Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/07/1974f 1 `? COMMISSIONERS D T Z 3.o m T ni n D T A N T � mfDZ�X< < IM P fA .A A R• CALL IP Present Motion All Ayes Motion All Ayes CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Regular Planning_Commission Meeting Place: City Council Chambers. Timer 3:30 P.M. MINUTES uace: ryu rUd VY i iY1Y INDEX X X X X X X X . EX- OFFICIO. MEMBERS. R. V. Hogan, Community Development Director David R. 8aade,. Assistant City Attorney Benjamin B. Nolan, City Engineer STAFF MEMBERS James D. Hewicker, Assistant Director - Planning William R. Foley, Senior Planner Rodney L. Gunn, Advance Planning. Administrator Shirley L. Harbeck, Secretary Minutes of the Special Meeting ofi January 10, 1974, were discussed and City Engineer Nolan suggested.that the third from the la.st paragraph on Page 4 be clarified in that there would be no traffic deficiency "on Dover Drive ". Planning Commission also requested that a cross reference be inserted.on Page 11 opposite the substitute motion to indicate that same was rescinded at the Regular Meeting of January 11, 1974. X Following.discussion of the minutes, same were approved as corrected above.. X Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January17, 1974 were approved as written. Item A -1 Request to create one parcel of land for develop- ment. tESUB- Location: Portion of Lots. 1 - 9, Lots 11, 12, and 14, and a portion of "The Arcade" (vacated) as shown on Tract 814; a portion of Block 222 and Lots 1 - 5 of Block 223, Sec- tion A, Newport Beach, and a portion of Section 33, Township 6 South,. Range 10 West, San Bernardino Page 1. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES RVLL.GALL i 1M I reDruar /, 19/4 INDEX Meridian, located at 2220 Newport Boulevard, on the east side of Newport Boulevard, north of 22nd Street, on the Balboa Peninsula. Zones: C -1 and C -2 Applicant: William.E. Blurock, Corona del Mar Owner: South Coast Shipyard & Design Center, Corona del Mar Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost' &.Assoc., Newport Beach Community Development Director Hogan pointed out two revisions to Condition No. 4 as suggested by the staff and reviewed same with the Planning Commission. Public hearing was opened in connection with this • matter. William Blurock, Applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission to answer questions in connec- tion with this request. He stated that he.and the lender objected to the last part of Condition No. 4 as being ambiguous and pointed out that there was visual access to the property. He also pointed out the need for controlled access beyond the 70` easement at the present time and that should the property be redeveloped or the use changed at some future date, further easements could be considered at that time. Planning Commission discussed parking requirements for the entire site as well as the need for some assurance that the property would either remain marine oriented with visual access to.the bay or that easements would be dedicated to provide for public access to the bay should there be a change in the use which would make public access desirable. Bill Frost of Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc., appeared before the Planning Commission to explain the need for-the resubdivision. • Planning Commission discussed possible wording of a condition which would alleviate their concern regarding access to the bay. Page 2. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH T T y� • � � p P p MINUTES ROLL CALL February 7 1974 There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Following discussion, motion was made to approve Resubdivision No. 421, subject to an additional condition that no building, repair or renovation upon the property shall result in uses or strut- tures which expand existing building footprints, exceed parking standards of the City of Newport Beach, or impair existing visual or physical access to the waterfront without review by the Planning Commission and that the second alternative to Condition No. 4 be imposed with the change to require additional easements at such time as the water frontage is redeveloped to a use "not hazard - ous to the public ". Motion X Planning Commission discussed the motion, following Ayes X X X X X X which a substitute motion was made to approve Abstain X Resubdivision No. 421 subject to the following conditions: . 1. That a parcel map be filed. 2: That the existing Marine facilities be brought to compliance with appropriate sections of the Council's Harbor Permit Policies and Municipal Code. Permits for this work shall be obtained from the appropriate City departments. 3. That prior to the recordation of the Parcel Map, the property owner shall dedicate to the City of Newport Beach an easement for reason - able public access from Newport Boulevard. across the subject parcel a distance of approx imately 70 feet bayward to a point near the existing sand and lawn area as illustrated on the Tentative Parcel Map. Said easement shall be for the purpose of establishing and main -, taining for the public a view bayward and laterally through the existing parking area. Said easement shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development and the City Attorney and shall be shown on the Parcel Map. 4. That the footprint or volume of any existing . structure shall not be increased nor shall. any marine oriented activity be changed to a use which does not. require controlled water access without the prior approval of the Planning Commission. At such time as the Page 3. r COMMISSIONERS 1mm� Z'yPtT' A�( CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES ruary 7, 1974 applicant desires to increase the footprint or volume of a building or at such time as there is a change in marine activities which would result in a use which does not require control water access the Planning Commission may requi the dedication of additional public access bayward and laterally along the bulkhead line. Commissioner Hazewinkel abstained due to the fact that he did not have the benefit of the previous public hearing. Commissioner Hazewinkel stepped down from the dais and abstained from deliberation on the following item due to the fact that he is presently managing a project for Bob Warmington's firm. Commissioner Parker stated that he did not know of • the relationship by Mr. Warmington and the Warmington Development Company with which he has done business, but in any event, does not feel this should disqualify him. Request to create one parcel of land where two lots and a portion of Via Genoa (vacated) now exist so as to permit the construction of a single family dwelling in the R -1 District. Location Zone Applicant Owner: Engineer: Lots 819 and 820, Tract 907, and a portion of Via Genoa (vacated), located at 220 Via Genoa, on the southeasterly side of Via Genoa, between Via Lido Nord and Piazza Lido on Lido Isle. R -1 Robert P. Warmington, Corona del Ma Same as Applicant Southwest Engineering, Orange Page 4. APPROVED rrnNnT- " r COMMISSIONERS Y T= g q A mxmy��mZ` Xp A ROLL CALL Motion Ayes Abstain 0 40 Motion All Ayes CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES f'_L wyI �. reuruar i, ioiY rove Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Bob Warmington, Applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission and stated his objection to the condition recommended by the staff because of the cost involved. Planning Commission discussed the procedure for filing of parcel maps and the cost involved as well as the policies and ordinances governing resub- divisions and building over lot tines. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. X Motion was made to approve Resubdivision No. 431, X X X X X X subject to the following condition: X 1. That a Parcel Map be filed. Commissioner Hazewinkel returned to the dais. Item A -3 Request to create two parcels of land where "7 lots and portions of 2 other lots now exist. RESUB- MMTON NY.—Ur Location: Lots 8 through 14 and portions of Lots 7 and 15, Tract 1622, located CONT. TO at 3366 Via Lido, on the north - ME= easterly side of Via Lido, south- easterly of Via Oporto, in the Lido Village Area. Zone: C -1 -H Applicant: Don Koll Company, Newport Beach Owner: Imperial Savings and Loan Associati n, San Diego Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc., Newport Beach X Planning Commission continued this matter to the meeting of February 21, 1974, at the request of the applicant. Page 5. COMMISSIONERS T mj � T m r T • Mc T A T Z P n ROLL CALL e" 0 Motion All Ayes • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES Fabruary 7. 1974 Item A -4 Request approval of a final map to subdivide 5.00 FINAL acres into one lot for the development of a forty- MAV two unit condominium. TRXCT Location: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 52 -22 (Resubdivision No. 382),.located APPROVED northerly of Pacific View Drive and C - easterly of New MacArthur Bouleva-rd,1TIONALL adjacent to "Harbor View Hills." Zone: R -3 -B Applicant: Estate Builders International, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Engineer: McIntire & Quiros, Inc.0 Santa Ana Steve Sharkey, Director of Development for Troy Equities, the financial backers of the project, appeared before the Planning Commission and stated there were no objections to the conditions which have already been met. He also answered questions on compliance with the condition relative to paleontological and archaeological clearance before grading. X Following discussion, motion was made to approve Final Map of Tract 8406, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the eighteen conditions of approval as applied to the Tentative Map of Tract No. 8406 shall be fulfilled. 2. That the street names shall be placed on the recorded map. 3. That all water line, sewer line, storm drain, and other public utility easements be shown and dedicated on the final tract map. Commissioner Hazewinkel stepped down from the dais and abstained from deliberation on the follow ing matter due to the fact that he used to reside at 2033 Santiago Drive, one of the properties in question. Page 6. COMMISSIONERS I I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Gl n 7 m� O T • m T £y= T Y { G T 1D T A Z p ROLL CALL P L MINUT @S 7 1e7A tem' A -5 Appeal of Mr. & Mrs. C. Walter Phipps, Jr. and PPEAL Mar -Gard Inc. from staff interpretation of Sec- S & tions 20.09.050 and 20.09.070 of the Newport Beach A - D Municipal Code as they pertain to a fence between properties located at 2100 Leeward Lane, 2030 DENIED Leeward Lane and 2033 Santiago Drive, in Dover Shores. Community Development Director.Hogan thoroughly rev.iewed this matter with the Planning Commission as outlined in the staff report, advising that it was the staff's determination that the fence in question was a legal nonconforming fence and could be maintained by the owner, including replace of same necessitated through unauthorized removal. Therefore, permits were issued for replacement of the fence. Mr. Phipps, one of the appellants, 2030 Leeward Lane,.appeared before the Planning Commission and advised that the footage indicated as being adja- cent to his property was incorrect and inasmuch as. the owners of property at 2033 Santiago Drive had removed that portion of the fence across the rear of his property, the fence should be made to conform to present Municipal Codes.. Mr. Baumgartner of Mar -Gard, Inc., appellant in connection with property at 2100 Leeward Lane, appeared before the Planning Commission and advise that the fence was actually on his property, therefore he removed it in order to construct a legal fence. He also disputed the measurements of the properties in question. Anthony Vitti, Attorney, representing Dr. and Mrs. Foxx, appeared before the Planning Commission in connection with the property at 2033 Santiago Drive, presented background information, and contended that his client did have the right to replace both the portion of the fence which was removed by Mr. Baumgartner and the portion which was adjacent to Mr. Phipps in order to achieve uniformity. When questioned as to whether the posts were placed in the same holes as that removed, Mr. Vitti advised that because of a new fence constructed by Mar -Gard, it was necessary to place the posts somewhat inside the Foxxes property line. Page 7. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH m ip % ,mi. 7� T Da T • < £ ,Y ,o m Z p p ROLL CALL ^' Februar 7 1974 MINUTES r y lnutx Richard Foxx, owner of property at 2033 Santiago Drive, appeared before the Commission and advised that his fence was constructed following construc- tion of a different type of fence than that remove by Mar -Gard. Mrs.Phipps, 2030 Leeward Lane, appeared before the Planning Commission,and commented in disagreement to.the new fence which had been constructed adja- cent to their property. Lucille Baumgartner, Corporate Secretary of Mar- Gard Inc., appeared before the Planning Commission and commented on the aesthetics of the fence. Planning Commission discussed the matter and felt that Foxx had the right to maintain the nonconform- ing fence, in that replacement was necessary adjacent to Baumgartner because of unauthorized removal of same, and replacement was necessary Motion X adjacent to Phipps in order to achieve uniformity. A s X X X X X X Therefore, motion was made to uphold the staff Alain X decision and deny the appeal. Planning Commission recessed at 6 :00 P.M. for dinner and reconvened at 7:00 P.M. with all Commissioners present. Page 8. COMMISSIONERS I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH D Z Z° 0 T n T T t • T P T R P P ROLL CALL r 0 MINUTES F b 7 1974 e ruary INUCA Request to reconsider a portion of the Circulation VROJECT Element of the General Plan pertaining to the segment of East Coast Highway between MacArthur Boulevard and Jamboree Road with the. possibility of an interchange at MacArthur Boulevard and East Coast Highway. ADOPTED Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Al Krier with Voorhees & Associates, Traffic Consultants, appeared before the Planning Commis- sion and presented a brief review of the planning process which resulted in the conclusions related to traffic on Coast Highway and other portions of the City. He advised that in connection with the segment of fast Coast Highway between MacArthur Boulevard and Jamboree Road, there were three alternatives proposed. One alternative was to .increase East Coast Highway to six lanes, another alternative was the interchange at East Coast High- way and MacArthur Boulevard, and the third alter- native was a one -way couplet on MacArthur and Avocado between East Coast Highway and San Joaquin Hills Road. The alternatives were discussed, including the need for signalization; visual impact of a interchange at MacArthur and East Coast Highway and comparison of same with the interchange at West Coast Highway and Newport Boulevard; probable lack of public support on the best technical solution; traffic volumes and deficiencies which the various alternatives would provide; diversion of traffic around Newport Beach; the importance of the Corona del Mar link in the road system; and the possible over- estimation of the traffic situation in light of the present fuel shortage. J. R. Blakemore, Vice President and Director of Municipal Affairs for the Harbor View Hills Community Association, appeared before the Plan - ning Commission and recommended that the action of December 13, 1973 adopting Option 2 for Project 7 be reaffirmed since this is what the public.desires and seems to be the best solution at the present time. If this should prove inadequate, the City could then consider an inter- change at a later date. Page 9. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH (1 T P onu reu m February 7. 1974 MINUTES Robert Sanchis, citizen of Corona del Mar, appeared before the Planning Commission in opposition to any interchange at MacArthur Boulevard and East Coast Highway as it would be visually undesirable, would encourage more traffic, and stated that technical solutions are not people solutions. Michael Gering, representing the Newport Harbor Chamber of Commerce, appeared before the Planning. Commission in support of the one -way couplet on MacArthur and Avocado, thus eliminating the problem of an interchange. John Carson, 2921 Setting Sun, Harbor View Hills, appeared before the Planning Commission in favor of Option 2 for Project 7 as adopted on December 13, 1973. Russ Greengard, President.of Broadmoor Hills Community Association, appeared before the Planning Commission in opposition to the interchange. • Russell Server,.President Cameo Community Associa- tion, appeared before the Planning Commission and expressed opposition to any change on East Coast Highway. Wallace Calderhead, Corona del Mar, questioned the number of people represented by the Newport Harbor Chamber of Commerce and also the Cameo Community Association. Walter Kerper, Cameo Shores, appeared before the Planning Commission to answer Mr. Calderhead, advising that the Association favored the 5th Ave - nue by -pass. Calvin McLaughlin, resident of Corona del Mar, appeared before the Planning Commission and commented that the best technical solutions were not necessarily the best for the City. Larry Moore, Associate Director, Planning Adminis- tration, The Irvine Company, appeared before the Planning Commission and commented on a very length . letter written by The Irvine Company regarding their position on the traffic study. Although it may not be possible to implement the best technical . solution, the City should take a good look at the one -way couplet on MacArthur and Avocado, Page 10. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH r�,zxgpT n m • m i s ^ Z MINUTES. onn roll M Fehruary 7. 1974 Margaret Butt, Corona del Mar, appeared before the Planning Commission and commented on construc- tion of Promontory Point and Jasmine Creek which will add to the traffic problems of Corona del Mar and the need for an increase in the Police Depart- ment and additional parks in the City. Dr. Nichols appeared before the Planning Commission in opposition to the one -way couplet on MacArthur and Avocado and commented on the interchange and six lanes of traffic on East Coast Highway through Corona del Mar. Bob Sanborn, President of Harbor View Hills Community Association, appeared before the Commis- sion and commented that construction of an inter- change, increasing 5th Avenue and doing anything to encourage the Corona del Mar Freeway into the area would be serving other people than those residents of Newport Beach. Paul Hummel, 416 Heliotrope, Corona del Mar, appeared. • before the Planning Commission in opposition to the. interchange and the one -way couplet on MacArthur and Avocado and in favor of leaving East Coast Highway as is. Charles Hill, resident of Harbor View Hills, appeared before the Planning Commission and com- mented on solutions to traffic problems implemente by other cities. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission discussed the one -way couplet on MacArthur and Avocado but were advised that no action could be taken on same as that segment was not a part of the advertised public hearing. Chairman Agee commented on the fact that the best technical solutions were not always the best solutions for the people in the community and, Motion X therefore, motion was made that Option 2 for Project 7 be adopted as part of the Circulation Element of the General Plan (i.e., widening of East Coast Highway to six lanes from MacArthur • Boulevard to Jamboree Road.) Discussion of the motion included the thought that interchanges do not have to be of such a large scale as to be visually objectionable; that the Page 11. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH M 1K s T yn t • Z P P P. ROIL CALL February Ayes Noes Motion Motion Ayes NSF Ayes Noes MINUTES IQ7a motion was not necessarily the best.soluti.on but seemed to be the desire of the people; retaining an open option on the one -way couplet; reconsider- ation of an interchange but with a low priority; and the fact that any action taken does not pre- clude amendments to the Circulation Element at X X X some future time. Following discussion, the motio X X X X was voted on and failed. X Motion was made that Project 7 of the Circulation Element of the General Plan be adopted to include the widening of East Coast Highway from MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road to six lanes as pre - viously acted on by the Commission but that the interchange be adopted and be assigned last priori y because of the significant cost involved and the desire to see what development of surrounding traffic arteries will occur and to what extent they will relieve the situation. X An amendment to the motion was made that in addi- X X X X X tion, an identification of the onemway couplet be X X established as.a part of the General Plan, said one -.way couplet to be an alternate and to be given further study as soon as the staff is in a positio to advise amount of land and the problems that are involved in preserving the alternative. X X X X X Vote was then taken on the above motion made by X X Commissioner Seely which- carried. Planning Commission recessed at 9:35 P.M. and reconvened at 9:45 P.M. Item B -2. Request to consider acceptance of Environmental EIR NB_ Impact Report No. EIR /NB 73 -042 in connection 73 -042. with The Housing Element of the Newport Beach: General Plan. ACCEPTED Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach Planning Commission reviewed the Environmental Impact Report and noted that the word "sex" should. be inserted in the last line of sub - paragraph f) under.Supporting Policies on Page C. Page 12. COMMISSIONERS �� • 1 �n P T p p ROLL CALL � Motion All Ayes L Motion All Ayes E CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES Gnhnunwv 7 107A , • + �nvex X Following review, motion was made to accept the Environmental Impact Report in connection with the Housing Element of the Newport Beach General Plan with the one change as noted above. Item B -3 Proposal to amend the Planned Community Develop- AMENDMENT ment Standards for "Harbor View Hills" by reducing O-.. i the permitted density in Areas 8 and 13; a general updating of the statistics as they pertain to the developed residential area; amendments to the s.ign APPROVED standards in Areas 8 and 13; and revisions to the standards as they pertain to the height and loca- tion of fences in Areas 9, 10, 11 and 12. Location: Portion of Blocks 91 and 93, Irvine's Subdivision, located south of Ford Road and east of MacArthur Boulevard in Harbor View Hills. Zone: P -C Owners: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter and there being no one desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. X Following review and discussion, motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 877 recommending to the City Council that Amendment No. 361 be approved. Item B -4 Request to subdivide 0.882 acres into one lot for an eighteen unit condominium development, and the acceptance of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR /NB 73 -036). TENTATIVE MA TR CT $4' Location: Portion of Block D, Corona del Mar REMOVED Tract, and a portion of Carnation Avenue (vacated), located at 307 FR CiLERDAR and 311 Carnation Avenue, southerly of Bayside Drive and westerly of the midline of the abandoned exten- sion of Carnation Avenue in Corona del Mar. Page 13. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH rn A ROLL CALL February ,Moti on All Ayes 0 MINUTES 1974 INDEX Zone: R -3 Applicant: William G. Hagen, Corona del Mar Owner: Same as Applicant Engineer: William G. Church, Newport Beach X Planning Commission removed this matter from the calendar at the request of the applicant. Item B -5 Request to subdivide 7.00 acres into one lot for ENTATIVE residential condominium development; and the acceptance of an Environmental Impact Report R CT (EI -R /NB 73 -039). 0 Location: Portion of Block 55, Irvine's APPROVED Subdivision, located at the south- D - east corner of the proposed exten- TIONALLY sion of Santa Barbara Drive and proposed San Clemente Drive in Newport Center. Zone: C -O -H Applicant: Interhope, Inc. & M. H. Golden, Inc. San Diego Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Engineer: Quinton - Budlong, Los Angeles Community Development Director Hogan advised that the staff had review those items on which the Planning Commission indicated a concern, that there have been amendments to the Environmental Impact Report, there has been a realignment of the layout on the property, all of which are included in the staff report and the staff feels that the proposal as amended carries out the interests and answers the concerns that the Planning Commission had at their previous meeting. Assistant Community Development Director Hewicker . presented communications from the Southern Calif- ornia Gas Company, the Southern California Edison Company and the Newport Mesa Unified School Dist- rict concerning energy consumption. He also advised that archaeologist should be changed to Page 14. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH m k = m Z MINUTES or,n eeu m Fphruary 7- 1974 paleontologist in Condition No. 8. Frank Hope, President of Frank L. Hope & Assoc., Architects, appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant and presented additional information on the project. He reviewed the layout of the project and commented on parking, internal ci- rculation, recreation and open space, traffic, energy consumption, fire and security measures, - profile of the proposed residents, and answered questions regarding the project. Larry Moore, Associate Director, Planning Adminis- tration, The Irvine Company, appeared before the Planning Commission and commented on traffic and the private road system. He also presented information on the paleontological aspects of the project. Motion X Following discussion, motion was made to accept All Ayes the Environmental Impact Report and approve Tentative Map of Tract 8480, subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial compliance with the plans and information submitted as part of the Environmental Impact Report except for minor changes and adjustments which may be approved by the Department of Community Development. 2. That residential development within Tract 8480 shall not exceed 245 dwelling.units. 3: That final recreational facilities within the development shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Parks, Beaches and Recrea- tion. 4. That prior to the issuance of building permits a final landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Parks, Beaches and Recreation. 5. That all development, including but not limited to the location of fire hydrants and fire access, shall be reviewed and approved by the • Fire Marshal. 6. That all.grading be in accordance with grading plans and reports approved by the Building Division of the Department of Community Page 15. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH • *^ m £ _ M ` MINUTES KWLL ALL I I rcuIuary i, 171Y INDEX.. Development, and a qualified soils engineer shall certify that the grading has been completed according to the plans and the re- quirements of the grading ordinance. Perman- ent reproducible copies of the "as- built" grading plans on standard size sheets shall be furnished to the Department of Community Development. Special attention shall be given to erosion control measures necessary to prevent silta- tion and sedimentation caused by storm water runoff during the course of the grading work. 7. That final plans be reviewed for seismic safety, noise attenuation, and energy consumption. 8. That a paleontologist be on site during grading operations and that a pre - grading conference be held with the paleontologist to point out areas of concern. • 9. That all signing within the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development. 10. That all trash shall be stored in enclosed containers located within a totally enclosed structure. 11`. That there shall be submitted a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions setting forth an enforceable method of insuring the installation and continued main - tenance of the landscaping, walls, fencing and all physical features such as building, fire hydrants, utility facilities, parking areas, drainage facilities and recreation facilities acceptable to the Department of Community Development, and in respect to legal enforceability, the City Attorney. 12. That all improvements be constructed.as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 13. That Section 19.16.030 of the Subdivision Ordinance regarding map scale be waived provided maps drawn accurately to a scale of 1" = 100' are furnished to the Public "Works Department. Page 16. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH • � Z A P P 0 9 MINUTES 14. That the boundary of the final tract map be checked by the County Surveyor before being submitted to the City for approval. 15. That the water capital improvement acreage fee be paid. 16. That water storage capacity in San Joaquin Reservoir equal to one maximum day's demand be dedicated to the City. 17. That the full width of San Clemente Drive from Santa Barbara Drive to Santa Cruz Drive be dedicated and improved in accordance with the plans which The Irvine Company has had prepared by the firm of Shuirman- Simpson prior to occupancy of any of the proposed residential structures. 18. That all the remaining public improvements for the full width of Santa Barbara Drive from Newport Center Drive West to Jamboree Road be completed in accordance with the plan which The Irvine Company has had prepared by the firm of Williamson and Schmid prior to occupancy of any of the proposed residential structures. 19. That all street parkway trees along the Santa Barbara'Drive and San Clemente Drive frontage be planted in accordance with the standards of the Parks Department and that the standard street tree inspection fee of $3 per tree be paid. Item B -6 Request an extension of a previously approved use USE permit to permit an illuminated 9 hole golf course PERMIT and driving range, and clubhouse facilities, in 5TH the Unclassified District, and the review of an Environmental Impact Report referred to the City EXTENSION by the County of Orange. CPS Location: Portion of Lots 101, 102, and 103, TINTELY Tract 706, a portion of Birch Street (vacated), and a portion of Block 5, Irvine's Subdivision, located at 2301 Mesa Drive, south- east of Irvine Avenue and northeast of Anniversary Drive, adjoining the Orange County Airport Clear Zone. Page 17. COMMISSIONERS m m�T ya m 11< CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES KULL c.AU I X 1� reoruar•y i, illy INDEX Zone: Unclassified Applicant: Pacific Coast Mfg. Co., Golf Division, Glendale Owner: The Irvine Co., Newport Beach Assistant Community Development Director Hewicker presented up -to -date information on the electric consumption based on the change to daylight saving time, petition with 81 signatures endorsing the project, and letters from the Upper Newport Bay Association and the Associated Riding Groups of Orange County in support of the project. Senior Planner Foley reviewed the information contained in the staff report and answered ques- tions pertaining to the request. Planning Commission indicated concern over the matter of pesticides and fertilizers finding their way into the Bay and discussed application of same • to the golf course in order to preclude further pollution. Steven Lane, one of the partners in the develop- ment, appeared before the Planning Commission and advised of the program implemented by the greens - keeper pertaining to fertilizers and pesticides. Larry Moore, Associate Director, Planning Adminis- tration, The Irvine Company, appeared before the Planning Commission and advised that the majority of the pollution arriving in the Back Bay is coming down San Diego Creek - Peters Canyon from the ag- ricultural lands inland. The property in ques- tion will consist of turf which when once estab- lished will cause little runoff, since turf is the•most efficient plant material in preventing runoff and water will carry the pesticides and fertilizers into the soil. William Bell, Golf Course Architect and resident of Newport Beach, appeared before the Planning Commission to comment on the program for applica- tion.of fertilizers and pesticides. • Tim Meagher of B.R.T. the firm which prepared the Environmental Impact Report, appeared before the Planning Commission and answered questions relative to the report. Page 18. COMMISSIONERS • < X � p P CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Ce6nunnv 7 107A MINUTES Planning Commission discussed the effect of the golf course on aircraft, overlapping jurisdiction in providing police and fire protection and other emergency services, provisions for a consultant to be present during grading operations on potential paleontological and archaeological resources, location of the trampoline and minature golf area, signs, the program for application of pesticides and fertilizers and control of water runoff. Motion X Following discussion, motion was made to approve All Ayes the extension of Use Permit No. 1594, subject to the original conditions of approval plus the following conditions: 1. That the applicant have a qualified consultant inspect the site during grading operations for potential archaeological or paleontological resources. 2. That a program for the application of fertilizers i and pesticides and control of runoff shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Parks, Beaches and Recreation. 3. That the final location, design, and method of construction of the pedestrian crossings on Mesa Drive and Irvine Avenue be approved by the Public Works Department. 4. That all signs be approved by the Director of Community Development. Planning Commission also directed the staff to forward the following comments on the Environmental Impact Report to the County of Orange: 1. Further study should be required to ensure that there are no archaeological or paleon- tological resources on the site. 2. The material on electrical consumption pre - pared by William Ishii and Associates contain - ed on Page 129 in the appendix should be expanded and discussed in the main report. Specifically there should be a discussion of alternate methods of reducing the amount of • energy consumed. These alternatives should include shortening the hours of operation and /or limiting night play to a portion of the course. Page 19. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH qGt n D m v OM„ m M f Y �` i` MINUTES s 2 A A A RMI eeu m February 7, 1974 INDEX r1 LJ E r 3. There should be a discussion of the impact of the driving range and related fences on the adjacent residential property. 4. The Environmental Impact Report concludes that there will be no adverse impact from fertilizers and pesticides if they are properly applied. There should be further discussion of ways to ensure the proper application of pesticides and fertilizers. S. The final location, design, and method of construction of the pedestrian crossings across Mesa Drive and Irvine Avenue will have to be reviewed and approved by the City of Newport Beach. Item B -7 Request to waive the required offstreet parking USE spaces in conjunction with the expansion of an PERMIT existing restaurant in the C -1 -H District, and the T7T'_ acceptance of an Environmental Document. . APPROVED Location: Portion of Lot 1123 and Lots 1124 CONDI-� and 1125, Tract 907, located at TfFN LY 3450 Via Oporto, on the northeast- erly side of Via Oporto, east of Central Avenue in Lido Village. Zone: C -1 -H Applicant: Donald M. Koll, Newport Beach Owner: June Johnson Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Jim Fetterhart of A. M. Voorhees Company in San Diego, appeared before the Planning Commission to review the report on traffic generation in Lido Village and answer questions in connection with the Environmental Impact Report. City Engineer Nolan reviewed with the Commission future plans for improving the signalization at Newport Boulevard and Via Lido. Page 20. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH n ,m MINUTES. . _• ___. � � A P -pi .. .'.:_ __._ -. awn• nvrr ...~ar r I ICU, ua I y , I ° , � IM DL'JC Don Koll appeared before the Planning Commission and answered questions in connection with.the request including discussion of the legal noncon- forming sign. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X following discussion, motion was made to accept the All Ayes Negative Declaration and approve Use Permit No. 1711, subject to the following conditions: 1:.: That development be in substantial compliance with the approved floor plans, except for minor modifications approved by the Department of Community Development. 2. That the occupancy of the restaurant use shall not exceed 277 persons prior to 6:00 P.M., daily, and shall not exceed a total of 400 persons after 6:00 P.M. daily. 3. That a minimum of 134 parking spaces shall be maintained in the "Lido Village" parking struc- ture for the restaurant use after the hour of 6:00 P.M. daily. These spaces shall be guar - anteed by an off -site parking agreement approved by the City Council. 4. That the second floor of the expanded restaura t shall not be utilized for public assembly or the serving of any meals or beverages prior to ..the hour of 6:00 P.M. daily. 5:" That all signs shall conform to the Sign .Ordinance of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. 6. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas le screened to the satisfaction of the Department of Community Development. 7. That a washout area for trash containers be provided in such a way as to allow direct drainage into the sewer system and not into . the Bay or the storm drains. 8. That kitchen exhaust fans be designed to control odors and smoke in accordance with Rule 50 of the Air Pollution Control District. Page 21. COMMISSIONERS m • <� T fo m Z a A ROLL. CALL 0 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES Fehruary 7. 1974 9. That the applicant shall obtain the services of an acoustical engineer and shall provide evidence of existing ambient outside noise levels and proposed interior noise levels. The building shall be insulated in such a manner as to maintain outside sound at the existing ambient level. 10. That a resubdivision application be processed And a parcel map be filed. 11. That.prior to the issuance of building permit the applicant shall furnish to the Department of Community Development a statement from the proposed restaurant operator indicating that he is familiar with these conditions of appro al and will operate the restaurant in compliance with them. Item B -8 Request to amend the Planned Community Development Plain for "Koll Center Newport" to permit general AMENDMENT NO. 426— changes in the Land Use Map and Text; and the Acceptance of an Environmental Document. APPROVED Location: Tract 7953, bounded by MacArthur Boulevard, Jamboree Road and Campus Drive in "Koll Center Newport ". Zone: P -C Applicant: Koll Center Newport, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Assistant Community Development Director Hewicker reviewed the changes to the.P -C Text for Koll Center Newport with the Commission. Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Bob Kraft of Langdon & Wilson appeared before the Planning Commission to answer questions relative to the changes and advised that they.are in agree- ment with the comments and recommendations of the staff. Planning Commission discussed landscaping within the project and amount of land necessary for construct on of a service station. Page 22. COMMISSIONERS X P P ROLL CALL T Motion All Ayes 0 Motion All Ayes CITY OF Vahruary 7 1074 NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. X Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 8760 recommending to the City Council that Amendment No.. 420 be approved subject to the following additions: 1. Page 6. - Add a second sentence to the defini- tion of the term "Landscape Area" as follows: "In calculating the area of required landscap- ing any off -site landscaping such as landscape ..medians or parkways in street rights -of -way shall not be included." 2. Page 21.1 - Add a second sentence under Group IV B. as follows: "Mechanical car washes shall only be allowed in conjunction with or in lieu of a permitted service station use." Item B -9 Request to permit the construction of an automatic USE car.wash in conjunction with a proposed automobile PERMIT service station in the P -C District, and the 1706 acceptance of an Environmental Document. CONT. TO Location: Portion of Lot 3, anal Lot 4, Tract B. 7953, located at the northeasterly corner of MacArthur Boulevard and Jamboree Road in "Koll Center Newport ". Zone: P -C Applicant: Texaco Inc., Los Angeles Owner: Koll Center Newport, Newport Beach X As recommended by the Staff, Planning Commission continued this matter to the meeting of February 21, 1974. Page 23. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH % c • T p T Z p p ROLL CALL Febr on A Ayes 0 MINUTES 7 107A -... ✓ , ,P,WCA tem B -10 Request to create one parcel of land for commercial ESUB- development where one lot and a portion of another ISION lot now exist. 420 Location: Portion of Lot 3, and Lot 4, Tract ONT. TO 7953, located at the northeasterly corner of MacArthur Boulevard and Jamboree Road in "Kull Center Newport ". Zone: P -C Applicant: Koll Center Newport, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc., Newport Beach X As recommended by the Staff, Planning Commission continued this matter to the meeting of February 21, 1974. tem B -11 Request to create one parcel of land for develop - ESUB- ment as a restaurant site. I ION Location: Portion of Lot 3, Tract 7953, locat- ed on the southeasterly side of Von PPROVED Karman Avenue, easterly of MacArthur ND - Boulevard in "Koll Center Newport ". TrOWLY Zone: P -C Applicant: Koll Center Newport, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Engineer:. Raub, Bein,,Frost & Assoc., Newport Beach Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Bob Bein of Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc., appeared before the Planning Commission to answer questions relative to this request. He advised that the applicant would prefer to dedicate all.of the Page 24. COMMISSIONERS ROLL CALL Motion All Ayes • 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES Ce6r. •>, ..., 7 tale • .� a mvcn meandering sidewalks at one time, upon completion of the program for resubdivisions. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the pub.lic hearing was closed. X FoT.lowing discussion, Planning Commission approved Resubdivision No. 430, subject to the following conditions: 1. That Amendment No. 420 be adopted. 2. That a parcel map be filed. 3. That appropriate width easements for storm drain and sanitary sewer purposes be dedicated across the parcel prior to recordation of the parcel map. 4. That all future building construction be kept clear of the dedicated sanitary sewer and storm drain easements and facilities. 5. That an appropriate easement be dedicated for the meandering combined pedestrian sidewalk and bicycle path along Von Karman Avenue at such time as the improvements have been completed and the entire easement necessary can be dedicated in a single document. 6.. That the results of a "television inspection" of the existing sewer lines within the parcel be made available to the Public Works Depart- ment if it is proposed to dedicate such facilities to the City. All necessary repairs shall be made by the Developer prior.to dedication. Item B -12 Request to create one parcel of land for commercialRESUB- development. DIV ION N . Location: Portion of Lot 5, and Lot 6, Tract 7953, located on the east side of APPROVED MacArthur Boulevard, between Von CONDI- Karman Avenue and Birch Street in T TFNTL LY "Koll Center Newport ". Zone: P -C Applicant: Koll Center Newport, Newport Beach Page 25. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH \\fO sn11 rwu 7 107A MINUTES INDEX Owner: Same as Applicant Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc., Newport Beach Assistant Community Development Director Hewicker presented additional information relative to the bicycle trail - pedestrian way which has been installed along Von Karman Avenue as opposed to MacArthur Boulevard. He pointed out that the Master P.lan of Bicycle Trails does indicate a trail along MacArthur Boulevard. However, since all landscaping has been completed in Koll Center Newport along MacArthur Boulevard prior to the adoption of the Master Plan of Bicycle Trails, an easement could be reserved for installation at 'a' later date. In addition to reserving an easement for bicycle trails - pedestrian ways along MacArthur Boulevard, City Engineer Nolan suggested that the Planning Commission waive any construction at the present time, the reason being that same could be • constructed in the future if necessary. Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Bob.Bein of Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc., appeared before the Planning Commission and advised they are.in agreement with the conditions as recommends and revised, and requested that any construction o bicycle trails or pedestrian ways by others be constructed to the same specifications as that already constructed. There.being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion % Following discussion, motion was made to approve All Ayes Resubdivision No. 432, subject to the following conditions: 1. Th.at Amendment No. 420 be adopted. 2.., That a parcel map be filed. 3. That the 15 foot wide storm drain easements . crossing the property be decidated to the City to recordation of th.e map. prior parcel 4. That the applicable conditions of .approval of Tract 7953 be completed (i.e. street trees, eta.) . Page 26. COMMISSIONERS C T= Y F T (1 IT % A � ROLL CALL IP E Motion All Ayes *ion All Ayes CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES c ICU IUQry i, 171Y - INDEX 5. That an easement be reserved for a combined bicycle path - pedestrian way along the MacArthur Boulevard frontage northerly of Yon Karman Avenue but that construction of said improve - . ments be waived. At such time as said improve- ment is constructed, it shall be constructed of materials and to a width which +conforms to existing i.mprovements in Koll Center Newport. Item B -13 Request to create two parcels of land for commer- RESUB- cial development where four lots_now exist. WT. TTV .Location: Lots 11 through 14, Tract 7953, located at the northwesterly corner APPROVED of Jamboree Road and Campus Drive CONDI -i in "Koll Center Newport ". SLY Zone.: P -C Applicant: Koll Center Newport, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Engineer: Raub, Bein Frost & Assoc., Newport Beach Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Bob Bein of Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc:., appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant and stated agreement with the conditions as recommended by the staff. There being no others desiring to appear and be hea:rd, the public hearing was closed. Motion was made that Resubdivision No. 434 be approved subject to the following.conditions: 1. That Amendment No. 420 be adopted. 2. That a Parcel Map be filed. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS X Planning Commission gave notice of intention to consider an amendment to the Rules.of Procedure at their meeting of February 21, 1974, relative to Section VI, Time of Meetings. Page 27. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES KOLL GALL I xyAk i k February i, 1974 - INDEX Motion X There being no further business, Planning Commis - All Ayes sion adjourned the meeting. Time: 12:55 A.M. l f SEPH ROSENER, JR.,.Secretary Planning Commission City of Newport Beach • Page 28.