The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS_MISC #10ONSOL'IDATED REPR OGRA.PH ics; ,MICRO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ��,•.•' .'i '•.L. ,�h v •! I�.I '+j �•. 31�t''. , �� r; c} _f •'s"'..�!'.i71G Vj. i�'� �.� "�a''�::. �.•S /"_�-` �r. r•e+•1 ''•. �; .t fAs•3s• �'•e �•[�•��. ..�Y ti � t' �`� h yy a f•. �:'� s. � ,�. .,►i.4: .r.,f. +n �a117 �r;, '':�lr. . �4�+"ii..{�;�..r#- '!V��! �•��e7� � �..-��•;,;;r +,� ,.�� jk'•} � �2 :�.{eK � }"•;"rT_7 ��_ i ':'�-i ;.` _i'e l�;t'r_ � y :.:�,,; ",� it-f.: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT March 26, 1987 MEMO TO FILE SUBJPCPr Residential Dennity Bonus - 827 835 843 & 847 15th Street For information, pertinent plans and documents for the nubject Residential Density Bonus, please see the file for Resubdivinion No. 800. CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION .r : r � is - ti4,� _ •�t4:.'+`�.::�'r .,'�i =:.• 1.Af .:i' .,�•.;~3 w'1 }}��`..:�:�.•Y•r1'r;p. ,_••,�c.•.rr�'•:� rff,,�L-^ 'Nk1': • :�a.:. :. [-.•. h'` .+L„llRa':n[•• ✓.�>•.. i". {p ':'.� r... :�.. ` Vht 4 �`,�H1 .� r..;��t;�•'`-:'}•,i:'`,�`.1.,. ir',',rf'•i"q..r K:J�i: .;. r r•, "� — r rs}--•�..1 !FCS.:eNYali. t3n/.il� �,�. s!if�AW-! �s W. i, •1 _ w?..t �r �a��'i} i� N r, .�F�•'.�'?q• '�7• t , CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 TO: Office of Planning and Research D 1400 Tenth Street, Roam 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 ElCounty Clark Public Services Division P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, _CA 92702_CA 92702 FILED SFp 2 2 M8 GMY 1 U;4N.LLE. COUMy CWrk 1. 6 LUERM .. FROM City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport ROU lovnrd P.O. Box 1760 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. PROJECT TITLE: Mess Development Apartments . PROJECT LOCATION: Monrovia and 15th Streets, Newport Beach, California PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of an apartment (affordable) project. CONTACT PERSON: Patricia L. Temple, Principal TELEPHONE NO. 714/ 644-3225 Planner STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER: Not applicable. This is to advise that the City of Newport Beach has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project has been X approved, disapproved by the City of Newport Beach. 2. The project will,-T—will not have a significant effect on the environment. 3. [:]An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of cEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A cop} of the Negative Declaration is attached. 4. Mitigation measures were, were not made a condition of approval of this project. 5. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was, X was not adopted for this project. 6. The Final Environmental Document and the record of the project approval may be examinedat the Planning Department of the City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915,0 14)G44/3225. DATE RECEIVED FOR FILINP 0 SEP 1' E D 21988 A4� eA'A ) Y -A0"L- beA Patricia L. Temple, rincipal Planner ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR DATE: 21 September 1988 ' CARP l ' �' LE, o:mty Cie�ic 330o Ne.vpcxt Boulevard, New ] `!`� ? h..w.ry . r-.:.�.. t - s M 1 � •'� � � r -+.sM r f -1=•. c by �., r* rN-r45'� s.t FILED"'.; CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SFp 1988 & f t. GPAINILLE. C waj Cier P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.891 S By IlAdw NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO: Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 aCounty Clerk of the County of Orange P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, CA 92702 NAME OF PROJECT: Mesa Development Apartments FROM: Planning Department City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1760 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 PROJECT LOCATION: Monrovia and 15th Street, Newport Beach, CA PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Construction of an apartment project. FINDING: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy K-3 pertaining to procedures and guidelines to implement the California Environmental Quality Act, the Environmental Affairs Committee has evaluated the proposed project and determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. MITIGATION MEASURES: None. INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: City of Newport Beach INITIAL STUDY AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT: DATE. RECEIVED FOR FILING: P 0 S' 3300 Newport Boulevard, Nei-rport Beach, CA rr4 D r Environmental Coord natar DATE: July 12. 1988 SEP 221988 GUMM CP'v; C,yunr1 Chic 8 � Y�:ry r �5�.6 ~•'''�•'+'t .r r,t � {'• '(tr ., t_ "�-S•....1..� �i�i. t,yt!x. "•:`�; +j '�ti {.�,, ,t.f .� nt.�5!'�S ti•M, r ti'?t�y�.•�t.J. L,. L":-�S tiu•.•L ,r'�'�. : hrl.�s. rtt.n:i�}V7'•'icT.`ri'r�� .t,.�...s )t�,lr.:. -i..,wnwi, Y\ "f '�� i �i-rhrl`.�Yi ..M• •-:M\ 1 to;t4 !ii 4..� f....'Mv enTit-�+I�%. t 2;'N' Y ]� L'h A-t N N-•p.`c. SN. /M`IMw"fw♦ ♦ _ t•.,.. a.,. YWM. dJ�t��"fH!yy'4JSL.tYa�Y Y . Eackgrmnd 1. Name of Proponent e-DevelogMial 2 • Address aid Phone dumber of Prononent Z� rfj%it/f . Q.,:JeA•� 3. Date Checklist Submitted AA 14#1 4. Agency Requiring Checklist Mwaar4 5. Nam of Proposal, if applicable II. Enviroiaental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) XU H be LQ 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d• The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of Soils, either on or off the site? £. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a• river or stream or the bad of the ocean or .� any bay, inlet or lake?. S. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure.or similar hazards? .� �''.•1'Y ,�La �i.� 4'� Sy i� A}Y4`i' �L. !f!'�.Tl4;e�_.f.•!��{-. :.'.S'�rti"rtt� .:?f ti, �fi..�. •,9•" l-Nr�A`T�' .�,"�, —.tt %i�'+�r,,�r�S _ .f ,. ,_ R!:9{,a :: 1.., .. . r:. �i.. ?��:'.. ..3•:W3:.. i�J�IL.,L... ._.��7tiYi�i,Sr .� .i.. f1Ii�JLt}.i�C_'L;S�,.'�}fif.i�J�.�'iti� .�e�1.�.,��:� y'*V 'r• I `� Y a.i1 „��f� .i��. t j�' I'l rap I.a f.•r t!•:,Na.W .>; ��t itln•. rr- wlal a7vw .Ma4.h.a+�A `^o XU. Hub, 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: A. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? l% b. The creation of objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either / marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, Including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground water? g, Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal, waves? 2• 'l.* a t J "� t�{�s 4 � �� .:��" ti '•i,.J h t �, ra•. ` '! `/ ! -'�.r.ti, .��!• •�4 ,1 ><i�4�ti* w•!� �:' w'..:. �J �2?�.�.C�-;•t.i•:i1a y � 'I; �� •' 7 :+rs�w'�' 17 i . 5 ti� S. .t t f �7FY t 'NJv �'!, .�eAf.rY. "jj:O:�.r•.\�. �.'la t(V%li!i�l}:�r,�...tlfMh,si n'Sii,:�tt!a.i..�.��1�....L:t?.'J rt.k,...t�.•'r..r,�l.,r.•,t,ri4.?...%t'..•... ,l•r't.r4iS#YF: rirY,r._ X K2 9. Matural Resources. Vill the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or Upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? SL 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing.' Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 13. ?ransportatioq/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Gweration of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or / demand for new parking? ✓ _ C. Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? a. Alterations to vaterborne, rail or air traffic?_ f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? L/ Ik. Public Services. Vill the proposal have an effect upon, or rasult in a need'for new or altered gov- ern■ental.services in any of the following areas: . 4 - M r ..J..('v+IR4h.✓{�Gi'M.L+.�fww.J�1 l+:^". >,�1S� t:w .w. arS�. .,'�.•r�'R.1 t. �s +S.n , rt-•.i$rN:—�-r.: 2.S 5t1!C! ,I.w..„:.'W �';V!f•.k+; ,�1.I...:j �. ry€.�..:i��. �K�tFc�.>rf�,''�•IG1�.:1 �'F3�+.. �� :d��i?'tfP f�„� .j: ! -�• ' aTlr rl`:ra -;.amc r-ri-�-�--r•�r7�--,zs�r-w-r;s�u�+�ar>rF-.'R e. ..�. --}'. is Fr yi ,.�•.;:y..�'7.? a mama • . jai � ' ✓•LL 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation.- Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. A. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? — b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses with the potential impact area? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Z/ ••�3:. {�.'. �•)� - �,5•yi•`;•rt', ! 1 �'A:Lri. `i4 `' �..� t 4r{•. � i ?.•ti: •.:'l.'•� •r7 ,•.1�'i { . iT' .t.•': .1r y:��y��,`''(L � �r (�(:.:'Y7. .�S)^��F '. �::;�li?i."747T��nJir'1L4^'.:J:-0`�i`.IYhYd4�•�t.'.?}:�=:i' •! � '',:„�i ,; i•y:•e.ii Lip. �{Y' 7•: (.! 'S '•1�. I„ .e;...•:'-a' .0 f`c „s, .. F', 7 1:, 4k.' i "t,e;l, I.•; ;LIJ�. +�;�.�gl4ro. H�.a� �{ + r �I�L<<l� � i'. ,�ra,••,��n't �T:��?!i . ..yi•str I ,. ��,{ Z,�`�`�yy i N�Ys,.d ♦r�f ."'•'wij .'• :,i a f:y, f'Y.,. Yf 1 �'1�C•lk� �.YL y�l i.•s �4S:' �`S CSJ �..;a; �'.�..? 7L'�n ai N• 4: �t iA:f. '"�iM �N'¢w �.'R`i'.vv .H'S>��I:�l'l.s.`•:��:�lV ,,•�'{�1..r1:�1 :'14�hi:N�-3�'}�:S'^�'9"7ij Y lb. Implementation of the project will result in the construction of residantial structures which will cover soil. The structures proposed are similar in nature and intensity with the surrounding area, and this effect is considered insignificant. 7. Addition of residential uses wil increase light and glare in the area. Since the project is similar to adjacent land uses, the effect will be similar to to the surrounding uses is not considered significant. S. The project will make use of a portion of an existing school site which is a change from the existing land use. The project area is planned for residential uses, and the project will be an implementation of the plan. 13b+ The project generate a need for additional parking, but includes the addition of parking spaces, which will offset the demand. This effect is considered insignificant. ':• f s :p r'e 5tAr?' .r��• _ .•i: r`'Fµ�%,�!.�s ,t4•::.i ,r f,.: :•o . rt:.. rRr `�i 3i �:�,�,i ��.L:°'P':�kKre�Ti; i'{{M1p�r.:.; ,I :`-�i.. �S .Y :.• ;a •: '.;.4.'_ .:U�". �. +�g:'1 „f...: a'.• •y � a,:: •, ,. �1 ,}�.e �ia.) rd•n. s: :� t� � cvi•:.:. >:r tc;" L,.�,..4;fr .atr`.��°:w3F.4 d.{..Y..tl:aH,a'; .:.5�5,•.F;,t.�"'".�•'`r143!?4 : ay f' %,�>> ♦ ,,•.�.s y-t.•N.+� r u;{r�i; S ..�.t.�ti,3r�C`.r��......c;s•;..::+�:�^, ::z-',E_�.rJ �i��kvs��:�t'¢�r'�1-��i�ir��`�x� t.•, -yNJ it Cd� FILE D CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH JUL 151998 P.O. BOX 1768. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 6AAy L. GWiftl"r'lIllE. Cour�y Clerk MUA I Wh UhU ARATUN TO: Office of Planning and Research ❑ 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95014 �County Clerk of the County x of Orange P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, CA 92702 FROM: Planning Department City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 L NAME OP PROJECT: Mesa Development Apartments I PROJECT LOCATION: Monrovia and 15th Street, Newport Beach, CA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of an apartment project. FINDING: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy K-3 purtajning to procedures and guidelines to implement the California Environmental quality Act, the Environmental Affairs Committee has evaluated the proposed project and determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. MITIGATIOU MEASURES: None. INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: City of Newport Beach INITIAL STUDY AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT: 3300 Newport Boulevard, flewport Beach, CA DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING: POSTED JUL fii11RY L,OMM C*k By PUTVI �. -4300N sip ...r'1.,•. J:-. .-.c:Yr. �- •. ... ., t.�"", �.- .-.-..._. .--1'.a. ...- ..:.n"y,�:rJ •i._._,,�...K.rNr.- Environmental Coord nntor DATE:3uly 12,•1988 ► id :ate f.= } N A __2 A Aodre4v I'm Plane i. 'Oliro fL O-VISM-RVIV!, VWIM 3. 'Date Checklist -Submitted' 4. Agency Requiring Checklist 5. Nam of Proposal, if applicable .(Explanatfohwid'all 'sysim 'aiid`M*b*11 a n- X*W'6! r's' are required on attached sheets.), Barth.- Will-t14, proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or In changes in geologic -substructures? f. - - b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or /overcovering of the soil? Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of Soils, either an or off the site? f. Changes in -do sition or of beach PO sands, or changes In siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channal of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or. aks? 9. Exposure of people or -property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides. ground failure, or similar hazards? JL( I {�y ji If , .�'Q- �i i• i'- -Y'!Y- i. -rr A:.• { , --: �.. `, Y7 "+r-AJ �,A'.ti � 1 i' Rmvwirons mtal Setting s!%(14 ,'i31.;;�:'.�}i:: ,;."t' '{}'s,'='.S IVV.' Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including inforsation on topograpby, soil stability, plants r�Ad animas, and any tural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe AM "istiegj.;struc• a on the site. and the we of the structures. Attach photographs of site. Snapots1atr,pexod ph"ooa rill;.be, accepted.: at nitrtna i r sties iaclud • iota , p . �L '.p °� . ,, �i; reatian ori' lams type 'o f its '(oae--la�i scale of dew] Attach Pt armbe Accep Certification dwwa r i h0torldal c icials s J."Wto indicate i. intensity of land y apartwiit b is. strops dipartnsi�t storei"' etc. ). and t' t1i �'tj. j kigptads,t. sot -back;... tsar. '.yard, etc,pof rricnity. Snapshots ar polaroid photos rill I hereby certify that the state is furnished above, Land ; in_„the. ..attached exhibits present the data and info ion required for this initial evalua. tion to the:best'of my:ability, and the facts; staterents,,and inform— Lion presented are true and correct to best of my knowledge and belief. Date C\P"IRF+ORM Signature ,• For :�f:sS�:J:s {;:.:.::'t;; Yc : �'r�:.`.��Ft(cl 1 st k •)�� ..::'. . i[t�1J13J.�#.I{iti:5! 1(! •'5:...:U', ,,ft)i:)a.:Y';i.'tf'S :};�1 !r ;iLfr:1!i!:•v� :1;"•i; 1r;;� iri 'R.�r:[i)N!S 'r11�)711Lf 'li:t; au to r7tJ f ft1 .'J 7'l iI, f '7V I, :.ii;3-1:3:1� �•a'.li: sri�1 �.3r� ;n fry •t��rflta .Iia? "c! n i:tolck of z.,,Jrrrl•ri;� 1 x� r�rFy�r., .r{s .�t3 b �rf 's,f7 •i11 r:1rn's?�. :f) 't �'�.' - • ),�}jr?�OEJ3 O.' vl Ivp{n7,: .r .rtji�f)'J i;7 r)'i11:.:,:,'�..� '14 �_ i;•3h,i 1�j tls;j , i•.�1�iF t1��'r'fi3•S `:13 r1J1�?: '.-::}S7> :.4::' - -�. .... ....,�.. i.'.it'SI:..ii5i� Y:..1 ��4? .sf7. r 5;[1l� �1,� ;1r1UO3�� . ('.f1f3�' 3...,,,•... � .. '`'4�.. r •i. c�: � '� � 'tat '1�,= +`Ff ', • e.,5� yy •^, . r' : ti i,y.(+i+_•4 _v,`{t;1,'..�` !. '" ri\t a,W i,^}a�_. ••,.,••�'.rN. �'.4i,CfJT .,,, t: yy 'If: �d�•f '!A1 .i"'l��i:: "?�y P a. s7 •.'•r•.' , i, C,r�r`.. %.y`r,• '1r:,:•` �'e,,••.ff w•� F'. .'Y h;y,ijia-•+r�.i .M�.P �.. iG i`i1+34r�.,.rr�,.r �.. r,:l, fy'r•.;IC;�. if;' },; i.� ., s;; .:.t ..., ,`.' •i7' Z`i. '- r XU MAM 82 4. Plant Ufa. Vill the proposel,result In:,., a. Change Ini the -41versfty!of.species, or,num-!...'., bar of any species of plantsi(Lacluding.-tv"s, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species i of., plants? C. Introduction of now.-species-ofiplants Into.,;,,, an area, or in a barrier to the normal repl anishment of ex i a ting species? d. Reduction in acreage of any,&gricultural-crop? S. Animal Ufa. Will the proposals result In: a. Change in tbe-diversity.ofispeciesi,or num-1 bars of any spociw of ;animls (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and. fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b._ Reduction of the numbers of any unique,_ rare or endangered species of animals? c_ Introduction of new species oflanivals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migra- tion ovauvinent of,_an1mslsT- d. Deterioration -toexisting-..fishorwildlife f.;:, -1 11 habitat? . .1 < 1. '�-' 1, -1 - 0 1., , 6. Noise. Vill tha-,$ proposal .� resul VIn:! A. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposurilbf peoples td),baverel nolse; 10"101 (I ?i :1 rf;i u r) 'I I 'I tj 11 F - �j I Ltotlmd Glare. VLl1%,tha;Vrcpoxa1 produce light or glare? f(I A B. Land U". stantial alter ' ation of the present land us* of an area? zl� jlx-lit Ir'l xI 4j MAI XU WbA H2 ` 9.. Natural Resources, Will the proposal result in: r a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural �A resources? 1 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous. substances (including, but not e limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or ..upset conditions? ,•• .1. b, Possible interference with.an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 11. Populatim.: Will:the proposal alter the location, distribution,.'domity; or: growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Vill the proposal-afiect:ezisting housing':'. or create a demand .for, additional bmwing?,, �. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: ',: . - a. .._Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?— \_.. ..._. . c..... Substantial impact upon existing :trans- , ti portation system? 14 d. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or MOV40int':of (people f,and/ot 'goods?, tf: "t . '' .' •,� e. Alterstions(,,to,waterboc" .'rail,or airctraffic .._ ^.__.. :,;.r.'if4 [rii�c��: ,trtif.;:,.:�' Fj•tat:-::,:� �I,_',.( f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclistsjrof Osdestrisast 14. Public Services. Vill the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for nw or altered gov- ernmental services in any of the following areas: rt•I r' f 5,,� r ?"s ��.t:.'L't,➢t . il.r��'d�`•+�� +�..l�i,�<s V'�nP��SY� a X" Uft ft a. Fire protsctLan?,%!,,:, b. Polic4-protectLon?,: C. Schools? '1_77 i d. Parks or other recreational facilities? 6. Maintenance!of public'facilitiesi;Ancluding roads?, ' -', -. ; i , - I;,- , I f -L' . -, -, - 1, i . I :,.; , � , " !, �'� . : i — f ..Other governmental services? 15. Energy. Will; the -,.proposal -i result. in:, a- Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energyv.— b. Substantial incress;j, in demand upon` existing! ,, sources or.'energy ' .,or: require the! development of now sources of energy? 16. Utilites. - Willths'proponal-, result, in afneed-for new systems, or-gubstantialaltsr&tLons,:to:the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Commun ic a t ions,'ays toms? I c Water? d ....... Sewer or septic tanks? 0. S torn water, draiTingfi? f. Solid waste and disposal? - r, , I ... I r; 'Irl I -) ".-' J'q �'v'.),! -) 11a Health: I - Wil I rthe i proposal 'l result f.in?! -it, &.--"Cra&tionAf any Ihealth6"ardtarcpot*ntial,j.,,,t i, health heazard (excluding mental health)? -,O-)Gw 0j ob-i11x1id (I] b.— Exposure of people tarpotsntla�health7A f hazards? J �f J,tiq q. I (I t rj � I )I-j fI I 'fit W il tj -1 J: .'ltf, fI VI I - X N2 .. 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of arny�scenic vista or view open to the publie,''or villttheiproposal'result'in:the creation�of-an sesthetically,'offsnsive site open to public view? . 19. Recreation:: Will the -proposal -result in3sn ` _impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. a. Wi Uthe proposal result in the.altsration of or the'distiwtion-of-a prehistoric or. historic'archasoioaical site? 4' b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthstic'effecm to;a prehistoric or historic 'building, structure, or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural'values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses with the potential impact area? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade tha=quality`-oUtMCinirironsnnt;? substantially ,,.:j -r; . .�.riducs'rttii�fiabitai�of�•'a fiahior �rildlifea'; ,:-, ,�_'; .�•,.,;:�+.:, species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten t' . ; r,riduce th4vnmhir or-ristrictrthirzangi'of a frari or-4ndangerid: plant or animal ,or r.eliminate r, i i iisportanVexamples'of+the major periods of<<,;: ,; ,:. r,r. ttcr California historylbrIprehistdrjr7 T,)Ari!?F ..lAir{.:i;°:(l:ij >ft�i T k;. F ''afr:', Is4,�a-:�ia�,.:.r..: b SGcyts �ti?yf �L� i,� '•� pry,,,].�•, a� �� s P.S xU Maybe H2 b. Does the projsct-,have , the •.potential lto achieve, short-term, )to.tbe;disadvantage of long -terse,., environmental goals? •(A..short-term impaction,, the environment is one which occurs in•,arela- tively brief, definitive period of time while long-tars.impacts rill;endure well into the,,; / future.)' c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulativaly.:con- ; siderable? (A project my impact on two or more separate resourew where the., impact ; on each resource-is--relativelg.smalli:,but where the effect of the total of-'those�ispacts:on; the environment is significant.) d. Does the , project, have environmental, effects which will-cause.substantial adverse;effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?` �( III. Discussion of EnvirorAwntal Kvaluatlon� (Narrative description of environmental!impacta:) i IV. Determination :1:}1ri ?i il:i �a: tr1liii, l41� 7-1 On the basis of this initial evaluation: o1w ",;.,;., :r>i.7�:r;�nq ::f.7 ::•°r r .' j"11 wri; qti.1 I find that , the jpropossd project :COULD, Wr biiXe iw tolgai.ficant effect on the enviroment,rtand +a tEGATiV,E,.WILL BE PREPARED. noi;r:iu=g;� ,�1.i;;.t1� :c) ria31 r. f,zr�rsa .<�,la+,+finoil i} �.:,..'lif7 : !*.`•,� ,,r:�t:.t:.;S::.: li.a„ I find that althoughr tba:proposed-iproject couldrha q.-A,aignif- icant effect, on,,titer environment: , there wila,:.notrbe ts:,aignificant effect in :thisadtse•ibedausanthe aLtigation,,ne"ures described on an attached1sheatihave.1eao addedoto.,therprojeatr,,,-(r:,l 'i A. NEGATIVE DECIMATION 1iILL1U'-.;1 PARED: r.,.t �:1 ri I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 0 11�Q �. Date C\PLT\EIRLIST.FRM Signature For &ILL T- - . • rt r Id, � -�' .s ( -',.+r i• L �..'T'±s }r �y r+r-�n ,x'i= l 'l�.r�i � y -;� � i t � } _ �� s err _ it r .i.c .7A. �tf'. .tt . �' r{s �� r� 3 � I s�, ,p � .�'�Fr. 1 a t y�y � ,a � •� lb. Implementation of the project will result in the construction of residential structures which will cover soil. The structures proposed are similar in nature and intensity with the surrounding area, and this Offset is considered insignificant. 7. Addition of residential uses wil increase light and glare in the area. Since the project is similar to adjacent land uses, the effect will be similar to to the surrounding uses is not considered significant. 8. The project will asks use of a portion of an existing school site which is a change from the existing land use. The project area is planned for residential uses, and the project will be an implementation of the plan. 13b. The project generate a need for additional parking, but includes the addition of parking spaces, which will offset the demand. This effect is considered insignificant. S l 1 'A ✓q � I'f .•5 S.. :!I � � `�.. s t vw .$r �[ 3•r � r'?' �"r 4 rig !r j J J, l f "MCE OF PmLIC HEARING • Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach will hold a public hearing on the application of Mesa Devela nt Company, Inc. for Residential Densi Bonus and Traffic Stud on ro rt located at 849 hest 15th Street. Request to permit the includes a 50 percent_ Government Code and the Code are also re ested the lot which are not i construction of a 15 unit low incone alMrtment develo densitZ bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the acceptance of an environmental document. Modification to so as to allow covered parkinq spaces within the front i Tuley enclosed with side walls ace to be located in the 2-^mA:. 20 foot front went which California the 7ronino no half Lparmit a NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Negative Declaration has been prepared by the City of Newport Beach in connection with the application noted above. The Negative Declaration states that, the subject development will not result in a significant effect on the environment. It is the present intention of the City to accept the Negative Declaration and supporting documents. This is not to be construed as either approval or denial by the City of the subject application. The City encourages members of the general public to review and comment on this documentation. Copies of the Negative Declaration and supporting documents are available for public review and inspection at the Planning Department, City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92658-8915 (714) 644-3225. Notice is hereby further given that said public hearing will be field on the 19th day of March, 1987, at the hour of 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of tht, ftawport Beach City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which tim" ntul place any and all persons interested may appear and be heard thereon. For information call. 014) 644-3200. Pat Eichenhofer, Secretary, Planning Commission, City of Newport Beach NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant. .. f •-M1� 4 � •' is �, . +' i I k x :'f` }�•.f. -.1 4 1'f}1g ^.Y !y �f d -7 44 .'P{ t'i t ` 424-011=01 Newport.Campus Church 424-011-`28 John Rawlins 931-37=008 George Wilson 315 33rd Street 167 4 Boa Vista 2616 E. Ocean Newport Beach,CA 92663 Costa Mesa,CA 92626 Balboa,CA 92661 424-011-05 Bernard Plam 1 Palermo Walk Long Beach,CA 92628 424-011-07 Newport Sea Crest P.O.BOX 1974 Costa Mesa,CA 92628 424-011-08 Newport Sea Crest P.O.BOX 1974 Costa Mesa,CA 92628 424-011-09 Newport Sea Crest P.O.BOX 1974 Costa Mesa, CA 92628 424-011-10 Newport Sea Crest P.O.BOX 1974 Costa Mesa,CA 92628 424-021-24 Cape Air Co. 1433 Superior Newport Beach,CA 92663 424-151-03 Noun-Shong Chi 22102 Wood Island Huntington Beach,CA 92647 424-151-04 American Land Assoc. 13921 Artesia Cerritos,CA 90701 937-37-001 Mary Kirkley 898 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663 937-37-002 Margaret Mayer 896 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663 424-011-18 937-37-003 Donald Jackson Joseph Irani 1455-H Superior 894 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663 Newport Beach,CA 92663 424-011-19 937-37-004 Mary Kreuger Harris Sherman 1435-G Superior 892 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663 Newport Beach,CA 92663 424-011-20 937-37-005 John Rawlins Yeheskal Akiva 1874 Boa Vista 890 Halyard Costa Mesa,CA 92626 Newport Beach,CA 92663 424-011-21 937-37-006 Bernard Plam Duncan McIntosh 1 Palermo Walk 888 Halyard Long Beach,CA 92628 Newport Beach,CA 92663 424--011-27 93.7-37-007 John; Rawlins Joseph Irani _1874.Boi_vista ,.. 3701 Seashore k,Caata `1lesa,G► =92626',; rt 4 wBeach{.CA ;92663 �, �' s`t _:•:.,.f1fiT.0 t .t. -a.. y4.�;fx.ra.I S.--'---,iY..I�Y"1��=�. 3 937-37-009 Robert Nettles 313 E 23rd Street Costa Mesa,CA 92627 937-37-010 Richard Brown 880 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663 937-37-011 Randall Hupp 878 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663 937-37-012 Joseph Hopkins 876 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663 937-37-013 Richard Potter 874 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663 937-37-014 Kenneth Sarvak P.O.BOX 2711 Newport Beach,CA 92663 937-37-015 Jane Campbell 870 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663;:: 937-37-016 Po Chi. Wu 3564 Apple Blossom Oceanside,CA 92054 937-37-017 Charles Tiee i 314 4 Emerald Isle Glendale,CA 91206 .937-37-018' JamesSimon ;: "019 93.7 37 Willi" Davis $62 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663 = 937-37-020 Ralph Wescott 860 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663 937-37-021 Malry Preidson 126 Via Orvieto Newport Beach,CA 92663 937-37-022 James Peely 32342 Crete Laguna Niguel,CA 92677 937-37-023 Kathleen Luke 1904 Lamplight Yorba Linda,CA 92686 937-37-024 Alan Spears 854 Halyard Newport Beach,CA 92663 937-37-025 David Schweitzer 3028 Capri Costa Mesa,CA 92626 937-37-026 Louie Troiano 33012 Terrapin San Juan Capistrano,CA 92675 - ., eft, �.�• q 'ice i LUR�cc..tw.y ��.sr GC2.rT n VL&C, ` ev <2.7/6 r �Q�%/�y JL� w•�.• w•f v^.. �)J � i',�, •�. •3��.,r'j � 1�+; �55 :: i. �s�i, kti. ..` C.' �j_.�{-'tr.�al�I�':t7.�a{i:F1.Fie'Ftl,�'Q_tVC1f'4�1.=�'sN �,�.. q,.•.:y'. +.V.r-11�; j»l C...:.1`�,' l'.�:i 1•'� !„R �tZn +?7 I< Liti,� '�j •S' ��e �i�1� ''iai 1. 1Y ?'�. �3i°1TR ..�J•f(y[i`�wj.�Cn._1t'Z[1:. � ++mot, 'r. _SA.. l.�lri. _f- �.� 1•� _ -jf e' t ' .. 5- /� *'r, ,as a��' Y -b: r�f:Otµ�r�_"y�y,—'.., \': ;.•. � -G: �.r, ,4,. - -� tie k1.5 1r. ORANGE COAST TITLE COMPANY To: PLANNING COMMISION City of: Newport Beach Legal Description: Lot 917 First Addition to Newport Mesa (Subject Property) Recorded in Book 8 Page 61 Miscellaneous Maps of Orange County Ownership: A list of the owners of lands located within a 300 foot radius of the subject property, together with a sip showing said land, is also attached hereto. .640 N..TtJSTIN AVENUE. SURE 10B. $ANTA ANA, CAUI"ORNIA_9Z7Q6 4 a.n1 r'• ' t5 ys 1, 'r �� fir•. ... ...d'+.:.>'�r:5:S4 ....�•1::r.'...�. �.�'_ - .. �_.�i',Ll�_,:'A ..a. ....... ..�.. ,.,......,��_•. __. ... .•�;w•`_•...•'i`� ..•..- rii ..',_.-y. . . .. . ........ �iY',�•'a- '4.r .... .. ...'M.. i.'..'�'J�'i ."_ .._ .�.:_.t `i.:{. :•:=.JlY�ai. �t'%Yr;•l.. 1]. .f , f.' ti,P.'•� :.. Ifi44. -er -ry.-- 1 jt.,,,c, _!•;; /ter sWar _ O � rowrly J10A N O 13� t afr / 1 L` r JnM r a III •JrrrJb �t 1 wwwr maA rmAcr .140 ,V .,. a owwwrxww J �rs�r flAt r 4W r0 - fAMW W.0 G} wAJ AMA 40, Go e o e� WL- Ji1 O O/rr J Fr 1 K JAI JMr. J/ tir •?► N J K r /N /AAA Jr ur y M � 11 RAW nwr / Pwr Aco rp ow 1 _ pro ft / JwJKM to ~'" .. At1ANt • ► 0 0 J 41 4'c rro�• 1 .i�� 1 .: .1$ • •.��' i4':F•isi'..d� F _ •,t :.t,M `.`_II •ti x'• �'/n s is `fF • 7 �1: f o .!�yr .}ir �r :Y � .'�4� fir' "r :,''•.. .1': Irk.` i .'1t' i •��Ci• �'T'.1•�'� '.�•;�d:{5.::...... M1 f vl.'i:i'{ii,.+J P .r �. liar {'l'�i:��' ti+iitit/i fs'.J►'S'S4L1•r i••' ,4 i:.:f. . .r... ��'� .t�,'tiCI.PF.: .��f]-£ .1 . •`. �=�",.. - �y.. „u �;, •.•�r'!}�:. 4e��'.. _ - 1'.. y,y_ (-72 • n�tr ngw a f AIW ff so of Of 0.0 #M14wp Ce) 105, OW 1) a am or it/ a M s' 'y opwr oiru mAcr aim a opwrawrof MACr trims r AW ro Iowa 06 O Q 0 AV ATM to? OP 0 ---------- ®R) @l) AIWL07 4# Off AV low MW Ff . ............ fir APP son Asp Of Aw "r im No of-Ap WORM J % ni 44 . A 'A • CITY Or* BUM PLAJOrnIG DEPARTNEX7 PLAN REV3[EW REQUEST X ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION i—PUBLIC WORKS DLIPARTPMINT )FTRAPPIc ENrrmRzR -:x 1r1jW'."bVA*niz*T X — PLAN REVIEW DIVISION PARKS & RECREATION — POLICE DEPARTMENT MARINE SAFETY _GRADING Date March 2, 1907 X PLANS ATTACHED (PLrME RETURN) — PLANS 01, FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. APPLICATION OF: Mesa Development Company, Inc. FOR: Residential Density Bonus and Traffic Study REQUEST TO: Permit the construction of a 15 unit low income artment development which includes a So percent density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the c&Iifo—rnia Government Code. The proponal also includes the ap2roval of a related traffic study and a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow parking graces within the front one half of tho lot which are not full y_ enclosed with ga-r—age doors. LOCATIONS 849 West 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: March 9, 1987 COMMISSION REVIEW: March 19,- 1987 NA MIL -IL signature Date 3 Id-17 X_ ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION X_PUBLIC WORKS DEPARI?ENT X TRAFFIC ENGINEER X FIRE DEPARTMENT _PARKS & RECRpJCTIoW- ,,POLICE DEPARTMENT MARINE SAFETY GRADING 1 CITY ' Oi lI1:WORT' BEACH PIJ1mnm DEPARTMEIIT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST Date March 2 1987 7f PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) — PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. APPLICATION OF: Mesa Development Company, Inc. FOR: Residential Density Bonus and Traffic Study REQUEST Tot Permit the construction of a 15 unit low income apartment development which includes a 50-percent density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code. The_propo na1 also includes the a roval of a related traffic stud and a modification n the also in Code so as to allow parking s aces within the front one half of the lot which are not fully enclosed with ara a doors. LOCATION: 849 West 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: March 9, 1987 COMMISSION REVIEW: March 19, 1987 COMMENTS: .tilT..i�,'Ir.Y{Rir t��r'.tY[�-L�':�IY'�t+1�1�i1i�i�J�•��.Sli��th t,-��.k7. �:1.Y.�ir� �t.i �+ 1 _ .� +�.. X'�� } �^� C.i3 t- t�i.'�4 CSI��f i � � .� F - 1�`} lA. N!i „ I r1.4`i �: �[i.r'irarL. {�r +�riS:•.i"fly If°'� �:'.i b M � ��r.JLi', Xi Jt]F�C� �?•ii i.•r `�ws'� f {i 4+ � t. i � { � _`� ,�. :�tr:is �::.'F. �.:r �k5, - {Fv j'Iit •�J • � 7 r.,. i t ad •t I `�� a -s -�`, .. '' S' a '•r: h.l�,t,;f/tii' Kx . "CISY! OF MOM" BFJKii • _ t� . PLA!!'lfI11C DL"PJIRTMM PLhX RMEW RPQ[ M R"' D VISION X PUBLlc,4VORXS DEPARTMENT )_XE TRAFFIC ENGINEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ) PLAN REYIEw DIVISION PARKS ; RECREATION �POL.ICE DEPARTMENT MARINE SAFETY —GRADING Date March 2I 1987 X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) APPLICATION OF: Mesa Development Company, Inc. PLANS ON FILE Ili PLANNING DEPT. FOR: Residential Density Bonus and Traffic Study REQUEST TO: Permit the construction of a 15 unit low income a rtment development which includes a 50 rcent densit bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code. The pro-p2nal also includes the approval of a related traffic study and a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow 12arking spaces within the front one half of tf lot which are not fully enclosed with garaga doors. LOCATION: 849 West 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: March 9, 1987 COMMISSION REVIEW; March 19, 1987 COMMENTS: / j %lr/'i >( /r. r Y'.i sjrf [�v lr� •.?;• rfr ll ,Lr/.'' r,'f 'lYr ,l'r � r ..7r.1/ " rff fKti> r r •lea r.S! rr. � r , i,..,;.r, �� JJ� lil.�.r,r,,•! ,7'i4Y lee' rr rJt% rl .Y�. r �r R!.r�il. r �, 1'f�I"l.ri�J7�i+d ,t'�f .•i 7r~ 'Yn•r .e.�J4)V& 41W4 S yr' efts trt wrrll �„r ri.rr, . rTr, t :�!/l,r',t' y 4V POS r s�xY rr /r.rr�3 i 4-��G/ Lr, rl- /YV-< 7Irl f7'w�7.07,eJ .4 C 7Urrx+f i. f�!<k�fl-rlr.'yWe rerYa ro7ere 4Wx7,, mf� �dr1 A A' 472 ,vr'Jc r F_ 5747ffl 0,v7 *dr Pz X rrt �175:ear7.-W/ 7l- C"f,D7c1V7S 1A1vry tsr lrr, .a►.,.s k sfA'c/ t�i'lG�tw D 7 rr x� x0' d.+•x�x.�.+f sF rvrs ,dr.0,d X M►4rn.,► srr�ss-red[ c«rvsrr! Si nature Date h 'Wrxv ro�1 &r'?.Wx Ar • /,7jt.''Wr Yft/,a- CrlL west D t•rPA"o 47 xs Fcrr 747:5 7110 ydrl �¢vD j taA �n r3�/ 7�J[ r'/lT�r7v'.vT.d W-V 4 <•01 t 744f 7rf %1' .vet rY � w✓<S .�S �a �.l r. r!i►vrrre�vduy� 7.0w : hr�ir/m �y r r rgrs y��,�.; - k,.tit� �n�� u1 �s�� y,r,,,►,v.�c �ocf�S ��ls�<rjrM�ry'J� Z!� d.►,o y1 �'; �rlxfTfs lia•- 3,D y,:'{t�p dXiltirarL�3 . ,..�...... �. ..... r .. . .. .._ .. _.• ... ... _ •'• 2..- k r.. _ r', ., ,... ,�.:2 .. 3. .ter � .. t ... �. �... ... „ 1. :. i. . �... .. _ ...... .�.. ... . .,. � .t� R 1: Lr %` e�y • �•C t f "^ 1 F' �". -1 ✓ :'{..:t�.htt. ; � -:1C :.y �r°G� r � �i t-i- j':.4- 'f' - 1s rORANGE COAST TITLE COMPANY ORANGE COAST TITLE COMPANY furnishes you the foregoing information for your sole use and benefit, subject strictly to the understanding that this information has been obtained from the current County Assessors Tax Rolls. On this basis, ORANGE COAST TITLE COMPANY verifies the information furnished and assumes no liabilty in excess of the fee charged for this report. Dated: ,-1 c/ F7 step anie Oglesbee Builder Services +W,r1. y A. NO N. TUSTIN AVENUE, SUITE i SANTA ' AHA CAUORNIA 92706 .714l66&Z83dt' r�yl r '.r • �� r.: ��i";y tit• - '•i:.et :•4.. LII•• :.yii•:�;R:4 r'r'• -� '1t•r-... 4 •::ir'y. i . •'i S n.:•tiY- i r a: • k nr .r.^. .,c *a' 'At. ..t ,rF ; 'Na.t.Sl:rY"7 i`1`.J:!•:.�9,t: i.r: r.lvta 7r:l s.`f'''�:4•i ��.�}?�:f. .f .rl• �;,q�%. .,,u •y::'�'.: �I• :tl. ..� .y} ci ."•."�..ri r:.,.+)n:�+y••� ;!r �� :►:;i�R=�S�fib•,+. `.�,ru�:=�t�.r;� v�;•4»�z �•. •.;,�. �� .��.;: • CITY OF NEWPORT DExci f PLANNING DEPART1--- A_ PLAN REVIEW REQUEST X—ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION Date March 2. 1987 X_PU8LXC'W0F='XXPJUtT1*=, X T�'rr C ENGINEER .X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) )FFIR.E DEPARTMENT PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. X — PLAN R M EW DIVISION — PAWS & RECREATION — POLICE DEPARTH M — MARINE SAFETY GRADING APPLICATION APPLICATION OF: Mesa Development Company, Inc. FOR: Residential Density Bonus and Traffic Study REQUEST TO: Permit the construction of a 15 unit low income development which— apartment _ce n t �de n 9, in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code. The Proposa the appro,�iaj _oE 1 also includes -related traffic study and a modification to the —Zonina Cods so as to allow Var:in s aces within the front one half nr the 18t which are not fu11q,enclosed with ara e doors. LOCATIOU: 849 Went 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: March 9, 1987 COKMISS1011 REVIEW. March 19, 1987 COK4ENTS: Signature Date 0 .4 Z. r'i Tz V • March 5, 1987 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS AND FINDING & CONDITIOINS OF APPROVAL TRAFFIC STUDY FINDINGS: 1. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. CONDITIONS: 1. That all improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 2. That a standard agreement and accompanying surety be provided in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improvements. 3. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian cir- culation systems be subject to further review by the Traffic Engineer. 4. That the water services be constructed per Mesa Consolidated Water District Standards. 5. That the intersection of the street and private drivee be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 30 miles per hour. Slopes, landscaping, walls and other obstruction shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight distance line shall not exceed twenty-four inches in -height. The sight distance requirement may be approximately modified at non -critical locations, subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer. 6. That landscape plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department and Public Works Department. 7. That curb, gutter and full width sidewalk be constructed along .,the 13th Street frontage; that the proposed drive apron be constructed per City Std. 166-L unless otherwise approved by the Public works Department; ar that the driveway have a minimum clear width of 26 feet; .r../ I�.��C. sae-.irv�e/s .� /f�r-15•�.. iBs �./.e�.I.c c/...r 8. That street, drainage and utility improvements be shown on standard improvements plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer. r,: .r. _P),.• � ��,��,�_� .r r. r, .+r�'.-? � y�1'.h �:.r-� ��r � f �P�' P�f x'ir� 1 4 i tJ: i•L March 5, 1987 Subject: Rsidential Density Bonus and Findings and Conditions of Approval Traffic Study Page 2 9. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, serer and storm drain facilities for the on -site improvements prior to issuance of building permits. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shill be the responsibility of the developer. 10. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 11. That the developer show proof that the subject parcel is a legal lot or that a parcel map be processed and recorded prior to issuance of any building permits. Don Webb City Engineer RLH:jd A !B .. tl';' .+ �'ir ._ .... :il .i • 4�.... r; � .. ,. i.•t.,'.'r .n. ._. .�t .. ?4 .. ..� .... ..i:�ii:..S :�>,<:� ��7�r �.iL;. 't`. -y{_Fti - iJ' -' ': \.x r t' -t e-:.lkfJ t i r _ Yq�- ti'�- -•i �•'-�' CITY OF nffPM SUCH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST X ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION X_PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X TRAFFIC ENGINEER X^_FIRE DEPARTMENT X PLAN REVIEW DIVISION PARKS & RECREATION POLICE DEPARTMENT _MARINE SAFETY GRADING Date March 2, 1987 X PLA?IS ATTACHED (PLEASE, RETURN) — PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. APPLICATION OF: Mesa Development Company, Inc. FOR: Residential Density Bonus and Traffic Study REQUEST TO: Permit the construction of a 15 unit low income_ apartment development which includes a 50 percent density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code. The proposal also includes the approval of a related traffic study and a modification to the Zoning Coda so as to allow parking spaces within the front one halt of the lot which are not fully enclosed with garage doors. LOCATION: 849 west 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: March 9, 1987 COMMISSION REVIEW: March 19, 1987 COMMENTS: Signature „Date .. .. :... , . �� ' :•w,.. ,,. , . _, .. . �. t.i•'".: �.:��, , i� - s ..-apt_ _�• ORANGE OOAST VTLE 41OMPANY P.O.A1BOX 4 ;ti25 ❑ 1W E_ wASHROGTON STREET SAlITA AH1� CA ate' 71 ! (714) 5%nX SUITE 2W GOLTOU, CA 92224 ❑ ORANGE COAST TITLE COV. PArrr of RIVERSIDE (71.4) e25-p" 1060 E. wASHINGTQrr STREET. SUITE 2W COLTON. CA 9M4 (714) e2&&,bW PRELIMINARY REPORT AiESA DEVELOPMENT • 2925 College #A3 Costa Mesa, Ca 92626 Date March 3, 1997 Attention; Your No Our No. 126574-5 Dated as of__. February 27, t9__ g7at 7:30 A.fd. In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, the Insurer hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring - refer against loss which maybe sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or reel to as an Exception below or not excluded from Coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, re r tions and Stipulations of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are sot forth In Schedule I and Schedule I (continued) attached. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. Thoy ure available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) Is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assume ereby. If it i5.Vesired that (la- bility be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title Insurance finder or C milmen should be requested. _+ - Title cer DON IBOY The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: "ran American Land Title Association Loan Policy - 1970 with A.L.T.A. Endorsee, ent Form 1 Coverage (amended 1047-70), loan policy." The estate or interest In the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report Is: a fee Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested In: JOSEPH H. tRAN4 an unmarried men, as to an undivided ore -half interest and ISHKNAN Y. SULTA NIAN and iLSE S. SULTANiAN, husband and wife, as joint tenants, as to. an undivided one-half Interest. - .. ;I: K- i,f .'•l`/1 L 1 f,i } tF_-,, , � rrJ Rli �:, iLr(-1 '- 1�. 1, Lf1 ii .}..�, .: L _ '. � 4 i• r..Y 4 ... 41 1.1 ii , �i��. � y-IJf1. ' 1 �s ♦ ef f + 'i 7 f ORDER NO. The land relerred to in this Report is situated in the State of California. County of Orange and is described as lolloivsi The East 72.60 feet of Lot 9179 First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, in the Costa Mesa County Water nistrkt, as shown an a map thereof Wall In Pxmk 4 Page 61, Miscellaneous Maps, In the offke of the County Recorder of said Orange County. At the date hereof exceplions to coverage in addition to the Excehlionx and Exclusions in said policy forrn would be as follows: A. The following taxes have all been paid and are reported for proration purposes only. General and Special Taxes for the fiscal year 1996-1987. Total Amount $1,361^ First Installment $782.77, Second Installment $782.77. Code Area 07-0119 Assessors Parcel. No. 424-011-06. Exemption None. B. Any additional amounts of general and special taxes which may be assessed by reason oft (a) Reappraisal of the property values as of March 1,1975; (b) Improvements added subsequent to March 1,1973; (c) Change of ownership subsequent to March 419731 (d) Any final "ment deter-mininll Article 13A as added to the Constitution of the State of California, toeing Invalid, unconstitutional, or having been Improperly applied. C. The Hen of supplemental taxes, If any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Section 73, et Seq. of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. t ...y4:. 5!. it'' Ji ':i.. .['•.. '.is �•: i�r;i �; "tom •I `.i tiY: •: Exotptions Cominued...1362. I. A Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of $13,500.00, and any other amownts payable under the terms thereof, recorded April 9, 1968, in Book 8567, Page 359, ©fficlal Records natedt February 4 1968. Trustor: Ries Camera Co., Inc., a California corporation. Trusteet Alleghany Investment Co., Inc., a California corporation. Beneficlary: Lena M. Pan^ a widow. I)B:vt (665) Policy Rates Regular Enclosures: Plats ORANGE289AST-T Q?.0. BOX 11925 SANTA ANA. CA 92711 (714)SSO.2836 TLE 4ROMPAW ❑ 939 W. FOOTHILL BLVD, UPLAND. CA 91796 (714) 981.5108 ❑ ORANGE COAST TITLE COMPANY OF RIVERSIDE 3773 UNIVERSITY AVE. • P.O. BOX 1326 RIVERSIOE, CA 92501 • (714) 781.6500 ZENITH 7."M LENDERS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT Report No.: Our No- 126574.5 Your No.: RE. The above, numbered report (including any supplements or amendments theretoi is h reby modified and`or supplemented to reflect the foddering additional items relating to the issuance of an American Land Title Association Loan Policy - 1970 with A.L T A. Indorsement Form 1 Coverage f ame^ded .0-17-70): ( ) ALTA Inspection Report to follow ( X) No survey will be required. Our ALTA Policy, when issued. will irnlude CLTA Indorse- ments No. 100 anti No 116 849 West 15th Street, Newport Beach Said Land is also l nown as _.___-_.--_—__-- —. County of State of California. a single family residence Title Officer DON BOYN1TON According to the public records there have been no conveyance of the property described In this report within a period of six months prior to the date of this report, except as foilowst None. :. . • ��'• a:: _', : tits;: . • SCHEDULEI • CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COYERAOE POLICY — 19Y3 SCHEDULE Thfs pocky does rot insure againsl loss or damage, row against costs, &ltorrwya. fees or ex by reason of the following:, any or all a which antes PW t - 1. Taxes or &ssessmants which are not shown as axisling (&+chiding lout not limited to building and zoning rase by the records of any taxing outhorittr that levies taxes ordinances) restricting Or regulating or prohlblgrg 1M Of a @Uffo$Ms on rear properly or by the public records. occupancy, use or enjoymeM of the land, or regulating the Ffft ings by a public agency which may mull to Char&cter, dimensions or location a any improvement now Wft a assessments, or notices of such prouedinge, whether or not Nawn by the records of such agency Or by Of hereafler erected on the land, or prohibiting & eeparWon in ownership or a change In the dimensions or am$ of the Ow public records. WW or any purl of which lbw land Is or was a put. 2. Any facia, rights, interests or china which an not whether or not Shown by the public records at Dale of allow n by the public records but which Could be ascertained Policy. Of the select of any 001100n of any such law, by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of ps" ordwWO or governmental regulation, whether or not In possession thereof. shown by IN public records at Date of Policy. i Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims there&, tl. ROW of eminent domain or governmental rights of ~ an not shown by fha public records. ponce power unless notice of the exercise of ouch rights d. Discropancles, conflicts In boundary lines. shortage In appeus in the public records. area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct b. Detects, liens, encumbrances. adverse cia;rns, or other survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the manors. (a) whether or not shown by the public records at public records. date a policy. but created. caused, suffered, assumed or & (a) Unpatentad mining claims: (b) reservations or agreed to by the Insured claimant; (b) not shown by the exceptions in patents or In Acts authorizing the Issuance public records and not otherwise excluded from coverage thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or but known to the Insured claimant either at Data of Policy ar not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by at the date such claimant acquired an estate or Interest Ow public records. insured by this policy or acquired the Insured mortgage and & Arty right, title, interest, estate or easement in land not disclosed In wr sting by cite insured claimant to the beyond the tines of the area specifically described of Company prior to the date such Inaured claimant became an referred to in ScheduM A. or in abulling streeta, roads, insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no Ios& or damage to the avenufa, &hays. lanes. ways or waterways. but nothing in insured claimant; (d) attaching Or created subsequent to this paragraph shall modify or limit the extent to which the Data of Policy, or (e) resulting In foss or damage which ordinary right of an abutting owner for &cuss to a would not haw been sust&ined If the insured claimant had physically open street or highway Is Insured by this policy. been a purchaser or encumbr&ncar for value without 7. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation knowtedle. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY-1974 EXCLUSIONS in addiilon to the exceptions in Schedule 0, you are not insured against toss, costs, atlorneys' fees and expenses resulting franc I. 0,0vernmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This Includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and rpulatlons concemtn land use Improvements on the land land division environmental protection This exclusion does not IkM the zoning coverage desaibed In Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks, 2. The right to take the land by condemning It, unless a nolke of taking appears in the public records on the Policy Date. 3. Title Rl"- that are created, allowed. or agreed to by you that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date — unless they appeared In the public records. that mull In no loss to you • that first affect your tMb after the Policy Date -- this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage In Mere 10f Covered Tibor i1RWW d. Failure to pay vMue far fm ti1M.. S. Lack of a right to any land outside the am specifically d&se toed and referred 10 In Item 3 of Schedule A ' . In striets, allay&, a wstarwayt 1hN loucf� ypur t&etd.' ':• • . This exclusion does. not limit the access eoverspe In MMn 5 of Covered TWO Rlske, C•: t '. /'..i.,, i •' nth '.tr' T' , , ,. ..l, CIA•'. is . :•r 1�i 4 ir'• . L' ., .. .. . . C, ':M t-' , ;�`..: ,. • '.5:...': �. .. ._ .: 1. ,. . -._.•,._ a�:>, _,.r��:,.1L._��.��..�1_`��ta^t.._... r :r�:. :r.��•�,;rr.•_ev=.ca,:-'�- x... _��_�,` _ _ :.t ._ ., .. _ 't-_. � . � SCH EDULE 1 (Continued) AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY-1970 WITH A.L,T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE (AMENDED 10.17.70) SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy: 1. Any 1a►r. ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning (irth. nances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the Occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regrilarling the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or herealter erected on Ilia land, or pr(Jfril)it• rng a separation In ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the (11 f ecl of any viola_ tion of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exorcise of such rights appears in the public records at Dale of Policy. g. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created• suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; lb) not known 10 the Company and not shown by the pubtir, records but knovm to the insured claimant either at Dale of Policy or at the date such claimant acil,rlrnel nn estate or Interest Insured Cy this policy or acquired this insured mortgage and not disclosed In wr11181q by Ilu1 insured claim• ant to Itto Company prior to the data ouch insured claimant became an Insured loargtrndrrr; pj resulting In no In9s rr damage to the insured ctairnant: (di attaching or created subso(iuent to Uate of f'a,tlr,y (e.cop, 10 IN.. u,ranr insurance is altorded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or rnatoriaf or to the extent inswisrio•g is afforded herein as to assessments for street improvements unCer construction or completed at Uuta of Policy), 4 I.1nr:nlprLrabilily of the lien of the insured mortgage because of failure of the insured at Date of Policy or of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness to comply with aphlI obte "doing business" laws of the state in which the land is situated. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM 8•--1970 (AMENDED 10.17.70) SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and Zoning or(Il• nances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or rugulaling the character, dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohillil• Ing a seaaration in ownership or a reduction In the dimensions of area of the land, or the effect or any violation of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appear in the public records at Dale of Policy. Defects. bens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant, (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insurn_d claimant either at Date of Policy or at the data such claimant acquired an estate or interest by this poker and not disclosed in w riling by the Insured claimant to Iho Company prior to the date such Inc -sited claimant bocnmu an insured hereunder; (c) resulting In no loss or damage to the Insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Data of Policy; (a) resulting In loss or damagewhich would not have been sustained if Ilia Insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. itOtMr 4A31tonto s fir rerkF-V '3Wk* This k Now a Oirt •rw �it it ttM IAnMate d ated bwm WO MWOM tO StMft IN Other (And, NO UN4 is MUMW by raw d w � r#Mno twrron," � N, I J 711 K 02 AN lD 3Kr mKf l rACl MAN r-a NMI . Ap1110[t am i awrmw .. Al ICrT� �l�Rq�• X ►YCII MVMNtl �If. �('•�r � �•S• - Ste: l':}IG i,7' '. i. �'r. !' ,I.F. •1 .�:/!:. }. .. —.yY. __ - t,� J - .! .r• 'tit .I S r t jI' � � .. "�>. r 'F •.f • 1I1 �•s'. •• I .•1' •J Y•. rf;. ,:��Y .1. C ..t .5�:• f. -�'r'`'- ^ell I:i. •t%�`��.;' '1 .r..'.'�i.. i'•7; �, +:isr'. ,: Tr-: .. s• i��' .7 t, .�' 1�'Fl. .. •.! `f' a a J •1 ••1S � ry, 3 .J.! �I�.. ..ti'^..j. �:'-.;'.�'S •. - :j•}:. � �f.... •�}Zt{ .y ;3.d„ 9' ftS. S. 4`. !. �'1. '•��itr' .i. •f•'i"a`�:'�p!' ..LG .41::! �`'' tl' .I 7. 1.. .�r Y, rFs„ f}+!, y,'�I' f, s 1.° 1. C: . f.. t. �F.: :�'1� 4�.1� a.,t •'. •� rl'' _ JUG... t ` 'sy . {, p=: .. i.. •�:! cr?'i:"1..( k a 'i1. :F r:� d-. 1+�• �,� Y .,r'f.. -!� {ii �J ;' f.'sl"'i s1��J il'�7d. .I �� ,•r; F.a t„�.h.. �t'�x.��'+fi�w�`�4��'R��'�rii��i•C=...t�i�:�:'�._yib8'�a.Y-'•...��t�i.'!�+��ti!S.dtf:�41:G.: ^rl: .1.<•.�,?ai.':isS�A.S:S•t` 1"r,�r.1:S..�rii1'�:,t:�S'y,:-::,v.t�t��;1�•�'":�;ySf,IG� aw =A L!- lr.l.aWFASlo W. Ono fl. ha M awa hhl ell pUN�� e ... • I.owlfit.. �•. �:�,. elxwrw• a/wlr I/. l ff.� teerl 18*II Iell Joel lee e1eeee1e4 !ii 4CAW~$* as I141 N,ti a r/al,r. rr r - CO-6 a- 1w11 /jowl NH 44" a a. War/u•/CU T fr" •+ +" w Lrallrrrrry (;ur �uruli�►i� {;rural f)�y•�I Tb Mr /v • •/1/aNwnl/./erral/w1 w.rg1 rlrirA rir 4 r1lr.�lnlenl 1 aJr r.� OMOMOIN.4 a C�fir..w r oelMlei tw �r re,�rrrllll w �� t. >n>+� � Iw■eTf�/ � « e. � wenuw ee+•lalr r.e..,as w�we c� fes �, wtrrtn� . �ea�ueif ales eggsM met eaeeeRe M v Iar WL...+a ,-rlo*4 rr/I I�1�.r1k M rh• 4alrr/a.rasrd errs 1•�f •f � . Nwa .f l'aLLw11l/ Mo "Ile rflM hat M see pf N eYl the nret selee a 11a,N.e �.. fie. w e>,,f. Pep 41 ele.wu1weeea w,..,eNa.e of ` la 1rrk,... M1urwll, r:l r.Irl/kraf /Irk M• r a....l .l• n.q..1i. nrnw ■nl val I., !. alha..l M+y+ta ur.l re. ilk• Ij MfllalaM Iw lir nM1I4 NY il■ IM,alera Wf wllr/rrrd l4r•rknl ■ k i �rrtwiary D w. ftwmb a n/ sort welt so/ 107e pr� awe • Ir.M/ /kati+ � �a,,,,a1 1.r•..� al...wr ' impo `ar � tf t. urmyes ekar Ia.wa M "law eaWalrur t#+m a/ w Y V lal a•nr+.�/wwlwl low won Ina ak. bow 4d "Womb A�� a. F �1 l•M M! F�a/1.�+/ lad eN �M ..N T� h ISM '- �� awrr A61rw /r/r• • fe11p i �� • 16r • • am N ^` l/ //• All 4 ai - mine • aw VA t _+ 1: %.r`�.r. �V if i� 6 CI'C�,p+y#ti� A61. ._SiY g�,2�.�� •1."idS. •`.1$'�r?�l�a�-'Ii4;{i[.�M,�f��.S!',.yt+7E��°a.i.t�. k...+.f.S�l, .�,.,/.Nn�=�•L1-+E..}�y�eF Yi��'iaiac��Sv�. :-71: i;1-7 -.1—el�s!'77--ci7zi—WN e$� i A .21 M- is .f e$� i A .21 M- is .f Fu AN ni vif MESA DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. POST OFFICE BOX i974 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92= December 17, 1986 TELEPHONE (714) 979.9ni , Mr. James D. Hewicker Director City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92663 ' J11V3 * sI;l 1:j0811311 4" i-10 } m13'J r� Dear Mr. Hewicker: I '0-.3l I''` We at Mesa Development have entered into an agreement to build apartments with Joseph Irani and Ilse Sultanian on their lot, located at 849 W. 15th Street in Newport Beach, also known as The East 72.60 feet of Lot 917, First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, in the City of Newport Beach, as per map recorded in Book 8, Page 61 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County. This property is currently designated for R-2178 development. The parcel is 72.60 by 300, which is 21,780 square feet or 1/2 acre. We are proposing a fifteen (15) unit apartment development, all units having two bedrooms, which would remain affordable for thirty (30) years to lower income families. This development would require a fifty percent (50%) density bonus, which we are hereby requesting. In order to achieve the proposal affordability standards, we are requesting that the City: (a) wave all park, fair share and application fees, (b) permit open covered parking and; (c) grant a density bonus from the prevailing twenty (20) units to the acre to thirty (30) units to the acre. We further request that the City allow the use of Section 8 Certificates (vouchers) and the prevailing Section 8 Fair Market Rent schedule for all the units in this development. If it is determined that this development, as proposed, is consistent with the City's affordable housing, please assist us in being placed on the calendar as soon as possible for the necessary Planning Commission and the City Council hearings. If it is detrmined that this project, as proposed, creates any conflicts with City policies or regulations, please meet with us at your earliest convenience to discuss and resolve these conflicts. We are looking forward to another successful project in Newport Beach. Sin Ferely, ames G. white, Jr. /rah h _r /�.'4» .it<r t1. h. U.r•• t.,%i', .7 �. 1. .i. -y ! 1.. t-1 ir11Z December 8, 1986 The City Of Newport Beach Planning and Building Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 To Whom It May Concern: I am the owner of the property located at 849 Went 15th Street in Newport Beach. I am seeking to develop thin property for affordable housing and am authorizing Mesa Development Company to act in all matters with the City of Newport Reach concerning the development of this property. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very ruly yours, Jo eh Irani r•• •j. k�%��`..'.! �'.� '.�.IR� � :ji --� Y 4: wJa:�'1'*' ' P '�, �L, i:. •fir.. .�: K. _;.` ��,'K•' age AUS"N•FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC. I TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING February 13, 1987 Mr. Rich Edmonston City Traffic Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 SUBJECT: 15th Street Apartments TPO Dear Rich: 1450 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE, SUITE 108 SANTA ANA. CAL$FORNIA 02701 TELEPHONE: (714) A61-0490 Attached are the one percent tests for the proposed 15th Street Apartments. The project passes the one percent test at all locations. For trip generation purposes, the City of Newport Beach apartment trip rates have been utilized. The trip rates and peak hour trips are summarized in Table 1. The: trip distribution associated with this project has been established by field observation of existing travel patterns from other developments in the immediate vicinity of the project site, and -%asignment to Coast Highway and Newport Boulevard based on other TPO studies. Traffic entering and exiting a similar project in the vicinity of the site was counted to determine the directionality of project traffic. Approximately 45 percent of traffic entering and exiting the site will be oriented towards the north and will have no impact on the intersections tested. The trip distribution pattern presented in Figure 1 illustrates our beet estimate of project traffic patterns. The project site is currt-.ntly a vacant lot. The site currently generates no appreciable traffic; therefore, the project receives no credit for existing traffic. This 'project satisfies the TPO process in terms of mitigation required of critically impacted intersections. If you have any questions regarding the above, please call. Sincerely, Jreust, PE JEFlbgw Attachments r 1:. - ..•.t-�' .,.:� '�;: Ili::, F�},i.4i.>•��'� '�,'ti,...; J•.�•y': ;,y�:Y: :: ryy °x�'et; `�:1 �1•d,:�, :lH••.L . .r. ". �1 J•i2,'. 'Jq� '�..!'ii'�`. }. �i..i •i ,, �.t •...�..� -d r^71Ui.'�:eJ!�e1�?Yam,�.t:,Ti?-"�:t1:.'`>,+'tr.::•;se;::�',i+:iF:'';:i.,'l� I f Jw�.,..\''et �r �chG_IV�I', �y�f"`�i 1.�,i'-��9.`.�ia:�>;�J-4• �`...!-,{'••t:"i'..;. •.� ,,.-y.-•_.l�,.i;�•� {r.{ HI . � Y Table 1 TRIP GENERATION --AK RATE— --PM RATE-- --Ali TRIPS- --PH TRIPS -- USE SIZE Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit 15th Street 15 DU .1 .3 .4 .2 2 4 6 3 Apartments - .: r.�'� �'-�e• .fit' ,'.t.3` :ram ,x.l • 1 ,:=►•tJa r' '..,4 i �'3 J ''s i ♦ e'J.• ...i ;' '.?,.:;��'' :••i ras4 . a '.�=i.?x.. . T".. d t p � � • `£.i�•.. . � G :...ct;'o Ez' . �I'� i:i:r�.+.: i::i � •,'.,.J'?Y • • ,ia ' :: ' t ,�. .'q? �q}��'l? ''�� ✓r• � >• '+?�.. �,'q,4 �•'•':�'..��a a rf.l{ - ...•irr t •.� :.�' •'-lY�` � �"�-.':1 .�'.a 4?: .��::•. � r�`t�, .: ;.. :f:.f:St,.0 }t i��1�}}" �y.:.��yy r q,„ ,�, �` ��,,,/�� j�_ s• r ��• ��5� .�. .. r"'r• • i"""f� itl�y t � t. ��.•_ 1.�.� rT'`�:1:}!f�'�w _. .�1*J'i �'1it•:1f".iir;�. ,�e� .t'a4rt rf fi■�.k:J l�• 0.`s"�'G:�ir.r�i.*.' .� i! • t. N 11 b45% ,15th Street 45s 20% ■ 5% 4. 30R �p / 3Q• 5% 30V'ft- 30�`�► 30% r5• Lldo .. 51k 25% 5! �� 25• 'o Pigure }[� �. � �t/ •' - •i'•' RIP, DISTRIBUTION' AND.ASSI47�lC�IT � C. • '�i� ��►s�r+uis� `'�•,, i.. {i�. f, a -.S 4 .�l11�.. .py.. i f _ t ( .,.�'L`:.,y!.. � '. y ;� �`.�"F'. in ,}� ��i.1�J 4�.��G. .i •Jn .. 4 S l ,Y f� s. Fk N\5�!i Ib' .i.t•.. Ipti.i1� la`.'. n.] .Z:i�4'n`i i �a' 42 1•; fi ,fiA�3""f7: vC. ,y�. .. L•. .ki• V.. .1 �. fl h:�'.1 �/'.ln d.V ✓i, tLl. JJ _ ls� ��!•r-t��a .a } "'7r -Y~' �. «•f 'r d}3�'�3p��;•~'� � Y''LS5 �i. ��}'� ry�,�vF, "T"iur_,l; jFi .? �-- k - r. ' ? t iy rti -r . It Traffic him Aesiysis Intersections Coast Key ! ilrasa St E:istint Traffic Volwn Based 0 Await Daily Traffic Vinterilpillaq m Afl Peat 2 112 Hour Approve: AFFrouk airectlen Evistin; Peat 2 1/2 Hour lee4iaal Projects irentlt Peat 2 112 Haar Projected Peat 2 112 Hour It of pro t:ted Peal 2 Proje:t Volume Volume Volume Volune 112 Muir Volume Peak 2 112 Hoar Volume Ilorthilimod 22 0 p Soathi}oacd 210 ._»_---- 0 0 ____----------------- 2I0 .. V».......... »...... ».. 8_.-__. Eastbtcad --------------»._»_...._�_.». 5537 --------------------------------------------- 221 1309 _.._..»_.M 7061 11 ---- 1 kstbo'.nd 2314 .... ------ 95 484 ................ 2953 ....................... 30 2 __> Project Traffic is estinted to be less than, 11 of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volwe. Project Traffic it ntisated to be ggreater thus It cf Projected Pall 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intarsectioa Capacity Uttli:aticn II.C.U.) Analysis is required, FRCJE.Tt IStI St ApartmFnts FULL 0'Cj?AN:f TER.: 19ta Austin -Foust Assm Irc. '; • Cale. bite 0211218�1: ,;- i Y • q;t�i .rd ��AlrS�t:.�W.i<:1iU.•et•��i:...::i.l..ri !Y. r «._. �..e: �:>�?.+::_.... .:..::rite rl.'�:'��'J�1.L A.. .ee h• •7 '� . i�} i Mtn'- '•}. . . v t••': )��„, :%err;•. f+. .. F. I. __��Y. S. .. .Y. �. }I�.. a^q.�l. _ .1. . JJ.-,. ^...._� ...... •...r �.c.�?_... .t_;.'sY�.%:u} ..., ,..Y:: t. c.. ta. i. n, `; J� ;a,1i� �/_ �r '1 :7:::i',':►L- ; 1.. ',r •_fi•' '�. L� - �- -)- .. ;{ ✓ -fa i -'? {. '.,1°' rK+i K! _2 Y. •Sfi!,_ . 1>< Traffic Wlmw Mal�►sit .. tatanectio': Cast fin 1 OrM41 St ' faisticl Traffic Wtmmes lased m irorale W.Ir Traffic dieter/feria' 16 Fn Peak 2 112 Moir Atpcned 6�raacl� Direction Eaistiy Peat 2 112 Now 2"i"al Prefects kaeth Peak 2 112 Mew Projected Peat 2 112 Maur It of Projected Peal 2 troject Volume Volume Wlwe Volume 112 Moan Volume Peat 2 111 Hour Volume Mortt�ta+cd 113 »•.•_a.«_.N•.N.•.N_NN.•M.•.rw».........a_•NN 0 0 11I 1 0 5a:thEau 132 0 0 132 .......................... 1 aa..... 1 __«».-_._._«•«.r_...•«»••-Na_.............»NN.....-a.►_a........ «--_.---r . East�oun: 1709 141 I11 /114 11 2 8estbwd 3631 N»»...... a . .................. ».... aa........ »... 226 1214 ..... ........_«--------�»a_. _.»_.....«a._._..»_.»_....... ................•......_..--------...... 7161 12 —...... N_»»-._... 1 N..._. ■7 Project Traffic is estimated to 11 less ti►am It of Projected Flat 2 112 ticw Traffic Volume/ Pro jrt Traffic is estimated to to ►eater than It of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Must. I ersettics Cyacity Utilization (I/C.U.) A--slysis is repirod. ISM S. •«_...._._.•.. YEdiis Ills z Austir.-f'orst Asst:: � � ' Ckc. his 0/12/11 �t + .•1 �1. t. PV-+.7xY M-:'ja ri s i r s -7'� 16 r �;;�� _ .. ji`�'4.vn z mac: '' :w 7 u;'!.. •� It Traffic hleute lmalysis . 1' 1i Ictersectianr Last fty f Pr"wt St Esistioq Traffic Volusas lasel en Rwap gaily Traffic #inter/SPriq 8S AR teal T 112 Roar fy;rore4 Approach Direction Eristi29 Peak 2 1/Z Hour blional Wouth Projects Peat 2 112 Hour PraJe:ted Peat 2 112 Rw It of he rcted Psai 2 11� Protect Volume Muse wlm Val-ise Nw. Yolwe Peat 2 1/2 kur Volvo* krthbaand 144 0 0 144 1 0 sautbbound 400 4 0 »»..» __.. .......... »..» 400 ............................. 4 0 Eastbund --_.._.__»»__--__._--__.»_-------------------- 4521 181 1316 ................ .. 6018 ..................... 10 .......... I ilestband ----».___»------........_---»--------••---_».»»------»•_»__ 2454 48 »--------------...___ 464 3041 ............................... u ...__........................... 2 u3 Project Traffic is estimated to be leis than It of Protected Peal 2 112 Roar Traffic iblume. Project Traffic is estimated to be gqreater than It of Protected Peak 1/2 Hour Traffic Valure. lnterwtios tya:ity Utilizatlor, II.C.U.I Analysis is repaired. -- FRUECT: 13a. Et Aya.•tre-t; Wre Date 0/1247 T h�.=:�f _ S rr _ ! � '•1 j 1. 1 1� } f- ! `f - - �l.r 1 - t -T! � 'fly if.1 :'rb5} It Traffic wswe flylpis 14tersutiont Coast wy ! Prxwt At Ulsti4q Traffic N4lumes kwg ea Arerafe Daily traffic fainter/ipriny t6 P11 Peak 2 112 flour Approrod !#Froth Directica E,istinq Regional Projects Projected Peak 2 1/2 hour iroatA Peak 2 It of fro�ected Project � 112 Peak 2 1/2 Pour Volume Volwe Volume Valve Feas 2 l/ gow VON Peak 2 1/2 Noun Voldee Morttbouad --------»----------- 117 0 0 117 _._...w_...«............ 1 0 whbount ----... ._.__.«—_--__.............. 260 0 0 260 ..... 3 ............. ..__ 0 ----»--- ---------- ------- -----_._-»............ ............»««........ ............................ � Eastb=ne ----------- $311 132 U1 4344 ---------------- —--- -------------- 41 «—_ 2 kstb3ofid ----»---...—_-»----._—_...--__..---- ---»_—..... ..... — ................... 0...... __ _ _««--- M 240 1284 7316 73 1 ............. ---------- _.-------- M--------------------- ---___-_ ;=3 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1t of ProiectW Peak 2 112 Hoar Traffic Volume. Project Traffic 1s estimated to be renter than It of Pro acted Peak 2 1/2 !four Traffic voluae. fn asectioc CARRY Utilitaticn 11.C.C.1 Analysis is required. • I y � G 'TT. _7�' r �r2 s Ji<_ •.ij .ti kr:.4:'SC - a --� - "'it ,ti i-� J ;- rr--. Ko:- ;;L�.C�+N.� -d' wT sv - _ r) - _ r.: r ,,.{ `i, e � 1" -� r'�R 5•. r t .� .F q r .. xy .1 i��1}.�..+a. 11 Traffi: Vain* Analysis loteructian: Coast Nrr if !alto, tivd/Supticr Av E:istinq Traffic Values Sued w-Averap 1gly Traffic Yirterl4rJnq Et Ar Peak 2 1/2 hour f�;rcved Aptroa:b Rlwtict Esistinq Peak 2 1/2 Hour Reglonal kouth Projects Peat 2 112 Isar Projected Peat 2 1/2 Hour It of Protected ieal 2 l/1 Project ••..w+�«1... Voluu w.r..«..« r.....«.w.....ra...«.......w.«w«« Voluk Value@ Volume Harr Volume Peat 2 112 Nour Volume NortMawd —«««.r«w!1.l...«r.—...!•« 1926 a ------ w.......r..•..., 6 w................►rr...wr.r... 1992 r..a...........w«s 20 a 5063eiaw ..r.w...r........ 604 .w ................. 0 .............../«� ............ 19 ««..««.........w........«.. 623 i ..... «. 2 . Eastiewd .. w..«.....a.wl...««««..«......«.rr.l.«a.aa«a. 4137 I66 .... ... 1002 ....«e.=.�.y........ 53Z w.................... 73 ........ «. 1 �etta��nd 1104 44 210 «....l...wa.a..«... 1653 ......................... 19 ... 0 �> Project Traffic is estiested to be lest tban It of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Value. Project Traffic is estimated to 6e gqreator than 11 of Projjected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volute. lntersrttion Cape ty Otili:atiol i1.C.D.1 Analysis Is required. �f rry PR",..'=tT; :stb :t Apartteats. FEEL otc! =,.t TER:. ilf8 ...... ..w....................«.......... ..�..«..r_---._.......w.ww.«........w..r..,,........:«.» AU6.1446st • Assoc• 1 lac.. - • .. .'•t ° i' ') •. ti:, ;.._ .sky ', • .. .i' � • .l_ • .. .. . . . •. 't r'h• .. ..s_.�.:l.�v�'.a7ifJF+i" �.._: ... -r :+:'.. .. _ ...e ...� .i�rr�r.., arL+.r'Y:-:ti ._ -Sr•. :i.. _... ��r �:..._... ... ._'e .... `S',.. r .. .S_... a ..r �Y.:'r'�_.. .. �h-:�1_rl.] [rr±.. _.4f�i:, s '' i'.T Ti��L'��j�'�,:� � !�-�7� �� i�t � `:1} r '�.'rx a �� r :�ty }- Y • �- r .ri It Traffic Volwe Analysis Esisting Traffic Voliies h :d oor. Overage Dailydtraffic Y1Rter1Sprinq 1i kprouh Qirecticn Feasting Peak 2 1/2 Hoar ValYne Peat 2 112 bar Reyiar.4; iro■th Volwe A;prayrd Projects Peat 2 1/2 Hour Voluae projected Peat 2 1/2 Hour Vo;uae It of prejecM Peak Ibw project Peal 2 112 Hour Volul! Ilorthbcund -..........._»__-- 1733 M.a_-»--........_........ 0 •47 1642 14 0 Soathbound 4297 0 224 _»».._.w».................................... 4521 45 1 Eastbound 436E 175 972 5315 55 2 1lestbound 6322 2m 1014 76 0 93) Project Traffic is estiiited to be less than 11 of Projected Peat 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Yoluee. pro 2t112allov TrafficaVoltm. bIsiriieticeaCapacof ityPUtiliiition I1.C.U.1 Analysis is repirit. ;ACISCT: 1Stt St A.partseets Fl.! OC.'"sJ>s/i7t:4 Yi:f: S9s"5 »«_._....._. «_.._.»M........»..»-................ _...................... ..........«~ ..... M........... f;�tiin-F�ust Asloc..1'Inc. GIc. Date 02112/17 r •t� A .... �-a�i"et. .. , ... _.a.. �... .....=: ae:dt.tx. �-e1.•.�. •'L, :�L'�<i�cd�i�� :i y. .*•:�,• i:'','' .4ae ..,:� i �, [<.._i.. .��s ..:�,. ..: m•i''�:- ..- --.,. =^..vim•— �-fr.� `• _^l _ `-?� 'xF,7t'�! r •. �ti r r :e .t. 3 '�- � r.. �! . t' � • �Z �k i'-:': '::; ti" .' >♦ � i'.� a 1: e � II Traffic Volga lealrsis Existing TrafficrmVotwei Stud Onn A±eRAP 4ii1YATriffic hinter/Spring k An 40roech Direction Eeiiting Peak 2 112 Maur Peek 2 112 Hoyr Regional iroeth Ayprcred Projects Peak 2 112 Hour Projecte, Peif 2 t/2 Hour It of Pro�Kted Peik 2 Project ect VoSaaa Yoluee Volute Volute ll Hti Volrae leak ? Hour Volaee rorti bawd 140 a 34 131 1 4 Southbound 169 0 42 Sat g _.....��._»----------»----_.__��------------------------».._w. 4 EaSO=d 022 lot 1091 .................. 7514 75 --------»----------------- 2 and ---- ---------- _.__�...___�-- 48 ----_..._-_. 1� .... ........................ 4044 41 1 �f Project Traffit is estieated to be lets thin It of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Values. Peak 2t112 Hout Trafficevalues. lreia#ctr tior. Ciji:it, U ilizaison 11.C.U.1 Aealysis is required. FMIM: 15tt, --.-»_._...._..._ FLU C'_L"1FAKY YEAR: 19E3 : Aultin-Foust Aisoc., Inc. air?^.�;�1: �� _ .� ' • • �' •t t•- y�� Ct f .'1�•5...�1�}°.;.-, t.. .. �•k. 'e.4.4Y.•• f• ..-..5 ,.• ...ycr�. �.r•1 ..._ ..-...f: �. .S�f.'.. fS... talc. late t•.: d r..r._fi.L':'J.'-_(?:±}n,t.•!J'if:s�..l:-.. .. ., :'.!'..x.._,f.. ._..,. ..:.r _..�k\i •c�t 4,7;':�y-�i�F�' 4r rrirr } r :r`_ }�- S`i; ?, • m ,,`,. }' a r,(. .ri'a � M �+`•ir�i + ' k�Y ) K f ..Sh n ? a:�`Slsr .•1'•if It Traffic Volpe Analysis latersKtiant Coast "my I! Ritierside AV Existing Traffic Volms lased oa Average Daily Traffic Yiaterllgring Bb Fr Approach Dirtttia= Existing Peat 2 112 Hour Peat 2 112 Hour Approved fegioul Projects Projected It of Projected Project Volute ftro■tb Peat 2 112 Hour Peat 2 1/2 Hour VCIus Volutt Volute Peak 2 1/2 Hcur Valets Peak 2 112 Hour -..---»_.___-----•---------._.-------------��...----- Volute lorthbouN ------- 44 ---- ----------------------------------- .... --.....---...... 0 0 44 --........ -.................. 0 0 whboW ------------- 1296 ---------- — -------- ------•....... ----._ 0 41 1337 ---- —---- ----- ....... .......... .......... 13 --........... 0 Eastbmd 6040 _... _-..—............ --- 47 1343 7480 ... — ................ 75 ... 2 .-.--- 1estboun. 5586 ------------------------------------- 14 1329 7003 --------------------- �3 Project TraffIt is ntieated to be less than it of Projected Ptak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volute, Project Traffic is estimated to be gqreater than It of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volute. fateriection Capacity Utilization fI.C.U.I Analysts is rquirta. PRW C7s 1501 5t Acarteants FU:L CiCO .f �r t 11ls -_.. .. _------------—..-�-_.................. ------------- _..... -----... --.... -_........... --... Aastin-Fast Assoc., Jet. .:4..�,. ..•.. •'Ci!). .�{P'. �. ,.... �. •.i.:1... _a_J._.._.. .... �....I., ....._ate __.... �. id, y...Y. �. Cale. Date, 02112117. Y i 1 'f.{ ea:T�S:,r i�i. iw i� f':+i�.m � �3 t :' a . +: t '" •Jt'� '�' �, ��'i'a J, / ��fi •1 :r;-}��4 .i� s4�r i�R`ta.��`s �, �iF :!_ -`. t:l � `I vey�, r�i,:�7i''."r.'';•:,:., t;' 'r-r 1 .�. a, _ _ ��4Y� 4. 1 -f l��• 1. _ Y- l �• i_ 1'hlrr v - �11 I • 3 it Traffic Yalu" Arralysls IAtersectiae: Coast Hoy t Tustin Av WSW; Traffic Values lased on Arerare gaily Traffic luster/kria4 Si AN Peak 2 112 How AyArored Avroach Eeistial Ae9iml Projects Projected Pirettiea Peak 2 112 Heer irooth Peak 2 1/2 Haar peak 2 1/2 Hosr 12 of Projected Peal 2 in liar Project Project Values valves Values Values hlsee Peak 2 slow Vol4ee Morthbound 11 4 ll ........._._....... .......... 4 0 w..—--------- ..«r.__«w—._._aw-w. Southbound 116 13 129 4 1 •..w.+rruw--- ------------MwMw.ri60B 0 -_--------- Eastbo5�81 f8 1033 .......aad ---•----_.__ w wstbaan4 320 52 1043 /341 «rwr..www.w_.•«_.«_. . ... M................ 43 . ...................... ... 1 as) Project Traffic is estieattd to be less than It of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Voluse. Project Traffic is estiestsd to be gqrater than It of projected Fes2 112 Hour Traffic Voluss. Intersettion Capa*,ity Utili:atia, II.C,IJ.1 Analysis is re{aired. PPCZF_Ts-1Stk-5t_+_�rteents ..rr__«--««'—_-w------------»----___.«_r----------•_+.++w__...+«�............... FaL 0-.Ct'PAt,.Y rm: 19i9 . Agstin-ftust Rifa., late. Glc42/12161;';, ,..af,, �'1�yy i. :tJFf. i 1 - r ♦ � . a "j:; `- • , ., -. �•ti �• '.i � .. . • w �� L- � }' _ .. ,�'7:.. :.. _ •_�. _ _.... -s_.. .� J. i r..... .+, :.9'LN..L.n'h .!t` ... _ . ear �@i: '.. _. x`P ". .._ ••t�<`+�A':!.''• ... ..R.'r �'. , .. F. �.1"J',._..aF4�il `_? +;''. w�r.3 S} Y i t lif: 1 Sr�y:;C Y1 +t-•�s�4r i- i �,i;}[ aK;E�o.'% ~.r - � 4- 'r. ;1(J� � � ! r."��}+.lp ( f3.f� ` i . r tit• j• . � - - - • . .. 11 Traffic Volume Analysts iot:rsecttonc Coast Fay ! Tustin Ar . Existing Traffic Volumes hued rm Average hilt' Traffic linter/Epilog U PH Approacft Oirectiw 111sti n9 Peak IHour Peal 2 1/2 Hour Aeyiooal iro■th Apprond Projects hak Projected it of Projected project Volume h1aN 2 1/2 Hoar Volume Peak 2 1/2 (lour Voluse Peak 2 112 Mcur Velree Peak 2 112 W Volute MorW%fld is 0 0 t5 1 p EoutrtcaM __.-_._____N._rr____-___•» Easttomd 4029 .___........... « .r........ _r...................... 1334 5427 2 Mutbazid 5M 94 1355 7305 73 U) Project Traffic is estiaated to be less than 11 of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic volume, Project Traffic is estieated to be greater than It of Projected Pea 2 112 Hocr traffic %olvae. 1nt+rs+ctics Capacity Utlli:atian U.C.U.) Analysis is re;otred. PR IMS ' l5tb $t Awtser.ts FC:L OCCIifAK:y yEfR: 1469 .. •Auatla-ft�st Aesetr � 'f'�;•.* ;'r,.. n _ l...a�`tbt%:�...'i_-.s+.._Y.:�,:F.•:......:`•`_��.: L�. .......... .._ .-_. .�_�_ f'.: .[i,Y. �._.°.0 .?,;.,•J. •..e-. ._ f•- s_ .-___.... .'a-:... .-,. .-. ...... .. ... ._�. a�_iS:'•':1:`.?.. �: ti�, _.. ... .'.�'._.._. t, �: '�k�tsi - wi ='N`<1 r- •, f r i,f`, a �_- w:r r' !':r�ee. - � •ry y:,. i . ` ��•ii �P -! - .: a''h >r � = s'' - tir • e !.. ::L - it: r.. It Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: Coast Hry ! Corer Wierswe Dr EsistinD Traffic Volumes lased m Arerw Daily Traffic Minter/String 1d Ax A�roach Direction Ealstiaq Peat 2 1/2 Hour Peat 2 1/2 Hour lagiooal Approved Projects Projected 11 of ProjJected Project Volume Womth Volume Peak 2 112 Hoer Volume Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Polk 2 1/2 *cur Volume Peat 2 I12 Nwr -----------.—..—_____ --- --- --- ---- -------- ----------------- Volume Northbound -- ---------------- 333 --------------- 0 -----------------------------------....................................... 0 --.w----.-- M 3 a kuthbounj .................... 2571 0 M 2705 21 0 Eastbcund ............. 4827 ...--- ...................... 1038 ----. —................... 5942 0.0................... yq -------- — ------ —---- ------- ------------------------ ' Mestbound ------------------------ 3182 -- 83 ---- --__._..................... 1017 -------------------- 4132 »--_...................... I ................... bs ........... 1 ..... __) Project Traffic Is estimated to be less than IY of Pro)ected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to bs greater than ti at Fro)acted Peal: 2 112 hour Traffic value@. Intersection Capacity Il:ililation f1.C.l1.1 Analysis is required. PI1CiE�T: ISth St A;artssnts Austin -Foust Assoc,, �Ic:. ,.. ,,.. � •�� '::��c: fJil ;:,, '• 1 ..-.:�'r .d.'.-_,. ..9.�.':.,1•�..�.-.n�i. �"y ^'iLv. G.L". irtr.:>... .-.;". L.. .:.a'.'iis-.3...`s�:_.,..«�i^t:'':: /�:�.t �-_._.._...,..*%v�,:::.t+•:.tF..."�.PY�#:ZSL�•:..J::-ss_. �,i:Lsri`as K 47, It Traffit Vow kalysls tataructioas coast *y ! Dover Drlla shore Dr Esistieq Traffic Valves lased oa Averq# laily Traffic kiater/*Orin, Ib he �ypraacr. Direction Esistia0 Peak 2 112 Nw Voluse Peak 2 112 Hour Regional Woeth Volwe .----------_.._—..___— Agroved Projects Peat 2 112 Hour Volm ----------- Proje:tld Peak 2 1/2 Fir Yalu" It of ProjecteC Peai 2 11j Hour Valuee Project Peai 2 1/? Hour Values Aarthboand 268 0 ..---..__.--..--_._---.-.._-----------------. 0 Southbcund 3176 o -------...._..----..-------------------------------------------...............-- 105 3281 31l EastEound 6104 ................. - 13I6 ------ kestbound 0761 -----------------------------------------------------..--.------------..._.......------.... 92 1389 _--_-_S69b _._...._ 7242 72 3 ■z) Project Traffic is "Heated to be less than It of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Our Traffic Votuse. Project Traffic is estiaated to be gqreater than It of Protected Peak. 2 112 Noor Traffic Voluee, Ietarsection Capicty Ut Meted II.C,V.I Analysis is requirtd. FW(CT: 15th St Apirtclats illL! CLCt1Aytf 1EAds 1589' = ....................... ........•-----------......_....__...--.».......... ................. ..........._ -�• °� fiustin-fwst Asszc.s lrc. erF:9_n. ., ,..�...-..., �..,.:t.•ti*��.:7, ... .1.- a ....... .x.... .4f .. .... . ialc: Date 02/12/87 . . :•��;i. •ice '�T'a 45:: i1 Traffic iroirme lmelysis `� lntmesectiaa: rs"erlar sir 1 Placestil AV Esistim! Traffic Volmmss Based on Arerap gaily Traffic Niaterilpir, 16 #A Peak 2 112 Moan S road Eeistimq hNiomal Direction Peal 2 112 Moor Wcoo siPprcred !rejects projected Peak 2 112 Hoar Peak 2 112 Hoy It of tre�ected PeaiMet112 Project Volume Volume Volume Volume Maur vat Aw Pe1kVolumne -.»-._»__------------------ MortArawmd 719 ------»--------•--....... 0 73 )!f 1 1 lioutb9�uA: 1293 0 33 1316 IS i 278! -- ---- -------------------- --_»».. a-_— 21 1 ------ btsttov,d 530 0 -------------- ---------------- -. JOS 813 -------------- --- i -------- ------- 0 ==3 Project Traffic is estimated to le less than 11 of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. j Peaks 2t112aNwr Traffic Volume. °1A�f iee`iaaaCapacity Uiiliiitior, 11.C.u•1 Aculysis is required. 0 iR7rfr;: 15th S! A2art;fr„s FULL CCCUAf YEA : j�n __.--....... --_.___....... _...... . ...................-__...»»»_-___.......__... Aastisi-Post AtsL:., jar. G1c.: late Q211218); �"A. fi Traffic Valae Analysis Intersections Suseria !r ! Pluestia M Esistimq Traffic titolnees used oc Amige hill Traffic Minter/Urirg !w PH Peak 2 1/2 Fw kpo»! flppraa;A Directicm Esisti21 Peak 2 1/2 lion )bhloaal DroRth Projects projected Peak 2 112 Hwr Peak 2 112 dour 1! of `re ectsl Peak 2 112 PrajKt Valmme Volume Volume valve hoar Volwm Peak 2 112 Four Volume Wthbound 1045 0 324 fu4 14 4 Szthb=d 1571 0 ae 101 -.III.._ -...... 1+ 3 — --- -------- _-«------ N»»w-_aw.wrwr__«---------------- ------ ..................Eastbwd ____..---r.r._w--------------.................... 100 0 120 15W 14 2 llestbolad »r_«___•__««.rrr«___.__-_««__.__.....«_.N__«»__� 1774 0 «................................ 4782 20% _-r.... _-.... 11 «__-...ter ..................«__. ....... --- 0 �) Project Traffic Is estimated to be less txm 11 of ProjectW hat 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic Is estimated to be reite+ than 1t of 1ro�e.ted Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volute, Ia ersectial Capacity Ut:li:atioa I1.C.il.l Acilysis is required. P2�1E:T: lath 5t 4artseats FtLi D:Li;oAt.CY !c/fi: 14it8 ti. .t•Ia;. [alt. Date 0?1i21$7.' . ew, •fw. �,- i i.^ o. ,- ..1 i9':�`S,.i. n ti;!i• `e!s.,.:'� 5:•>;•'Y'�'1 .. ,.._i;1• :.I ••>L' J' Kid, 4 =;�f• •;,x:,.. s;+;t'. ;' _•.f{r :�r ..v.:...e;'!. �'J+'<:; ,Fs. ii+. �?.. ..,.. .•r� �,;:�>�:• ..{. ti.... re`. .�:�=. .nr�e - ►.' ;y:r ,.� �.•'t'; .#- t '+•; "�F ={;'.: -L�1.. „w,., : _ •;':.':•;,,.. :i r ' s�•:,..: riF''`w.t� a.rrf, tts':e?C�,r."�.:r::...,.fju, �;�.a•h:s::.x:}°:L:r__ ., v ':; r t- '��r;;r� yy;x• '+i4?-�:; `•'`�"'•"",''. .,c ,,:�+� {�L yip ifari�Yl.:� ;i{.��'1a �d:,'�. '.'.� �i»i�tM.,.- :1'ta�r.3.fi.iii . J.1; Cj.. .'rll. I i 'i : a•.i! ;r�Ja:.�t'[,..!+4�R �%t WliYri� �eY"w.Ay:�[irt: +Rr 4 . `1: -.4. %.'t•'J: ?�S• t'[� •`�",C. ark'. 63 .. li Trsffic Value& Analysts inters:ction: Memport llvd ! Via Lida Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Hint#r1Sprirq 14 pit Peak 2 112 Hour Approved Approach Direction Existing Peak 2 112 Hour Regional fx owth Projects Pest 2 1/2 Hour Projected Peak 2 1/4 Hour 12 of /rolected Peel 2 11 Project Volume Volume Volume Voiumm Hour Volumm Peat 2 1/2 Hour Volm MorthbCund ................................................. 1166 0 110 . U76 - . .. 3......................--- 0 5outhbound ...------------------------- 2716 0 ---- ----------------------------------------------------..........------......---- ................... 44 ........................................ 2780 28 0 Eastbourd 0 0 0 0 0 0 Yemtbaurd 1077 0 0 __.----------------,,..------•--•--------- 1011 11 0 �> Project Traffic is estlmsted to be less than 12 of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hmr Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is mctimated to bm greater than 12 of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Nwr Traffic Voluu. Intersection Capacity Utilisation 1I.C.U.1 Analysis is required. FF3:...................ter...._.... »................................ .LL ...................---------......_--- bretin-fount Ann, Sc:. Caic. We 02132/e1 Y.` (•ti ` 0 • It Traffic volume Aaalysis Intersection: Nwpvt Blvd t Via lido Existing Traffic Value#% (lased on Aversye icily Traffic YinterlSpring flb pn Ptak 2 1/2 Hour A¢iro►ts Appfchcn fiirettw fxisting Peak 2 1/2 flour ltgional iro«th Proje:ts Peat 2 1/2 H.Ur Projected Ptak 2 1/2 HSLr tt of Projected Peak 2 Project ------------------------------------......------------------------------......---.............•.------...._.... Volute Volute Volume Volutt 1/2 flour V0141e Peat 2 1/2 Thar Volume fkorthtun! 2M 0 2105 3154 31 1 ....................--"-----------•-------- SoutAh rld 4702 0 ------ -.'---- -240 ------------------ ,.a......__.--------.... 4942 0 0 ..................................................................................A..............-- F1ttWilt, 0 0 ...... ._......a .................................................................................................... 0 0 0 lltstl:wrd 1312 0 0 1312 is 0 92) Project Traffic is estimated to be lets than It of Projected Peal 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volute. Project Traffic is estimated to b greater than It of projected Poik 2 112 Hour Traffic Volute. Inftrsettiot Capacity utilization fi.C.U.1 Anllysic is required, r'3uJ:CT: 15th £t Aparteents iUtl QtCUFA't;,1" YEAR. fife Aistir-cruet Assc:., Inc. tea{'! ,%. ''��•" � •! •`. r��. :j R}.:;'..., .. �.. �. La1c. 2atf 02/IZ/fi7 .'.�.�� , •. fit,',; �4 1 s 0 It Traffic Vcleat A,alylis tnterse:tions Beep rt blyd t Hcspita: Fd Eiistio; Traffic Volumes Based ra Avera;t Daily traffic dirter/Sprig Ab AH Peak 2 1/2 Hair Approved Approach Direction Esistinq Peat 2 1/2 Hxr Rolicaal Projects kcath Peal 2 112 Hour Projected Peal 2 1/2 Four It of Prc acted Peak 2 112 Froltst Volume Volume Volume VOI w F Ho•.0 Volume Fiji 2 112 Hour VOIYmt krthbound 3338 - 33 173 -------------------------.............._------..---- 35M i; I .................... •----•-__w--------------------..................------_...... ... 44........................ Southtound IM 31 227 2217 22 0 Eastbound 1092 0 11f ....................................... 1206 12 3 Ikitbannd 033 4 68 - ---------------- 4GIl-----_.._k..---� ------- __) Project Traffic is estimated to be less than it of Projected Peat 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Vcluee. Project Traffic is estirated to be gqreater than tt of frojecttd Peat 2 1/2 Four Traffic Voluat. latersectian Ca?achy Ulilitatian 11.L.U.1 Aaalys;s is require-. FACNEM VrttT e: i:ra•:ptrts FULL GCCUFA4'i fEP1. 1988 ........ --.............. --............ ----............................................... Aistit-Feast Aim., Inc. Cats. Wta 4:/f2197 All 12 Traffic Voleae Analysis latmrsectiont wort llyd I Hospital Rd bistinq Traffic 1lblum lase) on Average laily Traffic hinter/pyrinq &I, 1!i Awasch Directioe bisti N Peak 2 112 Now hat 2 112 Moir Apparel Waal hojKts Projected Womb hat 2 12 N he)ectel Project Volume 112 Moan tat 2 112 Hw Wim" %lw Volaoe het 2 it, Moen Volms, peak 2 112 Mohr Volaee Northbound 3459 -___................ »�—_____________ 39 4 wt-bull -------- 3721 -------- ------------------------ 60 207 3m -----_-.- 40 0 • 1:astbcarrd 1599 .................. ........................................ 0 Wb 2135 21 2 Mcstbound 910 •-----------------------------i;_...._._. 0 101 1061 --.__--- - . *�) Project Traffic is estimated to be less thin iY of Projected Peak 2 112 flour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be�r eater thin It of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. I trsectiou Capacity UtIlilition H.C.U.1 Analysis is required. f�I_CT: 150 St ksuteents FULL OCCUPANty yZAI: 19t3 ✓; stirs-f;.rst Asuc., lat. Lalt. late 02/12/87 ;'�irY�,y».r .rv: - .. r,:. •.r,' ' • �i �'1d1iJ`.�a:��:v Y i•r �'rii�� i•• n, .. �.+R.„fr w•'.�.+i. .�M��y k" A �1 11 7rr ��,;�. �;�� .... ��.rr � •, •: ' �t' .�'no'T'.'R !�wl!=wt�.�•�{Y�Si7l�.t`•{: ,4t .i.�•. '► _�i,;f;r✓w '1.:. .� '•��t�;...r �. •. =-•"' ..•c �:.�'•'.f'''(, �: •,'i'*:.r- t i4�ttf.wil... .f.=y,....�i �'as:. Jij.�� _ _ i lr .o r!%A:.:G •......,..,; r.. }... '�f.i .:ter',', ri,`. : �' ..r f..t t.: ,:ir{ � "'f2: .; •..,. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.Q. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658-8915 NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO: Office of Planning and Research ❑ 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 ECounty Clerk of the County of Orange P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, CA 92702 FILED PAID19 M7 GARY 1. 1Z B� FROM: Planning Department City of Nex(x)rt Beach P.O. pox 17611 Newport Beach, CA 9265E-8915 do NAME OF PROJECT: Mesa Affordable Apartments III --Residential Density Bonus, Traffic Stu PROJECT IACATION: 849 West 15th Street, West Newport Beach PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of a fifteen (15) unit low income apartment development which includes a fifty percent (50%) density bonus in accordance with Section No. 65915 of the State of California Gov. Code. The proposal also includes FINDING: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy K-3 pertaining to procedures and guidelines to implement the California Environmental quality Act, the Environmental Affairs Committee has evaluated the proposed project and determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. MITIGATION MEASURES: Please see the attached sheets. INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: The City of Newport Beach INITIAL STUDY AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING: Environmental Coordinator DATE: March 9, 1987 f 1 � 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach 7 KV Y M APPENDIX I [NVIRONMMAL CHLcMIST rORM Environmental Checklist Forma (To Be Completed ft Lead Agancy) I. Background 1. Kama of Proponent Mesa Developnent Company, Inc. f. Address and Phone Mumber of Proponent 2925 College Avarnu, 3. Date of Checklist Submission Jyyrsh Q. 1987 4. Agency Paquiring Checklist _ _ _ ,13�Y of �r�rrt j .� . S. base of Proposal, if applicable Mesa Affordabla Apnrtments III- -Residential Dona -fly Isonus, ra is Study It. Environmental Impacts• (Lxpla:nations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached shefics.) YES MAYBE !Q 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. 1lastable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. risruptions, displacasents, com- paction or overcovering of the sail? C. change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or ssodi- dfication of any unique geologic or ' . physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of . beach sands, or changes in saltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 73 I 0 Ygf MAYBE No R. E;xpcat:urc of people or property to geological hazards such as earth- quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deteri- oration of ambient air quality? �+ b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement. moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 7. water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of -water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 3t - S . a•,. n ri`• r� "M "i,S;•it" ;rc:i'` •'i': :i•�t`lm,t •,.. .F •' '' r .,+At YES 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of Plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of sni— nals into an area, or result in a barrier to the nitration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Li ht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? �— B. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a su stantisl alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? a =.'1 �• a.s %5:_;,}.�, +.SJ�y. .aiP?t: +.k.,sa.tSC.t�i7Y•Y. Ai+iJ Y►y MAYR[ no 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a- Increase in the rate of use nf any natural resources? / �_ w be Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? 10. Risk of li set. goes the pr olv a risk o an explosion or the release ofe hazardous substances (includins, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the @went of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Po elation. will the proposal alter the location. distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. _Musing. Will the proposal affect existing housing. or create a demand for additional Dousing? / 13. Trans ortatiou/Circulation. will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects On existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazardous to notor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 1L. Public Services. Vill the proposal have an ff'!ct upon, or result in a need for new or altered kovernmental services in any of the [olle-din; :etas: 76 /y ,✓ . !a 4. �I _ly .i ''x .1,-. •.y� �� f r. y. r-'' y`'. i1 rrN.J .•'I✓ .'� .1 i'.fi lf�} f�. us a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? C. schools! d. parks or othar recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities. including roads? f. Otbar governmental services! 15. Bearly Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial anoints of feet or energy! b. substantial increase in demand upon esigting sources of energy. or require the development of now sources of energy? lb. utilities. M£11 the proposal result is a seed for new systeem, or substantial ■iteration• to the following utilities: MATSE No �. I ...)L a. power or natural pas? b. Communications systains? C. pater? i. satyr or septic tanks? a. Storm water drainage? f, solid waste sad disposal? 17. Woman Health* pill the proposal result in: a. Creation of say health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hasacds? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result is the se'� t'^rue�—oa of any scenic vista or view apes to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation"of On aeatbat£caliy •ffies ire site open to public view? `3 t tin1 .'1 �.',fi �C'4i: •. ,1. 11 Yi'. 1. • F •:S}�,�,.'�i:,!•il,��t:,�ir,.•.,` Y'. 11• .!H.xL'� �!!.'?:'•v�.•4 .r5 .jli :-� �.•_-<,�.::a?ori�fie7a.Yr•.�:,..J,.F:1!ir. .Z. VATS �n 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result a an pact upon the quality or Quantity Of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeolo ical/ristorical. Will 011. Proposal result in SO alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, ebjeet or building? 21. Pandstory rindNe of Iipificamce. a• Was the project have the potential to degrade tie quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below set'f-auatsisisl levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce dw number or restrict the ranse Of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important usamples of the major Periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to acbieva amt-term, to the disadvantals of long -tangy, environmental goals? (A abort -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief definitive period of time while long- term impact* will endure well into the future.) C. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project MY impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the tnvironaent is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on humm 'beings, either directly or indirectly? Fit. Discussion of Lnvironeental evaluation Iv. Determination (10 be completed by' the T•ead Apency) 75 [ .rr •� �a;,F�.AF1,,.:.•4[�. �{Y�rttH.CY•n?.i�.1:�.•F�,.~ •Y}.. ��7. F on the basis of this initial evaluation: Q I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the esvirosineat. sod a MUTIVE MCLAUTIOM will .4s prepared. [3 I find that althoalb the proposed project could .live a eigoificast effect on the environment, there will sot be a significant -affect in this came because the litigation measures described on on attached sweet bare boom added to the project. A WCATIR MCLA UTION will be prepared. ` CD I find the propoaad project MAY have a significant -of fact on the esviro�t, and as IMhIEOOldL DCPWf WORT is requLred. lSdre Data g gnature For •�The City of Newport��eac w (#ote: This is only a auggssted form. Public agencies are free to devise their ova forwat for initial studies.) 7 r' r. �•' _ y iA t.♦ e • �r 1e - sli [' r � , . MESA AFFORDABLE APARTHENTS no (SEASIDE II)-- RF.SIDENTIAI. DENSITY BONUS, TRAFFIC STUDY lh. The proposed project will result in disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of the soil. However, given the present nature of the site, flat and at grade, these effects will he insignificant. 2b. The proposal may result in the creation of objectionable odors during the course of construction due to the construction materials and methods. Such effects shall be eliminated upon completion of the project and are, therefore, insignificant. 3b. Implementation of the proposal shall result in changes in the absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface runoff. however, these effects will be insignificant given the present nature of the site --flat and at grade. 4a. The proposed project will result in a change in the diversity and number of species of plants upon the site. The proposal shall result in an increase in the variety and numbers of plant life on -site, and, upon compliance with mitigation measures the effects shall be insignificant. 6a. Implementation of the proposal shall result in temporary increases in existing noise levels during the course of construction. They shall be alleviated upon completion, and no significant effects are anticipated. 7. The proposed project will produce new light and glare, yet the effects shall not significantly effect neighboring residences upon compliance with mitigation measures incorporated into the project. 13b. The proposed project shall create a demand for new parking. However, this effect shall be reduced to a level of insignificance upon compliance with mitigation measures. 14/14a. Implementation of the proposal may have an effect upon, or result in a need for fire protection. Upon compliance with mitigation measures however, these effect shall be reduced to a level of insignificance. 18. The proposal may result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view. However, these effects shall be rendered insignificant upon compliance with mitigation measures. MITIGATION MEASURES 15. 4a. That a landscape and irrigation plan for tho project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phanb the installation of landscaping with the, proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect "hall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan) . 2. 4a. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained frog of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 3. 7. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by n Licensed Electrical Englnneri with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been pet. 4. 13b. That the number of parking spaces required by the off-street parking requirements of the City of Newport Beach (as provided by the Municipal Code, Title 20, Chapter 20.30) be provided on -site. 5. 14/14a. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler protection. 6. 14/14a. The Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 7. 14/14a. That all access to the buildings be approved by the Fire Department. 8. 18. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. t: • � k,. � . i.. .. .,.�.� I .:':v r. i,Ta. ':; .A �.*..: ;_ � �-2';;� �`:i'�i�� . .if: -,is' .]!�.' !'lr .Y.• '::41 �.. City Council Meeting A ril 13, 1987 Agenda Item No. P-10(b) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Residential Densitv Bonus Request to permit the construction of a fifteen unit low-income apartment development which includes a fifty percent density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Govern- ment Code, and the acceptance of an environmental document. A modification to the zoning Code is also requested so as to allow covered parking spaces, within the front one-half of the lot, which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors. AND Traffic Study Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the construc- tion of a fifteen unit apartment complex. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 917, First Addition to the Newport Mesa Tract, located at 849 - 15th Street, on the southerly side of 15th Street, between Placentia Avenue and Monrovia Avenue, in the West Newport Triangle area. ZONE: R-3 (2178) APPLICANT: Mesa Development Co., Inc., Costa Mesa OWNERS: Joseph Irani and Ilse Sultania, Newport Beach Suggested Action If desired, set for public hearing on April 27, 1987. Planning Commission Recommendation At its meeting of March 19, 1907, the Planning Commission unanimously approved this request for a Residential Densit Bo T eel y nus, ra c Study, Modification, and r., '# �1,•.t •l .L •. •1 il�. _S .: TOt City Council — 2. the acceptance of an environmental document. Copies of the Planning Commission staff report and an excerpt of the minutes will be included with the staff report for the April 27, 1987 City Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAHE5 D. }IEWICKER, Director EY/. ti ROBERT P. LENARD Advance Planning Administrator RPL/kk CC20 A .0 8 ,-4, uGi a •a 'v y M i-. pCb '7 e'1 r+ to i•► OG .-� 'O ((�� t0 r+ 0 O 4 N co aj .7 Ln to C IT .� u t� •a C +• � C u � �! !� u r v to M .. SI L U ..t O N 0} .-� r ►r P. .+ 7 C as rg ►I G u -a !1 L7 wy •.. u S. ti O €i y'.-. u w .+ O '7 C .... .. 0 0! x 'rN fR w N !r p { V: ►- ►+ .• . c t1 �+. C Sr J •� ^ 4. t: ••• ••� 0 +� CL U LL �; f 4 > m 0 b u t.. Q 0 u c •r +� '� r Q. 4 Z �.. O • 4w W ro 4 �, M C "4 aI - to to 4 II Q C 4 1 I .. u C C W u ..t 4, 4 U �.. rl 1 w d L►. �- y GC 4 M 9 0 o f U£�a o044e�•aua•• naasAj a�aa U c •+ -• to 4 � an•+v�•• c3 F 6 .44 v b c o ... .• to uu 13 4 Z. to O PA H C1 u Q_ 4 G .r •L i+ a a t X u j w G sA .c tell • Q G >, 4 U .. u r? U M c c aC Cl - 1 Gl g W >, + •L 4 �. :C S+: J rJ u O C7 N ty d v 4 u +O1 i3 G. ..a c > q u O tC r. G 0 L+ O ++ to 0 t.3 t. C x !7 u u1' w U J •Q z u 7i O H t✓ O7 a r. z ... G C L Ls. -C a+ ^ 7 Q tt 0 ••4 > ¢. Z w • 4 0! w e -• •� u c C— u r a ++ O O U. 1.4 G 'O U. u p Cd u a u �-+ c z "4 G q 4 G yq U m C U, O 3 N 4 ►-. o+ G C w.=- O 0 G a. si C Z O d 1 u b x w t1 4 4 U d >. u L cc :. �.. as x u v CL Z .a 5 -. C .. tt1 c u : c w . c % O c G u M 13 vi a+ .0 ►+ t A 17 z u 4 CA 6! 4 {i 9 u u O 4 al . a b U V O 06 O Co F of O. u OG M . q w .� 4 O C O x C i. •� F C :. GL . O u C GJ ® oL -� O G. En trt V: M 1* ee ro a 6+ ^o C L.r ai C. C* 'O H to U A. w .3 u ►-e O 4 G '� I A. F Z: C+. m U O u co L Mtn b e J— -4 >. 4 n Q O! to C6 C lJ V1 w a a. >. 4 W O t0 L U 6 a U u C 'O C ^- '-) O c J aLC t:S -4 C u u 41 C1 U G 4 G c v e t; 4 a u c Vf + O t r ++ 7 G CL V O t~ S. -„ .-t fG w •'1 Vi 07 -3 = r_ F c u t� Q b tx C* U. •$ ' 4 O 4 0) • 4 O .a 0 Ln u �.a ... J C I O 0 ,, u 0 O U t3 R 7 tit v 07 u b u -0 u V w FL • u fi u.0 rO c y .� 3 F G w 'O 1-1 • M c w s. Lit a G G Z x U V O -C C :► c R Q G c-4 w C' C8 w-d O 4 Z O 0 C-e 4 t. C,b O 64 a, u I z C U � C a u V•0 O u a A C tv.[7 O > !J > U 44 C -S c :7 u r � au 0'. 10. O 4 ►-t o F: u o c • , 4 a O > fJ 4 O u O C 4 4 0 u 41 W 4 W 5 a O W N (1 +� 4 G �+ 4 u :+ M O H Lt t_ 4 M p to " O C V r- w to ra G -4 O • ". 0 •• LS .' w C o t> O 0 -4-1 4 i+ W eR tG4 0. w i3. a a. 0) 7 a 9 LG 4 u7 a o u •.+ o w v 8 to u O a 0 a -� 5C n y i7 !.] . Ol v�. � o X' � a► v 0 4.•L a .. G 4 4 vs W.2; 4) 44 • •I ^+ W O 6 z L-t a a S a U •• z O x z _< 4 Me x] 94 L7 �•+ ._ , 00 U ++ 'O v! U O 13 C u I- it ) R O. W tC C1. u4 v a lu .% .-. o . ,. ,•. .. 90 WW m td F: OL v v V7 UN �+ v C; co • i - .. .. .».. ...� ...... �•. .�...., .i..-.. ..._....._...._...Nr.Y..naN'�—.�.T-.r.�+"www..y..ry�ry...4.a++rr.4..�.NMM1. 1 r 1• L a 1 w a W C) U e�•t 00 00 utltl rJ s � � .•� u .. n G� V Lfl r• 41 ? N J val a s \a to co cS a v« Q 00 a 00 1. y O O O O O A tt. a+ V 14 u !~ +.4 rqAp x a O m w w n w q G w w . w ia� G U Q\ a .4 •J O u= •4 w w r of an C G .-t «-4 V .+ a -• r•1 �: -•+ O c 1. .0 %O A. a •-• w u o i a co u1 u > -. t..3 G ...• v1 O to A a G Sl w u e: }! �- C O ? • hJ O 7 A n +0 V w w A a• �. :► G. u u -• w G w n w -4 li V r•l « Jr c« raw O O L • �•rr� vwo+�a c.-ov,Un Gaa) r Aq G�aao •uro lu. u w >1 .+ .. w n ►+ p. %0 Q• v ..+ V C. a u 11 M u r u .- +.. c .4 .4 .j w .. r4 w x u ..4 c a ."•� a'a i I wcl. w i Uuw:1ava 'o .►+.: Co 0X wL)U 0., ww> • -4 w sj J., c O a -• rs+u�..w Aj U Kw a A .o .- >. 'A x v U w tjOj +.w w GU a w o o 'v >. ^ �-+ � :t >wo0wu� o u w u L N •• a w v w u 7 O F 0 o 0 U w \G L• O O a c w .1. u •-. L" u: O a. a 6 0 i K O u w U •+ J �! C w c, �8 1. U V v! V u J c 0. r: •, •• 0. b 6 c w u a v a O n 10 n M O w �L T. r`• .4 «w x -4 G> x w s.. U w .4 V O�S, C7 0 .r O-a •.+ ly w .4 O t- .•l - `r4 O u 00 .4 C O w w p hl A r-. 1l, O w O w.• O Z Z '+'� +4 • u A r\ a 0. 4, u 9 a 7 w :l -• a •+ N rl h ?. -4 V w 1r .� .O •C ri - .� n O U 0 • u H Ln ti: eui w ~ • + a a *` - u x „ 0 0 r. � u 1 a � C Z C6. o � i _ °° P •> , '"t F V C. w u c x n ►. >. c it a .a Q Co g4 ro .1 a u N vJ V .4 -4 l.+ 1.0 A ►w. a1C ro c�L u a r- a :J o G x U en ttf o V1 11 A .4 .7 a V w ►La Y 0 O V : O a z Z u w w v V • a V Z Uww >a O o 11 w -4 a cn C O L4 . V) A uA w 41, Ctl -i+4-a1 w ur�w00 wC9 ei awr.'o Jr.0 Gao C u� aQ ' 0 to a 44 co G S4: aa O u x O a. wxv% C to m O lY n« cr w n u .+ w w •. u u to o In 0 n B tr 144 ;a > 0 .4 d u a w co O w «c o 0 o a+ ea o a o w .0 w 0% o a i to a .4 L7 .4 cc w .4 .4 c in •C O w a U v w c x a ai �4 'J • G GI .= -4 cn cII w w Z Lt w 0: • 1 u V3 C u w r » ., V4 r-4 r• a. >\ 0. 00 A. 0 VJ w -1 W .r w a A u w r J a V G O w -4 1l C! R. > -• o > a b Z! a s J .4 = f- w V .0 41 f7 Q 'q b x>� w u- x V w a tk. r. x -4 o 00 «D .1 • x la • .c (n O y\ m •r 0 ,".� > 0.2 a 0, .v a. � .9r , f � m W ... . ,4 $ u G w u O o a 00 ., 7 ro O •-4 > a o o .+ .4 o« •, -4 a r4 O .� D 4 a. 0. a6 G« ..G4 � o 44 V A G b atria q (nn G. C G 40 w c U 'r4 ro w .. ra+ u W, u 1-4 o G 3 y u (nn •wtiw So .. .p ar.ou0aac.o a�` In A'o► AC u 44$1-41wa1clu ,laM 00 o°i"a �•'nmau •, COA � r W �j-4«0 w..4xAr >%itO w w ►•! U w Oro • • M Ux w, • a- ", w..vVro a O „Lw 1 > 0)AU)Uw au Maus C6%4mww w A V.C.4+,www+•av m 4d as.+"oOwa1uwOr,e0 �rCro$4 CAV4.�,wiaµdcu � W oo �• cxx ►+ w w w w to +-1 aL 'a .i r-1 C6.44 a w w c to w .0 w y a I2 . ro n. 0 w a ++ r `..°. w ro�. low>��te�:mo.ow s ltnyAr~ �c�ww'd w•-+c,oa•+0. a.ou4qrHtny r a $wa ,nt�aouww � H ��a+•O+ 9:N Viraa a. tOQ.a4�a+\a+ngo PP..+A1 l0 IlG 1wso uu j ..� N , f•1 •1 ' r, _ _` i. •., ... ..___....., ... ...-..__...,....w�wlw.........«nr..M.r.�i..w..\. w... �. +.ww.Jw.wy....Fr. r..��...x...w........w.ue�.'w«.. �rww •i' j �J if . :fir 1...f �J.' :r1MJ>•, i, tiJ: r'r lh�:�fWrr. fJ`t,e�L ..fit 4' l; rlK . �al.:rii « 7J"", i,, 1. ,: � �r !. • TO: City Council City Council Meeting April 271 1987 Agenda Item No. A-2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Residential Density Bonus Request to permit the construction of a fifteen unit low-income apartment development which includes a fifty percent density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Govern- ment Code, and the acceptance of an environmental document. A modification to the Zoning Code is also requested so as to allow covered parking spaces, within the front one-half of the lot, which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors. AND Traffic Study Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the construc- tion of a fifteen unit apartment complex. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 917, First Addition to the Newport Mesa Tract, located at 849 - 15th Street, on the southerly side of 15th Street, between Placentia Avenue and Monrovia Avenue, in the West Newport Triangle area. ZONE: R-3 (217B) APPLICANT: Mesa Development Co., Inc., Costa Mesa OWNERS: Joseph Irani and Ilse Sultania, Newport Beach Suggested Action Hold hearings close hearing) if desired: a) Adopt Resolution No. granting a Density Bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, accepting the Environmental Document, and approving a Modification to the Zoning Code; and b) Approve the Traffic Study subject to the Findings attached to the staff report. i.J... .•%f`�7. -�.� �:•2 ..}. .f. •i i•'1�',1�' .;y:��:.4•,r.t•�t:'::7: .'l. ::'�y Lii'rxLl+.�1Ai:...•. TO: • City Council - 2. 0 Planning Cc=ission Recommendation At its meeting of March 19, 1987, the planning Commission unanimously approved this request for a Residential Density Bonus, Traffic Study, Modification, and the acceptance of an environmental document. Copies of the March 19, 19H7 Planning Commission staff report and minutes are attached. Applications These applications involve a request to approve a traffic study and a resi- dential density bonus so as to permit the construction of a fifteen unit low-income apartment project on property located in the R-3 (2178) District, The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow covered parking spaces within the front one-half of the lot which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors. Traffic Study procedures are set forth in Chapter 15.40 and modification procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.81 of the Municipal Code. Residential density bonus provisions are set forth in Section 65915 of the California Government Code. The codification originally included a request to permit a required open parking space to be located in the required twenty foot front yard setback. However, the applicant has withdrawn this request and is relocating this parking space on another portion of the site. Environmental Significance An Initial Study Was prepared for this project in compliance with the Calif- ornia Environmental Quality Act and City Council Policy K-3. It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment. A Negative Declaration has been prepared and is attached for City Council review. Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is currently vacant and undeveloped. To the north, across 15th Street, is the Newport Terrace Mobile dome Park; to the east is a recently completed low-income apartment project constructed by the applicant) to the south is a fenced area which is partially vacant and partially paved for park- ing purposes; and to the west is a light industrial complex. Analysis Details of the proposed project are discussed in the attached Planning Commis- sion staff report. The Density Bonus request is identical to the two previous requests of the same applicant, which the City Council has approved (Newport Seacrest, immediately to the east, and the project at 1544 Placentia). The request is consistent with the provisions of the City's Housing Element and Section 65915 of the California Government Code. The Traffic Study indicates that the project passes the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance inasmuch as projected traffic is less than 1% of the peak at the potentially impacted intersections. n�i � r ` TO: - ��ity Council 3. Affordable Housing Standards The project will be required to provide all fifteen units at. wri Section 8 Fair Market Rents for d period of thirty years. This will make the units, availabin to Iow- and very lent -income families. The current maximuss rest that could log, charged is; $690/m. nth for the fifteen two -bedroom units. During they Planning Commission public hearing cn this project there wan nom,' dincurvioti of the Newport Seacrest project (next door, tr.the east) and tin required rent structure. The Newport Seacrest project is required to providh forty-five two-bedroco units at HUD low (80♦ of tsurdian) income rents of 3$760/ nonth, and twenty one-bedrocm units at HUD fair market rents of t$588/mnntti. The project currently under consideration has lower affordability standnr(lss than Newport Seacrest. Recently the new owner of newport Seacrest raised rents on the two-hadroom units to the level allowable under the affordable housing Agreement_ with the City. This rent increase was due to HUn's issuance of new Maximum rent starclards which are revised periodically. Unfortunately the HUD standards had not been revised fcr : eighteen srontha and the rent increase amounted to al:proximately $70 per north for the forty-five two-hedrocn units. Since the rent increase care only a short time after initial occuparicy of the unitK, some tenants contacted the City. Because of the special circumstnncr_c involved, staff cont.actad the new property owner and suggested that he consider phasing the rent increase. Staff has not received any further cal)t frcim tenants;. ;is a result of this experierce with the Newport Seacrest project, the project currently under cons id«:ration and future affordable hou;;ing projects will include provisions in the affordable housing Agreerents requiring a rcasonable program of rent increase through the term of the agreement. Respectfully sul-mitted, PLANtIING DEPARTMENT JAYF.S D. HEWICKER, Director by ROHERT P. LYNARD Advance Planning Administrator P.PL/kk CC21 Attachments for City Council only: 1) Vicinity i'.ap 2) Resolution 3) march 19, 1987 Planning Commission Staff Report 4) March 19, 1987 Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes 5) Traffic Study Findings t...v+.r.w ►a.� f.fv a/ Nf.^Wr C-2 V p M-1-A DANA /\\ n1� sr ^ 4 f¢�¢t J \%\. -,Ill fI D Poe rc "we I.. R•3 R•3 of • R•3 �'� A•P-!f 'ter r i A-P • A•P A•P-N + � •' P-C w r.-a.. • � _ `~"'"�"-�`�"•�-'•�'"'" DISTRICTING MAP "�—��-•�- --+��• NEW PORT 9EACH — CALIFORNIA �rr..r�• ra •f w� af.w r aHf •f•aw • M.r y .... i.y.♦ 11 w .i i •• w few• y. �wr . a.•.r+ .r «. ......,r I ."1d/i[ IIOYN! A{A1[ OYfI:IriO� YUY,iIt[ �(iO(NTlil ass X .....ar ►:r.• � `..`a� ••r•i. t-n�a' iw0.� I�11 i1Ck7[Nhlll. L1GNi GDUY[NCM4 OUMI[7I 0151"K ITYf, GIWA&L C6rKRCuI �•""' •`T.L�• agate M rttt r4stbWLT/LEI�Y�YKiNWIAL "wirAMR" Immewfilof • Poo,w •W u. - cov"" pl><incU 1MClRfi/t[D Ids^ v---.�rzcy /IIp11T TLb 0(►TM M f[[T $so" Tom: -10• 61410 rM • Woow 00. 2 Y M6t1Ff l f*l MO. A PI'. 61"tION Or TNl' CITY cOUMCIL of TmE CITY OF NF.1iPon micro API+0V11IG THr. Dl?.SITY PXMUS PFQUEST OF MESA DEVELOPKENT CtiOWAY MR PURK*CS Or MUSTYUCTIIIG A FITTEEX UNIT APARTHM DrVCIDkMW? All'OPDA13LV TG L AI.P IIICOML rAMILIrS FOP A PERfon or Tinny YrA/a, At-CEPTING ;HE EUVI"KEirfAL DOCUPM", AND APPhOVING A MODIFICATION TO THr ZONING CODE WIIEPF.AS, an Initial Study and a Negative Declaration Yav+ leaven prepared for the projects •rd WISUMS, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach kAe rAdr a com itm4,nt to increase the supply of affordable housing in Newport beschl and WiIr141:A5. the ilarisinq Element of the Newport Beach Geunral Plan has establiehrei policies Iwrtalnlnq to providing housing opportunitiee fr,r all cer,nrxnic nrelmernts of the City$ and WHENY.AN, these pr,licles include providing Incnntivrs an,I direct assistarce, tc, praparty r+.rara, within the limitations of avallable rrvr,rcess aped WHERFA5, Secticn 65915 of the California Government Codr pravleMs for ,spprnval of a density bonus for affordable housing developmentst aryl W11FREAS, the Mcsa Development Coel)any development provides fift"n units affordable to lower income families for a period of thirty yearat and WIIENY.AS, because of the number of units and thirty year term of affordability, this request for a density bonus in reasonable ar.4 justifledi a rui WURKAS. the proposed parking space encroachment Into the required front yawl notback will, under the circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the heal!.?., safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons reaidinq or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or bt detrimental or Injurious to property and improvements in the nelgbbarbood or the quneral welfare of the City, and further, that the proposed scdification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Codes ar:d W11ERr.AS, the siproval of covered parking spaces on the front coos -half of the lot which do not have garage doors and side walls in every use will not, under the circumstarces-of this particular case, he detrisesntal to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or �5..••'i'!�` �:�.i. ..F 1A,4 ,i� .�'�.x .j '.ri�'t1•...�Q, l� rj 1} � �`7.:� ASS cnl,Sf e,� S,` ' .`•.'1 `�� ,.i 1� working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrisiertal or Injurious to prol+rty and Improvements in U4 neighborhood or the general ralfAre of the City, and Furthr, that tl,c proposed sodlfication lr cons:atat,t with tM legislative intent of Title 70 of this Code. IKN. T11ZPEycR1:, tt-e City Caancil of the City of Newport Reach does horel,y rr•rnlve that the envlrtrsaesstal document is accepted with the fr,llwinr, i' I rut) r:rTs l 1. That the envIre-ramntal document Is cceplete and lima been prepared in corplia:ce with the California Environmental Nality Act 1Cr.QAJ, the State E:R Guidelines and City policy. 2. That the crntents of the environmental document have been considornd in the •ario.s doclslons on this project. 3. That In order to reduct adverse io+pacts of the proV xod project, all feanitlo Mitigation aeaauren discussed In thin nnvlrotupental 410rumetrt have beer. incorporated into the proi4sed prnyaat, a. That thn mltlgatioa seAsurea identified in the Init.lnl Study have bran incorporated into the proposed prnjar:t and are nspressed as Conditions of Approval. S. That based upon tkA inforration contained in the Initial Study, Negative Declarstian srd supportive materials thereto, that if the mitigation veaaures are incorporated into the project it will not have A Significant adverse itpact on the onvirons+nt. 1K'H. TUERL10R1:, the City Ccuncil of the City of Nevrart beach dons hernhy further resolve that a density bonus is hereby granted to ti►e Mesa Davalolvw.nt Company for tiie proposed fifteen unit rental apartment development at 847 - V th Street In this City, sutlect tel the following Corditionst 1. That the developwAt shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plan, and elevations. 7. That the applicant AU1.1 enter into an Affordable housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the planning Director, guaranteeing that a maximuta of fifteen units of rental housing shall be constructed an the .,_ •ti.a :i:..f�,...i.: it .' r)iiY1 P,r .S •: i i'��i' '+:� tt ?r��: t�'� i S•: r v5: aulo—ct prop*rty. All fifteen units shall be rented at ro sire than the HUa Seetlor. R fair Market Pent to persons arA faallles •arnirg 00% or less of the orange County ann:alired median faeily irecate as perit4ically )-fhlisheA by Orange Cvur.ty regardless of fully site. All (of tLe fifteen units shall tit offered en a preferential =.wale ti, tenants l6ssessirq an 'active' >I'tction B Existing Rental Jtasiatarr_« Certificate or Voucher and currvr.tly receiving rental asaistat.• frrax the section H rxisting Rental Assistance Certificate r,t ynucF,er Progran. Said Affordable Housirq hgraemont shall be recorrl•d with the Orarge County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of w tidies) permits. The trrm of this agreasent shall be for no Iesa than thirty DO) years. WN, THERYMPE, tho City Council of the City of Newport ne4ch do.s terelrf further resolve that the modification to allow non-rnclosaA cov«red p4rkinr, on the front half of the Sot It api.rcved subject to the fnlh,wlr.g Ccr'li r it,ut+t 1. That the development shall t-e in substantial cvnforsarce wits, the approved situ plan, flaer plan, and elevations. 2. That the open parking spact within the ftont yard settack srFn nhall be relocated to another portion of thu site. Said new Ito ation shall he subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer and thu Manning aepartstent. 3. That a landscape and irrigaticro plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan t.hall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the prop " construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed lardscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department thcat the landscaping has been installed In accordance with the prepared plan.) 4. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation stall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 5, That the light systeo shall be designed, directed, and main- tained in much a manner as to conceal the light stmuce mead to -3- t:,+��.e�t`,��,v_. c.. ;'i:.;S t.. of , .{ yr :i.: t;.: r "� .:y'•• r Ji•,r. ..t O�Vzv I s '.f ;'fir:"-'t's^:1 syninir.e light spillage and glare to the adjacent rexldt'r.tial usna. 'he plans shall be prepareC and signed try a LlcenW Electrical rrgineer, with a letter iron the tngiuter stating that, in his opinion, this regslrewrt has been net. 6, That the r.usber of parking spaces required by the off-streat parkir.el erqulrexrts of tine City o! t14,rport Peach lsa prvriM+d by the "unicipal Code, Title 20, Chapter 20.30) be pravi4ed F.r, site. 7. That prior to the issuance of building permits, 0- MO Department shall review the proposed plans and nay ra-luiro, automatic fire sprinkler protectioa- R. Tl&u rire Department access shall be approved by th4 rire Department. q. That all access to the t»ildirgs be approved trj the Fife PPL/kk CC21 Department. 10. That all trash enclosures shall be ecreunt'd fr(M adjacent properties. 11. Tilat a sssorry block wall st:ell to constructed along tr-3 Bart, went, and south property lines. Said wall shall Le sly feet in height crcept for that portion within the required twenty fr,-')t front yard cutback along 15th Street, where, paid wall shall Lu reduced to three feet in height. AAoi,TCD this — day of , 1407. AM NOES ADS= gAYGY - 4 - •Sl.. ' � 'r.,:J.,' :Ft a �.,:. .. •� � •i J F,. M • A7TACliMM NO. J Planning Commission Meng March 19, 1987 Agenda Item No. 6 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TOs Planning Co+amission PROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. Residential Density Bonus (Public ilea rinfl� Request to permit the construction of a 1, unit low income apartment development which includes a 50 percent density bonus in accordance with Boction 65915 of the California Government Code and the Acceptance of an environmental document. Modifications to the zoning Code are also requested so as to allow covered parking spaces within the front one-half of the lot which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors, and to permit a required open parking apace to be located in the required 20 foot front yard natback. 131,01 B. Traffic Study (Public Hearing) Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the construction of a 15 unit apartment complex. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 917, First Addition to the Newport Mesa Tract, located at 849 15th Street, on the southerly side of 15th Street, between Placentia Avenue and Monrovia Avenue, in the (test Newport Triangle area. ZONE: R-3 (2178) APPLICANT: Mesa Development Co., Inc., Costa Mesa OWNERS: Joseph Irani and Ilse Sultanian, Newport beach Application These applications involve a request to approve a traffic study and a residential density bonus so as to permit the construction of a 15 unit law income apartment project on property located in the R-3 (2178) District. The proposal also includes modifications to the Zoning Code so as to allow covered parking spaces within the front one half of the lot which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors, and to permit a required- open parking space to be located in the required 20 foot front yard setback. Traffic Study procedures are set forth in Chapter 15.40 and modification procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.81 of the Municipal Coda. Residential density bonus provisions are set forth in section 65915 of the California Government Code. - - 4 �?•. •.x •: .t :•. •" s v sv U. ..ZL•... .1.,s '::r.'.'I :43.. TO: Planning Commission -2. • Environmental Significance An Initial Study was prepared for this project in conpl.lane;n with the California Environmental Quality Act and City Council Policy r-3. It has b-en determined that this project will not have a nitinificant iapact on the environment. A Negative Declaration has born prepared and is attached for Planning Commission review. Subject Property and Surrounding Land Uses The subject property is currently vacant and undeveloped. To the north, across 15th Street is the Newport Terrace llobiln Plano Parkr to the east is a recently completed low income apartnnnt project constructed by the applicants to the south is a fenced arnn Which is partially vacant and partially paved for parking purponenl and to the West is a light inductrial complex. Analysis The applicant is proponing to construct a 15 unit low income apartaent project on the subject property. Said project containn three differ- ent floor plans containing 792 sq.ft., 875 sq.ft. and 915 nq.ft. All of the units contain two bedrooms and one bath except the "C" units which have 14 baths. The following outline has been prepared which sets _forth the major characteristics of the project relative to the R-3 (2178) Development Standards. Land Area (72.50 ft. x 300.36 ft.) 21,776.1 sq.ft. Buildable Area 17,438.22 aq.ft. 3 x buildable area (permitted by Code) 52,314.66 sq.ft. Proposed Gross Floor Area (Excluding covered parking permitted by Code): 13,0755 sq.ft. (Including Parking): 15,8B7± sq.ft. Floor Area Ratio (Excluding Parking): (Including Parking): Permitted No. of Dwelling Units: .799 x Buildable Area .911 x Buildable Area One dwelling unit for each 2,178 sq.ft. of lot area, or 10 units. Proposed No. of Dwelling Units: One dwelling unit for each 1,451.74 sq..t. of lot area, ' or 15 units. �'•��'• �r..r _ `i:f Y �' ��:.�fe1. .r :. .�.�. :.'• :�S'.i; : .tip... :1'1r: �� ':-tt .�1. � �� TO: P16ing Comission -3. Setbacks Required Front (15th 5treet)t 20 ft. Easterly side: Westerly sides Rear: Parking king Building Hei htt Density Bonus 4 ft. 4 ft. 10 ft. 0 Proposed 20 ft. Varies between 5 ft. and 7 ft. 29 ft. on front bldg.l 9 ft. on rear bldg. 10 ft. 23 spaces 23 spaces (includes 20 carport spaces and 3 open parking spaces) 28/32 Foot Height Limitation District 271 ft. average height of highest sloping roof 32t ft. maximum height of hlghent ridge line. Section 65915 of the California Government Code requires cities to grant a density bonus over the otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the applicable Zoning Ordinance and Land Use Element of the General Plan when a developer agrees to construct at least] (1) 25 percent of the total units of a housing development for persons and families earing 120% of the area median income as determined by HUD, or (2) 10 percent of the total units of a housing development at HUD lower income standards for Section 8 assisted housing, or (3) 50 percent of the total units for senior citizens. The Government Code does not permit a city to deny any request for a density bonus of up to 25% for those additional dwelling units that meet at least one of the three criteria. Further, the Government Code permits a city to grant density bonuses in excess of 25• in instances where more than 25% of the units meet the prescribed affordability or age standards. In the case of the subject development, the existing zoning, R-3 (2178) zoning permits one unit for each 2,178 sq.ft. of land area or 20 units per acre. Based upon 15 units and a- .499 acre site, the applicant is requesting a density of 30 units per acre or one dwelling unit for each 1,451t sq.ft. of lot area. The. project, as proposed,will provide all 15 units affordable to "lower income" households for a period of 30 years. The affordability standards and time period will be established in an affordable housing agreement which will be recorded against the property. The proposed affordability criteria and number of affordable units (100%) far exceeds the minimum State standards for granting a density bonus. TO: Plan Coissinn -4. • g ■w General Plan Housing Element The Housinq Element of the General Plan, which was amended by the City Council on June 25, 1464, sets forth the Housing Goals, Policies and Objectives of the City. The City's established goals for housing were formulated around two concepts. First, the physical and visual character of the City's residential neighborhoods are tha key to the provision of a quality living environment. Second, the City's housing stock must provide for the housing needs of all present and future residents of the City. In addition, Section 65707(c) of the California Government Code requires the Housing Element of all cities to ". . . make adequate provision for the housing needs of all econom- ic segments of the community." The specific goals of the City regarding the provision of housing for all economic segments of the City's population, as set forth in the Housing Element on page 142 are: "l. To provide a balanced community, with a variety of housing types and designs and housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community: very low and low income as well as moderate and upper incomo house- holds. 2. To preserve and increase affordability, through rnntal housing, for very low and low income households." The basic policies which describe the City's role in the attainment of affordable housing are: "i. Enabling private industry to function more effectively, as a result of constraints being eliminated, wherever feasible, and allowable density being increased. 2. Providing incentives and direct assistance to industry, within the limitations of available resources, to facilitate the provision of housing for very low, low, and moderate income households." Various housing objectives were formulated and adopted to achieve the aforementioned goals. Implementation plans and target dates for these objectives are alno set forth in the Housing Element. Objective No. 7 (page 158) is: "To promote and assist in the development of housing for low and moderate income households." The Implementation Plan for Objective No. 7 is set forth on page 161 of the Housing Element. The specific activities of the Implementation Plan pertaining to this development proposal are as follows: "c. The City shall continue to participate as a member of the OCHA Advisory Committee and work in cooperation with the Orange County Housing Authority to provide Section 8 Rental Housing Assistance to residents of the community ..... " '�� -'1: .� ra.i#�cet� �`:l ,�.y .�:'y., 'i. �'��~' .'•��t }�' .y.. .'y�` ��, ✓. .t::� a.' t''41�+u-?.�jt TOt Plang Comission -5. "e. The City Council shall have the discretion to review and waive planning and park fees for developments containing low and moderate income housing in proportion to the number of low and moderate income units in the entire project." "f. When a developer of housing agrees to construct at least 25 percent of the total units of a housing development for persons and families of low and moder- ate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, or 10 percent of the total units of a housing development for lower income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code, the City shall either (a) grant a density bonus or (b) provide other incentives of equivalent financial value, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 65915, et seq." These housing programs, as set forth in the Housing Element, are designed to address the regional housing needs, as defined in Section 65584 of the Government Code, and as established by the Southern California Association of Governments Regional Housing Allocation Model (SCAG-RIIAM). However, because of a wide variety of physical, environmental and fiscal constraints as described in the Housing Element, it is not possible for the City to satisfy all of its region- al need. Section 65583(b) of the California Government Code recogniz- es that meeting these regional housing needs may exceed available resources and the City's ability to satisfy these needs, and State Law permits the City to establish the, maximum number of housing units that can be reasonably constructed, rehabilitated and conserved over a five-year period. Pursuant to Section 65583(b) of the Government Code, it is estimated that the City can provide 45 du's in the very low income category, 125 du's in the low income category, 432 du's in the moderate income category, and 2,025 du's in the upper income category during the next six years, through the completion of major residential projects (page 178 of the Housing Element). Approval, construction and occupancy of this development with 15 lower income units (80 percent and below Orange County median income) will contrib- ute significantly towards meeting these established goals. Request to Waive Park Dedication and Fair Share Fees In order to achieve the lower income affordability standards, the applicant is requesting that the required park dedication fee for the proposed project be waived. Based on the current fee of $5,028.84 per dwelling unit the subject project would require a park dedication fee of $75,432.60. The applicant has also requested waiver of the Fair Share Fees for the project. However, no such waiver is necessary inasmuch as Section 15.38.110 of the Municipal Code already exempts affordable housing projects frog the payment of fair Share Fees. � ' �.' ,.4Y••� i.••• .�i� :,<v.'?:.: '�L.:�y � e. , v, •J i t h ti � ! ;:,�•i,l�,' _ �� •.✓:. 4`iA, 1. sty. rt. Er r..r.- TO Plalkg Commission -6. • Reauested Use of Section 8 Certificates The applicant is also requesting that he be permitted to rent all or a portion of the proposed dwelling units as Section 8 units using the Section 8 fair market rent schedule established by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The applicant has also indicated that with the Section 8 Designation, the entire project will be in the very low income category as established by HUD. Traffic Stud Approval of a Traffic Study prepared in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("Traffic Phasing Ordinance") and City Council Policy S-1 ("Administrative Procedures for implementing the Traffic Phasing Ordinance") is also required. The first step in preparing a Traffic Study is the identification of intersections which will be affected by the proposed developfiment. The City Traffic engineer has identified the following nine intersections for analysis: 1. Placentia Avenue/Superior Avenue 2. Coast Highway/Balboa Boulevard -Superior Avenue 3. Coast Highway/Prospect Street 4. Coast Highway/Orange Street 5. Coast Highway/Riverside Avenue 6. Coast Highway/Dover Drive/Bayshore Drive 7. Coast Highway/Tustin Avenue 8. Newport Boulevard/via Lido 9. Newport Boulevard/Hospital [toad An analysis was conducted to determine if one year from the completion of the project, the anticipated traffic volumes generated by the development plus existing volumes, anticipated regional growth and previously approved developments would generate one percent or more of the projected traffic volumes for each leg of those specific inter- sections during the 2.5 hour peak period. Based upon the one percent analysis contained in the Traffic Study (copy attached for review and consideration), it was found that the project traffic is estimated to be less than one percent of the 2.5 peak hour period volumes at each of the nine intersections. Therefore, further analysis is not required and no specific mitigation measures are necessary. Proposed Covered Parking on the Front On -Half of the Lot in accordance with Section 20.07.260 of the Municipal Code, covered parking spaces, located on the front one-half of a lot, are required to have side walls and an operating garage door. As shown on the attached plans, the applicant is proposing to locate 13 covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the lot which do not have operating garage doors and side walls in every case. Staff has no objections to the proposed design inasmuch as the parking spaces are parallel to 15th Street and are not highly visable from the public street. It is staff's further opinion that inasmuch as the subject .l ••1 •�4 �t •�(. Y'.; fit.. .�: ,I 1. fri. "�+ .,I�ia'fi �'f>.. •S.. 'a,.4�''•':Y:�r•.'�-, TO: Plang Comission -7. • project is an affordable housing project, the cost involved in providing garage doors and side malls on 13 of the 23 on -Alto parking spaces is not justified by any increased visual appeal that night result from the installation of garage doors. Proposed Open Parking Within Front Yard Setback In accordance with Section 20.10.050 of the Municipal Code, parking in the front yard of any "R" District shall be permitted on driveways in front of garages that set back at least 19 feet from the front property line. As shown on the attached site plan, the applicant is proposing to locate an open parking space within the required 20 foot front yard setback which is not within a driveway that provides access to a garage. It is staff's opinion that in this particular case, the proposed parking space is not an acceptable encroachment into the required front yard setback inasmuch as it results in a rather large reduction in landscaping adjacent to the public street and the approval of such an encroachment will set an undesirable president for future applications in the area. Staff has discussed thin matter with the applicant and he has no objections to relocating the parking space to another portion of the site. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the subject applications and suggests that the Planning Commission take such action subject to the findings and conditions set forth in Exhibit "A". PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director Sy--WW W. William Ward W itl. Senior Planner WWW/11 MISC3 Attachments: Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map Letter from Applicant Negative Declaration Traffic Study Plot Plan, Floor Plans and Elevation '•!ll.t. L�ti.. .�'1. stir'. !` .t.. ,.. •�S Il Si.0 1l'{' Tot Pening Comission -8. • EXHIBIT "A" FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, Krk RESIDENTIAL DENSITY SONUS, TRAFFIC STUDY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOUL'ISFI FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 849 15th STPEFT. A. ENVIRONMENTAL Document: Accept the environmental document, making the following findings; Findings 1. That the environmental document in cooplete and has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State EIR Guidelines and City Policy. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. That in order to reduce adverse imparts of the proposed project, all feasible mitigation measures discussed in the environmental document have been incorporated into the proposed project; 4. That the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study have been incorporated into the proposed project and are expressed as Conditions of Approvals 5. That based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, Negative Declaration and supportive materials thereto that if the mitigation measures are incorporated into the project it will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. B. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS: Recommend to the City Council that the requested Residential Density Bonus be approved, subject to the following findings and con-- ditionss Findings: 1. That this project provides affordable units in accordance with section 65915 of the C,overnment Code and Objective No. 7 of the City`s Housing Element. 2. That because of the number of units and 30 year term of affordability, this request for a density bonus is reasonable and justified. TO: P2ang Comission -9. • 3. That the proposed parking space encroachment into the required front yard setback will under the circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and iwproveawants in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and further that the proposed modification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. 4. T'hat the approval covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the lot which do not have garage doors and side walls in every case will not under the circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and further that the proposed =odification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. Conditions: 1. That the development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plan, and elevations. 2. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that a maximum of 15 units of rental housing shall be constructed on the subject property. All 15 units shall be rented at no more than the HUD Section 8 Fair Market Rent to persons and families earning 80 s or less of the Orange County annualized median family income as periodically published by orange County regardless of family size. Any or all of the 15 units shall be rented on a preferential basis to tenants possessing an 'active" Section 8 existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and currently receive rental assistance from the Section 8 Existing Rental assistance Certificate or Voucher Program. Said Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's office prior to the issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall be for no less than thirty (30) years. TO: Planning Comission -10. • 3. That the open parking space within the front yard setback area shall be relocated to another portion of the site. Said new location shall be subject to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer and the Planning Department. 4. That a landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan). S. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. G. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light npillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineers with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 7. That the number of parking spaces required by the off-street parking requirements of the City of Newport Beach (as provided by the Municipal Code, Title 20, Chapter 20.30) be provided on -site. 8. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler protection. 9. The Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 10. That all access to the buildings be approved by the Fire Department. 11. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. TO: Pi ng coaanission -11. • C. TRAFFIC STUDY: APPROVE THE TRAFFIC STUDY MAKING THE FOLLOWIWG FINDINGS: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak -hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Roach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the proj- ect -generated traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'mayor', 'primary -modified', or 'primary' street. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the proj- ect -generated traffic will be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of one critical intersection, but will not add to an unsatisfac- tory level of traffic servico at the critical intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of .90 or less. .r.•' • -f: • � ■•' .. of tot • .Ii.�I.0 :'l.. wS�iGi P' eVA AY scoop L$ cuw~A /.Pv PA600 C•rr pr vor"% nr At M/r 1 C-Z It id-1-A DANA V L !1 fa,f ('''i'�, W �3 . R3 - \u!3, rr� 'Y �r'ryh A•P-!d A-P / A-P A-P•H P-C \�� cnn�rrsr thr.i/ rt 4av lis 22•A w r•+~ r. y �. M,.r--"w/ A,�, .r ~•- DISTRICTING MAP NEW PORT BEACH •-- C A L I F 0 R N I A —0 ^w+ . N wr. ~ . o n r. as +rr r ,+r• w+ rli. «.. ++. r AE1St ARPI/ Iti1L+f OMwLIyLO�L MIL.TOU WSOWNL r. r •+• 1+Mi rrtiN r%• 7 s. Ar►a� .w Sag" omw m9scuff" UGHT ODMMKOL r . r .� w... .r wrir •♦ ♦ •r N �' � AL OEWALL OOMMU CALL rW l ix •late N rut KlItILLTVU 0-�lR1�NL M~ACTLot" r w~ ! Nr ar am u! COMML710 ow.mc?• LMCLLfWIM M VIET s -10- A%AU- IPA 1 0 f �:ti.k,?}.�4 ••r.. :a..:i_a.;`dei.:•:'i.".:�'.i�.;.'�:�.a,,ti.:�.«.'.,.��.J.%!.:'r!L? .;wU..,J,�s,+t.,,4vis'�'.4 ;i..,.,��. •'.a.G. ,�.�a,.J.:},5�,�,.. r.: .. ^;d. G r 11f MESA DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. POST OMCE BOX 1974 COSTA MESA. CALMORNU 9WW � f December 17, 1986 TELEPHONE (714) 9794*91 Mr. James D. Rewicker "l "��'' "�JF� • ' Director i�f '''"'10 City of Newport Beach Planning Departmentr� 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92663 f�n;r.i333 H c Dear Mr. Hewicker: cis 11..� We at Mesa Development have entered into an agreement to build apartments with Joseph Irani and Ilse Sultanian on their lot, located -at 849 W. 15th Street in Newport Beach, also known as The East 72.60 feet of Lot 917, First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, in the City of Newport Beach, as per map recorded in Book 8, Page 61 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County. This property is currently designated for R--2178 development. The parcel is 72.60 by 300, which is 21,780 square feet or 1/2 acre. We are proposing a fifteen (15) unit apartment development, all units having two bedrooms, which would remain affordable for thirty (30) years to lower income families. This development would require a fifty percent (501) density bonus, which we are hereby requesting. In order to achieve the proposal affordability standards, we are requesting that the City: (a) wave all park, fair share and application fees; (b) permit open covered parking and; (c) grant a density bonus from the prevailing twenty (20) units to the acre to thirty (30) units to the acre. We further request that the City allow the use of Section 8 Certificates (vouchers) and the prevailing Section 8 Fair Market Rent schedule for all the units in this development. If it is determined that this development, as proposed, is consistent with the City's affordable housing, please assist us in being placed on the calendar as- soon as possible for the necessary Planning Commission and the City Council hearings. If it is detrmined that this project, as proposed, creates any conflicts with q ty policies or regulations, please meet with us at your earliest convenience to discuss and resolve these conflicts. We are looking forward to another successful project in Newport Beach. Sincerely, James G. White, Jr. /rah ••5:f' 1r t I �l. i�l: •r � � � ..y..3r..Y4 e I +: C• x}.tk:!1��i CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92658.8915 NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO: Office of Planning and Research Q 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 County Clerk of the County of Orange P.O. Box 818 Santa Ana, CA 92702 f": Planning Department City of Newport 11anch P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 !NAME OF PROJECT: Mesa Affordable Apartments III--Residentiial Density fionus, Traffic St PROJECT LOCATION: 849 West 15th Street, West Newport Bench PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of a fifteen (15) unit low incorw, apartment development which includes a fifty percent (50%) density bonus in accordance with Section No. 65915 of the State of California Gov. Code. The proposal also includes FINDING: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy K-3 L:o:rt,,ininq to procedures and guidelines to implement the California Environmental Quality Act, the Environmental Affair, Committee has evaluated the proposed project and determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. MITIGATION MEASURES: Please see the attached sheet. INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: The City of Newport Reach INITIAL STUDY AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA DATF. RECEIVED FOR FILING: Environmental Coordinator DATE: March 9, 1987 il 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach ' APPENDIX I ' rMYIROM =rAL cMEcrLiST room Enviroameatal Checklist Form (To Be Completed 4 Lead Assacy) ' i. Background I. Kam* of Proponent Mesa Development Company, Inc. Z. Address and Phone Humber of Proponent 2925 College Avenue 3. Date of Checklist Submission 4. Agency Requiring Qhecklise S.. ?ham@ of Proposal, if applicable Mesa Affordable Apartments ill-- Ftas entl •nrst y menus, II. Environmental Impacts ro c Study . (Explanation@ of all "Yee" and "maybe" answers are required on sheets.) attached YES MAYBE ND 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Piaruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or ' physical features? ' e. AnY,increase in wind or water erosion Of @oils, either on or off the site? /. f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or chanpas is siltation, ' deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or ' lake? YES MAYBE No y,. t:Itlow.urr. of people or prop-i I y try geutoy.ital hisards such ns earth- quakes, landtilides. mudslides, ground failurc. or similar hazards? �^ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emission@ or .deteri- oration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 1. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh staters? b. Changes in absorption rates,, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood craters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters. either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cute: or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 74 Twit{` �. S'_ {?i1 �-{.i�.Rt�a•t ;�t }i, :.�1 1�. �1i 1 "+S ; "1 - + � l 11 •4. ..A ft.. .H l i ,Y :.�' I. .tl 4. •i 1:1,ty-E it YES 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species. or number of any species of plants (including trees. shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish. benthic organisms. or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of new species of ani- mals into an area. or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? b. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Lirht and Clare. Will the proposal produce new light �or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 75 : YtS MAYRC IV 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resourcesT b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resourceT 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk o an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including. but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of en accident or upset conditions? 11. Population. Vill the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Trans ortation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Ceneration of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Ef',ects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon esiiting transportation systeos? _ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne. rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazardous to rotor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the Proposal have an eff=ct upon, or result in a need for new or altered Rovernot ntal services in any of the folievine areas: 76 �5• ,�51' tY 7 j �a .mil-. •..c•':'•.� f: t•v !+•1 a.l:• .•,y%� .Y .:CI. �:1 ':tifss��l:f�: .art:. •:f. .�.�'e';-. :!__ _.':i...... a• ..�1�:":.. .I� ^.r....n.Y,.��:.5'.•. .M+.::'S�f�.ih{i:li:`=✓':h'�� PPE-U :24 ! • YES KAVIE MO a. fire protection? b. Police protection? �. c. Schools? �, .._ • Je— d. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. R- rA. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. substantial increase to domed upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of ansrsy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a aced for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? a. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? �.. b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result is the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public. or will the proposal rpautt in the creation of an aesthetically offensive Oita open to public view? T i".S J..s 41 c'S• � 11S ti ! / ((� .' .ill. • YES PAYBC ID 19. Recreation. Wilt the proposal result n an impact upon the quality or Quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeological/Historical. Will tip+• proposal result in as alteration of a sitsifiCONt archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. Mtsdatorp findinjs of Significance. a. Does the, project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environ t, substantially reduce Me habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below ael'f-sustaiming levels. threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the aumber or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve abort -term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short --term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small. but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human 5eings, either directly or indirectly? III. Discussion of Environmelital Evaluation IV. Determination (±o be completed by the T.ead Agency) 78 .a..*. 5..:�Yr..': "A.. .•>,i'r.` .:.4't. •.ii •'�.: � "`;+.�iki`. ,',r:.� .,rLr t r;�. ,.�: .1 i�r r:. :\ On the basis of this initial evaluation: [� I find that the proposed project OOM NOT have a significant effect 0o tits eariroemeat, sed a WA ATIvt DtCIARATIOM will be prepared. 0 I find that although the proposed project could .hare a siaeificaet effect oaa a the ewiroent. there will sot be a siamificant•effect is this use because the ■itiaation mmseres described an se attached sheet lave bea added to the project. d WCATIT9 DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 I tied the proposed project MAT beve a si;aificant-of fect on the emriroaeut, sad as EIRONOOMAL IIQACr RMRT is rMpirad. !larch Date !� (Plot*: This is only a au;aested form. I their own format for initial studies.) 4 L Signature for The. city of t!r�nrt�eeach� Public sisaciss are free to devise •MESA AFFORDABLE APAftTM1,2rl'S I I T (SEASIDE II) -- RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS, TRAFFIC STUDY lb. The proposed project will result in disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of the soil. However, given the present nature of the site, flat and at grade, these effects will be insignificant. ib. The proposal may result in the creation of objectionable odors during the course of construction due to the construction materials and methods. such cffacts shall be eliminated upon completion of the project and are, therefore, insignificant. 3b. Implementation of the proposal shall result in changes in the absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface runoff. However, these effects will be insignificant given the present nature of the nice --flat and at grade. 4a. The proposed project will result in a change in the diversity and number of species of plants upon the site. The proposal shall result in an increase in the variety and numbers of plant life on -site, and, upon compliance with mitigation measures the effects shall be insignificant. 6a. Implementation of the proposal shall result in temporary increases in existing noise levels during the course of construction. They shall be alleviated upon completion, and no significant effects are anticipated. 7. The proposed project will produce new light and glare, yet the effects shall not significantly effect neighboring residences upon compliance with mitigation measures incorporated into the project. 13b. The proposed project shall create a demand for new parking. However, this effect shall be reduced to a level of insignificance upon compliance with mitigation measures. 14J14a. Implementation of the proposal may have an effect upon, or result in a need for fire protection. Upon compliance with mitigation measures however, these effect shall be reduced to a level of insignificance. 18. The proposal may result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view. However, theno effects shall be rendered insignificant upon compliance with mitigation measures. MITIGATION MEASURES 15. 4a. That a landscape and irrigation plan for tho project shall be prepared by a licensed landscapa architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with tha proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupAncy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with tho prepared plan) . 2. 4a. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 3. 7. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall 1)e prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Enginnnri with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 4. 13b. That the number of parking spaces required by the off-street parking requirements of the City of Newport Beach (as provided by the Municipal Code, Title 20, Chapter 20.30) be provided on -site. 5. 14J14a. That prior to the issuance of building pernits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler protection. 5. 14J14a. The Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 7. 14J14a. That all access to the buildings be approved by the Fire Department. 8. 18. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. �,.' d;� f,�..r:• .}f,. ti: `'?:^ •:;^.`.' �`.T,: �r:: :i«• ^; t '�•r, (, u. 1��4: .+;. r1,"'•?. ::�'`•.2t'�.'..3; APPENDIX H Date Riled 2 - 7,9417 En viro owatal Wormation Form (To be oaspieted by.applicant) 2EMAL auw►�'I 1. Now sae address or developer or project sponsor: .�� MESA � ✓ eAbi�n1T - - - - - 2. Address of project: ! /S? Sf29ET• Assessor's hock and Lot amber 3. Name, address, and telephone number of pets n to be contacted concerning this project: lc�Hi T� — �i �Z32y-may/ r O r ■ r ^ ..�- $. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: i =iG ? 1L�,lS��r&Id&&i A22VWL 57. s a eser any► o er related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those rewired by city, regional, state and federal agencies: b. Existing zoning district: R 3 Zj 7. Proposed use of site (Project Jor.which_thiR. forw_is filed): PRWECT DESCRIPMON 8. Site site. 2/1 40 SQ, FIr. g. sq.Are footage. !i', 71 �?Fi• 10. Number of floors of construction. 2 5TG7e'r 11. )Amount of off-street parking provided. 2S 12. Actach plan3. t'ES 1). Proposed scheduling. 111. Associated projects. ,iJ 15. Anticipated incremental development.A00 a • -Asy 010 16. If residential, include the number -of units, schedule of unit altos, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. Sa= ,Q77;,Ve--11,,to )ce- S . 17. It commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or realonsily oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading faeil ties. ,v�} , 1a. It industrial, indicate type, estlaatod employment per shift, and loading facilities. M14 . . 19. It Imtitutional, indicato the major function, estimated euploya t per @hilt, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and commmity benefits to be derived from the project. �//;, 20. If the project involves a variance, eondit1ona2 use or rezoning application, state this and indIcato clearly why the application is required. A/A. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effectat Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary) . M No ✓ 21.. Charge in exleting.features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, laims or hills, or substantial alteration or ground contours. 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lauds or roads. wL/ 23. Change in pattern; scale or character of genergl area of Lproject. ✓ 24. Signlficant amounts of solid waste or litter. ✓ 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. _,d'**'26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground watelr quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. .� 21. Substantial change in existing noise or yibva tion � levels in the vicinity. _e 29. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or pore. 29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flaomables or explosives. •}i K3 YF:1" NO 30. Substantial change•ln demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 32. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects, ENVIR L Sa"INO 33. Describe the project alto as It exists before the project, Including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures,on the alto, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs -of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or ecenlc aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, ets.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photoLeraphs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photon will be accepted. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished ave and in the attached exhibito presc<<t the data and inror-, mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of ray ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Dn tc gna ure For ��,/�7. �,.t .�,�l: eti. S .r�T,� '.4'. 'S: •r:, �>'\ •e, s:4l.I �1'�i .l�: r;•}+�]i�. i! •r r 1 ��;, ......... ....... .1.. /40 ■ l • 4P a 9 "20 AWTIN•FOUST "S"IATES, INC. I TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ANO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING February 13, 1987 Mr. Rich Edmonston City Traffic Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 SUBJECT: 15th Street Apartments TPO Dear Rich; 1450 NORTH TUSYIN AVENUE, SUITE 106 SANTA ANA• CALIFOFINIA 92701 TELEPHONE: (714) 667.0496 Attached are the one percent tests for the proposed 15th Street Apartments. The project passes the one percent test at all locations. For trip generation purposes. the City of Newport Beach apartment trip rates have been utilized. The trip rates and peak hour trips are summarized in Table 1. The trip distribution associated with this project has been established by field observation of existing travel patterns from other developments in the immediate vicinity of the project site, and assignment to Coast Highway and Newport Boulevard based on other TPO studies. Traffic entering and exiting a similar project in the vicinity of the site was counted to determine the directionality of project traffic. Approximately 45 percent of traffic entering and exiting the site will be oriented towards the north and will have no impact on the intersections tested. The trip distribution pattern presented in Figure 1 illustrates our best estimate of project traffic patterns. The project site is currently a vacant lot. The site currently generates no appreciable traffic; therefore, the project receives no credit for existing traffic. This 'project satisfies the TPO process in terms of mitigation required of critically impacted Intersections. If you have any questions regarding the above, please: call. Sincerely. Joe E. Foust, PE JEFlbgw Attachments •'�.�t �s ":.i. ':Y,isy.i-:i�.. i� .fn r7 i j" � �r}ii •;>:%r: i•i. rrt.' ':•( a, M1t. ,l,1 .. ::it. •,i: a'- � t�'y�.� .�'S�F7T•�. •i:Y�.r ��1� '�ZA4.1• i!i �: .; �!- r..c "C.•' .1. ..1 .y Table 1 TRIP GENERATION —AN PATE-- --PM RATE-- --AM TRIPS- --PH TRIPS -- USE SIZE Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit 15tb Street 15 DU .1 .3 .4 .2 2 4 G 3 Apartments 20% 1 w V offs ONSTM•POUBT asi 5% 25% Figure 1 TRIP DISTRIBUTION NO ASSIGNNBNT i . It Traffic roluee Analysis Intersections toast Noy ! Orasge St E:istin} Traffic thlumms Mud on Karate Daily Traffic Vinter/Sprinq U AR Peat 2 112 Hour Agprored Aporaacd E:istiny Sgiamal Proje:ts Projected It of Pro1r_les Project 6irectim peat 2 1/2 Hour Volth Peat 2 112 Haar PW 2 112 Hour Peal 2 11heir NO 2 112 Haar Volume Voleoe him* blure Valuae NOW IiortAb"Ad 256 0 0 2SB 3 0 Soatktw:9 210 0 0 210 2 0 Easibcod 5537 221 Ilm 7067 71 1 Nestbo-and 2374 4S 494 2953 30 2 _z) PrOnt Traffic Is estimated to be less the. 11 of Projected Peat 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Voluae. Project Traffic is estimated to to gqreater O n 11 cf Pro jjected Pea! 2 1/2 Nwar Traffic Yalusa. Intersecti:A Capcity Utliiia;icn II.C.O.1 Analysis is rG4mirei. FRNKi: 115:t St A;irtarnts FUEL G:tj?A%%f yf'.Rs 1922 lwst:a-iws! Asset., Irc. Ca1c. wte 62/12167 ' .r It Traffic hlsoe Aulpis W Ksection: Laast in [ Orae4e St Esistial Traffic Valium NSW at ieerage gaily Traffic MinterlSpriwl 64 FS Peak 2 112 Hour 4 ronO Approach Eeistieq ltWoul Projects Projected It of Pro octet Proj ct Direction Peak 2 112 Nw Vwtl Peak 2 112 Hour Peek 2 112 Nxr Peal 2 11 Mont leak 2 112 Hour Valwe Yalu" hlwe volute Volute Volute iiarthiouad 111 0 0 lu 2 0 southhun6 112 0 0 ---------- 132 1 0 East!oun.4 A04 ------------------------- 148 IS7 ------------------..��.........�.------- 4714 47 2 Kest m6 $651 226 1284 7161 72 1 __) Project Traffic is estieated to be lest tbaa it of Prair_tei Peak 2 112 Hoir Traffic Volute. Prole:t Traffic is estiuted to be greater thin It of Projected Peak 2 112 hour Traffic Mute. 1t.ersactic4 Capacity Utilitation II.C.u.l analysis Is required. : ntJ'LcT: 1s:t, S. 4arttsats FAA 1>:u►'-'»r TEAA- HIS Austi"4xs. Alm., fcc. Cs!c. Date c2/1218: fit: _ '}� • w It Traffic Volaw Aaallsis Ittersect M Lest 11rr ll PrGspct 5t Esisting Traffic Velam hwO cm Arerap Wily Traffic IlinterJffrtej 84 M Peak 2 112 Hoer AV;roved Approach Ezistinq je} m"I Projects Projected It of Projected Project a1r1,,U;4 hA 2 1J2 Hour hart! Peak 2 112 Hour Peat 2 112 Hour Pta1 2 IJ Haag Ptak 2 112 kw Yoluse Value Value Volust Volaet Value lkrthtv4rA 114 0 0 144 1 0 Sorthboard 440 0 0 400 4 0 Eastbovee 4321 111 1316 6018 40 1 lfestbo=d --- 2454 TZ 484 3041 .... ...................... 30 .� 2 Frcject Traffic is estiaa:d to be less than 1t of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volose. Frcjtct Traffic is estieated to be greater than It of Projected Peak 2 112 How Traffic Must. latersection Ca wity Ut:lizatior, 11.C.U.1 Analysis is rep -Orel. FRU Is 159. 2.; tlartrerts FML NUFA.1 TEM: ME R;;slia-Foist A;s::., la:. Wc. Cat* 02;12161 .-..,�.. T" ...... . 12 Traffic Value* "Isis lntersectime: Coast flay ! Prospect St Eiistiag Traffic Valuers Iaset on Average Daily Traffic :inter/Sgriry U M Peak 2 112 Amur 49rated Approach Eeistia4 legioaal fhrojects Projected It of Project*$ Project Direction Peak 2 in lion firouth Peak 2 111 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Poor Feat 2 112 W Peak 2 1/2 Hour Volume Val au Volume Volume Valuse Volume Narttbound 117 0 0 111 1 0 Soutmound 20 0 0 260 -------------------------------------------•----- 3 0 .... --............... Easttxnd 1111 ..._--------------------------- lit U1 4304 47, 2 ---------------------......................... --.............. ------ --------- ---------------------------,....__. HestOaund M 240 1281 I516 15 i Projt:t Traffic Is estimated to be less khan it of Projected Peak 2 112 Herr Traffic Volua*. Project Traffic is estimated to be ggreater thaw 12 of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Value+. lnttrsectior. Capacity 0 li:aticn iI.C.C.I Malysls is required. PRMI C1: IRK St ;wtaarlts M. OC::Tr'ZY IE.O. Me 0 Austi:-FLIst Assoc., Icc. Calc. Cate 0/12111 t �.+. I I.NI4 ♦N. . M � � T 1 1�. r C i. r f •- _ 1 ... :. � i '� fit .. ..'t't..r ... � � . �.ti:•: .. :.:'� ti �. _ - � 1....�.l. ,!� W.. 1.,.� .. _... ... t' i. /�1 {..'l�f Y. - 1 5 .If;.J FI'. �. \'� r� It Traffic Valuer Analysis lottrsntim: Coast Nw If ealtas F IY:lSuprirw AY Existing Traffic Values fused an Avtrage Pail', Traffic VirterlS;rinj 91 Le Peak 2 112 Now A;;ravtd Aswoi:o Existing Rep tal Projects Projected It *f h s tctt; Project Dirrr:tirA Peak 2 112 Hour irorti; Peak 2 112 M,;? Peak 2 112 Ifaur Feai 2 113tcr Peak 2 112 dour Volute loluw Vollm Volute voluxe Volute Mcrthtaad-------198b 0 . 6 M 221 0 5tutkJta�a;~-----"d04 t 19 623 1 2 Esstbwd _--- 4157 1" 100: S1.2: :1 l ytstbor.r�d M 1104 N 710 1853 19 0 __) Project Traffic is estleatci to ke less than 11 cf Projected Peak 2 112 Flour Traffic Wim. Project Traffic is estitate: to !t ggreater VarJ 11 of Frejected Pea; 2 112 Hcer Traffic vc:cte. Interse:tior, I:aa city Utilization II.C.U.1 Analysis is rei Ore:. th delts ...�..........:t-ray........................................----- F.. ......... Y................------........ Aus n-Ftls: Assce.x Inc. `i` -• v . e : i � , ;lip . _a .... �. :'q G:c. 0ate 421i:131 ufet 11 Traffic W we Aailrsis Intersection: Coast Noy ! bl%u 11•1dlSuA:rior Me Eiistial Traffic Mules Awed 0 Avera;e icily Traffic Victor/Spring 8b ptut Peak 2 112 Hour Approved 4proat6 Ellis tinq ftelicaal Projects Projected It of Projected Project Oirecti a Peak 2 111 flour ira.:h Peak 2 112 �.cr Prat 2 l/2 Noun Peat 2 112 Hour Peat 2 112 Hour Volvat Value# Volute V0141e Yolwe Voluee kuthhca44 Ins 0 •47 1802 11 0 Y-.. rr.�..-r..-«r...�..r rrr....+.....+.«««....a.r�.......-....�«.«.r. �..�..� �.�........... - -w w r....r rr«w....... Sortumd �.«r...««�++w.��..«ter-�r.r�«� 4297 0 224 4521 45 1 Easthon3i 4368 �.r...�«...•....r...�..�r 175 972 w.�..�..«......«..w.. 5515 w -a - r- 55 -..r ....«��rl. 2 Yestbousd 63I2 253 1014 75E4 h 0 29) Project Traffic is estimated to be less tham It of Projected Peal 2 112 Hour Traffi: Values. Project Traffic is estimated to be ggreater thde It of Projected Ptak 2 112 Hour RAM: Volrs#. Inf0tsectW :1:a:it, Utilization II.C.J.I Aralysis is rt;stret. Fi;CdEC?: Silt St 4vidsets FVU OCCUPAM 1FW,::9;6 Fr4t1A4z st Assoc.." Inc. t• i- .. ] k- 4 IL �•{��•'• "MA, ig Calc. 5ats 02,11211? ;a: It Traffic Valuae Analysis Intersection: Coast May I Riverside At Esistiag Traffic Volumes lased on Average lailf Traffic VinterlSpriti U ra Peat 2 112 Hair kpraved SpDreach Esistiag Regional Proje:ts Projecte: It of Pro ected Project hire:tioa Peal I 112 Hour Vooth Pea! 2 112 Hour Peat 2 112 Your Peal 2 11Hw Peat 2 112 Nwr Valsae Volume Volaat Volume Volame Volume Mrtf.r=d 140 0 :1 1U 1 0 Southbound IM 0 42 !Sl 1 0 Eistbs nd 6022 101 toU 7514 75 2 lfestbwnd 2116 48 1055 4095 41 1 > Project Traffic is estimated to be less than li of Frojected Peat 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estiaated to be greater than It of Projected Peal 2 112 Nmr Traffic Volute. lottrwtior. C.pa:ity Utili:at:aa II.C.U.1 A}ilTsis Is required. FRU!:i: ;5t ::: kirtecAs FI1_l C:C'JFAlf:Y YEAF: 14i3 Auitin4wit Wx., Inc. 14 , Eitc. late 0;11241w'` r !v• tit:r:1"'.'!. ••;i iii' rr i�r• ..r...^1 ••f r�1r+. It Traffic Volute Anilysis Iatersestion: coast HEY ! Riverside Ar Eeistiag Traffic Valetas lased as Average Daily Traffic (linter/Spriry 68 Pr Peak 2 1/2 Home Approved Approach Elistiaq Reyconal Projects Projected It of Projtcted Project Oirectioc Peak 2 1/2 Haar worth Pak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Mann leak 2 112 Iftur Peak 2 112 Hoer Volume Volute Volume Volmee Volute Volume .r _----0-._.--------- 4-----.. Marthbound 41 0 4 41 --------------- ---_--------------------- ------------------------- ...----- ................. --.......... --....... Southbound 1246 0 41 1337 13 0 ........................ . --------•--M»-- _---------------- ---------1------- Eastb:uad 6040 41 13431480 i ............. ...... ............ Ilestbound SM6 8S 1328 7001 70 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- __) Project Traffic is estimated to be less than It of Projected Ptak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volute. Project Traffic is estimated to b1 grenter thin It of FrojectM Ptak 2 112 Hcur Traffic Volutr. Imtersectiar Capacity Utilitat:cn II.C.U.1 Analysis is required. t T'-'n-..i ..........b .. . ............... ..... .r..._.......il.................. . Aastin-Foust Assoc. r Sac. {a1c. Date 021121At ''�•�sr'. a�i4:,f'tir a _ •. ,•;�. .,.: :�_ t.�,:`. w. �, irT It traffic Valese Analysis istersettion: Gast Mry 1 Tustin AV ieistieE traffic Values Based CO Artrap Daily Traffic Mister/$;ring 16 AM Pul 2 112 }low Atwood Axracl OiretU4s Etisti+� Y+ak 1 U1 Mosr Bplaal firatl projects Peak 1 Ili If;r Projected Peat 2 1/1 Boar 11 of Projected Peak 1 112 (four Froj+ct Peat 2 ............................................•...-------•----------------------.-_._....----------- Volyee Values Volyet Vo1L'se Voluse 112 hoer tblcs+ Ibrth+soseE 11 0 0 11 0 0 SoetAlarsd .............................. Ill 4 _..........--•--....»._-•----------------------------....----------_---� 13 +` (14------.....-`--"--0__».-- Eastboat 2t11 PB IC33 6603 66 M•ttaowa ----.......................................... 3244 51 1013 _--»---------------------- 1311w-------•----•41 --_ �------___ -------------- ------------------ 1 _�} Proiact traffic is estivate: to he less Ilan 11 of Projected Peal 2 112 wxr traffic Value#, Proj+:t traffic is ettleate: to as gqreattr than It o! Projg+cte� P+ai tl1 M:a traffic Volyta, Interse:ticn Cipcity L, liratiel fi.C.lt.l tralys:s is re;Airm MUM: IRS, :t A:+-ttea:s FJL1 0: V.-O.1 TEAR: 19a5 �idttin-f:;it �isi4:.� 1c:• talc. Batt 92112/61 �1 I�r la' •Y.e,� ?fe• •L: �iT }N,y:�Si•'.•):r Nl :'J•.'�. �...i.li •.' iia4 'e './±.Si':•�'.•...:•. t`:�'1 �,.1...�11L�'i Y.. �.:f_�N� �:J- :YY� 11 Traffic Volume Analysis Intersection: toast Key ! Tustin At Eetstiag Traffic Volumes Raced ei Average Daily Traffic liAter/Sprisl 9E F?: Peak 2 1/2 Kwr Approves APprac?► Eelstial 1"ional Projects Pro Wted iT of Projected Project Dire;tioa Peat 2 112 kw &o.th Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 112 P-;x Feak 2 112 NMr Volume Volume Voluee Voluee Yoluae Voluee krthtound ...........................-------------------.»__..._..._._.------..................-••-••••••--...... 15 0 0 15 0 ......... 0 S 411ound 346 0 0 348 3 0 Eastta;n d 401.14 64 1334 5427 54 2*--•--- vest5c4snd 5956 94 1355 7305 73 4 �> Project Traffic is litigated tc to less than 1I of Projected Peak 2 1/2 W Traffic Voluee. Project Traffic is litigated to to ggreater tAaa 1i of Fro}}ectr: Peak 2 112 Nov Traffic Voluee, lnierstctiv Capacity Utilitaticn i1.C.U.1 Aailysis is required. IM St R;,artsvts FC.i OCCU=ICY VE:E: US Asstin•fu,st Atsc:. � tn:. Ca:c. 0::e O:IlIIE7 1.;`.•i••..A}... :4.pp.. .4�}:..f :{:•:.`,':. .: �.'�' '.i �4" :Y.`::� ':Si i•.: :r;'1•yi�: 4D 0 .. ■ ! It Traffic Volr.me Analysis Existing Intersecticas Cwst Hwy ! Corer Traffic Volumes lased Erne shore Or m Ateraga gaily Traffic Vinter/5tirIA, 86 All Peek 2 1/2 Hour Approred Approach Oirectiam Existiaq Peak 2 N2 Hour Aegioaal Projects Wo■th Peek 2 t/2 Hoer Projected Peak 2 In Hour II of projected seal 2 1/2 Ile ur Project Peek Valuse Volume Valuee Volume Volume 2 112 Ww Volree MnrthkauaE 33S 0 0 33S---------•-----i•---•----------- ------- 4 South:oun3 ................................................................................................................. 15]1 0 134 2105 -.....'...__...._._._....----- 11 Q Eastbcwnd 4827 11 1036 :942 51 , Hestbound 5182 83 1067 -------.. 6332 b........---•------------- 1 __) Prcjea Traffic is estimated to to less thin 11 of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Praje:t Traffic is estimates to be gqreater tha:, 12 cf Frojected Peal 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Voluse. InKrsectior. Capacity 1ltsliratier. 11.C,U.1 Analysis is ropired. FRCJE:T: I:tt St kartnats F.4i C:Ce?;h1.'1 f: , .............._................................................................... .............. ........... �. Austir-Fist Ass::., It:. Cal:. la:e C2/12/8] ti r t4a.i.fpSnit! 9 1, n } f ZL i ) •1 It Traffic Voltiae Analysis lntetstctions Coast Hey ft Sorer Dr/layshort Of Existing Traffic Wases lasts a Artrage Daily Traffic YlnterlSOriai ti PA Peak 2 112 kv ApFrored Apfroacl, Existing A"ional Projects Proje:ted It 0Projected Project Directior, Pea& 2 112 Noun iromtA Peek 2 112 four Ptak 2 1/2 Imar Peal 2 SIZ low Ptak 2 112 flour astute Volute Volute Volute Volsme Volute Morthbo:nd 268 0 0 268 i f.. »---- -p --- --- Southbcnns 3176 D for, 3281 ............................ 3I Eastbound 4104 a1326 -------------- 5446 ..--»----------------- Mestbotnd 5161 42 1385 7242 17 l.----------»- »»--- S at) Frojrt Traffic is estimate., to be less than 1t of Projected Feat 2 112 Hoar Traffic Solna. Frajnt Traffic is estieattd to be greater than 11 of Projected Fail Z 112 Hwr Traffic Volute. Intersecticc Capacity Utilization 11.C.U.1 Analysis is re;uirod. -,. F ILO: :Stt ._ Aoartrtnls FULL LCCU=A'Zf tE A: 1+ s Austirrfxrs: Ais;.;., Irc. Calc. Late 02112117 -` W. cif •`�� _ a:Ii''`s':' :.'�:'. ti'=? ��ii. :r.r . i .v!: ,.f, r'!ii�'r'I 'ter.i N�. .i?�: i'y .: '.'S:�•'rrr_ �.�{ ..r; .!. ��....r, �-....k:.l ..• •:i�'.:�. .1. .al �.F.. '! �.�'Zs' s rL! • II Traffic Valcse Analysis Atersettim: Wrier Ar I Placentia A, Existing Traffic Volumes Based as Average raily Traffic VicterlfOriq B& M Peat 2 in mow R:art"i 4=4th Esistimg 1"iomal Projects Projected 1t of Proiecte3 Project Direction Pail 2 112 Moan 6iodh hak 2 112 Near Peal 2 112 Hrur Pesi 2 112 Hour Peak 2 112 Nour Volume Volume robot Volume Value Volwe Northbood 711 0 75 794 1 t Sosthb=j 1293 a 53 1346 IS s ------------------------ EastLo.ad 2701 ---------------- ---- ------------ _.-_._w---------.._..-___K_.._._......... 0 .24 2805 28 1 Mestd=d 538 0 105 643 d 0 Project Traffic is estimated to he less this 11 of Projected Peal 2 112 11mr Traffic Volta. Project Traffic is estioatM to be reater than It of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Valwe. Musectioc CapcitI Uttlitatice fl.C.U.l Analysis is require:. FA2S'_STo 15t. St Alartamts. A,.stim-fc.st Am:., loc. FIB L 1XILPAC( Y. : ME ------------------------------------------------------------- UIc. cite 0210187 ■ 1% Traffic Voleme Analysis loteructioas Sueerior AV f1 Placestia ar Ealstimq Traffic Volumes lased oa Average gaily Traffic Minter/Soring M PM took 2 in Kaw Awn" Awwk Esistiml Regional Projects Projected It of Pro*hd Project lirectios Peak 2 112 Mow irorth Peak 2 112 Nwr Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 112 Now Peak 2 i12 Nmur WON Volume Volvo@ volume Valve hlwe NorUbous: 1045 0 324 1369 14 4 SoutMUM 1571 0 69 1639 li 3 Eastkvu 1230 0 120 i950 26 2 llmstigAd 1114 0 292 2056 21 0 �} Pro iact Traffic is ntieated to be less than 12 of Projected Pear 2 112 ilow Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to ke renter than 12 of Pro ette9 Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volum. sa ersectica Capacity Ut litation 11.CU,1 kalysis is required. P;CdE:i: ISO' St 4ar4,,ce:.ts FLU OCCGPA%':Y !cis: 1969 f►ntia-fan: Asso:.� h:. CaIc. late L21t21@7 s' t 0 11 Traffic Volcot Analysis latersectioat Weport Ilvd ! Via Lida Eristisg Traffic Volum hand on Average Icily Traffic Minter/Sprir.4 u AM Peak 2 112 Hour Approved Approach birectioe Eiistiaq Peak 2 112 Moor 1"loaal Irajects (freeth Peak 2 t12 Nour hojected Peat 2 112 Hour 11 of Projected Peal 2 1/2 Naar Project Volwe Volga Volume Volume Volute Peal 2 1/2 Mew Volume Iforthbcund ------------_ 3166 0 110 ------------- — ---- —--------------- 321b -------- 33 ------------- 0 Southbound -----------,—._——.---_. 217b ---------- 0 44 --__--.._—.....-------....--_.............................................. --------------------------------------------.... 2180 23 0 Eastbound 0 4 0 0 0 0 IfesWund 1011 - 0 0 ----............................................... 1011 11 0 _2) Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak 2 112 Nocr Traffic Volute. Project Traffic is estimated to be ggrester than 11 of Praje:to$ Peak 2 1/2 Ntrr Traffic Volume. lttersection Cap:city Utilization iI.C.U.1 balysis is required. PFO.=E:I: 1Sth St A,-M. .21..1 FLLL C=''Prx:Y YEA: 19EE kittin4wit Assc:., fr... cats. W.:42.12110 It Traffic Volume Analysis ss, taterstctiona NMWt sl d ! Via Lido Eaistiey Traffic Volman IasW w Average hily Traffic Hinter/Spriaq M III Ptak 2 112 Hour A�rarri Approach ESIstiaq 11"lomal Praj+sts Frcjected 1I of Projectel ►reject Oirtctia Peak 2 112 YAw firorth Peat 2 1/2 Kwr Ptak 2 112 W Peak 2 1/2 Now Ptak 2 112 Now ------ ............. Volume ..,.» Volume Volume ----------------- Valve Volume .____ Valeme Lorthbz.nt --»».---------. MI. U 23S 3156 ............... 3i ....._...__»- l ScvthDowud _..»»----------......------ .. 4702 ».............. ». 0 240 .................. -- ............ 4142 ..................»»_.------ 41 0 Eastbound 0 0 0 --..... 0 .-•.................... 0 ----».---_ 0 Ktttboua4 ..»»---------------•-- 1312 0 O .................. ................ 1312 .... --.... 11 ............... 0 ____-------_» 22> Project Traffic 1s ntimates to be less than It of Projectee Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Voluea. Project Traffic is estimated to be reattr than lI of Projected Peak 2 112 Her Traffic Volume. 1n�orse:tlor. Capacity Utili:ati x 11.C.U.1 Malysis is required, - ?3ui;CT: 15M Et 4artaertt ML f CW-i CV YEAR: 1S6a Astir.-io„tt 14tsQ:,., Tat. r::.}I• 'yt�✓. 11-} .\ '':lam �.• .l - .'S �a� : 1. t •�ti.. 4 Cal:. %te 02112/E1 5!�e• �i,+•.Vi It Traffic voltae Aaalysis lattra:tioo: Mt.porl 61rd 1 Ve"ita; fid Eaistie9 Traffic Vo;rats Dash oa Awa2e Daily Traffic linttrlSpriry D6 AM Ptak 2 in moa Approved Apprc&3 f/istin4 Retiosal Frosects ho;acted 1I of Prcjected Project Directics Peak 2 112 Maur Wat! teak 2 1/2 Hoar Peak 2 1l2 Boor Peak 2 11: Ibur Peak 2 112 gap:r Valkilo Volute Volru Valutf Valuer Voluse Marta:ar.6 3338 53 173 3561 36 1 5outt,:p,,�i l"i 31 227 2217 22 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EastEcrnc 1012 0 114 1204 12 3 Iititb: �s D33 0 68 101 1 Q s=) Project Traffic is tstiaattd to be less that 1Y of Frcjected Pak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volute. Project Traffic is tstirated to be greatir van 11 of Projected Peak 2 112 Kaur Traffic Volute. lotersectioa Capacity Utilization (1.C.1l.) A•lalysis is reguirn. FnT)_CT: l.tt, :: A;a•tai:is FULL BCCUPA9:f TEAS: 1188 Austif4cist Also:.$ SQL. Cats. Eatt C:11:197 ��•i. Ira f..: I •..r n•I.i dd � F �i I • �.. - `•<�:�• ', rl.[ �i}�. LY ..`Y'�.�YY=.l.. �-J��i .t•:-�,..'•,e(.. ZF� 11 Traffic Vol Aulysis �. on' Interu'ctimu "ort Blvd ! "ital Rd Existing Traffic Nelwn Used on Amap Daily Traffic Minter/Spriaq u p% feat 2 112 MINI, �mod Aprach Eaisti_I Op"iml !'Fijotts, ProjKt1d 11 of hajKtW Project Direction Peal 2 112 hoar Ireatll Peat 2 112 loaf Peek 2 112 Morn Peak 2 112 Morn Peak 2 112 Moor Yolww WIM Vilooe Molwo Volsoe yol� MorthbvAd 3459 SIS 3499 39 1 Soutrbwad 3721 60 207 3188 40 Eastt=d 1599 0 536 2135 21 2 Mestbtard 410 0 isl 1067 11--�'----__---a_.-_..... wa) Project Traffic 1s estioatN to to less than 1t of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Voltoe. Project Traffic is ostieated to bo greater than It of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. latermtloe Capacity Utilization 1I.C.U.1 Analysis is required. PROJECT: 1W St kartsents FILL VMPA6.T TM: IM _--------- «---------------------- —---- ----------------- ------------------------- ---............. ----.«.�_ Aistiz-k:st Assn., lot. Calc. We 6A"112161 v 5l L 14.r ,1 !� 1 't, i i�`.Y,Ik 7 � t-Fx a. 1. '1.�ti r✓n M 't r � v` 5 y. �1 COMMISSIONERS • Hal. CALL W71r40 rr NO. 4 MINUTES March 19, 1987 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH A. Residential Densi Bonus (Public Hearin:) Request to permit the construction of a 15 unit low income apartment development which includes a 50 percent density bonus in accordance with Snction 65915 of the California Government Code and the aeooptance of an environmental document. Modifications to the Zoning Code are also requested so as to allow covered parking spaces within the front one-half of the lot which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors, and to permit a required open parking Rpnce to be located in the required 20 foot front yard nnthack. AND A. Traffic Stud (Public Hearing) Request to approve a traffic study no as to po rmit the construction of a 15 unit apartment complex. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 917, First Addition to the Newport Mesa Tract, located at 849 15th Street, or. the southerly side of 15th Street, between Placentia Avenue and Monrovia Avenue, in the went flewport Triangle area. ZONE: R-3 (2178) APPLICANT: Mesa Development Co., Inc., Costa F.eaa OWNERS: Joseph Irani and Ilse Sultanian, Newport Beach James Hewicker, Planning Director, referred to page 5 of the staff report, "Request to waive Park Dedication and Fair Share Fees", and stated that because there is no subdivision or parcel asap associated with the subject project there would be no park dedication fee required and, therefore, no need to waive the fee. In reference to Condition No. 2, Mr. H(:wicker amended the condition to state ......All of the 15 units shall be offered on a preferential basis.....". The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Jim White, applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission. -16- INDEX Item No.6 )residential Density Bonus Traffic Stud Approved � f 1 1 Y S �a [.'13 •L•:'•f ..: 7':. ;��[�, [ �:H �s4 f' ,�Llr,. t.l ..�� P• �.,1 �f 7.1: ft f; f; f6{ >". ,Q.. .. �. [,. .�[ �� ,f. S.f .6,.f; :L., .. `.�• •:.'v fr` 1. a4.fx ? .f •: COMMISSIONERS Ne:- N\kel- \01;&\ MINUTES March 19, 1987 CITY 4F NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL In response to questions posed by Commissioner Merrill regarding wall* proposed to separate the Industrial site from the subject development, Mr. White replt*d that a retaining wall is proposed for the south side of the development and a six foot block wall is propaead for the west side of the development. Robert Lenard, Advance Planning Administrator, addressed questions posed by Commissioner Pomeroy regarding the Section 8 Fair Market Rent. Mr. Lenard explained the qualifications an applicant must meet to apply for an apartment. Mr. White, Commissioner Pomeroy, and Mr. Lenard compared the subject development's proposed Fair Market Rent to the rent standards of Mesa development, a low income apartment project that was constructed by the applicant and is adjacent to the subject property. In conclunlr,n, Mr. Lenard stated that the Mesa development rental agreement is different than the agreement for the subject project which specifies that ull of the :nits are subject to Section 8 Fair Market Rent and is a more stringent standard than the Mesa Development project. Mr. white stated that he concurs with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", and that the applicant will relocate the one parking space from the front yard setback as requested. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time, .lotion x Motion was made to approve Residential density Sonus, Traffic Study and Environmental Document subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", including amended Condition No. 2 as previously stated. Amendment The maker of the motion accepted Commissioner 19errill's to Motion recommendation that a condition be added that unuld require a six foot high masonry wall along the interior property lines. Staff recoasrended that :said Condition No. 12 state "that a masonry block wall shall be constructed along the east, west, and south property lines. Said wall shall be six feet in height except for that portion within the required 20 foot front yard setback along 15th Street where said wall shall be reduced to three feet in height." All Ayes Motion voted on to approve Residential Density bonus, Traffic Study, and Environuental Document, including amended Condition No. 2 and added Condition No. 12 as previously stated. MOTION CARRIED. -17- is ?�.•.nr'.+.^ir ,.;S': ..i:.:"-5i'i •is r..Ji ,Y rr4 _�; ��l. i.� .�.�,. ..{._ i.. �.. n'. .c.v.t-�lxS�-�`, --. .. .,'".1 _.�_rU_�..hr �r _•...k, lil `�"+r��.•.f/- COMMISSIONERS a CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES March 19, 1997 11�l11■ ' A. MWIROKKENTAL Docu lent: Findings: 1. That the environmental document is cowpintn nid has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CF;)A), the State EIR Guidelines and City Policy. 2. That the contents of the environmental doc:umant have been considered in the various deciniona on this project. 3. That in order to reduce adverse impacts of the proposed project, all feasible mitigation measures discussed in the environmental document have been incorporated into the proposed project: 4. That the mitigation :measures identified in the Initial Study have been incorporated into the proposed project and are expressed as Conditions of Approvals 5. That based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, Negative Declaration and supportive materials thereto that if the mitigation measures are incorporated into the project it will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. B. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS: Findings: 1. That this project provides affordable units in accordance with Section 65915 of the Government Code and Objective No. 7 of the City's 11ousing Element. 2. That because of the number of units and 30 year term of affordability, this request for a density bonus is reasonable and justified. 3. That the proposed parking space encroachment into the required front yard setback will under the circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and -18- III�I�I! Y, .; e.vR .�'1�+•la �.. C. •;.,,e; s. �, .,i. .�. :��i F,'a�'g�j�•:j�.. ..jr,.� a i1 .1. ii �: 7 `.,. ' .:�.,.•�J. �• 'L. .tip'.9 .•i!:.�4 F. .. r� d.. .. ..i".:, s� t5...? :.�., 'd'Y. 1� .d .�.a.(i..7 3. a..3.itx COMMISSIONERS • • MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH March 19, 1997 FMB CALL 111 I U I I I INDEX improvements in the neighborhood or the gonoral welfare of the City and further that the proposed modification is consistent with the loginlntive intent of Title 20 of this Code. 4. That the approval covered parking SWvlo on the front one-half of the lot which do not hnvQ garage doors and side walls in every case will not under the circumstances of this particular cane, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed uao or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or tha general welfare of the City and further that thn proposed modification is consistent with the inginlative intent of Title 20 of this Code. Conditions: 1. That the development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, fl.nor plan, and elevations. 2. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved an to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning director, guaranteeing that a maximum of 15 unite of rental housing shall be constructed on the subject property. All 15 units shall be rented at no more than the HUD Section 8 Pair Market Pont to persons and families earning 80% or less of the Orange County annualized median family incomr: as periodically published by Orange County regardless of family size. All of the 15 units shall be offered on a preferential basis to tenants possessing an "active" Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and currently receive rental assistance from the Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher Program. Said Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall he for no less than thirty (30) years. 3. That the open parking space within the front yard setback area shall be relocated to another portion of the site. Said new location shall be subject -19- L tip" t ��:" ter'.' tir�t�.:d.,.:r.�•.r,.r. ..f �YJ! �a •�t.� .fa. - ��i •. s - s>. .'�.'. ., .y, t`z.d .'s.?`♦M li. �iM. } �'w •. Y' r.iK�� •r �' .id^t''.t COMMISSIONERS 1P • MINUTES ROLL CALL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH March 19, 1987 INDEX to the approval of the City Traffic Engineer and the Planning Department. 4. That a landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integratq and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan). 5. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 6. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent reRidential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 7. That the number of parking spaces required by the off-street parking requirements of the City of Newport Beach (as provided by the Municipal Code, Title 20, Chapter 20.30) be provided on -site. S. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler protection. 9. The Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 10. That all access to the buildings be approved by the Fire Department. 11. That all trash enclosures shall be acreened from adjacent properties. 12. That a masonry block wall shall be constructed along the east, west, and south property lines. Said wall shall be six feat in height except for that portion within the required 20 foot front yard setback along 15th Street where said wall shall be reduced to three feet in height. -20- ! ;1 �1 :' v;�ii ~ '.•�tiH !�Y�k!'�LG eF, J�,tiy r+'."�:': ;. ii ky� :: !t� COMMISSIONERS is MINUTES March 19, 1987 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROIL CALL INDEX C. TRAFFIC STUDYs 1. That a Traffic Study has been propared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak -hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Reach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the proj- ect -generated traffic will neither cause nor wake worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on am/ 'major', 'primary -modified', or 'primary' street. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates; that the proj- ect -generated traffic will be greater that: one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of one critical intersection, but will not add to an unnatisfac- tory level of traffic service at the critical intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of .90 or less. r wr ir'y 40 I S CUSS ION ITEM r Discussion . i ten Pr sed agenda items to be discussed at the Joint Cit Coun 1 - Planning Comission meeting on March 23, 1987 INITIATE6•,9Y: The City of Newport Beach Chairman Person reviewed the suggested agenda items Joint CC - that the Planning Commission and the City Council could PC Meeting discuss at the .joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting, on March 23, 1987. Commissioner Pomeroy .,requested that the Planning Commission and City Council consider how the public hearing process could he improved. Discussion followed between the Planning Cosmi'ssicners regarding citizen involvement in the public heksing procesn during the recent proposed major developments, i.e. Cannery Village/NcFadden Square, Newport C"ter, and Santa Ana Heights, and they discussed the current City Council Ad -Hoc Committee meetings attended by,the citizens in the community. Motion x Notion was made to approve the agenda recomQeended by All Ayes staff. Notion voted on, WrION CARRIED. •* -21- P , $ I;s � J !q .i �.dr ::}�+�`'_1r t: i'. �': ;�; �;�:W 'a.} '.r :' :•.e��wy ; ,�'ii . �' ,•ius•,�r f � { • }�::';i: �/['•e 1 O"Aam" No. 5 TRAFFIC STUDY FINDINGS 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak -hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project -generated traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major', 'primary -modified', or 'primary' street. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project -generated traffic will be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of one critical intersection, but will not add to an unsatis- factory level of traffic service at the critical intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of .90 or less. n 4. 4 d. •ti•'r c: wi... ��.i?Y�_w{:'�r':.i :�'�}:i�: J�`•l,Ki::�;=.�:'nb•_' :.,:iL: c:".?;t•':{� .J.�s•i� P H O w 71 o a .4 a m o w A o .� a -ai ° �s ,c a w a m w a W i lY r.' C. •�. A �C1 h 4 k � O 9 C! +4 a .O{ Qi u w f✓ ` S y�O5��4 td U a 'O m 7Ln u � N u U .1 q v` a J iL a W i C7 p�4 'd a •t7 -5 O t w F y+ H W p �! �,tlT, En d > �. �' O b ul d Wfil `_..:.��8G f34 b Ga0 , 3 •� ' y p. y' d m ° a o a y w H G G4 a OQ 1+ M �r +1 Eu +� 1' a a O N '� W C�1 Rj f O y�j it LTt 0r lad 7 w G O C 0 a w w O ft W m ° O ra b � ..ai u� 0 k to > +1 p� R 0�1 i p a . �► m qA+ q 14 F rt PG r. 0 V a 10 O '[7 b k 4 u O Fa 0 m ° �+ 'C r4 .i V O »1 uNa z a10 ndy " pp Go 0AG i0 V »Oq ° O A i1 p $ u f �+ FI 2 V 1a4 . b -04 A"? a)a u w s, v a a m EH a v c 4 IV w w � a a .� a atp at V1 V S t -14 H U 3 !; �Q LO Ov W Q V O w q .'� ; p w a 111 +ii O yaj • W C�J Ul Q O �N p^ O y V {aj U W R ~ CJ o m N O G v M a M a rl �, O Od rl m � y m a a �' a .� d pu o f c°, ,N f� N ri A ii ! H O 'O u �7 a G O n a PGa W M +�1 rl 0 rl H 41 0 O r I I O O it •.1 p N K d O 0 a Y' rl N � O �aR �O p, w 10 goSula"+ a 1 � �p a •f s.. t' �tr• 1 t ! f. •w •t i• ti' • 8. t , ti .'fir . r• • i '''� . s•. �r �'i + - •{ sty ^t. '•;t:•- - � - ',7�-.i :`cJ1 eZ '. ,-'..i_ �.�:�� `r.•a .,•x:?.i3 ,, N+Sfi Jt�ir•.. f. ..' 7-,{s - 'i>'-. .-b'Ins'.r.-ii:-.aizkkiV,-rr3:zA.".:Fi ..;-.N .�P t. a,-r t 3.13y? 114tk, .... Lr,,�-5 ., ,`M'�.*:{l, r:�11��;a:.;h �`l'-',r., lEt'•'h.,.�`: .tS1��r'..r, f.t. i� :l�. r.,...a ati�, LF' o u P b R j ~1 p O•N 460 oas OV V a,cx C x 1j a ' o a a r. W O 4u id . a p� p b -H a -►4 W a in m H w y: a c a C 4 u " 0 o > +' O s y + u C a+ �. a 4U a 41 .a 9y j ,� +ri -4 u � a 10 o u a -5 a u a b �, o ° c to u 41 at N a w n, W 41 V a a .e O O A G > c 0 A v .+ >, a u JC o o & a a u >, A y, U m goO um Ai u U H p +�' p W w 44 R a o 14 .c 4 0 y m m C m a+ .� 14 4r O R +Q� O G N p 'S7 la GO r. p R i0 d• p to f G 41 �1 O U p y aR+ A D+ [1 K iG V b N C] ,o " J u G 0 to 04 IA tAO+ N p b Oi p 4 R 0 A C d 'u M tri 0 p4 ; o .4PA 0 Ili N p Ma • O +' a Y u p ►1 v a W4 >1 v v i� ri .• rOp~ b . a o► m •"I d G a a a a w SS w All go 44 P4 Ai n 't � w U p ."4 >, O O� j +� C1 10 CDg' a > `, It 1- rx. r .I J. f r I 1 s t L" -.!' i-i • -{- > -••^S rY 15 ' Y 1.r ! s �Jr + ri. 1 •kris l•. t y ..: R3A ..... s.7 t ti�.-S.I.{•`w' l[�7a� '7911�;. .� �. .i: "f„ �."- i• !- ..Y-.3x.r2!-.. ... M.�lS �. J... w..L�17Y,t�h.t.�1_.l:n�r•.'.',.i��%f��.a^`S'.l. ... s..4 • • O G N tr 7. wSj W tq41 oO A ril cuJ ,q q a1 44 R ° d w t4 4j g!a w �4yN u pG IQ R - IJ q ..4 i qAj a to p0 W C a FA -4 j � »4 lu +' 1Ni U ro u IS 0 Q Aj 0 V U sty W a� � t,T ,4 CD p lu b Q u N A .� m >» N 4 4 u � w inip • 44 0 u :3 w g u 4 04 w O to i u aoc 0 a F F J u w u 44 r-4 v N e 4 ic w ° k A N z u w r4 �J V as AjU G .e .qt V0 m ' m +O1 .0 r` q y m " dd � �° 8 44aA .ql n o a s+ 0 54 rs V V.a�3 44 aJ 'x3 u A' N O O ° d a �d O +� 0 � 16 44 H o ; N w R O •qr► r4 .° eb, r°•1 +� F a 'w4 u a u• r 0-4 W 0i ° 00 w 0 .� .°4 ro F 1 b Ali 4-4 GL LuL a c► d U u R r4 14 �' LL •?i' p, b 'i o V. O ,to � to .r. w a0+ �'' '�pa to 0 0 as N M +t u U s°i w -ri � a % fa v ''t cis d a Aj fa RW a +� O O ON r* -4 a ►� al u ro 8 C m ° w C u a� .-7 b 4- � M b r '� Aj 0 N O 4 Aj > � a do �i �. x G a a •G O �+ ?� d+ 43 yAi H s°.i c �G M o+ q u F u 4)F 1 u .rq v r♦ N t•1 'Q H1 ro aJ N u ,b 41 a 0 u t c 0 O '-1 R 0 1j ° 0 Aj q u w a y t'a 0 w .o 0 11 tv a+ F •i .i O W 4s d5 0 N 40 u W •n ro ao O N a R 4W 0 w 0 w r4 q F O H w 0 m O tr+ .r X L� G 19� u° •- 'fig y , pih jz 4� 1 s r:.:'• � .• C: t . ?.mow., y`�s. i 1^ k i• :•4 l- � f i�• ..•'�. �.q :i...l� ` `.rS'it.i. .'t�, r..VV+ARa ff ' � : �•=` +•.. 1 r per+ 1 � 't3`Y E- ti R .1.�l/S�/d r1: '..S'� .i �.W4_:.:'.4.v'�a: l� '•�• '` 'lI l'.i•• kr }`•',' .l ,a\'� Fi;�� 9 iS*� I!'i "�Y'C�I.MG� �� :) •°rF., _.l s .f�/.S^.•_ .e.�7•x �iY4'T' • +'. . u 4 a, InTS IT q O t? V V V at NN O C qu m L C r+ •+ :00 u 'V O' t0 C m O > .. to i.�.+ na+. W °u s.,. a t1D tJ w O W tJ 3 w a. Y S7 N .fir O� N G .-r O; u� u 010 u C O 7 M p O .0 V f) u 98 • Q w N M F. U. .�� F... gr1' O. r- .�+ .p O' R ua CYJ» u O V y 'J s� q V u i3 W t! Y 1+ Y �+ O} V >. iA *0O �+ C N Q W O C A , `� • U w -0 1C 71 t+� O i L l'C •J N :I' flf W !. E M I •� u r* '[7 O V G m to 4 .+ O u J Z tU Y G �+ �9 a .+ •� U G J± rJ: y y to .0 d L7 �. >' m b a U GD x x u s e a J'+ D > of u`►# a ty o t� i G ,o W CC c rt •ti .. ° u a ° G .. u d a, m ch , ..4 , a.l u .,d U. Y 1..� a+ Det Y 7 :. ■ O w u, u [-t� �y .rj .. . •. _ ++ f i CS U ii ,Ca .-1 co J± 40 -0 0 Z u L] A D . O - - ... u Aqp %D •O CC� 4Ai i r.T ... r4, f/S oO GOf. oC ad .t N O ul Y O ^p 8 G q .0 V O �C �. .G O �+ 4 J W> O C a � Ct Y aY ,r1 O C O u +. m �+ U M u A m Y d ILd On ,Ct in C C0 �: O E+ C O' A O _ Y �: C as U.. O N...O '1 .-. m ■ >,'w C u ._ 00 Y `A O. ri' O O O.,aa— +� .... G. pq a. CA V Y 4+ ..� t/ ,d t S J • J >Z G G O ,+ Y H C6 to ':7 1.1 ,d L yj Y ii Y w E7 rh W 1. k W C> .0 id X• tT U ++ C u u C .N 'b 'fl A m In V C Al Mi u �� 0� Z A q a� �� a d r+. •v . q _ _ ... �. ... o o -w + w ... p, _ .4 C a a. ■r O C x r O to •C ea0 m .-r a+ Y N •i� W v', �+ O A. .r r+ C q}'v1 0. L ¢a¢ O C y .-I C ■ .�; G O' to m e, U N 1. ►+ p Ca 0 •/ > ' W 'O GG O � y 4� � +1 1 i C u 74 ■ ,1 t . `. .lu a U O u v1 w X O a s a bi 4> RS O�� L O Q 1� ' W 4 fA I p� w� 9 sIf C� mQ m •. p �. •Oi F Jr W a r. CY C J* Q 'G9 c �1 J Y A • O a I+1 Y O 4• O J Y u Jr Y6 C7 y u D &' G 19. Ld �i u �61 6j D u a V4 y V p x R ate+ u IL .G W d , ^ u ulooC p [7 Y O t0 stt t, O �! C� V� nt: as a... id o R. Q ti 'O .' O ti r• . rw-1 C O v q CYI rml 40i W."C a0+ k OD}� r'7 �. V 7 k t00 rti u tS 'a ,w V V O m G q u L IOi •b L -4 . a Q W� 1'+ .. i :. O C y� C C • p is H }+ w R H m 1+ p C- Q w b m st G w N ?. O A m u CS. M ►+ +t r u >w U ,+ 04 ® G. u C 7 O 'S i ^G Y O 1� Q �• . 9 00 ••1 V d. 0 C ►+ a+ C. tp 'O u N 40 •-tCal to 1+ Mf; tit a GI O u � i� G b oD •■ ' O D. O � u C "4 O 'O s0 � C ti0 C ,>I C � O .fi 7Q Y ' "�7 1+ 1+ A d u! O V W COO ,+ x O 10 d M v M O m U Q O ti+ ' ,4 y O- u C '� N O T4 * �+ m m W D �0 �• 0. u. t� .4 4 ,1 U o O Ji 1 rl 1+ ttpp a p >. 00 Ll0 ,>+ U ' fJ rl u !� is 1. Y LJ O y M. O q Q tl Y > r+ B SO 's! x -: a i1 .pi , �Q7 O C O' C iS rl .� a a ro O s Au O oY'. a. �Y 4 "7 sp0 d IY+ , s LOS x A C) u '1r c� w w ' ate. l+ oc .+ n •� , t ,+ a t s� a o •p d F d ,..1 ':�"t:ti i>. .,p <, 1 n, 'r� s � fR,'r r S r,3 4'�:t"iC „J`=�3E+.:wkix•.l,e .r 4.y^ a R�iJ?'.. -- .., �`-,..i•_ k. ., i�J�'./-L ...t'�w �,.!:4. ��..f�nr�ir-8•r'"�,-rti.V� z-f.. ,.1 sT _ a �. _ .'Y'7.. r� v O O O 7 O G O 0 0 Q O o O O . f p O O d O o O 00 cRI O O O O O O O O O a O 00 0000 O •-+ H a 0 a) Om'QCc r- fj_ .. •.. -_� >,p v •� d rl �t N a� u'1 N o n !•i ++ L Lj1 1+' x \ L C J N •. V t•1 ., R M> q u O " wq O x w su u '•• t/> r{,.... •t�E '1L+I O4 Fmo y y pu �._Osr.. a _..cuac..•�Y�, O� u V V ►ft. O G� z H w G W E44 w V 0 F •94 IA 1 X S 03 x« w = v xMu6O O O u i W m "4 .* i w O u 0 M "�"a "O b v)a. -i 1u.. >.0 Q,M. .. � t7 o.,. O LO txC►vOo%. _. o m ra u -O O Q .•+ x�d �. . a ti�1 0 v to o a u Vp1 -wNo 0% .m,G� ,d-.,a4+ a. .� 4+ OR O M N U m_�_a... _ '.a*H"R.0 &J'lo � ' '•v! cc OwwN °°�Cad dv ao w -+ 4 9 .G� 41 14 n -4 cl u �G ._. . .am �r {Q'r1 n_+.:>_Fu 4W-0c-_Owy.y (A-W-1,.xW- DOu m..+C.- ,u_.o_cwo9LG w.c o u dd ao. es es u w a ., > w CW++ u 14 u 0 {0 'U u ►+ 0 7 7 %C •t C 01 C w qOua�.4 1 S.- 0 0 0 a w to BB r1 6 cs 9 O C ao r,wg o cf++ m Aj ++ O.t _._._. Li Y+ 0► 'CI O +y .• N w+ u u N m +f O V u a G. -0 +1 C to u !i V' m y .1 ..1 C r ...! a 'C ml «� R w •.•i GO a G> 93 4+ ti owc G c, a s u "q' :� ,s W. 'o C +Os 0 '' '. tl .i 0 41 u e6.-t i x u R Y w ,~ . �' O yO i.. • Q uO Q • I4 C C, tl 'bu Ww O O Q'..� y i • QO �,lI1.D co L+ • N 0! ►r d •�� d('•1•.1 u V ��x• �': o.N ,...,' N KEk: s » a' o ow .0 ►+. b u a �11 doisooa ao ho +r w 1' i• w to u V C co ml !A, ,__ ,. _.. _......... ...-^....,....�.tw.�+w...s••----�•...�..r.r.r++.w..+„r..w.....,..d+...r.rr..+r++rr+�w renMr.r.r.rury...,+v+.�+.rr�w. .. '�a�+r+.u.�.wrM..w•r•w.ww..r..wwwr++.+...:...onrr....s..•..raM.w............w.+..rr.+.�rs..www . 04 13; 1 .1 .r •i. '�,4 t� t: • I t• •�t 'ice::" -:r a ^a :'r tea• 'J . `4� 'Y:• .{, ..,r 4 'rf1.`5: a if.: • �.-.i'. 1...li. \. CFa :°r'•;7" i:'{�="Z+�R1'�S'c�'ti;Yx.=5,t� !'r� '.�•'. 4•.rw•%��l :�.i.+All-.r�sS"1:�: .�S _,�;*', al-�: �•; cr c-. _•.• .f.1: i." ih.1C-}+..3.-..•{ri in CITY Ot NEUPORT BEACH MS` PLAXXZXG DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST X ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION X_PUnIC WORKS DEPARTMENT i—FIRE DEPARTMENT ) PLAN REVIEW DIVISION �PARICS f. RECREATION POLICE DEPARTMENT MARINE SAFETY GRADING Date !larch 2 1987 X PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) APPLICATION OF: Mesa Development Ccepany, Inc. PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. FORS Residential Density Bonus and Traffic Study REQUP.ST TO: Permit the construction_ of a 15 unit low income apartment development which _includes a 50 F�2rcent density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code. The rp oponal also includes the approval of a related traffic study and a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow parking spaces within the front one half of tho lot which are not fully enclosed with garage doors. LOCATION: 849 West 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: March 9, 1987 COMMISSION REVIEW: March 19, 1987 COMMENTS: •1. f� '� u,�ubRC.`,` y{.f:.:.is-rX!:.,�,;�.., ..f:r..4W. r,a • r.Ss,..a...b,. �r 1 is :sip .L'i iA� 1!�` �..7�•�l,• k• ice.'":l• .N•sa • Orarge Coast DAILY PILOT/Tuesday, 8eptembor 13, 19M AS N,Bc O uncenterplans.. it RAUL A>1ZC81PLBY '[ sty wilhcquire a syrnnasiuin and Coundhvoman Ruthelyei Plummer said site. ,but ooundlmembers said the cow nsra�rsmrarw rttlated egaipment and several dassrooma a community center that weld serve murut�r enter would serve all she groups. from New Christian High School: The - ` rtiaideau in Wet Newport was ions including man�yy senior dtruns. o cur - Newport eeadi o(ficisk . took steps uhooi has relocated. overdue. really use the t7asitseniorCitin" Center Moaday to crate a Well Newport Com- A 16unitapartmentcomplex, including "I"ve bass a broken record in tryins w , in Corona dd Mar. muniry Grater the- will ` provide . rec- Hven designated u :Rordable housing set a place of brouad for some smW excuse the center will be (aridy funded ratiorml tictivities' coueseting and other units, will W built on the remainder of the somewba wail we an set our by the federal government, it wiU be open services to local residents. tehoot site. I..:, - ' park," Plummer said. to residents f den outside the city. • The City Council unsnimousiy cep- The S-ym!OM gymnasium, where sev- The wood 3 also, approved Plummer's That prompted Councilman Phil proved plots to 'spend S29%000 in city eral sports activities already are under . rxgvm that the name of the center be Saasone to wisest the ciq seek some kind . AM) and borrow anothw $11 milker 101, would be the only Ibcillty of its kind drwd. liom the Northwest Newport of tiveasnaaa■trithCoata Mea t of Homing and underc� oowol,Whillecitypmgr am Comm Caster. ol�thatMrotsidatlttlie>'gtirprstRaa� j� to on of . also hddin school gyms� they ah w v ;> k�lleasi dean_ piaded with theeound aeaio n to we the CoMa Dom Pit si53 . ISth St. taschool district sc Ming ' "'-Y Mlrliat bulldl a playground oa the oounaat ratesenjeJlNlhrraidaat� :l''v• 'f i f L• � � .c.Ys •�a r �h. hr! ..f. • F•'` .'S: ❑��:L'(.: A11.�.1t,� rr ic. :_s:: a. k• :'� .'^;i a•1L?.i1 L'h ,��:: :•i:- .. ., 9.. .Y�=•R 111.: i,...e.•.�.�b� • Wj&4WllBIBgj&=?KNEWFWVN8M Community center -approved BY CHERYL STELE MG West Newport Beach will have a tons -awaited community centeraad 16-aniuoiaifordabk Mart, as approved by the City Council at Monday night's meeting. "1 am very excited about this community center," said Counciimember Ruthelyn Plummc;, who represents West Newport. "i have been a broken record over the issue of i park or some kind of recreational facility in that area, because we am lacking there." The council discovered during the summer that the buildings forsrrty inhabited by a Chris- tie school located at U3 West 156 Street, were for sale- So city oQioWs toured the . buWiw in" include a gymnasium and died it would be ideal for the ciommunity center. "ire the city didn't need all of the property, so we contacted kills Development and they agreed to acquire Lbe rat of the property for the apartments," said Plummer. Crals Bludl, who works in the advanced pianninjdivision, Bald the city's cost of acquiring the property will be about S290A00 and will come out of contingency funds through the parks, beaches and recreation depart- ment, Men Development has scv- erai other affordable units in the area, Plummer said. Because the area is inter -mixed between industrial and residential, it would be diffualt to built up- scale howias, she added. The area is part of a county triansk which was amazed by the city several years qp and rezoned for raideatial. Tice city plans to use existing classroom and the gymouium for Community programs sports. fitnesa.and classes through the parks, beaches and recreation department. "How senior citizen Wag its the aura wont have to traMd across town to OASIS," Plummer said, "Tbe gym is fu*- class." . Mesa Development will build the 16 apartment rinits, seven of which, will be in & affordable range, guaranteed for 30 years and the other nine will be market value, said Larry Campeau, via president of the firm. The units will be two -bedroom, two -bath in about 1,000 square rat each. A chapel located on the property will be donated to a church in Chula Vista, Campeau said. Landscaping will be top -grade and a landmark tree will be spared, he said in answer to a question posed by Plummer. Because land in Newport is so expeatsive; Plummer. said Coat- muaity Block Development ' Grant (CBPG) funds were Vp- lied for througb- Housingand Urban, Development (HUD). "This assists developers in acquiring the land so they can keep their costs down and pass I, the savings on in lower rents," i lhtrrwsr sash. -The "I,ydoes mow to do lMe sttlsiliaM trsNa4, i�,MliaM;�ia ° 3 riy is: ;.:J'• .. �•Fn . `ft•r 'e=+.i �'i:r".'•. t. .sf.•`� ♦...: ..l,..c. .:g:�`..x, r.•sti't`•'i::• :�:��"i: J:��. rF,�.tti��'�.r: .�a�;`., ..r.'•. '•ik, .7.t��'tr•:�,a, y.��: :: i�i: �:..1,.Ss': �G• •.: � ... ..f:.`�.i _— - - .�'> .t. +F114 .(. 1. #�,S-ha "a�i.74�'t.. :�i�•r� Notice is hereby given that the Planning Comission of the City of Newport Beach will hold a public hearing on the application of Pacific Heights Anarth2Dis, for a Residential Density Bonus and Traffic study on 2roRertX located at QJ3 West 1-5th Strut - NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Negative Declaration has been prepared by the City of Newport Beach in connection with the application noted above. The Negative Declaration states that, the subject development will not result in a significant effect on the environment. It is the present intention of the City to accept the Negative Declaration and supporting documents. This is not to be construed as either approval or denial by the City of the subject application. The City encourages members of the general public to review and comment on this documentation. Copies of the Negative Declaration and supporting documents are available for public review and inspection at the Planning Department, City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92658-8915 (714) 644.3225. Notice is hereby further given that said public hearing will be held on the ith day of August. 1988, at the hour of " p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and be heard thereon. If you challenge this project in court, you slay be limited to raising only those issues you or someone alas raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. For information call (714) 644-3200. Janice Debay, Secretary, Planning Commission, City of Newport Beach. NOTE: The expense of this notice is paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant. F r ' ^,�•'� :4 � Y7. 1 __ __ C`� .F• .l ,{n � kr,.. !� Ij '•`Sir i S i �' l� �i r � � r • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUNNING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION 2LPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT &-TRAFFIC ENGINEER $,,,FIRE DEPARTMENT 2,PLAN REVIEW DIVISION PARKS & RECREATION POLICE DEPARTMENT --MARINE SAFETY _GRADING 01231ttfmipm II.� PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) ,PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. APPLICATION OF: Pacific Heights Apartments FOR: Residential Density Bonus LOCATION: 833 West 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: July 25, 1988 COMMISSION REVIEW: August 4, 1988 COMMENTS: Signature: Dates_ lei .� f:,,::,;.; 'i :':Y!•: r - i.;. r,-'•r�•':.'f'� ��5 1 f; 5�S'� •°ti. �. �ji.•::•�'::�• .�i. ::.y:. ,r �:.".. :•i5.. ...� ..J�fb3.�,er'� ll....:F.}�i:::i}:�:.'• 1.`..A.7'. .a'i:•: n.—.:1:.. i�:�i� .:%:�.�: :..!'`��:•� l,-. 424-151-03 i CHI, MOUN-SHUNG TR. �. 22102 WOOD ISLAND LN. HUNTINGTON BCH., CA. 92646 424-011-02 SCHULTZ, ERNEST K. 315 33RO. ST. ORANGE. CA. 92662 424-011-03 MAC DONALD, TIMOTHY G. P.O. BOX 385 MONTROSE, CA. 91020 ;24-011-04 -HILL, HAZEL V. 1478 MONROVIA ST. NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92663 424-011-05 FLAM, BERNARD 1 PALERMO WALK LONG BEACH, CA. 90803 424-011-06 IRANI, JOSEPH H. 3701 SEASHORE DR, NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92663 424-011-20 RAWLINS JOHN R. TR. 1874 BOA VISTA CIR. COSTA MESA, CA. 92626 424-011-21 FLAM, BERNARD 1 PALERMO WALK LONG.BEACH, CA, 90803 1 424-011-33 1 424-021-24 LA CRESTA INVESTMENTS 501 E. KATELLA AVE. 023A ,ORANGE. CA. 92667 424-031-01 424-401-11 PETREE PROPERTIES P.O. BOX 9900 CALABASAS, CA. 91302 is r 114-170-60 RANCHO SANTIAGO 2244 W. P.C.H. N200 NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92663 7 � yap.+-i • -.r' '-c: r '�' :.x !iL+- -{ s: ntia+"!:i'<.'!.kl•; tf7,'tir :,":':s:.-"li":,:i �:.}';;.•�`kr2,i�;•5•- t', ,-c. 937-37-001 KIRKLEY MARY 937-37-011 SCHWEITZER 937-37-021 DAVID FRIEDSOM NALRY 898 HALYARD ST 878 HALYARD ST 126 VIA ORVIETO NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-002 MAYER'MARGARET 896 HALYARD ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-003 IRANI JOSEPH 1533 MONROVIA AVE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-004 SHERMAN HARRIS 892•-HALYARD ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-005 AKIVA HESY,EL 890 HALYARD ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-006 BELL KENNETH 205 VIA CORDOVA NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-007 IRANI JOSEPH 3701 SEASHORE DE. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-008 WILSON GEORGE 2650 HARLA ST.#C213 COSTA MESA, CA 92626 937-37-012 HOPKINS JOSEPH 876 HALYARD ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-013 POTTER RICHARD 874 HALYARD ST NEWPORT BEACH, 937-37-014 SARVAK KENNETH P.O.BOX 2711 .NEWPORT BEACH, 937-37-015 CAMPBELL JANE 870 HALYARD ST NEWPORT BEACH, 937-37-022 GARNAUS JEFFREY P.O-BOX 114 CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625 937-37-023 LUKE KATHLEEN 1904 LAMPLIGHT LN. CA 92663 YORBA LINDA, CA 92686' 937-37-024 SPEARS ALAN 854 HALYARD ST. CA.92663 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-025 SCHWEITZER BRADLEY 848 HALYARD ST CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-016 DOURLET JOHN 868 HALYARD ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-017 TIEE CHARLES 3144 EMERALD ISLE DR GLENDALE, CA 91206 937-37-018 SIMOS JAMES 864 HALYARD ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-009 937-37-019 SHAHIN PHILIP DAVIS WILLIAM 882 HALYARD ST 862 HALYARD ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-010 937-37-020 BROWN.RICHARD WESCOTT RALPH 880 HALYARD ST 860 HALYARD ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 937-37-026 CONDRY PHYLLIS 850 HALYARD ST NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 ��-•'a:..• cif.:% .!_.r.._ '•a' 4a.�s. ,#;;s� t 'x1•I" !r ..'N^1;f "!:r+} •.J,J . tit.' t.. �t.� t•t' 'i:'s ::e, nis 7. e,,� ,�.7;.,. ti i, C+�+''t t :'I�:��d 1 _ y,i1n r..r ,:r.;`ri•ikv?�'��•�.....„ :.+.f. �;:it:'we.{�i=: ..h,«.,.l4fl.j.+..r, ��s.c'�s.r.:,2.+ .,':,�:.x_.k..:ti tv. ,'1":��.. �ss::..�i�• v> r �7 ,yy •Ayr"��''e-,:1ie'`.'''i'Y.,'t;3.y=e*f1"'-Kt'; 932-51-002 932-51-OI3' Edna Schneider Dallas W. Lee 2 Robin Ct. 14 Robin Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-003 932-51-014 Fred C. Irwin Douglas W. Dreyer 3 Robin Ct. 519 Marigold Ave. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 932ti5I-004 Lloyd E. Fritz 4 Robin Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-005 Peter We 7095 Columbus. Dr. Anaheim, CA 92807 932-51-006 Lydia Mendoza 6 Robin Ct. Newport Beahc, Ca 92663 932-51-007 David L. Kazan 6 Robin Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-008 Stphen Marosi 8 Robin Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-009 Linda H. Jacobs 9 Robin Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-010 Daonald Haworth 10 Robin Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-I1 Joseph A. Deutsch 1072 SE Bristol 1102 Santa A,a CA 92705 932-51-015 Roome Lingg 16 Robin Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-016 Patricia A. Powers 17 Robin Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-61-017 Janice Peddie 18 Robin Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-018 Janice Pddie 18 Robin Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-019 Janice Peddie 20 Robin Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-020 Jacqueline R. Weaver 16133 Sierra Pass Way Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 932-51-021 Robert W. Grunow P.O. Box 1504 Newport Beach, -CA 92663 932-51-022 Paul R. Frerer 401 Intrepid Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-024 Sandra G. Frush 2 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-025 Ethel E. Bluemke 3 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-026 Robert L. Sullivan 4 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-027 Clark C. Tawzer 5 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-028 Ted 0. Sperling 6 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-5I-029 Rodger F. Hageman P.O. Box 2251 Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-030 Charles Mendenhall 8 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-031 Lillian B. Ballard 9 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-032 Virginia Hope Davis 10 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-033 Eugene M. Frizelle 11 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 7 932-51-012 David. I. Val 932-51-023 932.51-034 :. tin o Susan'.'J. Smith Gerard. Bloaters Goodwill Ct. 881. t 1 610b.W. 0cesn'Frant ikrr rt Beach. CA 92b63 ., i V�, ��y,.,LLtt r i . F.. L.. F. :at3 'u flew Fn»� Aiirl�T ; ill"- 7lildtr r... ..91 %s 'e — Ys i�11si�,l ;'�liVliYiy _LSI*'M. ��'YT—r.S! �� fl'��'�Y�'�lYii.•�Af �::i } F 4� !T 4iC TSYi hfi-� ti`�:fl�`, ~' _"7."_' "" . .932-51-035 Jerry Artukovich 932-51-043 Charles 0, Ward 932-51-056 Charles'F. Suanders 14 Goodwill Ct. P.O. Box 2117 7 Wild Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-036 932-51-046 Jean P. MacDonald John S. Feike 116 Via Mentone 990 Bayside Cove Test Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92660 932-51-037 Sung Chun Chiang 3882 Balsa St. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-38 Virginia D. Fredericks 17=Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-039 Sterling 0. Goodman 18 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-040 William Edwards 2512 Ocean Blvd. Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 932-51-041 John P. Courtney 20 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 932-51-047 Bayne A. Sparks 24 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-048 Barry lister 3104 Fernwood Ct. Fullerton. CA 92635 932-51-049 Edgar Sinkins 26 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-050 Michael Mullin I Wild Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-051 Edith Schoffler 2 Wild Goose Ct. 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-042 Ruth Schum 21 Goodwill Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-043 Charles D. Ward P.O. Box 2117 Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-044 Steven Lewis 302 Intrepid Newport Beach, CA 932-51-OS2 Suzanne M. Shaw 3 Wild Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-053 Susan C. Dunn 4 Wild Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-054 Lyle S. Carlson 5 Wild Goose Ct. 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-057 Madorie S. Jones 8 Wild Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-058 Thomas B. Miller 9 Wild Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-059 John J. Kraus 10 Wild Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-060 Daniel D. Gilbert II Wildgoose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-061 Cheng wen Wang 8882 Baywood or. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 932-51-062 Michael P. Cornwell 14 Wild Goose Dr. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-053 Daniel H. Rogers 15 Wild Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-064 Walter R. Schottmiller 22212 Wood Island tn. Huntington Beach, CA 92646 932-51-065 William D. Bowers 17 Wild Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-045 932-51-055 932-51-066 Clarence Helfrich Lynn M. Moore •E�cal•T.. ti.t . Lela iK1day6Pgegnscee •L'.$. ,..-._,?.,._? 'h Y¢,: i�s 0 .s.26eWild Goose Ct. c926�t2,8ehXAbf +�. 932 51-067 Eilizabeth L. Grey _ .' 932-51-078 932-51-089 M. Sinasek Juan Quevedo Jaws .19 Wild Goose Ct. 101 Borromeo 2424 Francisco Or. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Placentia, CA 92670 Newport Beach, CA 92660 932-51-068 Maureen Francis O'Connor 5442 Kenosha Ln. Irvine, CA 92715 932-31-069 Leon R. O'Dell 21 Wild Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 932-51-070 Robert A. Cuthbert 22 .Vi 1 d Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 932-51-079 Bruce E. Rothenberg 5 Mojo Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-080 Frederick Yougdahl' 92663 6 Mojo Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-081 Euggene Sturm 92663 2011 Port Albans Cir. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-071 Frank J. Tetnoski 23 Wild Goose Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-082 Geor a J. Glass 8 Molo Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-072 932-51-083 Jules Levy Paula J. Jones 24 Wild Goose Ct. 2150 Mandeville Canyon Rd. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Los Angeles, CA 90049 932-51-073 932-51-084 Craig E. Jensen Thomas J. Bennington 25 Wild Goose Ct. 10 Mojo Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-074 932-51-085 Robert M. Courtney Gerard Wotter 3949 Vista Linda 11 Mojo Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-075 932-51-086 Sue M. west Rocco Minichiello . 1 Mojo Ct. 12 Mojo Ct. Newport Beach, CA' 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-090 Joyce E. Hilton 204 intrepid Newport Beach, CA 92660 932-51-091 Barry MacPherson 15 Mojo Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-092 Edwgrd J. Moran 16 Mojo Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-093 Nessim Albagli 2830 Sierra Canyon Way Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 932-51-094 Margaret A. Guignon 18 Mojo Ct. Newport Beach, CA 92663 932-51-095 James T. Ota P.O. Box 156 Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 932-51-096 Samuel G. Linday 31675 Sea Bluff Ln. South Laguna, CA 92677 932-51-097 Kranti K. Gupta 3 Kialoa Ct. Newport Beahc, CA 92660 932-51-076 932-51-087 932-51-098 William J. Thoele Marta N. Delozano Timothy J. Bernardy 2 Mojo Ct. 140 Via Havre 1512 Santanella Terrace Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newport Beach, CA 92663 Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 oman Abr amson 932-51-088 932-51-099 Norman. Abramson Martin J. Lockney Martin.'.Ronson 3.:, Mojo Ct. • 801.- V a .Lido Saud 216. N. Mancheiter Ave. S.M mit h icNri tcb_ `Aoiiwlfa� A t801 r'' ' ,- 932-5if13 YOUKKER-ROBERT CRAIN E' GENE 9 'KIALOA 902 EMERAKD BAY NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 v 932-51-123r BERNARDY THOMAS P.O.BOX 1776 SANTA ANA, CA 92701 932-51-104 TAYLOR PETER 10 KIALOA NEWPORT BEACH, 932-51-105 GILBERT SUSAN 11 KIALOA NEWPORT BEACH, 932-51-106 BABOFF CARRIE 12- KIALOA NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 CA 92663 CA 92663 932-51-107 FOX PATRICIA 1925 BEVERLY GLEN N36 LOS ANGELES, CA 90025 932-51-108 CORONA FERNANDO 15 KIALOA NEWPORT BEACH, 932-51-114 COLE JACK 1763 PLACENTIA COSTA MESA, CA 92627' 932-51-115 HOFFMAN W I LL I AM 22 KIALOA NEWPORT BEACH, 932-51-124 PACE CHARLES 7 GRETEL CIR. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 932-51-125 YACOEL MARIA 2073 CATALINA ST. CA 92663 LOS ANGELES, CA 90027 932-51-116 BROWN HARVEY 1 GRETEL CT. .NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 932-51-117 LISTER BILLIE P.O.BOX 5205 GARDEN GROVE, 93251-126 MC BRIEN SUZANNE 1812 ANTIGUA CIR NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 932-51-127 ALLEGER TFiOMAS 44128 GALICIA DR. CA 92645 HEMET. CA 92344 932-51-118 MC CAN GEORGE 351 HOSPITAL RD. CA 92663 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 932-51-109 COPE BARBARA 16 KIALOA NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 932-51-110 WEINBRANDT RICHARD 909 CANYON VIEW DR. LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 932-51-111 THOMPSON W. GRADY 18 KIALOA, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 932-51-112 TOMAN WARREN 17848 SKYPARK CIR IRVINE, CA 92714 932-51-119 GOEDEKE A 0. 4 GRETEL CIR. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 932-51-120 ALLEN LINDA 5 GRETEL CIR. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 932-51-121 ALLEN E. MAX, 135 S. 9th STREET LA PUENTE,'CA 91746 932-51-122 WOOLLEY GEORGE 102 INTREPID ST. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 932-51-128 RICHLEY FRANCES 11 GRETEL CIR NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 ?- 't Y� t r •+0:� . a.°I::SLr . .^!".. .k: �. ..t�;� a r.. .,r_�. � Ali - . 'r .' ?;1'S; �iS:,-.+y. ;i �wt . .i',�nr. i`�: r.�.'.{ s •. ., v.'.h..y.L:.w�G•',nt..•virrt.w-i:.+K'.�s.�.�......x.n 1-�;:.F,�r.�b.-✓W.f.•.cus....�y.'!I+. ., iy'1MIF. !.�t, • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION ILPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMPNT TRAFFIC C4qftv=M=M 2LPLAN REVIEW DIVISION PARKS & RECREATION —POLICE DEPARTMENT MARINE SAFETY GRADING Date PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. APPLICATION OF: City of Newport Beach and Pacific Heights Apartments FOR: Resubdivision No. 877 REQUEST TO: •:: t t t t- t t t _ r t LOCATION: 883 West 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: July 25, 1988 COMMISSION REVIEW: August 4, 1988 COMMENTS: IG- "7-Ir-Qf 0 •t. rti �' .•lam'• - i'V . - 16 � - •it r.;iy�[lKn..i'�1':f:13.�:r•.sl;.'�:r_��ci:�.4x,a�s:r.is<•�;_::•r� A' � • f Y.�r,�:�s�+....=�F`i �.L;" - S3''��.:e.0 .t. •. r, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION &-PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X-TRAFFIC ENGINEER X-FIRE DEPARTMENT '� 1! _PARK$ & RECREATION —POLICE DEPARTMENT --MARINE SAFETY —GRADING Date j-PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. APPLICATION OF: Pacific Heights Apartments FOR: Residential Density Bonus REQUEST FOR: A density bonus in accordaneg with--gecti2n 65ML of the jinits of —which some wLll be for affordgble to l!2wer-Incone families, modificatLon to the Zonij)g Code ig-also rgauested go as go allow: the 'a•z•a•t'��•1+11t1•�ii+l�!*i[•]1�•�`i.j{•t�i+�T�+ .�+�•�1� • •�•J*�. t + ; a 1 � - '1 • t 1 1 • 1= � . 1 •• LOCATION: 833 West 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: July 25, 1988 COMMISSION REVIEW: August 4, 1988 • �J . u f :� 1 1 � +r1 .,.i s� .: tr'•r.' 1�riy�f'' •`.'i �3•.i i' �.s �iw': •y. JJ F:. w,+(� �r :iY'- }� ,Ii=r,'�y'' fn �}�,�t�.t i .!w �'!< `Cc: •RA:L. H. i+�..'k..�+_i�a:�t:.iSn,r.:.... .•�i•:'�;:': ;�.t,; �'�'1: .. r�:•:;A�.'i*' ..iF%Q...w:. Y. �;�J'iFi'..:w�i x�.,.f�.5},-., i•.li3iJ:Y�'.Y•%,.N!fi. ,-.=4-S4iii:'•'iti3uv. �S'l•�: ter' a. _ i 2LADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION 2LTRAFFIC ENGINEER 2LFIRE DEPARTMENT 2LPLAN REVIEW DIVISION _PARKS & RECREATION POLICE DEPARTMENT .)SARINE SAFETY `GRADING CITY of NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST Date _ July 12, 298j K—PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) APPLICATION OF: Pacific Heights Apartnents FOR: Residential Density Bonus LOCATION: 833 West 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: July 25. 1988 COMMISSION REVIEW: August 4, 1988 COMMENTS: _ PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. Al /!�✓,d �E7— Aze r// -Ago/n ... r ., . r r'l'•i' �•L:: 5 i.4•.'�� ,.• ...,-Sv`ir. .v::wah�,r..r..Ieta,,:�.J-:,. �i";a..:�.tirOA":.u;._.1.. ;..... `�'' .', •:a,- - �••�� a,::=:.,: ?°i`•• •:i,;.;-.rY;f'+ 1' 1-.-. !.:i+!rF .�l l.:':h'�J iS �x�..:w�,.. .�.:'er:� .%:. 4 .�Y'+*.•�.��?�'... .r,+s,`! : +.c��i.,:r.•:•k7•'-r-7 f?. � • IF[�I H�4�,y'IV.'yeY'. `'.�..�7c.i �w•'r�i.i� w �,�_3 A `. w CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST X-ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT X-TRAFFIC ENGINEER 2LPLAN REVIEW DIVISION _PARKS 6 RECREATION ,POLICE DEPARTHM ._LARINE SAFETY GRADING Data X—PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) _PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT, APPLICATION OF: Pacific Heights Apartments FOR: Residential Density Bonus REQUEST FOR: A density bonus it grcordanc$_ with Section. 65915_ of the modification to the Zonij3g Code Is also reauested so 8 to allow: A - . " ww• U..t1 AI — — __-2 — ---- • v i-1•'��l-l■=i■�t•A•1'�tK•}Ill•!'L.i�•ll�iT•]:it'T•�1� _ • • � 1 • • 1 f • 1 • 1 1 1 1 ! 1• 1 •F.T. NR'3Ion.. _1• LOCATION: 833 West 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: July 250 1988 COMMISSION REVIEW: August 4, 1988 COMMENTS: 1. Construction is to meet the requirements of the UBC. 2. TUP of cgnstruclUnto be Type V-1 hr ot Type V-n s rinklered. 3.Each dwell-ing Unit is to have a minimum of 1 smoke detector. 4. rY i;��,: •n{ r.ir .s.'• '•2 .a•t: :'ti.rmr».+r+.�},;.vs;P'. i'.F+ •"�.. �t � E�•sr•, a ` rs+ .r. '�?' .:�I,tis.;•:t•,' �. :,:, t! :•r '(" r. _r, , 1- ,.r. i:a .� St.Y''1. : a'.�.. �l.,.l%.J?:•t ,.tip• ,..{'n�„ .�:i�5.: ,:roNsaZ'r.`i:'•,i. � r•• ii'a=`•F E,.d�..?i w.••a...y�.•,lew,+�a!r:.s.vr.r. rr...+YMa'.as-N: • L-ADVANCE PUNNING DIVISION &-PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT &-FIRE DEPARTMENT X-PLAN REVIEW DIVISION _PARKS & RECRitATION ,,,,_POLICE DEPARTMENT MARINE SAFETY -GRADING CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLAMNG DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW REQUEST V 6 r�% , Z Data - July 12,1988 &—PLANS ATTACHED (PLEASE RETURN) ,PLANS ON FILE IN PLANNING DEPT. APPLICATION OF: Pacific Heights Apartments FOR: Residential Density Barris REQUEST FOR: -- ----- — - --az'= I I M: I V, 117 i-!Il'Iim. Ut��-L.%�'• 1 • ( 1 • f: = • • r • • • 1 • • • 1 • • , r • 41 , 1- • 1 , 1: 1• t- 1 1 •1 1 1 1 • t- - f� • , 1 .• , 1 , LOCATION: 833 West 15th Street REPORT REQUESTED BY: July 25, 1988 le COHHISSION REVIEW: August 4, 1988 COHMENT5 T�✓riarvu r d anvedo- gia;:- O"h1G1 r�f•S i.:�iir,`Y,is�� I? t•'� 'xi••• '•Y• �"l:,Lt c': '�`�r:`.; .,'; :, :;:d. s: s, .•1' 9,• ��f• :i K t". e.e.. .:1;: ..S•• :.I>.1;-- .lr�nf . ::i�i;•.��.`%'i'�;:�Fa c; .'•*<. r.d:•:td. 4, t J• . it ,;v, �'i .i� r •:�^:;�,{ .•:E..u„L,{j5'sCi:•Y.,! E{a,�l�,,(.,�i:,J:i`t::...0..{1�„�t"1' ,,.,' } I 3 m ar �64 a� N m ij IPA a� Ch �o�-�04 ta w � �. Ow x rw QQ .. a v M O N w' p N 0. a A V O ii�{]�, u O -4wd 4N " d x O lj it O 0 �+ u� G v ..�4 � ri � • o Y+ -4 w w A "4 v r& C w r+ !, r6 11 pp 4 4 h 14 En En fq p In i ►�; H air ' 4 ' aK o �-4 0 co 0. q'b •'''w ;u ocv q B co ale Z{7~ b 04 A ywvo w ,� o 0 Is �! N d t � � 0 o + 0.A. NQ Y R� ?� .4 0. � r1. A ,3 f O Fl, f .r1 � r�4 - xa - .+ w a =., ram° gcq FI M y 4A7 N -41 Pd ra !y' y.{'v r� en Val � �" � O jy � � a • M :'� rl A .. W Oi a do d W' V �.•` r. G .. ll co q JP' o ; y . s C7 V 0 phi � pq � i~.+ � H ►�-e H � ,. �. �� ° :'��1 � 'C,� �17 i r} to � � � 04 a f�C rr � �►. �y t7 �1. � , ;; � *�, Sf 1 � . f4Ad s t'• t:.. t ,:t t :r.,. vi `Z�.'::.: R;i•^r'.�.:ta�' s n .�c�'t:>y+� `�`�a.�;'��,�?5�� .i, p, ;4� _ ,'� ,ti.. t s -y' f ?.;. �� R ... it t '•�. t rr rYr.•at-a�s:•C,: .•o.. s. City Council Meeting September 12, 1988 Agenda Item No. D•-3 CITY OF NF.MRT BEACH TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. TRAFFIC STUDY No. 47 Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the construc- tion of a sixteen unit apartment complex on property located in the R-3 (2178) District. B. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS Request for a density bonus in accordance with flaction 65915 of the California Government Code so as to construct an apartment complex with sixteen units of which some will 1s4 for affordable - to lower -income families. A modification to the Zoning Code is also requested so as to allow the new apartment building and a proposed carport to encroach ten feet into the required twenty foot front yard setback= to allow a two car carport to encroach four feet into the required four foot easterly side yard get - back; to allow covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the site, which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors; and to permit a portion of the required open parking spaces to encroach ten feet into the required twenty foot front yard setbackf and the acceptance of an environmental document. APPLICANT: Pacific Heights Apartments, Costa Mesa AND C. RESUBDIVISION NO. 877 Request to resubdivide property located at 883 West 15th Street, in the R-3 (2178) District, so as to create two parcels of land where only one parcel currently exists., The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a parcel design which will allow two of the existing remaining structures on the property to encroach 3 feet 10S inches into the required four foot side yard setback areas adjacent to the new interior common property line. .. IACATIOM: A portion of Lot 917, First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, located at 883 Nest 15th Street, on the southeasterly corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue, in the Northwest Newport area. •.�'_••tr_ ..... i:la . - -- ...,T...j ... � i �:t` ........- . ';.r w •P'.. xi:s::...<•..i�._ :��i;....u;.m...s�i' - . i �%:y;:.',R.,.i ti':;i.i`,....nr..... :7,1srLt,.. .::�'S ".'_ `...... . ,. ,t.�r.SL .lr�.i';...•l.S ._.i:.+•�:: f; a .K.. '.y,... a..• : Ls:>`:Sr ��.:: • E.. TO: ZONE: APPLICANTS: OWNER: MGII=R: Applications City Council - 2. R-3 (2178) City of Newport Beach and Pacific Heights Apartments, Costa Mesa Newport Campus Church, Newport Beach Robin B. Hamra i Associates, Inc., Costa Mesa This proposal includes a request to approve a Traffic Study prepared in accord- ance with Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code for a 16 unit apartment complex on property located in the R-3 (2178) District. The proposal also includes a request for a density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code for projects containing affordable- to lower -income units; a resubdivision so as to create two parcels of land where only one parcel currently exists; and a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a parcel design which will cause two of the existing remaining structures to encroach 3 feet 10� inches into the required 4 foot side yard setback areas adjacent to the new interior common property line. A modification is also requested so as to allow the new apartment building and a proposed carport to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; to allow a two car carport to encroach 4 feet into the required 4 foot easterly side yard setback; to allow covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the site which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors; and to permit a portion of the required, open parking spaces to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback. Resubdivision procedures are set forth in Section 19.22.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and modification procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.81 of the Municipal Code. Suggested Action Hold hearing; close hearings if desired, 1) Adopt Resolution No. granting a Density Bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, and accepting the Environmental Document, and 2) Approve the traffic study, the resubdivision and related modifica- tions for the 16 unit apartment complex at 883 West 15th Street, with the Findings and Conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" of the Planning Commission staff report dated August 4, 1988 (attached). City Council Action At its Meeting of August 22, 1988, the City Council set this matter for public hearing on September 12, 1988. • r�.r. NA ,�^;:��• � ;mod: ..i�•;f;' `1"�y,t' "1 s �� t'S `,� :a:T �iv'• g. r `.. ,k'L wr r• :.i •�xn .:air. :v .� �+tr••.. q'l•�' ri s.i• ..,e. #. ,•>.. ;x: fit. tf L. <ai, n'i''�.•al •.',k, :,�' ,�: ✓+i��'�•" �zl ' r>(�: Y;::F �'.�: ;.�t"i• ��!iLF Y..i,�•.�+fi,��'`6j7'1,...,•�.'+ti'�•.r�C.-{.".L ..r1;�•,•r,T li«i�:.., r).tUk °w�F4,lirrt.ri,.'7Y,.k.. 9.. .a;::f'F!JF,Y..,R..?.�:s=:'hS�� •;i.��:7.ft�.-iek'a. :rnt'. cZ 5+, 5 di.. �?C+:�, �...: 1� • • TO: City Council - 3. Planning Commission Recccmendation At its meeting of August 4, 1988, the Planning Commission unanimously approved the subject applications and accepted a related environmental document. Copion of the Planning Commission staff report and an excerpt of tho minutes are attached. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMS D. HEEWICKER, Director i by RA L. GENIS Senior Planner SLG/kk CC24 Attachments for City Council Onlys Council Resolution Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 4, 1988 Excerpt of the Planning Co= fission Minutes for August 4, 1988 ,•f. ''1! a ••! ••1. •�i.. '.+.•'.•' ! .,1".L..- �•. •�� •rt'ie{ "f .� �.�. .w •; •.C. •rF:e.""'. ,•:i�1v it af�`.�•��C �j•.. ;"' •'i K"'i� �ea.,,.-... �a ".i:•e•Z ?'- ------ ts�' c1.iZ '` �' ?''.7 ' d r `jr •. `y °5 O S : "l . S f r {,.: '•' .?:.;'•�'S+q� yf it :� .'s:`. +'�'£1�4� Y.?•� . f,T.r�.�:r.f�F.af�'�e:�i:?�:;,:.t�1:k.�•r�rtiYf...�•�j3t:N�lirt'rt �i..`�:..,d.fs...�:Y.L.11 . Y:al.�i�. i...�'tL.,v �'�,,.i'.is� ��.t+�w [�T 1 • ■ ': A RMUTrIWt Or 71i CITY COUIICIL or THE CITY or mvpoRT aricm C7Alr: %G 11" vu or A arsisI.7 bcttus MM 7Hi ACCUTANCE Or AN EHVIPol.-l7rrAL DrX-UMVrr IIMMAS, the City of Newport beach has adopted a Houaing Cleannc as part of its General rlanp and MNERf71S, tte Hrxaing Llenent of the Hevport Beach General PL+n has established policies pertaining to the provision of housing opportunities for all sconoaic segments of the ccemlunity, and WMREAS, ttese policies Include providing Incentives within the linitation of available resources, and WHEMS, tY* development of rental housinq affordable to lower lncoo!e persons and families is a goal established in the Housing Element of tl.e new - port Beach General Plant and WERr.A5, Sectice. 65915 of the California Government Code provides for approval of a density bongs for affordable housing developments err! - WHEMS, the Pacific Heights Apartments development provides seven units as affordable units to lower income parsons and families for a period of thirty years, and MHERiAS, the proposed seven units affordable to lower It -come persona And faailles will "gist the City in achieving its goal of providing housing for all income ssgmmts of the community, and 11UMAS,-the number of units provided and the thirty year tars of affordability justify the granting of 77% density bonust and WHEMAS, the Initial Study is complete and has been prepared for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQQA Guidelines, and City Council Policy K-31 and MHLRM, the Planning Comission has reviewed and considered the lnfGrWtion contained in the Initial Study in slaking its decision on the pro- posed developments and MHOUS, Eased upon the information contained In the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project as mitigated will not have a signlfi- cant effect on the environaent, '.1':,��:'•{� Y N'. - x- ''�A?A!• •'1.'' 3 i�;la, .. i� ra.! .r:.. .;%'.'' •..3. .r��:.: [I:t.F'i+•;N' •.:e�.. M.�'�:i.i� ��'• .•.:i':''' .N.1 •�'� 'L, !,. �� i�'s�. !. •: .µ:me'. t, ..',�1,' .�y. :t �"'1 ._ .y'.. + i�.• �i%' yr '••Y• /:- ':i �•:'� ^ •'w'}t �•C•-l.'' 1. w!;h:.��;t �.�4��: �=Vy; �+t , •"Jr Y �^•�• gget. �I.i '+Fi ,.•a«+'. ..'t13• 7^ r'1 r_.�"3'+. 3.} ,.:,,x'C�t 124{c .�t .!!�r .�i� .:Ielf„i. .4i'::! ., J,e.,•i •. �F f"� -s: ��!�'T•r!•1:'i �u.l:. L ::�.. :rN i�M��tr...l Ai�!.T: • NOW, TIM"=, BE IT RESOLVEI) that the Planning Caswisaion of the City of Newport Beach recommends to the City Council certification of the environmental dorasent and approval of the density bonus subject to the follrk- ing conditionsr 1. That deTslopment shall be In substantial conforaince with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevatirms except as rwtnd be low. 2. That all Conditions of Approval for Resubdivlalon Iwo. 077 shall l,e fulfilled. 3. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Ho•:sinq Agras.-*ent, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that a minivan of seven (7) of the sixteen (16) units within the project shall be node available on a prefer- ential basis to persons and families possessing an 'active" Section 0 Esistirq Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 6 Fair Market Rant (r") Schedule for Newport Beach. Vhen a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and familles earning a nAxiwus intake of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Ktvport Beach as determined trj the Department of Housing and Urban tevelopwnt at a rent which is no more than 30 percent of the aaxirnm inctaur. Bald Affordable Housing Agreement shall be retarded with the oranxia County kecorder'■ Office prior to the issuance of buildin,7 potMltm. The term of this agreamailt shall be for no more than thirty 00} yaara. i. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shalt tom+ prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and Ruse the installation of landscaping with the prcposed construe- tion schedule. Prior to occupancy, a licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been irstalled in accordance with the approved plan. 5. 7hat landscaping shall be regularly maintaired free of woods and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthl condition. 6. That the light system for the project shall be designed, directed, and eaintained in such a manner as to control the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed Electrical Engineers with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been meta 7. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. 0. That the waiver of the park dedication fee stall to subject to the City Council approval. ADOFJ this day of , 1908. MAYOR ATTZST I CITY CU= • eLG/kk =24 '1` • 1 •-t r J!.WG•��1j,?;R:t�,�;,:tile'�'•.fi1,�%�'::,'i'i'g�sat:•t�:.#�i�cti.'y�•r•..r:h:F•`-a,�r•P,.."�tlr...'�.it,4��.,ic�'��: ;';.,,>.r :. ;'t t',�s,' . r i •.} • �.' tie`ELMS• - i•'.e:i• i�...)Y��.-. r.A.:: e�,.i,:r�r 1� {:' �tila:(!.i•. yi,�4J. s;w';.,.1""5,: •.��i:.vf4..., e CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. Traffic 2SUdy No. 4 Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the construction of a 16 unit apartment complex on property located in the R-3 (2178) District. 0 B. Residential Density Bonu5 (DiscMssion) Request for a density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code so as to construct an apartment complex with 16 units of which some will be for affordable to lower income families. A modification to the Zoning Code is also requested so as to allow: the new apartment building and a proposed carport to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; to allow a two car carport to encroach 4 feet into the required 4 foot easterly side yard setback; to allow covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the site which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors; and to permit a portion of the required open parking spaces to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; and the acceptance of an environmental document. APPLICANT: Pacific Heights Apartments, Costa Mesa AND g on No. 877 (Public Hearinr) Raquest to resubdivide property located in the R•3 (2178) District so as to create two parcels of land where only one parcel currently exists. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a parcel dssignti which will allow two of the existing remaining structures on the property to encroach 3 feet 10b inches into the required 4 foot side yard setback areas adjacent to the new interior common property line. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 917, First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, located at 883-West 15th Street, on the southeasterly corner 1 i t� '• 'mot i '+t. f1.a}'. /.,•w i^::' 'S' A. 1 :..1.• .1�• .�!• .}'-.. �•'(. i:h�'•��•"s ^ taw., �i�:'.�►;:.'�k,�}.. ��•'i.��.ar"p7�rt��.u••:�:;,`%�. �ai '_�34��'Cot.t i:��:�.. :ur... :::��i2��•}..x++�.lf�-1,•: t..k,....r.�rn.. :s.. c.r �1K r t��i; .a,5:r..:. .v,€.. .�w.:;' ;c: -i - - I TO: Planning Commission-2. of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue, in the Northwest Newport area. ZONE: R-3 (2178) APPLICANTS: City of Newport beach and Pacific Heights Apartments, Costs Mesa OWNER: Newport campus Church, Newport Beach ENGINEER: Robin B. Hamers 6 Associates, Inc., Costa Mesa This proposal includes a request to approve a Traffic Study prepared in accordance with Chapter 15,40 of the Municipal Code for a 16 unit apartment complex on property located in the R-3 (2178) District. The proposal also includes: a request for a density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code for projects containing affordable to lower income units; a resubdivision so as to create two parcels of land where only one parcel currently exists; and a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a parcel design which will cause two of the existing remaining structures to encroach 3 feet 10 1/2 inches into the required 4 foot side yard setback areas adjacent to the new interior common property line. A modification is also requested so as to allow: the new apartment building and a proposed carport to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; to allow a two car carport to encroach 4 fact into the required 4 foot easterly side yard setback; to allow covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the site which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors; and to permit a portion of the required, open parking spaces to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback. Resubdivision procedures are set forth in Section 19.12.040 of the Newport beach Municipal Code and modification procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.81 of the Municipal Code. Hold hearing; close hearing; if desired: Approve the traffio study, the resubdivision.and related modifications for the 16 unit apartment complex at.883 Vest 15th'Streat, with the findings and cwAitions set forth in the attached Exhibit "A"; and Adopt Resolution No. , recosmanding to the City Council the approval of a density bonus as provided for in Section 65915 of the California Covernmsnt Coda for the proposed .16 unit apartment complex and the acceptance of an environmental document. ■`, ! �_ j 1,,�c��,rC kr. `; q s �J. I .?. . r�.`i✓arr:�.T'S Mf ••. +.�1. 'L •:. 'a.r �.ti1� �f l•' •S y�,i��. it l eh.�'y I { ' ,} •. �I t r4�+�. r ;:c. } +�3 %.7tri,ilb' . 1 �.6 r+�f.! Rl',W� Y`� }{II, �Tw^�� J • '•I'. �t i c".:�+it�JtRt �� .1� st iU+-.� ].u�.a.: r! �:.tr.k. <.t+x?� 0 i r� i51�, • TO: Planning Commission-3. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEO Guidelines and City Council Policy K-3, an Initial Study has been prepared for the proposed project. based on the information contained in the Initial Study, staff has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 'therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project and is attached for the Planning Commission's information. Since the project includes funding from the Housing and Community Development block Grant Program, it has also been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). The subject property is currently developed with a two story building containing classrooms, administrative offices, a gymnasium and chapel which were previously used in conjunction with the Newport Beach Christian High School. To the north, across 15th Street is the Seacliff Mobilehome Park; to the east, is a small industrial complex; to the south is the Newport Knoll Condominium Development, two single family dwellings and a fourplex which front on Monrovia Avenue; and to the west, across Monrovia Avenue is the CBS Magazine Office Building. At its April 25, 1988 meeting, the City Council unanimously approved a proposal to enter into a joint escrow for the acquisition of the private school at the southeast corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue. The joint acquisition of this facility will provide a publicly owned Community Center and a privately developed affordable apartment project. The easterly portion of the subject property (Parcel 2) is developed with a gymnasium, school classrooms, and a parking lot. This portion of the property would be subdivided from the balance while in escrow and would become the City's property, to be used as a Community Center for northwest Newport Beach. The balance of the property (Parcel 1). which is developed with a chapel, more classrooms, and grass field, will be redeveloped with the subject 16 unit apartment complex. Inasmuch as an existing building is located on both of the proposed parcels, the applicant will be physically separating his portion of the building, located on Parcel 1 from the City's portion, located on Parcel 2. The applicant is proposing to convert his portion of the existing remaining building into 8 apartments and at.the sass time demolish the existing chapel and construct a second building containing 8.apartment* and 14.carports. In order to satisfy the minimum covered parking requirement, a second two car carport is proposed along the easterly.side property line of the applicant's parcel. ` All of the apartments will contain two bedrooms and will range in size between 900 sq.ft. and 980,sq.ft. The following outline has been prepared which sets' forth the major characteristics of the proposed apartment project �`yq'r J5 {.t f. ...�i.�'-.31.. 1. �. a�i 4.' y�t`��y.yr � P�. �t a�•',�� d : eAj R.. '.•Y, �: n...F,. `.4C%41 t r r.: ? r . "� .� M r 1: 3 ;a: +,' 1,; .ri'.:• s.;� tti,;.: # k ; ' 3• "'✓'.':p:.:'., , r . N:i � . ''o' • �:k : . r. t Hof ; � .��'%'r . ..C'.' .�,.. t , ya .. , f � � r rt , .f�..� p� •Sti "l'e..rt,' � �m:'?':'ti•.r'£:x: .:AE �!•1. i �.+ t.` .p .<..Sr:'y .�'+,Fr,..'F. Fi41�.. ,1G! r'.s�•i-1's TO: Planning Commission-4. Lot Size: Humber of Units: Permitted: Proposed: Setbacks: Front (15th St) Sides: Easterly westerly 21,612 t sq.ft. - .499 acres 9 (1 du per 2.178 sq,ft.) 16 (1 du per 1,358 sq.ft.) 770 density bonus 20 ft. 10 ft. 4 ft. 0 ft. (see disc. below) 4 ft. 10 ft. for new bldg: 5 ft. for exist bldg. 6 ft.-6 in. for patio Rear 10 ft. 5 ft. for exist bldg. Buildable Area: (Lot area less setbacks) 16,395 ± sq.ft. Gross Structural Area: Permitted: (3 X buildable area, excluding carports) 49,185t sq.ft. Proposed: (.92 X buildable area, excluding carports) 15,188 sq.ft. (1.18 X buildable areei, including carports) 18,314 sq.ft. Parking: Required: 24 spaces (1.5 spaces per unit) Proposed 24 spaces (includes 16 covered spaces) Building Height: HANIMM Average Permitted: 29 ft. front half of lot; 24 ft. on front half of lot 33 ft. rear half of lot 28 ft. on rear half of lot Proposed: 26 ft.- 6 in.2 22 ft.. 6 in. Number of Stories: 2 1 Section 20.16.045A of the Zoning Code requires a 20 foot setback unless otherwise indicated on the Districting Map. -At the time this area was annexed into the City, no setbacks were established for this block. Front setbacks in other R-3 Districts in the City range from 0 ft. (Balboa Peninsula) to 20 ft. (Corona del Mar and Cliff Haven). 2 The attached elevations indicate a maximum ridge height of 25 ft.- 6 in.; however said dimension is taken from .finish floor rattier than from existing grade. stir• .i: '. 27"•• se ... i L� f� i i•.. '9'.v .tire':: `LP+ ,•i ,+'y1 f •'r. .y...r. ,.i f i,v� i ....' ,;, g;s..t.a:?,:s,r-,,•�..,�?iu�i.��L{ram �_: •4::�-��.'_'•s3 ti �:3�^•' '[�%�t•:��i�93��`rn:,e�.-+1_�.n.•r:�.f.:•�":.Zfi,i::!`.sir.si+r�'.3..tr�►1.�i� • TO: Planning Commission-5. The new building construction conforms to all applicable development standards. for the R-3 (2179) District, except for the requested density and modifications which are discussed below. Section 65915 of the California Government Code requires cities to grant a density bonus over the otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the applicable Zoning Ordinance and land Use Element of the General Plan when a developer agrees to construct at least (1) 25 percent of the total units of a housing development for persons and families earning 120% or less of the area median income as established by a combined federal and state standard, or (2) 10 percent of the total units of a housing development at the federal lower income standard for Section 8 assisted housing, or (3) 50 percent of the total units for senior citizens. The Government Code does not permit a city to deny any request for a density bonus of up to 25• for those additional dwelling units that meet at least one of the three criteria. Further, the Government Code permits a city to grant density bonuses in excess of 25% in instances where more than 25% of the units meet the prescribed affordability or age standards. In the case of the proposed development, the current R-3 (2178) zoning, permits one unit for each 2,178 sq.€t. of land area or 20 units per acre. Based upon 16 units and a .497 acre parcel, the applicant is requesting a density of 32 units per acre, or 1 dwelling unit for each ±1,350 sq.ft. of lot area, The project, as proposed, will provide a minimum of 7 units affordable to lower income households as established by the federal standard for a period of 30 years. The affordability standards and time period will be established in an affordable housing agreement and Grant Deed which will be recorded against the property. The proposed affordability criteria.and number of affordable units meets the State standards for granting a density bonus. As shown on the attached plot plan, the applicant is proposing to construct a new apartment building and attached carport which encroach 9 and 10 feet Into the required 20 foot front yard setback, It is also proposed to have two of the required open parking spaces encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback. It is staff's opinion that the proposed front yard encroachments ari reasonable and justified inasmuch as they occupy less than half of the parcel frontage along 15th Street and that the proposed setbacks are comparable to the setbacks permitted in conjunction with the applicant's previous apartment projects at 827, 835, 843 and 847 15th Street. In addition,: the site plan has been laid out in such a manner that provides greater separation between structures than is required, thereby increasing the open spaces within the interior of the project. .�� '„�.�.�,, � 1r.•a�l1.t!:-.f{s.�y�y r..Y� r. r •e+ .-t•1�':!�i1S!� :i�-: �i �"i �i'^,2 i+.ia Le :�r�um�;�i •. �S fit •' • +{^ lb fi,. ,1, ,.o-,i,.1•i• ' •*:a+A..zf{:•g;Lc3'!�rii n.*..tuir: As shown on the attached site plan, the applicant to also proposing to construct a two car carport with side walls which encroaches 4 feet into the required 4 foot easterly side yard setback. Staff has no objections to such an encroachment inasmuch as it involves a nonhabitable accessory structure which is located on a portion of the site which is adjacent to an open parking area on the adjoining property to the west (Parcel 2 of the subject parcel map). In accordance with Section 20.87.260 of the Municipal Code, covered parking spaces, located an the front one-half of a lot, are required to have side walls and an operating garage door.' As shown on the attached plans, the applicant is proposing to locate 9 covered parking spaces on the front one- half of the property which do not have operating garage doors and side walls in every case. Staff has no objections to such a design inasmuch as the parking spaces are not highly visible from the public street. It is staff s further opinion that inasmuch as the subject project is an affordable housing project, the cost involved in providing garage doors and side walls on 9 of the 15 covered off-street parking spaces, is not justified by any increased visual appeal that sight result from the installation of garage doors. This site has been identified by the City Council as a site for the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) to provide additional affordable housing units in the City. The City Council, at its meeting of August 22, 1988, is expected to approve the allocation of 1.0-1.2 million dollars of CDBG funds for acquisition of this site. If CDBG funds are allocated to the apartment portion of the site, additional units in this development will be required to be affordable at no more than the HUD lower income standard. Requirements and conditions concerning the granting of CDBG funds will be established by the City Council and an affordable housing agreement and Grant Deed which will be recorded against the property. The applicant is also, proposing to preferentially rent all 7 of the affordable dwelling units in accordance with the Section 8 rental assistance program using the fait' market rent schedule established by HUD. This preferential rent program will be incorporated in the requirements of the affordable housing agreement. Under this requirement, the 7 units will be preferentially rented to very low income tenants as established by federal standards. The Housing Element of the policies and objectives of housing are formulated around General Plan sets forth the housing goals, the City. The City's established goals for two concepts. First, the physical and visual f r, E:._} .�. .'f � � f ... •.l _ �.�' .St __... �� _ _._ .._ . �. 9 } ' Y ! i w ! .{ u,.5 + .: TI�yJ :i ! ►.r lsi�?s r i Y ;Ar`. •'• TO: Planning Commission-7. character of the City's residential neighborhoods are the key to the provision of a quality living environment. Second, the City's housing stock must provide for the housing needs of all present and future residents of the City. In addition, Section 65302(c) of the California Government Code requires the Housing Element of all cities to ". . . sake adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community," The specific goals of the City regarding the provision of housing for all economic segments of the City's population that pertain to the proposed development, as set forth in the Housing Element on page 142 are: 'l. To provide a balanced community, with a variety of housing types and designs and housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community: very low and low income as well as moderate and upper incosmm households. 2. To preserve and increase affordability, through rental housing, for very low and low income households." The basic policies which describe -the City's role in the attainment of affordable housing are: 01. Enabling private industry to function more effectively, as a result of constraints being eliminated, wherever feasible, and allowable density being increased. 2. Providing incentives and direct assistance to industry. within the limitations of available resources, to facilitate the provision of housing for very low, low, and moderate income households." Various housing objectives were formulated and adopted to achieve the aforementioned goals in accordance with City housing policies. Implementation plans and target dates for these housing objectives are also set forth in the Housing Element. Housing objective No. 7 (page 158) is: "To promote and assist in the development of housing for low and moderate income households." The Implementation Plan for objective No. 7 is set forth on page 161 of the Housing Element. The specific activities of the Implementation Plan that pertain to this development proposal are as follows: "a. The City shall continue to apply for and use its entitlement funds under the Cosmun ty'Deveiopment Block Grant program to facilitate the development and construction of housing fortlow and moderate income households. To the extent that developers and landowners are willing to cooperate in this endeavor, the:highest priority for the use of these funds shall be for the development and construction of housing affordable to "very low incom.0 households. This may be accomplished by using the City's existing and future Cosamity Development Block Grant funds for the acquisition of lend for the development, of houiing for very low Lneor households, or by •writing down" the cost of land for developers who have agreed to develop low and moderate income S.,;y�(..t..w;�i..li.,.�'t; .;ri•?1:..!!�'o:l:..,r�"rke. �,.:1.1.5 �: :fin T,:.ypli: ,;r>s.r�f.r. ai,.,r I.•i.C_r'.'.4 • • i0: Planning Comis4ion-8. housing. In this regard, the Newport Beach Planning Department shall negotiate with the interested landowners and developers to determine the availability of appropriate vacant sites for potential acquisition as very low income housing sites." Mc. The City shall continue to participate as a member of the OCIIA Advisory Committee and work in cooperation with the Orange County Housing Authority to provide Section 8 Rental Housing Assistance to residents of the community...." no. The City Council shall have the discretion to review and waive planning and park fees for developments containing low and moderate income housing in proportion to the number of low and moderate income units in the entire project." 'f. Uhen a developer of housing agrees to construct at least 25 percent of the total units of a housing development for persons and families of low and moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, or 10 percent of the total units of a housing development for lower income households. as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code, the City shall either (a) grant a density bonus or (b) provide other incentives of equivalent financial value, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 65915, at seq.• These housing programs, as set forth in the Housing Element, are designed to address the regional housing needs, as defined in Section 65584 of the Government Coda, and as established by the Southern California Association of Governments Regional Housing Allocation Model (SCAG-RHAM), However, because of a wide variety of physical, environmental and fiscal constraints as described in the Housing Element, it is not possible for the City to satisfy all of its regional need. Section 65583(b) of the California Government Code recognises that wasting these regional housing needs may exceed available resources and the City's ability to satisfy these housing needs, and State Law permits the City to establish the maximum number of housing unit that can be reasonably constructed, rehabilitated and conserved over a five-year period. Pursuant to Section 65583(b) of the Government Code, it is estimated that the City can provide 45 du's in the very low Income category, 125 du's in the low income category, 432 du's in the moderate income category, and 2,025 du's in the upper income category during the five-year period. July 1, 1984, through July 1, 1989, through the completion of major residential projects (page 178 of the Housing Element), Approval, construction and occupancy of this development with 7 very low income units will contribute significantly towards meeting there established goals. Approval of a Traffic Study, prepared in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code and City Council Policy S-1, is required inasmuch as the proposed project includes in excess of 10 dwelling units. 1`2 wi. ' . 1 • r^' -'f`i • i..:-�' .i'� �N . •7 ..•,y.t. ''1'• .nr e r..f .. •e�g,ye :•ri• la i. .<<i:Y. r�.1 .. r' � :r xr A•cr• • T0: Planning Commission-9. The first step in preparing a Traffic Study is the identification of intersections which will be affected by the proposed development. The City Traffic Engineer has identified the following five intersections for analysis; ,West Coast Highway/Balboa Boulevard and Superior Avenue West Coast Highway/Riverside Avenue West Coast Highway/Tustin Avenue Superior Avenue/Placentia Avenue Newport Boulevard/ Hospital Road An analysis was conducted to determine if one year from the completion of the project, the anticipated traffic volumes generated by the development. plus existing traffic volumes, anticipated regional growth and previously approved developments, would generate one percent or more of the projected traffic volumes for each leg of those specific intersections during the 2.5 hour peak period. Based on the one percent analysis contained in the attached traffic study, it was found that the projected traffic is estimated to be less than one percent of the 2.5 peak hour period volumes at each of the five intersections. Therefore, further analysis is not required and no specific mitigation measures are necessary. Waiver of Fees Park Dedication Fees. In accordance with Section 19.50.020 of the Municipal Code, as a condition of approval of a parcel map, the subdivider is required to pay an in -lieu fee for each new dwelling unit to be created in conjunction with the parcel map. However, inasmuch as the only reason the applicant is required to pay a park dedication fee is that he has agreed to allow the City to participate in the establishment of a neighborhood coewunity center on a portion of the property which in turn requires the filing of 'a parcel rap. NotwithstAnding the City's participation in the project, the applicant would not hxve had to subdivide the property and therefore, would not have been suject to the park dedication fee requirement. It is staff's further opinion that the subject project represents a significant contribution to the affordable housing opportunities in the City and that the waiver of park dedication fees in this case will increase the feasibility of the subject project. It should also be noted that the applicant's willingness to work with the City has given the City an opportunity to obtain an excellent public recreational facility for the residents of.Newport Beach. Pair Share Contribution. In accordance with Chapter 15.3E of the Municipal Code, the credit for the existing school and chapel facilities is in excess of the fee required for the 16 unit apartment; therefore. there is no Fair Share fee required for the proposed project. �a •d •.. .c+a, .1'o�i� Y' � is :�'� •.� .iyj :. r.: '�:` s4`• Tr' :r: `;`L4J1 .ti��,i` `•w .sY'`:-i..: `.r.:•:+'-..•:.: . �•;Cr��'. •µ'if•°5.�+�r':' . F� fie.•:fi1�9 TO: Planning Commission-10. PLANNING DEPARTKENT JAM D. HEWICKER, Director By_ W. Willi" Ward Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit who Vicinity Map Resolution No. Traffic Study Negative Declaration NEPA Finding of No Significant Effect Site Plan of Existing Buildings Plot Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations Tentative Parcel lisp n-4 dE ' TO: Planning Commission-11. EXHIBIT "A' FINDINCS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TRAFFIC STUDY, RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BOlNS, RESUBDIVISION NO, $77 AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT A. Envir2Msntsl Document: Accept the environmental document, making, the following findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project, 3. The project will not have any significant environ=ental impact. B. Traffic Study: Approve the Traffic Study, making the following findings: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1, 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project will neither cause nor crake worse an unsatisfactory level of service on any major, primary -codified, or primary street. C. ' Approve the Residential Density Bonus and adopt Resolution No. , subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. lit. . S> f ) _ That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations'except-as noted below. That all conditions of approval for .Resubdivision Ni . 877 •shall.be fulfilled. y.. "Y Ali jc•s.•C• ;tii•.+r:S,".rFt`n �"ri •r�t �.i":YZ.r. X1>`'�•. .iC:i i w : � r+i''.:t Li�:� �:i.itli•';+:i� i _•+.i�n•..�Y� � Si}•t�..fJ r.�. r .. J :•. '.'.:iw:-1 �sC:�r4:r..'i7;: Y�: i . r. TO: Planning Commission-12. 3. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that a minimum of seven (7) of the sixtein (16) units within the project shall be wade available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an *active' Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (FMR) Schedule for Newport Beach, When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport beach as determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at a rent which is no more than 30 percent of the maximum income, Said Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall be for no more than thirty (30) years. 4. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. Prior to occupancy, a licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the approved plan. S. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 6. That the light system for the project shall be designed, directed, and saintained in such a manner as to control the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 7. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent• properties. S.• That the waiver of the park dedication fee shall be subject to the City Council approval. 'ifs , a� i:.� ice'«rN•, . �•. r,i '•l;�w, t7. � ;5,��' h.7Yj ; .,-t. • :`n?J• 4;�". .f'"lG%� 1•nxl ii.4t l�•�r•i:iY.'1. ;•�-ii,:'•�iP.s�7%1'� :ii '4 'is •. nv-`:. is 4�S;-�5.�+(.�r fY.:*I�•':r': �: �f•.4t�:.ilr�.�.s%��1� TO: Planning Commission-12. 3. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that a minimum of seven (7) of the sixtein (16) units within the project shall be wade available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an *active' Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (FMR) Schedule for Newport Beach, When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport beach as determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at a rent which is no more than 30 percent of the maximum income, Said Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall be for no more than thirty (30) years. 4. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. Prior to occupancy, a licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the approved plan. S. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 6. That the light system for the project shall be designed, directed, and saintained in such a manner as to control the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 7. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent• properties. S.• That the waiver of the park dedication fee shall be subject to the City Council approval. 'ifs , a� i:.� ice'«rN•, . �•. r,i '•l;�w, t7. � ;5,��' h.7Yj ; .,-t. • :`n?J• 4;�". .f'"lG%� 1•nxl ii.4t l�•�r•i:iY.'1. ;•�-ii,:'•�iP.s�7%1'� :ii '4 'is •. nv-`:. is 4�S;-�5.�+(.�r fY.:*I�•':r': �: �f•.4t�:.ilr�.�.s%��1� i Planning Commission-13. D. J12subdivision No, 877 and Related _Modification: Approve Resubdivision No. 877 and related modification, making the following findings and with the following conditions: 1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 2. That the map seats the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Co®ission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 3. That the proposed resubdivision prnaents no probleas from a planning standpoint. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 5. The approval of the requested modifications, so as to allow the front and side yard setback encroachments and to allow the use of open carports on the front one-half of the property will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. COKDl TIONSA* 1. That a parcel asp shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits on Parcel 1, unless ' otherwise approved by the Public Works Department and Planning -Department. 2. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems shall be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. 3. That a curb access ramp be constructed at the corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue under an , ••irk•,. "' � , ' 1. �.�:� :.1 �1`•.1:. :' rat'.• .�-r i. �. ..t' •�J •: • ..J .J J� ..fir:. •'L I'' (.•' .. .1; '' } r a r1:,r.' • 1 .T ',i':; •�i'SZ.r xiC •rL'�!F•'.t `',V:. aria •��r � •: a� �J 'tR.'.'rt. r `!i !r.•at .i:: :� <' .�'. /, �.}e. r'i.•:.A.iJlr•�Cea`k+-r>r.rti(k�rl�..P..x'T,}..i.6d.. ti�•ii�'!�i7�•c.. �.'7N�..[i�r. •.•:1 •k`.i''.'ti5 i TO: Planning Commission-14,_. 15 2. That the on -site parking. vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems shall be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. 3; That a curb access rawp be constructed at the corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department, Work shall be completed prior to occupancy of the structures on Parcel 1. 4, That the building connected along the. parcel boundary between Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 shall be physically separated. In addition, all water, sewer, electrical and gas utilities shall be separate far Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. 5. That each building on Parcel 1 be served with an individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the public Water and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 6, That all improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 7. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. ��,:.�, +ta •Y"l% :iI'' ,�,�i.�..y �tt-•ZJ. :1•e,..: �i'a6'd . .!"f".' :�S,e4 y.,,i,A; _ -Y41-„•iwlp��•J.,''. Z�kr'�.� % J. •.S . Y,ti i •"•L'i Y.vu :?� yr„=,r' a• a 1��+:�r.;,. i;:+, s�'� �.s.7�.i.•t�l'�.��i�.Ll, .•:..C.ken*rii?s�:7•�cti'��r::�RF.�'!:�ii'tAi,�;rr,'!'��417�'��t��t�'•�.%��^t'N=�'s�}`4�.ip�c�"G9�.� 1 11 N YMIAII-rr, AoMP _ . 9-0,41 AY ��d 00 00, dw to" dlaw-w-&OrAlk. rAwp COOV O-P Av—vr Agar$* C-2 • A 16 W-1-A R-3 WLNAA P" PR-,3 A-P-H A-P - IXC DISTRI.CTING MAIP, ;-So Alm @*.*t &mom gem as—" E W PORT BEACH '— C A L I F 0 R N I A ww me-w. "@.Mom* *~ ftgo W! A~ dp Apr — . W%� — r—dL- ", deftff 4p ~00 Sep Sma Imu mummu. Ueff comowft owm mgmem"m o"mmuo"Mmmummmm" WAXMCrAM one=$ Owl ONO S 21- p FM sow" TmwR-.i 74f /C. r1• SWl' J4T �. RZ5OLft10M NO. - 1159 - A IiMUMON OF THE nA MINNIG COMMISSION OF 7EK CITY OF MZWrM BEAM RECDMDING TO MM CITY COUNCIL A"20VAL OF A DENSITY 5ORS AND THE ACCEPTANCE OF AN MMIRONKENTAL DOCUKENT WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach has adopted a Housing Element as part of its General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Housing Element df the Newport Beach General Plan has established policies pertaining to the provision of housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community; and WHEREAS. these policies include providing incentives within the limitation of available resources; and WHEREAS, the development of rental housing affordable to lower income persons and families is a goal established in the Housing Element of the Newport Beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 65915 of the California Government Code provides for approval of a density bonus for affordable housing developments; and WHEREAS, the Pacific Heights Apartments development provides 7 units as affordable units to lower income persons and families for a period of thirty years; and WHEREAS, the proposed 7 units affordable to lower income persons and families will assist the City in achieving its goal of providing housing for all liscome segments of the commmity; and WHEREAS, the number of units provided and 'the 30 year terra of affordability justify the granting of 770 density bonus; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study. is complete and has been prepared for the project in compliance with the California•Eavirome.ntal Quality Act, the , -s. . , t• a :.': . 1 . ..!ri•il_ic .. .}4J:�. .. .. .__.._. .. •ir".-.. ....ems `.,... ........... .__. ,...-. "r.:s ..t. i�IrL_'i•. •-. -:•a. a�ya;: •...... s. ..,. ... .. %i .... .. ., ..../ • State CE)QA Guidelines, and City Council Policy K-3; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial .Study -in making its decision on the proposed development; and WHEREAS, based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project as mitigated will not have a significant effect on the environment. WN. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach recommends to the City Council certification of the environmental document and approval of the density bonus subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That all conditions of approval for Resubdivision No. 877 shall be fulfilled. 3. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to fora and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that a minimum of seven (7) of the sixteen (16) units within the project shall be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an 'active' Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (FHR) Schedule for Newport Beach. When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport beach as determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at a rent which • is no sore than 30 percent of the maximums income. Said Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the .issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall be,for no more than thirty (30) years. 4. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be . prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall intestate and .phsia the inlstallation of , landscaping with, the proposed....'::'.' a • r. a.. n a� S�y�`- ,y j t A if".~ -:.Z•: ��.• •M1'.• '•f •r.'i .'.�'•�. y'•iN�~ r il•• •ally ...+5'f �i'M sa1+44'M.•q{iii ,�.. �.Q `tit••�"L � �� !�� I,t'f�1!: t}.,. .�1.+•il �,��"$. tr +, ! 1�^'1}�.��S; a'l. n y �.:� - c an+tL4=tC..:h+ 'vri.. �+o.`'i, F:'.. ~' E tRs�fE.y4i•,I�t;,•u,=:..,e`::a`tii::..,.�..}w:i y`'a.1:� :s::.�9ib�i� +`?L 'drti j, 1J :? * 1 ,V'�`"' '.i:it • S. 6. 7. S. ■ .I construction schedule. Prior to occupancy, a licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the approved plan. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of woods and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. That the light system for the project shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to control the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plant shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter fros the Engineer stating that, In his opinion, this requirement has been net, That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. That the waiver of the park dedication foe shall be subject to the City Council approval. ,r :k ] `I��.� �•f?•4?i•' '......, '�riai'.1 .h. .. :'J"' i•a4 .. �•r ``i"'. Y•:. 1 :• :. y}� �1'i'r - .`'Eaw.'l. *1+. •�'e.,.,i. �, �!', y..,6 �•� .!tf �,� +1, •'i '•.+•. :x.t:'�='.: :. N •_j•'t �•,6V_.f...n.i...•.� i'.r' ''* :�i"Y. j j'f i�µ "r+�, �. �'�-�•• } ,y. .,.f; ,I,'1".: .r.-1i��r ':1:. .•w +�•'{y ':Sa= il�s•4.�w%la4s}'.!1 a%.k1�3,i1}a�' }Sti' �`; � tti�r,� +' i�e� .�'� [.�i.��!'A):i. i/l..ii di,•. iii ;.e?. .,,a t°' Y�,{i7`3 s 1' fik. f> ii�'�a .1"f7F w \,, y.��'. iS '�' 7 :� ,1'si �t "+'iS �,,��. "'fif • _ � "`, `i.:y •'ter 1STH STREET APARTMENTS TPO Analysis Prepared for. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Prepared by: Arstl■-Fora Associates, loc. 1450 North Tustin Avenue. Suite 109 Santa Ana, Caiifarnis 92701 i•` E+• f. Mr iL ''�+i. �- .•i" ��i. s...�t..r•'.�r:�'�':� .�'ti:. tom, • � •'/�•:':")•. L! : Srb• .d. :�t S, �)iJ ��':�.' ''Y' �� `:a '�'�`'^�."x :!�?rr: 1•l��':1 'tr ..f, .t:a.'.�}"il - .•. ,ii>.-•'re !, .k':.�+�' :dt y4�'' .}%i..cF�}�r ., 1•.rr. R�L _;�,•k:�Nr,.iy.-. .Y�1.. ,. J'.'t:k'�'�rl .�' -I.1xA•P l�h s:.�'':w°`•'•' 1, i 4�i�:srr ,}�r' .r. %aNe�i }••��'�21� .G4�F�.F7,•�;7r•4Y:Y .'!n'�.. .n- ;FY • 15TH STREET APARTMENTS TPO Analysis PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed apartment site is located on the southeast corner of Monrovia Avenue and l5th Street. The site curready*consisu of a private high school. The proposed development will consist of 16 spartm nt units. Figure I illumtes the location of the .project site. and Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan. Access to the proposed project will be provided by one entry/exit driveway located on Monrovia Avenue and one entry/exit driveway on 15th Street. Monrovia is a two-lane street with no left turn lanes. 15th Street has one thru lane in each direction with no left turn lanes. Monrovia Avenue provides access to Newport Boulevard (SR-55) north of the protect via Oth Street. 15th Street provides access to westbound Coast Highway via Superior and to eastbound Coast Highway via Placentia, Hospital Road, and Newport Boulevard. Appropriate trip generation rates for the proposed land use were obtained from the City of Newport Beach trip generation rates. These trip generation rates are summarized as follows. • • • •Alt PEAK abut ... ...Pm Peat tl"... LAID USE WITS la oa Total to as Totet Apar16 Du TrlpsM Trip Generation 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.6 2 5 7 7 - 3 10 As the summary indkata. the proposed project will generate T trips in the AM peak hour and 10 trips in the PM peals hour. The trip generation was factored to obtain a peak 2.5 hour volume for the AM and PM peak boor periods. The peak 2.5 hour volt, were based on an estimated factor of 2.0 to account for the extension of tite usual.one-how peak period. 1p; r `. �l� � Kit ., •S .rftw•: . 4,i+<<Y:a.��•.F•r�l.�wiS::?�?S'?..--„ti1;..�,.a�i'��'�::ht ;.�:�Maw "�ta'�e�^yya�F�','`"'':',�`�:: .�'�� =fi�rr t �''v,.w.+`�;•��".�;�..yyf�"t•1'..�•�'.a (•��:�}'�:':,��b�.'�+�� Yip... �,.�4 'Y. L7M �k. J.W..I. ..��SR�Na. nlK+�i+r..4.•.a.. IV.cu...r 7•!,L�•�.. :]0+, ��fj i`x�.��. .�i:!.r.��',_ ■ f t II �� xyRf`�i f :_ -� T Y_ -__._ I � •,. 1 �,.�5. � • I■■■ f j1 .. T AfNOIATu. f:1A. Figure l Vlclml Y, Mhp . • �+',+ :1. .�.� .:x •:r>: q, ,r:^:z•: - .,r.•,r�+ic� aV'� ,:S:R 9 tl+• •ipr .'j.. �..i •'. :.'t,i.4,•7 . M} .) i ';F:: = i+`.. 'iF [:`,-vs„+•,•,�?- i�Fi+•'.,.!•'�:�- ''J'�;. ��• �•l i. +0. F "fn>~i�r4�: SN i` '?� Y. .y}': Jf.:. v;:. ,,`.tl�•.i, :[; �Y+.; n...).w•-".. t:'�tii. rt,.; [:�'�ij •:<..._.. :.a 1. la .L�•. s•ti Y• , ` ,�.: :.: •:. ►, k s�'-�•+C�X'1:4i`sv, r,,'..��++ yy 4w,,��++ i9•-tii �;''li `�: (fix ,,yy��,,yy[� w'; , ,,.Rss,,,�,r: �[j`"�%^I, f} p): ' ! # ,f.c: Sc' ,'='" r. 1+, ilk f ffvki'�iz�%?i'.es 1`�'�4rf:w:vw r::s:ri; :• . Sri+xt�f' y .. �,C�3b464l •p '� , 4M:•' �.�."c{'+.��s }fFfayr 1 � n[�� •. �' �:. � •` 10 mt � � e a i s � k f t , k t • k t 1 _ . c.s,rq-• ry. "syl 4"sy AAOIATt1+ r. '�t" �,.?:;et'•'%Q •et i^S .y y. '"J•. .i,tr.�.*.a'. .l .�!.•i ..y$'L`� '.='s:';c�:x4v`t:e�"crtit![�aC''t!='Z•t2�f �'.+?iTt'.''raC�:4 tFa`,-'��• "�;li.'S'' 4 i PROPOSEQ.�BITE .PLAN t. A.. :r .1 .•�t i" ...t+ i' !r N .H •�=.r ! :S i t.i?ee,, .�'�5.. 'r/•': p�:. :..,I. )F•,. 4, •.!M'.Iafti i+r'r. ..y y.. �.. �.;:.,� .;iiR 4'. yr4 :1"!'. f. SY A .•t.Yti"; :.L 1 .n �:5 f".1�r.•�3�r4`•i,�•+'ysf..s:d'.:{X�:.h3.;lY-?'t s,'ri;La:; •'t' l tt.i 'a' Ai _ Credit for existing traffic generated at the project site was not necessary due to the low trip geaeratioo of the proposed project+ Distribution of project generated traffic was derived from observed travel patterns in the vicinity of the project site as well as from locations and levels of devalopment in relation to the location of the proposed project. Approziaately 45 percent of traffic entering and exiting the site will be oriented towards the north and will have so impact on the intersections tested. The general trip distribution is illustrated in Figure 3. The City of Newport Beach identified rive intersections for analysis to determine the impact of the proposed development. These intersections are: Coast Highway/Balboa Boulevard -Superior Avenue Coast Highway/Riverside Avenue Coast Highway/Tustin Avenue Superior Avenue/Placentia Avenue Newport Boulevard/Hospital Road The 1997 peals 2.5 hour volumes as discussed in the previous section were provided for each intersection by the City staff. Siam the project is expected to be completed in 1991, the ambient growth rate for regional arterials was applied to the existing 1987 volumes to reflect 1991 traffic conditions. A growth rate of 2.5 pe. at was added to all volumes along Coast Highway west of Newport Blvd. A factor of one percent was added to all volumes along Coast Highway east of Newport Blvd and to Newport Boulevard north of Coast Highway. The peak 2.5 hour volumes of ail approved pro jests, alw provided by the City of Newport Beach, were added to the 1991 peak 2.5 hour volumes. The resulting volumes represent the projected peak 2.S hour volumes prior to the addition of project traffic. Oss percent of. the Projected peak 2.5 hour volumes at each approach of each inteneciion was Compared with .tlsa peak. 2.5 h6ur distributed. volumes from the proposed project. A :statuary of this comparison is shown is Table 1. ki l{� .X •t It ?fie .1 1�5A.h•'+h?"J'iw=.E:wi':is71.�ra�"�i�"la;�f.<:=f`t.,h'k.':iadff..+.,5�'k'ii. iY• "'.i:�. 44':'i.Y•.4 .:aii'a: ::,t4i•71.:V.fl...-w�, •ti, f•F l� �] , •'•1''mot' - '•pi.•s.rtY. �,+��sa. r,YLf%i�),i �.ii,9: 1{.'.a �:;2 tY. ?�.,r,;, ::'C��.•..',,`•,: 1,'ilr tail. 20% I Ln' - 9 �I4 tiDO COAST HWY Figure 3 ,ffir'"GTIM-FOUST PROJECT DIST;tIMMON c ASSOOIATIIi, IMC. }, s . r..' a•S1j• ' •'li ! '• i.i 1. .l � •1 1.' 4.• YI'� .i - - .:�es.. � �!1:s1r �,s 'f:'6��"�'t�•.. �il�r....•�i.:L�"!`= av:• [:: ;s!'�'. ,.�.: FS.�y7-rvS $:r, .yti•�:.e•";{i.�.Mlle.�,•?�f.�"Ida.,,nfs'n+€ws••.•...r'.'�tiG,k'k.�.S=i'�'1rie�.lx�.ry•.'L.f.µ;. ,�. .s • r Ysela 1 8~1 co 1: ANALY512 11119 CTION M mm" Pw 2.5 mm YOLL ES -- u ss Lin low a 01 Coast Wy//atboa•Rperlor 0 2 1 0 Yea Coast OW/Itiverside 0 0 3 1 Yes Cowl OW/Twtin 0 0 3 1 Yea l44w1or/rlumcfe 1 b 1 0 roe Me+prt/Noapital 1 0 < 0 Yes 1NTINSIC110N P% mJECT PM 2.5 MM YOLLM S e0 9 E0 fA LEti 1MAN 1% 01 1m P1 2.5 Ma 4011M Coat "/Batboa•Super ior 0 1 3 0 Yes Coat Miry/Riverside 0 0 2 4 Yes Coast Nary/Tustin 0 0 2 ; Yes superior/Ptaanti■ i 3 3 0 Yes Nr4mt/Nosp1ta1 S 0 2 0 Yes i• � �.7 "r' '" 'ei l�ssis..'"``.F�l+'.'•w::3Tivs'•`rt!$iA i"7'.i r -AA '"dix's•s:•f�:fit�..•.,•s,i?.r N J..�.r.s,t xf� ,Y• .w "F' T?1 1 All f. 7 fit+ S'. r•i7 •i'�}. �•s�w'.•i .7:i s yyi�,+vG� .•.v.4:i. f. " •r�!4�. ..�.. ,r/s4;,C;"C SGf. .TK1�il.-iZL�_ --- :.,•fir If the one percent of the 1991 peak 2.5 hour volumes of each approach were larger than The peak 2.5 honr project volumes, no further analyses were required. 1f project peak 2.5 hour volumes were higher than one percent of the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes at any approach of each intersection, the intersection was analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. Comparison of the one percent of the peak 2.5 hour volumes with the project peak 2.3 hour volumes resulted in all interseetW u passing the one percent analysis. Further analysis is not required. TU one percent analysis sheets are included in the Appendix. The proposed apartment development would generate 7 trips during the AM peak hour and 10 trips during the PM peak hour. Five intersections were checked to determine the marginal impact of project traffic on the street system. All intersections passed the one percent analysis and required no further analysis. Therefore, the proposed apartment development has no marg cW impact on the ICU's of the study intersections, ��.. :C^ •T •.. A `•�':: +.'+ee*�.�+�i�i�YL�'i''rrr.,Ksb..,�:iijC�Z� .=t•. nerd:/7: i`.: �=.j• ai1 �•=i.�:.:1. 't`�l�`. !! .S: j..N :S;�. ,.:, +S"'-•:;:�y•�; i•�.�•f x.,,�yi,�:�: i. .,r: 1�: '.'.i.' 3 APPENDIX ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS ,F� .F�� •.'� :t s,;f ..F:l E•',} 'S4 i.�`: —..' :4- r i'�� ^.'ry'if,.��••lY.'i'"'J. ..R..,.f: 3 S� +:+.. � .tit Y'' ,k', ii j r� � �'":'e'.:i.�,•• ti.)r�,�-� a }!r,'n,+`.y••a�,. � 4' A.. 1 i. riGF'ti`.l•..gi�, 3. �u7� .>S. Y-4,.�.i.�:!'�; �7�: �t-I� i'.,��:'ifh'rfir:i�.•+t.s�7t�`.�7itf.•.:;'iC��"•s•;;e, ., ra r.+„Iti.�.-4� 1 a l�. ,1':�Cii•1RXG?v��:'' ti+�i#iS` •5� 4 ",., 11 Traffic Volume Analysis latersection: Coast H14108y ft talk& Blvd/Superior Are Csistscq Traffic Volumes lases om Areragm Daily traffic Minter/Spring 81 M Peak 2 112 Hour AWarel A;;roach Esistlaq lgiosal Projects Projected It of Pro ected Project Direction Peak 2 ITHour Par&th Peat 2 112 lour Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 1!2 Hour 1 A 2 112 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Marthboond tell 0 13 1e90 14 0 Southbound 13I6 a 25 1401 14 2 Eastbound 07 512 410 7814 18 1 yNstboand to" 152 344 2450 24 0 __; Project traffic is estimated to be less :tan 1% of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Triff:c Volume, Project traffic is estimated to be gqreater than It of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour traffic Voluee. lntersecttcn Gpacity Utilization 1I.C.U.1 Analysts is required. PfiOlEfri= . FULL j)(G, AKI YEAR: 1441 ; ' �wwwa�ww�w�waw�/N�w�w�M�w•w�wNwwwwwwwaw�wNwNw•ww►wMww�w wwwwww� Nrw www MwMwwwww.wwww Mw�wawN/N.. . :{f• F• Y ,. Vl•1 �1'. �.f r••t••I ' -+r=:'-'..'.:e` •ra'• `f'.:F i�r " y; r.7ri ' 1. >.,}'.; :.,L...,,rf.._ ;+':: iY .:T. "r•�. y:.q ; .:.rt.. ;. i': r.. .,1i:` .;.�• '•�k'+ �� •, ••'i:: A • . N�'J•. f �3i tiS- . ).� i4. .5t•' � .d S". � �+5..,.4r. .-E..r.:. ,'c�: "�i, ,�,1:1'. •:V 1': •.R;'.:'�.T:�: ,..',.>i�.. ,-.�i:.•.�a: a,i��r,+!fr,.+.,.,i.,.,�:d�:;+��.;:r"k�;�i+.A .r:m...ova.;:;•r•••�•:`:+�'+�r,�s•x�'t;:�:��F.!.K:+�'��:iL''�r� �g�:?Si4�+..ti�� , li Traffic Volume Analysts latersectica: Coast Hilt -Nay 4 Balboa Ilyd/Supertor kre Esistinq Traffic Volumes lased on Average Daily Traffic (linter/Spring 87 PR Peak 2 112 Hour Approved AOproxb EYistiy fiel mmal Projects Projectt� )i of Pro ected Project Direction Peal 2 112 (bar Sromtb Peak 2 112 Hour Peat 2 1/2 hour Peak 2 l/ Hour Peak 2 112 Hovr Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 1861 0 50 1411 14 0 Soutnbound 3758 0 44 3852 34 1 Eastbound 4744 S" 722 5400 59 3 Ostbound 4784 33 868 6035 60 0 __) Project Traffic is estimated t3 to less than It al Projected Peal 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Must. Project Traffic is estimated to be qreater thin 11 of Projected Peat 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersectiao Capacity Utilization II.C.U.) Analysis is required. FUd. OCCUPAbC1 IEAA I I"I PRWIC13 w«•.w•«Kw+•rw++r•awwr•.r•«•r.r.••r••••r�rrN«N•••••«•�ww+wr«•w•rw wrwrr•r.o••+rr«.•�w .. .. i'' '.i '••�i. • / a 1.+Y �Ja'.' U 4 -• . Si (�'1' } �" i,:�', S.S� !1' 11� =i" A:�q� "iC..L...^-.5..;.'T�I�I:.,.n�..�f.1!!^L.:,;'f..!''.(.�1R'n_SV1:{`.•ANLfIC�.,l.Vlr•..a�.l Y� C.54{5L L 1,,�{ •� ,`.J :11!'.: R[.:.•1f11�.3f.T }.. l�l.::':f,Y3t`.5�11�.14.'�.L/%�r�\I'�i�T[..l a' ■ 11: Traffic Volume Amalysis latersections Coast H19mg, I Riverside Avenue E:istjq Traffic Volumes Baud on,Average Deily Traffic winter1SyriA' 4l M Peat 2 112 Hour Approved Approu h Eeistial Regional Projects Projxted It of irolectel Proiett Direction Peak 2 1/2 Nor• 8rorth Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 112 Your Peas 2 II Hour Peak 2 112 Hour voleae volume Volume Volume Volvo Vo1uM Northbound 28 0 34 62 1 0 Southbound 891 0 60 951 ld 0 Eastbound 5741 184 1070 6995 10 S westbound SS51 107 all 4130 41 I __> Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 11 of Prcjtcttd Peak : 112 Hoer Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater tun 11 of Protected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utiliratica fI.C.U.I Analysis is required. f . PAf1]ECT� itltl. GCOMrwY •LEAN: I491 �i.? .•i• ' is ". .'.y: •. �i' ,.7. 11 Traffic Yolum Analysis Intersection; Coast Nilbray IOlverslde Arrant • Eristin, Traffic Volumes lash on Arerip Daily iraffic NiaterlSprinq 87 to Peak 2 112 flour Approved Approach Eiistiy 1"i0nal Projects Projected It of Projected Proct , Direction Peat 2 112 Hour 6ro"th Peak 2 112 Nor Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 11Nour Ptak 21,12 Hour Volume Volute Values Volum YoIuee Volute Northbound 61 0 0 61 1 0 Scuthbound 1247 0 64 1311 13 0 Eastbound 5217 167 1050 6434 64 2 Yestbound 5836 187 1120 7143 71 4 x=! Project Traffic is esticated to be less than 11 of Projectea Peat 2 112 hour Traffic Voluse. Project Traffic is estinated to be greater than It of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic.Voluse. intersection Capacity Utiliuticn f1.C.11.1 Analysis is required. f?110iECh FULL OCCLOAKY VEARI.1991 • .NNNM�rI1N�M��NNMr �MMlN�MNjHyM��NMMN��1HWM�H��NM�N�M�M4A�NNNMI��N�N�N 1• . 4 '`t` '=.r•?}..+�: �`•: '�iy.'.4'"t �•.e�.e�r; ,t.� .%`.t�;'�^w1 'i +¢n.. .t;�i - .a'C3. Y•z�ls A. �7« .t5'r�,=l�l' sue, �.r•y, MS:-�'; �.?,; cl,%l.r., '�. .Aart'l>c4i':s?!i'�s.r of.:�e .�:q:74,+�.J„�r'� ..{•.:. r}. ..d.:, ¢�pj�I�`5'.3.�.a5��t�i�uY1'.� �A�... • ..t+ie ��+�tfrJ!5{;1 '�i�':fr". Y` `"� r�yM tr •e �. a'r �S`'' `.�;�� .............. • 11 Traffic Volume Analysis Esystinq latersectiom: Coast 1141MY ! lostia hesse Traffic Yoltins lase) on Average l+aly Traffic 4nterlSpring 97 Aft Approach Existing Peak 2 112 hour Approved Regional Projects Projected lx of Proiecteil ProJfst 6trect:on Prat 2 11Z Hour 6rortk Peak 2 112 Hour Peat 2 ll2 Noun Volume Volume peak !1 flour Volm Pe+t 2 112 Haar Volume Volrse Volume Northbound 7 0 14 21 0 0 Soutncound 138 0 19 157 2 0 Eastcocnd $134 164 tool 6249 63 3 kesthound 3105 97 .659 3663 '9 1 __> Project Traffic is estimated to to less than It of 'Projected Peat 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to he 9flAtIt than lS Of Projected Peat 2 112 hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (1.C.U.) Analysis is required. t� FkL 11CCUPA#CY YEAR: till +. ' . 1MIOif:CT� •• I�.M11lI..N.•.III.IIIIIIIIIIMIIIII1IIrNM�I�MNNM , • f �. MMIMIIIIIMINNM�I�IMII��II.�M�MMI�NI��NNSOIIM! _ .• t. .. x rid _ ( t 1%f ` •.L�1.' 1" ".:�. '.�. �:w/,i�`' '•t"1 •'i�l.'y.: 4P!•�..i. .. 'L'.f. •. !' � 4 :�� ,'� .j, .•�,7z}c':'-�. ,Y:H:;a.a?:, `�1-.�,.;.�`vr •SL~ .w.'•'s '"a's :w.,�; .,1.�..:V.. x.Ya. �t#'�('c•": puJ,n'..w — �.•ei'..•..R,,.. a •i d' r`w�� , �' .,).''' � � � '.`��: �:.+:: e,rl. .. •'t:�.;+ ... .� Q � .•^.r:�'•:! �.; �' iL�fo'-` • •�!'� .�+1�xk :� 11 Traffic Volume Analysis intersection: toast Hi6bMay 1 Tustin Avews Eristiml Traffic Voluaes hwd an Average Daily -Traffic tlisterl51rinq 67 Pal Peak 2 112 How Approved Awroacb Esistiq 11"ional Projects Projected 11 of Pro ectel Project Olrectios ►eat 2 112 Hour 6roeth Peak 2 112 Hour Peal 2 112 How Pear 2 It Hour Peak 2 112'Now Volume Volume Volume Volame Volume Volume Ilorthbou" 21 0 11 32 0 0 Southbound 305 0 76. 311 3 0 Eastbound • 4150 133 1029 5312 53 2 Uestbound SON 167 1113 7139 71 t _=} Project Traffic is estimated to be lass than 1% of Projected NO 2 112 Haar Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be Ireiter than It of Proiected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. intersection Capacity Utiliratica 11.C.U.1 Analysis is required. f!A1lif:LT:. F%XL OCCbPAMt'1_YEAR: 1991 • i � yNwMNM�MyNM�NMi��N*ter r�f��iw�I�y�yN��M1MM��Mw� Mr ��M�lM�fwMM��M�-. r..•r t' t - 3 :i. .1'� r3! r.l1'• �' rY!;r•» ' ,. �._:. `ni yis''�.i•i. .:.. a. M•':yi •' " 1.. J t " '+, rJ:•�. •.1 •3•''�,�j�, er^.}t i` Y•�. •. ti" ity� ..13.:'i:,.. �.f.'�`"i: i:`"• •,�}: Yi.�r �,wr . .r�' ��..; ��,,.`'' ...�...,. � .if7. � ti,.y,� Jtr�f•�;e ' y,�i. ty„! f l „TP., YAr'".�%Sd',,� anti �u•� ti.: `':i � `:i'r.-,,,t � 9•ts* ;�,�Lnw l;' ;Y •j. 4 7", 11 Traffic Volum Analysis intersectics: Superior Ave ! Placentia Ave Existing Traffic lolwes laud on Average Daily Traffic Minter/Spring 91 AA Peak 2 112 Your Approved Approach Existing Rgioaal Projects Projected 11 of Projected Projoct Directios Pear 2 1/2 Hour 6rooti Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour leak 2 Ili Hoar Voluae Mum Voluae Voluee Volue Volm Mortabound 693 0 59 742 7 1 Sou:hboyM 1179 0 51 1230 12 6 Eastbount 3059 0 44 3107 31 1 Yestbound 599 4 46 614 6 0 ==irra; rt Traffic is estiaited to be less th+i II of Projected ;ear 2 112 Hour Traffic oluu. Project Traffic is estiuted to be greater thin 11 of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Voluae. Intersectico Capacity Utilization fl.C.U.I Analysis is regaire+. `!`• l6GiiCTs " FULL OCLUPAK YEAR. 1591 ., ...*...rr..r.wr•«rw.rro.•...«.«.y «•.•r..•••r.....rr...•..........u.....r..rr.•.«.r....«......w•r.•..•�..•!. .iL .: ::1?:;;. fir.;"G.�� a ' .• L:.• I:_ f. ..r• 'f 4•T r,:i''. Hi" h. tit •.... !i. i•f�[ •�:•, .'nC•"G./.i.•.k'lil. :'iis•.e' .,3.:�':•�:�•:.�f:cl:.jF�IHr .} +-f:ta n�R'•. Y�r',V�.'1i`. %�irl'I •rlis.�� T; i�l.ii� I}s +t�;�}'f .'r�•A�i .}�^ 'v �!>i� ..S•- iM..•.Y GGnl �iti '•�. Ar. xff1L'l4L'1i'w.i.�'.yrr .'.7; �`'x... ra.,.ii'."$�.. la.. •+�.✓+Ki�'`.'4: te�..�.` .. 5r i s1. 1 ^i•.n � • . t it Traffic Yalrae Analysis lotersectiont Seprior Are-! Placentia Ave Eststial Traffic Volwes Based a Average Gaily Traffic 1haterlSoring 61 P11 Peak 2 !!T Roar AprorN �b/roacA Esisti I Regional Projects Projected it of pro rctel Project Direction Peak 2 112 Mir 6rovth leak 2 112 !lour Peak 2 112 Naar Peak 2 l! Rout Peak 2 112 hour Valtre Volwe Valm Vulvae Yoluee Volwe krthtwd gilt 0 101 1082 11 S Szathbouad 1715 0 54 1774 !6 3 East0ocad IB13 fl 1!3 1426 14 3 wstoound 202 0 58 2030 0 __) Project Trailtc is tstitrattd to be ltss thin !I of Projected Peak 2 112 four Traffic Volutt. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 11 of Projected Ptak 2 112 Roar Traffic Volute. latersectica Capacity Utilization tI.C.U.I Analysis is required. Psu�iECTs •. !FULL OCGIPAACY YEA 1_14l1 •t t' .F .F st:�i�s':5;�° . ��.� .� rty�. :F..-...�-�^:'• • �'r C:{ air_, :'o..- 4YL-.•: e• ��, •Zr�`;p;`•• �,.y;%:;�:�:,.._, :,:-�';:':H:s 1„ ,, .� 1 • 1 • ,7 It Traffic Palm Analysis Intersection: 11"part Blvd I Hospital Ad Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Yinterl5prinq V M Peak 2 112 Hour Approred A;proach Eiistinq Regional Pro}rots Projected It of Projjacted Project D uectao.'i Peak 2 112 Harr 6rorth Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume KorthbouM 4045 IN 141 4315 43 1 5,sthboumd 2445 90 256 2831 28 0 Esstcaund 1235 0 U 130 13 4 des'.taur.4 895 0 13 409 4 0 'rrcjett Traffic is estimated to he less tran lI of Projected Peak 2 111 oDur Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than 11 of Projected Peat 2 1/2 &-ur Traffic Yolume. Intersection Capacity Utilization iI.C.U.: Analysis is required. PROJECT: FULL 1)WANCY YEAM 1491 .................. .•-----.........--......------.................-............---------.................�.. fir;., �, Z';•;. :r w ..ice �`•. �, . r \ 1' � °� : = .:... Y •• �. .3 ., �:�'T.n..2�.),: 'A'.: •'i: .[1/'. ...}�:•.j:i'••,e+�� '.'I••Y .'•.`.•.. +::wain.. 's. .,.::�:`'•t :} .1 - '.�*• .�. , t�4::�•;1�.��;..'`�,!s..2,:.._4::5ti•'k��.a It Traffic Voluma Analysis lstirsectiess Newrt bird 1 Ne"ital Da Esistlsq Traffic Volumes Dased ON Wrap Daily Traffic IfisterlSpiM 17 Pil Peak 2 112 New A"rored Awmh Esistisg bliosal Projects Projected it of Pro'ectM Protect Direction Peak 2 112 Your Gostk Peak 2 112 Now Peak 2 112 Nour Peak 2 1! N:r lock 2 112 Neer Volese Volume Velwo Volga Velwe Volume Uortmnw 4430 142 294 116i 19 S Soathiowd 3816 125 231 4252 13 0 Eastb mj 2016 0 171 2167 22 2 16estiernj 1045 0 16 1061 11 0 __) Project Traffic is estiaated to k+ less than It of Projected teak 2 112 Hour Traffic Voluse. Project Traffic is estiaatee to he greater this it of Projected Peat 2 112 Hour Traffic Volwe. Intersection Capacity Utilization II.C.U.I Analysis is required. i r. ' ikLL DCCIIPAKY TEARS loll t1giECTo - ' �n 4.c JJ * 'ti!^: .L ••• � :i�iry•• �'f �.:.ty a Qyy �y ^:.=-fix �', - M, 1� .S (F�,•�ti.•� r..; •� i� � d'u }l�;�,�s.yti1, 1:. d4: �•sr��;:''f'. r .a, n r+� �<r W a51�.{�� ' i Y �1.. �y '3'4 o''�,e�" ..i+��? �•i' r:0:•..lJ•t. ,<; :t�.'JK. ` yt3 1;,�4 ••ti• i.`:a. J- • 3 S-�•� i; T �y 1 iLa'r :CIF:+ �� .�i ��:, �` W..r.4:.i :r. -a •�:�- Y •.1.' .,� ..:1 :;:''1,:. �:�i �r h• +.: ' •• f 7:1• tf•'•,v � } • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 926%4)915 rEGaTW oEMnannora TO: Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, P ou 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 DCounty Clerk of the County of Orange P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, CA 92702 FROM: Planning Departuent City of Newport Beech P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 NAME OF PROJECT: Mesa Development Apartments PROJECT LOCATION: Monrovia and 15th Street, Newport Beach, CA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of an apartment project. FINDING: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy K-3 pertaining to procedures and guidelines to implement the California environmental Quality Act, the Environmental Affairs Committee has evaluated the proposed project and determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. MITIGATION MEASURES: None. INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: City of Newport Beach INITIAL STUDY AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach,. CA DATE 11ECEIVED FOR FILING: Environmental Coors DATE: i 1 i2 1988 for `1y .ice, • r �:�. ,w•�i a0.�`.p+E h.7a �''.,^4,:5'ri iy.'.�•c •ii.+l!�_ a•..:•r+„'j�:� � 300. • J. �R Y •;.•h! It J (,. = t ( .�)�... i, F;S.i�:i.�1t1Y1•+. +sl;F i'�i � :,f � -i • •'-t I '1 M 1 . ■ . • I . leCitpvmd 1: owe of Proponent 2, AAdrsas +P¢ Phone •, 3. Date Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist S. Mane of Proposal, if applicable II. Environmental Impacts (Zxplanations of all *yes' and *maybe" answers are required an attached sheets.) Al duly Fsr 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ._.._. b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of -the soil? C. ftwp in topography or ground surface relief features? d. the destruction, covering or modification of guy unique. geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of Soils. either on or off the site? f. Chan1jes in deposition or erosion of beach sands. or changes in. siltation; deposition or erosion which may modify the: channel of a rives or strum ;or the bed of the ocean or -/ any bay+:inlet or lake? L S. MMosuace of people or property to biologic hasaids such as earthquakes, landilides. Ndsiides,, grand failure, or sWlar.hasards? .1 •. I.A 'rra't rr Si 1 '4 , • 1.. Si .X. w��x� '•.:sR'`�+' `'r�!;�. '-'J.•:'` .k..::� y, „f7xr. ..5.��+ •••4Y."?•"'` V1ti •'Rr` H: ten" `'i�5. •r'. r cfi�:rNT .1:.�=1 :.,.w.:iYi a..��i'•!Fi..-�V'FilrriH��.:.,�ii•a:�l., i1.��t. �r`sV.� •. •:J.i,+: 'a1�: :�'.7.:■� �„'_'«'R:t.... 1 4,`i ',r re. F,. ,i •i,� _1,,,u' • 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: A. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? — b. The creation of objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movament, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of crater movements, in either / marina or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? -�--- C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? -- d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground water? —.- g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? -- I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? t I r, s4. li.l°,• fir.• �.i y• , r^S'r4t:3. 4 • i "V:.1..Y .,•��'.�: �j� j �i•tji.Rk�: ^ ei�.•!• • .a 7.�'.?y. �•'4tF.�sx`t}..i'�J.i I[f711.1F:Mw\F�'�r:R r.II-�.:`.4.'��'x{�i�1•w��i!!'i\1'!;f11W.i��+�Vil�a7�:'.'1•�. 4::!"-iv:' . �.�t�titi.�J.V4 . i•�• 'l !, natural Raaourcem. Will the proposal reault in: A. Increase in the rate of usi of any natural resources? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? _ b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? �.. 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density. or growth rate of the human population of an area? .� 12. dousing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 1.3. Transportation/Circulation. Vill the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? _ L/ b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for now parking? _ C. Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goodi? e. Alterations to waterborne,' rail or air-traffic?— f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? 14. Public 2"vUss. WL11 the proposal have an:effect upon, or result in a need for nw,or altered gov- eramental services In' any of the following areas: �:� i L •.l �•7 . f.. •.L•:- �+ "Y .Z 0.' s•••• A' � :•['.,.: }'; i; .'!-': •wL.,^�.'. � ll-�.j•''r �C:� c.��i;,+.'ai'!MC�r:iAa�-l.,i+5''•�.�!'••.9riti� tq�.�risltt �,.�.t),;:��;, �;� i:;�:: `� 1!d ye. •s-' r r'-'�„'-�[�=�ry x r ;.� .i•� ,d.-�.iir:aai,.w.. �"..� ,.,�C`'?�ii ��'xi -1t �:' f. 3�rr $;3.9�".. � Aim U Wi ld. iestbatics. hill the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or vier open to the public', or will the proposal result in the creation of as aesthetically offensive site open to viaw? public 19. Racz atiem. Vill the proposal result In as Impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultuallawxnvss. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique cultural ethnic values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses with the potential impact area? _ 21. Mandatory Finding of Significance. A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the ernirorr nt, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? • i i g• $ 7 [!•i�. `.:7 .+ri'S ?"�:'w .Ca. ��.. r: '��`+r' .• � '2 :A��..e .' .. '- :.!r,-.:'. 'p':! �,.y,. :?ph3'S •�irc>.ir .•. �•S;.'i j; ;a.: .-.�.�Ji3•�i1: �i;yi•'...Lt i:.'i•t}�1• .t �. 4• r":.tr--.. � � �.r a :��LrTX:"'Y• 4.'`qG?� DISMSIM UMMMEM UAU=019 lb. Implementation of the project will result in the construction of residential structures which will cover soil. The structures proposed are *Lollar in nature and intensity with the surrouridinu area, and this effect is considered insignificant. 7. Addition of residential uses wil increase light and glare in the area. Since the project is similar to adjacent land uses, the effect will be similar to to the surrounding uses is not considered significant. B. The project will %aka use of a portion of an existing school site which is a change from the existing land use. The project area is planned for residential uses, and the project will be an implementation of the plan. 13b. The project generate a need for additional parking. but includes the addition of parking spaces, which will offset the demand. This effect is considered insignificant, X. �S pit.-, YY . na•�d'+: i. y�i': �. .i<` ::..... ':i S :ii •:i�..�.. .`-i':. .d .r• i 7. r'<Y `:� a :y.. e. '•k:' i . Steteetory Checklist Checklist of Applicable-Sra tes and Regulations Project Name and Identification No. Northwest Community Center (Block Grant 18-88-MC-0546) Are all acti.itics of this project exempt from NEPA procedures? ❑Yes ®too (If yes. this-Statutorr Checklist need not be filled out.) Are Wivities of this project_cate/ori�ally excluded from NEPA procedures? ❑Yes ®No (lf yes. this Statutory Checklist and all required actions must be completed.) Ares of Statutory--Regulalory complisace (Precise citations for applicable statutes and re=ulalions are printed on the back of this Checklist. Full discussion of each is provided in Atmcndix S of this Guide.) t � Note Compliance Documentation w i Minch!! Qn Ym n Historic Properties dicates no impact. x Floodplain Management On coastal plain, not within x Flood Plain re: Flood Ins. Ma Wcitands Protection No wetlands observed. No � x effect. Noise liProject Will conform with X HUD Noise Standards. No ant sources identified. Air Quality Incremental increase is an- x ticipated. Region is cur- renti in violation of clears Manmade Hazards Not Appplicable/None observ-� X ed Thermal/Explosive Hoards x Not applicable Airport Clear Zones Water Quality Site is already committed to x - urban use not within•a river Navigable Waters drains e. x ' Site .size is lusignificant I Aquifers for rechprxe purposei. Solid Waste Disposal Incremental increase -not x significant. Local services now in ac Comal Areas 1 JRO� d1recrmfiect an Ese lucas Coastal x v1M'Coip fitl14od1 Rpot�tW"t Zone Management _ u f Not,Applicable Coastal x . Barrier Resources Endsngered Species The site has been committed x to urban use. No species at -. present. No habitat -is pra- tir standardl 81 , beach. *A■ & c ohla ee dot n*kN met om M " brat eakat. i ;,. .,j•. '.%•4t '., Z�'�i 'i.i , ,. t! �!t .,! •' 4.., •JI ,1�..F ,ur.. a�.ri•� _ i ,:do .,.4 j: .i r • �i;;?.: :��•: i t l•. r � �e".l. �4�.r:strtSfx��=i:�n"4srTi::,'�=s•:ii�k'•ai�'; ��''F�tiVP,'•�i.a4rA.� ,,,4"i ,'..• t ,�,�•}.•r:.�../�;' _! r `1''� ,� .•a�$$ t'::; ,j, Y ,��. .1,. .i?e,�..r _,{".er--, i.",.j;s:.x� ry�`A$>��.k?f?�N.':ll9trtrStir�ri';': sf ? �`_:. t�; Environmental Assessment Checklist fW t Project Name and Identification No. anrctmmat QV..w.t,yCatt—1 1 Z •3 4 6 t3 7 Impact Categories�41 Land Dr%ovpmcnl 6uureror fkorumenladon More dow ei rmtna w Paxe refercmvs A"tkmaf ana&crW" be ■uachrd. {'nnforntan"Wilh X Consistent with Coastal Program, General flat)*.n<f zrn,� Plan and Zoning. g. Source. City of Newport Beach General Plan, t.CP and Zoning Code, ! Own 1mWct X On -site inspection (see comments attache J Skye X Negligible slope observed. LfuiKm x fully urbanized. Site is currently devel oiled. Soil Suhabr%ty x Soils testing is required prior to buil ing penit issuance. !lust comply with and local codes. MaIWI Nu` sancft WudMg x 06 hazards currently present. City ShrSaktM building codes and safe construction ' aethodology to be -followed. Consumption X Incremental only. Amount is insignifis NOW , rohronhviscfamd Sits visit indicates no effects on site totwByutbe�wl:orti• X, ftoo surrounding sources. (ass attached mow+► KeiartweV onments ) • *Niock Grant Number B-WKC-8546 I• t• is M.'! •%j.i- �, •4+. _ ::y :; �s.�,�tt';4:.�c:.*t=:.u333.rr1�;�:w:�:.t:C:7it�e..rl�'�4.'.{n�:,ir=.u.a pis:'�,.•+G•..�S�w':'�"�:'�'!'!'....Yair�e.�.l�:[..i•.. ,<�.l�i.��!..•s.;»?�., Envir+cmtmenUd Assessment Checklist Konlinued,fHff a1 Project Manx and Identification NO. i a � PP 3 a <zTO7 .. � Impact Categories/� .fir Qudily Effects o/AmtWem .lir Qualitv urt Prvim: and ConlrbulIon toCorn- X mun1r%-PoIIteI unLnrls Ln%ironmrntal lksypn and 1 ,x sbtrree or Docvrnenurlion ivae date of contact or page refererrcel AddklotW mateNai may be atvcl egion is currently in violation of Feder& lean air act. However, project is consis nt ith local and regional anticipated growth %isualQualilr— - onpatible wi'h surrounding eve opnent. cbherenre, bkxv:rihv. Compatible tlwand X (see comments attached.) Scale Histolde. culler l o reaaurces i anti ie Resouand rharulr t X and records check with the City old f sNevpor s; RMburrrss Beach Planning staff. SOCibCC011on{i[ , a"racter ha Urban Area. o significant change. Character (:harms X oisplaomient rote I:rltplo}Tnsrn and g Income Paticrns X Insi nificant .incresental change due to suall size of project. . Community Faca" end services Educelbnal Yacimift Current schoo>-Ls'relocating within the X area. No effect. Commercial radMks X N/A. No effect. Health cart Increased services. Positive effect. Itcreased sarviCaa. Positive effect. X °.s`��'L�}!'wl!",tiSS,..il��' !�°.riS:r,�,.'_r' cti�..',•c•§;..:�.,•F'`.. .�i.�•,4�'��i' n 4...�r1 ' f- ai 's:s`��°• � � ,•:Jr� f �'y J.!',Y•:`'s'. :.+:r'r. .I.S t .�.. _ f., •+•�.. ,k° �s', . { . r , . i"+af � k .:d S/.z i'�'Xf.. f �: IC1nMlaaaed, p� aJ -4� ProJecl Name and Identification No. fibrthwast Community Center and Residential -7 3 4 5 B T Impacl 1 I:ouanw 0 Sadie Wmv 11'azaJ: ri.ticr 51omill'atcr lrilerSupph• ,F er r 4 pries to and So kkes OC.onllnueds IxI x X t 5uura!n str Uurunwmladon Mule alum ul ranwwo ar Pogo rrle mntaa .Idalidonad naala:rW may be a,llachad, Incremental increase -ant c pate norza local growth. Services are present at the site. Source: City Public Works Dept same as above same as above X same as above pLblk Safety polite , X sane as above Fier X same as above aim?' �kdir� X same as above ' S NMI op" SPNX PN* Rscnaa�brl X same as above Aacrwubn x same•aa above culcurai ' 1'acWti�a • • X salt"aa above .. Tnn!P!on+!ion X saga as above '• � � - . . cat: -... ;�}'. :5;1.'1 •i�� .1• ;.: 1rN'p.}.. � i.` •ice {?.�,. t`ii' � r :•d .��. �• ��._ rL. ,i ems.., c. 7..a.. • t t• .r .o C •.{v !`Ld- J".�.. 1 4, .�• .fir. F•4:: 'Y.' '�3^J;ny'1., .J;r ..�: �f.'-,w�.7 •!'T. f a'7'1F .•2� {t�•, w,' J!('y .:rr.b.�!� •,��,, si{ ..� „`:'3sr..ra2 `•fir;::SS P�i"di'y:!'c'p �.a_.t�r. kk.. ';':g:.+:.:�Ki";'=:.'C .`'{�s'.�_• '.. < �s +-, . i.,..,•r ..2.,,. .q .`"r�i� �i�• •s rs�•� . 7 t. 7+ ..n. �: TaO..F :i . .I-rcl'�trsSi::.,,.�r .'•:;r •a �ta:�7t;:r..•,�x.. }�•a�.;�s.• ...*.•.r.Ta+ .�..i.�'F'��w �,�� '.„.l�Lr"-'�' Environmental Assessment Checklist 'cuminut-d. page al Prviect Name and Identification No. 1 3 3 4 5 6 7 ft t Source or Documentation ' Grote dale of contact or �f page reference) Impact Categories Addldonal materW maybe anached. Natural Featur" l► a1cY Nrat�4111'r•� x visual observation -none present �uri.K:C 15';I Cr isual observation -none present llu,dplains food Ins. Map 1 0602270005D X one C-No iapact t►'ctlancls x one observed Fa—mW Zone nsistent with LCP and City's Central x an. Affordable housing and cosaunity Ian. are consistent with local Unique Natural grog ass and pc Features and one observed licies Africullurallands x ►'esetation and . It-we x one observed i ter_ , !: �y F •a'•• . .rit •t rc -a �i,C �.1 +5� �$'. ':1�F, •.41. r;:i�% +Y; E:.a •:.�t%�i. .� r�' ,f.. 4:.•r. .: i<x-1 ."`r �.�r?�cs.ht• ''N � r •�^"r�i'5.:.'{2r'�.�:.�Y�,i:✓'S�tkl►•�,7:34. �'�' .'y :; 6�?;L.;W'•*'r" �!•� 7� rs�w��3. y i' �Y=' rs�r.ObVI 'Sum"WrY of nncOngs aiRd CAMmAusions: See attached coea+eats , Sunman. of !gin+ito»mraital ::on�lilions: i Project Modltications and Ahemath,es Considered: bone required. +. � jam•>:....L:.;�:" '.�•: `r . i' s�� .�• ..k •t. tt i'Y'i: •'J . •F• Y .•. iJi 5. �'. y ram• w:i� F}}• x t`1'v. .fir' �" nl•',• �. its: e�"'d ;'(!• •-r+ _.'* ;:i: �'�:'� 1.. si �.i.'+'Js':_ S•.`,7'•'7+: iJ 1n•s��!u+�i►7�T%e!..{N.�'�.-�i,? u.•�.n��`r :i':��ii• �•:;'S;�'tel.'J•o•:r.j..�•��.�i''' N� 1,.,r�....{,,rJ4.�.M,3., v::�..��••Y,,.pp .,,.t.. ,r.. P.r`.3a`:.�-�r...:.-. .n• �1 t R..e ..../•a+•=`vh f•,.Y...1(r . s,�.i.u.•. r.t ., <•..f• rr'" :::i�.s��`•F3"1wf�7�jYf••. � '� f:.7w�j�^�.15•F a.:d•'•�'. ��•rr i�.i2 s �• � .trs �, 0, • :. i gvMmnn3ental Awe"mehi Checklist 1cwtinued, pw rp. Additional Studies Performed (Attach Slu* or Summarv) None re Hired 161itigadon Measures Needed: None required -..' EnWm AMeltstnmentai neni ChecMW rc+ontlrw»d, p� � ' I. Is project in compliar p with applicable laws anti Room regulations? ®Yes 0 No 2. Is an I~tS required? : ❑ Yes M No i 3. A Finding of No Significant Impact IF ONSI i can lxs made. Project will not stgniflcantlyaffect the gµWityo[the human enAronment. MYes C.xo Prepared by Titlt: Robert Bolen Associate Carollyn 4obe11 Principal (LSA,6gsociates, Inc. (City Newport Beach) r M Date t •'v tt�� 1 . - •i.' •.� ' •4T:• •1.�! `fF. Y.Y. ( �{'�5,i,.u:., j S i �. .: 1� .' :� r�. i• �• r t �"f�,: �l, �{ '. �7 i F. :,.'r..1,`'�.'�i •k:e'• . i•.;R,yp• .r., .tr. J'f .f w,(`•Iy'•4•+ •!1. sr s,,. .yXr'i�,k l'.�..k.`[.�.T6:�1L"k•_.F'��+w.sY{�.F.�.L�_..}.,.ln��a``il��iwti r�5_{{. .'1.'.Yli',��. :}..1':h��i:; ..rf• 4 r.X�Sf �...�7 _�r_+C•.r.A.�.. _f.SS;ti''j.:t.t 7.'.w .i.f. �•�: i..rl�? I SERVICE AREA PROPOSED COl4S MI'IY CENTER SciS,YCensul Tract LoyZIlod Persons I"Al persons Newport Beach 636.01 176 558 ilevport Beach 636.03(C1) 249 459 Nevport Beach 636.03(C2) 681 1.694 Costa Mesa 636.02 3.927. �4}1 ' Percent of 1•ov/hoC - 5,033 -r 8,142 - 61.8t •:t^`s • •`1� if•�: ;•1 •. .t�r : i> «.gl ••.1'. • •....•.l !'rat r '.%1 r':i •. :( ��.. .•i ., t - i'.'�t.'r �`! .Y.,. .`.fir..' •tiY� ...y' ^�ti� ..i •1 •f. .t, •. t. 4J '� r.i• �• . 1.. tit �Yr"_'.f:Ytr.,�.e,a-.-,-.�Ri��'-v:.. ,..}.:.:1 a..•.:e,,rr.��-� ;s �r�,�".`�",•i: y -'�1•'�1,�. t� 1 h_ ..;: .;'"'••7�i';l•., d-+';•„" �{ �3`,� �"! .. }.y'a •n.ic. C:� !`t. 'w{ { t 11r., ..✓..••_=:�rih,: rL�i...'''.i•fi-�.7... r,^t��.14P1i'{.r.•Y� '•'TCLY�\ sm • w 1 r • � • IS flArtt/ r rslcr F/fiV ro T 0 0 O o O Na1Qt7? y 6 /..K it 0 ur rlr o------- m4cr .......... - Is ,^� MACr .• ... tog r� !u ® fl O ® • III Mr ARC 9010 CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS 1 7 L `' rim. f 1 1 Now arvr � ti '~- • YEA � s �..I, i . 1 �• I � I T7W- I i r ILr •r; 3L.�:• { - ;5: %: ;. ,.;.V ,. (,�'� 5S,• ,{ t •LAI1 S •I. 4"tl f�5.. wl'�� `�"-1 n{°` },, ,J ��- ,Z•. •.•��• ••I• .i .?S•,.. �. �'~ i!{!a •� N libf�. •. s. ..... Sszi7�tiC`i�ti v.>.s_Ei.}}+3�.`:i .YJ?t.'�+•3l•" i7�'Si.-!-�:s'..e.. L:'y .:Sra �r�•F..r:,../+..".'�I"Y',�.:.:1.!'fs:�Ye:�' ..•.'•,•' it"'-.,. ;+r Si•u "L..� Lta SIT VISIT BY LSA :: 11 i O The subject property, Newport Christian School, is located on 1.3 acres at 833 West 15th Street. The property is located on the southeast corner of !St.h Street and Monrovia Avenue. The subject property is surrounded by light industrial to the east, a mobile home park to the north, office and multi -family residential to the east and single family residential to the south. The school facility is a two story structure.with a gym to the southeast portion of the property, classrooms to the northwest portion of the property and a meeting hall structure fronting onto 15th Street. The parking is located to the east of the meeting hall structure, a playground and eating area are located to the west. Structyre Condition The on -site structure building material is cement stucco with a redwood exterior.. All of the classroom doors are fireproof. The structure is in good stable condition. There is no evidence of structure dilapidation or blight. The landscaping is well kept and is in good condition. There is no evidence of blight on the property, with the exception of solid waste. along the southern property line of the subject property. There are two large light industrial buildings that are built adjacent to the subject property's eastern property line. The second -light industrial abuts the. on -site structure at the southeast'section of the subject property. There is; a' three foot block wall that connects the two light industrial buildings along the eastern property line. , All of the on -site parking is located on the north and east sections of the property. All ;of the angled parking (3)'spaces), which abuts the two light industrial buildings, is designated and striped for two basketball courts. The basketball courts consist of four basketball backboards and six .9.:r"w'4�••'A_��,��'': y.. ;"+;:.�. ".f.'.: ':i:`:. ,,).. "•r•ty"•'•y.ro ■ ( �Y7 •i.,ky ..+:g{:?F•��a. .:'t..r•:3i�tif,?;..4s.4ih'3+:; fia.tti:a:k�ta+i:'�i�E4.oFPi�sf�&%7H?�i_.y,:s:.i�.�i:.•>..i"I'.�►ilY.r?•ur. 1 large halogen lights which surround the two basketball courts. There is in entrance and exit through a six foot wrought iron gate into the first parking area, and an exit only, six foot wrought iron gate in the second parking area. The on -site facility has two stairways on the eastern section and one stairway on the southern section. There are three lunch tables and a weight room, enclosed by a six foot chain link fence, under the southeast portion of the second story of the facility. There is one glass double door to the south section of the facility and eight fireproof classroom doors to the east of the facility (i.e. four doors on the first floor and four doors on the second floor). There are eighteen glass windows on the eastern portion of the structure (i.e. nine on the first floor and nine on the second floor). There are two foot by two foot planters, with shrubs and small trees along the eastern property line. There is a fire hydrant located in the landscaped median strip which separates the two parking areas. The subject property abuts Monrovia Avenue to the west. A six foot wrought iron fence and one six foot wrought iron gate are located along Monrovia Avenue. The two story on -site structure is set back approximately five feet from the western property line. The subject fronts onto 15th Street to the north. A portion of the on - site structure is set back approximately ten feet from the northern property line. This structure separates the parking on the east of the subject pro- perty from the playground and eating area of the property. A six foot wrought iron fence encloses the subject property to the north. A six foot wooden fence, which is set back approximately ten feet'froia . the six foot wrought iron fence, encloses'the playground area from.view of 15th Street. There are four: classrooms with fireproof doors and one ladies' restroom on the first floor: There are six classrooms with fireproof doors and one man's restroom on the second floor. There A s one landscaped planter.and four wooden benches on a cement slab In front of the classrooms. There is a patio cover with sixteen picnic '�r. =1Y tables on a cement slab adjacent to the west of the landscaped planter. Shrubs, trees and grass buffer the classrooms from 15th Street. South The on -site structure is set back approximately five feet from a six foot wooden fence which separates the on -site structure and a single family hope to the south. fI On June 16, 1988, LSA conducted an on -site walkover survey of the Newport Christian High School located at 833 West l5th Street. During the site walkover, LSA discovered two light industrial buildings adjacent to the east property line of the subject property. The noise generated from these buildings was minimal. The noise level from the surrounding area and road- ways was also minimal. FIRW Zone Flood zone flap 0060227005E (September 1, 1918) indicates that the prop- erty is not within a 100-year flood zone. The project is consistent with the residential designation and con- sistent with providing local "recreational and community services to 'serve nearby residences. B. Zones - R3 Multi -Family Residential The •residential project, is• consistent with the zoning. The former school. is a legal non -conforming -use. Conversion of the school to a com- munity canter will require a use perin issued by the City. s 3 . J4J: �•uj'�i - Y�°' ,4':Pl'=:, lia �•Gsf• Y �i ::wa ..x. a:.,i.."' -i a• ,', ... �,,�j,�,• i�'. M .�. --°°'+ .::y� -� „ . �.y '�;.; ,►..te.,� s d3•:`' ,��;''::• t :r—`,•,•::' ,r..;.•;;i,�i'.y ., .- ,.y;,.s=r'„iS•r.•,r;! �-�..r•.n• (` •'� �'j};Y. �:�•\`. .Y: ..xr`o r:'%•.17..4:i. �.''li�T+i_'�:: ►'h':•Ta.."s..1?. 1 �rrix � , R v.e f: •.t 4,... ,};� •'•�'�: r-:.....[ •'^!tn.n! � �3r. '� '�+\wat 4, 's,4t .'f •W( •Sz C-.: +. ,il•}•.'. Pre;At4„v • y MoAmo VIA �Nw» -AVE. Nor 1 txrsriMt aws I errs ard�r�c .1;:A kr: .fie. .�:'r � •�:� •"b•.. w , :nfo��T.?ckL-`�'..�.ra';'n'•lr;fr�.$l;.ya?fir:l{Y�s'+�:',i..R id:"�%+C;^ '::�i4�..xY,iisS S;. •a' :1 cy�",''i":i", r.,,..� Ali },"�' .'�• J •~'.'7"!`�iy •s':i'.iL1".. a:"C�'11 7ftis'el .d?. :�ti. .7a 7?i:4?... .wi 4i.:c<14i�e �r�•:T'3:1i�1(i'ae �- {.. �:v....Y,":S`(�Y'�i�G...f�l.vi:�%x:i=Z ..`,�.�;i�'+.Yfl l.iE"�v.k�'s ._ ...•COMMIS910NERa i MINUTE August 4, 1988 ti:• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 4, • That public improvements shall be required of ■ developer per Section 19.08.1020 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 1. t a parcel nap may be recorded prior to o upancy unless otherwise approved by the Public Vol and Planning Departments. The parcel map shal be prepared using the State Plane Coordinate System as a basis of bearing. 2. That all mprovements be constructed as required by Ordinance d the Public Works Department, 3. That each d lling be served with an individual water service nd sever lateral connection to the public water a sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the P lic Works Department. 4. ?hat deteriorated sections of sidewalk be reconstructed along a Marigold Avenue frontage under an encroachment rmit issued by the Public Works Department. Work all be completed prior to occupancy. 5. That all vehicular access t the property be from the adjacent alley. 6. That County Sanitation District as be paid prior to issuance of any building permit 7. That the Public Works Department p n check and inspection fee be paid. B. That a park dedication fee for one duel ing unit shall be paid in accordance with Chapter .50 of the Municipal Coda. 9. That this resubdivision shall expire if.the map as not been recorded within 3 years of the date it approval. unless an extension is granted by th A. Traffic Study No. 47 (Public HeiTjng) -6- 4: �.1. •. •fit M� v. e,. :}::,''ri"+...: s•,v t?'.s. rrti y; 7:y. :Cs. tom:!#,f ,ni.�11+4:�: ••.!tiIVNIA' :i,�vs' �: - v>ss.:e •i,+:: .,t.si �: .:�iN.+4+:wf« .NM„r�»si►�. �:(1t3s��il:xrr�.r.3!�i�kl- l�riM�'.ry'xa.. .4r.'��x�G`'''�i.•�i.�K'� Item wo.3 COMMISSIONERs . • t. MINUTES August 4, 1988 . CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I I INDEX Request to approve a traffic study so as to, permit the construction of a 16 unit apartment complex on property located in the A-3 (2178) District. AND Request for a density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code so as to construct an apartment complex with 16 units of which some will be for affordable to loner income families. A modification to the Zoning Code is also requested so as to allow: the new apartment building and a proposed carport to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; to allow a two car carport to encroach 4 feet into the required 4 foot hanterly side yard setback; to allow covered parking spncaA on the front one-half of the site which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors; and to permit a portion of the required open parking spaces to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; and the acceptance of an environmental document. APPLICANT: Pacific Heights Apartments, Costa Mesa AND Request to resubdivide property located in the R-3 (2178) District so as to create two parcels of land where only one parcel currently exists. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a parcel design which will allow two of the existing remaining structures on the property to encroach 3 feet 104 inches into the required 4 foot side yard setback areas adjacent to the new interior common 'property line. LOCATION; A portion of Lot 917', First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract. located at 88) West 15th Street, on the southeasterly corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue. in the Northwest Newport area. ZONE: R-3 (2178) rraflic study pme Ml leo ) R877 roved *,'s+t•'• .�.,:i _+'" '•+ + : �n • '.`'e•, s'.� .;ii.y:: .i�.'� , ' � :. —,rti t. e � a i) �''4+] 1 I:RAY• 1 :`i. a :. s r +;.i �,A • :' ,. 'w+i. y Y:'4%, (a y �. i 'i�ja.r� .•>,. �._.r .. We'r ..t-rs...�,. ..��(%j.':ar: �.i.15'.r.�.r�..r:..�'a.f..:�rw..�V,�K.�!MS.'.i�i1+►E:i3'M.ew•�+f=:�f+7,ktly►'ri•�iii1,:{�'►J't.. vi ,a �',^T'�'f:•yir7.&{�.r _�: Jar 9C w!.�'i;,�h�lAr •— �.•: ;i.�i4� COMMISSIONERS A MINUTES August 4, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CAu. I I I I I I 1 I I WMX Notjon All' Ayes APPLICANTS: City of Newport Beach and Pacific Heights Apartments, Costa Mesa OWNER: Newport Campus Church, Newport Beach ENGINEER: Robin B. Hamers 4 Associates, Inc., Costa Mesa James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the City is conducting programs in the gymnasium. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Kr. Jim White, applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission wherein he stated that the applicants concur with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". Mr. Brad Schweitzer, 848 Halyard, llevport Knolls, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Schweitzer stated that his concerns include the traffic at the intersection of 15th Street and Placentia Avenue; that the proposed carports will encroach .into a landscaped setback area; that the developers should be required to complete the street improvements on the north side of 15th Street inasmuch as it is used by apartment residents for parking; and he addressed the use of the gymnasium. In response to fir. Schweitzer's concerns, Mr. Hewicker replied that the gymnasium and the parking lot in front of the gymnasium will be purchased by the City and will be maintained as a community center; that the proposed residential development is where the chapel and the remaining classrooms of Newport Christian School are currently located; and the proposed setbacks will conform with the existing setbacks of the residential developments currently located on the same side of the street. Don Webb, City Engineer, explained the City's requirements regarding street improvements, and he stated that a traffic signal at the intersection of--15th Street and Placentia Avenue has been placed on, the signal priority list. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion was made and voted on to approve ;'Traffic 'Study No. 47, Residential Density Bonus (Resolution No. 1180) Resubdivision No. 877. and related ' Environmental Document as set forth in Exhibit "A". MOTION CARRIED.' .g. ='X1. •��s?'�`�!�+:'�?7`+�!.'fC.CI�}v.:!4a��l; ��:'�e++:5n'A".tMR'�4.r8+.+ �.i<.•..�1'RittYt'iJ .OMMISSIUNERS MINUTES August 4, 1958 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH INDEX A. Accept the environmental document, making tha following findings: 1, That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project, 3. The project will not have any significant environmental impact. B. Traffic Study: Approve the Traffic Study. naking the following findings: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of service on any major, primary -modified, or primary street. C. Approve the Residential: Density Bonus and adopt Resolution No. 1180, subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That all conditions of approval for Resubdivision No. 877 shall be fulfilled. 3. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and •the Planning Director, guaranteeing that a minimum of seven (.7) of the sixteen (lb) units within the project shall be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an "active" Section 8 Existing _9- i5'S .•, `. e:.d i.+'? a. li• .:.p. 1. ��.r -' i iTfiA,l.4l'L. .•rti l.v..Sw�13'd;i..Sh}ti7Y,`'v: ,••1+.-•,.%i }:•. •:i :i':- r:Jq'y§+._-1... :-%•i�'',+.Sr..n7%+.:h.;Fil.r�'t'?.:�F-•:i.•L•.,reti..r.rl. ..�7,lfao4l�-�Ci��"�. 'ti'Lh: . .60MMISSIONER8 0 1 • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES August 4, 1988 Mental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (FMR) Schedule for Newport Beach, When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be' rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport Beach as determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at a rent which is no more than 30 percent of the maximum income. Said Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall be for no more than thirty (30) years. 4. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape Elan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. Prior to occupancy, a licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the approved plan. 5. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 6. That the light system for the project shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to control the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 7. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. S. That the waiver of the park dedication fee shall be subject to the City Council approval. D. Hosubdivigloo No. 877 and Rela&Aye„dQdjfirfljQp: Approve Resubdivision No, 877 and related -modification, making the following findings and with•the following conditions: -10- � 55! �.ir 5•,4 ;F71 if,.ar.. •ri►..r-:i4�'Z Ka Y:+�-.a:1�GI•.i=%+Y'�li�'.Y{ M['L�. '�','�:..' Y'r«l�• •g';t? '�=.n%.:�1^. r.tr S� �..� r• '•'dir. 'e��;•`� ::1'.'.'.r a 7�'A�.+�°•',�et �trAAts:r4i?l �Niit:�fY::iMWViinfi:•r�4wr�iiaih�w'1r.'rw�':�lij.�l�`�:'.�i•i�J ntJ 41 ►'�,{"l:.c i:}'n�0••. .`l.FS: �•. • COMMISCOMERS ' MINUTES August 4, 1988 \-.\-\\\\\\CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL 11 Jill INDEX Findincs: 1. That the design of the subdivision Improvements will not conflict with any easements acquir"ed by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, 2. That the asap meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision, 3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems fron a planning standpoint. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 5. The approval of the requested modifications, so as to allow the front and side yard setback encroachments and to allow the use of open carports on the front one-half of the property will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. MITIONS• 1. That a parcel map shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits on Parcel 1, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department and Planning Department. • 2. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems shall be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. 3. That a curb access ramp be constructed at the corner. of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue under an , ' encroachment permit issued by.. the Public Works = ' Department. Work shall be completed prior" to ti. ., 7:• . y J ' Y� 7 1. .7t. ...i ld:�rt�`+ .R�' :•� nil,"' :li:5 •:�w..,.... :i V}••'•.:�1''t'ii`sdt. :.a� :3;%`t' rs�4• �.,_ _ +i•'Y�K',+t:"'ii,NL ii''::'w��%:.� ••`,:. :'�!` '' � a� y ,� r��'y'':�: �. j t::' — _ _ _ _ .•MM•7p•I`� �M•glNNr�J{,IPA'„�i•.a7�1.�lJbe•�%444�.AT.'1 N, �lJA%.eliii F'� • ZOMMISSIONERS ROLL CALL 0 MINUTES August 4, 1969 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH occupancy of the structures on Parcel 1, 4. That the building connected along the parcel boundary between Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 shall be physically separated. In addition, all water, sewer, electrical and gas utilities shall be separate for Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. 5. That each building on Parcel 1 be served with an individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and sever systems unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 6. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 7. That this resubdivision shall expire if the nap has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. e s e R uest to permit alterations and additions to an nxi ing duplex which exceeds the 24 foot basic height limit n the 24/28 Foot Haight Limitation District, on propert located in the R-2 District, The proposed constructi will be entirely below top of curb on ocean Boulevard. IACATION: Lo 2, Tract No. 1026, located at 3024 Brea rs Drive, on the northeasterly side re of Bars Drive, just above the Corona del Marti, to Beach, in Corona del Mar. ZONE: R-2 APPLICANT: Jack Larson, DDS,\cale OWNER: Same as applicant James Hewicker, Planning DireMar the subject variance has been removemuch as the variance was not required INDEX Ite■ No.4 V1124 Femora d f row Calendar yy LC' xi.. i•.: t. �!. '"•,i'�y„:;i�' .�j...i,1�� , ar'h \C J 1.•4 `,! „f err a, '}', tRl a, "•x''�� a,�'Y••.-• "=:�i'i`.a F� i:.5'` •�• '.� %��liit. 'K'� • `-'i,�^.��`C:i`t.. '+!jes�'.+�r �4..�rb;�;':. � .�., v,•iY ,iii ,.ate. .i&• �p;•,r. i.a'�;s :r..'!. :4'^,f fWi`fi�•. � �. r arue 5''. } • City Council Meeting AU22st 22, 1988 Agenda Item No. p-IA (41 . CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TOs City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 47 Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the construc- tion of a sixteen unit apartment complex on property located in the R-3 (2178) District. B. RESIDENTIAL. DENSITY BONUS Request for a density bonus in accordance with section 65915 of the California Government Code so as to construct an apartment complex with sixteen units of which some will be for affordable - to lower -income families. A modification to the Zoning Code is also requested so as to allow the new apartment building and a proposed carport to encroach ten feet into the required twenty foot front yard setbacks to allow a two car carport to encroach four feet into the required four foot easterly side yard set- backs to allow covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the site which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doorsi and to permit a portion of the required open parking spaces to encroach ten feet into the required twenty foot front yard setback; and the acceptance of an environmental document. APPLICANT: Pacific Heights Apartments, Costa Mesa AND C. RESUBDIVISION N0. 877 Request to resubdivide property located at 883 West 15th Street, in the R-3 (2178) District, so as to create two parcels of land where only one parcel currently exists. The proposal also includes a modification to the zoning Code so as to allow a parcel design which will allow two of the existing remaining structures on the property to encroach 3 feet 10h inches into the required four foot side yard setback areas adjacent to the new interior coven property line. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 917, First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, located at 883 West 15th Street, on the southeasterly corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue, in the Northwest Newport area. ZONE: R-3 (2178) .y ' c4 5 ` f t y y �� i tt +v•.fi�r + --``��,, 1". ij, t�+t.`�% y �tV +Z•. .! r.§�:. <•17 �4{te'a _.fb R. Lt'C•! ,1xTe .. rC ST 1. • _ • �[a �L _ rr:1. . ` .1 ,1, t'• i �, 1. 6^..( s~i�r`. �- 't �r. ,A ,h4`M1. TO: City Council - 2. APPLICANTS: City of Newport Beach and Pacific Heights Apartment$, Costa Mena OWNER: Newport Campub Church, Newport Beach ENGINEER: Robin B. Hawsers 6 Associates, Inc., Costa Mesa Suggested Action If desired, set for public hearing on September 12, 1988. Planning Commission Recommendation At its meeting of August 4, 1988, the Planning Commission unanimously approved the subject applications and accepted a related environmental document. Copies of the Planning Commission staff report and an excerpt of the minutes will be included with the staff report for the September 12, 1988, City Council meet- ing. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPAATi[EItiT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director ,.• Senior Planner WWW/kk CC24 • •'i t i. 5' t .�1 it '•�l'' '.;,.• s' •fit•': •� !!.. ,,j Sc ,.3. !/..f v%t?alLu! 1fi,.ft,•E,1�i.;;9•.f'�=d.•f •::�t�94•S :':. ':•I.1/.i•1��111',�,k '�,.r.IYiCY r. ".e �L..i.?.�'.w"��f.� �.p�;�'`N A�.��..��', A Go 0 C4 AJ to M C4 Z u .4 4c 0 t M r%% W fl- A cc W� U) 110-'m v - - 46 41 to -ro u ;ON �o 0 C: to a ri Ali 0 0 ►F, 2 u _4I v 0 v 19 u0 t' Lj cs z M: 114 2 23 0, U.. -41 * 0 -A lu - u �q w fj wi 0 0 o -A -r4 0 0 01 M to to tj (3 0 0 V b-i 94 • r. 'A du U) oj---o go go w m o ail �p *0 :3 u �I rd 44 a FA " 0 a A 13 uo'�' 40 0 -A .9 41 ba W C: w z cc 00 0 fA (A H w L3 M >'ev o a 4w o "Co z "4 >1 w 01 V) 1.- ar ?1 0 w 0 99 1 0 i u %A U a q3 0 IEU 01 _ .0 IV 0 9) 64 -U 41 u � a u 4) &J C V rs 0 U to u ri to W 6K 9 W 91 0 Wjj U DW 4 A 0 u 14 11 o = - C6, 1 .1 cd v z jW I aj U .1 -4 Cr -H Q "4 rA 0 0) 13 a lu lu 0 X IV I &j :3 u u M ro cc -0 44 CID ai ow &.4 to r. Q 0 00 lu 41 $4 ro ins m - - 41 C3 ga am% 0.4 - so 0_94 W C: I 'a 6 160 't •Q} xi :fj to 41 (a 4 0 m P. w 41 a 0 a a w lu -94 ca TA r_4 w z 0 u >d 41 V4 r 1 0 L) 4j 2 Ln w 0 v VC 0 A c u 0 W U4 coR,to 0 U-N oil 0.4 Ld P-4 r.. 13 i0ld 44 -r4 tu 1 0 -ri '14 V 0 .'o 1 .a. 0 V z 4 oj A"'I tic 0 0 (U Ij W 54 dC 0 0 a Cocoo a . c rA a Ad 0 Z 44 M A 9 %0 to co� 0- &a- 1-t C w 44 r- _9 4w > 13 ej CC 44 0 Id IX cn -0 lu 0 N." C6 -.4 0 .0-0-10-0 L) co U a 0 fA LO $01. Cj..r_ M 41 P�-j 'fd 14 :1 X 0 0-4 0 -C 0 u41 C: 4j u cc H 0 Ch a a -A Id dC W -=I V-' 00 0 tA M 44 -4 IA '04 V4 to 43 a C6 to La to a 0' 0 M cd ad v :3 Ld •o 0 cs 13 a > 04410 w 010 0 9: a 14 0 r r. co 0 6J -A W j >1 0 a 93 C3 1* �f I lu V: 0 cl 0 z . C ri U W $4 r. 1-f U 0 " to go 1.4 (4 Aj L) all u 0 0 W�w 0 P. I tn ch 9: OD 1 1 14 Q 064IV4, (A�4 V 44 -H W 0 2d to 4) -4 Z CA 0 0 w Go ail U3 > LA k "4 tn go 04.0 v :9 0 %4 0 " If a 9 CF, lu v a 11`4 m M U 0 :zI u -1 .44 "4 W. w 0 $4 1.4 0 a OD 43 0 Do 0 1, 0. 13 M4 sa< a Po C3 0 0 v CL u u C6 04 0 a 0 go u m 0) cr a m a 03 F 14 3ti 4) S �. i CL IV, $a V4 M2 0 -H OW4,0 ;0 0 9: 0 0 V a MIN a 0 c c 0 0 Id 44 C4 IIUL tj u in w m ZI 0 4LJ U6. 0 ?b A 00, w. '�;74 >1 0 ca I. x N �4 4 AV4 co a to ws (A 21,0 u d-o- .. - �4 'r 0 0 0 00 -r4 m 0 c c to 9:• u M 9: to w 13 CA 0 1: 0 (A rn 9: . . - ... - - '.. V4 CS -o ap 4J "N -0 c 10 C6 la 0 W) tj -4 it, Zo U f" z r. to 0 Gi to ta •-'-4 - •r. T; --4 -c 9: &j 'M rj V+ r L , Ij Aj � 1* eta fj- '0,4 c u 0 0 r: 1. %1 to tin 0 tat4-4 a -0 a :9 u C4 a w = JU 0 v to "a rj 0 93"' i r qu r_ cc G. C,4- Cc .0 U 44 v 0 V ej ci �4 O c z a M 0 V u a 93 .9 w t) v >- CA M U u 0 IT U w L; 41 N. u Q to •a 94 'Is > - -4.110 'q C. , I .- 1).-. > a 5% 2 ' c Pi- a -- -4 - -0 -0 - " %W "4 0 U c P 4U J3 U -4 a 1. 16d W 94 0 r- V 00 Ld 0 u a -14 a CU GO 93 �4 U4 M ch -O.Aj -a 4-0) ...... A4• %1 "4 to c r-4 a cl w 0 is >1 a to -0 13 C: -4 :z "4 u > Q c Li 0 0 :2 -r4 = a u 0 1�d w 0 C: 1 :-1 C: 2: L64 tp cn &r. 0 t3 lu :,_-r • w 0 0 �4 u A be- 0 0 u X G. lu a -A 41- C to > Aj 0 4W .0 U C La w Coco aj ".aj . v w - a 0 0 �C�Acn W r4 #A 0 4w 13 W 0 (A dj--� r4 U 0 C 64'a- 0 u U C) r6 c to V4 V4 -4 14 a :3 41 ai to U Ai cc a 00 w a F4 cl w V �4 dW tn' "m av IA in - tO in.-. ra "4, .60 0.0 ICY,, T, T- r Wj r- 4a r; x f r Fit r t: 'o4; g��V'gjgg I u= C-4 -.�. n q u o00 a •se V N d A co W.,..._. __•._. 1w m C O O' O z w..ci.;� x r N q j� O N �o ,v V ;' a A. . y',•u, �:.:. A YOLK t V M .Y. �H.e W r•� 5 G�m U U U o a C c w �J• c tr m 9 u O u lu �.L a+ O Lii F 'a L " .. " " •a a u.�.__ .._�•w G u G +C 61•rt 01 V. rr .G_ ' .� a1 p C W . a a W. W C 1• r d 'O .G 00 O V a• -.+ z .0 '•+ .0 73 . t m u �.. c ... .., t+ u a a O u ++ G .r u u a es " A U # '� a >, w z •v a a c - 10 o 41 v 21 M A a! a. C pC o %-• 3.0 rid a cr v 8 B ., O C a 0 a� o x- u !-• C as er u a -r 1 '� ;7 ... O is u v o -. ri. c - m ...., . .+ . b . a► . aa. r+ A • G - o. Ca ... E �+ 00 CO N V .. 'p u .� U G V. c 4 u " Z b R ►� t7 v .W �.. .. �..a ._. Im ci .-1 G «r Y4 a. 9 of 0. as 0.9 c U '.+ 1. L..., L es . S t0 w 0 w � r>1 0. v N 7 � '•! J • � c v •-• .i ro a� �vv 4!� M a0 0 � °`' air w o rl CA CA � Ci `.0 r4 r4 rzs a '0N00 U 0 t1en l �a,,c 4V-A0x...l..V.... -._- ._.. z- u$.tva .a8 a -t V a MWo Wa�. >= ,.taecu c�x.0 w r. O m C N c J uo Li%a•cs G�1.s7ac rr E.4QLifJ �. rAo��'�a �c.xoa► 'v a 1+ u ►. !J 1• V waFt� ow C C u 3 +� L .-• t ! Al v .. .. 61 _ •r4 01 4W 'rt •O r!"� _ N .: 1+ - Z U L• O Z 9 W fl - 1 _..... x . a L . • .. u L• O O til ' r1.. p +N _.+i ., f{pp O. 0. y. p u O C m p�-!C''C"M V L .. •. C x CL `L O. +t 'C 1 _ V b ]L . to - w O ... � Q� . _..." er x O J Go Y G V cr C?O H O x eF -4X V tir V O H i+ V 0.0 4• �-. �+ i e1 V G i. r .lL pG Q 'O U *J M C M C +s V i.i V L 0O U t V U M ,Y__'Ctd .._$y O u u tJ L. w _VO .�uy.t0-�O CD C CJ O UarL-Mr�. .. ..MO .._�.tu1 ..a ..1-0>• _td .++ ..+O+ "C>"Or�• .OJ .►a 1-4 .VIU 4 G U-4-.+'G•+-Va.y .-...- - L.Gd►.J+ 0 Cr-1 hu�� O 'V • +4 O d V U G O O .vG •CaN+ L_SS.Ct! tAa.. V .Q-+. •V•J O O $+ O V N N O a> r_ O ?d u 1Cr Y u. --. o «4 a to G a -.OtHA-�N....,GOJ ...rOl_Ly• �G4 ..cU . u u'C VGG ..• J - .. . -NV ''Uwrl -R• _V .+a++j..+wUu _sOGGO+► L 14 -'0aC ar✓ cadC7 ._.'00 y .O a N u Rr► u a+ O O C.0 • GN N O .'tq CQ7 O-+o aJ _�A CQr�4 a U tJ N.r1*uO'� W L. 0 44 a� a O 9 u -4 a to C: b .4 a C w 0 V r4 i. + . A» 6 dW �+x] c O e7 Q Ln-L V e4 .-r r4 G "4 tv J a a V 9.-C3 H N •r1 go Q w V 13 � ►o>..ydu � u10u a�°'c m C� a xu ut+ "a +i* C N >. G as 14 0 0 0 w a •+ d O U � C3 sC- HD cs O Cwa:f+ _ O.-. ._a+ L „1 O . kLLi N LV V G.i r♦ U to • Ir a'0 us O 'p Or LL � E-+�N O to C .G�. Ia.. . , NN C Sfidi� %G cu.tC �%4 r � da Tt to ri $a Y4C1 ►G ius Ct. 0. Ct. C rL+i-u s.p-t m Y rt a- 'ro�6t r+ U Go 0O'ri oRU 'C L• .c a.0 'O as.0 rt O I v a a s N,Ol!r•;,O O r, . w v .. V 96.w L V IA U "4 V a o. st CY O" >. tr CO, fV O V u u � M a `t r a'� U to o a+ 8 W. .19 rn u cc u V as V G" v may,-. O �.t O m to v •: a' a,• a+ u 0 O wl Le p.yM'I-rrfly R y• ..r ,e7 U v . ta.7...x0 IZO .� ,Z, t t • ..1ri Y` . .` -� -.. '... .�w�.w....h�a.r.n..y. `�M,.'�..�MrM•c.iye.i+w..sw.,y.4Ay .YY�,MM .M"wMs.MrM'....�.Yw..I�,r• .�1 tF.l Cl'I • f. .. IAi - - G� dd t �. p. .y .s• -s3Y „ S •�"i''-�� • �" , ,s Y.'1 .., .!,:.1r` �: 5! . ar"r�:�i`f`s'.�%£'r.a;i.:: _ r},.. �ivi'-fi. �'�!Ff..t..l,:,L,-...n. :, si:lr.."f1. S.: ��r:; w::n4•.<,r.. :�4+k.x! t P. .•r�l' i t' i - ':3; -''"dt >Y� �i1,`e-;.Fig �r.Y�b CD co co 43 co co co ift Mb v4 "4 9.4 ti y 4na a a d14 .0 . ..... W CI L" gI .0 0 00 V 0 Go go Go PC to ID 0% C: 93 41 cq . . O CS 4 %) 0 C: I i 4j 13 0 93 C14 g: :1 0 — f3 rA r4 0 &1 a a W 0 9: "4 93 u .0 vo S3, W.5 A 0 w VS pf • fA 0 -014 4j 11 fd6 00 V. 1A I IA C Aj C: 4) 00 r 0 0 > to .0 z A I 'A CC w 1 0 z :0 0 :1 4 3 co -r4 �4 c cc O. a. to Win Ct �4 .0 0 40 Lo 96 , %V S. ol fh Cj CA U4 U - (U Go rj q) 0 W, W Aj 11 C: r6'0 go rq x od U "4 %D g: -C C m 4 .0 JJ 1-4 ;a 0 C6 W *0 0 C4 -0 A. W 00 a N -r4 ai 0 C%4 •f4 lu 40 r-4 (A -.0.44" CJ W Ad 0 40 I_ 10% CC a 0 > 0 a- fj-. OD W, w 13 Ch Go 'o 4d 0 cc 4) 00 0 44 14 0 4J kj W Go 4) 9*.-4 -r- 0 U4 u 0 W v4 �l $4 go C3 a A 1w .0 C) $1.0 co C W ce C %D M qk W 44 41 0 M 0 Pip si 14 14 %n aft cc Q S6 0 0 $A tn fA z 95 ._r_rS to-, 0 2 V rij M W.W - r 0 a — - --- tn:�� . —4 tj -4 C3 w _4 44 c 0 a ta r4 r4 Ow wS _ to j g: -0 to .4 w r. u x ca is In a 0 M 0 0 W d3 0 CL C3 0 w �-d r. Gtl = j a �4 t� 0 U �q 14 C6 0 r. U 0 0 W 0 Is tn 0 r4 wq-t. a -H 44� cc .,U.r ___Ij .1 - u ____Ij - W -- jP% a 44 A_E.. A a., so to Aj -A ou &I &A A lu aj�C3 C4 a co m co 0 &J 0 'i %I %, m to q4 C 9: 1: Zo u 1.0 C 43 4 - i•14 44 4u cc -4 10 0 ,4 s-4 9: C6 G pc o 0 in 44 0 �4 u 44--al 0 16 C ptj .0 C 4 0 w 93 161 0 IM to U U 44 40 %o 0 CO - r4 00 -A -;4 f;v E3 -4 = In. f 4 �4 M 0 U 0 _4 ai -0 -rf -4 461 lu A 0 CM v4 10 4A rP4. 4 93 10 41 0 0 g: c u 0.00 P4 -4 Ll CO -4 r4 cl co 0 61 m a " ij w &A 0 Q go cu to a CrA 0 0 C) C6 A 9 0 = Cc; a- COL. 0 M 0 C C3 14.0 Q 161 01 0 W U r to j5 C4 - U P-*.'O G 4e. lu U 64 M .-r4 C6 9: 96 ad 0 th 0 4 s q,"D 43 os U. Ij Ill C6 u Pi .3. U I%. ad 0 U C6 �7 7- --4 ;pl o f M 460 CO Z C.) %-o 141-4 0 A 1 V a 01 0 12 1 coo 0 0 0 0 (DI 00� 0 to , . '00's a" 93 Kau "'0 tl 0 0 00 �4 0 101 0 w ,q 0, 0 ..0 A4 . 11 . - .. tu -4 f 1) � V4. N1. 1. 1 88 8 0 C-4 64 0---Ld-U jw AJ U) "4 - s o d' a 0 Q a 0 W I , CS Cj C2 11 0 0 VA cat-'alm oto� W ii I. C; C; C; 21 q A w 0 to a " :3 '00 1 a ad C.'" 0 A x I Ld r3 E0, mi- #A WIG C3 "f �&' 4 444 A 10 44 .0 c Aj 1w &J 41 N4 to A u vo 1wi w4lu V, m 00 0: iFA H 49 ��._.0.0._. I AU a -vLa, o vi C6 49 .0 64 - ■- as. 0 Id u __'O 4r jft..�_ u n E v C�' a 13 V 0--r4- c u u . IG 04 "4 "4 41 9 Iry 14, .0, N M si, i a, U, a � v mca 0 &j 0 Q a 0 :01 w to -v4 WOO cd 0 a a 160 0 $4 ri Sd M Id Is a m IOU 0 41 .4 no rf 9: H v qu 94 194 u wd 0 in a FA 0 Lp to A 9 1:6 is V4 w V 0 WO I j! a 0 ro A In c 44 v4 10.00-M A, a. 0 a v 00 lu 01 is. 00 to -� 8 C3 0 C: w H 4 v u I im, 0 66 S C: 110 — �-Z e�� 0 a 7 &A ., CID -A I$ 41J '0 1:1 0 u• ad: v 0 � : 121 w Ao w 0 . CS'L g3 .0, � 'o .4w 'u 0 ;era ;,Ek Yam" j F-I Ch Ch W co Qj :Sd,o &J '14 SIC A W �L V P� 44, go u v ate cs 0 P Ad.- .4. - OAS. 601WO .3 t"' Cr -4 "4, 0. F! aw 44 w SIC 7-37A"i 1 0 Aj -0 44 P% dl '". . . " - , A."i - ch; W: P% as 0, A C6 'C7 Y: C, P'f < 1_1. 4 tYv V 'A AD' :r, n i 0, D z n 0 4c 0 XV co CL V 0 00 qj 4 0 &J r. co C* a Au a G V Aj aj -A :--, J-5 r. 0 do -ri 0 W u 93 aJ go 01. .0 0 ca u a a to DO in 0 0 C ...►41 ri. 6 u X" 41 -4 0 u o ti fA 44 "4 0 % to " ii 44 -r4 -A Nk 444 :3 Ai —1 a -rf c W 0 Ai ri 0 64 to Uf •4 v W 40 -A W 0 0 9 a -q .0 90 PO 0 41 W 14 00 r- to Z I 44 U M C %&d 0 _6 aj Lw PC J3.6-U-0 0 64 o-4 44 E - " I 14.10-63.0 -06 % to 12 l>. 10 u 1 -,a to -q. 4) 44 44 C: Lo w A -ro 41 0 0 v 71 ;R 0 .4 -0 r.4 0 54 -rq to 0 r. — , .* .0 0 0 tk 0 0 r- V -4 a Sj 'a -1_4W U u 0 0 001, 2 U w cl J% a 13 w 0 10 U3 4.0 tho U)• 0. r. $4 CL > 4J 0 16.0 ca wo, 41 a Aj U--to 0 40 Li r. .-..0 Ch o 44 . -8-0, tx-CL , a (a c C -4 -rd $4 u cl 0 u :1 0 V en a a $4 " r. V &a *,a aj r. w lu D, PL, aj 41 -A 0 13 0 93 w u p., ai 0 Q > �"w 1w, a -H " 0 JC %4 -H " W f-4 "4 &J _jj Cti 64 -rf "4 Mi 93 :3 v cc W—d U) 0 044 0 V C6 r-6 4 40 r-4 "4 -0 to "4 " :: 41&6 @-1 61 aj to u 0 u 0 =vv 4 (a r 0.,. 0 1. 00 u &J 'A .0 a) 1 6H MCA 4. si. —E 0 0 o SJ 4 �4 14 O. w c ca u .Z -0 4LJ 0 CO W r4 tio to &J di "4 10 W.0 w 1" "4 w w FA r•-4 W *a r. f-I .0 a a U) DI 0 u U) 0 4 &j bo a r. W .0 -4-0 Aj v LL4 0 CO M4 (A 'I �V- r-4 0 1 14 0 C-A H .0 93 4 0) OV W.4 C6 &P 4J &J 'w4 4 0 0 0 0 0 -A ip Aj w 010 m :1 w a . 0) • r. C6 4 MA :3 $4 0 4) $4 to :3 A 4w > u Di a to 0 -u -0 cu X a 0 0 21 a. 0 rf Ll 0 9 0 lu Aj 5t la a m -H 0 -0 C 0 :3 Aj FA Sala 0 w Aj kv In 0 %4 a &J a-- - I , .0 w w tn -i 2 - 0; to V co ZP to qu 0 4j, 0 T $4 " , . W. 1-rc. gs .4 , U fa v 10 u -s4 X 9: iw I ve".0 1 0 - 0 1 U-r-4 M,41 .. #a 0 cGO 0 14 0 96 X: .0 v a PO .4 id 14 14 to tic A id --A r6 w4 to -H f I" co,- 0, ".'CS •e4 la 0"N WW 0 0 44 ot M 19 W 4j $4 '�j to ..,4;-, U 60 V > Cl 41 &J 14 lv4vl o"o 0 fj. r J&_ P% $4 10 4j �,Wtp, pv,� •-A, I' �11 -.44 a 0 ,-,o 1 C6 x a (i o 1 13 r4 W ci 44 C, 0 V 0 44.0 L Si to -v4.,S '�-'-lo Q, 44 14 64 C6 14 % I F rl t r, r: -4 0 1.4 34 r e) ; j,j 4-1 r; s-4 c u CIO 14 4u to a in O. 0 u 0 44 QM C3 r4 gid 0 tha�g u P) .4 r u 14 0 k- f-4 9 A - at +ts ; 0 gs 4u ba a V u 0 titiM 9L, 1--d a 4j 60 ej C: w4 cl M J-8 0-0 &j I uC3 . lu V "4 to -,* - 0 -r0f V% w = u " 0 -ro Sd .0 9N $4 -�f 0 w W u to co 0 sw r4 a a 0 :4 0 14 en -j go -P4 -92 tj 41 Ld 4 0 C: Q 02 -0 W (A u v w r. -a 54 r 0 IV 0 a 0 0 r. IU po •v-4 9: :3 Q > .14 -0 U4,-u C6 0 4" �4 C6 A- LM al al Q CL 0--- 00 OD to "T. L, W 4w4 Li 0 en 00 N $4 .4 V Is V) 6A 0 T4 0 ;1, 41 0 44 P% Ln u �4 ve o 0 A U 44 U CIO r. "4 rd 41 00 a 0 al V 0 en fin -r4 cs -4-0 un. fn .4 m 04 Ln co 92 U $4 W :01 U 0 41 0 cd # 4 '1 0 ai 10 en In 0 4) GO & OD co r. AT go rn 14 Ni " M w -H C6 :3 : ' a V 4 C6 M 9: 0 Li Q)- W C6 C4 IN 464 VIP W C6 0) lu r4 w4 w u ob or a.,. cd C6 Aj U W CA V,* . .0 E r Mp 0 $4 0 a 0 a 86 14 2 1., -! .. - w a 44 Q CLI 2 " -rf. a &A a co'? 0 f4 A. C4 M IN* C4 0 q4 0" f4 C6 0 C6 -4 vo q; 64 u -.- - 11 dicl .` a Aft ,Al $4 so lw lu u 95 14 0 u r6 O t 41 .0 )7 j 'S $ F • a c5 • t^�sw `w a 14> a O V _ .. U O Y* It !) N C . pae p` .-1 .04 O C Y O a C O Li .1 .u p O y a O +i 2 a O .J r4 eo u U .O A t J u. 0 +1 A a a SE ew •r+ 0 -94 Y Y- C �f a •t Vl C Y Y O ro Y M -r4to0 .r4 -A�. (fl 14 J i u 1�1 U W Y +� m C6 N N *.i Y .0 W 9 C 9 ti 1 Y 9 rl aJ t! v R w .J] - m m m g u a rl 1q Y +0 u Y �► k ,r ro Wr vW tiro17 Vw AQr4 .Via O "uO ,u0to R. o 4O C m G� 1+ w o cr o w G 0 +4 a w a U as a u a. za a ro •o O� ae W a iJ a Y a'1 Y a. �, m m m O .q . m r.{ ro Ica, W 1+ amp d a +t co to co V a u t+. m 0 x w to u too w� I "o ro IJ. ,� ,Rr A .c ,a~ .c C c+o d 7. C 7� ?� C Y 1+ u O+ u 14 O C V O a• L� > Y 0 C JJ O O .0 1q a " O . O O► a+..w M_. ++ O�.- _ �{�G .yL z G m W w' ..� _ .� Z + 7 M' �0 i� p ,4 . l+ G O O. va Y Y Y •► W 0. ai O' Y C U u z .. tr�e �o o w o .a a r ►« eo .-.••o b a1cf m: ai.ro.. . C �. C R 0 O O u a •r t o .c V a eV w W at u ti 1 O Y r1 Y �0 YI w vo ri al � A. ev C1 NO Y m 9 V . U O O ao .•t • O 1 v1 to U aJ fl. OO'S7 PG 9 p. a Q. taq Y 0. r+ .0 r•1 04 m I .0 O v1 R '0...... O Y +N .. Y.+1 ._... _ _ .`I .p ... V . ._. _. u..7 . V 10* .94 IVW _ .. 1 10+ M 1*0 O a40i .OI a. Y. y .�.. O �_ a ?% a 00 Y O aJ AJ (A L1 rl LS 44 •.i • a 'L7 N W u ao O N W 1J l4 - O Y "4-90 s A Od wl q .._.. p u. .. T: C m O R G •rl s0 W N O O M 1 aJ Z7 R. R 0. m O o a 0 a o. C a m rA iJ 44 Y •0 �• S O H 0► t+.. .aj.it Q �G,�.L. ..O..�. ,w. q n c! fb rq Ai to H •tf a _0 o r Y dri O�iY+-i►.Y.+Y.._ O t0 Ol m aJ 7 �i CS rA u .0 w � m A p C ..O _ u . •a u ,O Y �•. p,.4w.i 0.8 u4p m V u 9 a°� n sY. °u $Y+ 0 01'' �' b a. • n RIC u • �A eou a�J.�f ri- 05> uX� o. .O ., ..�._ �� n,. .. a► alp ,`°t�:; CIft4A0YN 44 0sir. c >mzo>"2a�go+at Y a laiatiUtaw� tsa10J Y 1 X m a 4J 14 r6 V u o .a 0. O ao to a ,c -i u [-. Y a .� O ,, �i Y a a u Q Lt rt x .•t a -H a .'t R. oC N ao w Oapw a Y a u 9 Y N `� m o cc 0 Y9 a or, @ a m $4 a u z +J aA•i a•3 .0 .+ s 0 00 00 ® 7 u r ag� a iV� a a► P 3 04 t7 w u .O C 0., AJ w W t0 C tp rl Y aJ t0 a t+7 z > q p .r O • t O R •.1 {R� , R u ,C tS fl O •.4 m .y w 1� Y 14 d v rt �S at N 1+ 01 'C 't7I M .7 pa tl Lr pp WG bB:�YaNC�.�� QO� p..�i�S� aG.�.�aja �d~O'-u�; R�W•O�Wp. 0. OO a •O !O �i L 0. Y Y N M .r W �S 1b O Y Y O Y. fa a Y w fi w Y W N O •••1' a M O O R CS a Y O O od" F 4 0. A 'c +••� r+ M O u .•1 u 4f 'b i1 W 10 .7 ` w Ff u m u pe� a a a ;Y V .. mil a , . 34 r , ti M41 � �•� � w . � F+ ,� iL A x Ct. • ; ;� a _R a O .c ... - • � ' Y .. ' - AR � O ,1.r. �� f• r -- .. ^+ ••- .. C •' ram. .�. _ _. — - - w o� Xs '.Yrti.`i _ ♦ •. y! < ,,i �' .�, �,wi•'`I. "'it-_ j. �•tf :'.'•�r •f+• '�} r r••.� N Y. .1. �' -.,�C � Y 1 oj• 6- f",:':,__�,i' i' x.. .S - - y,..• :• •'a« r•, f, w ,:5,i f�. t �',4�% x'' , n..i,.. 1a4Y , 5 �Sr �r_ �+: • '7 h f - •�, �. i'•a, � '� `'.• �f * Y `, ,y Y • :. i .. !.fat'Sk3i4.7.t�� .�lr..4 �. Fi••i'v,::T �.. �ti�.}�.•i.,ez- w �'F+,:� •y s ii r? .�,�ii��.Si�f��..�a.'4a•�'i•i•.a4i�:s�i Miv r: . •. '•ill. � wY t Mt .•�.. •� fi, t t} ,. ' R• t r i{fi:57i! ��-r"a...fu._._. _,... � r.., �.: a ,�+:.�.•�R•,a�.�:'''�.r�t City Council Meeting Se tember 12, 1988 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Agenda Item No. CITY OF NE'WPORT BEACH City Council Planning Department 0-a HUD "Section 100" Loan - Northwest Newport Community Centor Suggested Action Hold hearing; close hearings if desired, 1) Adopt Resolution No. , directing the City Manager to execute a HUD "Section 108" loan and an interim loan for no more than 1.2 Million Dollars; and 2) Approve a Budget Amendment to cover the City's portion of the costs related to acquisition of the site. Back round At its meeting of April 25, 1988, the City Council appropriated $300,000.00 in 1988-89 CDBG funds and directed staff to apply for a HUD "Section 108" loan for the acquisition of a portion of a school for the creation of a community center in Northwest Newport Beach,. Staff has applied for a HUD "Section 108" loan in the amount of 1.2 Million Dollars and HUD is currently processing that loan application. HUD established the "Section 108" loan process to allow cities to fund major projects by borrowing future CDBG funds. The acquisition of the gym, classrooms and parking lot portion of the school site for the creation of a community center is a major project and represents a multi -year commitment for the City. If approved, the City would be borrowing the equivalent of three years of CDBG funds over the next six years. The loan principal and interest would be paid back from future CDBG funds. If CDBG funds are discontinued, the unpaid balance of the loan is forgiven. HUD derives the "Section 108" loan funds from the sale of tax-free bonds. Since the bond sales are done at irregular intervals, the City will also be requesting an interim interest only loan along with the "section 108" loan to cover the time between the escrow closing date and the sale of the bonds by HUD. Payment of this interest may also be made from CDBG funds. In order to determine the value of the entire site and the two properties as they will be divided in escrow, staff contracted Z-or and received a profes- sional real estate appraisal. This appraisal was also referred to a second appraiser, for an -appraisal review. Based on the zeal estate appraisal, the entire site appraised ar $2,002,000.00. The purchase price of the entire site is 2 Million Dollars. The City's portion of the site appraised at $1,572,000,00 and the City is paying $1,570,000 for that portion. The housing portion of the site appraised at $430,000.00, and that amount is being paid for that portion. e S��ii•'• �i .:i: /!�' :�•' !G .,4y'Y ��' ''1:: ,:t[• 'ii.• !i t . � a if.,_ •:�fuiF , ,; �;� i.r ,.�. •\y:.�:• if•r�l:. .vi .�}�.i�t` y .nr': �i-•.''' •�l,Af. Jt�a S.� 1 rt. 'un�, ..�;r'. �tM x » j:;r'ji h�..a .��Y+.nc.tSii4.'';II.SYr:: ..lr fF'.!'r.:sw .y lb'�3t•t.:• +H�;i.tirr..� J,,....'S.iT:!'',4't.ral.t „t•i. 4 i'�;'ti d / �jL at'ti�! y :Xr t 'aJ�=X, �iJj? :�•,-•r.��►r•..r:s,••.x�.�.-:aw+'i• .�.,• r��, ��:',��i�F�i.,sv,* r,s�,,�i=. ��f,�- *� Zit 1 - i - - • !. - TO: 'City Council - 2. Since there are not sufficient CDBG funds to cover all the coats associated with the project, a Budget Amendment in the amount of $290,200.00 is being requested. The following is a list of the costs associated with the City's acquisition: Purchase Price $2,000,000.00 Housing Site 430,0Q0,00 City Site 1,570,000.00 2 Months Rent During Escrow 15,000.00 Appraisal and Escrow Costs 20,000.00 Separation and I=provement of Structures 100,000.00 6 Months Interim Interest 60,000.00 Contingencies 21,000.00 Gymnasium Equipment 4,200.00 TOTAL $1,790,200.00 CDBG Funds 1,500,000.00 City Portion (Budget Amendment) $290,200.00 At the title the project was proposed it was anticipated that the housing site would appraise for more than $450,000.00 and that CDBG funds would be needed to assist that development. The projected range of 4-7 units at market rate and 12-9 units at HUD standards assumed the use of CDSG funds to assist the apart- ment development. Since CD$G funds are not needed, the mix of affordable and market rate units approved with the density bonus is appropriate and additional units are not necessary. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director by RAIG T. LUELL Senior y' nner CTB/kk CC24 0 Attachment }y. r'+:�� ':L'4�'r �' :%ik1L ! r':.S 1:. :.'ti•'f1' r-i�:".:'•n*.J � � f.. .t:y..Pr::r �Lniv+:lrr �� r.•. t .'}'.S'.+•'.., <ii itr'. '=,Fa: •Yd � '; i�:S��Y�:fCrrxti:: ':i4,�i-vi,t;+,%+k..t J 1t?�-';:. •i+ r}n). kJ�• •S7;r•l i�i'i�'in•. �:. "r3e-1•�d�.'.if;i4'+� j'': }._ .0 co C6 : 01) C6 AC X 77 .0 ow a 0 0 :ov 0 0 0 u aj .4 0 40 V) o aj 0 4LJ AJ fa a W 10 " w " 4 di v Ivo CC Cc CS., 41.41 --14 0- 0 ---------- -.0". 0- w aj C -W,bj %00 tr 6"o i4 0 " c &j 0 • 14 :3 W 9: U 'a a A 4.4 1 w ty* Ili v 0 u 0 .14 -1 0 &0 u P4 14 'M u :P. > bi .94 41 0 to &J to -4 CL -0 in to In W W 93 &n *a u 0 0 J r. 164 CO A• ...... 4U.4, do..$I C3 —, - V-0—A.'s. 21- 0 4) IA. u -.0 z , . �4 — - of M 0 C .9 w rr 14 - . E .0 10 Aj A. 'M 0 di v FA 93 oj cr 044 N 6M v :1 w 0 4 0 0 0 v U 0 Aj a 9 U 0 A 0 CL. r. 44 w V 1. D.-u C. 0. jj.'JA VC. 4 OW 0 Aj.. I . ...... ...... - -�d -4j - - 1 4 si 44 V 00.4 11 0 (A.. d-46J U" IV w C6 V V m:0-t0 aj x19 9: IV w 0 V u 0 w v 0 1 0 0 1.4 bo Ld 44 u 10-0 o x 0 0 Aq 0 0 r0 0 o 1A 29 W 0 -0 W Cr W V la oc a qu f-4 04 a--,-rE r u 461 �4 W a 09 AJ to C 0 C: M a$4 :P% Z w0 wP .a to si 14 4LJ 0 .0 -4 go U M &J V 0 u -rl CL -A N U -'q 0 0" 0 V4 0 UIQ 0 :0 4p W C6 43 M si -�4 a 0 0 0 a ol 0 of 1--0 C6 W 0-4 -si un ENS -I* tn z 95 u 9: A V Q W4 $ W O V4 V4 41 44 0 Q 0 0 64 FA 06 0 000 C6 W .0 10 z 0 aj to 'i pr- �l 4) v No I-g-,j Ln 44 u 4A NV r-1 >* 14 aj a 044 Z C6 V4 0 A# 1 -0... 164 -A -H :3 to -H 0 0 -4 is 1. boa 0 0 0 0 0 04 -A OPP4 Aj H u w u 21 g w = P4 u P4 4) 91 1 21 .0 10 aj si 14 -A .4 c v as 0 404 "144 $04 w 0 93 " H a 0 41 to r-1 co 0 aj to v to 0 C6 'a 4U cl) v o-% H 0 go tl 0 1" %410 w00 a r6 '0 0 00 C: CA 44 W w 1-4 FA U 44 r. w1 r. " "q Go 41 N Go 1-d &J -4 0 OA4 W4 0 004%64 0 0 %3 4 $4 &J 16 9: &J > 4 N. u 4 P-4 �4 14 • So Go 0 of U O'So as -&LO 26 C: rr co in -wo o a --ul VC46 Gap. Q 0 a P� '_ Z a P-4 u 0) 7 4A, 0) W, V4 W A Ch 04 0 r 0 ; 0 IOL P" bitCi C13 0 gs r4' &J - 0; vi -41 0 U 41 ;F4 ':"l P� xs t � , 8,4 OW 19 19.11 01 44t& u ',A', r4 It 0: � is 6J4 AJI *'.a. 40 44444 444 0' 21'0. 0 44ACW4 > O. a cq 11. am i ! Z3� ouz >j- C6 id ir,..) ;,-r4 M 1,4 3; co, io .3 0. - P; - , f, ?- -1 .1; t7 u Vj A q I 7- Z; L-" T, L; - ;_1 o' ri 7." 1 ' " ' t�- 'C' . -, n :�' 1, k V. 1% 6' r 7� c 0 ell a 7, rl r re -14 V." el 10 P, r- PO' o:: C CI Cw.111 V -.-A ct 0 r r- fl 1.t 'I -q j, f- r% ri r 4 � -5 rl cj Co rl -o 0 4 0 r4 O.V4 d4 r, ;.;., 'i* ' ' ' , , " - t.N .; m� as u e a dc a w a 4 Y C rl J3 0 u a0 a� m 'Si b C�� Aa .i ti -. a .._.._.. .. �- -.aJ. -. �' O a ai Lire {i aJ - aF+p 0 C.1 Y C w a P a r N rf N a, rl a+ w .0 d •ey ,•1 a+ •r y .� b w �' .0 a+ O p 9 O y O O Y r a+ w }� t7 ft Y u .r+ m u -rd O u O 0 O a O u 7 .a r...40 . a . �+ a+ w •. . a u u 0 u $.ca.r,+..-.,�..7e.V4 -C. ¢..la..u-.. _•a �_g'a-w-a......_ u, n _.-.-_. r4 u a, 1w m C..._ ar u C X' O i � ^ V v Al m O o aJ �' d 1�r a� Y a m �M : Y V o t O V d a� 7 a+ 9 o OYO Y ►. O d 0010 W4 r• 4 10 � a w ns A tm .0 d W A 61 a R. u O 16 �ci 71a+ ¢W •M..w pJ �� W rto a .0 4 (� O w m -- a W "C:.._-., ...a p,oswbO _.� O..r-d-+if.....gwO O R d Y• O C 0. d O C O+ 1 •O ? w ►� •O �0 26 O O ►. u a+ rl Y CO • O C a �C u to 7!0 Yi M Y V3_a, •rr u ; 8 OG 'a�+ 10 q 7 9G gym{+p �. rw� ,Fi r. w E+,1+ 10 i a r O ar m A ..,ag..�._----C a a 7'iJ"'Ci x'tt'O'O"'a�" "�- -N ai�Q-�-fl w" 08 !0 u Ob a+ aj.r-0 - --._.._r.._. P7 v r u w w oA O 1�+ • a+ b u ate4 � � C a�i a. wY 9 ate+ •Ors a. d o: w � i a�i .�a j 00 0 10+ m es .Ci � yr+ tY. V b b � � w.*�_q.0._ _ w_.._ �. C_g-3t-0-p-4q}1^,G..._..vi rn _ »x�y� p_O-a..�-r"s.lO.p.as p _ _.._a+- �y..�1-_._a+-�..t�•O .•_r,......__ Cy _..si -y �.i p .�-) a�0 O p, - .: __ m vt V . ca u u .1 0 4 a ° d aT a 4 aa+ ° C ', A a. 3 0 • 17 V • i u aCi : V d .i � M 41 u a_ a x �v a+ a u w r o •a a w a+ a s m a.,a w 1+ "4 p v4 0 .. u w w �, 0 v_a r+ __ s-i s s a _.�..a. a,. ri�a o%n i a a__• c-� ,tii ►�+ a°°o M�� a L) so si 4 •r ° °-� W . _w._ m a ro u w w .� u r� a '~ o . A a r. r7 w a -n o r .+ O 1+ ..a •.4 � a' OQ +aj b 0 d V >% U O 9 00 � A. 0 w C0.1 a a� � ex • + C V i] ++ N .-1 d +1 O u w cS Y rA .0 ro :1 04 0 V •w .■ 1� • u W4 _ 0 C� a s a► O 7 M 1r 1 M .0 A. a+ .D 'C O .-r '�7 Y • .Iw O O a d rWI •rL1 W tu. V a a • v m 0 0 s= aJ m 3 Y u •0 b 4 a w ?. • w+ O rl 0. 0 tYi ate+ a0+ O a+ -0 A a� r C a+ r1 a+ M F+$r �r+ %1 w as O f3 O tJ 1n C a+ O di 'rr L:ad m 0 .0 Y •C a- U O„ r 1 r'73 .O w -:: 0.0 • y N i O u �6 O �1+ %/ • O i ! A�. '�7 0• 0 A a c= .-1 `*� 104 a,/ W � Y .� i � • a 0 lotw�� • O u R t C3 Via : r : ii. _w [ M �a �. a. a' p rho •.� it a+ m H u es a' L 41 a = �. .� B , O x O z, 1 . if C N O Q TI O aI f+ rl Y ti•1 wi m C� �. a�i .l OY u �1 u . „ FA � :1a .,- _ 0 00 O M w a i+ aI M a'O i+ 4�1=i1'w'�:�,yts� O 1r'r C`ta+ N *1 CS ,. rirw 41'O.: N'r .•„� r •! v-4 •04 Y;Q �1 J4 U-0 }� t i' r w .p • r•1 i u a �M .�7 c +t7 rl'�'w' r•1 "w C7' ti �� 'M i+ w-fs." r�'p 1� :.r a Qo a, �,�"� '" .�•� atc� • :.s a+:� a+ Y :°- 'a Mw.Yr •� a ;s.,a,s r ib1} b a+ AT a -ar'1' 1R 11'!�7 vd t7. O +r �e.w �_..,r.�la r a p �1~t+ GC77 r, is w C.a pOs. a+a�_ y! Sri O»it_ p pip^ a a p, y� { - 2 • .w NI O M ;: i aA M-� r1- . W � a► Uri, :w . r �" aL� � V � tf A ro ¢' •'tJ "w O a+ .p � • rY' n, 'Tj Ali V „1Er '�C.' i1 ,.,, •lam T .. " w I 1 -) L. '1w Z _ _ .; .. r,a: �' .L ( r .-. a ,J .._ ti l !' � t�1 � i .► r .� R! -: f :t 7 ': 1 .^ '» � � � L' r. 1 ,� T't "7 nj 71 - f•.) .t .-a r :r a; • .1.r,. ,.t: .l'• Y .t. S; i It ,-;' YSr. F : ..{� t.. :4f •��:�� 's��ir� r. ti •w ✓ z t.o''l..A�:nStiis'r.:.FN 1 :H .0 go u 0 a a 0 a-,m -.0 0- V: 44 >1 10 0 V v V f3 .0 a V4 ato 0 to 0 0 A A .0 %n 0 CO 0 0) aj (A -4.4 u Le '0 -@4 2 -0 -C 'J'aa" a A as a,to 0 .0 0 4 0 Ad to a& If r x -4 0 . ........ . 04 -r I" P4 - 6d �4- %4 %w at U to -A (4 u 0 0 W -4 r. 0 a u w: > 0 lw in el 10 U - U 0 r. cl IS H a V4 C3 Ef a ou ::3 31-4 4 00 -4 a to 4" to 40 w w "4 v $4 V V tie 0 4) 44 a 31 0 U 0- 0-0.0. .0 V .4 X 0 M 0.0 a ja. 0-4 Wit Aj 64 -- U-0 -.c 10.0 -ri CS .0. a, %4 .7 0 4 co io 0 u 0 0 :04�'a 0 0 tj CL 44 to v to .1 41 a V 41 -$ 0 "q 0 P.% 4w 0 u a 4 0 u r. a .0 -Pt 0 0 M U.- fi--t•f ..a r4 0 W . 0 14 M 41 UP A w - 44. u - -r. a ;'% -A 0 -4v A 0 +4 0 'X 0 *0 %&4 to 41 0 -.0 >. 4w M W 1" ba ts Aj &a w 14 go r. 0) to 0 > 0 0U W 14 0 W M 0 T C 0 0 lr4 0 -4 rj 0.4 0 V. 4 co *0 to to Aj -- co -. v cp-,_4 r. V4 64 u *0 0 W4 0 93 go = 0 fA a--" u Aj- C% c 14 ul 6 96 IV- 0 .0 0 0 •'4 LO 13 M u -4 9), 61 93 $4 u In 0 In X to r. - -A -A w V .9 to a to 41 '0 V4 'a -0 0 V4 qu Ill w a 0 w cj cn .9 04 In r. a I$ v4 U W 4) 9 M 0 0 31 0 90 0 r4 31 " 91 Ai 93 a r. q 'la q. r. U,44-0,W. 0 cc jp z a." "S 00.0 o C: 0 C6 0 )1 4" W 0 10 w 14 u 44 44 93 44 0 to P4 bo r. a 0 C6 �4 m r. ci ;0% :3 9: S 0 u 93 u 0 v D u 0 u u to 0 r4 bo 92 0 0 14 to 0 0 -4 'a > A C6 0 ra A, to A _C:-46J44 on lu M "4 a 101-0.0-0 -4u = r. we 0 0 r. In Pa - $4 44-0 (A W-0 41 > &j 41 w A w SL 9: 10 W '0 44 P4 40 $4 0 • 4 0 w 4) to M It I" al 0 ai 14 93 .4 u cl V 0 la U V4 V 2 • 1 lu �q Aj -94 C6 44 -rq -0 0 V) 93 0 0 C: "t as V4 in N 9: 0 U 0 w aj M -d 44 r4 4) �q 0 w U 0 ai 44 0 1 0 a v r. V im A a :3 >, as r. V as,4 0 JC C6 bO 0 C r. -4 -A &A 010 41 44 &J 96 0 *a 4 u 1H 0 u -4 kV C: 4 A -0 0 P-4 -rf In a 0 41 0 m ai 09-4 aj 11 0 0.0 co u 4,j r-f .0 v 1 21 en v . a 0 m L) C: 44 13 S. so 1= 0 0 M 0 u 92 -0 0. &J P-4 0, &J 'F4 O..0 0, O..M( IS V W 93 lu V4 P4'-O-'V lu :01 :-0": &J" 0 iu 44. &A a, fo, a -- :3_ 1:3 '1 9 ra V 0) - 1 --as 0 -0 -*-To 14-0- lu , "V A - fjo, O 00 L, %4 00 ql jz -- A-V4 r - " w U,4U W-.'eqr-r - :: 0 -W.0,91 �7 &J. Wv L'"4 0 O. w !,&& [MI-�-*Or4 4W'" 10' 1 �4 I C) AJ 'p4':P-, -Wj'4S'W-'6J:'P4-4U 0 0.01 rs 0.'o C6 &p dU '9: V4 -q4'L-O,t 'O.,V I ."4! u 1$4 44 -0 -Mllimpvllc�ollu a YAJ- 0 t"", 65. 3 1 A 0 -44"At'q v4 kxqo lC6 to rd vo .070 '0 93. fj 93 0'.0".4 .01 ' .0 0 40e '0 a a r4.0 0%10 0 -&j W 0;-r v-4 DMA W'D3 a "4 P4-Sd 0: V 0 0,;K 00 C6. 0 U! (A M M 0 N M All 71 i7' 41 n ej n Cl rl C! re zll 4c, Q 'X rl r-4, I 7. w Om Ii S�O rriL fTw c tt 0 =a go 00 1-4 ra :3 g 0 a o is bola A C6 0 Pi,. -A A L u W C'I to V Y :p* ca 0 a.1 44 b d a 'T4 to C: -IJ $44 44 to a-$, 4LP-0 4 V T4 s -f -M,u --Igj:- .4 Aj di -A V si "I w 0-0 0 to 4 w a $4 0.9 U w " " Cc L.0 -r4 0 0 it 2 U V a 4 " a 2 r, C6 CO w : 4 "4 a 0 u M 4u 60 41. $4 a r-4 " f4 C3 V PQ =_ *4-- 0 '0 .-a I- .-ulV-V4 A - aj- -46.0. 4.0 #"- O-A 11% w- - - .0 . - 0 -A' ff - -A ' - M, 0 0 V4 0 a a pb :;� V W• AJ a -rf dj 0 H V go to 0 " rO 6 LO to 0 x a V4 Qj 0 41 14 -A ai a roto 44 %4 40 si r-4 0 %4 -A u ji ;Ob 0 "4 96 80 'D 0 .0 6j &A 14 Ga. A 40 IA lw a 64 M.4 "4 0 40 0-1 -14 -M 0 &J w_w. u 14. 0. k ".44 Ad V-1-9 w 0 4-0 A a► - at a. -4j 0 .14-0 A a 0 0 V a -64--a u a 0 0 -0-4 V 9 V) " 0 ;"'40 -0 0 V 44 0 Vq a 4 0 0 cs 2 0 u i&f C a at CA 0 op 0 W (i solo 0 C u IV 0 6.0 -0 40 .010 Q = 0 2 -4 0 -.0 - -, 4j V-, A'414-- ".13 .0. . . A- to. a- M V's a 40 0,44-S4 .1 �.O. C) (i %3-0 -Ow -A " V-0- - u 114 A - A r4 14 &d 91 if Aj a- a 0 .c A C en 0 1" 41 .0 1114 a 0 V) w 0 V Cc a a ci 4.4 u .0 0 M `0 0 D 0 44 DO Vq 4 0 " a 0 0 &J a a 44 0 w M -A -A is Vq 44 CIO 0 C6 C 0,444 94 fA ------ u - 6 13 0 a 10 A 0 0 a -4n.Ld a w A C 4 0 0 W 2t C6 &.0 0.44 0 :0 X -V4 A) 0 -0 -A-AJ 0 00 u lu 0 ri CC C6 0 ai a 15 rj g M 4& U .4 0 .0 IV r6 0 9: 0 1044 .4 44-60- 60 V of fs - 9: 1-4- so 44 AJ u 0 &A 0 w A ad go A ja r V oc V %4 as ce so 0 $4 u to 2% u a " w 0 1 u V 40 .0 > 4j -rf &J u 0 w 1 0 to G 0 86-1 too g3 x'u -4 : 0 ►w 2 0 :- : $..a 0 0-0 E.0 *0 6j 6%4 P-% IA V4 go 0 P4 .2 0 41 o a 0.0 lu 0 r4 ft4 0 0 00.0 'V 6) al V $a 40 si 0%.c 0.40 P4 -F4 6 A 41 a V4 41 04 >%4 a c m 0 0 Is 61 0 li -q Ai 0) 1 X '-4 wt $4 i" A 41 0 `0 It di In D. V-4 V ai Q :0 A 46 P, U 2 a a 4 41 Oc 0 PQ CA 0 0 0.4 aj &j a a 0 0 13 0 a 0 03 rq 14 44 a Aj 0 'V u %3 a 4j .0 '4 lw 40 tj N' - -407 p �.' �- si, %a c --to 'P4 "04 Q a"* UL:6 fj, r..4i 0 t;C Wig 7 0 o" ph., 0;1.4j;" C6 44" 0 - Rrj lob m &J: ff. qlrc 0 4&j. W cl u c P4 I4VU 64"K "13 4-&' M' 48'0.0-1 C40 a w� 160 4a 0% (-ft-04 4-d .0 MtKIM-0:1 C3 -=.I 4i f LO ft4 ;t fq .-04 P-4 �4 ,%C , �42- 444 14. 1�4 U 94 -il 4u al 1, 21 on.. 34 tx;'%4)4J -a - i L" t! -1 j J1 Ll --4 L61 t. rl -4 C: z 17- w. 'vim f 'jk 'ok f'�; 'C' 4 fi L� x Cl -S la N' ,k i itlLf , '1; t-. -.. 'j - A d; to P�O 90 Go 00 CrL fa � 0 &j r% A A a Go u m 92. 0 cc 0 CIO 4c Ad 94 co C A w a J' IOA W is 0 ai 0 to 4) - ..=. 0 &1 41 A %4 :0% f4 9: r. C,-, "4. U C Oj 10 "0 rq 0 iu u 9: a FA cj C4 fr a a lu -1 44 A " x 0 0 0 10 CWD dc 4j v la A 4) 0 .0 0 Id lu 0 ai -4 w u 0 U U .4 _ &J _. 4) a 4j. L36.0.9%4j W4 -rc . 4j a w It C: w 19 U4 - 9 `5 " ; 4 ' ' si a &a (a a U) 4 0 u + f a 93 w 0 0 *0 v �4 t4 V 6.& 44 tic 0 0 0 Cd go to 31 —4, w lu C C, 0 &d 0 0 " v �4 a U a 0 93 "4 &J Q &J • 0 aj V F. to a to &J U. 61 z 4 Ai :3 Q '04 &J —1 m W a.,0. bd . -,t,fe r si *0 a-- A. c 10 _ ai a 44 V4 44' 0 0 lw +4 c -4 *0 0 0 (A. • CJ CC r- 0 .-4 W 31 2 V4 D r. 0 0 1" %4 9: .0 0 to 0 aj tio cn 0. G P. > u v 4j: 0 Ch SV4 p u C: .9 0 *0 0 W *0 a u 0 0 V4 pp 0 2 -4 o a. r.6 o in x w ca in v 10 ij 41 9 a lu 0 Q-1-a a W-a ta gi-, __4 M >;,:O% 0 aj 93 "4 0 u a n 7 0 u &j -v4 43 41 9: ery 14 1" u N M Ai r. lu u 41 42 9: 4LJ 0 r-I -ri Q w 44 si 41 44 V4 U U 0 'A X a w go 46 0 0 U)_p O,_v4_..=, Vq ft4 04 '" -' JS %4 D_-O--___* _d___W_ &#, &j---%jl "--&&-#- Aj O__ - � V4 _ a_1341 1 _t" V-4 41 ai to u " lu 0 0 0 " " a " a C 0 Ot 41 n C of 0 :1 lu X lit u a 0 w 34 tri Z 0 Aj v w 44 " to u c = 0 0.9-4xvv= 0 0 ca ,a 103 4510 0 0 It Q 0 In 0 0 cs i 0.6_0 a � 0 �4 .9612 PC - a — 0: lu . 14uo '114. lug. •-.,. �"414 M . -- Le - u IV -04 - -0 .0 C lu th > ai v in a 14 a 6 %a go u 46A 93 U a 0 9 0 0 P4 93 V4 aj lu %; c 464 W .0 04 PC -0 0 to u (n 0 $d -.4 -0 - u Ow W q&d �q 0 0 Ai 0, 0 w Im a Li 41 0 a n 0 F"4 44 4 0 tau G. w 0 c as • jog 9 W 60 = &L4 A :0., ai bo Aj :0 W4 a 41 w w 10 0 *0 0 14 0 14 ta M &j " Aj $4 ai y p a a m a 0 Aj A 0 &j C a W a 0 w w 21 a a a 0 v v 0 A a u 0 V4 0 C a 0 0 C6 .4 .0 Ln 3.0 0 0 " so 0 w 40 SA Ai a &J :1 a 0 m 0%4 0 a 41 "4 to 0 W 0 Li a. > 0%0 03 a 41 W 0 �m; t-�4_ 00. V4 0 da, r. 0 X: a,, *a u u to ma " F c '� a -0 Z .0 — :, a ;o 93 C 9: M > 0 *0 IA'S 40,'W' '; "' 'C', 'a.. 0 a$- 4U Id 0-1 r-1 c a to to 0.44 a in +4 is W $4 Is B. N ; 0 T'.C'dkC r 0 1* i-4 0 61 • �9.:O- :2 .0 a *4 m 0,001-4 91 fj 44 -00 .-a- 10.0 &A -MID A 0-01 U., V4 P-4 a 0 N ',a M, &J,--' C > bl--� (,u to Cj > $a" -im 0 0 0 V4 U,04 #4j 14 V4 w to e fu W, of ;r.-,Ig w j 1j. . P-4: 101,: a IUAJ W ci 41 A "'0 0 8 .18 UO M..0 911*1� 392ar1"'414 W.&A.P4 W .11 - W X: 02. 0 si a 10 Ja cr �l f 1=^ n OP' 01 1- CC tl F i.- 55 C; :Z: n ci 0 Ct D I lerLYi,,, -P. A Ch OD U ''i` � • ' t � L��y Y 1!1 ! C3ZCJ IA v�f • 4i Y .p� p 44 m �a aw.•O �V . _0o..a.y .or vi oN a 00 0 W o a .o0o a �a .i -Pq i .�aw•a .oaON No .Y.a.H au a N.y Q.y.p._� _ a c wooao 10+ N O, Y YN'► a a° 40 Y m N i O{q a Cj IQa..O. �y a O r1. r,0Y i ap Y •vw AQ Y� YY�aaa.+sr . f; { C6 r4 Y .94 v� o p, m a s 1 R a o •r•t a'u..- - a..�._... -- _.._ _ .._. ►+ ors U u _... ____ t ar m W a . wx_.r b. M _. WO_ s� a> eow a aaa a a c m a a ,. a .cob Y so +� a m a ►r '" u_ k .� '' a s *+ U a a u rt! Al. w 10 x. .{ �_._..,,� a_p.��._..u.. _ .,►—._' a._.. a_a--._,�a . - a._.._o..r�.a.. _FL a Y O O r1 a p 0�m N 14 Y a s 7 p w a i -�T. Y a �(r1 wti a m ,+ ,-r s. Y °o u a i f-pi u W ,° � 9 o.:0%u a A r 0 IQ C) i aaa �.� a {noun aV4 (1' Q a a p w a°g ° w ,•i o a e4 4j ,C Y c 1µ+ CIO .c 0 m u 0 a' 10 N w i+ K' a o ati o w u - aw a a+ m •raw a IN a I tor ,... m Md,o a.. ,,w a,Or ;,u a a; - _ ;u;aI,. ;�a' m ':: ��t�a,$4 ° � a.� oa IN ao fw+ �.�Y ,�+;� a+v wo oN°V'I''M., .{� ap 1 Y 0►�`p: M K.i;A;Ya" 9 w .o N.�o.�►•''p o N O' Y s. to =r , • >, is r, ti „ - W w ' ow it 44 08 In OTO Y.. £e f' rr T7 ;r •:1 nJ ,,7 +q r, -_ • � .5 r•, 9 -y+• _ _ - t' - �:! r r. .q - t.,.. •'X j 7 .'' r =,' '1 l ;,t ...y ...r .. . r, rin :l! +, +,7 J +y -"3 •f i7 .1 •.l : 1 Yl .I;i )' Y:: • � aJ •e M k ;r - i.: _ .r � ., - N LT sr .. .. .:•. r. i, 'r, ,!: r. " �, .7 ..� a •' 11 :\ Y3 �-4 rF w PIco rr i ,,, -.i : ,ft�z�`?a.,.,:'.i~ 1:'C rt_•: :ifi'+,.'�•r•l'u: aPo--a'+.b•... ... ::6.1 .._ .�,ts.,_ .... ._. ,..>r,,!,. _ . sl � .',�4'z.' .... , q 11 T Y o V4 ',r�at�i„ n�,'. 'nrYf.4�e�:�a�i`•?II�riL:Lkhi$�:�i�'„iiSs�3, 1 .�l��e:l�.:!� _,., i.•I: L,, t�; i . Y�icv i r: a!" 1 } 's•' r ,1 Y� f.t ; ^'iY1 I 1 • -Al m a w m ar I k a w w tr w m I 1 x w o m w > Q o •ca' Q b b w C N q x vD ON p N H N Aj a s+ v w m 14 �+ 4 0 O O 'd Q' psi to u N rt O ,0 14 •.4 N R. u ro a a 1 N a Y fn G y rq1 U d V ' 01 V RJ .NI f.+ m "1 K t7+ +D B a .. ' O. q 'Q O to ' t4 .� •./ UQt f' •' p ? � Q01 IV: Aj 41 y10 y of 44 Q R topo as p. M a•• `t i�''' „, y.�ln{,ll.�t �l[ C0 O Wf, p,..' V ►,+'. A.c, -yc: 'a q is .1 +CI q.• 14 40 O , • � �'• •�'-; ... � ` �p •. •� •.p r. � �� ,.: it •.: �� •� � ,.. ,w +H '•1 r•1 '_ � : •`. •� � f ��'i � r {: R �y l ' . , wt .i % W .' '.�, It! • r r k+rtp +► ,H :if 7� '• , 5' •i 'H .a.{ r1 'N it .. ': � r'• U *a 0 71 ii% � '�± f�rti /4{ ` •iT ••. "t i�� . . p ,O /tit WF/ r c� ►' OI �" O 'H TI In OA Aj ,- U � '* ' vi 10 � C: .. .. _ _ 1 04 ►" � - _. u, N O s~ r � � rs1 m 1= o d to :: ��qq ►+ •+e a ►r �+ �y ,o H �" i4 e'1i C "f; a `{ �r '} '�,• '� y�f 1f—,,,,� G 4 r er • ;, do � � � , , 7. >r �; •� 7, �.j .• 'C� f' •A �,. ►4 tY r � r, •. r � �� ~'n�,►) rr f r � � ' •[ �I It "A ;^ •+ ;}. r•1 1_ .�; -•3Y •• .•{ .!: "+ •:. !, y) N� + y YYYIII MM do 10 c� r.•1 ;S Tr .�j �: ,a yl a L7 r:•si Iq '�y ,r� •r, 17 .� �,, �+�,.� A sJ FA { 44 r'� ri �M 1 "• [v [f ►T r !l7 aG jj �•' !y •, � "i ' r.' r•' jJ � •�j � j �, I �� •'� a q � �'i — w� �': �7 /• ts�t F+ t:r � , +G 1', a +� ►+ c! •:: [' � ' Lit �; i. t p � 'w .1 i, r•. .^,, H r '{ n rr Iy, f " 0:1 Ir 71 Rom' :' ; T: M7 li} 1 ; d 1 �1 N 17 ', .0 i f ••: y , 7 +, �; % •• tr :.. !'� rJ- � � rA [. Ui ai. L1 "'� ,; �: ,i, i) '[.: G 'f} ':iyr s !� ip "I a `1 tip l �� f1 [] !,I :i H ^.i �n ,: SS 'S: •. C: ,t1 ! I • C:r Q I fri '.t1 1: ri Rt ;; n1 ar, .ri ;tI S r e^' i •• f.' L I / Y 4'. ..,I -•f 'Yilsti'".i+:� =•s . , :y,�., � �..i✓y - r a � • 4' •r"'r. i" ' . `'r_' ..k•�. - - •,I1.ir +w%:,,,.5 � ,.» s, : £+>'r M•. ,-, ,4 xti � ,�,•� =£'�+� i :r.-�•,;s•., ..fix a.rr, _ �. •.�..ti�.� '.r,.;riru+� �,a _ if o a u � O 0 o w O 0 ,0 V N .. V w 4LJ 41 ri a n C � V � a o � >A C V a a a 0 0 .: 'H M 94 • K � C AJ 11 u AJ > tT V v. .J F_s r u a C M� w.4 0 4 -.4i 0 n � oN �',� n ui a u >» 144 Qu o � .0 t 0 0 711 0 y Y• -'cu 0�0O14 c3w�a'0 V a IV $n� w� a *� M q O y g 0umv 14 � �o ,Q w ss +►� w ~: bu%4 r4 u . 1. 4� �` C �� y�. i0+ a, p► tr {� • •> ° i w aj M %* •rl y p"IS W. AAjuu9 ba dO40 rl 4 fn a 10 wo 94 u +1 0 0 .� , M p r� 4 �► q C a q r4, o a ,4X0tr u ao a .0 w � 41 a a u f� 1-1 d r a 'b r .rl ..� $4 a I 40 w a pf �ar�.'+Ci� A Id4 ^Ca' t QQ.. fig{ n04 ON a 0,44 a p � U +' C C a 0 � a+ o O 4 O �+ a Q 0 p 0 V u� .4 vns � � r•4 r 1 A w.s w ooA trb. .� 44. o. 7.4 w q f - u •; V :1L n y V' 0.; 0 N' V_s w' .•iq :� ra {I � UI �:i ,�4 OM� r'<r4 9 1 f i •7, - 1 -1 r S," ' i}i: %.�i:,#:S�T A.1h., ,•1r=. ,F, :4�>tJrk•.elhSie ? r!5 �4.J.1 � it: .'J'y'. r� .F ^.t�. 9..-�.Y.r� .f' i F � TO Sv8.1LCT I Ar1t.ICAM I City Council lteetiny Se r,sN,«,r 121996 Agenda ?too No. CITY 01' :1EW110PT 11LACH (ity Council 'i'laminq Departsent 4. "'f�lrFIC 3T'IIDT Ke,. 47 D•I Mequa4t to eppr+we a tratf►s OWIT 400 all Its, 1Mrp1• r#+« . tion of A SINtown -All 4vartlorwt +►►"Is* 0" I/P'bmfm F J'Aw *If In the x-1 1211111 dleati4q. •h I001,' 0 foil A 4Wa4111tr r.trtjs 1f-10.11rk IF wl.P r*.:,, t" �01 •,f tA• ' 14111h#044 *4,40 '10-- a. •." r;l`.1«r 1A 4r400wrnt CO.*+ 41A vivo& 016" % tirt►rs oil OWN +' 1nw w11i 1.. Its lfl� r=igblw• 14 1,AS1r1%iaW.*AR POAkIl»a. A tH @hk; i.,p jj;,f �.� � I$ 4166 tl"004 a* an oft 411FIS rt,* nov iirortt~wa« 1.t1141A.1 ar%,f 4 ytOP NO Q*VPw►r1 •s% s1w1VA*W 000 frwl iMin ++tr #*or-41r*4 twenty fat# 1114mt ysi4 Mwtlt<4x1t r14 aiI•A* A tv, Wrd swots -*ire t_i 11«.P1w4'1h fnat f►Irt 10AW � . fft"1164 0-44t to"tt 040001y 414s Vyi:t •st. M lk , 14) +l►Rw COW10rR4 re#►1A+t ey-01K+r4 INA. Oks f1ern4 .:ettr•t+A.;l nif the 1111s, VC14t# 4#0 Isla► fit I'I *r.+ti 1404144 VI Ph r144 "11 s an.4 414f41e 4-A#Me *0,4 !u falslr a V.tft►-l:Pt *.�r 0* li+* 0*4 «tf;ww wkr ") sV*!')r 1+O 014Qln*+RI6 yeI" (Not 114kki ti1+a rw '11144 twr«ary fe44 If'4nt Vold ltstf+-sek; 404 11i,+ off .4j% .n�r1II M>Iwwt4} 0so111P 00kg3taw AsaItowr+ 01 cnat,t 00fl1a Aj% '.r... jmRED !A k`!7.16.14.14 M t�seeR :th rsilt" IVl+lo yit�k�,tay �yt �f.►.1 ,tt aw I I jt►ito if' 411r1 �: lt1111 AL+Et! IeR+ 4*+ 4e t+=+ 4�r.,tllr t+r�.+►1e n; iev�.k nwly(a 'r..,+ .ararsr �brfsAl tEr •Miele. ter y1�sslf +t1 iMlkW"l a �+1ltic�li�+i 10 %TO 404t914 •.,-,:ir .. ;; .►►.�•. ,. p1401 lim•ltf+ Wki'm vlti 0100. twx, *,t Ohm &.t�}r4«:t 0*04•niRq str1M1 "04 (m tw. yroporly to 411erw•e1% 1 ►rs. ;1*Aop i tsru the feq Ures four foot slap yai4 00rll4k ..f 44* a.+f)r rtr..t I# %kr arty fetAirior ec+won property lire. LOCATION► A porUan of Lot 917, pivot AMItion let Me"rt Ib" Train, loeatod 'at 68) Meet 15th Atrest, al the aoutMaatrrly twrrl+ f of 15th 4tl*et I: and Monrovia Avenue, in t14 Northwat flw ert firer. �p f'I�`•^�a+'F i,/ 'r € s. `. a '� .. $� � .; .�+ ��=l•f4 �. -Lk —� �'. .\ � � �4r _,%e .1��. --�� , :Y.' City Council Meeting r. Septep1mr 12, 1988 Agenda Item No. D-3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. TRAFFIC STUDY No. 47 Request to approve a traffic study so as to Permit the construc- tion of a sixteen unit apartment complex on property located in the R-3 (2178) District. B. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS Request for a density bonus in accordance with nection 65915 of the California Government Code so as to construct an apartment complex with sixteen units of which some will be for affordable - to lower -income families. A modification to tho Zoning Code is also requested so as to allow the new apartment building and a proposed carport to encroach ten feet into the required twenty foot front yard setbacks to allow a two car carport to encroach four feet into the required four foot easterly side yard set- backs to allow covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the site, which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doorsi and to permit a portion of the required open parking spaces to encroach ten feet into the required twenty foot front yard setbacks and the acceptance of an environmental document. APPLICANT: Pacific Heights Apartments, Costa Mesa ?AM C. RESUBDIVISION NO. 877 Request to resubdivide property located at 883 West 15th Street, in the R-3 (2178) District, so as to create two parcels of land where only one parcel currently exists. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a parcel design which will allow two of the existing remaining structures on the property to encroach 3 feet 10y inches into the required four foot side yard setback areas adjacent to the new interior common property line. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 917, First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, located at 883 west 15th Street, on the southeasterly corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue, in the Northwest Newport area. 3 ;, 40: City Council - 2. ZONE: R-3 (2178) APPLICANTS: City of Newport Beach and Pacific Heights Apartments, Costa Mesa OWNER: Newport Campus Church, Newport Beach ENGINEER: Robin B. Hamers 6 Associates, Inc., Costa Mesa Applications This proposal includes a request to approve a Traffic Study prepared in accord- ance with Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code for a 16 unit apartment complex on property located in the R-3 (2178) District. The proposal also includes a request for a density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code for projects containing affordable- to lower -income units; a resubdivision so as to create two parcels of land where only one parcel currently exiata; and a modification to the zoning Code so as to allow a parcel design which will cause two of the existing remaining structuren to encroach 3 feet 10� inches into the required 4 foot side yard setback aronis adjacent to the new interior common property line. A modification is also requested so as to allow the new apartment building and a proposed carport to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; to allow a two car carport to encroach 4 feet into the required 4 foot easterly side yard' setback; to allow covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the site which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors; and to permit a portion of the required, open parking spaces to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback. Resubdivision procedures are set forth it section 19.12.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and modification procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.81 of the Municipal Code. Suggested Action Hold hearing; close hearing; if desired, 1) Adopt Resolution No. granting a Density Bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, and accepting the Environmental Document, and 2) Approve the traffic study, the resubdivision and related modifica- tions for the 16 unit apartment complex at 863 West 15th Street, with the Findings and Conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" of the Planning Commission staff report dated August 4, 1988 (attached). City Council Action At its meeting of August 22, 1988, the City Council set this matter for public hearing on September 12, 1988. T0: City Council - 3. Planning Commission Recommendation At its meeting of August 4, 1988, the Planning Commission unnnimr ui:ly approved the subject applications and accepted a related environmental document. Copirn of the Planning Commission staff report and an excerpt of the minutes are attached. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMBS D. NEWICKER, Director by ANDRA L. GENIS Senior Planner SI.G/kk CC24 Attachments for City Council Only: Council Resolution Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 4, 1988 Excerpt of the Planning Commission Minutes for August 4, 1988 r _FTX _._, A "MOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OY THE CITY OF UrdKPT BEJ✓.'H GRANTING APPPOVAL Of A M1517Y b.s+;S AND THE ACCEPTA"CE Or AH ENVIMIMML M L10JA T MHEMS, the City of Newport Beach has adopted a Housing Clement an part of its General Plan$ and MHERLAS, the Housing Lleraent of the llewpert beach General Plan has established policies pertaining to the provision of hvjsing opportunities for all economic segments of the comounityl and MHEREAS, these policies include providing incentives vithin the limitation of available resources$ and WaPYAS, the development of rantnl liousing affordable to lcwor income parsons and families is a goal astablialmil in the Housing Element of the isnw- port reach General Plans and WIMPEAS, Section 65915 of the California GcverrMent Code provides for approval of a density bonus for affordably housing duv►lopnonta) and WHEREAS, the Pacific Heights Apartments development provides saver units as affordable units to lower ine ma persons and families for a period of thirty years; and WHEREAS, the proposed seven unite affurdaW n to lower Income lxrsono and families will assist the City in achieving its goal of providing housing for all income segments of the community) and MHEREAS,.the number of units provided and the thirty year term of affordability justify the granting of 77% density bonus$ and MHERZMF the Initial fitudy is complete and has been prepared for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the state CEQA Guidelines, and City Council Policy K-11 and MUM, the Planning Commission has rtvieved and considered the information contained in the Initial Study in making its decision an the pro- posed developments and MHERtAS, based upon the information contained in the initial Study, it has been determined that the project an mitigated will not have a signifi- cant effect on the anvironwent. - I - WOW, THEWORE, BE IS RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Basch recomends to the City Council certification r.f the environmental document and approval of the density bonus subject to tlw folluv- ing conditionst I. That development shall be in substantial conforasancu will, thN approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations except as r,atr-d below. 2. That all Conditions of Approval for Remubdivision llo. HT) ml,all be fulfilled, 7. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable llousin) Agraament, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and Use planning Director, guaranteeing that a minimum of seven (7) of t.11a sixteen (16) units within the project shall be made available not a prefer- ential basis to persons and families possessing an "active" Aection 8 Existing Rental assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 rair Market Rant WMR) Schedule frir Newport Beach. When a Baction 8 tenant does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families morning a maximum lneawa of no more than 80 percent of the median inecue for Hewlxlrt Heach as determined by the Department of housing and Urban Devulnl4nr,t at a rent which is no more than 10 percent of they maximum iriGrom". Said Affordable Housing Agreement shall he recgrded with thu orewlp County Pecordar'e Office prior to the issuance of building pnrRila. Tile term of this agreement shall he for no morn than thirty Of)) ynare. 4. A landscape and irrigation plan for the nhall l,a proparai by a licensed landscape architect. Thu landscape pinn shall Intglrnte and phase the installation of iandscapin+i with the prolx,u"4 cmistruc- tion schedule. Prior to occupancy, a licnneed landscal," architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the lnndmr;nptr✓f has been installed in accordance with the approved plan. 5. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 6. That the light system for the project shall he designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to control the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent realdentisl uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Enginaerl with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requiresent ham been met. 7. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. 8. That the waiver of the park dedication fee shall be subject to the City Council approval. ADOPTED this ATTESTI CITY CLERK 8 LO/kk CC24 day of , 1988. WE MAYOR TO: FROM: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Planning Co=ission !Meeting Asigus,L 1 Agenda Item No. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Planning Commission Planning Department A. Traffic Study No. 47 (Publig_Healing) Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the construction of a 16 unit apartment complex on property located in the R-3 (2178) District. AND D. Residential Density Bo mis(Discussion) Request for a density bonuu in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code so as to construct an apartment complex with 16 units of which some will be for affordable to lower income families, A modification to the Zoning Code is also requested so as to allow: the new apartment building and a proposed carport to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; to allow a two car carport to encroach 4 feet into the required 4 foot easterly side yard setback; to allow covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the site which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors; and to permit a portion of the required open parking spaces to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; and the acceptance of an environmental document. Pacific Heights Apartments, Costa Mesa AND Request to resutidivide property located in the R-3 (2178) District so as to create two parcels of land where only one parcel currently exists. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a parcel design which will allow two of the existing remaining structures on the property to encroach 3 feat 10h inches into the required 4 foot side yard setback areas adjacent to the new interior common property line. A portion of Lot 917, First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, located at 883 West 15th Street, on the southeasterly corner r,; t y.l TO: Planning Commission-2. of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue, in the Northwest Newport area. ZONE: R-3 (2178) APPLICANTS: City of Newport Beach and Pacific Heights Apartments, Costa Mass OWNER: Newport Campus Church, Newport Beach ENGINEER: Robin B. Hamers & Associates, Inc., Costa Mesa ;.. 4M. a - This proposal includes a request to approve a Traffic Study prepared in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code for a 16 unit apartment complex on property located in the R-3 (2178) District. The proposal also includes: a request for a density bonus in accordanco with Section 65915 of the California Government Code for projects containing affordable to lower income units; a resubdivision so as to create two parcels of land where only one parcel currently exists; and a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a parcel design which will cause two of the existing remaining structures to encroach 3 feet 10 1/2 inches into the required 4 foot side yard setback areas adjacent to the new interior common property line. A modification is also requested so as to allow; the new apartment building and a proposed carport to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; to allow a two car carport to encroach 4 feet into the required 4 foot easterly side yard setback; to allow covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the site which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors; and to permit a portion of the required, open parking spaces to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback. Resubdivision procedures are set forth in Section 19.12.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and modification procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.81 of the Municipal Code. Hold hearing; close hearing; if desired: Approve the traffic study, the resubdivision and related modifications for the 16 unit apartment complex at 883 West 15th Street, with the findings and conditions set forth in the attached Exhibit "A"; and Adopt Resolution No. , recommending to the City Council the approval of a density bonus as provided for in Section 65915 of the California Government Code for the proposed .16 unit apartment complex and the acceptance of an environmental document. TO; Planning Commission-3. Environmental Significance In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and City Council Policy K-3, an Initial Study has been prepared for the proposed project. Based on the information contained in the Initial Study, staff has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 'Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project and is attached for the Planning Cosaission's information. Since the project includes funding from the Housing and Community Development Block Grant Program, it has also been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Protection Act (NPpA). Subject ProvartX and SUrrounding Land Uses The subject property is currently developed with a two story building containing classrooms, administrative offices, a gymnasium and chapel which were previously used in conjunction with the Newport Beach Christian High School. To the north, across 15th Street is the Seacliff Mobilehome Park; to the east, is a small industrial complex; to the south is the Newport Knoll Condominium Development, two single family dwellings and a fourplex which front on Monrovia Avenue; and to the west, across Monrovia Avenue is the CBS Magazine Office Building. Background And Analysis At its April 25, 1988 meeting, the City Council unanimously approved a proposal to enter into a joint escrow for the acquisition of the private school at the southeast corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue. The joint acquisition of this facility will provide a publicly owned Community Center and a privately developed affordable apartment project. The easterly portion of the subject property (Parcel 2) is developed with a gymnasium, school classrooms, and a parking lot. This portion of the property would be subdivided from the balance while in escrow and would become the City's property, to be used as a Community Center for northwest Newport Beach. The balance of the property (Parcel 1), which is developed with a chapel, more classrooms, and grass field, will be redeveloped with the subject 16 unit apartment complex. Inasmuch as an existing building is located on both of the proposed parcels, the applicant will be physically separating his portion of the building, located on Parcel 1 from the City's portion, located on Parcel 2. The applicant is proposing to convert his portion of the existing remaining building into B apartments and at the same time demolish the existing chapel and construct a second building containing 8 apartments and 14 carport&. In order to satisfy the minimum covered parking requirement, a second two car carport is proposed along the easteuly.side property line of the applicant's parcel. All of the apartments will contain two bedrooms and will range in size between 900 sq.ft. and 980 sq.ft. The following outlina has been prepared which sets forth the major characteristics of the proposed apartment project. 7O: Planning Commission-4. Lot Size: Humber of Units: Permitted: Proposed: Setbacks: Front (15th St) Sides: Easterly Westerly 21,612 ± sq.ft. - .499 acres 9 (1 du per 2,178 sq.ft.) 16 (1 du per 1,358 sq.ft.) 77% density bonus Require proposed 2ft.I 10 ft. 4 ft. 0 ft. (see dint:, below) 4 ft. 10 ft. for now bldg; 5 ft. for exist bldg. 6 ft.-6 in. for patio Rear 10 ft. 5 ft. for exist bldg. Buildable Area: (Lot area less setbackn) 16,395 ± sq.ft. Gross Structural Area: Permitted: (3 X buildable area, excluding carports) 49,185± sq.ft. Proposed: (.92 X buildable area, excluding carports) 15,188 sq.ft. (1.18 X buildable area, including carports) 18,314 sq.ft. Parking: Required: 24 spaces (1.5 spaces per unit) Proposed 24 spaces (includes 16 covered spaces) Building Height: maximum Average Permitted: 29 ft. front half of lot; 24 ft. on front half of lot 33 ft. rear half of lot 28 ft. on rear half of lot Proposed: 26 ft.- 6 in.2 22 ft.- 6 in. Number of Stories: 2 1 Section 20.16.045A of the Zoning Code requires a 20 foot setback unless otherwise indicated on the Districting Kap. At the time this area was annexed into the City, no setbacks were established for this block. Front setbacks in other R-3 Districts in the City range from 0 ft. (Balboa Peninsula) to 20 ft. (Corona del Kar and Cliff Haven). 2 The attached elevations indicate a maximum ridge height of 25 ft.- 6 in.; however said dimension is taken from.finish floor rather than from existing grade. Eq TO: Planning Commission-5. The new building construction conforms to all applicable development standards. for the R-3 (2178) District, except for the requested density and modifications which are discussed below. Section 65915 of the California Government Code requires cities to grant a density bonus over the otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the applicable Zoning Ordinance and land Use Element of the General Plan when a developer agrees to construct at least (1) 25 percent of the total units of a housing development for persons and families earning 120% or less of the area median income as established by a combined federal and state standard, or (2) 10 percent of the total units of a housing development at the federal lower income standard for Section 8 assisted housing, or (3) 50 percent of the total units for senior citizens, The Government Code does not permit a city to deny any request for a density bonus of up to 25% for those additional dwelling units that must At least one of the three criteria. Further, the Government Code permits a city to grant density bonuses in excess of 25% in instances where more than 25% of the units meet the prescribed affordability or age standards. In the case of the proposed development, the current R-3 (2178) zoning, permits one unit for each 2,178 sq,ft. of land area or 20 units per acre, Based upon 16 units and a .497 ache parcel, the applicant is requesting a density of 32 units per acre, or 1 dwelling unit for each ±1,350 sq,ft, of lot area, The project, as proposed, will provide a minimum of 7 units affordable to lower income households as established by the federal standard for a period of 30 years. The affordability standards and time period will be established in an affordable housing agreement and Grant Deed which will be recorded against the property. The proposed affordability criteria and number of affordable units meets the State standards for granting a density bonus. As shown on the attached plot plan, the applicant is proposing to construct a new apartment building and attached carport which encroach 9 and 10 feet into the required 20 -foot front yard setback. It is also proposed to have two of the required open parking spaces encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback. It is staff's opinion that the proposed front yard encroachments arei reasonable and justified inasmuch as they occupy less than half of the parcel frontage along 15th Street and that the proposed setbacks are comparable to the setbacks permitted in conjunction with the applicant's previous apartment projects at 827, 835, 843 and 847 15th Street. In addition,: the site plan has been laid out in such a manner that provides greater separation between structures than is required, thereby increasing the open spaces within the interior of the project. •r� ss• TO: Planning Commission-6. As shown on the attached site plan, the applicant is also proposing to construct a two car carport with side walls which encroaches 4 feet into the required 4 foot easterly side yard setback. Staff has no objections to such an encroachment inasmuch as it involves a nonhabitable accessory structure Which is located on a portion of the site which is adjacent to an open parking area on the adjoining property to the west (Parcel 2 of the subject parcel map). In accordance with Section 20.87.260 of the Municipal Code, covered parking spaces, located on the front one-half of a lot, are required to have side walls and an operating garage door. As shown on the attached plans, the applicant is proposing to locate 9 covered parking spaces on the front one- half of the property which do not have operating garage doors and side walls in ovary case. Staff has no objections to such a design inasmuch as the parking spaces are not highly visible from the public street. it is staff's further opinion that inasmuch an the subject project in ran affordable housing project, the cost involved in providing garage doorn anti aide walls on 9 of the 16 covered off-street parking spaces, is not justified by any increased visual appeal that might result from the installation of garage doors. eveloDment Block Grant Fund This site has been identified by the City Council as a site for the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) to provide additional affordable housing units in the City. The City Council, at its meeting of August 22, 1988, is expected to approve the allocation of 1.0.1.2 million dollars of CDBG funds for acquisition of this site. If CDBG funds are allocated to the apartment portion of the site, additional units in this development will be required to be affordable at no more than the HUD lower income standard. Requirements and conditions concerning the granting of CDBG funds will be established by the City Council and an affordable housing agreement and Grant Deed which will be recorded against the property. Use of Section 8 Certificate or Vouchers The applicant is also proposing to preferentially gent all 7 of the affordable dwelling units in accordance with the Section 8 rental assistance program using the fain market rent schedule established by HUD. This preferential rent program will be incorporated in the requirements of the affordable housing agreement. Under this requirement, the 7 units will be preferentially rented to very low income tenants as established by federal standards. General Plan housing Element The Housing Element of the General Plan sets forth the housing goals, policies and objectives of the City. The City's established goals for housing are formulated around two concepts. First, the physical and visual T0: Planning Commission-7. character of the City's residential neighborhoods are the key to the provision of a quality living environment. Second, the City's housing stock must provide for the housing needs of all present and future residents of the City. In addition, Section 65302(c) of the California Government Code requires the Housing Element of all cities to N. . , make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community." The specific goals of the City regarding the provision of housing for all economic segments of the City's population that pertain to the proposed development, as set forth in the Housing Element on page 142 are: "1. To provide a balanced community, with a variety of housing types and designs and housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community: very low and low income as well as moderate and upper income households. 2. To preserve and increase affordability, through rental housing, for very low and low income households." The basic policies which describe -the City's role in the attainment of affordable housing are: "1. Enabling private industry to function more effectively, as a result of constraints being eliminated, wherever feasible, and allowable density being increased. 2. Providing incentives and direct assistance to industry, within the limitations of available resources, to facilitate the provision of housing for very low, low, and moderate income households." Various housing objectives were formulated and adopted to achieve the aforementioned goals in accordance with City housing policies. Implementation plans and target dates for these housing objectives are also set forth in the Housing Element. Housing objective No. 7 (page 158) is: "To promote and assist in the development of housing for low and moderate income households." The Implementation Plan for objective No. 7 is not forth on page 161 of the Housing Element. The specific activities of the Implementation Plan that pertain to this development proposal are as follows: "a. The City shall continue to apply for and use its entitlement funds under the Community Development Block Grant program to facilitate the development and construction of housing for:low and moderate income households. To the extent that developers and landowners are willing to cooperate in this endeavor, the highest priority for the use of these funds shall be for the development and construction of housing affordable to "very low income' households. This may be accomplished by using the City's existing and future Community Development Block Grant funds for the acquisition of land for the development of housing for very low income households, or by "writing down" the cost of land for developers who have agreed to develop low and moderate income TO: Planning Commission-8. housing. In this regard, the Newport Beach Planning Department shall negotiate with the interested landowners and developers to determine the availability of appropriate vacant sites for potential acquisition as very low income housing sites." •c. The City shall continue to participate as a member of the OCHA Advisory Committee and work in cooperation with the Orarign County Housing Authority to provide Section 8 Rental Housing Annintance to residents of the community...." Me. The City Council shall have the discretion to review and waive planning and park fees for developments containing low and moderate income housing in proportion to the number of low and moderate income units in the entire project." of. When a developer of housing agrees to construct nt least 25 percent of the total units of a housing development for persons and families of low and moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, or 10 percent of the total units of a housing development for lower income hounnholds, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code, the City shall either (a) grant a density bonus or (b) provide other incentives of equivalent financial value, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 65915, et seq." These housing programs, as set forth in the Housing Element, are designed to address the regional housing needs, as defined in Section 65584 of the Government Code, and as established by the Southern California Association of Covornments Regional Housing Allocation Model (SCAG-RHAM). However, because of a wide variety of physical, environmental and fiscal constraints as described in the Housing Element, it is not possible for the City to satisfy all of its regional need. Section 65583(b) of the California Government Code recognizes that meeting these regional housing needs may exceed available resources and the City's ability to satisfy those housing needs, and State Law permits the City to establish the maximum number of housing unit that can be reasonably constructed, rehabilitated and conserved over a five-year period. Pursuant to Section 65583(b) of the Government Code, it is estimated that the City can provide 45 du's in the very low income category, 125 du's in the low income category, 432 du's in the moderate income category, and 2,025 du's in the upper income category during the five-year period, July 1, 1984, through July 1, 1989, through the completion of major residential projects (page 178 of the Housing Element). Approval, construction and occupancy of this development wish 7 very low income units will contribute significantly towards meeting these established goals. Approval of a Traffic Study, prepared in accordance with Chapter 15,40 of the Municipal Code and City Council Policy S-1, is required inasmuch as the proposed project includes in excess of 10 dwelling units. T0: Planning Commission-9. The first step in preparing a Traffic Study is the identification of intersections which will be affected by the proposed development. The City Traffic Engineer has identified the following five intersections for analysis: West Coast Highway/Balboa Boulevard and Superior Avenue West Coast Highway/Riverside Avenue West Coast Highway/Tustin Avenue Superior Avenue/Placentia Avenue Newport Boulevard/ Hospital Road An analysis was conducted to determine if one year from the completion of the project, the anticipated traffic volumes generated by the development, plus existing traffic volumes, anticipated regional growth and previously approved developments, would generate one percent or more of the projected traffic volumes for each leg of those specific intersections during the 2.5 hour peak period, based on the one percent analysis contained in the attached traffic study, it was found that the projected traffic is estimated to be less than one percent of the 2.5 peak hour period volumes at each of the five intersections. Therefore, further analysis is not required and no specific mitigation measures are necessary. Waiver of Fees Park Dedicatl2n ,E2,.5. I Municipal Code, as a condition is required to pay an in -lieu in conjunction with the parcel the applicant is required to pa to allow the City to partied community center on a portion filing of 'a parcel map. Noti i accordance with Section 19.50.020 of the of approval of a parcel map, the subdivider fee for each now dwelling unit to be created map. However, inasmuch as the only reason y a park dedication fee is that he has agreed late in the establishment of a neighborhood of the property which in turn requires the rithsthnding the City's participation in the project, the applicant would not have had to subdivide the property and therefore, would not have been suject to the park dedication fee requirement. It is staff's further opinion that the subject project represents a significant contribution to the affordable housing opportunities in the City and that the waiver of park dedication fees in this case will increase the feasibility of the subject project. It should also be noted that the applicant's willingness to work with the City has given the City an opportunity to obtain an excellent public recreational facility for the residents of_Newport Beach. Fair Share Contribution. In accordance with Chapter 15.38 of the Municipal Code, the credit for the existing school and chapel facilities is in excess of the fee required for the 16 unit apartment; therefore, there is no Fair Share fee required for the proposed project. TO: Planning Commission-10. PUNNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D, HEWICKER, Director By W. William Ward Senior Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" Vicinity Map Resolution No. Traffic Study Negative Declaration NEPA Finding of No Significant Effect Site Plan of Existing Buildings Plot Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations Tentative Parcel Hap MEN MEN r T0: Planning Commission-11. EXHIBIT "A" FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR '1'RMFIC STUDY, RESIDEIrrIAL DENSITY BONUS, RESUBDIVISION NO. 877 AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT A. Environmental Dogoyat: Accept the envirorunnutal document, making the following findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K-3. 2. That the contentn of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. The project Will not have any significant environmental impact. B. Traffic Study: Approve the Traffic Study, making the following findings: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of service on any major, primary -modified, or primary street. C. Approve the Residential Density Bonus and adopt Resolution No. subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That all conditions of approval for Resubdivision No. 877'shall'be fulfilled. i 1( TO: Planning Commission-12. 3. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that a minimum of seven (7) of the sixteen (16) units within the project shall be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an "active" Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (FMR) Schedule for Newport Beach. When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport Beach as determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at a rent which is no more than 30 percent of the maximum income. Said Affordable housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The torts of this agreement shall bo for no more than thirty (30) yeara. 4. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. Prior to occupancy, a licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the approved plan. 5. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 6. That the light system for the project shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to control the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 7, That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. 8.- That the waiver of the park dedication fee shall be subject to the City Council approval. /I TO: Planning Commission-13. D. Resubdi,vision No. 17and Relatt Hodifi tlon: Approve Resubdivision No. 877 and related modification, making the following findings and with the following conditions: 1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19,08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 5. The approval of the requested modifications, so as to allow the front and side yard setback encroachments and to allow the use of open carports on the front one-half of the property will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 1. That a parcel map shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits on Parcel 1, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department and Planning -Department. 2. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems shall be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. 3. That a curb access ramp be constructed at the corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue under an t TO; Planning Commission-14. 2. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems shall be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer, 3. That a curb access ramp be constructed at the corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department. Work shall be completed prior to occupancy of tho structures on Parcel 1. 4. That the building connected along tha parcel boundary between Parcel l and Parcel 2 shall be physically separated. In addition, all water, sewer, electrical and gas utilities shall be separate for Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. 5. That each building on Parcel 1 be unrvimd with an Individual water service and nnwar lateral connection to the public water and nsrw„r systems unless otherwise approved by the i'ublic Works Department. r; 6. That all improvements be constructed nn required by Ordinance and the Public Works Departioul t, 7. That this resubdivision shall expire if' the map has not been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. /I VicitirrY ,ur�4P _ 1 •ti .'•�� wrl.r I. I�.IY /IwI �/ ` b/ rwr r hMr �I.ur 1r MM. it .i.r. w mow... r w+.. r.. • rr� � ..,.+ wr. ��.. w w� .r•n.l �%/ � a rug ef / S/•.. �rw.o+wrw� ►awe C-1 2 C.I► P� Nir•vI IM srw 1 , 1 q 'l l t d : a A Ft•Z VANA A c/ CA i .I• it n/f w i.ii"' i .w' 1t R-3 !L WA Y c R 3 A-P i .. ti R-3 if A-P Ar ' ti� A-P-H G r A -Pt A-P•H A•r P-C Sta DISTRICTING MAP EwPOR7 BEACH — CALIFORNIA /A7 M AVAN AWt Ul AUV IM [HOLY /AMLY fas(s! m" OHrL[M 11[slD[M11AL Mtsib WLTML[ IMLLriItAMML cousla i DrITYXTS 6 ot►T:1 M CT_*NoMM_Tww. MMTM P410 M IAL UowT ommoc" CENUTAL COMwJICurL MAM OLCT MI UN LASW . .10- 09mm RESOLUTION 90. 1159 A RMLiTiION OF THE FLANNINC COMMISSION of THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECOMQMWIHC TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF A DENSITY BONUS AND THE ACCEPTANCE OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach has adopted a Housing Element ac part of its General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Housing Element df the Newport Beach General Plan has established policies pertaining to the provision of housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community; and WHEREAS, these policies include providing incentives within the limitation of available resources; and WHEREAS, the development of rental housing affordable to lower income persons and families is a goal established in the Housing Element of the Newport Beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 65915 of the California Government Code provides for approval of a density bonus for affordable housing developments; and WHEREAS, the Pacific Heights Apartments development provides 7 units as affordable units to lower income persons and families for a period of thirty years; and WHEREAS, the proposed 7 units affordable to lower income persons and families will, assist the City in achieving its goal of providing housing for all income segments of the community; and WHEREAS, the number of units provided and -the 30 year term of affordability justify the granting of 77% density bonus; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study is complete and has been prepared for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA Guidelines, and City Council Policy K-3; and WHEREAS, the Planning Comission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial .Study in making its decision on the proposed development; and W EREAS, based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project as mitigated will not have a significant effect on the environment. NOV, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach rocommends to the City Council certification of the environmental document and approval of the density bonus subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That all conditions of approval for Resubdivision No, 877 shall be fulfilled. 3. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that a minimum of seven (7) of the sixteen (16) units within the project shall be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an "active" Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (MR) Schedule for Newport Beach. When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport Beach as determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development at a rent which i■ no more than 30 percent of the maximum income. Said Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall be,for no more than thirty (30) years. 4. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of. landscaping with the proposed L construction schedule. Prior to occupancy, a licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning aepartnent that the landscaping has been Installed in accordance with the approved plan. 5. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 6. That the light system for the project shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to control the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 7. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. B. That the waiver of the park dedication fee shall he subject to the City Council approval. ISTH STREET APARTMENTS TPO Analysis Prepared for. CITY OF NEWPORT REACH Prepared by: Austin -Foust Associates, loc. 1450 North Tustin Avenue, Suite 108 Santa Ana, California 92701 July 21, 1988 15TH ST" E"T APARTMEN75 TPO Analysis The proposed apartment site is located on the southeast corner of Monrovia Avenue and 15th Street. The site currently consists of a private high school. The proposal development will consist of 16 apartment units. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the project site, and Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan. Access to the proposed project will be provided by one entry/exit driveway located on Monrovia Avenue and one entry/exit driveway on 15th Street. Monrovia is a two-lane street with no left turn lanes. Oth Street has one thru lane in each direction with no left turn lanes. Monrovia Avenue provides access to Newport Boulevard (SR-55) north ofi the project via 17th Street, 151h Street provides access to westbound Coast Highway via Superior and to eastbound Coast Highway via Placentia, Ilospital Road, and Newport Boulevard. Appropriate trip generation rates for the proposed land use were obtained from the City of Newport Beach trip generation rates. These trip generation rates are summarized as follows: ••••AN PEAK II" ••• ...PN PEAK HOUR LAND USE OWITS ttl go 70tat IV 29 19141 Aportments 16 DU Trips/DU Trlp Gwwratlon 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.6 2 S 7 7 - 3 10 As the summary indicates, the proposed project will generate 7 trips in the AM peak hour and 10 trips in the PM peak hour. The trip generation was factored to obtain a peak 2.5 hour volume for the AM and PM peak hour periods. The peak 2.5 hour volumes were based on an estimated factor of 2.0 to account for the extension of the usual one -hour peak period. an � 12 A Lancr% ,�AUSTINJOUBT A11110CIAT1111, INC* Figuic 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Credit for existing traffic generated at the project site was not necessary due to the low trip generation of the proposed project. THIP DISTRIBUTION Distribution of project generated traffic was derived from observed travel patterns In the vicinity of the project site as well as from locations and levels of development in relation to the location of the proposed project. Approximately 45 percent of traffic entering and exiting the site will be oriented towards the north and will have no impact on the intersections tested. The general trip distribution is illustrated in Figure 3. TRAEFIC IMPACTS The City of Newport Beach identified five intersections for analysis to determine the impact of the proposed development. These intersections are: Coast Highway/Balboa Boulevard -Superior Avenue Coast Highway/Riverside Avenue Coast Highway/Tustin Avenue Superior Avenue/Placentia Avenue Newport Boulevard/Hospital Road The 1987 peak 2.5 hour volumes as discussed in the previous section were provided for each intersection by the City staff. Since the project is expected to be completed in 1991, the ambient growth rate for regional arterials was applied to the existing 1957 volumes to reflect 1991 traffic conditions. A growth rate of 2.5 percent was added to all volumes along Coast Highway west of Newport Blvd. A factor of one percent was added to all volumes along Coast Highway east of Newport Blvd and to Newport Boulevard north of Coast Highway. The peak 2.5 hour volumes of all approved projects, also provided by the City of Newport Beach, were added to the 1991 peak 2.5 hour volumes. The resulting volumes represent the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes prior to the addition of project traffic. One percent of the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes at each approach of each intersection was compared with the peak 2.5 hour distributed volumes from the proposed project. A summary of this comparison is shown in Table 1. 20X .�AWGTIN•rOUST ASSOCIATES. INC. Figure 3 PROJECT DISTRIBUTION Table 1 VAPART OF 12 AAYULTS I S INTE/SECTION All PSi xCT Km 2.5 NOW VOLUMES Na a E! 11011 ..._ai�).p!i. LESS THAN 11 OF MMR_VOLift Coast "l/albom•Superiw 0 2 1 0 Yss Coast "/Itiverside 0 0 3 1 Yes Coast "ITuatin 0 0 3 1 Yes Superior/Placentia 1 b 1 0 Yes Newpwt/Maapi tal 1 0 l 0 yet PM PMECT PEAK 2.5 NOUR VOLUMES LESS TRAM tit 0/ 1,MItsSEC11000 N/ 3i Ei we 1991 PK 2.5 "N U!"t Comet Nmy/Salboa•Super Ior 0 1 3 0 Yes Coast "/Riverside 0 0 2 i yes Comet "/Tustin 0 0 2 i Yea Superior/PIscent Ia 5 3 3 0 yes Newport/Hospital 5 0 2 0 yes •y: If the one percent of the 1991 peak 2.5 hour volumes of each approach were larger than the peak 2.5 hour project volumes, ao further analyses were required. If project peak 2.5 hour volumes were higher than one percent of the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes at any approach of each intersection, the intersection was analyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. Comparison of the one percent of the peak 2.5 hour volumes with the project pack 2.5 hour volumes resulted in all intersections passing the one percent analysis. Further analysis is not required. The one percent analysis sheets are included in the Appendix. The proposed apartment development would generate 7 trips during the AM peak hour and 10 trips during the PM peak hour. Five intersections were checked to determine the marginal impact of project traffic on the street system. All intersections passed the one percent analysis and required no further analysis. Therefore, the proposed apartment development has no marginal impact on the ICUs of the study intersections. APPENDIX ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS 1t Traffi: 1,31im Analysis lntersectim Coast hi;reay 1 6alboa Bird/Superior Ave b isting Traif►c Volums kased a A+erap Daily Traffic ifinteriSprtnt V AM Peak 2 112 Hour Ayprcred Approach isisting Regional Pr» acts Projected 11 of Pra acted Project Girectiai Peak 3 112 dour Grooth Peak 2 1/2 kar Peak 2 112 Hour Peat 2 11 Hour Peak 2 112 ?our Volute Volute Voluea Values Volvo Volwe HOftADGand 1817 0 13 1890 19 0 Bouthbmd 1316 0 25 1401 11 2 fastbousd 6341 512 410 7017 18 1 �rttbx n: 1899 152 399 2450 �{ 4 =r r-rc/ect lraffic is estiutti to be lass t'i. l: of Projected Feak 2 112 Hour Trailic W uet. Fra}act Traffic is estieated to be reattr taam 11 of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Valm . lntersr:t►ca ".apacity Utilization ii.C.U.i Analysts is requirm FULL OCCUWV ItAA: 1941 ---- ROJECT: --------------------------------------------------- ...... ....................................._.._....._. 3 3 11 Traffic Valuer Analysis Intersecticet Coast Highviy f Balboa Blvd/Superior Ayr Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic Minter/Spring 61 M Peat 2 112 Hour Approvra Approach flistia4 Regional Projects - Projected 11 of Pro�K ted Project Direction Peak 2 112 Hour 6romth Peak 2 I/2 Hour Peak 2 112 hour Peak 2 11 War Peak 2 112 Hour Volume Voluer Volume Volume Volume Volume Northbound 18b1 0 50 t911 19 0 Sostnbouad Ma 0 94 :852 39 1 Eastbound JIM 364 122 5900 59 3 mrstoound II81 383 869 6035 e0 0 __: Project Traffic is estimated :s to :ess thin 1t of ProjecteS Flat 2 I/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than It of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersectica Capacity Utilization fI.C.l.l Analysis is required. PROJECT: Fua OCCUPANO OF.: 1941 11 Traffic Voluee Analysts Intersection: Coast Highway 1 Riverside Avenue Ecisting Traffic Voluoes lased on -Average Daily Traffic Ytnter/Sprin3 1/ Am Peak 2 112 Hoar A0pro►el Approach Elisting Regional Projects Projected Ix of fro ttttd Project Direction Peak 2 1/2 Hour Grooth Pea! 2 112 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Ptak 2 i1� Hoyr Peal 2 1/2 Hour Volume Voluet Volust Valuse Voluet Volume NorU400o 28 0 ;4 62 1 0 So -At Limit 891 0 60 951 10 0 Eastwind 5741 164 1070 6995 10 j utstttun4 MI lf7 672 4130 it 1 _>> irafect Traffic is estisited to to less tnin it cf Projected Feat 2 112 Hour Traffic Votsae. Project Traffic is estuattJ to ce -realer taan 12 of Projected Ptak 2 1/2 Hour traffic Voluee. Intersection Cpacity Utiliraticn tl.C.f1.l Analysis is required. MEET: FOIL OCCLP OCY 1EAR: 1i91 11 Traffic Volute Analysis Intersection: Coast HighNay it Riverside Avenue hist:ng Traffic Volumes lased on Average Daily Traffic Uinter/Spring $l PA Peak 2 112 Hoar Approved Anrcacn Isistieg Regional Pro)Icls Projected lI of Prolttled Project :irectian Feat 2 T12 lour 6rosth Peak 2 112 Four Peak 2 112 flour Peak 2 lit Hour Peat 2 112 Hour Volrse Volute Volute Volute Voluee Voluee sc,rtnbound It 0 0 61 1 0 Scuthbound 1247 0 64 1311 1: G fistbaund 5211 167 1050 6414 64 2 restbound 53:6 107 1120 7143 11 4 ==3 Prt;ect Traffic is est:sated to be less than 11 of Projected Prix 2 112 Hcur Traffic Voluee. Fr:jest Traffic is esheated to to greater than 11 of Projected Pear 2 112 Hour Traffic VoNse. Intersection Capacity Utilization (I.C.U.) Analysis is required. FULL OCCUPANCY VEAM 1711 .R03ECli ............................................. ................ It Traffic volume Analysts Intersection: Cast Highwy ! lustin Avenue Esistinq traffic Volumes Based on Average Ditty Traffic Yiater►Ssrinq 17 AM Peat 2 172 Hour Approved Approaca Existing Aegtonal Projects Projected it of l`ro acted Project OirecticA Peak 2 112 Hour 6romth Ptak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Peak 2 t1� dcur Peak 2 112 Pajr Yalu" Volume Volume Uolust Yoluee Yoluse liOrle9aVA; 7 0 14 21 0 �--- Soutnaound 1I8 0 Iq 157 ---2--.---w_�_._..4..._.� Eactac�n; 5134 164 i661 6244 hestbour.s 310� ?4 dSi 3fI63 ;7 1 Projtct Traffic is estismatec to oe less than n of Projected Peat 2 1/2 Hour Traffic loluie. ireject Traffic is estimated to be greater than 1. of Projected Peak 2 1/2,hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Ca;acitJ Utilization II.C.U.1 Analysis is required. PRWECTi FULL OCCi*fiatCr YEAR: 1991 12 Traffic volum Analysis Intersection: Coast Highsay ff Tvstin Avenue Existing Traffic Volumes Bawd on Average gaily Traffic Minter/Sp(taq 81 Ph Peak 2 112 Hour Approved Approach Existing Regional Projects Projected 12 of Pro ecled Project Direction Peak 2 112 Hour 6rosth Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 1/2 Hour Pelt 2 I/ Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Voluse Yalu" Volume Volume Volute Volume NorthWund 21 0 11 32 0 0 5outhbound 305 0 2S 331 3 0 Eastsourd 4150 133 t0.9 5312 53 2 Itestbound 5839 187 III3 7139 11 f __) Project traffic is estisated to be less than, 12 of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour traffic Volute. Project Traffic is estisated to be greater thin It of Projected Peak 2 1/2 Hour Traffic Volume. intersection Capacity Utilization fl.C.U.j Analysis is required. PAOJECT: FULL 4CCOPAXY iEUt 1991 ....._.------------------------------........._........................ .__............................. 11 Traffic Value Analysis Intersection: Superior Ave ! Placentia Ave fitsting Traffic volumes 6ised an Average Daily Traffic minter/Sprin4 87 AA Peak 2 112 Hour Approved Approach Eaist11 Regicaal Projects Projected 11 of Fro acted Project Direction Peak 2 112 Hour 6rooth Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 111 Hour Peik 2 112 Hour Volume Volume volume valuer Valise Volume Northbound 653 G 59 742 7 1 :z�tthtwd 1174 0 51 I�iO 112 d Eastbound 3458 9 49 3107 91 I fiestbound 593 4 46 644 0 6 ==r f O W t Trifftc is estisitf: to to less thin Ix of Projected Feats 2 114' M"r Traffic +51:me. Project iraiilc is estimitea to to greater thin 11 of Frojected Peal 2 112 hour Traffic Voltime. Intersection Capacity itilintion II.C.U.i Malysis is regatred, PROJEC1t FULL OCCUPAKY YEAR: 1591 ........................................... .............. ...... ................................................ 11 Traffic Volute Analysis Intersection: Superior Ave ! Placentia Ave Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily traffic linter/Spring 81 PH Peak 2 112 Hour Approved Approach Esisting Regional Projects Projected It of projected Protest Direction Peak 2 111 Hour Growth Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 7 112 Hour Volwe Volume Volume Volume Volute Volume Northbound 401 0 101 1002 11 5 Southbound ills 0 54 1114 16 3 Eastbound lets 0 113 1126 14 3 Vestoound 2002 0 66 2090 21 0 __? Project Traffic is estimated to tt less than It of Projected Peat 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. Project Traffic is estimated to be greater than It of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization fI.C.U.I Analysis is required. fEO3E�i1 FULL OCWPAfKY 1EAA: 1991 _. IT Traffic Volute Analysis Intersection: Mwort Blvd ! Hospital Rd Eeisting Traffic Volutes Based on Average Daily Traffic Ilinter5prirq 81 AA Peal 2 112 f;onr Approved Approach Ex sting Regional Projects Projected It of Projpected Project Direction Peal 2 11: Hour Gro.th Peat 2 112 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Peak ? Il7 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Volute Volume Wulf Volute Volume Volute Northhoun0 4045 171 141 4315 43 1 SouthDound i445 0 256 2931 16 0 lastcound 62 1J*I1 11 4 ilesttzund M r. I: 7O8 4 0 :=1 Lr;ject Traffic is tstiadtrc tU :e less titan It of Projectel Peat 2 11: Maur traffic Vslulf. Project Traffic is eslim+tes to Se qrealer than it of Projected Peat 1 !1: rlour Traffic M ule. intersectl.a Capacity Utilitatica ►i.C.U..,A-14itsls is t PROJECT: FULL OCCUFMCi YEARi lilt 11 Traffic Voluoe Analysis latersectiom: Ilemport Blvd 1 Hospital Ad Esistiml traffic Volrmes IM on AverW Nily Traffic hinter/Sarimt 11 PA Peak 2 112 Hour Approved Approach Eeistsog Regioeal Projects Projected II of Pro Kilt M lroject Direction leak 2 112 Wour Gi ostA Peak 2 !/2 Hour Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 lore leak 2 1/2 Hour VolrM Volrme Volume Volrme Volume Volume Nw thbound 4414 142 244 4866 44 5 Southbound 11194 125 211 4252 43 0 Eastbound 241k 0 171 2107 22 2 Westbound 1645 0 Id 1061 11 0 sz) Project iraff:c is estimates to be lest than It of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. Project 'raffic is estimated to be greater than 11 of Projected Peak 2 112 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (l.C.U.) Analysis is required. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92658.8915 NEGATIVE DECLARATION 70: Office of Planning and Research El 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 County Clark of the County of orange P.O. Box 838 Santa Ana, CA 92702 FROM: Planning Department City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92650-8915 NAME OF PROJECT: Mesa Development Apartments PRO,JF.CT LOCATION: Monrovia and 15th Street, Newport Beach, CA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of an apartment project. FINDING: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy K-3 pertaining to procedures and guidelines to implement the California Environmental quality Act, the Environmental Affairs committee has evaluated the proposed project and determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. MITIGATION MEASURES: None. INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: City of Newport Beach INITIAL STUDY AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA �r DATE RECEIVED FOR PILING: Environmental coordinator DATE:July 12. 1988 . 3300 MINOOMMEAL Qi1=S? ! I. Background 1. Raw of Proponent Moo Ocalow"I 2. Address a,>nd Phone lhabei of ,Proponent A 145 ids . guk#3 3. Date Checklist Subeitted k. Agency Requiring Checklist (!141 S. Name of Proposal, if applicable II. Environ ental Lepacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) Y21 Kuhl F-2 1. Barth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? _,. b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? _ C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of Soils, either on or off the site? t f. Chances in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which tray modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay,.inlet or lake? — g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, n0slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? — x. 3. YU UA4 H2 Air. Will the proposal result in: A. substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Vatar. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either / marine or fresh waters? w b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? C. Alterations to the course or Flow of flood waters?, d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground water? _ g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? I. Exposure of people or property to water relited hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? — . 2 . ,i� I XU MAXh 9. Natural sasources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: A. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? — b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? / 1L 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation,/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: A. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? C. Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and/or goods? T , e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air =traffic?_ f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? _ 14. Public Sorticea. will the proposal have an'effect upon, or result in a need for now or altered gov- srnmental services in any of the following areas: - 4 - XU HAAt 34 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an Impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources. A. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? / L b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses with the potential impact area? 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. A. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment. substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? . 6 - DISCUSSION OF EMIQIIUZM VALUM lb. Implementation of the project will result in the construction of residential structures which will cover soil. The structures proposed are similar in nature and intensity with the surrounding area, and this effect is considered insignificant. 7. Addition of residential uses wil increase light and glare in the area, Since the project is similar to adjacent land uses, the effect will be similar to to the surrounding uses is not considered significant. 8. The project will make use of a portion of an existing school site which is a change from the existing land use. The project area is planned for residential uses, and the project will be an implementation of the plan. 13b. The project generate a need for additional parking, but includes the addition of parking spaces, which will offset the demand. This effect is considered insignificant. �f1 z stioulory.Cheeklist Checklist of Applicable Statutes and Regulations project Name and Identification No. Northwest Cotrunity Center (Block Grant / B-88-MC-0546) Are all acti%ittcs of this project exempt from NEPA procedures? ❑ Yes ® No (If yes, this -Statutory Checklist need not be filled out.) 7 w Are activities of this project categorically excluded from NEPA procedures? ❑ Yes ® No or fires, this Statutory Checklist and all required actions must be completed.) Area of Statutory —Regulatory" Compliance fr r' ] e ,�• N (Prccise citations for applicable '�rf ,ri¢? statutes and regulations are printed P on the back of this Checklist. Full 4 a � a yore Compliance Docurnentation discussion of each is provided in r �e c� r Annendix B nr this Guide.) Z� C✓ � /t Historic Properties Floodplain Management Wetlands Protection Noise Air Quality x x X x x Manmade Hazards { x Thermal/Explosive Hazards Airport Clear Zones I X Water Quality X Navigable Waters Aquifers Solid Waste Disposal Coastal Areas Coastal Zone Management Coastal Barrier Resources Endangered Species X X x X vianningdDcon par dicates no impact. On coastal plain, not within Flood Plain re: Flood Ins. Ma No wetlands observed. No ' effect. Project will conform with HUD Noise Standards. No point sources identified. Incremental increase is an- ticipated. Region is cur- rently in violation of clean air standard Not Appplicable/Hone observ-' ed Not applicable Site is already committed to urban use not within a river drains e. Site.size is insignificant 1 for recharge ur ores. Incremental increase -not significant. Local services now in place. lZZoo recta eci on t e coastal wi�s'Cos��IfcIone Prrograient Cratit luell CltV of NeWDork Beach. Not Applicable T7b,,e site has been committed urban use. No speciesarp sent. No habitat -is pre- •Auaeh eridentt that required salons have bets Isfen. Environmental Assessment Checklist paste Project Name and Identification No. I" 2 3 4 5 K 7 a s * AC r. r: Source or Uururnrnlatiwl tea' 4 fa Mole dale of runlart or �� c t s page referrnreIal lal �• _• r additkrnnialcrnia►• bti Impa cl Categories C C� i C altachrif. Land Ursrkipmriit tnt'frxn'anurlti'lh '_ V411pWant x Consistent with Coastal Program, General- Pi.�ivaml billing .�xl Plan and Zoning. Source; City of Newport Beach General Plan, LCP and Zoning Code. ll111rl t ii}an ln�µir.1 x On -site inspection (see comments attached: Slope x Negligible slope observed. x Fully urbanized. Site is currently devel- oped. Suit suuabiiilv x Soils testing is required prior to build- ing permit issuance. ?lust comply with U and local codes. Hazards' \uitances.lnciuding X No hazards currently present. Ci t Y SiteSafcty building codes and safe construction methodology to be -followed. Energy" Consumption x Incremental only. Amount is insignifica Mcls of An*ie NoisePro*and at i� on Project Site visit indicates no effects on site ,Contsibutlontocom• x, from surrounding sources. (see attached munim >\ oim Lrmls c oltimen is ) *Block Grant Number B-88-MC-0546 41 Envirot;>tmental� • Assessment Checklist lronlenutd. P&W t+ Project Narne and Identification vo. ter and Residential I Z 3 4 5 B, 7 c `e �C 4 tr,4 �+rti,� ` Source or Documentation 1-Note date of contact or %` {�� `� page referencel InipactCalegories - additionalmalerWmaybe attached. Air quality Effects of dmblenl ,ur Quality un i'rujrtl Anil ConlnbuIiun IoCom• x munin, PulluIAin U, rls Cmironmroteal l}csixn anti Itiwtnrir 1 alum %UIPal Qu.1111Y_ Caherseirc. Unvr%in. Compatiblevi6e.and x Stale Itlslotic. CuliuraL and+Nt•hirulogical X Resowccs Socioccononik Dcmographiri Chatacler (:hanks x Region is currently in violation of Federal :lean air act. However, project is consistent Jith local and regional anticipated growth, %apatible with surround ing evc opment. (see comments attached.) NO resources identified by F e o serval n and records check with the City of ftewpor Beach Planning staff. Area. No significant c ange. r........ v..l Hone . X Emplo�,menl ants Insignificant g nif icant incremental change due to Income P+ucrns X small size of 'project. Cammunitr FacUldes and Senien Educational Facililks • Current school-ia relocating within the x area. No effect. Commen:W Facilillcs x NIA. No effect. Health Care Increased services. Positive effect. SOL W SeMces Increased ,services. Positive effect. 'X 0 Envbvnmental • Assewmnt Checkl6i ftomWoued• pale 3+ Muject Name and Identification No, thwest Cownunity Center and Residential ` 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 z d r Nr •ir .i'' Source orliwi,i,iris lrtlotl lhole tluu+ hi t•ottlarl or + � pAl;c rslrn+nrul Impact Categories �`,+ :r+ A .,•� , �{�+ Alklitionalalalerialma} ba att:�r.hall. (:ommunitr FacWdea and Servsces'Continued+ SuiklNaslc Incremental increaau-ant c pate norms x local growth. Services are present at the site. Source: City Public corks Dept:; 11'at1vtljlL:r X same as above 5lurni 11'alCr X same as above Walcr Supph- X same as above Public Safal+• Puticc X same as above Tint X same as above Enwrgenc}' Medical x same as above OFF Open Space Space and Recreation 1 X same as above lkcreatbn X same as above Cultural ' iacllltka ' X same as above Tmnsporwion X same as above 'Environmental Assessment Checklist �russlinucd. y.Rr ar 1 w ProjeclName and IdenliftcationNn,.Mrthuoxr CL1mmlla�tY r ��n,f RrRtl��nrfr] 1 2 3 4 5 B 7 Source or Documenladon Mole dale of contact or `del a page reference? Impact Calegories �° `,�`� �� addillonal malerlal maybe anilched kahiral F'rahires tl all•r Mr'xisill 11% X visual observation -none present Sailfarc ttMll� isual observation -none present i hKidNlains Flood Ins. Map i 0602270005B X one C-Ho impact 11"c11antis —4one x observed Coastal ianc onsistent with UP and City's General x ]one tan. Affordable housing -and community l'Itique Natural ervices are consistent with local prog ams and pc Fealuresand observed licies 46licullurat Lands x 1•egetalian and ► ld1ife X one observed Environmental .. Asm ssment Checklisl iwnlinued, p,,tpe S, •Summary of Findings ' and Conclusions: See attached eoments Simimarrof ':Ittirollilleillal ..conditions: a anticipated. Project Modifications and Alternatives Considered: None required. L 'I Environmental Assessment Checklist Iconlinutd page6v Additional Studies Performed tAllach Studv or Summar►•i Kane required Mitigation Measures Needed - None required 511 • Environmental Am enni ent ChecUm Iconrrnued. DMs 71 -1. is project in compliance with applicable laws anti regular ions? ®Yes ❑ No Z. Is an EIS required? . ❑ Ves ®No 3. A Finding of No Significant Impact IFONS11 can be made. Pruiect will not significantly affect the quality of the human ern•irunment. IN Yes C \,o Prepared by Title Robert Balen Associate Carollyn Lobell Principe LSA ssociates Inc. (City f Neu art Beach) a Date •,. , •. c Wai to SERVICE PROPOSED a . Census TratE 1 Ho•l Costs Hasa 1 Percent of Lov/Kod 5.0336.142 VNI ` NAJPCN IPTJ 15 E/RSr AAO. m Ala1 wr m[sA TRACT N x rRAcr Ma IN" rmw M1a Iwo Yl //k • AIi(I4d I MOCK A MOM 1M WJU $►loan# IN COWS x\1 4 r rJ�i• AIUSHWI NAI 0=424 /AG! 01 C COWWT o/ OWW-! L!ta D33 WEST 15TH STREET SITE VISIT BY LSA 6-16- a QESCRIPTIQN The subject property, Newport Christi•.n School, is located on 1.3 acres at 833 west 15th Street. The property is located on the southeast corner of ISth Street and Monrovia Avenue. The subject property is surrounded by light industrial to the east. a mobile home park to the north, office and multi -family residential to the east and single family residential to the south. The school facility is a two story structure.with a gym to the southeast portion of the property, classrooms to the northwest portion of the property and a meeting hall structure fronting onto 15th Street. The parking is located to the east of the meeting hall structure, a playground and eating area are located to the west. StructuEL Condition The on -site structure building material is cement stucco with a redwood exterior. All of the classroom doors are fireproof. The structure is in good stable condition. There is no evidence of structure dilapidation or blight. The landscaping is well kept and is in good condition. There is no evidence of blight on the property, with the exception of solid waste. along the southern property line of the subject property. There are two large light industrial buildings that are built adjacent to the subject property's eastern property line. The second -light industrial abuts the on -site structure at the southeast section of the subject property. There is a three foot block wall that connects the two light industrial buildings along the eastern property line. All of the on -site parking is located on the north and east sections of the property. All of the angled parking (31 spaces), which abuts the two light industrial buildings, is designated and striped for two basketball courts. The basketball courts consist of four basketball backboards and six large halogen lights which surround the two basketball courts. There is an entrance and exit through a six foot wrought iron gate into the first parking area, and an exit only, six foot wrought iron gate in the second parking area. The on -site facility has two stairways on the eastern section and one stairway on the southern section. There are three lunch tables and a weight room, enclosed by a six foot chain link fence, under the southeast portion of the second story of the facility. There is one glass double door to the south section of the facility and eight fireproof classroom doors to the east of the facility (i.e. four doors on the first floor and four doors on the second floor). There are eighteen glass windows on the eastern portion of the structure (i.e. nine on the first floor and nine on the second floor). There are two foot by two foot planters, with shrubs and small trees along the eastern property line. There is a fire hydrant located in the landscaped median strip which separates the two parking areas. Kul The subject property abuts Monrovia Avenue to the west. A six foot wrought iron fence and one six foot wrought iron gate are located along Monrovia Avenue. The two story on -site structure is set back approximately five feet from the western property line. The subject fronts onto 15th Street to the north. A portion of the on - site structure is set back approximately ten feet from the northern property line. This structure separates the parking on the east of the subject pro- perty from the playground and eating area of the property. A six foot wrought iron fence encloses the subject property to the north. A six foot wooden fence, which is set back approximately ten feet from the six foot wrought iron fence, encloses the playground area from view of 15th Street. There are four classrooms with fireproof doors and one ladies' restroom on the first floor: There are six classrooms with fireproof doors and one men$s restroom on the second floor. There.is one landscaped planter and four wooden benches on a cement slab in front of the classrooms. There is a patio cover with sixteen picnic 2 (00 . Lsa tables on a cement slab adjacent to the west of the landscaped planter. Shrubs, trees and grass buffer the classrooms from 15th Street. South The on -site structure is set back approximately five feet from a six foot wooden fence which separates the on -site structure and a single family home to the south. �io_f sc On June 16, 1988, LSA conducted an on -site walkover survey of the Newport Christian Nigh School located at 833 West 15th Street. During the site walkover, LSA discovered two light industrial buildings adjacent to the east property line of the subject property. The noise generated from these buildings was minimal. The noise level from the surrounding area and road- ways was also minimal. Fl ogd Zoe Flood Zone Hap 106022700SB (September 1, 1978) indicates that the prop- erty is not within a 100-year flood zone. GENERAL PLANIZONING t - any The project is consistent with the residential designation and con- sistent with providing local 'recreational and community services to serve nearby residences. Re i 1 The 'residential project is consistent with the zoning. The former school is a legal non -conforming use. Conversion of the school to a com- munity center will require a use permit issued by the City. 3 I =o MONROVIA AVE, I � . awsr. I I �xrsr��wcuae�aurnrR� 0 8 rSrasw�cK J,,;� 73700' to •r�,1J I Il v� ,••� �• III II = I .:r. L • ND /T // �✓ � // INO•/7 1d' Zi � 3L r EX/Si/NG 8L/I[.D1NGS � J *•: / �` ' y•' ••• Ila I ••"s If I rI 11 � II 9g0.0o' J o / '%ice • � n -i y *bOMMISSIONERS tV& NIL%t MINUTES August 4, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 4. That public improvements shall be required of a developer per Section 19.08.1020 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivinion Map Act. 1. at a parcel map may be recorded prior to o upancy unless otherwise approved by the Public Wor and Planning Departments. The parcel reap shal be prepared using the State Plano Coordinate Sy stern as a basis of bearing. 2. That all mprovements be constructed as required by Ordinance d the Public Works Department. 3. That each d fling be served with an individual water service nd sewer lateral connnr_Llon to the public water a sewer systems unlosn otherwise approved by the P lic Works Depnrtment. 4. That deteriorated sections of r.i(Iowa lk he reconstructed along a Marigold Avonuo frontage under an encroachment rmit issuad by the Public Works Department. Work all be completed prior to occupancy. 5. That all vehicular access t the property be from the adjacent alley. 6. That County Sanitation District -as be paid prior to issuance of any building permit 7. That the Public Works Department p n check and inspection fee be paid. 8. That a park dedication fee for one dwel ing unit shall be paid in accordance with Chapter .50 of the Municipal Code. 9. That this resubdivislon shall expire if the map as not been recorded within 3 years of the date f approval, unless an extension is granted by th A. Traffic St%iAy la -6- Item 14o.3 I -COMMISSIONERS MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH August 4, 1988 ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I I INDEX Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the construction of a 16 unit apartment complex on property located in the R-3 (2178) District. f `a11 B. Ras dential Density Bonus (0scussion) Request for a density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Coda no as to construct an apartment complex with 16 units of which some will be for affordable to lower income CaaLlies. A modification to the Zoning Code is also requested so as to allow: the new apartment building and a proposed carport to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; to allow it two car carport to encroach 4 feet into the required 4 foot „anterly side yard setback; to allow covered parking al,ncen on the front one-half of the site which are not fully enclosed with side walls and garage doors; and to permit a portion of the required open parking spacua to encroach 10 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; and the acceptance of an environmental document. APPLICANT: Pacific Heights Apartments, Costa Mesa AND C. Resubotyipign No, 7 Request to resubdivide property located in the R-3 (2178) District so as to create two parcels of land where only one parcel currently exists. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow a parcel design which will allow two of the existing remaining structures on the property to encroach 3 feet 104 inches into the required 4 foot side yard setback areas adjacent to the new interior common property line. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 917; First Addition to Newport Mesa Tract, located at 883 West 15th Street. on the southeasterly corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue, in the Northwest Newport area. ZONE: R-3 (2178) -7- Traffic Stud RD9 (Ri160) R877 Approved �A- -COMMISSIONERS MINUTES Motion All Ayes August 4, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 1■0111■ MILIIIII APPLICANTS: City of Newport Beach and Pacific sleights Apartments, Costa Mesa OWNER: Newport Canpus Church, Newport Beach ENGINEER: Robin B. Haoers b Associates, Inc., Costa Mesa James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the City is conducting programs in the gymnasium. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Jim Vhite, applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission wherein he stated that the applicants concur with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". Mr. Brad Schweitzer, 848 Halyard, Nnwport Knolls, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Schweitzer stated that his concerns include the traffic at the intersection of 15th Street and Placentia Avenue; that the proposed carports will encroach into a landscaped setback area; that the developers should be required to complete the street improvements on the north side of 15th Street inasmuch as it is used by apartment residents for parking; and he addressed the use of the gymnasium. In response to Mr. Schweitzer's concerns, Mr. Hewicker replied that the gymnasium and the parking lot in front of the gymnasium Will be purchased by the City and will be maintained as a community center; that the proposed residential development is where the chapel and the remaining classrooms of Newport Christian School are currently located; and the proposed setbacks will conform with the existing setbacks of the residential developments currently located on the same side of the street. Don Webb, City Engineer, explained the City's requirements regarding street improvements, and he stated that a traffic signal at the intersection of 15th Street and Placentia Avenue has been placed on the signal priority list. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion was made and voted on to approve Traffic Study No. 47, Residential Density Bonus (Resolution No, 1180) Resubdivision No. 877, and related Environmental Document as set forth in Exhibit "A". MOTION CARRIED. -8- dOMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES August 4, 1988 ROU CALL L lI I_I_ll I - 1 INDEX Im A. Environmental Document: Accept the environmental document, asking the following findings: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the Environnental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and Council Policy K•3. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 3. The project will not have any significant environmental impact. B. Trnffic Sttidv Approve the 'traffic Study, making; the following findings: 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak hour traffic and circulation uystem in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Reach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of service on any major, primary -modified, or primary street. C. Rea iltntial Densitybnus: Approve the Residential Density Bonus and adopt Resolution No. 1180, subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That all conditions of approval for Resubdivision No. 877 shall be fulfilled. 3. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordablo Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that a minimum of seven (7) of the sixteen (16) units within the project shall be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an "active" Section 8 Existing -9- IbOMMISSIOMERS .\41kk-*� vilc MINUTES August 4, 1988 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Harket Rent (F11R) Schedule for Newport Beach, When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning; a maximum income of no more than 80 percent of the median income for Newport Beach as determined Ity the Department of Housing and Urban Development at a rent which is no more than 30 percent of tho maximum income. Said Affordable housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits, The term of this agreement shall be for no more than thirty (30) years. 4. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensnri landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscapitip with tlic proposed construction schedule. Prior to occupancy, a licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the approved plan. 5. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. b. That the light system for the project shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to control the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 7. That all trash enclosures shall be screened frog adjacent properties. 8. That the waiver of the park dedication fee shall be subject to the City Council approval. D• R4pddivl§L213 No. 877 gnd Rela&G.d Modificatio.+• Approve Resubdivision No. 877 and related modification, making the following findings and with the following conditions: -10. U1 MINUTES COMMISSIONERS • A. A _a �. \. %A CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH August 4, 1988 ROLL CALL1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 INDEX 1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.120 of thn Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Hap Act. 5. The approval of the requested modifications, no as to allow the front and side yard setback encroachments and to allow the use of open carports on the front one-half of the property will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working In the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, 1. That a parcel map shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits on Parcel 1, unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department and Planning Department. 2. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems shall be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. 3. That a curb access ramp be constructed at the corner of 15th Street and Monrovia Avenue under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works Department, Work shall be completed prior to 7 ` `COMMISSIONERS IN \s1A\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES August 4, 1988 ROLL CALL-t i- I I I 1 I i I INDEX occupancy of the structures on Parcel 1. 4. That the building connected along the parcel boundary between Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 shall be physically separated. In addition, all water, sewer, electrical and gas utilitlas shall be separate for Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. 5. That each building on Parcel 1 be nerved with an individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and nnwhr systems unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department, 6. That all improvements be constructed an required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 7. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been recorded within 3 years eel' the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning Commission. f f R uest to permit alterations and additions to an exi ing duplex which exceeds the 24 foot basic height limit n the 24/28 Foot Height Limitation District, on property located in the R-2 District. The proposed constructi will be entirely below top of curb on Ocean Boulevard. LOCATION: Lo 2, Tract No. 1026, located at 3024 Brea rs Drive, on the northeasterly side of Bre ers Drive, just above the Corona del Mar to Reach, in Corona del Mar. ZONE: R-2 APPLICANT: Jack Larson, ADS, orona del Mar OWNER: Same as applicant James Hewicker, Planning Director, st ad that the subject variance has been removed -from tale ar inasmuch as the variance was not required. -12- Item No.4 V1124 Ra move d from Calendar KEAWETH A. AMREW As.t..a. LANDSCAPE ARCHrrECTURE / PLANNING ,-_studio 13ivt August 2, 1989 Cit! of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 'Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Ca. 92663 Re: landscape For Pacific Ileights Apartments. Gentlemen; Thrj landscape installation for the Pacific Ileightu Apartmenta, 881 W. 15th Street, Newport Beach han been completed F1f3 per plants and specifications prepared under my direction, dates! October 28, 1988. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Respec fully submitted, Kenneth A. Andrew, A.S.L.A. S� i /lye: a u [gig 004n s No, IAW CWarrs • Ha 220 Nevada - WEMSEA AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE ARCHtECis. 270E2 F04 Road, SuM 216 • LarjU No* Cd*Xrla Wey7 FAX (714) 364-3095 • (714) 472.1175 • (714) 364-060 M ttovismber 2, 1988 To: The City of Newport Beach FRU'd: Pacific Heights Apartments SUBJECT: 883 W. 15th Street, Newport Beach Pacific sleights Apartments is owned by Lawrence M. Campeau, Jamen G. White, Jr., and Wayne A. Praser doing husinans as Packe Heights Apartments, As nf�t forth in the Conditions of Approval for the obovu reff--renced project, a professional landscaper will In! rQtained to kQep the premises in an orderly manner. Planne feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jame:s G. White, Jr. ~f JGW:dh Mesa Development Co. 2925 College, Suite A3. Costa Mesa, CA 92626 17M; 979.9991 Ur. w, 374M ELECTRICAL Doug Scott grQOP' Electric CONTRACTOR Aug. 2, 1989 RE; Pacific Hieghts Apts. Exterior Lighting 'thin is to verify that all exterior buildin and walkway light fixturen installed by us is low wattage (13VI fluorescent lighting. All ertrport lighting, is 1-1140W fluorescent lamp per two (2) car stalls. No other type(s) of exterior lighting fixtures axist on thi, project. Lighting for thin ;project has been observed during the evening hours with i'ull illumination present. There was no splash aver lighting; observed in the neighbors property. Sinc ly, Douglas S. Scott Doug Scott Electric 16028 Mt, Hicks • Fountain Valley, CA. 92708 • .(714) 775•0061 August 3, 1989 City of liewport Beach P.O. Box 1760 Ilewport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Attention: Dana O. Astami Associate Planner Subject: 887 W. 15th Street, 1lewport Beach Dear- Dana, Our trash enclosure gates are currently being fabricated M'd will defenitely be installed by 8/7/89. 1f you have:! any further questions please call me at (714) 979-9991. Sincerely, F11:5A UFVI:1�Ul'ld1:1�'t' COMPANY .arry 'ampe, I.Cft ,b loth -Mind ac" o-d..7 '/a MI ke. I'Vynu rJ 6141lr�•y rk Gfbi� Mesa Development Co. 2925 College. Suite A3, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (7141 979.9991 CITY OF NF.WPORT BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMXNT March 26, 1987 14F.MO TO F I LP SUPJF,(.T: Residential DO -Welty flonus -_ 1544 P'lacen+fa Avenu+, For information, pertinent plans and documents for the subject Residential Densit7 Bonus, please see the file. for Amendment No. 640. CURREW PLANNING DIVISIOIi t I TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City Council Meeting July 27, Agenda Item No. D-4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH City Council 1 Planning Department 0 f L Request to("consider the granting of $350,000 in CDBG funds, $24,000 from fiscal year 1986- 87 andj $326,000 from fiscal year 1987-88, to assist with the development of a 26 unit apartment( for lower income persons and families and a finding of no significant effect on the environment. B. Request for DensitY_S_onus (Discussion) Request for density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code so as to construct an apartment complex with 26 units affordable to lower income families, and the acceptance of an environmen- tal document. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 715, First Addition of the Newport Mesa Tract, located at 1538 Placentia Avenue, on the easterly side of Placentia Avenue, between 15th Street and Production Place, in the West Newport Triangle area. ZONE: R-3(2178) District APPLICANT: Mesa Development Co., Inc., Costa Mesa OWNERS: Ben Indes Trust and K & M Enterprises Inc., Newport Beach ..- -. ; .� Hold hearing; close hearing; if desired, a) Adopt Resolution No. , approving a grant of $350,000 in CDBG funds, $24,000 from fiscal year 1986-87 funds and $326,000 from fiscal year 1987-88 funds, to assist with the development of a 26 unit TO: City Council - 2. apartment at 1538 Placentia Avenue for lower income persons and families and making a finding of no significant effect on the environment. b) Adopt Resolution No. , granting n density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code, and accepting the Environmental Document. At the Planning Commission meeting of July 9, 1907, the Commission voted (six ayes, one no) to recommend that the City Council approve the density bonus and accept the Environmental Document prepared in conjunction with this development. In a separate action, the Planning Commission also approved a traffic study and a modification to the zoning code so as to allow three, five foot high patio fences to encroach 5 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; three second floor decks to encroach ono foot into the required 20 foot front yard setback; a six car carport and a trash enclosure to encroach 10 feet into the required 10 foot rear yard setback; and to allow open carports on the front one-half of the lot. This proposal involves a request for the approval of a grant of $350,000 in CDBG funds to assist with the development of a 26 unit apartment for lower income persons and families. The proposal also includes a request for a density bonus pursuant to Section 65915 of the California Government Code in order to increase the allowable density from 20 dwelling units per acre to 30 dwelling units per acre. This density bonus will permit an increase in units from a maximum of 17 units to 26 units for the purpose of providing 26 apartment units at affordable rents to lower income families for a period of 30 years. rMI •! '! •! �! Since this development involves federal CDBG funds, an Environmental Assessment Checklist was prepared for this project in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act and the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. It has been determined that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A Finding of No Significant Effect on the Environment was prepared and is attached for City Council review. 0 0 TO: City Council - 3. Because of the City•s discretionary approvals which include the density bonus, modification, and traffic study, an Initial Study was also prepared for this development in com- pliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and City Council Policy K-3. It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environ- ment. A Negative Declaration has been prepared and is attached for Planning Commission review. U-ILWWW,�• •.i• 1• _,�. The subject property is currently developed with a plumbing supply store. To the north is an affordable apartment development; to the east is a mobile home park and medical center; to the south is an industrial use; and to the west, across Placentia Avenue, are industrial and multi-famil uses. y On December 8, 1986, the City Council unanimously approved a General Plan Amendment and zone change involving the subject property and several surrounding properties. The GPA and zone change reclassified all of the properties so as to permit multi -family development at 20 dwelling units per acre. In addition, the Council also approved a traffic study and density bonus for an affordable apartment development on the property immediately to the north of the subject proper- ty. The proposed development will be similar in design, architectural treatment and color so as to blend to the greatest extent possible with the previously approved development. Details of the proposed project are discussed in the attached Planning Commission staff report. Density Bonus. The Density Bonus request is identical to the three requests previously made by the same applicant and approved by the City Council. Two of the previously approved density bonus developments are located on adjacent parcels at 843 and 849 west 15th Street, between Placentia Avenue and Monrovia Avenue. The third development is located adjacent to the proposed development at 1544 Placentia Avenue. The 843 15th Street development, the 1544 Placentia Avenue, and the proposed development also involve grants of CDBG funds. This density bonus request is consistent with the provisions of the City's Housing Element and Section 65915 of the California Government Code. 10 • TO: City Council - 4. Tg. The Traffic Study indicates that the project passes the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance inasmuch as projected traffic is less than 1% of the peak at the potentially impacted intersections. Moreover, when the daily, A.M. peak, and P.M. peak trip ends for the 38,411 sq.ft. of retail commercial allowod on the site under the prior General Plan designation are compared to the trip ends for the current proposal of 26 dwelling units, a significant reduction in traffic is observed. TRAFFIC COMPARISON Prior General Plan 38,411 sq.ft. of Retail Daily trip ends: AM Peak trip ends: 1,536 (9 times) 46 (5 times) PM Peak trip ends: 119 (7 times) Current General Plan (with ty H,onup) 26 du's at 30 du/acro 169 10 16 The City's Park Dedication require- ments are contained in the Subdivision Section, Title 19, of the Municipal Code. Chapter 19.50 provides that "As a condition of approval of a tentative Subdivision Map or a Parcel Map, the subdivider shall dedicate land, pay a fee in lieu thereof, or both, at the option of the City ...." Since there is no parcel map or tentative or final tract map necessary for this development, the development is not subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.50. The City's Housing Element also contains a policy giving the City council the discretion to review and waive planning and park fees for developments containing low and moderate income housing in proportions to the number of low and moderate income units in the entire project. All 26 units in this development will be affordable to lower income tenants. The previously approved adjacent development at 1544 Placen- tia Avenue has on --site recreation facilities. This develop- ment will also have on -site recreation facilities for the tenants and their children. The Planning Commission dis- cussed recreation facilities available in the upper West Newport area during the public hearing on this application. As a result, the Commission conditioned the proposed develop- TO: City Council - 5. ment with a requirement that these two adjacent dovolopments have joint use of the on -site facilities. Since Newport Seacrest Apartments, on 15th Street, involved a resubdivision (parcel map), the development wou nuhject to the provisions of Chapter 19.50. The City Council waived the park fees for the 20 very low income units and raquired that the $226,297.70 in park fees associated with the remaining low income units be paid by April of 1989. At the time these fees are paid, the City Council can decide whether to wait for the development of the oil company property or une these funds to purchase a park somewhere in the area. At the City Council meeting of April 27, 1987, the Council received a report (attached) from the Parks, [leaches and Recreation Department concerning a potential mini park in the 15th Street and Placentia Avenue area. The Parkn, Beachou and Recreation (PBR) Commission reviewed the lark oppor- tunities in the Upper West Newport area and recommended that the City recognize the park deficiency in the area and wait for normal development of the oil company property in West Newport. At the April 27th meeting, the Council voted all ayes in support of the Commission's recommendation, but also requested that the PBR Commission again review the subject again in accordance with the comments of the Council. In the Fall of 1986, Congress approved the Urgent Supplemen- tal Appropriations Act of 1986 which entitled the City to an additional $73,000 in CDBG funds for fiscal year 1986-87. From these funds, the City Council approved an allocation of $24,000 for land acquisition for the purpose of providing affordable housing. During fiscal year 1987-88, the City received a CDBG entitle- ment of $432,000. From these funds the City Council allo- cated $326,000 to land acquisition for the purpose of providing affordable housing and identified 1538 Placentia Avenue as the potential site. The $326,000 was allocated, on the basis of the applicants' request at the 1987-88 fiscal year CDBG public hearing, for $350,000 to accomplish the development at 1538 Placentia Avenue. When the $326,000 is combined with the $24,000 from fiscal year 1986-87, the City Council has sufficient funds to grant the requested assis- tance. Both an affordable housing agreement and a grant deed will be recorded against the property to ensure compliance with the affordable housing conditions and protect the City's interest. 0 • TO: City Council - 6. The City also retained an economic consultant to evaluate the rent benefit of providing the assistance. Based on the analysis, the estimated rent benefit in current dollars over the 30 year period will be $1,067,730. A copy of the analysis is attached. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director By CRAIG T. LUELL Senior anner CTB:jm A2\CCSR\ 538PLAC.CTB Attachments for City Council Only: 1. Resolution No. , granting CDBG Funds/NEPA. 2. Resolution No. granting Density Bonus/CEQA. 3. Planning Commission minutes of July 9, 1987. 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1159 5. Planning Commission staff report of July 9, 1987 (Negative Declaration and Traffic Study attached). 6. Finding of No Significant Effect on Environment and Environmental Assessment Checklist. 7. PBR Report to City Council, April 27, 1987. 8. Rent/Benefit Analysis. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AUTHORIZING FISCAL YEAR 1966-1987 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. BLOCK GRANT SPECIAL APPROPRIATION FUNDS AND FISCAL YEAR 1987-86 CDBG ENTITLEMENT FUNDS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND MAKING A rVIDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the city of Newport Beach has adopted a Housing Element as part of its General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach is making a good faith effort to implement the policies and programs contained in the General Plan Housing Element; and WHEREAS, it is the City's desire to benefit low and moderate Income housaholds; and WHEREAS, on December B, 1986, the City allocated $24,000 of Its 1986-1981 Community Development Block. Grant Special Appropriation funds to be used for land acquisition for lower Income housing; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 1987, the City allocated $326,000 of its 1987-88 Community Development Block Grant Yearly Entitle=ant funds to be used for land acquisition for lower intone housing; and WHEREAS, on April 27, 1987 the City Council identified 1578 Placentia Avenue as a potential site for use of CDBG funds; and WHEREAS, Mesa Development Company has indicated their willingness and capability to construct 26 lower income housing units at 1518 Placentia Avenue if the City assists with land acquisition. WHEREAS, the City prepared an Environmental Roviax Record which determined that the rroiact does not aiq- nificantly affect the quality of the human environment and accordingly the City decided not to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (PL 91-190); and - 1 - MHERLAS, the City published said Finding of Ito Significant Effect in a newspaper of general circulation on July 9, 1987, and gave citizens 15 days to submit consaenta as required by Federal Regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a Findinq nr Ijo Significant Effect on the Environment is made for the prnyac:t as documented in the Environmental Review Record and properly published pursuant to N£PA regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that $24,000 of the 1986-1987 Community Development Block Grant Special Ap- propriation funds and $326,000 of 1987-88 Community Develop- mant Block. Grant Yearly Entitlement funds be allocated to Mesa Development Company for the housing development at 1538 Placentia Avenue, subject to approval of dovelopmont'plana by the City and execution and recordinq of an affordable housing agreement and grant dead. Adopted this day of 1987. MAYOR ATTEST CITY CLERK CTB:jm CTD:CDBG86-7.88 cem 0 0ATTA:;av2r7 2 RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEHFOR'T BEACH APPROVING THE DENSITY BONUS REQUEST OF MESA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR THE PURPOSE of CONSTRUCTING A 'liiEM-SI% UNIT APARTIMNT AT 1538 PLACENTIA AVENUE AFFORDABLE TO LOWM Ixc0KE FAMILIES FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY YEARS AND ACCEPTING THE ENVIRoKKEUTAL DoaMENT WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach has adopted a Housin7 Element as part of its General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Housing Element of the Newport Ranch General Plan has established policies pertaining to the providing housing opportunities for all economic aegmantn of the community; and WHEREAS, those policies include providing incentives within the limitation of available rosourcest and WHEREAS, the development of rental housing affordable to lower income pornonn and fauilics is a goal oatabliah011 in the housing Element of the Newport Beach General Plnn; anti WHEREAS, Section 65915 of the California Government f:odn provides for approval of a density bonus for affordnble housing developments; and WHEREAS, the Mona Development Company development provides all 26 units as affordable units to lower income perconn and families for a period of thirty years; and WHEREAS, the proposed 26 units affordable to lower Income persons and families will ausist the City in achieving its goal of providing housing for all income segments of the community; and WHEREAS, the number of units provided and the 30 year term of affordability justify the granting of a Sol density bonus; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach has recommended that the City Council approve the density bonus and certify the Environmental Document. NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach that the environmental document is accepted with the following Findings; - 1 - c1 9 . 1. That the environmental document is complete and has boon prepared in compliance with the California Environ- mental Quality Act (CEQA), the state EIR Guidelines and City Policy. 2. That the contents of the environmental document have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 7. That in order to reduce adverse impacts of the proposed project, all feasible mitigation measures discussed in the on•+ironaental document have been incor- porated into the proposed project. 4. That the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study have been incor- porated into the proposed project and are ex;ressed as Conditions of Approval. 5. That based upon the information contained In the Initial Study, Negative Declara- tion and supportive materials thereto, that if the mitigation measures are incorporatad into the project it will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Now, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESEED by the City Council of the City of Newport Roach that a density bonun in hereby granted to the Mesa Devalopmant Company to build a 2G unit apartre nt at 1538 Placentia Avenue subject to the following ccnditions: 1. That the development shall be insubstan- tial conformance with tho approved site plan, floor plan, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That a common pedestrian ingress and egress be provided between this project and the apartment project immediately to the north, in order to allow tenants of both projects to have joint use of recreational facilities on both sites. ]. That the applicants shall make an effort to provide an on -site recreational area of approximately 40 feet by 40 feet by relocating one of the buildings, subject to Zoning and Building Code provisions relating to separation between struc- tures. 4. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved an to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that all 26 units of rental housing shall be constructed on the subject property. That all 26 units shall be made available on a preferential basis to persona and families possessing an "active" Section 8 Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below - 2 - L the Section 8 Fair Karket Rent (M) Schedule for Nevport Heath. When a section 8 tenant •does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no more than a01 of the median intone for Newport Beach as determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment at a rent which i■ no core than 30% of the maximum intone. Said Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall be for no less than thirty (30) years. ,. That a landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Dapartaent that the landscaping has boon installed in accordance with the prepared plan). e. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly tria:.ed and kept in a healthy condition. 7. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer: 'with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been mat. a. That the number of off-street parking requirements of the City of Newport Beach (as provided by the Municipal Code, Title 20, Chapter 20.30) be provided on -site. 9. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler protection. 10. The Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 11. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent proportion. - 3 - .7 ADOPYED this day of 1987. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK. CTD:jm CTD: MIESADENS. R£S 12 0 ATTACHMM 3 COMMISSIONERS AFT MINUTES July 9, 1987 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INDEX Motion All Ayes Ling of 3uly 2s, 1987; Item No. 10, Traffic Lt.udy, Ilr._ erinit No. s274, and Resubdivision No. 1141), a reques to permit the construction of a drive -In and take-out estaurant facility with indoor And outdoor seating are in roll Center Newport be continue;] to the Planning fission sheeting of August 6, 19H`!1 and Item 110. 11, Ame nt No. 651, a request to ameliid the Planned Community eveloprent Standards of the Big Canyon Planned Coanaun so as to amend the front yard setback requirement for arages be continued to July 2s, 1987. Motion was made to continue to a Planning Comminnion meeting of July 23, 1987, item ti 2, Una i+etmit No. 1738 (Amended)Item No. 3, Use Pe t No. .!?,'l51 Item No. 4, Use Permit No. 3280; Item No. Vnrinnce No. 11411 Item No. 11, Amendment No. 651; an Lo continue to the Planning CcAnmission meeting of Augua 6, 1987, Item No. lb, Traffic Study, Use Permit No. ,1 11, and Resubdivision No. 849. Motion voted on, ION CARRIED. i A. Traffic -Stud (Continued Public Nearing) Request to consider a traffic study so as to Permit the construction of a 26 unit apartment complex on the property. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code go as to Allow three, five foot high patio fences to encroach 5 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback; three second floor docks to encroach one foot into the required 20 foot front yard setback; a six car carport and a trash enclosure to encroach 10 feet into the required 10 foot rear yard setback; and to allow open carports on the front one-half of the lot. At1D B. Request for Density Bonus (Continued Discussion) Request to permit a density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code so as to construct an apartment complex with 26 units afford- able to lower income families; and the acceptance of an environmental document. -:1- Item No. 1 TS Density Bonus (Res. No. 1159) (Approved !COMMISSIONERS • MINUTES July 9, 1987 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I I INDEX itCATION: A portion of Lut 715, first. Ai1r111Aor. of the Newport I+.ena Tract, locativ] nt 150 Placentia Avenue, on tho rt„rrtnrly side of Placentia Avenue, betwr,nn 15th Street and Production Place, in the West Newport Triangle area. ZONE: R-j (2178) District APPLICANT: Mesa Develorrtnent Co., Inc., Costa Mesa CWNERS: Ben Indes Trust anti Y. E. M Ento:rp,rises, Inc., ttewport beach Planning Director James Iiewicker stated that. It wan his understanding that one concern of the Planning) com_ is- sion was the lack of public park facilities its the area of the proposed project, And referred the Commirnrion to the April 27, 1987 City Councils staff report prepared by the Parks, Beaches and Necreation Director as well as an excerpt from the City Council minuten for that some meeting. Mr. Hewicker quilted from both of the aforementioned documents and the conclusion in the staff report that "time and new residential development is the solution to this park deficient area." Mr. Hewicker continued that the applicants of the proposed project are not required to contribute land or pay in -lieu fees for park dedication. However, the proposed development plans provide on -site recreation facilities~ for the teriants and their children. Mr. Ilewicker acked Mr. Robert P. Lenard, Advance Planning Administrator to respond to a letter which the Commission had received from Robert M. Hixson, Jr., a property owner in the area of the proposed project site. In the letter, Mr. Hixson cited his belief that increasing the allowable density in the area would add to traffic and parking problems. Mr. Lenard informed the Commission that prior to the subject site being rezoned from ccw-zw rcial to residential uses, commercial use would have permitted 5 to 9 times the traffic generation from the propoaed residential use. -4- I I� COMMISSIONERS 16 C7 MINUTES ROLL CALL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH July 9, 1987 In responding to a question poiiod by Cr,mminnioner Pomeroy, Mr. Hewicker answered that the city is requirod to grant a 25% density honun when a developer compliec with certain specified State. critrrla regard- ing affordability standards. Commissioner winburn cited the need for recre.itional facilities and indicated she would ask the apl)icants what type of such facilities the proposed project would provide. In response to Commissioner Herrill'n ntated concern regarding the number of parking npaces provided, Planning Director 114,wicker ntated that the project provides the amount of harking required by the Municipal Code. sir. flewicktr further stated that if it is the teeling of the Manning Cca=isaion that the Code Is deficient, then the Commission can amend the parking standards. In reply to Commissioner Merrill questioning the 50% density bonus requested by the applicants, Mr. Hewicker replied that the proposed project will provide all 26 units aftordable to lower income households, as estab- lished by the federal standard, for a period of 30 years, which far exceeds the minimum State standards for granting a density bonus. Itr. Ifewickcr also cited that the City Hnusing Element defines a need for two and three bedroom housing units. In referring to a Dousing Element objective to provide for a balanced community, Commissioner Debay asked how many low-income projects were located in the subject area. In responding to this question, Mr. Hewicker stated that there wero four such projects, and further commented that the City has worked with other developers: in an effort to provide low and moderate income housing in other parts of the City, and mentioned the North Ford project and the Bayview Expansion project an examples. Mr. flewicker stated that it was staff's upinioti that the City was very fortunate to be involved with the developers of the proposed project who have already provided the City with three similar projects. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item and Mr. Larry Campeau appeared before the Commis- sion representing Mesa Development Company. Mr. Campeau stated that he concurs with the staff report and the findings and conditions of approval contained in Exhibit "A." INDEX -5- 15 COMMISSIONERS ! • MINUTES July 9, 1987 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CALL ! I I I I I I I INDEX in addressing the concerns expressed by the Cov=iaalon, Mr. Campeau pointed out on the displayed project flans where the proposed recreational facilities might be located. Mr. Campeau Ltated that a pool contractor was currently studying the area to determine the upnciflc location for a pool. Mr. Campeau referred the Cotrmlu- sion to a 'tot lot' with commercial playground equip- ment located on the adjacent project which would nlno be available to tenants of the _proposed projoCt. As far as the number of cars that might be expected to result from full occupancy of the project, Mr. Campeau stated that 16 of the 26 units were already pro -leased to sinyle-parent families, and citing from experience the developers le.Yve had with similar proje!r.tn, the number of r.ar5 generated per unit is below that which .night be expected frcn units that are; rent_od to a large majority of adult tenants. In responding to a question from Chairrwn Vcrrnon, Mr. Campeau Stated that the density of the proruti+,r1 project was the same as for the adjoining site and the same contractor would do the construction. Mr. raml:eau also advised that there were currently 141 affordable units in the area. Responding to Chairman Person, Mr. Campeau Bald that the applicants agreed with the staff report and the findings and conditions of approval contained in Exhibit "A." Chairman Person recounted his recent vioit to the site of the proposed project as well as that of the adjoining project and cor^=ented on the attractive and well -maintained landscaping and overall good appear- ance. Comnissioner Pomeroy co=.cnted that he had recently visited the abuttinq property and was impressed with its extremely clean and neat appearance and added that it did not look like one might expect of a low-income housing project, but like a market -rate apartment complex. In responding to Co=issionur's Herrilles inquiry as to the height and construction mat9rial of the walls that would surround the project, Mr. Campeau stated the back wall would be 11 feet high, the side walls 6 feet high, and all would be masonry walls. -6- COMMISSIONERS 4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES July 9, 1987 ROLL CALL INDEX In reply to a question by Coraisnioner Merrill, Plan- ning Director Fewicker stated that an added cotidltion of approval could provide for ccvr�on ingreut ,and egrean het-.een the proposed protect and the adjoinitol 1>rr.ject, in the discussion which followed Commissioner Prmwroy'n request that the applicants agree to a 40 feet by 40 feet recreation area, Mr. Hewicker suggested aM ing n condition of approval stating "that the applicants would make the best effort to provide a 40 feet by 40 feet recreation area with a caveat that the proper Building Code and Zoning Code separation Letween buildings will be maintained," I John Miller, a neighbor, addreused the Commisnion. Mr. !filler said he lived across the street from the proposed protect, and referring to the aforementioned letter from Mr. Robert kiixson, Jr., Mr. Miller stated his concerns were for both parking and what facilities would be available for children. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Corumissioner Koppelman declared her satisfaction with the J0 year term of affordability of the proposed project. *lotion x Motion was made to approve the Traffic Study and Ayes x x x x x x Request for Density Bonus with two added conditions of No x approval providing for the common ingress and egress between the two projects, and a best effort to provide a 40 feet by 40 feat recreation area on the project site subject to the "Zoning and building Code requirements relating to separation between structures. Chairman Winburn stated she would be supporting the motion inasmuch as thare would be recreational facilities and that the facilities would be located at the rear of the property and not adjacent to the busy street. Chairman Person indicated his support of the motion and also referred to Mr. Lenard's statement that the planned residential use of the site would generate leas traffic than the previous zoning and General Plan permitted. -7- COMMISSIONERS • • MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH July 9, 1987 ROLL CALLI J I Jill f l INDEX Commissioner Merrill stated that he could ru.)t support the motion due to the lack of off-street parkinq in the area. The Commissioners agreed affirritively to for. 1.cnard's request for clarification that the common iri{iress and egress condition pertained to pedestrian use only. Motion voted on to approve the Traffic Study and Request for Density Bonus subject to the findings and conditions of approval contained in Pesolution No. 1159 and Exhibit "A", and with Condition No, l modified to read "That the development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, flr.or plans, and elevations, except as noted below."r and added Condition No. 2: "That a common pedestrian ingress and egress be provided between this project and the apartment project immediately to the north, in order to allow tenants of both proiects to have joint use of recreational facilities on both sites."; and added Condition No. 3: "That the applicants shall make an effort to provide an on -site recreational area of approximately 40 feet by 40 feet by relocatinging one of the buildings, subject to the Zoning and Building Code provisons relating to separation between structures." MOTION CAPRIFD. A. Traffic Study: the Following )rove the Traffic Study_Nakin ings 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact. of the proposed project on the peak -hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport ©each Municipal Code and City Policy S-l. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the proj- ect -generated traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major,' 'primary -modified,' or 'primary' street. :i. That the Traffic Study indicates that the proj- ect -generated traffic will not be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of the critical intersections. -B- It e COMMISSIONERS MINUTES July 9, 1907 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLLCALL11 I Jill I I INDEX B. Modification Findings: 1. That the proposed modification for the front and rear yard encroachments and to allow Oren larports on the front one-half of the lot will rslit under the circumstances of this particular rnaet, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and Improve- ments in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and further that the proponcd modi- fication is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. 2. That the proposed front and rear yard er.croach- ments are minor in nature and will not block views from adjoining properties. 3. That the open carports on the front one-half of the lot are not highly visible from the public street and inasmuch as the subject project is an affordable housing project, the cost involved in providing garage door and side wall on 15 of the 39 on -site parking spaces is not justified by any increased visual appeal. Conditions: 1. That the development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans and elevations except as noted below. 2. That a common pedestrian ingress and egress be provided between this project and the apartment project immediately to the north, in order to allow tenants of both projects to have joint use of recreational facilities on both sites. 3. That the applicants shall make an effort to provide an on -site recreational area of approximately 40 feet by 40 feet by relocating one of the buildings, subject to Zoning and Building Coda provisions relating to separation between structures. •ff -9- 11 RESOUlrION NO. ,,,,,1154 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMUSSION OF THE CITY OF NE1(PORT 1BEA( ( RECOIU(ENDING TO THE CITY CDOCIL APPROVAL OF A DENSITY 0ONU6 AND THE ACCEPTANCE Or AN ENVIROXXMAL DOCUXM" W}1EREAS, the City of Newport Beach has adopted a HouKinq Elece nt as part of Its General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Housing Element of the I;ewport 1;aach General Plan has established policies pertaining to the providing housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community; and WHEREAS, those policies include providing incentives within the limitation of available resourcoa; and WHEREAS, the development of rental housing affordable to lover income persons and families is a goal ostablished in the Housing Element of the Newport beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 65915 of the California Government Codn provides for approval of a density bonus for affordable housing developments; and WHEREAS, the Mesa Development Company dovelopannt provides all 26 units as affordable units to lower income persons and families for a period of thirty years; and WHEREAS, the proposed 26 units affordable to lower Income persons and families will assist the City In achieving Its goal of providing housing for all income segments of the community; and WHEREAS, the number of units provided and the 70 year term of affordability justify the granting of a 50% density bonus; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study is complete and has been prepared for the project In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA Guidelines, and city Council Policy K-]; and - 1 - �L / • • WHEREAS, in order to reduce adverse impacts of the proposed project, all feasible mitigation measures discussed in the environmental document have boon incorporated into the proposed projects WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study in making its decision an the proposed development i and WHEREAS, based upon the information contained in the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project 4s mitigated will not have a significant effect on the onvirun- ment. NOW, THF.REFORF. BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Cousin - Dion of the City of Newport Beach rocommends to the City Council certification of the environmental document at.,] approval of the density bonus subject to the fo11t)wIrrl conditiono: 1. That the development shall be insubstan- tial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plan, and elevations except as noted below. 2. That a cannon pedestrian ingress and egress be provided between this project and the apartment project immediately to the north, in order to allow tenants of both projects to have joint use of recreational facilities on both sites. 1. That the applicants shall make an effort to provide an on -site recreational area of approximately 40 feet by 40 feat by relocating one of the buildings, subject to Zoning and Building Code provisions relating to separation between struc- tures. 4. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, guaranteeing that all 26 units of rental housing shall be constructed an the subject property. That all 26 units shall be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an "active" Section a Existing Rental Assistance Certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section a Fair Market Rent (FMR) Schedule for Newport Beach. When a Section B tenant does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a maximum income of no - 2 - .tI L' • more than got of the median income for Newport Beach as determined by the Departmant of Housing and Urban Develop - sent at a rent which is no more than 30% of the maximum income. Said Affordable Housing Agree=ent shall be recorded with the orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall be for no less than thirty (30) years. That a landscape and Irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan). That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of woods and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. ;hat the light system shall be designed, diructed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to sininize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineers with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been net. B. That the number of off-street parking requirements of the city of Newport Beach (as provided by the Municipal Code, Title 20, Chapter 20.30) be provided on -site. 4. :hat prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler protection. 10. The Fire Department access shall be approved by the Firs Department. 11. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent proportion. - 3 - r 0 0 ADOPTED this day of 1987, b/ the following vote, to wit: CILA I MAN By SEC?F.'TARY CTB2:uP\PCD8RI'il July 21, 1987 AYES HOES ABSENT 4 r3 • i 11TTACHHY.IIT 5 Planning Commission Meeting July 91 1987 Agenda Item No. 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. Traffic Study (Continued Public Hearing) Request to consider a traffic study so as to permit the construction of a 26 unit apartment complex on the property. The proposal also includes a ardification to the Zoning Code so as to allow three, five foot high patio fences to encroach 5 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setbacks three second flr,.,r decks to encroach one foot into the required 20 foot front yard setback; a six car carport and a trash enclosure to encroach 10 feet into the required 10 foot rear yard setback; and to allow open carports on the front one-half of the lot. B. Request for Density Bonus (Discussion) Request for density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code so as to construct an apartment complex with 26 units affordable to lower income families; and the acceptance of an environmental document. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 715, First Addition of the Newport Mesa Tract, located at 1538 Placentia Avenue, on the easterly side of Placentia Avenue, between 15th Street and Production Place, in the West Newport Triangle area. ZONE: R-3(2178) District APPLICANT: Mesa Development Co., Inc., Costa Mesa OWNERS: Ben Indes Trust and K t M Enterprises Inc., Newport Beach Application This proposal involves a request for approval of a Traffic Study prepared in accordance with chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code for the 26 unit apartment complex. The proposal also includes a .24 TO- Planning commission - 2. modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow three, five foot high patio fences to encroach 5 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setbacks three second floor decks to encroach one foot into the required 20 foot front yard setbacks a six car carport and a trash enclosure to encroach 10 feet into the required 10 foot rear yard setbacks and to allow open carports on the front one-half of the lot. Modification Procedures are set forth in Chapter 20.01 of the Municipal Code. Also requested is a density bonus pursuant tr, Bection 65915 of the California Government Code in order to increase the allowable density from 20 du's per acre to 30 du's per acre, permitting an increase in units from a maximum of 17 units to 26 units for purposes of constructing an apartment complex affordable to lower income families for a period of 30 years and the acceptance of an environmental document. suggested Action Hold hearing; close hearing; if desired, Approve the traffic study and modification for the 26 unit apartment complex at 1538 Placentia Avenue, with the the Findings and Conditions set forth in the attached Fxhibit "A"; and Adopt Resolution No. , recommending to the City Council the approval of a density bonus as provided for in Section 65915 of the California Government Code for the proposed 26 unit apartment complex and the acceptance of an environmental document. Environmental Significance An Initial Study was prepared for this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and City Council Policy K-3. It has been determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment. A Negative Declaration has been prepared and is attached for Planning commission review. Subject Property and Surrounding band Use The subject property is currently developed with a plumbing supply store. To the north is an affordable apartment developments to the east is a mobile home park and medical centers to the south is an industrial user and to the west, across Placentia Avenue are industrial and multi -family uses. Background On December 8, 19B6, the City Council unanimously approved a General Plan Amendment and zone change involving the subject property and several surrounding properties. The GPA and zone change reclassified • • TO; Planning Commission - 3. all of the properties so as to permit multi -family development at 20 dwelling units per acre. In addition, the Council also approved a traffic study and density bonus for an affordable apartment develop- ment on the property immediately to the north of the subject property. The proposed development will be similar in design, architectural treatment and color so as to blend to the greatest extent possible with the previously approved development. Analysis The following sections describe the physical elements of the proposed development, discuss the request for a density bonus pursuant to State Law, the use of Community Development Block Crant Funds, the use of Section B Rental Assistance Certificates or Vouchers, project fees, and the traffic study before the Planning Commission. The following analysis of the physical characteristics of the proposed development is based upon the R-3 zoning standards. � C TO: Planning Commission - 4. • Project Characteristics Got Size: 38,411 sq.ft. - 0.88 acres !lumber of Units: Permitted: 17 (1 du per 2,178 sq.ft.) Proposed: 26 (1 du per 1,477 sq.ft.) Unit Size. 21 - 2 bdrm./1 bath @ 1900 sq.ft. 5 - 3 bdrm./2 bath @ 11,050 sq.ft. Setbacks: Required Proposed Front (15th St.) �20 ft.• 20 ft. building setback Sides: Northerly 4 ft. 5 ft. Southerly 4 ft. 26 ft. b 29 ft.-6 in. Rear 10 ft. 35 ft.-6 in. build.eetback 0 ft. carport setback Buildable Area: (lot area less setbacks): 32,4031 sq.ft. Gross Structural Area: Permitted: (3 x buildable area, excluding carports) 97,20W sq.ft. Proposed: (.70 x buildable area, excluding carports) 22,8221 sq.ft. (.87 x buildable area, including carports) 28,3511 sq.ft. Parking: Required: Provided: Building Height: Permitted: Proposed: 39 (1.5 per unit) 26 carports 13 open spaces 39 spaces Number of Stories: 2 Maximum Average 33 ft. 28 ft. 25t ft. 21 f ft. Section 20.16.045A of the Zoning Code requires a 20 foot setback unless otherwise indicated on the Districting Map. At the time this area was annexed into the City, no setbacks were established for this block. Front setbacks in other R-3 Dis- tricts in the City range from 0' (Balboa Peninsula) to 20' (Corona del Mar, Cliff Maven). The project conforms to all applicable development standards for the R-3 (2178) District, except for the requested density and modifica- tions which are discussed below. �_I TO Planning Commission - 5. Density Bonus Section 65915 of the California Government Code requires cities to grant a density bonus over the otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the applicable Zoning Ordinance and Land Use Element of the General Plan when a developer agrees to construct at least (1) 25 percent of the total units of a housing development for persons and families earning 120% or less of the area median income as established by a combined federal and state standard, or (2) 10 percent of thn total units of a housing development at the federal lower inco" standard for Section 8 assisted housing, or (3) 50 percent of the total units for senior citizens. The Government Code does not permit a city to deny any request for a density bonus of up to 25% for those additional dwelling units that meet at least one of the three criteria. Further, the Government Code permits a city to grant density bonuses in excess of 25• in instances where more than 25% of the units meet the prescribed affordability or age standards. In the case of this proposed development, the proposed zoi0 nq, N-3 (2178), permits one unit for each 2,178 sq.ft. of land arnn or 20 units per acre. Based upon 26 units and a .88 acre parcel, the appli- cant is requesting a density of 30 units per acre, or 1 dwelling unit for each t1,477 sq.ft. of lot area. The project, as proposed, will provide all 26 units affordable to lower income households as estab- lished by the federal standard for a period of 30 years. The af- fordability standards and time period will be established in an affordable housing agreement which will be recorded against the property. The proposed affordability criteria and number of afford- able units (100%) far exceeds the minimum State standards for granting a density bonus. Proposed Front and Rear Yard Encroachments As shown on the attached site plan, the applicant is proposing to construct three patio areas adjacent to Placentia Avenue which en- croach 5 feet into the required 20 foot front yard setback and are enclosed by 5 foot high fences. in accordance with Section 20.02.070 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, fences located in a required front yard setback may not exceed a height of 3 feet. The applicant is also proposing to construct three, second floor decks which encroach one foot into the required 20 foot front yard setback. Staff has no objections to the proposed patio fences and second floor deck encroachments, inasmuch as the encroachments are minor in nature and they will not block any views from adjoining properties. The applicant is also proposing to construct a six car carport and a trash enclosure which encroach 10 feet into the required 10 foot rear yard setback. Said carport will be approximately 55 feet long and will include a solid wall along the rear property line which will be 11 feet high to the top of the parapet. The proposed trash enclosure will include walls equal to the height of the proposed perimeter malls which will be 6 'feet high. Again, staff has no objections to the proposed encroachments inasmuch as they are minor in nature and they will not block views from adjoining properties. TO: Plangng Coassission - 6. 0 Prsposed Covered Pdrkin2 on the Front One -Half of the Lot in accordance with section 20.87.260 of the Municipal Code, covered parking spaces, located on the front one-half of a lot, are regsired to have side walls and an operating garage door. Its shown on the attached plans, the applicant is proposing to locate 1: covered parking spaces on the front one-half of the lot which do not have operating garage doors and side walls in every case. Staff has no objections to the proposed design inasmuch as the parking spaces are not highly visible from the public street. It is staff's further opinion that inasmuch as the subject project is an affordable housing project, the cost involved in providing garage doors and side walls on 15 of the 39 on -site parking spaces is not justified by any increased visual appeal that might result from the installation of garage doors. Community Development Block Grant Funds This site has been identified by the City Council aB Laving the p7tential for use of Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) to provide additional affordable housing units in the City. The City Council, at its meeting of July 27, 1987, is expected to approve the allocation of $350,000 of CDBG funds to this development. Since it is anticipated that CDbG funds will also be allocated to thin site, 100% of the units in this development will be required to be affordable at ra more than the HUD lower income standard. Requirements and con- ditions concerning the granting of CDBG funds will be established in a Grant Deed which will be recorded against the property. use of Section 8 Certificate or vouchers The applicant is also proposing to preferentially rent all of the proposed dwelling units in accordance with the section 8 rental assistance program using the fair market rent schedule established by HUD. This preferential rent program will be incorporated in the requirements of the affordable housing agreement. Under this require- ment, the entire 26 units will be preferentially rented to very low income tenants as established by federal standards. General Plan Housing Element The Housing Element of the General Plan sets forth the Horisinq Goals, Policies and objectives of the City. The City's established goals for housing are formulated around two concepts. First, the physical and visual character of the City's residential neighborhoods are the key to the provision of a quality living environment. Second, the City's housing stock must provide for the housing needs of all present and future residents of the City. In addition, Section 65302(c) of the California Government Code requires the Housing Element of all cities to ". . . make adequate provision for the housing needs of all econom- ic segments of the community." The specific goals of the City regard- ing the provision of housing for all economic segments of the City's population that pertain to the proposed development, as set forth in the Housing Element on page 142 are: to M PlannTng Commission - 7. "1. To provide a balanced community, with a variety of housing types and designs and housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community: very low and low income as well as moderate and upper income households. 2. To preserve and increase affordability, through rarital housing, for very low and low income households." The basic policies which describe the City's role in the attainment of affordable housing are: "1. Enabling private industry to function more effectively, as a result of constraints being eliminated, wharover feasible, and allowable density being increased. 2. Providing incentives and direct assistance to industry, within the limitations of available resources, to facilitate the provision of housing for very low, low, and moderate income households." various housing objectives were formulated and adopted to achieve the aforementioned goals in accordance with City housing policies. implementation plans and target dates for these housing objectives are also set forth in the Housing Element. Housing objective No. 7 (page 158) is: "To promote and assist in the development of housing for low and moderate income households." The implementation Plan for objec- tive No. 7 is set forth on page 161 of the Housing Element. The specific activities of the Implementation Plan that pertain to this development proposal are as follows: "a. The City shall continue to apply for and use its entitlement funds under the Community Development Block Grant program to facilitate the development and con- struction of housing for low and moderate income households. To the extent that developers and landown- ers are willing to cooperate in this endeavor, the highest priority for the use of these funds shall be for the development and construction of housing afford- able to "very low income" households. This may be accomplished by using the City's existing and future Community Development Block Grant funds for the acqui- sition of land for the development of housing for very low income households, or by "writing down" the cost of land for developers who have agreed to develop low and moderate income housing. In this regard, the Newport Beach Planning Department shall negotiate with the interested landowners and developers to determine the availability of appropriate vacant sites for potential acquisition as very low income housing sites." "c. The City shall continue to participate as a member of the OCHA Advisory Committee and work in cooperation with the Orange County Housing Authority to provide Section B Rental Housing Assistance to residents of the community...." 30 0 0 TO: Planning Commission - 8. 'e. The City Council shall have the discretion to review and waive planning and park fees for developments containing low and moderate income housing in propor- tion to the number of low and moderate income unite in the entire project." 'f. When a developer of housing agrees to construct at least 25 percent of the total units of a houninq development for persons and families of low and wxler- ate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, or 10 percent of the total units of e housing development for lower income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code, the City shall either (a) grant a density bonus or (b) provide other incentives of equivalent financial value, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 65915, at seq.' These housing programs, as set forth in the Housing Flamont, are designed to address the regional housing needs, as defined In Section 65584 of the Government Code, and as established by thn Southern California Association of Governments Regional Housing Allocation Model (SLAG-PIIAM). However, because of a wide variety or physical, environmental and fiscal constraints as described in the Iiousing Element, it is not possible for the City to satisfy all of it.n region- al need. Section 65583(b) of the California Government Code recogniz- es that meeting these regional housing needs may exceed available resources and the City's ability to satisfy these needs, and State Law permits the City to establish the maximum number of housing units that can be reasonably constructed, rehabilitated and conserved over a five-year period. Pursuant to Section 65583(b) of the Government Code, it is estimated that the City can provide 45 du's in the very low income category, 125 du's in the low income category, 432 du's in the moderate income category, and 2,025 du's in the upper income category during the five-year period, July 1, 1984, through July 1, 1989, through the completion of major residential projects (page 178 of the Housing Element). Approval, construction and occupancy of this development with 26 very low income units will contribute significant- ly towards meeting these established goals. Traffic Stud Approval of a Traffic Study prepared in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("Traffic Phasing ordinance") and City Council Policy S-1 ("Administrative Procedures for Implementing the Traffic Phasing ordinance") is required. The first step in preparing a Traffic Study is the identification of intersections which will be affected by the proposed development. The City Traffic Engineer has identified the following five intersections for analysis: �k TO: Plafkg Commission - 9. • 1. Placentia Avenue/Superior Avenue 2. Coast Highway/Balboa Boulevard -Superior Avenue J. Coast Highway/Prospect Street 4. Coast Highway/Orange Street 5. Coast Highway/Riverside Avenue An analysis was conducted to determine if one year from the completion of the project, the anticipated traffic volumes generated by the development plus existing volumes, anticipated regional growth and previously approved developments would generate one percent or more of the projected traffic volumes for each leg of those specific inter- sections during the 2.5 hour peak period. Based upon the one percent analysis contained in the Traffic Study (copy attached for review and consideration), it was found that the project traffic is estimated to be less than one percent of the 2.5 peak hour period volumes at each of the five intersections. Therefore, further analysis is not required and no specific mitigation measures are necessary. Waiver of Fees Park Dedication Fees. Inasmuch as there is no parcel map or tentative or final tract map necessary for this development, the developer is not required to contribute land or pay in -lieu fees for park dedica- tion. However, it should be noted that inasmuch as this project is to be affordable to very low income families, it is the City's policy to waive these fees (current park fees are $5,028.84 per unit, or $130,750). However, this development is providing on -site recreation facilities for the tenants and their children. Fair Share Contribution. Section 15.3B.110 of the Municipal Code waives fees for affordable residential housing, resulting in a re- duction in fees of an additional $14,339.78. PLANNI14G DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director By CTE SR2 Attachments: 1. vicinity Map. 2. Findings and Conditions of Approval for Traffic Study and Modification. 3. Resolution No. , recoarnending to the City Council approval of Density Bonus and Acceptance of the Environmental Document. 4. Traffic Study. 5. Negative Declaration. 6. Site Plan, Floor Plan, and Elevations. •4 ;� I;,� .•• p— 0 0 vvW 1T7 MAP 621 -- - t DISTRICTING MAP NEWPORT BEACH — CALIFORNIA WAN f&Wt HM7IwMl C-1 L1af/t CGr MAL •-t OV0,LIa 01,11c naL Lt11(sm CC+11 W., OW r-f lrsth wwwu Show•trot�t>aL -• rl1111 "wom1/s •.. wnw.s Ast}cts 1s1CLAW40 VIC 14.1s!! TRA"IC STd0Y WSIP&4TIAL CWVTlo EXHIBIT "A" FINDINGS AND CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR TRAFFIC STUDY AND MODIFICATION A. TRAFFIC STUDY: APPROVE T119 TRAFFIC STUDY MAKING THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS 1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak -hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Reach Municipal Code and City Policy S-1. 2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the proj- ect -generated traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic on any 'major,' 'primary -modified,' or 'primary' street. 3. That the Traffic Study indicates that tho proj- ect -generated traffic will not be greater than one percent of the existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of the critical intersections. B. MODIFICATION Findings: 1. That the proposed modification for the front and rear yard encroachments and to allow open carports on the front one-half of the lot will not under the circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and improve- ments in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and further that the proposed modi- fication is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. 2. That the proposed front and side yard encroach- ments are minor in nature and will not block views from adjoining properties. 3. That the open carports on the front one-half of the lot are not highly visible from the public street and inasmuch as the subject project is an affordable housing project, the cost involved in providing garage door and side wall on 15 of the 7v �4k 39 on -site parking spaces is not justifir.d by any increased visual appeal. Condition: 1. That the development conformance with the plans and elevations. CTB:jm S R20 - 2 - shall be in nubrtantial approved plot salmi, floor RLSCiUMON NO. A RESOUMON Or TM P'ISNNING lO MSSI0N or 7M CITY Or MZMPORT R CH RECOM MDIM TO TM CM COUNCIL APPROVAL or A DMM & Mvs AND TRY ACCEP'iAXCZ Or AN ENVIiti010IE "AL DOCUMfP WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach has adopted a Housing Element as part of its General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Housinq Llemant of the Newport Beach General Plan has established policies pertaining to the providing housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community; and WHEREAS, these policies include providing incentives within the limitation of available resources; and WHEREAS, the development of rental housing affordable to lower income persons and familia■ is a goal established in the Housing Element of the Newport beach General Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 65915 of the California Government code provides for approval of a density bonus for affordable housing developments; and WHEREAS, the Name Development Company development provide■ all 26 units as affordable units to lower Income persons and families for a period of thirty years; and WHEREAS, the proposed 26 units affordable to lower income persons and families will assist the city in achieving Its goal of providing housing for all income segments of the community; and WHEREAS, the number of units provided and the 10 year term of affordability justify the granting of a 50% density bonus; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study is complete and ham been prepared for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the State CEQA Guidelines, and city council Policy K-]; and WHEREAS, in order to reduce adverse impacts of the proposed project, all feasible mitigation measures discussed - 1 - -8- in the environmental document have been incorporated into the proposed projects WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the initial study in making its decision on the proposed development s and WHEREAS, based upon the information contained In the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project as mitigated will not have a significant effect on the environ- ment. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commis- sion of the City of Newport Beech recommends to the City council certification of the environmental document and approval of the density bonus subject to the following conditions: 1. That the development shall be insubstan- tial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plan, and elevations. 2. That the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement, approved as to form and content by the City Attorney and the Planning Director, quarantoeing that all 26 units of rental housing shall be constructed on the subject property. That all 26 units shall be made available on a preferential basis to persons and families possessing an "active* Section S Existing Rental Assistance certificate or Voucher and shall be rented at or below the Section 8 Fair Market Rent (FMR) Schedule for Newport Beach. When a Section 8 tenant does not occupy a unit, the unit shall be rented to persons and families earning a saximum income of no more than 80% of the median income for Newport Beach as determined by the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment at a rant which is no sore than 30% of thee maximum incase. Said Affordable Housing Agreement shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. The term of this agreement shall be for no less than thirty (30) years. 1. That a landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed construction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan). 2 e. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition- S. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source and to minimise light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Enginserr with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been mat. 6. That the number of off-street parking requirements of the cityy of Newport beach (as provided by the Municipal Code, 'Title 10, Chapter 20.30) be provided on -site. 7. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Tire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler protection. B. The Fire Department access shall be approved by the Tire Department. 9. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. ADOPTED this day of 1986, by trio following vote, to wit: AYES !lots ABSENT BY CHAIRMAN au SECRETARY CT92:NP\PCDSR193 t4li8 SEASIDE APARTMENTS III TPO Analysis Prepared for: CITY .OF NEWPORT BEACH Prepared by: Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. 1450 North Tustin Avenue, Suite 108 Santa Ana, California 92701 June 1. 1997 • elk .. SEASIDE APARTMENTS. PHASE III TPO Analysis The proposed apartment site is located on the east side of Placentia Avenue north of tith Street. The site currently hu a muffler shop and pipe company. The proposed development will consist of 26 apartment units. Figure I illustrates the location of the project site. and Figure Z illustrates the proposed site plan. Access to the proposed project will be provided by one entry/exit driveway located on Placentia Avenue approximately 5W feet north of 15th Street. Placentia is a four -lane street with a two-way left turn lane. Placentia Avenue provides access to Newport Blvd (SR -SS) via 17th Street and to Coast Highway via Superior Avenue. Appropriate trip generation rates` for the proposed land use were obtained from the City of Newport Beach trip generation rates. These trip generation rates are summarized as follows: • .. •AM PM MOM. • • ... N1 " MQ.I ... T A Apsrtmrits 26 Ou Trips/DU 0.1 o.3 0.18 0.4 0.2 0.6 Trip G~ffitlon 3 a 11 10 S is As the summary indicates, the proposed project will generate I trips in the AM peak hour and 15 trips in the PM peak hour. The trip generation was factored to obtain a peak 2.5 hour volume for the AM and PM peak hour periods. The peak 2.5 hour volumes were based on an estimated factor of 2.0 to account for the extension of the usual one -hour peak period. Credit for existing traffic generated at the project site was not necessary due to the low trip generation of the proposed project. �0 i Figure 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN qx tr RIMINI P M111 r•. Distribution of project generated traffic was derived from observed travel patterns in (he vicinity of the project site as well as from locations and levels of development in relation to the location of the proposed project. Approximately 45 percent of traffic entering and exiting the site will be oriented towards the north and will have no impact on the intersections tested. The general trip distribution is illustrated in Figure 3. The City of Newport Beach identified five intersections for analysis to determine the impact of the proposed development. These intersections are: Pacific Coast Highway/Orange Avenue Pacific Coast Highway/Prospect Avenue Pacific Coast Highway/Balboa-Superior Pacific Coast Highway/Riverside Superior Avenue/Placentia Avenue The 1987 peak 2.5 hour volumes as discussed in the previous section were provided for each intersection by the City staff. Since the project is expected to be completed in 1999. the ambient growth rate for regional arterials was applied to the existing 1987 volumes to reflect 19g9 traffic conditions. A growth rate of 2.5 percent was added to all volumes along Coast Highway west of Newport Blvd. A factor of one percent was added to all volumes along Coast Highway east of Newport Blvd. The peak 2.5 hour volumes of all approved projects, also provided by the City of Newport Beach, were added to the 1987 peak 2.5 hour volumes. The resulting volumes represent the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes prior to the addition of project traffic. One percent of the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes at each approach of each intersection was compared with the peak 2.5 hour distributed volumes from the proposed project. A summary of this comparison is shown in Table 1. If one percent of the 1999 peak 2.5 hour volumes of each approach were larger than the peak 2.5 hour project volumes. no further analyses were required. if project peak 2.5 hour 43 rt w 1aAe 1 sLWMI Of 1% A"LTSIS N4 PlOJECT PEA[ 2.5 WA VOLUMES (ESS TKU 3 Of l7�2 PK 2.5 NR YWm INTERSECT Pacific Coast "/0r~ 0 0 1 3 Yes Pacific Coast "/Prospect 0 0 1 3 let Pacific Coast Nwy/Balboa•Svperlor 0 3 1 0 yes Pacific Coast Nwy/Rivtrside 0 0 5 2 Yes Suptrior/Placentla 2 9 1 0 Yes PM ►ftoA cl PEAK 2.5 MA VOLUMES (ESS THAN 1% Of H INTERSECTION- MVHL Pacific Coast MNy/Orange 0 0 44 2 Yes Pacific Coast Mwy/Prospect 0 0 i 2 Yes Pacific Coast Mwy/#alboa•Superiot 0 2 S 0 Us Pacific Coast Mwy/illverside 0 0 3 6 Yes 7 6 4 0 Yes Superior/Placentia ` i • volumes were higher than one percent of the projected peak 2.5 hour volumes at any approach of each intersection. the intersection was `aaalyzed using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method. Comparison of the one percent of the peak 2.5 hour volumes with the project peak 2,5 hour volumes resulted in all intersections passing the one percent analysis. Further analysis is not required. The one percent analysis sheets are included in the Appendix. The proposed apartment development mould generate 11 trips during the AM peak hour and 15 trips during the FM peak hour. Five intersections were checked to determine the marginal impact of project traffic on the street system. All intersections passed the one percent analysis and required no further analysis. Therefore, the proposed apartment development has no marginal impact on the ICU's of the study intersections. 7 APPENDIX ONE PEOCENT ANALYSIS 0 24 • 0 ,, 12 Traffic V.,late fwilf0s letersettioo: Coos: ky ! Cringe St E::stln; Traffic Volutes bsel An Wri}lr ie::y Trhflit Ir:ntirl,yir.q E1 fit; Pei1 2 1;2 Hour Rpprctiet E.:ft:'3 Agicnil PrDJfctt F'�owtj l: AIr;�s::F. �filtit ::►�.S.L' rest 2 :!i hur Growth Poik 2 11: Hur Fall : 14 Fc,;( roil 2 1 s Mop• iei. J I/; loU' Wcl«? 7o:Uot Vblu.e •c:40- .':I"w VoLigt li; lmw l c±:; la. Mj! L' ::, irL)i:'. 'rsff:c .s ts(ttilif tt ci Itts thin ti :f I'r:;t:to: F-t• ; 1 N. r T•iFfl: volutt. iI��S;! •I:i1i .S fSt:riiE� t� iM Qti1;/• �i:i' 1� i� •rt)i:tiG •iy is:,r �fil•;; 4L:yi?. �r.t'Sr.:�u' C•L�: :. tlt:i.ietiSC iii r*at; rip. EL G; ,.is;. i. Asia.. :r.i. r2 IlL:. pia ii S% CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS MICROFILM DIVISION 9 e •% 11 Traffic Volust Aublysis i.,terst_tirn: Coast War + Ortrgt St E.ist:nq traffic loluses filed 01 Avenge biil-r Traffic fir+ter►Sorinq E1 PI, Eaistiay Fei$ 2 112 hor tppro4rc kegioul Prole::s Pr,)je•tFd it cf ;+;jetted Frc,f:t krra.ct Dire:ts Pee$ 2 1,12 Rur Ftii 2 1/:' d3v :ea$ 1 I!1 h"r Pei ; ;,: �v.+ .G.uf.i :alust VoIvu 7:, Ue6 .GI re 1G.::4 I Z. tt.tfa:*S 41.11. SCAM.:.F: • . 10! ._ . .. Q 0 20. ......-':..........__. Eis:U:,a. 474 • :Si s;se S-ii: 9.. i Fr,,ec, iriffic is estisite7 to 5e less th:a 11 of Fra;etted Fti. .;? Hour t•i{f;c Yolure. =•:;s:: :fri: s :itit�tr0 to �e fre�ter .tar, 1% 0. F'r�ift:e: jr�{iit 1oljfv. is.prStctie4 Ci:ie.t, .:........................................................................................................... ;tic. We OS1:,61V 41 Z6 11 traffic Voiuw Analrus Irtersectiop'. Coa4t Y+r # Eras;tct Are b istinq traffic Wages lasfd an Average Daily traffic Winter/Spring 17 AR Foal i 112 lfarr Approved Appru; f. E►is:izq Negionil Projects Projected IT of i'ro'ecttf Peal ww.r F'role(t Peal Jirt;:jai peal 2 112 Kour firortA Peak 2 112 Fr r Ptak 2 1/2 Hour 2 11) 2 112 Awf Voluse Volune Valeet Valutze 14.nrr Vc1611 Mo►ttrJaua; !1r 0 C 171 0 C.CLttt-,ul t :I. 4 1.4V f 0 f,;;;a.r d :6:4 IS: M3 b&',,3 bt t f1 to[ ••7J I . ira)t:t iraifit c; eftlrateJ tc Ot lE;s ttau lT ;f �rt�ettea 'real : 11: Nov, traffic Volm, :rctect *";II[ Is tstllatee tcc bf .•N:er :M- i2 of fr�:t:tt: ;jai i roi,• irililc Val,,m. ifhfiect;:f Ca:a:tit :l:I�ittl:-. ;.�.,.' Arih sts 3s reculreo. i M. ? c ci1.. Gt., i4a rii�:s ir: .ak. Drte 0512M?e r II Traffic lhlu" AuIvsis Ir:ersn a en: {rust I., # F•tissct A+E ialstlnG tr;{;3c eta ures 5;sfi ;,� a.e+;fit D.I�r �r.IFI; Ylnt!►l.prlry ZF pf Fes.: il: Rt,rr A;;rt.fS E,istira ;tisc�;: F►pJf'ti FfQjetie: r,1 FrUle.tf: F►srett .3►; a :.', rt.: !r? =tur 6►2rtb Fe;i .1: L:. FE;I 7 1.. Hc.► ieil Ill ►`1r' F►;1 : I1: H,;► �CItea iG.6F. 'rL1jet 7::�fi 7 r� f�S'.LL.LS '.313 i:' ii. let. I -- ;rG icI i►iN it IS fi:3:itE3 :fl r. .ei3 11;• i. ;F I•'71l:ti3 Ftt3 : H"ur •,•i... Y.16At . z 8 r: ir, N E 'i i:..:i:t: :5 I 'f�:i• 'r.;f LI tvI 'Psi � +�.r i•+•+.. .u.�{d. �f•�.f'Si::.. ,I:t:i'. .:.1�1J:.. .. .. u•itS i4r3►i i. ii.c. �.tf `.'7a•3i It Traffic Volume Analysis Intersectiv: Coast J61 1 16302 Avi/Supwicr AYe Existing Traffic Volumes 14wd an Average 04ily Traffic Yioter/Sp►ing 87 AA Peak 2 1/2 flour ApPrared 4v oac► Existing Regional Projects Praje•tei 11 of Projected Project Oire:ticr. Peak ? 1!? Hoar 6roMlh Peak 2 1/1 Hcur Peak 2 1/2 Out Peak 2 112 Hcar Peai 2 Ili fox, Volume Valuae VGIWe Va;Ufe Vclvee Volua1 r,rthtoucc 1677 0 a ISE3 1; 0 Sa�ttsauu� ;37L 0 it 1392 14 Eattbcun! 07 256 103i i685 77 1 rIit6:and ................................................................................................................. IM 76 740 2715 21 0 Project Traffic is estimated to be fits t►+:l, 11 of Proje:ted Pea, 2 112 Hftr Traffic Volume. pro)kct irafflc is Istimata. to be Treater ;hel it of fro wtec Feat 7 112 Hr#ur Traffic Volust. It.trsec:ti:n S.p:c:ti a 0itatI r II.C.J.I Ar-alysis is reiuiref. ?::«ECI: EcAwIiE A=aRTME:STS f:.l CCUPAKI '011. 1465 listin•ku:l Assoc., Irc. Ca1c. Hale 0:/20181 l �— a It Traffic Volutt Analfsts Intersection: Cosit 41.! ! WIDoa ArelSu�erlor AV# [Tistsng Traffic VOILNS Eased oa Average 01ly Traffic 1liater/SOriaq 81 F-9 Peak 2 11; Flour A;;roved :s•o:a 'xsstinq Regional Projects Prcjected 11 sl Frc ected Prole:t 2,r.ttscl Peat 2 11? Haur 6rortR fell 7 112 Hour Fs:k 2 Ili Haut NO2 11kykr Peal :Ili Fair Volute volute Value# valuff valur-e Volta~ Ncrthbo.W 1861 0 47 I S 11 6 SciMou"d s75i 0 178 39;•6 39 [astbour'. 4734 IS2 997 5M' t; 4 KwIOD.:: 4734 M 1031, 6060 tl Prclect Traffic is tsticatec to be less tn:r 11 of Projected Ftai 2 112 Hour Tralfsc Volute. Pralcct 1r:Iltc Is W is:ttd to ba irc:ta• tea'• .1 sf vrolecte4 Feat 7 112 Hour Traffic Volute, If ersectson .a;w. is ttili.ah v 11.r.U,I anal)s:s :s reg61reC. At stir -Foist Assoc.. Inc. 0 talc. Wte 05/28/37 3 It Traffic VoTlue Analysis Intersections Coast Oy Q Riverside Fit ix. stirq Traffic Voi usesgated on Average Daily traffic KinterlSpring 87 An fell 2 112 Hour 4;rcve3 ::3r�. a E:Is:sng hilabil Projects 13 of F+a�Fcted Prolrct ..tirectio' Feat : 1,2 F;,-r e-DON Peal 2 112 Hour PFaI 2 I!: d: ✓ Its. 2 I11 Htur Fes' 2 112 {our ........................................................................................................_....... '01LIO Volim V41use VDtYac 1121tit Vo;wt Rr,!tAt;3ur.S N 0 3+ :.2 1 C :: .tl�co:nt 841 472 4t: IL Q .--__ Eistbcund 5741 9; 1161 AM 7.y ' . 1., kistb3uric 335i 54 1071 447; 4; 2 Prc)ict Traffic is estlaale3 to be less tA.n 11 of Pro)attc Feal 2 11: Four Traffic Vo1u&e. F-3;act Tr,fiic i$ ►sullies V. t,Q WWI' tray 11 tf 'TDWW' 1 : ww, 'ral-IC S vl;. ltttrwtl.,n CJp&:1!v ttlii:/:lt' Ar..Irsss 1; fe,.j1rj4. Fi::E:i. SEA:1U. G=-RillEhiS FUt. MOAF:i rEAai 1+84 Inc. Calc. Date 01123187 I V 11 Traffic Volaot Analysis lnttrsection: WO Hrr ft RiVrrside Ave Existing Traffic Volutes Said Ea Average Daily Traffic Winter/Wing 87 PH Peal 2 112 Hour Approved Aa;roacl Esistir.9 Regicaal Projects Froircted 1I of Pro etted Project Direction Peak 2 112 Hour Sro.tn Peak 2 112 Nrur Peak 2 112 Hour Peak 2 lf� Hour Peat 2 11I rover Voluse Vol+ite Volute Voluak Voluee VON%# Nu Mour l 61 0 0 61 1 C Scittbou-►t 1747 0 103 1350 14 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastboind 5217 83 IU S 6665 V ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mest6cant 5936 9: 1371 7300 73 t ==j Proje:t Traffic is estleatai to be less than it tf Projected Peak 2 117 hour Traiflc Voiuet. Project iraff:t is Estieate6 to oe yyrsater thin t1 of Projected Peas 2 1/2 Hour 1r O IC iolurt. Intersectian caiatitl utilisation II.C.0.1 Aaalrs:s :s required. RVEM. Ho"ME AIAMENTS FULL OCCLPA4C( 'EAR: 1939 Austin -Rust Assoc., Inc. Cast. Gate 05426/1715 It Traffic Volume hulysis Intersection: Superigr Are ff f1westia Arr Existing Traffic Volumes Used an Average Saily Traffic ftimterlSprsng 67 PP Peal 2 112 Hour Approved Apprw h Eiictiq Regional Projects Projected 11 of frolecte: Prole;t Dfr n tsar fei� 2 112 dour Srorth Peat i 112 Nov Peat 2 !/2 flour Peak 2 11 Hour 'eak 2 112 Nair Volume Volume Volumi 7oluse Volusa Viluse NorOU4114 981 0 :149 1220 112 7 S�uthSound VIS 0 b1 1779 le 6 ................................................................................................................. Eastbm'nd 1813 0 l24 1935 19 ; Mcsttiscnd M1 0 21. 2245 72 0 Pro)ect Traffic :s estimated to be iess than 11 tf Projected frat 2 11; h m Traffic Volume. Prclect Iriffic ss estimated to be Create, tf.a* 11 of fr:jests: ffal 7 112 Hwr Traalic Voluu. Interse.tior Zicac:ty V00atiw, fI.C.U.1 fnalrsls is required. F;NF%'fs SiIS1DE A"Ap RDIS FM L':il"Cru YEAR: 1939 Austin4mit Assoc., Inc. Caic. ;ate 0512931 l� II traffic Valuae Analysis Intersection: Sulerigr Are ! Plac111W Ave iristtag Traffic Voluats kstd an Average laily Traffic 1linterlS9ring 87 AN Peal 2 112 Hour Approved ATAroach Existing Regional Projects Frojected 11 of Pro}}ecte� Project ::rection Peal 2 112 Hour Growth Ptak 7 I12 Hour Ptak 2 112 Hour Peal 2 111 H,x,r Pea:' 7 112 Hcur Volume Volume Volute Vo:ust Va"Oute Valur,a s3rttLa.,nd 623 0 67 752 U 2 Scuttto►nd 1179 0 51 12:8 17 9 EastLaind :01SE 0 2; MI. I; 1 itesltou.d 578 0 85 68: 1.4 zi> Prolf:t 'raffic is estimated to be less thin ii of Projected PFaI 2 I.: Hour Traffic Volute. Pry e:t Traffic is ettia.ted to ti - neater than 3 Of Frcle: W F W : 1:'. `4,u► Tralfic Volute. I -I m sector capicW. Util:iatioa i1.C.".; "rilys:s ,s required. K3;H's 5EAS'S' AFAZTrl=1TS F11:! CCCUFACY tEAR: 1c'f+ Astir.-Faist Assx., :nc. Calc. Date OS1211107 s� • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 9265"915 NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO: Office of Planning and Research Q 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Sacramento, CA 95814 County Clerk of the County X of Orange P.Q. Box 838 Santa Ana, CA 92702 FROM: Planniiul Department City of Unwport Beach P.O. Box 1760 Newport bo ach, CA 92658-8915 NAME OF PROJECT -.Mesa Affordable Apartm nts IV Residential Dlyr,141t7 Waus, Traffic 5t PROJECT LOCATION: 1538 Placentia Avenue, Newport Beach, Californln PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Constrdction of a twenty-six (26) unit "iowur" income apartment de- velopment which includes a fifty percent (50►) density bonus. The term to last for a minimum of thirty (30) years in regards to affordability. The project includes the use FINDING: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy K-3 pertaining to procedures and guidelines to implement the California Environmental quality Act, the Environmental Affairs Committee has evaluated the proposed project and determined that'.the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. MITIGATION MEASURES:please see the attached sheets. INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: The City of Newport Beach INITIAL STUDY AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING: 'Pit Environmental Coordinator DATE:11 June 1907 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach 0 .0 • �PPt�1Q}IX I FXVItCWWAL CHEMIST TOR" Lnviromestal geckiist fors (To Be Completed ft lead Agency) I. Background 1. Itow of Proponent 2. Address and phone Lumber of Proponent 2925 r, e Costa M90a, California 1714) ,979-99_ 91 3. Date Of Checklist Submissiaa 11 June 1987 ;. Agesey Requiring Checklist The City of NCW&4t 112ach s. Mass of rtoposal. it applicable . Mesa Affordably Apartments IV it. environmental Impacts (Lxplanations of all "yes" and "saybe" answers are rc;uired on attached sheets.) 1. Barth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in reolo;ic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacement$, cor paction or overcovering of the sail? C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction. covering or sodi— 'fication of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any ineresse in wind or water erosion of soils. either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands. or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which ■ay modify the channel of a river or strea■ or thh bed of the ocean or any bay. islet or 1061 M ern �a Y 73 s�i • YES MAYBE no it. Expo!.urc of people or property to geological hazards such as earth- quakes, landslides „ mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deteri- oration of ambient air quality? b. the creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? a. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cutK or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 74 G, L+ S , • �. r.n. r46 YES MAYBE to 4. Plant Life. W"' the proposal result in: as Change in the diversity of species. or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? — �- b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rare or endangered speies Of plants? c. Introduction of new species of in barrier Plants into an area, or a to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction is acreage of say / agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: A. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals land animals including reptiles, . (birds, fish and shellfish, benthic orRanisms, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any uniques Animal$? rare or endangered species of C. introduction of new species of ani— mals into an area, or result in a or movement _ / barrier to the migration of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? bs Boise. Will the proposal result in: • a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Li ht and Clare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? it. Land Use. will the proposal result in a au atantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 75 (,I 34 YFS 9. Mstural Resources. win the proposal result a. Increase in the rate of use of guy natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nou- renewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk o an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including. but not Limited to, oil, pesticides, Chemicals or radiation) in the event of on accident or upset conditions? 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Rousing Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Ceneration of substantial additional vehicular move wnt? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parkins? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systeos? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or wovenent of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazardous to rotor vehicles. bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an eff=ct upon, or result in a need for new or altered Rovernmental services in any of the folle wing areas: PAYR[ no n 76 le ;— Ftt-2A:24 2 VIf MAYtt MO a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? C. schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? a. Maintenance of public facilitiso, imcludiag roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Will the proposal result im: a. Use of substantial amounts of fwl or energy? b. substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy. or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. utilities. Vill the proposal result is a mead for new systems, or substantial " alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? C. Weter? t. sewer or septic tanks? a. Storm +rater drainage?, f. solid waste and disposal? 17. Duman Health. Will the proposal result in: a. creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result is the abs�trvcttii o'm of say scenic Yiata or view apes to the public, or will the proposal result is the creation of an aesthetically offensive site ores to public view? M YATK R! 19. Recreatiom. Will the proposal result n an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Arcbeological %istar ical. Will Or proposal remelt in am alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. Maodat limdi s of li ifitaucs. a. Goes the, project have the potential to dstrsda tbs quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below sell -sustaining levels. threaten to aliniwate a plant or animal-eorlunity. reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare of endangered plant or saimal or sliniaste important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve abort -term, to the disadvantage ' of longs -term, environmental goals? (d abort -term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively swall, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. loss the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on huwin beings, directly indirectly? either or III. Discussion of Environmental tvaluation IV. neterminst ion (To be sompleted by the Lead Agency) 76 E on the basis of this initial etelvatios: 0 I find tbat the proposed project COOLA Wr bare a significant effect sa the envitonseot. and a RCATIVI NCLARATIO14 will be prepared. ® I furl that alt%cmgb the propaed prajact could ."Ve a sissificaat effect OR the eawiromeat. there will abt be a sippificast•effect ip tbia CS" because the ■itigatioa a � srr a described C p�CU�se att&cWW ahest have bee■ anted to the project. ICM will be 1"MrOd - Ib 0 I find the proper Waject WAY bare a significant affect an the eastiromeat. aid as =vEMMMAL UVACt WORT is ragrirad. 11 June 1987 Date (1ba: this is only initial rdieseated ) form. their oft Raw.. �M E�. For The CLty of jinwpgrt Public asewcies are free to dwise 79 MESA Af'P'ORDABLE APARTHERTS IV RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS, TRAFFIC STUDY 2b. The proposal may result in the creation of objectionable odors during the course of construction due to the con- struction materials and methods. Such effects shell be eliminated upon completion of the project and are, there- fore, insignificant. 4a. The proposed project will result in a change in the diver- sity and number of species of plantn upon the site. The proposal shall result in an increase in the variety and numbers of plant life on -site, and, upon compliance with mitigation measures the effects shall be insignificant. 6a. Implementation of the proposal shall result in temporary increases in existing noise levels during the course of construction. They shall be alleviated upon completion, and no significant effects are anticipated. 7. The proposed project will produce new light and glare, yet the effects shall not significantly effect neighboring residences upon compliance with mitigation measures incor- porated into the project. 8. Implementation of the proposal shall result in a substantial alteration of the present (retail and service commercial "pipe" outlet) land use. However, the present use is a legal, non -conforming use. The proposed change would be to a use conforming to both the municipal planning documents and to the exhibited trend in area land useage. As a result, this effect is insignificant. 14/14a. Implementation of the proposal may have an effect upon, or result in a need for fire protection. Upon compliance with mitigation measures however, these effects shall be reduced to a level of insignificance. . U %' MITIGATION MEASURES 1. 4a. That a landscape and irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed con- struction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan). 2. 4a. That landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall ho regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 3. 7. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conchal the light source and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 4. 13b. That the number of parking spaces required by the off-street parking requirements of the City of Newport Beach (as provided by the Municipal Code, Title 20, Chapter 20.30) be provided on -site. S. 14/14a. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler protection. 6. 14/14a. The Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 8. 18. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from Adjacent properties. Rare tiesa pevelomen ..r P � Les CDBG New Oonstruction fiYY-�iM� \ s/w.. 'this review fora is $ol{ Ion, for "cat cal acalwi—.- eea 24 Cn ?art ATTAMMENT 6 5a.35 is anUcabls. it is PA" of the rerlty fora for 'anrircooDStal aaseesaaat• sat consultation Midcca■eata l�a= W90 - aes�a aas7 by ity►ias Statutory tasad 1pplioable fecesaart Mitiptioo d t oteelmses date a� Regulations so And x"Murse rpta Fi* iapact To completed tpplicable p;atraaiisonpe�•s2 ire project Or Mid I prM �joa ViiLtahcnbrief anawra to ticas on reveres side of �, Eiatorio prtsertatioa Site visit and records c ec . Indicates 36 cn W (6+��9)( x No impact to historic resources 2. noodnasar(d( Protection Z.O. 11968 i V= x On coastal plain, not within flood pla ns Rasa. 43'M 6030(2-10-79) shown on Flood Ins. Ma 3, vat-Lands Prateotion Site is on elevated coasts plain, no 7W aeculatioas X wetlands observed. 43 M 6030 (2-10-78) L. caastai Zoo. Act (section 307(c)) X Project s consistent w oca coos plans and City's General Plan, Craig 1 i5 CPR Part 930 Bluell Planning. (1-25-79) 5. sole Source ►aquifers 11 w{ r Gp t- a t UC66a �lbirstl?A�hinSiiE�'js1Z�st151`n11IC� t Lo CPR Part 1L2 (1-20-76) for recharge purposes. 6. a-Aamemd species This section of newport Beach i, Ident 5o CPRQPan Lot X ified as an urban area without any en- 7. wild k Scenic Miter Site is not within a river draingage Proteotica iot x (section 7(a)) area (CEq HMO. 5-10-80) 8. fir Quality Protection Increase is incremental and dnticipdt 40 CPA Pars 51 (M's) x in local regional and State Projectio S. dentified. 9. Project will conform with HUD staadardas X noise standards. No point sources i- 2L CPR 51- as Aaended) dentified by site visit. a. %oiee (Subpart 3. Pjbliwwd 7-12-79 x improvements W111 not attect b. Tout/chef. 3uards CPD Letter - a, apset Hazards sub- No potential risk identified, Appro- part C. Proposed x ri struction methodology will �elfii�. gulf 8-19-8o) Eued on %be antiromectal rater f1RdLc s oe+erius the abars factors it is detemiaed that Lisa cited project is subject tol Q i fiadLag that 24 Cn part 56.34(a)(10) is applicable and the project qualifioa as sn ogxmagticn" and ao further m iron aatal review, notices or olearaaesa are required, orl f l firAias that 2L Cn Part 58.35(b) is applicable and a Raqueat For Relsaas 0f Puma public notice sad related certification elaas>tms is requirtd. Mlti4pLuon measurse art identified. DMrousental Specialist Date ` 5uperrisory awriramontal Officer Date 7-7-917 &I 11 Environmental Assessment Checklist Pam t 141iJect Name and Identification No. Mesa Develoin"ut. x.t 1 3 4 11 8 7 !� �� fluurre or Ik�rumrntallon Utiuta dale of rontart or a �I WKa raferrncel Additkmal mairrlal may be Impact Categorics •� awch«!. Land DeMopmeni Confornunre With Comprehenanr Fulfills local anrf rrrjiunal housing goal Plans andZaning X s consistent with City': General Plan Xir<()r zoning nr�7115c',rt.i�,n5 (not Compatiblllty sod Urban Impact X ompatible with adjacent developments of ike size and style. Project immediately est is 21 units by same developer. sl(JIM iegligible slope. No impacts associated X ith grading. Etvatorr K ully urbanized surroundings; project mus follow City of Newport Beach erosion cont rading procedures during construction. Soil Suitability oils test of the site are required prior X o construction. Soils in the area are enerally suitable for construction. Hammis and NuMncn.I Nulsancea.IncludlnK j( io chemical or fire related hazards are Site safety anticipated. City Building Codes and Sa construction methodology will be followed Energy Consumplion X emY� 9 Incremental only. No significant or un- le xpected demand anticipated. Notre I Effects of Ambient Nalse on Project and Project design will comply with all appli ConitibutlontoCum• X cable NIiD/CDBG Noise Standards. munity Nose I^rls Osignificant) are required to impliment the project as proposed. These modifications include minor yard encrochments and open carports (for further detail, uce the Manning Commission agenda item of July 9, 1987). of VI 27 a BnvironmentW Assessment Checklist tcontinued, pale 21 Project Name and Identification No. Mesa Development Nd 1 3 4 6 8 77 t9 Source or Documentation ;7 {!M Wwe a.1e or contact Or page reference) Adddon.l mated..) may be Impact Categories �P� attached. Air QuaSty EffectaofAmblentAir Small incremental effect only. Addition Quality on Project and Contribution to Com• X units is anticipated in regional ro ectio p g p j muniy Pollution tomis rmssronmenuu uesun ano rnstone values t %Uual Quallty— Coherence,Diversity. Compatible and similar to adjacent develop Compatible Use, and X men ts. Project is adjacent to similar scale project built by same developer Historic. Cull ural, No resources identified in immediate area, andArchacaioglcal X Resoumes socsoecona m Ic I f S. Waphici nwcterChaa Changes Character C Character X Incremental change. Insignif�lcant within urban context. Displacement The site is currently occupied by a pipe X supply company. no residences are on site Pipe company will be dispiaced. Appropriat Employment and IncomePattems 7. Sma ncrement on y. u ure res dents art expected to be local and/or local region. Community Factllues and Semices I Educational Facilities June 30 confirmed that Newport -Mesa Uni f i e X School District collects developer fees on residential and commercial projects. fees Commercial Facilities OUVVV X Project is within urban framework currentl served by a large variety of commercial tlealtnt are Project is within urban framework and a - X jacent to regional health care services(Ho Complex) currently providing services. socwservlcea X Project is adjacent to bus nes an a equ close to major social services within Oran County. zoning ant l Itigate an. impacts. I tely e Ir 2E Environmental Assessment ChecUst 1rontinued. page 31 i'Mect Name and Identification No. llesa Developnent a4 1 Z 3 4 6 6 7 t4' Source or @ocu►nentatk►n lNote date of contact or page reference) , Additk►nal malarial may l►r Impact Categories ,�° �� attached. Community Facillllea and ScnM WW Waata z Waste Chafer x Incremental increase in service demand anticipated in local and regional service planning. Plannlnq bepartment-Advance Pla n same as above 51txm►ti'aler X same as above. Waler supply X same as above Public Safety Police X same as above Fire K same as above Linetgenry AFedical x same as above Open L43co Space space sad leeaeation X same as above Ftccreat wn X same as above F'acilillea x same as above err Transportation ncremen a increase.Insignificant to X ocal circulation/arterial system. Consi - ant with General Plan Circulation Eiefnen . Environmental Asse8siv lent Checklist Icontitwrd. Irapp AI 11rojeci Name and Identification No. ltesa Development ra 1 Z 3 4 5 6 7 d 0, tfource or Doc.umentadon (Note date of contart or page reference) cP Additional malaria! may be lmi�art (:ategat•ies �° �' y' attached. Natural reatures Water Resources x !lone present Sutlarel►'aler x Hone present Flwdplains x Hone present as indicated on Flood Insurance Naps. %Vr.11a11di x Hot located in a wetland. coastal %eme Project is consistent with Local Coast 1 x Program and City's General Plan. Unique Natural Featutcsand x tlone present Agneultural Linda Vegetation and ►►'ile!life x Hone present n Environmental Asms ment Checklist 4 Iwntinued. pales) Summary of Findings and Conclusions: the project is_a small infill development in an area long ago co urhati— deveiopment. Any impacts associated with the project are insignificant incrrrmental impacts on the urban system currently in place, Summary of Environmental CorldhionS: The project is a logical extension of urban -type development which will pr(aldg infill consistent with the existiagr Project 1<lodifications and Alternatives Considered: The project is consistent with area development, th z ni ' could be eSe-wj, andlor assistance. The positive_b2nefit of this alternative is that it will "rnyidP__ additinnal affnrdahle hnusing to as4ict in nipetinq the ritylt�g go,02 IhQ alternative is to withdraw CDBG support, in which case the project might ec in virtually the jame way uOder curr nt citygtandards_ . . ........... I Environmental Assessment Checklist faint fnuml, {me 8t Addkional Studies Performed (.Attach Study or Summary) Mitigation ,Sfeawureq Needed: None required 1 `� Environmental Assesonent Checlfflst IcanUnuW, pw ,n t. Is project in compliance with applicable laws and ".,gulations? U Yes ❑ No z. I.r an EIS mquired? ❑ Yes K} No I A Finding of No Significant Impact IFONSII can be made. Project will nol significantly affect the quality of the human environment. O Yes ❑ No I'mpared by Title Robert Balen and Carollyn Lobell, LSA Associates, Inc. Craig Rliwll. Planning Departments City,of fiewport Beach Date �r 33 rI CITY OF t1ENPORT BEACH 0 A71rACHX0iT 7 Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department 0 TO: Mayor and City Council FRO14: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Director SUBJECT: POTENTIAL M111I PARK DEVELOPMENT, 15th and PLACENIIA AREA Recommendation: April 27, 1987 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 110. E—M4�) Recognize the deficiency in the area and wait for normal development of the West Newport Oil Company property which will provide a number of park opportunities if the Implementation Plan of the Recreation and Open Space Element of the General Plan is followed. Background: At the City Council meeting of December 8, 1986, the question of park and open space in the subject area was discussed. Upon reviewing this matter, it has been determined that the only vacant land that could be used for small park tot lot purposes is the 1/2 acre parcel identified as Lot 20 on the. attached map. This location is accessible to a number of new condominium developments in the area and from the back side of Newport Crest. It can be reached off of Monrovia Street onto Halyard or through the property at 1455 Superior. It is surrounded by a chain link fence and most of the property is asphalt paved. In addition, the City Council at their meeting of February 9, 1987 requested that this review include an analysis of the former Banning Ranch property as it relates to our Recreation and Open Space Element of the Genral Plan. Discussion: The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission, at their meeting of April 7, 1987, extensively reviewed the park opportunities in the Upper west Newport area. After careful deliberation the Commission unanimously voted to transmit the above recommendation as one that is economically the only feasible alterna- tive. Other alternatives considered by the Commission were: 1. Request authorization from the City Council to negotiate public acquisition of the 1/2 acre Rawlins property and develop mini park. Anticipated cost to be $500,000. $350,000 for acquisition and 5150,000 for development. See Attachment "A". 2. Pursue acquisition of property in the West Newport Oil Company property (Banning) to develop a community park that will serve the entire Upper hest Newport residential developments. See attached letter that outlines this concept (Attachment "B"). JU The staff and Commission have reviewed a number of alternatives and have found that time and new residential development is the solution to this park deficient area. 0 1 «til yy too , • 1 Ii ;N \. J. 1 ORANGE COLtO'Y \ '•.,•% .•`\\44-00 r 41 i3Q � 1 tH t��• . a. '�' os wtVP �.•�r/ � 1 1 Y I —'"_1�.�7n:�i:"if is w ��CL�J�� 1�� OVQ `�W 1K10 ✓ '•. j a Ups r u c`Mal n :FtNINSAA 7�'�„ b NEWPORT Piro 1 E�ti �1I N&vport G M �7 Recreation and .Open Space Element SERVICE AREA 1 Lm ® RECREATIori Lkmvsx. UP N(106-401161002 rA"n "r Col•r.'O"1 r Olin,( Cr YrEw r•"t rP lCNOgs! !C to PL1©LIC BEACH r� 0 OPEU SPACE IM(A N(NIWT I(ACR IC0044AI n(,E"1( �■ CMINK r Cs MISINCTEo ACCESS i; © EXISTING o PROPOSED i PnoPOSEo r*(uu tocArlo" WU it 09T(w.•40 ". s"NstIM"Tr� rn sk rwo SERVICE AREA BOUiDARCUM EAUT 15 IF, :-:NTN� TRACT c, j .�[0s' ,,T -1 DD TO ;- -" l"for 32 r114?Ac.�e' for for l,r 7 ------------------------ fRoircr 0l1.Jr r."Ar. for pia tar 1 lei, C- - Of cor s/s N0." 11018 t01 40 zt y R • • 1.ts AC. h�\ NE!%PORT MESA TRACT �.• _ _ P� 02 S t 73 FiR r Q . S / 9 S 00. TO NFIS'PORT MfSA TRACT At. 6 61 NOTE AS5E.S0lt'S . eloC+c d TRACr—#0,v10172. . A Al. 454-35 36 A�. PAi;CEI NU►WAS BUOK, •At<toj TTRACT ND, 10AI.AC 410-II, SPIOwN IN CiaCLES COUNtr Of O+ANGf it R.ECT Na!-l10/8•••• •--- l.M. 492-2J,24,75 "t•t t.. :•.. r.'. wd•`• �"., • Ht'.. •r. t•-i. •L f"' ..lt .'1 -lti•. N . • ATTACHMEUT '.B" • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKS. IitEACIIESA14D RECREATION DEVAft'I'�li�:NT P.O. MIN iIFLA. NE%V 111)R UGACII. Crl;il658-991.1 `f 41644.3ia3 March 27, 1987 Mr. David Heisch Urban Assist 3151 Airway, Bldg. A-2 Costa Mesa, CA. 92627 Dear David: As discussed with you on the phone, I have been doing an anaiy;is of pars; acquisition and development possibilities in the West liewpnrt Brea above Coast Highway. This area has been identified in our Recreation and Open Space Element of the General Plan as highly deficient in part: facilities available to the community. Specifically, I have been locking at the recently annexed triangle that is in the Superior Avenue, 15th street location. In this review, it became desirable to project and consider what future residential development would occur on the West tlewport Oil Company property. Alternatives can be perceived that might satisfy the entire area from a park requirement standpoint. Understanding that it might be sometime before the vacant property is residentially developed, the possibility of advance dedication or some form of public acquisition with credits given has been discusses) at the staff level to accelerate a public improvement to solve current park deficiencies. Your reaction to this matter or an opportunity to meet and discuss alternatives would be appreciated. Thanks for your consideration on this subject and if there are any questions, please feel free to call. Cordially, Ronald A. Whitley Director �Znll �['�a�.rt,n�• "nttln��e�w� �th�t�nnw• 11��!n1h JC0 0 CITY OF PORT COMM WhIsm )ANR\h , \10`1 �_ W&.; a.rtt tl_ Isel BEACH "sorts Svp+rior AaAatlan,a, fnc, Ia17S Gnldrnwal &free[ Vestalnetrr, CA !/,dI Ito& ion a Motion was Ydf to schefmle a ►edit All Afrs tangly ea Ike folesnllA for of 11. tit?, as germane44•4. a. &afgfl Irow ►at$., A..tAaa aM ISthiplatnts f.I[feat tnw Utreelwt 1.111411f MUMAL Milli ►fi M t1l ►A#1 6tYfll.fimtorl. ISI% 4a4 (6�) Ila[aatta area, eta prrarnlyd. Ca-M it !,Jebel fl„e..er l.fellsd to it* = Attsehmd fa fh► 40jort report aatIll 04 f.rl.afi,,n serf rjv's !fate tlewenI. and atafe.i tl,.t Ihele ate eo'Hn garis :oath of rr,lfl, r-nsel ilgbvat, fra" Is Inl a .n,.ple of vtry ►ari., ref a 1cton1161 0,40 . rryabtnatlon of N fin la the fwt,tle, &fir stated that ale ferlt the aflojellion of the three 7r fC+ r Into Mltlnnrd In ttM fvpoft rvald ►e verT I.elpfvl In ■o aloA Ibat is ILensins frna en InAuetfle!-te+wet[t�l to a lwatlon f.,f hl&r••f.oaitf. low-tne.v. bewails, If- stated it t,. het 11.4f ll.e tfrnd It, this Meata 4 rill f.,ne lwn. t,• !r•rlt•s t1ah-40!ellt h...,elnl, end ietea.e t"f ere Ides derelap.d so Itw-Ifcamo 134ttl at dr.ille-ro, let Palk foes are Aetna welrr4 p•cf.aer,f 1� City otdtr-anr*. C9nH{w�t11. 11..1. le nn orr7Tlrntt/ 11 el sit sc+. 11pe of p61, fund. She ett►.1 a /er if Ihr tr•ae frl.nt lt•r-1M1t tnw fflelCpMlt s, .a,.1.11• fall foot rate rllrrd t+t s silaai.I• ..•.wnt. snd 4tatad aAa +wsu:d ill• Ihs urea, leaches and tatTutton CGa+elVinn to tote another loot at thrlt t Hn I,r lecteatio/ and C."a Spero If- trfae ,.f the tri+ of fereloSe•nt Ilat la L. rut ins In 11'e L.at 1"tt arwn Not tot . fttloe rla •440 tU apro"ve, Ito still's All Ayes gK ayrlAal lr& a■ set f„tth Ia the s..bjoct f.pnit, t„ 11 1'• also r/,rest 11,41 t%,o faria, leaches attf 11rcre4tloe Cnwnllainn tr.ler M . [ire in is etterd..tt• r11h eha I .1111.4 [osrrnt ■. 5. ftaltlut rrsnl,.11„I. Piptovlrt lUA it to 1el.t r,wrra fple,.•nt fraittns the puts Aso inlet-f.,l,.t/ Airynll Aothofill iC-7L471i C-75a7) 4p91w+1%4 an Ast.n.wht bet..tn the (CAA t36? a+d first Sowlhraal u. pane. with repnrt [fee the f.ertrll.. l.elsf:r, I" the CStI r.atrr, r, rr pr,.•.••., .J. • ATTACHKUM 8 July 1. 1987 Mr. Craig Bluell Senior Planner Community Development Department CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 Newport Blvd., CA 92663 REs Rent/Deneflt Analysis on 26-Unit Housing Project Dear Mr. Illurlh 3901 MxAMw Bwkvard Sidle too f 10*po l Beath. CA 926W-3010 (114i 931-?bro 4222 E. Cntr%o4bxk Ad. rkute 2WH Phc lei■ AZ 85018 OW1 W1Q-2S64 In aecordnner with your request and authorization. Tarantrllo and Company has prepared an analysis of the Rent/ilenerit to be derived by the City of Newport Beach's Involvement In the above cited affordable hotLiing project. Specifically, the nnalysl.s Includes conelw0onn on the appropriate r11Ir nlnrkrt rents for the 26 unitQ and the resulting rent benefit to the City of Newport lies1(!11. The rent bene- fit Is defined in terms of present value dollars as of June 1987. The anlllysis was carried out over a 30 year period and was based primarily on asqumptions Inane by the, consul- tants. These asaumptlons were considered reliable Indicators or future growth trends over the 30 year term or the, project and were establlshed via prevloun market trends, fu- ture projectloro, and theoretical backing. A full discussion or the assumptions made and their basis Is Included later In this report. Additionally. the difference over the 30 year period between the affordable rent le►•rIx. ss determined by H.U.D. Se.ctlon 8 as adminiq- tered by the Orange County Housing Authority and the estimated market rents for the project was indicated. This value we-% discounted at the appropriate rate In order to derive the rent benefit to the City of Newport Beach. We thank you for this opportunity to be of service and look forward to your continued patronage In the future. Respectfully submitted, TARAN ELLO do COMPANY r R. arant'110. CRE President A R. Sims Senior Project Manager smn • • L EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The current fair market rents for the herein described proposed dpvelopment -krre determined to be the following: 2 Bedroom (800 sq. ft.) $848 Per Month (S1.05/iq. ft.) 2 Bedroom (900 aq. ft.) $954 Per Month ($1.06/sq. ft.) 3 Bedroom (989 sq. ft.) $1.088 Per Month ($1.10/9q. ft.) IL The current affordable rent mnximums for the Subject. as establi0ed by H.U.D. Section 8 as administered by the Orange County Housing Authorlty ns of April 29, 1987. which include the 10 percent rent exception allowed for the City of Newport Beach location. are as follows: 2 Bedroom $749 per month 3 Bedroom $940 per month III. The difference, over a 30-year period. between the affordable rent levels and the market rents for the Subject is $4,300,303. IV. The combined rent benefit to the. City of Newport Beach as indicated by the cash equivalency of the projected rental differences In 1987 present value dollars is $1,067.730. Bads for these conclusions are explained within the following report under the headings of Methodology for the Analysts. Statement of Assumptions. and Summary and Conclw+lons. Job No. 17114 • • 1 METHODOLOGY FOR THE ANALYSIS FAIR MARKET RENT In order to determine the rent benefit to be obtainrd by the f;lty of !tewport Bench'R Involvement In the affordable housing project to be constructed. the fair market rent for the property had to be established. This Haa done by a surrey and field audit of comparable units located within the surrounding competitive. market aren 1C.,M.A). The C.M.A. included the cities of Newport Beach, Costa ,Mesa, and portlons of Irvine and Huntington Beach. Specific details in regard to the surveyed projncta sire Summarized within the following table. Job No. 17114 f1 ' 'J II I I I f i I I I I a(MTAt Suaw1y , • met M e ■ port I11M0a Caapat3tive Narut Area Total Irot Or use recantl atntal Rant 0.91 oat. Cbbalop/tetatlan units unit so. rt. "•AID R1ts Aatt to. rt. Sol we red ••"&23.47 11 the Booth MewM APu 776 Iscnolor 0.01 s 505 S1.)t 103) wpariet ave. furnlahtd Newport Irate, CA 1 ball be 720 710 .fe to A- AA S) wnf ur+Usht 0 r ►romontory Point sic I bVibe 7SD-e1(1 LII 1,0gs-1,140 1.61 e.g. 623.17 2DO ►r000ntaff Oftrt i . lobe 17D.1.050 1.193-I,473 i.JT' ar$. mow pert leach, C a 2 bd/7bo 1.OM1.115 1.443.1.710 Le) gig. 175-4000 2 DO . lofV2 be 1,A7>-I,AfO 1,170.3,200 1.74 ar0. 7) bei-0et mar CM JAI studio 730 1.32 1.050.1.200 1.5061e. &24.17 1221 Coast Mlenver unl.arslshed No#Deft beach, C A 1.100.1,230 1.57 erg. e4S-S000 futhUhed I bail be 1.150 l.als-1.300 1.2r Ave. 1 bd/?be 1.330 1.723.1.7T3 LID avg. 3 bd/2 be 1.$00 J.OM2,150 1.20 avg. $ ball be 2.000 2.s00-3,100 1.50 avg. a bat be 2.700 ).100 1.15 avg. Penthouse 2.000 3,500 1.27 are. 41 ►ark Newport 1.106 Stuole 113 - 73) LAS 6-736/7 On@ Park Newport of. i bdfl be 720 113 1.74 Newport beech, CA 1 . den/2 Oa 1.201 1.140 1.07 411A_1900 2 ball be 1,024 11110 1.01 2 bd/2.3 be 1.22A 1.370 1.12 bd/23 be i411 1,)73 1.01 17 Hrwaed )II 1 ba/ibe 710 $.71 4$0 720 1.11 4WD. 6-23.17 1 la►wo*$ Or. 2 bd/2 N 1,015 t.OMIJ10 .fa are. Newport batch, t A 2 bd Thowsa/3 be 11311 1.300.1060 .17 Are. e$A.3333 3 bw7 be 1.)03 1,200.11310 .94 Ave. 3 bd Thowse/2 be I'M 1.410-1.400 .rd Iwo. 0 Oakwood Apart wtnu 713 Stwdla Soo 1.71 00.491S 1.30 avg. d.23.17 440trvint Awe. 1 Wite 710 700415 1.06 Ave. Newport booth. CA 3 bd/lbe 750 1o0-1a$ 1.17 avg. oA3-O330 I bd/2 be 1,000 I.OMI'D#$ 1.07 avg. Ili AnChofeet Ap$rtetnu 31 Ibd/lb$ moo 3.11 12S 1.03 owl. a-7A-87 • I111 m87share 20d/2.4 be 1.900 I.1SO 1.16 Ave. Mewoutt mooch, CA Sas-1)01 al mass veto! VW" 71A I bd/1 as ISO 1.71 700 .1) ave. 1-73.17 1135 Me►A VIM 1 001 51 elf 720.750 f0 Ave. Cott$ Mne. CA I bawl be 1.037 A) -M .1e avg. Sao-1171 7 Owl be 1.235 1ID-PAS .15 avg. 3" No.11i1A I w ►IMIIL %UPItI ItDMU d) f AMt r a a part 1 dangle Caapstmot Marlat Asta I atal 17pe 07 :411 Yetallt7 Gent al afnt Ott 6sta C6901411/LateLLan un51a U4,111 Si ft. bate bete St. rt. Svtttted f1 •eta Mere Met 774 ;tudto 551 b.41 40'r110 1.11 •.y. 9-71.47 ►aularina 1 toast fvTf%U%ee C oil Masa. C A ) ball be 711 455.445 .97 owl. T51-4M 1 bdi$ be 721 710-710 .91 owl 1 bat? be 016 71& to .e4 e.a. M Vlste Dal tabo 444 Stu(sa 4so 2.01 S15.410 1.25 etg 4.1 t-a7 7775 Deals vctde 1 be/1 ba fall 47r-dn 1.17 avy. Costa Mesa, CA 1 bd/1 be goo TM71J .94 A.g. 5AGWIgoo 1bd/Ibe ftl 643495 .14av/. 2 bat? be 1.120 fla97C .04 etg. 7 bd/7 be . den 1.454 ),Iml,215 .47 e.g. 11) Hnetiese a6srtatntl 747 1 be/1 be 71G 2.11 W64e5 .71 67a-17 2300 rLUTIea 1 betl.S be $$a 711.a10 .44 C bet& Moil. C a 7 bd/7 be 1.015. 1.015 83:130 .42 541.1300 32) .lnt Break tWegt 700 1 bell be TS0 1.51 710 f5 4.7Y17 135S Mass Verde 1 b(F/1 be 815 74a70 .17 erg. Costa Mete, C A 7 Dal be 1.017 14t:./01 .as evg. 179-5710 7 bd/7 be 1.215 9luM .77 avg. 1)) ILI)1 Creek 250 Studio 1LD 1.21 71t.I" l.lf avg. 4-1us? 335 ►eularthe furtil4ned Canto Rne, C A 7 bell be 710 755.745 1.04 e.g. 5496.1307 7 b0/7 be Ila tau Ill 1.00 avg. 7 bd/7 be 1.074 f)7 M .97 avg. 14) 1a9elsnd Village lls Studio 375 SIF510 1.1D owl. 4-7a-17 140 Bailer 1 bd/1 to ID 450-460 .90 $•g. Costs Mesa. CA 7 bd/ t.5 be 900 Itti ITO .45 all. 754.0051 13) the Atpsns L42 1 b0/1 be Ill 5.0% 47Cr7T0 JS e.g. 421.17 M Oralthut a Plate 1 bd/1 be a4D 113.7a5 .ail avg. Santa Ana, CA 2 bell to 1.100 171rf30 .00 e.g. 557-0333 7 b0/7 be 1.750 1.060-1,100 .46 avg. IQ fliewedon Gltn 144 Studio $52 1.41 450.440 1.20ays. 4.33Ya7 1147 Bueldngne■ 1 bell be ISA 770.100 1.001TV. Costa hale. C A 1 . dent! be Ila 1140,1,00 .19 evy. 261.0500 7 D012 be 1.307 1.2006A.1" .94 e.g. 17) turtle Mack villa 2S7 1 bat) as T40 4.02 77S.S7S 1.01 *to, (_77-It ) AdCkvlsa 7 be/7 be 1.074 a7S .1) lrvine, C A 1 bdll be ).110 f/o .Ail 654-1411 ) b0/1 be 1.137 1.221 .97 1/house 2/1.5 1.741 1.754 .90 1/he~ 212.5 1,A35 1.300 .19 Job Me. 1711a •I * I r aErtat 1Va OE*_[CanUnued) too ■ e ■ Mr1 3 dom*o C o r pWatl N e arbat ■ rea total It" of SIt4 14s6nep 44n141 Mont Mn Date ;5ael4s1tetotlen U7ttlt Unit la. rt. Mate Mate sq. ►t. Surveyed 11) SaeDrSoye e1.1164 344 Studla al3 $.&t 45e-719 Lay erg, 1-23 87 loatnrAalua 1 ed/l ee 1N et/-/7/ 1.1) arg. rueLLnitan beach. CA 7 D9117 be 170 1,0)16.1.179 1.17 arg. 1laL7all 7 Do . 19fu1 04 1111 flu1.010 1.:1 erg. 7 De . Iart.J7 as 1.)00 1.)2161,4I1 1.D1 evp 111 •untln7.an arro■ers 147 1 54110e 47A 7.01 7SL t.SO 1i-17.1c 7-177Q 14a" 11v0. 7 4412 D4 Aga 170 1.C7 .V uhv..*n Death. C a Sluafo A47 4I5 3.44 1916744) A2)u37[D NJ Mist _Aaits 76Daw.UNITS M[Dlarrsr""D. 310)_A1,c a C k I 11.0VSC.r1JMQ. MEAN • 31`11/M4. l30 AVr SQ.r1. ADIu$IED_agMtat aA7[S) AOMM. VMI7S ■(CIA■ . 11.115/MD. 11,011 avL. aEr! 41.1ClSG.rrJMp. ME$% . S1,047/M4. fee St..? 1. Soumm tatontailo A Ceepany 0 • 0 0 6 All of the information obtained from the surrey was compared with the proposed Improvements for the Subject Property. The concluded adjusted rental retts were. based on adjustmrnts made to the comparable'.-; current rental rates for differenre4 in complex amenities, unit size. vacancy rates, and location. The resulting adjuatrrl rental rateq were then aird as the basis for arriving at the appropriate. fair market rents for the Subject. As evidenced by they table, the median adjusted rental rates for the rompetitive market area on a per square root basis were $1.06 for a two bedroom unit and Sl.lo for a three bedroom unit. Further. the complexes surveyed displayed it current vacancy factor which averaged 3 percent. slightly higher than the most recent measure for Newport Beach multi -family units at 2.6 percent and equivalent to the countywide average for multi -family unit-9 of 3.0 percent. (County and city measurr,y exirnetrd from the F.H.L.B. Vacancy Survey 1986-87 edit.) Thus, it is apparent that thr► rental rates Indi- cated by the surrey provide a good indication of fair market rent for the Subject Units. Consequently, the resulting fair market rents for the Subject take into consideration the Idea that the proposed complex will maintain a 3 percent vacancy factor throughout the 30-year period of the project. In conclusion. it Is felt by the consultants that. dun to Information obtained from the market, the current fair market rents for the 26 units are as follows: 2 Bedroom (800 sq. ft.) $848 (31.06/sq. ft.) 13 units 2 Bedroom (900 sq. ft.) $954 ($1.06/sq. ft.) 8 units 3 Bedroom (989 sq. ft.) $1.088 ($1.10/9q. ft.) 5 units _. These rents were then projected and adjusted over the 30-year life of the project. Job No. 17114 $ t • • 7 AFFORDABLE RENT The affordable rent level` for the Subject were ratabllshrd by 11.U.D. Section 8 nq adminl•terrd by thr Orange County Housing Authority. A ten percent rent exception k allowed for the City of Newport Brach location. The current and effective affordable rents of April 29, 1987 are as foliows: 2 Bedroom $749 per month 1 Bedroom $940 per month All assumptions made in our arrival at these rates will be. explained In detail within the Statement of Assumptions section of this report. Affordable rental rates shall be -- allowed to Increase by 2.8 percent per unnum which corresponds to the projected average annual Increase In the Orange County median income as explained in Ihr Statement of Assumptions section of this report. These rates were then projected over the term of the project and compared against the previously derived market rents In order to arrive at the difference between the two, and consequently, the present value of that rent I— difference. ff- The derived estimate was determined to be the rent benefit to the City of Newport Beach for their involvement in the project. The following table summarizes the derivation process for the rent benefit to the City of Newport Brach. Job No. 17114 W1+ NMI, Vim: City of mown ONO 1 � � � s � r � ► 19 1- tlea(i [Haim PMIM MCC s ss.OK S a►,s7) 1 K,117 s s7,774 L &1.776 1 u.1n s S7.10 1 %,m? 1 x.ias 1 x,f.c7 ?. ?. &W K>sM► oW@V rIMS: 71.7 w Wdu ("I.) 1 aee m I,om 1,0Y IIIXI 1.7m +.m 1.7I3 1.30 y3 pa "U s I,OM l.lu 1.7H 1 ]Ol 1.fa7 1.410 i 7a1 1.f77i 1 7(11 1 la nn%wl Cram M.Rw Leal wtwllaad R w Icp S M.)M 9711,90 U17,170 1177,10 s717,47► Lm,aQ1 L"7,7n µII'm Sa)a,373 L4L.))7 ). MJ7A. =- a Ar1vO11Li ►w. r1UIIAM, 71•) od udU twy.) 1 7a1 no 777 u+ IUi alD as )A 131 t4 y.) na Wilts „n ►u ►►7 1 MI 1 OY1 1 07► I 0• 1 lb 1.172 1 arrw ums "VWIA 1 741.1.a 717," 251,19+ 74.7ea 773.i77 7at,an le►.TA 7TI W )o7,ob 71s,7Z1 an►wl Ol rf umve Y1R. w4 1aa afraro. 1rR1 s )S.zm 47.90 Se,1nl 7o,ar� a7.7s7 17,LF ia,aa 17G,71n tJ3,{13► 1N.11, pfumt gala a of Hv 1 72.033 W.C" a1,ia7 M,m )7,OQ7 U.►r7 111.977 34.077 S�,Ix x,In st 10.011 total Roar "its H aL }wts a of Hit al 10.01P 1 l.O .M lots! amwl Olrtmumr awn Ur )n Yr. p iod 1 <�7W.7Q1 rlll maw* nla rlpllaa are In0lal4d In cmw* 11147) rohn ODIIAn. lorwi 7arr+tat)o a Camwv ma Ma. 11114 • �1 SSA_ rl1_ MiafSis 1twAlftpd) Llt7 Mt Orrin 11 l) 1! 14 13 u 17 it 1f SI7 I. WAQ I lsm Iola" bma s i0.721 s Q.M? 1 64,47f 1 "ON s Y.34? s ►_,fr7 s 77,704 : 1a,471 s 7i,flf ! tf,tt'7 r. IS= IOI17Lf WMU IORi: 21 7rarm Vdl4 logs.) s 1.331 I.SR I.OA 1,c" 1.72) :.r75 1.110 1.147 1.90 1,171 3 3 Ilr>ra, Ildtt s 1.174 1 M I'm 7 aw 2 III I'm n 7,216 1.20 2 304 2 >k Anal CMI IlagRa Lon mwmllmd A ►rorcy s 90.421 5477.TI4 0111M ►]2e,rA laa.= U44.444 s371,324 IM3.I29 s»4,mi "06,M SM. It MfOGIKL7 21 ?aid t+dt4 can.) 3 M7 I.M3 1.IA! 1,an i,:z 1.113 11Ii3 1.1f0 1.231 1.244 S 3 od Udta 1,770 3,774 ., 1,T" l,w l,I" :,a27_ _ 1,40 1,%D 1.45 I,W aril GI9aa phVaa s )"'0" 332,7m 341,116 lm,vx 14z.1M MILM 3G,3m M.0 4 41M,912 414.3rt Anal 01ffa7mu s i49,71I 163, rA 17I.ai3 177, 354 !l3,94 1tf.00 If0,724 111.0) Ifl.ay4 if?.xn hwmr+t 1alla at e7 N07 at IM s 34,WU 12.rm af,c72 4a.7w a3,to &:.20 37.01 34.w 3I.544 20,547 .)ob Ma, 17114 • L Me WCTI? aft" "IF of Ma*ti fiffe. 77 i 4wt1 CMX" -=IM 9cbt { I:.f01 1 U,rss 1 M,f(D 1 as.?w a1.M 1 Wi.077 t 7:.M s 17, 7s7 sri,ltl If7.m J. 7AUMT SPOW fOrM JJ t IN I — 1wJts 10-2.) s 1.90 LSW I,f7f I,flf 7.mf 7.0" 1.oa, 7,DIU ?.1C1 7,i7J S 7 1•2sv Wits 7 fa: 7 lJS 7 Mf 2,414 7 t m J SH J,drm 7,424 bTu7 C3A1 somw Us. ru.f71� 31 owoc 1 1:s.fs7 A17,rs7 06.279 07.ct OI.Sce as.n2 uI,171 656.142 UA,EM L7:.Sri t. MLL. Q. 1 Y+'7SMlt �W7 s1UD�l1G• u t Iferet� wtt s s,sm �,7s6 i,�n i,u. i,fn i,f.. 7,is4 t,sn i.m �.u+� s t raa usu :,as i rn t 77� : �• i n+ : R7s i rt7 1 f67 7,031 1Aff AFIW Cann l.Ww f rrS.t7J f77,>16 4f0,OfO fC,7b In,»c alt,tef 7�.t�1 f11.7fi 571.2:9 xs.rm M..s7 CIIIRry : 1M.77s7 1C,fJ1 I7i,2lf Ia,Ix Ip,ttJ 7x.76f iH,tOR Ifl,�tf 77s.m I23.1" fsoffnc �M f. so Yr at LM 1 73,477 tr,M IS,6eo 17,7ss rS.Vt) is,iil 1i,76i f,110 I,an 7.Ix 0 � • STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS The previous table lndlentes the rant benefit to the City of Ne p,-art Brach by way of 1987 present value dollars. This figure, however. is based on certain assumptions made by the consultants with regard to how the market as well as affordable rental rates would change over the 30 year term of the Subject, It Is the purpoRc of this section to state the, assumptions made and give explanation as to why they were made. The majori- ty of the reasoning upon which the assumptions were based consists of peAt trends, future projections, and theoretical analysis. The following is a summation of all the a:. -lump - dons made and the reasoning behind those assumptions. (1) Project characterbitics Number of affordable units: 26 Unit mix: 13 two bedroom units at 800 sq. ft. 8 two bedroom units at 900 sq. ft. 5 three bedroom units at 989 sq. ft. (2) Absorption All rental units, excluding a normalized 3 percent vacancy factor, are absorbed at completion of construction. (3) Discount Sate A discount rate of 10 percent was used over the 30-year term of the project. Thlr rate was used in carrying back the future rent benefit projections to 1987 present value dollars. The rate was based on the current lending and borrowing rates as well as the long run average rate of return for Investments over a 34- year period as based on the Fisher and Lorie Study of the early 1970s. This study revealed the average annual rate of return compounded annually was ap- proximately 9.3 percent over the term of the study. Due to the fact that both equity and debt yleld4 are currently In roughly the name rang, it Is felt that a 10 percent annual rate of return is substantiated. Job No. 17114 q5 0 • 12 0 (4) Vacancy Rate A normalized vacancy rate of 3 percent over the term of the project was used In computing the yearly Gross Revenue for the project when It In being leased at market rates. This rate, was substantiated by the average indicated vacancy ractor in the sample surveyed In the CMA rental survey. A vacancy factor or 0 percent was used under affordable rental rates becau.+e it project in this location with the projected affordable rates should have no vneancl". (5) Income Levels H.U.D. Section 8 provides figure, for current affordable rental rntes, as stated previously. Future increases In ouch rental units. however are unknown and must be projected over the 30 year analysis period in a reationable manner. Since current H.U.D. affordable rental rates are basically determined as a function of County median Income level. it seems reasonable to aavRume that future changes In the H.U.D. affordable rents shall occur roughly In conjunction with changes in Income levels. Therefore It was necessary to examine historical and projected trends as well as current Income levels in order to estimate future affordable rentals. Incomes were determined to increase at a rate of 3.5 percent over the first ten years, 3 percent over years 11 through 20, and 2 percent over years 21 through 30. The rates of Increase were primarily attributed to present growth trend,; within Orange County and future long-term projections for income rates. It was determined that over the last 10 years, Incomes within Orange County have been Increasing but at a decreasing rate. The average per annum Increase over the last 10 years has been 7.8 percent. However, more recent Indicators show lower increases at 3.6 percent between 1986-87 and a projec- trd 2.6 percent from 1987-88. The following table delineates median Income levels and rates of change over the past ten years. Including forecasts for 1987 and 1988. Job No. 17114 14 13 RANGE COUNTY MEDIAN FAMELY INCOME Percent Change Year Total from Previomi Year 1977 $20.731 5.5 1978 21,578 4.1 1979 24.081 11.6 1980 26.046 8.2 1981 29,703 14.0 1982 32.600 9.8 1983 34.400 5.5 1984 37,025 7.6 1985 39,196 5.9 1986 41.537a 6.Oa 1987 43.046b 3.6b 1988 44,165C 2.11c `l ean: 7.03116 a. Revised mesure = avg. annual median income for 1986 b. First quarter 1987 measure c. Forecast Source: Chapman College Center for Economic Research It iq concluded therefore, that income levels will rise on the average. between 3 and 4 percent per year, over the next 10 years, or at a level slightly above the long run rate of productivity. As the economy develops over the 30-year period of the, project. it is ex- pected that any increase in Income levels will approximately coincide with the long -run rate of productivity which has been established at between 2 1/2 and 3 1/2 percent. Therefore, it is concluded that over the term or the project the rate of Increase in Income will approximate 2.8 percent. The results of this analysis reveal income levels increaming In the following manner: Year 1-10 11-20 21-30 Rate of Increase 3.5% 3% 2% -- Job No. 17114 q7 Based on the above table. the average long -run rate of Increarr over the 30- year period Is established at 2.8 percent. The Orange County median Income ward was $43.046. (6) Affordable Rental Rates The H.U.D. Section 8-provided rent levels, including a LO percent rent exception allowed for the Newport Beach location. as of April 29. L987 urn ns follows: Two Bedroom Unit - $749 Three Bedroom Unit - $940 The following additional assumptions have been made for the affordable rental levels: 1) tenant shall pay gaq and electric; 2) landlord .shall pay water; 3) no refrigerators will be provided by landlord. Actual future increases In the H.U.D.-determined rental rates are unknown. It has been assumed that the affordable rents will Increase at a rate roughly equivalent to the Increase In median income levels. As noted, the estimated average long -run rate of Increase In Income levels approximated 2.8 percent. Accordingly, In the thirty year analysis. rents have been adjusted annually in order to arrive at the appropriate affordable rental rates for the subject In each future period. (7) hair Market Rental Adjustments Adjustments made to the fair market rental rates for the Subject were based on current rental Increase trends as well as future rental Increase projections. More %wclfleaUy. rental increases for the first 10 years of the project were established by surveying existing complexes to find out how rent levels have Increased in the marketplace, and also by analyzing the Consumer Price Index for rental expenditures over the last 14 years. A review of this material Job No. 17114 qV i� 15 indicate•+ a CPI increase, over the last 14 yearn of 7.31%, and a 5.8% average rent incre&-cp per annum for the complexes surveyed over the lint four yenrr. Consequently. it was felt that an Initial rate of approximately 7 percent per year should be used. However. because rents have increa:4ed ro dramatienlly over the past three to four years. a trend indicating Incren Ling rent.,q at a decreasing rate Is predicted. Once again. as with income Ievelr, long -run rental increases have been tied to the long -run rate of produellvity and the long -run real rate of interest. The long -run rate of productivity equals the, growth in Gross National Product adjusted for inflation. and the long -run real rate of interest equals the price adjusted nominal interest rate. This has been evidenced to be between 2 1/2 and 3 1/2 percent as supported by n study of the past 50 years of economic activity. From these assumptions, It Is predicted that rental rates will Increase In the following manner: Rate_ of Year lncreaae 1 7% 2-5 6% 6-10 5% 11-15 3% 16-20 2% 21-30 1% Long Run average annual Rental Increase = 3.0% (8) City of Newport Beach Investment It Is assumed that the City will provide the developer with the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds to develop the Subject Property. In exchange, the developer agrees to provide 26 units for rent, for 30 years, at the pre►loualy defined H.U.D. Section 8 affordable rental levels. Job No. 17114 qh 16 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS As evidenced by the preceding analysis and aq summarized below, the entlmeted rent benefit to be obtained by the City of Newport Beach for itq involvement in funding the. _ Subject Property's development is $1.067.730 in 1987 present value doliarn. It should be noted that this rent benefit reflects point "timates based upon a series of ansumptlons ` detailed earlier In this report. The actual rent benfit for the proposed project will depend upon the, degree to which variances from these assumptions are experienced and In what direction (i.e., positive or negative) they occur. It Is the opinion of the con- sultants that the majority of the a,,wumptions are rather conservative and Nell Supported. Therefore, the expected rent benefit should at the least equal the analytically derived value. Job No. 17114 0 a(k rWOE COAST TITLE COMPANY To: Legal Description: (Subject Property) PLANNING COMMIS70N City of: Newport Beach Lot 715 First Addition to Newport. Mesa 'Tract Book 5 Page 1 Miscellanvous Maps Ownership: A list of the owners of lands located within a 300 foot radius of the subject property, together with a map shoving said land, is also attached hereto. 640 N. TUSTIN AVENUE, SUITE 106, SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92705 714/558•2836 o 0 0 0 o s o 0 0 o $roam :ALP SAMAUP 131 T � � New t SO ow o i I.w .r. o "MACCl n AtA o o; o o �� o � o � �w�•r Pam nis Aw. w a 0 o �� o f.1M AG�1 t t�rr w �;� o 10 O r�r1r�I�N A l--- _ __ --------------- to w O ter iog � p L"At. �. t T A*sA nwr rRACr r • $ WACO o o r.rsn�td r ! r r r ~ -- - of F#o --�-•�^1, Or on 71 1 or ! =o o1 o o 110 o w do �„ AIEwIK.1RT1 A�ICr VA. all m lq-- frosr Aw ro O � o o 10 OF are ur t rn 1�IGp Orr \0 rrr.�l 0 o AAWACAW � ur no • I� W. N / Agvnw mw nwcr MAcr + I « lie i • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 46 Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach will hold a public hearing on the application of mesa Development ComEtnZ for Traffic Stueiy on property located at 153a Placentia Avenue. ` Request to consider a Traffic Study _Eree2ared in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code for a 26 unit apartment complex. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that the Planning Commission will be conriMering a residential density bonus under the provisions of Section 65915 of the State rovnr'nmont Code for the property at 1538 Placentia Avenue. This will allow an increano in allownlrin density from 20 to 30 units per acre. It is anticipated that $350,000 in Conn -unity I)nvnlopment Block Crant Funds will he used in conjunction with thin project to providrn lirlusing affordable to lower income families. NOTICE. IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Negative Declaration has been prepared by thn City of Newport Beach in connection with the application noted above. The Negativo 1)0claration states that, the subject development will not result in a significant effect on the enviro=,,ent. It is the present intention of the City to accept the Negative Declarntion and supporting documents. This in not to be construed as either approval or denial by the City of the subject application. The City encourages members of the general public to review and comment on this documentation. Copies of the Negative Declaration and Ruppartinq documents are available~ for public review and inspection at the Planninq Onpartmont, City of Newport (;each, 3300 Newport noulevard, Newport Reach, California, 92658-891r) (714) 644-3221i. Notice is hereby further giveen that ,aid public hearing will hre he:lel on the l8th day of June, 1987, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in thc! Council chambers of the Newport 13each City Hall, 3300 Newport Roulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and be heard thereon. For information call (714) 644-3200. Harry O. Merrill, Secretary, Planning Commission, City of Newport Beach. NOTE: The expense of this notice in paid from a filing fee collected from the applicant. '! .. i i : i 1 / Aaron Sage 519 S Burlingame Los Angeles,CA 90049 0 1U notnc ry P '. Developmc 3561 How; • Avenue 110� Los A l am: , .;,CA 90720 424-131-18 Raymond Totah 27592 Escuna Mission Viejo, CA 92692 424-151-04 American Land Associates 13921 Artesia Cerritos, CA 90701 424-151-05 Rockne Lambert 1732 Mountain View F'ullerton,CA 92631 424-151-06 Mark Kornwaxser 8222 Melrose Los Angeles, CA 90046 124-161-01 �uith/Phil. ips . 1;544 ,P�'la'cer�ti.a� 1k1%rt Beach, 7�92660 424-161-02 Ben 1ndes 10000 Jefferson Culver City, CA 90230 424-161-03 Noland Peterson 129 E. Day Newport Beach, CA 92660 424-161-05 George Wilson 1504 Beech S. Pasadena, CA 91030 424-161-08 Mary Morrison Route 1 Box 206 Millfield, Ohio 45761 424-142-11 Robert HiAson 829 Production Newport Beach, CA 92660 424-142-12 Robert Hixson 829 Production Newport Beach, CA 92660 424-142-13 Mary Axelson 611 Lido Park 04 Newport Beach, CA 92660 .. . ... _ . 424-161-09 Rothery Roh Development 3561 Howard Ave 1102 Los Alabitos, CA 90720 -iz4 t 3i 1 / Aaron Sage 519 S Burlingame Los Angeles,CA 90049 424-131-18 Raymond Totah 27592 Escuna Mission Viejo, CA 92692 424-151-04 American Land Associates 13921 Artesia Cerritos, CA 90701 424-151-05 Rockne Lambert 1732 Mountain View Fullerton,CA 92631 424-151-06 Mark Kornwasser 8222 Melrose Los Angeles, CA 90046 424-161-011 Frei tM Ph - 1 1 i s l �"`� • 1549, Y 1 Ne;dport Beach CA 92660 424-161-02 Ben Indes 10000 Jefferson Culver City, CA 90230 424-161-03 Roland Peterson 129 E. Bay Newport Beach, CA 92660 424-161-05 George Wilson 1504 Beech S. Pasadena, CA 91030 424-161-08 Mary Morrison Route 1 Box 206 Millfield, Ohio 45761 •1k4-1b1 10 notBery P-h Development , 3561 Howa:d Avenue #102 Los Alamitzin,CA 90720 424-142-11 Robert Hixbon 829 Production Newport Beach, CA 92660 424-142-12 Robert tlixson 829 Production Newport Beach, CA 92660 424-142-13 Mary Axelson 611 Lido Park #4 Newport Beach, CA 92660 424-161-09 Rothery Roh Development 3561 Howard Ave #102 Los Alalbitos, .CA 90 720 "A notrCef by Deuee of the S"PW.Off Court or Orange tounty. Cardorn,s. Nurnaer A•6214 dared 29 Sea+ember, 1961, and A•24531- dated t t 1u*•e 1%3 • STATE OF CALIFORtAIA County of Orange •.rti••• .a..Ua.y �••••• h +•a u+2a.+ -a 20 w 2 rea .,ems .! PC Ib%' . —00 I am a Citizen of the Umted States and a resident of the Ccunly aloft -said. I am over the age of eighteen years. and not a party to or interested in the below enticed mallet I am a principal Ovk of the Orange Coast DAILY PILOT kith nhiCh is Combined the NE wS-PRESS. a newspaper of general circulation, printed and publrsned in the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange State of California. and that a Notice Of f lihl? dcazir�n ---- --- cf hr ch copr dllav -c-d ,t.reto -s a true and complete Copy -.as printed and ; ur,lis"ed in the Costa Mesa, 'ir .,port Peach tlunio, glon Beach. Fountain :'alley irviriei the South Gr:asl co-mun,lies and Laguna Deaf" -sswes of ,did r+Cr.spa,,ov for Gil(.•..... (_ cor,ecUiwe oeeer5 tp +.,' ire SS,r�SI Of July 1 7 198 7..- 198 --- ---- --- -.._.. 198 -_.. - ---- --- _ . 198 ---- ---- ---- ---- -- . .- - . -.. - -' -- - -.. --.. 19a I declare, under p nalt)� of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. E3:CCUILd on 1 7 128 ?._ at Cr' -.t i.e,.,3• C; `�{r;rt,r�. 11.' CGop Off- PU::!.ICAJ*J0JJ • •fj k�('r �� J �•�rn",T 'ht 19871 is ��, • REVISED NOTICE or PUBLIC HEARrNGO Notice is hereby given that the Planning Co=ission of the City of Newport Beach will hold a public hearing on the application of Mesa Development Company for Traffic StudX on property located at 1538 Placentia Avenue. Is Request to consider_a Traffic Study prepared in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of On munici- pal Code for a 26 unit apartment coml2lex on property located -in the R-3 (2178)District. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zonin2 Code so an to allow: three five foot high patio fences to encroach 5 feet into the required 20 foot front and ngtback; a six car carport and a trash enclosure to encroach 10 feet into the required 10 foot rear arc! setback; and to allow o en carports on the front one-half of the +lot. "`— NOTICE: IS HEREBY FURTiIER GIVEN that the Planning Commission will be consirinring a residen- tial density bonus under the provisions of Section 65915 of the State C,Ovnrnment Code for the property at 1538 Placentia Avenue. Thin will allow an increase in allowable density from 20 to 30 units per acre. It is anticipated that $350,000 in Community development Block Grant Funds will be used in conjunction with this project to providf? h.usin•l afford- able to lower Income families. NOTICE IS NEPESY FURTHER GIVEN that a Negative. Declaration has been prepared by the City of Newport ;teach in connection with the application noted above. 'Chi! Ncgntive t3ge— atlon states that, the subject development will not result in a significant. rff+trt on tl:c environ- ment. It in the present intention of the City to )Ccrpt the ldrr,lr:laws Declarat,ion and supporting docurents. This in not to be conntruv-d as either approval or elonlal lay the City cif the subaect application. The City encourage,; members of the general I,u1:11c to . and comment on thin docu:-entation. Copies of the Nf-clative Derlaration an,1 mippurtinq rlrjcurnents are available for public review and inslx-ction at the Planning Departmtsnt, city if Newport Beach, 3300 Newport P,)uievard, Newport Beach, California, 92658-8015 (714) 044-3225. Notice is here_b7 further given that said public hearing will be held oil the. 9th clay of July, 1987, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach City hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and be heard thereon. For information call (714) 644-3200. Harry 0. Merrill, Secretary, planning Commission, City of Newport Beach. NOTE.: The expense of thin notice is paid from a fflinq fee collected from the arrplirant. Planning Comissionotting .rune 18 1987 Agenda Item No. 2 CITY OF' NEWPORT BEACH TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: A. Traffic Stud (Public llearinr) Request to consider a traffic study so an to (,nrmit the construction of a 26 unit apartment coml)lnx on the property. AND B. Request for Density Bonus (Dincusnion) Request to permit a density bonus in ncrortinnce with Section 65915 of the California Covernrwvnt. ceoq so as to construct an apartment complex with 2r. unlf.n nfford- able to lower income faailien, and the a�r_n(,�,,�,�r, of an environmental docunent. I.fX:ATIO'1: A portion of Lot 715, Firnt Addition of Ihn Ilewport Mesa Tract, located at 1538 Placentia Avenu,,, on the easterly side of Placentia Avenue, between 15t:h Street and Production Place, in the West Newport Triangle area. ZONE: R-3 (2178) District APPLICANT: Mena Development Co., Inc., Couta Mesa OWNERS: Ben Indes Trust and Y. 6 M Enterprises, Inc., Newport Beach Su2gestr_d Action Staff recommends that these applications be continued to the Planning Com. fission meeting of July 9, 1987 so as to allow additional time to renotice the project for thr, purpose of including A vxxlification to the Zoning Code. Staff has discussed this with the applicant and he has no objections. PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. IIEWICKER, Director W. liam Ward Senior Planner WWW/l 1 Rob Hixson 829 PRODUCTION PLACE • NEYrPCRT REACH, CA Q2663 TELEPm06sE' 1141 r,4E, 4900 Harry 0. Merrill, secretary June 15, 1987 Planning Commission City Hall 3300 Newport Blvd. P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA. 92658-8915 Re: Increase in allowable density Mesa Development - 1538 Placentia Av+!. Dear Mr. Merrill: The above proposed increase in den.*iit.y from 20 to 30 units per acre does not appear to bc- in the best interest of this Newport Beach Area. It has become very apparent that the two biggest problems with which this area has to contend are traffic and parking. Increasing the allowable density will exacerbate these problems to an extent where the resulting congestion will be insurmountable. We still have the opportunity to prevent this and we should avail ourselves of this opportunity. We strongly urge that the allowable density not be increased. Respectfully, <---- 12 Robert M. Hixson,Jr. ��NOE C0A6T 4 TITLE COMPANY ORANGE COAST TITLE COMPANY furnishes you the foregoing information for your sole use and benefit, subject strictly to the understanding that this information has been obtained from the current County Assessors Tax Rolls. On this basis, ORANGE COAST TITLE COMPANY verifies the information furnished and assumes no liabilty in excess of the fee charged for this report. Hated St phanie Ogles�e Builder Services 640 N. TUSTIN AVENUE, SURE 106, SANTA ANA, CAUFORNW 92705 714/558.2836 COMMISSIONERS • • MINUTES t June 18, 1987 s CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL CAU INDEX Motion Ayes Absent x ere was no one representing the applicants however C issioner Koppelman stated that she believed the Sign rdinance has been applied to all of the buildings In the ewport Beach area and is quite adequate for tho purpose informing people of the business. Motion was de to deny Exception Permit No. 28 with the findings d conditions contained in Exhibit "A." Motion voted on, MOTION CARRIED. FINDINGS: 1. That the location of the business does not pre- clude the effective a of permitted signs. 2. That three wall siyns and one projecting sign will provide adequate identlfl6ation for the business. f. That the granting of such an',exception permit in not necessary to protect a s tantial property right, will be contrary to the p Ise of Chapter 20.06 of the Municipal Code as the in set forth, And will be materially detrimental t the health, safety, comfort or general welfare**,; persons residing in the neighborhood, and detri •ntal or injurious to property or improvements the neighborhood, and to the general welfare o the City. A. Traffic Stud (public Hearin ) Request to consider a traffic study so as to permit the construction of a 26 unit apartment complex on the property. AND a. Request for Density Bonus (Discussion) Request to permit a density bonus in accordance with Section 65915 of the California Government Code so as to construct an apartment complex with 26 units afford- able to lower income families, and the acceptance of an environmental document. - 3- Item No. 2 TS Density B= us Continued to 7-9-87 COMMISSIONERS • MINUTES June 18, 1987 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ROLL- CALL I INDEX motion AY W; Absent LOCATION: A portion of Lot 715, First Addition of the Newport Mesa Tract, located at 1538 Placentia Avenue, on the easterly side of Placentia Avenue, between 15th Street and Production Place, in the west Newport Triangle area. ZONE: R-3 (2178) District APPLICANT: Mesa Development Co., Inc., Costa Mesa OWNERS: Ben Indes Trust and r & M Enterprises, Inc., Newport Peach Staff recommended thin item be continued to the July 9, 1987 planning Commission meeting. Motion voted on, MOTION CARRIED. Uft Permit No. 1327 (Amended) (PLblic Hearin ) Item No. 3 Reque to aaend a previously approved use permit that Up 1327A permitt the construction of an automobile salsa and Aiprove d service ciiity in the Unclassified District. The proposal i ludes a request to renodel and expand the existing sh com, office, and service areas of the auto facility. New landscape and sign plans are also proposed in conj ctian with said expansion. I.00ATIOtt: Parce 1 of Parcel Nap 25-46 (Res vision No. 202) , located at 445 East Coas highway, on the southwesterly side of st Coast Highway, between Ilayside Driv and Jamboree Road, adja- cent to Promon ry Point. ZONE: Unclassified APPLICANT: Newport Auto Center, thyport Beach OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newfof, Beach The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and Mr. Bill Ficker, project architect, ppeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of the ppli- cant. Mr. Ficker stated that he concurs wit the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A." Mr. Fic'1�er explained that the added space requested is to enclo �, the cars that usually are displayed outside. Ile -4- City Council Meeting july. 27 iu Agenda Item No. Supplemental Information CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: s gd-Site Plan Attached is a copy of the revised site plan as required by the Planning Commission for the development at 1538 Placentia Avenue. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D.fiEWICKER, Director By + CRAIG T. L ELL Senior P anner CTB: jm A2\CCSR\DV4SUPp.CTB Attachment for City Council Only w � ei O U O x° 0 �4 O �, o, C) G H a o x ro .,I M u�wg 43 G o 0 mo iv iv Ir z�9 E c 44 ° M .,4 rA � H M u C) �� Cf N Wzu�H pq s~ As O' G 0 ,-I W 14 G x°wEw o i d w N •r4 H ms p4 E+ H y� x K � •r •.. G Qp 43 x }..1 EK H w a ° °1 •+� u o ° 4 ° V ro r. b w V 41 '� •r4 W to W M O b � a°i a x In > 41 c�i G v •.� M V ° 4) 4) 4' . N a G .. ° 1 4) Q itl w o O O •� V0 riN 1:. o H v+c .rl o .° 4) 44 O 51 O 4 > O) 'd a w c 4► d � � •� 44 'O O ri G O p, O U 4 G � 4) O 00 3 .0 v w ° G n r • 4 m o 4) O U Q) O o o CI v 44 01 0 % z O i N G� w A b 44 O w en o A N b O > O '� W rn b 't3 r � V% th G Q. ° > O b r.� y (1�.++) Y. 4) ?, u•H a y > N A �, w a w 4! O r. � 41 m G p 44 b G O N o b b x+ y 54 O 0 •� � $� w° to .11 13 w C b r $4 ;s H a A b Q wc ro �D N O o A. (D V`� o6 w Cn ••4 d U >. +� � Nz •,1 r4 b w .O � y f W w 4f a� 41 w � t [ -4a) 0 9 � O x ON ..: ru a a 44 O 1-1 o '° ., >, 41 •� �, 0 *� •O ,.� '' � 44 O sa 4f G 41 x w �, G •O b 44 O '' � >. 44 N O •r-, >, ,4J (a to 44 o fo ,. ro ad Qa ,3wu '> 0 Rf .,� 1 G H 41 AG w 0 0 �, C y 13 u V U y% O 14 p' .0a 0 b v b IA .,I � u N Q) U •t •.1 V Q 4) >~ i0 •, :4O >. u p a 4 •W U V. O u 4-) •rl 3 m 3 O r+ x 0) .G V > O k m a � O 4 > O w a W m m m a U G •r1 O' IA V •ri O u 4) V a G O A P 0 p w •> ri O w V ••e u 0 x 0 4 A ro •� V •r4 41 r01 r. u V v O .-1 (v > U 4)0 N 9 0! +� n U)b v p m U% .� w N '0 .4 � 0 m O. •.Gi ¢t O t7 •d t� 0 w w t� ro ?+ N O N >, tr r♦ m v 00 14 :s .. fd v y ay > ro to ..Gt G .� v m Goa r.uv00 1i01AUGU ftlrom0rl94-4 00ft ,,�o a � m •'i m G A ro •-+ ° ro 0) 0 l4 0 O O G -4 ro A ro G U. M ro ht l� A G ri 3� 13 to U •n � y 'H ro •n•-t !4 O v M O A ro O 41 ° O t~ c '� y! �{ O Id N 7C 0 rl 1� m N w A to 4J w O 4) N m rt N •-t 41 A rJ O y N O G O A O th N m K N 0) 41 O •-4 N > �% Cir•rl 41 ro �.' 0 w ..{ O O P� i� 0 'O my> GO41G0+Oro0UU�, :irro00 ro N at U 13 C Otr Na4roO� rdw O '�ta�roG�>0m••-tO� N m 0 .% m s ro m b 0 c ym, N •r4 o N to a s, . �+ a 3 r •mot s� ro gym, cn � as 04 0) U N U A p G A w as G G �s •'{ W 0 0'•-1v4141 •-1� N W� G�! �� ro� 4I m" 4j�a � Q.0 14 aa) O . � r♦ ° w m 14 U m a y •ri 4J 9 3.4 41 . G �N � 3 41 •.1 � O V 'CS �> f-I 0 • U U b Q > 01 ro > r, '° ro > •ri .° •°.•Ofa Q � .a b o 0) a4) . � •r, � +°� � u a � o •� ro ro N b s~ U 1~ A rf ° m m r* C 0 U "p y A ro m U O x w 4 C tp A O 0 H Qa y bra ,� O U O O � 1� 0 j 13+�4J4j 0 N ro U o p4 0� O 4l t~ v w U O t1 i� 3 OA tnG ro O 0 G .I- G wx Gp.-Oi 10 •� 0 •0 N •-Gi W U A N N�'d N •p41 rt A m`H qy• •� PA p H m� G� y a) b O .,I a 43 O G Qf ,q .G .,� N +� � O+ A rd b to 0 N G a 'O !"• O Ol .,4 sd v $4 V 'r4 O V ri 'd 09 41 f.] �+ .0 .I O ) '� © k m tr to 0) w O >r 3 m ,U 0' m -A N N .r .,� � � � O N ,� t o b s b m ro A Z O+ U •N O 'a ol tL 41 is N ,;j c t~ '� O a p tp m tr 0 0 N Rf •rl s= w d A -el G m 4) i7. CI G G b y >+ O O 41 G p .i O U 41 U •.i G +� •-1 to 4 z 0► 11 N •� G m m ro E 4 0 0 >, O U m U H y •-t N G fq •.t -t y� A m G r w u O A 0 A H O '� �Oi q R• 0 O {�3 G ti .H G C 040 U •o 000 •00 woo N G� •0 m w o ,�.� 0 0 0 N > w Ol 00) '•'q a •'� U '� om, 0 o0 p 0 IJ %V 0 %0 0 m b o W 0 0 •d rw v 04 q 0 rtf 0 0 Z .0 0 v O 0° 0 w, �, � � 4i •-t tr, V � �y G a N� N w a r� G •,4 m ,U 'G A W 43 co ,N 'G w p •Q U N �C O O 'a K G a! i� 4) Q is O id ro 0 G ..{ 61 G. q A V� ..i m •' t 0 •r1 tr A y r-1 rt LI N tr {� m 0-4 N A A G •A N O O O N m A Uw y,mC 0 Q'$a y p O.b•0 ,Gt b !� ro aYi• m 4) 0 o•G•-� 0 m a1 is •, 0 Id G (uv >t CD A 0 y G m LL ty 0 {J N !1 0 0 .-I a+ A 'CS •H O rr U U m A ri U V -•i G G +3 m A w m+ b 0 �' b m y p w �I U 40 ••+ N U 043 •14 ° tv w u bba edNvm�m ro rt .,N row bro ro �•-+am�mc�� th 0 $4 O to +� b H U o N C, 1~Lb H U'0AJA N EE-4V 0 NV Pv H� o .0 owW> fUh lj�w c a •> a s to qj 4.) G G °'�' 0 0 m �+ M to m 0 'm0 r ro z O oP a •� A. U H •A Li •N U o' 0 ko 1 doo4woo i11ba00[S t,G'41j0 >.r1'�k0aNror0alAa tT3ta W Q) 04 040 r1 v O .0 C 0 Z N .0 0 4 r1 rn •-I r1 .••1 C 'a a v .0 C •.1 a C U '4 C al k .0 !� W 4.) O m .0 •.•1 ••1 Er w r3 v -P4 4J ro .0 k +rC t0 a C 41 ro a .1 ro 4j ..-1.,i -H N �0bV .W bA GL41a �Nis0 Z '0C O.A•�bA to r4 �fOid 0 We 0 .Q a .COO} ©N G ri ro N ••i r1 c0i ❑ 41 %4 v U V A. •� 3 �' c �+ .. a�i - aNi ro a 3 ro a 4J N � tic ro ro %4 �, .,, •.1 a � 4 a ro a b +� 11 a .a .-, O r.m a :~ k k •.•1 V a A A .,,,,a aQaW A C�+� 0+.+jUyvro Ak 1CUk�'4) �s0'C0 H •'•1 y NN a ro 14 U w U U N ro a �L 0 O ro >r 4.1 a) �AO.OaOa O00 a o c O NCB a)41 a0k'4 GPkCis a3U 0.Caj0 1J H C•.13.1�•.1k W,�-1 41rq cl4J .��•'10.q,1a a'O� ANOO+ •,1a d k�r1�a1 N� taCj N J .H •�Ov401N (0N ro14"1+00 q•C0 AC AC HlyN,O y•g F1 Wrov a O 0a fata '0 a 'CSC ,C k C y 1+ .�+ i1. U ©aUi A k C k +� O '� ,� C N .,14-) 1 .4 > U c .d 11 U aJ [� a y� C a1 •,1 N 14 41 .ti U >. fo d ro r1 •ri • 11 ro 0 'ti r. O N .� W 0 •U O iG �w C 0. V Jj �3 N ,�tO.,1 0H14��.1>1 11Q110CCN1* �A� rota 23b►e Na) faW�� O •CAS N1+roa �0 �W a �� A ,�� C •,1 k � of m y 1~ ' a1 a ••1 0 N ro .-4 A � .0 CA 0A 0A 110 R7 mH O1- 13,C N AO 01 k C ••1"1�,�br1 C !� y1U a •.i A.NX C C 4' N •-� A U +� % m m c r1 Q.•••1 as •.-1 0 so o3 ro m 3 0 U y� ,- •a a ro H. 0 0 0 •A c c •� y� a U afro .cG W O r110bO U,.1'[.0 MWA NCm•'�� UCN AA m -114 0..j ro O O 3..1� >,0 k ro{ 4 U >,yA• 41 9 O >1 >'••1A a ro''1 '� C �., tr}a1, m .c to m c ;j U'u sT •�+ .� c y +a P � 1� �+ w • +1 1� o w a. 0. u+ N dr U x �1 )r "� U ro 1i y b c »Oi i� C C. a C..0 Ra GS r1 i1 �i qj Gl U m m W •� • •,.R RS 0 ro W C a a O C N ••1 U C 0 AJ 0 it t "� J 1 ro a1 rt1 .•-1 r-1 A k 1 0.00 0 ik V C) a A la 00 a O a a u ra •,� N 1a .-t 00 C CL,� 11 a.,1 U k .G ro •C 'o 10 •C N f� O N a•1 m i1 ass N R k• 4 11 .d •-1 O ro 3 v1 %-I Ul a 1J+ C O b� m N 'O a •.4 ca x � .a U a -1 o U U x .,.1 ro U. 4 w c c 0 o C aroi0Q0N+1C ro aaUU ya A'tS *4 s~rr a O•'1 A'3N 41°W A W 10 13 'a 0 'a •0 U a O 10 ► 0 k a •.1 41 O 1� a r♦ •[ a.1 C "4 W ro O 0 P .0 a C 1; 1! •"I m b U m v A 'o W .0 0 •H 0. U r1 l ss 0+ ro A k 0 00 0 a IA >, 10 0 •A v C .0 a N C 0 ►1 f3 > M L1 • k H 14,0 '0 ro 'd 1aky,romCka°41 eb"thUCNa w W a0ro aN 41 a a r 1 'O CO10 10 •.1 �1 .1 m N k w A i•1 0,00 �+ > C O N 4 'tA ° c m "' °� k j1 U A '� U ,� C O O ..1 p. u •H » o a a p• b j s N +1 N �1 ©ro [S. J.1 O +' 9 0 P �1 0 •.1 10 -4 O v 11 41 A O >♦ 11 a k 3 we a y ro m U 1; m O U Sa a U 90-4 a+w to k c•r,b 041 N41 It �N ro 1+O41 m 0a0a440.90a41 .9.C-410.C140•-40.CU .C10Oa .c•HN•H10.C•Ha.,1a Aaroo r~aAa A0, .cU O rZ' Cl a O x 1J4.1.p ri E 4 41 ,-.1 .-f 41 Q. rf U v 10 &1 A > .SC H 'C1 0 SAS tl1 0 r•1 A 9 E- k 'IN E•1 04 V M E•F 10 E•1 N . ' • 0 4 to 1` e» C� H m • a • rn m co y� UH EA u .• W N U) CQ rl D m Vi W x U m a N 4a j 4 h C C O t10 :! O u u n N a' y u -4 O aJ O O C v T: O is -4 O da v -'a C w 6 7 L •� a7 'I. G ,7 'Cf u -•+ -« C . • . ,C 44 -a L M ro Y o. O C Tf :7 G w 00 rl (+• C Za a.� u a N a7 N u 0 V" w tl - -• C O C+ G I - rt x .• O u co v u C --4 C= 7 C L 1 G U -4 O �+ a0 C C ro L 9 r-1 X -a C u V1 V 7 v -• C O v >, v -+ ' J y..C, H O l h co r3 G :4 u 14 •+ L vl "4 rl to 1i MI O !T u ,.e Q 0 a J 7 3 .. ft. ri O 00 1 —• •7.. v ..a '.i V .-• to -4 U N 9 14 t} J :2U -• - .Z+ .G to u w v C CJ ( h W L 't'. v Z :1 -4 ra I 6 C6 H H 1C I•. w u ►� u C u� V r. L r. I. a -a t O• t] ,O OO O v O C C u >, ro 0 �" t7 :4 �. +4 9 e3 tG "[ to r4 i. u A: - d u u V Ln ao o, 46 O V' rs 7 L O ro N W v C3. ro n O 1. o :+ T L --• p, *0 .« U. U a. >, G. �+ ro 1. u rn :E O, — u c v u U 0 V C u a+ r3 tz ►. ar CJ L .•. G t: n +� �' -•� u O. +w N U ^� t~ to •• L. N G WV ri a) to Q V; 'V .'... m U G.. 4w 14u u -+ O i. w. E w u O q -4 0 v 3 13 u 0 -d O 4J N a+ O r -a V ►+ .G W -2 L ro H O 'J C '� U -U •-F .d u u O aJ C 60 u H N L 'L7 0: .d V G -- v C G. a 0 ft7 m 0 0. � .i C H ri m u X V C to -4 O " f`4 tC m u -a O O CL a4 >, O to @ -4 • O v m u x c w@ •+ m y ro i, L v +C4 aJ a1 .9 O = 4 L x H r.0 ^ts oo >, r4+4cc v u ao.+-4 o a c>~ I.ho0C-+ 1•xC@ n c:ur, 7 7 -J C 4♦ C -4 a1 -a O u aJ ri •, 1 'V U C -4 ,T; u q ++ tp '•+ r! -• G a0 C 'S7 G -H .-4 ro> L '7 L O z v .0 O '.i 14 G O a C v w L rw --4 L y L o 4 o' &J " ro u ro :, c -• a ca ►+ u m. a► to A -1 al r4 C 'O ++ x a O v -1 u v I- 4s w u N-0 :1 t]. -4 r 4 O •, %• u C+ 4 .0 v L= 'V N ro o N" a .. H• -4 w- as as O •- -1 .0 .. r G. o x aJ u C r a+ u A y -• 61 u U a H ,J +4 w at -� � d u .-4 3 -•1 .. ro d y .• n. u v a O� �. � L a+ w 0 'C7 C 00 W w ,C v a u L a t6 O - .0 A. C 00 u C t.7 v1 in o q aJ O h C .0 u a7 o. C w w L u : 41 U C O .� u .. • v v v H :! u u" V E u 7 >± y rrtt +4 u C Ii 9 IL) 13 C6 d q O O v x 14 a -• U O> u — W O ai O U .o to 1 O (j -» C u ,a U. V I-� 7 -• " C Q iii w d to 6 m A CJ O 'f] w• O .0 A O L w C u u W 44 .� 3 L z o+ u •C nl 0 �3 � O V► " d v O • C O N tr U B t3 O i! - C3 • -4 a C" a C x 4w ��++ W O 0 a4i •G C 2 1 H 44 IU O. w a - 00 y �y d b Ci �• Z! z. O Jt 14 it p •r� O 0 0 N H O C x .0 x V4 a G 1- i7. at C. C r ! R tit d 4�J a► 1 O � V W r4 O O v v az. C &► f0 t13 +4 gp� "O > i u 1� tS --4 -4 .-4 O -4 L -4 0 10 u 'V O C L L U d m a+ Iit f3 .w O C • v O O u@ -• u U 4I v u O j�-++ d Q r4 p) 1+ •0 C 14 a -4 `r4 G %I u a a. u H .4 a) L V L� L. O u +1 u u m N= O.ap O - a0 u --4 +4 ,.1 -4 k 41 W O 0 14 C A C -4 u ro ai u O v 2 u 0 -4 c 0 -4 ro 7 a o1 ,.4�4r1 41 1 O m . �47 •.4 N ,w a >r G1 .t V4 N e@ w rw W tf1 a+ 0 u Q aD yy y�►• v> b 14 W C 'W m it 9 r4 -4 i3 7 a C 14 ca > a, C u v= to s. OO.a z O C1 10 •j O P. y O' N en N O. D w O 4s !a3 O O. P-4 Yw O R k If y w CL O O v O O JC -4 4) O d v C a w X V v aJ A 1w A a• i. u O u a " -4 ai v A a L v C s O .0.4 »;o0 x u u U). 4A t3 0 %r a a. C3 j A- v7 V ro a. tl H OG x V >s X - t �, x O ro - +4 to W ►3 T-� . • u at CI t4 0 .O W x a w *DO IUL 0 w W CP Z qL rn aO N 7 J I N N 9uIn I ^ d H v lu C C 1 d u f D env u p �tl .Oi w C C +b is • p ti C .a +r ri h, w w o0 Co tt d •U •+ ►. er0 q O. C►. N v C w +1 to O • +� al 0 O • .•i g C w u V O y� w .i O O u u N Aqq u 'r u to 47 u M ++ O O m p a O C O W tn 'L O tl , �1 E1 ►. LL •4 q a $$4 �i 1+ IG C C 0 C G u .O O w -0 C u u W +Ci e` G O, U 1-4 I 17 +� C C q w q 0. • l .-4 •C > 1: V t, t. C3 V V u 0 y O N+ • N �•• C 4 V '7 N w an 10 u u V O. 0. u G 'tl C 0. a u u C u 1J C 1/J u 0. u 00 U +:1 +A Ls 1+. ►+ A C r+ Q rR v .4 M C V 1 'u1 N m 9 A. .* .0 --• .O I m a C q.q G q d: yy '1] t11 "d IV, Vi aQi u uq C O O' u O C O C C m ' C q +� u 4+ O w V .-t 1� u F+ to OC U •+ �•• b co tow •O I D to 9 91 m C O gy 8 ao A u .� w g 0. G V n 0 0. q A.0, d u �.+ �� a w C7 q a4 V v�1 u q 0 •.0 4 1+ 0 w u g H d 'L1 a C ro w w V d O u A q v O O O C% > •-. C W O u 4) 1+ 'V of eJ ?, L• 0! C L u 1+ 1 .a7 U 0 u 00 ++ u VI O 1 a . G u to G x Q M •-• V ++ G u Z >, etl > ++ t/1 >qq n� V 4 u 0> V O TI e= u Q w G A w t H m r u •C PC C* d U 0. 0. m M G G d G w I i u '>y ,+ .w .w+- v' C A V w 0! 00 1. C +q >► C! AO `� Ai 4 O t0 N C g V 6i W C r1 1+ {A w V Z u )1 W q O i W .+ C u q C4 . v PG v l }, ++ q q u A u >, fA U C C. ++ '1 N C V p 0. C • 't .0 d u A U fV. 0 >. a w w� L. u OR >, u C O V u V wl -v4 �' 'D •r4 6" 0 Wl u: to � �. u. O O 0 a 13 13 w w O. w " V �+ V I+. .a .-� ro •' 210 = .0 10 C w V -4 O #4 ed �+ CL O c 0 A w O O • u LV. C oA .-1 1tl •• dJ •-+ .0 B C ++ u C •" t Y O b W O C' u S g 0. C C. O a! O 9g C. V w +f C g ?, C try ~ Y7 Cr G 0 +� O N! q u rl L� e= C to P so m� w w u p � � w E w� 93 u O 0 q uq 9 0. ►V. U w w q •v •b ri CA V Iw.. -9 q •+ V Ix• C C a m C *wr1 u [3 •�-pQi p V V G. 9 Q O U � cbl CC > M w u G .ui w p -V4 -0 1 u X G U O. pq p H V 71 OC O [J q �y u 91 to u 0 1f. C r-f .+ M 0. w U w a .• Y C w C �+ Y r! M 47 Q 0. C O Y 1..-! , V +/ to G w{ V �! O' ++ 40 C ++ C a 'd K tip rl 1+ w U C V Y an d TI 91 O MCC a fl +a -+ a is 00 > fl Q u v u a of FO >. •+ d C 8 ; u ►� •" " '� '' +1 r, p a u 44 vara uwv,�>b.+cs 101+u.0u0 < to a .+ b a .G a+ya ,�wm!,au ao CD '°i w� a•'+•+G+4; •►+ u d w >. Y r{YC14 c d q ti >.w es < •+ m a ►+�. » a W u .°'> a $4, ►V+ •ro a t f+ O vV1 CL G. N w ata rlawoom i ~ H1 i ., r 4 V C DC CK> 1tpp >' 4 0 y ei O +o V o v a ►°• { a o a�i u d R N A C a ►. oa oZ A ►. CL 10 w < 7C A. u .+ C U •• ,'� '1, u q W q u u x x u.. _ _.. _.._.... _.-. u 0 .t fl 7�:d xd W; n v r, rl r. 00 x O H 0 aG 3 C, P4 zGr�QWL� ao�ca1� ONLt.W'�`' >4 (a u a Ham U°. 0 z Ina W W x N E) in M E"1IWIHHW O:nw� WH� y44 0 8z u° n >4 ' W 0 UUHy�C >` x OW M z°�+�>,. o �a AG tT 4 0 w 0 D G W 4) 0 41 i4 IT a $4 :N G u A D 4) 0 -H 10 r+ O V. O G .O (a • 1 ro 41 > D A 4) D V w •-+ N (1) 0 •-+ ° Z b U ro g- u O > ;, m O fn i. to H O G lu o, G H 4) til 0 w it i w j D 4! 41G N LOnwro a u � ri d H CrN o th A 0 x '� •l •'q a 0% °� rd u w o � ro w w N of u > 4) O C .,I N O N ° a C C O ,,OI O 0 rl fd U 44 A ,[ Nri .o 4) u PC 43 CA 41 0 G ,..I i4 H i1 '� W U A o '� to FA tr to 4) . W W Q) 3a 0 4) 0 ed 4 41 O A$ ra)i N •� ro prj 0 V b G O tp � W •� •� > W N 3 ed w .0 •r4 43 d O to p 4 4) 3 � •4 r •>0x M p' Wz 0 tx Gin W O O 9 to M w •r4 4,f-I 0, ldO D O 14 . •:3a b o U 0 M o r4 O 4o in o N rN•� >1 0 A CC c � 4.),�+ p 41 i+ O m Ia!'} b rj Al N •a O G4 G O W rOi w N 'tf tn ° w > W ,� b w o w u0 0 O x .! x .•� a tr x w m W. �' b ..� w o 3 O v G 3: 'a O 3 0 O K 5° m a $4 b u •.� N av -ri •.I •ri ° 0 tr :3 �s m G 0 0 � 3 4) O � O m U 0 8 LI ri 0 w .C, •.i O .Q N O k 4) G V O 0 w 0 a V 3 H V a x a s •r4 •r4 u V � 4D •.N. D V ai si > O O 44 p U ° U 0 O• C ,q u y u D d a) � o ° o x U 0 V O o >, •� ?� lZ O > G .. • ;� I G .3 43 W � G .� N U C1 CWG w � yr 1�•1 ,� . U "� w -r+ O a a w° 0 W 4 U a a y O W x �+ N x b•1 a+ O ��0 •V) U tJ C) 43 4) t u s� • 3 b 0 i-a 4A I: 1 a r-4 4) r4 •.4 O H 4d 4 0W Vv 14 C 'a a R roWgo a•r' N oua� va�V > 4) 4) 0 Va o w a. dty��U V�U1 U CVWr•4 A A d �� 044 o � 0oil ° •� ,G a •.t � A N «I V aci C>'c ,0 3- a Z - >•n U R.v a u A °1 41V IJ a •� 4n 0-4r4a0 41 CLpdVV 130 V 0•A ra 0V-•I rduP .c004117 .[OR E+ U u u c7 E-4 '0 > 0 a a 1 41,4 A k 0Alp O f~4MOc+0i %4 c V W O � tal'Q� 4ti b ym114 a .u>a a U.44•13 U 4) 'O 0 00 R- '00 134 Cp 14400-0�1°, 0ua A mvx fj m 0, R O $4 acvv cc "4 0 .•rl ,C V .0 .[ � O &10sma 'C7 I 0 44 ro .�. b4l00 4n A �o a a� 10Aw 00 a Qrd °n.o cV0•r4 Ov $4v •ri v1 a•r+ 41 V 'bau° rt •rt 4J 0 1A 4-1 m a H •,04 'a a do 0 x E-4 a m v •a I - a is a mro0$404 c 14 aj Id 1341 +m d tt 14,0 H c as U m Mr-4 0 0a u U mmN4j� aa,a mm � m V U) %4Z A .,I 0 ;' R. > "4•xro 'Qi tam #V1 a -ri 43 � 43N1+•�010G c �, O c u 41 0 d WN"4+a cr 4�1}at�wb01 AroQ.av A ►�a to O Id u > > .CO•r4A['a�.. H •r4 4-I �.► •rt A m Ur >1 m jJ •rt N .C: V N R J v a 41 A U a 0) z w 0 v r-4 O A 0 ro a 13 O u 0 E3 a 0 H 4) d Q ro N a a O V V c a 14 d a >� R A 41, 43 A •.I m c A 0 v a ro 14 0► 1 a aj ca�i�. V aj O %4 %4 c0u00 V d >,41 0 1 1441AUcu a1 'rl 4n 14 •1 443dUcr•1>,.-49: OU a •,4 a VI4fU d 0 •n>.y 0 14 m 0� wa •r+••i I� •r4 r, 41 A 4a1 f. r-4 010w0.c14n Oaa 10 x 't7 a 0.-44100 1R 14 �} 0 m 44 mAWV 01 ,.� O O •r4 t4 es00000H ..44u.o c > V as 0. "1 14 .0 el4v ul>0 4na41 41 ac -r d,Nla> cc 0 0"c01040014 -45 14aacm> 0-H0 t�yw C O I: •r4 14 0 14 4A"•4 (V0 M l '[y i 4. A O .$4 C •ri 0 to a a M 14•-4 as 14 a >1 d z7 14 .4 A•-+ m b Id c 0 GA •r4 >~:1,1 0)„'Ttr 0 x R c 0 3 41rov07vC)41- Vv v •.4 tro 0 v aml4 0 A 0 00 •n a 41 >1-'4•0 a 'u g4JU A Q1 R > 41 .n 13 0 •►•1 'O u .-4 m 0 c d N�OUfa41 V H V A ��m,OgO►c c 411 t4 •� A v00 4� m ''4013 ��c41 NAtn=4ua Aj 4A N a'r•'14 a01 o y mw 41•G.° y �p 1ai 0m.b Ay �+ G-r4 a 'dA 0.1.1 v •,4pa'[j� b 'maGt4a.1�A a.�A m S amc a1 .0 a -r4 a m 'Iy 0,4 'dc�'v'''' to 4A v ., 4 14 +' 1 ij O 4A 174 N 0u1#1.44 O U 4a ..4 a, 0 u 0>� Ao>,o�Q. u m 1cariV u •r, [ c V v •r•I 0 �c� m 0'0 tn44 m0.0 '�avcc r4�0c4IJc04N1m a>f 11d) fl$1k-.4v �H 0.. °a0 aoucatv�ivin41 px'0.R%0Uto44)00i't3 v44400A 0aa Uabxoo dvaxtp a�gwr•1 N�Q.% O a I:.a ,a A 4LJ 14 .,4 aym.Ca04� 41 -AO ,,4 � IT 0 � A r 4 4j r-4 14 U1 rn a6�a)AaI/IA1(4O �} b o A�m O qu ar-a .,I .,1 m %em ay�jrU41f .41 VaioONd0 �g ajou041R•1 c a a d Od40 d 14 'O m V U 4ua4JmVoNNAHcuH A 44�.•4 r4 I A 00 44 '0 41 a fi •r4 :14 ° Ql oE•HV s Aww> tr O N 4"1 •7 H r-4 0 44 r, .� >40 1 #0va>44)0 Pn00014a 0C >1r-1'a->40aNro(a01~ MaQ) Us :1 a a a [Y. Li 0r:R,0ri4.)0Ad 0 4'.l40afu•,I �qr•4i~ 'I3fJyA0 rja OU.1 0 'ir &J 0 rh A •-4 •H E+ w P r• y •ri V ro A }+ ;i ro U 4.) (0 a •0-1 r,7 0 r4 rl r 1 •, -[�.,drCLw� �uJU-.o:ii. 'A�OfC>+, �drJIG°9} .sgC�C[JJJ•U�•Oac1 �y�".��doyxrQd•,Nr� 1 da• rxlZL71 'i°7 p�+�� N7', .� >qN ,1 ro.l No• VU�U+ yO��Aa�@d >roaa;. r ro1N� A'S>~� •rNa O� 'd 0�roa saa A�a°N°W, � �a b�•drai +y � to 3 N N rrmH 1 v :1 a a 0 •d 0 0.A a+ . ur rodRA-1 w v a ..1 H r.w-1 1 ,ra �N °°6.0)dc00 yuc�O d O rl NL1 U y414 .,1"1a VI .� � L cU y UroE30 w ro1 4 .a.aCaQ 0w Ua �u tr a+aki trH U 0 aO + UwOroN ,1 ]r , O•dA a NO Q4.)A 0dC.) O N y a �w A N °r � rod 4 r(a0 ro'0 U�0 Q3 O +j � 3 N a N w ,' U 07 . rri to 0t)u' 0 d a N 1 0•0U4N0 J �rN H 0tA4 y roro0 r: W00 ro i0 � O P �O ro pl44903U >1 M ro H -H 4 4 w tn a � dLroUO+i 013 0'Ola Ua 'dtr•,l a0yOA t.,I N l 0a a, 0•.G � a a'd a s Ny ; � ro H U °a aU fa Ua ro° A�•r00A OQ,,-s•.I Ojy{00 w U .j pN.I U .4 a � .l 14 43 ro °y��bri V�+-lr0(J9 } W•V41O A n �° Wy NN Ntas N N C:E t) "� � o z O tg, o Ttda y, a roa G � • C4 �4)�y•.o4N °w 0 UN to �jVroa ro� a ..1U ao�N•�roa p'o�°ro 'd •,N Clro:rowro�;tp r-4 ° aN•-O v ro0 aWZ rOa °'4y��•1y�0°N+��ORw 0 U C4a'daV rA 144 -+ aN m Q'+ H ro to ro gCr N ro •r'd n0 0 'ti� toa °ro D Ad14 0 • 41 •r'ro ra O a"43 'd a 0 a v w.,j d> a -4 N�y a a [a}J tiro to r+ �U�N °,•t•ri e..a4y0-eq rogj.ay VHaa .,0 W•d-4 '1 ~ •-+ 0.0 N 4-) y U 13 U 41 vy-1aaro,1y0 N w rob C4 o 43r.aV VIV r400rgQ)V �0w oanil .vr. asN ro0Ur.a0 q)p to--itn" rot~ r.r•►roUVNsN;roaV W Ua43wfl04yaHV�roJ40Ea�O`oAOAHailE4pap Id Hurnnz'Q"AVre riri4HU 9x HfodaaH4a E+ Ln +p r Co cn r, it 9 0 PF • 1i • I n 0 0 H H 0 N W x I's i V, % 0300 -� C) w ":a + : V tit:J� s�ni+7N 0 to .,... 4. ti. ad ora F 0 Ei �rcazw H, uFj .�'3 W U W H W H W HAa, W[x-H O -i t4 '`I U a0 a•oaaHzt`' ::) 0 w og co=caZ Ey000Za uUxazww WW x E. G4 t3 > Iz. E + wuxaSIRZ ��s u ° u ►°- H w � = 0a L.' R V, % 0300 -� C) w ":a + : V tit:J� s�ni+7N 0 to .,... 4. ti. ad ora F 0 Ei �rcazw H, uFj .�'3 W U W H W H W HAa, W[x-H O -i t4 '`I U a0 a•oaaHzt`' ::) 0 w og co=caZ Ey000Za uUxazww WW x E. G4 t3 > Iz. E + wuxaSIRZ ��s u ° u ►°- H w � = 0a L.' R 0 a) G .ti o r. R 4� -4 L% a R 0 r001 'CS rl U R .,.t •rt N ro EAR' to [ r A 0 � ro• 44 >`+ a u a w ('rj V. u 1.1 R. W R •'4 0 ri is N ro 0 a O 0 'Cf Qi C 3 , N z ,U,4 U a, 4) w O N w ri u 41 ° W 4 - 4 4 of 33 � 4J C U u at 41 m � x 43 V a u .4 ro N - 9 ro N •,+ a N W41u a W w 0 N � o ro x 44 •rl d 11 0 r- H � r. 0 O i U 1 V to ••1 v R w U U l9 •�+ U {9 G 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 .f •� U 4a Ri i jJ � ..1 IA W •� UL -r4 U 11 U u 0 W G H Ci �+ Q 0. C 0 `H �' ay a} CIO a co at 0 '° 0t a)0 © w ra ro H >+ N O � �, ro N co "� 0 Cj �` ro � •0 r. O O N 0 0 ri ro 0 [ O ••4 > U to R -,4 U Q. Q t1f U '0 •40� N V .1 Q m L7+ CO b 0 G t 'is 0 N 0 t0 OG C 0 CID, Ch 44 .. U 0o rs 0 r. R to ra to V) N aCi a U) a 0 0 M GL •ri 4 a .. O U W W N r. .� w a 0 r U 4) W w P 0 r� � 0 -ri 0 ro a ro o 0 � � 1� a •.a ri • '14 0 u � •% aUi sr et°v O N m O m 0 0 'd 44 V), N w 4'A.. 'M ,4 •ro O 0 V � 2 V V O V1 H •-a r3 U -•1 >41 �4 Q ri :~ v} „0� U 67 [ to O 0 'O sv •O7. w '4 a rj .,I W N 0 U u gj �7 $4 4j a. > at V a A a a u PCs ro '�V 4J U)•N ro ' •O •b' w cn N w A '' •N •ri G O of 0 i% U •� 41 A a ro ,-1 r4 G rt iG R t) V t: r. It rl It 0 0 O 1� to 0 11 s f ii1 i►7 C 3 rl ° r. a 4 a w 0 i o d >+ .V R w O U Q) 44 .t~ I~ W 44 41 n) z r-I 4J r>1 i CT N U .1 •r 11+ IRj U U w U Q. r•4 •� ro H CL 0 a N O v >, �4 0 1 1 O 00 0 V 0 0 a U 0 H w 41 °' a. a w cn b U �i 0 o d d v y, >4 V •� 1 U U 4j t~ A o a 41 y r A `� � ro �� r� za o -r � a r v I;. U -4 O 'C w N • V O a $4 rl A w N N i� f a1 ,-1 O O 0 aO b A •i� 1� d i1 0 > 0 444 to ro �4 U N d > ro N Q! 0 41V. w 00 CIOw ro a a, N ❑ W N •.� •a � X U 1• .,� w 0 w �: w >4 � > M U 0 0o N 0 0 0 9 9 a � A4 � 0 0 t .,0 �" �,�} a�iLn a o b 0 0� :°+ fu n. N ' Cf H iDi H d a O []. G H •• t 41 (T ON o •A IV U N 0 0 > p o 41 a► �1 ca W O 0 � W O •�+ a'�} •.N1 V z 44 U rJ 1� � Q! � •U 0) a a O W O ,� go •r ► M w 0 4! v 4 >+ V ,. 1r ro N >' F. n: o U vi b $ x U r x U s+ � � � � 0 H 4f G b Ey � '� � � 4t a► .�. a 44 d w N - !~ sr m t~ ar I uc ca z4 w v N 3 o U a1 � O m 0 O U a > b .� u w z v v m z w ae 0 d t: A s~ c O to U t3 U 9 4i ao 4J W w U N H.t 4 Q th 14 rr-i - .41 � 0 U >+ � C. 'Cf 04 4-1 ro tr tJ' to A :3 co 0 t~ N M 0 •� 7 V •,1 N V O In P of O H ,C In h t N a a U H it s Z a V ro v 41 u rn • N 'tl al 41 V N � tr a 1� a3 4i 14 M ro to co UU • • FILED T PORT BEACH JUN 17 IMI CITY OF NEW � L. G CCb& 11•0• BOX 176w, tiF Wf't11tT HEACH. CA 921>58-8915 y _i• ,�, r NEGATIVE DECLARATION Office of Planninc; area kt ;e.irt:li 1400 Tenth Street, ltoom 121 Sacramento, G. 95614 D County Clerk of the County of Orange P.G. 11or. 838 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Planning [N:I'nrtrA:nt City of tlewtflrt Peach 11.0. Is ,r. 1 , „' Ile rx)rt lleach, C1, 162F 'M-8915 :thy:.' ')F 1'1a),11;CT:tit05A Af.fordat,lo: Aloartments l'- __ Ftesidcntial Iu:n111t.y Iu)nus, Traffic S PNt>.:FCT 1f;CATIOIl: 153H Placentia Avenue, Newport Beach. California PRCGJi�:T GF.SCPIPTIC•!:: ConstrUct ion of a twerity-six (26) unit "lowof" incorrc: apartment de- velopment which includes a fifty percent (50-4) density bonus. Thc> term to mist for n minimum of thirty (30) years in regards to affordability. 7'h4 pro}ect incl>ules the use rINDI::G: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy Y.-3 pot t•,:niny to procedures and 0uidelines to implement the California 1nvironmental rjuality Act, the Environmental Affairs Committee has evaluated the proposed project anti determined that, -.the prolx,sed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. MITIGATION 14EASURES:plea., see the attached sheets. I11ITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: The City of Newport Leach INITIAI. STUDY AVAILABLE FOR HFVIM' AT: DATF: RECEIVED FOR FILING. JUN 171987 3300 liewport. Boulevard, Newport 1{each, CA Environmental Coordinator - DATE' l l .Tune 1987 / is p fir• JUL221987, LM Ur nE"W PORT BEACt - .l _ I L; 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach r APPENDIX I TMVIAMMEMTAL CNECTLIST TORN Environmental Clecklist Form (To Be Completed By Lead /lgency) 1. Background 1. Name of Proponent 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 2925 r�l1�� r• .. Costa 11CO11a ra l 1 rortjia 3. Date of Cbecklist Submission 11.nme 1987 4. Agemcy Requiring Checklist Thy ri i.v of t�P%'T ri htac S. Name of Proposal, if applicable Moun Affordable Apartments Iv It. Environsental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and 'maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) 1. Earth. will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditicas or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com— paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The deetcuction, covering or modi— fication of any unique geologic or pbysical features? a. Any increase in wind or water erosion of sails, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bey, inlet or lake? M PAYNE 1Q I 73 f' YES MAYBE f4 x. Expo!:urc of people or property to geological hazards such as earth- quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or kleteri- oration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates,, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 74 -J/— 121 .... u...a YES MAYBE In 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: s. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of ani— mals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? 4. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Lipht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? S. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Y I 75 YPS MAYBE hp 9. Katural Resources. Will the proposal result in: at. Increase in the rate of use of aay natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any non- reaevable natural resource? 10. Risk of U set. Does the proposal involve a risk o an explosion or tM release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the want of an accident or upset conditions? 11- Population. will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of to area? 12. _14_0_u�s_i_a. Will the proposal affect axistins housing, or create a demand for additional housing? / 13. Trans ortation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Ceneration of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new perking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alteration■ to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? E. Increase in traffic hazardous to rotor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an Rff:ct upon, Or result in a need for new or altered Rovernmental services in any of the folleuira areas: 76 h PPE-2A:2A 0 YES VA"C IND a. Tire protection?' b. Ponce protection? C. schools? . d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. other gareramental services? 15. &WEST. will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amouats of fuel or energy? b. substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. ?fill the proposal result in a use—" d for now w systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? .....r..� b. Communications systemst C. water? . d. sewer or *optic tanks? a. storm Water drainage? f, solid waste and disposal? 17. *man Health. will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hasard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? la. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result is the obstruct on of any scenic vista or vier opts to the public, or will the proposal result is the creation of on aesthetically offissive site open to public view? ;7 • US NYSE No 19. Recreation. Mill the proposal result to an pact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Arck_eolosicaliHistorical. Will tN#. proposal result in an alteration of a Significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. Mandatory Findings of siRaificance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the eav iron- t, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below ee11-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rate or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important e3amplss of the major periods of California history or prehistoryt b. Does the project have the potential to achieve abort -term. to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief definitive period of time while long - tore impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project hove impacts which are individually limited, but cusu- lstively Considerable? (A project mar impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small. but +here the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is aignificant.) d. Does the project have enviroungntsl effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on hur:m beings, either directly or indirectly? III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation IV. Determination (±o be completed by the Lead Aponcy) 73 M. On the bisis of this initial evaluation: [� I tied that the proposal project COULD 1lOT have a significant affect an the eaviroarent. and a WCATIVX MCLARATION will be prapared. 0 I tied that although the proposed project could •liars a significant effect as the environment, there will Mot be a significant- effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on as attached •beet have bens added to the project. A 1ECATIVL MCLARATIdM will be prepared. I find the proposed project MAT have a significant effect on the emvirommest, and an UMB011ltlOM IMiACT MORT is required. 11 June 1I)Fs7 Date (Bete: lbia is only a suggested form. their owe format for initial studies.) 14 79 g tare For The City of ll+rwijort Beach - ftblic agencies are free to devise MESA AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS IV RESID£liTIAL DEnsrTy BONUS, TRAFFIC sTUDy 2b. The proposal may result in the creation of objectionahln odors during the course of construction duo_ to the con- ntruction materials and methods. Such effects shall ho eliminated upon completion of the project and are, there- fore, insignificant. 4a. The proposed project will result in a change in the diver- sity and number of species of plants upon the site. Tho proposal shall result in an increase in the variety and numbers of plant life on -site, and, upon compliance with mitigation measures the effects shall be insignificant. fia. Tmplementation of the proposal shall result in ter:porary increases in exinting noise levels rlurinq thty course of construction. They shall be alleviated upon r_nmiillition, and no sirinificant effects are anticipated. 7. The proposed project will produce new light and ellare, yet the effects shall not significantly effect neighborinq residences upon compliance_ with mitigation meanuren incor- porated into the project. A. Implementation of the proposal shall result in a nubntantial alteration of the present (retail and service commercial "pipe" outlet) land use. However, the present use is a legal, non -conforming use. The proposed change would be to a use conforming to both the municipal planning documents end to the exhibited trend in area land useage. As a result, this effect is insignificant. 14/14a. Implementation of the proposal may have an effect upon, or result in a need for fire protection. Upon compliance with mitigation measures however, these effects shall he reduced to a level of insignificance. MITIGATID!7 MEASURES 1. 4a. That a landscape and irrigation plan for thn l,rojest shall he prepared by a licensed landscape nrchitoct. The landscape plan shall integrate and phase the installation of landscaping with the proposed con- struction schedule. (Prior to the nccupnnry of any structure, the licensed landscape archltnct shall certify to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan) . 2. 4a. That landscaping shall he regularly m-tintalnnrl free of weedy and debris. All vegetation shall he regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 3. 7. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light sourre and to mininize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Fnginnerj with a letter from the Engineer nt-ating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 4. 13h+ That the number of parking spaces required by the off-street parking requirements of the City of Newport Beach (as provided by the Municipal Code, Title 20, Chapter 20.30) be provided on -site. S. 14/14a. That prior to the issuance of building permitn, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler protection. 6. 14/14a, The: Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. 8. 18. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P.O. BOX 1768. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: '7fflcc Of H.snr.lnq .slid Research 1.300 Tenth Street, P.00m 121 �.acramento, CA 95814 ElCounty Clerk Public services Division P.O. f+ax R38 Santa Ana, CA 92702 F L E.."D AUG 5 1987 GA�R�YYL..GRANMLLE. Comfy Clerk �// �.+pLLiL1S DEPUTY City of 11+•:rlort fii!acll Planninq Diparterent 1100 Newr,or t itou l r�v+r r tl P.O. 11ox 17611 Newport Jiccacth, CA r.iYr,'111-t1g15 SU11.1F.'C1': F11'rvi of !Notice of Determination in conplianco with section 211031 or 21 152 of the Puhl i c Resources Code. PROJECT T17-:.E:: Mega Affordable Apartments It' -- Rent:entta Density t:rnur�, '1'raffl: 5t dy RCtnc,r LCtiCATIOf1: 153Ji i•I+scentia J,ven6u, t1+�w7rrrt 1ieAch, Cal l fUrr,la i'}iQ,JF.("I' nE:S�iiI1'TIOt1; Conrtructirill of s twenL;.-six (26) unit "lr.) er" l[Irr,mr� n(,-rrts",enC de- velopment which inc1rules a fifty percent (50►) clrrnr:it.y 1.onu6. Tne term to last for a minimum of thirty ("10) 'fears in regards to affordat,i 1 it_y. The project itzCludf!5 the use of Federal C.D.B. ;. funds and the omits will be in thv Section 8 :;rogram co:rrACT Pt.»S0:1: Patricia L. Temple / Craiq T. TF::.F.PIVAIJ-: 1.G•. (714) 6,14-3225 STATE CLEARItIGTIouSF: 11UMIif:11: Pot atwnl icable. This i:: to advino that the City of Newport Reach his m;t-le the fol lo:rinq determinations regardinr3 the al/3ve described project: 1. The project has been. approved, disapproved by the City of Newport Beach. 2. The project will, f will not have a .itinificant effect on the environ[rent. 3. ^ In F.nvironnental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to LJ the provisions of CEQA. 0 A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the rovi:iions of CE9A. A COPY Of the flegative Declaration i; attached. 4. Mitigation tneasures Z were, were [lot Made a condition of approval of this project .- 5. A Statement of Overridinq Consideration:, was, X was not arlopted for thin project. 6. The final Environmental Document and the record of the project apt>roval may be examined at the Planning Department of the City of Newport Reach, 3300 ',ewl:nrt Iloulev,srd, Newport peach, CA 926511-8915, (7106,14/3225. DATE: PrCEIVED FOR FILING: --•--r- -Q f��C`t�� ,, 3300u &u"* ✓JUlnt_4_ __ F INI ROf11 VITAL C00RDI JIATOR nATF:: 3 Auqust 19t17 Ift A C! T AUG 51987 EiAitY L GRAtIV1 L Gosx�sY CleftNewport Beach 0 FILED CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AUG 5 1987 1'.0. BOX 1768. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92656-8915 GARY i GRANWLLF. Cotvf C** NEGATIVE DEPUTY TO: aOffice of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Roos, 121 Sacramento, CA 95fl14 aCounty Clerk of the County of Orange P.O. Box 83B Santa Anti, CA 92702 FROM: P1anning D•fl)artmcl,r Cit•; of h^.wlwrt B�:,i:h P.O. Box 17611 Newport beach, Ch '.+1WAJ_8915 NAM-F: OF PRO.IEC"I':Me,a Affordable Apartments I!' __ Res;irlr:riial Dunal+v t )MV;. Traffic 5t PROJECT InC-ATION: 1538 Placent i,i Avenue, Newport Beach, Ca 1 i forni.l PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of a twenty-six (26) unit "lower" incurns-- apartment de- velopment which includes a fifty Percent (50%) density bonus. lira term to lest for a minimum of thirty (30) years in regards to affordability. The project includes the use MIMING: Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy Y,-3 pe:'talninq to procedures and guidelines to implement the California Fnvironrl-_ntal Quality Act, the Environmental Affairs Cosamittee has evaluated the. prolosed project and determined that.the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environ:..ent. MITIGATION MEASURES:please see the attached sheets. I111TIAL STUDY PREPARED 11Y: The Cityof Newport Reach INITIAL STUDY AVAILAiLE FOR REVIEW AT: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA DATF. RECEIVED FOR FILING: & \SS�S� f. Lw ter: 1• „�1'�V e Environmental Coardinato� DATE:11. June 1987 AUG 51987 Y GARY l GRANViII.E, County Clbtlt ER1fY Newport Beach APPFKDIX I [MYIRMNEMTAL cREcnIST FORM Environmental Checklist Form (To Be Completed By Lead Agency) I. Background 1. Name of Proponent —Mesa Develnrrx+nr fmmnnn, 2. Address and Phone number of Proponent 2925 Avenue, r. Costa M na allf� riln f 714 f 97q-9991 3. Date of Checklist Submission 11.7une 1987 4. ASoncy Requiring Checklist The City —of fl wr,rr. c Aoiirh S. Pose of Proposal, if applicable Ale:;a Af.fordahle Ar)artmerrtn iv It. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are rewired on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displaces,ents, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modi- fication of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in vied or voter erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or chanRaa in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? 73 yes MAYBE No g. Exposure of people or property to geological hazards such as earth- quakes. landslides„ mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or +leteri- oration of ambient air quality? b. the creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of eater movements. in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates., drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? +, d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters or in ■ny alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cute: or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Fxposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 74 5 ...r &I..'& 0 0 YES 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, or insects)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of ani— mals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or nove■ent of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Hoist, Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. Li ht and Clare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? B. Land Use. still the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 11AYRE i) 75 9. Natural vesources. Win the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use nf any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resource? 10. Risk of tT set. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiatiaa) in the event of so accident or upset conditions? 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, densityor growth , rate of the human population of an area? 12. _Housin . Will the proposal affect existing housing. or create a demand for additional housing? 13. iransportatiaa/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Ceneration of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? / c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systens? �^ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or move"at of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazardous to rotor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. Public Services. Will the Froposal have an Vff:ct upan, ar result in a need for new or altered Rovernmental services in any of the f011cwin; areas; /� 76 Pr[-U :24 s yes a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintanaac• of public facilities. including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Ems. will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial iocreass in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for now systems. or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural Baer b. Coasunications systems? C. hater? d. Sewer or septic tacks? a. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstructo-n of any scenic vista or view open to the public. or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthatically offensive site open to public view? I KAYIE No EFA M MAYBE No 19. Recreation. will the proposal result n an pact upon the quality or quantity Of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Arcbeolo ical/Historical. Will t1++- proposal result is w alteration of a significant archeological or historical sites structure, object or building? 21. Nanda_ _t_,Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-suataining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal"community. reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage - of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure wall into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumu- latively considerable? (A project sum impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those isrpacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation It'. Orterminstion (To he :orpleted by the Lead Agency) 78 On the basis of this initial evaluation: Q I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, sed a WCATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. E] I Haw that althougk the proposed project could ,Have a sigoificant effect an the enviroement, there will sot be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on see attached sibeet Mve been added to the project. A NECATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 0 I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the eaviromsuet, aid as 07110O ZI6TAL DRACT REPORT is required. 11 June 1987 Date (Note: ibis is only a suggested fors. their own format for initial studies.) Pa, IV Signature For Tile Cil_y f,!IJrrw22rt Quasi Public agencies are free to devise 11 79 0 C MESA AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS IV RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS, TRAFFIC STUDY 21h. The proposal may result in the creation of Obinctionable odors during the course of construction due f.n the con- ntruction materials and methods. Such effert:n shall he eliminated upon completion of the project And nrn, there- fore, insignificant. 4a. The proposed project will result in a change in the diver- sity and number of species of plants upon thr. nite. The proposal shall result in an increase in thn variety and numbers of plant life on -site, and, upon compliance with mitigation measures the effects shall be insignificant. 54. Implementation of the proposal shall result. in temporary increases in existing noise levels during thn courar_. of construction. They shall he alleviated upon completion, and no significant effects are anticipated. 7. The proposed project will produce new light and glare, yet the effect, shall not significantly effect neighboring residences upon compliance with mitigation measures incor- porated into the project. fl. Implementation of the proposal shall result in a substantial alteration of the present (retail and service comnercial "pipe" outlet) land use. However, the present use is a legal, non -conforming use. The proposed change would be to a use conforming to both the municipal planning documents and to the exhibited trend in area land uneage. As a result, this effect is insignificant. 14/14a. Implementation of the proposal may have an effect upon, or result in a need for fire protection. Upon compliance with mitigation measures however, these effects shall be reduced to a level of insignificance. MITIGATION MEASURES 1 }�� That a landncape and Irrigation plan for thn pro jnct shall be prepared by a licensed landscape arc;lilt.ect. The landscape plan shall integrate and phnan the installation of landscaping with the proposincl con- struction schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure, the licensed landscape architncL shall certify to the Planning Department that the lnndscaping has been installed in accordance with the prepared plan). 2. That landscaping n1inI1 be regularly maintained free of weeds and debrin. All vegetation shell he regularly trimmed and kept in n healthy condition. 3. 7. That the light system shall be designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner as to concnnl the light source and to mininize light spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Fngineer stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. 4. 13b. That the number of parking spaces required by the off-street parking requirements of the. City of Newport Beach (as provided by the Municipal Code, Title 20, Chapter 20.30) be provided. on -site. 5. 14/14a. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall review the proposed plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler protection. 6. 14/14a. The Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire Department. That all trash enclosures shall be screened from adjacent properties. CONSOLIDATED REPROGRAPHICS MICROFILM DIVISION