Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/18/1979COMMISSIONERS poi `i City of Newport Beach Regular Planning Commission Meeting Place: City Council Chambers Time: 7:30 p.m. Date: January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL Present X X X X X Absent X EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R V. Hogan, Community Development Director Hugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney STAFF MEMBERS James D. Hewicker, Assistant Director - Plannin .Bill Dye, Assistant City Engineer David Dmohowski, Advance Planning Administrator Fled Talarico, Environmental Coordinator i ID Minutes written by: Elisabeth McCoskey and James Hewicker Motion X Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 4, 1916 Ayes X X X X X were approved as written. Qhsent 4I quest to permit the construction of a two -sto y building that may include a mixture of retail, office and light manufacturing uses on .a site i the Recreation and Marine Commercial area of the Mariners Mile Specific Plan Area, and the revie of an Initial Study. Existing uses along the W s Coast Highway frontage of the property are prop s to remain in conjunction with the proposed deve c Ont. Location: A portion of Lot H, Tract No. 919, lac ted at 2701 -2703 West Coast Highway,. ic the southerly side of West Coast Highway, between Riverside Avenue and Tustin on Mariners Mile. Zone: Specific Plan Area No. 5 Applicant: Edward B. Robinson, Newport Beach 0 ners: Elmer John Larson, Newport Beach; an Gwendolyn I. Snyder, Balboa Island I -1- I MINUTES t ed p- a- INDEX COMMISSIONERS & 'L 2 City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROIL CALL Motion X Motion was made to continue this item until the Ayes X X X X X X Planning Commission meeting of February 8, 1979 Absent X at the request of the Applicant. Request to consider a Traffic Study for a two -sto 30,000 sq.ft. + office - retail building with relat ed subterranean parking spaces in Corona del Mar. Location: Lot 1, Block L, Tract No. 323, and Lo 16, 18, 20, and 22, Block 732, Corona del Mar, located at 2600 East Coast Highway, on the southeasterly corner East Coast Highway and Dahlia Avenue Corona del Mar. Zone: C -1 -Z Applicant: Ernest George, Corona del Mar �— Owner: Same as Applicant Engineer: Osborn and Associates, Tustin AND Request to permit the construction of a two -story office - retail building and related. subterranean parking spaces in the Corona del Mar Specific Pla Area where a specific plan has not been adopted, and the acceptance of an Environmental Document Location: Lot 1, Block 1, Tract No. 323, and Lo 16, 18, 20, and 22, Block 732, Corona del Mar, located at 2600 East Coast Highway, on the southeasterly corner East Coast Highway and Dahlia Avenue Corona del Mar. Zone: C -1 -Z Applicant: Ernest George, Corona del Mar ,. Owner: Same as Applicant -2- MINUTES • INDEX Item #2 ry TRAFFIC - STUDY - APPROyED is of in • is of in 40 COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROIL CALL AND I Request to create one parcel of land for commerc;i< development where five lots now exist. Location: Lot 1, Block L, Tract No. 323, and Lbi 16, 18, 20, and 22, Block 732, Coron del Mar, located at 2600 East Coast j Highway, on the southeasterly corner < East Coast Highway and Dahlia Avenue i Corona del Mar. Zone: C -1 -Z Applicant: Ernest George, Corona del Mar Winer: Same as Applicant Enlgineer: Osborn and Associates, Tustin hjairman indicated that because of the relations i eltween Items Nos. 2, 3 and 4 they would be hearlH together but voted upon separately. Public hearing was opened in conjunction with the! items. The applicant, Ernest George,.2600 East I Colast Highway, Corona del Mar, stated he had real the staff reports and felt they were- favorable tb the project. He commented that the project had . assed the Traffic Study criteria, complied with zoning requirements, and he felt it would upgrad the existing area and that the merchants he had tanked to were favorable to the project. i':scussion then followed between the Applicant anc he Planning Commission regarding architectural Lyle, increase in the intensity of land use and i traffic that would be brought to this area. Some f the concerns expressed by the Commissioners wer that the building may not be in.keeping with it urr,ent image of "Old Corona ", 2) increase in intE ity up to 1.75 times the buildable area of the iite, and 3) the general increase in traffic inchL nlg the use of Fifth Avenue as a point of ingress I I -3- MINUTES INDEX .Item #4 A RESl1B- DIMON N0. 584 :s CONT'D T if FEB. 22, n 11979 P e n -e ie !n- COMMISSIONERS ®m oo a m vest °W amp � y`o City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL and egress and the traffic that might be circulat through the adjoining residential area. It was pointed out that this is one area where a Specifi Plan has not yet been adopted with regard to inte sity of land use. In other areas similar to this one the maximum allowable is 1.0 times the build- able area and in many cases less. As far as traffic generation is concerned, it was noted tha if the intensity is decreased traffic would possi be reduced. Applicant stated he was amenable to changing the style of the building and emphasized that the size of the building was dictated by existing parking criteria and suggested that cur- rent parking requirements may not be applicable to the Corona del Mar area. Robert Donald, architect for the project, appeare and indicated that the findings and conditions as set forth in the Staff Report were acceptable to the Applicant if the Planning Commission desired to approve the project. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made to accept the Traffic Report, Ayes X X X K X X subject to the following finding: Absent X 1. The proposed project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service on any "major ", "primary- modified ", or "primary street." One of the Commissioners stated that he was havir trouble accepting the report as it did not take into consideration the residential streets. The Staff stated that the Traffic Report had been pre pared in compliance with requirements of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance only and if the Commis- sioners felt it advisable to make further findinc and conditions related to the effects on other streets it could be done when the Use Permit is considered. -4- MINUTES • INDEX ;ed C �n- t bl_ 0 l Y COMMISSIONERS vm0Oa 4 v� • !S s 1p yCa �O City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL Motion X Motion was made to deny Use Permit No. 1894 and Ayes X X X X X X make the following findings: Absent X 1. The proposed office - retail building is not'ir keeping with the desired character of the specific plan area as identified by the General Plan. 2. The proposed building is not consistent wi h j the General Plan Policies. 3. The proposed use will preclude the attainm ni of the Specific Area Plan objectives state in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 4. The approval of Use Permit No. 1894 will, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of per$ol residing and working in the neighborhood on I detrimental or injurious to property and im- provements in the neighborhood or the generra welfare of the City. X Motion was made to deny Resubdivision No. 584 so as to be consistent with the denial of Use Permit No. 1894. Applicant stated he would withdraw this request. Upon further consideration the Applicant indicat( that he would probably want to join these parcel! regardless of the design of the project. One of the Commissioners asked if a 30 day continuancd might not be in order for the Applicant to redes' .the project. The Applicant agreed. Motion X Motion was made to continue request for Resub- Ayes X X X X X X division No. 584 until February 22, 1979. Absent X ;Chairman stated that Items Nos. 5 and 6 would be !heard following Items Nos. 7, 8, 9 and 10 beca►►►IIIs 'traffic considerations relating to these 4 Itejns ,would also affect Items Nos. 5 and 6. The !Applicant was agreeable. _ i -5- ! MINUTES S e V gn INDEX COMMISSIONERS �Z City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL Meeting was adjourned for a 10 minute recess. Request to consider a Traffic Study for two ten - story office structures and a free - standing res- taurant. (Public Hearing) Location: A portion of Block 55, Irvine's Sub- division, located at 800 Newport Cent Drive, on the westerly side of Newpor Center Drive, northerly of Santa Barbara Drive in Newport Center. Zone: P -C Applicant: Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company Newport Beach Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach AND Request to establish a Planned Community Develop- ment Plan and Development Standards for Block 80C in Newport Center, and the acceptance of an Environmental Document. Location: A portion of Block 55, Irvine's Sub- division, located at 800 Newport Ceni Drive, on the westerly side of Newpor Center Drive, northerly of Santa Barbara Drive in Newport Center. Zone: P -C Applicant: Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company Newport Beach Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach AND Request to subdivide 17.4 acres into 2 parcels f( professional, office, restaurant, and residential -6- MINUTES INDEX Item #7 TRAFFIC STUDY - APPROVED e r C NDI- t TI WLY , :e r .t r AMENDMENT NO. 526- R W-1030) I COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach • \ \ \ \ \\ <X January 18, 1979 MINUTES ROIL CALL condominium uses in accordance with proposed Planned Community Development Standards for Blo�k 800 in Newport Center. Location: A portion of Block 55, Irvine's Subs division, located at 800 Newport Center Drive, on the westerly side of Newport Center Drive, northerly of Santa Barbara Drive in Newport Center. Zone: P -C Applicant: Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company, Newport Beach Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach i i Engineer: Williamson and Schmid, Irvine AND Request of The Irvine Company to re- allocate 40,000 square feet of proposed office building development from Block 500, 80;000 square feet from Pacific Coast Highway east and west, and 40,000 square feet from Avocado /MacArthur to Block 800 in Newport Center making 350,000 square feelt available for potential office building. Additlion- ally, The Irvine Company requests that 5,667 sgjuare feet from Pacific Coast Highway east and west iln addition to the aforementioned 80,000 square felet be re- allocated to Block 800 in Newport Center1to allow for the construction of a 10,000 sq.ft. restaurant. (Discussion) Location: Block 800 Newport Center; Newport Beach Applicant: The Irvine Company The Chairman stated that Items Nos. 7, 8, 9 and 10 would be heard together'because of their related- ness. -7- i INDEX Item #10 APPROVED COMMISSIONERS 9CM 7( B0 City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL Staff distributed to the Commission copies of a letter received January 18, 1979 from The Irvine Company, co- signed by The Irvine Company and Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company, indicatin their agreement to and requesting the following reallocations of space to provide the 350,000 s. of office space required in Block 800 to develop the proposed project: Block 800 - 88,015 s.f., Block 500 - 66,015 s.f., Pacific Coast Highway east and west - 58,680 s.f., Avocado /MacArthur - 44,010 s.f., and at the option of The Irvine Company and Pacific Mutual prior to recordation of Parcel Map, transfer from either Block 500 or Block 700 of 93,280 s.f. In addition a realloca tion of 5667 s.f. - 4156 s.f. from Pacific Coast Highway east and west and 15.11 s.f from either Block 500 or 700, at their option, for 10,000 s. of restaurant was requested. It was also pointed out by the staff that the Traffic Study in the Staff Report was prepared �- prior to the opening of the east -west couplet at Bristol and therefore the traffic projections at the intersection of Bristol North and Campus Dri have changed. New tests taken on January 11 and 16, 1979 at the intersection of Bristol North an Campus Drive were distributed to the Commission. It was noted that these changes would affect bot .the Pacific Mutual Project and the Back Bay Offi development to be considered following these items. Public hearing was opened and Steven Gavin, Vice President Corporate Relation Officer of Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company made some opening remarks. He expressed publicly appreciation anc gratitude for the Staff's cooperation during the long period leading up to this point. He descri the history and growth of Pacific Mutual prior t the move of its home offices to Newport Beach, stating it was a difficult decision and one that required substantial investment on their part. Since that time an attempt has been made by the company and its personnel to be good corporate citizens and active participants in the communit It was pointed out that Pacific Mutual was not i -8- MINUTES ti f. f. ve d h ce be 0 y. INDEX r1 �J 0 COMMISSIONERS F ° • njip4o9+ �,y : City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL ;developer and had now outgrown its original spec :and was in critical need of more. He stated the ;project is consistent with all City requiremenit< iEstimated construction time is approximately.2b ;months to 2 years and initial occupancy will be :approximately 70,000- 80,000 s.f. It was noted !that the company is now growing at approximately 10,000- 15,000 s.f. per year. There are 1250 ;employees at present and there will be approxi- imately 2500 employees upon completion of occu- ipancy. The project incorporates extensive land• !scaping and is designed for efficiency from an energy standpoint. Mr. Gavin noted that trafftii :improvements are really traffic management mea- sures designed to improve traffic flow throughi ;existing intersections. Mr. Gavin explained thi :these will be paid for by Pacific Mutual and alri ;consistent with the City's General Plan Circula• tion Element and will significantly improve ex;i! ding and projected traffic congestion, and that i ;corporate commitment had been made to find other ;measures as well to deal with the traffic prob.li :The company also recognizes the serious housing .problem in the general area and has tried to provide leadership to solve these problems. Gin Wong, architect for the project, appeared :before the Planning Commission and described th design and orientation of the proposed develop - ment. It was noted that the buildings would be ;set back approximately 130 feet from Newport iCenter Drive and were orientated in such a way, Ito take advantage of the northern exposure to c serve energy and minimize obstruction to existi buildings. Mr. Wong indicated that there would be no parking along the Newport Center :Drive frontage and that all vehicular access would be from Santa Barbara Drive and the internal road 'system. It was further noted that the project had been planned to minimize cut and fill andt .building footprint. It was indicated that the! buildings would occupy appoximately 10% of thel isite, parking 62% and the remaining 28% would b set aside for circulation and landscaping. Mr. Gavin concluded by stating that the project • had been designed to include all of the improve ;ments and measures recommended by the City staff -9- i MINUTES e t �t- i gym. )s )n Ig le 5 INDEX COMMISSIONERS vc v FF O P y' o } F F 9C5� VF OF9 �<O City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL and that the project would be a positive benefit to the Community. It was emphasized that Pacific Mutual has a critical need for space for their er ployees and they want to provide that space in Newport Beach. Olive Wiggenhorn, 1009 West Bay Avenue, appeared and inquired about the condominium units which have been mentioned in conjunction with the pro- posed Planned Community Development Plan. She indicated that she would be in favor of any dev.e' opment that would improve the City and broaden ti tax base. Mr. Don Gralneck, representing Pacific Mutual, explained that the entire property is zoned PC al for that reason the Development Plan was prepares to cover the entire PC area. Mr. Gralneck furth( explained that the Planned Community would be di- vided into two parcels one of which would be sol( to and developed by Pacific Mutual. It was notes that the Development Plan would permit a maximum of 245 residential dwelling units to be developer on the remaining site and that this proposal was consistent with the City's General Plan. Mr. Gralneck pointed out that the P.C. Text requires any future developer of the residential site to secure site plan approval from the Planning Comm Sion. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard the public hearing was closed. Fred Talarico, Environmental Co- ordinator, was asked to e) plain the additional information which had been discussed the Study Session regarding the intersection of Bristol Street North and Campus Drive. Mr. Talarico explained that the Traffic Analysis prepared the City's consultant includes not only the existing trafi but traffic which has been committed from undeveloped pro, It was noted that the.committed traffic figures used in tl report were approximately 26% higher than would be used tc because of the reductions in intensity, which have occurr( in the General Plan and zoning since the consultant start( working on this project. -10- MINUTES • INDEX r ie id I sr. I I I s- at by 'ic, ect . e ,day . !d !d 4 r1 LJ COMMISSIONERS e0, • F 7�S'� 7� 0�9 Ti v4� i MINUTES City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROIL CALL Mr. Talarico commented further on the system improvements. w6ich.eould be used to reduce the I.C.U. at the intersectio of Bristol Street North and Campus Drive from the higher . figures calculated on January. 11 and 16, 1979, following th restriping by Signal Development Corporation. Mr. Talarico explained that the consultant had already suggested (EIR .0.p pendix B, Page 24) that had a previous project been approle by; the City Council, it would be necessary to add a third southbound lane to Campus Drive. In addition, it was noted that with a third southbound optional through right turn la and the restriping of the Bristol Street westbound lanes wo further reduce the I.C.U. measured on January 16 to .8864. Richard Hogan, Community Development Director, summarized 1b stating that with the addition of the project traffic plu traffic system improvements, noted by Mr. Talarico, the , ject traffic plus the improvements would be less than these ing traffic without the improvements - the level of service would be improved and the I.C.U. would be reduced. Mr.. Hog further noted that these improvements should be required if the project is to be approved. . Commissioner McLaughlin asked if the system improvements wh have been suggested are consistent with the adopted Circula tion Element of the General Plan. Mr. Hogan explained that the system's improvements which ha been suggested are recommendations made by the City's Traff Consultant to improve the traffic system as it is related 't this project. Mr. Hogan further elaborated that the Circul tion element as set forth in the General Plan is a major $y tem for carrying traffic throughout the City and that the street system calls for so many.through lanes without destr irig the ultimate configuration of each intersection. In th case, the proposals which have been suggested are not incon si.stent with the General.Plan. However, Mr. Hogan emphasiz that if the Commission, in considering these developments, feels that the turning movements as proposed and the handli of those turning movements is inconsistent with what they would like to see as far as intersection design is concerne they should say so and alternate designs can be considered if they feel that the design is inadequate. ommissioner Beek commented that the Circulation Element is Bally silent on the point of intersection design so almost tithing could be in conflict with it. -11- i I ie A Ki in ich �e is i- ib- is :d Ig i INDEX COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL Commissioner McLaughlin asked if the proposed system improv, ments set forth in Table 9, Pages 21 and 22 of Appendix A of the Traffic Analysis Study just involved restriping. He man Basmacujan, the City's Traffic Consultant, indicated th the proposed system improvements involved a combination of striping and new pavement. Commissioner Beek asked for a clarification of the system i provements which would have to be added to the Bristol Stre North /Campus Dr. intersection. -Mr. Talarico explained that there would be 1) a third southbound optional through right turn lane from Campus Drive to Bristol Street North, and 2) a second optional through left turn lane from westbound Bri tol Street North onto Campus Drive. Commissioner Frederickson commented on the traffic counts t at Bristol Street North and Campus Drive on January 11th an 16th and indicated that they were probably abnormal, given fact that the improvements on Bristol Street had only been open for a few weeks. It was felt as this route becomes mo congested, motorists will find alternate routes and the who system will level off later on to some extent. Motion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make the fol- Ayes, x x x x lowing findings in reference to the Traffic Study: Noes x x Absent x 1. That a `traffic -study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the peak hour traffic and circulation system in accordance with Chap ter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 2. That the traffic study indicates that the project -gene ated traffic will be greater than one percent of exist traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of critical intersections, and will add to an unsatisfact level of traffic service, prior to mitigation or circe lation systems improvements, at three critical inter- sections which will have an Intersection Capacity Util zation of greater than .90. 3. That a traffic study prepared for the City at the .re- quest of the applicant indicates that the project -gene ted traffic will be greater than one percent of existi traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of intersection, and will add to an unsatisfactory level traffic service, prior to mitigation or circulation systems improvements at the Jamboree Road /Campus Drive intersection which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of greater than 0.90. -12- t MINUTES • INDEX it °e n- et L ak n d th re le ems] r- in th or i- ra- ng sai of • COMMISSIONERS MINUTES City of Newport Beach qy ti January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL 4.; That the traffic study indicated that the project- generated traffic plus "committed traffic" will be greater than one percent of existing traffic during tl 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of the critical inter- sections, and will add to an unsatisfactory level of: traffic service, prior to mitigation or circulation systems improvements, at ten critical intersections which will have an Intersection Capacity Utilization: of greater than .90. 5i That a traffic study prepared at the applicant's re- quest, for the Jamboree Road /Campus Drive intersectioi not deemed critical by the City, indicates that the project- generated traffic plus "committed traffic" will be greater than one percent of existing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of the intersection and will add to an unsatisfactory level; of traffic service, prior to mitigation or circulatib systems improvements, at the intersection which will. have an Intersection Capacity Utilization of greater than .90. 6i That the traffic studies suggest several circulations system improvements which, according to the calcula- tions, will improve the level of traffic service to an acceptable level at ten of the critical intersec i and will improve the existing level of traffic servic at the remaining impacted intersection. 7t That the traffic system improvements proposed for t e intersection of Bristol Street North and Campus Drive have been considered by the Planning Commission andli has been determined that they will improve the level of traffic service and reduce the I.C.U. to less thAn .90. 8. That the proposed project, including circulation sy$t improvements, will neither cause nor make worse an on satisfactory level of traffic service on any "major'!, "primary- modified" or "primary" street. i Commissioner Beek commented that he thought the staff wa§ being unusually forthright in suggesting the findings if, the Commission desired to approve the project and anothe olf findings if the Commission wanted to disapprove the p C jiect. i -13- e I >ns t em set INDEX COMMISSIONERS tp y�ss, y� O��Q2p y�0 City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL It was indicated that it should perhaps be the other way around. First, you make the findings and having made the findings, you decide whether or not you will approve or disapprove the project. Mr. Beek went on to state that he did not feel the Commission could find that given the way the Traffic Phasing.Ordinance is written and with the guidance and clarification being given by the City Counci in preparing policy that the project could.be approved. Beek concluded by saying that the proposal is dependent u projects which have no corresponding description in the Circulation Element of the General Plan and that these pr jects may be unwelcome or unworkable when we get around t considering a specific Circulation Element for the Genera Plan. Commissioner Cokas asked if there would be a time limit f the completion of the proposed system. improvements. The staff replied that they would be tied to the occupancy of building. Commissioner Agee indicated that he could not agree with Commissioner Beek and that as far as he was concerned, tf project met the intent of the current Traffic Phasing Orc nance and the Commission should not speculate on what re- vised version may ultimately be handed down by the City Council. Motion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make the fol Ayes x x x x lowing findings in reference to the Draft Environmental Noes N Impact Report: Absent x 1. That the Draft Environmental Impact Report is complf and prepared in compliance with the California Envii mental Quality Act, and that its contents have been considered in the decisions on this project. 2. That based on the information contained in the Draf- EIR, the project incorporates sufficient mitigation measures to reduce potentially- significant environ- mental effects, and that the project will not resul in significant environmental impacts. Commissioner Beek asked if it would be possible to find that the Draft Environmental Impact Report is satisfacto in all parts except the Traffic Phasing Analysis. -14- MINUTES 1 Nr. D- D 1 or e i- !te ry INDEX COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROIL CALL Hugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney, replied that the Com{ mission must either find that the Environmental Impact Repo is'adequate and complete under the guidelines or if it isW complete, why it isn't. Motion x Motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 1030 approving Amel Ayes x x x x meet No. 526 and establishing a Planned Community Developmo Noes x Plan and Development Standards for Block 800, Newport Centl Absent x Motion x Motion was made that Planning Commission make the followinj Ayes x x x x x findings in reference to Resubdivision No. 612: Noes x Absent x 1.! That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of tl City, all applicable general or specific plans, and tl Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of sub division. 2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. and approve Resubdivision No. 612, subject to the following • conditions: Li That a parcel map be filed. 2. That all public improvements be constructed as require by. ordinance and the Public Works Department. 3.: That P.C.C. sidewalk be constructed along San Clemente Drive. 4.1 That a hydrology and hydraulic study for the site be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to recordation of the parcel map. Any modifica tions to the existing storm drain system or extensions shown to be required by the study shall be the responl bility of the developer. 5. That vehicular access to the site from the public streets be subject to further review and approval by the Public Works Department. In addition, the on -sit vehicular circulation plan shall be reviewed and ap- proved by the Public Works Department. 6. That a Water Capital Improvement Acreage Fee be paid. i i i -15- MINUTES INDEX art t id—RESOLUTION ar. 1030 a � ie ie ?d s si- COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL 7. That storage capacity in San Joaquin Reservoir equal to one maximum day's demand be dedicated to the City of Newport Beach. 8. That the final design of on -site pedestrian circulatio be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Departmen and the Community Development Department. 9. That a standard subdivision agreement and surety be pr vided to guarantee satisfactory completion of the publ improvements if it is desired to obtain building permi or record the parcel map before the public improvement are completed. 0. That the developer be responsible for 50% of the cost of a traffic signal at the intersection of Newport Center Drive West with Santa Barbara Drive. A separat agreement and surety should be provided. 1. That on -site fire hydrants be provided as required by the Public Works Department and the Fire Department. 2. That Fire Department access shall be approved by the I �— Department. 3. That street trees be provided along the public street! as required by the Public Works Department and the Pai Beaches and Recreation Department. 4. That the developer reimburse the City, prior to recor( tion of a final map, for 50% of the cost of the exist - traffic signal at the intersection of Santa Barbara Di with Jamboree Road in conformance with an a reement w, The Irvine Company dated February 10, 1975 �Resolutioi No. 8431). 5. That the developer construct a traffic signal at the intersection of San Clemente Drive with Santa Barbara Drive. The plans for the traffic signal shall be re- viewed and approved by the Public Works Department. 6. That the project comply with the Uniform Building Cod, 1976 requirements. 7. Development of the site will be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Department of Community Development. Surface and subsurface drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Community Deve ment Department and the Public Works Department. -16- MINUTES INDEX I t D- ic is s .y i ,ks fa- ng -i Vf th i 0 • 1 COMMISSIONERS MINUTES City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 '62 y ROLL CALL 181. An erosion and dust control plan shall be submitted with the grading permit application and be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. 19. The landscape plan be subject to the approval of the Community Developemtn Department and the Parks, Beach and Recreation Department, and shall include a maintei ance program which controls the use of organo - phospha and pesticides. Oj. That the landscape plan shall place heavy emphasis on use of drought - resistant or ornamental vegetation. T. That planting be done on any exposed slopes within 30 days after grading or as approved by the Grading Engi eer. 2. That the applicant provide for daily vacuum sweepinj all surface parking areas and the top levels of all p ing structures. 3,. That the applicant provide on -site retention basins j (i.e., grease traps) and for their. maintenance. 4,. That the applicant demonstrate to the approval of + Community Development Department that the project's, desiltation facilities have a capacity designed to ac commodate runoff and silt from both the Pacific Mutwa Plaza project and the area tributary to this existing facility, and agrees to the maintenance and improveme of off -site desilting basins. 5. That construction activities on site be limited to th hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and that all reasonab steps be taken to avoid generation of loud, excessive repetitive noise. 8. That the project be designed to conform to Title 24, graph 6, Division T -20, Chapter 2, Subchapter 4. 7., The final design of the project provide for the sorti of recyclable material from other solid waste. 8. That final design of the project provide for the in�c poration of a private security system. i 9. That final design of the project provide for the in.tc poration of water- saving devices for project lavatohi and other water -using facilities. I -17- as 1-. :es i- )f 1 nt e le an Par - ng r- r- es INDEX of P00�O,y.�P�. 9� F v��'F � pPO2l City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROIL CALL 0. That should any resources be uncovered during constru- ction, that a qualified archaeologist or paleontologis evaluate the site prior to completion of construction activities. 1. That the applicant consider the inclusion of an obser- vation area open to the public on one of.the upper flo of one tower. 2. That operation noise characteristics of the project be considered in the final design phase of each structure 3. That the applicant investigate the potential reduction of wastes as provided for by the Quiet Communities Act of 1978. 4. The following disclosure statement of the City of New- port Beach's policy regarding the Orange County Airpor shall be included in all leases or subleases for space in the project and shall be included in any Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions which may be recorded agai the property. Disclosure Statement The Lessee herein, his heirs, successors and assigns acknow ledge that: a) The Orange County Airport may not be able to provide ad quate air service for business establishments which rel on such service; b) When an alternate air facility is available, a complete phase out of jet service may occur at the Orange County Airport; c) The City of Newport Beach may continue to oppose addi- tional commercial air service expansions at the Orange County Airport; d) Lessee, his heirs, successors and assigns will not acti ly oppose any action taken by the City of Newport Beach to phase out or limit jet air service at the Orange CoL Airport. 5. That prior to the occupancy of the project, the applic shall install all the circulation systems improvements identified in Table 9, pages 21, 22, 23 and 24, for e) - isting plus committed, plus total Block 800 in the Dra -18- MINUTES e- ft • INDEX L COMMISSIONERS • CiA m �p City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL cnu EIR, with the exception of the Upper Newport Bay Bridg and the redesign of the intersection of MacArthur Bouil vard /ford Road. The Bay Bridge project and the redesi of the MacArthur Boulevard /Ford Road intersection shal be under construction prior to occupancy. 6. That prior to the occupancy of the project, that appll cant shall install the circulation systems improvemenit designated as Improvement A and B in the "Supplemental Traffic Study for Block 800 at Newport Center." 37.1 That an erosion and siltation control plan be approvek by the California Regional Water Quality Control Boa Santa Ana Region, and that the plan be submitted to se Board ten days prior to any construction activities. 8. That prior to the occupancy of the buildings, the Trai System Improvements proposed for the Bristol Street Nc Campus Drive intersection, being a third southbound dT tional through right turn lane from Campus Drive to ; Bristol Street North and a Second optional through 101 turn lane from west bound Bristol Street North onto . I Campus Drive, shall be completed. Motion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make the fol� Ayes x x x x lowing findings with regard to the reallocation of develo r Noes' x x Newport Center: Absent x 1.. That the proposed project does not exceed the total pi jected intensity for Newport Center as established by General Plan Amendment 78 -2, subject to Condition No. below. 2.; That the traffic analysis of both location and inters i of the proposed uses demonstrates that the traffic s tem is not adversely affected and that traffic genera. tion as it affects the major intersections during cr . tical peak periods does not exceed the capacities in the approved street development plan. 3.i That the necessary improvements to the traffic system are coordinated with increases in traffic generation. . 4.1 That the project is consistent with other relevant alb ed policies of the City. ar�d approve the reallocation of development /Newport Centeq subject to the following Condition: I -19- MINUTES e' e- gn 1 M id C 02 1 ty INDEX COMMISSIONERS= ®0 0 qy City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL 1. That the reallocation shall be consistent with letter from The Irvine Company, co- signed by The Irvine Compai and Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company, dated Jan- uary 18, 1979, which is incorporated as part of the record. The Planning Commission recessed for a period of ten minute Request to consider a Traffic Study for a 69,720 sq. ft. office building complex. (Public Hearing) Location: Parcel 2, Parcel Map 3 -35 (Resubdivision No. 211), located at 2222 University Drive on the northerly side of University Drive, east erly of Irvine Avenue, adjacent to the Orang Coast Y.M.C.A. Zone: R -3 -B -2 Applicant: James F. Deane, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant AND Request to amend a portion of Districting Map No. 30 from 1 R -3 -8-2 District to the A -P District, and the acceptance of Environmental Document. Location: Parcel 2, Parcel Map 3 -35 (Resubdivision No. 211), located at 2222 University Drive on the northerly side of University Drive, ease erly of Irvine Avenue, adjacent to the Orani Coast Y.M.C.A. Zone: R -3 -B -2 Applicant: James F. Deane, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant These items were heard together because of their relatednei -20- MINUTES INDEX V s. Item #5 e • :he Item #6 le (APPROVED ss. 0 COMMISSIONERS 7p � ptp p0 Y q R v��? 7S p�pOypC O • ��P l2 RO 0 City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ll CALL Rilchard Hogan, Director of Community Development, indicate( that the only information to be added at this point is that this same traffic problem exists with this project, the in' section of Bristol Street North /Campus Drive, as existed w. the Pacific Mutual project. Mr. Hogan explained further ti with the conditions as recommended by the Commission in thr proval of the Pacific Mutual project the traffic added by this proposal would be insignificant and would be absorbed in the Pacific Mutual development. Mr. Hogan concluded by indicating that the Commission would want to make sure tha' the improvements required of the Pacific Mutual project ar completed before the development and occupancy of the buih iogs proposed by this project. Commissioner Beek commented on the practice of tying occub to the completion of traffic system improvements and the (ff((( consensus that seemed to have been reached by the Commissf that this was a very difficult problem to deal with. Mt. Hogan indicated that the easiest way to control the s' ation would be that not to issue building permits until t system improvements were completed. However; it was note this procedure would not allow the development of the pro' and the installation of the system improvements to be car- ried on at the same time. It was explained that the intern s�aff, if building occupancy is the controlling factorytoj rpuire the developer to acknowledge prior to the issuance of the building permit, that he will not be given occupargc or utility releases until the system improvements are co -. ppeted. Mr. Hogan concluded by indicating that in the fin analysis the risk is the responsibility of the developer. Commissioner Beek asked the Assistant City Attorney if h felt the Commission could be absolutely secure that the i w4s entirely that of the developer. I Hugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney, replied that with a siigned acknowledgement, it may be presumed to be valid tho arguments could be raised regarding its validity and perha through litigation it could be overturned. Mr. Coffin con ciluded by indicating that it would be a difficult conditic to enforce. Commissioner McLaughlin asked if the Traffic System Imprqv ments proposed by Mr. Dean were a part of the Circulation) Element of the General Plan as adopted. I -21- MINUTES :er th rat !a i- )n to -I athot pct to Y al sk ps n e- INDEX MINUTES :er th rat !a i- )n to -I athot pct to Y al sk ps n e- INDEX COMMISSIONERS F vas} vU, 0�9 yc yGo City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 tO►► cAU Mr. Hogan explained that the arterial highways are a part the Circulation Element but the General Plan does not disc the specifics of the design of each intersection. The public hearing was opened. Mr. Dean, the applicant, appeared and indicated that he co curred with the staff report, but requested that the fol- lowing items be clarified: 1. Does Condition No. 11 require that Anniversary Lane be terminated in a cul -de -sac; and, 2. Is Condition No. 2, occupancy of the buildings, dependent on the State in light of Findings No. and 5, which indicate that the impact of this project at the intersection of MacArthur Blvd./ Campus Dr. is very small and the system improve- ments planned by the State are anticipated to commence within a year. The staff indicated that Condition No. 11 would not requir a cul -de -sac at the end of Anniversary Lane. With respect Condition No. 2, it was indicated that if the Commission f - the effect of this project on the intersection was inconse quential, the occupancy requirement could be deleted. How ever, if the Commission feels that the impact is of some c sequence, it should be left in. Commissioner Balalis asked about the costs which would be lated to the improvement of the MacArthur Blvd. /Campus Dr. intersection. Bill Dye, Assistant City Engineer, indicated that the cost would be approximately $30,000 and could be as high as $65,000 with the modification to the traffic signal. Commissioner Balalis asked Mr. Dean if he would be willing post a bond for these improvements. Mr. Dean replied that he would. The staff distributed a letter, received late in the after noon, from the Miller's, 2231 Golden Circle, protesting th office park proposal. Dick Hunsaker, engineer for the applicant, appeared and as for verification that Condition No. 12 on the Environmenta Impact Report would supercede a former condition of Re- subdivision No. 215, dealing with the extension of Univers - Drive. -22- MINUTES • INDEX of us n- 4 e el on s h 0 ked 1 ity • City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL Bill Dye indicated that the developer would be obligated tc bond for that portion of the alignment adjacent to the pro - ject. Mr. Dean responded that it would be very difficult to bond for the extension of University Drive particularly because one knows what the alignment will be if it is extended at all. i Commissioner Beek indicated that the developer's share of t extension of University Drive, if it is extended to Jam re Blvd., would be very small in terms of the total cost ofl th project and therefore suggested that the bonding requirener should be waived altogether. i John Chiu, 2128 Mesa Dr., appeared and expressed his oppbsi tion to the increase in traffic that this project wouldlbri to the area and the incompatibility between the proposed) of fice use and the existing residential use. Tim Shepard, 2215 Anniversary Lane and President of the ad- joining Newport Upper Bay Estates Homeowners Associations, appeared and spoke in opposition to the intensity of thel pr posed use, the increase in traffic and noise that this pro- ject would bring to the area and inadequacies in the design of the site plan, particularly if University Drive is rep Aligned. Keith Goodell, 2107 Anniversary Lane, appeared and expreisse his concern regarding proposed sewer connections and on -Isit drainage. Mr. Hunsaker, replied that it would be their intent to use the facilities of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and that drainage would be handled through on -site catch basins. Jean McClatchey, 2201 Anniversary Lane, spoke in oppositIion to the project and the fact that it would infringe on the Back Bay Preserve and the beauty of the Back Bay area. Sill Pannell, 2245 Golden Circle, spoke in opposition to,th site plan and explained that he would like to see Buildipg, located in such a manner that it would be more compatible t the entire area. Ar. Dean explained that the main reason for the placement o the buildings was to allow the greatest flexibility in the Alignment of University Drive, provide greater setbacks IFro the residential area and reduce the impairment of views.; � I -23- MINUTES he e e t ng o- e A 0 f M INDEX COMMISSIONERS �L0 F a City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL There being no others desiring to appear and be heard with respect to this project, the public hearing was closed. Motion x Motion was made to approve the Traffic Study, Amendment No 520 and the Environmental Impact Report incorporating the findings and conditions as set forth in the staff report w the suggestion that the applicant consider the relocation Building B. A discussion followed among the Planning Commission regard the location of the buildings on site and the possibility continuing the public hearing for a revised site plan, pro traffic system improvements and their relationship to the adopted Circulation Element of the General Plan, and a nee for the applicant to bond for the proposed system improve- ments at the intersections of MacArthur Blvd. /Campus Dr. a Bristol Street North /Campus Dr. Following the discussion, Commission determined that they would vote on the Traffic Study, and Amendment No. 520 and the Environmental Impact Report separately and the original motion was withdrawn. Motion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make the foll AyPC x x x x ing findings regarding the Traffic Analysis: NL,,,,, x x Absent x 1. That a traffic study has been prepared which analyzes the impact of the proposed project on peak hour traff and the circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 2. That the traffic study indicates that the project -gen ated traffic will be greater than one per cent of exi ing traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on any le the critical intersections, and will add to an unsati ctory level of traffic service, prior to circulation tems improvements, at two critical intersections whic will have an ICU of greater than .90. 3. That the traffic study suggests two circulation syste improvements which, according to calculations, will i prove the level of traffic service to an acceptable 1 at both critical intersections. 4. That the traffic study indicates that at the intersec of MacArthur Blvd. /Campus Dr. the existing ICU is 0.9 the existing plus project ICU is 0.9340, and that bot values round to 0.93. Further, that this equals roug six - tenths of one percent of the total volume of thos movements. 5. That circulation system improvements are scheduled by the State of California that would effectively reduce -24- MINUTES of nd is er- st- ms m- tioi 259 h hly e INDEX L • COMMISSIONERS MINUTES City of Newport Beach • \ \ \\\ `,A Pc\ January 18, 1979 ROIL CALL \ ICU at the intersection of MacArthur Blvd. /Campus Dr. below 0.90 and that these improvements are anticipated to commence within a one year period. 6. That the proposed project, including the circulation system improvements will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service on any "major ", "primary- major" or "primary" street. and approve the Traffic Report subject to the conditions that: 1. That prior to the issuance of building permits, theiap- plicant shall enter into an agreement and post a bond in the amount of $45,000 to guarantee satisfactory completii of the proposed Traffic System Improvements at the inter• section of Bristol Street North /Campus Dr. Said improve. ments shall be completed prior to occupancy or within 3 years from the date on the agreement, whichever occurs first. ti. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the appl• in cant shall enter into an agreement and post a bond thi amount of $60,000 to satisfactory completion o .guarantee the proposed Traffic System Improvements at the intersec• tion of MacArthur Blvd. /Campus Drive. Said improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy or within 3 years, from the date on the agreement, whichever occurs fi st. The occupancy of the buildings will not occur untillthe traffic system improvement at the intersection of I vine Avenue /University Drive has been completed. 4;. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall indicate to the Director of Community Development in writing that he understands and agrees to conditions numbered 1, 2 and 3 above. Motion Motion was made that the Planning Commission make the follow - Ayes x x x x x x iing findings with regard to the Environmental Impact Report: Absent x li. That the Draft.Environmental Impact Report is complete and was prepared in accordance with the California n- vironmental Quality Act, and that its contents havei been considered in the decisions on this project. i i -25- INDEX COMMISSIONERS 2cry ROLL CA City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 LL 0 mi n 2. That, based on the information contained in Draft EIR, the project incorporates sufficie mitigation measures and will not result in significant environmental impacts, providing the following conditions are met: and that the Planning Commission recommend appro of the Draft EIR and of Amendment No. 520, subject to 1 following conditions: 1. That a landscape plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. Said plan sha include a maintenance program which controls the use of organo - phosphates and pesticide a shall place a heavy emphasis on the use of native vegetation and planting materials of drought - resistant nature. Prior to the occu pancy of the buildings a licensed landscape architect shall certify that the landscaping has been installed in accordance with the pr pared plan. 2. That prior to the commencement of grading activities the applicant shall contract with an approved paleontologist to be on site to oversee the collection and storage of signif cant fossils if uncovered. 3. That prior to the issuance of a building per the applicant demonstrate to the satisfactio of the Community Development Department and Public Works Department that sewer facilties will be available for the project at the tim of occupancy. 4. That the project be designed to meet the Sta Standards for interior noise level. 5. That the proposed structures be designed in such a manner that they do not reflect glare emit electronic interference or produce smok so as to endanger aircraft operations at Orange County Airport. 6. That prior to the issuance of a building per the applicant demonstrate to the satisfactio -26- MINUTES I INDEX th nt va :he 11 nd a I- nn n th e to r� LJ 0 mi n r� LJ COMMISSIONERS MINUTES v • � v S� v�` Fp }'}y�C 9p R 4 F_ L City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 OLL CALL of the Community Development Department that the guidelines of the Airport Land. Use Commi sion have been followed in the design of the project. 7.. That building access shall be approved by th Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 8i. That development of the site will be subjec to a grading permit to be approved by the Department of Community Development. Surfa and subsurface drainage shall be provided t the satisfaction of the Community Developmeh Department and the Public Works Department. 91 . That the grading plan shall be developed in accordance with Mitigation Measures 1 throug 7, 9, 10, and 11 as set forth on pages 11 an 12 of the Draft EIR. 10. An erosion and dust control plan shall be sip mitted with the grading permit application p be subject to the approval of the Community' Development Department. 11�. That prior to the issuance of building perm' all remaining applicable conditions of Resu division No. 215 shall be met. 121. That all necessary improvements be made in extension of Univeristy Drive (to the parki area) which will insure that no erosion is caused by runoff from the paved surface into the Santa Ana -Delhi channel. 13. That the project incorporate a pollution sep ration device (grease trap) on the proposed drain from the parking lot to the Santa Ana - Delhi channel. 14. That the applicant provide for the weekly cleaning of the parking lot by vacuum sweepi 15. That the applicant provide for a regular maintenance program for the pollution separy tion device(s). I j I -27- INDEX s- e e t h d b- nd is he 9 a- n F n} P Cy City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL L6. That the vegetative buffer between the Santa Ana - Dehli Channel and the project be retained so as to stabilize the channel and prevent erosion. 7. That the applicant investigate the potential reductior of wastes as provided for by the Quiet Communities Aci of 1978. 8. The following disclosure statement of the City of New{ Beach's policy regarding the Orange County Airport shi be included in all leases or subleases for space in ti project and shall be included in any Covenants, Condi• tions and Restrictions which may be recorded against property. Disclosure Statement The Lessee herein, his heirs, successors and assigns acknowledge that: 1. The Orange County Airport may not be able to pro vide adequate air service for business establish ments which rely on such service; v 2. When an alternate air facility is available, a c, plete phase out of jet service may occur at the Orange County Airport; 3. The City of Newport Beach may continue to oppose additional commercial air service expansion at t Orange County Airport. 4. Lessee, his heirs, successors and assigns will n actively oppose any action taken by the City of Newport Beach to phase out or limit jet air sery at the Orange County Airport. 19. That the applicant consult with the Orange County En- vironmental Management Agency as to the need for stab zation of the Santa Ana -Delhi flood control channel p to the issuance of grading permit. 20. That the site plan as contained in the EIR is approve in concept with the exception that Building B shall b relocated to a position parallel to Building A and ae jacent to the Santa Ana -Delhi Channel. -28- MINUTES • INDEX 11 e :he >m -I • ie )t ice ili rio d e • I I COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROIL CALL Request to amend a previously approved Use Permlii which.allowed a remodel and second floor expansnc of the Red.Onion Restaurant so as.to permit exits iing guest dock spaces or in -lieu parking permits to be used as an alternative to providing requilri narking spaces off -site. Location: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 57 -25 (resub- division No. 375) located at 2406 Newport Boulevard, on the easterly side of Newport Boulevard, souther, of 26th Street on the Balboa Peninslu Zones: C -1 and C -2 Applicant: Mrs. Jean R. Belden, Newport Beach: Owner: Same as Applicant l public hearing was opened and the applicant, Mis .Dean Belden, Newport Beach, appeared and stated he concurred with the staff report. Sohn Butler, representing the Central Newport Beach Community. Association, stated it was the feeling of the Association that to allow docki g Or in -lieu parking permits as an alternative t providing off -site parking spaces as pre - 'v iously required. would only increase the Already. conges e raffic situation that now exists for drivers in the area and should be prohibited for this or any other operation,. Mr. Frederickson stated that in light of the tommission's,desire to encourage the use of the bay for marine purposes, he felt the practice of having people come by boat was a healthy one and should be encouraged for this and other restaurants hav !the capacity. ;Commissioner McLaughlin asked why in ConditionlN 4 of the Staff Report that 7 docking spaces we e being given for the proposed dock facilities ii ilieu of 4 parking spaces previously allowed. Staff explained that present dock area if proper jmanaged would handle a maximum of eleven boats, a0c 1 -29- MINUTES In ad Ia. M ins o. ly INDEX tem #11 SE 'ERMIT 10. 1581 MA ENTE iPPROVED :ONDI- 'I LLY COMMISSIONERS ROLL CALL Motion MINUTES City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 • that seven dock spaces would be a reasonable use.of the dock' space. Motion was made that Planning Commission make the following findings in conjunction with Use Permit No. 1581 (Amended): 1. That the proposed use is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The project is categorically exempt from the require- ments of the California Environmental Quality Act. 3. The Police Department has indicated that they do not contemplate any problems. 4. Adequate "guest dock spaces" are being provided in con- junction with the proposed remodeling and expansion of the Red Onion Restaurant facility. 5. The approval of Use Permit No. 1581 (Amended) will not, under the circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neigh- borhood or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. and approve Use Permit No. 1581 (Amended) subject to the fol- lowing conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance wit the approved plot plan. 2. That a maximum credit of 7 parking spaces be given for the proposed guest dock facilities. 3. That the entire dock facility bayward of the restaurant shall be maintained only for patrons of the Red Onion Restaurant and shall be so posted. No overnite mooring shall be permitted. 4. That should the guest docks be sued for any use other than guest docks for the restaurant, the owner shall be required to provide 4 parking spaces in a location meet- ing the approval of the Planning Commission, or reduce the net public area of the restaurant accordingly. -30- INDEX E COMMISSIONERS MINUTES ���9�p�a�a ;� City of Newport Beach • \ \\\\ \\\ January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL Motion Ayes x x xi Noes x Absent Motion Ayes x x x Noes x Absent W • x x x x 5: All other applicable conditions of Use Permit No. 1581 shall remain in effect. 6. Any violation of this use permit will be cause for re- vocation proceedings by the Planning Commission. Motion was made to amend the original motion and change Con - d'p'tion No. 2 to read as follows: Z. That a maximum credit of 5 parking spaces be given for the proposed guest dock facilities. The original motion was then voted on and carried. Commissioner Beek indicated that he felt the City's formula for parking is inadequate'in the case of a restaurant as well populated as this one and that they should be provid- ing more parking or have less public area. He concluded by staying that this type of use does nothing to enhance the'Cit3 draws people from outside the City and should be discouraged. -31- INDEX COMMISSIONERS p �1 City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL Motion x Request to construct a restaurant with on -sale Ayes x x x Y alcoholic beverages within Office Site "G" of the Noes x Koll Center Newport Planned Community. A modifi• Absent x cation is also requested to extend an unenclosed roofed entry 10 feet into the required 30 foot landscaped setback on Jamboree Road. Location: Parcel No. 3, Parcel Map 108 -27 (Resubdivision No. 557) located at 5180 Birch Street, on the South- westerly corner of Birch Street and Jamboree Road. Zone: P -C Applicant: Far West Services, Inc., Irvine Owner: Koll Center Newport, Newport Beach. Motion x Request to permit the construction of a two -stor; Ayes x x x x x single family dwelling (and related third floor Noes x open deck) in the C -1 District. Said dwelling Absent x unit will be located on the same lot as an exist muffler shop. A Modification to the Zoning Code also requested, since the proposed development encroaches to the rear property line and to the side property line along Orange Avenue (where:th Ordinance requires 5 foot yard setbacks). Location: Lot 8, Block 6, Tract No. 27, locate at 496 North Newport Boulevard, on t southeasterly corner of North Newpor Boulevard and Orange Avenue, adjacen to Newport Heights. Zone: C -1 Applicant: Morris Desatoff, Newport Beach Owner: James L. Crockett, Newport Beach. -32- MINUTES 10 INDEX USE PERMIT x$96 CONTINUED TO FEB. 8 1979 • Item #13 i USE PERMIT NO. 1895 in is CONTINUED TO FEB. 8 I ie t t n A COMMISSIONERS 9PA 9f B0 • � v��4 Y� �p� pbt� of City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL Motion x i R I equest to permit the construction of a commerci Ayes x x x x x residential complex in the C -1 District, and the Noes x ajcceptance of an Environmental Document. A modi Absent x flication to the Zoning Code is also requested, since a portion of the second floor of the strut tlure encroaches to within 7 feet of the rear property line (where the Ordinance requires a 1 foot rear yard). A portion of the required par ing spaces are also tandem spaces (where the Ordinance provides that all required parking. slpaces shall be accessible and usable. Further more, the proposal also includes the paying of annual fee to the City for a portion of the re -I gluired parking spaces in a nearby Municipal par iing lot in lieu of providing said parking space$ op -site. Location: Lot 13, Block 21, Newport Beach, located at 114 22nd Street, on the southeasterly side of 22nd Street, between West Balboa Boulevard and West Ocean Front in McFadden Square:. i Zone: C -1 Applicant: Vic Sherreitt, Balboa Island . Owner: John W. Klug, Newport Beach. Motion x Request to consider an amendment to the Civic Ayes x x x x K Pjlaza Planned Community Development Plan to re -1 Noes x gjuire the preparation of a traffic phasing plan! Absent X aInd possible reduction in allowable intensity of dlevelopment and the acceptance of an Environment Document. Location: Property bounded by San Joaquin Hill Road, Santa Cruz Drive, San Clemente Drive, and Santa Barbara Drive in Newport Center. l 1 I -33- MINUTES INDEX Item #14 al USE PERMIT NO. 1897 CONTINUED TO FEB. 8 1979 n al 3 COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach January 18, 1979 ROLL CALL PLAN NWPRT PLACE PTANNED h MPRUNTITY CONTINUED TO FEB. 8 1979 • i Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach t. a- al Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach * * * Motion x Request for the approval of a Phasing Plan for Ayes x x x x x remaining development in the Newport Place Plann Noes Community. (Discussion) Absent Location: Property bounded by MacArthur Boule- vard, Bristol Street North, and Birc Street,.in Newport Place. Applicant: Emkay Development and Realty Company Newport Beach. * ** ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: Motion x 1. Motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 1031 setting i All Ayes public hearing for February 22, 1979, to consider re- Absent x classification of the Caltrans parcels in West Newpor Motion 2. Motion was made to adjourn to a special study session All Ayes at 7:30.p.m. on January 25, 1979, to discuss the Circ Absent x lation Element of the General Plan. Motion x 3. Commissioner Cokas asked to be excused from the Speci Ayes x x x x x Study Session of January 25, 1979. Noes x Absent x There being no further business, the Planning Commiddion a journed at 11:40 p.m. GEORG COKAS, Secretary City o Newport Beach Planning Commission GC /gg -34- ..r. MINUTES i INDEX e d PLAN NWPRT PLACE PTANNED h MPRUNTITY CONTINUED TO FEB. 8 1979 • i RESOLUTION t. a- al d- •