HomeMy WebLinkAboutEXCEPTION PERMIT 28App2zcat10n ReQ `,:by W�
Phone
�3uena Park CA 90620
Y
t
Phc� 71.-
�
-C4 926b
3ta6 Newport Beach, Y
mat G6aa,. H ff ~. `New obrt : Beach CA 2b'
a
O =e fOr exceptZon perms t 'On s'.
.y F
IS`
asn Ursa
d { tao Lang, attach separate sheets '
k r S� gn? Ordinance?
h _purpose� =
srdrianae Tfiis is tie re��eef
Ghatces $:velved7 t lease r� ear ata�ec
F
#ta-grotea� a�substantfal;pragertv xxght?�s),g
to the ne:ghnarhaod' F_la G? r �' f r'r ^ a i"F
_ N ,
s
41
F $ MrIUAVIT
depase'' and sag]
ties �Lnvolved in-;thts_'ppplicatrton. (;2
_ that' tZsa arego ng .. at�►t �nen� attd
�ri h�sxewi th ubmitt �► � iri a�� respects tr
ri+a3+edge 'and belie
A
staurant-bakery.< in Lido -Marina Village be continued
to the Planning commission meeting of July 9, 1987
Item o.7, Use. Permit no. 3275 requesting tho lase of
variou outdoor portable food carts and an outdoor
flowers d in Lido Marina village be continued to the
Planning ission meeting of July, 9,.1987; and Item
No. 9, Ts Fic Study, Use Permit No. 3x7i3, and
Resubdivision o. 849 regarding a proposed taleee-•out
restaurant faci ty at_4101 Jamboree Road, be continued
to July 9, 1987.
Motion x Motion was made to co tinue to the Planning Commission
Ayes x meeting of July 9, 198 It
No. 2, Traffic Study and
Absent x Density Bonus Request; .It No. 5, Use Permit No. 1738
(Amended); Itom No. 7, Use f�ermit No. 32751 Itom No. 9,
Traffic Study, Use Permit No'% 3278, and Resubdl,vision
No. 849; and to continue to e Planning Commission
meeting of July 23, 1987, Item 4, Use Perrm.tt No.
1600 (Amended). Motion voted on, ION CARRIVD.
Planning Director Hewicker informed tNR Planning
Excused
Commission that Commissioner Pomeroy had contacted him
Absence
earlier and informed Mr. Hewicker of his ungxeidable
absence from the June 18, 1987 Planning Comftssion
Motion
x
Meeting. Motion was made to excuse Commisslqner
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
Pomeroy from the June 18, 1987 meeting. Motion vo d
Absent
x
on, MOTION CARRIED.
Exception Permit No. 28 (Discussion)
Item No. 1
Request to permit the installation of five -.,ill 'signs
EP No. 28
on an existing building in tl,;e Marinerls,Mlle Specific-.
Denied .
Plan Area, where the Zoning Code permits a maximum of
three wall signs per building,-
LOCATION: Lot 16, Tract No. 11331 located at.2542
West Coast Highway, on the northeasterly
corner of Tustin Avenue and , Wast Coast
Highway, in the Mariner's MiXo Specific
-Plan Area.
ZONE: C-O-H
APPLICANT':The Crystal.. Factory, Buana Park
OWNER Mrs. Corinne, Franklin, Newport Beach
M t
,...; C4l�lyi �SIONER� .,._
t June IS
ROLL =CALL
INDEX
There was no one representing the applicants hewever
Commissioner Koppelmanstated that she bel,i+v.M the
sign Ordinanco;has been applied 'to`all of the buildings
in the Newport Beach area and is quite Adequato for the
purpose of informing people of the business.
Motion
x
Motion was made to deny- Exception Permit No. 28 with
Ayes
xK
C
x
x
x
the findings and conditions contained in gibibit "A."
Absent
x
Motion voted on, MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS
1. That the location of the Liasiness does not pre-
clude the effective use of permitted sign#.
2. That three wall signs and one projecting eign will
provide adequate identification for the business.
3. That the granting of su :h are exception permit is
not necessary to protect a substantial property
right, will be contrary to the purpose of Chapter
20.06 of the Municipal Code as therein set forth,
and will be materially detrimental to the health,
safety, comfort or general welfare of persons
residing in the neighborhood, and detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood, andtothe general welfare of the
City.
A. raffic Study_(Public Hearin)
ItemNo. 22
Request t consider a traffic study so as.to.permit the
TS
construction f a.26 unit apartment complex on the
Density
property..
Bonus.
AND
continued
B. Request for Densit Bon (Aiscuseion)
to 7-9-87
Request to permit a .density bonu in accordance with
Section.659i5 of 'the California`Gove ent Code so As
-.
°to`constzuct an aparta:ent complex with units afford-
able to lower °income families, and the ac ace of an
"
environmental document.
3-
;y:
t
R f2y�
�✓ . ... .,Plann Ag. ommissiam' " z
`
'Subject Property and surrounding Land Uses
The subject
j, property i`s' occupied by a retail store and dry cleaner.
To the :north are mixed commercial uses and associated p4rkingI to the
east fs.a restaurant; to the south, acro" West Coast 1lighway are
mined restaurant and retail unes; and to the west, A(,*fogs Tustin
Avenue, in the Mariner's Mile Square retail complex.
._ Background
No permits for any. si ns on; .. the, s ubj act ,pro
Perty have e been; f aund by
City staff. On slidesphotographed in 1975 . prior to the adoption of
the City's Sign Ordinance,`,it app,ears'that wall signs existed on the
`westerly
southerly and -sides' of the building'`and `on -the northwesterly
side of`�the' tower' at, the "southwesterly corner of, `:he building. The
wall signs were' in the; form' of` 1+hite T'ettering painted on the bvown
building. A projecting sign was also present on the site. It is not
'whether
knownadditional signage was hdded prior to the .adoption sf
the''City's Sign Ordinance in 1977
In 1986, the building was painted white and '4 new signs c(Maifsting of
white copy on a red painted background were painted on the building
and tower. In addition, a wooden multicolored sign on a white back-
ground wapnailed over a previously rocessed area on the "OUthwesterly
face of '_he tower. Tie` pro jecting sign' was `altered in keeping °with
the new color scheme.
On November 6, 1986, in response to a citizen complaint, City staff
inspected the site And found nu',, roux window signs in addition to the
wall signs described ,above. Tlpe proprietor was advised that 'signage
exceeded that; permitted by Code. A portion of :the window:'signs Vas
removed. However, on December 4, 1986, signs were still diApl'1.ed`_n
•
wikdowfs and 'the; proprietor had - made no � effort to' "I ee�a li zc'; the call
signs The matter'' t46.'referred'.to •the' City Attorneytn .:office':in
December,' "I986 and the°'proprietor, removed "all window ,sign;t 'and :agreed
`,signage
to `bring on 'the:`buainess into., cosnplittnc.e with � tha Ci.ty!,s''. Sign
Ordinance. An application for an exception permit.to'2egalixe:`on--site
signage was filed on May.22, 1987.
The applicant has indicated that the new signs were.merrly replace-
ments far the'old signs=advertiising- the' ous:businesrb.:`.1�s sFcated.
above,'evidence;daes'not?'exist that all of the.=signs were im:existence,
Prior. to the adoption of the':Sign,�Ordinance;::,and could •be ;considered
legal, ,noncanforming. In any "case, Section '20.Ob.'110 ,E provides ::hat
' alterations ,.try=, nonconforming; signs ,: are do be made only uponi„abtaiafng
an Exception -Permit:
2. Two-3 foot by 11 foot (33 sq.ft.) wall ai.gr►m, one each
painted on the northwesterly and southeasterly faces of the
tower.
3. One-S foot 6 inch by 9 foot 6 inch (521 sq.ft.) wall sign
painted on the southwesterly face of the tower.
4. One-3 foot 6 inch by 16 foot double faced (:56 sq.ft. per
face) projecting sign on the southerly side of the building.
An can be seen above, a total of S wall signs having a total area of
2931 sq,ft. are requested. The applicant also proposes to revise the
wording on four of the existing wall signs fr,,m "C-,r/atal Factory
Outlet" to "Crystal Factory Newport". The City's Sign Code permits a
maximum of three wall signs having an area of up to 200 sq.ft. each or
up to 40% of a building face, whichever is smaller, and one projecting
sign per building, and thus an exception permit is required.
Applicant's Statement of Support
SwIl1
DPI
r
`�'
"{
;comitsion
_O: .PA ngjj
-=a
-. EXHIBIT
•FINDINGS AND . CONDITIONS, OP' APPROVAL
EXCEPTION PEP.MIT. NO. 28
FINDINGSs
,
1 That,' the location of the business on* a corner
nece. srjitates the. use,' of. ,addieianal. 'ai,gnage.
=' 2. That :the -'2E3t total square fisgtage'
' less than would-be permit-ted if ''a 200 sq,ft. wall
sign were , erected: on each exposed snide of the
building.
3. That the grantinq o `,'"such an" exception permit is
necessary to protect'a"substantiial property right,
will � not be contrary to. , the purpose of Chapter
20.06 as therein set forth, and will not be
matcrially' of the Municipal .Code detrimental to
the health, safety, comfort or general welfare of
persons residing'' in the neighlx)rhood, or
detrimental or . - 'injurious to . , ;property or
improvements' ,in the neighborhood, or to the
general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be, ,In, 'substantial confor-
mance with the approved plot plan and elevations.
2 ;That a sign permit, ' shall be approved by the
' Building and Planning Departsrlents. %'
'
.... / s
r
. - ... ..,. .....,....a. .. ,. -............._. ., . •... wr.. ....,ems I 7 m•. w.•......
.(
1
A' 3rV'" I. r Y ti„:.;..j ..A+.u(, ? �
+,cwr•�
i
fr•.I I
r \ .--- \ �� \ •� ,�\
�� J r
7r \ ` `�\\ •r ft .M' tiR «. wtr ftr <Y.7`Xrf . W ....«
1 \\! fN .lot M 11 �.I 1rY /aW ttf 94 •ff fU-4
ws.+.rot I+l � N,lr, tr/tir ltYMYt u „ !er •t►M -
�. •yd, N .ti4 yI� f,Y t1yY� 4. :1+ w.r r M. �t •, IH
a.t f 7:w Nai
rr
DISTRICTING MAP
NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA
1hY AtNltq,'LTUMtL RIE91DLItTYI R"+-M1AYIILL Ri.9tp[NTtAL -
N�-f fiMGll: FAMILY NL9WpiTiAt.'` C--t c.*W COMMLIICML -
N DUPLEX,RLfIDLNTIAL _ LLNLRAL'Co"[KtA1
T R- 3 Rift 6WI►li IaVV ftV09hMAL 0-1 M MFXTURINO •OHO. !W, to;
L-0ArINI"vayRIDi9 UNCLAi91FIED h QtCR..:JiO MAPtop
MOST I W D C fli IAI \\` .;
i �.t
C 7 'r 1 C L �': f x�.'�� FIAt
i
�'`
�
f
`t
.1
l4 (
`}
ii 1�5 )d
tfJ fZ iY ri A: � Y
IS f`�s)}n f
JS
:'[.
4' if _..
'
� s�� t t t i' Sie� � 1
f:! tikiR„�.G.i � ..a.,r t .).,.c�. r ,i 3..?.XP:ii ^.� .�
, i. 5 �. � � r c;. 1 j. 6
i t t ` t
4
Im
'tt ;ti
t
•ltM
tr fi
It... ^m3�1S
June 19, 1987
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd.
P.O. BOX 1768
Newport beach, CA 92658-8915
Planning Department
Planning Commission
To the Members of the Planning Commission:
It is wihh disappointment that we concede with your decision of denial
REQUEST TO: Permit. the i
building in the Mariner's
permits a maximum of three w
stallation o£ five wall signH
Iil.e_ Specific Plan Area, where
11 s
LOCATION: 2542 West Coast Highway
REPORT REQUESTED BY: June 5, 1987
COtdMISSION REVIEW: June 18, 1987
COMMENTS:
an existing
7aning Code
FOR: Exception Permit No. 28
Id QUEST TO: Permit the installation of five wall signs on an existing -
building in the Mariner's Mile Specific Nan Area, where: the Zoning Code
airmits a maximum of three wall signs per building
WCATION: 2542 West Coast Iliclhwefy
IiMPORT RE9UESTED BY: June 5, 19117
COMMISSION REVIEW: June 18, 1907
C:OMME TTS : j1�ll tll�
Date 21�T
Ji
FOR: Exception Permit No. 28
REQUEST TO: Permit the installation of five wall signs on an existing
building in the Mariner's Mile Specific Plan Area, where the 7,oning Code
permits a maximum of three wall signs per building.
LOCATION- 2542 West Coast Highway
RF:PORT REQUESTED BY: June 51 1987
COMMISSION REVIEW: June 18, 1987
COMMENTS:— /0 A-
REQUEST TO: Permit the installation of give wall Sloirm on an existin
building in the Mariner's Mile Specific Plan Area, where the Zoning Code
permits a maximum of three wall signs 12er building.
LOCATION: 2542 Wost Coast Highway
REPORT REQUESTED BY: June 5, 1987
COM14ISSIOZI REVIEW: June 18, 1987
COMMENTS:
`F: �: i ry ti` ! r i,. •. 5 +
' I.
wii
LZTY OP NEWPORT .EEACA
' .
PLANNZIti?G DEP cR3': JT
Y '
PLAN RMEW,
Date May 28, 198'7
- ADVANCE PLAMMIG DIVISION
XPUBLYC WORKS DEPARTMENT
X PLAUS ATTACHED (FLEASE RETURN)
X~_TRAFFIC ENGINEER
XyFIRE DEPARTMENT_
PLAHS ON FILE IN PtAMTING DEPT.
X PLAN REVIEW DIVISION
& RECREATION
_~PARKS
i14ARINE
SAFETY
GRADING
APPLICATIUN OF: The Cryvdal Factory
FOR: Exception Permit No. 28
REQUEST TO:
Wilding in
ELIMits a max
Permitthe installation of five wall signs on an existing
the Mariner's toile Specific Plan Area, where the_Zoning Code
imum of three wall signs per building.
LOCATION: 2542 Wont Coast- Highway
12EPORT REQUESTED 1,iy: June 5, 1907
COMMISSION REVIZIer; June 18, 1987
COMMENTS:
!l39yynN NOIS30 3113
�.
I
m
m
O
G)
Z
D
r
0
m
D
2
m
m
z
D
D
m
m
v
m
O
v
m
M
O
.n
O
c
Z
C)
m
r-
m
n
.i
m
S2
Z
O
z
D
�Z
{
�N`t�,nrvCE �,L�L1�Tl0�J �'rtoc�E�
1
ti
Mo
0
O
aD � n
'ITA LIAN CERAMICS
L)
FJ C)
,Y
I
C,
jLIYS,xx-s.L
..
ANcz)••D"NbEknC,A1.`To
13CTtA SI 1, E 1E, b P `VaD (--- tZL, ,
45 � ueLEUAT\41'O
10A \7 ZE, L t i A. �ZVZV,�. n PET) 0 1-11 !,;7, C.) bNc• -.
G Ct\X_') j t) V t t~n 1 PJ (.- v3 kA t Z k` . .
33' o"'+ c,�D
RED t3a�kG\1C +: r v : l41 U,
PA1ti�re V ^.0�1,� DT RtzG IJ6oa)
+_d
a
VAT l0 Q) MTYa�AV\J Ct G L U
r115" t c,A Ib0cL,:.a43oL)Q) I
'F_SM
51(c(\�`a,►�� r'13` �,� x 33' =g2,a x 2 165�
Ip Llt`1£ Zr
T�IAI. A Lt✓ 51ior.��� 31$-# +
-ruulttzT,Lr-NATt0N N,W,FDL0. VIM
f�': PO\NTCON 70 WALL
D 'S(Cnr,) C SROItJuL
-�+ .9 -C�t_TiaiL �J t4C� St CaVJ1C1 0.►J`COu7EGZ =JCS ptTAIL �jC, i3 1-CC1c�tZ /' Wt\1`ttr 11�'x�Ll Q:C�(�t� lS 1-i �_,
x, ' eeP PP!1OTED t3P,usti • I EaCN S1C)l= 1�!`IIT1Cva 1
l I �
PAR.I�1NCr i
m
cn
0 1 (
cn
m/---
< !' _ _
O
C W
37 cn
1
y �i I�ii t� �y11 I i? I �.
Arm
'RvqkTAL FACT-ORYwoe'Y'A
m Z
v y: m i. r t _ 1
T
D '
eel 0,
D3 .. _ .�_ ... . _ .. ._._..... .�_....,... _.....�....� .�.._..�........... .._._.._.-....,..
� m
i
-
r - -
r Z
I _
m p
m
r
0 C)T F��Ct�\e. Cc�� �T FA Cat{U...1A1A
II
-([)AI
10 I I 1 1
i
i
1
j
ii;
i
i
14
1%UDt Q_
?.)A UC.-
tYE coal
I
m
OOO
`...
3
Z
Z
_•r—._..�..r�-_ - - __ter.._—_
- loWEtz �t->`VAT1pN S.� �L���: �1.11aT
,mow ,��.�w�r- �rw�a�rr�✓•
SQ.O' \-k'E.LV= \✓AT10N p (2j =1 C, C0AS�'
Z
n z
^
m
. _ _
t! u — 1 rPA
O
D
N y
oo.M
s
I