The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04/20/1978COMMISSIONERS vp n 1 v, /TOLL CALL Present , Motion Ayes 0 Absent 0. Motion Ayes Abstain City of Newport Beach Regular Planning Commission Meeting Place: City Council Chambers Time: 7:25 P.M. Date: April 20, 1978 X X* X X *Arrived at 7:30 P EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R. V. Hogan, Commu Hugh Coffin, Assis Benjamin B. Nolan, STAFF MEMBERS James D. Hewicker, David Dmohowski, A Fred Talarico, Sen Shirley Harbeck, S X Minutes of the Reg X X X X were approved as w X Request to approve acres into nine nu condominium develo recreational and o lettered lots for .Location: Por 98 are Sp "Br Sea San is 872 Hil Zone: P -C Applicant: The Owner: Sart Engineer: Sig X Motion was made th X X X X to the City Counci X .M. ,iity Development Director Cant City Attorney City Engineer Assistant Director - Pla.nning dvance Planning Administrator for Planner acretary * * * ular Meeting of March 2, 1978, ritten. * * * MINUTES a Final Map to subdivide 48.068 mbered lots for residential pment, five numbered lots for pen space purposes, and seven streets. tions of Blocks 91, 92, 97 and of Irvine's Subdivision, in an a bounded by the existing yglass Hill" development, the en III" development, Broadmoor view, San Miguel Drive, and the Joaquin Reservoir site. This a portion of Tentative Tract No. 5 - Sector IV of Harbor View ls, known as "Harbor Ridge." Irvine Company, Newport Beach ie as Applicant ipson- Steppat, Newport Beach at Planning Commission recommend 1 the approval.of Final Map of Page 1. INO<X COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach MOLL CALL Motion AyesIX X IX IX IX Abstain ril 20 Tract No. 9858, subject to the following condi- tion: 1. That all applicable conditions of approval for the Tentative Map of Tract No. 8725 shall be fulfilled. MINUTES s INOax Request to approve a Final Map to subdivide 15.022 acres into two numbered lots for residential condominium development, two numbered lots for recreational and open space purposes, and four lettered lots for streets. Location: Portions of Blocks 91, 92, 97 and 98 of Irvine's Subdivision, in an area bounded by the existing "Spyglass Hill" development, the "Bren III" development, Broadmoor Seaview, San Miguel Drive, and the San Joaquin Reservoir site. This is a portion of Tentative Tract No. 8725 - Sector IV of Harbor View Hills, known as "Harbor Ridge." Zone: P -C jApplicant: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Same as Applicant Engineer: Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach Motion was made that Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the approval of Final Map of Tract No. 9859, subject to the following condi- tion: 1. That all applicable conditions of approval for the Tentative Map of Tract No. 8725 shall be fulfilled. Page 2. Item #2' FINAL IW— APPROVED C NDI- IO LNA LY n COMMISSIONERS m'A 'L /ROLL CALL Motion All Ayes • City of Newport Beach A„ -a 1 on in MINUTES I N Ol.X )prove a Final Map to subdivide 13.648 Item #3 iirty -seven numbered lots for residen- nent, one numbered lot for park pur- qo lettered lots for streets. FINAL MAP TR C1� T N0. Request to a 9860 Portions of Blocks 91, 92, 97 and 98 of Irvine's Subdivision,.in an area bounded by the existing "Spyglass Hill" development, the APPROVED CONDI- TIONALLY acres into t Seaview, San Miguel Drive, and the San Joaquin Reservoir site. This is a portion of Tentative Tract No. tial develop 8725 - Sector IV of Harbor View Hills, known as "Harbor Ridge." P -C poses, and t Same as Applicant Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach ide that Planning Commission recommend Location: :ouncil the approval of Final Map of 50, subject to the following.condi- I applicable conditions of approval Zone: fulfilled. City of Newport Beach shall be a the map. Applicant: City of Newport Beach shall accept ^ation grant deed from the Irvine . for Lot 38 of the Final Map of Tract Owner: )nsider the approval of the draft Item #4 Engineer: Is and Economic Feasibility Study of X Vewport Beach Area." NEWPORT. Motion was m to the City Tract No. 98 tions: 1. That al for the shall b 2. That th party t 3. That th a corpo Company No. 986 Request to c report on "P "Parking Nee the Central Initiated by MINUTES I N Ol.X )prove a Final Map to subdivide 13.648 Item #3 iirty -seven numbered lots for residen- nent, one numbered lot for park pur- qo lettered lots for streets. FINAL MAP TR C1� T N0. 9860 Portions of Blocks 91, 92, 97 and 98 of Irvine's Subdivision,.in an area bounded by the existing "Spyglass Hill" development, the APPROVED CONDI- TIONALLY "Bren III" development, Broadmoor Seaview, San Miguel Drive, and the San Joaquin Reservoir site. This is a portion of Tentative Tract No. 8725 - Sector IV of Harbor View Hills, known as "Harbor Ridge." P -C The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Same as Applicant Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach ide that Planning Commission recommend :ouncil the approval of Final Map of 50, subject to the following.condi- I applicable conditions of approval Tentative map of Tract No. 8725 fulfilled. City of Newport Beach shall be a the map. City of Newport Beach shall accept ^ation grant deed from the Irvine . for Lot 38 of the Final Map of Tract for park and landscaping purposes. )nsider the approval of the draft Item #4 irking Program Feasibility" of the Is and Economic Feasibility Study of CENTRAL Vewport Beach Area." NEWPORT. The City of Newport Beach Page 3. lull COMMISSIONERS t City of Newport Beach April 20, 1978 BOLL CALL Community Development Director Hogan advised the were many things contained in the report which - would take substantial consideration by the Plan ning Commission and that a viable program would be prepared as a result of the public hearings a following direction to the staff by the Planning Commission. Senior Planner Talarico appeared before the Commission to comment on meetings and correspond ence between the City and the Orange County Tran District with respect to a shuttle bus service. William Hurrell with Wilbur Smith and Associates appeared before the Commission and reviewed the draft report of the Parking Program Feasibility for the Central Newport Beach Parking Study area He brought the Commission up to date on previous events and reviewed their findings and recommend tio.ns contained in the report which included an 800 -space peripheral parking facility with Shutt bus service; alterations to existing public park operations and increased parking rates; a reside tial parking permit program; the construction of 200 additional parking spaces in the study area 400 additional peripheral parking spaces by 1985 the construction of an additional 700 parking spaces in the study area by 1990; and establish- ment of a Central Newport Beach Parking Authorit; for the purpose of planning, financing, implemen ing and operating the parking program. Followin review, Mr. Hurrell answered questions of the Commission which included feasibility and partic patios of a parking facility, method of financin income and operating costs, involvement of priva industry in the development of parking facilitie feasibility /success of the shuttle bus service, residential permit program, and additional traff generation created by the additional parking. Public hearing was opened in connection with thi: matter. Nuri Nazar, resident of Beverly Hills, appeared before the Commission and advised of his interes to purchase the property on the north side of West Coast Highway at Newport Boulevard presentl; owned by Cal Trans and his willingness to cooper: with the City with respect to its development. Page 4. MINUTES • INCIM Id ;1 le •ing. ►nd i t- 1 f- 1> >e is r Ite • COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach MINUTES m4 April 20, 1978 MOLL CALL Margot Skilling, West Newport, appeared before the Commission to comment on the draft report ani voiced concern and opposition to any development at Coast Highway and Newport Boulevard which wou further impact traffic along Coast Highway, voic concern with the size of a structure which would hold 800 cars and its incompatibility with the village atmosphere of Newport Beach., and voiced concern with the number of people which use the beaches in excess of the mandated beach capacity levels. John Shea, 2214 West Oceanfront appeared before the Commission and voiced concern with the impac on parking and circulation created by any promot of increased activities in the area and question the impact of the proposed parking program on th Specific Area Plans which are being developed fo McFadden Square and Cannery Village areas. . Pat Strang, 351 Catalina Drive, appeared before the Commissiona and voiced concern with the propo parking structure because of the impact of addit al traffic, increased pollution, and additional on- street parking in the area when the structure is full. Milbeth Brey, 3355 Via Lido, appeared before the Commission both as a representative of the Centr Newport Parking Committee and as an individual, comment on the study and felt that any action to on the recommendation was a positive step in the direction to a solution and that no action would only assure failure to solving the problems. Sh recommended the establishment of a parking autho in order to implement each of the steps in a progressive manner without over - committing ourselves. Bob Inch, Manager of the Via Lido Village, appea before the Commission and advised of their coope tion with respect to use of the peripheral parki by their tenants and employees which would free some of the parking in the area. A. Gadarian of Blacky's Boatyard, appeared befor the Commission to comment on the parking study. Dick Kent with Sham -Kent Architects, 501 31st Street, appeared before the Commission in suppor Page 5. iol ad sei 101 )1 to <e n ri rea ra- ng up e t INOI X COMMISSIONERS 7Q�® 1-41\ City of Newport Beach April 20, 1978 MOLL CALL of the parking program and felt it was a step in the right direction and doing nothing would only perpetuate existing problems. Planning Commission pointed out the following issues which they felt should be considered: 1. Greater r?liance on private development in order to reduce the bond liability which could face the city; 2. What direction the focal point of the area would take, i.e. commercial over residentia should the proposed program be implemented; and 3. Use of the beach facilities by people outsi the city. Motion X Following discussion, motion was made to continu All Ayes this matter to the meeting of June 1, 1978. Planning Commission recessed at 9:10 P.M. and . reconvened at 9:20 P.M. Request to consider an amendment to Title 20 of Newport Beach Municipal Code establishing regula tions for developments located on or adjacent to bluffs, to include building setbacks from the ed of bluffs, and other development standards. Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach Advance Planning Administrator Dmohowski reviewe the proposed ordinance with the Planning Commiss as well as suggested revisions to the wording as result of general input from the public and dis- cussion with the staff and City Attorney pertain ing to the safety aspects and reference to the P.R.D. Commissioner Balalis felt that the ordinance as written was too open and that specific directive or design criteria should be incorporated into t ordinance such as minimum setbacks. Page 6. MINUTES • INOax 1, le • the IItem #5 AMENDMENT ge NO. 507 CONT. TO 7UHr-T5-- d ion a h I • he • COMMISSIONERS � 90��0��9 \ \\ City of Newport Beach MINUTES April 20, 1978 POLL CALL Planning Commission discussed the issues of safety and aesthetics in the development of the ordinance They also reviewed some of the properties which brought the problem of bluff development to light. Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Dr. Atherton, 195J 16th Street, felt that the ordinance should deal separately with the issue of property already subdivided and that which is still in large undeveloped parcels. Mike Ericson with the Irvine Company felt that some consideration should be given to the defini- tion of a bluff, that the maps should be more definitive as to the area covered, voiced concern with excessive setbacks which could be landscaped, thus creating stability and other problems,. and suggested that a performance standard rather than • strict criteria be established. Mr. Gibbs, owner of a lot on the bluffs felt that the establishment of specific setbacks could be detrimental to single lots because of their size. Gordon Glass, Architect, commented on the need for a specific definition of a bluff should the ordinance be adopted and questioned whether it was the purpose and intent of the ordinance to use the bluff in a safe feasible was or to keep them empty. He commented on the proposed ordinance and its so- called flexibility and felt it was an unnecessary ordinance to impose on the people in the City of Newport Beach. Motion X Following discussion, motion was made to continue All Ayes this matter to the meeting of June 15, 1978, and directed that the staff prepare a definition of a bluff; make recommendations as to either an angle of repose or specific setbacks; that a list be prepared of all the affected properties and any adverse impacts caused by the ordinance; and that alternative.proposals be prepared which would include separating the undeveloped subdivided lots from large undeveloped parcels. Page 7.._ 0401M COMMISSIONERS. City of Newport Beach 0 'P,��4mp A--;7 'Jn 1074 MOLT. CALL Request to change the operational characteristic of the existing restaurant facility in Neiman- Marcus to include the service of beer and wine. Location: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 67/23 (Resubdivision No. 466) located a 49 Fashion Island in Fashion Isla Zone: C -O -H Applicant: Carter Hawley Stores, Inc., Los Angeles Owner: Same as Applicant Public hearing was opened.in connection with thi matter and there being no one desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission make th All Ayes following findings: 1. That the proposed use is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The project will not have any significant environmental impact. 3. The Police Department has indicated that they do not contemplate any problems. 4. Adequate offstreet parking spaces are being provided in the Fashion Island Common parking lot for The Zodiac Restaurar facility. The service of beer and wine with meals in the restaurant complex will have no significant impact on the parking demand. 5. The approval of Use Permit No. 1863 will not, under the circumstances of this, case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimen or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. Page 8. MINUTES INOKX s Item #6 USE PERMIT N . 863 t APPROVED nd N� DI TITN LLY e • tal l • COMMISSIONERS t 9 • YCm� YC 9S��t�1 O/ City of Newport Beach 6...,41 vn 1070 ROLL CALL and approve Use Permit No. 1863, subject to the following condition: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved floor plan. Request to permit the construction of a second dwelling unit and a four car garage on a lot in the R -2 District in a Specific Plan Area where a specific plan has not been adopted. A modifica- tion to the Zoning Code is also requested, since the proposed development also includes the remod eling of the existing dwelling unit on the site that has a nonconforming 2 foot side yard setbac (where the Code requires a 3 foot side yard). Location: Lot 4, Block 128, Lake Tract, located at 206 29th Street, on th southeasterly side of 29th Street between Newport Boulevard (south- bound) and West Balboa Boulevard West Newport. Zone: R -2 Applicant: Bob Girandola, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Staff advised that the lower unit did not meet t minimum requirement of 600 square feet required the City and that sufficient room existed on the lot to increase the size of the unit without exceeding the 1.5 floor area ratio, therefore, staff recommended the addition of a condition requiring that the unit be increased to the minimum requirement of 600 square feet. Public hearing was opened in connection with thi matter and the applicant indicated his concurren with the recommended conditions of approval. There being no others desiring to appear and be . heard, the public hearing was closed. Page 9. MINUTES 1NOax Item #7 SITE PLAN. RE. APPROVED k ONDI- NALLY e in he by s ce COMMISSIONERS 1� Clty Oi I Newport l Beat l MINUTES ril 20- 197A MOLL CALL INOIX Motion X Following discussion, motion was made that Plan - All Ayes ning Commission make the following findings: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and will not preclude the attainment of the General Plan objectives and policies. 2. The proposed development is a high - quality proposal and will not adversely affect the benefits of occupancy and use of existing properties within the area. 3. The proposed development does not adversely affect the public benefits derived from expenditures of public funds for improvement and beautification of streets and public facilities within the area. 4. The project will not have any significant • environmental impact. 5. Adequate parking spaces and related vehicular circulation will be provided in conjunction with the proposed development. 6. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use of the property or building will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. 7. That the removal of existing living area on the site would be an unnecessary hardship on the applicant. and approve Site Plan Review No. 13, subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations with the exception of • Condition No. 2. Page 10. COMMISSIONERS city @°y Apri 1 MOLL CALL U • of Newport Beach 9n_ 197R the first floor unit shall be enlarged to provide a minimum of 600 square of floor area. MINUTES all requirements of the Uniform Building shall be met. all new construction shall conform to °equired yard setbacks. establish one parcel of land where two axist so as to permit the conversion of it units into a residential condominium. Lots 12 and 13, Tract No. 3606, located at 1100 Rutland Road, on the easterly side of Rutland Road, between Mariners Drive and Bedford Lane in Westcliff. we C.E.L.S. Corporation, Tustin William C. and Evelyn Gray, Santa Ynez Same as Applicant aring was opened in connection with this grave, 161 Fashion Lane, Tustin, appeared e Commission on behalf of the applicant tion with this matter and concurred recommended conditions except for No. 1. He advised of the provisions n 66428 of the Subdivision Map Act and that the filing of the parcel map be ng no others desiring to appear and be e public hearing was closed. Commission discussed condominium conver- quired parking, and traffic generation. Page 11. INOQX Item #8 RESUB- . DIVISION N0.55 0— CONT. TO MAY T- 2. That so ai feet 3. That Code 4. That the Request ti lots now residenti complex. Location: Zone: Applicant Owner: Engineer: Public he matter. Talis Mar before th in connec with the Condition of Sectio requested waived. There bei heard, th Planning sions, re the first floor unit shall be enlarged to provide a minimum of 600 square of floor area. MINUTES all requirements of the Uniform Building shall be met. all new construction shall conform to °equired yard setbacks. establish one parcel of land where two axist so as to permit the conversion of it units into a residential condominium. Lots 12 and 13, Tract No. 3606, located at 1100 Rutland Road, on the easterly side of Rutland Road, between Mariners Drive and Bedford Lane in Westcliff. we C.E.L.S. Corporation, Tustin William C. and Evelyn Gray, Santa Ynez Same as Applicant aring was opened in connection with this grave, 161 Fashion Lane, Tustin, appeared e Commission on behalf of the applicant tion with this matter and concurred recommended conditions except for No. 1. He advised of the provisions n 66428 of the Subdivision Map Act and that the filing of the parcel map be ng no others desiring to appear and be e public hearing was closed. Commission discussed condominium conver- quired parking, and traffic generation. Page 11. INOQX Item #8 RESUB- . DIVISION N0.55 0— CONT. TO MAY T- COMMISSIONERS 1 r,Ar SSI 9 City of Newport Beach MINUTES � \ Opp pay A41 OA 1070 ROLL CALL Motion X Commissioner Balalis felt that a condominium conversion of this size should provide more park ing and that the City should adopt a condominium conversion ordinance, therefore, motion was made to deny Resubdivision No. 580. Commissioner Haidinger opposed the motion becaus he was familiar ri th the property and the area and advised that parking was not a problem. He also felt that the imposition of additional park ing would be a tremendous burden on the applican Planning Commission reopened the public hearing. Talis Margrave appeared before the Commission an challenged their right to deny this request beca of the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, specifically, Sections 66473.5, 66474, and 66427 City Attorney Coffin commented on the revised Ma Act, the lack of a City ordinance relative to condominium conversions, and concurred with Mr. Margrave's remarks. Planning Commission voiced concern that they wer being presented with a request in which they had no choice of action. Following discussion, Commissioner Balalis withdrew his motion and mad Motion X a new motion to continue this matter to the meet All Ayes ing of May 4, 1978, for the purpose of further investigation as to what action could be taken. Request to amend a previously approved use permi that permitted the establishment of Nick and Gin Pizza take -out restaurant facility so as to incl the service of beer and wine in the existing restaurant patio area. The proposed development also includes the expansion of the existing kitc service area and the deletion of public area in patio area of the restaurant complex. Location: Lots 8 and 10, Block 436, Corona Mar, located at 420 Iris Avenue o the southeasterly side of Iris Av nue between East Coast Highway an First Avenue in Corona del Mar. Zone: C -1 -H Page 12. • I N OILX e t. . 21 I P' e e t Item #9 a ' s ude USE PERMIT N0: 1761 AMENDED hen the DENIED del n e- d 0 COMMISSIONERS y City of Newport Beach MINUTES S p�4 �� coq. April 20, 1978 ROLL CALL Applicant: John Costa, Corona del Mar Owner: E. Morris Smith, Newport Beach Public hearing was opened in connection with thi matter. John Costa, Applicant, appeared before the Commi sion in connection with this matter and request that the take -out window adjacent to the parking lot remain if the request was approved. He also questioned the recommendation for denial because the request seemed fairly simple and reasonable. He advised of their need to expand the kitchen area and provide more ventilation in very cramp quarters. Staff advised that the reason for recommending denial was based on the increase in number of employees without additional parking in an alrea .congested and inadequate parking facility and.th . expansion of any of the facilities in the shop- ping center which would increase the need for parking would create additional adverse impacts on the adjacent residential neighborhood. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Agee felt that the serving of beer and wine would not be detrimental, however, he concurred with the recommendation for denial of the expansion because of the effects on the Motion X neighborhood. Therefore, motion was made to approve the request for on -sale beer and wine only for a period of 2 years and that any extens be subject to the approval of the Modifications Committee. Commissioner Cokas opposed the motion as he felt that the applicant's direction of success should be viewed in terms of a possible move. Ayes X X The motion was voted on and failed. Noes X X X otion X Motion was then made that Planning Commission ma yes X X X X the following findings: oes X Page 13. s. s- ed dy at io k INCIM COMMISSIONERS s ��b 4 City of Newport Beach April 20, 1978 MOLL CALL . That the service of beer and wine in this location would be inconsistent with the action already taken by the City Council. 2. That the outdoor service of beer and wine would not be compatible with existing resi- dential uses on the northerly side of Iris. 3. That the proposed remodel will accommodate expanded business in a shopping center whi has a substnatial parking deficiency. 4. The approval of Use Permit No. 1761 (Amend will, under the circumstances of this case detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighbo hood or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborho or the general welfare of the City. and deny Use Permit No. 1761 (Amended). Commissioner Haidinger left the meeting at 10:55 P.M. Request to expand an existing coin - operated laundry facility in the C -1 District, and the acceptance of an environmental document. The proposed development also includes the construc- tion of a second floor office, and the acceptanc of an offsite parking agreement for the required parking spaces. The proposed commercial complex encroaches to within 5' of the rear property lin (where the Code requires a 10' rear yard when abutting an alley). Location: Lots 20, 21, and 22, Block 3, Eas Newport, located at 500 - 502 -504 West Balboa Boulevard, on the northwesterly corner of West Balb Boulevard and Island Avenue on th Balboa Peninsula. Zone: C -1 Page 14. MINUTES f` J INDRX an ch ed) be r- od • Item #10 USE PERMIT NU-TW2 e APPROVED Mar-_ e IT^ONILLY t )a I COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach MINUTES • April 20, 1978 NOLL CALL Applicant: Robert C. Durkee, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. John Butler, 912 West Balboa Boulevard, appeared before the Commission on behalf of the Central Newport Beach Homeowners Association and requested a 30 day delay for the purpose of forming a committee to survey the property owners in the are as to the preferred direction of the land use because of the ambiguity as to the legislative intent for the characterization of the area and the discrepancies between the Land Use Element and the established zoning. Staff pointed out that the General Plan provided for the commercial businesses to remain until they were discontinued or until the residential • zoning was requested. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission make the Ayes X X X X following findings: Absent X 1. The proposed use is compatible with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and with surrounding land uses. The proposed development will also greatly upgrade the existing commercial uses on the site. 2. The project will not have any significant environmental impact. 3. The Police Department has indicated that they do not contemplate any problems. 4. Adequate offstreet parking spaces are being provided in conjunction with the proposed remodeling and expansion of the commercial development. 5. The offstreet parking spaces for the expanded • proposal on separate lots from the building site is justifiable for the following reasons Page 15. INCIM COMMISSIONERS MOLL CALL 01 °z City of Newport Beach MINUTES • April 20 1978 INO<X a. The offsite lots adjoin the laundromat- office site and will be easily accessibl . b. The proposed development will not create undue traffic hazards in the adjoining area. C. The Ci *.v Traffic Engineer has no objec- tions with the proposed parking layout. d. The proposed commercial development and related offstreet parking spaces are on three contiguous lots that are all owned by the applicant. 6. That the establishment of a 5 foot rear yard setback along the rear property line of the site will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort and general . welfare of persons residing or working in the . neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City and further that the proposed modification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code. 7. The approval of Use Permit No. 1862 will not, under the circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighbor - hood or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood, or the general welfare of the City. and approve Use Permit No. 1862, subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans and elevation. 2. That all exterior lighting shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. • 3. That all signs shall conform to Chapter 20.06 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Page 16. COMMISSIONERS `IS = City of Newport Beach ro �� = April 20, 1978 ROLL CALL 4. That all mechanical equipment and trash are shall be screened from public streets, adjacent alley, or adjoining properties. 5. That an offsite parking agreement shall be approved by the City Council, guaranteeing that a minimum of 4 parking spaces, portior of 5 other parking spaces, and related acce thereto, shall be provided on Lots 21 and f Block 3, East Newport, for the duration of the expanded laundromat- office complex on I 20, Block 3, East Newport. 6. That a corner cutoff easement with a 5 foot radius be dedicated to the City for street purposes. 7. That the unused portions of the driveway approaches on Balboa Boulevard and Island . Avenue be closed up with the construction c curb and gutter and sidewalk. In addition the curb return at Balboa Boulevard and Island shall be reconstructed. The plans f the work will be prepared by the Public Wor Department. 8. That a use permit agreement and surety be provided to guarantee satisfactory completi of the public improvements if it is desired to obtain a building permit prior to their completion. Request to amend a portion of Districting Map Nc 35 from the Unclassified District to the P -C District. The proposal also includes an amendmer of the Planned Community Development Plan for Kc Center Newport so as to permit the increase in t building site and the allowable building area of Office Site C, and the acceptance of an environ- mental document. Location: Parcel 2, Parcel Map 68 -19 (Resut division No. 477) and a portion c Block 50, Irvine's Subdivision, . located on the easterly side of MacArthur Boulevard, between Camr Page 17. MINUTES INOQ.X as s ss 2, of 19 or ks on Item #11 t AMENDMENT 11 Nom( X05 he APPROVED RES. f0_08 f us COMMISSIONERS 111- P� �c A 7�P7P �ppi�P POLL CALL Motion Ayes Absent x City of Newport Beach Drive and Birch Street in and adjoining Koll Center Newport. P -C, Unclassified The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Sare as Applicant MINUTES firing was opened in connection with this chnorr appeared before the Commission on the Irvine Company and concurred with report and recommendations. Ig no others desiring to appear and be public hearing was closed. I made that Planning Commission adopt I No. 1008, recommending that the City )prove Amendment No. 505. ) create two parcels of land for com- ?velopment. Parcel 2, Parcel Map 68 -19 (Resub- division No. 477) and a portion of Block 50, Irvine's Subdivision, located on the easterly side of MacArthur Boulevard, between Campus Drive and Birch Street in and adjoining Koll Center Newport. P -C, Unclassified The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Same as Applicant Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach aring was opened in connection with this Page 18. INO<X • • Item #12 RESUB- DIVISION. NN0. 59- APPROVED TGfl6— . T I FN K LY • Zone: Applicant: Owner: Public hei matter. Douglas S behalf of the staff There beil heard, thl x ( x X Motion wa: Resolutioi x Council al Request ti mercial d Location: Zone: Applicant Owner: Engineer: Public he matter. Drive and Birch Street in and adjoining Koll Center Newport. P -C, Unclassified The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Sare as Applicant MINUTES firing was opened in connection with this chnorr appeared before the Commission on the Irvine Company and concurred with report and recommendations. Ig no others desiring to appear and be public hearing was closed. I made that Planning Commission adopt I No. 1008, recommending that the City )prove Amendment No. 505. ) create two parcels of land for com- ?velopment. Parcel 2, Parcel Map 68 -19 (Resub- division No. 477) and a portion of Block 50, Irvine's Subdivision, located on the easterly side of MacArthur Boulevard, between Campus Drive and Birch Street in and adjoining Koll Center Newport. P -C, Unclassified The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Same as Applicant Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach aring was opened in connection with this Page 18. INO<X • • Item #12 RESUB- DIVISION. NN0. 59- APPROVED TGfl6— . T I FN K LY • COMMISSIONERS 9PM yC 'F�'Aa y� City of Newport Beach Anvil 9n 107R NOLL CALL Douglas Schnorr appeared before the Commission o behalf of the Irvine Company and concurred with staff report and recommended conditions. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission make Ayes X X X X the following findings: Absent X 1. That the map meets the requirements of Tit 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. ' and approve Resubdivision No. 579, subject to th following conditions: 1. That a parcel map be filed. 2. That Amendment No. 505 be approved. 3. That all improvements be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 4. That all vehicular access rights to MacArth Boulevard be released and relinquished to i • City of Newport Beach., 5. That all vehicular access rights to Campus Drive except for the one existing private drive opposite Martin and one additional private drive at a.location to be approved the Public Works Department be released anc relinquished to the City of Newport Beach. 6. That a document, satisfactory to the Direct of Community Development and the City Attor providing for ingress, egress, and parking (if required) on Parcel 1 for the benefit c . Parcel 2 be recorded. Page 19. MINUTES n th le e ur he by or ne..) if INOIX COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach MINUTES DOLL CALL 7. That a 37 -foot wide strip of land on the easterly side of MacArthur Boulevard from Campus Drive to approximately 355 feet southerly be dedicated to the public for street purposes. In addition a 6 -foot wide easement for pedestrian and public utility purposes along the westerly side of Parcel shall be dedicated to the City of Newport Beach. 8. That a 14 -foot wide strip of land on the southerly side of Campus Drive from MacArthur Boulevard to approximately 320 -feet easterly be dedicated to the public for street pur- poses. In addition a 3 -foot wide easement for bicycle and pedestrian purposes along the northerly side of Parcel 1 shall be dedicated to the City of Newport Beach. That the subdivider be responsible for completing the remaining public improvements along MacArthur Boulevard and Campus Drive (including curb and gutter, pavement widen- ing, sidewalk, street lights and storm drain modification). Modification of the existing traffic signal at the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard and Campus Drive will not be the developers responsibility. 10. That sidewalk be constructed along the MacArthur Boulevard, Campus Drive, and Birch Street frontages. The sidewalk along MacArthur Boulevard shall be 10 -feet wide located immediately behind the curb. The sidewalk along Campus Drive shall be 8 -foot wide located 5 to 13 -feet behind the curb. The sidewalk along Birch Street shall be of a width and location approved by the Public Works Department. 11. That the work in MacArthur Boulevard be done under an Encroachment Permit issued by the California Department of Transportation. 12. That all new Sewer Lateral Connections be done in a manner satisfactory to the Public Works Department. 13. That domestic water facilities be provided to the requirements and standards of the Irvine Ranch Water District. Page 20. r� L INOKX A • COMMISSIONERS , \\\ City of Newport Beach MINUTES • @ V � n_.__� DOLL CALL 14. That the location of on -site fire hydrants reviewed and approved by the Fire Departmen 15. That a Standard Subdivision Agreement and Surety be provided to guarantee satisfactor completion of the Public Improvements if it is desired to record the Parcel Map before the improvements are completed. Request to amend a previously approved use permi that permitted the establishment of a McDonald's take -out restaurant facility so as to remodel an expand the existing complex. The proposed devel ment includes the addition of a drive -up window and the enclosure of an existing outdoor eating area to provide interior dining space. . Location: Lots 18 through 23, Tract No. 121 located at 700 West Coast Highway on the northerly side of West Coa Highway, across West Coast Highwa from Bayshores. Zone: C -1 -H Applicant: Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. Los Angeles Owner: Same as Applicant Public hearing was opened in connection with thi matter. Lorenzo Reyes, Construction Manager with McDona' Corporation, appeared before the Commission and concurred with the staff report and recommendat` There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission make V Ayes X X X X following findings: X •Absent 1. That the proposed expansion is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. Page 21. INOIX >e t. V t Item #13 0, , s y , s do, s ons le COMMISSIONERS /� j City OI j Newport Beach MINUTES A�y�4 ey up d) .al !ct in `i c Ig i- Ina? ad. INOIX n MOLL CALL 2. The project will not have any significant environmental impact, providing that the proposed drive -up window is not permitted a requested, and providing that adequate offstreet parking spaces are maintained on the site. 3. The Police Department has indicated that th do not contemplate any problems with the proposed development if the proposed drive- window is not installed in the existing structure. 4. The approval of Use Permit No. 1534 (Amende as recommended, will not, under the circum- stances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detriment or injurious to property or improvements it the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. and approve Use Permit No. 1534 (Amended), subj( to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plan and elevations, except as noted Condition Nos. 2 and 3 below. 2. The proposed drive -up window shall not be permitted. 3. That a revised parking layout shall be submitted to and approved by the City Traf Engineer, indicating a minimum of 62 parkii spaces. Said spaces shall be marked with approved traffic markers or painted white lines not less than 4 inches wide in accor ance with the approved plan. 4. That all applicable conditions of the orig Use Permit No. 1534 shall be maintained. 5. That Resubdivision No. 581 shall be approv Page 22. ey up d) .al !ct in `i c Ig i- Ina? ad. INOIX COMMISSIONERS 9 • 9Q�gY � ='O City of Newport Beach a--41 3n 1070 MINUTES INOIX - Item #14 RESUB- he DIVISION NO. 5T1 POLL CALL 0, APPROVED ONDI- st TIONALLY Y Request to establish one building site and elimi nate interior lot lines where six lots now exist so as to permit the remodeling and expansion of the McDonald's take -out restaurant facility on t property. Location: Lots 18 through 23,. Tract No. 121 located at 700 West Coast Highway on the northerly side of West Coi Highway, across West Coast Highwi from Bayshores. Zone: C -1 -H Applicant: Franchise Realty Interstate Corp Los Angeles Owner, Same as Applicant Public hearing was opened in connection with th matter. Lorenzo Reyes, Construction Manager with McDona Corporation concurred with the staff report and recommendations. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission make. • Ayes X X X X the following findings: Absent 1. That the map meets the requirements of Tit 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, al ordinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planninc Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 2. That the proposed resubdivision presents I problems from a planning standpoint. and approve Resubdivision No. 581, subject to 1 following conditions: 1. That a parcel map be filed (parcel map mu! be recorded prior to obtaining building permit). Page 23. MINUTES INOIX - Item #14 RESUB- he DIVISION NO. 5T1 0, APPROVED ONDI- st TIONALLY Y is le 1 0 i t COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach M 9(' yw OVA 'L April 20, 1978 Moll CALL n he e d 2. That all of the conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 1534 (Amended) be fulfilled. 3. That 12 feet of right -of -way be dedicated c West Coast Highway in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. 1 adjoining property owner may continue to us the 12 foot strip of land until it is neede for street construction purposes. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: Commissioner Cokss advised that he would be out of town on May .4, 1978 and therefore requested permission to be excused. There being no further business, Planning Commis sion adjourned the meeting. Time: 11:05 P.M. PAUL L. BALALIS, Secretary Planning Commission City of Newport Beach Page 24. MINUTES 0 IND<X -I ! 0 n he e d -I ! 0