HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/07/1985Present
1 on
nnt
Motion
Ayes
Absent
Absent
(VVV \DJ10.J1NUN31 REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
A
PLACE:
City Council Chambers
c
o
TIME:
7:30 p.m.
i v a a
m z
r a x
DATE:
February 7, 1985
=
2 A z a=
T m►
City
of
Newport
Beach
K9
91
I
x
x
Commissioner Koppelman was absent.
EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT:
James D. Hewicker, Planning Director
Robert H. Burnham, City Attorney
,t x
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
William R. Laycock, Current Planning Administrator
Robert Lenard, Advance Planning Administrator
Patricia Temple, Environmental Coordinator
Donald Webb, City Engineer
Dee Edwards, Secretary
* * x
Minutes of January 10, 1985
Motion was made for approval of the revised minutes of
the Planning Commission meeting of January 10, 1985,
which MOTION CARRIED.
Minutes of January 24, 1985
Commissioner Person stated that on page 19 of the
January 24, 1985 minutes, the motion made by
Commissioner Person should state that "a motion was
made to continue Amendment No. 615, Traffic Study, and
Tentative Map of Tract No. 12245, to February 21,
1985 ", instead of "a motion to approve Amendment No.
615, Traffic Study, Tentative Tract Map No. 12245 ". .
Motion was made for approval of the minutes of the
Planning Commission meeting. of January 24, 1985, which
MOTION CARRIED.
* * r
Request for Continuance
Staff recommended that Agenda Item No. 3, (Use Permit
No. 1417 (Amended) be continued, to the Planning
Commission meeting of February 21, 1985.
Motion was made to continue Item No. 3 to February 21,
1985, which MOTION CARRIED.
MINUTES
Minutes
1 -10 -85
Minutes
1 -24 -85
Request
for
Continu -.
ance
•
0
Motion
Ayes
Absent
x
Use Permit No. 3125 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to permit the construction of a
relocatable structure to be used for
retail sales and display of flowers in
the open, on property located in the C -1
District. -
LOCATION: Lots 1 and 2, Block AA, Tract No. 323,
located at 3601 East Coast Highway, on
the southeasterly corner of East Coast
Highway and Orchid Avenue, in Corona del
Mar.
ZONE: C -1
APPLICANTS: Said Shokrian and Judy Farrah, Corona
del Mar
OWNER: Said Shokrian, Corona del Mar
Mr. William Laycock, Current Planning Administrator,
advised the Planning Commission that Condition No. 3 in
Exhibit "A" should read ":
"That the existing on -site parking area shall be
restriped so as to provide a minimum of 17 parking
spaces as shown on the approved plot plan, except
that Parking Space No. 17 shall be redesigned as
required by the City Traffic Engineer."
Mr. Laycock explained that the reason for the change is
that a curb has been constructed adjacent to the alley,
and by moving the parking space closer to Orchid
Avenue, the depth of the parking space would be
increased to 25 feet rather than the original 22 feet.
The public hearing opened in connection with this item,
and Mr. Said Shokrian and Judy Farrah, 3617 East Coast
Highway, Corona del Mar, appeared before the Planning
Commission. Mr. Laycock informed Mr. Shokrian that the
City Engineer will explain more of the details
regarding Parking Space No. 17 to the owner. Mr.
Shokrian stated that he agrees with the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A ".
The public hearing closed at this time.
Commissioner Kurlander made a motion to approve Use
Permit No'. 3125, subject to the findings and conditions
in Exhibit "A ", including the modification of Condition
No. 3. MOTION CARRIED.
-2-
MINUTES
INDEX
Item #1
Use Permit
No. 3125
Approved
o
February 7, 1985
c a
F�
a v
m
M
r 9
z c
m
m
z
=
Z Z
w
a
G 3
0 0
City
of
Newport
Beach
z
x
Use Permit No. 3125 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to permit the construction of a
relocatable structure to be used for
retail sales and display of flowers in
the open, on property located in the C -1
District. -
LOCATION: Lots 1 and 2, Block AA, Tract No. 323,
located at 3601 East Coast Highway, on
the southeasterly corner of East Coast
Highway and Orchid Avenue, in Corona del
Mar.
ZONE: C -1
APPLICANTS: Said Shokrian and Judy Farrah, Corona
del Mar
OWNER: Said Shokrian, Corona del Mar
Mr. William Laycock, Current Planning Administrator,
advised the Planning Commission that Condition No. 3 in
Exhibit "A" should read ":
"That the existing on -site parking area shall be
restriped so as to provide a minimum of 17 parking
spaces as shown on the approved plot plan, except
that Parking Space No. 17 shall be redesigned as
required by the City Traffic Engineer."
Mr. Laycock explained that the reason for the change is
that a curb has been constructed adjacent to the alley,
and by moving the parking space closer to Orchid
Avenue, the depth of the parking space would be
increased to 25 feet rather than the original 22 feet.
The public hearing opened in connection with this item,
and Mr. Said Shokrian and Judy Farrah, 3617 East Coast
Highway, Corona del Mar, appeared before the Planning
Commission. Mr. Laycock informed Mr. Shokrian that the
City Engineer will explain more of the details
regarding Parking Space No. 17 to the owner. Mr.
Shokrian stated that he agrees with the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A ".
The public hearing closed at this time.
Commissioner Kurlander made a motion to approve Use
Permit No'. 3125, subject to the findings and conditions
in Exhibit "A ", including the modification of Condition
No. 3. MOTION CARRIED.
-2-
MINUTES
INDEX
Item #1
Use Permit
No. 3125
Approved
MINUTES
'X x
February
7, 1985
C o
FINDINGS:
F
a v
=
1. That the proposed development is consistent with
-
z c
o
m
r v
z
z
the General Plan and the adopted. Local Coastal
C z
M
w
z
z r
v r
A=
O O
r m
City
of
Newport
Beach
surrounding land uses.
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed development is consistent with
the General Plan and the adopted. Local Coastal
Program, Land Use Plan, and is compatible with
surrounding land uses.
2. The project will not have any significant environ-
mental impact.
3. Adequate off - street parking spaces are being
provided in conjunction with the proposed develop-
ment and no existing parking spaces will be
eliminated in conjunction with the outdoor sales.
4. The Police Department does not anticipate any
problems in conjunction with the proposed
development.
5. The approval of Use Permit No. 3125 will not under
the circumstances of this case be detrimental to
the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and
general welfare of persons residing and working in
the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the neighborhood or
the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS
1. That development shall be in substantial confor-
mance with the approved plot plan, floor plan, and
elevations and the outdoor sales area shall be
confined to the extent shown on the approved plan.
2. That restrooms within the existing commercial
building on -site shall be available to the custom-
ers and employees of the proposed flower sales
business.
3. That the existing on -site parking area shall be
restriped so as to provide a minimum of 17 parking
spaces as shown on the approved plot plan, except
that Parking Space No. 17 shall be redesigned as
required by the City Traffic Engineer.
4. That the proposed structure shall be constructed
upon a permanent foundation in accordance with the
requirements of the Uniform Building Code.
-3—
0
5.
6.
February 7, 1985
m
That all signs shall
provisions of Chapter
Municipal Code.
Beach
conform with the applicable
20.06 of the Newport Beach
That the employee and owner of the flower sales
facility shall park on -site at all times.
7. That the Planning Commission may add and /or modify
conditions of approval to this use permit, or
recommend to the City Council the revocation of
this use permit, upon a determination that the
operation which is the subject of this use permit
causes injury, or is detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare
of the community.
8. This use permit shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
* x
A. Use Permit No. 3132 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to permit the construction of three, 2 -unit
residential condominium developments and related
garages on three individual lots located in the Unclas-
sified District.
AND
B. Tentative Map of Tract No. 12360 (Continued Public
Hearing)
Request to subdivide an existing parcel of land into
three numbered lots, each for 2 -unit residential
condominium development and one lettered lot for public
access and public utility purposes, on property located
in the Unclassified District.
LOCATION: A portion of Lot 37, Newport Heights
Tract, located at 726 -732, Tustin
Avenue, on the southeasterly side of
Tustin Avenue, between Holly Lane and
16th Street, in Newport Heights.
ZONE: Unclassified
APPLICANT: Brion S. Jeannette, Newport Beach
OWNER: Keith Hosfiel, New
-4 -
MINUTES
INDEX
item #2
Use Permit
No. 3132
TTM 12360
Approved
a 0
C o
=
c
M
m
z c
m
m
z
as
x
zr
a> x
C z
N
p z
0 0
9 m
O
m D
M T
z a
z
M z
n m
0
5.
6.
February 7, 1985
m
That all signs shall
provisions of Chapter
Municipal Code.
Beach
conform with the applicable
20.06 of the Newport Beach
That the employee and owner of the flower sales
facility shall park on -site at all times.
7. That the Planning Commission may add and /or modify
conditions of approval to this use permit, or
recommend to the City Council the revocation of
this use permit, upon a determination that the
operation which is the subject of this use permit
causes injury, or is detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare
of the community.
8. This use permit shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
* x
A. Use Permit No. 3132 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to permit the construction of three, 2 -unit
residential condominium developments and related
garages on three individual lots located in the Unclas-
sified District.
AND
B. Tentative Map of Tract No. 12360 (Continued Public
Hearing)
Request to subdivide an existing parcel of land into
three numbered lots, each for 2 -unit residential
condominium development and one lettered lot for public
access and public utility purposes, on property located
in the Unclassified District.
LOCATION: A portion of Lot 37, Newport Heights
Tract, located at 726 -732, Tustin
Avenue, on the southeasterly side of
Tustin Avenue, between Holly Lane and
16th Street, in Newport Heights.
ZONE: Unclassified
APPLICANT: Brion S. Jeannette, Newport Beach
OWNER: Keith Hosfiel, New
-4 -
MINUTES
INDEX
item #2
Use Permit
No. 3132
TTM 12360
Approved
COM MNSSIONERS
Planning Director James Hewicker informed the Planning
Commission that this item is a continuation from the
January 24, 1985, Planning Commission meeting. Mr.
Hewicker referred to the comments made by the project's
neighbors at the January 24, 1985, meeting, by stating
that the comments can be typical of a single - family,
single -story neighborhood when there is potential of a
two -story development on adjoining property. Mr.
Hewicker commented to the Planning Commission to
consider advising the applicant to reverse the
site plan in order to construct the driveway on the
side of the property adjacent to single - family homes,
and to put the residential buildings on the other side
of the property to backup to the existing multi - family
development.
The public hearing opened in connection with this
item, and Mr. Brion S. Jeannette, architect, appeared
before the Planning Commission. Mr. Jeannette stated
that he is in opposition to Mr. Hewicker's comments to
reverse the site plan because by reversing the units,
there would be less orientation to the sun in the
living areas; that there could be more traffic noise
from the driveway area adjacent to the single - family
dwellings, and the play yard is better suited in the
existing area. Mr. Jeannette further commented that
there are currently six apartments on the site, and
that the proposed project will also have six
condominium units.
Mr. Jeannette advised the Planning Commission that he
agrees with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ".
Mr. Michael Allen, 2508 Holly Lane, Newport Beach,
appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Allen
commented that he does not agree with the staff's
recommendations regarding .land uses, setbacks, and
zoning. Mr. Allen read a letter written by him
describing why he opposes many of the findings and
conditions in the the staff report's Exhibit "A ". The
following are specific areas that Mr. Allen was
concerned about: lack of adequate parking; lot area
requirements; chimney heights; that the project will be
detrimental to the neighborhood; lack of open space;
parking and circulation; ingress /egress easement; and
the driveway turnaround.
Mr. Hewicker stated that if the present Unclassified
District would be reclassified to the R -2 District,
then the subject property could be resubdivided into
-5-
MINUTES
INDEX
X R
'-
February 7, 1985
c o
0
x
_
v
> y
m
C
C 2
9
N
O L
0
0
of
Newport
Beach
, _ City
Planning Director James Hewicker informed the Planning
Commission that this item is a continuation from the
January 24, 1985, Planning Commission meeting. Mr.
Hewicker referred to the comments made by the project's
neighbors at the January 24, 1985, meeting, by stating
that the comments can be typical of a single - family,
single -story neighborhood when there is potential of a
two -story development on adjoining property. Mr.
Hewicker commented to the Planning Commission to
consider advising the applicant to reverse the
site plan in order to construct the driveway on the
side of the property adjacent to single - family homes,
and to put the residential buildings on the other side
of the property to backup to the existing multi - family
development.
The public hearing opened in connection with this
item, and Mr. Brion S. Jeannette, architect, appeared
before the Planning Commission. Mr. Jeannette stated
that he is in opposition to Mr. Hewicker's comments to
reverse the site plan because by reversing the units,
there would be less orientation to the sun in the
living areas; that there could be more traffic noise
from the driveway area adjacent to the single - family
dwellings, and the play yard is better suited in the
existing area. Mr. Jeannette further commented that
there are currently six apartments on the site, and
that the proposed project will also have six
condominium units.
Mr. Jeannette advised the Planning Commission that he
agrees with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ".
Mr. Michael Allen, 2508 Holly Lane, Newport Beach,
appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Allen
commented that he does not agree with the staff's
recommendations regarding .land uses, setbacks, and
zoning. Mr. Allen read a letter written by him
describing why he opposes many of the findings and
conditions in the the staff report's Exhibit "A ". The
following are specific areas that Mr. Allen was
concerned about: lack of adequate parking; lot area
requirements; chimney heights; that the project will be
detrimental to the neighborhood; lack of open space;
parking and circulation; ingress /egress easement; and
the driveway turnaround.
Mr. Hewicker stated that if the present Unclassified
District would be reclassified to the R -2 District,
then the subject property could be resubdivided into
-5-
MINUTES
INDEX
r:
0
A x T
February
7, 1985
C o
0
x
z C
m
o m
z
W a
9
a
z
z r
z z
0 x
m m
City
of
Newport
Beach
three R -2 parcels. Mr. Hewicker stated that if it
would be rezoned to the R -2 District, and the property
was not resubdivided, than only a single duplex or two
single family residences could be constructed on the
site, but the frontage would still be along Tustin
Avenue. Mr. Hewicker commented further that the side
yard setback between the project and the Holly Lane
residences would not be substantially affected in
either situation.
Mr. Jay Swigart, 2500 Holly Lane, appeared before the
Planning Commission. Mr. Swigart commented that he
believes that there are few R -1 and R -2 zoning areas in
Newport Beach that are adjacent to one another as is
this neighborhood. Mr. Swigart described his
opposition to the project's setbacks, and recommended
that this item be sent back to the staff for a more
workable solution. In response to Chairman Winburn's
inquiry, Mr. Swigart stated that he applied for a
modification to the Zoning Code at the time he
constructed his six -foot high fence, and before he
constructed the 7'9" high wooden fence.
Mr. Hewicker stated that there are R -1 and R -2 lots
in adjoining areas in Newport Beach, and particularly
in Newport Heights when that area was in the County and
prior to the annexation to Newport Beach.
Mr. Brion Jeannette informed the Planning Commission
that the proposed development of 1.3 times the
buildable area of the property is below the permitted
2.0 times the buildable area in the R -2 District. Mr.
Jeannette commented that the project height limit is
within the City's height requirements.
The public hearing closed at this time.
Commissioner Turner asked staff to explain the staff's
recommendations of the project's setbacks. Mr.
Hewicker described why staff made the proposed
recommendations of the project's setbacks by pointing
to specific areas on the proposed plan. In answer to
Chairman Winburn's question regarding the staff's
comments regarding reversing the site -plan, Mr.
Hewicker replied that Mr. Jeannette is knowledgeable in
the use of solar energy and that staff would be
agreeable to Mr. Jeannette's recommendation.
Commissioner Goff stated that there is a possibility
that there could be some alterations in the project's
-6—
MINUTES
INDEX
Motion
Ayes
Absent
•
is
COMMISSIONERS
x
Ix
February 7, 1985
setbacks, but that
enough difference fj
changes worthwhile.
Use Permit No. 3132
12360, subject to
Exhibit "A ".
Beach
he did not think there would be
,,om the current proposal to make the
.Mr. Goff made a motion to approve
and the Tentative Map of Tract No.
the findings and conditions in
Commissioner Turner stated that he will support the
motion, and that he feels that staff has interpreted
the setbacks correctly.
Motion voted on, and MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That each of the proposed units has been designed
as a condominium with separate and individual
utility connections.
2. The project lot size conforms to the .Zoning Code
area requirements in effect at the time of
approval.
3. The project is consistent with the adopted goals
and policies of the General Plan.
4. That adequate on -site parking spaces are available
for the proposed residential condominium projects.
5. That the proposed chimney heights in excess of the
basic height limit are minor architectural
features which are open in nature and will not
block views from adjoining residential properties.
6. The approval of Use Permit No. 3132 will not,
under the circumstances of this case, be detri-
mental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing
and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental
or injurious to property and improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be in substantial con-
formance with the approved plot, floor plans, and
elevations, except as noted below. .
2. That all conditions of approval of Tentative Tract
No. 12360 be fulfilled.
-7—
MINUTES
F x
C o
z c
C
m
�' m
a
W 9
`ay
W
2 r
°`°°
L 2
2 W
m a
City of
2
:0 a
i m
x
Ix
February 7, 1985
setbacks, but that
enough difference fj
changes worthwhile.
Use Permit No. 3132
12360, subject to
Exhibit "A ".
Beach
he did not think there would be
,,om the current proposal to make the
.Mr. Goff made a motion to approve
and the Tentative Map of Tract No.
the findings and conditions in
Commissioner Turner stated that he will support the
motion, and that he feels that staff has interpreted
the setbacks correctly.
Motion voted on, and MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That each of the proposed units has been designed
as a condominium with separate and individual
utility connections.
2. The project lot size conforms to the .Zoning Code
area requirements in effect at the time of
approval.
3. The project is consistent with the adopted goals
and policies of the General Plan.
4. That adequate on -site parking spaces are available
for the proposed residential condominium projects.
5. That the proposed chimney heights in excess of the
basic height limit are minor architectural
features which are open in nature and will not
block views from adjoining residential properties.
6. The approval of Use Permit No. 3132 will not,
under the circumstances of this case, be detri-
mental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing
and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental
or injurious to property and improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be in substantial con-
formance with the approved plot, floor plans, and
elevations, except as noted below. .
2. That all conditions of approval of Tentative Tract
No. 12360 be fulfilled.
-7—
MINUTES
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
INDEX
February 7, 1985
3. Fire Department vehicle access shall be approved
c o
�
by the Fire Department.
mr
4. This use permit shall expire unless exercised
v
z c
m
o m
z
=
9
N
a
o s
9=
o
T
O
City
of
Newport
Beach
Beach Municipal Code.
m
MINUTES
INDEX
3. Fire Department vehicle access shall be approved
by the Fire Department.
4. This use permit shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances
of the City, all applicable general or specific
plans, and the Planning Commission is satisfied
with the plan of subdivision.
2. That the proposed subdivision presents no problems
from a planning standpoint:
3. That the site is physically suitable for the type
•
of development proposed.
4. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed density of development.
5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed
improvements are not likely to cause serious
public health problems.
6. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed
improvements will not conflict with any easements,
acquired by the public at large, for access
through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision.
CONDITIONS:
1. That a final map be recorded.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required
by ordinance and the Public Works Department.
3. That a standard subdivision agreement and
accompanying surety be provided in order to
guarantee satisfactory completion of the public
improvements if it is desired to record a map or
obtain a building permit prior to completion of
the public improvements.
-8-
MINUTES
INDEX
•
4. That each dwelling unit be served with an
individual water service and sewer lateral
connection to the public water and, sewer systems
unless otherwise approved by the Public Works
Department.
5. That all conditions of Use Permit No. 3132 shall
be fulfilled.
6. That the intersection of the street and private
drive be designed to provide sight distance for a
speed of 25 miles per hour. Slopes, landscaping,
walls and other obstructions shall be considered
in the sight distance requirements: Landscaping
within the sight distance line shall not exceed 24
inches in height. The sight distance requirement
may be approximately modified at non - critical
locations, subject to the approval of the Traffic
Engineer.
7. That a 26- foot -wide ingress /egress easement over
Lot A for the benefit of Lots No. 1, 2, and 3 be
provided and, further, that an easement for
ingress, and egress be provided over portions of
Lots No. 2 and 3 for the benefit of Lots No. 2 and
3. Said easements shall correspond to the turning
areas and drives for vehicular access as shown on
the approved site plan in conjunction with Use
Permit No. 3132.
8. That landscape plans shall be subject to review
and approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Department and the Public Works Department.
9. That curb, gutter, street pavement and five -foot
sidewalk be constructed along the Tustin Avenue
frontage per City of Costa Mesa standards:
10. That the sewer laterals be installed per Costa
Mesa Sanitary District standards.
11. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior
to issuance of any building permits.
12. That the private drive have a minimum clear width
of 26 feet with a turnaround at the end of the
drive.
* * x
C
MINUTES
INDEX
L
February 7, 1985
C o
x
_
a
9
m
z c
C
m
s m
z
C z
0
0 a
o
T
0
M 9=
m
City
of
Newport Beach
a=
4. That each dwelling unit be served with an
individual water service and sewer lateral
connection to the public water and, sewer systems
unless otherwise approved by the Public Works
Department.
5. That all conditions of Use Permit No. 3132 shall
be fulfilled.
6. That the intersection of the street and private
drive be designed to provide sight distance for a
speed of 25 miles per hour. Slopes, landscaping,
walls and other obstructions shall be considered
in the sight distance requirements: Landscaping
within the sight distance line shall not exceed 24
inches in height. The sight distance requirement
may be approximately modified at non - critical
locations, subject to the approval of the Traffic
Engineer.
7. That a 26- foot -wide ingress /egress easement over
Lot A for the benefit of Lots No. 1, 2, and 3 be
provided and, further, that an easement for
ingress, and egress be provided over portions of
Lots No. 2 and 3 for the benefit of Lots No. 2 and
3. Said easements shall correspond to the turning
areas and drives for vehicular access as shown on
the approved site plan in conjunction with Use
Permit No. 3132.
8. That landscape plans shall be subject to review
and approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Department and the Public Works Department.
9. That curb, gutter, street pavement and five -foot
sidewalk be constructed along the Tustin Avenue
frontage per City of Costa Mesa standards:
10. That the sewer laterals be installed per Costa
Mesa Sanitary District standards.
11. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior
to issuance of any building permits.
12. That the private drive have a minimum clear width
of 26 feet with a turnaround at the end of the
drive.
* * x
C
MINUTES
INDEX
•
Motion
Ayes
Absent
C:
COMMISSIONERS
a F
an
=
c
Z c m
r.v
> m
m
z
W A A
Z r
2
C S N
p;
0
0 0
z
d
m D
- Z D =
9 2
T M
x
February 7, 1985
of Newport Beach
Request to amend a previously approved use permit that
permitted on -sale alcoholic beverages and dancing
entertainment in conjunction with an existing restau-
rant in the C -1 District. The proposed amendment is to
change the "Park Bar and Grill" Restaurant's hours of
operation so as to permit the service of lunch and
dinner between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m.,
Monday through Saturday and 10:30 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. on
Sundays. The proposed development also includes a full
service bar, an addition of an open patio for dining
and drinking purposes, and the use of live entertain-
ment within the restaurant facility. The proposal also
includes the request of an informal off -site parking
agreement which will provide additional restaurant
parking spaces.
LOCATION: Lots 1, 2 and a portion of Lot 3, Block
C, Tract No. 470 and an abandoned
portion of Carnation Avenue, located at
2515 East Coast Highway, on the
southeasterly corner of Carnation Avenue
and East Coast Highway, in Corona Del
Mar.
ZONE: C -1
APPLICANT: Loomis Foods, Inc., Corona Del Mar
OWNER: Poole Properties, Inc., Corona Del Mar
Motion was made to continue this item to the Planning
Commission meeting of February 21, 1985. MOTION
CARRIED.
A. Site Plan Review No. 37 (Discussion)
Request to permit the construction of a retail commer-
cial building and related off - street parking spaces in
the Mariner's Mile Specific Plan Area.
AND
-10—
MINUTES
Item #3.
Use Permit
No. 1417
Continued
to
Feb.21,
1985
Item #4.
SPR N0:37
R 799
COM
E
Motion
February 7, 1985
of Newport Beach
B. Resubdivision No. 799 (Public Hearing)
Request to resubdivide three existing lots and a
portion of a vacated alley so as to eliminate interior
property lines and create a single building site for
retail commercial and off - street parking purposes, on
property located in the "Retail Service Commercial"
area of the Mariner's Mile Specific Plan Area.
LOCATION: Lots 7, 8 and 9, Tract No. 1133, and a
portion of a vacated alley located at
150 Riverside Avenue, on the
southeasterly corner of Riverside Avenue
and Avon Street, in the Mariner's Mile
Specific Plan Area.
ZONE: SP -5
APPLICANT: Senator D.G. Anderson, Honolulu, Hawaii
OWNER: Same as applicant
ENGINEER: Lancor Architects, Del Mar
Commissioner Person stated that he recommends that the
Planning Commission call up Modification No. 3017
regarding this property that was heard at the January
22, 1985, Modifications Committee Hearing. Commissioner
Person explained that he believes that the modification
should be heard in conjunction with the Site Plan
Review application. Commissioner Person made a motion
to call up Modification No. 3017, and a motion to
continue Site Plan Review No. 37 and Resubdivision No.
799 to the Planning Commission meeting of February 21,
1985.
Planning Director Hewicker informed the Planning
Commission that in accordance with Section 20.81.070 of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission has the right to review any decision of the
Modifications Committee, and because Chairman Winburn
contacted staff on February 4, 1985, the request was
made prior to the time that the action by the
Modifications Committee became final.
Motion voted on to call up Modification No. 3017, and
MOTION CARRIED.
-11-
MINUTES
Continued
to
Feb.21,
1985
a x
c o
x v
m
a
r v
z c
m
Z m
z
a
= r
O x
C z
X m
o
m a
M r
Z D
Z
i Z"
m
E
Motion
February 7, 1985
of Newport Beach
B. Resubdivision No. 799 (Public Hearing)
Request to resubdivide three existing lots and a
portion of a vacated alley so as to eliminate interior
property lines and create a single building site for
retail commercial and off - street parking purposes, on
property located in the "Retail Service Commercial"
area of the Mariner's Mile Specific Plan Area.
LOCATION: Lots 7, 8 and 9, Tract No. 1133, and a
portion of a vacated alley located at
150 Riverside Avenue, on the
southeasterly corner of Riverside Avenue
and Avon Street, in the Mariner's Mile
Specific Plan Area.
ZONE: SP -5
APPLICANT: Senator D.G. Anderson, Honolulu, Hawaii
OWNER: Same as applicant
ENGINEER: Lancor Architects, Del Mar
Commissioner Person stated that he recommends that the
Planning Commission call up Modification No. 3017
regarding this property that was heard at the January
22, 1985, Modifications Committee Hearing. Commissioner
Person explained that he believes that the modification
should be heard in conjunction with the Site Plan
Review application. Commissioner Person made a motion
to call up Modification No. 3017, and a motion to
continue Site Plan Review No. 37 and Resubdivision No.
799 to the Planning Commission meeting of February 21,
1985.
Planning Director Hewicker informed the Planning
Commission that in accordance with Section 20.81.070 of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission has the right to review any decision of the
Modifications Committee, and because Chairman Winburn
contacted staff on February 4, 1985, the request was
made prior to the time that the action by the
Modifications Committee became final.
Motion voted on to call up Modification No. 3017, and
MOTION CARRIED.
-11-
MINUTES
Continued
to
Feb.21,
1985
Motion
Ayes
Absent
•
/1
u
CONVAISSIONERS
x
x
February 7, 1985
Beach
Mr. Joe Lancor, appeared before the Planning Commission
representing the owner /applicant, stating his approval
to continue this item to February 21, 1985.
Motion voted on to continue Site Plan Review No. 37 and
Resubdivision No. 799 to February 21, 1985. MOTION
CARRIED.
A. Use Permit No. 3133 (Public Hearing)
Request to permit the construction of a two unit
residential condominium development and related garages
on property located in the R -3 District.
B. Resubdivision No. 800 (Public Hearing)
Request to resubdivide an existing lot so as to create
a single parcel for residential condominium develop-
ment.
LOCATION: Lot 10, Block 110, Tract No. 234,
located at 1036 West Balboa Boulevard,
on the northerly side of West Balboa
Boulevard, between 10th Street and 11th
Street, on the Balboa Peninsula.
ZONE: R -3
APPLICANT: Alpine Consultants, Inc., Costa Mesa
OWNER: Albert Centofante, Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Same as applicant
Mr. William Laycock, Current Planning Administrator,
suggested to the Planning Commission that Condition No.
5 of Resubdivision No. 800 be amended to read:
"That Orange County Sanitation District fees shall
be paid."
Mr. Laycock commented that the purpose for the amended
condition is that the building is already under
construction.
-12-
MINUTES
INDEX
item #5
Use Permit
No. 3133
Resubdivi�
sion
No. 800
Approved
c o
x
z c
m
m
z
m a
`ZN
x
z r
O;
Q
°°
x
M M
o
a
City of
m
Z
s z
i
m
x
x
February 7, 1985
Beach
Mr. Joe Lancor, appeared before the Planning Commission
representing the owner /applicant, stating his approval
to continue this item to February 21, 1985.
Motion voted on to continue Site Plan Review No. 37 and
Resubdivision No. 799 to February 21, 1985. MOTION
CARRIED.
A. Use Permit No. 3133 (Public Hearing)
Request to permit the construction of a two unit
residential condominium development and related garages
on property located in the R -3 District.
B. Resubdivision No. 800 (Public Hearing)
Request to resubdivide an existing lot so as to create
a single parcel for residential condominium develop-
ment.
LOCATION: Lot 10, Block 110, Tract No. 234,
located at 1036 West Balboa Boulevard,
on the northerly side of West Balboa
Boulevard, between 10th Street and 11th
Street, on the Balboa Peninsula.
ZONE: R -3
APPLICANT: Alpine Consultants, Inc., Costa Mesa
OWNER: Albert Centofante, Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Same as applicant
Mr. William Laycock, Current Planning Administrator,
suggested to the Planning Commission that Condition No.
5 of Resubdivision No. 800 be amended to read:
"That Orange County Sanitation District fees shall
be paid."
Mr. Laycock commented that the purpose for the amended
condition is that the building is already under
construction.
-12-
MINUTES
INDEX
item #5
Use Permit
No. 3133
Resubdivi�
sion
No. 800
Approved
Motion
Ayes
Absent
•
•
IX
Chairman Winburn opened the public hearing. The
applicant did not have a representative in the audience
to speak on behalf of the use permit and resubdivision.
The public hearing was closed at this time.
A motion was made to approve Use Permit No. 3133 and
Resubdivision No. 800, subject to the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A" including Condition No. 5, as
amended.
Use Permit No. 3133
Findings:
1. That each of the proposed units has been designed
as a condominium with separate and individual
utility connections.
2. The project complies with all applicable
standards, plans and zoning requirements for new
buildings applicable to the district in which the
proposed project is located at the time of
approval.
3. The project lot size conforms to the Zoning Code
area requirements in effect at the time of
approval.
4. The project is consistent with the adopted goals
and policies of the General Plan, and the Adopted
Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan.
5. That adequate on -site parking spaces are available
for the proposed residential condominium
development.
6. That the establishment,, maintenance or operation
of the use of building applied for will not, under,
the circumstances of the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing or
working in the, neighborhood of such proposed use
or be detrimental or injurious to property and
improvements in the neighborhood or the general
welfare of the City.
7. That the proposed building will be designed in
full compliance with the height limitations of the
-13
MINUTES
X x
T
February 7, 1985
c o
n
x
_
a
9
m
z c
a
m
Z m
z
C_
Z a
0
Z
v i
m>
0
0
m
City
of
Newport
Beach
A E
T
IX
Chairman Winburn opened the public hearing. The
applicant did not have a representative in the audience
to speak on behalf of the use permit and resubdivision.
The public hearing was closed at this time.
A motion was made to approve Use Permit No. 3133 and
Resubdivision No. 800, subject to the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A" including Condition No. 5, as
amended.
Use Permit No. 3133
Findings:
1. That each of the proposed units has been designed
as a condominium with separate and individual
utility connections.
2. The project complies with all applicable
standards, plans and zoning requirements for new
buildings applicable to the district in which the
proposed project is located at the time of
approval.
3. The project lot size conforms to the Zoning Code
area requirements in effect at the time of
approval.
4. The project is consistent with the adopted goals
and policies of the General Plan, and the Adopted
Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan.
5. That adequate on -site parking spaces are available
for the proposed residential condominium
development.
6. That the establishment,, maintenance or operation
of the use of building applied for will not, under,
the circumstances of the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing or
working in the, neighborhood of such proposed use
or be detrimental or injurious to property and
improvements in the neighborhood or the general
welfare of the City.
7. That the proposed building will be designed in
full compliance with the height limitations of the
-13
MINUTES
MINUTES
INDEX
x x
o
February 7, 1985
24/28 Foot Height Limitation District on the front
c o
�
� v
m
y
Z c
v
m
r v
Z m
=
c=
W
p;
0
0
City
of
Newport
Beach
a
z
m
INDEX
24/28 Foot Height Limitation District on the front
one -half of the lot, and of the 28/32 Foot Height
Limitation District on the rear one -half of the
site.
Conditions:
1. That development shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved plot plan, floor
plans, and elevations, except as noted below.
2. That two on -site garage spaces shall be provided
for each unit.
3. That all conditions. of approval of Resubdivision
No. 800 be fulfilled.
4. This use permit shall .expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
RESUBDIVISION NO. 800
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of
the Newport Municipal Code, all ordinances of the
City, all applicable general or specific plans and
the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan
of subdivision.
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
3. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed
improvements will not conflict with any easements
acquired by the public at large for access through
or use of property within the proposed
subdivision.
CONDITIONS:
1. That a parcel map be recorded.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required
by ordinance and the Public works Department.
3. That each dwelling unit be served with an
individual water service and sewer lateral
11
u
•
February 7, 1985
11
connection to the
unless otherwise
Department.
Ewa
public water and sewer systems
approved by the Public Works
4. That all vehicular access to the site shall be
from the adjacent alley.
5. That Orange County Sanitation District fees shall
be paid.
6. That the settled sidewalk be reconstructed along
the West Balboa Boulevard frontage under an
encroachment permit issued by the Public Works
Department.
7. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map
has not been recorded within 3 years of the date
of approval, unless an extension is granted by the
Planning Commission.
Amendment No. 613 (Public Hearing)
Request to amend the Planned Community Development Plan
for the North Ford Planned Community so as to establish
development.standards for Area 5; and the acceptance of
an environmental document.
LOCATION: Portions of Blocks 51 and 57 of Irvine's
Subdivision, on property generally
bounded by MacArthur Boulevard, Bison
Avenue, Camelback Street, Jamboree Road
and University Drive (Extended),
commonly known as Area 5 of the North
Ford Planned Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
Chairman Winburn informed the Planning Commission that
a draft has been received from the Citizens
Environmental Quality Advisory Committee (CEQAC) making
recommendations to Amendment No. 613, and that the
Committee's concerns have been taken into consideration
and are included in the findings and conditions in the
tentative tract maps as well as development standards.
-15—
MINUTES
INDEX
Item #6
Amend-
ment
No. 613
Approved
c o �
x
M
z c
m
m z
W s
n
z r x
c z
m
o> 0 0
0
i s
o
m a
z
s z w m
11
u
•
February 7, 1985
11
connection to the
unless otherwise
Department.
Ewa
public water and sewer systems
approved by the Public Works
4. That all vehicular access to the site shall be
from the adjacent alley.
5. That Orange County Sanitation District fees shall
be paid.
6. That the settled sidewalk be reconstructed along
the West Balboa Boulevard frontage under an
encroachment permit issued by the Public Works
Department.
7. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map
has not been recorded within 3 years of the date
of approval, unless an extension is granted by the
Planning Commission.
Amendment No. 613 (Public Hearing)
Request to amend the Planned Community Development Plan
for the North Ford Planned Community so as to establish
development.standards for Area 5; and the acceptance of
an environmental document.
LOCATION: Portions of Blocks 51 and 57 of Irvine's
Subdivision, on property generally
bounded by MacArthur Boulevard, Bison
Avenue, Camelback Street, Jamboree Road
and University Drive (Extended),
commonly known as Area 5 of the North
Ford Planned Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
Chairman Winburn informed the Planning Commission that
a draft has been received from the Citizens
Environmental Quality Advisory Committee (CEQAC) making
recommendations to Amendment No. 613, and that the
Committee's concerns have been taken into consideration
and are included in the findings and conditions in the
tentative tract maps as well as development standards.
-15—
MINUTES
INDEX
Item #6
Amend-
ment
No. 613
Approved
MINUTES
INDEX
Item #7
TTM 12309
Approved
Item #8
7TM 12306
Approved
X x
Tj
February 7, 1985
Planning Director James Hewicker referred the Planning
Commission to proposed changes to Conditions No. 7 and
C
m.
y
v
z c
m
a m
z
_=
M
N
=
o;
=
o
r
oI
m
City
v
of
Newport
p
Beach
and Mr. Bernard Maniscalco, representing The Irvine
,
MINUTES
INDEX
Item #7
TTM 12309
Approved
Item #8
7TM 12306
Approved
Planning Director James Hewicker referred the Planning
Commission to proposed changes to Conditions No. 7 and
10 to Amendment No. 613 submitted by The Irvine
Company.
The public hearing opened in connection with this item,
and Mr. Bernard Maniscalco, representing The Irvine
Company, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr.
Maniscalco informed the Planning Commission that in
addition to this item, The Irvine Company has requested
the presentation include Tentative Map of Tract No.
12309, Tentative Map of Tract No. 12271, and Tentative
Map of Tract No. 12306, concurrently. City Attorney
Robert Burnham commented that to combine these items
into the public hearing would be acceptable.
Tentative Map of Tract No. 12309 (Public Hearing)
Request to subdivide 125.88 acres of land located in
the North Ford Planned Community so as to create one
(1) lot for office development, one (1) lot for single
•
family detached residential development, four (4) lots
for residential condominium development, two (2) lots
for residential apartment development, one (1) lot for
retail commercial development and one (1) lot for
public park purposes.
LOCATION: Portions of Blocks 51 and 57 of Irvine's
Subdivision, located on property bounded
by MacArthur Boulevard, Bison Avenue,
Camelback Street, Jamboree Road and San
Diego Creek, in the North Ford Planned
Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
ENGINEER: Psomas & Associates, Costa Mesa
Tentative Map of Tract No. 12306 (Public Hearing)
Request to subdivide 13.1 acres of land located in Area
5 of the North Ford Planned Community, being a further
•
subdivision of Lot No. 8 of Tentative Map of Tract No.
12309, so as to create six (6) numbered lots for
residential condominium purposes, two (2) lettered lots
-16—
MINUTES
INDEX
Item #7
TTM 12309
Approved
Item #8
7TM 12306
Approved
0
•
COM
February 7, 1985
Beach
for private street purposes, one (1) lettered lot for
private recreation purposes and two (2) lettered lots
for private open space purposes.
LOCATION: Portions of Block 51 and 57 of Irvine's
Subdivision, located at 4836 Jamboree
Road, on the northeasterly corner of
Jamboree Road and Camelback Street, in
Area 5 of the North Ford Planned
Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Irvine Pacific, Newport Beach
OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Adams Streeter,,Irvine
Tentative Map of Tract No. 12271 (Public Hearing)
Request to subdivide 31.0 acres of land located in Area
5 of the North Ford Planned Community, being a further
subdivision of Lot No. 9 of Tentative Map of Tract No.
12309, so as to create 172 numbered lots for detached
single family residential development, one (1) lettered
lot for private recreational purposes and three (3)
lettered lots for private open space purposes. The
proposal also includes an exception to the Subdivision
Code so as to allow the creation of interior lots which
are less than 50 feet wide and less than 5000 sq.ft. in
area and corner lots which are less than 60 feet wide
and less than 5,000 sq.ft. in area.
LOCATION: Portions of Blocks 51 and 57 of Irvine's
Subdivision, located at 4836 Jamboree
Road, on the. easterly side of Jamboree
Road, between Camelback Street and the
proposed University Drive (Extended) in
Area 5 of the North Ford Planned
Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Bren Company, Newport Beach
OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Adams Streeter, Irvine
-17-
MINUTES
INDEX
Item #9
TTM 12271
Approved
F �
C O
O
v
r 9
m
z C
C
m
y m
z
W v
n
z r
Q
x
°z
M
Q
O
°;
m a
°°City
of
z
z
� z
i
m
February 7, 1985
Beach
for private street purposes, one (1) lettered lot for
private recreation purposes and two (2) lettered lots
for private open space purposes.
LOCATION: Portions of Block 51 and 57 of Irvine's
Subdivision, located at 4836 Jamboree
Road, on the northeasterly corner of
Jamboree Road and Camelback Street, in
Area 5 of the North Ford Planned
Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Irvine Pacific, Newport Beach
OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Adams Streeter,,Irvine
Tentative Map of Tract No. 12271 (Public Hearing)
Request to subdivide 31.0 acres of land located in Area
5 of the North Ford Planned Community, being a further
subdivision of Lot No. 9 of Tentative Map of Tract No.
12309, so as to create 172 numbered lots for detached
single family residential development, one (1) lettered
lot for private recreational purposes and three (3)
lettered lots for private open space purposes. The
proposal also includes an exception to the Subdivision
Code so as to allow the creation of interior lots which
are less than 50 feet wide and less than 5000 sq.ft. in
area and corner lots which are less than 60 feet wide
and less than 5,000 sq.ft. in area.
LOCATION: Portions of Blocks 51 and 57 of Irvine's
Subdivision, located at 4836 Jamboree
Road, on the. easterly side of Jamboree
Road, between Camelback Street and the
proposed University Drive (Extended) in
Area 5 of the North Ford Planned
Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Bren Company, Newport Beach
OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Adams Streeter, Irvine
-17-
MINUTES
INDEX
Item #9
TTM 12271
Approved
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
February 7, 1985
of Newport Beach
x
a
G O
O
Mr. Maniscalco stated that the current public hearing
2
z c
m
m
z
W a
9=
r
0 2
C 2
p >'
0 0
0
m D
Z s
9 =
M m
MINUTES
February 7, 1985
of Newport Beach
_18-
Mr. Maniscalco stated that the current public hearing
is the final step of a three step process. Mr.
Maniscalco briefly described the history of the
applications: on October 24, 1983, General Plan
Amendment 82 -1 was approved by the City Council. The
subject Amendment evaluated the total development;
realigned University Drive South; established the
present entitlement; established TPO requirements; and
established affordable housing provisions. On November
13, 1984, the City Council approved Development
Agreement No. 2 that detailed the terms under which the
entitlement could be utilized including affordable
housing criteria and circulation improvement phasing.
The current Planned Community Amendment incorporates
residential standards into the existing Planned
Community for North Ford.
Mr. Maniscalco reviewed the Tentative Tract Maps as
follows: No. 12309 subdivides North Ford into 10
parcels, establishes the alignment for University Drive
and internal streets; Lot 1 is for the 12 acre park;
Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 are for apartments; Lot 6 for
retail - commercial; and Lot 10 for future offices.
Tract Map 12306 subdivides Lot 8 for townhomes; and
Tract Map 12271 subdivides Lot 9 for single family
detached homes.
Mr. Maniscalco advised that the applications are
consistent with General Plan 82 -1 and Development
Agreement No. 2. The proposed construction will be as
follows: 596 apartments built by Irvine Pacific,
including a minimum of 222 affordable units; 120
townhomes built by Irvine Pacific; 172 single family
detached homes built by Bren Company; and 50,000 sq.
ft. of retail - commercial. Mr. Maniscalco stated that
the proposed changes to the conditions of approval,
as presented prior to the meeting, are for the
consideration of the Planning Commission and for the
Planning Commission's recommendation to the City
Council.
Mr. Hewicker stated that staff approves of the proposed
changes in Conditions No. 7, and 10, of Amendment No.
613, and Conditions No. 10, 19, 20, 23, 62, and 77 of
• -
Tract Map No. 12309.
In response to Chairman Winburn's .question, Mr.
Maniscalco commented that the 12 -acre park will be
graded and dedicated to the City by January, 1986, and
_18-
MMISSIONERS
X x - February 7, 1985
c o 0
x
m
X
MINUTES
that the first occupancy will be by June, 1986. Mr.
Hewicker advised that the City has budgeted to improve
the park. Mr. Maniscalco cited that if occupancy occurs
c a
N
=
o[
=
0 0
r m
City
of
Newport Beach
will advise the occupants of that fact.
MINUTES
that the first occupancy will be by June, 1986. Mr.
Hewicker advised that the City has budgeted to improve
the park. Mr. Maniscalco cited that if occupancy occurs
before the completion of the park, The Irvine Company
will advise the occupants of that fact.
In response to a question posed by Chairman Winburn,
Mr. Webb advised that the 100 -year flood means that
the proposed site elevation would be subject to
inundation at a 100 -year frequency averaged over time.
Mr. Webb described the water flow levels of the park
site in the Bonita Creek area in detail and by using an
exhibit, he commented on reasons why the park site is
in a 100 -year flood area. Mr. Webb suggested ways that
the 100 -year flood levels and the 25 -year flood levels
could be avoided on the park site. Mr. Webb commented
that the difference between a 25 -year flood level and a
100 -year flood level is 6 inches.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Turner,
Mr. Webb advised that the existing pipeline ranges from
•
three to four feet in the shallow end at San Diego
Creek to six to seven feet towards the southerly end of
the park site. Commissioner Turner and Mr. Webb
discussed various proposals that could be made to
properly support the subject pipeline.
Commissioner Eichenhofer requested what options could
be made to the park site if the City's recommendations
would not be acceptable. Mr. Webb referred to
Condition No. 18 which states that the boundaries of
the tracts would have to be adjusted to provide 12
acres for the park outside of the Metropolitan Water
District easement area. Mr. Hewicker commented that if
that would be necessary, the total number of
residential developments could still remain the same.
Mr. Webb stated that The Irvine Company and the
Metropolitan Water District are currently working
together to arrive at a final conclusion satisfactory
to all interested parties. Commissioner Kurlander
inquired if an option could be considered that if the
required fill for the park site is not satisfactory if
the park site could be moved. Mr. Hewicker replied
that Condition No. 18 allows for that situation.
.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Goff in
regard to the proposed deletion of Condition No. 62,
stating that grading be limited to the non -rainy
season, Mr. Webb replied that the City did not have any
significant problems during the grading operations of
the Upper Newport Bay during that specific time period.
_19—
MINUTES
C:
Motion
Ayes
Absent
0
COMMISSIONERS
v
February 7, 1985
of Newport Beach
Mr. Webb advised that residential streets "A" and "B"
of the subdivision have been planned to include a 10
foot median to enhance the appearance of the entrance
areas. Mr. Webb stated that if the Parks and
Recreation Department does not have sufficient manpower
to maintain the landscaping, that the following
condition be added:
"That the median landscaping of streets "A" and
"B" be maintained by the adjoining homeowners
associations if the Parks and Recreation Director
determines that his Department cannot provide the
maintenance."
Commissioner Turner
recommendations would
Development Agreement.
current recommended cc
conditions that have
Agreement.
inquired if the stated
be in a conflict with the
Mr. Burnham replied that the
nditions shall prevail over any
been made in the Development
The public hearing was closed at this time.
Chairman Winburn stated that her interpretation. of the
applicant's proposed change of Condition No. 18 states
that if flood protection cannot be provided within the
park site's 12 acres, that the park would still have to
remain in that spot. Chairman Winburn stated that
staff's Condition No. 18 is more acceptable.
In response to Commissioner Turner, Mr. Webb advised
that the final grading plan would take the erosion
protection under consideration.
A motion was made to approve Amendment No. 613, subject
to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ", with
changes to Conditions No. 7 and 10. Motion voted on,
MOTION CARRIED.
A.Environmental Document
Approve the draft Environmental Impact Report for the
North Ford project and supportive materials; recommend
that the City Council certify the Environmental
Document is complete and make the Findings listed
below:
-20 -
MINUTES
INDEX
� x
C o
r v
z c
m
m
z
W ]
MX
C Z
N
a
O s
0
o 0
A m
o
T Y
T T
2 S
'L
:B -d
T T
v
February 7, 1985
of Newport Beach
Mr. Webb advised that residential streets "A" and "B"
of the subdivision have been planned to include a 10
foot median to enhance the appearance of the entrance
areas. Mr. Webb stated that if the Parks and
Recreation Department does not have sufficient manpower
to maintain the landscaping, that the following
condition be added:
"That the median landscaping of streets "A" and
"B" be maintained by the adjoining homeowners
associations if the Parks and Recreation Director
determines that his Department cannot provide the
maintenance."
Commissioner Turner
recommendations would
Development Agreement.
current recommended cc
conditions that have
Agreement.
inquired if the stated
be in a conflict with the
Mr. Burnham replied that the
nditions shall prevail over any
been made in the Development
The public hearing was closed at this time.
Chairman Winburn stated that her interpretation. of the
applicant's proposed change of Condition No. 18 states
that if flood protection cannot be provided within the
park site's 12 acres, that the park would still have to
remain in that spot. Chairman Winburn stated that
staff's Condition No. 18 is more acceptable.
In response to Commissioner Turner, Mr. Webb advised
that the final grading plan would take the erosion
protection under consideration.
A motion was made to approve Amendment No. 613, subject
to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ", with
changes to Conditions No. 7 and 10. Motion voted on,
MOTION CARRIED.
A.Environmental Document
Approve the draft Environmental Impact Report for the
North Ford project and supportive materials; recommend
that the City Council certify the Environmental
Document is complete and make the Findings listed
below:
-20 -
MINUTES
INDEX
•
•
COMMISSIONERS
7, 1955
Beach
FINDINGS:
1. That the environmental document has
been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the State EIR
Guidelines and City Policy.
2. That the contents of this
environmental document have been
considered in the various decisions
on the project.
3. That in order to reduce adverse
impacts of the proposed project,
all feasible mitigation measures
discussed in the environmental
document have been incorporated
into the proposed project.
The environmental document approved for this project
and the findings made herein are also for Tentative
Naps of Tracts No. 12309, 12306 and 12271 related to
this action.
B. Amendment No. 613
Approve Amendment No. 613 amending Planned Community
District Regulations and adopting Planned Community
Development Plans for the North Ford Planned Community,
recommend to the City approval of said amendment with
the revisions listed below:
1. Section B.2.a shall be amended to read:
"Setbacks from Streets:
Setbacks shall be measured from property line.
Street Setback from Ultimate
Right -of -Way Line
Jamboree Road 30'
University Drive South 20'
Camelback Street 20'
Collector Streets 15'
Private Streets and Drives 0
-21
MINUTES
INDEX
c o
r v
z C
m
o m
z
as
C z
M M
a
m
O
ar
o a
c�
o
a
x
o
�1 }�
City
as
Z
a
m a
az
M
m
m
7, 1955
Beach
FINDINGS:
1. That the environmental document has
been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the State EIR
Guidelines and City Policy.
2. That the contents of this
environmental document have been
considered in the various decisions
on the project.
3. That in order to reduce adverse
impacts of the proposed project,
all feasible mitigation measures
discussed in the environmental
document have been incorporated
into the proposed project.
The environmental document approved for this project
and the findings made herein are also for Tentative
Naps of Tracts No. 12309, 12306 and 12271 related to
this action.
B. Amendment No. 613
Approve Amendment No. 613 amending Planned Community
District Regulations and adopting Planned Community
Development Plans for the North Ford Planned Community,
recommend to the City approval of said amendment with
the revisions listed below:
1. Section B.2.a shall be amended to read:
"Setbacks from Streets:
Setbacks shall be measured from property line.
Street Setback from Ultimate
Right -of -Way Line
Jamboree Road 30'
University Drive South 20'
Camelback Street 20'
Collector Streets 15'
Private Streets and Drives 0
-21
MINUTES
INDEX
•
COMMISSIONERS
February 7, 1985
Beach
No structures or open parking shall be
permitted in setback areas from Jamboree
Road, University. Drive South and Camelback
Street.
2. Section B.2.b should be revised to delete
the last sentences as follows:
"A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured
from back of curb, or in the event that
sidewalks are constructed, from back of
sidewalk shall be. permitted with roll -up or
other type of garage doors approved by the
City Traffic Engineer. Additional garage
spaces in excess of two (2) need not meet the
above criteria."
3. Section B.2.c should be revised as follows:
"Setbacks from other Property Lines and
Structures
1. A minimum setback of five (5) feet is
required from all other property lines.
2. All main residential structures on the
same lot shall be a minimum of eight(8)
feet apart. This shall be measured from
face of finished wall to face of
finished wall.
The above standards shall be required unless
one of the following conditions prevails:
1. Structures which abut a plaza, park,
mall or other permanent open green space
may abut the common property line and
have openings onto same, provided the
open spaces are not publicly owned.
2. Where there are no openings on a given
side, that side may be placed on the
property line and may abut a structure
on an adjoining lot.
3. An attached or detached garage or
carport may abut a side property line or
another structure, provided no openings
are located on the abutting surfaces.
-22—
MINUTES
F T.
a O
=
A
y
y
m
Z c
m
a m
z
m a
s=
r
n
x
N
° ;
°
= y
0
m a
City of
Z
a z
i
m
February 7, 1985
Beach
No structures or open parking shall be
permitted in setback areas from Jamboree
Road, University. Drive South and Camelback
Street.
2. Section B.2.b should be revised to delete
the last sentences as follows:
"A minimum of eighteen (18) feet measured
from back of curb, or in the event that
sidewalks are constructed, from back of
sidewalk shall be. permitted with roll -up or
other type of garage doors approved by the
City Traffic Engineer. Additional garage
spaces in excess of two (2) need not meet the
above criteria."
3. Section B.2.c should be revised as follows:
"Setbacks from other Property Lines and
Structures
1. A minimum setback of five (5) feet is
required from all other property lines.
2. All main residential structures on the
same lot shall be a minimum of eight(8)
feet apart. This shall be measured from
face of finished wall to face of
finished wall.
The above standards shall be required unless
one of the following conditions prevails:
1. Structures which abut a plaza, park,
mall or other permanent open green space
may abut the common property line and
have openings onto same, provided the
open spaces are not publicly owned.
2. Where there are no openings on a given
side, that side may be placed on the
property line and may abut a structure
on an adjoining lot.
3. An attached or detached garage or
carport may abut a side property line or
another structure, provided no openings
are located on the abutting surfaces.
-22—
MINUTES
•
0
Dwellings may orient toward the streetside
property line or the opposite property line
in order to .take advantage of view
conditions.
4. Sections B.2.d. and B.2.e. shall be
deleted.
5. Section B.3. shall be amended to read as
follows:
"Fences, Hedges and Walls -
Fences shall be limited to a maximum
height of eight (8) feet, except within
street setback areas where fences,
hedges and walls shall be limited to
three (3) feet. Wing walls, where an
extension of a residential or accessory
structure is to be constructed may be
eight (8) feet in height. At street
intersections all fences, hedges and
walls shall conform to the requirements
of City Standard Drawing 110 -L,
intersection line -of -sight requirement."
6. Section C.3 shall be amended as follows:
"Setbacks
Setbacks shall be measured from property
line.
a. Setbacks from Streets:
Street Setback from ultimate
Right -of -Way Line
Jamboree Road 30'
University Drive South 20'
Camelback Street 20'
Collector Streets 15'
b. Front Yard
A minimum setback of ten (10) feet
for the dwelling unit shall be
maintained.
-231—
MINUTES
10010
February
7, 1985
c o
n
i
a v
m
9
r v
a S
9
N
=
O X
; Z
O
T
O
M
City
of
Newport
Beach
Dwellings may orient toward the streetside
property line or the opposite property line
in order to .take advantage of view
conditions.
4. Sections B.2.d. and B.2.e. shall be
deleted.
5. Section B.3. shall be amended to read as
follows:
"Fences, Hedges and Walls -
Fences shall be limited to a maximum
height of eight (8) feet, except within
street setback areas where fences,
hedges and walls shall be limited to
three (3) feet. Wing walls, where an
extension of a residential or accessory
structure is to be constructed may be
eight (8) feet in height. At street
intersections all fences, hedges and
walls shall conform to the requirements
of City Standard Drawing 110 -L,
intersection line -of -sight requirement."
6. Section C.3 shall be amended as follows:
"Setbacks
Setbacks shall be measured from property
line.
a. Setbacks from Streets:
Street Setback from ultimate
Right -of -Way Line
Jamboree Road 30'
University Drive South 20'
Camelback Street 20'
Collector Streets 15'
b. Front Yard
A minimum setback of ten (10) feet
for the dwelling unit shall be
maintained.
-231—
MINUTES
10010
0
0
February 7, 1985
Beach
C. Side Yard
Side yard setbacks shall be a
minimum of five (5) feet.
d. Rear Yard
A minimum of ten (10) feet shall be
maintained for the rear yards.
e. Setbacks - Garages
Garages may be setback either from
five (5) to seven (7) feet average
or a' minimum of twenty (20) feet
measured from back of curb, or in
the event that sidewalks are
constructed, from back of
sidewalk."
7. Section C.4. should be amended to read:
"Fences, Hedges and Walls
Fences shall be limited to a maximum
height of eight (8) feet, except within
street setback areas where fences,
hedges and walls shall be limited to
three (3) feet. Wing walls, where an
extension of a residential or accessory
structure is to be constructed may be
eight (8) feet in height. At street
intersections all fences, hedges and
walls shall conform to the requirements
of City Standard Drawing 110 -L,
intersection line -of -sight requirement.
Walls constructed to satisfy noise
barrier requirements may encroach into
required setbacks on Jamboree Road and
University Drive South. These walls
must be set back a minimum of 4 feet
from the property line, allowing for
provision of landscaping between the
noise wall and the right -of -way line."
8. Section C.8. should be added as follows:
"Floor Area Limit
The total gross floor area, including
basements, garages and carports, but
-24.;.
MINUTES
c o
x v
m
v
r v
z c
m
Z m
z
m a
W m
a
0
o
z r
o
°
x
°
City
za
z
m a
az
m
M
M
m
m
of
0
0
February 7, 1985
Beach
C. Side Yard
Side yard setbacks shall be a
minimum of five (5) feet.
d. Rear Yard
A minimum of ten (10) feet shall be
maintained for the rear yards.
e. Setbacks - Garages
Garages may be setback either from
five (5) to seven (7) feet average
or a' minimum of twenty (20) feet
measured from back of curb, or in
the event that sidewalks are
constructed, from back of
sidewalk."
7. Section C.4. should be amended to read:
"Fences, Hedges and Walls
Fences shall be limited to a maximum
height of eight (8) feet, except within
street setback areas where fences,
hedges and walls shall be limited to
three (3) feet. Wing walls, where an
extension of a residential or accessory
structure is to be constructed may be
eight (8) feet in height. At street
intersections all fences, hedges and
walls shall conform to the requirements
of City Standard Drawing 110 -L,
intersection line -of -sight requirement.
Walls constructed to satisfy noise
barrier requirements may encroach into
required setbacks on Jamboree Road and
University Drive South. These walls
must be set back a minimum of 4 feet
from the property line, allowing for
provision of landscaping between the
noise wall and the right -of -way line."
8. Section C.8. should be added as follows:
"Floor Area Limit
The total gross floor area, including
basements, garages and carports, but
-24.;.
MINUTES
•
•
excluding decks, balconies or patios
open on at least two sides or open on
one side and unroofed, contained in all
buildings on a building. site in this
District shall not exceed one and
one -half the buildable area of the site,
provided that any required parking
space, whether open or covered, shall be
included in the calculation of gross
floor area. The term 'buildable area'
shall mean the area of a building site,
excluding any basic minimum side, front
and rear yard spaces."
9. Section C.9. should be added as follows:
"Trellis
open trellis and beam construction shall
be permitted to attach the garage or
carport to the dwelling and may also
extend from the dwelling to the side or
rear property line. In side yards, the
maximum height shall be eight (8) feet.
These areas shall not be considered in
calculating lot area coverage, however,
trellis areas shall not exceed 50
percent of the remaining open space of a
developed lot.
If residential development utilizes a
'zero lot line' approach, trellis
structure may attach to the adjacent
dwelling unit, consistent with the
requirements of the Uniform Building
Code.
Trellis and beam construction shall be
so designed as to provide a minimum of
50 percent of the total trellis area as
open space for the penetration of light
and air to areas which it covers."
10. Add General Note #13, as follows:
"Units will be designed based on final
noise studies, utilizing ultimate
traffic volumes so that noise levels
will not exceed 65 CNEL and 45 CNEL in
the outdoor and indoor living areas
respectively."
-25—
MINUTES
INDEX
February
7, 1985
c o
x
m
C Z
M
0
a
a L
; _
o
M
O
m
City
of
Newport
Beach
excluding decks, balconies or patios
open on at least two sides or open on
one side and unroofed, contained in all
buildings on a building. site in this
District shall not exceed one and
one -half the buildable area of the site,
provided that any required parking
space, whether open or covered, shall be
included in the calculation of gross
floor area. The term 'buildable area'
shall mean the area of a building site,
excluding any basic minimum side, front
and rear yard spaces."
9. Section C.9. should be added as follows:
"Trellis
open trellis and beam construction shall
be permitted to attach the garage or
carport to the dwelling and may also
extend from the dwelling to the side or
rear property line. In side yards, the
maximum height shall be eight (8) feet.
These areas shall not be considered in
calculating lot area coverage, however,
trellis areas shall not exceed 50
percent of the remaining open space of a
developed lot.
If residential development utilizes a
'zero lot line' approach, trellis
structure may attach to the adjacent
dwelling unit, consistent with the
requirements of the Uniform Building
Code.
Trellis and beam construction shall be
so designed as to provide a minimum of
50 percent of the total trellis area as
open space for the penetration of light
and air to areas which it covers."
10. Add General Note #13, as follows:
"Units will be designed based on final
noise studies, utilizing ultimate
traffic volumes so that noise levels
will not exceed 65 CNEL and 45 CNEL in
the outdoor and indoor living areas
respectively."
-25—
MINUTES
INDEX
•
11. Add General Note #14, as follows:
"Detached, single- family development on
substandard lots shall provide a minimum
30% of units using a 'shared driveway'
approach. The location and distribution
of these units shall be subject to
review by the Planning Department and
the City Traffic Engineer, in order to
assure provision of adequate on- street
parking throughout the subdivision.
12. Add General Note #15, as follows:
"Detached, single - family development on
substandard lots shall be required to
utilize a reciprocal easement approach;
allowing the use of the property in a
zero lot line manner, assuring a useable
side yard area."
* r r
The Planning Commission recessed at 9:00 p.m. and
reconvened at 9:15 p.m.
* * x
City Attorney Robert Burnham stated that the City and
The Irvine Company are in agreement with the revised
Condition No. 18 as follows:
"The final grade of park site shall be adequate to
protect the site from water and flooding and to
insure that the site is fully useable as an active
park. The final grade of the site shall be to the
satisfaction of and approved by the Public Works
Director and the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Director. In the event that the applicant is
unable to provide adequate elevation at the site
designated on the map, the boundaries of the park
may be adjusted with the approval of the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Director and the Public
Works Director."
Mr. Burnham stated that the boundaries of the park may
be adjusted, however the boundaries could not be less
than the stated 12 acres. Mr. Burnham cited that the
purpose for the approval of the Public Works Director
and Parks, Beaches and Recreation Director would be
that if the applicant proposed moving the park site,
that the proposed site would be acceptable to the City.
-26—
MINUTES
INDEX
A F
T1
February
7, 1985
A T
=
C
z C
9
m
P 9
z m
m
z
C a
Z Z
0
o;
9
0
r
0
m
I City
of
Newport
Beach
z
a
11. Add General Note #14, as follows:
"Detached, single- family development on
substandard lots shall provide a minimum
30% of units using a 'shared driveway'
approach. The location and distribution
of these units shall be subject to
review by the Planning Department and
the City Traffic Engineer, in order to
assure provision of adequate on- street
parking throughout the subdivision.
12. Add General Note #15, as follows:
"Detached, single - family development on
substandard lots shall be required to
utilize a reciprocal easement approach;
allowing the use of the property in a
zero lot line manner, assuring a useable
side yard area."
* r r
The Planning Commission recessed at 9:00 p.m. and
reconvened at 9:15 p.m.
* * x
City Attorney Robert Burnham stated that the City and
The Irvine Company are in agreement with the revised
Condition No. 18 as follows:
"The final grade of park site shall be adequate to
protect the site from water and flooding and to
insure that the site is fully useable as an active
park. The final grade of the site shall be to the
satisfaction of and approved by the Public Works
Director and the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Director. In the event that the applicant is
unable to provide adequate elevation at the site
designated on the map, the boundaries of the park
may be adjusted with the approval of the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Director and the Public
Works Director."
Mr. Burnham stated that the boundaries of the park may
be adjusted, however the boundaries could not be less
than the stated 12 acres. Mr. Burnham cited that the
purpose for the approval of the Public Works Director
and Parks, Beaches and Recreation Director would be
that if the applicant proposed moving the park site,
that the proposed site would be acceptable to the City.
-26—
MINUTES
INDEX
Motion
Ayes
Absent
•
•
;1
February 7, 1985
of Newport Beach
Mr. Burnham advised that he is requesting that The
Irvine Company make a statement advising that this
condition is consistent with the provisions of the
Development Agreement, and that problems that may be
associated with bringing this site up to a particular
elevation would not entitle them to delay the
construction of the affordable housing on the site.
Mr. Brad Olson, representative of The Irvine Company,
stated that after hearing the City's testimony
regarding Condition No. 18, that The Irvine Company is
in agreement with the revised condition.
Commissioner Turner made a motion to approve Tentative
Map of Tract No. 12309, subject to the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A ", including the changes in
Conditions No. 10, 18, 19, 20, 23, 62, 77, and the
addition of Condition No. 83. Motion voted on, MOTION
CARRIED.
A. Environmental Document
Approve the draft Environmental Impact Report for the
North Ford project and supportive materials; recommend
that the City Council certify the Environmental
Document is complete and make the Findings listed
below:
FINDINGS:
1. That the environmental document has
been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the State EIR
Guidelines and City Policy.
2. That the contents of this
environmental document have been
considered in the various decisions
on the project.
3. That in order to reduce adverse
impacts of the proposed project,
all feasible mitigation measures
discussed in the environmental
document have been incorporated
into the proposed project.
-27—
MINUTES
INDEX
F x
a O
O
S
m
z c
C
m
> m
z
W p
A
a
c a
z
p;
0 0
0 0
2 x
0
o
m D
2
a =
T m
;1
February 7, 1985
of Newport Beach
Mr. Burnham advised that he is requesting that The
Irvine Company make a statement advising that this
condition is consistent with the provisions of the
Development Agreement, and that problems that may be
associated with bringing this site up to a particular
elevation would not entitle them to delay the
construction of the affordable housing on the site.
Mr. Brad Olson, representative of The Irvine Company,
stated that after hearing the City's testimony
regarding Condition No. 18, that The Irvine Company is
in agreement with the revised condition.
Commissioner Turner made a motion to approve Tentative
Map of Tract No. 12309, subject to the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A ", including the changes in
Conditions No. 10, 18, 19, 20, 23, 62, 77, and the
addition of Condition No. 83. Motion voted on, MOTION
CARRIED.
A. Environmental Document
Approve the draft Environmental Impact Report for the
North Ford project and supportive materials; recommend
that the City Council certify the Environmental
Document is complete and make the Findings listed
below:
FINDINGS:
1. That the environmental document has
been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the State EIR
Guidelines and City Policy.
2. That the contents of this
environmental document have been
considered in the various decisions
on the project.
3. That in order to reduce adverse
impacts of the proposed project,
all feasible mitigation measures
discussed in the environmental
document have been incorporated
into the proposed project.
-27—
MINUTES
INDEX
MINUTES
INDEX
February 7, 1985
B. Tentative Map of Tract No. 12309
C o
o
Recommend that the City Council approve, the Tentative
9 9
m
1
9
r v
=
M
w
=
v 9
. =
0
T
0
m
City
of
Newport
Beach
FINDINGS:
INDEX
B. Tentative Map of Tract No. 12309
Recommend that the City Council approve, the Tentative
Map of Tract No. 12309 subject to the following
Findings and Conditions of Approval:
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements
of Title 19 of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code, all ordinances of
the City, all applicable general or
specific plans.
2. That the Planning Commission is
satisfied with the plan of the
subdivision.
3. That the proposed subdivision
presents no problems . from a
.
planning standpoint.
4. That the site is physically
suitable for the proposed density
of development.
5. That the design of the subdivision
or the proposed improvements are
not likely to cause serious public
health problems.
6. That the design of the subdivision
or the proposed improvements will
not conflict with any easements,
acquired by the public at large,
for access through or use of,
property within the proposed
subdivision.
7. That the discharge of waste from
the proposed subdivision into an
existing community sewer system
will not result in violation of
existing requirements prescribed by
•
the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board pursuant to
Division 7 of the Water Code.
-28-
MINUTES
INDEX
February 7, 1985
8. That the proposed subdivision is
co
consistent with the Newport Beach
°y
x
-a
r
m
z c
M
m
s m
z
M
a=
H
o 3
O
O
.
� =
T
m
City
of
Newport
Beach
North Ford Development Agreement be
_
INDEX
-29
8. That the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the Newport Beach
General Plan, and the policies
contained therein.
CONDITIONS:
1. That all the conditions of the
North Ford Development Agreement be
fulfilled.
2. That each dwelling unit be served
with an individual .water service
and sewer lateral connection to the
public water and sewer systems
unless otherwise approved by the
Public Works Department.
3. That the on -site parking, vehicular
.
circulation and pedestrian
circulation systems be subject to
further review by the Traffic
Engineer.
4. That the design of the private
streets and drives conform with the
City's Private Street Policy (L -4),
except as approved by the Public
Works Department. The basic
roadway and driveway width shall be
a minimum of 32 feet unless
otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department. The location,
width, configuration, and concept
of the private street and drive
system shall be subject to further
review and approval by the City
Traffic Engineer.
5. That the intersection of streets
and drives be designed to provide
sight distance for a speed to be
determined by the Traffic Engineer.
slopes, landscaping, walls and
other obstruction shall be
•
considered in the sight distance
requirements. Landscaping within
the sight distance line shall not
-29
COMMISSIONERS
•
February 7, 1985
r
exceed 24 inches in height. The
sight distance requirement may be
approximately modified at
non - critical locations, subject to
approval of the Traffic Engineer.
6. That the California Vehicle Code be
enforced on the private streets and
that delineation acceptable to the
Police Department and Public Works
Department be provided along the
sidelines of the private streets.
7. That if it is desired to have a
control gate at the entrance, to
provide street or drives, a
turn - around shall be provided prior
to the gate. The design of the
controlled entrance shall be
reviewed and approved by the Public
Works Department and Fire
Department.
8. That street, drainage and utility
improvements be shown on standard
improvement plans prepared by a
licensed civil engineer.
9. That Camelback Drive be widened to
accommodate at a minimum lane
configuration with two lanes each
direction, double left -turn lanes,
and bike lanes with a transition
westerly of "B" Street. Config-
uration to be approved by the
Public Works Department.
10. That "A" Street at University Drive
be a minimum 70 -foot right -of -way
width to provide for one vehicular
lane in each direction with bike
lanes on each side and left turn
pockets at University Drive and "C"
Street.
11. That all public and private street
improvements include, but not be
limited to, the construction of
curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement
and street lights, as approved by
the Public Works Department. That
-30—
MINUTES
� x
c o
�
x
z c
m
m
z
m a
C z
z
a
z r
o;
o
O
x
o
,
W z
m D
�I�`
i
a z
m
Y
•
February 7, 1985
r
exceed 24 inches in height. The
sight distance requirement may be
approximately modified at
non - critical locations, subject to
approval of the Traffic Engineer.
6. That the California Vehicle Code be
enforced on the private streets and
that delineation acceptable to the
Police Department and Public Works
Department be provided along the
sidelines of the private streets.
7. That if it is desired to have a
control gate at the entrance, to
provide street or drives, a
turn - around shall be provided prior
to the gate. The design of the
controlled entrance shall be
reviewed and approved by the Public
Works Department and Fire
Department.
8. That street, drainage and utility
improvements be shown on standard
improvement plans prepared by a
licensed civil engineer.
9. That Camelback Drive be widened to
accommodate at a minimum lane
configuration with two lanes each
direction, double left -turn lanes,
and bike lanes with a transition
westerly of "B" Street. Config-
uration to be approved by the
Public Works Department.
10. That "A" Street at University Drive
be a minimum 70 -foot right -of -way
width to provide for one vehicular
lane in each direction with bike
lanes on each side and left turn
pockets at University Drive and "C"
Street.
11. That all public and private street
improvements include, but not be
limited to, the construction of
curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement
and street lights, as approved by
the Public Works Department. That
-30—
MINUTES
•
•
February 7, 1985
t Beach
Street "B" (Tentative Tract No.
12309) have a 70 -foot minimum
right -of -way width, a 54 -foot
roadway width curb ,to curb with
median, and 8 -foot sidewalk both
sides; that Street "C" (Tentative
Tract No. 12309) have a 60 -foot
minimum right -of -way width, a
minimum 48 -foot roadway width and a
minimum 5- foot -wide sidewalk. That
all parkway trees be placed behind
the proposed sidewalk. That all
other public local streets conform
to the City's design standards
unless otherwise approved by the
Public Works Department.
12. That vehicular access be provided
to the commercial retail
development in Lot 6 from Street
"C ". The design shall be approved
by the Public works Department
prior to issuance of any building
permits unless otherwise approved
by the Public Works Department.
13. That the existing storm drain
system on the easterly side of
Camelback Street be upgraded to
handle runoff from a 25 -year storm.
The design of this system shall be
approved by the Public Works
Department.
14. That a separate subdivision
agreement and surety be provided to
guarantee satisfactory completion
of the circulation system
improvements prior to recordation
of a final tract map.
15. That the North Ford developer pay
for the on -site and off -site
improvements to reverse the traffic
flow through the Camelback Post
Office parking lot and mail
drop -off area. These modifications
shall be completed in conjunction
with the Camelback Street
improvements required of the
subject development.
-31—
MINUTES
x x
..
c o
�
x
_ r
r v
m
z c
m
> ,"
z
m a
C z
a
W
Y r
O;
"'
O
O
x
O
�+ (�'(�'
City
Y9
z
M z
z
r
m
y VI
•
•
February 7, 1985
t Beach
Street "B" (Tentative Tract No.
12309) have a 70 -foot minimum
right -of -way width, a 54 -foot
roadway width curb ,to curb with
median, and 8 -foot sidewalk both
sides; that Street "C" (Tentative
Tract No. 12309) have a 60 -foot
minimum right -of -way width, a
minimum 48 -foot roadway width and a
minimum 5- foot -wide sidewalk. That
all parkway trees be placed behind
the proposed sidewalk. That all
other public local streets conform
to the City's design standards
unless otherwise approved by the
Public Works Department.
12. That vehicular access be provided
to the commercial retail
development in Lot 6 from Street
"C ". The design shall be approved
by the Public works Department
prior to issuance of any building
permits unless otherwise approved
by the Public Works Department.
13. That the existing storm drain
system on the easterly side of
Camelback Street be upgraded to
handle runoff from a 25 -year storm.
The design of this system shall be
approved by the Public Works
Department.
14. That a separate subdivision
agreement and surety be provided to
guarantee satisfactory completion
of the circulation system
improvements prior to recordation
of a final tract map.
15. That the North Ford developer pay
for the on -site and off -site
improvements to reverse the traffic
flow through the Camelback Post
Office parking lot and mail
drop -off area. These modifications
shall be completed in conjunction
with the Camelback Street
improvements required of the
subject development.
-31—
MINUTES
•
•
16. That a traffic control plan shall
be submitted as a part and be
approved by the City Traffic Engi-
neer.
17. That an 8 -foot wide sidewalk be
constructed on the westerly side of
Camelback Street between Bison
Avenue and Jamboree Road.
18. That the final grade of the park
site shall be adequate to protect
the site from water and flooding
and insure that the site is fully
useable as an active park. The
final grade of the site shall be to
the satisfaction of and approved by
the Public Works Director and the
Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Director. In the event that the
applicant is unable to provide
adequate elevation at the site
designated on the map, the
boundaries of the park may be
adjusted with the approval of the
Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Director and the Public Works
Director.
19. That the location of the proposed
bike trail along Bonita Creek be
subject to further discussion as
negotiations with CalTrans may
require revisions in alignment.
That an appropriate easement for
bike trail purposes be dedicated to
the City and that an easement be
dedicated to the City for the
existing bike trail along San Diego
Creek.
20. That vehicular access rights be
modified from Condition 10 in the
Settlement Agreement to allow one
driveway entrance on Bison Avenue
and two street entrances off of
University Drive for Lot 10, with
locations as approved by the Public
Works Department.
-32
MINUTES
INDEX
X x
T
February
7, 1985
C o
O
x
m
.
z c
m
o m
z
m z
C 9
a
=
= z
a=
0 2
T m
City
of
Newport
Beach
16. That a traffic control plan shall
be submitted as a part and be
approved by the City Traffic Engi-
neer.
17. That an 8 -foot wide sidewalk be
constructed on the westerly side of
Camelback Street between Bison
Avenue and Jamboree Road.
18. That the final grade of the park
site shall be adequate to protect
the site from water and flooding
and insure that the site is fully
useable as an active park. The
final grade of the site shall be to
the satisfaction of and approved by
the Public Works Director and the
Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Director. In the event that the
applicant is unable to provide
adequate elevation at the site
designated on the map, the
boundaries of the park may be
adjusted with the approval of the
Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Director and the Public Works
Director.
19. That the location of the proposed
bike trail along Bonita Creek be
subject to further discussion as
negotiations with CalTrans may
require revisions in alignment.
That an appropriate easement for
bike trail purposes be dedicated to
the City and that an easement be
dedicated to the City for the
existing bike trail along San Diego
Creek.
20. That vehicular access rights be
modified from Condition 10 in the
Settlement Agreement to allow one
driveway entrance on Bison Avenue
and two street entrances off of
University Drive for Lot 10, with
locations as approved by the Public
Works Department.
-32
MINUTES
INDEX
•
•
A x L
February 7, 1985
C
v
x
I
z c
C
v
m
r v
m
m
z
C z
C D
N
o;
0 0
r
City
of
Newport
Beach
2
M a
m
21. That a formal notification program
be developed and implemented to
inform lessees and purchasers (both
first time and future) of the
future construction of the San
Joaquin Hills Transportation
Corridor (SJHTC) . The program is
to be approved by the Planning and
Public Works Departments and should
inform people of the location and
design of the SJHTC, and that noise
levels will increase when the
corridor is constructed.
22. That an interconnect conduit and
pull boxes be installed to complete
the traffic signal interconnect on
Jamboree Road between Bison and
Eastbluff.
23. That bus stops be installed on
Jamboree Road northerly of
University Drive and on University
Drive at the park site and Lot 10
with the locations to be determined
by the Public Works Department and
Orange County Transit District.
24. That a maintenance vehicular access
easement from easterly side of
Jamboree Road to the flood control
easement/bike trail be dedicated to
the City.
25. That the hydrology and hydraulic
study include an analysis of Bonita
Creek and that a sufficient opening
be provided at San Diego Creek to
allow the storm flows to pass
without affecting the bicycle
bridge.
26. That the top or toe of all slopes
adjacent to °A ", "B ", and "C"
Streets be a minimum of 2 feet
outside the street right -of -way
line.
-33-
MINUTES
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
INDEX
x
"-`
February
7, 1985
C o
sidewalk be provided on both sides
s
of the entrance streets and drives
_
v
m
off of "C" Street.
28. The grading permit shall include,
C=
N
V a
m
0
0
T
if required, a description of haul
City
Of
Newport
Beach
9
a
watering, and sweeping program
MINUTES
INDEX
27. That a 4 -foot minimum width
sidewalk be provided on both sides
of the entrance streets and drives
off of "C" Street.
28. The grading permit shall include,
if required, a description of haul
routes, access points to the site,
watering, and sweeping program
designed to minimize impact of haul
operations.
29. The velocity of concentrated
run -off 'from the project shall be
evaluated and erosive velocities
controlled as part of the project
design.
30. That grading shall be conducted in
accordance with plans prepared by a
•
civil Engineer and based on
recommendations of a soil engineer
and an engineering geologist
subsequent to the completion of a
comprehensive soil and geologic
investigation of the site.
Permanent reproducible copies of
the "Approved as Built" grading
plans on standard size sheets shall
be furnished to the Building
Department.
31. Prior to the issuance of the
grading permit, the design engineer
shall review and state that the
discharge of surface runoff from
the project will be performed in a
manner to assure that increased
peak flows from the project will
not increase erosion immediately
downstream of the system. This
report shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning and
Building Department.
•
32. Control of infiltration to the
groundwater system for the project
shall be provided as part of the
project design.
-34—
MINUTES
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
February 7, 1985
33. The landscape plan shall be subject
to the review of the Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Department and
approval of the Planning and Public
Works Departments.
34. The landscape plan shall include a
maintenance program which controls
the use of fertilizers and
pesticides.
35. The landscape plan shall place
heavy emphasis on the use of
drought=resistant native vegetation
and be irrigated with a system
designed to avoid surface runoff
and over- watering.
36. The landscape plan shall place
• heavy emphasis on fire - retardant
vegetation.
37. Street trees shall be provided
along the public streets as
required by the Public Works
Department and the Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Department.
38. Landscaping shall be regularly
maintained free of weeds and
debris. All vegetation shall be
regularly trimmed and kept in a
healthy condition.
39. That prior to the issuance of
building permits, the Fire Depart-
ment shall review the proposed
plans and may require automatic
fire sprinkler protection.
40. That any cul -de -sac, building
address, and street name shall
comply with City Standards and
shall be approved by the Fire
• Department.
41. The Fire Department access shall be
approved by the Fire Department.
-35-
A x
y y
m
v
r v
z c
m>
m
z
Q A
Icz
v m
S
w
o
Z r
v[
m s
0 o
n
o
o
m
�� }"
of
Z a
z
a z
r
m
l.�l
MINUTES
February 7, 1985
33. The landscape plan shall be subject
to the review of the Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Department and
approval of the Planning and Public
Works Departments.
34. The landscape plan shall include a
maintenance program which controls
the use of fertilizers and
pesticides.
35. The landscape plan shall place
heavy emphasis on the use of
drought=resistant native vegetation
and be irrigated with a system
designed to avoid surface runoff
and over- watering.
36. The landscape plan shall place
• heavy emphasis on fire - retardant
vegetation.
37. Street trees shall be provided
along the public streets as
required by the Public Works
Department and the Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Department.
38. Landscaping shall be regularly
maintained free of weeds and
debris. All vegetation shall be
regularly trimmed and kept in a
healthy condition.
39. That prior to the issuance of
building permits, the Fire Depart-
ment shall review the proposed
plans and may require automatic
fire sprinkler protection.
40. That any cul -de -sac, building
address, and street name shall
comply with City Standards and
shall be approved by the Fire
• Department.
41. The Fire Department access shall be
approved by the Fire Department.
-35-
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
INDEX
February 7, 1985
42. Non - residential portions of the
G o
o
£_C
aMn
m
an internal securing system (i.e.
v
v
'>
z c
m
m
z
m a
z
S
z
z r
_
0
2
m
City
of
Newport
Beach
reviewed by the Police and Fire
INDEX
-36—
42. Non - residential portions of the
proposed project shall incorporate
an internal securing system (i.e.
security guards, alarms, access
limits after hours) that shall be
reviewed by the Police and Fire
Departments and approved by the
Planning Department.
43. That all access to the buildings be
approved by the Fire Department.
44. That all on -site fire protection
(hydrants and Fire Department
connections) shall be approved by
the Fire and Public Works
Departments.
45. That fire vehicle access, including
the proposed planter islands, shall
be approved by the Fire Department.
46. The turning radius at all corners
shall be approved by the Fire
Department.
47. The project should be designed to
conform to Title 24, Paragraph 6,
Division T -20, Chapter 2,
Sub- chapter 4 of the California
Administrative Code dealing with
energy requirements.
48. The project should investigate the
use of alternative energy sources
(i.e. solar) and to the maximum
extent economically feasible
incorporate the use of said in
project designs.
49. Final design of the project shall
provide for the incorporation of
water - saving devices for project
lavatories and other water -using
facilities.
50. Development of the site shall be
subject to a grading permit to be
-36—
COMMISSIONERS
•
•
February 7, 1985
Beach
approved by the Building and
Planning Departments. The
application for a grading permit is
to be accompanied by the grading
plan and specifications, and
supporting data consisting of soil
engineering and engineering geology
reports or other reports required
by the building official.
51. All construction activities will be
limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m.
and 7 :00 p.m. Monday through
Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
on Saturday and Sunday.
52. Prior to occupancy of any unit, a
qualified acoustical engineer shall
be retained by the city at the
applicant's expense to demonstrate
to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director that noise impacts do not
exceed 65 CNEL for outside living
areas and active recreation areas
and 45 CNEL for interior living
areas.
53. Any mechanical equipment and
emergency power generators will be
screened from view and shall be
sound - attenuated so as not to
exceed 55 dBA at the property line.
54. Any rooftop or other mechanical
equipment shall be sound - attenuated
in such a manner as to achieve a
maximum, sound level of 55 dBA at
the property line.
55. A letter of service regarding
school services shall be executed
prior to final tract map .approval
and shall be subject to approval by
the Planning Department.
56. Letters of service regarding water
shall be executed prior to approval
of a final tract map.
-37—
MINUTES
F ]C
.
C O
�+
E
a v
x
_
9
r v
m
z C
C
m
o m
z
W a
C 2
a
z r
p E
Q
o
x
0
}
M m
0
O
m a
m
m
C' -lv Of
Z D
a
a Z
w
m
•
•
February 7, 1985
Beach
approved by the Building and
Planning Departments. The
application for a grading permit is
to be accompanied by the grading
plan and specifications, and
supporting data consisting of soil
engineering and engineering geology
reports or other reports required
by the building official.
51. All construction activities will be
limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m.
and 7 :00 p.m. Monday through
Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
on Saturday and Sunday.
52. Prior to occupancy of any unit, a
qualified acoustical engineer shall
be retained by the city at the
applicant's expense to demonstrate
to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director that noise impacts do not
exceed 65 CNEL for outside living
areas and active recreation areas
and 45 CNEL for interior living
areas.
53. Any mechanical equipment and
emergency power generators will be
screened from view and shall be
sound - attenuated so as not to
exceed 55 dBA at the property line.
54. Any rooftop or other mechanical
equipment shall be sound - attenuated
in such a manner as to achieve a
maximum, sound level of 55 dBA at
the property line.
55. A letter of service regarding
school services shall be executed
prior to final tract map .approval
and shall be subject to approval by
the Planning Department.
56. Letters of service regarding water
shall be executed prior to approval
of a final tract map.
-37—
MINUTES
COMMISSIONERS
MINUTES
X o n
February 7, 1985
57. Letters of service regarding sewer
9
x
_
v
m
of a final tract map.
C z
p
N
=
a 9
m >
o p
� m
City
of
Newport
Beach
M z
weight and bearing proposed, it is
MINUTES
57. Letters of service regarding sewer
shall be executed prior to approval
of a final tract map.
58. To reduce settlement loads of the
weight and bearing proposed, it is
recommended that the northern
portion of the site be provided
with an uncompacted surcharge fill
placed above the final design grade
and later removed. Specifics for
the surcharging program are
contained in the "North Ford
Grading Study" (Moore and Taber,
1984) contained in Appendix C of
the DEIR.
59. Settlement readings for the areas
subject to significant
consolidation and subject to the
recommended surcharge fill program
•
should be monitored and recorded as
specified in the North Ford Grading
Study. Additionally, similar moni-
toring of the adjoining Jamboree
roadbed should also be included.
60. Any abandoned utility lines or
other underground structures shall
be removed, destroyed, or abandoned
in compliance with specifications
of the building official and
recommendations of the soils
engineer. Care should be taken
during construction to monitor flow
lines that may be critical. The
existing subdrains in the northern
part of the site should remain
undisturbed. If disturbed during
grading, subdrains should be
restored to the satisfaction of the
soils engineer.
61. To reduce sedimentation in the
Upper Newport Bay, the following
•
construction BMPS are recommended
for occasional to frequent use
within the San . Diego Creek
watershed (Cities of Irvine and
Newport Beach and SCAG, 1983):
_38—
MINUTES
MINUTES
x x T February 7, 1985
f a v =
C v r c m
z C m m z
Im s a z r 0 a
Oh fz Z = a z m City of Newport Beach
MEL a
CALE INDEX
1. Temporary Gravel construction
entrance.
2. Sandbag, gravel bag, or straw
bale barriers.
3. Silt fences.
4. Filter berms.
5. Filter inlets.
6. Interceptor ditches.
7. Diversion dikes.
S. Active fill diversions.
9. Permanent diversions.
10. Perimeter berms or swales.
11. Right -of -way diversions.
12. Stormwater channels.
13. Slope drains
14. outlet protection.
15. Level spreader.
16. Riprap.
17. Streambank stabilization.
18. Grade control structures.
• 19. Vegetation protection.
20. Vegetation establishments.
21. Mulches.
22. Temporary sediment traps.
23. Temporary sediment basins.
24. Permanent debris basins.
25. Topsoiling.
26. Dust control.
27. Stockpile stabilization.
62. Deleted.
63. Where possible, drainage systems
should be designed to divert runoff
around areas where significant
amounts of urban pollutants
accumulate (e.g., parking lots).
64. Consideration should be given to
the construction of an overpass
style creek crossing in order to
minimize impact on the value of the
creek as a wildlife corridor.
65. As much existing vegetation as
• possible should be left in place
during construction of the
University Drive Extension.
-39—
0
COMNUSSIONERS
66. Earth - moving equipment should be
confined to the narrowest possible
corridor during construction. Care
should be taken to avoid depositing
waste dirt or rubble in the
creekbed or on the creek banks.
67. Revegetation of the road banks
should be accomplished with
drought - tolerant native plant
species which are compatible with
riparian habitats, such as coyote
bush (Baccharis pilularis).
68. Per Section 1603 of the Fish and
Game code, the applicant must
notify the Department of Fish and
Game of changes affecting the
Bonita Creek. This notification
(with fee) and the subsequent
agreement must be completed prior
to the initiation of any changes
and preferably before completion of
project design features.
69. A qualified archaeologist shall be
present during pregrade meetings to
inform the developer and grading
contractor of the results of any
archaeological surveys and studies
completed. In addition, an
archaeologist shall be present
during grading activities to
inspect the underlying soil for
cultural resources. If significant
cultural resources are uncovered,
the archaeologist shall have the
authority to stop or temporarily
divert construction activities for
a period of 48 hours to assess the
significance of the finds.
70. In the event that significant
archaeological remains are
uncovered during excavation and /or
grading, all work shall stop in
that area of the subject property
until an appropriate data.recovery
program can be developed and
-40—
MINUTES
X F
February /, 198b
n
F
x v
m
9
r v
c z
W 9
0
z;
v i
o
T
o
m
City
of
Newport
Beach
z
66. Earth - moving equipment should be
confined to the narrowest possible
corridor during construction. Care
should be taken to avoid depositing
waste dirt or rubble in the
creekbed or on the creek banks.
67. Revegetation of the road banks
should be accomplished with
drought - tolerant native plant
species which are compatible with
riparian habitats, such as coyote
bush (Baccharis pilularis).
68. Per Section 1603 of the Fish and
Game code, the applicant must
notify the Department of Fish and
Game of changes affecting the
Bonita Creek. This notification
(with fee) and the subsequent
agreement must be completed prior
to the initiation of any changes
and preferably before completion of
project design features.
69. A qualified archaeologist shall be
present during pregrade meetings to
inform the developer and grading
contractor of the results of any
archaeological surveys and studies
completed. In addition, an
archaeologist shall be present
during grading activities to
inspect the underlying soil for
cultural resources. If significant
cultural resources are uncovered,
the archaeologist shall have the
authority to stop or temporarily
divert construction activities for
a period of 48 hours to assess the
significance of the finds.
70. In the event that significant
archaeological remains are
uncovered during excavation and /or
grading, all work shall stop in
that area of the subject property
until an appropriate data.recovery
program can be developed and
-40—
MINUTES
0
•
COMMISSIONERS
implemented. The cost of such a
program shall be the responsibility
of the landowner and /or developer.
71. A paleontological monitor shall be
retained by the landowner and /or
developer to attend pregrade
meetings and perform inspections
during development. The
paleontologist shall be allowed to
divert, direct, or halt grading in
a specific area to allow for
salvage of exposed fossil
materials.
72. Prior to issuance of any grading
permits, the applicant shall waive
the provisions of AB 952 related to
City of Newport Beach
responsibilities for the mitigation
of archaeological impacts, in a
manner acceptable to the City
Attorney.
73. The commercial and park sites
should be designed to minimize
light and glare spillage on
adjacent properties.
74. The landscape plan shall be subject
to review by the Parks, Beaches,
and Recreation Department, Planning
Department, and Public Works
Department.
75. Signage and exterior lighting shall
be approved by the Planning
Department.
76. All mechanical equipment, vents,
and other service equipment in the
commercial area should be shielded
or screened from view by
architectural features.
77. The project applicant shall
construct the noise barriers
required to meet the city standards
for indoor and private outdoor
residential areas. Noise barriers
-41-
MINUTES
INDEX
X x
February 7, 1985
C o
x
_
a y
m
c a
9=
w
o r
o
T
o
m
City
of
Newport Beach
a a
implemented. The cost of such a
program shall be the responsibility
of the landowner and /or developer.
71. A paleontological monitor shall be
retained by the landowner and /or
developer to attend pregrade
meetings and perform inspections
during development. The
paleontologist shall be allowed to
divert, direct, or halt grading in
a specific area to allow for
salvage of exposed fossil
materials.
72. Prior to issuance of any grading
permits, the applicant shall waive
the provisions of AB 952 related to
City of Newport Beach
responsibilities for the mitigation
of archaeological impacts, in a
manner acceptable to the City
Attorney.
73. The commercial and park sites
should be designed to minimize
light and glare spillage on
adjacent properties.
74. The landscape plan shall be subject
to review by the Parks, Beaches,
and Recreation Department, Planning
Department, and Public Works
Department.
75. Signage and exterior lighting shall
be approved by the Planning
Department.
76. All mechanical equipment, vents,
and other service equipment in the
commercial area should be shielded
or screened from view by
architectural features.
77. The project applicant shall
construct the noise barriers
required to meet the city standards
for indoor and private outdoor
residential areas. Noise barriers
-41-
MINUTES
INDEX
COWAISSIONERS
l/
u
February 7, 1985
Beach
constructed along Jamboree Road and
University Drive South shall be
set back from the property a
minimum of four (4) feet, to allow
for a landscape area between the
noise barrier and the right -of -way
line.
78. Prior to approval of final site
plans or building permits, a more
detailed noise barrier analysis
based on the final freeway
alignment (if known) and final pad
and roadway elevations will be
conducted by a licensed noise
engineer. Noise barrier locations
and wall heights shall be as
specified by this study and are
subject to final review and
approval of the Planning and Public
Works Departments. Due to the fact
that the final alignment and
traffic volumes for the San Joaquin
Hills Corridor are not known at
this time, it is recommended that
further analysis of the onsite
noise impacts from traffic on this
freeway be evaluated at such time
as this information is known.
79. Adequate traffic control should be
maintained during construction.
80. School bus access should be
considered in the design of the
local (private) streets and should
incorporate bus turn -outs where
needed.
81. Bus shelters and passenger waiting
areas should be provided concurrent
with development.
82. If the park site is not developed
prior to occupancy of the first
residential unit, a mechanism shall
be established to inform all first
and subsequent occupants and owners
-42
MINUTES
INDEX
F x
r 9
z c
m
Z m
z z
W D
C 8
9
N
Z r
O;
A
O
2
o'
}` '
zz
maim
�' `Y
of
z
� z
l/
u
February 7, 1985
Beach
constructed along Jamboree Road and
University Drive South shall be
set back from the property a
minimum of four (4) feet, to allow
for a landscape area between the
noise barrier and the right -of -way
line.
78. Prior to approval of final site
plans or building permits, a more
detailed noise barrier analysis
based on the final freeway
alignment (if known) and final pad
and roadway elevations will be
conducted by a licensed noise
engineer. Noise barrier locations
and wall heights shall be as
specified by this study and are
subject to final review and
approval of the Planning and Public
Works Departments. Due to the fact
that the final alignment and
traffic volumes for the San Joaquin
Hills Corridor are not known at
this time, it is recommended that
further analysis of the onsite
noise impacts from traffic on this
freeway be evaluated at such time
as this information is known.
79. Adequate traffic control should be
maintained during construction.
80. School bus access should be
considered in the design of the
local (private) streets and should
incorporate bus turn -outs where
needed.
81. Bus shelters and passenger waiting
areas should be provided concurrent
with development.
82. If the park site is not developed
prior to occupancy of the first
residential unit, a mechanism shall
be established to inform all first
and subsequent occupants and owners
-42
MINUTES
INDEX
Motion
Ayes
Absent
•
•
COMMISSIONERS
X
of the community park location and
the intent to provide active
recreation facilitites with night
lighted fields.
83. That the median landscaping of
streets "A" and "B "be maintained by
the adjoining homeowners
associations if the Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Director determines
that his department cannot provide
the maintenance.
Vs. l
Motion was made to approve Tentative Map of Tract No.
12306, subject to the findings and conditions in
Exhibit "A ". MOTION CARRIED.
A. Environmental Document
Approve the draft Environmental Impact Report for the
North Ford project and supportive materials; recommend
that the City Council certify the Environmental
Document is complete and make the Findings listed
below:
FINDINGS:
1. That the environmental document has
been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) , the State EIR
Guidelines and City Policy.
2. That the contents of this
environmental document have been
considered in the various decisions
on the project.
3. That in order to reduce adverse
impacts of the proposed project,
all feasible mitigation measures
discussed in the environmental
document have been incorporated
into the proposed project.
-43-
MINUTES
INDEX
x x
"-
February
7, 1985
c o
x
_
v
9 v
m
C
C 2
9
N
=
0 3
=
o
T
0
r
City
of
Newport
Beach
;
X
of the community park location and
the intent to provide active
recreation facilitites with night
lighted fields.
83. That the median landscaping of
streets "A" and "B "be maintained by
the adjoining homeowners
associations if the Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Director determines
that his department cannot provide
the maintenance.
Vs. l
Motion was made to approve Tentative Map of Tract No.
12306, subject to the findings and conditions in
Exhibit "A ". MOTION CARRIED.
A. Environmental Document
Approve the draft Environmental Impact Report for the
North Ford project and supportive materials; recommend
that the City Council certify the Environmental
Document is complete and make the Findings listed
below:
FINDINGS:
1. That the environmental document has
been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) , the State EIR
Guidelines and City Policy.
2. That the contents of this
environmental document have been
considered in the various decisions
on the project.
3. That in order to reduce adverse
impacts of the proposed project,
all feasible mitigation measures
discussed in the environmental
document have been incorporated
into the proposed project.
-43-
MINUTES
INDEX
•
0
February 7, 1985
t Beach
B. Tentative Map of Tract No. 12306
Recommend that the City Council approve the Tentative
Map of Tract No. 12306 subject to the following
Findings and Conditions of Approval:
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements
of Title 19 of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code, all ordinances of
the City, all applicable general or
specific plans.
2. That the Planning Commission is
satisfied with the plan of the
subdivision.
3. That the proposed subdivision
presents no problems from a
planning standpoint.
4. That the site is physically
suitable for the proposed density
of development.
5. That the design of the subdivision
or the proposed improvements are
not likely to cause serious public
health problems.
6. That the design of the subdivision
or the proposed improvements will
not conflict with any easements,
acquired by the public at large,
for access through or use of,
property within the proposed
subdivision.
7. That the discharge of waste from
the proposed subdivision into an
existing community sewer system
will not result in violation of
existing requirements prescribed by
the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board pursuant to
Division 7 of the Water Code.
-44—
MINUTES
X
a
v
x
a
9
m
C
z c
m
o m
z
W a
C S
9
N
z
0 X 3
D
0
2
01
�'t` I
z s
z
m
of
Y
z
z
r
m
February 7, 1985
t Beach
B. Tentative Map of Tract No. 12306
Recommend that the City Council approve the Tentative
Map of Tract No. 12306 subject to the following
Findings and Conditions of Approval:
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements
of Title 19 of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code, all ordinances of
the City, all applicable general or
specific plans.
2. That the Planning Commission is
satisfied with the plan of the
subdivision.
3. That the proposed subdivision
presents no problems from a
planning standpoint.
4. That the site is physically
suitable for the proposed density
of development.
5. That the design of the subdivision
or the proposed improvements are
not likely to cause serious public
health problems.
6. That the design of the subdivision
or the proposed improvements will
not conflict with any easements,
acquired by the public at large,
for access through or use of,
property within the proposed
subdivision.
7. That the discharge of waste from
the proposed subdivision into an
existing community sewer system
will not result in violation of
existing requirements prescribed by
the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board pursuant to
Division 7 of the Water Code.
-44—
MINUTES
Ion
Ayes
Absent
COMMISSIONERS
X
February 7, 1985
Beach
8. That the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the Newport Beach
General Plan, and the policies
contained therein.
CONDITIONS:
1. That all the conditions of the
North Ford Development.Agreement be
fulfilled.
2. That all conditions of approval of
Tentative Map of Tract No. 12309 be
fulfilled.
3. Slope lots "D" and "E" shall be
landscaped by the applicant and
maintained. by the homeowners asso-
ciation.
Motion was made to approve Tentative Map of Tract No.
12271 subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit
"A ". MOTION CARRIED.
A. Environmental Document
Approve the draft Environmental Impact Report for the
North Ford project and supportive materials; recommend
that the City Council certify the Environmental
Document is complete and make the Findings listed
below:
FINDINGS:
1. That the environmental document has
been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the State EIR
Guidelines and City Policy.
2. That the contents of this
environmental document have been
considered in the various decisions
on the project..
3. That in order to .reduce adverse
impacts of the proposed ,.project,
all feasible mitigation measures
-45
MINUTES
X 7
c o
r o
z c
m
Z m
z
m S
`ZN
M m
a
O
z r
° ;°
L1
2
°City
x a
=
m a
a z
r
m
m
m
of
X
February 7, 1985
Beach
8. That the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the Newport Beach
General Plan, and the policies
contained therein.
CONDITIONS:
1. That all the conditions of the
North Ford Development.Agreement be
fulfilled.
2. That all conditions of approval of
Tentative Map of Tract No. 12309 be
fulfilled.
3. Slope lots "D" and "E" shall be
landscaped by the applicant and
maintained. by the homeowners asso-
ciation.
Motion was made to approve Tentative Map of Tract No.
12271 subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit
"A ". MOTION CARRIED.
A. Environmental Document
Approve the draft Environmental Impact Report for the
North Ford project and supportive materials; recommend
that the City Council certify the Environmental
Document is complete and make the Findings listed
below:
FINDINGS:
1. That the environmental document has
been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the State EIR
Guidelines and City Policy.
2. That the contents of this
environmental document have been
considered in the various decisions
on the project..
3. That in order to .reduce adverse
impacts of the proposed ,.project,
all feasible mitigation measures
-45
MINUTES
0
discussed in the environmental
document have been incorporated
into the proposed project.
B. Tentative Map of Tract No. 12271
Recommend that the City Council approve the Tentative
Map of Tract No. 12271 subject to the following
Findings and Conditions of Approval:
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements
of Title 19 of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code, all ordinances of
the City, all applicable general or
specific plans, with the exception
that the subdivision creates lots
which are less than 50 feet wide
and less than 5000 square feet in
area, and corner lots which are
less than 60 feet wide and less
than 6000 square feet in area.
2. That the Planning Commission is
satisfied with the plan of the
subdivision.
3. That the proposed subdivision
presents no problems from a
planning standpoint.
4. That the site is physically
suitable for the proposed density
of development.
5. That the design of the subdivision
or the proposed improvements are
not likely to cause serious public
health problems.
6. That the design of the subdivision
or the proposed improvements will
not conflict with any easements,
acquired by the public at large,
for access through or use of,
property within the proposed
subdivision.
-46—
MINUTES
INDEX
x x
m
February
7, 1985
C o
x
_
v
a
m
a
c z
9
w
o z
a
o
o
City
of
Newport
Beach
z
discussed in the environmental
document have been incorporated
into the proposed project.
B. Tentative Map of Tract No. 12271
Recommend that the City Council approve the Tentative
Map of Tract No. 12271 subject to the following
Findings and Conditions of Approval:
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements
of Title 19 of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code, all ordinances of
the City, all applicable general or
specific plans, with the exception
that the subdivision creates lots
which are less than 50 feet wide
and less than 5000 square feet in
area, and corner lots which are
less than 60 feet wide and less
than 6000 square feet in area.
2. That the Planning Commission is
satisfied with the plan of the
subdivision.
3. That the proposed subdivision
presents no problems from a
planning standpoint.
4. That the site is physically
suitable for the proposed density
of development.
5. That the design of the subdivision
or the proposed improvements are
not likely to cause serious public
health problems.
6. That the design of the subdivision
or the proposed improvements will
not conflict with any easements,
acquired by the public at large,
for access through or use of,
property within the proposed
subdivision.
-46—
MINUTES
INDEX
0
•
COMMISSIONERS
February 7, 1985
7. That the discharge of waste from
the proposed subdivision into an
existing community sewer system
will not result in violation of
existing requirements prescribed by
the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board pursuant to
Division 7 of the Water Code.
8. That the proposed subdivision is
consistent with the Newport Beach
General Plan, and the policies
contained therein.
CONDITIONS:
1. That all the conditions of the
North Ford Development Agreement be
fulfilled.
2. That all conditions of approval of
Tentative Map of Tract No. 12309 be
fulfilled.
3. Slope lots "A ", "B ", "C ", "D", "E",
and "G" shall be landscaped by the
applicant and maintained by the
homeowners association.
4. That all residential lots have a
minimum average width of 35 feet.
5. That a minimum 30% of units be
designed with shared driveway
access.
General Plan Amendment 85 -1 (Discussion)
Consideration of initiation of amendments to The Land
Use, Recreation and Open Space, Circulation and Noise
Elements of The Newport Beach General Plan for the site
located at 3901 East Coast Highway,(Laredos Restaurant
property, formerly A.T. Leos): and for The Newport
Center, Bayview Landing, Newporter North and Big Canyon
sites.
-47—
MINUTES
INDEX
Item #10
GPA 85 -1
Initiated
F F
c o
�
x
_ 1
y
9
m
z c
m
D m
z
m a
C z
s
z r
O i
•
•
The discussion regarding Laredos Restaurant property
opened at this time, and Mr. Al Mayo, 11572 Vista Mar,
Santa Ana, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr.
Mayo stated that he is recommending that the 14 lots of
the stated property be converted into 1 lot, and that
within the 14 lots that the zoning be consistent
instead of zoning for both commercial and residential.
In response to Commissioner Turner, Mr. Mayo stated
that there has not been a definite plan regarding the
utilization of the area, that the building will be
changed, and that the City is assisting the applicant
in developing a commercial use proposal.
Planning Director James Hewicker advised that the
discussion that the Planning Department has had with
the applicant has been centered around three different
uses: a new restaurant; a hotel or inn; or an
ambulatory adult care facility . Mr. Hewicker advised
that these recommendations fit under the land use
classification in the Corona del Mar area.
Mr. Hewicker explained that the zoning and general plan
of the property commenced at the time when the property
was under different ownerships, citing that there have
been use permits for the restaurant, and the parking
lot of the restaurant has been located on the R -1
portion of the property.
Mr. Hewicker stated that before the General Plan can be
initiated, the applicant will need to make a decision
regarding a project they will want to propose for the
property, and to submit a project description in order
to enable an environmental determination.
Mr. Mayo advised that he is more concerned with the
zoning than the land use designation of the property.
Mr. Hewicker stated that in order to process the
project the steps involved are the General Plan
Amendment; the LCP Amendment; establishment of zoning
and any other discretionary actions required to enable
use of the property.
Mr. Ted Kenay, Laguna Beach, appeared before the
Planning Commission as a real estate agent, stating
that he has a client that is interested in building a
restaurant on the site, and that they are awaiting a
zoning decision.
-48—
MINUTES
INDEX
February
7, 1985
C o
x
.
C
M
m
a z
N,
i
0
0
T
City
of
Newport
Beach
z
a
The discussion regarding Laredos Restaurant property
opened at this time, and Mr. Al Mayo, 11572 Vista Mar,
Santa Ana, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr.
Mayo stated that he is recommending that the 14 lots of
the stated property be converted into 1 lot, and that
within the 14 lots that the zoning be consistent
instead of zoning for both commercial and residential.
In response to Commissioner Turner, Mr. Mayo stated
that there has not been a definite plan regarding the
utilization of the area, that the building will be
changed, and that the City is assisting the applicant
in developing a commercial use proposal.
Planning Director James Hewicker advised that the
discussion that the Planning Department has had with
the applicant has been centered around three different
uses: a new restaurant; a hotel or inn; or an
ambulatory adult care facility . Mr. Hewicker advised
that these recommendations fit under the land use
classification in the Corona del Mar area.
Mr. Hewicker explained that the zoning and general plan
of the property commenced at the time when the property
was under different ownerships, citing that there have
been use permits for the restaurant, and the parking
lot of the restaurant has been located on the R -1
portion of the property.
Mr. Hewicker stated that before the General Plan can be
initiated, the applicant will need to make a decision
regarding a project they will want to propose for the
property, and to submit a project description in order
to enable an environmental determination.
Mr. Mayo advised that he is more concerned with the
zoning than the land use designation of the property.
Mr. Hewicker stated that in order to process the
project the steps involved are the General Plan
Amendment; the LCP Amendment; establishment of zoning
and any other discretionary actions required to enable
use of the property.
Mr. Ted Kenay, Laguna Beach, appeared before the
Planning Commission as a real estate agent, stating
that he has a client that is interested in building a
restaurant on the site, and that they are awaiting a
zoning decision.
-48—
MINUTES
INDEX
Motion
Ayes
Absent
0
•
Ix
x
Commissioner Person made a motion to recommend to the
City Council to initiate General Plan Amendment 85 -1,
3901 East Coast Highway. MOTION CARRIED.
Chairman Winburn stated that discussion will commence
regarding the Newport Center portion of General Plan
Amendment 85 -1.
Chairman Winburn advised that she is concerned about
the residential portion of the Newport Center proposal,
since the residential uses are proposed to be moved out
of Newport Center to other areas, and that she is
supportive of the Newport Center residential idea. Ms.
Patricia Temple informed Chairman Winburn that the
residential reductions in Newport Center would not
affect the proposed Brisa del Mar project.
Mr. Robert Burnham, City Attorney, advised that if the
City Council and the Planning Commission do not
initiate the General Plan Amendment, the Fifth Avenue
parcels GPA's will then be considered individually. If
the General Plan Amendment is initiated other projects
that are under environmental review may have to be
considered for purposes of determining cumulative
impacts in the area. It may be possible that the Fifth
Avenue Environmental Impact Reports (EIR) will have to
be revised.
Commissioner Person stated that he will reluctantly
support the General Plan Amendment; however, at the
present time he does not fully support the build -out of
the Newport Center area after comparing the numbers
that were proposed in General Plan Amendment 80 -3.
Commissioner Person cited that the reason he will
support General Plan Amendment No. 85 -1 is because the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will reflect the
proposed Newport Center area as well as the proposed
Fifth Avenue project and surrounding development.
Mr. Hewicker advised the Planning Commission that there
is a possibility that in order to have the details and
information available that will make all interested
parties comfortable, that the initiation of the General
Plan could delay a decision on Fifth Avenue.
Commissioner Turner stated that because The Irvine
Company is the applicant for Newport Center and Fifth
Avenue, that the applicant would consider the revised
EIR and the ramifications involved.
-49—
MINUTES
INDEX
x x
February 7, 1985
C o
x
y
m
z c
m
s m
z
c z
W
p a
O
O
T
City
of
Newport
Beach
T
z
m
Ix
x
Commissioner Person made a motion to recommend to the
City Council to initiate General Plan Amendment 85 -1,
3901 East Coast Highway. MOTION CARRIED.
Chairman Winburn stated that discussion will commence
regarding the Newport Center portion of General Plan
Amendment 85 -1.
Chairman Winburn advised that she is concerned about
the residential portion of the Newport Center proposal,
since the residential uses are proposed to be moved out
of Newport Center to other areas, and that she is
supportive of the Newport Center residential idea. Ms.
Patricia Temple informed Chairman Winburn that the
residential reductions in Newport Center would not
affect the proposed Brisa del Mar project.
Mr. Robert Burnham, City Attorney, advised that if the
City Council and the Planning Commission do not
initiate the General Plan Amendment, the Fifth Avenue
parcels GPA's will then be considered individually. If
the General Plan Amendment is initiated other projects
that are under environmental review may have to be
considered for purposes of determining cumulative
impacts in the area. It may be possible that the Fifth
Avenue Environmental Impact Reports (EIR) will have to
be revised.
Commissioner Person stated that he will reluctantly
support the General Plan Amendment; however, at the
present time he does not fully support the build -out of
the Newport Center area after comparing the numbers
that were proposed in General Plan Amendment 80 -3.
Commissioner Person cited that the reason he will
support General Plan Amendment No. 85 -1 is because the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will reflect the
proposed Newport Center area as well as the proposed
Fifth Avenue project and surrounding development.
Mr. Hewicker advised the Planning Commission that there
is a possibility that in order to have the details and
information available that will make all interested
parties comfortable, that the initiation of the General
Plan could delay a decision on Fifth Avenue.
Commissioner Turner stated that because The Irvine
Company is the applicant for Newport Center and Fifth
Avenue, that the applicant would consider the revised
EIR and the ramifications involved.
-49—
MINUTES
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
x x
0
Iz
a
i
c m>
r v
m
m
z
2 r GI
2
c 0
°m
'
s a
0
z s z
a z M
m
Motion
Ayes
Absent
Motion
Ayes
Absent
•
February 7, 1985
of Newport Beach
Mr. Burnham cited that he has not arrived at a firm
conclusion as to what additional information, if any,
that the staff and the City would have to provide for
the Fifth Avenue project, and that this information
will be available to the Planning Commission at the
February 21, 1985, Planning Commission meeting.
Commissioner Turner made a motion to initiate the
General Plan Amendment 85 -1.
Commissioner Goff advised that he will reluctantly
support the motion on the basis that by initiating the
General Plan Amendment that the EIR will reflect the
Fifth Avenue project.
Chairman Winburn advised that she will support the
motion for several reasons: that by bringing a plan to
build -out Newport Center to the City there would be an
opportunity to put the roads in place as proposed in
GPA 80 -3; that the 278 units in Newporter North are
presently delayed because of archeological studies in
the area and that she would like them returned to the
Newport Center area in the affordable class; that The
Irvine Company would be prepared to go into extensive
study if the Company finds that Newport Center office
requirements would require the build -out of Pelican
Hills Road. Chairman Winburn stated that she is
requesting an in -depth cost revenue analyses and an
alternate study done for the residential area in
Newport Center.
Motion voted on, MOTION CARRIED.
x
A D D I T I O N A L B U S I N E S S:
The Commission voted to call up Modification No. 3017
for review, and set the public hearing for the Planning
Commission meeting of February 21, 1985.
Commissioner Person was excused from the February 21,
1985, Planning Commission meeting.. MOTION CARRIED.
A D J O U R N M E N T: 9:50 P.M.
JOHN C. KURLANDER, SECRETARY
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
-50 -
MINUTES
Business
Adjourn-
ment