is proposed to be enclosed in a building with sound attenuation panels and is not expected to negatively affect surrounding uses. 4. The Applicant has provided a Site Photometric Plan and Lighting Plans which describe the Project's lighting around the Property. There are lights proposed to be attached to the Electrical Room, Generator Room, and Odor Control Area, with minimal lighting around the interior of the perimeter security walls. The Project's lighting is conditioned to comply with the outdoor lighting standards of the NBMC and will not negatively affect surrounding uses. As conditioned, the Director may order the dimming of light sources or other remediation upon finding that the site is excessively illuminated. 13-51 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 9 of 28 5. If the pump station facility were to fail, sewage would build up in upstream sewers and could result in an overflow from the lowest elevation manhole upstream from the Property. Furthermore, backups and/or spills could occur at specific residences or businesses that have sewer laterals lower than the lowest elevation manhole. If the force mains in the bay were to fail, a sewage spill could occur into the bay. The Project seeks to upgrade the existing pump station and provide improvements to an existing utility which serves a large portion of the city. Coastal Development Permit In accordance with Subsection 21.52.015(F) (Coastal Development Permits - Findings and Decision) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of such findings as set forth: Finding: H. Conforms to all applicable sections of the certified Local Coastal Program. Facts in Support of Finding: 1. Facts 2 through 5 in support of Finding A are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. Facts 1 and 2 in support of Finding B are hereby incorporated by reference. 3. A Coastal Hazards Report and Sea Level Rise Analysis was prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc. dated October 1, 2023, for the Project. The current maximum bay water elevation is 7.7 NAVD 88 (North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) Based on the State of California's Sea Level Rise Guidance, the sea level rise for the Los Angeles region is 6.6 feet NAVD 88, under the H++ scenario. Since the life expectancy of the new pump station is approximately 50 years, the 6.6-foot sea level rise for the year 2080 is appropriate to use for evaluation of the Project. Therefore, the sea level is estimated to reach approximately 14.3 feet NAVD88 (7.7 + 6.6 feet NAVD 88). The finished floor elevation of the electrical room and entrance to the dry well is 15.5 feet, which provides more than adequate protection from sea level rise. The generator room has a finished floor elevation of 14.17 feet. While slightly under the 14.3-footsea level rise elevation projection, the generator is proposed to be mounted on a 2-foot-high fuel tank and the generator panels will be mounted 3.5 feet above the finished floor, which will provide adequate protection from flooding. For the Odor Control area, there is a proposed finished floor elevation of 14 feet. Equipment within the area is proposed to be mounted on pads higher than 14.3 feet NAVD 88, to protect from cases of flooding. Additionally, temporary flood barriers such as sandbags can be deployed for openings during flooding situations. Finally, the Applicant is proposing to waterproof a portion of the Odor Control area's block walls to provide additional protection from flooding. 4. The Project includes the construction of upgraded replacement force mains, which run from the Property onto the western side of the Bay Bridge through micro -tunneling. The new force mains are an upgrade to aging infrastructure that will better serve the surrounding area and is screened from public view within an existing vault. The existing 13-52 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 10 of 28 vault, which is located on both the public right-of-way and private property, is to be abandoned in place. The public right-of-way area where the new vault is proposed includes new landscaping to further enhance the area for pedestrians, motorists, and nearby residents. 5. The Applicant submitted a Construction Management Plan ("CMP") prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc., dated October 2023, which documents the construction phase implementation, construction requirements and quality control, and traffic control associated with the construction of the Project. The CMP discusses construction easements at the Property for construction access as well as offsite staging areas at Lower Castaways Park and the Orange County Sanitation District Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. A Temporary License Agreement was approved by City Council on September 12, 2023, allowing for the siting of office trailers, temporary staging and storage of construction equipment and materials, and the parking of vehicles to support the Project during construction. The agreement is for a limited basis only and includes a term until December 31, 2028, or the completion of the Project, whichever first occurs. The CMP also includes a Traffic Control Plan which includes closing of necessary sidewalks during construction hours and re -opening during non -working hours. The Traffic Control Plan has been reviewed by the City's Public Works department and has been determined to be sufficient to minimize traffic impacts during the construction period. 6. The Property is located in an area known for the potential of seismic activity and liquefaction and is required to comply with the California Building Code ("CBC") and City's Building Division standards and policies. Geotechnical investigations specifically addressing liquefaction are required to be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. Permit issuance is also contingent on the inclusion of design mitigation identified in the investigations. Construction plans are reviewed for compliance with approved investigations and CBC requirements prior to building permit issuance. 7. The Property is located on East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Back Bay Bridge. East Coast Highway and Bayside Drive (south of East Coast Highway) are identified as a Coastal View Roads by the CLUP. The Property currently includes multiple pump station buildings, visible mechanical equipment, security block walls and vegetation which impair the view of the back bay. This specific pump station has existed since its original construction in 1966. Additionally, the adjacent Recreational Vehicle Storage parking lot includes many recreational vehicles which also impair the view of the bay. The Project includes a 22-foot high electrical and generator room above a subterranean pump room on the west of the property. There is also a 15.5-foot-high odor control building to the east of the property. Site walls are proposed for security purposes but do not exceed the height of the proposed buildings. From East Coast Highway, the Project does not impair the existing view of the bay and maintains a view of the Back Bay bluff to the north. Two nearby Public Viewpoints are identified as part of a pedestrian trail at Castaways Park, located approximately 1,500 feet northwest of the Property. When viewing the Property from Castaways Park, East Coast Highway, the Back Bay Channel and marina, and Recreational Vehicle Storage are within immediate view, while a commercial shopping center and Promontory Point residences are located further east across East Coast Highway. Although the Project proposes to replace the existing pump station buildings with taller buildings, the 13-53 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 11 of 28 views from Castaways Park are mostly unchanged. Parts of East Coast Highway may be impaired by the new structures, but the marina, commercial shopping center, and Promontory Point are not affected by the Project. The Project does not interfere with any of the identified Public Viewpoints due to the large distances from them. The Project may be in the distant viewshed of the Public Viewpoints but will not interfere with the public views that are currently provided. 8. Under Municipal Code Section 21.35.050 (Water Quality and Hydrology Plan), due to the proximity of the development to the shoreline and the development containing more than 75% of impervious surface area, a Water Quality and Management Plan (WQMP) is required. The Applicant submitted a Non -Priority Project Water Quality Plan ("NPP"), prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc., and dated October 17, 2023. An NPP is required for new development or significant redevelopment projects that do not meet the criteria for Priority Projects as defined by the County's Model WQMP, but instead qualify as Non -Priority Projects as defined in the Drainage Area Management Plan. The NPP provides stormwater Best Management Practices ("BMPs") that are planned for controlling discharges of pollutants from the Project. Finding: Conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act if the project is located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the coastal zone. Fact in Support of Finding: 1. The Property does not currently provide nor inhibit public coastal access. The Property is located in close proximity to potential lateral access to the Back Bay Channel, as designated by the CLUP. The lateral access is a small beach located along the Back Bay Landing property, which is ranges from 250 feet north and 550 feet west from the Property. The Project consists of the replacement of an existing pump station with an upgraded pump station. Access to the bay remains available Back Bay Landing. Therefore, the Project will not impact public access to local coastal resources. 2. The Project includes installation of force mains in a new subterranean utility vault within a small portion of the public right-of-way area on the southwestern side of the Bay Bridge. This public -right-of-way includes an existing fence which leads to a walkway to the north side of the bridge. There is no direct access to the water in the area of the vault and therefore the Project does not affect public access in this location. 3. The Project includes temporary construction staging at Lower Castaways Park, which is approximately 1,100 feet west of the Property, and across the Bay Bridge. Lower Castaways Park is not identified as a Public Park by the CLUP. The construction staging is temporary for the duration of construction for the Project, as stipulated by the Temporary Lease Agreement between the City and the Applicant. The temporary construction staging does not alter access to the bay. The Applicant is only using a portion of the park, which has been historically used for construction staging and off -site 13-54 DocuSign Envelope ID: FB7E1031-6092-4360-8FB9-D97AFC201580 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 12 of 28 parking since the City acquired the property. The staging site is buffered and screened from adjacent right of ways by existing landscaping which is to remain. The portion of the Staging Area that is open and available for public parking and access is not affected by the Project. The public access for small vessel launching into the bay is also unaffected. SECTION 4. DECISION. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby finds this Project complies with the California Environmental Quality Act as it is consistent with the certified EIR for Project No. 5-67, also known as the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project as approved by the Orange County Sanitation District, and the subsequent certified Addendum to the EIR. 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby approves a Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "F," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. This decision shall become final and effective 14 days following the date this Resolution was adopted unless within such time an appeal is filed with the City Clerk in accordance with the provisions of Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) and Title 21 (Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Final action taken by the City may be appealed to the Coastal Commission in compliance with Section 21.64.035 (Appeal to the Coastal Commission) of the NBMC and Title 14 California Code of Regulations, Sections 13111 through 13120, and Section 30603 of the California Public Resources Code. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 18T" DAY OF JANUARY, 2024. AYES: Ellmore, Harris, Rosene, and Salene NOES: Langford and Lowrey RECUSED: Barto ABSENT: BY: Curtis Ellmore, Chairman BY: IVisfav, RaVvis Tristan Harris, Secretary 13-55 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 13 of 28 Attachments: Exhibit A — Legal Description Exhibit B — EIR No. 5-67 Exhibit C — OCSD's Return on Peremptory Writ of Mandate on OCSC Case No. 30-2021-01194238 including Court's Order Exhibit D - Addendum to EIR No. 5-67 Exhibit E - Stipulation Discharging the Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Dismissing Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021- 01194238 Exhibit F - Conditions of Approval 13-56 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 14 of 28 A'1:1 I =i iiI_Iv Legal Description 13-57 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 15 of 28 EXHIBIT "A-1" LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 5-67-01 (FEE) ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Newport Beach, County of (range State of California, being that portion of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 93-111 filed in Book 278, Pages 40 through 45 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Orange County, described as follows: COMMENCING at the easterly terminus of that certain course in the centerline of the East Coast Highway shown as "North 871136'58" West 160.15 feet" on said Parcel Map No. 93-111, said point also being marked with a "spike and washer tagged DOH per Caltrans F.B. SR. 81-115111" per said Parcel Map No. 93-111; thence along said centerline North 87"36'58" West 160.15 feet to the northwesterly terminus thereof, said point also being marked with a "spike and washer tagged DOH per Caltrans F.B. SR, 81-115111"per said Parcel Map No. 93-111; thence leaving said centerline at right angles North 02'23'02" East 85.94 feet to a line shown as "North 87°36' 16" West 123.34 feet" in the southerly boundary of said Parcel 3. said line also being the northerly Right -of -Way line of the East Coast Highway as shown on said Parcel Map No. 93-11 and also shown on a Caltrans Right -of -Way Map No. 25491-C for 07-0RA-1 18.3; thence along said southerly line of Parcel 3 North 87°36' 16" West 65.10 feet to the intersection of the southerly boundary of said Parcel 3 and the easterly line of Parcel 1 Dedicated to the Orange County Sanitation District in a document recorded September 10, 1965 in Book 7661, Page 741 of Official Records, in the Office of said Orange County Recorder, said point also being the TRITE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 13°39'41" East 71.32 feet.; thence North 76°24'23" West 173.32 feet; thence South 13°39'46" West 79.83 feet to a line shown as "North 66'24'24" West 284.74 feet" in said southerly boundary of Parcel 3; thence along said southerly boundary of Parcel 3 the following six (6) courses: (1) South 66°24'24" East 8.72 feet to an angle point therein; (2) South 73'06'54" East 43.65 feet to an angle point therein; (3) South 83°06'23" East %83 feet to an angle point therein; (4) North 01°46'10" West 60.00 feet to an angle point therein; (5) North 88'1T14" East 60.00 feet to an angle point therein; Page 1 of 2 ❑C 5AN 22-03-8 13-58 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 16 of 28 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATIOIti DISTRICT BAY BRIDGE FUNIF STATION PARCEL 5-67-01 (FEB) (6) South 01°46'46" East 70.87 feet to an angle point therein to the TRUE POItiT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 9,713 Square Feet more or Icss. EXHIBIT "A-2" attached and by this reference made a part hereof. 08/17/2021 Stev C. Slocum, P.L.S. 9044 Date Michael Baker International 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, California 92707 Project No. 163755 H:lpdata1163755%CADDWepping\ExhihilsTtimp Station Legals and Exhibits Lcgall163755-00A l - Lcgal Fee Parcd.docx Page 2 of 2 OC SAN 22-03-9 13-59 � SAY HARBOR NEWP�RT CHANNEL UPPER BAY 11 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 17 of 28 RECORD REFERENCES: R1 CALTRANS RIG{T-OF-WAY MAP NO. 25491-C.. R2 PARCEL MAP NO. 93-111, P.I.B. 278/40-45. A -0 rr `moo M' C \ 6-17'43'19" \ R-10114 0 L=3f3.064 (R2) ;X-Llr — YfA — "DCH' PER CAI -TRANS Fe, 8t-',15/TT AND PM 93-111. P.fA.B. 275/40-45 N87'36'58"W 160.15' (R2) P.O.C. PARCEL I \ I 1 i� ExHIBIT nA-0� y SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION PARCEL W-01 (FEE) CONTAINING: 9,713 S.F. MORE OR LESS SHEET INDEX 0 INDICATES SHEET RACER PARCEL 5-67-01 (FEE) (sQE owl Wa7 i OF z SHMrS I N T E R N A T I O N A L 5 Hutton Centre give, Suite 500 Santa Ana, CA 92707 (949; 472.3506 MBAKERINR.CDM ALgET 13, 202' JN 163755 1NIiw ,ea�'w'mryAn'rvn..��arrawmu.�ro�ao�rrfvw WRK UM" M a mrA wftms - mw rw r m DC 5AN 22-03-10 13-60 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 18 of 28 +D r S66'24'24"E 8.72' VARIES VARIES �r I l (R2} S73'%'54'E 43.65' rn PARCEL 5-67-01 �� (FEE) zp a�G V & ' a ro v w D u} S'LY L[NE CF PARCEL 3 tlF P.M. N0. 93-111, P.1-1,r LRZ� n6'�6 w N [n a LINE 278/40--45 AND N' LY R.O.IK OF EAST COAST HISIPNAY g PER CALTRANS R.Q.N. MAP NO. 25491-C o" AA Cn � 1 T.P.O.B. rn 0 V ARZEr' r SP M ANa NASFER "00H' PER g5.94 — �� 23 Q?"� CALTRANS FB. SR-$1-115/11 AND P.M. NO. 93-111. P.M.B. f 278/40-45 EXHIBITTO'A-2"= SErMACCOMPANYA P. N}3'39'41"E 71.32 STY LINE OF PARCEL 3 OF PM 93-111, P.M.B. 278/40-45 AND N`LY RIGHT -OF -NAY LINE OF EAST COAST H["AY PER CALTRANS RIGHT OF NAY MAP N0. 25481-C tEGALt1tlN FAR PARCEL •1 ORANGE COUNTY SAN[TATION DISTRICT BAY BRIE PUMP STATION SPIRE AND WASHER 'DOH' PER CALTRANS FB. SR-81-115/11 PARM W01 (FMANO P.II. NO. 93-111, CONTAINING: 9,713 S.F. MORE OR LESS P.M.B. 278�40-45 SHEET 2 OF 2 SINS INTERNATI0NAL 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, CA 92707 (949) 472-3505 • MBAKERINTL.COM lllvrtuus+_soUerm LCWMMrVq lal ppoWp"Ve ggIT yV sanm urxs up o.ieris�wsasoea - MET M.YR1.Pc mwc.w.a*r a.�ivs+ rs ft aC SAN 22-03-11 13-61 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 19 of 28 EXHIBIT "B" EIR No. 5-67 Available separately due to bulk at: https://www.ocsan.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/21159/636976643775800000 13-62 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 20 of 28 EXHIBIT "C" OCSD's Return on Peremptory Writ of Mandate on OCSC Case No. 30-2021-01194238 including Court's Order Available separately due to bulk: https:Hecros.newportbeachca.gov/WEB/DocView.aspx?dbid=0&repo=CNB&id=2938615 13-63 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Fee Exempt Per Gov. Code § 6103 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC BRADLEY R. HOGIN - State Bar No. 140372 bhogin@woodruff.law RICIA R. HAGER - State Bar No. 234052 rhager@woodrufflaw 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7670 Telephone: (714) 558-7000 Facsimile: (714) 835-7787 Attorneys for Respondent ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT et. al. SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, Petitioner, V. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT; ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS; AND DOES 1-25, INCLUSIVE, Respondents. TO THE ABOVE -ENTITLED COURT: CASE NO.: 30-2021-01194238 ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM CLASTER DEPARTMENT: CX104 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S RETURN ON PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER DISCHARGING THE WRIT OF MANDATE HEARING DATES PENDING: None DATE ACTION FILED: April 19, 2021 TRIAL DATE: None On February 7, 2023, the Court issued a Peremptory Writ of Mandate ("Writ") directing Respondents the Orange County Sanitation District and Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors ("OC San") to bring its 2020 Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (` EIR") into compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). As set forth in detail below, the Writ has now been fully satisfied. 1780709.1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S RETURN ON WRIT OF MANDATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 11 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN Background A. The Litigation As Lead Agency, OC San prepared the EIR for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project. The OC San's Board of Directors ultimately certified the EIR f on February 24, 2021. On April 1, 2021, Bayside Village Marina filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate against OC San in this matter alleging that the EIR failed to comply with CEQA on numerous grounds. On December 16, 2022, the Court issued a ruling that upheld the EIR in all respects except one. The Court issued a limited writ directing OC San to correct deficiencies in the EIR's description of the project's proposed construction staging areas. (Minute Order, pp. 1, 16.) The Court's December 16, 2022, ruling is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (the "Ruling"). The EIR explained that construction staging will occur somewhere in the "Adjacent Pump Station Work Area" ("Adjacent Area") shown in yellow on Exhibit 3-6 of the EIR. Lower Castaways Park is within the Adjacent Area. The City of Newport Beach submitted a comment letter to OC San stating that the "City will likely neither support a permanent nor temporary easement through Lower Castaways Park" because the City plans to develop the site with park facilities. In responses to comments on the EIR, OC San stated that, should Lower Castaways not be available, construction staging would occur elsewhere within the Adjacent Area. The Court found that, assuming Lower Castaways is not available, "it is unclear whether creating a staging area in the limited, designated space is even possible." (Ruling, p. 7.) The Court concluded that no specific location with adequate square footage had been identified in the EIR, nor was there any analysis as to whether Mitigation Measures AES-1 and TRA-1 would apply to any area other than the Lower Castaways. (Id.) The Court also noted that Mitigation Measure TRA-1 implies that construction staging could occur outside the Adjacent Area. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 states in relevant part, "[construction drawings shall] identify any and all construction staging or material storage sites located outside of the project area." (Ruling, p. 7.) The Court further noted that counsel for OC San stated in a prior hearing that the lowest responsible bidder will have complete discretion to decide where staging will occur and how many staging sites will be necessary. (Id.) The Court explained that because the 1780709.1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S RETURN ON WRIT OF MANDATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EIR's analysis failed to account for impacts that could occur elsewhere, and the low bidder could place the project elsewhere, it would make Mitigation Measure AES-1 "toothless." (Ruling, p. 8.) The Court also questioned whether AES-1 imposes enforceable standards. (Id.) B. The Peremptory Writ of Mandate On February 7, 2023, the Court issued a Peremptory Writ of Mandate which directed the District to bring the EIR into compliance with CEQA regarding the construction staging areas and Mitigation Measure AES-1. (Writ, p. 2.) The Writ directed OC San to file a Return to the Writ within 180 days of service of the Notice of Entry of Judgment. (Writ, p. 2.) The Notice of Entry of Judgment was served on February 7, 2023, making this Return due August 7, 2023 (the 180th day is August 6, 2023, a Sunday). The Writ is attached hereto as Exhibit `B." H. OC San Has Fully Complied with the Writ of Mandate In response to the Ruling, OC San prepared an Addendum to the EIR. The Addendum provides additional information regarding the proposed use of the Lower Castaways as a construction staging area and adds a new construction staging area at OC San Plant No. 2 located in the City of Huntington Beach for soil storage/drying activities. The Addendum also modifies TRA- 1 to eliminate any reference to additional construction staging or material storage areas and, per a new condition of project approval, states that the construction contractor will not have discretion to select staging areas (the "COA"). Finally, the Addendum modifies and addresses the enforceability of Mitigation Measure AES-1. Mitigation measures for public projects are considered enforceable when they are incorporated into the project design. (Public Resources Code § 21081.6(b); 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15126.4(a)(2).) Mitigation Measure AES-1 has been incorporated into the project's design. Collectively, these clarifications and additions are referred to as the "Modified Project." The Addendum evaluated the Modified Project's potential environmental impacts. The Addendum concluded that the Modified Project would not result in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts. The Addendum concluded that no further environmental review is required. (CEQA Guidelines §§ 15162, 15164.) The Addendum is attached hereto as Exhibit "C." On July 26, 2023, OC San's Board of Directors considered the Addendum along with the 1780709.1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S RETURN ON WRIT OF MANDATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 final EIR (CEQA Guidelines § 15164(d)), and adopted a resolution which imposed the COA, incorporated Mitigation Measure AES-1 into the project's design, and approved the Modified Project. OC San's Resolution is attached hereto as Exhibit "D." For the foregoing reasons, OC San respectfully requests that the Court issue an order discharging the Writ. DATED: July 27, 2023 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC By.;411-17 4 BRADL Y R. HO RICIA R. HAGER Attorneys for Respondents ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT and ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1780709.1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S RETURN ON WRIT OF MANDATE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER The Court, having considered Respondent Orange County Sanitation District's Return, hereby DISCHARGES the Peremptory Writ of Mandate issued on February 7, 2023 in this matter. DATED: By: Honorable William D. Claster Judge of the Superior Court 1780709.1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S RETURN ON WRIT OF MANDATE EXHIBIT A SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE Civil Complex Center 751 W. Santa Ana Blvd Santa Ana, CA 92701 SHORT TITLE: BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC vs. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING/ELECTRONIC CASE NUMBER: SERVICE 130-2021-01194238-CU-WM-CXC I certify that I am not a party to this cause. I certify that the following document(s), dated, have been transmitted electronically by Orange County Superior Court at Santa Ana, CA. The transmission originated from Orange County Superior Court email address on December 16, 2022, at 2:21:32 PM PST. The electronically transmitted document(s) is in accordance with rule 2.251 of the California Rules of Court, addressed as shown above. The list of electronically served recipients are listed below: NOSSAMAN LLP NOSSAMAN LLP JERSKINE@NOSSAMAN.COM JFLYNN@NOSSAMAN.COM WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, APC WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, APC BHOGIN@WSS-LAW.COM BPATTERSON@WSS-LAW.COM WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, APC RHAGER@WSS-LAW.COM Clerk of the Court, by: � , Deputy CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING/ELECTRONIC SERVICE V3 1013a (June 2004) Code of Civ. Procedure, § CCP1013(a) DATE: 12/16/2022 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL COMPLEX CENTER MINUTE ORDER TIME: 02:16:00 PM DEPT: CX104 JUDICIAL OFFICER PRESIDING: William Claster CLERK: G. Hernandez REPORTER/ERM: None BAILIFF/COURT ATTENDANT:. None CASE NO: 30-2021-01194238-CU-WM-CXC CASE INIT.DATE: 04/01/2021 CASE TITLE: BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC vs. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CASE CATEGORY: Civil - Unlimited CASE TYPE: Writ of Mandate EVENT ID/DOCUMENT ID: 73909236 EVENT TYPE: Under Submission Ruling APPEARANCES RE PETITIONER'S WRIT OF MANDATE There are no appearances by any party. The Court, having taken the above -entitled matter under submission on 12/14/2022 and having fully considered the arguments of all parties, both written and oral, as well as the evidence presented, now issues its ruling. The Court's ruling is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Court orders clerk to give notice. DATE: 12/16/2022 MINUTE ORDER Page 1 DEPT: CX104 Calendar No. BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Petitioner Bayside Village Marina LLC (Bayside) seeks a writ of mandate compelling Respondent Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD" or the "District") to vacate and set aside its approval of (1) the OCSD's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains ("BBPS") replacement project ("Project") located on East Coast Highway in Newport Beach, and (2) the certification of the Recirculated Environmental Impact Report ("REIR") for the Project. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS a limited writ as set forth below. I. BACKGROUND Bayside is the owner of 31.4 acres of property located at East Coast Highway in the City of Newport Beach, California between Newport Channel and Bayside Drive. (ROA 25, First Amended Verified Petition (Petition), ¶ 9; AR230.) Approximately 24 acres of Bayside's property are developed with mobile homes, and the remaining seven acres contain an outdoor storage space of RVs and small boats, parking and restrooms facilities for the Bayside Marina, a kayak rental and launch facility, parking and access to Pearson's Port seafood market, and marine service equipment storage under the Coast Highway Bridge ("BVM Property"). (AR230, 011290.) The seven acres are being developed as the "Back Bay Landing" Project, which is a mixed -use development that will be implemented pursuant to the Newport Beach- and Coastal Commission -approved Back Bay Planned Community Development Plan ("PCDP"). It will have a boat storage facility, retail stores and recreational marine -related facilities and residential units. (AR226, 230, 3274, 7539-97; Petition, ¶ 9.) Bayside is also the developer of this Back Bay project. (Petition, ¶ 9.) OCSD owns and operates the BBPS, which is located at 300 East Coast Highway in Newport Beach, just east of the Newport Bay Channel. (ROA 103, Opp., p. 8; AR186.) BBPS transports sewage or wastewater through pipelines to OCSD's Ruling Page 1 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 sewage treatment plant in Huntington Beach and is a piece of critical infrastructures that conveys 50-60% of the total wastewater flow generated in Newport Beach. (ROA 103, Opp., p. 8; AR186.) BBPS is located on the southern boundary of Bayside's property, is surrounded on three sides by that property, and is adjacent to the Back Bay Landing Project. (AR230, 3206.) The District's Project involves the construction of a new, larger pump station extending 100 feet to the west of the existing pump station and the installation of new force mains. (AR186 and 237.) The new pump station facilities will include a pump station, generator and odor control facilities. (AR186, 230.) Planning on the Project started in 2013. (AR3206.) Since the Bayside Property, and particularly the Back Bay Landing Project, surrounds the Project, from 2014-2016, Bayside and OCSD exchanged information and worked together to discuss alternatives for the Project. (See e.g., AR3206, 6371-72, 7040-43,7090, 7324, 7342-43, 15667, 16128-131.) In June 2017, OCSD published a draft EIR that analyzed a version of the Project involving the demolition of the existing facility, construction of a new and larger facility adjacent to Bayside Drive and installation of force main improvements beneath the Newport Bay Channel north of the Bay Bridge. (AR236, AR9383-84.) The District never presented the 2017 Final EIR to its Board of Directors for approval due to conflicts with the planned development of the Back Bay Landing Project. (AR236, AR1501-1506.) In July 2019, OCSD published a recirculated EIR with three alternatives for the Project. (AR236, AR11613-14.) During the public comment period, there were concerns regarding the three conceptual site plans, including confusion about one of the alternatives known as the South Pump Station. (AR236.) OCSD did not present the 2019 EIR to the OCSD Board. Ruling Page 2 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Instead, OCSD decided to select one conceptual site plan and construction method and update the EIR in its entirety. (AR236.) The concept chosen and analyzed in the 2020 recirculated EIR (REIR) is the Adjacent Pump Station, which is essentially the South Pump Station alternative in the 2019 REIR. (AR237.) The Final EIR (FEIR) was published in January 2021 and approved on March 1, 2021. (AR1-3.) II. OVERVIEW OF CEQA PROCESS "CEQA is a comprehensive scheme designed to provide long-term protection to the environment. [Citation.]" (Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105, 112.) It applies to "discretionary projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies." (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080(a).) "In enacting CEQA, the Legislature declared its intention that all public agencies responsible for regulating activities affecting the environment give prime consideration to preventing environmental damage when carrying out their duties. [Citations.] CEQA is to be interpreted 'to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language.' [Citation.]" (Mountain Lion Foundation, supra, 16 Cal.4th at p. 112.) An EIR, which has been described as "the heart of CEQA" (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564), "is required for any project that a public agency proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment. [Citations.] An EIR must describe the proposed project and its environmental setting, state the objectives sought to be achieved, identify and analyze the significant effects on the environment, state how those impacts can be mitigated or avoided, and identify and analyze alternatives to the project, Ruling Page 3 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 among other requirements. [Citations.]" (Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 465-66 (Ballona).) Once a draft EIR is prepared, the public must be notified, and the draft and all documents it references must be made available for public review and comment. (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21091(a), 21092; CEQA Guidelines, § 15087. 1) The public agency acting as the lead agency then prepares a final EIR, which must include comments received from the public and from other agencies concerning the draft EIR, responses to those comments, and any revisions to the draft EIR. (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15088, 15132; Ballona, supra, 201 Cal.App.4th at p. 466.) III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Overview Bayside asserts that the EIR description of the Project and its environmental setting is "inaccurate and unstable." "The fundamental goal of an EIR is to inform decision makers and the public of any significant adverse effects a project is likely to have on the physical environment. [Citations.] To make such an assessment, an EIR must delineate environmental conditions prevailing absent the project, defining a baseline against which predicted effects can be described and quantified. [Citation.]" (Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (2013) 57 Ca1.4th 439, 447.) This generally includes providing "a description of the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the project, as they exist at the time the notice of preparation is published, or if no notice of preparation is published, at the time environmental analysis is commenced, from both a local and regional perspective." (Id., at p. 448; see CEQA Guidelines, § 15125(a).) 1 References to the CEQA Guidelines are to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq. Ruling Page 4 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 "Without accurate and complete information pertaining to the setting of the project and surrounding uses, it cannot be found that the [EIR] adequately investigated and discussed the environmental impacts of the development project." (San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 713, 729 (San Joaquin Raptor).) Thus, [i]f the description of the environmental setting of the project site and surrounding area is inaccurate, incomplete or misleading, the EIR does not comply with CEQA." (Cadiz Land Co. v. Rail Cycle (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 74, 87.) B. Failure to Identifv Neighboring Commercial Operations Bayside contends that repeated use of the phrase "RV Storage facility" obscures "the site's coastal -dependent, visitor serving uses." (Pet. Supp. Br. at p. 16.) Indeed, a number of businesses on the west side of the Project site (e.g., Southwind Kayaks, Gondola Adventures) are not mentioned by name anywhere in any EIR. While it is true that these businesses are not referenced by name and that the site is referred to as an RV Storage facility (presumably since RVs are stored near where the actual construction will take place), those references do not create an inaccurate picture of the Project. In fact, the EIR refers to these businesses on the west side of the Project as "commercial" or "commercial recreation marine uses" in a number of places. (AR230, 234, 260, 392, 436.) The businesses also are listed on Table 3-1 under "General Commercial." (AR235.) The fact that the site is called an RV Storage facility is not misleading when considering the EIR as a whole. The above -cited references to commercial activity and the various maps/photos of the Project site overcome this alleged shortcoming. Ruling Page 5 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 A related purported flaw in the EIR's Project description is the failure to address the potential adverse physical impacts Project construction would have on these businesses. On the contrary, such analysis is found at AR 473-482 regarding noise and vibrations during construction, and at AR 302-305 with respect to air quality. In terms of traffic, the EIR makes clear that access to the Project site will be shared via Bayside Drive by construction vehicles and users of the commercial facilities. As to the added construction and operational traffic, the EIR addresses these issues at AR499 and in Impact Statement TRA-4. C. Construction Staging Area Description Bayside contends that the Project description is inaccurate and, indeed, is an "unstable moving target" by virtue of the failure to describe and evaluate a construction staging area. The Court agrees. The 2020 REIR includes several references to construction staging. Page 3-11 states: "Portions of the adjacent private property (currently a RV storage area) and Lower Castaways Park could be temporarily utilized for construction staging, if these areas are available during construction of the proposed project." (AR241.) Then, in response to a letter from the City of Newport Beach stating that the Lower Castaways would not be available (AR1120), the 2021 FEIR noted: "Should Lower Castaways not be available, construction staging would occur within other proposed areas of disturbance (as identified in the project boundary shown on 2020 Recirculated Draft EIR Exhibit 3-4)." (AR1127.) Exhibit 3-4 is a Proposed Conceptual Site Plan that shows the areas (highlighted in yellow) where the proposed project construction will take place as well as the Lower Castaways. (AR238.) A virtually identical site plan (also highlighted in yellow) is found at Exhibit 3-6 which is entitled Adjacent Pump Station Work Areas. (AR243.) According to OCSD's supplemental brief, based on the unavailability of the Lower Castaways, "the construction staging will occur Ruling Page 6 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 somewhere in this Adjacent Pump Station Work Area." (OCSD Supp. Br. at p. 12.) Based on this statement, the District argues in its supplemental brief that it satisfied CEQA since the EIR "considered all potential impacts that could occur in the Adjacent Area." However, based on a review of Exhibits 3-4 and 3-6, it is unclear whether creating a staging area in the limited designated space is even possible. With the exception of the Lower Castaways, the Coast Highway and the Newport channel, it appears that the areas highlighted in yellow are where virtually all of the construction actually will take place. Certainly, no specific location with adequate square footage is identified, nor is there any analysis as to whether Mitigation Measures AES-1 and TRA-1 would apply to any area other than the Lower Castaways. Perhaps a more significant problem with the statements in both the FEIR and supplemental brief about an alternative site in the project area is that they may well be inaccurate. Indeed, TRA-1 tends to contradict OCSD's supplemental brief by virtue of acknowledging that future staging areas may be located off -site: "[construction drawings shall] identify any and all construction staging or material storage sites located outside of the project site." (AR206 [emphasis added].) Compounding this problem, counsel for the District told the Court at an earlier hearing that the lowest responsible bidder on the Project will have complete discretion to decide where staging will occur and how many staging sites will be necessary. (August 4, 2022 Transcript at pp. 11-12.) Importantly, by not limiting that comment to sites within the yellow -highlighted boundaries of Exhibits 3-4 or 3-6, the District appears to acknowledge that staging sites not identified in either the REIR or FEIR might be utilized. Given that uncertainty, Bayside's argument regarding a lack of a complete, accurate and stable project description has merit. More specifically, the District's argument (OCSD Supp. Br. at p. 12) that the EIR considered all environmental impacts (biological, noise, aesthetics, etc.) in the Ruling Page 7 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Adjacent Area fails to account for any potential impacts that might occur if the construction staging area occurs elsewhere. Without identifying the area or areas where staging will occur, the public is left in the dark about whether that staging will have any effects on the environment at location(s) yet to be identified. Counsel's statement that the lowest responsible bidder will have complete discretion with regard to construction staging also renders the mitigation measures of AES-1 toothless. AES-1 purports to minimize aesthetic impacts of construction by requiring the District's Director of Engineering to personally approve construction staging areas, transport routes, etc. before grading or demolition permits are issued. To the extent AES-1 actually imposes enforceable standards (which the Court questions), it cannot be reconciled with the vesting of complete discretion in the lowest responsible bidder. IV. CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES "An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decisionmaking and public participation. An EIR is not required to consider alternatives which are infeasible. The lead agency is responsible for selecting a range of project alternatives for examination and must publicly disclose its reasoning for selecting those alternatives. There is no ironclad rule governing the nature or scope of the alternatives to be discussed other than the rule of reason." (CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.6(a).) The EIR identified five alternatives to the Project to analyze in detail: the "no project" scenario, the "adjacent project/microtunneling" scenario, the "origina Ruling Page 8 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 northeast pump station with horizontal directional drilling" scenario, the "rehabilitate in place with microtunneling" scenario, and the "pump station south relocation with microtunneling" scenario. (AR539-540.) Nearly 40 pages of analysis are devoted to comparing each of these alternatives to the Project. (AR540-578.) Bayside does not challenge the analysis presented. Rather, it faults the EIR for failing to discuss two additional alternatives: the "Expand -in -Place" scenario and alternative alignments for the dual force mains south of East Coast Highway. "Courts will defer to an agency's selection of alternatives unless the petitioners (1) demonstrate that the chosen alternatives are " "'manifestly unreasonable and ... do not contribute to a reasonable range of alternatives,"' " and (2) submit evidence showing the rejected alternative was both "feasible" and "adequate," because it was capable of attaining most of the basic objectives of the project, taking into account site suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, general plan consistency, and other relevant factors. [Citation.]" (South of Market Community Action Network v. City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.Sth 321, 345.) The Court assumes for the sake of argument that the "Expand -in -Place" scenario and the alternative alignments for the dual force mains are both feasible and adequate. That is, the Court assumes Bayside has met the second prong of its burden. However, Bayside fails to meet the first prong of its burden. "The 'key issue' is whether the range of alternatives discussed fosters informed decisionmaking and public participation. [Citation.]" (Cherry Valley Pass Acres & Neighbors v. City of Beaumont (190 Cal.App.4th 316, 354.) Bayside complains that two alternatives were not considered, but it identifies no authority holding that the failure to consider a specific alternative or alternatives automatically renders the range of Ruling Page 9 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 alternatives considered "manifestly unreasonable" or insufficient to "foster informed decision ma king." (Compare id., at p. 355 ["Though one or more of these 328 imaginable alternatives may have represented the optimum number of residences that could have profitably been built while minimizing the agricultural impacts of the project to the fullest extent possible, the range of alternatives discussed in the EIR was sufficient to foster informed decisionmaking on this very question."].) V. INCONSISTENCIES WITH PLANS A. Overview Bayside contends the EIR is fatally flawed because it fails to disclose the Project's inconsistencies with the PCDP, the Newport Beach Local Coastal Program ("LCP"), and the Coastal Act. An EIR must discuss "any inconsistencies between the proposed project and applicable general plans, specific plans and regional plan." (CEQA Guidelines § 15125(d).) This includes inconsistencies with the Coastal Act. (Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1209, 1233.) A determination of consistency "comes to this [C]ourt with a strong presumption of regularity. [Citation.] To overcome that presumption, an abuse of discretion must be shown. [Citations.] An abuse of discretion is established only if the city council has not proceeded in a manner required by law, its decision is not supported by findings, or the findings are not supported by substantial evidence. [Citation]." (Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.App.4th 704, 717.) "It is, emphatically, not the role of the courts to micro -manage these development decisions. Our function is simply to decide whether the city officials considered the applicable policies and the extent to which the proposed project conforms with those policies, whether the city officials made appropriate Ruling Page 10 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 findings on this issue, and whether those findings are supported by substantial evidence." (Id., at pp. 719-20 [emphasis in original].) In addition, Bayside's opening brief suggests the EIR is inadequate to the extent it fails to explain why the District found the Project consistent with applicable plans. (Pet. Opening Br. at p. 19, lines 6-8.) Because EIRs need only evaluate inconsistencies with plans, no analysis is required if the project is consistent with plans. (North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Morin Municipal Water Dist. Bd. of Directors (2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 614, 632 [citing City of Long Beach v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 889, 918-19].) Insofar as Bayside argues the explanation of consistency is inadequate (as opposed to arguing the finding of consistency is an abuse of discretion), this challenge fails. B. PCDP Inconsistency The PCDP contains zoning regulations that dictate acceptable land uses in each "Planning Area" it covers. It is undisputed that both the current pump station and the new pump station to be built as part of the Project are in Planning Area 1. According to the PCDP, "Wastewater Pump Station" is a permitted land use in Planning Area 1. (AR7615.) Bayside nevertheless contends the Project is inconsistent with the PCDP. It argues that the PCDP "identifies the existence of the BBPS, however, only at its current size and location, not the expanded size and altered location contemplated by the Final EIR." (Pet. Opening Br. at p. 18.) The claimed inconsistency apparently arises from conceptual drawings attached to the PCDP (for parking plans, public spaces, etc.) that show the BBPS in its current location in the context of the larger planning area. (See AR7650-7663.) That is, as the Court understands the argument, because the conceptual drawings show the current BBPS, any deviation is an inconsistency. Ruling Page 11 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 As the District points out in opposition, the PCDP imposes specific numeric limits on the square footage of commercial, residential, marina, and dry dock use in Planning Area 1, but not wastewater pump use. (AR7612.) The conceptual drawings do not on their face appear to limit the size or the location of the pumping station, only to show it in relation to other then -existing uses for planning purposes. The only explicit limitation placed on a wastewater pump station by the PCDP is that it must be in Planning Area 1. As to Bayside's contention that AR7549 allows the pump station also to be in Planning Area 2 (a contention that the Court will accept even though it does not appear that AR7549 is in the record filed with the Court), that fact does not establish PCDP inconsistency. Accordingly, the Court cannot say the finding of consistency is unsupported by substantial evidence. C. LCP Consistency Bayside contends the Project is inconsistent with policy 2.1.9 of the LCP because that policy "mandate[s] protection and expansion of coastal -dependent over commercial/industrial uses." (Pet.'s Opening Br. at p. 17.) As the District points out, nothing in policy 2.1.9 or its associated sub -policies discusses the relative priority of coastal -dependent uses vis-a-vis utility uses like the Project. (Furthermore, it appears the only hard-and-fast priority is that coastal -dependent uses are prioritized over residential uses, not over commercial/industrial uses. See policy 2.1.9-1, at AR11289.) In any event, the City correctly notes that relative priority matters only if the Back Bay Landing development and the Project are a zero -sum game in terms of developed square footage. Under the PCDP, square footage for a wastewater pump station does not count against commercial, residential, marina, or dry dock square footage. (See AR7612.) The Court cannot say the finding of consistency is unsupported by substantial evidence. Ruling Page 12 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 D. Coastal Act Consisten Bayside contends the Project is inconsistent with multiple sections of the Coastal Act, in particular Pub. Resources Code §§ 30213, 30221, 30222, 30224, and 30253(e), and policy 3.2.1-1 of the LCP, which similarly requires protection of coastal recreation opportunities. The Court agrees with the District that § 30222 is inapplicable. On its face, that statute prioritizes "visitor -serving commercial recreational facilities designed to enhance public opportunities for coastal recreation ... over private residential, general industrial, or general commercial development, but not over agriculture or coastal -dependent industry." Again, the Project is a utility use, not one of the categories enumerated in this statute. Of the remaining provisions, the only one discussed in any detail in Bayside's briefing (opening, reply, or supplemental) is § 30253(e) of the Coastal Act. The remainder are simply referred to in laundry lists without discussion of any particular alleged inconsistencies. Because Bayside bears the burden of showing an abuse of discretion, the Court finds the failure to specifically discuss §§ 30123, 30221, and 30224 of the Coastal Act, as well as policy 3.2.1-1 of the LCP, means Bayside has not shown an abuse of discretion in the District's finding of consistency. As to § 30253(e), it provides: "New development shall ... [w]here appropriate, protect special communities and neighborhoods that, because of their unique characteristics, are popular visitor destination points for recreational use." "Where appropriate" is an important qualifier here, as the District flags a competing provision of the Coastal Act, § 30231, which provides: "The biological productivity and the quality of coastal waters, streams, wetlands, estuaries, and lakes appropriate to maintain optimum populations of marine organisms and for the protection of human health shall be maintained and, where feasible, restored Ruling Page 13 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 through, among other means, minimizing adverse effects of waste water discharges and entrainment ...." The administrative record contains evidence that the current pump station is deteriorating and does not meet current standards for construction, electrical equipment, or maintenance. (AR187.) The record also contains evidence that failure of the system could result in the release of sewage into Newport Bay. (AR187, 245.) Section 30231 of the Coastal Act imposes a mandatory policy for protecting water quality (it "shall be maintained"), while § 30253(e) only imposes a duty to protect recreational use "where appropriate." On this record, the Court cannot say the District lacked substantial evidence to conclude its duties under § 30231 prevailed over its duties under § 30253(e), and thereby to conclude the Project is consistent with the Coastal Act. Put another way, Bayside must show the District abused its discretion in finding the "where appropriate" qualifier in § 30253(e) inapplicable here, and it has not met its burden to do so. VI. ADEQUACY OF RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Bayside contends the District's response to comments prior to certification of the FEIR is inadequate. The Court agrees with the District that Bayside failed to exhaust its administrative remedies on this issue. "[T]he time for complaining about the inadequacy of [the District's] responses was when the issue was before the agency and any alleged deficiency could be explained or corrected." (Towards Responsibility in Planning v. City Council (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 671, 682.) Bayside points to nothing in the record indicating that the alleged inadequacy of the District's responses was raised at the administrative stage. As a result, this challenge is barred. Bayside responds that the foregoing statement from Towards Responsibility is dictum unnecessary to the holding. This is true enough, as the Court of Appeal in that case found the agency's response to comments adequate on the merits. But Ruling Page 14 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 "[t]o say that dicta are not controlling [citation] does not mean that they are to be ignored; on the contrary, dicta are often followed." (9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (6th ed. 2022) Appeal § 532.) And while Bayside cites a number of cases on page 21 of its supplemental brief holding that inadequate responses to comments may render an EIR defective, none of those cases discusses the effect of the challenger's failure to raise the inadequacy issue before the agency. VII. REMEDIES AND CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, Bayside's petition is GRANTED on the ground that the description of the construction staging area is inadequate, and for the related reason that AES-1 is a toothless mitigation measure as a result. Bayside asks the Court to set aside the District's Project approvals and EIR certification. Public Resources Code § 21168.9 gives the Court discretion to fashion a narrower remedy. "The 1993 amendments to section 21168.9 expanded the trial court's authority and 'expressly authorized the court to fashion a remedy that permits some part of the project to go forward while an agency seeks to remedy its CEQA violations. In other words, the issuance of a writ need not always halt all work on a project.' [Citation.]" (San Bernardino Valley Audubon Soc. V. Metropolitan Water Dist. of Southern California (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 1097, 1104- 1105.) "The choice of a lesser remedy involves the trial court's consideration of equitable principles." (Id., at p. 1104.) As discussed above, Bayside's challenge is largely unsuccessful. And the vast majority of Bayside's challenge has little, if anything, to do with construction staging issues. The Court therefore finds the remainder of the Project severable from the construction staging issues. The Court further finds severance will not prejudice full and complete compliance with CEQA, because the remainder of the Project is CEQA-compliant. (Pub. Resources Code § 21168.9(b).) Ruling Page 15 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 In considering equitable principles to fashion a remedy, the Court is especially mindful of the severe risk to the environment that would be posed by the outdated pumping station and force mains failing and spilling raw sewage into Newport Bay. Furthermore, as explained in the District's filings in the companion eminent domain case, permitting from the relevant authorities is expected to take 9-12 months, with construction not starting for another six months after that. (See OC Superior Court case no. 2022-01251890, ROA 92, at pp. 2-3.) Based on representations made at the hearing, it appears that the City will not allow the permitting process to start without OCSD approval of the Project and its certification of the EIR. Of course, stalling that already lengthy process increases the risk of the very sewage spill the Project seeks to prevent. Because the issues with construction staging are both severable and appear to be readily correctable, and given the overriding need for the Project, OCSD will not be required to withdraw its approvals for the Project and certification of the EIR. As explained by the court in Preserve Wild Santee v. City of Santee (2012) 210 Cal. App. 4t" 260, 287-88: In our view, a reasonable, commonsense reading of section 21168.9 plainly forecloses plaintiffs' assertion that a trial court must mandate a public agency decertify the EIR and void all related project approvals in every instance where the court finds an EIR violates CEQA. Such a rigid requirement directly conflicts with the "in part" language in section 21168.9, subdivision (a)(1), which specifically allows a court to direct its mandates to parts of determinations, parts of findings, or parts of decisions. Such a rigid requirement also conflicts with the language in section 21168.9, subdivision (bl, limiting the court's mandates to only those necessary to achieve CEQA compliance and, if the court makes specified findings, to only "that portion of a determination, finding, or decision" violating CEQA. (Italics added.) Ruling Page 16 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Accordingly, the Court will impose the limited remedy of requiring OCSD to bring the EIR into CEQA compliance with respect to the construction staging issue and the related question of the enforceability of AES-1. Because the District's CEQA noncompliance involves construction issues, this means no construction or other physical activity may take place at the Project site until the District is in compliance with CEQA. Whether bringing the EIR into compliance can be accomplished via a supplemental EIR (CEQA Guidelines § 15163) or an addendum (CEQA Guidelines § 15164) will be left to OCSD to decide. Note that the Court's order includes only these mandates, which are necessary to achieve compliance with CEQA. (See Pub. Resources Code § 21168.9(b).) In order to avoid unnecessary delay that increases the risk of a sewage spill, the District may continue to seek the necessary permits from the City, Coastal Commission, etc. to move forward with the Project, and it may continue to pursue the companion eminent domain action. Bayside shall prepare a proposed order in accordance with this ruling and provide it to OCSD for comments before submitting it to the Court. Ruling Page 17 EXHIBIT B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOSSAMAN LLP FILED JOHN P. ERSKINE (SBN 084994) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE jerstcine@nossaman.com JOHN J. FLYNN III (SBN 76419) jflynn@nossaman.com FEB 0 7 2023 SAMANTHA SAVONI (SBN 329243) ssavoni@nossaman.com DAVlD H. YAMASAKI, Clerk of the Court 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800 _ Irvine, CA 92612 �IU Ty Telephone. 949.833.7800 Facsimile: 949.833.7878 Attorneys for Petitioner BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE - CENTRAL COMPLEX CENTER BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC, Petitioner, VS. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT; ORANGE COUNTY . SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS; and DOES 1-25 inclusive, Respondents. Case No: 30-2021-01194238-CU-WM-CXC (Related to Case No. 30-2022-01251890) Assigned for all purposes to: Hon. Judge William Claster, Dept. CX104 PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE [California Environmental Quality Act; Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21168, 21168.5; Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1085, 1094.5] Action Filed: March 31, 2021 Amended Petition Filed: May 13, 2021 Trial Date: Not Set 61199873 -1- PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9' 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 issued, Judgment having been entered in this case ordering that a peremptory writ of mandate be IT IS ORDERED: I. Upon service of this writ of mandate, Respondents Orange County Sanitation District ("OC San") and the Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors, its governing body (together, "Respondents"), shall bring the 2020 Recirculated Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") into compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") with respect to the construction staging deficiencies and the deficiencies identified by the Court pertaining to mitigation measure AES-1, as specified in the Judgment and Ruling attached thereto. 2. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21168.9, subdivision (b), this Court will retain jurisdiction over Respondents' proceedings by way of a Return to this peremptory writ of mandate until the Court has determined that Respondents have complied with the provisions of CEQA, the Judgment, and the Ruling attached thereto, such Return to the writ to be filed by Respondents within 180 days of receiving service of the Notice of Entry of Judgment. 3. Except as provided herein and in the Judgment, this peremptory writ shall not limit or constrain OC San's lawful jurisdiction and discretion. OC San may continue to seek the necessary permits from the City of Newport Beach, the California Coastal Commission, and other regulatory agencies required to move forward with the Project, and it may continue to pursue the companion eminent domain action, Case No. 30-2022-01251890-CU-EI-CXC. I Dated: 2-1-2-1 Han. William D. Claster Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Orange 61199873 -2- PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned declares: I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to the within action; my business address is c/o Nossaman LLP, 18.101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800, Irvine, CA 92612. On January 25, 2023, I served the foregoing PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE [Proposed] on parties to the within action as follows: ❑ (By U.S. Mail) On the same date, at my said place of business, copy enclosed in a sealed envelope, addressed as shown on the attached service list was placed for collection and mailing following the usual business practice of my said employer. I am readily familiar with my said employer's business practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and, pursuant to that practice, the correspondence would be deposited with the United States Postal Service, with postage thereon fully prepaid, on the same date at Irvine, California. ❑ (By Overnight Service) I served a true and correct copy by overnight delivery service for delivery on the next business day. Each copy was enclosed in an envelope or package designated by the express service carrier; deposited in a facility regularly maintained by the express service carrier or delivered to a courier or driver authorized to receive documents on its behalf; with delivery fees paid or provided for; addressed as shown on the accompanying service list. ❑ (By Electronic Service) By emailing true and correct copies to the persons at the electronic notification address(es) shown on the accompanying service list. The document(s) was/were served electronically and the transmission was reported as complete and without error. R1 (By Electronic Service) Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 2.251(a)(2) and 2.251(a)(3), by submitting an electronic version of the document(s) to One Legal LLC, through the user interface at www.onelegal.com, I caused the document(s) to be sent to the person(s) listed on the attached service list. Executed on January 25, 2023. d (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Amy RTayl r 61199873 PROOF OF SERVICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SERVICE LIST Bradley R. Hogin Ricia R. Hager Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart, APC 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7670 Tel: 714.558.7000 Fax: 714.835.7787 bhogin@wss-law.com; rhager@wss-law.com Attorney for Respondents ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, et aL 161199873 PROOF OF SERVICE EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT D RESOLUTION NO. OC SAN 23-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECEIVING AND FILING THE ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAINS REPLACEMENT PROJECT NO. 5-67 AND APPROVING THE MODIFIED PROJECT WHEREAS, the Orange County Sanitation District ("OC San") certified an environmental impact report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project ("Project") No. 5-67 on February 24, 2021 ("EIR"); WHEREAS, on April 1, 2021, Bayside Village Marina filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate against OC San in Orange County Superior Court alleging that the EIR failed to comply with CEQA on numerous grounds, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238; WHEREAS, on December 16, 2022, Judge William Claster of the Orange County Superior Court issued a ruling that upheld the EIR in all respects except one; the Court issued a limited writ directing OC San to sufficiently identify the project's proposed construction staging areas (the "Court Ruling"); WHEREAS, the Court Ruling also questioned the enforceability of Mitigation Measure AES-1; WHEREAS, OC San has prepared an Addendum, "Attachment A," to the EIR in response to the Court Ruling (the "Addendum"); WHEREAS, OC San has also modified the Project ("Modified Project") and certain mitigation measures as described in the Addendum; WHEREAS, the Addendum finds that the Modified Project would not result in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts and that no further environmental review is required pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15162 and 15164; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of OC San has considered the Addendum and the EIR prior to making a decision regarding the Modified Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT OC San does hereby find and determine as follows: 1780089.1 OC SAN 23-13-1 Section 1. The above findings and recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein in full by this reference. Section 2. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(b) and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15126.4(a)(2), Mitigation Measure AES- 1 is hereby incorporated into the Project's design. Section 3. The Addendum is hereby received and filed. Section 4. The following condition of approval is imposed on the Modified Project: "The constructor contractor will not have discretion to select any construction staging or material storage sites. The construction staging or material storage sites for this project are identified in the Addendum to the certified Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Environmental Impact Report." Section 5. The Modified Project is hereby approved, subject to the condition of approval stated in Section 3, above. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at the Orange County Sanitation District Board of Directors meeting held on this 26th day of July 2023. Chard wahke Chad Wanke (Jul 27, 2023 13:47 PDT) Chad P. Wanke Board Chairman ATTEST: &6&- /e4z Kelly Lo (Jul 27, 2023 13:52 PDT) Kelly A. Lore, MMC Clerk of the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: Bradley R. Hogin (Jul 27, 202 10:45 PDT) Bradley R. Hogin General Counsel 1780089.1 OC SAN 23-13-2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, Kelly A. Lore, Clerk of the Board of Directors of the Orange County Sanitation District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. OC SAN 23-13 at a regular meeting of said Board on the 26t" day of July 2023, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Brad Avery, Pat Burns, Doug Chaffee, Jon Dumitru, Rose Espinoza, Stephen Faessel, Ryan Gallagher, Marshall Goodman, Glenn Grandis, Johnathan Ryan Hernandez, Farrah Khan, Christine Marick, Scott Minikus, Jordan Nefulda, Andrew Nguyen, Robert Ooten, David Shawver, Schelly Sustarsic, Chad Wanke, Bruce Whitaker, John Withers and Jordan Wu (Alternate) NOES: None ABSENT: Phil Hawkins, Steve Jones, and Susan Sonne ABSTENTIONS: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of Orange County Sanitation District this 26t" day of July 2023. Kelly Lo (Jul 27, 2023 13:52 PDT) Kelly A. Lore, MMC Clerk of the Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 1780089.1 OC SAN 23-13-3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; I am employed by WOODRUFF & SMART in the County of Orange at 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200, Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7670. On July 27, 2023, I served the foregoing document(s) described as ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S RETURN ON PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE; [PROPOSED] ORDER DISCHARGING THE WRIT OF MANDATE ❑ by placing the true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as stated on the attached mailing list; ❑ (BY MAIL) I placed said envelope(s) for collection and mailing, following ordinary business practices, at the business offices of WOODRUFF & SMART, and addressed as shown on the attached service list, for deposit in the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with the practice of WOODRUFF & SMART for collection and processing correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and said envelope(s) will be deposited with the United States Postal Service on said date in the ordinary course of business. ❑x (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE) I caused the above -referenced document to be transmitted to the interested parties vie electronic mail as stated on the attached service list. ❑ (BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I placed said documents in envelope(s) for collection following ordinary business practices, at the business offices of WOODRUFF & SMART, and addressed as shown on the attached service list, for collection and delivery to a courier authorized by to receive said documents, with delivery fees provided for. I am rea i y a iar with the practices of WOODRUFF & SMART for collection and processing of documents for overnight delivery, and said envelope(s) will be deposited for receipt by on said date in the ordinary course of business. ❑ (BY FACSIMILE) I caused the above -referenced document to be transmitted to the interested parties via facsimile transmission to the fax number(s) as stated on the attached service list. ❑ (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I delivered such envelope(s) by hand to the offices of the addressee(s). 0 (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. ❑ (Federal) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. Executed on July 27, 2023 at Costa Mesa, California. Is/Katie E. Kane Katie E. Kane 1780709.1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S RETURN ON WRIT OF MANDATE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC V. ORANGE CO UNTY SANITA TION DISTRICT ET. AL. CASE NO. 30-2021-01194238 SERVICE LIST NOSSAMAN LLP Tohn P. Erskine, Esq. jerskine@nossaman.com Tohn J. Flynn III, Esq. jflynn@nossaman.com Samantha Savoni ssavoni@nossaman.com 18101 Von Karman Ave. Suite 1800 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: 949-83 3 -7800 Facsimile: 949-833-7878 Attorneys for Petitioner 1780709.1 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S RETURN ON WRIT OF MANDATE Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 21 of 28 EXHIBIT "D" Addendum to EIR No. 5-67 Available separately due to bulk at: https://www.ocsan.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/34145/638253730131970000 13-64 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 22 of 28 EXHIBIT "E" Stipulation Discharging the Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Dismissing Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238 13-65 30-2021-01 Electronically Filed by Superior Court of California, County of Orange, 08/28/2023 03:49:00 PM. 238-CU-WM-CXC - ROA # 226 - DAVID H. YAMASAKI, Clerk of the Court By G. Hernandez, Deputy Clerk. 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Fee Exempt Per Gov. Code § 6103 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC BRADLEY R. HOGIN - State Bar No. 140372 bhogin@woodruff.law RICIA R. HAGER - State Bar No. 234052 rhager@woodruff.law 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7670 Telephone: (714) 558-7000 Facsimile: (714) 835-7787 Attorneys for Respondent ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT et. al. SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, Petitioner, \A ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT; ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS; AND DOES 1-25, INCLUSIVE, Respondents. CASE NO.: 30-2021-01194238 ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM CLASTER DEPARTMENT: CX104 STIPULATION DISCHARGING THE PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE AND DISMISSING THE CASE; [PROPOSED] ORDER HEARING DATES PENDING: Type: Hearing on Writ Return Date: November 3, 2023 Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept: CX104 DATE ACTION FILED: April 19, 2021 TRIAL DATE: None This stipulation is entered into between the parties through their respective counsel as follows: RECITALS WHEREAS, on February 7, 2023, the Court entered a Peremptory Writ of Mandate in this matter; WHEREAS, on July 27, 2023, Respondent Orange County Sanitation District timely filed a Return on the Peremptory Writ of Mandate (the "Return"); I STIPULATION DISCHARGING THE PREEMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE AND DISMISSING THE CASE; 1786198.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 13-66 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 lL 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Petitioners previously requested, and the Court set, a hearing on the Return for November 3, 2023; WHEREAS, the parties now agree that the Peremptory Writ of Mandate should be discharged; WHEREAS, the parties agree the hearing set for November 3, 2023 should be vacated; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that the case should be dismissed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: 1. The Peremptory Writ of Mandate should be discharged. 2. The November 3, 2023, hearing date should be vacated. 3. This case should be dismissed. DATED: August 28, 2023 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC DATED: August 24, 2023 By:/s/Bradley R. Hogin BRADLEY R. HOGIN RICIA R. HAGER Attorneys for Respondents ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT and ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOSSAMAN LLP By: P. ERSKINE JOHN J. FLYNN III Attorney for Petitioner BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC 2 STIPULATION DISCHARGING THE PREEMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE AND DISMISSING THE CASE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1786198.1 13-67 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties having entered into a written stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Peremptory Writ of Mandate issued in this case on February 7, 2023 is hereby discharged. 2. The hearing on the Return on the Peremptory Writ of Mandate set for November 3, 2023, is hereby vacated. 3. This case is dismissed. DATED: 08/28/2023 HON. WILLIAM CLASTER JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT STIPULATION DISCHARGING THE PREEMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE AND DISMISSING THE CASE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1786198.1 13-68 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 W STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; I am employed by WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART in the County of Orange at 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200, Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7670. On August 28, 2023. I served the foregoing document(s) described as STIPULATION DISCHARGING THE PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE AND DISMISSING THE CASE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 9 El In by placing the true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as stated on the attached mailing list; byy pplacin ❑ t1h� original ❑ a true copy thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes aadresseSas follows: (BY MAIL) I placed said envelope(s) for collection and mailing, following ordinary busine practices, at the business off ces of WOODRUFF SPRADLIN &SMART and an ressed as shown on the attached service hst, for deposit in the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with the practice of WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART for collection and processing correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and said envelope(s) will be deposited with the United States Postal Service on said date in the ordinary course of business. ❑ (BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I placed said documents in envelope(s) for collection follow ingg ordinary business practices, at the business offices of WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART, and addressed as shown on the attached service list, for collection and delivery to a courier authorized by GLS to receive said documents, with delivery fees provided for. I am readily familiar with the practices of WOODRUFF, SPRADLIN & SMART for collection and processing of documents for overnight delivery, and said envelope(s) will be deposited for receipt by _GLS on said date in the ordinary course of business. 0 (BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE) I caused the above -referenced document to be transmitted to the interested parties via electronic mail as stated on the attached Service List. I1M 0 (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I delivered such envelope(s) by hand to the offices of the addressee(s). (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. Executed on August 28, 2023, at Costa Mesa, California. Is/Katie E. Kane Katie E. Kane 2 STIPULATION DISCHARGING THE PREEMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE AND DISMISSING THE CASE; 1786198.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 13-69 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BA YSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LL C V. ORANGE CO UNTY SANITA TION DISTRICT ET. AL. CASE NO. 30-2021-01194238 SERVICE LIST NOSSAMAN LLP John P. Erskine, Esq. jerskine@nossaman.com John J. Flynn III, Esq. jflynn@nossaman.com 18101 Von Karman Ave. Suite 1800 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: 949-83 3 -7800 Facsimile: 949-833-7878 Attorneys for Petitioner STIPULATION DISCHARGING THE PREEMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE AND DISMISSING THE CASE; 1786198.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 13-70 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 23 of 28 EXHIBIT "F" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Project -specific conditions are in italics) Planning Division 1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plans, and building elevations stamped and dated with the date of this approval (except as modified by applicable conditions of approval). 2. The Project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 3. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. A material violation of any of those laws in connection with the use may be caused the revocation of this Major Site Development Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Coastal Development Permit. 4. The major site development review and coastal development permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Sections 20.54.060 and 21.54.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code unless an extension is otherwise granted. 5. Any change in operational characteristics, expansion in the area, or other modification to the approved plans, shall require an amendment to this Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit or the processing of a new Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit. 6. A copy of the Resolution, including conditions of approval Exhibit "A" shall be incorporated into the Building Division and field sets of plans before issuance of the building permits. 7. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect. These plans shall incorporate drought -tolerant plantings and water -efficient irrigation practices, and the plans shall be approved by the Planning Division. 8. All landscape materials and irrigation systems shall be maintained by the approved landscape plan. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and growing condition and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. All landscaped areas shall be kept free of weeds and debris. All irrigation systems shall be kept operable, including adjustments, replacements, repairs, and cleaning as part of regular maintenance. 9. The site shall not be excessively illuminated based on the luminance recommendations of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, or, in the opinion of the Director 13-71 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 24 of 28 of Community Development, the illumination creates an unacceptable negative impact on surrounding land uses or environmental resources. The Director may order the dimming of light sources or other remediation upon finding that the site is excessively illuminated. 10. Prior to construction, the applicant shall prepare a photometric study in conjunction with a final lighting plan for approval by the Planning Division. The survey shall show that lighting values are I" or less at all property lines. 11. All exterior lighting shall be shielded with light rays confined within the boundaries of the Property. Site lighting shall not create a public nuisance by shining onto public streets or adjacent sites. 12. All mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be fully screened from view from East Coast Highway, Bayside Drive, and the surrounding properties (including from above) and shall be sound attenuated in accordance with Chapter 10.26 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 13. The odor control room shall be screened with louvers. The mechanical equipment shall be screened from view of future adjacent residents. 14. Site lighting shall be designed so light generated on -site does not spill on to adjoining properties or rights -of -way. On -site lighting shall be designed so that light sources are not visible from East Coast Highway, Bayside Drive, or from adjacent properties. 15. Prior to construction, the applicant shall pay any unpaid administrative costs associated with the processing of this application to the Planning Division. 16. All noise generated by the proposed use shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 10.26 and other applicable noise control requirements of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. The maximum noise shall be limited to no more than depicted below for the specified periods unless the ambient noise level is higher: Between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM Between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM Location Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Residential Property 45dBA 55dBA 40dBA 50dBA Residential Property located within 100 feet of a commercial property 45dBA 60dBA 45dBA 50dBA Mixed Use Property 45dBA 60dBA 45dBA 50dBA Commercial Property N/A 65dBA N/A 60dBA 17. All trash shall be stored within the building or within dumpsters stored in the trash enclosure (three walls and a self -latching gate) or otherwise screened from view of neighboring properties, except when placed for pick-up by refuse collection agencies. The trash enclosure shall have a decorative solid roof for aesthetic and screening purposes. 13- 72 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 25 of 28 18. The exterior of the Project shall be always maintained free of litter and graffiti. The owner or operator shall provide for daily removal of trash, litter debris, and graffiti from the premises and on all abutting sidewalks within 20 feet of the premises. 19. The applicant shall ensure that the trash dumpsters and/or receptacles are maintained to control odors. This may include the provision of either fully self-contained dumpsters or periodic steam cleaning of the dumpsters if deemed necessary by the Planning Division. Cleaning and maintenance of trash dumpsters shall be done in compliance with the provisions of Title 14, including all future amendments (including Water Quality related requirements). 20. Deliveries and refuse collection for the facility shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and Saturdays and between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on Sundays and Federal holidays unless otherwise approved by the Director of Community Development and may require an amendment to this approval. 21. Prior to construction, a waterproofing curb or similar design feature shall be constructed around the proposed structures as an adaptive flood protection device based on the State of California's Sea Level Rise Guidance H++ Scenario, per the approved plans and Coastal Hazards Report dated October 2023. Flood shields (sandbags and other methods) can be deployed across the openings to protect and prevent flooding to the structure. 22. Prior to construction, the property owner shall submit a notarized signed letter acknowledging all hazards present at the site, assuming the risk of injury or damage from such hazards, unconditionally waiving any claims of damage against the City from such hazards, and to indemnify and hold harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements, and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City's approval of the development. 23. This approval does not authorize any new or existing improvements (including landscaping) on California Coastal Permit Jurisdiction, State tidelands, or public beaches. Any improvements located on tidelands, submerged lands, and/or lands that may be subject to the public trust shall require a coastal development permit (CDP) approved by the California Coastal Commission (Coastal Commission). Prior to construction, the applicant shall provide a copy of said coastal development permit or CDP waiver or documentation from the Coastal Commission that subject improvements are not subject to the permit requirements of the Coastal Act and/or not located within the permit jurisdiction of the Coastal Commission. 24. No demolition or construction materials, equipment debris, or waste, shall be placed or stored in a location that would enter the sensitive habitat, receiving waters, or storm drains or result in impacts to environmentally sensitive habitat areas, streams, the 13-73 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 26 of 28 beach, wetlands or their buffers. No demolition or construction materials shall be stored on public property. 25. The applicant is responsible for compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). In compliance with the MBTA, grading, brush removal, building demolition, tree trimming, and similar construction activities shall occur between August 16 and January 31, outside of the peak nesting period. If such activities must occur inside the peak nesting season from February 1 to August 15, compliance with the following is required to prevent the taking of native birds under MBTA: A. The construction area shall be inspected for active nests. If birds are observed flying from a nest or sitting on a nest, it can be assumed that the nest is active. Construction activity within 300 feet of an active nest shall be delayed until the nest is no longer active. Continue to observe the nest until the chicks have left the nest and activity is no longer observed. When the nest is no longer active, construction activity can continue in the nest area. B. It is a violation of state and federal law to kill or harm a native bird. To ensure compliance, consider hiring a biologist to assist with the survey for nesting birds, and to determine when it is safe to commence construction activities. If an active nest is found, one or two short follow-up surveys will be necessary to check on the nest and determine when the nest is no longer active. 26. Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Good Housekeeping Practices (GHPs) shall be implemented before and throughout the duration of construction activity as designated in the Construction Erosion Control Plan. 27. The discharge of any hazardous materials into storm sewer systems or receiving waters shall be prohibited. Machinery and equipment shall be maintained and washed in confined areas specifically designed to control runoff. A designated fueling and vehicle maintenance area with appropriate berms and protection to prevent spillage shall be provided as far away from storm drain systems or receiving waters as possible. 28. Debris from demolition shall be removed from work areas each day and removed from the project site within 24 hours of the completion of the project. Stockpiles and construction materials shall be covered, enclosed on all sites, not stored in contact with the soil, and located as far away as possible from drain inlets and any waterway. 29. Trash and debris shall be disposed of in proper trash and recycling receptacles at the end of each construction day. Solid waste, including excess concrete, shall be disposed of in adequate disposal facilities at a legal disposal site or recycled at a recycling facility. 30. The Applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program of the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Environmental Impact Report No.5-67 (SCH2O16111031). 13-74 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 27 of 28 31. At the request and to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, the Applicant shall make future alterations to the exterior fagade for consistency and compatibility with the architecture of a future approved Back Bay Landing mixed -use project. 32. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements, and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City's approval of Back Bay Pump Station Replacement including, but not limited to, a major site development review, conditional use permit, and coastal development permit (PA2023-0076). This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorney's fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit, or proceeding whether incurred by the applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing the such proceeding. The applicant shall indemnify the City for all the City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages that which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions outlined in this condition. The applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City under the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. Fire Department 33. Premise identification shall be provided per the Newport Beach Fire Department guidelines. 34. A knox box for emergency access shall be provided. 35. NFPA 704 Placarding for onsite hazards shall be provided. Public Works Department 36. The Traffic Control Plan shall be further review and approved by the City of Newport Beach and Caltrans prior to construction. 37. All work within Caltrans right-of-way requires an encroachment permit from Caltrans. 38. The Applicant shall comply with the approved Construction Management Plan and Traffic Control Plan. Any deviations to these plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director prior to implementation. 39. The Applicant shall maintain all landscaping in the public right-of-way adjacent to East Coast Highway, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. 13-75 Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 Paae 28 of 28 40. Construction activities shall comply with Section 10.28.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Noise -generating construction activities shall be consistent with a Traffic Management Plan and Construction Management Plan approved by the Public Works Director. 41. All conditions and provisions stated in the Temporary, Non -Exclusive and Revocable License Agreement Between the City of Newport Beach and the Orange County Sanitation District for Use of City Property shall be adhered to. 42. The construction staging area at Lower Castaways park shall not impact the public's ability to access designated public parking. 13-76 Attachment D Planning Commission Staff Report from January 18, 2024 (No Attachments) 13-77 PQR �. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH n PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT cgL'FOP- SUBJECT: OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) ■ Major Site Development Review ■ Coastal Development Permit SITE LOCATION: 250 East Coast Highway and 100 Dover Drive APPLICANT: Orange County Sanitation District OWNER: Orange County Sanitation District PLANNER: David Lee, Senior Planner 949-644-3225, dlee@newportbeachca.gov PROJECT SUMMARY January 18, 2024 Agenda Item No. 3 A major site development review and coastal development permit to allow the demolition of an existing pump station (approximately 4,800 square feet) and associated force mains and construction of a new pump station (approximately 7,500 square feet) and associated force mains at 250 East Coast Highway. Additionally, the project includes a temporary construction staging area at Lower Castaways Park at 100 Dover Drive (Lower Castaways Park). RECOMMENDATION 1) Conduct a public hearing; 2) Find this project complies with the California Environmental Quality Act as it is consistent with the certified EIR for Project No. 5-67, also known as the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project as approved by the Orange County Sanitation District, and the subsequent certified Addendum to the EIR; and 3) Adopt Resolution No. PC2024-002 approving a Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit (PA2023-0076) (Attachment No. PC 1). 13- 78 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 2 VICINITY MAP Construction Staging Area (Lower Castaways Park) �$ Bridge y5 x Pump Station 7 - New force main vault ... !:2A W GENERAL PLAN ZONING LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZONING CURRENT USE ON -SITE Mixed -Use Water 2 MU-W2 Back Bay Landing PC-9 OCSD Ba Bridge Pump Station NORTH MU-W2 PC-9 RV and Boat Storage and Marina Parkin SOUTH Recreational and Marine Commercial Recreational Balboa Marina Commercial CM and Marine (CM) EAST Multiple Residential (RM) Bayside Village Mobile Mobile Home Park Home Park PC-1 WEST MU-W2 PC-9 RV and Boat Storage and Marina Parking 13-79 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 3 INTRODUCTION Project Setting and Background The subject property is located on East Coast Highway between Bayside Drive and the Bay Bridge. Adjacent to the property is the Bayside Village Marina, which includes visitor serving uses (i.e. Pearson's Port seafood market and Southwind Kayak rentals), recreational vehicle and boat storage, and marina parking lot. This adjacent property is intended to be developed with a future mixed -use waterfront village in accordance with Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9)1. Additional surrounding uses include the Bayside Village Mobile Home Park to the north and east across Bayside Drive, a restaurant (Sol Mexican Cocina) and the Balboa Marina to the south across East Coast Highway, and various commercial uses to the southeast including a gas station, shopping center, and automobile dealerships. The property consists of an existing wastewater pump station known as the Bay Bridge Pump Station (BBPS), which was constructed in 1966 and has been operated by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) (Figure 1, below). The existing BBPS includes two single -story buildings, a perimeter wall with a vehicular access gate from East Coast Highway, and outdoor mechanical equipment that is not screened from public view. The BBPS also includes force mains which tunnel under the bay to the western side of the Bay Bridge into an existing vault that straddles the public right-of-way and private property. OCSD has aging infrastructure throughout the City of Newport Beach (City) and frequently undertakes projects to repair or replace sewer main lines, pump stations, and other equipment. In 1995, OCSD upgraded the BBPS with new pumps, piping and ventilation, and in 2014, added an additional pump for increased capacity and reliability. The existing pump station is over 50 years old and requires replacement to serve the city. The station pumps wastewater flow generated by residents and businesses west of Newport Bay, including Balboa Island and Crystal Cove, and ultimately to a wastewater treatment facility located in the City of Huntington Beach. The project also includes a temporary construction staging area proposed at Lower Castaways Park at 1100 Dover Drive. Lower Castaways is a City -owned park that is approximately four acres, located directly north of West Coast Highway and directly east of Dover Drive. Castaways Park, which is a larger, approximately 16-acre park, is located directly to the north. Lower Castaways is improved with public parking spaces and is used as access to the bay for boat launching, but is also utilized for temporary construction staging and parking to accommodate public works and/or large construction projects. While the property is zoned under the Castaways Marina Planned Community Text (PC- 37) and was originally intended to be developed as a commercial marina with boat slips by the prior property owner, the property was dedicated to the City in 2008 as a public PC-9 was amended by the City Council on Amended 26, 2016 through Ordinance 2016-8. Since the approval of the City Council was legislative only, a future site development review and coastal development permit is required for the Back Bay Landing mixed -use village project to be implemented. 13-80 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 4 benefit. The City is investigating opportunities to further develop the site recreational and marine related uses. Figure 1: Existing Bay Bridge Pump Station While the existing property is 4,879 square feet in area, OCSD is acquiring an additional 9,713 square feet of land from the adjacent property at 100 Bayside Drive, which is the site of the future Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Village. The acquisition, which is for the purpose of constructing a larger pump station facility, is a result of an eminent domain case wherein OCSD has secured an order of immediate possession expanding the property to a total area of 14,592 square feet. A lot line adjustment is not required, as OCSD will record a final order of condemnation at the end of the eminent domain case, which will have the effect of creating the new parcel boundaries and will be recorded with the County Assessor's Office. Project Description In order to upgrade the aging BBPS, OCSD requests a major site development review and coastal development permit for the following: 1. The demolition of an existing pump station and construction of a new pump station (total of approximately 7,500 square feet) that includes a new underground pump room (3,616 square feet), electrical room (1,175 square feet), odor control facility (1,781 square feet), and a generator room (672 square feet) (Figure 2, below); 13-81 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 5 Figure 2: Proposed Pump Station Site Rendering 2. The installation of new, 25-inch dual force mains by micro -tunneling beneath East Coast Highway from the Project across the Newport Bay Channel, to a new valve vault located below grade in the public right-of-way at the southeast corner of the intersection of West Coast Highway and Dover Drive, where the existing force mains are to be abandoned in place (Figure 3, below); and f If �� Electrical Room iJnderground� Pump Station Connect to Existing Force Mains --` R 72-inch RCP casing Microtu nnel ing Air Release Valve Vault Figure 3: Location of Proposed Force Mains in Red Generator Room� -Odor Control I-4; Microtunneling Launching Shaft T-- I 3. The temporary use of a portion of the City -owned Lower Castaways Park as a construction staging yard. OCSD proposes to use approximately 18,000 square feet of the southwest corner of Lower Castaways Park, which is to be fenced and screened. This allows the Applicant to temporary locate office trailers, stage and store construction equipment and materials, and provide vehicle parking. Project Plans are provided in Attachment No. PC 7. The project is subject to review and permitting approval by numerous agencies including the Orange County Sanitation District, Caltrans, California Coastal Commission (CCC), California State Lands Commission, 13-82 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 6 California Department of Fish and Wildlife, National Marine Fisheries Service, Army Corps of Engineers, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, private property owners, and the City. Since a significant portion of the new force mains are proposed to be constructed in tidelands and in CCC permit jurisdiction, OCSD must obtain a separate coastal development permit from the CCC. All portions of the Project located in the City's permitting jurisdiction, including the pump station site at 250 East Coast Highway and the proposed temporary construction staging area at 100 Dover Drive, are located within the coastal zone and therefore, the project requires a coastal development permit. DISCUSSION Anal General Plan, Zoning Code, and Local Coastal Program 250 East Coast Highway — BBPS Site The property at 250 East Coast Highway is categorized as Mixed -Use Water 2 (MU-W2) by the General Plan Land Use Element, which is applied to waterfront locations in which marine related uses may be intermixed with buildings that provide residential on the upper floors. The property is a part of Anomaly 80 of the General Plan Land Use Plan. Anomaly 80 includes the 250 East Coast Highway as well as 100 Bayside Drive, which is the site of the future Back Bay Landing mixed -use village project, and sets a development limit of 131,290 square feet for nonresidential development within the Anomaly. Although currently under developed, the PC-9 zoning district sets nonresidential development limits for the future Back Bay Landing development, which is 61,534 square feet for commercial and 32,500 square feet for dry stack boat storage, for a total of 94,034 square feet of future nonresidential development. The addition of the 7,244-square-foot pump station to the future Back Bay Landing mixed -use village project would result in a total of 101,278 square feet, which is within the development limit of Anomaly 80 of the General Plan Land Use Element. The property is categorized as Mixed -Use Water Related (MU-W) by the Coastal Land Use Plan, which is intended to provide for commercial development on or near the bay in a manner that will encourage the continuation of coastal dependent and coastal -related uses and visitor -serving uses, as well as allow for the development of mixed -use structures with residential uses above the ground floor. Additionally, CLUP Policy 2.1.9.1 limits the maximum floor area to what is established in General Plan Land Use Element Anomaly 80, as discussed above. The property is located in the Back Bay Landing Planned Community (PC-9) Zoning and Coastal Zoning District. Specifically, the property is categorized by PC-9 as Planning Area 1 (Mixed -Use Area) where a wastewater pump station is a permitted use. Per Section 2 of PC-9 (Development Limits and Land Use Plan), the Orange County Sanitation District wastewater pump station shall not be counted towards square footage development limits 13-83 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 7 of the PC. Per Section 3 of PC-9 (Permitted Uses), the initial construction of any new structure, or the significant reconstruction or major addition to an existing structure requires a Site Development Review pursuant to Section VI of PC-9. Lower Castaways Park — Temporary Construction Staging Area Lower Castaways Park at 100 Dover Drive is designated Recreational and Marine Commercial (CM) by the General Plan Land Use Element and is located in the Castaways Marina Planned Community (PC-37) Zoning District. It is located in the coastal zone and is designated as Recreational and Marine Commercial (CM -A) — (0.0 — 0.30 FAR) by the CLUP and is located within the Castaways Marina Planned Community (PC-37) Coastal Zoning District. OCSD is proposing to use an approximately 18,000-square-foot portion of the 4-acre park for temporary construction staging purposes. Per Section IV.B (Permitted Uses) of PC-37, temporary structures and uses are listed as permitted uses. Additionally, per Table 21.26-5 of the NBMC, temporary uses are listed as allowed uses. Therefore, the temporary construction staging at Lower Castaways is consistent with the NBMC. Site Development Review Findings Pursuant to Subsection VII (C) (Back Bay Landing PCDP Implementation/Site Development Review — Findings) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC), the Planning Commission must make the following findings before approving a Major Site Development Review: A. The development shall be in compliance with the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan, including design guidelines, and any other applicable plan or criteria related to the development. B. The development shall not be incompatible with the character of the neighboring uses and surrounding sites. C. The development shall be sited and designed to maximize the aesthetic quality of the project as viewed from surrounding roadways, properties, and waterfront, with special consideration given to providing a variety of building heights, massing, and architectural treatments to provide public views through the site. D. Site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas, pedestrian and vehicular access ways, landscaping and other site features shall give proper consideration to functional aspects of site development. E. The development shall not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. As previously discussed, the proposed project is within the development limits of the MU- W2 and General Plan Anomaly 80, and is recognized as permitted use by PC-9. The project is consistent with the various development standards required by PC-9. Per 13-84 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 8 Section IV (B) (Development Standards — Permitted Height of Structures), the maximum building height within Planning Area 1 shall not exceed 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs. The proposed electrical and generator building features a sloped roof design with parapet walls which is 22 feet high. The proposed odor control building features a flat roof design with parapet walls which is 15.5 feet high. All proposed buildings comply with the required height requirements of PC-9. Per Section IV (A) (Development Standards — Setback Requirements), a minimum 10- foot landscape buffer is required to be provided to the back of sidewalk, where the project provides a 10-foot buffer only on a small portion of the East Coast Highway frontage. However, per Standard A.4.d of Section IV, encroachments may be permitted through a Site Development Review. While the proposed landscaping buffer does not fully meet the standard, landscape along East Coast Highway varies between approximately 9 feet and 6 feet in depth. Staff believes that this meets the intent of PC-9's landscaping standards, which includes reflecting the project's coastal marine location, providing creative plant combinations, installing a highly efficient irrigation system, and preserving and enhancing view corridors. The project landscaping includes low-water, drought tolerant plants including a mixture of deer grass, slipper plant, foxtail agave, and red yucca plant types located at the East Coast Highway frontage. Since the project includes property line walls along East Coast Highway for security purposes, the proposed landscape is appropriate to break up the mass of the walls and improve the overall aesthetics of the project as viewed from East Coast Highway. The proposed plants are relatively low profile in height and will not diminish any view corridors as identified in PC-9 (Figure 4, below). Figure 4: Landscape Buffer and Building Elevation Along East Coast Highway Frontage Section V (Design Guidelines) of PC-9 provide guidelines intended to express the desired character of the future mixed -use waterfront village that helps achieve overall consistency of architectural quality. The project is designed to fit with a coastal architectural theme of the future adjacent mixed -use village development, incorporating a modern design with a cantilevered roof overhang and an integration of materials and details inspired by the surrounding coastal context. The buildings avoid long, continuous blank walls with a 13-85 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 9 simple faqade composition of a base and top separated by different colors. The design includes a variety of colors and finishes such as stone and stucco to reduce the visual bulk and scale of the building faqade. There is a mixture of heights and roof types (sloping and flat) to create visual interest, as well as provide rhythm, dynamic building forms, and shadows (Figure 5, below). Figure 5. Rendering of BBPS Electrical Room While the proposed pump station is aesthetically pleasing as a standalone development, it has been designed per PC-9 design guidelines so that it would be visually compatible with the future Back Bay Landing mixed -use village. Per Section V.D.10, the pump station will be aesthetically improved with entire new buildings and perimeter walls to reflect PC- 9 design standards. The project considers future residents, businesses, and patrons of the Back Bay Landing mixed -use village by including louvers designed to conceal the odor control facility and screening for on -site mechanical equipment from above. While the new pump station buildings are 22 and 15.5 feet high, taller and larger than the existing pump station buildings, it is not out of scale with the surrounding uses and/or future adjacent developments. The overall layout of structures is efficiently arranged on a constrained lot and is designed to accommodate service vehicle access and maneuvering requirements. Currently, vehicular access to the existing pump station is through a curb cut on East Coast Highway, followed by gates that are opened for vehicles to access. The existing access is challenging due to traffic on East Coast Highway and the necessity for vehicles to drive across the public right-of-way. While an access gate will remain adjacent to East Coast Highway, it will be used only for when access at the Bayside Drive entrance is temporarily hindered. To improve access, OCSD proposes access through a permanent access easement taken through Bayside Drive and into the Back Bay Landing property at 100 Bayside Drive (Figure 6, below). 13-86 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 10 ENTRANCE & EKf -bN eav sioE oawe - b 4 879 r - - 9,713 SF t &.ice t3.0 ❑ EXPANSION PROPERTY PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT EXISTING OCSD PROPERTY TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXISTING OCSD PROPERTY IN PUBLIC ROW TEMPORARY ROAD EASEMENT Figure 6: Proposed Site Access Easements The proposed project is not detrimental to the growth of the City, nor does it constitute as a hazard to the public. The existing pump station provides essential infrastructure to the surrounding community for waste management and has existed in this location for many decades. OCSD has aging infrastructure throughout the City and it is typical for utilities such as this pump station to be replaced and upgraded. The project improves an existing pump station, which serves the overall community as part of a larger wastewater collection system. Unlike the existing pump station, the proposed pump station includes an odor control room that is included to mitigate potential odors from the Property. The odor control room includes treatment for both liquid and vapor phase waste. Additionally, the new pump station proposes equipment with lower noise. The highest noise producer of the project is the standby generator, which is to be used in emergency situation if there is a power outage. The generator is proposed to be enclosed in a building with sound attenuation panels and is not expected to negatively affect surrounding existing or future uses. As conditioned, the facility will need to comply with City noise standards. OCSD has provided a Site Photometric Plan and Lighting Plans which describe the Project's lighting around the Property. There are lights proposed to be attached to the Electrical Room, Generator Room, and Odor Control Area, with minimal lighting around the interior of the perimeter security walls. The lighting is conditioned to comply with the outdoor lighting standards of the NBMC and will not negatively affect surrounding uses. As conditioned, the Community Development Director may order the dimming of light sources or other remediation upon finding that the site is excessively illuminated. 13-87 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 11 Finally, the proposed upgrade of the aging pump station is necessary for the benefit of the City. If the pump station facility were to fail, sewage would build up in upstream sewers and could result in an overflow from the lowest elevation manhole upstream from the property. Furthermore, backups and/or spills could occur at specific residences or businesses that have sewer laterals lower than the lowest elevation manhole. If the force mains in the bay were to fail, a sewage spill could occur into the bay. Coastal Development Permit Findings The BBPS property and the temporary construction staging site at Lower Castaways Park are both located within the coastal zone and require a coastal development permit. Per Section 21.52.015.E of the NBMC, the required findings to approve a coastal development permit are as follows: A. Conforms to all applicable sections of the certified Local Coastal Program. B. Conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act if the project is located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the coastal zone. Compliance with Local Coastal Program As previously discussed, both the BBPS property and temporary staging area are consistent with their respective CLUP land use categories and coastal zoning districts. The proposed pump station building heights are 22 feet (sloped roof) for the Electrical and Generator Room and 15.5 feet (flat roof) for the Odor Control Area, where PC-9 limits development to a maximum height of 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs. The proposed pump station, while factoring in the future Back Bay Landing mixed -use village, comply with CLUP Policy 2.1.9.1, which limits the maximum non-residential floor area to 131,290 square feet per General Plan Land Use Plan Anomaly 80. With the addition of the proposed 7,244-square-foot pump station, the total projected non- residential floor area of Anomaly 80 would be 101,289 square feet. Coastal Hazards A Coastal Hazards Report and Sea Level Rise Analysis was prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc. dated October 1, 2023 (Attachment No. PC 2). The current maximum bay water elevation is 7.7 NAVD 88 (North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88) Based on the State of California's Sea Level Rise Guidance, the sea level rise for the Los Angeles region is 6.6 feet NAVD 88, under the H++ scenario, which is a projection for extreme sea -level rise. Since the pump station is considered critical infrastructure and has greater impacts than typical structures in case of failure, it is required to be analyzed under the H++ scenario. Since the life expectancy of the new pump station is approximately 50 years, the 6.6-foot sea level rise (SLR) for the year 2080 is appropriate to use for evaluation of the project. Therefore, the sea level is estimated to reach approximately 14.3 feet NAVD 88 (7.7 + 6.6 feet NAVD 88). The finished floor elevation of the electrical OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 12 room and entrance to the dry well is 15.5 feet, which provides more than adequate protection from sea level rise. The generator room has a finished floor elevation of 14.17 feet. While slightly under the 14.3-foot sea level rise elevation projection, the generator is proposed to be mounted on a 2-foot high fuel tank and the generator panels will be mounted 3.5 feet above the finished floor, providing adequate protection from flooding. For the Odor Control area, there is a proposed finished floor elevation of 14 feet. Equipment within the area is proposed to be mounted on pads higher than 14.3 feet NAVD 88, to protect from cases of flooding. Additionally, temporary flood barriers such as sand bags can be deployed for openings during flooding situations. Finally, the Applicant is proposing to waterproof a portion of the Odor Control area's block walls to provide additional protection from flooding. Force Main Upgrade The Project includes the construction of upgraded replacement force mains, which run from the Property onto the western side of the Bay Bridge through micro -tunneling. The new force mains are an upgrade to aging infrastructure that will better serve the surrounding area and is screened from public view within an existing vault. The existing vault, which is located on both the public right-of-way and private property, is to be abandoned in place. The public right-of-way area where the new vault is proposed includes new landscaping to further enhance the area for pedestrians, motorists, and nearby residents. Construction Staging Area and Management Plan The project includes temporary construction staging at Lower Castaways Park, which is approximately 1,100 feet west of the BBPS property, and across the Bay Bridge. Lower Castaways Park is not identified as a Public Park by the CLUP. OCSD submitted a Construction Management Plan (CMP) prepared by Arcadis U.S., Inc., dated October 2023 (Attachment No. PC 3), which documents the construction phase implementation, construction requirements and quality control, and traffic control associated with the construction of the Project. The CMP discusses construction easements at the Property for construction access as well as offsite staging areas at Lower Castaways Park and the Orange County Sanitation District Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. A Temporary License Agreement was approved by City Council on September 12, 2023, allowing for the siting of office trailers, temporary staging and storage of construction equipment and materials, and the parking of vehicles to support the Project during construction. The agreement is for a limited basis only and includes a term until December 31, 2028, or the completion of the Project, whichever first occurs. The temporary construction staging does not alter access to the bay. OCSD is only using an approximately 18,000-square-foot portion of the 4-acre park, which has been historically and consistently used for construction staging and off -site parking since the City acquired the property. The staging site is buffered and screened from adjacent rights - of -way by existing landscaping to remain. The portion of the park that is open and 13-89 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 13 available for public parking and access will remain unaffected by the Project. The public access for small vessel launching into the bay is also proposed to be unaffected. The CMP also includes a Traffic Control Plan which includes closing of necessary sidewalks during construction hours and re -opening during non -working hours. The Traffic Control Plan has been preliminarily reviewed by the City's Public Works department and has been determined to be sufficient to minimize traffic impacts during the construction period. Further review of a final Traffic Control Plan is required by Condition of Approval No. 25 in the draft resolution prior to the start of construction (Attachment No. PC 1). Public Views East Coast Highway and Bayside Drive (south of East Coast Highway) are identified as a Coastal View Roads by the CLUP. The BBPS property currently includes multiple pump station buildings, visible mechanical equipment, security block walls and vegetation which partially impair the view of the back bay. Additionally, the adjacent RV and boat storage parking lot includes many vehicles that also impair the view of the bay. The proposed reconstruction of the BBPS includes a 22-foot-high electrical and generator room above a subterranean pump room on the west of the property. There is also a 15.5-foot-high odor control building to the east of the property. Site walls (approximately 8 feet high) are proposed for security purposes but do not exceed the height of the proposed buildings. From East Coast Highway, the project does not significantly impair the existing view of the bay and maintains a view of the Back Bay bluff to the north (Figure 6, below). Figure 6. Existing View (Above) and Proposed View (Below) with Northern Bluff Visible 13-90 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 14 Two nearby Public Viewpoints are identified as part of a pedestrian trail at Castaways Park, located approximately 1,500 feet northwest of the Property. When viewing the Property from Castaways Park, East Coast Highway, the Back Bay and marina, and Recreational Vehicle Storage are within immediate view, while a commercial shopping center and Promontory Point residences are located further east across East Coast Highway. Although the Project proposes to replace the existing pump station buildings with taller buildings, the views from Castaways Park are mostly unchanged. Views to parts of East Coast Highway may be impaired by the new structures, but the marina, commercial shopping center, and Promontory Point are not affected (Figure 5, below). The project does not interfere with any of the identified Public Viewpoints due to the large distances from them. The project may be in the distant viewshed of the Public Viewpoints, but will not interfere with the public views that are currently provided. A public view impact analysis has been provided in Attachment No. PC 3. Figure 5: View Simulation of Existing BBPS (Above) and Proposed BBPS (Below) from Castaways Park 13-91 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 15 Public Access The BBPS property does not currently provide nor inhibit public coastal access. The property is located in close proximity to future vertical and lateral access to the Back Bay, as designated by the CLUP, through the adjacent Back Bay Landing project site (once developed). The future lateral access is required to be a public bayfront promenade along the entire waterfront edge of the Back Bay Landing property connecting to other public access trails. Access to the bay remains available Back Bay Landing. The replacement of the existing pump station will not impact the future bayfront promenade and therefore, will not impact public access to local coastal resources. The project also includes installation of force mains in a new subterranean utility vault within a small portion of the public right-of-way area on the southwestern side of the Bay Bridge (see Vicinity Map on Page 2, above). This public -right-of-way includes an existing fence which leads to a walkway to the north side of the bridge. There is no direct access to the water in the area of the vault and therefore the Project does not affect public access in this location. As previously discussed, the temporary construction staging at Lower Castaways Park only will occupy a portion of the park and will not affect existing public parking or access to the bay. Environmental Review Pursuant to Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR is required unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: a. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; b. Substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or c. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable due diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; 13-92 OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 16 Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; iii. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerable different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. In February of 2021, the Applicant approved the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) and certified an EIR for Project No. 5-67. On April 1, 2021, Bayside Village Marina filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate against the Applicant in Orange County Superior Court alleging that the EIR failed to comply with CEQA on numerous grounds (Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30- 2021-01194238.) On December 16, 2022, the Court issued a ruling that upheld the EIR in all respects except one. Thereafter, the Court issued a limited writ directing OC Sanitation District to sufficiently identify project construction staging areas. In response to the Court ruling, OC Sanitation District has prepared an Addendum to the EIR for the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Addendum) which was certified by OC Sanitation District Board on July 23, 2023. Specifically, the Addendum clarifies the use of the Lower Castaways Park in the City as a construction staging area and adds a new construction staging area at OC Sanitation District's Plant No. 2, located in the City of Huntington Beach, for soil storage/drying activities and determines that Project No. 5-67, as modified by the Addendum, would not result in any new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts in accordance with Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines. A link to both the EIR and subsequent Addendum to the EIR are included in Attachment No. PC 5 to this Staff Report. Public Notice Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to all owners of property within 300 feet of the boundaries of the affected sites (excluding intervening rights -of -way and waterways) including the applicant, and posted on the subject property at least 10 days before the scheduled meeting, consistent with the provisions of the Municipal Code. Additionally, the item appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the city website. 13-93 Prepared by: avid Lee, enior Planner ATTACHMENTS OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) Planning Commission, January 18, 2024 Page 17 Submitted by: Jai e Murillo, AICP Acting Deputy Community Development Director PC 1 Draft Resolution with Findings and Conditions PC 2 Coastal Hazards Report PC 3 Public View Analysis PC 4 Construction Management Plan PC 5 Environmental Impact Report and Subsequent Addendum PC 6 Applicant's Project Description PC 7 Project Plans 01 / 18/23 13-94 Attachment E Planning Commission Meeting Minutes from January 18, 2024 and Written Correspondence Submitted 13-95 DocuSign Envelope ID: FB7E1031-6092-4360-8FB9-D97AFC201580 NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS — 100 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE THURSDAY, JANUARY 18, 2024 REGULAR MEETING — 6:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER — 6:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE — Commissioner Lowrey III. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chair Curtis Ellmore, Vice Chair Mark Rosene, Secretary Tristan Harris, Commissioner Brady Barto, Commissioner Jonathan Langford, Commissioner Lee Lowrey, and Commissioner David Salene ABSENT: None Staff Present: Assistant City Manager/Community Development Director Jurjis, Acting Deputy Community Development Director Jaime Murillo, Assistant City Attorney Yolanda Summerhill, City Traffic Engineer Brad Sommers, Senior Planner David Lee, Administrative Assistant Clarivel Rodriguez, and Department Assistant Savannah Martinez IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS Regarding the reasonable accommodation case at 1691 Orchard Drive, Jim Mosher thought the hearing officer and Planning Commission were not properly informed about the land use regulations and pre -annexation agreement that apply to Santa Ana Heights. V. REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCES None VI. CONSENT ITEMS ITEM NO. 1 MINUTES OF DECEMBER 21, 2023 Recommended Action: Approve and file Motion made by Secretary Harris and seconded by Vice Chair Rosene to approve the minutes of December 21, 2023, including Mr. Mosher's edits. AYES: Ellmore, Langford, Lowrey, Harris, Rosene, and Salene NOES: None ABSTAIN: Barto ABSENT: None ITEM NO. 2 MINUTES OF JANUARY 4, 2024 Recommended Action: Approve and file Motion made by Vice Chair Rosene and seconded by Commissioner Salene to approve the minutes of January 4, 2024, with Mr. Mosher's edits. Page 1 of 5 13-96 DocuSign Envelope ID: FB7E1031-6092-4360-8FB9-D97AFC201580 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 18, 2024 AYES: Barto, Ellmore, Langford, Lowrey, Harris, Rosene, and Salene NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None VII. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS ITEM NO. 3 BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION (PA2023-0076) Site Location: 250 East Coast Highway and 100 Dover Drive Summary: A major site development review and coastal development permit for the following: • The demolition of an existing pump station and associated force mains and construction a new pump station (total of approximately 7,500 square feet) that includes a new underground pump room, electrical room, odor control facility, and a generator room; • The installation of new, 30-inch dual force mains by micro -tunneling beneath East Coast Highway from the Project across the Newport Bay Channel, to a new valve vault located below grade in the public right-of-way at the southeast corner of the intersection of West Coast Highway and Dover Drive; and • The temporary use of a portion of the City -owned Lower Castaways Park as a construction staging yard. The Applicant proposes to use approximately 18,000 square feet of the southwest corner of Lower Castaways Park, which is to be fenced and screened. This allows the Applicant to temporary locate office trailers, stage and store construction equipment and materials, and provide vehicle parking. Recommended Actions: 1. Conduct a public hearing; 2. Find this project complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as it is consistent with the certified environmental impact report (EIR) for Project No. 5-67, also known as the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Projects as approved by the Orange County Sanitation District, and the subsequent certified Addendum to the EIR; and 3. Adopt Resolution No. PC2024-002 approving a Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit (PA2023-0076). Commissioner Barto recused himself due to personal property within 500 feet of the subject property. Senior Planner Lee used a presentation to outline the Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit for the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Bay Bridge pump station, including the project location, background, adjusted property lines, public views, access to Page 2 of 5 13-97 DocuSign Envelope ID: FB7E1031-6092-4360-8FB9-D97AFC201580 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 18, 2024 Castaways Park, revised conditions of approval, CEQA review, and an additional proposed condition of approval. In response to Commissioner Langford's question regarding consistency with the architectural design of the future Back Bay Landing mixed -use project, Acting Deputy Community Development Director Murillo stated that early discussions for the mixed -use project included a coastal mediterranean architecture, but with possible development changes, staff thought the proposed design of the pump station would fit in better with the future project. In response to Secretary Harris' question regarding status of litigation, Assistant City Attorney Summerhill indicated that the court had a limited order, the addendum was completed and certified this summer, the case is closed, and both parties have agreed to terminate the litigation. The Commissioners disclosed no ex parte communications. Chair Ellmore opened the public hearing. Mike Dorman, Director of Engineering of OCSD, used a presentation to review the Bay Bridge pump station replacement, OCSD mission and service area, Newport Beach pump stations, project overview, existing Bay Bridge pump station, reasons for the project, microtunneling section, new pump station design, and pump station cut section rendering and access. He agreed to the recommended conditions. In response to Commissioner Langford's question, Mr. Dorman confirmed that the station will be at the same capacity as it is now. In response to Vice Chair Rosene's questions, Mr. Dorman clarified that the primary site access is a permanent easement and assumed that the roadway will be used jointly with the Bayside Village Marina during construction and then be integrated into the Back Bay Landing plan. In response to Vice Chair Rosene's inquiry, Harmik Aghanian with Arcadis and design consultant for OCSD, explained the background of the access road and stated that they have past renderings from PC-9. Acting Deputy Community Development Director Murillo stated that PC-9 contains conceptual plans included for exhibits and a coastal architectural theme and the City has not received revised designs from the Back Bay Landing team. In response to Vice Chair Rosene's suggestion to add a depression in the sidewalk (noted on page 177) to help with the transition, Mr. Aghanian stated that the minimum sidewalk is 8-1/2 feet at the driveway entrance and beyond 10 feet to the east side to accommodate chemical delivery trucks. In response to Secretary Harris' questions, Mr. Dorman stated that they have the rights to the property and will be going to court to determine the value of the property, the easement was granted with the eminent domain case, and they are willing to make building color changes to match a neighboring design. He reviewed the process to determine the location. John Erskine, Nossaman LLP partner and representative of the property owners, stated a wonderful working relationship with staff and noted efforts to negotiate a willing seller/purchaser acquisition with the OC San District, having learned a lot from the depositions collected from the four project managers, the challenges of the project, and having tried to work proactively with the OC San District. He relayed that the eminent domain case will go to a jury trial in July and the problems with the project size. Page 3 of 5 13-98 DocuSign Envelope ID: FB7E1031-6092-4360-8FB9-D97AFC201580 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 18, 2024 Michael Gelfand, representing the ownership of the Bayside Village Marina and Back Bay Landing project, noted the impact of the project, suggested the proposal be rejected and recreated by OSCD with community input, traced the project history, and noted alternatives. Jim Mosher reviewed the proposed project design diagrammed on page 177 and made suggestions. Julie Sheffield expressed concern about the access road on Bayside Drive, the impact from the number of trucks, and hours of operation. Mr. Dorman noted the daily truck traffic on the access road and thought the pump station is properly sized to meet the demand. Traffic Engineer Sommers noted a rolled curb in the plans to address an abrupt driveway drop off and beneficial access off Bayside Drive. Acting Deputy Community Development Director Murillo noted that staff worked with OCSD to review many design options, make changes, and justify sizing and indicated that staff believes that OSCD did the best they could to select an architectural theme not knowing what the neighboring mixed -use project will look like in the future. In response to Commissioner Langford's inquiry, Mr. Gelfand suggested that the exterior fagade be changed in the future to match his project and expressed concern for the project footprint, setbacks, easement through the middle of the property, and size. He thought that there was not enough room to add a parking lot behind the easement. Chair Ellmore closed the public hearing. Commissioner Lowrey expressed confusion for the status of the condemnation litigation. Assistant City Attorney Summerhill deferred the issue to the applicant but conveyed that she thought they have the right of possession, and the squabble is over the value. Commissioner Langford expressed concern for the architectural impact with the future Back Bay Landing project. Chair Ellmore reminded the Commissioners to address the matter based on the merits of the application. Commissioner Harris relayed that although the project has made its way through the courts, he does not think it is ideal. Commissioner Lowrey expressed an increased comfort with the project's merits if the matter is settled by a judge. Vice Chair Rosene expressed concern for the project size, location, and thoughtfulness. Chair Ellmore noted future surrounding development is unknown and the Commission needs to focus on the application presented, expressed concern for the size and location, trusted staff's recommendation, and did not find a reason to not approve the project. Page 4 of 5 13-99 DocuSign Envelope ID: FB7E1031-6092-4360-8FB9-D97AFC201580 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes January 18, 2024 Motion made by Secretary Harris and seconded by Chair Ellmore to approve the item with a condition, modification, or inclusion that would state that staff can require the applicant to modify the exterior aesthetics in the future to match surrounding development. AYES: Ellmore, Harris, Rosene, and Salene NOES: Langford, Lowrey ABSTAIN: None RECUSED: Barto Vill. STAFF AND COMMISSIONER ITEMS ITEM NO. 4 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION None ITEM NO. 5 REPORT BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR OR REQUEST FOR MATTERS WHICH A PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER WOULD LIKE PLACED ON A FUTURE AGENDA Acting Deputy Community Development Director Murillo announced that the Airport Land Use Commission found two residential projects proposed for the John Wayne Airport area inconsistent and staff will schedule a public hearing with the City Council on February 13 to discuss a potential override. Furthermore, he noted that the February 8 Planning Commission meeting is cancelled, and the February 22 meeting has scheduled a variance and coastal development permit for a new single-family home, and one consent item to formally adopt a resolution for a reasonable accommodation request for the keeping of chickens. ITEM NO. 6 REQUESTS FOR EXCUSED ABSENCES Secretary Harris requested an excused absence on February 22. IX. ADJOURNMENT — With no further business, the meeting was adjourned by Chair Ellmore at 7:09 p.m. The agenda for the January 18, 2024, Planning Commission meeting was posted on Thursday, January 11, 2024, at 5:35 p.m. in the Chambers binder, on the digital display board located inside the vestibule of the Council Chambers at 100 Civic Center Drive, and on the City's website on Thursday, January 11, 2024, at 5:32 p.m. Curtis Ellmore, Chair Tvisfm& RaVV'is Tristan Harris, Secretary Page 5 of 5 13-100 Planning Commission - January 18, 2024 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Received OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) January 18, 2024, Planning Commission Item 3 Comments These comments on a Newport Beach Planning Commission agenda item are submitted by: Jim Mosher (iimmosher(cD-yahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach 92660 (949-548-6229). Item No. 3. BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION (PA2023-0076) General comments: Unless I am dreaming, those who followed OCSD's public outreach regarding this project some years ago were left with the impression the pump station was to be replaced by a new one in the northeast corner of the PC-9 property, near Bayside Drive, adjacent to the mobile homes, where it would be much less intrusive. It is a surprise to find the replacement will be going in an expanded version of the current location. It is an even bigger surprise to find no mention or explanation of the change.' The staff report extols the aesthetics of the project, including the "coastal architectural theme" and building fagades that "avoid long, continuous blank walls." Yet to my taste, the aesthetics are terrible. First, I would think darker earth tones, somewhat like the present building, would be less intrusive than off-white. Second, whatever the architecture, the renderings in Figures 4 and 5 show it will be largely hidden behind the kind of "long, blank walls" the fagades seek to avoid. To me, they create the impression of a secretive government installation or a prison yard. What is the purpose of these property -defining walls along Coast Highway? It would not seem to be sound mitigation, since the only they protect is the highway. Wouldn't an openwork metal security fence be adequate and far more aesthetically pleasing (as this example from CMSD)? Or is there really something OCSD doesn't want prying eyes to see? ' What seems to be the EIR for construction using the present "Adjacent Pump Station" alternative layout option was apparently approved by the OCSD Board as Item 8 on February 24, 2021. 13-101 Planning Commission - January 18, 2024 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Received OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) January 18, 2023, PC agenda Item 3 comments - Jim Mosher Page 2 of 2 Comments regarding the proposed resolution: Page 1 of 26 (handwritten 23, agenda packet 39): Statement 1.1 refers to a "an existing 4,800- square-foot pump station." It is hard to believe the existing buildings occupy 4,800 sf if the entire parcel is only 4,875 sf. The existing concrete apron along PCH, alone, appears to represent more than 1,000 sf of unoccupied area. This appears to be a reference to the size of the existing lot, not the station. Page 2 of 26: Statement 1.5 ("While the Property is 4,879 square feet in area, OCSD is acquiring an additional 9,713 square feet of land from the adjacent property at 100 Bayside Drive, which is the site of the future Back Bay Landing Mixed -Use Village") does not match the definition of "Property" in Statement 1.1 on the preceding page. According to the prior definition, and presumably throughout the resolution, "Property" is used to mean the full 14,592 square foot. development area, not just the former parcel. Pages 3 of 26 (and 19 of 26): Statement 1.2 refers to OCSD's EIR. The link to it provided in Exhibit "B" is to the Final EIR, which is mostly just comment letters, responses to them and the mitigation monitoring plan. What most people would think of as the "real" EIR is the Draft EIR, more specifically the 2020 Recirculated EIR. A better link would be to the OC San's Bay Bridge Pump Station Project CEQA Documents page, which includes that and more. The Draft EIR appears to have analyzed the impacts of replacing the existing station with one in the northeast corner of the Bayside Village Marina (PC-9) property. Wouldn't the aesthetic impacts at that location be quite different from the ones from placing it directly adjacent to a designated Coastal View Road?2 Isn't this new expanded location also blocking what was designated as a possible alternative ingress/egress point to PC-9 from PCH? Page 5 of 26: Fact 3.A.5: I'm not sure how providing 6 foot of landscape buffer along PCH achieves the same purpose as the required 10 feet, or why the low height profile of the vegetation is a plus (generally, one would want higher vegetation to screen the walls, which already block views). I am particularly concerned about the project's impact on the public sidewalk, which is well used by a mix of pedestrians and cyclists (it is "bicycle legal" as far as I know). Page 6 of 26: Finding 3.13: Why does PC-9 use a double negative? Is there intended to be some subtle difference between a required finding that "The development shall not be incompatible with..." compared to "The development shall be compatible with ..."? Page 6 of 26: Fact 3.B.2 says "The pump station pumps waste water to a pump station in Crystal Cove" Is that correct? I thought the flow all went the other way (also note, "wastewater" is one word). (I have not reviewed the rest of the resolution) 2 On a quick glance, it looks like the various OCSD EIR's rely on the City approval process to mitigate aesthetic impacts. 13-102 Planning Commission - January 18, 2024 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Received OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) ATTORNEYS AT LAW #NOSSAMANLLP VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL planningcommission(a)-newpoftbeachca. qov January 17, 2024 Chair Curtis Ellmore and Planning Commissioners City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 18101 Von Karman Avenue Suite 1800 Irvine, CA 92612 T 949.833.7800 F 949.833.7878 John P. Erskine D 949.477.7633 jerskine@nossaman.com Admitted only in California Refer To File # 400244-0001 Re: Planning Commission Agenda Item No. 3 January 18, 2024: OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA 2023-0076) Dear Chair Ellmore and Planning Commissioners: Our firm represents Bayside Marina Village, LLC ("Bayside" or "BVM"), the owners and developers of Back Bay Landing, located at 300 East Coast Highway in Newport Beach. The Back Bay Landing project, on 7+ acres and approved unanimously by the Planning Commission and City Council in 2016, surrounds the existing OC San's 4,800 square foot Bay Bridge Pump Station ("BBPS") on three sides and will be directly and irreparably adversely affected by the proposed BBPS expansion both in the short-term, during the ill-defined 4-6 year demolition, excavation and construction period, and in the long term. Because neither BVM, its long-time Project Manager, R. Gordon Craig, or this firm received timely notice,l the bulk of our comments and explanation of the reasons for our opposition to the proposed BBPS project will need to be presented to you at the Thursday, January 18 hearing on this matter. In brief summary, your Staff Report fails to adequately disclose the multiple defects in the design of this massive and unnecessary industrial facility that will occupy the very threshold and entryway to Upper Newport Bay and dominate the scenic heart of Newport Harbor. We say "unnecessary" because OC San had (and has) other alternative locations including potential locations immediately adjacent to and on either side of the East Coast Highway harbor bridge, and as has been done in other sewage pump station projects across the country and worldwide, could've been downsized, and/or utilized more subterranean construction, etc. Apparently notices were mailed to a former Los Angeles address of the owner's management company and hand delivered to the Bayside Village Mobilehome Park; BVM's only actual notice was a posting on ECH observed by BVM representatives this recent Monday. 62469533.vl nossaman.com 13-103 Planning Commission - January 18, 2024 Item No. 3b - Additional Materials Received OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station (PA2023-0076) January 17, 2024 Page 2 As set forth previously by prior commenters on the various EIRs (there were 3-4 versions of the EIR) and the various and ever-expanding Project Descriptions, the BBPS is inconsistent with the City's Coastal Land Use Plan, the Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan ("PCDP"), does not protect LCP-mandated coastal views, and does not comply with the PCDP's Architectural Theme or Required Fagade Treatment conditions (see section 10, Back Bay Landing PCDP, page 26). Contrary to Planning Staff's assertions (page 9) in the Staff Report, we do not believe the proposed expanded, 22-foot high pump station is either "aesthetically pleasing as a stand-alone development," appropriate for this central Newport Harbor coastal location, or visually/architecturally compatible with the Back bay Landing PCDP. Finally, both the Staff Report and the Addendum -- prepared in response to the Superior Court ruling in BVM v. OCSD, fails to set forth additional environmental impacts that have only recently come to light, as many of the submittals for the Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit post-date the preparation of the Addendum. Thank you for your attention to our input on this matter; we urge the Commission to reject the current submittals and deny the Site Development Review and CDP unless revised and conditioned to be compatible with the City Back Bay Landing mixed -use coastal and Coastal Commission approved village. Sincerely, John P. Erskine Nossaman LLP JPE:dif 62469533.v1 13-104 Attachment F Appellant's Appeal Application January 31, 2024 13-105 (#NOSSAMANLLP VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND HAND -DELIVERY Ibrown(@n ewportbeachca.gov January 31, 2024 Leilani I. Brown City Clerk City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 18101 Von Karman Avenue Suite 1800 Irvine, CA 92612 T 949.833.7800 F 949.833.7878 John P. Erskine D 949.477.7633 jerskine@nossaman.com Refer To File # 400244-0001 Re: Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station — Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit (PA-2023-0076) — 250 E. Coast Highway and 100 Dover Drive (Lower Castaways Park) Dear Ms. Brown: Our firm represents Bayside Village Marina LLC ("BVM"), owners of the Bayside Village Marina and related recreational and marine commercial uses at 300 E. Coast Highway (ECH and Bayside), as well as the Bayside Village Marina Mobilehome Park, and developers of the Back Bay Landing project proposed for 7+ acres of the subject property. Please see the attached Appeal Application of the January 18, 2024 Planning Commission approval of the OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Main Replacement Project — Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit (PA 2023-0076), to the Newport Beach City Council. The filing fee of $2,116.00 is being hand -delivered to your office this afternoon. You may contact me at (714) 349-6996 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, 4ossain. Erskine man LLP JPE:dlf Enclosure cc: Seimone Jurjis, Assistant City Manager (siuriis(cDnewportbeachca.govl Jaime Murillo, Acting Deputy Director, Community Development fimurillo(c)newportbeachca.govl Michael Gelfand, Bayside Village Marina LLC R_ Gnrdnn Craig, Pr ;meet Manager, Bark Bay Landing 625159t2.vl nossaman.com 13-106 ��_ WPORT Appeal Application O n City Clerk's Office u T 100 Civic Center Drive cl, OR��P Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-644-3005 City Clerk's Office Use Only Cs6 'Ji �_ F'i1 0 RE-C"D C! Y C La IRS OF', Appeals are time sensitive and must be received by the City Clerk within the specified time period from a decision or final action by a decision -maker. It is advisable to consult with the Department managing the issue if there is question with regards to appealing an action. This is an appeal of the: ❑ (CDD222) Coastal Development Application CDP Appeal from Zoning Admin to the Planning Commission (only if appeal is solely based on the CDP portion of the application) — No Fee ❑ (CDD222) Community Development Director Action to the Harbor Commission - $1,250 ❑ (CDD222) Community Development Director Action to the Planning Commission - $2,116 ❑ (CDD222) Harbor Commission Action to the City Council (CDD — Planning) - $940 ❑ (CDD222) Hearing Officer Action to the City Council - $2,116 ® (CDD222) Planning Commission Action to the City Council - $2,116 ❑ (CDD222) Zoning Administrator Action to the Planning Commission - $2,116 ❑ (CDD223) Building Official/Fire Marshal Action to the Building/Fire Board of Appeals - $1,768 ❑ (CDD224) Chief of Police Action on an Operator License to the City Manager - $1,000 ❑ (FIN123) Short -Term Lodging Permits Suspension or Revocation Hearing - $538 ❑ (HBR001) Harbor Commission Action to the City Council (Harbor Department) - $940 ❑ (HBR001) Harbormaster Action to the Harbor Commission - $1,250 ❑ (PBW018) Harbor Commission Action to City Council (Public Works Department) - $940 ❑ (PBW018) Public Works Director Action to Harbor Commission - $1,250 ❑ (RSS073) City Manager Action on a Special Events Permit to the City Council - $1,890 ❑ Other - Specify decision -maker, appellate body, Municipal Code authority and fee: Appellant Information: Name(s): Bayside Village Marina LLC ("BVM") ; Agent: John P. Erskine, Esq., Nossaman LLP Address: 300 East Coast Highway , Nossaman LLP: 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800, Irvine, CA 92612 City/State/Zip Newport Beach, CA 92660 Phone: (714) 349-6996 Appealing Application Regarding: Email: jerskine@nossaman.com Name of Applicant(s): Orange County Sanitation District ("cc San") Project No.: PA2023-0076 ate of Final Decision: January 18, 2024 Activity No.: Bay Bridge Pump Station Application Site Address: 250 East Coast Highway and 100 Dover Drive (Lower Castaways Park) Description of Application: OCSD Bay Bridge Pump Station -- Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit Reason(s) for Appeal (attach a separate sheet if necessary). As approved on January 18, 2024 in a 4-2 vote of the Planning Commission, the Bay Bridge Pump Station Expansion and Force Main Replacement will dominate the East Coast Highway frontage of the City's landmark mixed use waterfront village Back Bay Landing ("BBL") at the iconic and scenic epicenter of Newport Harbor. Approved unanimously by the City Council and California Coastal Commission in 2016, Back Bay Landing (SEE ATTACHED SHEET FOR CONTINUED DESCRIPTION) Signature of Appellant: Date: January 31, 2024 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Date the Appeal was Filed and Administrative Fee Received: 20. te i lQYI ( �tOW✓1 City Clerk cc: Department Director, Deputy Director, Staff, File O� O F lUserslClerkISharedlForrnslAppeat Application Updated 9/28/23 625126361 13-107 �G/ FORNr APPEAL APPLICATION re Bayside Village Marina LLC (continuation from page 1): includes 49 residential units, a boathouse, new marina improvements, relocated recreational and marine commercial uses, a relocated Pierson's Port, and a new public promenade along the waterfront, and is proposed for the 7+ acres currently surrounding the BBPS pump station on three sides. Additional information will be provided in support of this appeal under separate cover, but in brief summary, the bases for this BVM appeal are: • Contrary to the Planning Commission's January 18, 2024 discussion, and based on misleading and unsupported testimony from OC San, the eminent domain process does not prevent the City Council from assessing all of the impacts of the OC San's project, and rejecting it, or selecting an alternative location. • The expanded Bay Bridge Pump Station ("BBPS") is too massive, too tall, and is an unnecessary industrial type facility that can easily be located in a less conspicuous site elsewhere on BVM's property (e.g., immediately adjacent to and on either side of and partly underneath the East Coast Highway Bridge); • The BBPS expansion, as proposed, will triple its current size (4,800 to 14,500 sf), and as stated by prior commenters on the three prior versions of the BBPS EIR is inconsistent with City's and Coastal Commission's unanimously approved Coastal Land Use Plan, the Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan ("PCDP"), and key provisions of the California Coastal Act. The BBPS expansion does not protect LCP-mandated coastal view corridors from Coast Highway towards Upper Newport Bay and Castaway's Bluffs, and is not in compliance with the City's General Plan scenic highway policies, and does not comply with the requirements or the intent of the Back Bay Landing PCDP's Architectural Provisions (Section 10, page 26 Back Bay Landing PCDP), that the pump station essentially be camouflaged, and incorporated within the overall BBL development. • Staff and Applicant failed to adequately address or explain why the alternate site south of the ECH bridge — .62 acres owned by BVM — is not superior to the expanded site north of ECH. This southern alternative avoids numerous operational and aesthetic issues, and poses far less construction risks, including minimizing sub -surface microtunneling (boring of a 6-7 foot wide tunnel) beneath ECH. • Contrary to Planning Staff's assertions (page 9) in the January 18 Planning Commission Staff Report, the proposed expanded, 22-foot high pump station is neither "aesthetically pleasing as a stand-alone development," appropriate for this central Newport Harbor coastal location, or "visually/architecturally compatible with the Back Bay Landing PCDP." • Despite OC San's multiple assertions that any further delay or rejection of their Site Development Review submittal will risk sewage spills in the harbor, there has been no evidence provided that the recently (2014) refurbished and mechanically upgraded BBPS facility cannot continue to function safely for the balance of this decade. In fact, OC San has not even received a complete, filed CDP application with the California Coastal Commission for the new 30-inch force mains that must be microtunneled from a 54-foot deep launch pit near Bayside and Coast Highway and traverse under ECH and under the Newport Harbor Channel. Likewise they have no approval from Caltrans for proposed access to and from East Coast Highway. • The recirculated EIR, and subsequent evidence obtained in depositions in the pending Eminent Domain case (OCSD v. BVM, case no. 30-2022-01251890-CU-EI-CXC) of four different BBPS Project Managers, indicates that this massively disruptive OC San project will be under construction, with upwards of 1,200 truck trips on Coast Highway, Bayside and Dover per year for 4-5 years+. There is no need for the City to rush the approvals of this ill-advised, risky and poorly managed project while the City Council works with OC San and BVM to identify an alternative location and design of the project. 62512612A 13-108 Attachment G Staff Response to Appellant Letter 13-109 Attachment G- Staff Reponses to Appellant Appeal Letter 1. Contrary to the Planning Commission's January 18, 2024 discussion, and based on misleading and unsupported testimony from OC San, the eminent domain process does not prevent the City Council from assessing all of the impacts of the OC San's project, and rejecting it, or selecting an alternative location. Response: As the City Council will conduct a de-novo hearing, its review authority is not bound by the Planning Commission's decision or limited to the issues raised on appeal or at the Planning Commission. The eminent domain matter, in and of itself, does not prevent the City Council from assessing the project in accordance with City codes and standards. After conducting a public hearing and taking in all public comments including staff's presentation and staff report and related documents, the City Council may vote to deny the project if it determines the project is not meeting one or more of the required findings for a major site development review application and coastal development permit. If the City Council denies the application, the applicant may submit a new application with an alternative design or location. 2. The expanded Bay Bridge Pump Station ("BBPS') is too massive, too tall, and is an unnecessary industrial type facility that can easily be located in a less conspicuous site elsewhere on BVM's property (e.g., immediately adjacent to and on either side of and partly underneath the East Coast Highway Bridge). Response: Staff has conducted a thorough evaluation of the project and determined that its size and height conform to the development standards and the findings both in the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment D) and Planning Commission Resolution No. PC 2024-002 (Attachment C) support the conclusion. While there may be alternative locations available within the property site, the project as proposed has met the applicable development standards of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC). Staff believes that the additional size of the proposed station is necessary to meet current OCSD functional requirements and to accommodate the addition of a new odor control. There is no odor control facility in the existing station. Per Section IV (B) (Development Standards — Permitted Height of Structures) of PC-9, the maximum building height within Planning Area 1 shall not exceed 30 feet for flat roofs and 35 feet for sloped roofs. The proposed electrical and generator building features a sloped roof design with parapet walls which is 22 feet. The proposed odor control building features a flat roof design with parapet walls which is 15.5 feet. Additionally, the proposed height of the building accounts for the raised floor necessary for flood and coastal hazard protection, electrical and mechanical equipment for station operation, and screening for rooftop HVAC equipment. The height appears to be the minimum necessary for proper functionality of the station. 3. The BBPS expansion, as proposed, will triple its current size (4,800 to 14,500 so, and as stated by prior commenters on the three prior versions of the BBPS EIR is inconsistent with City's and Coastal Commission's unanimously approved Coastal 13-110 Land Use Plan, the Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan ("PCDP'), and key provisions of the California Coastal Act. The BBPS expansion does not protect LCP-mandated coastal view corridors from Coast Highway towards Upper Newport Bay and Castaway's Bluffs, and is not in compliance with the City's General Plan scenic highway policies, and does not comply with the requirements or the intent of the Back Bay Landing PCDP's Architectural Provisions (Section 10, page 26 Back Bay Landing PCDP), that the pump station essentially be camouflaged, and incorporated within the overall BBL development. Response: The Planning Commission staff report (Attachment D) and Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 (Attachment C) support the required findings demonstrating that the project is consistent with the Coastal Land Use Plan. Additionally, the findings for determining consistency with the PCDP (PC-9) are incorporated in the findings for Major Site Development Review. As stated above, the staff analysis, with its supporting facts demonstrates that the project meets the findings and is consistent with the PC-9. The appellant claims the project does not protect LCP-mandated coastal view corridors from Coast Highway towards Upper Newport Bay and Castaway's Bluffs. However, Facts 5 and 6 of Finding "C" listed in Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 (Attachment B) provide supporting statements that the project meets the finding requiring consideration of public views through the site. Fact #6 states that the project is designed to maintain the six view corridors identified by the PC-9 and Exhibit 13 of the PC-9, which the Coastal Commission has certified. Furthermore, staff provides a thorough analysis of the public views on pages 13 and 14 in the Planning Commission Staff report (Attachment C), demonstrating project's compliance with said findings. Staff continues to assert that the project conforms to the coastal view corridors from Coast Highway towards Upper Newport Bay and Castaway's Bluffs. The appellant also claims that the project is not in compliance with the City's General Plan scenic highway policies. Policies NR20.3 (Public Views) of the General Plan's Natural Resources Element require that view corridors from certain roadway segments, including various sections of the Coast Highway, including the segment adjacent to the project site, be protected, and enhanced. As discussed above, the project conforms to the standards in the PC-9 which is consistent with the General Plan policies in addition to the Local Coastal Plan. Landscaping is proposed along the East Coast Highway frontage, which helps reduce the massing of the property walls. The landscape buffer also enhances the appearance of the public right-of- way so that the Project does not appear walled off from public viewsheds. The appellant states that the project does not comply with the requirements or the intent of the PC-9 Architectural Provisions. PC-9 contains a provision stating that "should the OCSD facility be relocated and/or reconstructed, the architectural design of the structure be compatible with the architectural design of the Back Bay Landing 13-111 development and design standards..." At the time PC-9 was adopted by the City Council and certified by the California Coastal Commission, it was assumed the Pump Station reconstruction would likely occur after the development of the Back Bay Landing mixed -use project. The fact that the Pump Station is now proposed to be reconstructed first and there is no currently proposed or approved Back Bay Landing mixed -use project to compare the proposed architecture of the Pump Station to complicates matters. Furthermore, PC-9 does not mandate a particular architectural style, but it merely stipulates that development be designed with a "coastal architectural theme" with the intent that no particular historically specific or rigid architectural style be selected for the project. PC-9 simply requires that the mixed -use project "follow principles of quality design and exhibit a high level of architectural standards and be compatible with the surrounding area, sensitive to scale, proportion and identify." The proposed Pump Station design incorporates a modern design with a cantilevered roof overhang and an integration of materials and details inspired by the surrounding coastal context. The buildings avoid long, continuous blank walls with a simple fagade composition of a base and top separated by different colors. There is a mixture of heights and roof types (sloping and flat) to create visual interest, as well as provide rhythm, dynamic building forms, and shadows. To resolve the concern about the Pump Station design's potential inconsistency with the future and undetermined design of the Back Bay Landing mixed -use project, Condition No. 31 of Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2024-002 (Attachment B) requires that the applicant make future alterations to the exterior fagade to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director for consistency and compatibility with the architecture of a future approved Back Bay Landing mixed -use project. 4. Staff and Applicant failed to adequately address or explain why the alternate site south of the ECH bridge - .62 acres owned by BVM — is not superior to the expanded site north of ECH. This southern alternative avoids numerous operational and aesthetic issues, and poses far less construction risks, including minimizing sub- surface microtunneling (boring of a 6-7 foot wide tunnel) beneath ECH. Response: The applicant's letter in response to the Appellant mentions that the alternative site was discussed in the EIR, and that the alternative site was not chosen for other reasons including space needs, vulnerability to flooding and other factors listed in the applicant's response letter (Attachment H). Although discussions have occurred between staff and the Applicant regarding alterative locations, staff is not in the position to mandate construction of the project at one particular location over another. As the applicant ultimately presented the proposed a project, it was staff's responsibility to evaluate the project, as proposed, based on City's General Plan, Zoning, Local Coastal Plan and the PCDP. Furthermore, with regards to the EIR, the City is not the Lead Agency but a Responsible Agency and it has limited authority compared to the Lead Agency (OCSD). A Responsible Agency may require changes in a project to lessen or avoid only the effects, either direct or indirect, of that part of the project which the agency (the City) will be called on to carry out or approve. 13-112 5. Contrary to Planning Staffs assertions (page 9) in the January 18 Planning Commission Staff Report, the proposed expanded, 22-foot high pump station is neither "aesthetically pleasing as a stand-alone development," appropriate for this central Newport Harbor coastal location, or "visually/architecturally compatible with the Back Bay Landing PCDP" Response: The matter related to aesthetics and architectural compatibility were discussed during the January 18, 2024, Planning Commission hearing. To ensure aesthetic quality, the Planning Commission imposed a condition of approval (discussed earlier) requiring future alterations to the exterior facade of the project for consistency and compatibility with the architecture of a future Back Bay Landing mixed -use project. Furthermore, the Project emphasizes clean lines, simplicity and avoids excessive ornamentation which will easily facilitate future facade modifications so the buildings would be consistent with the architectural style of the future Back Bay Landing mixed -use village. 6. Despite OC San's multiple assertions that any further delay or rejection of their Site Development Review submittal will risk sewage spills in the harbor, there has been no evidence provided that the recently (2014) refurbished and mechanically upgraded BBPS facility cannot continue to function safely for the balance of this decade. In fact OC San has not even received a complete, filed CDP application with the California Coastal Commission for the new 30-inch force mains that must be microtunneled from a 54-foot deep launch pit near Bayside and Coast Highway and traverse Under ECH and under the Newport Harbor Channel. Likewise they have no approval from Caltrans for proposed access to and from East Coast Highway. Response: Staff works with applicants to find solutions that achieve the applicant's desired project while at the same time, ensuring that the applicant's project conforms with the City's vision and objectives as articulated in the General Plan, Zoning, and various other policy documents. Staff does not believe it is in a position to dispute OCSD'S assertion that the facility in its current form (primarily age of the infrastructure) poses a risk of sewage spill and that the project is necessary in part to negate the chance of sewage spills. Staff's responsibility is to provide recommendations as to whether or not a project conforms with the City standards (General Plan, Local Coastal Program, zoning, etc.). According to OCSD's Asset Management Plan, which is a tactical document that captures OCSD's structure maintenance plans and capital improvement plan implementation on an annual basis for all its facilities, indicates the subject Bay Bridge Pump Station has less than five years of useful life. Based on the Asset Management Plan, the current pump station needs to be replaced to safeguard against sewage spills. Furthermore, the trial court's ruling on Bayside Village Marina LLC v Orange County Sanitation District recognizes the "sever risk to the environment that would be posed by the outdated pumping station and force mains failing and spilling raw sewage into Newport Bay (page 16 of the ruling) (Attachment H). 13-113 7. The recirculated EIR, and subsequent evidence obtained in depositions in the pending Eminent Domain case (OCSD v. BVM, case no. 30-2022-01251890-CU-EI- CXC) of four different BBPS Project Managers, indicates that this massively disruptive OC San project will be under construction, with upwards of 1,200 truck trips on Coast Highway, Bayside and Dover per year for 4-5 years+. There is no need for the City to rush the approvals of this ill-advised, risky and poorly management project while the City Council works with OC San and BVM to identify an alternative location and design of the project. Response: It's recognized that the project will involve truck trips due to the construction phase including grading, excavation, dredging, etc. There will be lane closures, additional truck trips through the neighborhood and other construction related activities as disclosed in the EIR. It is staff's opinion that the expected disruption resulting from the project does not justify the delay or denial of the project. Even if the project would occur at an alternative location, favored by the appellant, the level of disruption would not be any less as the project would still involve construction, grading, excavation, dredging, truck trips, etc. Although not related to construction related truck trips, the frequency of truck trips to the site and the type of trucks during the operation of the new facility will not be different than the current level of truck trips. According to OCSD's Project Resolution of Necessity, service vehicles will be limited to 15 trips on a weekly basis that will use the access easement from. The Final EIR also discloses this matter and stats "the project would require up to 15 maintenance vehicle trips per week for periodic maintenance and inspections by OCSD staff, and no new vehicle maintenance trips would be required as a result of the proposed project. No new employees would need to be hired as part of the project." The primary access to the site will be primarily from an agreed shared access easement from Bayside Drive. Access from East Coast Highway will serve as the secondary access. The use of the easement access will increase the safety for OCSD operations and maintenance. 13-114 Attachment H Applicant's Response to Appellant's Appeal February 14, 2024 13-115 ALSTON & BIRD 350 South Grand Avenue, 51st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 213-576-10001 Fax:213-576-1100 Matthew Wickersham Direct Dial: 213-576-1185 Email: matt.wickersham@alston.com February 14, 2024 Mayor Joe Stapleton and City Councilmembers City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Re: Orange County Sanitation District's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station — Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit (PA-2023-0076) — 250 E. Coast Highway Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, On behalf of Orange County Sanitation District ("OC San"), this letter responds to the January 31, 2024 appeal ("Appeal") by Bayside Village Marina ("BVM") of the Planning Commission's approval of OC San's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Main Replacement Project ("Project"). BVM's Appeal ignores several key points: • BVM seeks to delay a Project that will, when complete, offer Newport Beach a significant benefit by substantially reducing the risk of a potentially catastrophic sewage spill into Newport Bay. The Bay Bridge Pump Station (`BBPS") treats over half of the sewage generated by Newport Beach —on average 4.2 million gallons of sewage flows through the BBPS every day. However, the BBPS is nearly 60 years old, has no odor control, and needs to be revamped to meet modern standards for construction, electrical equipment, and maintenance. The completion of the Project will give Newport Beach a state-of-the-art modern Pump Station. • OC San has spent many years trying to engage with BVM regarding the location and design of this Project. These negotiations resulted in OC San changing the location and scope of the Project to suit the most recent location offered by BVM.1 OC San invested precious time in these negotiations, and significant resources and expertise into developing an Environmental Impact Report for the Project, which was approved by OC San in March 2021 (the " BIR"). 1 The December 16, 2022 trial court ruling in the CEQA litigation describes some of the many steps taken by OCSD to accommodate any concerns raised by BVM about the location of the expanded pump station. (Exhibit A [12/16/22 Ruling] at pp. 2-3.) Alston & Bird LLP www.alston.com Atlanta I Beijing I Brussels I Charlotte I Dallas I London I Los Angeles I New York I Raleigh I San Francisco I Silicon Valley I Washington, D.C. 13-116 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 2 • Despite these changes, BVM filed litigation challenging the EIR under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). On December 16, 2022, Judge William Claster of the Orange County Superior Court issued a ruling denying all of the challenges brought by BVM, except for a minor issue concerning the location of construction staging areas. The trial court held that "[b]ecause the issues with construction staging are both severable and appear to be readily correctable, and given the overriding need for the Project, OCSD will not be required to withdraw its approvals for the Proiect and certification of the EIR." (Exhibit A [ 12/16/22 Ruling] at p. 16, emphasis added.) "In order to avoid unnecessary delay that increases the risk of a sewage spill, the District may continue to seek the necessary Permits from the City, Coastal Commission, etc. to move forward with the Project, and it may continue to pursue the companion eminent domain action." (Id. at p. 17, emphasis added.) • BVM did not file an appeal to the trial court's CEQA ruling. It did not file a challenge to the revisions prepared by OC San in response to the trial court's limited finding of deficiencies. Instead, BVM stipulated that OC San had complied with the trial court's writ of mandate and that its CEQA case should be dismissed. (Exhibit B [8/23/2023 Stip & Order].) • As a result of the resolved CEQA litigation, BVM has lost or waived all of its challenges to the environmental review conducted by OC San for the Project. Despite stipulating that OC San has complied with the trial court's writ of mandate and that its CEQA case should be dismissed, BVM raises many of the same environmental challenges that it raised in the CEQA litigation again here, in its appeal. This is improper. • The City is a responsible agency under CEQA, and in reviewing the Project, the final EIR prepared by OC San is "conclusively presumed to comply with CEQA." (CEQA Guidelines, § 15231.) • In the pending eminent domain lawsuit, BVM has withdrawn the deposit of "probable compensation" provided by OC San. (Exhibit C [9/14/23 Stipulation and 9/15/23 Order of Withdrawing Deposit].) This withdrawal has the legal effect of "waiv[ing] all rights to dispute the taking other than the right to challenge the amount of just compensation." (Mt. San Jacinto Community College Dist. v. Superior Court (2007) 40 CalAth 648, 653; see also Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1255.260.) The only legal issue remaining to BVM concerns the amount of just compensation that must be paid to BVM for the small portion of its property needed for the expanded pump station. In sum, the environmental issues raised by the Appeal have already been resolved and BVM is in no position to raise waived, untimely and/or previously resolved objections concerning the characteristics of the Project. However, to the extent that the Council has independent concerns about the topics raised by the Appeal, OC San provides the following 13-117 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 3 information below in response to each of the topics raised in the Appeal, and OC San would be happy to provide any further information desired by the Council: • BVM Appeal Topic #1: Contrary to the Planning Commission's January 18, 2024 discussion, and based on misleading and unsupported testimony from OC San, the eminent domain process does not prevent the City Council from assessing all of the impacts of the OC San's project, and rejecting it, or selecting an alternative location. OC San Response #1: As discussed above, the objections raised by the Appeal must be considered in the context of BVM's litigation history, particularly to the extent that it has waived its right to challenge the location of the Project as part of the eminent domain litigation. Further, as to the environmental objections raised by the Appeal, as a responsible agency under CEQA, the City has a limited role in reviewing the environmental analysis that is now final and has been already approved by the Orange County Superior Court. To the extent that there are additional impacts within the purview of the City (for example, on aesthetic issues), the condition of approval already adopted by the City regarding future aesthetic modifications to the Project fully address any such issues. • BVM Appeal Topic #2: The expanded Bay Bridge Pump Station (`BBPS') is too massive, too tall, and is an unnecessary industrial type facility that can easily be located in a less conspicuous site elsewhere on BVM's property (e.g., immediately adjacent to and on either side of and partly underneath the East Coast Highway Bridge) OC San Response #2: The trial court already rejected BVM's argument that the critical infrastructure that BVM seeks to delay is a "too massive" and "unnecessary" facility that should be situated elsewhere. (Exhibit A [12/16/22 Ruling] at pp. 8-9.) Indeed, the EIR devoted nearly 40 pages to painstaking analysis comparing alternative locations and configurations with the current Project, before applying its expertise in going forward with the current Project. Indeed, the reasons for going forward with the Project are compelling and supported by substantial evidence. BVM's comparison of the proposed Project to the nearly 60-year- old Station is an apples -to -oranges comparison. The proposed Bay Bridge Pump Station is an essential critical facility that has been designed to minimize the footprint while meeting the modern-day functional requirements of the facility. Functionality takes into consideration the current codes and the safety, reliability, and maintainability of the mechanical, electrical and control system of the pump station for long-term continued operability. A majority of the pump station mechanical equipment will be below grade (below ground level). The new pump station has a larger underground footprint to meet current industry hydraulic standards, unlike the existing pump that was constructed nearly 60 years ago. The above -grade structures include an electrical building, generator building, and odor control structure. The electrical building is designed in accordance with the National Electrical Code (NEC), except that the distance between 480-volt electrical 13-118 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 4 equipment is six feet (per OC San's standards) instead of four feet (per the NEC) for safety reasons as it provides an electrician with the proper working clearance to verify the equipment is properly de -energized. This safety feature only increases the depth of the building by four feet. The designed electrical equipment also includes additional reliability and redundancy, which offers additional environmental protection by preventing a sewage spill flowing from a single point of failure. The standby generator maintains pump station operation during a utility power failure, like the existing pump station. Additionally, new Odor Control facilities are being provided to meet OC San's high standards to minimize impacts to surrounding neighbors. This new feature, not present in the current Station, accounts for a significant portion of the larger footprint. Figures 1, 2, and 3 depict the layout of the above grade facilities, specifically, electrical room, generator room, and odor control structure, respectively. The size of the buildings has been optimized to house the required equipment to maintain pump station functionality. Figure I — Electrical Room Layout sa -o AL ELECTRICAL ROOM EQUIPMENT LAYOUT p \`II ELECTRIC AN � CONTROL PANELS MP) 0 0 0 0 o g.. 13-119 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 5 Figure 2 — Generator Room Layout r r. LOUVERED {! PANELS AND a DOOR FOR =4 x= COOL AIR I - INTAKE m I PORTABLE ELECTRIC AND — ACCESS CONTROL PLATFORMS PANELS(TYP) (TYP) s °F" GENERATOR ROOM Figure 3 — Odor Control Structure 39'_4" CHEMICAL STORAGE ^TANKS I: a w 3 CHEMICAL FEED PUMPS ROLLUP -' - -� PICKUP TRUCK TO DOOR FOR REPLACE ODOR TRUCK CONTROL MEDIA ACCESS ODOR CONTROL MEDIA AND FAN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS DOOR The Project's size and footprint are consistent with the footprint of similar, modern Pump Stations. The Bay Bridge Pump Station's proposed building size is comparable to OC San's Bitter Point Pump Station (5904 West Coast Highway, Newport Beach) constructed 13-120 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 6 approximately 12 years ago. Table 1 lists the sizes of the buildings. Bitter Point Pump Station does not have an odor control facility since there are no current or future known developments in the vicinity of the Bitter Point Pump Station. Electrical Generator Odor Control Building Height: Bitter Point Pump Station 1,300 800 N/A Proposed Bay Bridge Pump Station 1,600 700 1,800 The height of the Project is relatively modest. The top of the electrical building (tallest building on the site) is designed to be at Elevation 36.00, which is 23.75 feet above adjacent grade. This is only about 66% of the maximum height above adjacent grade allowed by the City in this area. The City's Planned Community (PC-9) allows building heights to a maximum of 35 feet above adjacent grade at the location of the pump station height zone (Zone PA). Further, the height of the Project considers the preliminary design information provided by BVM of its planned Back Bay Landing development. BVM anticipated that its development will include a building situated behind the Project which will be much taller than the electrical building. The electrical building was designed to unobtrusively stand in the shadow of the taller, planned BVM building if BVM ever proceeds with the development. The pump station height is also driven by the following safety and environmental factors: • Building raised to protect from tsunami caused flooding; • Electrical and mechanical equipment required for the pump station operation; and • Roof parapet to screen the roof -mounted HVAC equipment. Figure 4 illustrates a cross section of the electrical building with the electrical panels, HVAC equipment both inside the building and roof, and the parapet. HVAC is required to cool critical electrical equipment and prevent corrosion from the coastal environment. 13-121 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 7 Figure 4 — Generator Room Layout TOP OF PARAPET 1EL. MG) ROOF MOUNTED HVAC EQUIPMENT ROOF { I HVAC DUCTS - CONOUTTS AND WTW ill _ CABLE TRAYS ELECTRICAL PANELS ■ BUILDING RAISED TO PREVENT FLO=NG FIN I SH ED G RAOE N (EL. 13.25) BVM Appeal Topic #3: The BBPS expansion, as proposed, will triple its current size (4,800 to 14,500 sf), and as stated by prior commenters on the three prior versions of the BBPS EIR is inconsistent with City s and Coastal Commission's unanimously approved Coastal Land Use Plan, the Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan ("PCDP'), and key provisions of the California Coastal Act. The BBPS expansion does not protect LCP-mandated coastal view corridors from Coast Highway towards Upper Newport Bay and Castaway's Bluffs, and is not in compliance with the City's General Plan scenic highway policies, and does not comply with the requirements or the intent of the Back Bay Landing PCDP's Architectural Provisions (Section 10, page 26 Back Bay Landing PCDP), that the pump station essentially be camouflaged, and incorporated within the overall BBL development. OC San Response #3: The trial court in the resolved CEQA litigation specifically rejected BVM's claims that the Project is inconsistent with the PCDP, the Newport Beach Local Coastal Program and the Coastal Act. (Exhibit A [12/16/22 Ruling] at pp. 10-14.) Indeed, the EIR had a lengthy 25-page provision -by -provision discussion of the Project's compliance with these various land use plans. As shown by the trial court's ruling, BVM's arguments of inconsistency ultimately depend on its skewed legal interpretation of the plans' provisions. The trial court held that BVM's arguments were not accurate or reasonable and instead that the EIR's analysis was supported by substantial evidence. The trial court's ruling on the proper legal interpretation controls here. Regardless, the Planning Commission staff report showed that the Project does not obstruct the public view corridors identified in PC-9, the Coast View Roads identified in the CLUP, or any Public Viewpoint. The Staff Report also described how the Project was designed in an aesthetic sense to be visually consistent with any future Back Bay Landing mixed -use village. Notably, while the almost 60-year-old Pump Station needs to be 13-122 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 8 revamped in the near term, it is substantially unclear when, or even if, Bayside will propose a project -level design for a mixed -use village, what that design will look like, or indeed whether the project will ever be built in any form. Further, and in any event, the Planning Commission added a condition providing for future alterations to the exterior fagade of the Project for consistency and compatibility with the architecture of any future -approved Back Bay Landing project. This condition allows the City to reap the safety and environmental benefits of the Project now, while allowing for aesthetic modifications in the future if the Back Bay Landing project is ever developed. Lastly, to the extent BVM complains about the larger foot size of the Project as compared to the almost 60-year-old existing Pump Station, OC San addressed this apples - to -oranges comparison in OC San Response #2. • BVM Appeal Topic #4: Staff and Applicant failed to adequately address or explain why the alternate site south of the ECH bridge - . 62 acres owned by BVM — is not superior to the expanded site north of ECH. This southern alternative avoids numerous operational and aesthetic issues, and poses far less construction risks, including minimizing sub -surface microtunneling (boring of a 6-7 foot wide tunnel) beneath ECH. OC San Response #4: OC San evaluated the southern alternative in the EIR as part of the CEQA process. As part of the CEQA litigation, the trial court has determined that the EIR's discussion of alternatives fully complied with CEQA, and that BVM's arguments to the contrary were incorrect. (Exhibit A [12/16/22 Ruling] at pp. 8-10.) The southern alternative had several safety and environmental issues including the lack of space for a backup generator and odor control facility. The southern site is also more vulnerable to flooding, has additional environmental concerns, involves multiple property owners, and constrains any future Caltrans bridge improvements. Further, the southern site would have required the construction of a new connection to the OC San gravity sewer system. The gravity sewer would still need to be microtunneled under East Coast Highway. • BVM Appeal Topic #5: Contrary to Planning Staff's assertions (page 9) in the January 18 Planning Commission Staff Report, the proposed expanded, 22 foot high pump station is neither "aesthetically pleasing as a stand-alone development, " appropriate for this central Newport Harbor coastal location, or "visually/architecturally compatible with the Back Bay Landing PCDP" OC San Response #5: The Project is aesthetically designed to be non-descript and to blend into the Back Bay Landing development (if such development ever gets off the ground). This issue was addressed at the January 18, 2024 meeting. During the Planning Commission meeting on January 18, 2024, Planning Commissioner Langford asked BVM's Michael Gelfand if he agreed with the architectural 13-123 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 9 theme of what is being presented and if it would match whatever the future intentions of what his future project would look like since he was the direct neighbor that was affected the most. The original plan was coastal Mediterranean. Mr. Gelfand stated that this is certainly what they had in mind, but the reality is that OC San is kind of a shell. If and when he moves forward, he would propose to OC San that the exterior fagade be changed to match. His main concern is not the actual design from an aesthetic standpoint. It is the footprint, setbacks, easement through the middle of the property, and the size along PCH. (1/18/24 Transcript at 58:45-60:00.) Ironically, BVM has already conceded these points in its eminent domain litigation and has lost its challenges, as part of the CEQA litigation, to the environmental review conducted for the Project. In the aftermath of the January 18, 2024 meeting, recognizing that Newport Beach could secure the safety and environmental benefits of a state-of-the-art Pump Station now, while securing aesthetic harmonization with a potential Back Bay Landing project later in the event the Back Pay project proceeds, the Commission adopted a condition providing for future alterations to the exterior fagade of the Project for consistency and compatibility with the architecture of any future -approved Back Bay Landing project. Lastly, as to the appropriateness of the Newport Harbor coastal location, this issue was looked at detail in the EIR, and reviewed and affirmed in Court as part of the CEQA litigation. Whatever BVM's objection, it is, respectfully, of no moment in the face of OC San's court -approved application of its expertise in selecting the location and characteristics of the Project. • BVM Appeal Topic #6: Despite OC San's multiple assertions that any further delay or rejection of their Site Development Review submittal will risk sewage spills in the harbor, there has been no evidence provided that the recently (2014) refurbished and mechanically upgraded BBPS facility cannot continue to function safely for the balance of this decade. In fact OC San has not even received a complete, filed CDP application with the California Coastal Commission for the new 30-inch force mains that must be microtunneled from a 54 foot deep launch pit near Bayside and Coast Highway and traverse Under ECH and under the Newport Harbor Channel. Likewise they have no approval from Caltrans for proposed access to and from East Coast Highway. OC San Response #6: There is no reasonable basis by which BVM can dispute OC San's determination that an upgraded BBPS facility is necessary. As the trial court found in the CEQA litigation, the "record contains evidence that the current pump station is deteriorating and does not meet current standards for construction, electrical equipment, or maintenance... The record also contains evidence that failure of the system could result in the release of sewage into Newport Bay." (Exhibit A [12/16/22 Ruling] at p. 14.) California law, specifically Section 30231 of the Coastal Act imposes a mandatory policy for protecting Newport Beach's water quality (it "shall be maintained"). In accord, OC San is an agency solely tasked with ensuring the collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater for approximately 2.6 million people in central and northwest Orange County. 13-124 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 10 It is odd that BVM believes that it is in any position to question OC San's court -approved technical determination that this Project needs to move forward post haste. Even more puzzling, BVM has already conceded this point. In a joint status conference statement recently filed in the eminent domain action, BVM agreed that it has waived any dispute as to the public use and necessity for the Project: "The parties agree that the public use and necessity for project and acquisition are no longer at issue in this case, leaving the amount of compensation due as the sole remaining issue." (Exhibit D [1/31/24 Joint Statement] at pp. 4-5; see also id. at p. 3 ["BVM having now waived all its challenges and objections to OC San's right to acquire the Property Interests..."].) Of specific note, the statement made by BVM that the BBPS facility was refurbished and mechanically upgraded in 2014 is not accurate. In 2014, OC San added a pump to increase reliability in the pump station and provide a backup pump for wet weather conditions. But this was a stop gap solution that allows OC San the time to complete the Project on the current schedule. It was not undertaken to enable the further delay that BVM effectively seeks with the Appeal. The timely completion of the Project is important. Safe and reliable infrastructure is essential to providing industry -leading wastewater collection and management. OC San manages asset reliability, mitigates risk, and ensures the quality of our delivered services. OC San captures facility condition information in our Asset Management Plan which can be found online Document Central I Orange County Sanitation District (ocsan.gov). The 2023 Asset Management Plan identifies Bay Bridge Pump Station as having a Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of less than 5 years as shown in the table below: 13-125 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 11 Table ES-1-3- Pump Station and Force Main Remaining Useful Life and Raplatement Value Summary mp WAYwage-RemitinknqUisefui ILI AL y ' W Lire score i A JH1 i �t Rrpdacamu# Velue i$ rnilliern, lel LEAMM`IrEm o ono ��0000� RUL Legend; ■ RUL < 5 years ❑ RUL 5-10 years ❑ RUL 11-15 years D RUL 1fi-,20 years 0 RUL �p 20 years This finding aligns with previous asset management plans and the schedule for the current pump station and force main replacement project. Now is the time to implement this Project to address the critical major assets that need to be replaced. Next, the statement made by BVM that OC San has not even received a complete, filed CDP application with the California Coastal Commission is inaccurate. On January 24, 2024, OC San received notification from the California Coastal Commission that they have filed our application as complete. Indeed, as is the case with other necessary approvals, the fact that OC San did not file a California Coastal Commission application sooner is the direct result of BVM's ultimately meritless CEQA challenge to the project. But for that, Newport Beach would be closer to reaping the benefits of a state-of-the-art Pump Station. 13-126 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 12 Lastly, OC San has been working cooperatively with Caltrans and believe we have a path forward to obtain an encroachment permit. • BVM Appeal Topic #7: The recirculated EIR, and subsequent evidence obtained in depositions in the pending Eminent Domain case (OCSD v. BVM, case no. 30-2022-01251890-CU-EI-CXC) of four different BBPS Project Managers, indicates that this massively disruptive OC San project will be under construction, with upwards of 1,200 truck trips on Coast Highway, Bayside and Dover per year for 4-5 years+. There is no need for the City to rush the approvals of this ill-advised, risky and poorly management project while the City Council works with OC San and BVM to identify an alternative location and design of the project. OC San Response #7: OC San has articulated the environmental and safety reasons as to why it is important that the Project proceed according to schedule without any further delays in Response #6. Likewise, BVM's substance -free categorization of the project as "ill-advised" and "risky" stands in contrast to the thorough analysis found in the EIR, which was affirmed by the trial court in the CEQA litigation. In any event, BVM has waived its right to challenge the location of the proposed expansion. BVM has already withdrawn a deposit of over $4.3 million of taxpayer dollars that is entirely dependent on OC San's ability to obtain BVM's property at the specific location at issue here in this approval. BVM was not required to withdraw this money. It could have retained its right to challenge OC San's right to acquire property at this location. It did not. It is far too late for BVM to now ask for an alternative location. As to the disruption caused by the construction of the Project, the number of truck trips will ebb and flow with the stage of project construction. The Recirculated Environmental Impact Report identifies the average number of truck trips to the site during the significant construction periods: • Demolition Activities -- 10 average trucks per day • Grading Activities — 25 average trucks per day • Building Construction — 16 average trucks per day • Installation of Force Mains — 28 trips per day • Gravity Sewer Improvements — 23 trips per day Given the state of the existing Pump Station, construction in the near term is necessary. The sooner the Project proceeds, the sooner construction will finish. In the aftermath, 13-127 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station February 14, 2024 Page 13 Newport Beach will benefit from a state-of-the-art Pump Station which will protect the environment, wildlife, and the health of Newport Beach residents for decades. Sincerely, - Vx Matt Wickersham Z" /1� '14 �e 1, le __ 16- - I — 13-128 EXHIBIT A [OCSD Response to 1/31/24 Appeal] 13-129 DATE: 12/16/2022 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CIVIL COMPLEX CENTER MINUTE ORDER TIME: 02:16:00 PM DEPT: CX104 JUDICIAL OFFICER PRESIDING: William Claster CLERK: G. Hernandez REPORTER/ERM: None BAILIFF/COURT ATTENDANT:. None CASE NO: 30-2021-01194238-CU-WM-CXC CASE INIT.DATE: 04/01/2021 CASE TITLE: BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC vs. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CASE CATEGORY: Civil - Unlimited CASE TYPE: Writ of Mandate EVENT ID/DOCUMENT ID: 73909236 EVENT TYPE: Under Submission Ruling APPEARANCES RE PETITIONER'S WRIT OF MANDATE There are no appearances by any party. The Court, having taken the above -entitled matter under submission on 12/14/2022 and having fully considered the arguments of all parties, both written and oral, as well as the evidence presented, now issues its ruling. The Court's ruling is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Court orders clerk to give notice. DATE: 12/16/2022 MINUTE ORDER Page 1 DEPT: CX104 Calendar No. 13-130 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Petitioner Bayside Village Marina LLC (Bayside) seeks a writ of mandate compelling Respondent Orange County Sanitation District ("OCSD" or the "District") to vacate and set aside its approval of (1) the OCSD's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains ("BBPS") replacement project ("Project") located on East Coast Highway in Newport Beach, and (2) the certification of the Recirculated Environmental Impact Report ("REIR") for the Project. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS a limited writ as set forth below. I. BACKGROUND Bayside is the owner of 31.4 acres of property located at East Coast Highway in the City of Newport Beach, California between Newport Channel and Bayside Drive. (ROA 25, First Amended Verified Petition (Petition), ¶ 9; AR230.) Approximately 24 acres of Bayside's property are developed with mobile homes, and the remaining seven acres contain an outdoor storage space of RVs and small boats, parking and restrooms facilities for the Bayside Marina, a kayak rental and launch facility, parking and access to Pearson's Port seafood market, and marine service equipment storage under the Coast Highway Bridge ("BVM Property"). (AR230, 011290.) The seven acres are being developed as the "Back Bay Landing" Project, which is a mixed -use development that will be implemented pursuant to the Newport Beach- and Coastal Commission -approved Back Bay Planned Community Development Plan ("PCDP"). It will have a boat storage facility, retail stores and recreational marine -related facilities and residential units. (AR226, 230, 3274, 7539-97; Petition, ¶ 9.) Bayside is also the developer of this Back Bay project. (Petition, ¶ 9.) OCSD owns and operates the BBPS, which is located at 300 East Coast Highway in Newport Beach, just east of the Newport Bay Channel. (ROA 103, Opp., p. 8; AR186.) BBPS transports sewage or wastewater through pipelines to OCSD's Ruling Page 1 13-131 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 sewage treatment plant in Huntington Beach and is a piece of critical infrastructures that conveys 50-60% of the total wastewater flow generated in Newport Beach. (ROA 103, Opp., p. 8; AR186.) BBPS is located on the southern boundary of Bayside's property, is surrounded on three sides by that property, and is adjacent to the Back Bay Landing Project. (AR230, 3206.) The District's Project involves the construction of a new, larger pump station extending 100 feet to the west of the existing pump station and the installation of new force mains. (AR186 and 237.) The new pump station facilities will include a pump station, generator and odor control facilities. (AR186, 230.) Planning on the Project started in 2013. (AR3206.) Since the Bayside Property, and particularly the Back Bay Landing Project, surrounds the Project, from 2014-2016, Bayside and OCSD exchanged information and worked together to discuss alternatives for the Project. (See e.g., AR3206, 6371-72, 7040-43,7090, 7324, 7342-43, 15667, 16128-131.) In June 2017, OCSD published a draft EIR that analyzed a version of the Project involving the demolition of the existing facility, construction of a new and larger facility adjacent to Bayside Drive and installation of force main improvements beneath the Newport Bay Channel north of the Bay Bridge. (AR236, AR9383-84.) The District never presented the 2017 Final EIR to its Board of Directors for approval due to conflicts with the planned development of the Back Bay Landing Project. (AR236, AR1501-1506.) In July 2019, OCSD published a recirculated EIR with three alternatives for the Project. (AR236, AR11613-14.) During the public comment period, there were concerns regarding the three conceptual site plans, including confusion about one of the alternatives known as the South Pump Station. (AR236.) OCSD did not present the 2019 EIR to the OCSD Board. Ruling Page 2 13-132 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Instead, OCSD decided to select one conceptual site plan and construction method and update the EIR in its entirety. (AR236.) The concept chosen and analyzed in the 2020 recirculated EIR (REIR) is the Adjacent Pump Station, which is essentially the South Pump Station alternative in the 2019 REIR. (AR237.) The Final EIR (FEIR) was published in January 2021 and approved on March 1, 2021. (AR1-3.) II. OVERVIEW OF CEQA PROCESS "CEQA is a comprehensive scheme designed to provide long-term protection to the environment. [Citation.]" (Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105, 112.) It applies to "discretionary projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies." (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080(a).) "In enacting CEQA, the Legislature declared its intention that all public agencies responsible for regulating activities affecting the environment give prime consideration to preventing environmental damage when carrying out their duties. [Citations.] CEQA is to be interpreted 'to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language.' [Citation.]" (Mountain Lion Foundation, supra, 16 Cal.4th at p. 112.) An EIR, which has been described as "the heart of CEQA" (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564), "is required for any project that a public agency proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment. [Citations.] An EIR must describe the proposed project and its environmental setting, state the objectives sought to be achieved, identify and analyze the significant effects on the environment, state how those impacts can be mitigated or avoided, and identify and analyze alternatives to the project, Ruling Page 3 13-133 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 among other requirements. [Citations.]" (Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 465-66 (Ballona).) Once a draft EIR is prepared, the public must be notified, and the draft and all documents it references must be made available for public review and comment. (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21091(a), 21092; CEQA Guidelines, § 15087. 1) The public agency acting as the lead agency then prepares a final EIR, which must include comments received from the public and from other agencies concerning the draft EIR, responses to those comments, and any revisions to the draft EIR. (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15088, 15132; Ballona, supra, 201 Cal.App.4th at p. 466.) III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Overview Bayside asserts that the EIR description of the Project and its environmental setting is "inaccurate and unstable." "The fundamental goal of an EIR is to inform decision makers and the public of any significant adverse effects a project is likely to have on the physical environment. [Citations.] To make such an assessment, an EIR must delineate environmental conditions prevailing absent the project, defining a baseline against which predicted effects can be described and quantified. [Citation.]" (Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (2013) 57 Ca1.4th 439, 447.) This generally includes providing "a description of the physical environmental conditions in the vicinity of the project, as they exist at the time the notice of preparation is published, or if no notice of preparation is published, at the time environmental analysis is commenced, from both a local and regional perspective." (Id., at p. 448; see CEQA Guidelines, § 15125(a).) 1 References to the CEQA Guidelines are to Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq. Ruling Page 4 13-134 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 "Without accurate and complete information pertaining to the setting of the project and surrounding uses, it cannot be found that the [EIR] adequately investigated and discussed the environmental impacts of the development project." (San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 713, 729 (San Joaquin Raptor).) Thus, [i]f the description of the environmental setting of the project site and surrounding area is inaccurate, incomplete or misleading, the EIR does not comply with CEQA." (Cadiz Land Co. v. Rail Cycle (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 74, 87.) B. Failure to Identifv Neighboring Commercial Operations Bayside contends that repeated use of the phrase "RV Storage facility" obscures "the site's coastal -dependent, visitor serving uses." (Pet. Supp. Br. at p. 16.) Indeed, a number of businesses on the west side of the Project site (e.g., Southwind Kayaks, Gondola Adventures) are not mentioned by name anywhere in any EIR. While it is true that these businesses are not referenced by name and that the site is referred to as an RV Storage facility (presumably since RVs are stored near where the actual construction will take place), those references do not create an inaccurate picture of the Project. In fact, the EIR refers to these businesses on the west side of the Project as "commercial" or "commercial recreation marine uses" in a number of places. (AR230, 234, 260, 392, 436.) The businesses also are listed on Table 3-1 under "General Commercial." (AR235.) The fact that the site is called an RV Storage facility is not misleading when considering the EIR as a whole. The above -cited references to commercial activity and the various maps/photos of the Project site overcome this alleged shortcoming. Ruling Page 5 13-135 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 A related purported flaw in the EIR's Project description is the failure to address the potential adverse physical impacts Project construction would have on these businesses. On the contrary, such analysis is found at AR 473-482 regarding noise and vibrations during construction, and at AR 302-305 with respect to air quality. In terms of traffic, the EIR makes clear that access to the Project site will be shared via Bayside Drive by construction vehicles and users of the commercial facilities. As to the added construction and operational traffic, the EIR addresses these issues at AR499 and in Impact Statement TRA-4. C. Construction Staging Area Description Bayside contends that the Project description is inaccurate and, indeed, is an "unstable moving target" by virtue of the failure to describe and evaluate a construction staging area. The Court agrees. The 2020 REIR includes several references to construction staging. Page 3-11 states: "Portions of the adjacent private property (currently a RV storage area) and Lower Castaways Park could be temporarily utilized for construction staging, if these areas are available during construction of the proposed project." (AR241.) Then, in response to a letter from the City of Newport Beach stating that the Lower Castaways would not be available (AR1120), the 2021 FEIR noted: "Should Lower Castaways not be available, construction staging would occur within other proposed areas of disturbance (as identified in the project boundary shown on 2020 Recirculated Draft EIR Exhibit 3-4)." (AR1127.) Exhibit 3-4 is a Proposed Conceptual Site Plan that shows the areas (highlighted in yellow) where the proposed project construction will take place as well as the Lower Castaways. (AR238.) A virtually identical site plan (also highlighted in yellow) is found at Exhibit 3-6 which is entitled Adjacent Pump Station Work Areas. (AR243.) According to OCSD's supplemental brief, based on the unavailability of the Lower Castaways, "the construction staging will occur Ruling Page 6 13-136 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 somewhere in this Adjacent Pump Station Work Area." (OCSD Supp. Br. at p. 12.) Based on this statement, the District argues in its supplemental brief that it satisfied CEQA since the EIR "considered all potential impacts that could occur in the Adjacent Area." However, based on a review of Exhibits 3-4 and 3-6, it is unclear whether creating a staging area in the limited designated space is even possible. With the exception of the Lower Castaways, the Coast Highway and the Newport channel, it appears that the areas highlighted in yellow are where virtually all of the construction actually will take place. Certainly, no specific location with adequate square footage is identified, nor is there any analysis as to whether Mitigation Measures AES-1 and TRA-1 would apply to any area other than the Lower Castaways. Perhaps a more significant problem with the statements in both the FEIR and supplemental brief about an alternative site in the project area is that they may well be inaccurate. Indeed, TRA-1 tends to contradict OCSD's supplemental brief by virtue of acknowledging that future staging areas may be located off -site: "[construction drawings shall] identify any and all construction staging or material storage sites located outside of the project site." (AR206 [emphasis added].) Compounding this problem, counsel for the District told the Court at an earlier hearing that the lowest responsible bidder on the Project will have complete discretion to decide where staging will occur and how many staging sites will be necessary. (August 4, 2022 Transcript at pp. 11-12.) Importantly, by not limiting that comment to sites within the yellow -highlighted boundaries of Exhibits 3-4 or 3-6, the District appears to acknowledge that staging sites not identified in either the REIR or FEIR might be utilized. Given that uncertainty, Bayside's argument regarding a lack of a complete, accurate and stable project description has merit. More specifically, the District's argument (OCSD Supp. Br. at p. 12) that the EIR considered all environmental impacts (biological, noise, aesthetics, etc.) in the Ruling Page 7 13-137 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Adjacent Area fails to account for any potential impacts that might occur if the construction staging area occurs elsewhere. Without identifying the area or areas where staging will occur, the public is left in the dark about whether that staging will have any effects on the environment at location(s) yet to be identified. Counsel's statement that the lowest responsible bidder will have complete discretion with regard to construction staging also renders the mitigation measures of AES-1 toothless. AES-1 purports to minimize aesthetic impacts of construction by requiring the District's Director of Engineering to personally approve construction staging areas, transport routes, etc. before grading or demolition permits are issued. To the extent AES-1 actually imposes enforceable standards (which the Court questions), it cannot be reconciled with the vesting of complete discretion in the lowest responsible bidder. IV. CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES "An EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decisionmaking and public participation. An EIR is not required to consider alternatives which are infeasible. The lead agency is responsible for selecting a range of project alternatives for examination and must publicly disclose its reasoning for selecting those alternatives. There is no ironclad rule governing the nature or scope of the alternatives to be discussed other than the rule of reason." (CEQA Guidelines, § 15126.6(a).) The EIR identified five alternatives to the Project to analyze in detail: the "no project" scenario, the "adjacent project/microtunneling" scenario, the "origina Ruling Page 8 13-138 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 northeast pump station with horizontal directional drilling" scenario, the "rehabilitate in place with microtunneling" scenario, and the "pump station south relocation with microtunneling" scenario. (AR539-540.) Nearly 40 pages of analysis are devoted to comparing each of these alternatives to the Project. (AR540-578.) Bayside does not challenge the analysis presented. Rather, it faults the EIR for failing to discuss two additional alternatives: the "Expand -in -Place" scenario and alternative alignments for the dual force mains south of East Coast Highway. "Courts will defer to an agency's selection of alternatives unless the petitioners (1) demonstrate that the chosen alternatives are " "'manifestly unreasonable and ... do not contribute to a reasonable range of alternatives,"' " and (2) submit evidence showing the rejected alternative was both "feasible" and "adequate," because it was capable of attaining most of the basic objectives of the project, taking into account site suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, general plan consistency, and other relevant factors. [Citation.]" (South of Market Community Action Network v. City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.Sth 321, 345.) The Court assumes for the sake of argument that the "Expand -in -Place" scenario and the alternative alignments for the dual force mains are both feasible and adequate. That is, the Court assumes Bayside has met the second prong of its burden. However, Bayside fails to meet the first prong of its burden. "The 'key issue' is whether the range of alternatives discussed fosters informed decisionmaking and public participation. [Citation.]" (Cherry Valley Pass Acres & Neighbors v. City of Beaumont (190 Cal.App.4th 316, 354.) Bayside complains that two alternatives were not considered, but it identifies no authority holding that the failure to consider a specific alternative or alternatives automatically renders the range of Ruling Page 9 13-139 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 alternatives considered "manifestly unreasonable" or insufficient to "foster informed decision ma king." (Compare id., at p. 355 ["Though one or more of these 328 imaginable alternatives may have represented the optimum number of residences that could have profitably been built while minimizing the agricultural impacts of the project to the fullest extent possible, the range of alternatives discussed in the EIR was sufficient to foster informed decisionmaking on this very question."].) V. INCONSISTENCIES WITH PLANS A. Overview Bayside contends the EIR is fatally flawed because it fails to disclose the Project's inconsistencies with the PCDP, the Newport Beach Local Coastal Program ("LCP"), and the Coastal Act. An EIR must discuss "any inconsistencies between the proposed project and applicable general plans, specific plans and regional plan." (CEQA Guidelines § 15125(d).) This includes inconsistencies with the Coastal Act. (Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1209, 1233.) A determination of consistency "comes to this [C]ourt with a strong presumption of regularity. [Citation.] To overcome that presumption, an abuse of discretion must be shown. [Citations.] An abuse of discretion is established only if the city council has not proceeded in a manner required by law, its decision is not supported by findings, or the findings are not supported by substantial evidence. [Citation]." (Sequoyah Hills Homeowners Assn. v. City of Oakland (1993) 23 Cal.App.4th 704, 717.) "It is, emphatically, not the role of the courts to micro -manage these development decisions. Our function is simply to decide whether the city officials considered the applicable policies and the extent to which the proposed project conforms with those policies, whether the city officials made appropriate Ruling Page 10 13-140 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 findings on this issue, and whether those findings are supported by substantial evidence." (Id., at pp. 719-20 [emphasis in original].) In addition, Bayside's opening brief suggests the EIR is inadequate to the extent it fails to explain why the District found the Project consistent with applicable plans. (Pet. Opening Br. at p. 19, lines 6-8.) Because EIRs need only evaluate inconsistencies with plans, no analysis is required if the project is consistent with plans. (North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Morin Municipal Water Dist. Bd. of Directors (2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 614, 632 [citing City of Long Beach v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 889, 918-19].) Insofar as Bayside argues the explanation of consistency is inadequate (as opposed to arguing the finding of consistency is an abuse of discretion), this challenge fails. B. PCDP Inconsistency The PCDP contains zoning regulations that dictate acceptable land uses in each "Planning Area" it covers. It is undisputed that both the current pump station and the new pump station to be built as part of the Project are in Planning Area 1. According to the PCDP, "Wastewater Pump Station" is a permitted land use in Planning Area 1. (AR7615.) Bayside nevertheless contends the Project is inconsistent with the PCDP. It argues that the PCDP "identifies the existence of the BBPS, however, only at its current size and location, not the expanded size and altered location contemplated by the Final EIR." (Pet. Opening Br. at p. 18.) The claimed inconsistency apparently arises from conceptual drawings attached to the PCDP (for parking plans, public spaces, etc.) that show the BBPS in its current location in the context of the larger planning area. (See AR7650-7663.) That is, as the Court understands the argument, because the conceptual drawings show the current BBPS, any deviation is an inconsistency. Ruling Page 11 13-141 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 As the District points out in opposition, the PCDP imposes specific numeric limits on the square footage of commercial, residential, marina, and dry dock use in Planning Area 1, but not wastewater pump use. (AR7612.) The conceptual drawings do not on their face appear to limit the size or the location of the pumping station, only to show it in relation to other then -existing uses for planning purposes. The only explicit limitation placed on a wastewater pump station by the PCDP is that it must be in Planning Area 1. As to Bayside's contention that AR7549 allows the pump station also to be in Planning Area 2 (a contention that the Court will accept even though it does not appear that AR7549 is in the record filed with the Court), that fact does not establish PCDP inconsistency. Accordingly, the Court cannot say the finding of consistency is unsupported by substantial evidence. C. LCP Consistency Bayside contends the Project is inconsistent with policy 2.1.9 of the LCP because that policy "mandate[s] protection and expansion of coastal -dependent over commercial/industrial uses." (Pet.'s Opening Br. at p. 17.) As the District points out, nothing in policy 2.1.9 or its associated sub -policies discusses the relative priority of coastal -dependent uses vis-a-vis utility uses like the Project. (Furthermore, it appears the only hard-and-fast priority is that coastal -dependent uses are prioritized over residential uses, not over commercial/industrial uses. See policy 2.1.9-1, at AR11289.) In any event, the City correctly notes that relative priority matters only if the Back Bay Landing development and the Project are a zero -sum game in terms of developed square footage. Under the PCDP, square footage for a wastewater pump station does not count against commercial, residential, marina, or dry dock square footage. (See AR7612.) The Court cannot say the finding of consistency is unsupported by substantial evidence. Ruling Page 12 13-142 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 D. Coastal Act Consisten Bayside contends the Project is inconsistent with multiple sections of the Coastal Act, in particular Pub. Resources Code §§ 30213, 30221, 30222, 30224, and 30253(e), and policy 3.2.1-1 of the LCP, which similarly requires protection of coastal recreation opportunities. The Court agrees with the District that § 30222 is inapplicable. On its face, that statute prioritizes "visitor -serving commercial recreational facilities designed to enhance public opportunities for coastal recreation ... over private residential, general industrial, or general commercial development, but not over agriculture or coastal -dependent industry." Again, the Project is a utility use, not one of the categories enumerated in this statute. Of the remaining provisions, the only one discussed in any detail in Bayside's briefing (opening, reply, or supplemental) is § 30253(e) of the Coastal Act. The remainder are simply referred to in laundry lists without discussion of any particular alleged inconsistencies. Because Bayside bears the burden of showing an abuse of discretion, the Court finds the failure to specifically discuss §§ 30123, 30221, and 30224 of the Coastal Act, as well as policy 3.2.1-1 of the LCP, means Bayside has not shown an abuse of discretion in the District's finding of consistency. As to § 30253(e), it provides: "New development shall ... [w]here appropriate, protect special communities and neighborhoods that, because of their unique characteristics, are popular visitor destination points for recreational use." "Where appropriate" is an important qualifier here, as the District flags a competing provision of the Coastal Act, § 30231, which provides: "The biological productivity and the quality of coastal waters, streams, wetlands, estuaries, and lakes appropriate to maintain optimum populations of marine organisms and for the protection of human health shall be maintained and, where feasible, restored Ruling Page 13 13-143 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 through, among other means, minimizing adverse effects of waste water discharges and entrainment ...." The administrative record contains evidence that the current pump station is deteriorating and does not meet current standards for construction, electrical equipment, or maintenance. (AR187.) The record also contains evidence that failure of the system could result in the release of sewage into Newport Bay. (AR187, 245.) Section 30231 of the Coastal Act imposes a mandatory policy for protecting water quality (it "shall be maintained"), while § 30253(e) only imposes a duty to protect recreational use "where appropriate." On this record, the Court cannot say the District lacked substantial evidence to conclude its duties under § 30231 prevailed over its duties under § 30253(e), and thereby to conclude the Project is consistent with the Coastal Act. Put another way, Bayside must show the District abused its discretion in finding the "where appropriate" qualifier in § 30253(e) inapplicable here, and it has not met its burden to do so. VI. ADEQUACY OF RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Bayside contends the District's response to comments prior to certification of the FEIR is inadequate. The Court agrees with the District that Bayside failed to exhaust its administrative remedies on this issue. "[T]he time for complaining about the inadequacy of [the District's] responses was when the issue was before the agency and any alleged deficiency could be explained or corrected." (Towards Responsibility in Planning v. City Council (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 671, 682.) Bayside points to nothing in the record indicating that the alleged inadequacy of the District's responses was raised at the administrative stage. As a result, this challenge is barred. Bayside responds that the foregoing statement from Towards Responsibility is dictum unnecessary to the holding. This is true enough, as the Court of Appeal in that case found the agency's response to comments adequate on the merits. But Ruling Page 14 13-144 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 "[t]o say that dicta are not controlling [citation] does not mean that they are to be ignored; on the contrary, dicta are often followed." (9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (6th ed. 2022) Appeal § 532.) And while Bayside cites a number of cases on page 21 of its supplemental brief holding that inadequate responses to comments may render an EIR defective, none of those cases discusses the effect of the challenger's failure to raise the inadequacy issue before the agency. VII. REMEDIES AND CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, Bayside's petition is GRANTED on the ground that the description of the construction staging area is inadequate, and for the related reason that AES-1 is a toothless mitigation measure as a result. Bayside asks the Court to set aside the District's Project approvals and EIR certification. Public Resources Code § 21168.9 gives the Court discretion to fashion a narrower remedy. "The 1993 amendments to section 21168.9 expanded the trial court's authority and 'expressly authorized the court to fashion a remedy that permits some part of the project to go forward while an agency seeks to remedy its CEQA violations. In other words, the issuance of a writ need not always halt all work on a project.' [Citation.]" (San Bernardino Valley Audubon Soc. V. Metropolitan Water Dist. of Southern California (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 1097, 1104- 1105.) "The choice of a lesser remedy involves the trial court's consideration of equitable principles." (Id., at p. 1104.) As discussed above, Bayside's challenge is largely unsuccessful. And the vast majority of Bayside's challenge has little, if anything, to do with construction staging issues. The Court therefore finds the remainder of the Project severable from the construction staging issues. The Court further finds severance will not prejudice full and complete compliance with CEQA, because the remainder of the Project is CEQA-compliant. (Pub. Resources Code § 21168.9(b).) Ruling Page 15 13-145 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 In considering equitable principles to fashion a remedy, the Court is especially mindful of the severe risk to the environment that would be posed by the outdated pumping station and force mains failing and spilling raw sewage into Newport Bay. Furthermore, as explained in the District's filings in the companion eminent domain case, permitting from the relevant authorities is expected to take 9-12 months, with construction not starting for another six months after that. (See OC Superior Court case no. 2022-01251890, ROA 92, at pp. 2-3.) Based on representations made at the hearing, it appears that the City will not allow the permitting process to start without OCSD approval of the Project and its certification of the EIR. Of course, stalling that already lengthy process increases the risk of the very sewage spill the Project seeks to prevent. Because the issues with construction staging are both severable and appear to be readily correctable, and given the overriding need for the Project, OCSD will not be required to withdraw its approvals for the Project and certification of the EIR. As explained by the court in Preserve Wild Santee v. City of Santee (2012) 210 Cal. App. 4t" 260, 287-88: In our view, a reasonable, commonsense reading of section 21168.9 plainly forecloses plaintiffs' assertion that a trial court must mandate a public agency decertify the EIR and void all related project approvals in every instance where the court finds an EIR violates CEQA. Such a rigid requirement directly conflicts with the "in part" language in section 21168.9, subdivision (a)(1), which specifically allows a court to direct its mandates to parts of determinations, parts of findings, or parts of decisions. Such a rigid requirement also conflicts with the language in section 21168.9, subdivision (bl, limiting the court's mandates to only those necessary to achieve CEQA compliance and, if the court makes specified findings, to only "that portion of a determination, finding, or decision" violating CEQA. (Italics added.) Ruling Page 16 13-146 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC v. ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 21- 1194238 Accordingly, the Court will impose the limited remedy of requiring OCSD to bring the EIR into CEQA compliance with respect to the construction staging issue and the related question of the enforceability of AES-1. Because the District's CEQA noncompliance involves construction issues, this means no construction or other physical activity may take place at the Project site until the District is in compliance with CEQA. Whether bringing the EIR into compliance can be accomplished via a supplemental EIR (CEQA Guidelines § 15163) or an addendum (CEQA Guidelines § 15164) will be left to OCSD to decide. Note that the Court's order includes only these mandates, which are necessary to achieve compliance with CEQA. (See Pub. Resources Code § 21168.9(b).) In order to avoid unnecessary delay that increases the risk of a sewage spill, the District may continue to seek the necessary permits from the City, Coastal Commission, etc. to move forward with the Project, and it may continue to pursue the companion eminent domain action. Bayside shall prepare a proposed order in accordance with this ruling and provide it to OCSD for comments before submitting it to the Court. Ruling Page 17 13-147 EXHIBIT B [OCSD Response to 1/31/24 Appeal] 13-148 30-2021-01 Electronically Filed by Superior Court of California, County of Orange, 08/28/2023 03:49:00 PM. 238-CU-WM-CXC - ROA # 226 - DAVID H. YAMASAKI, Clerk of the Court By G. Hernandez, Deputy Clerk. 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Fee Exempt Per Gov. Code § 6103 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC BRADLEY R. HOGIN - State Bar No. 140372 bhogin@woodruff.law RICIA R. HAGER - State Bar No. 234052 rhager@woodruff.law 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7670 Telephone: (714) 558-7000 Facsimile: (714) 835-7787 Attorneys for Respondent ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT et. al. SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, Petitioner, \A ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT; ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS; AND DOES 1-25, INCLUSIVE, Respondents. CASE NO.: 30-2021-01194238 ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM CLASTER DEPARTMENT: CX104 STIPULATION DISCHARGING THE PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE AND DISMISSING THE CASE; [PROPOSED] ORDER HEARING DATES PENDING: Type: Hearing on Writ Return Date: November 3, 2023 Time: 10:30 a.m. Dept: CX104 DATE ACTION FILED: April 19, 2021 TRIAL DATE: None This stipulation is entered into between the parties through their respective counsel as follows: RECITALS WHEREAS, on February 7, 2023, the Court entered a Peremptory Writ of Mandate in this matter; WHEREAS, on July 27, 2023, Respondent Orange County Sanitation District timely filed a Return on the Peremptory Writ of Mandate (the "Return"); I STIPULATION DISCHARGING THE PREEMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE AND DISMISSING THE CASE; 1786198.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 13-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 lL 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, Petitioners previously requested, and the Court set, a hearing on the Return for November 3, 2023; WHEREAS, the parties now agree that the Peremptory Writ of Mandate should be discharged; WHEREAS, the parties agree the hearing set for November 3, 2023 should be vacated; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that the case should be dismissed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: 1. The Peremptory Writ of Mandate should be discharged. 2. The November 3, 2023, hearing date should be vacated. 3. This case should be dismissed. DATED: August 28, 2023 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC DATED: August 24, 2023 By:/s/Bradley R. Hogin BRADLEY R. HOGIN RICIA R. HAGER Attorneys for Respondents ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT and ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOSSAMAN LLP By: P. ERSKINE JOHN J. FLYNN III Attorney for Petitioner BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC 2 STIPULATION DISCHARGING THE PREEMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE AND DISMISSING THE CASE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1786198.1 13-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties having entered into a written stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Peremptory Writ of Mandate issued in this case on February 7, 2023 is hereby discharged. 2. The hearing on the Return on the Peremptory Writ of Mandate set for November 3, 2023, is hereby vacated. 3. This case is dismissed. DATED: 08/28/2023 HON. WILLIAM CLASTER JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT STIPULATION DISCHARGING THE PREEMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE AND DISMISSING THE CASE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1786198.1 13-151 EXHIBIT C [OCSD Response to 1/31/24 Appeal] 13-152 iFFRT.'1 r1 :lectronically Received by Superior Court of California, County of Orange, 09/14/2023 03:17:11 PM. -01251890-CU-El-CXC - ROA # 159 - DAVID H. YAMASAKI, Clerk of the Court By eClerk, Deputy Clerk. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Fee Exempt Per Gov. Code § 6103 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC GARY C. WEISBERG - State Bar No. 132092 gweisberg@woodruff.law MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO - State Bar No. 186882 mdangelo@woodruff.law ELIZABETH VALADEZ - State Bar No. 216235 evaladez@woodruff.law 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7670 Telephone: (714) 558-7000 Facsimile: (714) 835-7787 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public entity SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CIVIL COMPLEX CENTER ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, CASE NO.: 30-2022-01251890-CU-EI-CXC a public entity, [Related to: 30-2021-01194238-CU-EI-CXC Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Plaintiff, Sanitation District, et al.] BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, a California limited liability company; LAGUNA BEACH COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a public entity; DOES 1 through 100, inclusive; and ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, Defendants. ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM CLASTER DEPARTMENT: CX-104 STIPULATION FOR ORDER RE WITHDRAWAL OF DEPOSIT OF PROBABLE COMPENSATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON [Assessor Parcel No. 440-132-60] HEARING DATES PENDING: Status Conference Date: February 7, 2024 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: CX 104 Trial Readiness Conference Date: May 10, 2024 Time: 1:30 p.m. Dept: CX104 Trial Date: May 20, 2024 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept: CX 104 DATE ACTION FILED: March 25, 2022 TRIAL DATE: Mav 20. 2024 STIPULATION FOR ORDER RE WITHDRAWAL OF DEPOSIT OF PROBABLE COMPENSATION 1789574.1 13-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 H 13 ¢W 14 wig ww� ��O qOO 15 3 L 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Orange County Sanitation District ("Plaintiff' or "OC San") and Defendant Bayside Village Marina LLC, a California limited liability company ("Defendant" or "Bayside") (individually, "Party," and collectively, "Parties"), through their counsel of record, stipulate to Bayside's withdrawal of the deposit of probable just compensation from the California State Treasurer in the sum of Four Million Three Hundred Seventy -Nine Thousand Five Hundred Eighteen Dollars and Zero Cents ($4,379,518.00) ("Condemnation Deposit"), with reference to the following facts: A. On March 25, 2022, OCTA filed its complaint in eminent domain seeking to acquire certain property interests within portions of Assessor Parcel No. 440-132-60 (the "Property"). The interests in the Subject Property sought to be acquired include one partial fee acquisition (Parcel 5- 67-01), a permanent non-exclusive access easement (Parcel 5-67-02), a temporary road easement (Parcel 5-67-03), three temporary construction easements (Parcels 5-67-04, 5-67-05, and 5-67-06), and two permanent sewer easements (Parcels 5-67-07 and 5-67-08) (collectively, the "Property Interests"). B. Bayside is the owner of the Property. C. On or about April 4, 2022, OC San deposited with the California State Treasurer's Office the Condemnation Deposit as the probable amount of compensation that would be awarded herein pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1255.010, subdivision (a). D. No portion of the Condemnation Deposit has been withdrawn by any party hereto. E. Defendant Laguna Beach County Water District disclaimed its interest in the Condemnation Deposit via a disclaimer filed with the Court on August 29, 2022. F. The Parties wish to enter into this stipulation to allow Bayside to immediately withdraw the entirety of the Condemnation Deposit. IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between OC San and Bayside, as follows: 1. The statements set forth above are incorporated herein through this reference. 2. No other parties have an interest in the Property Interests or in the Condemnation Deposit. 2 STIPULATION FOR ORDER RE WITHDRAWAL OF DEPOSIT OF PROBABLE COMPENSATION 1789574.1 13-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 H 13 ¢W 14 wig ww� ��O qOO 15 3 1 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. OC San shall receive a credit in the full amount of the Condemnation Deposit against any judgement entered against it at trial, by stipulated judgment or upon the execution of an out -of - court settlement agreement between the Parties. 4. If the amount awarded by judgement in favor of Bayside and against OC San is less than the full amount of the Condemnation Deposit, Bayside shall issue payment in the excess amount to OC San within 45 days of entry of judgment. 5. Bayside is entitled to the immediate release of the Condemnation Deposit. 6. The Court may enter an Order in the form attached hereto authorizing and directing the California State Treasurer to issue payment as follows: A check in the amount of Four Million Three Hundred Seventy -Nine Thousand Five Hundred Eighteen Dollars and Zero Cents ($4,379,518.00) made payable to `Bayside Village Marina LLC" and mailed to: Brad B. Kuhn, Esq., NOSSAMAN LLP, 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800, Irvine, CA 92612. 7. This Stipulation may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original, but all of which shall constitute one Stipulation. IT IS SO STIPULATED, AGREED AND REQUESTED. Dated: September 14, 2023 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC By: Is/ Elizabeth Valadez GARY WEISBERG MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO ELIZABETH VALADEZ Attorney for Plaintiff Orange County Sanitation District Dated: September 14, 2023 NOSSAMAN LLP BRADFORD B. KUHN By: Is/ Bradford B. Kuhn JOHN P. ERSKINE BRADFORD B. KUHN Attorney for Defendant Bayside Village Marina LLC STIPULATION FOR ORDER RE WITHDRAWAL OF DEPOSIT OF PROBABLE COMPENSATION 1789574.1 13-1 30-2022-01: Electronically Filed by Superior Court of California, County of Orange, 09/15/2023 09:34:00 AM. 51890-CU-EI-CXC - ROA # 164 - DAVID H. YAMASAKI, Clerk of the Court By G. Hernandez, Deputy Clerk. 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Fee Exempt Per Gov. Code § 6103 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC GARY C. WEISBERG - State Bar No. 132092 gweisberg@woodruff.law MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO - State Bar No. 186882 mdangelo@woodruff.law ELIZABETH VALADEZ - State Bar No. 216235 evaladez@woodruff.law 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7670 Telephone: (714) 558-7000 Facsimile: (714) 835-7787 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public entity SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, CIVIL COMPLEX CENTER ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, CASE NO.: 30-2022-01251890-CU-EI-CXC a public entity, [Related to: 30-2021-01194238-CU-EI-CXC Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Plaintiff, Sanitation District, et al.] BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, a California limited liability company; LAGUNA BEACH COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a public entity; DOES 1 through 100, inclusive; and ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, Defendants. ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM CLASTER DEPARTMENT: CX-104 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S WITHDRAWAL OF PROBABLE COMPENSATION ON DEPOSIT WITH THE STATE TREASURER [Assessor Parcel No. 440-132-60] HEARING DATES PENDING: Status Conference Date: February 7, 2024 Time: 8:30 a.m. Dept: CX 104 Trial Readiness Conference Date: May 10, 2024 Time: 1:30 p.m. Dept: CX 104 Trial Date: May 20, 2024 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept: CX 104 DATE ACTION FILED: March 25, 2022 TRIAL DATE: May 20, 2024 i7a 6 PRoz.iOPOSED] ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S WITHDRAWAL OF PROBABLE COMPENSATION ON DEPOSIT 13-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court having considered the stipulation entered into by Plaintiff Orange County Sanitation District ("Plaintiff' or "OC San") and Defendant Bayside Village Marina LLC, a California limited liability company ("Defendant" or "Bayside") (individually, "Parry," and collectively, "Parties"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDICATED AS FOLLOWS: 1. No other parties have an interest in the Property Interests or in the probable compensation on deposit with the California State Treasurer in the sum of Four Million Three Hundred Seventy -Nine Thousand Five Hundred Eighteen Dollars and Zero Cents ($4,379,518.00) ("Condemnation Deposit"). 2. OC San shall receive a credit in the full amount of the Condemnation Deposit against any judgement entered against it at trial, by stipulated judgment or upon the execution of an out -of - court settlement agreement between the Parties. 3. If the amount awarded by judgement in favor of Bayside and against OC San is less than the full amount of the Condemnation Deposit, Bayside shall issue payment in the excess amount to OC San within 45 days of entry of judgment. 4. Bayside is entitled to the immediate release of the Condemnation Deposit. 5. The California State Treasurer is hereby authorized, directed and ordered to issue payment as follows: A check in the amount of Four Million Three Hundred Seventy -Nine Thousand Five Hundred Eighteen Dollars and Zero Cents ($4,379,518.00) made payable to `Bayside Village Marina LLC" and mailed to Brad B. Kuhn, Esq., NOSSAMAN LLP, 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800, Irvine, CA 92612. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 09/15/2023 u� THE HONORABLE WILLIAM CLASTER Judge of the Superior Court i7a 6 PRoz.iOPOSED] ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S WITHDRAWAL OF PROBABLE COMPENSATION ON DEPOSIT 13-15-1 EXHIBIT D [OCSD Response to 1/31/24 Appeal] 13-158 30-2022-0 Electronically Filed by Superior Court of California, County of Orange, 01/31/2024 11:14:00 AM. i1890-CU-El-CXC - ROA # 175 - DAVID H. YAMASAKI, Clerk of the Court By E. efilinguser, Deputy Clerk. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC GARY C. WEISBERG - State Bar No. 132092 gweisberg@woodruff.law MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO - State Bar No. 186882 mdangelo@woodruff.law ELIZABETH VALADEZ - State Bar No. 216235 evaladez@woodruff.law 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7670 Telephone: (714) 558-7000 Facsimile: (714) 835-7787 Fee Exempt Per Gov. Code § 6103 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public entity SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, COMPLEX JUSTICE CENTER ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public entity, Plaintiff, a BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, a California limited liability company; LAGUNA BEACH COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a public entity; DOES 1 through 100, inclusive; and ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, Defendants. CASE NO.: 30-2022-01251890-CU-EI-CXC (Related to 30-2021-0119423 8-CU-EI-CXC Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al.) ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM CLASTER DEPARTMENT: CX-101 JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT [Assessor Parcel No. 440-132-60V HEARING DATES PENDING: Type: Status Conference Date: February 7, 2024 Time: 8:30 a.m. Type: Trial Readiness Conference Date: Auggust 2, 2024 Tit 1:30 Tip.m. Type: Trial Date: August 12, 2024 Time: 9:00 a.m. DATE ACTION FILED: March 25, 2022 JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT 801457.1 13-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 H 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public entity ("OC San") and BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, a California limited liability company ("BVM" or "Bayside") submit the following Joint Status Conference Statement. I"i INTRODUCTION In this eminent domain action, OC San is acquiring permanent and temporary property interests in real property located at 100 N. Bayside Drive and 100 E. Coast Highway in the City of Newport Beach, California (the "Property"). The property interests being acquired consist of a partial fee interest (Parcel 5-67-01), a permanent non-exclusive access easement (Parcel 5-67-02), a temporary road easement (Parcel 5-67-03), temporary construction easements (Parcels 5-67-04, -05, and -06), and permanent utility easements (Parcels 5-67-07 and -08) (collectively, the "Property Interests"). The Property Interests are being acquired for the construction of the Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (the "Project"). BVM is the fee owner of the Property. Laguna Beach County Water District ("LBCWD") was also named as a defendant in this action as an easement holder in the Property but has disclaimed all interest to compensation in the action. OC San contends the Project is needed to rehabilitate or replace aging infrastructure facilities that are vital for the delivery and processing of sewer wastewater in Newport Beach and surrounding areas. OC San further contends that the Project will bring the facility and its component parts to current design and reliability standards to ensure continuous service to the community and prevent sewage spills, to improve odor control, and to improve public safety. According to OC San, the Project includes demolition of the existing pump station building and construction of a new pump station, including a modernized pump station, generator, and odor control station and two new force mains under the Newport Harbor Channel. BVM is no longer contesting OC San's right to acquire the Property Interests or to build the Project in this eminent domain action, reserving only the issue of just compensation under the applicable Eminent Domain Law. 1801457.1 JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT 13-1E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 H 13 10 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1® PROCEDURAL STATUS OF CASE OC San filed its Complaint in Eminent Domain on March 25, 2022, and BVM filed its Answer to the complaint on May 9, 2022. On August 29, 2022, a disclaimer of interest by LBCWD was filed with the Court. There are no other claims being brought by OC San, and there are no crossclaims. Presently, no additional parties are anticipated to be added to the I action. OC San's deposit of its estimate of probable compensation pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1255.010(a) was made with the California State Treasurer on April 4, 2022. OC San subsequently filed a motion for pre judgment possession of the Property Interests, which motion was granted on January 3, 2023, subject to the terms of the Court's order. In the course of these proceedings, BVM agreed to allow OC San temporary access to the property at -issue to conduct preliminary testing and analysis necessary to process permit applications with the City of Newport Beach, the California Coastal Commission, and other regulatory agencies. That work was completed on June 5, 2023 (though there is some continuing periodic work associated with measuring ground water levels). OC San's efforts to secure the various permits from the regulatory agencies to build the Project is ongoing, and is incomplete as of this date. This case was deemed related to Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, etc., et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238- CU-EI-CXC ("Related Case"). However, as described below, the writ of mandate in the Related Case was discharged and that case dismissed by stipulated order dated August 8, 2023. 3. CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES BVM having now waived all its challenges and objections to OC San's right to acquire the Property Interests, the only remaining issues in this proceeding pertain to the amount of just compensation owing for such acquisition. BVM seeks reimbursement for its independent appraisal, compensation for the property sought to be taken, compensation for the temporary and permanent injury to the remainder of the property, compensation for damage to its fixtures, 3 JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT 1801457.1 13-16, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 H 13 10 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 equipment and improvements pertaining to the realty, compensation for mitigation costs, compensation for pre -condemnation damages, and all other amounts as are just and proper. BVM originally asserted a "loss of business" claim but subsequently waived that claim in verified responses to written discovery. As to BVM's claim for purported pre -condemnation damages, OC San contends that entitlement to those damages must be determined by the Court in advance of the jury trial. Im STATUS OF DISCOVERY The parties have exchanged written discovery and tens of thousands of pages of documents in response to requests for production of documents. OC San also obtained documents from the City of Newport Beach and the California Coastal Commission through requests under the California Public Records Act. Additionally, the depositions of four different witnesses as designated "persons most qualified" at OC San have been completed. OC San has issued business records subpoenas to various third -party witnesses identified in documents produced by Bayside, and recently served notice of the deposition of the person(s) most qualified of Bayside. Bayside has taken persons most qualified depositions of OC San and intends to take additional depositions of OC San project management, and serve additional written discovery, primarily to address issues the deponents could not address. 5. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION The parties participated in two private mediations in hopes of resolving the compensation and related issues. The mediations were not successful. However, the parties are amenable to participate in further mediation efforts after they have an opportunity to complete discovery and engage in informal discussions regarding their respective contentions. 6. DESCRIPTION OF CORE LEGAL AND FACTUAL ISSUES IN THE CASE The typical condemnation trial has two phases: the prima facie phase and the valuation phase. In the prima facie phase of the trial, the condemning agency establishes the public use and necessity for the project and acquisition. In the valuation phase, a jury determines the value of the property interests being acquired and the resulting damages (if any). The parties 4 JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT 1801457.1 13-16 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 agree that the public use and necessity for project and acquisition are no longer at issue in this case, leaving the amount of compensation due as the sole remaining issue. OC San also contends that entitlement to pre -condemnation damages must be determined by the Court in advance of the jury trial. 7. CONCLUSION The parties request that the Court continue the status conference considering the recent continuance of the trial date from May 20, 2024, to August 12, 2024. DATED: January 31, 2024 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC By: GARY C. WEISBERG MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO ELIZABETH VALADEZ Attorneys for Plaintiff ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public entity DATED: January 31, 2024 NOSSAMAN LLP By: BRADFORD B. KUHN JOHN P. ERSKINE Attorneys for Defendant BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, a California limited liability company JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT 1801457.1 13-16 Attachment I Coastal Hazards Report 13-164 Memo SUBJECT Coastal Hazards Analysis TO Orange County Sanitation District Introduction PROJECT Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement Project (5-67) DATE October 2023 04ARCADIS This memorandum summarizes the analysis for coastal hazards for the Bay Bridge Pump Station (BBPS) Replacement Project, Newport Beach, Orange County, California. The Orange County Sanitation District (OC San) proposes to replace the existing BBPS with a new pump station and force main infrastructure. The existing BBPS is over 50 years old, outdated, and no longer meets structural, electrical, and maintenance standards. The Project includes replacing the existing pump station and force mains with a new pump station, replacement force mains, a new electrical building, a new emergency generator building, and an odor control structure. The new pump station will include a trench -type wet well and a dry well for housing the pumps, motors, and other mechanical equipment. As shown on Figure 1, the pump station site also includes an electrical building, a generator building, and an odor control structure. The proposed electrical building includes the electrical equipment, instrumentation, control equipment, and restroom. The electrical building has a finished floor elevation of 15.50 feet NAVD88 and is elevated from the grade level. The entrance to the underground pump station dry well is also elevated to the same elevation of the electrical building finished floor at 15.5 feet NVAD88. The generator room finished floor is 14.17 feet NAVD88 and the generator will be mounted on a 2-ft-high belly fuel tank. The odor control structure finished floor is 14.00 feet NAVD88. The new force main will be installed beneath the Newport Bay Channel and would not be affected by coastal processes and is not included in the analysis. This memorandum summarizes the potential impacts on the BBPS resulting from anticipated sea level rise, coastal geologic instability, and flooding per the requirements of the Newport Beach Local Coastal Plan Policies LUPs 2.8.1-1, 2.8.-2 and 2.8.1-4 and per Section 30253 of the Coastal Act. Site Characteristics and Land Use The Project site is located within a fully developed and urbanized area north of East Coast Highway. The existing BBPS is approximately 4,800 square feet, occupied by a single -story pump station building. The perimeter of the pump station building is surrounded by concrete masonry walls on all sides with two entrance gates. The existing facility is located on a parcel that is surrounded to the north, east, and west by a recreational vehicle storage area. Seven acres of the site are planned for a mixed -use development. Surrounding land uses include residential, commercial, and commercial recreational marine uses. Within the vicinity of the Project, East Coast Highway, also known as State Route 1 is a 7 to 8 lane roadway including a bridge that crosses the Newport Bay Channel. Bayside Drive is located to the east of the Project and is a 4 lane, designated secondary road. Sea Level Rise Evaluation and Flooding Several analyses have been conducted to understand the potential for anticipated Sea Level Rise (SLR) to impact the BBPS and whether the facility is at risk. In 2019, OC San prepared the Resiliency Study SP-152 (Resiliency Study) which examined the potential climate change impact, including SLR on OC San facilities throughout its service area. The Resiliency Study used SLR projections from the Rising Seas Report and California's Fourth Assessment (Hall 2018) as representing the state 13-165 Orange County Sanitation District Coastal Hazard Analysis October 2022 of science for SLR for the Orange County area. Relying on Hall 2018, OC San used SLR increases of 1.54 feet for 2050 and 3.71 feet for the year 2070 (Hazen 2019) to determine the potential risk of SLR in 2050 and 2070. Using the 2050 and 2070 projections, the Resiliency study did not identify the BBPS site as having a significant risk associated with SLR in Year 2050 or 2070 (Hazen 2019). The design also considers the most conservative SLR reference from the State of California's Sea Level Rise Guidance (California Ocean Protection Council 2018) and Critical Infrastructure at Risk: Sea Level Rise Planning Guidance for California's Coastal Zone (California Coastal Commission 2021). According to the State of California's Sea Level Rise Guidance (California Ocean Protection Council 2018), the H++ scenario SLR for Los Angeles are 2.6 feet by 2050, 6.4 feet by 2080, and 9.9 feet by 2100. According to the State Sea -Level Rise Guidance, under the H++ SLR scenario, 2.7 feet of SLR can be expected by 2050, 6.6 feet by 2080, and 10.2 feet by 2100 (California Coastal Commission 2021). The life expectancy of the new pump station will be around 50 years and the 6.6 feet SLR of Year 2080 based on California Coastal Commission 2021 will be used for evaluation. The SLR is evaluated based on the mean high water (MHW). The MHW is 4.50 feet NAVD88 for Newport Beach Bay Per NOAA Tides & Currents. The Our Coast Our Future (OCOF) map with projection of 6.6-ft SLR above MHW is shown on Figure 2. A portion of the existing site is shown inundated based on the 2080 SLR of 6.6-ft SLR Above MHW (11.10 feet NAVD88). The BBPS design took a conservative approach of designing to a minimum floor elevation of 14.00 feet NAVD88 as shown on Figure 1. Using this minimum floor elevation, construction of the new BBPS would avoid SLR impacts for the anticipated life of the facility. Per comments received from the City of Newport Beach on August 3, 2023, a maximum bay water elevation of 7.7 feet NVAD88 was evaluated for SLR. The 6.6-ft SLR above the maximum bay water elevation leads to 14.3 ft NVAD88 elevation. The electrical room and the entrance to the underground pump station are at 15.5 ft NVAD88, hence, the electrical equipment and underground pump station will be protected from SLR. The generator room finished floor is 14.17 feet NAVD88, however, the generator will be mounted on a 2-ft-high belly fuel tank and the generator panels will be mounted 3.5 ft above finished floor. Therefore, the generator and panels will be located higher than 14.3 ft NVAD88 elevation and protected from SLR. The odor control area finished floor is at 14 ft NVAD88. The liquid odor control is not critical process for the facility, however, measures have been incorporated to protect from SLR. For example, the foul air fan and carbon scrubber will be mounted on equipment pads and the equipment will be higher than SLR elevation of 14.3 ft NVAD88. In addition, flood barrier/shield can be used for odor control area pedestrian door and temporary measures such as sand bags can be used for roll up gate. Waterproofing admixtures such as Dry -Block or Eucon Blocktite systems will be used for the odor control area structure block walls to protect the facilities from flooding. Per the discussion above, the BBPS critical process will be protected from SLR based on either MHW or maximum bay water level elevation. Flooding & Tsunami According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 2019 FIRM map, the Project is not located within the 100 year flood hazard zones (Figure 3). As analyzed in the 2020 Recirculated Environmental Impact Report (Michael Baker International 2020), less than significant impacts are anticipated in the event of the 100- year flood. The Project site is located within the designated tsunami zone (California Department of Conservation 2022). During design of the BBPS, the engineers used the American Society of Civil Engineer's (ASCE) Tsunami Design www.arcadis.com 2/4 Coastal Hazards Analysis 13-166 Orange County Sanitation District Coastal Hazard Analysis October 2022 Zone (TDZ) to determine the Maximum Considered Tsunami (MCT). In the event of a tsunami, the Project site could be expected to see some minor flooding and the run up elevation at the Project site is 7.24 feet above MHW or 11.74 feet NAVD88 (Figure 4 and 5). Figure 4 shows that in the event of tsunami, the parking areas may be expected to see minor flooding. However, because the minimum floor elevation of the new BBPS would be 14.00 feet NAVD88, the new facilities would not be subjected to inundation. Furthermore, onsite drainage is routed to the BBPS. The pump station is designed to operate even if the site is inundated. Therefore, the risk of flooding the pump station is minimal. Ground Improvements and Shoring The Project site is located in an area of potential liquefaction. To mitigate the potential for liquefaction, static settlement, and differential settlement, the new pump station will be excavated over 35 feet deep such that the impacts from liquefaction are not anticipated. The ground improvement plan for the overall pump station site can be referenced to the Geotechnical Design Report enclosed in the permitting package. Deep excavation will require shoring and design is exploring several techniques including, but not limited to slurry diaphragm wall, secant pile wall shoring, solid sheet pile wall, or a combination of shoring techniques. Erosion and Shoreline Loss The location of the BBPS is located within a developed area and is not located at the shoreline or at the bank of the Newport Bay Channel. The Project site is not subject to erosion and shoreline loss. The BBPS would not be subjected to erosion or shoreline loss as a result of waves or wave run up. The Project does not include, and does not require shoreline protection. Summary and Conclusion The BBPS Project has been analyzed with regards to postal coastal hazards, including SLR, flooding, tsunami, and geologic stability. The new BBPS will be located in a developed area, including the location of the existing BBPS. The new BBPS is designed to ensure that the facilities would not be subjected to the SLR and tsunami impacts. www.arcadis.com 3/4 Coastal Hazards Analysis 13-167 Orange County Sanitation District Coastal Hazard Analysis October 2022 References: Michael Baker International. 2020. Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) 2020 Recirculated Environmental Impact Report. May 2020. Arcadis. 2022. Preliminary Design Report Project No. 5-67 Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement. California Coastal Commission. 2021. Critical Infrastructure at Risk: Sea Level Rise Planning Guidance for California's Coastal Zone. Final Adopted Guidance. November 17, 2021. California Department of Conservation. 2022. Orange County Tsunami Hazard Areas. Website located at https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/tsunami/maps/orange. Retrieved June 17, 2022 California Ocean Protection Council. 2018. State of California's Sea Level Rise Guidance. March 14, 2018. Hall, Alex, Neil Berg, Katharine Reich. (University of California, Los Angeles). 2018. Los Angeles Summary Report. California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment. Publication number: SUM-CCCA4-2018-007 Hazen. 2019. Climate Resiliency Study. Final Report. SP-152. November 27, 2019. Our Coast Our Future Mapping Tool. 2022. Website located at: https://ourcoastourfuture.org/ retrieved June 10, 2022 NOAA Tides & Currents Datums for Newport Beach. Website located at: https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/datums.html?datum=NAVD88&units=0&epoch=0&id=9410580&name=NEWPO RT+BEACH %2C+NEWPORT+BAY+ENTRANCE&state=CA retrieved August 22, 2023 Enc. [Enclosures] www.arcadis.com 4/4 Coastal Hazards Analysis 13-168 Attachment J Public View Analysis 13-169 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 0 10 0 C 0 o_ co CL E. CID /IFc�' m r` cO I 0 U) U 0 �o �o c'M OM �a �o N �p O CO N co _ co m EXISTING PUMP STATION PROPOSED NEW PUMP STATION — THE PROPOSED NEW PUMP STATION MAINTAINED THE VIEW CORRIDOR IDENTIFIED IN 2014. THE FUTURE COASTAL PUBLIC VIEW TOWER AND BLUFF IS UNOBSTRUCTED ON THE VIEW CORRIDOR. IN RESPECT TO THE BACK BAY LANDING DEVELOPMENT, A LANDSCAPE SETBACK IS PROVIDED IN FRONT OF PCH PERIMETER WALL. THE BUILDING MASSING AND MATERIALS ARE ADDRESSED TO INTEGRATE WITH SURROUNDING SITE CONTEXT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT. 1 1 LCP RESUBMITTAL MARK I DESCRIPTION DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ _ LINE IS 2 INCHES F AT FULL SIZE —� 06/2023 (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. NOTES: THIS DRAWING CONTAINS COLOR DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND/OR COLOR RENDERINGS. SEE THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS SHEET FOR MAXIMUM CLARITY. VAARCADISI C)c CALLISOK'ORTKLORANGE� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT EAST COAST HIGHWAY VIEW CORRIDORS PER BACK BAY LANDING PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PC-9) — Coastal Public View Tower )Public & ADA Accessible) 0 East Coast H41wa" VIEW CORRIDOR IDENTIFIED IN 2014 VIEW CORRIDOR IDENTIFIED IN 2016 VIEW CORRIDOR COMPARISON BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION 5-67 REPLACEMENT VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS — 01 DRAWING NO.: A9001 SHEET NO.: OF 302 13-170 1 2 K, 21 5 R 7 8 10 0 C 0 E n m m i �o �o 0-)� co a cy)o N co O M N co m MARK V4 - VIEW FROM EAST OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY EXISTING PROPOSED LCP RESUBMITTAL DESCRIPTION 06/2023 DATE I APPR. DESIGNED BY: Designer DRAWN BY: Author CHECKED BY: Checker _ LINE IS 2 INCHES F AT FULL SIZE —� (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) _ Y� V5 - VIEW FROM COAST HIGHWAY & N BAYSIDE DR EXISTING PROPOSED V6 - VIEW FROM N BAYSI DE DR EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES- THIS DRAWING CONTAINS COLOR DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND/OR COLOR RENDERINGS. SEE THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS SHEET FOR MAXIMUM CLARITY. � ARCADIS CALLlS0NRTKL(3 � ORANGE COUNTY SANITATAION DISTRICT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT VISUAL IMPACT ANALYSIS - 03 M �ij all ■aa-1Fa fi'1���'H'11'."f-R�1�■ 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A9003 SHEET NO.: OF 302 13-172 Attachment K Applicant's Project Description 13-173 CICASAN ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Project No. 5-67 Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement Project Description and Justification (Updated November 2023) Orange County Sanitation District (OC San) owns, operates, and maintains the wastewater pump stations and Newport Force Main (NFM) network along the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) in the City of Newport Beach (City), California. The network conveys wastewater to the Plant No. 2 wastewater treatment facility in Huntington Beach. The existing Bay Bridge Pump Station (BBPS) conveys approximately half the wastewater flow generated in the City and the wastewater will eventually be treated at OC San Plant No.2. The locations of the existing and proposed pump stations are shown on Figure ES-1 and Figure ES-2. The existing BBPS was constructed in 1966 (Project No. 5-12) and upgraded in 1995 with new pumps, piping and ventilation modifications, structural upgrades, architectural revisions, and a standby generator (Project 5-33). In 2014, another pump was added for increased capacity and reliability (under Project 5- 60). The existing BBPS has been over 50 years and requires replacement. The Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement Project (Project 5-67) includes the replacement of both the pump station and the associated force mains. The work includes demolition of the existing pump station building, construction of a new underground pump room (approximately. 2,500 sf), and above grade facilities consisting of an electrical room, an odor control facility, and a generator room (three buildings; totaling approximately 3,630 sf). The new dual force main alignment is approximately 1,300 linear feet and is located adjacent to the existing force mains. The following section provides justification and response to findings in accordance with the City's August 3, 2023 request: a. Site Development Review (20.S2.080.F): Finings and Decision. The review Authority may approve or conditionally approve a site development review application, only after first finding that the proposed development is: 1. Allowed within the subject zoning district A wastewater pump station is allowed within the subject zoning district per Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9), Planning Area as identified in Table 2, Permitted Uses under Section III. 2. In compliance with all of the applicable criteria identified in subsection (C)(2)(C) of [Site Development Reviews 20.52.080] i. Compliance with this section, the General Plan, this Zoning Code, and applicable specific plan, and other applicable criteria and policies related to the use or structure The project compliances with the General Plan, Newport Beach Municipal Zoning Code, Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9), and California Building Code. 13-174 CICASAN ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Project No. 5-67 Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement ii. The efficient arrangement of structures on the site and the harmonious relationship of the structures to one another and to other adjacent developments; and whether the relationship is based on standards of good design. The overall layout of structures on the site is dictated by phased construction and service vehicle maneuvering requirements. The structures have been split into two to allow for construction of new pump station before replacing the old one with odor control facility, and allow service vehicle to maneuver between the two. The structures are efficiently arranged on a small site to meet minimum clearances. To create a harmonious relationship of the structures, the design applies an integrated approach and creates a cohesive identity to the split building structures and perimeter walls around the site. With break -down massing, coastal architecture features, and nature inspired materials, the project blends into nearby commercial context and coastal environment with good design strategies and compatible aesthetic qualities. iii. The compatibility in terms of bulk, scale, and aesthetic treatment of structures on the site and adjacent development and public areas The structure design recognizes the light nature of many modern beach structures with cantilevered roof overhang in low profile, simple building fagade composition of base and top, and dynamic integration of materials and details inspired by coastal context. The structure is designed with minimum size and height by functional and security requirement, minimizing visual impact and maximizing unobstructed public views through the site. The building employs light materials at the building tops and heavier materials for the base to break down its scale. Features such as roof overhang, awning canopy and window headers create shadows and details on building fagade that recognizes the breezes and sun that characterize the ocean setting. These architectural devices also blend well into the commercial mixed -use context around the site. Inspired by the coastal bluffs nearby, the bulk of perimeter wall has been broken down into layered and stacked format with a mix of stone and stucco in sandy colors. Together with native plants proposed along the sidewalk, it turns an otherwise passive uniform perimeter wall into a positive interface with pedestrians and surrounding public areas. iv. The adequacy, efficiency, and safety of pedestrians and vehicular access, including drive aisles, driveways, and parking and loading spaces The project is normally unoccupied and not intended to be accessible by the public except regular maintenance crew and vehicles. The proposed accesses are dictated by minimum service vehicle requirements that can be safely used. Sidewalks will be restored to ADA compliant width following project completion. 13-175 OC,SAN ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Project No. 5-67 Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement The adequacy and efficiency of landscaping and open space areas and the use of water efficient plants and irrigation materials All plants are low water drought tolerant plants once established. The following palette will be used: PUMP STATION PLANTING SCHEDULE SHRUBS CODE 130TAN[CAL I COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE QTY DETAIL " � • � MUH RIG MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS I DEER GRASS 1 GAL MODILOW 8 2IL5001 0 PED BRA PEDILANTHUS BRACTEATUS 1 SLIPPER PLANT 1 GAL LOW 21 211-5001 ANNUALSIPERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL I COMMON NAME CONT WATER USE QTY DETAIL G+ AGA ATT AGAVE ATTENUATA I FOXTAIL AGAVE 1 GAL LNL 16 2IL5001 lklffo HE5 PAR HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 1 RED YUCCA 1 GAL UVL 24 21L5001 Open space is maintained between the structures to allow maintenance access, facilitate phased construction, and preserve views. Open spaces will not be open to the public. vi. The protection of significant views from public right-of-way and compliance with Section 20.30.100 (Public View Protection). The structure is designed with minimum size and height by functional and security requirement, to minimize visual impact and maximize unobstructed public views through the site. The structure does not obstruct the public view corridors identified in PC-9. Visual Impact Analysis figures have been prepared and included in the application submittal. 3. Not detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, nor endangers, jeopardizes, or otherwise constitutes a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. The project provides essential infrastructure to the community and contributes to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City. Strict measures have been implemented to mitigate odors and noise from the site. For odors, an odor control facility for both liquid and vapor phase treatment is included. For noise, equipment with lower noise is specified and generally located away from the property line. The standby generator (highest noise producer onsite) has been enclosed in a building with sound attenuation panels. 13-176 CICASAN ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Project No. 5-67 Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement b. Back Bay Landing Site Development Review (PC 9 Section VII, Letter C) 1. The development shall be in compliance with the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan, including design guidelines, and any other applicable plan or criteria related to the development The project compliances with the General Plan, Coastal Land Use Plan, Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development Plan (PC-9). 2. The development shall not be incompatible with the character of the neighboring uses and surrounding sites; The development provides essential infrastructure to adjacent neighborhood and aesthetically compatible with the neighboring uses by applying coastal building features and nature inspired materials. 3. The development shall be sited and designed to maximize the aesthetic quality of the project as viewed from surrounding roadways, properties, and waterfront, with special consideration given to providing a variety of building heights, massing, and architectural treatments to provide public views through the site; The structure design recognizes the light nature of many modern beach structures with cantilevered roof overhang in low profile, simple building facade composition of base and top, and dynamic integration of materials and details inspired by coastal context. The structure is designed with minimum size and height by functional and security requirement, minimizing visual impact and maximizing unobstructed public views through the site. The building employs light materials at the building tops and heavier materials for the base to break down its scale. Features such as roof overhang, awning canopy and window headers create shadows and details on building facade that recognizes the breezes and sun that characterize the ocean setting. These architectural devices also blend well into the commercial mixed -use context around the site. Inspired by the coastal bluffs nearby, the bulk of perimeter wall has been broken down into layered and stacked format with a mix of stone and stucco in sandy colors. Together with the native plants proposed along the sidewalk, it turns an otherwise passive uniform perimeter wall into a positive interface with pedestrians and surrounding public areas. 4. Site plan and layout of buildings, parking areas, pedestrian and vehicular access ways, landscaping and other site features shall give proper consideration to functional aspects of site development, The overall layout of structures on the site is dictated by phased construction and service vehicle maneuvering requirements. The structures have been split into two to allow for construction of new pump station before replacing the old one with odor control facility, and allow service vehicle to maneuver between the two. The structures are efficiently arranged on a tight site to meet minimum clearances. 13-177 CICASAN ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Project No. 5-67 Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement 5. The development shall not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. The project provides essential infrastructure to the community and contributes to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City. Strict measures have been implemented to mitigate odors and noise from the site. For odors, an odor control facility for both liquid and vapor phase treatment is included. For noise, equipment with lower noise is specified and generally located away from the property line. The standby generator (highest noise producer onsite) has been enclosed in a building with sound attenuation panels. c. Coastal Development Permit (21.52.015.F) F. Findings and Decision. The review authority may approve or conditionally approve a coastal development permit application, only after first finding that the proposed development: 1. Conforms to all applicable section of the certified Local Coastal Program See discussion in Sections 'a' and 'b' above on Back Bay Landing Planned Community Development zoning requirements. 2. Conforms with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter of the Coastal Act if the project is located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the coastal zone. The project conforms with the public access. The project is NOT located between the nearest public road and the sea or shoreline of any body of water located within the coastal zone. The following discussion is specific to the City of Newport Beach Coastal Land Use Plan: Land Use Policies for Back Bay Landing Area — Section 2.1.9 of the LCP identifies Back Bay Landing land use requirements (Policies 2.1.9-1 thru 2.1-9-5). The policy requires coastal -dependent, coastal -related and visitor -serving development. The project architecture is coastal inspired and it serves visitors as well as residents of the City by providing an essential utility. The Policy also requires public bayfront access, particularly for pedestrians. The project includes a shared access easement to allow public access but also availability for maintenance vehicles to enter and exit the pump station site. Hazards Analysis — Section 2.8.1 of the LCP identifies hazards and implements policies to reduce the potential risks to life and property. The project has evaluated the various hazards and integrated mitigation measures as follows: 13-178 OCAiSAN ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT Project No. 5-67 Bay Bridge Pump Station Replacement (1) tsunami inundation, sea level rise, and flooding — all critical facilities will be constructed at elevation 15.5 to mitigate flooding. See Coastal Hazards Analysis memo dated October 2023 included with these responses; (2) geologic and seismic — the facility is designed based on California Building Code, 2019 Edition, specifically Risk Category IV, Site Class D, Seismic Design Category D. Additionally, liquifiable soils are being mitigated by this project by ground improvements; (3) fire — facilities are constructed with noncombustible material (concrete, masonry, aluminum, steel) Shoreline Access — Section 3.1.1 of the LCP requires developments not interfere with the public's right to access the sea (waterway) and maintenance of public access from the nearest public roadway to the shoreline. This project maintains a continuous access to the waterway throughout construction and has no impact to public access to the waterway once construction is completed. 13-179 Attachment L Applicant's Letter Regarding Vehicle Access dated March 22, 2024 13-180 ALSTON & BIRD 350 South Grand Avenue, 51st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 213-576-10001 Fax:213-576-1100 Matthew Wickersham Direct Dial: 213-576-1185 Email: matt.wickersham@alston.com March 22, 2024 Mayor Joe Stapleton and City Councilmembers City of Newport Beach 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Re: Orange County Sanitation District's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station — Major Site Development Review and Coastal Development Permit (PA-2023-0076) — 250 E. Coast Highway Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, On behalf of Orange County Sanitation District ("OC San"), we submit this letter in further response to the January 31, 2024 appeal ("Appeal") by Bayside Village Marina ("BVM") of the Planning Commission's approval of OC San's Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Main Replacement Project ("Project"). We understand that BVM has requested more information regarding the trucks and vehicles that will be using the access easement and Pacific Coast Highway entry as part of the Project. OC San has already provided BVM with detailed information on this topic. Attachment A to this letter contains excerpted portions of the transcript for the recent deposition of Don Stokes, maintenance manager for OC San, taken on December 13, 2023. During this deposition, Mr. Stokes confirmed the available information on the size, number and frequency of vehicle traffic expected for the Project. OC San previously referred to this testimony in its responses to BVM's Second Set of Special Interrogatories, excerpts of which are attached here as Attachment B 1. We also wanted to note that a shared access roadway was encouraged by BVM as part of their prior discussions with OC San for this Project. In providing comments on OC San's Draft Environmental Impact Report, BVM's consultant emphasized that BVM's future construction project "can accommodate the minimum turning radius of the largest [OC San] truck needed" and that OC San's trucks could use either the existing driveway 1 OC San also referred to its 2020 Recirculated Environmental Impact Report, which identified the anticipated vehicles to be used during Project construction. Relevant excerpts are included as Attachment F. The full document is available at the link below: http s: //www. oc san. gov/home/showpublisheddocument/2983 0/63 734645 8079100000. Alston & Bird LLP www.alston.com Atlanta I Beijing I Brussels I Charlotte I Dallas I London I Los Angeles I New York I Raleigh I San Francisco I Silicon Valley I Washington, D.C. 13-181 OCSD's Response to Appeal of OC San Bay Bridge Pump Station March 22, 2024 Page 2 on East Coast Highway or a shared access easement route, in order to access the pump station. Attached as Attachment C is the relevant excerpt from these September 5, 2019 comments. Also attached as Attachment D is a December 17, 2019 email from BVM's consultant that noted "our proposed `shared access' roadway." We are happy to provide any additional information that may be needed on this issue, but again these are all issues that have been repeatedly discussed with OC San and BVM. As conceded by BVM, it has waived its right to challenge the location of OC San's Project and the shared access roadway when it withdrew the deposit of probable compensation submitted by OC San. (Attached as Attachment E are relevant portions of BVM's February 27, 2023 responses to interrogatories from OC San.) As shown by the court documents previously provided to the City, BVM can no longer dispute that OC San has the legal right to take physical possession of the acquisition area, which includes a permanent non-exclusive access easement. The proposed location and layout of the permanent easement is moveable at BVM's discretion as indicated in the legal description in the Resolution of Necessity. And once physical possession is taken by OC San, that easement provides OC San with the legal right to use the easement for both construction vehicles for the Project's construction and maintenance vehicles for the Project's subsequent operation. BVM has waived its right to challenge this use, and has in fact already received compensation for this use. Instead, the remaining legal issues concern whether the value of the access easement and any alleged damages resulting from the use of the easement exceed the amount already paid by OC San. While BVM is still disputing the amount of compensation that it should be paid for a small portion of its property, that should not affect the City of Newport Beach's approval of this critically important project. Sincerely, �� a, � I I-e � ell - Matt Wickersham Attachments 13-182 ATTACHMENT A 13-183 to a tus. pRT REPORTING vw-ww.apt usCR.00 m 866,999.8310 13-184 Page 1 Page 3 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 APPEARANCES: 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE -CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER 2 3 For Plaintiff: 4 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION, ) DISTRICT, a public entity, ) 3 5 ) WOODRUFF & SMART, APC Plaintiff, ) 4 BY: GARY C. WEISBERG, ESQ. 6 ) 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200 Vs. ) Case No. 5 Costa Mesa, California 92626-7670 7 ) 30-2022-01251890- (719) 558-7000 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, ) CU-EI-CXC 8 a California Limited Liability) 6 gweisberg@woodrufflaw.law Company; LAGUNA BEACH COUNTY ) 7 For Defendant Bayside Village Marina, LLC: 9 WATER DISTRICT, a Public ) 8 NOSSAMAN LLP Entity; DOES 1 through 100, ) BY: BRADFORD B. KUHN, ESQ. 10 inclusive; and all persons ) 9 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800 unknown claiming an interest ) 11 in the property, ) Irvine, California 92612 10 (949) 833-7800 12 Defendants. ) bkuhn@nossaman.com 11 13 AND ALL RELATED CASES. ) 12 13 14 15 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF PERSON MOST KNOWLEDGABLE ALSO PRESENT: LEANN EMMOTT, VIDEOGRAPHER 16 DON STOKES 14 17 15 Date and time: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 16 18 1:24 p.m. 17 19 Location: 18101 Von Karman Avenue 18 20 Suite 1800 19 Irvine, California 20 21 21 22 Reporter: Tammi L. Lee, CSR 22 Certificate No. 11034 23 23 Job No. 10132830 24 24 25 25 Page 2 Page 4 1 1 I N D E X 2 2 Examination By: Page 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 MR. KUHN 7 4 FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE -CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER 5 4 6 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION, ) 5 EXHIBITS DISTRICT, a public entity, ) 6 Exhibit Description Page 7 ) 7 Exhibit 29 DMS Structural and Architectural 19 Plaintiff, ) 8 ) Workshop document VS. ) Case No. 8 Exhibit 25 E-mail dated 8/10/23 w/attachment 39 9 ) 30-2022-01251890- Exhibit 26 Letter dated 7/5/23 w/attachments 52 BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, ) CU-EI-CXC 9 Exhibit 27 Complaint in Eminent Domain 58 10 a California Limited Liability) Company; LAGUNA BEACH COUNTY ) P Exhibit 28 E-mail dated 12/29/21 70 11 WATER DISTRICT, a Public ) 10 Entity; DOES 1 through 100, ) 11 12 inclusive; and all persons ) 12 unknown claiming an interest ) 13 in the property, ) 13 INSTRUCTED NOT TO ANSWER 14 (None.) 14 Defendants. ) 15 16 15 AND ALL RELATED CASES. ) 17 16 18 17 Videotaped deposition of Person Most 19 REQUESTED INFORMATION 18 Knowledgable Don Stokes, taken before Tammi L. Lee, 20 (None.) 19 CSR, a certified shorthand reporter for the State of 20 California, CSR #11034, with principal office in the 21 21 County of Orange, commencing on Wednesday, December 22 22 13, 2023, at 1:24 p.m., at 18101 Von Karman Avenue, 23 23 Suite 1800, Irvine, California. 24 24 25 25 13-185 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 5 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2023, 1:24 P.M. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on the record. Today's date is December 13th, 2023, and the time is 1:24 p.m. Pacific. This is the video deposition of Don Stokes PMK being taken in the matter of "Orange County Sanitation District vs. Bayside Village Marina, LLC, et al." on behalf of the defendant pending in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2022-01251890-CU-EI-CXC. This video -- this deposition is taking place at 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800, Irvine, California 92612. My name is Leann Emmott appearing for Aptus Court Reporting located at 401 West A Street, Suite 1680, San Diego, California 92101. 1 am the official videographer, and this is the only authorized video recording of the deposition. The audio and video recording will take place at all times unless all counsel agree to go off the record. Will counsel please identify yourselves and state whom you represent starting with the noticing attorney? Page 6 MR. KUHN: Brad Kuhn, Nossaman, LLP, on behalf of the defendant Bayside Village Marina. MR. WEISBERG: Good afternoon. I'm Gary Weisberg on -- with Woodruff & Smart on behalf of Orange County Sanitation District. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The court reporter today is Tammi Lee, and she may now swear in the deponent. DON STOKES, called as a witness, and having been first duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows: THE REPORTER: Will you raise your right hand, please? Do you state or affirm under penalty of perjury that the testimony you are about to give in the cause now pending shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? THE WITNESS: I do. THE REPORTER: Thank you. MR. KUHN: You left out Mr. Spradlin, Gary. MR. WEISBERG: Oh, Mr. Spradlin is no longer -- he retired. Page 7 1 MR. KUHN: So you don't even go by 2 Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart? 3 MR. WEISBERG: Well, we can have this 4 discussion off the record, but, yeah, it's -- 5 there's a -- he thought maybe he wanted to continue 6 to practice law in some capacity, and apparently 7 there's a state bar rule that you can't have your 8 name on -- 9 MR. KUHN: Ah. 10 MR. WEISBERG: -- a firm when you are 11 still practicing even in a temporary or, you know, a 12 part-time capacity, so... 13 MR. KUHN: Got it. Sorry for the 14 distraction. 15 16 EXAMINATION 17 18 BY MR. KUHN: 19 Q Good afternoon, Mr. Stokes. Thank you for 20 being here. I understand you are currently employed 21 by Orange County Sanitation District? 22 A That is correct. 23 Q And what is your job title? 24 A Maintenance manager. 25 Q And what are your current job duties or Page 8 1 your role at OC San? 2 A So my responsibility is overseeing our 3 wastewater collection system, which is basically the 4 regional collection system for North and Central 5 Orange County, which goes all the way up to, 6 basically, L.A. border and down to the Crystal Cove 7 area. 8 Q And so do you oversee the maintenance and 9 operations of all of OC San's pump stations? 10 A I do. 11 Q Okay. And how long have you been in that 12 role? 13 A It's been four and a half years. 14 Q And have you held other positions at OC 15 San? 16 A I have. 17 Q And what are those other positions? 18 A Prior to that was maintenance 19 superintendent with the responsibility of running 20 the treatment plants, prior to that was maintenance 21 supervisor with a sub work group, and then prior to 22 that was as an electrician in the field. 23 Q And do you report to anybody at OC San? 24 A I report to the director of operations and 25 maintenance Reaz Moinuddin. 13-186 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 9 THE REPORTER: I'm sorry. What was the name? BY MR. KUHN: Q Do you want to spell it if you can? MR. WEISBERG: Do you know how to spell it? THE WITNESS: Yes. M-o-kn-u-d-kn. I'm not sure if there's two Ds in there or one D. MR. WEISBERG: He's not going to ask you, so I'm going to. Just try to slow down your cadence a little bit. THE WITNESS: Okay. MR. WEISBERG: If you talk too fast, it's real hard for the court reporter to take down what you say, so -- THE WITNESS: Will do. MR. WEISBERG: -- I know it's kind of -- we develop natural cadences in life, but if you could just try to slow it down a little bit -- THE WITNESS: Yes. MR. WEISBERG: -- that would be great. THE WITNESS: Okay. BY MR. KUHN: Q Yeah. To make things easier today, it's helpful to let me finish my question, and I'll do Page 10 the same for you with your answer. I understand you're being designated today by OC San as the person most knowledgeable on the operations and maintenance of the existing Bay Bridge Pump Station along with the proposed new Bay Bridge Pump Station; is that correct? A That is correct. Q Any other topics you're aware of that you're being designated as the person most knowledgeable? A Not that I'm aware of. Q Do you currently oversee the operations and maintenance of the existing Bay Bridge Pump Station? A Indirectly, yes. In my capacity I oversee the staff that do. Q And who is directly responsible for the Bay Bridge Pump Station? A There would be no direct person as it is a departmental responsibility, and I oversee that department. Q And what's the department that oversees the Bay Bridge Pump Station? A It is the collection system operations and maintenance. Page 11 1 Q And will the same be true with respect to 2 your overall oversight and then the collections 3 system operations and maintenance direct role with 4 respect to the future Bay Bridge Pump Station? 5 A That is correct. 6 Q Can you describe for me generally what -- 7 what your role is with respect to operations and 8 maintenance of OC San's pump stations? 9 A So I'm designated as what's known as the 10 legally responsible official for our wastewater 11 collection system, which would be all the pump 12 stations. And I have staff that report to me, and 13 staff are tasked with various roles and 14 responsibilities. And maybe you can restate the 15 question. I started to kind of go off on a tangent 16 in my mind there, so... 17 Q I'm looking for your role generally as it 18 pertains to operations and maintenance of pump 19 stations, and I understand you kind of have a -- an 20 overall review of all of them -- 21 A Uh-huh. 22 Q -- and then, obviously, oversight of the 23 staff that -- that works on them directly; is that 24 fair? 25 A That is fair. Page 12 1 Q And when you use the term "legally 2 responsibly official," what does --what does that 3 mean? 4 A So, basically, within the State of 5 California when it comes to sewer collection system, 6 somebody has to be designated a legally responsible 7 official who oversees a wastewater collection 8 system. 9 Q What is -- what is the significance of 10 that role or that title? 11 A It means I have competency and I'm trained 12 and I know what to do in case we have any type of an 13 issue and also that I have the competency to operate 14 and maintain the systems. 15 Q And what kind of issues could arise on a 16 pump station that would require a legally 17 responsible official? 18 A Any type of sewer spill that would happen 19 anywhere in any collection system within the state 20 would have to have somebody in a legally responsible 21 official capacity to be able to certify a report 22 back to the State. 23 Q Has OC San had sewer spills in the past? 24 A Yes. 25 Q How many? 13-187 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 13 A I couldn't tell you an exact number right now, but I can tell you they're extremely low. Q Do you have an estimate of how many sewer spills OC San has had over the last five years? A Maybe less than a dozen. Q And were you the legally responsible official on all of those sewer spills? A No. Q Who would have been the legal -- legally responsible official for those? A Depending on the time frame, it would have been my predecessor or myself. Q And how many sewer spills have taken place while you have been the legally responsible official for OC San's pump stations? A Less than six. Q And you've been the legally responsible official for OC San for the last four or so years; is that right? A Since stepping into this role about four and a half years ago. Q Have there been any spills or leaks at the Bay Bridge Pump Station that you're aware of? A Not during my tenure. Q What about prior to your tenure? Page 14 A Not that I can recall. Q Let's briefly touch base on the existing Bay Bridge Pump Station facility. MR. KUHN: I'll mark as Exhibit 24 a photograph Bates labeled OC San 060706. (Exhibit 24 was marked for identification and is attached hereto.) BY MR. KUHN: Q Does this photograph -- and I'll represent that it was a -- an image taken from OC San's design workshop for the Bay Bridge Pump Station Project, and I think it's dated September 13th, 2021. Do you recognize the -- this photograph as being a generally accurate depiction of what the pump station currently looks like? A I do recognize it, and it does appear to be accurate. Q It looks like in this photograph the pump station is accessed directly off of Pacific Coast Highway. It appears to be a curb cut there; is that correct? A That's correct. Q And is that the only access point for the existing Bay Bridge Pump Station facility? A It is for the existing pump station, yes. Page 15 1 Q And so for any maintenance or operations 2 that need to take place at the existing facility all 3 the access for those activities comes off of PCH; is 4 that fair? 5 A That is a fair statement. 6 Q So OC San does not use any of the Bayside 7 Village Marina property for any operations, 8 maintenance, access whatsoever; is that correct? 9 A To the best of my knowledge, that's 10 correct. 11 Q What kind of vehicles does OC San use 12 currently when it's undertaking operations or 13 maintenance of the existing pump station facility? 14 A Various, depending on the task, it could 15 be a light -duty truck like a Ford F-150, it could be 16 a little bit of a heavier -duty truck like a Ford 17 F-250 with kind of, like, mechanic toolboxes on the 18 back and a heavier -duty truck known as a combination 19 sewer cleaning vehicle, which sizewise is analogous 20 to a trash truck and also a mobile crane with a 21 15-ton capacity. 22 Q And all the vehicles that you just listed, 23 they all would access the existing pump station from 24 the curb cut out at Coast Highway; is that correct? 25 A That is correct. Page 16 1 Q How many vehicles can access or park on 2 the property or on the pump station site at one 3 time? 4 A Perhaps one to two. 5 Q And when vehicles enter and leave the 6 station, do they -- they pull up and then back out, 7 or do they back in? How does that work? 8 A Depending on the vehicle, they may pull 9 onto the curb and back into that little alcove area 10 or park parallel to the curb as close to that 11 boundary wall that faces PCH. And for the larger 12 vehicles it requires a traffic control setup that 13 would take that No. 4 lane closest to the curb. 14 Q So, essentially, you would have to get 15 approvals or you would close down a lane of traffic 16 for the larger vehicles? 17 A It does require approvals, yes. 18 Q And do you have any sense of how often OC 19 San accesses the current pump station facility? 20 A Depending on the task, it could be daily, 21 multiple times a week for something as simple as 22 just a quick check, quarterly for some of the 23 heavier -duty maintenance, and even once a month for 24 some of the in-between tasks that come up. 25 Q Do you have any estimate of the frequency 13-188 Page 17 1 of access at the station currently? 1 2 A At least daily. 2 3 Q And so the -- the combo sewer cleaning -- 3 4 you know, the ones the size of a trash truck or the 4 5 ones with mobile cranes, are those less frequent, 5 6 the ones that would occur maybe monthly? 6 7 A Less frequent, likely a quarterly basis. 7 8 Q Are there ever situations where you need 8 9 to have more than two trucks or vehicles at the site 9 10 at one time? 10 11 A There are situations. It could be a task 11 12 that is not going as planned and requires additional 12 13 support, something such as removing a pump and staff 13 14 can't get it out with equipment they have, so they 14 15 need to summons additional support, or it could be 15 16 an emergency situation in which we had equipment 16 17 failure that's beyond any plan or any control. 17 18 Q And if you have more than two vehicles at 18 19 a time, where would those vehicles park to access 19 20 the existing pump station? 20 21 A The existing pump station would be in 21 22 the -- the cut out there for the bus stop 22 23 temporarily, if that's a short duration. Otherwise, 23 24 it requires taking that lane of traffic to provide 24 25 safe access for those vehicles to park. 25 Page 18 1 Q You had mentioned some activities 1 2 involving pump removal. How often does that occur? 2 3 A At the current station, at least annually. 3 4 Q And with the proposed future station, does 4 5 that frequency increase or decrease or stay the 5 6 same? 6 7 A I would anticipate the same. 7 8 Q You also mentioned emergency situations. 8 9 Can you give me examples of what you would consider 9 10 to be an emergency situation at the existing 10 11 facility? 11 12 A A long -duration power outage, structural 12 13 failure of piping systems, blockage from debris 13 14 coming in from the sewer system, and potentially 14 15 component failure, all things that could happen even 15 16 with the best maintenance plans. 16 17 Q Are there any other emergency situations 17 18 you could think of? 18 19 A Not to the best of my knowledge. 19 20 Q And how frequently does OC San have 20 21 long -duration power outages, structural failures, 21 22 blockage, or component failures at its other 22 23 existing pump stations? 23 24 A Very, very rarely. We have a planned 24 25 maintenance approach to ensure those things don't 25 Page 19 happen. The things that are beyond our control are long -duration power outages. They are very infrequent. Q Can you give me any sort of estimate of how often you've had some sort of emergency situation over the last four years at one of your pump stations? A I can use this station as an example here. We did have some isolation valve failures that did not result in any loss of the water coming in, and we did not have a sewer spill. But this necessitated a contract service mobilizing within 24 hours to get out and repair it. And, again, within my tenure of the last four and a half years, that's the best I can recollect at this station. Q And what about the other -- are there 15 stations under your -- under your supervision? A That is correct. We have 15 stations. Q And do you have an estimate of how often you've had emergency situations at your other 14 stations? A Potentially once per year. Q Do you mean one emergency situation per year per station or once per year for all 15? A Once per year for all 15. Page 20 Q Do you have a sense of how many workers or employees or contractors for OC San could be on the site at one time? A You can have a single vehicle, single -staffer there on a daily basis, and for some of the larger tasks, like I explained, you could have four to six people there. Q Are there any types of large equipment or parts or things that need to be brought onto the pump station site? A Yes. We have the large pumps that actually convey the wastewater. Those would be moving around the other crane and the larger pieces of equipment. We also have some temporary equipment that's brought on site to facilitate maintenance and testing of electrical systems. Q And so when you bring in a crane, is that something that -- that comes in on the, I guess, mobile crane type of vehicle, the one that you mentioned was a 15-ton capacity? A Think of, basically, a flatbed ten -wheeled truck with a crane pivoting from the center of it. Q Do you have any estimate of the dimensions of that truck as far as length and height? A I couldn't tell you off the top of my 13-189 Page 21 1 head. I could use the analogy of maybe a standard 1 2 ten -wheel dump truck that would hold about 15 tons 2 3 of dirt. 3 4 Q Do you know if there are any height 4 5 clearance requirements to use that sort of crane? 5 6 A With any crane there is always height 6 7 requirements that the operator must know to make 7 8 sure they steer clear of power lines and anything 8 9 else that is a risk. But to drive the vehicle down 9 10 the road, it has standard clearances that, again, to 10 11 use the analogy of a trash truck, would be the 11 12 clearance. 12 13 Q Can you help me just understand the basics 13 14 of the equipment and the facilities at the existing 14 15 pump station that's currently there? 15 16 A I can. I guess it might help if I explain 16 17 kind of like what the intent of the station is, 17 18 right? So in a sewer system we desire to have 18 19 gravity be our friend. In a place where we have to 19 20 move water uphill, we have to rely on a pump 20 21 station. So using this as the example, this pump 21 22 station has what's known as a wet well, basically a 22 23 big swimming pool, if you will, collects the water, 23 24 has piping systems that dip into it kind of like a 24 25 straw, the pumping systems suck that water up, push 25 Page 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 it through the piping system and discharge it at a higher point for gravity to take over. And, obviously, we have to have some ventilation, electrical systems to make sure all that can happen. Q So you have a wet well at the existing facility, and then you have the pressurized or gravity -pushed force mains that go to that wet well; is that right? A So the gravity sewer system terminates at a wet well, and then the pumping systems withdraw from that wet well and, essentially, hydraulically lift it up into the pipes just like a water hose, only it's pressurized, and then at a different point discharges that wastewater into another gravity system to continue on down the system. Q So the gravity --just to make sure I understand, the gravity force mains push the water into the wet well, the wet well then treats the -- the sewer or water through the pumps, and then where does water then go? A So the gravity pipeline terminates at the well. It's non -pressurized. And all the pumps are doing is sucking that water out, pushing it into a pipeline which is then low pressure to another point elsewhere away from the station. So if we look at Page 23 this picture here, there's a gravity system that comes into that pump station that you can't see and there is piping that leaves and goes to a different area to discharge that water at a different point. Q And do you have any understanding of where the pipes are that come into the station and where they are that leave the station? A Yes. Q Can you describe those for me? A So with any sewer system, it may be of different types of material, depending on the construction. In this case it's likely vitrified clay pipe that comes in under the PCH area here and terminates in the station. And then the pressurized pipes known as the force mains leave the station and then come across the street and go into the parking lot and discharge on the other side of the bay. Q How long has the existing pump station been operational? A I believe it was built in the '60s. Q And do the pipelines that you mentioned both that feed into the station and that leave the station -- do those require maintenance or service or replacement? A Yes, they do. Page 24 1 Q And how do you currently service or 2 maintain those? 3 A On the gravity systems leading in to the 4 pump station we have manhole access points out in 5 the public right of way, and crews would access that 6 to go in and use a high-pressure water system to 7 flush it out and then move on to the next segments. 8 And on the force main side the mains really consist 9 of assessments which are done at pre -determined 10 access points. 11 Q And where are the access points for the 12 existing force mains? 13 A At the pump station itself and then across 14 the bay at the discharge for the force mains. 15 Q And does anything that we've talked about 16 as far as the -- the maintenance or the operations 17 of the pump station changed between what currently 18 exists and what's proposed for the Bay Bridge Pump 19 Station? 20 A Generally speaking, it would be the same 21 approach, but different vintages of equipment 22 require different types of tasks. But in the grand 23 scheme of things, not much. 24 Q And so what is it with the proposed new 25 pump station that would change? 13-190 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 25 A With the new pump station we will have different code requirements that dictate the way it's constructed. It requires us to access things a little bit differently. We'll still require having equipment on site closer to it being able to actually get in and perform some of the tasks that we struggle to do now. Also, depending on the manufacturer of the equipment, there might be some different tasks that must be performed at different intervals and may require different equipment. Q So let's -- let's go through each of those real quickly. You mentioned there are certain tasks that you struggle with right now. Can you describe some of those? A Getting real good access into the pump station to clean the wet well we have to use this combination sewer cleaning vehicle. Again, it's analogous to a trash truck. It has a high-pressure water system and a vacuum system. It needs to, basically, kind of be right on top of the opening. They're designed to kind of like be on top of a manhole in the street, if you will. The challenge is getting that vehicle into that station now. It requires the traffic control setup and a little bit of an elaborate method of extra pipes and vacuum Page 26 hoses for staff to use. Q And so with the new design pump station and the new access points that will -- that issue will be alleviated? A It's a major safety issue to have traffic control staff running around, so to get them into the actual work area without having to deploy all that would make it a safer more efficient approach. Q Can you remind me how often that vacuum truck would come service the facility right now? A It's profiled to be quarterly, just like our other locations. Q Does that service frequency of quarterly change with the new pump station? A I don't anticipate it doing that. Q You had mentioned some activities would be at different intervals. Can you describe what those activities would be for me? A Sure. It could be something as simple as a general walk -around inspection. It could be a weekly thing, equipment inspection. It could be monthly. Equipment adjustment and repair could be monthly. Could be quarterly. Intense testing of electrical systems could be semiannual. Could be annually. And pump replacement could be annually. Page 27 1 Q So those items that you just mentioned, 2 does the frequency change at all between the 3 existing pump station and the proposed new pump 4 station? 5 A I don't anticipate it changing, unless 6 conditions dictate change, and that would be no 7 different at any of our stations. 8 Q Okay. What do you mean when you say 9 "conditions dictate change"? 10 A So within our sewer systems if we see a 11 lot of grit and debris and stuff that we don't 12 normally see within a sewer system, we might have to 13 get out and clean things more often, inspect things 14 more often, but it's not anticipated that we would 15 see that under normal operation. 16 Q Is there any reason why the potential 17 frequency would change based on the existing pump 18 station versus -- versus the proposed new pump 19 station? 20 A It would only be as a matter of site 21 conditions changing, which would be, again, back to, 22 you know, if we saw stuff coming into the sewer 23 system that is not anticipated, it's more of an 24 anomalous thing than it is an expected thing. 25 Q Do you have any reason to believe today Page 28 1 that there would be any need for an increased 2 frequency with the new station compared to the old 3 station? 4 A I do not. 5 Q You mentioned that the type of equipment 6 may also change between the existing facility and 7 the new facility. Can you describe what equipment 8 changes you're referring to? 9 A To clarify, the type of equipment may 10 change depending on the task. So a routine walk 11 through would be something like the light -duty Ford 12 F-150 truck. Replacing a pump would require the 13 crane and similar support vehicles. So depending on 14 the nature of the task would change the types of 15 vehicles that would be present at any given time. 16 Q And, again, do you envision any changes in 17 the type of equipment or frequency of use of 18 equipment between the existing pump station and the 19 new minimum station? 20 A I do not. 21 Q How often did you say the -- the crane is 22 currently utilized? 23 A Depends on some of the tasks that would 24 require it. At this time we're seeing it about 25 annually to semi-annually. 13-191 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Page 29 Q And you don't expect that annual to semi-annual use of the crane to change with the new pump station? A I do not, and I want to clarify. That crane, it's annual usage is tied to each individual pump. So if we have one pump, we would see it once per year. If we have three pumps, three times per year. Q And how many pumps are there at the existing pump station facility? A Five. Q And how many pumps are proposed at the new pump station facility? A I believe it's the same. It could have an additional one there. Q And so when you mentioned that the crane is used annually to semi-annually per pump, does that mean that you would expect the crane to be used approximately five times per year or potentially ten times per year per facility? A That would be a correct statement. 22 Q Is it the same with the vacuum truck, or 23 is that just a quarterly use? 24 A That's less because that's only for 25 cleaning the wet well system, which would be 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 30 quarterly. Q Do you know how tall the existing pump station facility is? A I could take a guess, but I don't recall off the top of my head. Q Roughly one-story building, though? A One story, maybe a story and a half. Q And is there currently a roof structure on top of the -- the equipment and facilities at the existing pump station? A Help me understand what you mean by roof structure. Q A cover on top of the actual buildings. A There is, and you can see it here in this picture. There's a parapet that goes around a flat roof type of structure. Q So is the current facility an open-air facility where the equipment is actually exposed to the open air? A It's ventilated with atmospheric air. Q Do you know if that changes with the proposed new pump station? A From my understanding, it does. Q How does it change? A It conditions the air before bringing it Page 31 1 to the control room and the electrical rooms as a 2 matter of best practice to mitigate any issues with 3 the salt air being so close to the coast. 4 Q When you say "it conditions the air," what 5 does that involve? 6 A Heating and cooling. 7 Q So the existing facility does not have any 8 sort of temperature regulation of the air? 9 A That's correct. 10 Q And the new facility will have a 11 temperature regulation of the air that comes into 12 the facility? 13 A That's correct. 14 Q Does that involve an air conditioner? A 15 heater? A generator? What's involved in that? 16 A A traditional commercial heating, 17 ventilated, and air conditioning unit, as they are 18 termed HVAC, and I believe roof -mounted. 19 Q Do you know how tall the proposed new pump 20 station is going to be? 21 A I believe about the same. 22 Q But the new pump station will have an HVAC 23 unit mounted on the roof of the structure; is that 24 correct? 25 A From what I can recall, I believe that to Page 32 1 be correct. 2 Q Do you have any sense of the noise that 3 the HVAC unit would generate for the type of use 4 that we're talking about? 5 A I don't think it would be any louder than 6 the current equipment there because this current 7 station has a ventilation fan that makes about the 8 same amount of noise. 9 Q Can you generally describe for me how 10 often parts or equipment are replaced or repaired at 11 the existing pump station? 12 A Depending on what the part or component 13 would be. It could be changing a light bulb once a 14 month. It could be replacing a sensor quarterly. 15 When I say a sensor, a small component maybe the 16 size of my water bottle here. Replacing a pump 17 annually, replacing air filters monthly for the HVAC 18 system. 19 Q And do you anticipate the frequency of 20 replacements or repairs changing at all with the new 21 pump station? 22 A I do not. 23 Q Has OC San ever done any noise readings or 24 monitoring at the existing station? 25 A The only noise readings that I'm aware of 13-192 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 37 Think of milk of magnesia when you have an upset stomach. It's essentially the same thing in a little bit stronger concentration. And calcium nitrate, which is a clear liquid, again, nonhazardous. Q And how frequently are those chemicals brought to and from the existing pump station? A Depending on the dosage rates into the system, it could be monthly. It could be less than that. Q Do you have any estimate for the existing pump station of how often chemicals are brought on? A It's on track to be about monthly. Q Does the frequency of bringing chemicals on and off to the pump station change with the new pump station? A I do not anticipate any change at all. Q Will the chemicals be brought to the new pump station through the Bayside Village Marina property? A I believe they will be brought onto the new pump station via Pacific Coast Highway, emptied into the on -site tanks, and then an empty truck will traverse through the property through the pre -determined exit route. Page 38 Q So once the new pump station is constructed, it will still be accessed via PCH for purposes of delivering chemicals? A I would imagine so. Based on the size of that vehicle and what I've seen in the proposed layout, that is one path. Q But you don't know for sure? A I don't know for sure. Q So there's a possibility that OC San could be bringing chemicals across the Bayside Village Marina property for the new pump station? A I would not anticipate it, but I don't know for certain at this point, no. Q Who would know that? A Somebody on my team would be able to work with the project team. Q Do you have anyone in particular? A That reports to me? Q That would have an understanding of whether chemicals will be brought on Bayside Village Marina's property. A I would have to go back to the project team. Q Is there someone in particular that you would -- you would reach out to or ask? Page 39 1 A Probably one of the folks that you've 2 already deposed, either Andrew Brown or Cindy Murra. 3 Q And do you have a sense of the volume of 4 the chemicals that are brought to the existing pump 5 station? 6 A If I recall correctly, it's about 6,000 7 gallons, and that is 3,000 gallons of each chemical 8 on a monthly basis. 9 Q And would that volume change at all with 10 the proposed new pump station? 11 A I do not anticipate that changing at all. 12 Q So the increased size of it with the new 13 equipment doesn't require additional chemical usage? 14 A It does not because it's all determined by 15 the flow rates in the sewer system. 16 MR. KUHN: I'm mark as Exhibit 25 a 17 document Bates labeled OC San 096970 and 096971. It 18 appears to be an e-mail dated August 10th, 2023. It 19 appears to attach monthly collection odor 20 performance report for July of 2023. 21 (Exhibit 25 was marked for identification 22 and is attached hereto.) 23 BY MR. KUHN: 24 Q Have you seen monthly reports like this? 25 A Yes, I have. Page 40 1 Q Any reason to believe that this monthly 2 report for the Bay Bridge Pump Station is 3 inaccurate? 4 A No. It looks to be accurate to me. 5 Q And so if I understand this correctly, the 6 total monthly usage on a per -gallon basis for 7 magnesium hydroxide at Bay Bridge Pump Station is 8 about 9200 gallons? 9 A From what I see on this report, that looks 10 to be correct. 11 Q And the calcium nitrate is about 4500 12 gallons, at least in July 2023? 13 A From what I see here, yes. 14 Q And if I go down further, there's a 15 monthly sampling and monitoring data chart for -- 16 for Bayside Drive. Can you explain to me what the 17 vapor peak and mean numbers refer to? 18 A So the numbers that are listed under the 19 peak column are what I spoke about earlier, 20 concentrations of hydrogen sulfide gas. So this is 21 the rotten -egg -smelling gas. And peak would be what 22 was measured in a 30-day period as one of the 23 highest levels. And mean being in that middle 24 threshold of that -- what that vapor reading was. 25 Q And so if it had a high peak number, like, 13-193 Page 53 1 facilities, and also temporary and permanent access 1 2 areas? 2 3 A From what I can recall when reviewing the 3 4 design, yes, this looks to be accurate. 4 5 Q And is it correct, then, that for future 5 6 access purposes associated with the new pump 6 7 station, OC San will primarily be coming in off 7 8 Bayside Drive driving through the Bayside Village 8 9 Marina property in order to get access to the new 9 10 pump station? 10 11 MR. WEISBERG: Objection; lacks 11 12 foundation, calls for speculation, assumes facts. 12 13 You can answer. 13 14 THE WITNESS: I would anticipate most of 14 15 the entrance would come off of Coast Highway, and 15 16 the egress would be through the pre -determined path 16 17 to get to Bayside Drive. 17 18 BY MR. KUHN: 18 19 Q And what's that understanding based on? 19 20 A Just standard traffic flow, turning 20 21 radiuses of vehicles, access off of Bayside Drive. 21 22 Q So why is there a need to have two points 22 23 of ingress and egress to the future pump station? 23 24 MR. WEISBERG: Objection; that's 24 25 irrelevant to the extent that public use and 25 Page 54 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 necessity is not an issue in the case. You can answer. THE WITNESS: Because there may be times where equipment is staged near the access point off of Coast Highway, and they would need to access the station through the Bayside Drive entrance. BY MR. KUHN: Q So for purposes of your overseeing the future maintenance of this facility, you're not envisioning OC San using as its regular point of ingress the access point off Bayside Drive? A No. I would say it would be a regular point of access. It would just have a lower frequency of access than the Coast Highway side. MR. WEISBERG: His question asked about ingress. You answered him about access. THE WITNESS: So meaning they would -- they would access the pump station from both routes. Ingress into the pump station I would say is still coming through Bayside Drive but at a less overall frequency than ingress to the station from Coast Highway. BY MR. KUHN: Q And I know you're not particularly being designated on construction, but do you have an Page 55 understanding, is this the same route that OC San intends to use during construction of the new pump station? A I'm not real familiar with that. Q Okay. Would OC San need to use the entrance off Bayside Drive and drive through the Bayside Village Marina property for its passenger vehicles and service trucks? A Depending on traffic conditions on Coast Highway, that may very well dictate that. Q And would OC San potentially need to use the Bayside Drive entrance and driving through Bayside Village Marina's property for its tanker trucks? A I would anticipate not. I would anticipate that the access would come through the Coast Highway as far as an ingress into the station. Q But you would envision OC San using that -- that access drive aisle through Bayside Village Marina's property for egress for tanker trucks? A That could be a potential route, yes. Q And what about vacuum trucks? Would vacuum trucks use the -- the Bayside Drive access point and drive in and out of Bayside Village Page 56 1 Marina's property through that access road? 2 A Yes, I would anticipate them using both 3 points of entry into the pump station, depending on 4 the area within the pump station they need to place 5 that piece of equipment. 6 Q And what about the Vactor trucks? Is 7 that -- 8 A That's a combination vacuum sewer -cleaning 9 thing. Vactor is a name brand. 10 Q Okay. So the vacuum trucks would be using 11 the Bayside Drive entrance and driving through 12 Bayside Village Marina's property both ingress and 13 egress? 14 A I would say that's a correct statement. 15 Q And what about the bucket trucks? Would 16 the bucket trucks be using the Bayside Drive access 17 point driving through Bayside's property for ingress 18 and egress? 19 A I'm not sure what we're referring to for a 20 bucket truck. 21 Q Or the -- the cranes. 22 A Okay. The crane would use both points of 23 entry as well, depending on where they have to stage 24 that crane to maneuver equipment. 25 Q Is there a chance that OC San would be 13-194 Page 57 1 staging the cranes within the access easement area 1 2 when it's undertaking maintenance activities? 2 3 MR. WEISBERG: Objection; incomplete 3 4 hypothetical, calls for speculation, lacks 4 5 foundation. 5 6 You can answer. 6 7 THE WITNESS: I do not anticipate that 7 8 happening. 8 9 BY MR. KUHN: 9 10 Q So if -- if OC San is using the cranes, 10 11 crane trucks, for maintenance at the facility, those 11 12 trucks would be stationed within the pump station 12 13 site itself? 13 14 MR. WEISBERG: Same objections. 14 15 You can answer. 15 16 THE WITNESS: I would anticipate that to 16 17 be a true statement, all within the pump station 17 18 confines. 18 19 BY MR. KUHN: 19 20 Q Are there any trucks or any vehicles that 20 21 you would envision using the access road for parking 21 22 or staging? 22 23 A I do not anticipate that happening at all. 23 24 MR. KUHN: Gary, do you know if Patrick 24 25 marked the complaint in eminent domain as an 25 Page 58 1 exhibit? 1 2 MR. WEISBERG: I don't believe he did. 2 3 MR. KUHN: Okay. Let's do that as 27. 3 4 (Exhibit 27 was marked for identification 4 5 and is attached hereto.) 5 6 (Interruption in proceedings by the 6 7 reporter.) 7 8 MR. WEISBERG: Do you need me to talk 8 9 louder? 9 10 THE REPORTER: Nope. 10 11 MR. KUHN: Just me. 11 12 THE REPORTER: And the witness. 12 13 BY MR. KUHN: 13 14 Q Have you seen this complaint in eminent 14 15 domain? 15 16 A Yes, I have. 16 17 Q Are you familiar with the permanent road 17 18 easement that's attached as Exhibit B to the 18 19 complaint? 19 20 A As much as I would understand based on the 20 21 Exhibit -- previous Exhibit 26 we were looking at as 21 22 far as a pathway through the property, that's kind 22 23 of how I understand it to be. 23 24 Q And do you have any familiarity or did you 24 25 have any input as to the terms of the access 25 Page 59 easement? A Could you clarify what terms you're referring to? Q So if you turn to Exhibit B to the complaint, in addition to the -- A It's right here. Q -- legal description and the plat map that describes the location and the location of the access easement -- A Uh-huh. Q -- in front of that is a set of what I call easement terms -- A Okay. Q -- the language that governs the use of that access easement. Did you have -- have you seen that before? A Yes, I have seen it because a copy was provided to me by Mr. Gary Weisberg. Q Did you ever have any inputs into the terms or conditions of OC San's access easement? A I was consulted generally as to what type of access frequency our vehicles would need to operate and maintain the pump station during the process of designing the project very early on in the phase. From what I can remember, that was quite Page 60 a while ago. Q Do you understand that the access easement can be utilized by OC San, its employees, agents, representatives, contractors? A My understanding, yes, it is that which I would entail to be business purposes. Q And you understand the access easement is for ingress and egress purposes? A Yes, I do. Q Is it your understanding that the easement prevents the property owner Bayside Village Marina from making any use of that area that would impede OC San's ability to access its pump station with all the types of trucks and vehicles we just discussed? MR. WEISBERG: Objection; the document speaks for itself. You can answer. THE WITNESS: I would say I understand that just based on the terminology of an easement. BY MR. KUHN: Q So, for example, Bayside can't construct improvements or buildings or aboveground structures within that access easement; is that fair? A I would say that's fair because that would prevent the access. 13-195 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Page 65 or the depth of material or anything like that with respect to access roads? A I would imagine we would call upon some type of standard that's used to construct public rights of way and typical roads designed for the equipment that it needs to support. Q I don't want you to speculate, though. Is -- do you -- are you aware of any standards that OC San requires? A For access roads I do not recall if there are anything cited. Q Has OC San ever received any claims or requests for restoration or repair of access roads that it utilizes? A Not that I can recall. Q Do you have any understanding of why there appears to be a setback or a gap between the access road on Bayside Village Marina's property in the pump station? A I do not know of one. Q Are there particular turning radius requirements that Bayside Village Marina is going to be required to maintain for purposes of ensuring OC San's access? 25 A From my understanding, the turning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 66 radiuses of the equipment we use is what was used to determine the access needs of this path. Q Do you know, is there some sort of program that was utilized to determine the turning radiuses that would be required? A Actual measurements of the vehicles themselves. Q And what are the size of the vehicles that were utilized for determining turning radius requirements? A The largest vehicle that we would need to access that, and, again, that would be that -- that combination sewer cleaning vehicle or the Vactor, the vacuum truck. Q And you said that was a ten -wheeler? A It's ten wheels, and it has what's called a tandem axle that drops down, but for analogous purposes a trash truck is probably the best. Q Do you know if there are any sight line or visibility requirements that OC San is going to be required to maintain for purposes of OC San to secure access to its pump station? A Could you elaborate a little bit more? Are you -- are we referring to -- back to the access road? Page 67 1 Q Correct. 2 A I would say it would just be what is 3 required for the driver to be able to safely 4 traverse that path and make sure that there are no 5 pedestrians or anybody else that could be in an area 6 and be harmed. 7 Q So, for example, do you have any 8 understanding of whether or not Bayside Village 9 Marina could put way -finding signs or trees or other 10 large landscaping within immediately adjacent to the 11 access road? 12 A My understanding would be if it did not 13 cause a safety issue, that that would not be 14 something that would be of concern. 15 Q Are there certain standards that would be 16 utilized to determine whether or not there's a 17 safety issue for sight line visibility? 18 A Not that I'm aware of. 19 MR. WEISBERG: Brad, when you get a 20 chance, can we take a break? 21 MR. KUHN: Sure. Let's -- let's take a 22 break. Go off the record. 23 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 2:51 p.m. 24 We are off the record. 25 (Recess taken.) Page 68 1 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are on the record. 2 This is media two. The time is 2:54 p.m. Go ahead. 3 BY MR. KUHN: 4 Q Do you know if OC San has any setback 5 requirements for purposes of maintaining its access 6 routes to the pump station? 7 A My understanding is the easement route is 8 the entirety of the setback. 9 Q So, in other words, the property owner 10 could build the building up to the access road 11 limit? 12 A As long as we have those property lines 13 defined maintained, that would be my understanding. 14 Q And would your larger trucks, your --your 15 Vactor, would they have mirrors or anything that 16 would hit a building if it was built up right up to 17 the edge of the -- of the access easement line? 18 A Part of determining the width is assuming 19 that those are the lines, the exact lines that we 20 have to stay within. 21 Q And once the pump station is operational, 22 is it your understanding that OC San can only use 23 the access easement 15 vehicle trips per week, 24 except in the cases of emergency? 25 A That is my understanding. 13-196 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 69 Q Is a vehicle trip in and out, or is a vehicle trip just in or just out? A For the purposes of a vehicle trip, I would assume in and out. Q So, in other words, OC San can use the access route 15 times in and 15 times out per week; is that fair? A That's fair. Q And if multiple vehicles are needed for a single service, each one of those vehicles would count as a vehicle trip? A I would say yes. Q How is the 15 vehicle trips determined? A Frequency of access to the station currently in operation based on the tasks that are performed by staff and routine operations. Q And it has this qualifier language that it can go over 15 in cases of emergency, and I think we covered a number of emergency situations earlier today. Is it fair, to your understanding, OC San can use the access road more frequently in cases of an emergency? A That would be a fair statement. Q And in cases of emergency there are no limitations on the number of vehicle trips OC San 1 can utilize the access easement, right? 2 A In case of an emergency, that would be 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 70 correct. MR. KUHN: Let's mark as Exhibit 28 a document Bates labeled OC San 050671 through 050673. It's an e-mail chain starting at the top December 29, 2021, between Valerie Ratto and Raul Cuellar, C-u-e-1-1-a-r. (Exhibit 28 was marked for identification and is attached hereto.) BY MR. KUHN: Q Mr. Stokes, it appears you were in this e-mail chain earlier as well. Have you seen this e-mail? A From what I can recall, yes, I do remember interacting with this team. Q Who is -- who is Valerie Ratto? A She is an engineering supervisor within our design team, construction design team. Q And who is Raul Cuellar? A He would be my counterpart at the management level within that same team. Q And this e-mail appears to refer to the number of vehicle trips per week for -- for service of the proposed new pump station; is that fair? Page 71 1 A That's fair. This is a representative 2 example. 3 Q Any reason to disagree with the numbers 4 identified on this e-mail for the number of vehicle 5 trips per week? 6 A Yes, because this is a representative 7 example, and there are times where we would exceed 8 this for corrective maintenance intervals. So 9 that's why we went with the worst -case scenario of 10 15 trips. In other words, if everything was great 11 in a planned world, this would be the bare minimum. 12 Q So the -- the bare minimum that you would 13 envision for maintenance purposes would be one 14 vacuum truck and two service trucks per week, one 15 tanker and one service truck per week for chemical 16 delivery and wet well vacuum service? 17 A When we average them out, yes. So these 18 are representatives examples pulled from on page 2, 19 which is a screen shot of the typical maintenance 20 tasks associated with the current pump station. 21 Q So there would be certain weeks where you 22 have more than one vacuum truck per week or more 23 than one tanker per week, and then you'll have some 24 weeks where you won't have any; is that correct? 25 A That would be a correct statement. Page 72 1 Q And how long did some of these activities 2 identified in here typically take? How long would 3 OC San be on the pump station property for chemical 4 delivery? 5 A Could be two to four hours typically. 6 Q What about for the wet well vacuum? 7 A With any of these given tasks, it could be 8 anywhere from a half a day to a full day, and a day 9 would be about eight hours. 10 Q So for chemical delivery, wet well vacuum, 11 force main flush, daily pump station check, those 12 could be anywhere from four to eight hours, 13 generally? 14 A Correct. 15 Q And looking at that chart on page 2, it 16 says "daily pump station run." Is that suggesting 17 that OC San would be driving through the Bayside 18 Village Marina property every day? 19 A That would be a correct assumption. 20 Q If I'm doing math correctly, if we have 15 21 trips per week times 52 weeks of the year, are we 22 talking about nearly 800 trips per year that OC San 23 would be using the Bayside Village Marina property 24 for access? 25 A If we get to the -- the upper limit there, 13-197 Page 73 1 that's probably pretty close without breaking out 1 2 the calculator. 2 3 Q Are the trucks and -- and tankers and 3 4 vacuum trucks, are those diesel operational? 4 5 A My understanding is the tanker trucks are 5 6 diesel. The vacuum trucks may be diesel, may be 6 7 compressed natural gas, depending on the unit used. 7 8 The remainder of the vehicles would be gasoline. 8 9 Q Do you have any sense of the noise 9 10 activity or noise level from the maintenance 10 11 activities from the vacuum trucks, from the tanker 11 12 trucks, from the wet well vacuum or force mains 12 13 flushed, anything like that? 13 14 A The vacuum truck would exhibit a similar 14 15 noise level as a trash truck when it's in operation. 15 16 The tanker truck I would say would be no different 16 17 than it sounds like for that vehicle driving down 17 18 the road at ten miles per hour. 18 19 Q And I'm not familiar with the noise of a 19 20 tanker truck. Is it similar to a trash truck? 20 21 A Think about, I guess, a truck idling at a 21 22 red light. There's no excessive noise coming off it 22 23 unless there's something wrong with it. 23 24 Q Is the force main flushing particularly 24 25 noisy? 25 Page 74 1 A No. 2 Q Is the wet well vacuuming particularly 3 noisy? 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 A That would be probably one of the noisier operations, which would sound like that trash truck emptying the garbage. Q And that could happen roughly once a week? A In the current location, yes. In the new design it's not anticipated to be any more frequent. In fact, it's anticipated to be less frequent. Q But for purposes of -- of your estimations, we've -- we've estimated one wet well vacuum per week; is that fair? A That is -- that is fair. Q Have you ever had any situations where any chemicals spilled from any of your -- your trucks doing chemical delivery? A Not that I can recall. Q Have you had other situations where waste has -- has leaked either from the facilities themselves or from trucks or anything like that? A We have had situations at other pump stations where we've had a catastrophic failure and we've had the sewage leak out. Q How often does that happen? Page 75 A It's happened once during my tenure. Q And what facility was that? A That was at our Main Street Pump Station in Irvine. Q And what was the ramification of that? What happened? A So we had a pipe corrode and basically leak, and sewage left the property and flowed down the gutter and was eventually stopped and recovered to the best of our ability from the local stormdrain system. THE REPORTER: The local storm. THE WITNESS: Stormdrain system. THE REPORTER: Thank you. BY MR. KUHN: Q Are there any other future plans for expansion of the pump station that you're aware of? A Not that I'm aware of. MR. KUHN: Let's go off the record. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 3:07 p.m. We are off the record. (Deposition concluded at 3:07 p.m. Declaration under penalty of perjury on the following page hereof.) I STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) 2 COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS: 4 I, Tammi L. Lee, do hereby certify: 5 That I am a duly qualified Certified 6 Shorthand Reporter, in and for the State of Page 76 7 California, holder of certificate number 11034, 8 which is in full force and effect and that I am 9 authorized to administer oaths and affirmations; 10 That the foregoing deposition of the 11 herein named witness was taken before me at the time 12 and place herein set forth; 13 That prior to being examined, the witness 14 named in the foregoing deposition was duly sworn or 15 affirmed by me to testify the truth, the whole 16 truth, and nothing but the truth; 17 That the testimony of the witness and all 18 objections made at the time of the examination were 19 recorded stenographically by me and were thereafter 20 transcribed under my direction and supervision; 21 That the foregoing pages contain a full, 22 true, and accurate record of the proceedings and the 23 testimony to the best of my skill and ability; 24 25 13-198 Page 77 1 I further certify that I am not a relative 2 or employee or attorney or counsel of any of the 3 parties, nor am I a relative or employee of such 4 attorney or counsel, nor am I financially interested 5 in the outcome of this action. 6 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have subscribed my 8 name this 21st day of December, 9 2023. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TAMMI L. LEE, CSR NO. 11034 Page 78 DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY Case Name: Orange County Sanitation District vs Bayside Village Marina Date of Deposition: 12/13/2023 Job No.: 10132830 I, DON STOKES, hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day of , 2023, at DON STOKES NOTARIZATION (If Required) State of County of Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this day of 20 by proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me. Signature: (Seal) Page 79 1 DEPOSITION ERRATA SHEET 2 Case Name: Orange County Sanitation District vs. Bayside Village Marina Name of Witness: Don Stokes 3 Date of Deposition: 12/13/2023 Job No.: 10132830 4 Reason Codes: 1. To clarify the record. 2. To conform to the facts. 5 3. To correct transcription errors. 6 Page Line Reason 7 From to 8 Page Line Reason 9 From to 10 Page Line Reason 11 From to 12 Page Line Reason 13 From to 14 Page Line Reason 15 From to 16 Page Line Reason 17 From to 18 Page Line Reason 19 From to 20 Page Line Reason 21 From to 22 Page Line Reason 23 From to 24 Page Line Reason 25 From to Page 80 1 DEPOSITION ERRATA SHEET 2 Page Line Reason 3 From to 4 Page Line Reason 5 From to 6 Page Line Reason 7 From to 8 Page Line Reason 9 From to 10 Page Line Reason 11 From to 12 Page Line Reason 13 From to 14 Page Line Reason 15 From to 16 Page Line Reason 17 From to 18 Page Line Reason 19 From to 20 Page Line Reason 21 From to 22 Subject to the above changes, I certify that the transcript is true and correct 23 No changes have been made. I certify that the transcript is true and correct. 24 25 DON STOKES 13-199 ATTACHMENT B 13-200 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 a 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WOODRUFF & SMART, APC GARY C. WEISBERG - State Bar No. 132092 gweisberg@woodruff.law MICHAEL L. D'ANGELO - State Bar No. 186882 mdangelo@woodrufflaw ELIZABETH VALADEZ - State Bar No. 216235 evaladez@woodruff.law 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7670 Telephone: (714) 558-7000 Facsimile: (714) 835-7787 Fee Exempt Per Gov. Code § 6103 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public entity SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, COMPLEX JUSTICE CENTER ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public entity, Plaintiff, V. BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, a California limited liability company; LAGUNA BEACH COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a public entity; DOES 1 through 100, inclusive; and ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, Defendants. CASE NO.: 30-2022-01251890-CU-EI-CXC Related to£ 30-2021-01194238-CU-EI-CXC Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al. ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM CLASTER DEPARTMENT: CX-101 PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO [Assessor Parcel No. 440-132-60] HEARING DATES PENDING: Type: Status Conference Date: May 22, 2024 Time: 8:30 a.m. Type: Trial Readiness Conference Date: August 2, 2024 Time: 1:30 P.M. Type: Trial Date: August 12, 2024 Time: 92 a.m. DATE ACTION FILED: March 25.2022 PLAINTIFF OC SAN'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT BAYSIDE'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO 1816902.1 13-201 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 10 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOUNDING PARTY: RESPONDING PARTY: SET NO.: DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, a California limited liability company PLAINTIFF ORANGE DISTRICT, a public entity TWO (2) COUNTY SANITATION Plaintiff ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, a public entity ("OC San" or "Responding Party"), pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.220, et seq., hereby responds to the special interrogatories, set two, propounded by defendant BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Bayside" or "Propounding Party") as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT These responses are made solely for the purpose of this action. Each answer is subject to all objections as to competence, relevance, materiality, propriety, and admissibility, and any and all other objections and grounds that would require the exclusion of any statement herein if the Interrogatories were asked of, or any statements contained herein were made by, a witness present and testifying in court, all of which objections and grounds are reserved and may be interposed at the time of trial. Responding Party has not yet completed its investigation or discovery of the facts surrounding the above -captioned matter. The responses contained herein are based only upon such information, belief, and documents as are presently available to and specifically known to Responding Party. The responses contained herein will disclose only that information which is subject to these limitations. As discovery proceeds, witnesses, facts, and evidence may be discovered that are not set forth herein but which may have been responsive to a request. Facts and evidence now known may be imperfectly understood, or the relevance or consequence of such facts and evidence may be imperfectly understood. Accordingly, such facts and evidence may, in good faith, not be included in the following responses. It is anticipated that further discovery, independent investigation, legal research, and analysis will supply additional facts or add new meaning to the known facts, as well as establish entirely new PLAINTIFF OC SAN'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT BAYSIDE'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO 1816902.1 13- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 factual conclusions and legal contentions, all of which may lead to substantial additions to, changes in, and variations from, the responses herein set forth. The following responses are given without prejudice to Responding Parry's right to produce evidence of any subsequently discovered facts, witnesses, or documents that Responding Party may later recall. Responding Party accordingly reserves the right to change any and all answers herein as additional facts are ascertained, analysis is made, and legal research is completed. The responses contained herein are made in a good faith effort to supply as much factual information and as much specification of legal contentions as is presently known but should in no way be to the prejudice of Responding Party in relation to further discovery, research, or analysis. Responding Party assumes no obligation to voluntarily supplement or amend these responses to reflect the discovery of witnesses, facts, and evidence following the serving of these responses. In addition, because some of these responses may have been ascertained by counsel or investigators for Responding Party, it may not have personal knowledge of the same. RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.33: IDENTIFY (as used herein, "IDENTIFY" means, with respect to a vehicle, to state the make and model) each type of VEHICLE (as used herein, "VEHICLE" means anything used for transporting people or goods or conducting services, including but not limited to, a car, van, truck, or tanker) that will traverse the ACCESS ROAD (as used herein, "ACCESS ROAD" refers to the permanent non-exclusive access easement described and depicted in Exhibit "B" of the Complaint on file in this action) to enter or exit the BBPS (as used herein, "BBPS" means Bay Bridge Pump Station and related force mains) in connection with YOUR (as used herein "YOU," "YOUR," and "YOURS" means plaintiff Orange County Sanitation District and its employees, agents, representatives, contractors, successors, assigns and anyone else acting on its behalf) construction, use, and operation of the BBPS. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.33: OC San objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that it is overly broad, burdensome and oppressive, vague and ambiguous. OC San further objects to this interrogatory on the ground that an PLAINTIFF OC SAN'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT BAYSIDE'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO 1816902.1 13- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 a 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 answer would necessitate the preparation or making of a compilation, abstract, audit, or summary from documents that are equally available to and/or already within the possession of the propounding party or that OC San already has otherwise agreed to produce to the propounding party. The burden or expense of preparing or making such a compilation, abstract, audit, or summary would be substantially the same for the party propounding this interrogatory as for OC San. OC San further objects to this interrogatory on the ground that it seeks information that is neither relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. OC San further objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that it is impermissibly compound. Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing, OC San responds as follows: OC San avails itself of the rights set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.260 and refers propounding party to the 2020 Recirculated Environmental Impact Report, which identifies the anticipated vehicles to be used during the construction of the project. OC San further refers propounding party to the testimony of Don Stokes given at his deposition in this case on December 13, 2023, during which vehicles anticipated to be used during the use and operation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station are identified. More specific information regarding vehicles that will be used during the construction of the project will be determined after the issuance of a contract to the contractor that will be responsible for the construction of the subject project. Discovery and investigation continue. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.34: State all facts regarding the specifications for each VEHICLE identified in Special Interrogatory No. 33, including but not limited to, the length, width, height, weight, inside and outside turning radius of, and material to be hauled by each VEHICLE. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.34: OC San objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that it is overly broad, burdensome and oppressive, vague and ambiguous. OC San further objects to this interrogatory on the ground that an answer would necessitate the preparation or making of a compilation, abstract, audit, or summary from documents that are equally available to and/or already within the possession of the propounding party or that OC San already has otherwise agreed to produce to the propounding party. PLAINTIFF OC SAN'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT BAYSIDE'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO 1816902.1 13- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 a 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The burden or expense of preparing or making such a compilation, abstract, audit, or summary would be substantially the same for the party propounding this interrogatory as for OC San. OC San further objects to this interrogatory on the ground that it seeks information that is neither relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. OC San further objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that it is impermissibly compound. Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing, OC San responds as follows: OC San avails itself of the rights set forth in California Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.260 and refers propounding party to the 2020 Recirculated Environmental Impact Report, which identifies the anticipated vehicles to be used during the construction of the project. OC San further refers propounding party to the testimony of Don Stokes given at his deposition in this case on December 13, 2023, during which vehicles anticipated to be used during the use and operation of the Bay Bridge Pump Station are identified. More specific information regarding vehicles that will be used during the construction of the project will be determined after the issuance of a contract to the contractor that will be responsible for the construction of the subject project. Discovery and investigation continue. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.35: Describe in detail YOUR obligations and responsibilities to maintain the ACCESS ROAD throughout YOUR construction, use, and operation of the BBPS. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.35: OC San objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that it is overly broad, burdensome and oppressive, vague and ambiguous. OC San further objects to this interrogatory on the ground that it may be deemed to seek information that is protected from disclosure by the attorney -client privilege, the attorney work product doctrine, and other applicable privileges. OC San further objects to this interrogatory on the ground that an answer would necessitate the preparation or making of a compilation, abstract, audit, or summary from documents that are equally available to and/or already within the possession of the propounding party or that OC San already has otherwise agreed to produce to the propounding parry. The burden or expense of preparing or making such a compilation, abstract, audit, or summary would be substantially the same for the party propounding PLAINTIFF OC SAN'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT BAYSIDE'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO 1816902.1 13- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VERIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE. I have read the foregoing PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA, LLC'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET TWO and know its contents. INN lO X CHECK APPLICABLE PARAGRAPH I am a party to this action. The matters stated in the foregoing document are true of my own knowledge except as to those matters which are stated on information and belief, and to those matters I believe them to be true. I am ❑ an officer ❑ a partner ❑x an agent of Orange County Sanitation District, a party to this action, and am authorized to make this verification for and on its behalf, and I make this verification for that reason. 0 I am informed and believe and on that ground allege that the matters stated in the foregoing document are true. ❑ The matters stated in the foregoing document are true of my own knowledge except as to those matters which are stated on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. ❑ I am one of the attorneys for , a party to this action. Such party is absent from the county of aforesaid where such attorneys have their offices, and I make this verification for and on behalf of that party for that reason. I am informed and believe and on that ground allege that the matters stated in the foregoing document are true. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 20, 2024, at Fountain Valley, California. Cindy Murra, P.E.. Type or Print Name Signature 1816902.1 VERIFICATION 13- ATTACHMENT C 13-207 xIIItl Irvine 7 San Diego Ontario FUSCOE Los Angeles fil.. LI Centro I N 6 1 N I III R 1 N 6 Son Ramon September 5, 2019 Nossaman LLP Attn: John Erskine, Partner 18101 Von Karman Avenue, STE 1800 Irvine, CA 92616 Fuscoe Engineering, Inc (FEI) welcomes the opportunity to provide Nossaman LLP technical comments on the Bay Bridge Pump Station (BBPS) and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) Recirculated Environmental Impact Report (Public Review Draft) July 2019 prepared by Michael Baker International on behalf of Orange County Sanitation Districts (OCSD). FEI is the civil engineering firm for the Back Bay Landing (BBL) project on behalf of Bayside Village Marina, LLC (BVM). FEI has been working with OCSD staff and their technical consultants for the past several years on various pump station configurations to identify a solution satisfactory to both OCSD and the BBL project. FEI offers the following comments on the 2019 Draft EIR (DEIR): 1 . In June 2017, OCSD produced a DEIR for the Bay Bridge Pump Station that included the Existing Pump Station Site Rehabilitation Alternative (Expand in Place) which identified a total square footage of 9,500 square feet (SF). The July 2019 DEIR replaced this alternative with the South Pump Station Alternative which, based off FEI calculations, requires a total area of 15,500 sq. ft. This square footage is not referenced or described anywhere in the text of the DEIR or the exhibits. No technical analysis, data or justification has been provided in the DEIR for the expanded South Pump Station configuration or why it was enlarged and this statement was confirmed by OCSD staff and their consultant (Arcadis) in a video conference meeting between the two parties on August 27, 2019. The South Pump Station alternative significantly impacts fire access, circulation, the proposed parking structure, and residential units related to the BBL proposed development project. In order to validate the need for a site larger than 9,500 SF, OCSD must provide in writing a detailed analysis justifying the additional space requirements. 2. Based on information and exhibits set forth in support of the project description for the preferred alternative of expand in place, the 2017 DEIR, a 9,500 SF pump station facility allowed for the 5 pump/wet well configuration pump station, electrical building, 1,240 square foot building(s) dedicated for odor control and backup generator, transformer and space for parking and access. This alternative required shared access with the BBL project and was tentatively acceptable to BVM representatives in prior meetings but not agreed to by BVM. 3. In 2016, BVM hired an experienced pump station engineer to determine necessary square footage requirements for the Bay Bridge Pump Station to meet all applicable standards and we came up with a maximum of approximately 10,000 SF, consistent with OCSD's findings in their 2017 DEIR for all alternatives analyzed. r c I e t h i n k i n g "' 16795 Von Karman, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92606 tel 949.474.1960 fax 949.474.5315 www.fuscoe.com 13-208 Fuscoe0018011 FUSCOF N E E R 1 N iry Irvine San Diego Ontario Los Angeles LI Centro San Ramon 4. Through discussions with OCSD in November 2018 and again in August 2019, FEI learned from OCSD engineers that a reason for the expanded footprints identified in the 2019 DER was OCSD's desire for independent access to and from their pump station facility and uncertainty regarding "shared access". In order to validate "shared access" to and from the South Pump Station alternative, FEI utilized Bay Bridge Pump Station Collection Facilities Vehicles identified by OCSD (2014) for analyzing truck access, turning radius and other dimensional requirements. FEI used the largest truck referenced in OCSD's document, which is the Vehicle 354 (3-axial Comb Truck). This vehicle would visit the site approximately 4 times per year based on their documentation. The truck dimensions include a length of 38'-6", 10'- 8" width and outside turning radius of 45'-1 ". 5. Our analysis revealed OCSD's largest truck requirement (as provided to FEI) can access the expanded pump station location in multiple ways. The truck can enter off N. Bayside Drive, drive westerly through the BBL project, then southerly to the western end of the expanded pump station and egress through OCSD's existing entrance off East Coast Highway. Alternatively, the same truck could exit back through the BBL site back to N. Bayside Drive. This would require the operator of the truck to back up approximately 150' from the western edge of their expanded pump station and then pull forward to turn onto BBL's main roadway through the site back to N. Bayside Drive. FEI's analysis also demonstrated that OCSD could enter BBPS off East Coast Highway through their existing driveway, access the pump station and then turn right onto BBL's main proposed interior roadway, though the site, back to N. Bayside Drive. In all scenarios, the BBL site plan and drive aisles can accommodate the minimum turning radius of the largest OCSD truck needed as provided to FEI by OCSD and allows for multiple ways to access their facility. Four exhibits demonstrating the various access routes are provided herewith (see attachment). 6. Following the release of the 2019 DEIR, some discussion has recently occurred (we note after the release to the public of the BBPS REIR) between OCSD and BVM which have led to yet a third Expand in Place alternative. This alternative requires a footprint of approximately 11,205 SF. OCSD has also provided verbal comments that they need the additional square footage (approximately 1,705 SF) beyond the 9,500 SF due to technical hydraulic standards related to the distance of the incoming gravity sewer line and the wet well. BVM has not been provided any written data and analysis that supports the 11,205 SF size requirement nor is it identified in the 2019 DEIR. When OCSD identified the hydraulic constraint as the primary reason for the expansion, FEI's pump station expert (Civiltec Engineering, Inc.) raised technical questions regarding the hydraulic standards and methods for analyzing alternatives and OCSD stated they had not performed such analyses. Given the significant impacts to the BBL site plan beyond 9,500 SF, we believe more advanced modeling should occur to determine a design that works in an equivalent hydraulic manner and may result in a shorter incoming gravity line or design modification resulting in a smaller space requirement. 7. OCSD also provided new information to BVM that the Odor Control and Generator building now needs to be approximately 2,100 SF instead of the prior requirement of approximately 1,240 SF (620 SF odor control building + 620 backup generator building) as set forth in the REIR (refer to page 1-2, Executive Summary and page 3-10, Project Description respectively). f u I� i r c I e t h i n k i n g'R 16795 Von Karman, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92606 tel 949.474.1960 fax 949.474.5315 www.fuscoe.com 13-209 Fuscoe0018012 FUSCOF N E E R 1 N 0 Irvine San Diego Ontario Los Angeles LI Centro Son Ramon OCSD and Arcadis stated they had made BVM aware of this expanded requirement for odor control and generator buildings in a November 2018 meeting but a review by BVM confirmed that all representations of the generator building and odor control facility remain at the approximately square footage of 1,240 SF — 1,290 SF. The 2019 Draft EIR does not show the expanded footprints of the odor control building and generator building anywhere in the DER at 2,100 SF and all text identify the total square footage requirement for the two buildings as 1,240 SF and all exhibits show them as approximately 1,290 SF in total. FEI requests that OCSD recirculate the DER with the supporting technical documentation as to why the combined odor control and generator building needs to be greater than 1,240 SF including a detailed description of the odor control system, the design criteria and if an odor control specialist has been consulted to minimize square footage requirements (see also, Nossaman LLP Comment Letter Submitted on 09-03-19). In summary, no technical discussions, data or analysis have been provided by OCSD or their consultant to validate their request for expanded footprints related to the "Expand in Place" option known as the South Pump Station alternative in the 2019 Draft EIR. OCSD staff and Arcadis shared in an August 27, 2019 meeting that they had additional technical information including hydraulic design criteria and odor control criteria that justified the expansion but admitted none of this information has been provided to BVM and none of this information was documented in the 2019 Draft EIR. FEI requests that OCSD provide their technical analysis and justification for the expanded footprints for both the pump station and odor control/generator buildings in a recirculated EIR so BBL has the opportunity to provide peer review with BBL's pump station experts and confirm or provide feedback on how modifications can be made to limit additional space requirements. At a minimum, OCSD should develop a physical model or a computational flow dynamic model to analyze the site -specific hydraulic conditions to develop the most efficient in -take configuration for the pump station and minimize impacts to the BBL property. Sincerely, Mark Nero, P.E. Project Manager Attachments: Ian Adam Principal �12_ _; , � Z_� co OCSD Truck Turn Study: Option 1, Option 2A, Option 2B & Option 3 (Exhibits) 16795 Von Karman, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92606 tel 949.474.1960 fax 949.474.5315 www.fuscoe.com 13-210 Fuscoe0018013 ATTACHMENT D 13-211 Message From: Ian Adam [/O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=483553F7239D4D6AA8DF12B676731DE2-IAN ADAM] Sent: 12/17/2019 3:36:57 PM To: Ratto, Valerie [VRatto@OCSD.COM] Subject: FW: BBL-pump station area per manfredi site plan dated 11-27-2019 Attachments: BBL pump station area per manfredi site plan dated 11-27-2.pdf; BBL pump station area per manfredi site plan dated 11-27-2019.dwg HI Valerie, Thank you for the call today. This is the current layout we're land planning around. The pump station footprint is approximately 13,227 SF and rotated a tiny bit to better accommodate our proposed "shared access" roadway. Please confirm you got this to help with your upcoming meetings. Regards, Ian IAN ADAM, CPSWQ I Principal iadam(a-)fuscoe.com FUSCOE ENGINEERING, INC. an employee owned company 16795 Von Karman, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92606 949.474.1960 1949.271.4318 (direct) 1 714.655.5835 (cell) fuscoe.com f u l l c i r c l e t h i n k i n g° From: Debbie Bade <dbade@fuscoe.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 3:28 PM To: Ian Adam <iadam@fuscoe.com> Subject: BBL-pump station area per manfredi site plan dated 11-27-2019 Ian, Please see the attached pdf and cad file with the OCSD pump station area, access road, and property line for reference. ..IqI -411111 FUSCOE 111• I I I It 1 M F. 13-212 Fuscoe0026698 ATTACHMENT E 13-213 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOSSAMAN LLP BRADFORD B. KUHN (SBN 245866) bkuhn@nossaman.com JOHN P. ERSKINE (SBN 084994) jerskine@nossaman.com 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: 949.833.7800 Facsimile: 949.833.7878 Defendant Bayside Village Marina LLC SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE - CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT, A PUBLIC ENTITY, Plaintiff, VS. BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; LAGUNA BEACH COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC ENTITY; DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE; AND ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN CLAIMING AN INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY, Defendants. AND ALL RELATED CASES Case No: 30-2022-01251890-CU-EI-CXC [Related Case No.: 30-2021-01194238] Assigned for all purposes to: Hon. William Claster, Dept. CX-104 DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE Date Action Filed: March 25, 2022 Trial Date: None -1- DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE 61345301.v1 ' 3-214 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I PROPOUNDING PARTY: PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT I RESPONDING PARTY SET NO.: DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC ONE Defendant Bayside Village Marina LLC ("Defendant") hereby responds and objects, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.210, et seq., to the first set of special interrogatories propounded by Plaintiff Orange County Sanitation District ("Plaintiff'). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Defendant has not yet completed its investigation or discovery of the facts surrounding the above -captioned matter. All of the responses contained herein are based only upon such information, belief, and documents as are presently available to and specifically known to Defendant. The responses contained herein will disclose only that information which is subject to the above -described limitations. As discovery proceeds, witnesses, facts, and evidence may be discovered that are not set forth herein but which may have been responsive to an interrogatory. Facts and evidence now known may be imperfectly understood, or the relevance or consequence of such facts and evidence may be imperfectly understood. Accordingly, such facts and evidence may, in good faith, not be included in the following responses. It is anticipated that further discovery, independent investigation, legal research and analysis will supply additional facts or add new meaning to the known facts, as well as establish entirely new factual conclusions and legal contentions, all of which may lead to substantial additions to, changes in, and variations from, the responses herein set forth. The following responses are given without prejudice to Defendant's right to produce evidence of any subsequently discovered facts, witnesses, or documents that Defendant may later recall. Defendant accordingly reserves the right to change any and all answers herein as additional facts are ascertained, analysis is made, and legal research is completed. The responses contained herein are made in a good faith effort to supply as much factual information and as much specification of legal contentions as is presently -2- DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE 61345301.v1 13-215 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 or summary would be substantially the same for the Plaintiff as for Defendant. Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing, Defendant responds as follows: April 11, 2018 Offer and Appraisal; December 10, 2020 Offer; June 1, 2021 Notice of Decision to Appraise; September 7, 2021 Offer to Purchase; and January 26, 2022 Resolution of Necessity. Defendant elects to further respond to this interrogatory pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.230 and identifies the Administrative Record created and lodged with the Court in the matter of Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, and previously produced by Plaintiff, in this action, in response to Defendant's first set of requests for production of documents (OCSAN 000001 — 037435), as the source from which the information responsive to this interrogatory may be obtained. As discovery is ongoing, Defendant reserves the right to supplement its response as additional discovery and information becomes available. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 21: State all facts that support YOUR contention that the PROJECT is not "planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the least private injury" as alleged in YOUR ANSWER. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 21: Subject to Plaintiff complying with the court's February 7, 2023 Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Judgment in the related case of Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, Defendant waives its right to take challenge in this eminent domain action, and, as such, no response to this request is required. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 22: -24- DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE 61345301.v1 13-216 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IDENTIFY all PERSONS (with the exceptions of your expert witnesses and attorneys) that have knowledge of facts that support YOUR contention that the PROJECT is not "planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the least private injury" as alleged in YOUR ANSWER. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 22: Subject to Plaintiff complying with the court's February 7, 2023 Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Judgment in the related case of Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, Defendant waives its right to take challenge in this eminent domain action, and, as such, no response to this request is required. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 23: IDENTIFY all DOCUMENTS that evidence, refer to or relate to YOUR contention that the PROJECT is not "planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the least private injury" as alleged in YOUR ANSWER. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 23: Subject to Plaintiff complying with the court's February 7, 2023 Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Judgment in the related case of Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, Defendant waives its right to take challenge in this eminent domain action, and, as such, no response to this request is required. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 24: State all facts that support YOUR contention that the acquisition of the PROPERTY INTERESTS is not necessary for the PROJECT as alleged in YOUR ANSWER. ("PROPERTY INTERESTS" refers to the property interests being acquired by OC SAN for the PROJECT as identified in OC SAN's complaint filed in the ACTION.) RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 24: -25- DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE 61345301.v1 13-217 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Subject to Plaintiff complying with the court's February 7, 2023 Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Judgment in the related case of Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, Defendant waives its right to take challenge in this eminent domain action, and, as such, no response to this request is required. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 25: IDENTIFY all PERSONS (with the exceptions of your expert witnesses and attorneys) that have knowledge of facts that support YOUR contention that the acquisition of the PROPERTY INTERESTS is not necessary for the PROJECT as alleged in YOUR ANSWER. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 25: Subject to Plaintiff complying with the court's February 7, 2023 Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Judgment in the related case of Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, Defendant waives its right to take challenge in this eminent domain action, and, as such, no response to this request is required. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 26: IDENTIFY all DOCUMENTS that evidence, refer to or relate to YOUR contention that the acquisition of the PROPERTY INTERESTS is not necessary for the PROJECT as alleged in YOUR ANSWER. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 26: Subject to Plaintiff complying with the court's February 7, 2023 Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Judgment in the related case of Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, Defendant waives its right to take challenge in this eminent domain action, and, as such, no response to this request is required. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 27: -26- DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE 61345301.v1 13-218 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant waives its right to take challenge in this eminent domain action, and, as such, no response to this request is required. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.32: IDENTIFY all DOCUMENTS that evidence, refer to or relate to YOUR contention that alternative locations have been proposed that are "environmentally superior and less impactful" than the subject location as alleged in YOUR ANSWER. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.32: Subject to Plaintiff complying with the court's February 7, 2023 Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Judgment in the related case of Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, Defendant waives its right to take challenge in this eminent domain action, and, as such, no response to this request is required. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 33: State all facts that support YOUR contention that the PROJECT is not "planned in the manner that will cause the least private injury" as alleged in YOUR ANSWER. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 33: Subject to Plaintiff complying with the court's February 7, 2023 Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Judgment in the related case of Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, Defendant waives its right to take challenge in this eminent domain action, and, as such, no response to this request is required. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.34: IDENTIFY all PERSONS (with the exceptions of your expert witnesses and attorneys) that have knowledge of facts that support YOUR contention that the PROJECT is not "planned in the manner that will cause the least private injury" as alleged in YOUR ANSWER. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.34: -29- DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE 61345301.v1 13-219 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Subject to Plaintiff complying with the court's February 7, 2023 Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Judgment in the related case of Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, Defendant waives its right to take challenge in this eminent domain action, and, as such, no response to this request is required. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.35: IDENTIFY all DOCUMENTS that evidence, refer to or relate to YOUR contention that the PROJECT is not "planned in the manner that will cause the least private injury" as alleged in YOUR ANSWER. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 35: Subject to Plaintiff complying with the court's February 7, 2023 Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Judgment in the related case of Bayside Village Marina, LLC v. Orange County Sanitation District, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2021-01194238, Defendant waives its right to take challenge in this eminent domain action, and, as such, no response to this request is required. SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 36: State all facts that support YOUR contention that "Plaintiff failed and refused to satisfy its obligations under the California Environmental Quality Act" as alleged in YOUR ANSWER. RESPONSE TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO.36: Defendant objects to this interrogatory on the grounds that it is overly broad, burdensome and oppressive, vague and ambiguous. Defendant further objects to this interrogatory on the ground that it may be deemed to seek information that is protected from disclosure by the attorney -client privilege, the attorney work product privilege, and other applicable privileges. Defendant also objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for a legal opinion, expert opinion and/or the unilateral disclosure of expert witness information and/or documents. Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing, Defendant responds as follows: -30- DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE 61345301.v1 13-220 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 product privilege, and other applicable privileges. Defendant also objects to this interrogatory to the extent that it calls for expert opinion and/or the unilateral disclosure of expert witness information and/or documents. Dated: February 27, 2023 NOSSAMAN LLP BRADFORD B. KUHN JOHN P. ERSKINE By: Bradford B. Kuhn Defendant Bayside Village Marina LLC -53- DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE 61345301.v1 13-221 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VERIFICATION I, Michael Gelfand, declare: I have read the foregoing DEFENDANT BAYSIDE VILLAGE MARINA LLC'S RESPONSE TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT'S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE, and know of its contents. I am the President of Bayside Village Marina LLC, a party to this action. I am authorized to make this verification for and on its behalf, and I make this verification for that reason. The matters stated in the foregoing document are true of my own knowledge except as to those matters which are stated on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them to be true. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on this day of February 2023, 15�0j-& t� , California. Michael Gelfand 61323934.v1 -2- 13-222 ATTACHMENT F 13-223 Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project (Project No. 5-67) 2020 RECIRCULATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT yy+ 4 Mf�L�a( i � 1 AUGUST 2020 d ' ,.,., Prepared for: Orange County Sanitation District Prepared_by: Michael Baker International fi.',�ili��• .4. k-0-41. PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2020 RECIRCULATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project State Clearinghouse No. 2016111031 Lead Agency: ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Contact: Mr. Kevin Hadden Principal Staff Analyst 714.962.2411 Prepared by: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500 Santa Ana, California 92707 Contact: Ms. Kristen Bogue 949.472.3505 August 2020 JN 168975 13-225 2020 Recirculated Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project City of Newport Beach SB 743 VMT Implementation Guide The City SB 743 VMT Implementation Guide (VMT Implementation Guide), dated April 6, 2020, also known as City Council Policy K-3, is used as a reference document to determine the appropriate VMT analysis methodology for projects within the City. According to the VMT Implementation Guide, the framework for completing a CEQA-level VMT transportation analysis for proposed land development projects and transportation projects include the following steps: a. Screening Criteria under which projects are not required to submit a detailed VMT analysis. b. Significance Thresholds for Land Development projects (Residential, Office, Retail, Other). c. Significance Thresholds for Transportation projects. d. Requirements for projects to mitigate significant and unavoidable impacts. According to Section 2, Land Development Pr ject Screening, of the VMT Implementation Guide, certain conditions may exist that would presume that a proposed land development project has a less than significant VMT impact. Land development projects that have one or more of the identified attributes may be presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact. Among other attributes, Attribute E states that land use development projects that generate a net increase of 300 or less daily trips, utilizing the most current Institute of Transportation Engineers JTE) Trip Generation Manual would have a less than significant VMT impact. 5.11.3 IMPACT THRESHOLDS AND SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines contains the Environmental Checklist form used during preparation of this EIR. Accordingly, a project may create a significant adverse environmental impact if it would: • Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities (refer to Impact Statement TRA-1); • Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b) (refer to Impact Statement TRA-4); • Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment) (refer to Impact Statement TRA-2); and • Result in inadequate emergency access (refer to Impact Statement TRA-3). 5.11.4 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ROADWAY, TRANSIT, BICYCLE, AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES TRA-1 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COULD ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANS RELATED TO ROADWAY, TRANSIT, BICYCLE, AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES. Public Review Draft . August 2020 5.11-5 Transportation 13-226 2020 Recirculated Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project Impact Analysis: Roadway Short-term increases in vehicle trips on the circulation system would occur during construction. Construction -related trips would occur during the 36 months required for demolition, grading, building construction, installation of force mains, and gravity sewer improvements. Traffic would include the transfer of construction equipment/materials, construction work trips, and hauling trips for soil. Construction associated with trucks and employees traveling to and from the project site may result in minor increases in vehicles on the circulation system. Specifically, demolition activities would require approximately 10 trips per day (including two haul trips), grading activities would require approximately 25 trips per day (including two haul trips), building construction would require approximately 16 trips per day (no haul trips), installation of force mains would require approximately 28 trips per day (no haul trips), and gravity sewer improvements would require approximately 23 trips per day (no haul trips). These nominal increases would be temporary and would cease upon completion of construction. Further, these construction -related vehicle trips would occur throughout the day, and hauling or transport of oversize loads would only occur between the non -peak hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday with implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-1. Thus, construction - related vehicle trips on the roadway circulation system would be less than significant. Following construction, the proposed project would require a maximum of approximately 15 vehicle trips per week for OCSD staff to perform periodic maintenance, inspections of facilities and equipment, and/or chemical deliveries. However, development of the proposed project would result in no new vehicle trips on the circulation system, since these vehicle trips are currently required for maintenance/inspection of the existing pump station, and because no new employees would need to be hired or visit the site as part of the project. As such, the project would not result in any long-term operational impacts on the surrounding roadway network. Transit, Bicycle, Pedestrian Facilities Temporary construction -related traffic may disrupt transit, pedestrian and bicycle traffic through the project area. During project construction, the following temporary lane closures would be required along Coast Highway to allow for the following construction activities, which may overlap: • East Coast Highway: Temporary closure of one eastbound lane of traffic to allow for construction of the gravity sewer improvements and temporary closure of one westbound lane of traffic to demolish existing manhole and abandon the existing 42-inch sewer. Demolition/abandonment and construction of this gravity line would take approximately 131 non-consecutive days over the project's 36-month construction period. Vest Coast Highway: Temporary closure of one eastbound lane of traffic and bus turnout area to allow for connection of the two force mains to the existing system. Demolition/abandonment and construction of this gravity line would take approximately 33 consecutive days during the project's 36-month construction period. Public Review Draft . August 2020 5.11-6 Transportation 13-227 2020 Recirculated Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project These proposed lane closures could temporarily impact transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation in the project area. To reduce the potential impacts of construction -related vehicles interacting with pedestrians, bicyclists, and other local traffic, a Construction Management Plan would be required per Mitigation Measure TRA-1, which would implement a variety of measures to minimize traffic safety impacts. The Construction Management Plan would be required to include, but not be limited to, the following: • Advanced mailings notifying surrounding property owners of project activities; • Construction signage; • A construction flagperson, as necessary, to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions; • Prohibition of construction worker parking along local streets; • Identification of appropriate haul routes to avoid traffic disruptions; and • Limitation of hauling activities to off-peak hours. Compliance with Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would ensure pedestrian and bicyclist access would remain open, to the greatest extent possible, during construction or re-routed to ensure continued connectivity. While it is unknown at this time which sidewalks and/or bicycle paths may be closed during construction, at least one sidewalk/bicycle path along the roadway would remain open and temporary detours to the open path would be provided with signage and/or direction from a construction flagperson. Advanced notification to surrounding property owners, a construction flagperson, and construction signage to reroute pedestrians and bicyclists around the affected areas would be required during all construction activities. Thus, with implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-1, the project would not conflict with policies related to public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, as access would be maintained to the greatest extent possible and no permanent impacts to these facilities would result. In addition, operations of the proposed pump station facility would be similar to the existing pump station, and would not introduce any new land uses that could affect public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian travel. Impacts in this regard would be reduced to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measures: TRA-1 Prior to initiation of construction activities, engineering drawings and specifications, and/or contractor shop drawings shall be prepared by the Project Engineer, or designee, and submitted for review and approval by the Orange County Sanitation District, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department. These documents shall, at a minimum, address the following: • Traffic control protocols shall be specified for any lane closure, detour, or other disruption to traffic circulation, including bicycle and pedestrian trails. Disruption to traffic circulation shall be minimized to the greatest extent feasible. Bicycle and pedestrian trails shall remain open, to the greatest extent feasible, during construction or shall be re-routed to ensure continued connectivity. Public Review Draft . August 2020 5.11-7 Transportation 13-228 2020 Recirculated Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project • Bus stop access impacts shall be coordinated with, and approved by, the Orange County Transportation Authority. • At least one week before any construction activities that would affect travel on nearby roadways, the construction contractor shall notify the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department and Caltrans, as applicable, of construction activities that could impede movement (such as lane closures) along roadways, to allow for planning temporary detours or identifying alternative emergency access routes where appropriate. Surrounding property owners shall also be notified of project activities through advanced mailings. Identify construction vehicle haul routes for the delivery of construction materials (i.e., lumber, tiles, piping, windows, etc.) to the site; necessary traffic controls and detours; and a construction phasing plan for the project to reduce impacts to local streets and plan for traffic control signage and detours along identified haul routes to minimize impacts to existing traffic flow. • Identify any and all construction staging or material storage sites located outside of the project site. • Specify the hours during which hauling activities can occur and methods to mitigate construction -related impacts to adjacent streets such as traffic control barricades, cones, flaggers, and warning signs. • Require the contractor to keep all haul routes clean and free of debris, including but not limited, to gravel and dirt resulting from project construction. The Contractor shall clean adjacent streets, as directed by the Orange County Sanitation District, of any project material which may have been spilled, tracked, or blown onto adjacent City of Newport Beach and Caltrans streets or areas. • Hauling of oversize loads shall be allowed between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. only, Monday through Friday. No hauling or transport shall be allowed during nighttime hours, weekends, or Federal holidays. Any oversized loads utilizing Coast Highway shall obtain a Caltrans permit for such activities. • Use of local streets shall be prohibited, except when required to provide direct access to the project site and in compliance with the approved project haul routes. Haul trucks entering or exiting public streets shall yield to public traffic at all times. • If hauling operations cause any damage to existing pavement, streets, curbs, and/or gutters along the haul route, the contractor shall be fully responsible for repairs. The repairs shall restore the damaged property to its original condition. • All construction -related staging of vehicles shall be kept out of the adjacent public roadways and shall occur on the project site or within additional off-street staging areas previously identified and arranged. Public Review Draft . August 2020 5.11-8 Transportation 13-229 2020 Recirculated Environmental Impact Report Bay Bridge Pump Station and Force Mains Replacement Project • Construction -related lane closures would only occur between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. More or less restrictive closure hours may be prescribed by the City. Use of a construction flagperson (as deemed appropriate by the Orange County Sanitation District) to assist in maintaining efficient vehicle travel in both directions (particularly during peak travel hours) and use of construction signage and safe detour routes for pedestrians and bicyclists when travel lanes and sidewalks along Coast Highway are affected. The engineering drawings and specifications shall meet standards established in the current California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Device (MUTCD). Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. HAZARDOUS DESIGN FEATURES TRA-2 THE PROJECT COULD SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE HAZARDS DUE TO SHORT-TERM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN SURROUNDING ROADWAYS. Impact Analysis: Construction As stated above, temporary lane closures would be required along Coast Highway to allow for project construction activities. These proposed lane closures could result in temporary traffic hazard conditions. Therefore, to reduce the potential impacts of construction -related vehicles interacting with pedestrians, bicyclists, and other local traffic, Mitigation Measure TRA-1 requires a Construction Management Plan be developed to implement a variety of measures to minimize traffic safety impacts. Implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-1 would reduce the project's temporary construction - related hazards within surrounding roadways and impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Operations Upon completion of construction activities, no permanent changes to the local circulation system would result, such as hazardous geometric roadway design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections). In addition, the proposed project would not result in any new land uses that would involve incompatible features or equipment that could cause a hazard on roadways in the project area. Currently, primary site ingress and egress for OCSD maintenance vehicles is provided via a right turn only driveway from East Coast Highway. Maintenance trucks must currently back into oncoming traffic on East Coast Highway to exit the site. The project would increase transportation safety by redirecting OCSD vehicles through the Bayside Village Marina, LLC property via Bayside Drive for primary site access, both ingress and egress, with secondary site access provided via the existing driveway along East Coast Highway. As such, impacts in this regard would be less than significant. Public Review Draft . August 2020 5.11-9 Transportation 13-230 Attachment M Project Plans 13-231 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 0 II B / / / / �I I ,1 C 0 E v� m m Q ti Q0 L6 c 0 ca 0- E m 0) m ' IFca� m ti co I SITE PLAN 0 U) U SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-O" O r` 00 �o aC) C-0� o, 0� c')a co N �p O co N co �_ 1 LCP RESUBMITTAL Q0 m MARK DESCRIPTION DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE 06/2023 (IF NOT 2"- SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. Fu TAR _ E A C CSSS N 10' HIGH WALL ` \ R04D 1 �3 84 A2001 NORTH GATE 24' WIDE SWING GATE 4 10' HIGH WALL TOW = 29.33' 15HIGH WALL FDS CA ARCAD IS APRIL 2023 NOT FOR CALLISONTKL()c � SA I CONSTRUCTION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT (SEE LANDSCAPE DWGS) BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT SITE PLAN 1S HIGH WALL 5-67 DRAWING NO.: Al 001 SHEET NO.: 59 OF 302 13-232 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 \ Vv CONSTRUCTION NOTES: ---- _ I \��s°\ O CONSTRUCT 6" AC ON 12'' AB ON 95% MAX DENSITY COMPACTED PRIVATE PROPERTY 1 - \ w�O)� SUBGRADE PENDING FINAL GEOTECH REPORT). REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK IN KIND ANY A PORTIONS THAT ARE DAMAGED OR REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION. REPLACE SIDEWALK TO THE NEAREST FULL SECTION, PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. MH-1 9 _ N :2172041.06 \ 30w�o\ „ E:6058631.44 \ )� \3\ 2 CONSTRUCT 9 PCCP ON 12 AB ON 95/o MAX DENSITY COMPACTED RIM 58631. SUBGRADE (PENDING FINAL GEOTECH REPORT). INV IN=10.52 \ o \ ' INV OUT-10.42 CONSTRUCT PCC GUTTER PER CONB STD. DET. 140 MODIFIED % j \ \ AS SHOWN ON DETAIL 2 ON SHEET C5005. 21 \ °w(O \ _ 2 STORM DRAIN A 10 N:2172025.01 \ \ 3°\ O5 CONNECT TO BUILDING FLOOR DRAIN SEE SHEET M1101 FOR 8"HDPE (SD) �_'���__ \ �o _ C3003 PROFILE E:6058699.66 CONTINUATION. FS=13.15 / �`- � ` '-��__,,`\_`\ RIM=13.20 \\ �'' �_,,__\__ FS=12.85 - INV OUT-11.15 2 18" RCP (D2000) STORM DRAIN, PLAN AND PROFILE ON DWG C1006. B FS=13.55 INV -`\ FS / IFS=13.35 '��\ MATCH EX. 2 FURNISH AND INSTALL 6" STORM DRAIN CLEAN OUT PER OC SAN \ 15 PAD-14.00 STD. DWG S-073 AND S-015. , FS=13.50± - ACCESS ROAD - BY OTHERS ' ' MATCH EX. 21 O8 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE COLLAR, REFER TO SPPWC FS � GENERATOR ROOM 18 PAD=15.50 ----- ' FS =13.67 STANDARD PLAN 380-4. FS =12.85 pv �F ..4 ° , \ J O9 FURNISH AND INSTALL 24'' DRAIN BASIN (NYLOPLAST PART # 2812AG / FS-14.13 p F\,�F\ O PRIVATE OR EQUAL) WITH H-20 RATED SOLID COVER, FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT STORM DRAIN A 2 8"HDPE (SD) FS-13.60 �p a O OC GRADES. PROFILE C3003 � - FS=13.15 F\ p SAN _ FS=12.00 FS=15.46 - 3 FS=13.00 O 18 O \` 10 FURNISH AND INSTALL 12'' DRAIN BASIN (NYLOPLAST PART # 2812AG FS-13.67 �� O 23 TYP. FS=13.50 OR EQUAL) WITH H-20 RATED STANDARD GRATE INLET. 21 FS-13.67 STORM DRAIN B 3 6"HDPE (SD) O O �I 5 7 INV=8.00 PROFILE C3004 - - - - - - 11 18" RCP STORM DRAIN, PROFILE ON DWG C3003. C \�` \�ELECTRICAL ROOM FS=13.50 O FS=13.30 3 12 CONSTRUCT STORM DRAIN MANHOLE JUNCTION STRUCTURE 10 CB-4 O WITH H-20 RATED SOLID COVER. \\ FS-11.80 �i FS-13.25 \ N:2172001.70 �� 6"HDPE (SD) 4 STORMDRAIN C EXIST OC SAN PS �\ p E:6058721..68 C3004 PROFILE / PROPERY BOUNDARY 13 FURNISH AND INSTALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE WITH `\ FS -11.70 FS =12.00 23 1 I RIM =12.90 22 I / STANDARD INLET TYPE G1 PER CALTRANS STD. DET. D73. FS=11.80 I INV=8.50 FL=11.42 FS=12.60 \ FS=13.50 14 CONSTRUCT 2' WIDE BY 18" HEIGHT RECTANGULAR WALL CB -5 OPENING WITH TRASH RACK METAL GRATE. 10 O FS=15.46 22 � � ODOR CONTROL AREA I pR�V N :2171970.24 O E:6058615.60 ' , O p _ O 17 \; 4 \ 1 FF-14.00 I / 15 FURNISH AND INSTALL DUCTILE IRON HEEL PROOF, 600 PSI RATED yp FS-13.50 4__ RIM=11.40 �� _ FS=13.96 / GRATE INLET WIDTH 6.1 INCH. R'gNs INV=9.00 19 / 4/• O O per_ , \� FL=13.05 \ 6 STORM DRAIN E FS=11.60 ' 17 O O O FS=13.25 J r ! ; 6`HDPE (SD) C3004 PROFILE CB-6 16 CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE INTERFERING PORTIONS OF FS-11.50 O O �� / /y_' FL=13.15 I 10 N:2171952.08 EXISTING SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER AND DRIVEWAY. MATCH o\ ; MH-2 9 5 7 INV=8.00 I / E:6058766.92 EXISTING ELEVATIONS TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE. CONSTRUCT ROLL D CURB AND GUTTER TYPE E PER CALTRANS STD. DET A87A, SEE oT�(e) \ 22 `� 5 STORM DRAIN D _,� J , , IN:2171963.84 I RIM=13.25 FS=12.30- 6 HDPE (SD) C3004 PROFILE fir, �,= ' IE:6058740.37 / INV 6-IN(NW)=5.77 DETAIL ON SHEET C5002. � FS-13.50 CB ,) �� ` 4r\ ; INV (W)=7.50 - ►NV 6-IN(SW)=6.96 -----``` TSre) Sr(e N:2171966.44 ` \ ` ` FS=13.20 %e \\ INV (N)=7.08 \`\` 6"HDPE (SD) 22 INV 6-IN(N)=7.80 17 UNDERGROUND CONCRETE STRUCTURE, SEE STRUCTURAL E.6058613.04 INV E =6.50 - O SHEET S1004 FOR CONCRETE ROOF SLAB PLANS. FG=11.65 CD ire RIM=11.50 / 2 FL=12.22 \\\\ -_ _0� ; y , INV 8- =2.50 -- TW =16.95 I ` FS 13.4 ;� - \ \ _ 4 INV IN=9.7 C - 20 - _ i ,;v�,h ,,,,-m FS=13.50 1/2"CU (POTW) M3008 18 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAD, SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS. Ic?FL-13.12 FS-13.25� �, INV OUT=9.63� MATCH EX. �e - -_� FS=13.55 ;= c 22 ,� � � _ �-, =-, , FL=13.30 , 1.��< ;,�; >Sx ,\, � 3 � �� �� > \r FG=16.65 rv�� - - ',> * \\\ _ _ INV E =10.50 19 CONSTRUCT 8 X8 WALL OPENING AT BASE OF WALL. 12 INV S -9.00 co STORM DRAIN A 1 __ _ ( ) 8"HDPE (SD) - = - ORM DRAIN B 3 PROFILE C3003 FG=15.00' _ --�_� `FL=13.17 ; - ; ' / 8"HDPE SD 22 INV=10.89-t 20 CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALL SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS. w ,\ ` ` _ - - �_� 6"H PRO ILE . 04 ( ) 14 o ''�__� ----- ------ =crv= _ - _ m DPE (SD) 22 y MATCH EX. i \� FG=14.00 21 CONSTRUCT SCREEN WALL, SEE ARCHITECTURAL aINV=8.00-FS=13.75 /- - , AND STRUCTURAL PLANS. g E \ \ �2a\ _____________ _ - _ _ 2 �_--- CB-3 13 i 11 4=FS=14.00 'x FS o ----------- -=�s� \�\ - - _ -- _- __��__, \ \ ` �r N:2171942.25 F a a -14 a 4 _\ _ _ _ 20 22 FURNISH AND INSTALL HDPE PIPE (SSPWC 207-18, MIN. PS-50), o _______ __ - ��-\------____________ _ E.6058705.02 �cT �� x 13 1 x 13.51 4 �, - - _ PRIVATE LENGTH, SIZE, AND SLOPE AS NOTED ON PLAN AND PROFILE. - _ - __ RIM=13.50±--sr ��.=:�� 2 5 - - C/D___________________ ��, \ INV(W)=8.7 �' c ire r 4 9' I E C5001 2 C B - 23 CONSTRUCT BOLLARDS PER OC SAN STD. DET. S-120 AND -_----__ __--- �2aeJ�•�� \ - - - _ - _ - _ - _ INV(S)=8.68- _ s ° / - v 3 S-121. SEE SHEET C1002 FOR BOLLARD LAYOUT AND SPACING. ----- 2 rs '`� `� - _ - _ rs B �B) rS B �-_x�S sow 18"RCP (SD) 6 cos - - - - - - - - - - - - - - u B). (B) )(e C1006 NOTES: - `°--- I T(Btl) 3 T(B) 6 (Ts6 FL=13.24 TS(B)1s ) ~•=2 MATCH EX. , / ={� --__ I �! • GROUND SURFACE ELEVATIONS AND COORDINATES ARE PROVIDED \` �- z / - I I FL=12.82 _ -'-••.=v - 4 FOR CONTRACTOR'S REFERENCE ONLY, AND REPRESENT THE o a�� / / FL=12.98 I - ----------- ❑ / / / -�_ I� FL=12.14 --____ _ _ - J DESIGN INTENT. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LAY �, 16 - / OUT THE SITE SO THAT A SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS GROUND / / / / -�4Vp co FL=12.46 16 rn / > / / / 2(B ° FL=11.78 MATCH EX. SURFACE WITH ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IS PROVIDED. FL=12 06 CD CD CD IF i(C)-- C)----30SD( )----30SD(C)----30SD(C) -- -!t30SQ(C)- _ - ) �S --,3D�D(G'� 30SD(C)---�30SQ(C)=---30SD(C)----30SD(C)----30SD(C)24 _ 4Sp(C)__ _ _-._ 24ip T N --2 4SD(C)- 7-24SD C U) o / / / / / / ' -� �' EX. 18" RCP-_..2aw(B) r - - - O- _ 24SD(C)=___ / / PROTECT EXISTING$ 4sD(c) -24SD / / / / - O III CATCH BASIN IN PLACE 2aW(D)__. Q INV E =8.53 - - --24W(D)---- C�E I - - momi 10, 0' 10, 20' SCALE: 1 " = 10' Q o �00 DESIGNED BY: JESUS LOPEZ � DRAWN BY: ALAN PROCTOR BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT 5- 7 �" o CHECKED BY: PRAVEEN YERRA D DRAWING NO. ARCADIS 12 N JAN UARY 2023 LINE IS 2 INCHES 1-0 ON c� OO CONSTRUCTIONGRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FULL SIZE P"=comCl 003 Q MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. (IF NOT2"-SCALE ACCORDINGLY) ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SHEETNO.: 18 OF 298 13-233 i K 3 n 6i on 7 0 9 1 10 0 B 0 7D 0 0 0 r- 1 Ln J U !24g\ w w 0 o SSFM(D�-- ECO _ — 0 27SSFM(D .o • cb I 1 D" Q E m ED � f(D m T m cfl ♦ 0 ;)---- U 0 CID co Mloj' o F0 Q o �< U W oU) o� U U E o � Ur 00 QT M N m o i N N N U� Q MARK 00 1 LIGHT POLE AND CONDUITS - / EXISTING OC SAN / \ PR/VATE OC SAN PROPERTY PROPERTY BOUNDARY OC SAN PROPERTY OC s� BOUNDARY BOUNDARY N � OC SAN PROPERTY BOUNDARY / 1 CHAINLINK FENCE \ NEW TANK / TO PROP BNDY \ LOCATION 1 (TYP) BLOCK 13.1 WALL AND � X FOOTING ASPALT � ASPALT OC SAN PROP OC SAN 3 ;2!' CONC \ PROPERTY OC SAN PROP EXIST PUMP (TYP) TANK / 1 LIGHT POLE AND OPEN SPACE - - CONDUITS C / TANK I 1 ASPALT m I DISCHARGE PIPING _ - ASHPAL. BLOCK WALL AND 12.7 FOOTING -I — - I PUMP STATION TANK / X CONIC I I WEST WALL 1 CHAINLINK I I 3 FENCE METER VAULT 42" VCP INLET / FENCE \ ASPALT I I ❑2 SEWER / TO PROP�BNDY ALL TANKS TANK — _ ' 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY I DISCHARGE LIGHT POLE AND CONDUITS BOUNDARY CHAINLINK APPURTENANCES 3 I (VALVE VAULT FENCE 47 BACK OF VEGETATION 1 CONC 49 WALK ❑1 — I I ui _ ❑2 I N ----- CK "T �- 1 WALLANDEXISTING PUMP I I I e (eSTATION O� �- " I I I Q \T(e FOOTING + I e 1 ATE C �Q �\\� SAN12 SIDEWALK 1 CONDUITS _ I I w I CO a NOTE 3 I co a- I 8 1 v -�� � 1 GATE J DIRT now _ \ (B) T 2 T � \\\\\ �S CT � T(B) N OCSAN � ,_ m SEE NOTE 4 ----------- - `-CAL I I \ \ CONC T DIRT (e J DIRT $ 47 ��\ I m 3 CONDUIT BLOCK I I I/----------- ` \ B ' rs e Ts(B �c�r m I I I� I NOTE 5 WALL AND BTs )�\ 5 v FOOTING I j OC SAS_ 5 ) � (J I T CONCN 4 NOTE 6 I� 2 ELEC----CTV(B)--- w(� �27SSFM(Dj----27SSFM(D 2 FORCE MAINS I 2 DRIVE (D�---27SSFM(D� 27SSFM(Dj— _ 47 ) SSFM( T g _ \_ 4 \♦� t-- � 4STs()46 T Ts(B)48 4 SST B)_T_TS(B) 27SSFM(D}----27SSFM(D�---27SSFM(D}� CURBAND S(B �s� I jcF�eJ J� �) __---_27SS_FM(D)-----27SS— -S B ) ST(B) (g)TS BGUTTER Ts(B) \ \ `07, •\ ` / / 4SS Ml�� / / 24SF l� / _ = _ - T— — — I I (i E(B) ♦ 0"1 2::! �24SSj / /E��24SS T(p p E(p) —E(D) M_��T(B) (B — T(B) ) =CV( ) -�--- ♦ �� ♦ T(p��(DT(p E D E(D) 4 T(U) S/SFD 'S /11iyi'QJ)%"'c24S D ( II 2JUNCTION BOX -_ �/ w(m ► I — — - I M3SZb----(p)M3SZb----(C)M3SZb--- TC� SZb-- ♦ ♦ • /4S FS M��i / / /�_2 SSFMj / / � _! 24SSf I I 18" RCP SD I IC0I--42SEW(C)--- / / Dj / 2=) o SEW(C) — — — — 42SEW(C) — — — — 42SEW(C 4SS _ (D)M3SZb---- (C)M3SZb---- (C)M3SZb---- (C)M3SZb-- •/ ��2 j / (gJLt m /4 �Ml��' / /a�SSFM� � � • 'r4W(M�- - — — — — — — — SDJP'MT6)—i--30SD(C)----30SD(C)-- 3QSD(C)----30SD(C)----30SD(C)----30SD(C)----30SD(C) --- ---- -- —c (�; _ — 5�24S (g _ �4 24SD(C)_ ft / ♦ / SFM�D� ♦ ♦—►?4W(�) 1 m—24SD(C)-- • 4S • —�i —24SD / -1 SD(C)--- / / ♦ • ♦ • I ��) 24 g • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ I I 1 I I _�_ ) �_ 24W(D) ♦ ♦ '� i ENLARGED PLAN 1 SCALE: 1/8"-1'-0" C5105 DESCRIPTION DATE I APPR. DESIGNED BY: JESUS LOPEZ DRAWN BY: ALAN PROCTOR CHECKED BY: PRAVEEN YERRA LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2"-SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DS3 JANUARY 2023 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCADIS L=Com ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 46 JOIN TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN. REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF INTERFERING PORTIONS. 47 CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY 18" RCP (D2000). 48 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE COLLAR PER SSPWC STD PLAN 380-4. 49 CONSTRUCT TEMP SD INLET PER CALTRANS STD DETAIL D73B TYPE G1. DEMOLITION NOTES: REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF �2 PROTECT IN PLACE TEMPORARILY, SEE SEQUENCE OF WORK IN SPECIFICATION 01120 WORK SEQUENCE. �3 RELOCATE ® PLUG END OF PIPE AND ABANDON FORCE MAINS IN PLACE PROTECT IN PLACE NOTES: 1. COORDINATE WITH OC SAN FOR RELOCATION OF TANKS, PIPING, AND APPURTENANCES. RELOCATE AND RECONNECT PIPING TO EXISTING PS. REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF CHEMICAL TANKS, PIPING AND APPURTENANCES AFTER NEW PS IS IN OPERATION. CONTACT THE OC SAN PS MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR AND THE ENGINEER FOR WORK COORDINATION (OC SAN MAIN NUMBER 714-962-2411, CONTROL CENTER NUMBER 714-593-7025). 2. EXISTING PUMP STATION IS OPERATIONAL. ALLOW OC SAN PERSONNEL ACCESS TO PUMP STATION AT ALL TIMES. 3. AT&T OWNS THE PULLBOX AND CONDUITS THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE DRAWING. THESE FACILITIES ARE INACTIVE (EMPTY CONDUITS). REMOVE THE CONDUITS (2-4" PVC) THAT INTERFERE WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE SHAFT. REPLACE CONDUITS WITH MATCHING DIAMETER AND SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUITS THAT ARE UL LISTED. SEE DWG C4001 FOR APPROXIMATE LIMITS. 4. THE EXISTING STORM DRAIN IS TO REMAIN ACTIVE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION OF NEW MANHOLE. CONSTRUCT THE NEW STORM DRAIN PER DRAWING C1003 BEFORE NEW MANHOLE TO MAINTAIN AREA DRAINAGE. 5. THE COMMUNICATION SERVICE (4" PVC) TO THE EXISTING PUMP STATION INTERFERES WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE SHAFT. REPLACE CONDUIT AND WIRES/CABLES WITH MATCHING TYPE, DIAMETER, AND SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUITS THAT ARE UL LISTED. SEE DWG C4001 FOR APPROXIMATE LIMITS. 6. EXISTING FORCE MAINS ARE TO BE PLUGGED AND ABANDONED IN PLACE ONLY AFTER THE NEW PUMP STATION AND THE NEW FORCE MAINS ARE IN OPERATION. ABANDON FORCE MAINS PER SPECIFICATION 02278. ONSITE PORTIONS OF EXISTING FORCE MAINS ARE TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED OF. Underground Service Alert REF ORE yo Cal I : 811 1111 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG 8' 0' 8' 16' SCALE: 1" - 8' BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT PUMP STATION SITE DEMOLITION 5-67 DRAWING NO. D1001 SHEET NO.: Q OF 298 13-234 1 1 2 I 3 1 4 I 5 6 1 7 I 8 1 9 1 10 0 10 D N O O 0 1p Lo O 75 W 0 co W W cn 0 co U 0 g 0 0 co c- 0 v 0- E CD 0) cz T m Lo 0 co U O co co 0 F 0 co c� U) Q "C cn E U U 5� ;w U (n 0 U E— Q � �o c � U N 0 U N U) r U co w �Q 00 MOTOR ROOM DEMOLITION PLAN SCALE: 3/8" =1'-0" DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY QIU, XINTONG ROSHANI, SHRESTHA HARMIK, AGHANIAN LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE MARK I DESCRIPTION I DATE I APPR. I (IF NOT 2"-SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DS3 JANUARY 2023 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCADIS ID1:6SArq ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT GENERAL DEMOLITION NOTES: THE PLAN IS BASED ON CONTRACT 5-33 "CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO: BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION" AS BUILTS APPROVED ON 1995-03-15. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION SECTIONS 02050 AND 02278. 3. BLIND FLANGE AND CAP ALL EXISTING EXTERIOR PIPE PENETRATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 4. ALL PIPING, DUCTWORK, GRATING, STAIRS, RAILING, EQUIPMENT, ELECTRICAL, AND OTHER NON -CONCRETE ITEMS INSIDE OF PUMP STATION AND ABOVE GRADE SHALL BE DEMOLISHED. 5. NOT ALL PIPING, DUCTWORK, GRATING, STAIRS, RAILING, EQUIPMENT, ELECTRICAL, AND OTHER NON -CONCRETE ITEMS HAVE BEEN SHOWN FOR CLARITY. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION 01900, LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL GUIDELINES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL LOOSE AND FLAKING PAINT PRIOR TO ABANDONING THE DRY WELL AREA OF THE PUMP STATION. 8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, DEMOLISH EXISTING STRUCTURES 7.2 FEET BELOW EXISTING GRADE. 9. AFTER DEMOLITION PER NOTE 4 AND 8, PUMP ROOM, WET WELL, AND INFLUENT PIPE SHALL BE FILLED WITH ONCE SACK SAND -CEMENT SLURRY. PER SPECIFICATION SECTION 02200 UP TO THE TOP SLABS. PIPE SHALL BE FILLED COMPLETELY TO CAP AT OPPOSITE END. 10. CLEANING OF THE EXISTING WET WELL SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: a. DRAINING AND CLEANING OF WET WELL TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO DEMO/BACKFILLING. b. CONTRACTOR SHALL PUMP ALL REMAINING LIQUID FROM THE WET WELL AND DISPOSE PER SPECIFICATION 02050. c. REMOVE ALL REMAINING SOLIDS, GRIT, DEBRIS, AND ORGANIC MATERIAL FROM THE WET WELL AND DISPOSE PER SPECIFICATION 02050. d. POWER WASH WET WELL AND DISPOSE OF PER SPECIFICATION 02050 AFTER CLEANING. e. SUBMIT CLEANING PROCEDURE TO BE ACCEPTED BY THE ENGINEER. 11. CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (SCE) OF DISCONNECTION OF POWER TO EXISTING PUMP STATION AND COORDINATE DISCONNECTION WITH SCE. 12. SALVAGE PLC, RACK, AND 10 CARDS AND DELIVER TO OC SAN PLANT NO.1. BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT PUMP STATION DEMOLITION PLANS 1 5-67 DRAWING NO. Dl 002 SHEET NO.: 10 OF 298 13-235 cY) 0 0 0 L) O 75 w 0 w w U) 0 Q U 0 g 0 CO U- 0 n c O a E n aD cz T m LO I 0 U) U O 00 0 0 0 M co Q co U Q U O 0 U U Q c a> U U C3 0 U C C O U w U) D a co LO 4 co N O N C'7 T co LU Q 0 1 1 2 I 3 1 4 I 5 I 6 1 7 0 10 0 0 c� 0 0 75 w 0 w w U) 0 Q U co g UD 0 U) c- 0 v 0- E CD 0) cz T m Lo I 0 U) U 0 00 0 0 0 0 co c� U) 0) Q "C cn C L5 U co U U Q OC cn LU U U) 0 U E- Qcz 9 c �o c � N 0 U N (n r U co w �Q 00 0 10 .l E F DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: QIU, XINTONG ROSHANI, SHRESTHA HARMIK, AGHANIAN LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. (IF NOT 2"-SCALE ACCORDINGLY) SECTION A SCALE: 3/8" = V-0" D1002 DS3 JANUARY 2023 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ARCADIS c)(:i6sArq ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DEMOLITION NOTES: 1. THE PLAN IS BASED ON CONTRACT 5-33 "CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO: BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION" AS BUILTS APPROVED ON 1995-03-15. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS. 2. SEE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR PIPE ROUTING INCLUDING PLAN LOCATION AND ELEVATION AT INTERSECTION WITH WALL. 3. FF ELEVATION BASED ON AS BUILT DRAWINGS IS 12.80 FT, THE ELEVATION DATUM ADJUSTMENT TO AS BUILT DATUM IS +2.39'. 4. DEMOLISH EXISTING PUMP STATION WALL AS NEEDED TO INSTALL APPROACH PIPE. SEE SHEET C1004. BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT PUMP STATION DEMOLITION SECTIONS 1 5-67 DRAWING NO. D3001 SHEET NO.: 12 OF 298 13-23 7 1 1 2 I 3 1 4 I 5 I 6 1 7 0 10 F1 0 10 D N O O CrJ 0 Lo 0 75 W 0 co W W cn 0 co U 0 g 0 c- 0 v 0- E CD 0) cz T m Lo F. co co F 0 co c� U) Q "C cn C co 0 U Q OC cn LU U (n 0 U E— Q z �o c � N 0 (1) N U) r U co w �Q 00 DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: QIU, XINTONG ROSHANI, SHRESTHA HARMIK, AGHANIAN LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. (IF NOT 2"-SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DS3 JANUARY 2023 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SECTION A SCALE: 3/8" = V-0" D1002 ARCADIS c)(:i6sArq ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT DEMOLITION NOTES: 1. THE PLAN IS BASED ON CONTRACT 5-33 "CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO: BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION" AS BUILTS APPROVED ON 1995-03-15. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS. 2. FF ELEVATION BASED ON AS BUILT DRAWINGS IS 12.80 FT, THE ELEVATION DATUM ADJUSTMENT TO AS BUILT DATUM IS +2.39'. 3. DEMOLISH EXISTING PUMP STATION WALL AS NEEDED TO INSTALL APPROACH PIPE. SEE SHEET C1004. BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT PUMP STATION DEMOLITION SECTIONS 2 5-67 DRAWING NO. D3002 SHEET NO.: 13 OF 298 13-238 1 2 3 4 EXISTING MANHOLE ABANDON PER DETAIL 3 SEE DWG C4101 FOR LOCATION (40± FROM w VALVE VAULT) w _E rr FOR FORCE MAIN z 0 CONTINUATION SEE AU) C1101 0 J Q FOR FORCE MAIN o CONTINUATION SEE U- DWG C1101 Lu w� Ns Y�- F/ Uccnn� 01. Qo 4 3 10 POSTLLI—\ vi1 - _ _ F ,16'I'W4Y � z7L,0 5,?IC62 A193 °Iz `J7'E FOR FORCE MAIN t SEE FyFET 6 CONTINUATION SE r 1 E �_._;��� • • , �, � 2 C DWG C 1101 �.: ' '� C' \ ���, �u ALL VALVES, PIPING, AND APPURTENANCES �.•��{ y AN INSIDE VALVE VAULT 'oo24" VALVE (B) 28 VALVE A___ LT D ETA I D — EXISTING MANHOLE ABANDON PER DETAIL 2 Lo 0 L _ 0 w 0 w w cn 0 Q U 0 E g 0 c- O U) Q E n N m 00 Lo 0 U) U O 00 co 0 F 0 M co � O Q O O L5a- coc� O cd : Q U) U LJJ O C0 0 � U U O N U N O Q 1:c) cz N roo Q)T U C�j w Q MARK 00 PLAN — VA LV SCALE: NTS DEMOLISHMENT NOTES: E VAULT ABANDONMENT it REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF �2 PLUG END OF PIPE, FILL WITH CLSM. �3 CUT PIPE �4 PROTECT IN PLACE �5 PLUG WALL HOLE WITH CONCRETE, CLASS C. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 10 ABANDON EXISTING 24" DUAL SFM IN PLACE. FILL PIPES WITH CLSM AND CAP ENDS. SEE NOTE 2. 28 ABANDON EXISTING FORCE MAIN IN PLACE. FILL PIPES WITH CLSM AND CAP ENDS. DESCRIPTION I DATE I APPR. C1101 Q O O Ir 0 w Q Ir LL J X w J J LL z O z X w Lu �C/) � Z OQ zw wU �0 z0 o z m — w� LL a 2 5 Lr (TYP ) .i FR R1%TG wEL4fD Tj aT FOR FORCE MAIN — CONTINUATION SEE DWG C1101 NOTES: 1. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE AND GATE, WOOD AND STEEL RAILINGS, AND NEW WROUGHT IRON FENCING. 2. THE EXISTING DUAL 24" FORCE ARE ACTIVE. PROTECT IN PLACE DURING ALL MICROTUNNELING AND ALL PUMP STATION WORK. COMPLETE THE INSTALLATION AND ACTIVATION OF THE NEW FORCE MAINS PRIOR TO ABANDONING THE EXISTING FORCE MAINS. DESIGNED BY: JESUS LOPEZ DRAWN BY: ALAN PROCTOR CHECKED BY: PRAVEEN YERRA LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2"-SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DS3 JAN UARY 2023 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION n 7 Cll REBAR #4 DOWELS EMBEDDED 4" MIN INTO A DRILLED HOLE IN THE EXISTING VAULT WALL, SET IN EPDXY GROUT AT EVERY 12"MIN 4 1 (TYP ) d 1 VAULT LID 1 ti..: (TYP ) 1 1 1 1 ?4" f74" D-1. T 1 w� 7rp 811W FI A�IGE� IL } l 30' X 74" D. CO+VCENTRIC RF!]LIPER I 1 4 I VALVE VAULT SECTION I T - T " 1/? " = I'- a'. mm LJ . (TYP FOR FORCE MAIN CONTINUATION SEE DVVG G 1101 .. �h1aFR AtL.'T'.s TH15 VAULT SECTION — VALVE VAULT ABANDONMENT SCALE: NTS ARCADIS A=COM ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT LL O W o O m � c o w zz a- a c/) w O w Ir 9 1 10 36-INCH MANHOLE LID, SAWCUT CONCRETE AROUND GRADE RING AND REMOVE, REPLACE PAVEMENT SECTION WITH CLASS C CONCRETE, MATCH EXISTING THICKNESS - - - - - - -- - - - f--------- - - - - - - - - J EXISTING GRADE O zz I I I I (CONCRETE) �Q I I I I C) I I I I LU w III--rll BACKFILL MH WITH 00 < I I I CLSM Lu 0 I I I EXIST 60" DIA °CO I I I I MANHOLE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXIST CONCRETE BASE I I E�====�� I I EXIST 32" HDPE FORCE MAIN i i WITH OUTLET —I-; j- 44 ,Iad _ ABANDONMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 101 36-INCH MANHOLE LID LOCATED ABOVE GRADE ------------ EXISTING GRADE (DIRT) BACKFILL MH WITH CLSM EXIST 60" MIA MANHOLE z I I � I I UJ —i 0 I I I I I I I I EXIST CONCRETE = z z i= I I I I ET I I BASE 2 X r �_,� — — "____I, EXIST 32" HDPE LL 0 w I I, _ I FORCE MAIN \�` zO I y.'� i WITH OUTLET I \I \� Ir I I a d° 4 ' a ABANDONMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT EXISTING VALVE VAULT ABANDONMENT DETAILS C4101 5-67 DRAWING NO. D51 01 SHEET NO.: 14 OF 298 13-239 1 2 K ABBREVIATIONS 0 5 C: SYMBOLS 7 E GENERAL NOTES 10 0 C � E uj Q_ m m a ti c O — r_ m U) Q E m n 00 M> F m ti Co L6 iw T ao N O 4 co ch N Z) �a co Zz 0 o co N co co I-f 00 AAB ANCHOR BOLT G GA GAUGE PC PRECAST T T TREAD OR TOP AC ACOUSTICAL TILE GALV GALVANIZED PCEM PORTLAND CEMENT TB TOWEL BAR AD AREA DRAIN GB GRAB BAR PA PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM TBL TOP OF BRICK LEDGE AFF ABOVE FINISH GFRC GLASS FIBER REINFORCED PCF POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT T&B TOP AND BOTTOM ALT FLOOR ALTERNATE GFRG CONCRETE GLASS FIBER PL P. PLATE PLASTIC TC TOP OF CURB ALUM ALUMINUM GL REINFORCED GYPSUM GLASS LAM LAMINATE TD TRENCH DRAIN ARC ARCHITECTURAL GND GROUND PLTR PLASTER TEL TELEPHONE AU ASH URN GR GRADE PLBG PLUMBING TERR TERRAllO AV AUDIO VISUAL GYP GYPSUM PLF POUNDS PER LINEAR FOOT T&G TONGUE & GROOVE GYP BD GYPSUM BOARD PMR PROTECTED MEMBRANE ROOFING THK THICK OR THICKNESS PNL PANEL THRU THROUGH BBD BOARD PNT PAINT OR PAINTED TLT TOILET BLDG BUILDING POL POLISHED TO TOP OF BLKG BLOCKING PR PAIR TOC TOP OF CONCRETE BM BEAM OR BENCHMARK H HIGH PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT TOD TOP OF DECK B BEARING HB HOSE BIBB PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH TOF TOP OF FOOTING BO BOTTOM OF HC HOLLOW CORE PT POINT TOI TOP OF INSULATION BOD BOTTOM OF DECK HD HOLD PTD PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER TOJ TOP OF JOIST BOT BOTTOM HBD HARDBOARD PTD/WR PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER/ WASTE TOL TOLERANCE BR BACKER ROD HCTLT HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE TOILET PTM RECEPTACLE PATCH TO MATCH TOP TOP OF PARAPET BRG BRIDGING HDR HEADER PTN PARTITION TOS TOP OF STEEL BUR BUILT-UP ROOFING HDW HARDWARE PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE TOW TOP OF WALL BW BOTH WAYS HDWD HARDWOOD PVMT PAVEMENT TPH TOILET PAPER HOLDER CC COURSE HM HOLLOW METAL PWD PLYWOOD TR TELEPHONE RECEPTACLE CAB CABINET HOR HORIZONTAL TS TOP OF SLAB CEM CEMENT OR CEMENTITIOUS HPL HIGH PRESSURE LAMINATE QT QUARRY TILE TTB TELEPHONE TERMINAL BOARD CG CORNER GUARD HR HOUR QTR QUARTER TV TELEVISION CIP CAST -IN -PLACE HT HEIGHT QTY QUANTITY TYP TYPICAL CIR CIRCLE HVAC HEATING, VENTILATION & AIR CONDITIONING CJ CONTROL JOINT CLG cm CEILING CENTIMETER I ID INSIDE DIAMETER R R RA RADIUS OR RISER RETURN AIR IN INCH u UCL UNDER CABINET LIGHT CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT INCAN INCANDESCENT RCP REFLECTED CEILING PLAN ULAY UNDERLAYMENT CIK CONC COLUMN CONCRETE INSUL INSULATION RD ROOF DRAIN UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE INT INTERIOR RE REFER OR REFERENCE UR URINAL CONST CONSTRUCTION REFL REFLECTED CONT CONTINUOUS REG REGISTER V VB VAPOR BARRIER CORR CORRIDOR JB JUNCTION BOX REINF REINFORCEMENT VET VINYL COMPOSITION TILE CPT CARPET JT JOINT REQ REQUIRED VERT VERTICAL CSK COUNTERSINK OR COUNTERSUNK RES RESILIENT VP VENT PIPE CT CERAMIC TILE REV REVERSE VS VENT SHAFT K KID KNOCK DOWN RH ROBE HOOK VT VINYL TILE D DEPTH OR DEEP KNOCKOUT RM ROOM VWC VINYL WALLCOVERING DKO DBL DOUBLE RO ROUGH OPENING DEG DEGREE ROW RSF RIGHT-OF-WAY RESILIENT SHEET FLOORING W WEST OR WIDE OR WIDTH DEM DEMOLITION L LONG 0 DETAIL LAM LAMINATED W/ WITH DTL DRINKING LAV LAVATORY WB WIND BRACE OR BRACING DF FOUNTAIN LB LAG BOLT S SOUTH WC WATER CLOSET DIA DIAMETER LF LINEAR BOLT OR LINEAR FEET SA SUPPLY AIR WCOT WAINSCOT SAB SOUND ATTENUATION BATTS WD WOOD DIM DIMENSION LLH LONG LEG HORIZONTAL SAN SANITARY WDO WINDOW DN DOWN LLV LONG LEG VERTICAL SB SPLASH BLOCK WH WEEPHOLE DP DAMPPROOFING LT LIGHT OR LIGHTING Sc SOLID CORE OR SHOWER CURTAIN WO WINDOW OPENING DR DOOR SCHED SCHEDULE OR SCHEDULED W/0 WITHOUT DS DOWNSPOUT SD SOAP DISPENSER WP WATERPROOFING DTL DW DETAIL DISHWASHER SECT SECTION WR WASTE RECEPTACLE m M METER SF SQUARE FOOT OR SQUARE FEET W/R WATER RESISTIVE OR RESISTANT DWG DRAWING MACH MACHINE SFP SPRAYED FIREPROOFING WS WEATHERSTRIPPING DWR DRAWER MAS MASONRY SH SPRINKLER HEAD WT WEIGHT EE EAST MAT'L MATERIAL SHT SHEET WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC EA EACH MAX MAXIMUM SHTG SHEATHING EHB ELECTRIC HAIR BLOWER MBH MOP AND BROOM HOLDER SIM SIMILAR y YD YARD EHD ELECTRIC HAND DRYER MBR MODIFIED BITUMEN ROOFING SKLT SKYLIGHT EIFS EXTERIOR INSULATING FINISH MC MEDICINE CABINET SND SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL EJ SYSTEM EXPANSION JOINT MECH MECHANICAL SNV SANITARY NAPKIN VENDOR EL ELEVATION (GRADE) MEMB MEMBRANE SP STANDPIPE ELEC ELECTRICAL MFR MANUFACTURER SPEC SPECIFIED OR SPECIFICATIONS EQ EQUAL MH MANHOLE SPR SINGLE PLY ROOFING EQUI EQUIPMENT MIN MINIMUM SQ SQUARE P ETS EXPOSED TO STRUCTURE MIR-F MIRROR -FRAMED EDGE SR SHOWER ROD EW EACH WAY MIR G MIRROR GLASS EDGE SR/SC SHOWER ROD/ SHOWER CURTAIN EWC ELECTRIC WATER COOLER MLD MOULDING SS STAINLESS STEEL EXP EXPANSION OR EXPOSED MM MILLIMETER ST SOAP TRAY EXIST EXISTING MO MASONRY OPENING STA STATION EXT EXTERIOR MS MOP SINK STC SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS EXTD EXTRUDED MTD MOUNTED STD STANDARD MTG MOUNTING STL STEEL METAL STOR STORAGE FMTL FD FLOOR DRAIN STRU STRUCTURE OR STRUCTURAL FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER N NORTH SUSP SUSPENDED OR SUSPENSION & AND FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET NCO NONCOMBUSTIBLE SYM SYMBOL L ANGLE (RIGHT) FEX FIRE EXTINGUISHER (NO CABINET) M NIC NOT IN CONTRACT SYN SYNTHETIC L ANGLE (ACUTE) FFA FURNITURE, FIXTURES & ACCESSORIES NOM NOMINAL SYS SYSTEM @ AT FFE FURNITURE, FIXTURES & EQUIPMENT NIPS NOMINAL PIPE CL CENTERLINE FF FINISHED FLOOR NTS SIZE NOT TO SCALE FHC FIRE HOSE CABINET FIN FINISH FLR FLOOR = EQUAL FLUO FLUORESCENT PLUS OR MINUS R FP FIREPROOFING #POUND OR NUMBER FIRFIRE RETARDANT/ FIRE RESISTIVE O OC ON CENTER x TIMES FRP FIBERGLASS REINFORCED POLYMER OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER °DEGREES FT FOOT/ FEET OFCI OWNER FURNISHED CONTRACTOR INSTALLED FTC FULL TILE COURSE OFD OVERFLOW DRAIN FTG FOOTING OFOI OWNER FURNISHED OWNER INSTALLED FOOT OR FEET FURN FURNITURE OH OPPOSITE HAND OR OVERHEAD INCH FV FIELD VERIFY OPG OPENING MINUS FWC FABRIC WALL COVERING OPP OPPOSITE + PLUS FPHB FREEZE -PROOF HOSE BIBB OPT OPTION OR OPTIONAL 11:i► DATE I APPR. DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) ROOM NAME 101 ROOM TAG W/ AREA 150 SF LEVEL EL 0.00' SIM 1 ------ STRUCTURAL GRID - EXISTING A101 1 SIM 0 STRUCTURAL GRID - NEW A101 1t PARTITION TYPE TAG XX-XX CEILING TAG XX-XX 88' -10" CEILING TAG W/ HEIGHT FL-01 FLOOR TAG 101 DOOR TAG DOOR #1 SIZE # I X LIFE SAFETY DOOR TAG XX XX FURNITURE/FIXTURE/ CASEWORK TAG OGLAZING TAG AR WINDOW TAG 1J REVISION DELTA NOTE NOTE WITH LEADER OKEY NOTE O FINISH/MATERIAL TAG L2 I LIGHTING TAG PL 01 PLUMBING TAG XX-XXX SPECIALTY EQUIPMENT TAG AL 0'-0" SPOT ELEVATION - ELEVATION VIEWS 0' - 0" SPOT ELEVATION - PLAN VIEWS x DP �I O RD 0 FD 0 LEVEL/DATUM ELEVATION MARK SECTION MARK DETAIL SECTION MARK DETAIL CALLOUT MARK INTERIOR ELEVATION MARK EXTERIOR ELEVATION MARK NORTH ARROW DOWN PIPE ROOF DRAIN FLOOR DRAIN DS3 PARCADIS JANUARY2023 NOT FOR sAr4 CALLISOK�TKLORANG,.E4:�CONSTRUCTION COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1. DO NOT SCALE THESE DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. IN THE EVENT OF OMISSION OF NECESSARY DIMENSION(S), THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ON 1/16" 1/8" & 1/4" SCALE PLANS ARE TO THE FACE OF MASONRY OR CONCRETE OR THE OUTSIDE FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE ACTUAL UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, CONDITIONS, EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AND GRADES AT JOB SITE. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS. 4. VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF ALL WORK AND EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED OR RELOCATED (WHETHER FURNISHED BY OWNER OR BY CONTRACTOR(S)) BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION PERTAINING TO SAME IS BEGUN. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS IN THE ROOM, DOOR, WINDOW OR EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES DO NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTORS FROM EXECUTING WORK SHOWN ON DRAWINGS OR DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. 5. VERIFY AND COORDINATE THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL OPENINGS FOR STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK AND EQUIPMENT WITH ALL TRADES INVOLVED. 6. CEILING HEIGHTS INDICATED ON THE ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE ARE TAKEN FROM THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION. THE SIZE, LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF ALL MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND STRUCTURAL ITEMS SHALL BE VERIFIED BEFORE CEILING CONSTRUCTION IS BEGUN. 7. COORDINATE WITH ALL TRADES IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN SCHEDULED CEILING HEIGHTS. VERIFY THAT REQUIRED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CLEARANCES ARE PROVIDED FOR ALL EQUIPMENT ITEMS. 8. INSTALL ALL ITEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS, EXCEPT THAT THE SPECIFICATIONS HEREIN, WHERE THE MORE STRINGENT, SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY CONFLICTS. 9. COORDINATE DELIVERY AND INSTALLATION OF ALL EQUIPMENT WITH OWNER. VERIFY THAT ALL INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AS DESCRIBED ARE MET, INCLUDING ADEQUATE TRAVEL ACCESS FOR EQUIPMENT ITEMS THROUGH THE BUILDING. MATERIAL LEGEND CMU (IN PLAN) CMU (FACE) CONCRETE (SECTION) ALUMINUM (CUT) STEEL (CUT) METAL PANEL (FACE) WOOD (CUT/FACE) RIGID INSULATION SPANDREL GLASS (FACE) BATT INSULATION PORTLAND CEMENT PLASTER OR EIFS (FACE) GROUT EIFS (CUT) GYP BD BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, & GENERAL NOTES EARTH NATURAL STONE FINISH 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A0001 SHEET NO.: 55 OF 298 13-240 1 2 0 5 L•� 7 1 8 BUILDING CODE DATA (CONY.) 0 BUILDING CODE DATA 10 0 I FE TYPE B ABC FE TYPE ABC c Ea6Z1' DO36" 1 01,101, 0 NOTES: ROOFLESS EXTERIOR RATED FACILITY - NOT INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA FE TYPE ABC ODOR CONTROL GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = l'-0" STORAGE ROOM p USE GROUP: F-2 AREA: 19 SF OLF: 100 I OCC LOAD: 1 � E L7 m m ti c 0 c6 U) Q E In 0) S m m F m r` Co L6 L♦ �i ao co CD 4 M N ch Z) �a co Zz 0 co N (h co I RESTROOM USE GROUP: F-2 AREA: 170 SF OLF: 100 OCC LOAD: 2 EXIT 1I DOOR4 I 11:i► EXIT DOOR ENERATOR CC LOAD FE TYPE ABC - - - _ _P_AT_H (PUMP) TRAVEL DIST. = 23' 77" ■ W�.,iil W.,�il W�.,�il W.,�il W�.,�il W.,iil W.,�il W.,iil W.♦♦♦ ♦♦:♦: �.::♦:♦♦.��I Will �i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦ • • � � ♦ ♦♦i♦i� TRAVEL DIST. = 57' - 4" E TYPE i ELECTRICAL & GENERATOR ROOM GROUND FLOOR PLAN 3 SCALE: 3/32" = l'-0" DATE I APPR. TOTAL PATH OF TRAVEL DISTANCE — 139'+90'-7"+ 23-7"= 253'-2" << 3001, OK 1EXIT I STAIR 1 36" 101, 150 12 0 PUMP ROOM I SE GROUP: F-2 AREA: 77 SF OLF: 100 OCC LOAD: 1 (ACTURAL=O) EXIT DOOR 2 350 0.110.1 DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUDTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) EXIT ■mI xPATH (PUMP x.H �. ( U ,VEL DIST. = 90' NOTES: PER CBC 506.1.3, BASEMENTS NEED NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA OF A BUILDING PROVIDED THE TOTAL AREA OF SUCH BASEMENTS DOES NOT EXCEED THE AREA PERMITTED FOR A ONE- STORY ABOVE GRADE PLANE BUILDING. USE GROUP: F-2� 1,121 V�IREA' OLF:1No OAD:, .1 PUMP STATION MEZZ PLAN AT EL. —5.00 SCALE: 3/32" = V-0" APPLICABLE CODES 2022 NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 9 - FIRE PROTECTION AND LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE BUILDINGS NOT EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE SYSTEM CHAPTER 3 - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AND USE CHAPTER 10 - MEANS OF EGRESS F-2 (FACTORY INDUSTRIAL) OCCUPANCY NUMBER OF EXITS AND EXIT ACCESS: PUMP ROOM - 1 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED CHAPTER 4 - SPECIAL DETAILED REQUIREMENTS BASED ON ELECTRICAL ROOM - 1 REQUIRED AND 2 PROVIDED OCCUPANCY AND USE RESTROOM - 1 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED GENERATOR ROOM - 1 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED CHAPTER 5 - GENERAL BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS ODOR CONTROL ROOM - 1 REQUIRED AND PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHTS: EXIT EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE: ALLOWABLE: 55' (NS) FAIR 1 PER TABLE 1017.2 EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE, OCCUPANCY F-2 SHALL NOT PROPOSED: 23' LIL0 Hk'12 EXCEED 300 FEET WITHOUT SPRINKLER SYSTEM NUMBER OF STORIES: " EXIT DOORS: ALLOWABLE: 3 STORIES (NS) p SHALL BE OPERABLE FROM INTERIOR PROPOSED:1 STORY SHALL COMPLY WITH THE 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE AND THE CITY OF BUILDING AREAS: NEW PORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODES ALLOWABLE: 23,000 SF (NS) >00 >00 PANIC BARS REQUIRED PROPOSED: 1,183 SF + 163 SF + 77 SF + 672 SF — 2,095 SF EXIT LIGHTS: PER 1013.3 ILLUMINATION, EXIT SIGNS SHALL BE INTERNALLY OR EXTERNALLY xx ILLUMINATED. CHAPTER 6 - TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION xx CONSTRUCTION CLASSIFICATION: xx CHAPTER 11 B - ACCESSIBILITY F-2 TYPE IIB PER 11 B-203.4 LIMITED ACCESS SPACES, SPACES NOT CUSTOMARILY OCCUPIED AND ACCESSED ONLY BY LADDERS, CATWALKS, CRAWL SPACES OR TABLE 601 FIRE -RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING ELEMENTS: VERY NARROW PASSAGEWAYS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THESE REQUIREMENTS OR TO BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. BUILDING ELEMENTS TYPE IIB EXIT STAIR 1 TH =139' • Ij III 11 ���♦��� NOTES: PER CBC 506.1.3, BASEMENTS NEED NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA OF A BUILDING PROVIDED THE TOTAL _ AREA OF SUCH BASEMENTS DOES NOT _ EXCEED THE AREA PERMITTED FOR A ONE- STORY ABOVE GRADE PLANE BUILDING. PUMP STATION FLOOR PLAN AT EL. —22.00 1 SCALE: 3/32" = l'-0" FIRE AND EGRESS KEY — �- EGRESS PATH EMERGENCY EXIT SIGNS INDICATE FACE OF SIGN AND DIRECTION OF TRAVEL FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER EXIT #1 EXIT # DOOR WIDTH 36" 28" PROVIDED DOOR WIDTH REQUIRED 180 DOOR CAPACITY: 3611/0.2 = STAIR WIDTH 44" 1 42" STAIR WIDTH REQUIRED PROVIDED 146 STAIR CAPACITY: 44"/0.3 = 138 ACTUAL USE TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM ANY POINT TO NEAREST FIRE EXTINGUISHER SHALL NOT EXCEED 75 FEET (50 FEET IN GARAGE). FIRE DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REVISE LOCATION AND QUANTITY OF FIRE EXTINGUISHERS DURING INSPECTION. EXIT SIGN PLACEMENT SHALL BE SUCH THAT NO POINT IN AN EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR OR EXIT PASSAGEWAY IS MORE THAT 100 FEET, OR THE LISTED VIEWING DISTANCE FROM THE SIGN, WHICHEVER IS LESS, FROM THE NEAREST VISIBLE EXIT SIGN. EXTERIOR WALLS IN TYPE IIIA BUILDINGS REQUIRED TO HAVE FIRE - RETARDANT TREATED WOOD FRAMING. ALL EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS TO BE 2 HOUR RATED AREA NOTES AREA SHOWN ON CRTKUS DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN CALCULATED ELECTRONICALLY BASED ON CRTKUS DESIGN DOCUMENTS, USING THE APPROPRIATE SECTIONS OF APPLICABLE BOMA STANDARDS ACCORDING TO THIS PROJECT'S USE, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE CLIENT, AND ARE PROVIDED SOLELY AS AN ACCOMMODATION TO THE CLIENT. AS SUCH, THEY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO BE APPROXIMATE CALCULATIONS. ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS OF BUILT SPACES MAY VARY DUE TO A NUMBER OF FACTORS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CHANGES DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES, AND VARIATIONS IN THE METHODOLOGY USED TO CALCULATE AREA. CRTKL ADVISES THE CLIENT TO VERIFY ALL AREAS AND METHODS OF CALCULATION PRIOR TO PUBLICATION FOR ANY REASON. DS3 � ARCADIS JANUARY2023 NOT FOR CALLISOK4TKLORANGECONSTRUCTION COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME BEARING WALLS - EXTERIOR* 0-HOUR 0-HOUR & TALBE 602* BEARING WALLS - INTERIOR 0-HOUR NONBEARING WALLS AND PARTITIONS - EXTERIOR SEE TABLE 602 NONBEARING WALLS AND PARTITIONS - INTERIOR 0-HOUR FLOOR CONSTRUCTION & SECONDARY MEMBERS 0-HOUR 0-HOUR ROOF CONSTRUCTION & SECONDARY MEMBERS TABLE 602 FIRE -RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR WALLS BASED ON FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE: FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE = X (FEET) TYPE IS (F-2) X < 5 1-HOUR 1-HOUR 5 5 X < 10 10:5X<30 X>_ 30 0-HOUR 0-HOUR CHAPTER 7 - FIRE AND SMOKE PROTECTION FEATURES TABLE 705.8 MAXIMUM AREA OF EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE = X (FEET) OPENING PROTECTION ALLOWABLE AREA X < 5 UP, NS NP 55X<10 UP, NS 10% 105X<15 UP, NS 15% 15 <_ X < 20 20 <_ X < 25 UP, NS 25% UP, NS 45% 25 <_ X < 30 UP, NS 70% X>_ 30 UP, NS NO LIMIT CHAPTER 8 - INTERIOR FINISHES FLAME -SPREAD CLASSIFICATIONS CLASS FLAME -SPREAD INDEX SMOKE DEVELOPED INDEX A 0-25 0-450 B 26-75 0-450 C 76-200 0-450 TABLE 803.13 INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH REQUIREMENTS BY OCCUPANCY NON SPRINKLERED INTERIOR EXIT CORRIDORS & GROUP STAIRWAYS AND ENCLOSURE FOR ROOMS AND EXIT PASSAGEWAYS* EXIT ACCESS STAIRS ENCLOSED SPACES* & RAMPS F-2 B C C BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT CODE COMPLIANCE DRAWINGS 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A0002 SHEET NO.: 56 OF 298 13-241 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 0 C ❑c } E v� m m Q ti 6 c o — r- m Q E m n a� m '' c� F m ti Co L6 T 0, MR.. ao co O Mco ch N Q co Zz 0 0 N M m m 11:i► / / / / i ,1 II i' \ _ T _ U _ R _ _ E A C S w 41' 10' HIGH WALL \` R O A D �7/8" o 773.84 _\ co TOW = 24.00' 133, 53' 4 NORTH GATE 10' HIGH WALL 24' WIDE SWING GATE _\ SWITCHBOARD TOW 24.00' GENERATOR = 10' HIGH WALL ROOM TOW = 29.33' /- 15' HIGH WALL DATE I APPR. DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) 15' HIGH WALL (SEE LANDSCAPE DWGS) BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION 5-67 DS3 IPARCADIS I REPLACEMENT JANUARY 2023 SITE PLAN DRAWING NO.: NOT FOR TM Al 001 CONSTRUCTION CALLISOK ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SHEET NO.: 57 OF 298 13-242 1 2 i, 0 5 R 7 N. 0 10 0 1.9 C 0 } E m m ti In c O — r_ m Q ^m LL m >" cB F m ti Co L6 0 U) U O r` 20000 ao co O M M N Q co Zz 0 0 N (h co m MARK :' B TA C 80'-0" 50'-0" 30'-0" 2'-0" 76'-0" 2'-0" I—IIIIIII III - II III III I III III III III III III III II III III 0 - r-r-T --r -1--i--r-r- i Rl ANDINGTOW =-21.98' I5' - 0" FFL A3001 FE TYPE ABC 42" H RAILING, TYP. I I I I I I I I I I o CONC. WALL REFER TO STRUCTL DWGS. PLATFORM ACCESS LADDER, TYP. 15' - 7" 5' 05/811. r5511 FRP GRATING FLOOR L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I � I I I I 5-6I4' 4I5 6II 4 4" 5 6II 5 6II 411 4 4II 5 611111111111111 6 0II IT co oo 1I- 8" o0 00 00 0o RAILING W/ I I 0 0 00 00 0o co I _— HANDRAIL I 0 ---- --- ---- --- ---- 3' - OII 17M j o PUMP ROOM T 001 I I i SUMP 6'-0" 3-10" 6'-0" 3'-10" 6'-0" 3'-10" 6' 0" 3-10" 6'-0" FETYPE ABC 4'- 0" TOC =-25.33' TOC=-22.32' o 0 0 0 0 I � o o o N I WET WELL 60 I I 0 N I III III ��� III I III- III II ''I I III III Ili I.• ,�, PUMP STATION FLOOR PLAN AT EL. -22.00 SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. 2 A4003 BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION 5-67 DS3 ARCADIS REPLACEMENT JANUARY2023 PUMP STATION FLOOR PLAN AT EL. DRAWING NO.: NOT FOR TM Al 002 CONSTRUCTION CALLISOK -22.00 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SHEET NO.: 58 OF 298 13-243 1 2 i, 0 5 R 7 0 10 0 1.9 C ❑c } E v� m m Q ti 6 c o r- — m Q E m n a� m > F m ti Co L6 0 U O ti 20000 ao co O M M N Q co Zz 0 0 N M m MARK :' n PUMP STATION MEZZANINE PLAN AT SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. 801-0° EL. -5.00 I Illllllli��lll,,,lll III ��� "'- ''� III,��IIIIIIIII I� it VA ACCESS TYP. 'L BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION 5-67 DS3 PARCADIS I REPLACEMENT JANUARY 2023 PUMP STATION MEZZANINE PLAN DRAWING NO.: NOT FOR TM Al 003 CONSTRUCTION ()c6sACALLISOK AT EL. -5.00 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SHEET NO.: 59 OF 298 13-244 1 0 C c 0 E v� n m m Q r; co c 0 cu Q E n a� m >" F m m ti co 6 0 U) 0 ti 2 � Qo 000 M M N � �Q N C 0 co N cy) m MARK 2 3 0 7'-7" 5 6 A2003) '7 2 36'-0" nni nil Of']I ACILJ f)l nnv A nil I All A nil I All Ai nll I All ELECTRICAL & GENERATOR ROOM GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE I APPR. 7 1 8 11' 101 /2" 6^0" 10 PLAN NOTES (ELECTRICAL &... Note Number Note Text 1 CLEANING PANEL - SEE'E' DRAWINGS 2 FOUL AIR CONTROL PANEL - SEE 'E' DRAWINGS 3 COMB. GAS CALIBRATION PANEL - SEE 'E' DRAWINGS 4 HVAC DUCT 5 SEAT COVER DISPENSER 6 TOILET PAPER DISPENSER 7 GRAB BAR (NON HC) 8 MIRROR W/ SS FRAME & SHELF 9 TOWEL DISPENSER/ WASTE RECEPTACLE 10 ELEC. WATER HEATER 11 3'-6" X 2'-0" OPERATOR DESK 12 2'-0" X 2'-0" FILE CABINET 13 SOAP DISPENSER 14 PROVIDE BACKING PLATES AT WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, TYP. 15 MTL STUD WALL ON TOP OF 6" H CONC. CURB 16 SWITCHBOARD PLATFORM TO BE DESIGNED BY CONTRACTOR (REMOVABLE & PROVIDE LIFTING EYES) BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION DS3 CAARCADISI REPLACEMENT JAN UARY 2023 1110C:6SAIN ELECTRICAL & GENERATOR ROOM NOT FOR TM CONSTRUCTIONCALLISON GROUND FLOOR PLAN ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5-67 DRAWING NO.: Al 004 SHEET NO.: 60 OF 298 13-245 1 1 2 1 3 4 1 5 1 6 7 0 10 0 C C 0 } E m m Q ti 6 c — r _ _m Q E m D_ a� 00 '' c� F 00 ti Co L6 0 U O ti 2 00 ao co O Mco ch N Z) �a co Zz 0 0 N M m MARK :' TOW = 32.17' I I I METAL ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE co I I EXP. JOINT TOW - 32.17' 16" X 8" S.S. BOX SCUPPER, BRONZE A2003 DECORATIVE 2 16" X 8" S.S. BOX ANODIZED ALUM. 381- 2„ SCUPPER, BRONZE CANOPY 7'-111 81_011 81_011 81_011 71- 11I — , - ----- - - - - ---------- - - - - - - ---_DP- - — — - I — — — — — — — R D i d d � METAL ROOF d O OVERHANG � ABOVE �b d GENERATOR EXHAUST. ROOF O F i SEE MECH. i 110, � GENERATOR �-01d ROOM d GENERATOR d 2' - 9" 1' - 2" ROOM FAN. SEE 11 MECH. d d N N SIDE -MOUNTED RAILING d 4' _ 811 EXP. JOINT COVER ❑ i d 29.50' 30.00' co Ic\j V llA I T A2003 1 OF METAL CANOPY BELOW I I I I I � I 2 TOW = 32.17' TOS = 31.00' DATE I APPR. I d d �I d d DRAIN - 29.33' 12'-8" _ 2% 181010" o_ (V ROOF OF ELECTRICAL R PREFAB. MECH EQUIP METAL CURB N d T o METALAil 1 BELOW M d o HEAT PUMP o FFL - 29.71' zy.yy 29.65' 0 2% FFL = 29.67' TOS - 30.83' oo co METAL CANOPY l BELOW I I ROOF PARAPET SIDE -MOUNTED RAILING ALUM. COMPOSITE PANELS METAL STUDS OF ROOF SCREEN @ 2' O.C., TYP. METAL ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE 7- 7 5/8" 51-73/811. 8 I i O° EXP. JOINT i 16" X 8" S.S. BOX i00 If1 SCUPPER, BRONZE 4'-0" rn TOW = 32.17' -- --L - - - IL N co i PREFAB. RD MECH EQUIP _ MDRAIN = 29.33' ETAL CURB I� 5'-10" 2'-11" i CV \ 0 0 RESTROOM FAN EXHAUST SEE MECH DWGS. ROOF OPENINGS OF o 3 A2002 MECH DUCTWORK p o SEE MECH DWGS. CE OOMMECH DUCT � i SEE MECH DWGS. 1 b----- - - - - -- - i D PREFAB. RF-01 MECH EQUIP a METAL CURB b d SEE MECH DWGS. ROOF PARAPET 2' - 0" TYP. d I d�--�- a--------------------------------------�-- 01 0 CV 7'-9" 12'-0 12'-0" 12'-0" 8'-5" DECORATIVE ANODIZED ALUM. A CANOPY ELECTRICAL & GENERATOR ROOM ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) 52'-2" 50'-0" 5 A A3002 A2002 B DS3 PARCADIS JANUARY2023 NOT FOR CALLISOKTKL(Dc 6 SA I CONSTRUCTION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1' _ al TOW = 32.17' RECESSED DOWN LIGHT UNDER CANOPY SOFFIT, TYP. SEE 'E' DRAWINGS BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT ELECTRICAL & GENERATOR ROOM ROOF PLAN 5-67 DRAWING NO.: Al OLO5 SHEET NO.: 61 OF 13-246 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2'-2" 36'-8" 11'-10" (A2003 2 A 4'-411 41-011 41-011 41-011 41-011 41-011 41-011 41-011 41-411 T/O OVERHANG = 35.50':low: lz//-- T/0 OVERHANG - 35.50' 41 1 w 0 I J c O ROOF OVERHANG CLADDED W/ ALUM. CD COMPOSITE PANELS I w OPEN TO ROOF OF B o GENERATOR ROOM T � T I BELOW CD I I \ SIDE -MOUNTED RAILING T/O OVERHANG = 34.00' z o \ z o I TOW = 32.17' co "' x TOW = 32.17' � � T/O OVERHANG = 34.00' "' `V w T/0 0 ERHANG = 34.00' 0 0 I TOW = 32.17' c I A A3001 I I 1 1A I I I La --LA 0 B TOW = 32.17' I A3002 0 I I A2003 1 SIDE -MOUNTED RAILING 3 A2002 I 21 - 011 _ I 0 ° w OPEN TO ROOF OF uj a O a_ a_ coI i co o I� ELECTRICAL ROOM cn BELOW 0 0 I I � E I uj I I m m w Q o o 0 N � I 4' 4" 6' 0" 6' 0" 6' 0" 6' 0" 6' O" 6' 0" 6' 0" 4,V 0 O ( n _ _ T/O OVERHANG = 36.00' _ _ _ _ _ T/0 OVERHANG = 36.00' Q ROOF OVERHANG E CLADDED W/ ALUM. m COMPOSITE PANELS � I I 0) 50'-8" m 5 F B co A A A2002 A3002 L6 I co U ELECTRICAL & GENERATOR ROOM ROOF SCREEN PLAN 0 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" ti 00 0 o DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION cJ-67 �o M �? DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI REPLACEMENT N Z) CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ I I DS3PARCADIS DRAWING NO.: co Q JANUARY2023 ELECTRICAL & GENERATOR ROOM 0 co o LINE IS 2 INCHES NOT FOR TM4D6sik Al 006 r4l �� c\l co AT FULL SIZE CONSTRUCTION ROOF SCREEN PLAN m CALLISOK (IF NOT 2 SCALE ACCORDINGLY) ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SHEET NO.: 62 OF 298 MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. 13-24 7 1 0 c ❑c } E v� m m Q ti 6 c o — r- m Q m D_ m > F Co L6 r) U) U O ti 20000 ao C\lo co ch co N Z) �a co Zz 0 0 N M m MARK :' OA 2 1 3 3 9' - 4 " ODOR CONTROL AREA GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0" DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. C! OB 5 24( A2001 01 O 6 OA i 7 24 - 411 r,L-uivi. vr,ivvi I An A3003 7'-011 81 -011 81 -011 38' - 0 " ODOR CONTROL AREA ROOF SCREEN PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" DS3 1$4 ARCADIS JANUARY2023 CNOT FOR CALLISOKTKL4: 6 SAIIN CONSTRUCTION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 0 7' - 011 OB 001 10 BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION 5-67 REPLACEMENT ODOR CONTROL AREA PLANS DRAWING NO.: A1007 SHEET NO.: 63 OF 298 13-248 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 PROP. LINE - 0 SITEWALK RAILING (TO MATCH EXISTING OR PUBLIC WORK REQ.) SITEWALK AVG. SITE LEVEL _ EL 13.50' B SITE GRADING LINE _ BEHIND SITE - SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-O" OB OA C B A 1 PROP I INF R" H NAFTAI (.nNTRni T W NAFTAI CONTROL Si ll E Uj PROP. m m Q TOW = 24.00' Q0 c 0 ca W 0- E m cm m ' IFc�� m r` co . I JOINT, TYP. 0 SITE - WEST ELEVATION 0 00 SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-O" CD LCP RESUBMITTAL DESCRIPTION DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE 06/2023 (IF NOT 2"- SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. 7 A4005 CANTILEVER SLIDE GATE TOW = 24.83' TOW = 22.00' SITEWALK RAILING (TO MATCH EXISTING) SIDEWALK SITE _LEVEL EL 13.50' SITE - EAST ELEVATIO N - PROP. LINE MATERIAL LEGEND ( SEE DETAILS IN MATERIAL SCHEDULE) CODE DESCRIPTION COLOR GL-01 LAMINATED, FRITTED GLAZING BRONZE ST-01 STONE VENEER, STACKED STONE LIGHT BROWN STU-01 STUCCO OFF WHITE STU-02 STUCCO MEDIUM BROWN MP-01 METAL PANEL, ANODIZED BRONZE MTL-01 METAL COATING BRONZE CMU-01 EXPOSED CMU, TAN/ PRECISION CREAM PT-02 PAINTING BRONZE 2" W METAL �f\ OP. LINE OW = 29.50' _ ODOR CONTROL TOW AIL EL 29.33' AVG. SITE LEVEL EL 13.50' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-O" BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION 5-67 FDS CAARCADIS REPLACEMENT DRAWING NO.: APRIL 2023 SITE ELEVATIONS NOT FOR TM A2001 CONSTRUCTION CALLISON ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SHEET NO.: 66 OF 302 13-249 1 2 K, 0 5 R 7 0 10 0 A C ❑c ROOF ELEC) EL 30.00' } E U) 0- m m Q ti 1 6 c 0 m cf) GROUND (ELECC) 0- EL 15.50' o_ a� m co F I m Co ti I 1 L6 0 U) U O MR.. ao C\lCD Mco ch N Z) �a co 0 co N (h co m MARK 0 N :' ELECTRICAL ROOM SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" A A A3002 B — SOUTH ELEVATION ELECTRICAL & GENERATOR ROOM — EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2'I - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. 0 FO I 0 N V ROOF (ELEC EL 30.00' GROUND (ELEC EL 15.50' V MILL IV IIIuIN I LV I ILL .)IP I I V I AI). SEEM' DRAWINGS. DS3 PARCADIS JANUARY2023 NOT FOR CALLISOKTKL()c � sAr4 CONSTRUCTION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 1. MATERIAL LEGEND ( SEE DETAILS IN MATERIAL SCHEDULE) CODE DESCRIPTION COLOR GL-01 LAMINATED, FRITTED GLAZING BRONZE ST-01 STONE VENEER, STACKED STONE LIGHT BROWN STU-01 STUCCO OFF WHITE STU-02 STUCCO MEDIUM BROWN MP-01 METAL PANEL, ANODIZED BRONZE MTL-01 METAL COATING BRONZE CMU-01 EXPOSED CMU, TAN/ PRECISION CREAM PT-02 PAINTING BRONZE -ROOF (GEN EL 29.50' GROUND(GEN EL 14.17' BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT BUILDING ELEVATIONS 1 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A200?2 SHEET NO.: 65 OF 2 13-250 1 0 10 0 C Ic } E v� m m Q ti 6 c o — m Q E m n aD m m '' c� F m ti Co L6 0 U O ti 00 ao Log M M U) N Z) �a m 0 co N (h co m MARK 2 3 4 5 6 7 nB A nA ELECTRICAL & GENERATOR ROOM SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ROOFIGEN) EL 29.50' GROUND(GEN EL 14.17' - NORTH ELEVATION ELECTRICAL & GENERATOR ROOM - WEST ELE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" :' DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. VATI ON 1 A A3001 1R"XR"q. Rny T DS3 PARCADIS JANUARY2023 NOT FOR CALLISOKTKL CONSTRUCTION � ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ROOF (GEN EL 29.50' GROUND (GEN EL 14.17' ROOF ELEC EL 30.00' GROUND ELEC EL 15.50' MATERIAL LEGEND ( SEE DETAILS IN MATERIAL SCHEDULE) CODE DESCRIPTION COLOR GL-01 LAMINATED, FRITTED GLAZING BRONZE ST-01 STONE VENEER, STACKED STONE LIGHT BROWN STU-01 STUCCO OFF WHITE STU-02 STUCCO MEDIUM BROWN MP-01 METAL PANEL, ANODIZED BRONZE MTL-01 METAL COATING BRONZE CMU-01 EXPOSED CMU, TAN/ PRECISION CREAM PT-02 PAINTING BRONZE BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT BUILDING ELEVATIONS 2 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A2003 SHEET NO.: 66 OF 298 13-251 1 0 1.9 C ❑c } E v� m m Q ti 6 o — r_ m Q E m n a� m '' c� F m ti Co L6 0 U) 0 ti 2 oo ao Log Mco ch N Q co Zz 0 0 N M m m MARK :' 2 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 8 1 9 1 10 MATERIAL LEGEND ( SEE DETAILS IN MATERIAL SCHEDULE) OA OB CODE DESCRIPTION COLOR GL-01 LAMINATED, FRITTED GLAZING BRONZE ST-01 STONE VENEER, STACKED STONE LIGHT BROWN B STU-01 STUCCO OFF WHITE %3111 STU-02 STUCCO MEDIUM BROWN MP-01 METAL PANEL, ANODIZED BRONZE MTL-01 METAL COATING BRONZE CMU-01 EXPOSED CMU, TAN/ PRECISION CREAM PT-02 PAINTING BRONZE J ODOR CONTROL AREA -SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 01 A 02 12" H METAL A3003 311 COF STOP ODOR CONTROL AREA -WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. ODOR CONTROL TOW EL 29.33' ODOR CONTROL GROUND LEVEL EL 14.00' =TAL G, TYP. ODOR CONTROL TOW AIL EL 29.33' ODOR CONTROL GROUND_LEVEL EL 14.00' BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION 5-67 DS3 PARCADIS I REPLACEMENT JANUARY2023 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 3 DRAWING NO.: NOT FOR TM 4Dc6sikr4l A2004 CONSTRUCTIONCALLISOK GRANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SHEET NO.: 67 OF 298 13-252 1 0 C Ic } E v� m m Q ti 6 c o — r- m Q E m n a� m '' c� F m ti Co L6 0 U) 0 ti 2 � ao 00 CM M N Z) �a co Zz 0 0 N M m MARK 2 A4001 PLATFORM CANTILEVER SILDING DOOR POCKET OPENING FOR DRAIN :' 2 T i, 0 PUMP STATION, ELECTRICAL ROOM SEC �002 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. 5 TION1 n. B 7 DS3 � ARCAD IS JANUARY2023 NOT FOR () (:CALLlS0t\qTKLjORANGE�CONSTRUCTION COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 9 T BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT BUILDING SECTIONS 1 10 _ROOF ELEC EL 30.00' GROUND ELEC EL 15.50' MEZZANINE LEVEL EL -5.00' L FOUNDATION LEVEL EL-22.00' 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A3001 SHEET NO.: 68 OF 298 13-253 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 0 1.9 C ROOF (ELEC EL 30.00' GROUND (ELEC EL 15.50' ELECTRICAL ROOM & GENERATOR ROOM r SECTION �11 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" D } E uj 0- co m Q ti L6 c o — r_ m Q E m n a� m '' c� F m ti Co L6 B RESTROOM SECTION �OO SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ti 00 ao 00 eM Mch N Z) �a co Zz o � N co m MARK DESCRIPTION DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. DS3 PARCADIS JANUARY2023 CNOT FOR CALLISOKTKL4: 6 SAIIN CONSTRUCTION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT _ R00 UELEC EL 30.00' GROUNDff LEC EL 15.50' BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT BUILDING SECTIONS 2 ROOF GEN EL 29.50' GROUND GEN EL 14.17' 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A300?2 SHEET NO.: 69 OF 2 13-254 1 2 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 0 10 0 1.9 C r --� ODOR CO �11 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ❑c } E v� m m Q ti 6 c o — r- m Q E m n a� m '' c� F m r- Co L6 0 U) U O ti � c00o Qo 00 ei M co ch N Z) �Q co Zz 0 o co N co co m MARK NTROL AREA SECTION 1 rB ODOR CONTROL AREA SECTION 2 �OO SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" :' DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) DATE APPR. OA) ( �OB B PROPERTY LINE _ODOR CONTROL TOW EL 29.33' L2 02 rA 01 A3003 DS3 � ARCAD IS JANUARY2023 NOT FOR () (:CALLISOKqTKLIORANGE�CONSTRUCTION COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ODOR CONTROL GROUND LEVEL EL 14.00' _ ODOR CONTROL TOW EL 29.33' ODOR CONTROL _ GROUND LEVEL EL 14.00' BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT BUILDING SECTIONS 3 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A3003 SHEET NO.: 70 OF 298 13-255 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A MECH SCREEN�HIGH) � — — — _ ----- — — — EL 36.00' - -- ROOF OVERHANG 2' - 011 A CLADDED W/ ALUM. ALUM. COMPOSITE COMPOSITE PANELS — — I I SIM PANELS 3 o i � I I A5001 co T ALUM. COMPOSITE METAL TUBE PER w ALUMINUM I I PANELS cl- STRUCTURAL COMPOSITE co PANELS I z w Lu DECORATIVE I o ANODIZED ALUM. 5 I � CANOPY A5001 I I I DECORATIVE L 13— „ I 2 PLY SBS SELF I ANODIZED ALUM. B SCUPPERSBRONZE I ADHERED SYSTEM I I CANOPY WITH TOP TRAFFIC N 6� I COATING SLOPPED 2% ROOF LEC I ROOF ELEC MIN. To DRAW �I EL 30.00' EL 30.00' 4" 1' 8" 2-PLY SIBS ROOF LGEN 60 2-PLY SBS MEMBRANE OVER EL 29.50' MEMBRANE OVER RIGID INSULATION RIGID INSULATION OVER METAL DECK OVER METAL DECK o SLOPPED 2% MIN. TO SLOPPED 2% MIN. TO DRAIN — — — — — — — — — DRAIN ---- --- PRECAST HEADER 77 3-COAT CEMENT 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER OVER PLASTER OVER METAL LATH OVER METAL LATH OVER ALUM. FRAMED I I FLUID -APPLIED WRB FLUID -APPLIED WRB OVER CMU OVER CMU o WINDOW W/ I I LAMIATED GLAZING 4 C I A5001 ALUMINUM TO CANOPY ACOUSTIC PANELS _ 1 I A5002 I I I N I I o______------ I I T I 00 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER LJ SYSTEM OVER METAL LATH OVER FLUID- I `� APPLIED WRB OVER CMU DRIP FLASHING T I ANODIZED ACOUST. LOUVER ELECTRICAL ROOM I I 003 FRP DOOR I GENERATOR ROOM I ROOF STAIR 005 RECESSED I 008 CLEANING PANELS - °° SEE ELEC DWGS. o 60 o co I I A5002 _ 0 2 r2 A5001 A5002 STONE WATER TABLE E SIM m STONE VENEER OVER 76 Q SCRATCH COAT — A5001 BACKER ROD Q _ GROUND�LEC I I ROUND ELEC I CONC. BASE W/ EL 15.50' EL 15.50' I PAINT FINISH CONC. SLAB PER STRUCTL -� 1 I - m FALL PROTECTION ANCHOR I °° c" F SEE STRUCTL. 1 I E GROUND (GEN — — — m A5001 — — ti I I p I 1 WALL SECTION A `_ J 2 WALL SECTION B 3 WALL SECTION C r-� �01 SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" A3001 SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0" A3002 SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-O" 00 co oo DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION 5-67 00 M c? DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI REPLACEMENT N Z) CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ DS3PARCADIS DRAWING NO.: M Q JAN UARY 2023 WALL SECTIONS 1 0 o LINE IS 2 INCHES NOT FOR CALLISOK4TKL A4001 N co AT FULL SIZE CONSTRUCTION 4Dc6sikr4l 1_2 m (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) GRANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SHEET NO.: 71 OF 298 MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. 13-256 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 02 01 OA ANODIZED ALUM. LOUVER A PANEL, TYP. I 8" H ANODIZED 8" H ANODIZED ALUM. COPING, ALUM. COPING, ANODIZED ALUM, BRONZE BRONZE LOUVER PANEL 10" _ ODOR CONTROL TOW _ ODOR CONTROL TOW ODOR CONTROL TOW _ EL 29.33' EL 29.33' EL 29.33' � 7 SIM I I D 7 I A5002 I I A5002 A5002 L-- 3-COAT CEMENT B PLASTER OVER ANODIZED ALUM. METAL LATH OVER LOUVER PANEL, CMU `° 2" W EXTRUDED REMOVABLE ALUMINIUM REVEAL � `9 METAL REVEAL 2" W EXTRUDED ALUMINIUM REVEAL DECORATIVE 12 ANODIZED ALUM. A5002 WATER REPELLENT ON WATER REPELLENT ON CANOPY EXPOSED 8X8X16 CMU EXPOSED 8X8X16 CMU 12 BLOCK, TAN/ GROUND BLOCK, TAN/ GROUND A5002 - 4 SIM 0 C � T A5002 6 — A5002 � — — — — 21-011 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER OVER METAL LATH OVER ODOR CONTROL AREA CMu 006 ODOR CONTROL AREA STU 01 ALUM. OVERHEAD 006 PLASTER CEMENT ER OVER COILING DOOR METAL LATH OVER CMU I I D ODOR CONTROL AREA o STONE WATER � — L 006 60 TABLE RETURN I 3 STONE WATER TABLE A4005 SIM STONE VENEER OVER A5001 I 2 SIM I MORTAR SETTING A5001 BED OVER SCRATCH STONE VENNER OVER — L COAT SCRATCH COAT STONE VENNER OVER SCRATCH COAT I I ST-01 I E I I ODOR CONTROL ODOR CONTROL ODOR CONTROL c� GROUND LEVEL _ GROUND LEVEL GROUND LEVEL A4005 m EL 14.00' EL 14.00' EL 14.00' r` I — I- o = _ r±: PEOR STRUCTURAL Q E 0_ m c� F m ti Co L6 U 1 WALL SECTION D 2 WALL SECTION E 3 WALL SECTION F A3003 SCALE: 3/4" = V-0" �OO SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-O" �O3 SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-O" ti 00 o DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION cJ-67 0 0 M c? DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI REPLACEMENT N Z) CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ DS3PARCADIS DRAWING NO.: M Q JAN UARY 2023 WALL SECTIONS 2 o o LINE IS 2 INCHES NOT FOR TM A4002 N AT FULL SIZE CONSTRUCTION co co m CALLISOK (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) GRANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SHEET NO.: 72 OF 298 MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. 13-257 1 2 K, 0 5 R 7 0 10 0 C C ❑c } E v� I.ML MW W a ti i 6 C O — r- m Q E m n m >" cB F m ti Co L6 1 1/2" DIA ALUM. HANDRAIL 1 1/2" DIA ALUM. GUARDRAILS 42" H ALUM. TOP MOUNTED 3-RAIL GUARDRAIL W/ HANDRAIL 6 ALUM. ST A4003 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 1/2" FRP GRATING LANDING GALV. STL. ANGLE SUPPORT AIR TYP DETAIL 4 FRP STRINGER & TREADNC. FLOOR PER STRTCTRL 9 FRP STAIR LANDING DETAIL A4003 J SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" N C 5 A4003 Lo o ' J Uf CID c, U C Al NUSINU, I YH. ALUM. GUARDRAIL i i 1 112" FRP i GRATING TREAD i i i ALUM. CHANNEL STRINGER i i i i 1 1/2" FRP GRATING FLOOR 5 ALUM. STAIR TYP DETAIL 3 �003 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 1/2 FRP GRATING LANDING FRP STRINGER FRP STAIR TO CONIC DETAIL JI.HLC: I 1/L = I -U 12' -10" 14 EQUAL TREADS @ 11" MIN. 4'-0" LANDING 4 ALUM STAIR TYP DETA �OO SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" FRP GRATING ODOR CONTROL AREA FRP STAIR Jl./-HLC: 1/L = I -U 18'-4" 20 EQUAL TREADS @ 11" MIN. CONCRETE FLOOR IL 2 ALUM. CHANNEL STRINGER o o � 11 1 1 1 rT- ALUM STAIR TYP DETAIL 1 �OO SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 3 0 0 1 PUMP STATION MEZZ. LEVEL ALUM. STAIR 2 PUMP STATION LEVEL ALUM. STAIR r` A1003 SCALE: 1/2" = V-0" A1002 SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" a� (p oo DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG 00 BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION cJ-67 M c? DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI REPLACEMENT N Z) CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ DS3PARCADIS DRAWING NO.: M Q JANUARY 2023 ENLARGED STAIR & DETAILS 1 0 o LINE IS 2 INCHES NOT FOR TM A4003 Nco AT FULL SIZE CONSTRUCTIONCALLISOK m (IF NOT2"-SCALEACCORDINGLY) GRANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SHEET NO.: 73 OF 298 MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. 13-258 1 2 3 C! 5 L 7 10 0 42" H ALUM. RAILING W/ HANInn All SIDE MO 4'-0" MAX. ALUM. C HANDRAIL ALUM. FRP GRATING (TYP.) TOP TOP MOUNTED (TYP.) U E go r` co c 0 cy V) Q E n a) m '' F cv 00 ti co Q o 00 C;j co M N � ,Q Nzz- o co N M m 11:i► O cl�J U � U 21" 12'-0" 3 EQ. TREADS 11"MIN. PLATFORM FRP TREADS W/ NON -SLIP NOSING (TYP.) SIDE MOUNTED RAILING MIN. 12" CHANNEL ALUM. STRINGER 11" FRP GRATING TREAD� FUG U-1 1211 � I I �Ll 3/8" THICK BASE PLATE 2'-9" 3 EQ. TREADS @ 11" MIN. DETAILS AND CONNECTIONS PER STAIR MANUFACTURER 2-5/8" O A307 BOLTS MIN. FRP GRATING PLATFROM T 12" MIN. PLATFORM STRUCTURE MIN. 4"X4" ALUM POST AND 3/8" THICK BASE PLATE SWITCHBOARD FRP PLATFORM & STAIR (REMOVABLE) SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) TREAD SPACING 11" UNO ALUMINUM NOSINGS WITH _ 1/2" RADIUS ABRASIVE SURFACES, 4" WIDE MINIMUM v _ d -d , o #5 TYP. d d 1 ° � d - d ° d v v _ d O Z 'w^ VKJ LL 0 6 CONC STAIR NON -SLIP NOSING DETAIL A 41 _ nll CONC. STAIR LANDING CONC STAIR LANDING DETAIL 1 SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" 0 0 p o p o p o a a a 0 0 4 CONC STAIR & LANDING A4004 SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" REINF. CMU WALL 3X3 RETROFIT WATERSTOP, TYP. 3 CONC STAIR LANDING DETAIL 2 �O4 SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" /l nl \/ O00 KACn norm n lC ALUM. NOSING W/ ABRASIVE SURFACES AT TOP LANDING AND AT EACH TREAD, 4" W MIN. PROVIDE 1" WIDE NON -SLIP CONTRASTING MARKING STRIPE AT NOSING w a> � Qw w � Z � 0 1l2" RP w I' u1 O a_ LL o p - T C/) CIP CONCRETE STAIR, REINFORCING PER STRUC . ..� � CIP CONCRETE STAIR & ROOF DETAIL SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" d' -n" R' -i" 5" 51 HIHL AI NU51N(3, I YF'. SEALD CIP CONCRETE CIP CONCRETE ROOF STAIR SCALE: 1/2" = V-0" DS3 CAARCADIS JAN UARY 2023 NOT FORsAr4 L CONSTRUCTION �RTK GRANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT ENLARGED STAIR & DETAILS 2 FLASHING = 29.71' E OF C. 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A4004 SHEET NO.: 74 OF 298 1 1 2 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 7 9 10 0 C s Lu w Q r` 6 c o — ca W 0- E CL m C>U-' F m ti co 6 !t� a o N_ 0 006 co 4a co N �p o co cfl — 1 m MARK WELD -ON HEAVY DUTY BARREL HINGE. PROPERTY SIDE PAINT TO MATCH FRAME 4"X4"X1/4" THK STL G, POST W/ 1/4" THK PLATE CAP. PAINT MATCH FRS 6063 T6 AL 3"X2"X1 CHANNEL INFILL P—,,-- FRAME FACE -MOUNTED GATE ASSEMBL SCALE: 1" = V-0" Y DETAIL 6063 T6 AL " X2"X1/4" GATE RAVE BEHIND 6063 T6 AL 1 "X61-0.100" T&G SLAT INFILL ADJ. WALL ALUMN. FRf SS BOTTOM TRACK STANDARD CARRIAGE GROUND FINISH PER CIVIL DWGS CONC. FOUNDATION PER MANUF. SPECS III 0 C N 7777777777 31'-5" 6063 T6 AL 3"X2"X1/4" U- A2001 CHANNEL INFILL PANEL FRAME FACE -MOUNTED 6063 T6 AL 3"X2"X1/4" GATE FRAME BEHIND 6063 T6 AL 1 "X6"-0.100" T&G 24' 0" //7/,SLAT INFILL 4" 2" 4" 2" 11' - 6" V.I.F. 11' - 6" 2" 4" MTL-01 (6) WELD -ON HEAVY DUTY BARREL HINGE. PAINT TO MATCH FRAME (2) 4"X41X1 /4" STL GATE POST W/ 1/4" THK STL PLATE CAP. PAINT TO MATCH FRAME o 0 i \ \ I MTL 01 MORTICE LOCKSET W/ CYBERKEY CYLINDAR & Lu SS LEVER HANDLES 2RI nil CONC. FOUNDATION PER MANUF. SPECS 71-711 --� 2'-0" WEST GA SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" NMI 8 ALUM INFILL DETAIL A4005 SIM. 18'-0" R.O. TE — CANTILEVER SLIDE 24' - 0" V.I.F. 0 0 (2) S.S. CANE BOLT o o �; I MOUNT TO BASE OF 1 N Lu GATE AND CORE STRIKE coN HOLES 3 DEEP ANCHOR co SO, CONCRETE — — ------ — —------y------ INTO 12" � ) L ' POUR �.. 1' 0" U) (1) HEAVY DUTY L �.J GATE WHEEL L I I / I A4005 6 SOUTH GATE — SWING A2001 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" LCP RESUBMITTAL DESCRIPTION 06/2023 DATE I APPR. 4"X4"X1/4" THK STL GATE / POST W/ 1/4" THK STL I / PLATE CAP. I I A4005 24' - 0" III V.I.F. 5 NORTH GATE — SWING A2001 SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) a 6063 T6 AL 3"X2"X1 /4" U- CHANNEL INFILL PANEL FRAME FACE -MOUNTED 6063 T6 AL 3"X2"X1 /4" GATE FRAME BEHIND WALL -MOUNTED GATE RECEIVER 6063 T6 AL 1 "X6"-0.100" T&G SLAT INFILL MORTICE LOCKSET W/CYPERKEY CYLINDAR & SS LEVER HANDLES WALL -MOUNTED BOTTOM END CUP WALL -MOUNTED GATE RECEIVER & BOTTOM END CUP 6063 T6 AL 3"X2"X1/4" U- CHANNEL INFILL PANEL FRAME FACE -MOUNTED 6063 T6 AL 3"X21X1/4" GATE FRAME BEHIND MTL-01 6063 T6 AL 1 "X6"-0.100" T&G SLAT INFILL (2)4"X4"X1/4" THK STL GATE POST W/ 1/4" THK STL PLATE CAP. PAINT TO MATCH FRAME (8) WELD -ON HEAVY DUTY BARREL HINGE. PAINT TO MATCH FRAME MTL-01 MORTICE LOCKSET W/ CYPERKEY CYLINDAR & SS LEVER HANDLES (2)S.S. CANE BOLT MOUNT TO BASE OF GATE AND CORE STRIKE HOLES 3" DEEP ANCHOR -- INTO 1211S . CONC POUR Q (1)HEAVY DUTY GATE WHEEL 4"X4"X1/4" THK STL GATE POST W/ 1/4" THK STL PLATE CAP. ALUM, COPING W/ CONT. CLEAT, SLOPE-----\ TO DRAIN FRT WOOD BLOCKIN J MOLDIN 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER FINISH (OR THIN STONE VENEER OVER SCRACH COAT) OVER METAL LATH OVER CMU. SEE ELEVATIONS REINF. PER STRUCTRL 4 TOP OF WALL �OO SCALE: 1 1 /2" = V-0" REINF. PER ST^" ' 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTI OVER METAL LATH J MOLDI GSM FLASHI JOINT SEAL THIN STONE VENEER OVEF COAT OVER METAL LATH M P-01 NOTES: 1/2" THK FLAT -CUT ALUM NUMERIALS, PAINTING ON ALL SIDES. MOUNTED TO FACE OF 0 EXTERIOR FACADE WITH 1/4" THICK STAND-OFFS APINTED TO MATCH NUMERALS AND THREADED INSERTS AS 1' - 2„ REQUIRED TO ATTACHMENT. 9 ADDRESS ID �OO SCALE: 1 1 /2" = 1'-0" PROPPERTY LINE VAIN - 2" MIN. TO CMU BLOCK 3" H ALUM COPING, BRONZE 4 A4005 11 I• I I I I 1-1 i 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER FINISH (OR THIN STONE VENEER OVER 1 SCRACH COAT WHERE OCCURS) OVER METAL LATH OVER CMU. WALL FINISH PER ELEVATIONS. I 3\i\ 1 1 A4005 CMU BLOCK GROUT 1 SOLID, REINFORCING PER STRUCTRL OFF PROPERTY PLASTER/ STONE TRANSITION SCALE: 1 1 /2" = V-0" REINF. PER STRUCTRL 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER FINISH (OR l THIN STONE VENEER OVER SCRACH COAT WHERE OCCURS) OVER METAL LATH OVER CMU. WALL FINISH PER ELEVATIONS. �� 1 Lj � I WEEP SCREEDi� I �r 1 CONC. BASE IN PAINT 1 FINISH TO MATCH ADJ. I I UNFINISHED z 1 GRADE SRF. f 1 I EARTH I WEEP SCREED TOW EL VARIES PER SITE PLAN WATER REPELLENT ON EXPOSED 8X8X16 CMU BLOCK, TAN/ GROUND PROJECT SIDE 1 I 1 2 A4005 i l FIG VARIES I � II 11-1 RETAINING WALL PER STRUCTRL CONCRETE FOOTING PER STRUCTRL �� z • r, cl- Lu PER ENG, 2 GRADE CONDITION 1 PERIMETER WALL TYP. �OO SCALE: 1 1 /2" = 1'-0" FDS VIARCADIS APRIL 2023 NOT FOR TM CONSTRUCTION CALLISON ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT , �OO SCALE: 3/4" = V-0" BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION 5-67 REPLACEMENT ENLARGED SITEWORK & DETAILS DRAWING NO.: A40015SHEET NO.: 77 OF 13-260 1 2 3 0 5 L•� 7 0 10 0 C C � Cc 2-PLY SBS GRANULE MEMBRANE COVER BOAR RIGID INSULATIO � E m m 1 Q ti 1 c o — c6 U) Q m D_ 0) 00 cB'' F 00 ti Co 1 L6 ao C.0 co M N Z) �a co Zz 0co o N co M MARK METAL EXPANSION JOINT COVER W/ - LOW PROFILE METAL COPING 42" H ALUM. SIDE OFFSET >IDE MOUNTED 3-RAIL aUARDRAI L ALUM. HANDRAIL SBS BANE SYSTEM ,LUM. WALL 10UNTING 'RACKET LC d EXPANSION JOINT @ROOF PARAPET SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" 42" H ALUM. SIDE OFFSET SIDE MOUNTED 3-RAIL ,., I A I'l I'l I'l All W/ SLOPE __R STRUCTRL ALUM COMPOSIT METAL PANEL DRIP WEE ALUM. COPING V CONT. CLEAT, S1 TO DRAIN CEMENT PLAS- METAL LA- 16" X 8" S.S. BOX SCUPPER, BRON 21- 011 I, � ►1 1 9 EXPANSION JOINT ROOF CURB 7 CMU WALL - ROOF PARAPET ABOVE STAIR 5 TOP OF WALL - WEST & EAST A3001 SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" A3001 SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" A4001 SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" 611 1 - 011 JOINT FILLER ALUM. EXTERIOR JOINT COVER CMU 611 JOINT FILLER ALUM. EXTERIOR JOINT COVER CMU CEMENT PLASTER METAL LATH AIR/WATER BARRIER $ EXPANSION JOINT @ WA SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" DATE I APPR. LLS DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 211 - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) 42" H TOP MOUTED ALUM. RAILING CIP CONCRETE PLATFORM SEE STRUCTURAL — J MOLDING STONE VENEER OVER _ MORTAR SETTING BED OVER SCRATCH COAT METAL LATH RAISED PLATFORM EDGE SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" 0 DRIP -WEEPS ------" 3 5/8" METAL STUDS @ 16" O.C. MAX. ACMP LIGHTING FIXTURE REF. TO ELEC. DWG CEMENT PLASTE SOLID GROUTED CMU - 2.0% 2-0'1 21-011 MOUNTING PLATE SEALANT OVER BACKER ROD 4 METAL CANOPY �11 SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" 2' -- _ co II DRIP WEEP 1'- 6" ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL N ALUM. COPING W/ EAT, SLOP TO DRAINE / ALUM RT PER STRUCTRL ALUM WF PER FRT WOOD STRUCTRL NAILER W - -- SOLID GROUTED CMU LINTEL BLOCK COURSE METAL LATH II II I II II i _ II II II II 611 411 II II o L .1- 21- 011 12-PLY SBS GRANULE MEMBRANE II II ALUM. EXTRUS. -PLY SBS MEMBRANE WALL MOUNTED YSTEM METAL CANOPY CMU 3 TOP OF WALL - SOUTH �OOSCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" J MOLDING DRIP FLASHING SEALANT OVER BACKER ROD RECESSED ELECTRICAL 811 PANEL FLUSH W/ STUCCO FACE, TYP. SEE ELECT DWGS GSM FLASHING 3" X 6" PRECAST STONE WATERTABLE BANDING, TAN SEALANT OVER STL L ANGLE I BACKER ROD DRIP EDGE STONE VENEER OVER MORTAR SETTING BED OVER SCRATCH COAT 1� 0 STONE WATER TABLE DS3 � ARCADIS JANUARY2023 NOT FOR CALLISOKTKL � CONSTRUCTION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT A4001 SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" STONE VENEER OVER SCRATCH COAT II II BACKER ROD METAL LATH -_ I I o oll IIp o p FLUID APPLIED WRB I I a a 0 FALL PROTECTION T - IL ANCHOR — SEE STRUCTL. of REINFORCING I PER STRUCTRL = o� II SLURRY FILL WEEP SCREED CONC. BASE IN PAINT FINISH TO MATCH ADJ. z N II o CONC. SRF. ri CONDITION AT GRADE �OO SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" ALUM RT PER STRUCTRL ALUM WF PER STRUCTRL Lu w cr TOW BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION 5-67 REPLACEMENT ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS 1 DRAWING NO.: A5001 SHEET NO.: 76 OF 298 13-261 1 0 3 LINE OF METAL COPING BEI- TOP OF WALL BEI- INSULATING B 2X4 ALUM. EXTRL ALUM. EXTRL LOUVER PAN BIRD SCREE(` HSS 4X4X1/4 DIAGONAL BF BEHIND INSULATIN( GASKE STEEL L ANG HSS 14X4X1/z STRUCTRL FC,­ DETAILS 11 TYP. LOUVER PNL. HSS 1 A3003 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" N = 29.331 2X10 ALUM. EXTRUS. CEMENT PLASTER ALUM. EXTRUS. LOUVER PANEL W/ 3-COAT CEMENT o 0 21- 01 ALUM. EXTRUS. I O O METAL LATH ALUM. EXTRUS. BIRD SCREEN, PLASTER OVER .�� LOUVER PANEL W/ 211 1/411 41' 1/4" 2'1 LOUVER PANEL W/ 21' 1/41' 4'1 1/4" 2'1 REMOVABLE BIRD SCREEN, TYP. BIRD SCREEN, METAL LATH OVER • 2X4 ALUM. EXTRUS. REMOVABLE CMU • INSULATING BUSH _ _ _ INSULATING PAD - SHEET METAL .� CONTROL 2X4 ALUM. EXTRUS.�� a o I I C JOINT F HSS 4X4X1/4 - - DRIP/ VENT DIAGONAL BRACING �� ` LIFTING ANCHOR CMU 1 BEHIND ��� N BEHIND —1•� i I _ SCREED L U L L U L N CIO 4X4 ALUM. DIAG. 4 FLUID -APPLIED INSULATING BRACING BEHIND jam— AIR/WATER GASKET 2X10 ALUM. EXTRUS. a ALUM. EXTRUS. BARRIER 1 WALL MOUNTED STEEL L ANGLE 4X4 ALUM. DIAG. INSULATING METAL CANOPY BRACING BEHIND GASKET HSS 14X4X1/4. SEE STEEL L ANGLE STRUCTRL FOR STEEL L ANGLE DETAILS HSS 14X4X1/4. SEE CONTROL JOINT STRUCTRL FOR DETAILS 12 PLASTER JOINTS & REVEALSr_o-�REMOV. LVR. PNL. HSS 1 s REMOV. LVR. PNL. HSS 2 6 COILING DR LINTEL 4 ALUM. CANOPY �OO SCALE: 12" = 1'-0" �OO SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" �O4 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" �OO SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" �002 SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" 5 ALUM. EXTRUS. LOUVERP""'r' '"" BIRD SCRI HSS 4X4X1/ DIAGONAL BRACING BEHIND HSS 14X4X1/4 BEHIND L rq TYP. LOUVER PNL. HSS 2 A3003 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 7 ALUM. COPING W/ CONT. CLEAT, SLOP TO DRAIN 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER OVER METAL LATH OVER CMU ALUM. EXTRUS. LOUVER PANEL W/ BIRD SCREEN, TYP. ALUM. EXTRUS. LOUVER PANEL W/� BIRD SCREEN, REMOVABLE 7 TYP. LVR. PNL. TOW �OO SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 0 10 HSS 14X4X1/4. SEE STRUCTRL FOR DETAILS ALUM. COPING W/ CONT. CLEAT, SLOPE TO DRAIN 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER OVER METAL LATH OVER CMU 5 REMOV. LVR. PNL. @ TOW �002 SCALE: 1 1/2" = V-0" � E uj 0- co m Q ti Co 6 c 0 c6 U) 0- E m D_ a� 00 >" F m 00 ti L6 r) U) 0 ti 00 Q O N O CD �i co Mch N Z) ,Q co Zz cy) 0 co N M 2 m MARK INTERIC STL L ANC CMU LINTEL REINF. PER STRUCTRL 3-COAT CEMENT R DVER D WRB \AG UM. VER N IIOR LASHING EALANT iENEER OVER H COAT P SCREED SRF. CEMENT PLASTER METAL LATH AI R/WATER BARRIER CMU — J MOLDING - PREFAB CONC. WATER TABLE - FLASHING BELOW - AI R/WATER BARRIER SEALED • TO ACOUSTIC • LOUVER FRAME FOR CONT AIR BARRIER STL L ANGLE 7 611 ANODIZED ALUM. ACOUST. LOUVER 3 ACOUST. LOUVER DETAILS �OO SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" DATE I APPR. DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 211 - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) CEMENT PLASTER 8 3/4" FRP FRAME WITH 1" BACKBENDS FOR INSTALLATION OF BACKER AND SEALANT AIR/WATER BARRIER SEALED TO HM FRAME FOR CONT AIR BARRIER FACE OF DOOR FRAME BEYOND - ALIGNS W/ EDGE OF BUILDING SLAB S.S. L2X2X3/16 CONTINUOUS ACROSS DOOR OPENING W/ 1 /2" DIA. (4") AB @ 24" MAX. (2 MIN. PER PIECE) CEMENT PLASTER \ 7 METAL LATH _ AIRUATER BARRIER CMU 8 3/4" FRP FRAME WITH 1" BACKBENDS FOR INSTALLATION OF BACKER AND SEALANT EDGE OF BUILDING SLAB AND THRESHOLD BELOW AIR/WATER BARRIER SEALED TO FRP FRAME FOR CONT AIR BARRIER 2 DOOR HEAD, SILL & JAMB �01 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER OVEF METAL LATH 0' FLUID-APPLIEC OVER CMU REINFORC CMU LIN 7-1/2"X2" PREC CONC. LINTEL, STL L ANG DRIP FLASH WINDOW SYSI WITH EXTERP COMPENSATION CHANNEL DRIP FLASHIN CMU BLOCH CEMENT PLASTER SILL INTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER CMU WINDOW SYSTEM WITH EXTERNAL COMPENSATION CHANNEL DRIP EDGE BELOW 1 WINDOW HEAD, SILL & JAMB A4001 SCALE: 1 1/2" = 1'-0" DS3 PARCADIS JANUARY2023 NOT FOR CALLISOKTKL (Dc6sA CONSTRUCTION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS 2 7 5/8" • • 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A5002 SHEET NO.: 77 OF 298 13-262 1 2 i 0 5 0 7 0 10 0 1:3 C _ E VJ d m m E go r` co 1 c O cy U) Q E n a) m >" F cv co ti 0 0 00 co p CD C;j C'M Mcn N =) �Q N zz- 0 0 co N M 2 m NOTES: 1. PORTABLE PIPE HANGERS (MODEL PP10 W/STRUT SHOWN FOR ONE POSSIBLE EXAMPLE) OR EQUAL. COORDINATE REQUIRED SUPPORT TYPE AND SIZE WITH PIPING OR OTHER MATERIAL TO BE SUPPORTED. CV CN 11:i► SLIP M PIPE SUPPORT SECTION POWDER COATED S.S DOWNSPOUT G.I. DOWNSPOUT CLAMPS-3 PER DOWNSPOUT ATTACH TO PANEL WI 1A " o EXPANSION BOLTS. PRE -CAST CONCRETE SPLASH LOCK. FINISHED GRADE FACE OF WALL. DOWNSPOUT ABOVE. --- 1ST CONCRETE SPLASH N N PLAN DOWNSPOUT & SPLASH BLOCK POCKET SLIP TYPE NAIL 0 3" O.C. FILL W/ MASTIC & FOLD OVER COUNTERSINK BOLT & FILL WITH MASTIC 24 GA GALV. SHEET METAL FLASH & COUNTERFLASH SINGLE -PLY ROOFING TO EXTEND UP & OVER CURB MEMBRANE ROOF METAL DECK �/ / WOOD BLOCKING 1. THIS DETAIL SHALL BE USED FOR ALL ROOFTOP DUCT PENETRATIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FLASHINGS AT ALL CURBS AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A WATERTIGHT SEAL. NOTES: 1. DUCT SUPPORT DETAIL PROVIDED AS AN EXAMPLE. COORDINATE DUCT SIZE, SUPPORT DUCT WORK AS REQUIRED - REQUIREMENTS, WIND UPLIFT/ RESISTANCE DUCT WORK AND JOINTS TO REQUIREMENTS, ETC. BE COMPLETELY WATERTIGHT (TYPICAL) CAP SUPPORTS AS REQUIRED TO CREATE DUCT COMPLETELY WATERTIGHT Im SUPPORTS (TYPICAL) O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ WASHER MIN. 2°x4° HIGH PRESSURE TREATED WOOD CURB SET IN MASTIC CAST-IRON DRAIN ASSEMBLY - ROUND HOLE CUT IN MEMBRANE AT DRAIN SHOULD EXTEND PAST CLAMPING RING A MIN. 1". HOLE IN MEMBRANE TO BE LARGER THAN DIAMETER OF PIPE MWIL r;•rN:�r�r� COMPATIBLE SEALANT BETWEEN DRAIN BOWL FLANGE AND ROOF MEMBRANE WHERE CLAMPING RING COMPRESSES PREMANUFACTURED TAPERED INSULATION SUMP AT DRAIN -REFER TO DETAIL 21 A8.26 (TYPICAL) REFER TO DETAIL 1 FOR TYPICAL ROOFING ASSEMBLY SECURE CURB TO ROOF W/ 1/4°0 x 5 1/2° LAGBOLT MINIMUM OF 2 BOLTS UNISTRUT OR OTHER /_ PER SIDE W/ 1 112° ELECTRICAL BOX EMBEDDING TO JOISTS OR SUPPORT w BLOCKING BELOW ❑ x Lu DUCT FROM BELOW ROUND OR SQUARE 2 SEE DWG. FOR SIZE TUBE SUPPORT 0 0 ROOFING PENETRATIO a ROOF DRAIN FLASHING (TYPICAL) T 3 eDUCT THRU ROOF DETAIL NOTES: 1. THIS DETAIL IS TO BE USED AT ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT DESIGNED TO REST ON A CURB. 2. THE ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHOULD NOT BE SET UNTIL ROOF MEMBRANE WRAPS TOP OF PREFABRICATED CURB. 3. ATTACHMENT OF ALL BLOCKING, CURBS & OTHER ROOF COMPONENTS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED PER ALL FMG CRITERIA AT MINIMUM. 4. COORDINATE TAPERED INSULATION SYSTEM/ FLOW LINES OF SLOPED SUBSTRATES WITTH CURBS SUCH THAT WATER FLOW IS DIRECTED AROUND THE UNIT AND POSITIVE DRAINAGE IS ACHIEVED IN ALL LOCATIONS. DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES --m-1 AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) CURB MOUNTED ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT CONTINUOUS SEALING GASKETING MATERIAL PREFABRICATED METAL ROOFCURB TWO-PIECE REMOVABLE COUNTER FLASHING THERMOPLASTIC MEMBRANE, FULLY ADHERED TO CURB INSULATED PREFABRICATED METAL CURB REFER TO DETAIL 1 FOR TYPICAL ROOFING ASSEMBLY FLASHING AT PREFAB. METAL CURB eDUCT SUPPORT NOTES: 1. PENETRATIONS SHOULD HAVE A RECOMMENDED 12" OF CLEARANCE ON ALL SIDES FROM WALLS, CURBS AND OTHER PROJECTIONS. 2. PENETRATIONS SHOULD BE RIGID, ROUND OR SQUARE TUBE AND EXTEND PERENDICULAR FROM THE SURFACE OF THE ROOF. 3. THIS DETAIL IS TO BE USED ONLY WHEN A PREMANUFACTURED FLASHING MEMBRANE CANNOT BE USED. PENETRATION - SILICONE SEALANT- S.S. DRAWBAND- INSTALL SILICONE SEALANT BETWEEN PENETRATION AND FLASHING MEMBRANE ADHERED MEMBRANE FLASHING REFER TO DETAIL 1 FOR TYPICAL ROOFING ASSEMBLY PENETRATION FLASHING DS3 CAARCADIS JAN UARY 2023 NOT FOR6 sAr4 L CONSTRUCTION """"`RTK ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM L:W RATIOS FOR SADDLES AND CRICKETS ROOF SLOPE SADDLE MATERIAL SLOPE LW RAT IO 114 1'2 11 112 V2 1 1 II1UULfl1 L-V- PRE-FABRICATE❑ CURB CRICKET - EXAMPLE CRICKET AND SADDLE LAYOUT eEXAMPLE CRICKET &SADDLE LAYOUT 2-PLY STYRENE-BUTADIENE- ROOFING CROSS SECTION BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS 3 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A5003 SHEET NO.: 78 OF 298 13-263 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ALUM TOE BOARD 1 1/2" MIN A 1/8"0 AIR VENT 3 1/2" MAX ON ALL POSTS #3 (10) 61 THAIRPIN BARS 41„ 4L RAILING POST REINFORCING BAR TOE BOARD CAULK WITH TOE BOARD SYNTHETIC N 1/4" BASE PLATE RUBBER 1 1/2" DIA RAILING 1/4" BASE PLATE 1/2" DIA. S.STL. + (TYPE 316) THRU-BOLT EDGE OF BRACKET - �i -CONC 3/8" DIA ANCHORS = ° z3" 6�, 4T" 5/8" DIA ST STL #4 (13 GRATING ADHESIVE ANCHOR 6"x 6"x 3/4" PLATE �FH4-LHIT-HY 200 OR EQUAL RORM W/ 2 1/2" -PLASTIC PIPE 1/2" DIA. S.STL. EDGE OF GRATINGW/4" EMBEDMENT AND SLEEVE OR (TYPE 316) THRU-BOLT NEOPRENE WASHER STYROEOAM NON -SHRINK B POST NSERT 4"TYP GROUT PLANX SECTION ALUM BENT PLATE 21/41'X5"X1/4"(-8 HANDRAIL MOUNTING DETAIL EMBEDDED POST 3 TOP MOUNTED GRATING 6 NTS NTS 11 TOEBOARD SUPPORT DETAILS NTS EXISTING OR NEW GUARDRAIL POST ALUM. C HANDRAIL ALUM ALUM N TOEBOARD TOEBOARD REMOVABLE — ATTACHMENT HANDRAIL 1 1/2" DIA. RAILING OF TOEBOARD POST REINFORCING BAR TO POST PER o RAILING MANUFACTURERS LEDGE FOR Ix FLOOR FLANGE �:, STANDARD COVER PL 5/8"0 ST STL REINFORCING BAR ADHESIVE ANCHORS N - Ix p HIT-HY 200 OR EQUAL - TOE BOARD o a W/4" EMBEDMENT FASCIA FLANGE Ix 2 1 /2"0 SCHEDULE 40 L EXISTING OR ALUM PIPE a ° ° ° DIA. BOLTS NEW GUARDRAIL � 3/16 v - 3/811 p POST - 2"� 3 1 /2" `� _� SCHEDULE 40 4 - 3/8" r a ALUM PIPE 3 1/211* 4 1/2" PLAN SECTION 3/16 SECTION ELEVATION ALUMPL r )i 5 TOP MOUNTING DETAIL a 1 /4"x 3"0 NTS 1 o TOEBOARD STRAP DETAILS HAIRPIN REINF \ - - ' 2 SIDE MOUNTED TO STEEL POST_ 4" TYP. NTS �_ / NTS SECTION 2-#3 10 HAIRPINS � -� a v ALUM. ( ) GUARDRAIL }, E - - 4" MAX. 5'- 0" MAX. 1/2" 11-0" Uj ALUM �-I -� ALUM. m PLATE _ a p a HANDRAIL m QTL ' wU' 112" 0 SST � ADHESIVE jor REINFORCING BAR ANCHOR HIT-HYc 200 OR EQUAL W. 4" EMBEDMENT _ a RAILING POST AND NEOPRENE - o Lu - Q WSHER ��� ANGLE FLANGE — N SECTIONAL PLAN TOEBOARD ELEVATION PLAN 3/8" DIA S ST BOLTS 6 -06/1 w m m F T m Co ti ' 9 HANDRAIL END PLATE 7 REMOVEABLE RAILING DETAIL 4 STRINGER MOUNTING DETAIL 1 3-RAIL RAILING ELEVATION o U) NTS NTS SCALE: 1 112" - 1'-0" NTS U O ti � c00o a� o DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION cJ-67 ri o DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAIPARCADISM REPLACEMENT N Z) CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ DS3 DRAWING NO.: M Q JANUARY 2023 ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS 4 0 o LINE IS 2 INCHESpooNOT FOR TMc (:6sikrq A5004 N AT FULL SIZE CONSTRUCTIONCALLISOK m (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) GRANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SHEET NO.: 79 OF 298 MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. 13-264 1 2 WALL & PARTITION TYPES 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 FLOOR ASSEMBLY TYPES ROOF ASSEMBLY TYPES 10 0 1.9 C Ic E /V J IryL1 W m a 1 1 6 c — r _ M W Q E M n m > F m Co 1 L6 r) 0 ti 200 ao �o co Mch N Z) �a co Zz 0 0 N M 00 11:i► STRUCT STRUCT SEALANT (NO 77 SEALANT(NO Lu AIR LEAKAGE) AIR LEAKAGE) Q CLG -�------------ I I CLG II MTL STUDS PER MTL STUDS PER SCHEDULE U. SCHEDULE 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD Q 5/8" GYP BD. EA. SIDE I II I I II Lu SEALANT SEALANT L FLR FLR TYPICAL WALL FURRING NON -RATED STC: N/A 0 L v W C� STUD SIZE SUFFIX / WIDTH CHART STUD SIZE SUFFIX / WIDTH CHART STUD SIZE TOTAL WIDTH SUFFIX STUD SIZE TOTAL WIDTH QSUFFIX J U. L1 6" 7 1/4" V1 6" 6 5/8" V2 8" 8 5/8" i' 1: :"i STRUCT STRUCT SEALANT (NO AIR LEAKAGE) CLG_ W SEE STRUCT. DRAWINGS FOR WALL BRACING W -} FINISH t 8K z CMU O MORTAR JOINT FLR FLR CMU CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE WALL 0w x W C� STUD SIZE SUFFIX 1 WIDTH CHART STUD SIZE SUFFIX / WIDTH CHART BLOCK WIDTH SUFFIX TOTAL WIDTH QSUFFIX J U. W1 8" (WITH 7/8" PLASTER OR STONE X1 8" CONIC CURB VENEER APPLIED ON EXTERIOR SIDE) W2 10" (WITH 7/8" PLASTER OR STONE VENEER APPLIED ON EXTERIOR SIDE) PARTITION 'LC' READ SEALANT INFERIOR PARTITION NON -EXPOSED EDGE GYP -BOARD 2 3/4" GYP, SUSPENDED CEILING SYSTEM r - CONTROL JOINT . 24'-0' MAX + 26 O" MAX CONTROL JOINT FOR GYPSUM GOAD OILING SOUND ATTENUATION BLANKET IHE OF PARTITION COMPRESSF13 TO FI IL OPENING AT SOUND RATED PARTITION PARTITION "LC" BEAD SEALANT & BACKE PROD CONTROL JOINT AT PARTITION INTERSECTTON/CHANGE IN CONSTRUCTION PARTITION VS.. SPACE 2 LAYERS 518" GYP. BD. r CONTROL JOINT 24'0 MAX 1HR. FIRE RATED WHI.495-PSV-0624A CONTROL JOINT AT FIR E RATED PARTITION UNDERSIDE OF DE OR SLAB ROOF 1 FI 22 GA- MTL TOP TRACK I TYP, U.N.( 12 GA. 80TTOM T: FLOOR LINE PARTITION 518" SPACE 2 LAYERS 5/8' GYP. RD. CONTRDIJOiNT 241-07 W6AX 24'-0" MAX 2HR. FIRE RATED WHI-495-PSV-0624 CONTROL JOINT AT FIRE RATED PARTITION GCONTROL JOINT DETAILS DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAI CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ LINE IS 2 INCHES AT FULL SIZE (IF NOT 2" - SCALE ACCORDINGLY) CONCRETE SEALER CAST -IN PLACE CONCRETE FL- 01 TYP. SEALED CONCRETE FLOOR TOTAL DEPTH =SEE STRUCTURAL ABOVE CEILING OPENING TRAFFIC COATING CAST -IN PLACE CONCRETE FL- 02 CONCRETE FLOOR WI TRAFFIC COATING TOTAL DEPTH =SEE STRUCTURAL IAAGE ABOVE CEI ONG OPENING RF - 01 METAL DECK 2-PLY SBS GRANULE MEMBRANE SLOPPED 2% MIN. TO DRAIN 1/2" HD POLYISO PROTECTION BOARD (2) LAYERS OF 2" POLYISO INSULATION W/ STAGGERED JOINTS METAL DECK & STEEL BEAM PER STRUCTRL PRCIVI DE DIAGONAL BRACING OF TOP TRACK AT 4S" O.C. MAX BETWEEN FULL HEIGHT STUDS --� K J � I[I IF I L { \ 20 / 1 it 1 \\ 30 r ru I \'ODOR.. / 1 � F DOOR 1 12/ 30 DOOR DOUBLE• \ 12I � I � 10 _. OPENINC 8 •• OPENING 9 BELOW CEILNG "OpfNING 9 -.LARGE BELOW OPENING 8 ,t 9 DOOR BELOWMILING 9 -LARGE BELOW 1■ , 77w CEILING OPENING OPENING \ -'ENING�. W- CEILING OPENING 117 / ACK TYP. ■ \ / \ �' �� N �/� 1 1 1- :�, � 11 1141 11 11 DOUBLE STUAS J1 DOUBLE STUDS .1 - DOUBLE SNDS DOUBLE STUDS 1 1A STUDS I D<1� OBL. STUDS FULL HGT. ' $TDU05 18 GA. STUDS 1 I 4'-fi" NSAX. 8'-fix MAX. 4'-fi" MR]C. 4'-fi" MAX. 8'-fi" MAX. 8'-6" MAX. 1B GA. STUDS FULL AGT- FULL HGT• '\ 4',6" MAX. 8'-6' MAX 4'-6" MAX. 8'-fi" MAX. ' AT WALL MOUNTER ARCHITECTURAL �,Inl airs , 1-1k n AT WAIL MOUNTED ARCHIFECTURAL \\ I oaf in SHELVING AND STONE VENEER CONT. 20 GA, MTL WALL STUDS IOOMM WIDE MTL BACKUP PLATE -- 92 MIN. DEEPER IF REQUIRED u � � a = � ~ c43� t7 = Foe LL 18 GA MTL RUNNER TRACK - 2 a CLIP FLANGES TO FIT OVER W a STUDS TYPE [A TYPE B� ACCESSORY / EQUIPMENT MOUNTING DETAILS CLIP ANGLE— L8 GA. X 1112 x 1 L/2" K 3" FOR 3 5/8' STUDS AND 5" FOR B' STUDS Ell SI DE DOUBLE ;B GA 3 S18" Oft 6" METAL -- 22 GA. MTL TRACK - -- MIN. 18 GA. MTL STUDS FACING OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS TO ALLOW MOUNTING PLATE ATTACHMENT 92 MEN. DEEPER IF REQUIRED M 2 F W x 14 GA STEEL RUNNER TRA[K- 0 CLIP FLANGES AND FOLD WEB TO FORM ATTACHMENT FLANGE NOTES: TYPE C 1. PROVIDE MOUNTING DETAILS TO SECURE ALL WALL MOUNTING EQUIPM ENT AS REQUIRE ❑ STUDS I 22 GA. MTL TRACK �. 22 GA. MR TRACK RI P ANG LE- 18 GA X 1 1/2' 9 1 CLIPANGLE- 28 GA. X 11/2" x 1 1/2" K 3" FOR 3 SIB' STUDS AND S" F x 3" FOR 3 STUDS AND DR 6'STUDS E&IL SIDE 5" FOR fi' STUDS EA. SIDE I 1F - 22 GA. MTLTRACK CUP AN..- 18.11111/2"x 1 112" x 3" FOR 9 W" STUDS AN D 5' FOR 6" 5TU D$ EA. SIDE R DOUBLE DOOR/LARGE OPENING HEADER B DOOR OPENING HEADER@ OPENING HEADER SHELVING AND STONE VENEERV Y MOUNTING DETAIL B TYPICAL PARTITION FRAMING (�5 ) 1 40 22 Glk MTL TRACK AT DOUBLE 20 GA- MTL- FLOOR STU DS AT BOTH (AMISS =7 \ 1"X 22GA-f.LR- STRAP PLATES AT 3•-fi" O-C- ELL SIDE DOOR OPENING JAMB STUDS (�) 1: 5 22 GA. MTL SILL TRACK BELOW STUDS 'I R 22 GA. MTL TRACK CLIP ANGLE-- 18 GA X 1 Ili" x I ATPLOOR 112" X 3" FDA 3 5/9" STUDS AND S" FOR 6" STEADS EA. SIDE 1" X 22 GA, MTL STRAP PLATES AT 3'-6- O.C. EA. SIDE LARGE OPENING JAMB STUDS (D 1 5 DS3 1$4 ARCADIS JANUARY2023 NOT FOR CALLISOKTKL4D4: 6 SA I CONSTRUCTION ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 12 GA. BOTTOM TRACK TYP NOTES: 1, ALL STUDS ARE SPACED AT I67 D.C. MAXIMUM 2. ALL STUDS SHALL BE "C" STUDS WNH 114' FLANGE MINIMUM 3, 1//1/ll1 DENOTES SHELVING OR CABINETRY- 4- STUDS BEHIND BASE CABINETS MAY BE TYPICAL STUDS, S- IN NO CASE SHALL DOUBLE STUDS AT SIDES OF OPENING BE CUT FOR DUCTWORK OR OTHER MECHANICAL SYSTEM5- AIAT�RIAL SEALANT .POINT TYPES HEAD (GYP ED) SI-L ;GYP BC? HEAP ICAAJh ACOUSTIC SEALANT AT NCIN-RATED PARTITIDNS AND FIRESTOP SEN-ANT AT FIRE RESISTANT RATED PARTTRCNS I II I I II I li I - - • li I � i I I I BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT WALL, ROOF, FLOOR TYPES & ASSEMBLIES 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A6001 SHEET NO.: 80 OF 298 13-265 1 2 i 0 5 y ■ 7 Q ■ 0 1'-6" I o B T i IF ROOM WIDER THAN T-6" 1'-3" MIN. O NON HC WATER CLOSET NON HC SINK SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" TOILET ROOM & ACCESSORIES NOTES 1. ENLARGED PLANS INDICATE TYPICAL DIMENSIONS, LOCATIONS FOR ACCESSORIES AND SPECIALTIES AS WELL AS REQUIRED CLEARANCES TO BE MAINTAINED. REFER TO THE EQUIPMENT FLOOR PLAN SHEET(S) WHERE TOILET & SINK TYPES ARE KEYED ON THE DRAWINGS & ADDITIONAL TOILET ACCESSORIES ARE IDENTIFIED. 2. REFER TO FLOOR PLAN SHEETS FOR ROOM OR FIXTURE ORIENTATION, LOCATION OF DOOR, WALL CONSTRUCTION AND ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT ITEMS. 3. DIMENSIONS INDICATED ARE TYPICAL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DIMENSIONED 1/8" SCALE FLOOR PLAN SHEETS. 4. DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR WALLS AND OPENINGS ARE TAKEN FROM FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD. 5. DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR ACCESSORIES AND EQUIPMENT ITEMS AND CLEAR FLOOR SPACE AREAS ARE FROM FACE OF ROOM FINISH (SUCH AS TILE). 6. FIXTURES SHOWN ARE GENERIC - REFER TO THE PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR SCHEDULED FIXTURES. 1'-0" C 0 ova �v� Om zm Xz Q 0 O Q N O Q z U � p Of =Za- O CD W -- -- J - N O - M N � V Q CD v M N Lo V r r WATER CLOSET TOILET PAPER DISPENSERS NOTE: LOCATE HANDLE FACING SIDE OF TOILET ROOM (AWAY FROM WALL) TYPICAL D TOILET FIXTU SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0" r GRAB SEAT BARS COVER DISPENSER r SINK & SOAP MIRROR DISPENSER RES & ACCESSORIES - MOUNTING HEIGHTS -ALTERNATE SIGN LOCATION--7 J J � Z z U- O O 0 O - ---Of o LL z 0 � � o O� O Lo M M TOWEL DISPENSER / WASTE RECEPTACLES —JECTING SIGNAGE NOTES:-`-' - 00 co 1. PROVIDE "EXIT" SIGNS AS SHOWN ON ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN 1 DRAWING SYMBOL ❑E INDICATES SIGN LOCATION. `n E 2. PROVIDE ONE FIRE EXTINGUISHER SIGN FOR EACH SURFACE MOUNTED SIG FIRE EXTHINGUISHER SHOWN. LOCATE SIGN ABOVE FIRE EXTINGUISHER ELEVATION 1 ELEVATION 2 m AT 6'-8" AFF. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION. m NON ANSI (PROJECTED SIGN) 3. PROVIDE HAZARD RATING SIGNS / RIGHT —TO —KNOW SIGNS, LABELS � AND TAGS TO COMPLY WITH NFPA 704, OSHA 1910.1200, AND OSHA SCALE: 3/16 = 1 —0 SCALE: 3/16 = 1 —0 SUBPART Z, FOR PROPER IDENTIFICATION OF ALL THE CHEMICALS AND 8» o MATERIALS PRESENT. THE HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE CHEMICALS m AND MATERIALS, AND WHERE THEY ARE LOCATED. VERIFY EXACT cf) INFORMATION FOR SIGNS AND LOCATION OF SIGNS IN THE FIELD WITH E OWNER AND ENGINEER. FIRE E]f71HGI115HER 00 (Z a, 4. PROVIDE ALL ACCIDENT PREVENTION, HEALTH, SAFETY AND WARNING -0 SIGNS IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANSI Z525.1, ANSI Z636.2, ANSI Z535.3 m AND OSHA 1910.44 AND 1910.145. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF TYPE Q: F SIGNS WITH OWNER AND ENGINEER. °° FIRE EQUIPMENT ti L6 I 2-WAY SIGN o U) SCALE: 1 1 /2" = 1'-0" U 0 00 a� FFL DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR SIZE DOOR FRAME DETAILS DOOR FIRE DOOR NO. ELEV TYPE W (R.O.) H (R.O.) MATT FINISH RATING MAT'L FINISH HEAD JAMB TRES HARDWARE COMMENTS 1 AA 6' - 0" 8'-0" FRP PT-02 0 FRP PT-02 DC, CR, PEH 2 A 3'- 4" 8'- 0" FRP PT-02 0 FRP PT-02 DC, CR, PEH 3 A 3'- 4" 8'- 0" FRP PT-02 0 FRP PT-02 DC, CR, PEH 4 E 3'- 4" 8'- 0" FRP PT-02 0 FRP PT-02 LV (BOTTOM), DC, CR, PEH 5 A 3'- 4" 8'- 0" FRP PT-02 0 FRP PT-02 DC, CR, PEH 6 B 13' - 4" 9' - 0" MTL-01 0 AL MTL-01 DC, CR, PEH, SLIDE BOLT, LEVER HANDLE 7 C 12' - 0" 8'- 0" AL MTL-01 0 - MTL-01 POWDER COATED S.S. FLAT SLATS, CHAIN HOIST, FACE OF WALL MOUNTING 8 A 3'- 4" 8'- 0" FRP PT-02 0 FRP PT-02 DC, CR, PEH 9 D 3'- 4" 8'- 0" FRP PT-02 0 FRP PT-02 PEDESTRIAN GATE, DC, CR, PEH 14 A 3' - 4" 6' - 8" FRP I PT-02 0 FRP I PT-02 I I I I I INTERIOR DOOR 0 0 6 3' - 411 61 - 011 3' - 011 51 - REFER PARTITION TYPE" CMU BOND BEAM HEAD - REF STRUCT FOR REIN RAKE & FILL W/SEALAN 1 3/4" THK DOOR AS SCHEDULED 8 3/4 WIDE FRAME HEAD & JAMB - CONVENTIONAL FRAME @ CMU PARTITION SCALE:NTS Flyl1 12'-0" LOUVERED 3' 0" 2" 8' 6" 2 11 DOOR 3 EQ, LOUVER PANELS 0 0 / REMOVABLE 6'Nk PANELS B LOUVER & DOOR COMB. W/ REMOVABLE PANELS GROUT SOLID FLOORING AS SCHEDULED SILL - TYPICAL SCALE:NTS 12'-0" R.O. C OVERHEAD COILING DOOR FRAME BEYOND OF DOOR NOTE: TRANSITION FLOORING @ CENTERLINE OR DOOR IN CLOSED POSITION - TYPICAL FLOORING AS SCHEDULED S.S. L2X2X3/16 CONTINUOUS ACROSS DOOR OPENING W/ 1 /2" D IA. (4") AB @ 24" MAX. (2 MIN. PER PIECE) FIBERGLASS BOTTOM SOLID LOUVER W/ MIN. 0.28 TRANSOM SF FREE AREA PANEL 3 3'-" -4'4 D DOOR ELE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" DOOR SCHEDULE ABBREVIATIONS: CR - CARD READER DC -DIRECT CURRENT PEH - PANIC EXIT HARDWARE LV = LOUVER PANEL 0 0 000 I� J E VAT I O N TYPES WINDOW NO. 1 2 WINDOW TYPE A A HEIGHT 2'- 8" 2'- 8" DIMENSIONS WIDTH 8'- 0" 8'- 0" WINDOW & LOUVER SCHEDULE DETAILS SILL HEIGHT HEAD TJAMB SILL EXTERIOR 8'- 8" MTL-01 8'- 8" MTL-01 FINISHES INTERIOR MTL-01 MTL-01 GLAZING/ LOUVER GL-01 GL-01 NOTES FIXED WINDOW FIXED WINDOW 3 A 2'- 8" 8'- 0" 8'- 8" MTL-01 MTL-01 GL-01 FIXED WINDOW 4 A 2'- 8" 8'- 0" 8'- 8" MTL-01 MTL-01 GL-01 FIXED WINDOW 5 B 2'- 8" 6'- 0" 8'- 8" MTL-01 MTL-01 GL-01 FIXED WINDOW 6 C 9' - 0" 4'- 0" 0'- 8" MTL-01 MTL-01 MTL-01 MTL-01 MTL-01 MTL-01 MTL-01 FIXED LOUVER 7 C 9' - 0" 4'- 0" 0'- 8" MTL-01 MTL-01 FIXED LOUVER 8 C 9' - 0" 4'- 0" 0'- 8" MTL-01 MTL-01 FIXED LOUVER 9 D 9' - 0" 4'- 8" 0'- 8" MTL-01 MTL-01 FIXED LOUVER 10 D 9' - 0" 4'- 8" 0'- 8" MTL-01 MTL-01 FIXED LOUVER Y ly 9' - 0" 3' - 0" 0' - 2" 1 1 1 1<ByCategory> I<ByCategory>l 8'-0" 2'-8" 5'-4" `° x 0 N i 6 0 . `° 0 x N � i A B WINDOW ELEVATION TYPES SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" o DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG CD M co DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAIch DS3 N PARCADIS CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ Q JAN UARY 2023 0 o co LINE IS 2 INCHES NOT FOR rM (Dc 6 SA I cy)c\lc� AT FULL SIZE CONSTRUCTION CALLISOK MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. (IF NOT 2 SCALE ACCORDINGLY) ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT m t 4' - 0'I 4' 8" C BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT OPENING SCHEDULES & MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 11 5-67 DRAWING NO.: A60LO2SHEET NO.: 81 OF 13-266 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE OCSD EXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULE 16-Dec-22 N0. ROOM NAME FLOOR FINISH BASE FINISH WALL FINISH CEILING FINISH NOTES CODE DESCRIPTION COLOR LOCATION NOTES 001 PUMP ROOM SC - EXP EXP GL-01 GLAZING Bronze Window glazing 1/4" (6mm) bronze (printing: V1093 Simulated 002 MEZZANINE PLATFORM SC - EXP EXP Mfr.: Viracon Sandblast translucent ceramic enamel on #2 003 ELECTRICAL ROOM SC - EXP, PT-01 EXP Mfr. Code: 9/16" (14mm) Laminated Bronze surface) 004 RESTROOM SC RB-01 EXP, PT-01 EXP 005 GENERATOR ROOM SC - EXP, AWP ACP 0.060" (1.52mm) clear PVB B 006 ODOR CONTROL AREA SC - EXP - 1/4" (6mm) clear 007 PUMP ROOM STAIR SC - EXP EXP 008 ROOF STAIR SC - EXP - 009 STORAGE ROOM SC - EXP EXP ST-01 NATRUAL STONE VENEER Light Brawn Fence Wall, Exterior wall Height: 4". Mfr.:Eldoradostone Length: 8", 12", 20" _ Mfr. Code: Stacked Stone, Alderwood® Average Thickness: 1-3/16" FINISH GENERAL NOTES ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE DETAILS - 1. INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS APPLIED TO WALL AND SECTION 033500 - CONCRETE SEALERS CEILING SHALL BE TESTED AS SPECIFIED IN CBC SECTION SC SEALED CONCRETE 803. STU-01 STUCCO Off White Fence wall, Exterior wall Omega ColorTek Finishes 2. ANY DECORATIONS SHALL BE NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR SECTION 096500- RESILIENT FLOORING Mfr.: Omega Products International Stucco texture: 20 30 FINE SAND FLOAT FLAME-RETARDANT TREATED IN AN APPROVED MANNER Mfr. Code: 242 MIST (CURTAINS, DRAPES, SHADES, HANGINGS, ETC.) RUBBER BASE C 3. MATERIAL, OTHER THAN FOAM PLASTIC USED AS RB-01 MANUFACTURER: JOHNSONITE INTERIOR TRIM, SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLASS B FLAME STYLE: RUBBER WI TOE. SPREAD AND CLASS C FLAME SPREAD AND SMOKE- SIZE: 4 INCHES DEVLOPED INDEX WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COLOR: 08 ICICLE. STU-02 STUCCO Medium Brown Fence wall, Exterior wall Omega ColorTek Finishes ASTM E 84 OR UL 723. (SECTION 806.5) SECTION 099000 - PAINTING AND COATING Mfr.: Omega Products International Stucco texture: 20 30 FINE SAND FLOAT PT-01 MANUFACTURER: SHERWIN WILLIAMS Mfr. Code: 241 Cobblestone NOTE: INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH MATERIALS SHALL BE CLASSIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 OR UL 723. COLOR: CUSTOM COLOR TO MATCH STU-01 (SEE EXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULE) SUCH INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS SHALL BE GROUPED IN THE FOLLOWING CLASSES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR FLAME GENERAL ROOM FINISH NOTES SPREAD AND SMOKE -DEVELOPED INDEXES. 1. ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE SHALL BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH LIST OF MATERIALS, FINISH NOTES, GENERAL NOTES, SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE DRAWINGS. CLASS A = FLAME SPREAD INDEX 0-25; SMOKE -DEVELOPED MP-01 METAL PANEL Bronze Roof screen, roof overhang, metal canopy PPG ❑uranarl Sunstorm® Liquid Coatings INDEX 0-450 CLASS B = FLAME SPREAD INDEX 25-75; SMOKE -DEVELOPED Mfr.: PPG INDEX 0-450 ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE LEGEND Mfr. Code: Driftwood Mica - UC106692F D CLASS C = FLAME SPREAD INDEX 76-450; SMOKE -DEVELOPED INDEX 0-450 B BASE C CARPET NOTE: INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH MATERIALS TESTED EL CONCRETE EL ELASTOMERIC LIQUID FLOORING IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 286 AND MEETING THE THE EXP EXPOSED ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OF SECTION 803.1.2.1, SHALL BE G GROUT GWB GYPSUM WALL BOARD MTL-01 METAL COATING Bronze Metal shelf, louvers, and misc. metal finishes Metal Coating to match MP-01 PERMITTED TO BE USED WHERE A CLASS A CLASSIFICATION IS MEL MELAMINE Mfr.: PPG on exterior REQUIRED. MTT METAL TILE TRANSITION P PAINT Mfr. Code: Custom color to match MP-01 INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH SHALL HAVE A FLAME PL PLASTIC LAMINATE RB RUBBER BASE SPREAD INDEX NOT GREATER THAN THAT SPECIFIED BELOW RCT RUBBER CARPET TRANSITION PER TABLE 803.9 FOR THE GROUP AND LOCATION DESIGNATED. RST RUBBER STAIR TRANSITION SC SEALED CONCRETE SPRINKLERED SS SOLID SURFACING GROUPS ( ) STN STAIN PT-01 PAINTING Off White Misc. exterior finishes Painting to match MP-01 1. CLASS C @ INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAYS, INTERIOR EXIT T TILE Mfr.:Sherwin Williams RAMPS AND EXIT PASSAGEWAYS VP VINYL PLANK E 2. CLASS C @ CORRIDORS AND ENCLOSURE FOR EXIT ACCESS WD WOOD Mfr. Code: Custom color to match STU-01 STAIRWAYS AND EXIT ACCESS RAMPS. 3. CLASS C @ ROOMS AND ENCLOSED SPACES m m PT-02 PAINTING Bronze FRP door panels Painting to match MP-01 Q ti Mfr.:Sherwin Williams L6 Mfr. Code: Custom color to match MP-01 c 0 M U) 0- E tl a� m '' c� F m ti L6 I 0 07 O r` C-0o a� o DESIGNED BY: JOHN ERIC CHUNG BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION cJ-67 C.0 o DRAWN BY: RUOTIAN CAIPARCADISM REPLACEMENT N Z) CHECKED BY: SIEGFREDO LOPEZ DS3 DRAWING NO.: M a JAN UARY 2023 ROOM FINISH & EXTERIOR 0 o LINE IS 2 INCHES NOT FOR TM111111C)C6SAIN A6003 N CO AT FULL SIZE CONSTRUCTIONCALLISOK MATERIAL SCHEDULE (IF NOT2"- SCALE ACCORDINGLY) ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT m MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. SHEET NO.: 82 OF 298 13-267 1 12 3 4 TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS: 5 6 7 8 9 KEY MAP 10 I_1 0 C 0 E During receiving shaft construction: Pacific Coast Hwy. at Dover Dr.: Close south side sidewalk during working hours. Restore this sidewalk during non —working hours. Close existing walk/bike path under PCH during weekdays. Restore this path on weekends. No interference with through traffic lanes. During forcemain connections: Pacific Coast Hwy. at Dover Dr. (night work): Maintain two eastbound (southbound) lanes on PCH during working hours (night). No interference with westbound (northbound) through traffic on PCH at anytime. Dover Dr.: Maintain two southbound left turn lanes, one southbound through lane and one southbound right turn lane during working hours (night). No interference with northbuond traffic at any time. During tunneling pit construction: Pacific Coast Hwy. at Bayside Dr.: Close north side sidewalk during working hours. Contractor shall provide flaggers to direct pedestrian/ bike traffic (north side sidewalk) during working hours. No interference with through traffic lanes. Durinq underground utility construction (sewer/storm drain/electrical/street light): Pacific Coast Hwy. at Bayside Dr (night work: Maintain two westbound (northbound) lanes during night working hours. Bayside Dr.: Maintain one northbound left trun lane and one northbound shared left/thru. lane during night working hours. No interference with southbound traffic. Pacific Coast Hwy. at Bayside Dr ,day work).: Maintain three westbound (northbound) lanes during daytime working hours. No interference with eastbound (southbound) through traffic on PCH at anytime. During future driveway improvements: Pacific Coast Hwy. at Bayside Dr. (weekend work): Maintain three westbound (northbound) lanes on weekends. No interference with eastbound through traffic on PCH at anytime. Prohibit left turns when in conflict with construction and when left turn visibility is restricted by construction. Working Hours : to be approved by City of Newport Beach and Caltrans All private driveways and side streets shall be kept open at all times except when construction takes place directly in front of the driveway/side street. All open excavations on public streets shall be back —filled or steel —plated (with recessed and anti—skid plates) for traffic to the satisfaction of City/Caltrans Engineer outside the working hours. Traffic and roadways shall be restored to normal conditions during non —working hours. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN GENERAL NOTES: A. It is the responsibility of the contractor performing work on a public street to install and maintain the traffic control devices as shown herein, as well as any such additional traffic control devices as may be required to insure the safe movement of traffic and pedestrians through or around the work area and provide maximum protection and safety to construction workers. B. All delineators shall be equipped with reflective band at night time. C. The contractor shall notify the City of Newport Beach and Caltrans at least five working days in advance of implementing any construction detour. D. All signs, delineators, barricades, etc. and their installation shall conform to the State of California Standard Specifications latest edition, the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) latest edition and the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook (WATCH, latest Edition). All traffic control devices shall be in new or like new condition throughout the life of the project. E. City of Newport Beach and Caltrans reserve the right to observe these traffic control plans in use and to make any necessary changes as field conditions warrant. Any changes shallsupersede these plans and be done per CA MUTCD with the approval of City/Caltrans Engineer. Revised traffic control plans may be required by City/Caltrans. Exact location of all equipment and traffic control devices shall be determined by the Engineer. F F. Contractor shall notify Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) at (714)265-4330 or any other affected transit services at least five working days prior to construction. G. All traffic control devices, stripes, markings, legends and raised pavement markers shall conform to California MUTCD, Caltrans Standard Plans, and Standard Specifications (most recent edition). T1221-2 OCSAN BBPS NPB DESIGNED BY: KUAN, DAVID - 7/23 QROFESS/ DRAWN BY: LU, FRANK - 7/23 ��o P�,D CHECKED BY: KUAN, DAVID - 7/23 w✓ m � NO. 57387 _ LINE IS 2 INCHES _ I * EXP12-31-23 r' AT FULL SIZE , sT CIVIL �P MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. (IF NOT 2"-SCALE ACCORDINGLY) 9TF of CALIF Ian.--- . PACIFIC COAST HWY NOT TO SCALE TC/7 ,T ' CITY OF NEWI'u"" � � TME,� C16 RIDGE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUMP STATION Vim, `4CIFIC PACIFIC COAST HWY. - _ _ b CpAs � � MICROTU NELING — _ — — — "--. --------. ---_'- _ — s i 711 O O O O O O b CI OF NEWPORT BEACH nE _ O O O O �CV o a l � `- \ GAS STAl10N LOWER NEWPORT BAY CHANNEL a � \ Dg BAYSHORE DR. I�E 13 H. All traffic control devices shall be kept in their proper position at all times, and shall be repaired, replaced, or cleaned as necessary to preserve their appearance and continuity. I. All traffic lanes shall have a minimum of 5 feet clearance from open excavations and a minimum of 2 feet from vertical obstructions. Open trench with less than five feet of clearance shall be protected by K—rail barriers/temporary crash cushions installed per Caltrans Standards. J. Contractor shall provide flaggers as deemed necessary by Engineer. Flagger's training and operation shall comply with the latest edition of WATCH and CA MUTCD. K. Contractor shall notify all affected residents and businesses five working days prior to construction. L. All advanced warning signs shall be equipped with flags during day time working hours and with warning lights at night. M. Traffic signals shall remain in operation at all times. Conflicting traffic signal indications shall be covered and signal operation during each construction phase shall be coordinated with and approved by the City/Caltrans Engineer. N. Place additional "LANE CLOSED" (C30) signs on Type II barricades at 150 foot intervals throughout extended work areas in each lane that is closed. Install "OPEN TRENCH" (C27) signs whenever an open excavation area exists adjacent to the traveled way. 0. All temporary traffic control devices shall be removed following completion of each construction stage and the permanent traffic control devices shall be restored by the contractor at the end of each work day of construction stage. P. Contractor shall replace/repair all damaged striping with temporary striping or raised pavement markers at end of each working day. Q. Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the American with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines and with the California Accessibility Guidelines as related to pedestrian access and shall maintain pedestrian access at all times per ADA requirements. Sidewalk closure/detour shall comply with the CA MUTCD standards. R. Contractor shall cover or remove all conflicting signs. S. Contractor shall post "symbol" uneven lanes, "Steel Plates Ahead" or "Bump" signs, for pavement surface disruptions of 1 /2 in. or greater. Pavement disruptions of 1 in. or greater shall have beveled edge of four(4) horizontal to one(1) vertical along the shoulder and min. ten (10) horizontal to one (1) vertical within vehicular travel way. All ramp transition shall be approved by City/Caltrans. T. Contractor shall install "CAUTION STEEL PLATES AHEAD" and/or "ROUGH ROAD" signs in advance of steel plate bridging. U. When work requires the use of steel plates, they shall be of the non—skid type, recessed to be flush with the pavement surface, pinned to be secured in place and installed in accordance with Caltrans standards. Advance warning signs shall be implemented for the entire duration of time the steel plates are in place. TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING, INC 2687 SATURN ST. BREA, CA 92821 (714) 447-6077 CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY 8 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS (PCMS). CONTRACTOR SHALL POST MIN. 2 PCMS (ONE IN EACH DIRECTION) ON EACH PROJECT STREET AT LEAST 2 WEEKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXACT LOCATIONS AND MESSAGES OF PCMS TO BE DETERMINED BY EACH CITY/CALTRANS.. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL AFFECTED RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES AT LEAST 2 WEEKS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR MAY CLOSE ONE SIDEWALK AT A TIME DURING WORKING HOURS. NO CONCURRENT SIDEWALK CLOSURE ON PCH SHALL BE ALLOWED AT ANY TIME. BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN KEY MAP do GENERAL NOTES 5-67 DRAWING NO. TC1 OF XX • :i qO&O 7 E 10 U 0 C X E F 1 2 3 1 4 5 1 6 n(45 MPti1 PFPVTTTTl\TC- C°T-TA FT rn1\TC''TPTT0"TTn1\T LEGEND: b EXISTING SIGN h NEW SIGN X TYPE TWO BARRICADE I --I TYPE THREE BARRICADE • DELINEATOR/CONE WITH REFLECTIVE TAPE [� ARROW BOARD ARROW BOARD (CAUTION MODE) O SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION DIRECTION OF TRAVEL ® CLOSE BUS STOP © COVER EX. CONFLICTING SIGN DURING CONSTRUCTION FLAGGERS cMs PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN (EXACT LOCATIONS & MESSAGES TO BE DETERMINED BY CITY/CALTRANS.) WORK AREA T1221-2 OCSAN BBPS NPB MARK BAYSHORE DR. co H TIl r W74(L) > \ � z m X R9-9 \\ R9-3 IT 50 0 50 100 150 GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 50' DESIGNED BY: KUAN, DAVID — 7/23 QRoFESS/ DRAWN BY: LU, FRANK — 7/23 ��o P�,D CHECKED BY: KUAN, DAVID — 7/23 w✓ m � NO. 57387 _ LINE IS 2 INCHES _ i * EXp12-31-23 r' AT FULL SIZE , sT CIVIL �P DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. (IF NOT 2"—SCALE ACCORDINGLY) 9TF of cAoF TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING, INC 2687 SATURN ST. BREA, CA 92821 (714) 447-6077 BUS qTnp Z z m R10-15 a R2-1(25) r/c R4-7 - R9-9(MOD) JG ANY TIME a �x R9-3 /? .r.,.�sqmll11"wimllraI:11 R81 R81B BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT 5-67 c 6 SPL 14 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN DRAWING NO. RECEIVING SHAFT CONSTRUCTION TC3 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PCH AT DOVER DR. OF XX 1 3-270 ?71 5 X 7 �_� 0 10 L 0 C 9 E F UUN I KAU I UK MAY ULUbL UINt JIUt1NALK AT A TIME DURING WORKING HOURS. NO CONCURRENT SIDEWALK CLOSURE ON PCH SHALL BE ALLOWED AT ANY TIME. EXISTING SIGN NEW SIGN TYPE TWO BARRICADE TYPE THREE BARRICADE DELINEATOR/CONE WITH REFLECTIVE TAPE [� ARROW BOARD ARROW BOARD (CAUTION MODE) O SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION -� DIRECTION OF TRAVEL ® CLOSE BUS STOP © COVER EX. CONFLICTING SIGN DURING CONSTRUCTION FLAGGERS cMs PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN (EXACT LOCATIONS & MESSAGES TO BE DETERMINED BY CITY/CALTRANS.) WORK AREA T1221-2 OCSAN BBPS NPB DESIGNED BY: KUAN, DAVID - 7/23 DRAWN BY: LU, FRANK - 7/23 CHECKED BY: KUAN, DAVID - 7/23 _ LINE IS 2 INCHES _ r AT FULL SIZE MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. (IF NOT 2"—SCALE ACCORDINGLY) 50 0 50 100 150 GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 50' �Rof E S S/PJ 1 0 k qq rs rn cy- NO. 57387 EXp 12-31-23 \F VIL OFcICAL TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING, INC 2687 SATURN ST. BREA, CA 92821 (714) 447-6077 �y- BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SEWER FM CONNECTIONS PCH AT DOVER DR. w z z U Q 5-67 Fa- 19 no rel \• TC5 OF XX 1 3-272 ?73 ?74 ?75 ?76 1 2 3 rd 5 C 7 E 10 F.l 0 C X E F CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FLAGGERS FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS (NORTH SIDE SIDEWALK) DURING WORKING HOURS AND SHALL MAINTAIN MIN. 4' SIDEWALK DURING NON —WORKING HOURS. ELECTRICAL GRAVITY 100, SEWER BYPASS PUMP SD Z C27 y S SZ LI GH-T C27 — ------------------- ------------ 29 LEGEND: b EXISTING SIGN h NEW SIGN X TYPE TWO BA H TYPE THREE [ • DELINEATOR/( [� ARROW BOAR[ ARROW BOAR[ O SIGNALIZED IN > DIRECTION OF ® CLOSE BUS S © COVER EX. C( FLAGGERS cMs PORTABLE CH (EXACT LOCA TO BE DETE[ WORK AREA T1221-2 OCSAN BBPS NPB MARK PCMS SET—UP SHALL MAINTAIN MIN. 5' SIDEWALK OPEN FOR PED. ACCESS. NB PCH W20-1 CURB LANE CLOSED (dates) (time) r/c 25 TO BE POSTED 2 DAYS PRIOR TO PCH AT BAYSIDE DR. UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION (SEWER/STORM DRAIN/ELECTRICAL/STREET LIGHT) NIB (W/B) SINGLE CURB LANE CLOSURE CLOSURE & R2-1(25) DURING CLOSURE. r/c Bus ® l00' 9 11(L) BUSOCTH STOP IC30 W11— 6-1 1-6 -3 9 a —3 � —11(L) 1 R15 73(MOD) BUS TEMP.) • . . • �• R© — Z r R81B STOP — 10' a C. � - - _ � � R15-3(MOD) R4-7 - - - R om- 4 • a S • - - R_ R10-15 DESIGNED BY: KUAN, DAVID - 7/23 QRoFESS/ DRAWN BY: LU, FRANK - 7/23 CHECKED BY: KUAN, DAVID - 7/23 w✓ m � NO. 57387 _ LINE IS 2 INCHES _ * Exp12-31-23 r' AT FULL SIZE , sT ciwL �P DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. (IF NOT 2"-SCALE ACCORDINGLY) 9TF OF CALIFO�� i \g 6-7P D DDD � R1-2 R10-15 \ GAS STATION \ \ \ r/c y \ \ \ \ y C20(R) • r/c r/c \ \ r/c W3-3 � \ \ O d R81� 0 \ 'W20-1 STED r/c \' _OSURE. �� G �P r WORKING HOURS : WEEKDAY : 6AM — 2PM WEEK NIGHT : 8PM — 6AM NO LANE CLOSURE ALLOWED FROM 2PM TO 8PM ON WEEKDAYS TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING, INC 2687 SATURN ST. BREA, CA 92821 (714) 447-6077 CONTRACTOR MAY CLOSE ONE SIDEWALK AT A TIME DURING WORKING HOURS. NO CONCURRENT SIDEWALK CLOSURE ON PCH SHALL BE ALLOWED AT ANY TIME. • • �\ DSO O�q� \ Np STO,p A • q� R2-1(50) r/c \ \ \ \ \ Qj r/c dj"�^ 50 0 50 100 150 GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 50' BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN PCH A T BA YSIDE DR. UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION (SEWER/STORM DRAIN/ELECTRICAL/STREET LIGHT) 5-67 DRAWING NO. TC10 OF XX 13-277 Wo ?79 I_1 0 C X 1 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FLAGGERS FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS (NORTH SIDE SIDEWALK) DURING WORKING HOURS AND SHALL MAINTAIN MIN. 4' SIDEWALK DURING NON —WORKING HOURS. 100, \\\\\ GRAVIT �U Q LECTRICAL',,,SEWER YPASS MID kii z � rn k ZZv __C27 _` ST-LIGHT Z — \5' _ -C27 — - z � - m � � m 21 P A r/c \ o c� r W4-2(R) \ C20(BIKE) r/c \ \ R2-1(40),6 \ \ \ r/c \ \ \ R3-7(R) \ r/c BUS STOP 00, LEGEND: �\ \ Bus STOP b EXISTING SIGN h NEW SIGN X TYPE TWO BARRICADE E H TYPE THREE BARRICADE \ \ • DELINEATOR/CONE WITH REFLECTIVE TAPE g� R1-1 .6 L� ARROW BOARD ARROW BOARD (CAUTION MODE) \ SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION �d DIRECTION OF TRAVEL ® CLOSE BUS STOP © COVER EX. CONFLICTING SIGN DURING CONSTRUCTION FLAGGERS F cMs PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN 3 ■ PCMS SET—UP SHALL MAINTAIN MIN. 5' SIDEWALK OPEN FOR PED. ACCESS. NB PCH CURB LANE CLOSED (dates) i TO BE POSTED 1 WEEK PRIOR TO CLOSURE & DURING CLOSURE. BUS n W11- 6- C30- 10' 0. C. W20 _1 '/ / 25 5 6 7 8 PCH A T BA YSIDE DR. UNDER GR 0 UND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION (SEWERISTORM DRAIN/ELE C TRI CAL/S TREE T LIGHT) NIB (WIB) DOUBLE CURB LANE CL 0 S URE WORKING HOURS : WEEK NIGHT : 9PM — 6AM, SUN — THURS 0 R2-1(25) r/c OCTA goo CONTRACTOR MAY CLOSE ONE SIDEWALK BUS AT A TIME DURING WORKING HOURS. 9-11(L) STOP NO CONCURRENT SIDEWALK CLOSURE ON 1-6 �' 9-3 x-11(L) R3-7(R) © (NEW TEMP.) 1so PCH SHALL BE ALLOWED AT ANY TIME. T R15-3(MOD) Rai BUS �� • R81B STOP R3-7(R) R15-3(MOD) /p/c - _ -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - �C30 lS I -------- --- __ - .W12-1 1 O p �� Cyo R - 15�� q R3-77 4�5, • \ R10-15 a NO STO • 10 PPINO ANY TIME \ \ 4 3 1\ \ • 6-7P R81 6 DD �R1-2 \� • 1 • W12 1 R10-15 \ \ • � � \ • c \ R3-7(R) \ \ GAS STATION \ � \ C30 \ \ \ \ ° C' R61 �o \ • ONLY \ r/c \ R3-7(R) �� \ • \ r STO \ \ � �\ \ \ '' \ • o 3 \ G� \ Na S \ • • \ r/c •A 1-6(R) R2-1(50) c \L r/c \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \� •\� yam' \ \ � \ \ r/c <0 \' \ \ G�y0� r/c \ \ C20(R) 5F �� o \ J r/c \ \ \ �\ do SC11(BIKE) \ \1,101 \ W3-3 o \ W11-1 \ R81� g \ y W16-1 0 � \ \� W20-1 y r/c G (EXACT LOCATIONS & MESSAGES C LOSEDE �G� 50 0 50 100 150 TO BE DETERMINED BY CITY/CALTRANS.) AHEAD \�P WORK AREA TO BE POSTED DURING CLOSURE. T1221-2 OCSAN BBPS NPB DESIGNED BY: KUAN, DAVID - 7/23 QRoFEssioN DRAWN BY: LU, FRANK - 7/23 ��o P�,D CHECKED BY: KUAN, DAVID - 7/23 w✓ m NO. 57387 _ LINE IS 2 INCHES _ I * Exp12-31-23 r' AT FULL SIZE , sT CIVIL �P MARK DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. (IF NOT 2"-SCALE ACCORDINGLY) 9TF �F CAEIFo�� TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING, INC 2687 SATURN ST. BREA, CA 92821 (714) 447-6077 GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 50' BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN PCH A T BA YSIDE DR. UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION (SEWER/STORM DRAIN/ELECTRICAL/STREET LIGHT) 5-67 DRAWING NO. TC13 OF XX 1 3-280 ► ONA ►0 • 1 2 3 rd 5 C 7 0 10 FT, 0 C X E F CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FLAGGERS FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS (NORTH SIDE SIDEWALK) DURING WORKING HOURS AND SHALL MAINTAIN MIN. 4' SIDEWALK DURING NON —WORKING HOURS. 100' Z _ C27 —�5' — C27- - C/)�- \ 29 LEGEND: b EXISTING SIGN h NEW SIGN X TYPE TWO BA H TYPE THREE [ • DELINEATOR/( [� ARROW BOAR[ ARROW BOAR[ O SIGNALIZED IN > DIRECTION OF ® CLOSE BUS S © : COVER EX. C( FLAGGERS cMs PORTABLE CH (EXACT LOCA TO BE DETEI` WORK AREA T1221-2 OCSAN BBPS NPB MARK PCMS SET—UP SHALL MAINTAIN MIN. 5' SIDEWALK OPEN FOR PED. ACCESS. NB PCH W20 1 CURB LAN CLOSED (dates) r c 2s TO BE POSTED 2 DAYS PRIOR TO PCH AT BAYSIDE DR. DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENT NIB (W/B) DOUBLE CURB LANE CLOSURE CLOSURE & R2-1(25) DURING CLOSURE. r/c Bus OCT® 100' 9 11(L) BUSH STOP IC30 W11— 1-6 a -3 9 —3 6-1 � R —11(L) R15 73(MOD) BUS TEMP.) �• X. R© — Z r R81B STOP — 10' a C. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ � � R15-3(MOD) R4-7 Rom- 4 • a S • — — R_ R10-15 DESIGNED BY: KUAN, DAVID - 7/23 QROFESS/ DRAWN BY: LU, FRANK - 7/23 CHECKED BY: KUAN, DAVID - 7/23 w✓ m � NO. 57387 _ LINE IS 2 INCHES so* Exp12-31-23 r' AT FULL SIZE , sT CIVIL �P DESCRIPTION DATE APPR. (IF NOT 2"—SCALE ACCORDINGLY) 9TF of cAoF i \g 6-7P D DDD R1-2 R10-15 \ GAS STATION \ \ \ r/c r c \� y \ \ \ \ y NB( CH r/c r/c \ \ r/c W3-3 � \ \ O d R81_, 0 \ yW20-1 STED r/c \' _OSURE. �� G \�P r TRAFFIC CONTROL ENGINEERING, INC 2687 SATURN ST. BREA, CA 92821 (714) 447-6077 WEEKEND WORK : FRI 8PM — MON 6AM SUMMER WORK IS NOT ALLOWED • CONTRACTOR MAY CLOSE ONE SIDEWALK AT A TIME DURING WORKING HOURS. NO CONCURRENT SIDEWALK CLOSURE ON PCH SHALL BE ALLOWED AT ANY TIME. A 14CIFIC co 50 0 50 100 150 GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 50' ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 2p, ' °C, • O,p • q� R2-1(50) r/c \ \ \ \ r/c dj"�^ BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN PCH A T BA YSIDE DR. DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENT NIB (W/B) DOUBLE CURB LANE CLOSURE 5-67 DRAWING NO. TC16 OF XX 13-283