Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/05/1995COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES 4 Mc A: r s REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PLACE: City Council Chambers TIME: 7:30 P.M. DATE: January 5, 1995 ROLL INDEX CALL * * * * * All Commissioners were present. # ## EX- OFFICIO OFFICERS PRESENT: James Hewicker, Planning Director Bob Burnham, City Attorney # ## William R. I-aycock, Current Planning Manager Patty Temple, Advance Planning Manager John Douglas, Principal Planner Don Webb, Public Works Director Dee Edwards, Secretary Minutes of December 8 1994 Minutes of 12/8/94 Commissioner Ridgeway requested that page 22 of the December 8, 1994 minutes be corrected to state that "The subject child care is more mitigated by pro)dmity to the airport than the YMCA property, and yet the Commission tion * chose to deny the this request." Motion was made and voted Ll Aye on to approve the corrected December 8, 1994, Planning Commission Minutes. MOTION CARRIED. # ## Public Comments: Public Comments No one appeared before the Planning Commission to speak on non - agenda items. # ## Posting of the Agenda: Posting of the Agenda James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the Plamung Commission Agenda was posted on Friday, December 30, 1994, in front of City Hall. # # i 4 4 COMMISSIONERS s� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5. 1995 ROLL INDEX CALL X k i Use Permit No. 2018 (Amended)(Public Hearing) item No. 1 Request to amend a previously approved use permit which UP 2018A permitted the installation of two off -site, directional signs Removed from and the alteration of an existing off -site directional sign. The Calendar proposed amendment involves a request to revise a previous condition of approval that limits the directional information on one of the signs located in the P -C District to projects within the City of Newport Beach. The proposed amend- ment is necessary so as to allow the directional information pertaining to "Newport Coast" which is a project outside of the City of Newport Beach. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 145, Block 50, Irvine's ' Subdivision located at 3366 Jamboree Road, on the southeasterly corner of Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boule- vard. ZONE: P -C AND Use Permit No. 3176 (Amended)(Public Hearing) item No. 2 Request to amend a previously approved use permit which UP 3176A permitted the installation of an off -site, directional sign on property located in the P -C District. The proposed amend- Removed from ment involves a request to revise a previous condition of Calendar approval that limits the directional information on the signs to projects within the City of Newport Beach. The proposed amendment is necessary so as to allow the directional information pertaining to "Newport Coast" which is a project outside of the City of Newport Beach. 2 L M, A COMMISSIONERS 0,� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES c Ianc ROLL CALL INDEX LOCATION: A portion of Lot 146, Block 51, Irvine's Subdivision, located at 3500 Jamboree Road, on the southeasterly corner of Jamboree Road and Bristol Street. ZONE: P -C APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant At the request of Jim Hewicker, Planning Director, Agenda Items 1 and 2 were addressed together. Mr. Hewicker explained that the two subject use permits were originally approved permitting off -site directional signs; however, conditions of approval for both use permits limit the direc- tional information on the signs to projects within the City of t Newport Beach. Subsequently, the Zoning District Regula- tions have been changed so as to allow off -site signs within the San Diego Creek North and Jamboree /MacArthur Planned Community District. The Planned Community District Regulations that have been approved by the Plan- ning Commission and the City Council allow the off -site signs and do not restrict their use to developments within the City. Therefore, Mr. Hewicker continued, the Planning Department was recommending that these two items be removed from calendar and the filing fees be refunded to the applicant. otion * Motion was made and voted on to remove Use Permit No. 11 Ayes 2018 (Amended) and Use Permit No. 3176 (Amended) from calendar and to refund the filing fees associated with each to the applicant. MOTION CARRIED. -3- COMMISSIONERS 4 o 0 �0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH •MINUTES January 5, 1995 OLL CALL I INDEX Use Permit No. 1561 (Amended) (Public Hearing) I Item No. 3 Request to amend a previously approved use permit which U UP 1561A Approved permitted the establishment of a Del Taco, drive through A District. The proposed amendment involves: the retention of an as -built outdoor patio dining area; the extension of the - as-built outdoor patio so as to be 10 feet closer to Bristol Street; and the construction of a 10 foot addition across the front of the existing building, which will be used as addition- al interior seating. The proposal also includes: an addition to the rear of the building which will be used for additional storage space; the relocation of an existing trash storage area; and a request to waive a portion of the additional required off - street parking. LOCATION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 59 -4 (Resubdi- vision No. 414) located at 2101 Bristol Street, on the southerly side of Bristol Street, between Irvine Avenue and Birch Street, adjacent to the Santa Ana Heights area. ZONE: C -1 -H APPLICANT: Del Taco, Inc., Orange OWNERS: Mr. and Mrs. Llewellyn B. Copp, New- port Beach Referring to the staff report and observations made by staff of the site operations, Commissioner Adams questioned whether or not high schools had been in session on the day of the observances. He opined that it had been his experi- ence when visiting the site, this operation received a fairly high number of high school students for lunch. Planning Director Hewicker stated that the observances made on December 20, might possibly have been during the school Holiday period. He opined that Corona del Mar High COMMISSIONERS 4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL I INDEX Coast Highway. Much of the traffic comes from employees working in the Newport Place Planned Community and the Koll Center Planned Community office developments, which for a long time had a scarcity of restaurants. Responding to a question from Commissioner Ridgeway, Mr. Hewicker stated that there was an opening in the rear wall on the site which provides vehicular ingress and egress to. Irvine Avenue. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item and Mr. Kenneth Carrell, project architect representing the applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Carrell stated he concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A." Mr. Carrell commented that there was no high school located in close proximity to the restaurant site, and the lunch traffic consists primarily of office employees. Replying to a question from Commissioner Adams, Mr. Carrell stated that the proposed remodel includes doubling the size of the food preparation area so as to allow for quicker preparation of the food product, and hence quicker service. There were no plans to increase the kitchen area nor the number of employees. Mr. Carrell stated that 85% of the business at this particular location is drive -thru business with customers exiting the site after receiving their order. Commissioner Ridgeway discussed with Mr. Carrell the ingress and egress provisions of the site. Commissioner Ridgeway stated the former front access drive, now eliminat- ed, had provided customers with an eluting option. Mr. Carrell stated he had observed the operation on several occasions, at different times of the day, and believed the right turn only onto Bristol Street did not constitute a major problem. In answer to a question posed by Commissioner Adams regarding traffic back -up on Bristol Street, Mr. Carrell said the operation currently has a person outside with a remote COMMISSIONERS 0\ d�t��4�,pV%\Aj� °' 4 Mo Al 4 MINUTES CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH January 5, 1995 RCALL OLL INDEX board taking orders at lunch time. He continued the biggest problem is not being able to get the food prepared fast enough. The proposed double -sided taco bar, allowing quicker food preparation, is expected to help eliminate the traffic back -up. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Commissioner Adams voiced his concern that Del Taco had previously expanded its operation without benefit of permits. He stated his belief there could still be problems with traffic backing -up on Bristol Street. He felt, however, that the purpose of the proposed expansion was to improve the efficiency of the operation, and that conditioning the project with a requirement to maintain a remote order unit during peak hours, would help alleviate the back -ups. He stated he did not feel that the elimination of the pass - through lane resulted in a major change of the operational characteristics and would support the application. Commissioner Ridgeway stated his concern regarding the previous unapproved expansion of the outdoor patio area of Del Taco at this site. He commented he had visited the site on many occasions and did not feel the pass- through lane was a necessity as the persons who frequented the site appeared familiar with its operation. He commented that signage might be improved calling attention to the existence of the rear driveway. Commissioner Ridgeway stated he would support the application for expansion. Planning Director Hewicker informed the Commission that a sign exists on a side wall of an adjoining building that directs customers to the vehicular access easement to Irvine Avenue. Commissioner Pomeroy stated his support of the application. tion * Motion was made and voted on to approve Use Permit No. 1 Ayes 1561 (Amended) subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A." MOTION CARRIED. 6 4 COMMISSIONERS O�r CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 OI,L CALL INDEX Findings: 1. That the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. That the waiver of the take -out restaurant develop- ment standards as they relate to a portion of the required parking (15 parking spaces) will be of no further detriment to adjacent properties inasmuch as the drive -in and take -out restaurant is an existing development which is designed in a way that meets the purpose and intent of such design standards; and adequate parking is being provided on -site. 3. That the design of the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed development. 4. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 20.80.060 of the Municipal Code. 5. Adequate provision for traffic circulation is being made for the drive -in and take -out restaurant facility. 6. The approval of Use Permit No. 1561 (Amended) will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detri- mental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. Conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, floor plans, elevations and sign plans, except as noted below. -7- 4 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 OLL CALL INDEX 2. That the proposed facility shall be permitted to operate 24 hours daily. The outdoor dining area shall be monitored for noise and, if necessary, the hours of its use shall be curtailed to an earlier closing hour. 3. That the proposed relocation of the pole sign at the southeasterly comer of the property be positioned so that sight distance is maintained in accordance with the City's sight distance standard 110 -L. 4. That the proposed patio fencing and landscape planter shall be revised to provide sight distance at Bristol Street and the private drives in conformance with City Standard No. 110 -L. Landscaping, walls and other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Walls and landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed 24 inches in height measured above the pavement. 5. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 6. That a minimum of 29 off -street parking spaces (plus an additional 12 spaces in the drive -up stacking lane) shall be provided at all times. 7. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer. S. That the drive- through facility shall be operated in such a manner that vehicles will not be allowed to block access driveways. This shall be monitored at all times by the applicants' representatives at the site. An employee with a remote order unit shall be used during peak hours of operation to expedite the orders so there will not be back =ups in the stacking lane onto Bristol Street. If back -ups occur, the incoming customers shall be directed to bypass the drive- -8- a r CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX through facility. If a traffic congestion problem occurs on Bristol Street related to the drive- through facility that is not immediately corrected, the Planning Commission may recommend to the City Council revocation of this Use Permit. 9. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from adjoining properties and from adjoining streets. 10. That the development standards pertaining to a portion of the required parking spaces (15 spaces) for the take -out restaurant shall be waived. 11. That any new directional signs shall not exceed 6 sq.ft. and shall not include the restaurant name or logo. ` 12. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces shall be designated within the on -site parking area and shall be used solely for handicapped self - parking. One handicapped sign on a post and one handicapped sign on the pavement shall be required for each handicapped space. 13. That the service of any alcoholic beverages in the take -out restaurant facility is prohibited unless an amended use permit is approved by the City. 14. Landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition. 15. That all employees shall park their vehicles on -site. 16. That trash receptacles for patrons shall be located in convenient locations inside and outside the building. ' -9- COMMISSIONERS db\ lot�000aolml\&S� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX 17. That a washout area for refuse containers be provided in such a way as to allow direct drainage into the sewer system and not into the Bay or storm drains, unless otherwise approved by the Building Depart- ment. 18. That grease interceptors shall be provided on all fixtures in the restaurant facility where grease may be introduced into the drainage systems in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Plumbing Code, unless otherwise approved by the Building Depart- ment. 19. That exhaust fans shall be designed to control smoke and odor, unless otherwise approved by the Building Department. 20. That one bathroom for each sex shall be provided and shall be made readily available to patrons of the facility during all hours of operation. 21. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090.A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 22. That the Planning Commission may add or modify conditions of approval to this use permit, or recom- mend to the City Council revocation of this use permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this use permit, causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the community. 10 -10- COMMISSIONERS r d�\ i 4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX Use Permit No. 3429 (Amended) eview) Item No. 4 Request to amend a previously approved use permit that UP 3429A permitted the construction of a hand car wash and detailing facility which also permitted the sale and dispensing of Continued t gasoline, on property located in the RSC -H District. Said 4/20/95 approval also allowed a portion of the proposed building to exceed the 26 foot basic height limit in the 26/35 Foot Height Limitation District. The proposed amendment involves a request to allow the sale of soft drinks and pre - prepared food items for customers and employees in con- junction with permitted retail sales on the property; and a request to permit a background type music system in the outdoor customer seating area. The proposed amendment also includes a request to approve an off -site parking agreement for employee and additional overflow parking on the adjoining Marakesh Restaurant property. LOCATION: Parcel No. 1, Parcel Map 282/40, 41 (Resubdivision No. 988), located at 1200 West Coast Highway (car wash site); and Lots 37 and 38, Tract No. 1210, located at 1100 West Coast High- way (off -site parking lot), on the north- erly side of West Coast Highway across from the Balboa Bay Club. ZONE: RSC -H APPLICANT: Warren Levy, Newport Beach OWNER: Golden Empire Trading Company, Corona del Mar Planning Director Hewicker explained that tonight's review of the subject application had been stipulated in Condition No. 14 when the project received Planning Commission approval on November 10, 1994. He reviewed the conditions of approval since that approval and stated that compliance had been reached on all but two of the original conditions: the complete removal of the outdoor speaker system and on- -11- pr COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES 7anuary 5. 1995 . \ - �0�S' ROLL CALL INDEX site parking requirements. Director Hewicker stated the outdoor speakers had been disconnected, but, to date, had not been removed as requested. He continued that in regards to the condition that all employees park on -site, the applicant was working on an off -site solution to this require- ment. He described parking agreements the applicant was attempting to arrange with a future owner of an adjacent property and with the Balboa Bay Club. In the interim, the applicant was attempting to arrange for employee parking at the Lutheran Church site on property located at the corner of 16th Street and Dover Drive, and transporting the employees, by van, from there to the car wash site. Director Hewicker stated that the Planning Commission, after tonight's review, might wish to continue this item for one or two months allowing the applicant time to effect a long -term off -site parking solution. Responding to a question posed by Chairman Gifford, Director Hewicker stated that 300 feet to 500 feet was generally considered the maximum distance for an off -site parking location. In regards to the applicant securing an off - site parking agreement with the aforementioned Lutheran Church, discussion ensued between the Commissioners and staff regarding ways to insure the site was so used. Regard- ing such an agreement, City Attorney Burnham stated the church should designate a particular area to be used by the car -wash employees and the City obtain the names of the employees who would be utilizing the spaces. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item and Mr. Warren Levy, 1200 West Coast Highway, applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Levy outlined the attempts to solve the off- street parking require- ments since acquiring the car -wash site in April, 1994. He opined that an off -site parking agreement would eventually be effected with the owner of the adjacent property to the west, and explained the delays associated with the sale of that property. Mr. Levy stated that the pastor of the Lutheran Church was very receptive to an off -site parking agreement on a temporary basis, which included designating i -12- COMMISSIONERS \ i 0\ NMOMN\e\�o L CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 CALL OLL INDEX a specific area to be used by the car -wash employees. He said it was his intent to comply fully with City requirements and requested a six-month extension of time to do so. In answer to a question posed by Commissioner Ridgeway, Planning Director Hewicker stated that his information was that the Board Members of the Lutheran Church must approve the off -site parking agreement before it could become effective, and that the Board was to meet sometime in the following week. Commissioner Ridgeway commented that he could not support an extension of six months for the subject use permit. Responding to queries from Commissioner Adams and Chairman Gifford, Mr. Levy explained why the car -wash operation could not accommodate 8 on -site parking spaces. He stated that the car -wash operates with two shifts; current- ly 70% of the employees use carpool, public or bike trans- , portation and 30% of the employees drive cars. However, he explained these figures change as the employees change. In responding to a comment from Commissioner Ridgeway, Planning Director Hewicker stated he felt a 90 -day extension was adequate. He also stated that should Mr. Levy arrange a parking agreement with the adjacent property owner, a portion of the property should be used for long -term parking and will require an off -site parking agreement to be ap- proved by the Planning Commission and the City Council. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Motion was made to take no action at this time and to set iotion Use Permit No. 3429 (Amended) for review at the April 20, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. emended After discussion, amendment to the motion by Commissioner Motion Adams was made to continue the review of Use Permit No. 3425 (Amended) to April 20, 1995, subject to interim parking being provided on the Newport Harbor Lutheran Church -13- Ames Mo t: vo tf All 4 COMMISSIONERS r 0 � Op`o��o�rs �r CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 OLL CALL INDEX parking lot, utilizing an employee shuttle, with the area to be used designated by the permittee and said designation and ided employee identification information given to the Planning Lon Director; and if the interim off -site parking is not arranged, =_d on the Planning Director is to bring the matter back to the Ayes Planning Commission. Amended motion voted on. MO- TION CARRIED. A. Amendment No. 814 (Public Hearing) Item No. 5 Request to amend the North Ford Planned Community A 814 District Regulations so as to modify the parking require- Approved ments for Area 4 of the Development Plan to allow for the reduction of 40 parking spaces as required to comply with Resolution the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and No. 1377 the acceptance of an environmental document. AND B. Tentative Map of Tract No. 14989 (Public Hearing) TTM No. 14! Request to subdivide 20.36 acres of land into 2 numbered Approved lots for a 300 -unit residential condominium development and 3 lettered lots for open space. AND C. Site Plan Review No. 72 (Public Hearing) SPR No. 72 Request to approve a Site Plan Review for the development Approved of 300 residential condominium units and approximately 2.49 acres of open space on property located in the North Ford Planned Community District. LOCATION: A portion of Lot 10, Tract No. 12309, located at 3100 Jamboree Road, on the northeasterly corner of Jamboree Road and University Drive, in the North Ford Planned Community. ' -14- m 4 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX ZONE: P -C APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as applicant ENGINEER: Adam Streeter, Civil Engineers, Inc., Irvine John Douglas, Principal Planner, stated the proposed Baypoint project, also known as San Diego Creek South, was a component of the Circulation and Open Space Agreement (CIOSA) approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 1992. He reviewed the applications explaining the Site Plan Review is required under the zoning regulations to provide site specific review prior to construction. The amendment to the North Ford Planned Community District ' Regulations is a result of the requirement placed on the applicant, The Irvine Company, by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to create some additional habitat area to facilitate wildlife migration between Upper Newport Bay and the open space areas to the east of the subject property. In order to comply with this request, the applicant redesigned the project to eliminate 40 parking spaces to create the additional habitat area. The conclusion of a parking study completed to determine the effects of the proposed parking reduction was that the reduction would not have any substantial effect on the project. The tentative map is proposed in order to create condominium units although it is the intent of the applicant to build the project as rental apartments with the option for later condominium conversion. Mr. Douglas pointed out some minor typographical errors in the staff report to the Commission: Page 3. Background. 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence: delete bluff and view park dedica- tion. Page 4. Tentative Tract Map No: Tract No. should be 14989. Site Plan Review No: Site Plan Review No. should be 72. Page 5. Paragraph 6: should read, multi - family subdivision. ' -15- COMMISSIONERS �d 0 0 0 0\ � x `O s' 4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX Mr. Douglas stated that after distribution of the staff report, a letter was received from the Newport North Homeowners Association with comments regarding the Negative Declara- tion. As a result, a supplemental staff report was prepared with responses to the Homeowners Associations' expressed concerns. Mr. Douglas summarized the City's responses to the issues questioned by the Homeowners' Association. Conclusions out of date. He stated that the project was evaluated as part of the CIOSA agreement approved in 1992. However, as an environmental review, an extensive Initial Study was completed evaluating the specifics of the current application and determined that the conclusions contained in the CIOSA Final EIR are still valid. Staff has recommended additional mitigation measures, however. Parking adequacy. It is the opinion of staff that the parking study prepared for the project shows the proposed parking will be adequate. Traffic, air quality, and noise Staff believes that these issues were adequately evaluated during the CIOSA public hearing process, and since this proposed project is substantially the same as the project approved under CIOSA, there are no additional impacts that would result from the approval of the tract map and site plan review. Security and handicapped accessibility. The Police Department has reviewed the project and made recommendations to the developer regarding appropriate security measures which will be incorporated into the project. In addition, the project is required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Lighting. There is an existing mitigation measure from CIOSA. Staff has recommended an additional mitigation measure requiring a licensed engineer to review the plans and certify that light spillage on adjacent properties will be minimal. Mr. Douglas continued that staff had met with the applicant to discuss conditions of approval contained in the original staff report, and based upon those discussions with the applicant, Public Works Department and Planning Depart- ment, revisions have been prepared and are included, in strikeout and underline format, in the revised Exhibit "A" of the supplemental staff report. Mr. Douglas pointed out the . -16- r� 4 COMMISSIONERS �do�'rd CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 OT CALL INDEX omission of the lighting mitigation measure, discussed above, stating it should appear as number 5 on handwritten page number 5. He reviewed, for the Commission, the recom- mended revisions to the findings and conditions of approval. C. Tentative Map of Tract No. 14989. Conditions No. 8 and No. 9 These two additional conditions are recommended by the Public Works Department, to clarify the record, that this project would create additional traffic and would justify the improvements on the adjacent road network. Condition No. 7. A minor clarification is being recommended that the additional review by the Traffic Engineer is to ensure compliance with City policies, standards and codes. Condi- tion No. 8. Clarifies the location of the connection to the San Diego Creek bike trail. Condition No. 9. Recommend- ing review by the City Traffic Engineer to ensure compliance with City policies, standards and codes. Condition No. 18. An insert to allow for vehicular access for utility mainte- nance purposes. Condition No. 21. Adds text to allow flexibility in case it were desirable to have the property served by Irvine Ranch Water District rather than the City. Condition No. 33. A clarification that the existing vehicular access be maintained. Condition No. 35. Provides that the grading for the future ramp would be subject to a feasibility study and approval by the Transportation Corridor Agency unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. Condition No. 37 and Condition No. 38. Mr. Douglas stated these conditions refer to the lettered lots which are the open space portions of the development. The map included with the staff report shows three lettered lots, A, B and C. The original condition would have required that all three lettered lots be owned, landscaped and maintained by the developer or the Homeowners' Association. He said that Condition No. 37 specifies that Lot C would be divided into two portions and the portion that is along Bonita Creek and wrapping around the comer containing the bicycle trail would be dedicated to the City. He stated the area is a natural open space area as opposed to a manufactured slope and would be consistent with previous Planning Commission and City Council actions on other CIOSA properties for the developer or his successors to be required to own and I -17- COMMISSIONERS �0 10 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 OLL CALL I INDEX maintain manufactured slope areas. Condition No. 38 clarifies that even though some of the open space areas are privately owned, they would be included in the tabulation of the open space requirements that were adopted in the CIOSA agreement. Continuing, Mr. Douglas referred the Commission to item D. Site Plan Review No. 72. Conditio n No. 2. A typographical error and does not apply to the proposed project. Conditions No. 4 through No. 10. These contain the same revisions as those listed under the Tenta- tive Map, Item C. Responding to a question from Commissioner Adams, Public Works Director Webb confirmed that the easements on private streets referred to in the conditions of approval include provisions for providing traffic signal equipment easements for the intersection. Mot All 4 COMMISSIONERS '�rd�"O Grp d `YQ O s CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 OLL CALL I INDEX There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Discussion followed between staff and Commissioner Ridgeway regarding the date of receipt of the aforemen- tioned letter from the Newport North Homeowners' Associa- tion. Mr. Douglas stated it was stamped received January 3, 1995, and the 30 -day Negative Declaration public review period closed January 3, 1995. ion * Motion was made and voted on to approve Amendment No. Ayes 814 (Resolution No. 1377), Tentative Map of Tract No. 14989, and Site Plan Review No. 72 subject to the revised findings and conditions in Revised Exhibit "A." MOTION CARRIED. A Environmental Document ' Findings: 1. That CEQA allows a program EIR to be used to simplify the task of preparing environmental docu- ments on later parts of the program. Among several uses the program EIR can provide the basis in an Initial Study for determining whether the later activity may have significant effects (CEQA Guidelines, section 15168, subd.(d).) 2. CEQA further allows that a negative declaration may be issued in reliance upon an existing EIR prepared for an earlier project, if the project for which the negative declaration is prepared will not cause any significant effects or in the case of a mitigated nega- tive declaration any effects which cannot be eliminat- ed or reduced to a level of insignificance. (Guidelines, section 15070. subd.(b) and 15153, subd.(c).) 3. The Initial Study analyzed the proposed amendment, site plan and tentative map for the Baypoint residen- t -19- COMMISSIONERS dh\X �� 0 0 16 �O �oo o%b CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX tial development based on information contained in the previously certified 1992 Final CIOSA Program EIR and any new information which has become available regarding the project. 4. The assumptions and conclusions of the 1992 Final CIOSA Program EIR have been found to be valid and appropriate for use in evaluating the current proposal. The Initial Study has found that there are no new potential significant adverse impacts which cannot be eliminated or mitigated to a level of insignificance, therefore a Negative Declaration has been prepared. 5. The Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission and has been reviewed and considered prior to approval of the project. Mitigation Measures: 1. That all mitigation measures applicable to the project set forth in Final Environmental Impact Report No. 148 be complied with as set forth in the approved mitigation monitoring program. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall demonstrate to the Building Depart- ment that all recommendations of the noise study have been incorporated into the design of the project. 3. Prior to issuance of any grading permit for property containing saltbush scrub habitat, the applicant shall demonstrate to the Building Department that an Interim Take of California gnatcatcher habitat has been approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits for the development, that the noise study for the project be revised to include potential future • -20- COMMISSIONERS L CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX traffic for the JR -5 ramp, and that the mitigation measures suggested in the revised report be incorpo- rated into the project design. Additionally, all tenants and /or owners shall be informed of the potential future JR -5 ramp connection to the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor, and the potential adverse impacts which would result from its construction. 5. All exterior lighting shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to conceal light sources and to minimize spillage and glare to the adjacent residential properties. Prior to issuance of a building permit, lighting plans shall be submitted by a licensed electri- cal engineer with a letter stating that, in his opinion, this requirement has been met. B. Amendment No. 814 Adopt Resolution No. 1377 recommending City Council approval of Amendment No. 814. C. Tentative Map of Tract No. 14989: Findings: 1. That the subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan and its objectives, policies, general land uses and programs, and the North Ford Planned Community Development Plan and District Regula- tions. 2. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the density of development proposed. -21- COMMISSIONERS r d� s o� o�'Ppo s C • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 OLL ALL INDEX 4. That the design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 5. That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. 7. That public improvements may be required of a developer per Section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code and Section 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act. 8. That the proposed apartment project is expected to generate nearly 2000 trips per day. Approximately 1600 of these trips will be using Jamboree Road, with 1300 of them north of University Drive. This repre- sents a 2.3% increase in trips over existing traffic. Increases of 1% or greater are considered significant and will contribute to the need for widening Jambo- ree Road as provided in the Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement and the Final EIR. 9. That the proposed project takes its access from University Drive and will increase traffic on Universi- ty Drive by 2000 trips per day. This is a 5.6% in- crease over existing traffic. Increases of 1% or greater are considered significant and this increase will contribute to the need for widening University Drive as provided in the Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement and the Final EIR. Conditions: 1. That a final map be recorded. That the final map be prepared so that the Bearings relate to the State -22- r COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 OLL LL CA INDEX Plane Coordinate System. The final map shall be prepared on the California coordinate system (NAD83) and that prior to recordation of the final map, the surveyor /engineer preparing the map shall submit to the County Surveyor a digital - graphic file of said map in a manner described in Section 7 -9 -330 and 7 -9 -337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. 2. That prior to recordation of the final map, the surveyor /engineer preparing the map shall tie the boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System established by the County Surveyor in a manner described in Section s 7 -9 -330 and 7 -9 -337 of the Orange County Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual, Subarticle 18. 3. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag) shall be set on each lot corner unless otherwise approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be protected in place if installed prior to completion of construc- tion project. 4. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 5. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompa- nying surety be provided in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of the Public improvements if it is desired to record a tract map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public improve- ments. 6. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual metered water service connections to the public water system and sewer lateral connection with a cleanout to the public sewer system unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department and the Building Depart- ment. • -23- COMMISSIONERS \%'706 s -yi CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX 7. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the Traffic Engineer for compliance with City policies, standards and codes. 8. That the on -site circulation system connect to the existing Bike Trail along San Diego Creek between buildings 14 and 15 in a manner approved by the Public Works Department. 9. That the design of the private streets and drives conform with the City's Private Street Policy (LA), except as approved by the Public Works Department. The basic roadway width shall be a minimum of 32 feet. The location, width, configuration, and concept of the private street and drive systems shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer for compliance with City policies, standards and codes. 10. That an Encroachment Agreement be provided where non - standard improvements are to be constructed over public easements. 11. That the intersection of the private streets and drives be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 25 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls and other obstruction shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty -four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non - critical locations, subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer. 12. That the California Vehicle Code be enforced on the private streets and drives, and that a Traffic Control plan acceptable to the Police Department and Public Works Department be provided. 13. That if it is desired to have a control gate at the entrance, a turnaround shall be provided prior to the • -24- L COMMISSIONERS 0 16 ON R%\t S CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Depart- ment and Fire Department. The entry gate shall have a minimum clear opening of 16 feet. The control gate shall be equipped with Opticam and Nox Box devices for emergency access as approved by the Fire Marshal. The gated entry shall have a minimum of two lanes in (one for visitors and one for owners). The guard gate shall be positioned so that a minimum of 80' is provided for automobile stacking. 14. That additional right -of -way be dedicated to the public along the University Drive frontage to provide a right -of -way width of 118 feet with an additional 6 foot dedication easterly of the proposed entrance for a deceleration lane; and that frontage improvements be constructed to provide for a third west bound lane on University Drive along the project frontage with a deceleration lane at the entrance to the proposed development. 15. That additional right -of -way be dedicated to the public along the Jamboree Road frontage to provide a minimum right -of -way width of 142 feet; and that frontage improvements be constructed to provide for a fourth north bound lane on Jamboree Road along the project frontage. 16. That easements be provided for public emergency and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes on all private streets and parking bays be dedicated to the public within the development; that the location, width and configuration of the easements be reviewed and approved by the Utilities and Public Works Departments; and that the easements be dedicated prior to recordation of the tract map unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 17. That asphalt or concrete access roads shall be provid- ed to all public utilities, vaults, manholes, and junc- • -25- COMMISSIONERS 41- ivoa\�%\\&' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 'ROLL CALL INDEX tion structure locations, with width to be approved by the Public Works Department. 18. That all vehicular access rights to Jamboree Road be released and relinquished to the City of Newport Beach. That all vehicular access rights to University Drive be released and relinquished to the City of Newport Beach except at the proposed private street entrance and utility access as approved by the Public Works Department. 19. That street, drainage and utility improvements be shown of standard improvement plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer. 20. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public Works Department, along with a master plan of water, . sewer and storm drain facilities for the on -site im- provements prior to recording of the tract map. Any modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be required by the study shall be the responsibility of the develop- er. That the design of the storm drain system meet the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Standards. 21. That water and sewer service for the subdivision shall be provided only by the City of Newport Beach unless otherwise approved by the Newport Beach Utilities Department. 22. That the water system be looped between University Drive (Zone 3) and Jamboree Road (Zone 2) with a pressure regulating station provided unless otherwise approved by the Utilities Department. 23. That a 10 foot wide Easement be provided from the Jamboree Road frontage in order to loop the pro- posed water system . The easement shall be paved • -26- L COMMISSIONERS �ctO�c0�0%\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX with a hard surface unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department in order to provide mainte- nance capabilities. 24. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 25. That fire hydrants be spaced a maximum of 300 feet apart unless otherwise approved by the Fire Marshall and that a fire hydrant must be located within 25 feet of all Fire system pump connections. 26. That the Water Capital Improvement fee be paid. 27. That prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department and the Planning Department that adequate sewer facilities will be available for the project. Such demonstration shall include verification from the Orange County Sanitation District and the City's Utilities Department. 28. That the Public Works Department plan check and inspection fee be paid. 29. That any Edison transformer serving the site be located outside the sight distance planes as described in City Standard 110-L. 30. Disruption caused by construction work along road- ways and by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by proper use of traffic control equip- ment and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and local requirements. There shall be no construction storage or delivery of materials within the Jamboree Road or University Drive rights -of -way unless otherwise approved by the City Traffic Engineer. . -27- COMMISSIONERS d h\ r.,t�d � '�p ors �r -�1 �,N � L CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX 31. That overhead utilities serving the site be under - grounded in accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code unless it is determined by the City Engineer that such undergrounding is unreasonable or impractical. 32. That a fire protection system acceptable to the Fire Department be installed by the developer and tested by the Fire Department prior to storage of any combustible materials or start of any structural framing. 33. That the existing vehicular access be maintained off of Jamboree Road at the Jamboree Road bridge to provide for County Flood Control access to San Diego Creek and Bonita Creek. The design of this access shall be approved by the county of Orange and the City Public Works Department. 34. That Lots A, B & C be privately owned, landscaped and maintained. Landscaping shall be installed as described in the approved site plan. 35. Subject to feasibility and approval by the TCA, that the future freeway ramp right -of -way on Jamboree Road be graded to future ramp grades unless other- wise approved by the Public Works Department. 36. Prior to recordation the map shall be revised to delete the term "Vesting" and correct statistical errors and section labeling errors. 37. Lot C shall be divided adding a Lot D which would encompass the portion of Lot C facing Bonita Creek and containing the improved bicycle trail. Lot D shall be dedicated to the City of Newport Beach. 38. Notwithstanding the maintenance of Lots A, B and C as private open space, all lettered lots shall be 28 4 4 COMMISS.rIIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX deemed as satisfying the requirements for open space dedication contained in the Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement. D. Site Plan Review No. 72 Findings: 1. That the development of the project will not preclude implementation of specific General Plan objectives and policies if in accordance with the plans as modified by the condition for approval. 2. That the value of the property is protected by preventing development characterized by inadequate and poorly planned landscaping, excessive building bulk, inappropri- ate placement of structures and failure to preserve where feasible natural landscape features. ' Conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan, landscaping plan, site plan, floor plans and elevations, except as modified in the following conditions and those imposed on the Tentative Tract Map. 2. That this site plan review shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.01.070 K of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 3. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review by the Traffic Engineer for compliance with City policies, standards and codes. 4. That the on -site circulation system connect to the existing Bike Trail along San Diego Creek between buildings 14 ' -29- L COMMISSIONERS NO CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX and 15 in a manner approved by the Public Works Department. 5. That the design of the private streets and drives conform with the City's Private Street Policy (L•4), except as approved by the Public Works Department. The basic roadway width shall be a minimum of 32 feet. The location, width, configuration, and concept of the private street and drive systems shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer for compliance with City policies, standards and codes. 6. That the intersection of the private streets and drives be designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 25 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls and other obstruction shall be considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty- , four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be modified at non - critical locations, subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer. 7. That if it is desired to have a control gate at the en- trance, a turnaround shall be provided prior to the gate. The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department and Fire Department. The entry gate shall have a minimum clear opening of 16 feet. The control gate shall be equipped with Opticam and Nox Box devices for emergency access as approved by the Fire Marshal. The gated entry shall have a minimum of two lanes in (one for visitors and one for owners). The guard gate shall be positioned so that a minimum of 80' is provided for automobile stacking. 8. That fire hydrants be spaced a maximum of 300 feet apart unless otherwise approved by the Fire Marshall and that a fire hydrant must be located within 25 feet of all Fire system pump connections. 9. That the existing vehicular access be maintained off of Jamboree Road at the Jamboree Road bridge to provide -30- COMMISSIONERS Ask CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5 1995 • -31- ROLL I INDEX CALL for County Flood Control access to San Diego Creek and Bonita Creek. The design of this access shall be ap- proved by the county of Orange and the City Public Works Department. A. General Plan Amendment No. 94 -3 (A) (Public Hearine) I Item No. 6 Request to amend the General Plan Land Use and G GPA 94 -3 (A) Recreation and Open Space Elements, and the Local A Approved Coastal Program, Land Use Plan for the CalTrans West parcel. This request would change the land use designa- R Resolution tion of Multi - Family Residential with an allocation of 152 N No. 1378 dwelling units to add an alternate designation of Recre- ational and Environmental Open Space which may be implemented subject to specific criteria set forth in the General Plan. ' G AND B. Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 35 (Public L LCP No. 35 Hearing) Approved Request to amend the Local Coastal Program, Land Use R Resolution Plan for the CalTrans West parcel. This request would N No. 1379 change the language of the LCP to be consistent with that approved in General Plan Amendment 94 -3(A). AND 4 COMMISSIONERS 2 Yp o CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL INDEX CALL C. Amendment No. 815 a!uhlic Hearing) A 815 Request to amend the Planned Community District Approved Resolution Regulations for the CalTrans West Planned Community. This amendment will cross reference the provisions of No. 1380 General Plan Amendment 94 -3(A) in order to maintain internal consistency between the General Plan and Zoning Regulations. INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach In reviewing the subject applications, Patty Temple, Advance Planning Manager, stated this hearing represented the first step in the approval of an issue that has been discussed within the City for approximately two years. She said that the City first received a General Plan Amendment request from a group of West Newport Beach area residents who were interested in facilitating the City's acquisition of the site for open space purposes. The Department of Transporta- tion objected to the redesignation of the land use of the site from its current designation of single family attached, and the City had its own reservations regarding legal implications that might be incurred by a unilateral redesignation. During the past several months, the City Attorney's Office and the Public Works Department have been working with the Right - of -Way Manager for CalTrans in order to develop the language presented in the staff report, and which has been approved by the local Office of the State Department of Transportation. Ms. Temple stated the City had been recently contacted by a concerned resident who expressed concern regarding why another parcel owned by the State Department of Transpor- tation, located on the opposite side of Superior Avenue from the subject site, had not been included in current General Plan Amendment request. Ms. Temple distributed a map to the Commission to better define the location of the two separate sites. She explained the site the resident questioned had a land use designation of Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities and was assigned no actual square ' -32- COMMISSIONERS Y0o sr d ,yo R C 0 • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 OLL ALL INDEX footage allocation in the General Plan. Ms. Temple stated that past discussions have focused on providing a mechanism whereby the existing multi - family entitlement on the Cal - Trans West property could be transferred or handled in some other way in order to potentially help the City acquire the site as open space. She continued that there might be persons who testify at tonight's hearing and request that this site be incorporated into any action taken tonight. However, this particular property has not been discussed directly with the representatives of CalTrans and they have no knowledge that the City aright be considering a land use change or any other disposition. It also has not been included in any public hearing notices or legal descriptions prepared for the public hearing. Ms. Temple suggested if it were the Commissions' desire to further address this particular property, staff would enter into further discussions with representatives of the State Department of Transportation and suggest another General Plan initiation in February. Responding to an query from Commissioner Di Sano, Ms. Temple stated she saw no reason to defer action on the subject application. She explained that the two sites are on opposite side of a four -lane arterial highway; there is no direct connection between the two except by ownership; the City would need to work with CalTrans to make sure they were informed and satisfied with the nature of the action taken in regards to the residual parcel; and the two sites would be addressed separately within the General Plan. Discussion ensued between staff and Commissioner Ridgeway regarding what the current land use designation would permit on the residual site and what the potential use might be. Planning Director Hewicker stated that the site, zoned as Planned Community, lacks any entitlement under both the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. It is not part of the Hoag Hospital expansion, and would require public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. -33- COMMISSIONERS O s' R O • CJ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 OLL CALL INDEX Replying to a request by Commissioner Adams to provide an example of transfer of entitlement, Advance Planning Manager Temple stated that under the existing Land Use Element of the General Plan, approved in 1988, there is a broad ability to transfer entitlement on a Citywide basis on a like use for like use basis. The subject proposal presents a very clear and specific ability plus some incentives, i.e. Park Dedication Credits, to do so. While to date, there has not been any residential transfer, there was recently transfer of entitlement from the Bayview Landing site to Fashion Island. Discussion followed. City Attorney Burnham stated that also, there had been effective provision of transfer of potential development from the Buck Gully Site to the 5th Avenue and Marguerite Projects several years back as well as transfer of entitlement from the Newport Village site. Ms. Temple stated that while these referenced transfer of entitlements had been accomplished within the General Plan, there has not been any transfer where a project actually has been built. Responding to a query from Commissioner Adams regarding the method for transfer of entitlement as it would apply to the subject site, City Attorney Burnham stated the entitle- ment assigned to CalTrans West site would be transferred in whole or in part to another parcel. If the transferee parcel was zoned differently, the entitlement would be converted to a traffic equivalency, that is the residential entitlement would be converted to the average daily trip generation rate, and then it would be converted back to the intensity of land use that would equal that trip generation rate. Whatever is physically proposed for the receiving parcel under the entitlement transfer would be subject to a traffic study as well as Planning Commission and City Council approvals. The entitlement agreement would be subject to any possible changes in the Traffic Phasing Ordinance. The public hearing was opened in connection with this item and Ms. Louise Greeley, Chairman of the Committee for the Acquisition of Sunset Ridge (formerly known as CalTrans West), addressed the Planning Commission. Ms. Greeley -34- 41 COMMISSIONERS t d� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 101011y1TD?.� January 5, 1995 OLL CALL INDEX stated this was a happy conclusion to many months of meetings and expressed her appreciation to the staff for their creativeness in working with CalTrans to formulate the proposed applications. She said that before the realignment of Superior Avenue, the two CalTrans parcels had been one, and in her mind and many others, the two parcels are still considered as CalTrans West and opined that the residual site should be pan of the open space in the West Newport area. Discussion followed regarding the issues and processes involved to ensure the preparation of a General Plan Amendment for the residual CalTrans parcel in the February initiation schedule. Mr. William Jennings, 280 Cagney Lane, appeared before the Planning Commission, endorsed the proposed project as presented and encouraged subsequent action on the residual parcel as discussed above. In answer to a question posed by Commissioner Ridgeway, Mr. Jennings stated he did not feel that the parcel was suitable for an active park site, however, he opined it would serve nicely as a view park. Ms. Marilyn Tabor, 102 Sholz Plaza, appeared before the Planning Commission and stated her support of the subject applications and her hope that the smaller parcel would be acted upon as discussed earlier. Mr. Dave Bent, 4904 Seashore Drive, President, West Newport Beach Association, appeared before the Planning Commission, and stated his interest and support for the proposed project. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed at this time. Chairman Gifford expressed her appreciation to Ms. Greeley and staff for their efforts in formulating the subject proposal. ' -35- Mod Vial 4 COMMISSIONERS �O CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES January 5, 1995 ROLL CALL INDEX * Motion was made to approve of General Plan Amendment .on 94 -3(A) (Resolution No. 1378), Local Coastal Program Amendment No. 35 (Resolution No. 1379), and Amendment No. 815 (Resolution No. 1380). In responding to a question from Commissioner Ridgeway, Public Works Director Webb stated that although a formal plan had not yet been developed, the subject parcel would support at least one soccer field and several baseball diamonds. Commissioner Ridgeway voiced his support of the motion. Ayes Motion was voted on. MOTION CARRIED. :ss ADJOURNMENT: 9:10 p.m. Adjournment sss GAROLD ADAMS, SECRETARY CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSIO -36-