Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03/24/1983MMISSIONERS REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING PLACE: City Council Chambers TIME: 7:30 p.m. m DATE: March 24, 1983 m w. City of ' Newport Beach -m MINUTES M ROLL CALL I I I I Jill i INDEX 0 XIX IX IX IX I All Present. * * r EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT: James D. Hewicker, Planning Director Robert Burnham, City Attorney STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: William R. Laycock, Current Planning Administrator Donald Webb, City Engineer Pamela Woods, Secretary Amendment No. 585 (Continued Public Hearing) Items No. 1 thru 4 Request to consider an amendment to a portion of Districting Map No. 3 so as to reclassify property from the Unclassified District to the R -2 District. In addition, the applicant proposes to establish 10 foot front yard setbacks on said Districting Map for lot frontages adjacent to 32nd Street (extended) and 33rd All Street and a 9 foot front yard setback on 31st Street. Continued The proposal also includes the acceptance of an to April Environmental Impact Report and the approval of a 21, 1983 Coastal Residential Development Permit. AND Traffic Study (Continued Public Hearing) Request to consider a Traffic Study in conjunction, with the.construction of nineteen residential units. MINUTES March 24, 1983 m � m X w. City of Newport Beach C S 6 p -m WZEI Use Permit No. 3022 (Continued Public Hearing) Request to permit the construction of nine individual two -unit residential condominium projects and related garages, on property proposed for rezoning to the R -2 District. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow minor building encroachments into the required front and side yard setback areas. 11 Tentative Map of Tract No. 11906 (Continued Public Hearing) Request to subdivide 1.65 acres of land into nine lots for residential condominium development, one lot for • residential duplex development and one lot for single family residential development. The application also includes a request for exceptions to the Subdivision Code so as to allow the creation of corner lots containing less than 60 foot widths and less than 6,000 square feet in land area, and interior lots containing less than 50 foot widths and less than 5,000 square feet in land area. The proposal also includes a request to establish grades for the purpose of measuring heights of proposed buildings. The request also includes the extension of Seashore Drive from 33rd Street to Balboa Boulevard and the extension of two existing alleys. LOCATION: Portions of Blocks 31.and 32 of.the Lake Tract, located at 120 32nd Street, on the southwesterly side of west Balboa Boulevard between 31st Street and 33rd Street, in West Newport. ZONE: APPLICANT: I I I l I I ENGINEER: Unclassified Max Morgan, Newport Beach Same as applicant Donald E. Stevens, Costa Mesa -2- INDEX Motion All Ayes U U � r c m � m v m T A m D F, MINUTES March 24, 1983 of Newport Beach INDEX Staff stated that the ,applicant for these items has requested a continuance to the Planning Commission meeting of April 21, 1983, in order for the Citizens Environmental Quality Advisory Committee to complete its review and comment and response for this project. Motion was made to continue these items to the Planning Commission Meeting of April 21, 1983, which MOTION CARRIED. x Zoning Amendment No. 587 (CalTrans West) , Item #.5 Request to amend a portion of Districting Map No. 46 from O- S.(Open Space) to P -C (Planned Community). LOCATION: Northwesterly corner of West Coast Highway and Superior Avenue (as AMENDMENT realigned). NO. 587 GENERAL PLAN: Recreation and Environmental Open Space ZONE: O -S (Open Space) OWNER: State of California, Department of _ Transportation - APPROVED INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach - Planning Director Hewicker presented background information on this item. He stated that adoption of a Planned Community District at this time would be an initial step towards implementing proposed General Plan policies and would clarify constraints on site development which could affect. potential owners and developers. He stated that adoption of a Plan_ ned Community District also allows the City to comply with State laws relating to general planning and actual zoning of property for certain housing types. -3- m � m v m X G) D .m� m March 24, 1983 of Newport Beach MINUTES 0 ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I I INDEX Planning Director Hewicker referred to the Municipal Code, Section 20.51.020 F, relating to Planned Community District regulations, which requires that an unimproved parcel of land have a minimum .size of 25 acres. He suggested that inasmuch as this particular parcel contains less than 25 acres, it would be necessary for the Planning Commission to waive the 25 acre limitation. Planning Director Hewicker then referred to various other sections of the Municipal Code, relating to Planned Community District regulations, and suggested that the map, as furnished, be altered to exclude the residual parcel after the realignment of Superior Avenue. Planning Director Hewicker referred to Page 5 of the staff report, the Statistical Analysis section, and • stated that the figure of 13 gross acres. should be utilized, rather than 17 gross acres. Planning Director Hewicker then referred to Page 7 of the staff report, the General Notes section, and stated that Item No. 11 should be deleted. Planning Director Hewicker stated that the attorney for the CalTrans parcel could not be in attendance for tonight's meeting. However, he stated that the attorney had submitted two copies of an agreement to be executed by the City which .would allow the City the right of entry on the subject property for the realignment construction of Superior Avenue. In response to a question posed by Chairman King, Planning Director Hewicker stated that the agreement which allows for the right of entry was outlined in the Resolution adopted by the Planning Commission. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Goff, Planning Director Hewicker stated that Item No. 11 is being deleted because the right of entry agreement has been provided under the General Plan Amendment, rather than the zone change amendment. • II II II II -4- - 3 F � c 3 C m m D xG)m- MINUTES March 24, 1983 of Newport Beach The public hearing opened in connection with this item and Mr. Robert Beaman, resident of Newport Crest, appeared before the Commission. Mr. Beaman expressed his concerns with the control of growth for the area. He referred to the staff report, Resolution No.. 1088, Item No. 4 of CalTrans West, and asked if the four foot line -of -sight is to be preserved from the lowest balconies in Newport Crest.. He stated that there is an extreme differential in height from one end of the Newport Crest development to the other. Planning Director Hewicker stated that the four foot line -of -sight will be preserved from each of the balconies in the Newport Crest development. INDEX Motion X Motion was made to waive the 25 acre limitation, as Ayes X X X. X X X X suggested by staff, which MOTION CARRIED. - Motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 1091,' Motion RESOLUTION - recommending approval. of Amendment No. 587 to the City All Ayes X X X X X N0. 1091 Council, waiving the 25 acre limitation; correcting the gross acreage to 13 gross acres in the Statistical Analysis; and, deleting Item No. 11 from the General Notes section, which MOTION CARRIED. ,t x • IIIIIIII -5- MINUTES March 24, 1983 f 3 m m City of Newport Beach Request to amend portions of Districting Maps No. 22 and 25 from the Unclassified /MHP. District to the Unclassified (2178)/MHP District (i.e. the Seacliffe and Newport Terrace Mobile Home Park sites) , and the remaining residentially designated areas from the Unclassified District to the R -3 (2178) District; and the acceptance of an environmental document. LOCATION: Lots No. 815, 816, 915 through 919, and portions of Lots No. 817, 818, and 819, First Addition to the Newport Mesa'Tract on property located northwesterly of Superior Avenue between Monrovia Avenue and Placentia Avenue in the former County Triangle.. INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach . Planning Director Hewicker presented background information on this item. He referred to Page 5 of the staff report and stated that on three of the parcels within the Triangle, Parcels No. 16, 22 and 29, the existing intensity is higher than that which would be permitted under the proposed zoning. The public hearing opened in connection with this item and Mr. Jack Walley, resident of Newport Terrace Mobile Home Park, appeared before the Commission. Mr. Walley requested clarification on the proposed request and asked what affect the addition of (2178) will have upon the Mobile Home Park District. Planning Director Hewicker stated that the (2178) indicates to the property owner or the developer of the property, that if the property were to be redeveloped for residential use, one dwelling unit for 'each 2,178 square feet of land area would be allowed. He stated that this would amount to the maximum density of 20 units per buildable acre. He further stated that the Unclassified and Mobile Home Park overlay designation would still exist on the property. -6- INDEX Item #6 AMENDMENT NO. 588 APPROVED • IIIIIIII � r � m m c m > >c G) 91 n A s a a m- .m� m MINUTES March 24, 1983 itv of Newport Beach INDEX Mr. Chris Hansen, resident of 22 Encore Court, appeared before the Commission.. Mr. Hansen expressed his concern with the density increase. Planning Director Hewicker explained the annexation background of this area. He stated that prior to annexation in 1980, the County would have permitted a development intensity of 24 dwelling units per acre. He stated that prior to annexation, the City was required to amend its General Plan and the density of 20 dwelling units was selected based upon the following considerations: it was very close to the intensity of development which was permitted under the County; it was acceptable to the owners of the land within the County Triangle; and, the density figure had been identified by the City in previous studies as being a density where it could be expected to provide housing for persons of low and moderate income. Ms. June Mickelwait, resident of 1425 Superior Avenue, • designated as Parcel No. 26 on the Land Use Inventory Exhibit, appeared before the Commission. Ms. Mickelwait stated that her property is one of the last single family residences located on' Superior Avenue. She stated that before the annexation her property was zoned for residential or medical uses. Planning Director Hewicker 'stated that the proposed amendment would place an R -3 classification upon Parcel No. 26 which would allow one dwelling unit for each 2,178 square feet. He stated that under this limitation, a maximum of 5 dwelling units could be allowed to be built upon the.property. Ms. Mickelwait stated that she is considering an offer for a small medical equipment building to be built upon her property, which would generate a minimal amount'of parking and traffic. She stated that the - proposed building would consist of a medical equipment warehouse to be leased to Hoag Hospital. Planning Director Hewicker stated that the General Plan classifications which exist on the property are the same zoning classifications which existed on the property prior to when it was annexed to the City in 1980. He explained the procedures which Ms. Mickelwait • would have to follow in order to amend the General Plan for consideration of a medical equipment building on the site. -7- MINUTES March 24, 1983 n x w. City of Newport Beach INDEX Planning Director Hewicker stated that medical type uses normally generate more traffic per unit than residential uses. He stated that the increase in traffic generation would certainly be considered and influence the decision of the Planning Commission. He further stated that changing the General Plan designation for one parcel on Superior Avenue, may ultimately affect other parcels with similar requests on Superior Avenue. Chairman King suggested that Ms. Mickelwait write a letter to the Planning Department defining her proposal so that the staff can respond to the request. Commissioner Goff asked how approval of the proposed amendment will affect Ms. Mickelwait's property. Planning Director Hewicker stated that under the current Unclassified zoning, a use permit or a zone change request would be necessary to develop the • property for anything other than maintaining the existing single family dwelling. He stated that by rezoning the property to the R -3 (2178) District, Ms. Mickelwait would automatically be allowed to develop up to 5 dwelling units. He stated that if something other than a residential use, such as a retail or industrial use, would be proposed for the property, an amendment to the General Plan would be necessary. Motion I IXI I I I I I Motion was made for approval of Amendment No. 588, subject to the environmental.findings. Commissioner Goff stated that the staff report alludes to the concept that affordable housing incentives can be produced as a result of allowing 20 units per buildable acre, but asked how affordable housing, can be assured by allowing 20 dwelling units per buildable acre. Planning Director Hewicker stated that affordable housing would not be guaranteed. However, he stated that the proposed zoning would permit rental' type units as opposed to condominium units. He stated that approval of a condominium project would require - . further discretionary review by the City, at which time the City could act accordingly. Q=om � r c m � m Jc m x c> m a J J m m T m J MINUTES March 24, 1983 of Newport Beach INDEX Commissioner Goff stated that the City is currently in the process of studying this area and asked how approval of the proposed amendment will affect the current density study. Planning Director Hewicker stated that the action which the City takes upon the proposed amendment will be an indication as to what the City feels at this time. However, he stated that there is nothing to preclude the City from initiating a change in the density at a later date. Commissioner Balalis referred to Ms. Mickelwait's earlier comments and stated that the City has an obligation to the residents of the area and a commitment to the County Board of Supervisors relating to the 1980 annexation of this area, to comply with the zoning. He stated that the proposed amendment basically provides the zoning to the General Plan Amendment which existed at the time the annexation occurred. • Commissioner Balalis further stated that Ms. Mickelwait's proposal for a medical equipment building would most likely not be approved, because it would constitute spot zoning. He stated that the City is obligated to follow the zoning based upon the General Plan at the time the area was annexed by the City. Commissioner Goff asked what the current rents are at the Beach House Apartments, which is a highly dense development in the area.. Planning Director Hewicker stated that he does not have the specific rent figures for the Beach House Apartments. Commissioner Winburn referred to the Newport Villa Apartment complex and stated that she was informed that a two bedroom unit is $500.00 per month,_ and a one bedroom unit is $425.00 per month. Commissioner Balalis stated that rents at the Beach House Apartments range from $425.00 to $700.00 per unit, per month. Commissioner Goff asked if these rents are considered affordable. Commissioners Balalis and Winburn stated that these rents are considered affordable. Commissioner Balalis stated that under the County standards for affordable, a two bedroom unit can go up to $850.00 per unit, per month. • -9- MINUTES March 24, 1983 m � m 3 ' m City of Newport Beach ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I I INDEX •.. Ayes Noes • Ix Planning Director Hewicker referred to Page 5 of the staff report, Parcel No. 15 - The Brookview Condominiums and stated that the existing use is 24 units, rather than 17 units. Commissioner Goff stated that he can not support the approval of the proposed amendment. He expressed his concern with the higher densities and impacts which could occur in the existing uses under the proposed amendment. Commissioner Allen concurred with the comments made previously by Commissioner Balalis and stated that when this property was annexed from the County, she had made a commitment for the zoning. She stated that it would not be fair to change her decision now. Commissioner Goff stated that his moral obligation is based upon good planning policy, not necessarily fulfilling obligations which the City may have made in the past to the property owners of the area. Commissioner McLaughlin's motion for approval of RESOLUTION Amendment No. 588, adopting Resolution No. 1092, No. 1092 subject to the following environmental findings, was now voted on, which MOTION CARRIED: FINDINGS: 1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and that their contents have been considered in the decisions on this project. 2. The project will not have any significant environmental impact. -10- m � m Q m x Q D ROLL E r 1 U MINUTES March 24, 1983 of Newport Beach Request to amend a previously approved use permit which allowed the establishment of a delicatessen- restaurant facility with on -sale beer and wine in the C -1 District so as to allow the expansion of the existing "net public area" and food preparation area, and the construction of a new storage area and related office space. The proposal also includes a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow the use of tandem parking spaces with valet service for a portion of the required off - street parking. The proposal also includes a modification to the Municipal Code so as to allow a portion of the required off- street parking spaces to encroach 4 feet, and a portion of a proposed landscape planter to encroach 10 feet, into the required 10 foot rear yard setback adjacent to an alley. LOCATION: Lot 1, Block B, Tract No. 470, a portion of Lot 10, Block 730, Corona del Mar Tract and a portion of an abandoned alley, located at 2407 East Coast Highway, on the southeasterly corner of East Coast Highway and Begonia Avenue in Corona del Mar. ZONE: C -1 APPLICANT: Helmut Reiss, Corona del Mar OWNER: Same as applicant In response to a question posed by .Commissioner Winburn, Planning Director Hewicker .stated that one handicapped parking space shall be required to be provided. The public hearing opened in connection with this item and Mr. Jack Weston, architect for the project and representing the applicant, appeared before the Commission. Mr. Weston stated that they concur with the handicapped parking requirement and requested approval of the amended use permit. -11- INDEX Item #7 USE PERMIT No. 1851 (AMENDED) Continued to April 21, 1983 COMMISSIONERS � F � r c m = m D — m � m ROLL CALL MINUTES March 24, 1983 of Newport Beach INDEX In response to a question posed by Commissioner McLaughlin, Mr. Weston explained the proposed parking layout and stated that the handicapped parking space will be located inside the parking area, adjacent to Begonia Avenue. Commissioner Winburn expressed her concern with the narrow width of the alley for the access to the self parking spaces. She suggested that the parking area located directly off of the alley could be utilized for employee parking and perhaps the self parking spaces could be located closer to Begonia Avenue for easier access. She also expressed her concerns relating to the monitoring of the self parking spaces and the valet parking use. Mr. Weston stated that the parking layout can be . adjusted to accommodate these concerns. He stated that the use of one valet can adequately handle the parking needs for the restaurant facility. Ms. Lyla Crespin, resident of 707 Begonia Avenue, and representing residents of 706 and 709 Begonia Avenue, appeared before the Commission. Ms. Crespin stated that the original conditions of the existing use permit have not been adhered to by the applicant. She requested that a decision on *the item be continued so that the neighbors in the area can express their concerns with the proposed expansion. She stated that these concerns relate to the increase in traffic, the off -site parking, and an increase in noise and exhaust pollution. Ms. Crespin referred to the data supplied in the staff report and stated that there are currently 6 to 8 employees for the restaurant, not 4 employees. She further stated that 14 vehicles park in the lot, whereas the staff report only indicates 10 parking spaces are currently provided. She also stated that the applicant has extended his hours of operation to 10:00 p.m., rather than 9:00 p.m. as required by the • originally approved use permit, and that the parking lot is no longer chained during non - business hours, as originally stipulated. -12- r m � m Jvm > A s>N n � m March 24, 1983 of Newport Beach MINUTES INDEX Ms. Crespin stated that the use of the 'valet parking service increases the number of vehicles to the area. She further stated that the trash is deposited into the dumpsters during the late evening hours and is picked up by the trash service during the early morning hours on the weekends. Planning Director Hewicker stated that this is the first request by the applicant for an amendment to the originally approved use permit. He stated that based upon the testimony given by Ms. Crespin, the existing use permit appears to be in violation in several areas. He stated that the Commission could consider an action to initiate a hearing for the revocation of the existing use permit. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Kurlander,'Ms. Crespin stated that she is requesting a • continuance in order to submit pictures of the use in question and to present further public testimony from concerned neighbors. She stated that a continuance for one month would be helpful. Commissioner Goff asked what the advantages were of chaining the parking lot during non - business hours. Ms. Crespin stated that without chaining the parking lot, easy access is obtained for vehicles not utilizing the restaurant facility during all hours of the day and evening. She stated that by chaining the parking lot, the traffic can be controlled during the non - business hours. In response to a question ,posed by Commissioner Goff, Ms. Crespin stated that the existing Rothchild's Restaurant facility is successful in the community, however, she stated that the area may not be large enough to handle the proposed expansion. Commissioner Balalis stated that he was a member of the Planning Commission when the original use permit was granted. He stated that the conditions which were imposed on the original use permit reflected 'the concerns which were expressed by the Planning Commission and the surrounding residents. He stated that before the Commission can consider an expansion of the use, the alleged violations which have been stated must be resolved. -13- r m m ROLL MINUTES March 24, 1983 of Newport Beach INDEX In response to a question posed by Commissioner Balalis, Ms. Crespin stated that a chain is never utilized on the alley side of the parking lot, but a chain is occasionally utilized on the driveway on Begonia Avenue. In response to a question posed by Chairman King, Planning Director Hewicker stated that the original use permit granted in 1978, required that the parking lot be chained during non - business hours. Planning Director Hewicker then explained the use of other parking lot devices which have been recently approved for projects. He stated that the requirement for an alternate parking lot device can be considered for the use. Planning Director Hewicker stated that the City has not received any complaints relating to the existing establishment, from adjoining residential properties. • Chairman King stated that before an alternate parking lot device is required, all conflicts must be addressed, such as how the parking lot device affects the delivery trucks which must frequent the restaurant, if there is through circulation in the parking lot, and so on. Commissioner McLaughlin expressed her concern that there are tremendous insurance costs involved with the use of parking lot devices which puncture the tires. She urged that all of the alternatives be examined, before a specific parking lot device is decided upon. Commissioner Balalis stated that the applicant must comply with the rules which have been imposed. However, he stated that the property which is owned by Ms. Crespin is adjacent to commercial property. He stated that if the proposed expansion can provide the necessary parking and mitigate the concerns which have been expressed, the requested application may be approved. Ms. Crespin expressed her concern that if the traffic and parking is allowed to increase, the exhaust and soot pollution to the adjoining residential areas will • also increase. -14- � c a m 3 F 6Y m R .m MINUTES March 24, 1983 of Newport Beach INDEX Ms. Elizabeth Barron, resident of 709 Begonia Avenue, appeared before the Commission and expressed her concern with the proposed parking layout. Planning Director Hewicker stated that the applicant has proposed 24 parking spaces, but the discussion this evening has recommended the use of 21 parking spaces. He stated that the applicant is proposing to remove the existing garage structure. Ms. Barron stated that the proposed expansion will not fit into such a small area. Mr. Helmut Reiss, the applicant and the owner of Rothchild's, appeared before the Commission. Mr. Reiss stated that the parking lot was originally chained, but many problems were encountered, such as the lock or the chain being cut, the poles being smashed, vehicles which were left in the parking lot after the closing time, and delivery trucks which could not gain access. Mr. Reiss suggested that perhaps the use of wrought . iron sliding gates' would resolve the concerns which have been expressed. He stated that the valet can move the remaining vehicles to the front of the restaurant when the restaurant is closing. He stated that in this way, the back parking lot can be closed off when the restaurant is closed. He stated that he can attempt to control the noise which the restaurant use would generate, however, he stated that he would have no control over the vehicle emissions. Mr. Reiss stated that he is willing to cooperate with the community and the City in resolving the concerns which have been expressed.. Commissioner McLaughlin asked how the trash service will gain access to the dumpster, if the gates are locked during non - business hours. Mr. Reiss stated that he can control the trash service schedule and that a key can be supplied to the trash service. Mr. Reiss stated that when the original use ,_permit was heard by the Planning Commission,in 1978, there was discussion that the removal of the garage- structure would be highly .recommended. He stated that the proposed request is for the removal of the garage structure which will provide for a more useful parking . layout. -15- K r m m cm > x Gf mm -n MINUTES March 24, 1983 of Newport Beach INDEX In response to a question posed by Commissioner Goff, Mr. ,Reiss explained how the valet would move the vehicles from the back parking lot at closing time and notify the owners. He stated that this would only affect the remaining one or two restaurant patrons. Commissioner Balalis asked the applicant to comment on. the 10:00 p.m. closing time. 'Mr. Reiss stated that the 10:00 P.M. closing time is necessary because of the nature of the area. He stated that a restaurant needs to be open until 10:00 p.m. in Corona del Mar or Newport Beach in order to do any business. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Balalis, Mr. Reiss stated that his primary business is from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. He stated that it generally takes until 10:00 p.m. for the last customers to leave the restaurant. • Commissioner Allen suggested that perhaps the dumpster could be located within the building, thereby absorbing the noise which would be generated from restaurant employees emptying the trash,during the late evening hours. Mr. Reiss stated that because of sanitary factors, the dumpster could not be located inside the building, however he stated that the trash could be emptied earlier in the evening. He suggested that a high wall be constructed surrounding the dumpster which would absorb the noise generated from the trash dumpster. Mr: Emil Crespin, resident of 707 Begonia Avenue, expressed his concern with the vehicles-which will park in front of the restaurant and the possibility that East Coast Highway will be widened. Mr. Donald Webb, City Engineer, stated that the City and the State have no plans to widen East Coast Highway or to remove parking from East Coast Highway in Corona del Mar. Commissioner Goff suggested that the alternatives be explored on how the parking lot can be secured during the non - business hours. Chairman King requested that the suggestion for the • construction of a high wall surrounding the dumpster be further addressed in order to sound attenuate the dumpster from the adjoining residents. -16- ROLL CALL Motion All Ayes n u r1 U March 24, 1983 � r c m � m y. City of Newport Beach MINUTES X Motion was made to continue this item to the Planning X X X K Y X Commission Meeting' of April 21, 1983, so that the applicant can meet with the residents of the area to resolve the difficulties as stated, and the staff can respond to the violations which have been cited on the original use permit and respond to the suggestions which have been stated, which MOTION CARRIED. Request to establish a take -out restaurant facility Item, #8 with on -sale beer and wine on property located in the M -1 -A District. The proposal also includes a request to waive a portion of the required off - street parking spaces for the restaurant use. LOCATION: Lots 11, 12, 50 and 51, Tract No. 3201, USE PERMIT located at 2030 Quail Street, on the NO. 3026 northerly side of Quail Street between Campus Drive and Birch Street, across from the John Wayne Airport. ZONE: M -1 -A APPLICANT: Leslie Leonard, Rancho Palos Verdes OWNER: L. Boyd Higgins; c/o Seeley Co., Los Angeles The public hearing opened in connection with this item and Mr. William Lang, representing the applicant, appeared before the Commission and requested approval of the use permit. Commissioner Goff suggested a condition that the approval shall be for a period of one year, and - any extension shall be subject to approval of the Modifications Committee. In response to a question posed by Chairman King, Mr. Lang stated that such a condition would be acceptable. -17- APPROVED CONDI- TIONALLY MNNSS"ERS MINUTES March 24, 1983 � x f` m � m m m City of Newport Beach INDEX Motion X Motion was made for approval of Use , Permit No. 3026, - All Ayes X X X X X X subject to the following findings and conditions, including a condition. for the. review by the Modifications Committee after one year, was now voted on, which MOTION CARRIED. FINDINGS: 1. That the proposed development is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The project will not have any significant environmental impact. 3. That the waiver of the development standards as they pertain to a portion of the required parking, walls, landscaping, parking lot illumination and. • utilities, will be of no further detriment to adjacent properties inasmuch as the site has been developed and the structures have been in existence for many years. • 4. That the proposed use does not represent an intensification of use that will result in an increased parking demand for the area. 5. The Police Department has indicated that they do not contemplate any problems. 6: The approval of Use Permit No. 3026 will not, under the.. circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety; peace, morals, comfort and general welfare. of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. CONDITIONS: 1. That development shall . be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan and floor plan. coo ROLL CALL • Motion All Ayes MINUTES March 24, 1983 3 x m � m m m 2 y. City of Newport Beach 2. That the development standards related to a portion of the required parking spaces (i.e. 29 spaces); walls, landscaping; parking lot illumination and utility requirements are waived. 3. That all exterior signs shall conform to Chapter 20.06 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 4. That a trash compactor shall be installed in conjunction with the proposed use. 5. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from adjacent properties and streets. ' 6. That this approval shall be for a period of one year, and any extension shall be subject to approval of the Modifications Committee. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Extension of Time for Tentative Map No. 10019 - North Ford Planning Director Bewicker suggested that the words, "with the limitations and subject to the provisions as set forth in the City Attorney's memo of February 24, 1983" be added to the original motion. of February 24, 1983, and that the Planning Commission direct that the Minutes of February 24, 1983, be so changed. Motion was made to approve revisions, as suggested, to X X X X X the February 24, .1983, Planning Commission Minutes in conjunction with the recommended approval of a two year extension of the Tentative Map of Tract No. 10019, which MOTION CARRIED. - -19- INDEX COMMSSIONERS MINUTES March 24, 1983 � r c c m o 7c G) m City of Newport Beach POLL CALL INDEX F"" L J • *x There being no further business, the Planning Commission adjourned at 9:00 p.m. to the March 28, 1983, Joint Study Session between the City Council and Planning Commission at 2 :00 p.m. F. =I Dave Goff, Secretary Planning Commission City of Newport Beach -20-