HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/06/1997CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
• Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
Regular Meeting - 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Fuller, Ridgeway, Kranzley, Adams, Selich and Ashley.
Commissioner Gifford was excused.
Chairperson Adams, on behalf of the Planning Commission, welcomed
Commissioner Fuller at his first meeting.
STAFF PRESENT:
Sharon Z. Wood, Assistant City Manager,
Communityand Economic Development
Patricia L. Temple, Planning Director
Robin Clauson, Assistant City Attorney
Rich Edmonston, Transportation and Development Services Manager
Ginger Varin, Executive Secretary to Planning Commission
•
Minutes of January 23,1997:
Motion was made by Commissioner Selich and voted on to approve, as written, the
January 23, 1997 Planning Commission Minutes.
Ayes:
Ridgeway, Kranzley, Adams, Selich, Ashley
Noes:
none
Absent:
Gifford
Abstain:
Fuller
Public Comments none
Postina of the Agenda:
Ms. Temple stated that the Planning Commission Agenda was posted on Friday,
January 31, 1997 outside of City Hall.
40
Minutes
Public Comments
Posting of the Agenda
City of Newport Beach
is Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
1. SUBJECT: Lindamood- Bell Learning Center
4100 Campus Drive, Suite 100
• Use Permit No. 3596
Establish an instructional facility specializing in the language and cognitive skills
development of children and adults (ages 5 to adult) within an existing commercial
office complex.
Planning Director Temple summarized the staff report and explained the parking
necessary to support this development. Staff is recommending that 13 spaces be
identified as the allocation for this particular property which will make use of a
portion of the surplus spaces on site. An amended condition number 6 was
suggested to read as follows: 'That 13 parking spaces (6 spaces allocated to the
tenant space square footage plus 7 of the unallocated surplus parking spaces) shall
be made available within the reciprocal parking lots of the office complex for the
subject facility. That all students, faculty and employees shall park their vehicles on-
site at all times:' This does not require the office complex to actually mark off and
identify specific parking spaces for the facility. Rather, it is the intention to make use
of a portion of the unallocated spaces for this particular use.
Public hearing was opened.
• Applicant, Kimberly Worrell, 4100 Campus Drive was given a copy of the revised
condition 6 and in response to Commission inquiry, stated that she understands and
agrees to the findings and conditions of the Use Permit No. 3596. Ms. Worrell
explained that typically the students are not developmentally disabled but have a
type of learning disability that is not physical. A clinician is one trained in their
program of intensive work based one on one.
Chairperson Adams asked staff about the notification to the owner of the property
of these conditions. Ms. Temple answered that the City will transmit a copy of the
conditions of approval to the property owner.
Public hearing was closed.
Motion was made by Commissioner Kranzley for approval of Use Permit No. 3596 as
amended subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit A.
Ayes:
Fuller, Ridgeway, Kranzley, Adams, Selich and Ashley
Noes:
None
Absent:
Gifford
Abstain:
None
Findings:
That the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan since an
educational facility is a permitted use within the Administrative, Professional
•
INDEX
Item No. 1
UP No. 3596
Approved
City of Newport Beach
• Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
and Financial Commercial
2. That this project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is
categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act under Class (ExistingFacilities).
3. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use of the property
or building will not, under the circumstances of this particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or
the general welfare of the City for the following reasons:
• The use is expected to operate in a manner similar to other office
uses.
• No noise problems are anticipated based upon the fact that
children are supervised and not left unattended and the use does
not include play activities.
• The number of parking spaces provided for the subject property
and available by reciprocal arrangements is adequate to
accommodate the proposed private instruction facility, since the
majority of the students are not of driving age, seminars for adults
• are limited to evenings and on weekends, and the facility is
located in an area with a large pool of parking which is
immediately accessible.
Conditions
1. That the use of the facility shall be consistent with the approved plot plan and
floor plan.
2. That the activities associated with the proposed facility shall be conducted
within the subject tenant space and that no activities shall be conducted
outside. That the employees of the facility shall provide full supervision of
students at all times they are present in the facility, unless otherwise
accompanied by a parent or other responsible adult.
3. That the total number of students and employees shall not exceed 23 persons
in the tenant space at any one time, during the daytime hours. That the
seminars shall be restricted to weekends and after 5:00 p.m. on weekdays
only.
4. The facility shall be approved by the Fire Department for exiting and fire
prevention requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and the Uniform Building
Code, unless otherwise exempted by the Fire Marshall and the Building
Department.
•
INDEX
City of Newport Beach
• Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
•
•
5. That a fire alarm system or early warning device shall be installed in
conjunction with this facility as required and approved by the Fire
Department.
6. That 13 parking spaces (6 spaces allocated to the tenant space square
footage plus 7 of the unallocated surplus parking spaces) shall be made
available within the reciprocal parking lots of the office complex for the
subject facility. That all students, faculty and employees shall park their
vehicles on -site at all times.
That the hours of operation shall be limited between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and
10:00 p.m., daily, and that any increase in hours shall be subject to the
approval of the Planning Director.
8. That all signs shall conform to the provisions of Chapters 20.06 of the Municipal
Code.
That the Planning Commission may add to or modify conditions of approval to
this use permit, or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this use
permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this
use permit, causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort, or general welfare of the community.
10. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of
approval as specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal
Code.
2. SUBJECT: Martial Arts Studio (Gentll Pennewaert, applicant)
4533 MacArthur Boulevard
• Use Permit no. 3600
Establishment of a martial arts studio specializing in instruction for both adults and
children within an existing office /retail complex. The request will also allow for
occasional seminar sessions for visiting martial arts instructors.
Ms. Temple summarized the staff report and explained that the tenant space in
question is currently occupied by the applicant in Agenda Item No. 3, a similar
activity. Based on the analysis in the staff report, parking will be adequate for this
business.
Commissioner Ridgeway complimented staff on the parking analysis work and the
fact that it was done during the lunch hour time. Chairperson Adams agreed and
stated that the contents of the staff reports of late have been outstanding and
contribute to efficient meetings.
INDEX
Item 2
UP No. 3600
Approved
City of Newport Beach
• Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
was
Dr. Christine Pennewaert, 4533 MacArthur Boulevard, applicant, in response to
Commission inquiry, stated that she understands and agrees to the findings and
conditions of Use Permit No. 3600.
Motion was made by Commissioner Ridgeway for approval of Use Permit 3600
subject to the findings and conditions as attached in Exhibit A.
Ayes:
Fuller, Ridgeway, Kranzley, Adams,, Selich and Ashley
Noes:
None
Absent:
Gifford
Abstain:
None
Findinas:
That the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and is
compatiblewith surrounding land uses because:
• Instructional facilities are allowed in the APF District.
The Floor Area Ratio is less than the Base Development Allocation
• 2. That this project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is
categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act under Class (Existing Facilities).
3. The approval of Use Permit No. 3600 will not, under the circumstances of the
case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general
welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood or be detrimental
or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the general
welfare of the City for the following reasons:
• That adequate on -site parking is available for the existing and
proposed uses.
A martial arts facility is similar in operational characteristics to the
children's fitness facility currently operating at the same location which
has not presented a problem to the surrounding area, and since the
daytime use will be primarily children, should not increase noise and
traffic in the area.
That the proposed evening classes should not disturb adjacent tenants
because most of the surrounding office and retail uses will be closed.
Conditions:
That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site
plan, floor plan and elevations, except as noted below.
49
INDEX
City of Newport Beach
• Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
2. The hours of operation for the facility shall be limited to 5:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on weekends.
3. The number of students and employees attending the midday classes shall be
limited to 13 persons.
4. That all signs shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 20.06 of the Municipal
Code. No temporary "sandwich" signs or balloons shall be permitted, either
on -site or off -site, to advertise the martial arts studio.
5. That all employees shall park on -site at all times.
6. That all noise created from the martial arts instruction shall be confined to the
interior of the building and all doors and windows within the buildings shall be
closed while instruction is conducted.
7. That no outside paging system shall be utilized in conjunction with the martial
arts facility.
8. That the Planning Commission may add or modify conditions of approval to
this Use Permit or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this Use
Permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this
• Use Permit, causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort, or general welfare of the community.
That this Use Permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date
of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code.
3. SUBJECT: My Gym Children's Fitness Center (Rick Altman, applicant)
2040 Quail Street
• Use Permit No. 3601
To allow the establishment of a recreational facility specializing in children's fitness in
an existing shopping center.
Ms. Temple summarized the staff report and stated that the existing site currently has a
deficit as to the parking formula required for the shopping center, the demand for
parking as a result of this project should reduce the deficit in this particular location.
Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Rick Altman, 2040 Quail Street, applicant in response to Commission inquiry stated
that he has read, understands and agrees to the conditions and findings for Use
Permit No. 3601.
•
INDEX
Item No. 3
UP No. 3601
Approved
City of Newport Beach
• Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
Public Hearing was closed.
Motion was made by CommissionerSelich for approval of Use Permit No. 3601 subject
to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ".
Ayes:
Fuller, Ridgeway, Kranzley, Adams, , Selich and Ashley
Noes:
None
Absent:
Gifford
Abstain:
None
Findinas:
That the proposed development is consistent with the Land Use Element of the
General Plan, since the site is designated "Administrative, Professional,
Financial Commercial', and this facility is a service which is supportive of the
predominant office uses in the area, and is therefore, a permitted use within
this classification.
2. That this project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is
categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act under Class (Existing Facilities).
• 3. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use of the property
or building will not, under the circumstances of this particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or
the general welfare of the City, for the following reasons:
That the number of parking spaces provided on -site in Campus Square
is adequate for the proposed recreational facility.
That the facility is comparable to similar uses located in other shopping
centers of the City and which have not generated any particular
problems or complaints.
That the same business has been operating at a different location in
the City for the past five years, and there have been no problems
stemming from the parking situation or complaints of any kind about
noise.
Conditions:
That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site
plan and floor plan.
E
,II IJS4
City of Newport Beach
• Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
That all teachers and employees shall park their vehicles on -site at all times.
3. That all signs shall conform to the provisions of Chapter 20.06 of the Municipal
Code.
4. That the hours of operation shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m.
and 6:00 p.m., daily, and that any increase in hours shall be subject to the
approval of an amendment to this use permit; or in conjunction with special or
holiday events, subject to the approval of a Special Event Permit issued by the
Recreation Division and approved by the Police Department.
5. That pre- recorded music shall be limited so that the sound shall be confined to
the interior of the structure and all windows and doors within the facility shall
be closed, except when entering and leaving by the main entrance of the
facility.
6. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian circulation
systems be subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer, should any
change be made to the existing configuration.
7. That the project shall comply with State Disabled Access requirements.
• 8. That a maximum of 16 children shall be permitted per class during the week.
That all gym classes be for children between the ages of 3 months and 7 years,
and that any adult use of the gym, or change in the operational
characteristicsbe subject to an amendment to this use permit.
10. That no outdoor loudspeaker or paging system shall be permitted in
conjunction with the proposed operation.
11. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify conditions of approval to
this Use Permit or recommend to the City Council the revocation of this Use
Permit, upon a determination that the operation which is the subject of this
Use Permit, causes injury, or is detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort, or general welfare of the community.
12. That this Use Permit shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date
of approval as specified in Section 20.80.090A of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code.
•
INDEX
City of Newport Beach
• Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
4. SUBJECT: Speedway Restaurant (Jerry King, applicant)
353 East Coast Highway
• Use Permit No. 3598
Establishmentof a theme restaurant facility (race car theme) with incidental alcoholic
beverage service. The application includes a request to:
• allow an exception and a modification to the Sign Ordinance to allow the
display of two formula one race cars on the roof and side of the building to act
as an attention attracting device and to permit wall signs (racing graphics) in
excess of the permitted 200 square feet allowed by the Sign Code;
• continue the waiver of specific restaurant development standards.
The applicant has requested that this application be continued to the meeting of
February 20, 1997, to allow additional time to resolve design issues which have been
raised in conjunction with this application. Staff has no objection to this request.
5. SUBJECT: Balboa Peninsula Planning Advisory Committee (BPPAC)
Reportand Recommendations of Project2000
• • Receive report and file
Commissioner Kranzley, as spoke person for the BPPAC, gave a slide presentation to
the Commission and reported on the recommendations as contained in Project 2000.
BPPAC was formed in March 1995 to study the issues on the peninsula. There are four
villages that were reviewed: Lido Village, McFadden Square, Cannery Village and
Central Balboa. The outgrowth of this review was a plan from Jack Camp (Urban
Design) and the outgrowth of that was the Balboa Peninsula Planning Advisory
Committee Project 2000 report. This is not the first plan that talks about the
revitalization of the peninsula. Plans dating back to 1983 that say many of the things
are being presented in the plan today. The core peninsula wide issues are:
• Beautification of Balboa Boulevard
• Parking
• "Mixmasterat McFadden Square
Commissioner Kranzley then proceeded with a slide presentation to emphasize the
three issues. He also emphasized that this plan is conceptual only. Discussion followed
by the Commission and staff on the following:
• Local Coastal Plan and compliance
• elimination of some metered parking
• comprehensive parking study to be done
• feasibility study on parking management plan, Balboa Pier Parking Lot
•
INDEX
UP No. 3598
Continued to
2/10/97
Item No. 5
Report received
City of Newport Beach
. Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
improvements, Local Coastal Plan amendment and certification, tenant
marketing plan, alcohol policies, derelict boat ordinance; and to develop a
Peninsula Revitalization Financing Program
• Marina Village- tidelands- special study group
• recommendationsand implementation on pages 34 and 54 in Project 2000
• suggested introduction of trolley on Balboa Boulevard
• water taxi
• boundaries
Chairperson Adams noted that the City Council will be meeting on February 10th to
receive public comments and to review these recommendations and direct staff to
prepare a community outreach strategy coordinated with BPPAC. No specific
elements of the plan will be approved, but rather direction to staff for moving forward
on some of the steps that are less controversial that can be funded and will make a
positive impact immediately.
Public Hearing was opened.
Ken Kuhlmann, 213 39th Street, presented a photo board to the Commission. He has
read the BPPAC report and agrees with it. He addressed his concern that the
neighborhood he lives in is not part of the project. The photos presented showed the
overhead wires as well as the poor condition of the streets in the West Newport area.
• He requests that this area be included in the beautification and upgrades in Project
2000.
•
Commissioner Kranzley stated that West Newport is out of the scope of area in the
plan. He agrees with the comments and hopes that what comes out of the plan will
be useful in the future.
Commissioner Ridgeway also agreed and stated to include West Newport in what is
being attempted now, would not feasible. The BPPAC report concentrates more on
the commercial areas.
Chairperson Adams reiterated that the Commission is not able to act on any of this, so
the time to repeat this message is on Monday night at the City Council meeting that
starts at 4:00 p.m.
Martha Durkee, P. O. Box 3353, Newport Beach - spoke to the Commission against the
project for the following reasons:
• removal of on- street parking areas from in front of the businesses would be
detrimental
• removal of business driveways would be detrimental
• off street parking issues
signage issues
Chairperson Adams thanked Mrs. Durkee and stated that her comments would be
iLI
INDEX
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
most welcomed at the Council meeting on the 10th. There will be numerous
opportunities for the public to comment on this plan.
Mrs. Wood stated that the first public outreach and information meeting on February
3rd was not an official City meeting, rather it was coordinated by the BPPAC.
However, both Tim Collins co- chairman of the committee and herself were present
and took copious notes that will be summarized for the City Council meeting on the
10th.
Ardee Allen, business owner of two tattoo shops at 313 E. Balboa Blvd. and 2309 West
Balboa Blvd. stated that she has been in business for fifteen years. She has read the
plan and stated she is concerned with what appears to be bureaucratic and
prejudicial statements. Her main concern is that the plan lists her businesses as
liabilities to the City. She explained that she has improved her landlords' properties,
has worked hard to set standards for her workers and has an honest business. Crime is
not brought in by her business. Many years of hard work have been devoted to
overcoming the stigma of a tattoo parlor in her area and to have the prejudicial
statements in this report is very upsetting. She stated that she supports any of the
improvements listed in the plan.
Public Hearing was closed.
• Commissioner Ridgeway reiterated that Monday at 4:00 p.m. in the afternoon is a
Council hearing and encouraged all the speakers to make their presentations at that
time because Councilmembers are the ones who will be taking action. The Planning
Commission is hearing this plan for the first time tonight and does not have the means
to implement it.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
a.) City Council Follow -up - Oral report by the Assistant City Manager regarding
City Council actions related to planning - On January 27th, the update to the
Zoning Code was approved on first reading and is scheduled for adoption on.
February 10th; approved on first reading was an Ordinance authorizing an
increase in fees, including development review fees, setting what percent of
our total costs the City should be recovering for these services; the Ebell
General Plan Amendment and zone change were approved as was the Thrifty
Car use.
b.) Oral report by the Planning Director regarding Outdoor Dining Permits,
Specialty Food Permits, Modification Permits and Temporary Use Permit
approvals - Modification Permits were approved for 412 Redlands Avenue, 617
Lido Park Drive, 406 Belvue Lane, 232 Agate Avenue and a Lot Line Adjustment
was issued for 1531 Sontanella Terrace.
•
INDEX
Additional
Business
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission Minutes
February 6, 1997
c.) Oral report from Planning Commission's representative to the Economic
Development Committee- None.
d.) Oral report from Planning Commission's representative to the Balboa Peninsula
Planning Advisory Committee - presented as Item No. 5.
e.) Matters which a Planning Commissioner would like staff to report on at a
subsequent meeting - Commissioner Ashley expressed appreciation to
Councilman Thomson for his assistance in making the parking permits
available to the Planning Commission.
f.) Matters which a Planning Commissioner may wish to place on a future
agenda for action and staff report - None.
g.) Requests for excused absences - None.
ADJOURNMENT: 8:25 PM
• ED SELICH, SECRETARY
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
40 12
INDEX