HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/18/1990COMMISSIONERS REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
PLACE: City Council Chambers
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
DATE: January 18, 1990
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
■ ROLL Cats 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INDEX
Present I* I *I *I *I *I *I All Conuni ssioners were present. i
EX- OFFICIO OFFICERS PRESENT:
James Hewicker, Planning Director
Robin Flory, Assistant City Attorney
William R. Laycock, Current Planning Manager
Robert Lenard, Advance Planning Manager
Don Webb, City Engineer
Dee Edwards, Secretary
• Minutes of Januaa 4 1990:
Motion Motion was made and voted on to approve the January 4, 1990,
Ayes Planning Commission Minutes. MOTION CARRIED.
Abstain
■ s s
Public Comments:
No one appeared before the Planning Commission to speak on
non - agenda items.
Posting of the Agenda:
James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the Planning
Commission Agenda was posted on Friday, January 12, 1990,
in front of City Hall.
• Request for Continuances:
James Hewicker, Planning Director, requested that Item No. 4,
Use Permit No. 1905 (Amended), Walter J. Heim representing
Camelot Restaurant, applicant, located at 3420 Via Oporto, be
Minutes of
Jan. 4,1990
Posting of
Requests
COMMISSIONERS January 18, 1990MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL 11 Jill I INDEX
continued to the February 8, 1990, Planning Commission meeting
to allow further review of the project.
Motion Motion was made and voted on to continue Use Permit No. 1905
All Ayes (Amended) to the February 8, 1990, Planning Commission
meeting. MOTION CARRIED.
Resubdivision No. 917 (Public Hearing)
Request to resubdivide two existing lots located in the R -2
District into two parcels of land for the purpose of establishing
a two unit condominium development on each parcel.
LOCATION: Lots 6 and 8, Block 735, Corona del Mar,
located at 704 and 706 Heliotrope Avenue,
on the southeasterly side of Heliotrope
Avenue, between Fourth Avenue and Fifth
• Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONE: R -2
APPLICANTS: Chuck and Nancy Fry, Corona del Mar
OWNERS: Same as applicants
ENGINEER: Duca- McCoy, Inc., Corona del Mar
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Chuck Fry, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission wherein he concurred with the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A".
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the
public hearing was closed at this time.
Motion Motion was made and voted on to approve Resubdivision No.
All Ayes 917 subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A".
MOTION CARRIED.
•
-2-
Item No.l
R917
Approved
COMMISSIONERS January 18, 1990 MINUTES
\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I I INDEX
1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision.
2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the
City, all applicable general or specific plans and the
Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of
subdivision.
3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems
from a planning standpoint.
4. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section
• 66415 of the Subdivision Map Act.
1. That a parcel map be recorded prior to occupancy unless
otherwise approved by the Public Works Department and
the Planning Department and that the Parcel Map be
prepared using the State Plane Coordinate System as a
basis of bearing.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
3. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual water
service and sewer lateral connection to the public water
and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department.
4. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to
issuance of any building permits.
5. That all vehicular access to the property be from the
• adjacent alley.
-3-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
\��\\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
I
INDEX
6. That arrangements be made with the Public Works
Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion
of the public improvements if it is desired to record a
parcel map or obtain building permits prior to completion
of the public improvements.
7. That the tree damaged and displaced portions of curb,
gutter and sidewalk along the Heliotrope Avenue frontage
be reconstructed and that the existing tree be root pruned.
All work shall be completed under an encroachment
permit issued by the Public Works Department.
8. That the Public Works Department plan check and
inspection fee be paid.
9. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not
been recorded within 3 years of the date of approval,
unless an extension is granted by the Planning
Commission.
•
x x x
Final Man of Tract No. 14025 (Discussion)
Item No.2
Request to subdivide 26 existing lots into a vertical subdivision
FTM 14025
containing two lots for residential condominium purposes, one lot
for commercial and marina purposes, one lot for residential
Approved
parking purposes, and one lot for commercial parking purposes.
LOCATION: Lots 1 -12 of Block 324, Lancaster's Addition,
Newport Beach together with lots 1 -14 of
Block 224, Section A, Newport Beach,
located at 2602 - 2620 Newport Boulevard,
on the southeasterly comer of 28th Street
and Newport Boulevard, in the Cannery
Village/McFadden Square Specific Plan Area.
ZONE: SP -6
APPLICANT: N/R Marina Partners, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
•
Associates, Inc., Tustin
ENGINEER: K W. Lawler and
-4-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
� \� \\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
1
11
fill
INDEX
Mr. John Newcomb, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission wherein he concurred with the finding and condition
in Exhibit "A".
Motion
Motion was made and voted on to approve the Final Map of
All Ayes
Tract No. 14025 subject to the finding and condition in Exhibit
"A". MOTION CARRIED.
Findine
1. That the Final Map of Tract No. 14025 substantially
conforms to the Tentative Map of said Tract and with all
changes permitted and all requirements imposed as
conditions to its acceptance.
Condition:
1. That all conditions imposed by the City Council in
conjunction with its approval of the Tentative Map of
.
Tract No. 14025 shall be fulfilled.
A. General Plan Amendment No 89- 3(E)(Continued Public
Item No.3
Hearing)
GPA 89 -3E
Request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan
so as to increase the allowable Floor Area Ratio of the Our
Ts 61
Lady Queen of Angels Church from 0.15 to 0.17; and the
acceptance of an environmental document.
UP991A
INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach
Approved
(Resolutioi
AND
No. 1211)
B Traffic Stuff No 61 Continued Public Hear—L4)
Request to approve a traffic study so as to permit the
construction of a 23,534± square foot addition to the Our Lady
Queen of Angels Church.
•
AND
-5-
COMMISSIONERS January 18, 1990 MINUTES
O �
3 �a
0 y_N `Cyr
db CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
C. Use Permit No. 991 (Amended)(Continued Public Hearing)
Request to amend a previously approved use permit which
allowed the establishment of the existing Our Lady Queen of
Angels Church. The proposed amendment involves a request to
permit the construction of a 23,534± square foot addition to the
church which will include a new parish hall, administrative
offices, new classrooms and a new garage for the parish rectory.
LOCATION: Record of Survey 63-46 (Resubdivision No.
173), located at 2046 Mar Vista Drive, on
the southwesterly comer of Mar Vista Drive
and Domingo Drive, across from the Corona
del Mar High School.
ZONE: R -3 -B
APPLICANT: Our Lady Queen of Angels Church, Newport
Beach
•
OWNER: Roman Catholic Bishop of Orange, Orange
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Glen Gellatly, architect, appeared before the Planning
Commission on behalf of the applicant, wherein he concurred
with the findings and conditions in Exhibit W.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards with
regard to neighbors indicating concerns relating to a potential
increase in traffic, Mr. Gellatiy responded that the applicants
have not received any inquiries with respect to the proposed
project.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the
public hearing was closed at this time.
Motion
Motion was made and voted on to approve General Plan
All Ayes
Amendment No. 89 -3(E) (Resolution No. 1211), Traffic Study
No. 61, and Use Permit No. 991 (Amended) subject to the
findings and conditions in Exhibit W. MOTION CARRIED.
-6-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
` 111 d
Orn
�o ��
a O CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
111
Jill
I
INDEX
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
Findings:
1. That an Initial Study has been prepared for the project in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines and City policy.
2. That based upon the information contained in the Initial
Study, the project is not anticipated to have a significant
effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration has,
therefore, been prepared.
3. That the information contained in the environmental
document has been considered in the decision on the
project.
B GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 89 -3(E) Adopt
Resolution No. 1211, recommending approval of General
•
Plan Amendment 89 -3(E) to the City Council.
-, TRAFFIC STUDY NQ. 61
Findings:
1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the
impact of the proposed project on the circulation system
in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code and Council Policy S -1.
2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project- generated
traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory
level of traffic on any 'major', 'primary- modified', or
'primary' street.
D USE PERMIT NO. 991 (AMENDED) .
Fin in :
1. As approved, the proposed project is consistent with the
Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible
•
with surrounding land uses.
-7-
COMMISSIONERS January 18, 1990 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL 111 Jill I INDEX
2. That the design of the proposed improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed
development.
3.. That the use of on- street parking for some of the church
parking will not adversely affect surrounding properties.
4. That the proposed parish center, classroom additions and
garage added to the church will not result in the increase
in the demand for off- street parking during the peak hours
of activity on Sundays.
5. That public improvements may be required of the
applicant per Section 20.80.060 of the Municipal Code.
6. That the establishment, maintenance of operation of the
existing and proposed church facility will not, under the
circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the
health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such
proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property
and improvements in the neighborhood or the general
welfare of the City.
1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved site plan, floor plans and
elevations, except as noted below.
2. That the Use Permit No. 991 (Amended), as approved by
the Planning Commission on July 19, 1984 shall become
null and void and that the temporary building shall be
removed from the site at the time construction begins.
3. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
4. That a standard use permit agreement and accompanying
. surety be provided in order to guarantee satisfactory
completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to
S1
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
0
d
d� c
' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public
improvements.
5. That the on -site vehicular and pedestrian circulation
system be subject to further review by the Public Works
Department and the City Traffic Engineer.
6. That a curb access ramp be constructed at the corner of
Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive (north) and at the
comer of Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive (south);
that the existing trees be root pruned and the displaced
curb, gutter and sidewalk be reconstructed along the Mar
Vista Drive frontage; that the displaced curb and gutter at
the bus stop on Domingo Drive southerly of Domingo
Way be reconstructed along with any other displaced
sections of sidewalk along the Domingo Drive frontage.
All work shall be completed under an encroachment
permit issued by the Public Works Department.
7. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be
•
screened from public streets and adjoining properties.
8. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces
shall be designated within the on -site parking areas and
shall be used solely for handicapped self - parking. One
handicapped sign on a post and one handicapped sign on
the pavement shall be required for each handicapped
space.
9. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify
conditions of approval to this Use Permit or recommend
to the City Council the revocation of this Use Permit,
upon a determination that the operation which is the
subject of this Use Permit, causes injury, or is detrimental
to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general
welfare of the community.
10. That this Use Permit shall expire unless exercised within
24 months from the date of approval as specified in
Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
-9-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
.o d, o�
A CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
1
11
Jill
INDEX
Use Permit No. 1905 (Amended)(Public Hearing)
Item No.4
UP1905A
Request to amend a previously approved use permit which
permitted the establishment of George's Camelot Restaurant with
on -sale beer and wine and an outdoor dining area on property
Cont'd to
located in the C -1 -1-1 District. The proposed amendment involves
2-8 -90
a request to expand the existing restaurant by converting 576±
of retail area to restaurant "net public area ". The request to
expand the subject restaurant also represents a conversion of a
portion of a building from a Base FAR use to a Reduced FAR
use which also requires the approval of a use permit.
LOCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 59 -17 (Resubdivision
No. 416), located at 3420 Via Oporto, on the
northeasterly side of Via Oporto, between
Central Avenue and Via Lido, in Lido
Marina Village.
ZONE: C -1 -1-1
•
APPLICANT: Walter J. Heim, ALA, Newport Beach
OWNER: Lido Marina Village, Newport Beach
James Hewicker, Planning Director, requested that this item be
continued to the February 8, 1990, Planning Commission meeting
for further review.
motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to continue this item to the
All Ayes
February 8, 1990, Planning Commission meeting. MOTION
CARRIED.
Use Permit No 3310 (Amende )(Public Hearing)
Item No.s
Request to amend a previously approved use permit that
UP3310A.
permitted the establishment of a nighttime only emergency
animal hospital on property located in the M -1 -A District. The
Approved
proposed amendment involves a request to allow a daytime
referral practice involving limited specialized surgical procedures
whereas the existing use permit limits the hours of operation
from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. Monday through Thursday; between
5:00 p.m. Friday and 8:00 a.m. Monday; and all day on holidays.
-1a
COMMISSIONERS January 18, 1990 MINUTES
I\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ,
ROLLCALI-111 Jill I INDEX
LOCATION: Lot 5, Tract No. 3201, located at 3720
Campus Drive, on the southeasterly side of
Campus Drive, between Bristol Street North
and Quail Street, across from the John
Wayne Airport.
ZONE: M -1 -A
APPLICANT: Central Orange County Emergency Animal
Clinic, Inc., Newport Beach
OWNER: I.C.I. Properties, Newport Beach
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item and
Mr. Tom Walker, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission wherein he concurred with the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A ".
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the
• public hearing was closed at this time.
Motion Motion was made and voted on to approve Use Permit No. 3310
All Ayes (Amended) subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A".
MOTION CARRIED.
Findings:
1. That the proposed application is support service in nature
and not an intensification of square footage of the existing
structure, and as such, is consistent with the Land Use
Element of the General Plan and is compatible with
surrounding land uses.
2. That adequate parking exists on -site for the proposed
development.
3. That the change in the operational characteristics of the
subject business will not have any significant environmental
impact.
4. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3310 (Amended) will
• not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental
to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general
welfare of persons residing and working in the
-11-
COMMISSIONERS January 18, 1990 MINUTES
MIN, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
1 ROLL CALL I I J f i l l I I INDEX
neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property
and improvements in the neighborhood or the general
welfare of the City.
Conditions:
1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved plot plan and floor plan.
2. That all applicable conditions of approval of Use Permit
No. 3310 shall remain in effect.
3. That the operation of the facility shall be restricted to
performing only specialized surgical procedures and only
on a limited basis between the hours of 8:00 am. and 5:00
p.m. Monday through Friday.
4. That should the facility desire to develop a general animal
care facility in addition to the emergency animal hospital
and the specialized surgical referral practice, an
amendment to this use permit shall first be obtained.
5. That the Planning Commission may add or modify
conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend
to the City Council the revocation of this use permit, upon
a determination that the operation which is the subject of
this use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the
health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare
of the community.
6. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24
months from the date of approval as specified in Section
20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
Use Permit No. 3373 (Public Hearing)
Request to permit the establishment of an automobile repair
facility on property located in the C -1 -H District.
Is LOCATION: Parcel No. 1 of Parcel Map 71 -18
(Resubdivision No. 478), located at 1000
West Coast Highway, on the northerly side
-12-
COMMISSIONERS
ROLL CALL
40
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
of West Coast Highway, across from the
easterly end of the Balboa Bay Club.
ZONE: C -1 -H
APPLICANT: Esmaiel Fadaee, Newport Beach
OWNER: Deeb Investments, Inc., Toluca Lake
James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that a building permit
is pending for alterations to the subject structure in the event
that the subject use permit is approved.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Debay, Mr.
Hewicker stated that the business has been operating for
approximately three months, and there have been no complaints
regarding the existing operator. Mr. Hewicker explained that the
previous owner obtained the approval of Use Permit No. 3285 so
as to install automobile accessories at the subject location;
however, he said that when the subject applicant purchased the
business and obtained a Business License, the applicant was not
informed of the existing use permit.
Commissioner PersBn indicated that a method needs to be
implemented through the Business License Division to inform a
new business owner of an existing use permit on the premises.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards
regarding parking, William Laycock, Current Planning Manager,
explained that parking would not be impacted by the proposed
construction inasmuch as the overhead doors are being moved
from one side to the other side of the building.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Esmaiel Fadaee, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission wherein he concurred with the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A ".
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Di Sano, Mr.
Fadaee explained that only general auto repair is provided; that
they do not rebuild engines; and if any engine repair is
performed, there are enough parking spaces within the building
to permit the automobile to remain overnight.
-13-
m *�
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
■ ROLL CALL 1 ! 1 J i l l 1 I INDEX
Motion
•
All Ayes
10
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the
public hearing was closed at this time.
Motion was made to approve Use Permit No. 3373 subject to the
findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ".
Commissioner Pers6n supported the motion; however, he
emphasized the need for new business owners to be notified of
existing use permits. Chairman Pomeroy suggested a method be
implemented between the Business License Division and the
Planning Department. Robin Flory, Assistant City Attorney,
stated that the City Attorney's Office is implementing a policy
that will require a Business License applicant to complete and
submit a form to the Planning Department for review.
Commissioner Pers6n indicated his support of the City Attorney's
proposal. Mr. Hewicker explained that the City Council has
discussed procedures with the City Attorney's Office that would
put businesses requiring use permits on notice. Commissioner
Pers6n addressed the expeditious action taken by the applicant
after he had been approached by a Code Enforcement Officer
that the business was operating illegally.
Motion was voted on to approve Use Permit No. 3373 subject to
the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". MOTION CARRIED.
Findings:
1. That the proposed application is not an intensification of
the existing use, and as such, is consistent with the Land
Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with
surrounding land uses .
2. That the design of the proposed improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed
development.
3. That adequate parking exists on -site to serve the auto
repair facility.
4. That the establishment of the subject business will not
have any significant environmental impact.
-14-
COMMISSIONERS January 18, 1990 MINUTES
JP \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLLCALL111 Jill I I INDEX
5. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3373 will not, under
the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the
health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare
of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in
the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
Conditions:
1. That the development shall be in substantial conformance
with the approved plot plan, floor plans and elevations.
2. That the paved parking areas on the subject property shall
be resurfaced. That the parking lot layout shall be
prepared and the striping shall be marked with approved
traffic markers or painted white lines not less than 4
inches wide and shall be approved by the City Traffic
Engineer.
-15-
3. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and
pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further. review
by the City Traffic Engineer
4. That a minimum of twelve (12) independently accessible
parking spaces shall be provided on -site for the customers
and employees of the proposed auto repair facility. That
existing landscaping within the sight line of the driveway
entrances shall not exceed 24 inches in height and shall be
subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer.
5. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be
screened from West Coast Highway and adjoining
properties.
6. That all repair and service activities to include the storage
of tires and other auto related parts or merchandise shall
be located inside the building.
7. That no vehicle waiting for service shall be parked outside
of the building for a period longer than twenty-four hours
unless it is in the process of being serviced. No vehicle
shall be considered to be in the process of being serviced
for a period longer than one (1) week.
-15-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
d 0
db �0' 0 \CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
8. That no vehicles waiting for service or pickup shall be
stored on West Coast Highway or on any other public
street or other public property.
9. That automobile body, frame and fender repairs, painting,
automobile washing and polishing or detailing shall not be
permitted on -site unless an amended use permit is first
approved by the Planning Commission.
10. That the hours of operation shall be limited between the
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., daily.
11. That all signs shall meet the requirements of Chapter
20.06 of the Municipal Code. Signs indicating "for sale" or
"lease" shall not be permitted in the windshield of autos
or elsewhere on the site. Also that any signs in or on the
windows of the building shall be included as separate signs
and subject to the provisions of Chapter 20.06 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code.
i12.
That all employees shall park on -site at all times.
13. That all improvements be constructed as may be required
by Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
14. That the Planning Commission may add or modify
conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend
to the City Council the revocation of this use permit, upon
a determination that the operation which is the subject of
this use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the
health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare
of the community.
15. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24
months from the date of approval as specified in Section
20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
•
-16-
COMMISSIONERS January 18, 1990 MINUTES
IW \\��\i\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL 1 I I INDEX
Modification No 3647 (Referred by the Modifications Item No.7
Committee)(Public Hearing)
Mod 3647
Request to permit additions and alterations (currently under
construction) to an existing single family dwelling, a portion of Approved
which encroaches 2 feet 1 inch ± into the required 6 foot
interior side yard setback on property located in the R -1 -13
District.
LOCATION: Lot 144, Tract No. 1237, located at 448
Rivera Terrace, on the southwesterly corner
of Rivera Terrace and Seaward Road, in
Corona Highlands.
ZONE: R -1 -13
APPLICANT: A. Martin Morgenstern, Corona del Mar
OWNERS: Corinne and A. Martin Morgenstern, Corona
• del Mar
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. David Baade, attorney for the applicant, appeared before
the Planning Commission. Mr. Baade referred to a letter dated
January 9, 1990, addressed to the Planning Commission from Mr.
Baade regarding the subject modification. In reference to a
statement made by James Hewicker, Planning Director, indicating
that the question was raised if a modification is necessary, Mr.
Baade explained that the wording in the Zoning Code as to the
definition of "cessation of a nonconforming use" is not clear;
therefore, the intent of the applicant should be the determining
factor inasmuch as it was not the intent of the applicant to give
up the nonconforming use. Mr. Baade explained that because it
was necessary to comply with the height restrictions in the
CC &R's of Corona Highlands, a portion of the living area was
required to be built under the structure which maintained a 4
foot side yard setback; therefore, in order to construct the
footings and retaining walls, it was necessary that the wall of the
building be demolished and rebuilt in the same location. Mr.
Baade said that the City Attorney's opinion is that after the wall
is demolished the wall ceases to be nonconforming; however, he
• said that to demolish a wall to facilitate construction and then
rebuild the wall in exactly the same location as before is not a
-17-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
.o
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
cessation because there was not an intent to cease the
nonconforming use.
Commissioner Pers6n and Mr. Baade discussed a controversy that
has occurred between the Morgenstern and the Cashes, adjacent
property owners westerly of the subject property.
Commissioner Debay addressed the necessity of removing the
wall of the structure so as to construct the footings and retaining
walls for the subterranean area of the residence.
Martin Morgenstern, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission wherein he concurred with the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A ".
Mr. Morgenstern addressed the controversy that has occurred
with the adjacent property owners. Mr. Morgenstern advised that
the Cashes requested that a portion of the subject structure be
removed so the adjacent property owners' view of the proposed
golf course would not be impacted, and he agreed to cut back
•
four inches so as to maintain an aesthetically pleasing design.
He said that the Cashes requested an exact measurement of four
inches; however, he agreed to 'approximately' four inches
inasmuch as construction materials could result in the
measurement not being exactly four inches. Mr. Morgenstern
stated that a compromise was made with the Cashes not to
construct an eave surrounding the chimney, and the remaining
eaves on the dwelling unit be constructed no more than 18
inches wide. Mr. Morgenstern stated that the neighbors who
would be impacted by the subject property were contacted, and
two of said neighbors requested a low profile of the roofline.
Mr. Morgenstern described how the structure was designed so as
to maintain a low roofline.
In response to Commissioner Debay's foregoing question
regarding the necessity to demolish the wall, Mr. Morgenstern
described the area that was excavated and, based on the note on
the plan requesting that the structure be properly supported, the
wall was removed. Mr. Morgenstern concluded that if he had
been aware that problems would develop from the removal of
the wall he would have requested that the wall remain.
•
Commissioner Pers6n and Mr. Morgenstern discussed the Cash's
concern, and Mr. Morgenstern stated that he would abide by the
-18-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990 MINUTES
� 4\\\ O CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Cash's requests with the exception that he would agree to only
cut back the structure 'approximately' four inches.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Merrill, Mr.
Morgenstern replied that he has resided on the subject property
for. approximately four years.
Mr. Morgenstern concluded that the new structure was not
moved from the original location; the wall's impact remains the
same as before it was demolished; to move the wall would be a
financial hardship; the new dwelling will enhance the
neighborhood; that the project complied with the CC &R's of
Corona Highlands and was approved by the Homeowner's
Association; that the structure's height was a primary
consideration; that the Cashes original complaint addressed the
six foot side yard setback; that 10 feet separates the Cash
residence from the subject structure; and the subject structure
was not built to the maximum setback area.
Mr. Norris Cash, property owner of 444 Rivera Terrace,
•
appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Cash commented
that his primary residence is in Northern California. He said that
the property at 444 Rivera Terrace was rented from June 1,
1989, to December 31, 1989. Mr. Cash described the effort that
he made to come to a written agreement with the Morgenstern
concerning the removal of 4 inches of the structure at the rear
of the subject property.
Commissioner Edwards commented that the dispute appears to
be entirely between the applicant and the Cashes. In response to
questions posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr. Cash replied that
his residence consists of a single family residence with one
kitchen, three bedrooms, two baths, living room, small family
room, and a two car garage. Mr. Cash further replied that when
he purchased his property six years ago, the subject property was
constructed approximately two feet into the side yard setback.
Commissioner Di Sano stated that irrespective of accommodative
language regarding 'approximately' or 'exactly' 4 inches, once a
red tag appears and there is a violation, the City's position does
not change. Commissioner Di Sano concurred with Commissioner
Edwards' foregoing statement.
•
-19-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
� \\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Mr. Cash described the detrimental impact that the proposed
structure would have on his property inasmuch as the dwelling
reduces light and air, and he indicated a six foot side yard
setback would improve their quality of life.
Commissioner Debay commented that the proposed structure
extends 2 feet 1 inch into the side yard adjacent to the Cash
residence.
Commissioner Merrill commented that the Planning Commission
does not protect private views from private property. He said
that he would not agree to cut back the comer of the subject
structure inasmuch as the Planning Commission does not become
involved with said issues.
Commissioner Pers6n stated that the subject modification came
to the City based on a complaint by the Cashes, and he
indicated that he had a desire that the two parties would come
to a compromise without the Planning Commission becoming
involved with the issues. He indicated that the wall of the
structure that the contractor demolished in the side yard setback
was in error.
Mrs. Carolyn Cash, appeared before the Planning Commission.
Mrs. Cash explained how the subject project could have been
designed so there would not have been an impact on their
property.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Debay, Mrs.
Cash replied that they have resided in their home thirty percent
of the time during the past six years.
Mr. Morgenstern reappeared before the Planning Commission to
address concerns that were expressed by the Cashes. He
addressed their request to move the television set, and be
indicated that he agreed to reduce the size of the fireplace to a
three foot width; however, he said the Cashes expressed a
concern with regard to the eaves. Mr. Morgenstern further
responded that there is a Fire Department regulation requiring
a window to be easily accessible. He explained that based on
the inaccessibility of the two parties, it was difficult to review the
written agreement with Mr. and Mrs. Cash prior to the Planning
Commission meeting.
-20-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
A O�
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Commissioner Debay and Mr. Morgenstern discussed the height
of a wall that would be allowed along the side property line in
accordance with the Homeowner Association's CC&R's.
Commissioner Debay commented that a wall could be
constructed on the side property line within four feet of the
Cash's property.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Glover, Mr.
Morgenstern confirmed that the proposed project has been
approved by the Corona Highlands Homeowner's Association.
Commissioner Di Sano asked what would the Planning
Department have replied if the contractor had conferred with the
Planning Department prior to the demolition of the wall. Mr.
Hewicker replied that the Planning Department would have
suggested to either retain the existing wall of the structure or
apply for a modification to construct a new wall. Mr. Hewicker
explained a conceivable scenario wherein it was an attempt by
the architect to retain the wall, and the contractor's decision to
•
demolish and reconstruct a new wall.
Chairman Pomeroy asked if it would have been possible to
demolish one -half of the wall, rebuild that portion of the wall,
then demolish and rebuild the second half of the wall to
maintain the nonconforming use without violation? Mr.
Hewicker explained that the zoning regulations require the
original wall be retained.
Commissioner Merrill and Mr. Hewicker discussed the notes that
were attached to the plans that were submitted to the City by
the architect with respect to removing the front and back walls
and the side walls, and the contractor's interpretation of the
notes.
Commissioner Edwards questioned if the new wall is larger than
the old wall and would the new wall obstruct air and light. Mr.
Morgenstern described the size of the new larger wall of the
structure compared with the original wall. In response to a
question posed by Commissioner Edwards regarding if a fence
fell down under natural conditions, Mr. Hewicker explained that
if the fence fell down because of a natural disaster, the property
owner would be able to legally rebuild said fence. Mr.
Morgenstern further replied that none of the original wall of the
•
residence that encroached into the side yard setback remains.
-21-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
111 ROLL CALL I 11 I f i l l I , INDEX
Motion
All Ayes
•
•
Mr. Morgenstern emphasized his desire to cooperate with all of
the neighbors' requests several months ago when the plans were
drawn.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the
public hearing was closed at this time.
Motion was made and voted on to approve Modification No.
3647 subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A".
Commissioner Pers6n indicated that the Modifications Committee
would have approved the subject application based on the
foregoing testimony. MOTION CARRIED.
Finines:
1. That the as-built encroachment into the required 6 foot
side yard setback is consistent with the previously existing
structure.
2. That the side yard encroachment will not affect the flow
of air or light to the adjoining residential property and
that eaves would be allowed to extend to within 2 feet of
the side yard property line.
3. That the approval of the side yard encroachment will not
set a precedent for other lots of this subdivision.
4. That the approval of a modification to the Zoning code,
so as to allow the encroachment into the required side
yard setback will not, under the circumstances of the
particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working
in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in
the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and
further that the proposed modification is consistent with
the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code.
1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with
the approved plot plan, floor plans and elevations, except
as noted in the following condition.
-22-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990 MINUTES
db �0' � \
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
2. That revised drawings shall be submitted to the Building
Department which accurately depicts the encroachments,
the distances from property lines, and the amount of
demolition which actually has taken place.
s : :
The Planning Commission recessed at 8:45 p.m. and reconvened
at 9:00 p.m.
Amendment No. 696 (Public Hearing)
stem No . s
A696
Request to amend a portion of Districting Map No. 17 so as to
establish a 10 foot front yard setback along Carnation Avenue
(private street) which shall be measured from the original right-
Approved
of -way line of Carnation Avenue.
LOCATION: Portions of Lots 8 and 14 and all of Lots 10
and 12 and a portion of abandoned
Carnation Avenue, all in Block 231, Corona
del Mar, located at 308 -312 Carnation
Avenue (private), on the easterly side of
Carnation Avenue, between Seaview Avenue
and Bayside Drive, in Corona del Mar.
ZONE: R -3
APPLICANT: Richard R. Duggan, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item.
There being no one to appear before the Planning Commission,
the public hearing was closed.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Amendment No. 6%
All Ayes
subject to the findings in Exhibit "A'. MOTION CARRIED.
•
-23-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990 MINUTES
� d
• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed ten foot front yard setback is the same
as other required front yard setbacks designated on
Districting Map No. 17 along Carnation Avenue.
2. That the proposed ten foot setback along the Carnation
Avenue frontage of the subject property is compatible with
the allowable scale of development in the R -3 District.
3. That the establishment of a 10 foot front yard setback on
the subject property will not obstruct any public or private
views from surrounding property.
Amendment No 697 (Continued Public Hearine)
Item No.9
Request to amend the Mariner's Mile Specific Plan (SP -5),
A697
revising the permitted land uses in the Recreational and Marine
Commercial areas consistent with the Newport Beach General
Approved
Plan and Local Coastal Program, Land Use Plan. Other
amendments include changes to the development standards to
(Resolution
eliminate the concept of increased floor area in association with
No. lzlz)
certain incentive uses and other minor changes to the
development standards.
INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach
Commissioner Glover requested a clarification of the following
sentence as stated in the staff report: 'This existing office space
becomes legal non - conforming as well, and conversion of other
existing uses to office will only be permitted upon the provision
of incentive uses:' Robert Lenard, Advance Planning Manager,
explained that under the existing Mariner's Mile Specific Area
Plan, offices are a permitted use and the change would be
consistent with the General Plan and Local Coastal Program
requiring incentive uses be provided in conjunction with office
use. He said that under the existing plan a use permit is not
required to replace a permitted use; however, it would be under
the new plan.
Commissioner Debay asked if the vacant space existing in the
nonconforming buildings can be leased without an incentive use.
-24-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990
MINUTES
rO o
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Mr. Lenard explained that some of the old required incentive
provisions that related to Base .85 FAR under the old Specific
Area Plan will be allowed to be reoccupied with retail uses, a
permitted use under the new plan as opposed to requiring a use
permit under the old plan. James Hewicker, Planning Director,
explained that there are uses included on the new list that
heretofore did not require incentive uses such as personal
services, which will now require an incentive use. Commissioner
Debay stated that she was concerned with vacant space not being
utilized.
Commissioner Pers6n supported the subject Amendment based
on the fact that by allowing the property developers to exceed
the base FAR ratio to .10, in conjunction with incentive uses, the
property owner was encouraged to over build the property.
Commissioner Pers6n requested a clarification of the Mariner's
Mile Specific Plan regarding setback requirements, stating that "A
12 foot wide setback along the northerly side of Coast Highway
shall be maintained for potential future highway widening to an
•
ultimate width of 112 feet.". Don Webb, City Engineer,
explained that the existing width of West Coast Highway is 100
feet and the extra 12 feet provides for the proposed widening on
the inland side of West Coast Highway. Mr. Webb further
explained that there is an additional setback requirement in
Mariner's Mile beyond said 12 feet inasmuch as 50 percent of
the property is required to be set back 10 feet and 50 percent
is required to be set back 5 feet or an average of 7 -1/2 feet
across the entire frontage. Commissioner Pers6n emphasized
that it is essential that the options are kept open in this regard.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the
public hearing was closed at this time.
Motion
Motion was made and voted on to approve Amendment No. 697,
All Ayes
y
and adopt Resolution No. 1212, recommending to the City
Council the adoption of amendments to the Mariner's Mile
Specific Plan. MOTION CARRIED.
s : :
•
-25-
COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1990.
MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
Add ' l
Business
Motion
Motion was made and voted on to excuse Commissioner Debay
All Ayes
from the February 8, 1990, Planning Commission meeting.
Debay
Excused
MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: 9:05 p.m.
Adjournment
JAN DEBAY, SECRETARY
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
i
-2-