HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/10/1979L-1
City of Newport Beach
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
Place: City Council Chambers
Time: 7:30 P.M.
Date: Mav 1n_ 1979
ROLL CALL
Present
x
x
x
x
x
x
Absent
*
*Commissioner Balalis arrived at 8:30 P.M.
EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS
R. V. Hogan, Community Development Director
Hugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney
STAFF MEMBERS
David Dmohowski, Advance Planning Administrator
Fred Talarico, Environmental Coordinator
Don Webb, Subdivision Engineer, Public Works Dept
Glenna Gipe, Secretary
* * *
Motion
x
Minutes of the regular Planning Commission meetin
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
of April 5, 1979 were approved as written.
Absent
* * *
tion
x
Minutes of the regular Planning Commission meetir
Yes
x
x
x
x
x
ix
of April 19, 1979 were approved as revised to in-
Absent
*
clude the additional recommendations of the sub-
committee.
* * *
Motion
x
Motion was made that Item No. 1 be continued to
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
the regular Planning Commission meeting of May 24
Absent
*
1979, due to the applicant's request, that Item P
15, 17 and 18 be continued to the regular Plannir
Commission meeting of May 24, 1979, and that Iten
No. 16 be continued to the regular Planning Commi
sion meeting of June 7, 1979, due to the length c
the regular Planning Commission meeting agenda of
May 10, 1979.
i
* * *
Request to establish a restaurant facility with c
sale alcoholic beverages in an existing commerciz
building in the C -1 District, and the acceptance
an offsite parking agreement for the requireo, par
ing spaces on adjacent residential and commercial
property.
Location: A portion of Lot 2 and Lot 3, Bloc
U, Tract No. 323, located at 3520
East Coast Highway, on the norther
-1-
MINUTES
INDEX
E'
E.
,
os
9
s-
f
n. Item #1
1
of USE PER
k- MIT NO. r
108
CONTIN-
k ED TO
tom,
s T97T_
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
City of Newport Beach
ROIL CALL
May 10, 1979 0
erly side of East Coast Highway be-
tween Narcissus Avenue and Orchid
Avenue in Corona del Mar.
Zone: C -1
Applicant: Manto, Brady Enterprises, Inc., dba
La Strada, Laguna Niguel
Owner: United California Bank as Trustee
for Lola Bernice Baltz, Santa Ana
The Planning Commission continued Item No. 1 to
the regular Planning Commission meeting of May 24,
1979, as per the applicant's request.
Request to permit the construction of a two -story
commercial building on property in a Specific Plan
Area where a specific plan has not been adopted.
A modification to the Zoning Code is also requested
since a portion of the required parking spaces are
tandem spaces (where the Ordinance provides that
all parking spaces shall be accessible and usable).
The proposal also includes the paying of an annual
fee to the City for a portion of the required park-
ing spaces in a nearby parking lot in lieu of pro-
viding parking onsite.
Location: Lot 13, Block 5, Balboa Tract, locat
ed at 207 Palm Street on the wester-
ly side of Palm Street between East
Bay Avenue and East Balboa Boulevard
in Central Balboa.
C -1
Gary E. Malazian, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
The Public Hearing was opened regarding this item
and Gary Malazian, Corona del Mar, appeared before
the Planning Commission to state his intention to
build this project as it is presented and to lease
and maintain it as he had done with its two year olc�
precursor.
-2-
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
t
's og 9 mC1 .
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROIL CALL
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the Public Hearing for this item was close
In response to a question from Commissioner Frede
ickson, Mr. Malazian relayed that three of the si
parking garages on the site are currently ocdupie
with trash cans and that the other three areirare
used.
Motion
Motion was made that the Planning Commissionimake
the following findings:
I. The proposed development is not consistent
the General Plan and will preclude the attai
ment of the General Plan objectives and poli
cies.
2. The proposed development will adversely aff e
the benefits of occupancy and use of existi
properties within the area.
3. The proposed development will adversely aff e
•
the public benefits derived from expenditure
of public funds for improvement and beautifi
cation of streets and public facilities with
in the area.
4. An inadequate number of accessible and usabl
on -site parking spaces is provided in conju
ction with the proposed development.
5. The project will have a significant environ
tal impact.
j
6. That the establishment, maintenance or opera
tion of the use of the property or building
will, under the circumstances of the particu
lar case, be detrimental to the health, safe
peace, comfort and general welfare of person
residing or working in the neighborhood of
proposed use or be detrimental or injurious
property and improvements in the neighborho
or the general welfare of the City and furt
that the proposed tandem parking spaces on
site are not consistent with the legislative
intent of Title 20 of the Municipal Code.
and deny Site Plan Review No. 21.
-3-
MINUTES
rw
r-
x
d
ly
wit
n-
ct
ng
ct
s
e
n-
men
ty
s
Suc
to
od
her
the
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
�p
ROIL CALL
Ayes
Absent
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
MINUTES
INDEX
F the
ldden COMMER-
ing r=N
re- LIEU
into P RKING
DENIED
ion A,,
lst
21st
i
)mmis
(ing
id to
to
ing
[din -
I to
sta-
>tanc
se.
the
rt
id
:om-
!der -
3erty
•
Commissioner Frederickson stated his support o
motion due to the parking situation.
x
x
x
x
x
x
Motion was then voted on, which MOTION CARRIED
Request to provide required parking in the McF
Square Municipal Parking Lot in -lieu of provid
required parking onsite in conjunction with th
modeling of the existing Harbor Glass Building
a two -story office building.
Location: Lots 16 and 17, Block 220, Sect
Newport Beach, located at 222 2
Street, on the easterly side of
Street, northerly of West Balbo
Boulevard, adjacent to McFadden
Square.
Zone: C -2
Applicant: Tom Moon, Newport Beach
Owner: Betty J. Stanley, Costa Mesa
Tom Moon, Architect, relayed to the Planning C
sion their intention to provide blue -meter par
in McFadden Square in -lieu of onsite parking ,a
state the indication of the Spaghetti Factory
allow them to use a small number of their park
spaces.
In response to a question from Commissioner Ha
ger, Mr. Moon stated that they would be willin
purchase the adjacent lot to provide additiona
parking.
Richard Hogan, Community Development Director,,
ted that in this instance, the issue is the di
of the proposed parking lot from the related u
Commissioner Beek stated his observation that
proposed parking is on the other side of Newpo
Boulevard, providing a psychological barrier a
that he was in support of the decision of the
munity Development Director.
In response to a question from Commissioner Fr
ickson, Mr. Hogan stated that the adjacent pro
-4-
MINUTES
INDEX
F the
ldden COMMER-
ing r=N
re- LIEU
into P RKING
DENIED
ion A,,
lst
21st
i
)mmis
(ing
id to
to
ing
[din -
I to
sta-
>tanc
se.
the
rt
id
:om-
!der -
3erty
•
COMMISSIONERS
p �y
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROLL CALL
al
t.
he
Y
u
e-
Item $4
AMEND -
y
would provide an additional 8 parking spaces.
530
Dick Kent, Architect, 501 31st St., then expresse
his support of this project and his feeling that
the proposed parking would encourage a. walking sc
Motion
x
Motion was made to uphold the decision of the Com
munity Development Director and not allow the Com
mercial In- Lieu Parking request at 222 21st Sltree
Commissioner Haidinger expressed his support !of t
motion, with his concern in mind of the deficient
of 26 parking spaces in the proposed project.
Commissioner Beek expressed his support of in -lie
fees.
Commissioner Frederickson then stated his opposi-
tion to the motion.
Ayes
x
X
x
x
i
Motion was then voted on, which MOTION CARRI�D.
Noes
x
sent
Request to consider an amendment to the adopted D
velopment Plan for the Newport Place Planned Com -
munity, so as to reduce the allowable development
to be consistent with the Phasing Plan approved h
the City Council.
Initiated By: City of Newport Beach
*Commissioner Balalis arrived at 8:30 P.M.
The Public Hearing was opened regarding this iten
and there being no one desiring to appear and be
heard, the Public Hearing for this item was close
Motion
x
Motion was made to approve the Negative DeclaraV
All Ayes
and adopt Resolution No. 1035 recommending to the
City Council that the Newport Place Planned Commt
ity Development Plan be amended to reduce allowat
development by 86,119 sq. ft. on Office Site$ 1 z
2, and 20,000 sq. ft. on Industrial Site 3A, con!
I
tent with the approved development phasing plan.
* * *
i
i
-5.
MINUTES
INDEX
I
al
t.
he
Y
u
e-
Item $4
AMEND -
y
MMM -N0 .
530
d.
on
n-
le
n
is
U_
WO
VED
COMMISSIONERS
ROLL CALL
MINUTES
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979 .
INDEX
Request to amend the Planned Community Development
Item #5
Standards for Corporate Plaza so as to permit ad-
ditional signs within the Planned Community.
AMEND -
MENf_NO.
Location: Property bounded by Newport Center
9T1_
Drive, Farallon Drive, Avocado Ave-
R OW-
nue and East Coast Highway, in Cor-
-IT ON NO.
porate Plaza.
10_36
Zone: P -C
APPROVED.
Applicant: The Irvine Co., Newport Beach.
Owner: Same as Applicant
The Public Hearing was opened regarding this item
and Paul Thakur, representing the Irvine Company,
appeared before the Planning Commission to answer
the questions of the Planning.Commission.
Commissioner Balalis inquired as to the necessity
of two Number One signs, to which Mr. Thakur repl-
•
ied that Newport Center Drive and Pacific Coast
Highway were the two main entrances.
Commissioner Beek expressed his feeling that signs
of this magnitude were unnecessary, and he pro -
posed an amendment to 4 (d) "Project I.D. Signs ", to
reduce all the proposed signs on the project to 12
sq. ft., maximum.
Mr. Thakur expressed his feeling that sculpturally
and architecturally, 12 sq.-ft. signs would be unaccept-
able.
Ron Hendrickson, Architect, The Irvine Company,
appeared before the Planning Commission. -to, state
his feeling that the identity of this project is
needed to a much greater degree than that of a
street sign, that aesthetically the proposed signs
would be an enhancement, that the structures on
which the signs are set are sculptures and walls
and are part of the landscape design and addition-
ally that the designer felt that the entryways
should be symmetrical.
Commissioner Beek then withdrew his proposed amend-
me nt,•
•
10
COMMISSIONERS
• m v S} Vu oF4 yp! Q
4
I
L
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROLL CALL
Motion was made to modify proposed Amendment No..
Motion
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
531 to allow only one entry sign at each of the t
Noes
x
main entrances of Corporate Plaza and approve sai
Amendment No. 531, Section IV. E. of the Planned
Community Text, an amendment to the Planned Commu
ity District regulations, to wit:
j
4. Project Identification Signs
a. The location of project identification
signs will be subject to the approval o
the Director of Community Development.
b. Only one sign shall be permitted at eac
of the two main entrances to the projec
C. These signs may be located within setba
areas.
d. Maximum height of the sign will not exc
six (6') feet above existing grade.
e. Single sign face (not including support
t
ing structure) will not exceed one hun-
dred (100) square feet.
f. The letter size will not exceed 1W.
g. No flashing or pole signs.will be permi
ted.
h.. The signs may be externally illuminated
5. Directional and Parking Signs
a. The location.of directional and parkine
signs will be subject to approval of th
Director of Community Development pnd t
Traffic Engineer.
b. Maximum height of these signs will not
ceed 4' above existing grade.
C.. Single face (not including supporting
structure) shall not exceed twelve (12)
square feet.
d. The letter size shall not exceed none (9 ") incl
'
i
e.' No flashing or pole signs will be permitted.
i
i
-7-
MINUTES
ee
t-
e
he
ex
les .
COMMISSIONERS
fS W t$p .p
wn'L '2
ROIL CALL
MINUTES
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
D create two parcels of land for single
sidential development where a portion of
Dw exists, and the acceptance of an En-
al Document.
A portion of Lot 48, Newport Heights
located at 2327 16th Street, on the
southwesterly side of 16th Street
between Tustin Avenue and Irvine
Avenue in Newport Heights.
R -1
Tom W. Robinson, M.D., Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
Donald E. Stevens, Inc., Costa Mesa
c Hearing was opened regarding this item
. Robinson, M.D., Applicant, appeared be-
Planning Commission to state that the to-
Dotage on the subject property is 12,159
and his intention that the two nonconform-
ings would be brought up to the standards
t Beach and greatly improved and to state
Dwner of neighboring Lot 21 is in support
Dject. He concluded by stating his con -
mith the conditions, with the exception of
No. 7, adding that his intent to correct.
age problems would be only in the event
nproved the back property. He explained
property is receiving water from all the
properties, due to an existing drainage
in which the lot slopes.
son, Newport Heights, appeared before the
Commission to state his opposition to the
as he felt that it would create inferior
in relation to the majority of the lots
t Heights, and that he did not wish to
he considered as a negative precedent set.
, property owner south of the applicant,
before the Planning Commission on behalf
Dring property owners, to express his sup -
he project, as he felt it would be an as-
s property that the drainage problem be
go
C
INDEX
Item #6
RESUB-
D.IVISION
NO. 625
DENIED
•
•
Request t
family re
one lot n
vironment
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner;
Engineer:
The Publi
and Tom D
fore the
tal sq. f
sq. ft.,
i.ng dwell
of Newpor
that the
of his pr
currence
Condition
any drain
that he i
that the
adjacent
problem,
Gary John
Planning
lot split
size lots
in Newpor
see what
Dale Hart
appeared
of neighb
port of t
set to hi
resolved.
May 10, 1979
D create two parcels of land for single
sidential development where a portion of
Dw exists, and the acceptance of an En-
al Document.
A portion of Lot 48, Newport Heights
located at 2327 16th Street, on the
southwesterly side of 16th Street
between Tustin Avenue and Irvine
Avenue in Newport Heights.
R -1
Tom W. Robinson, M.D., Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
Donald E. Stevens, Inc., Costa Mesa
c Hearing was opened regarding this item
. Robinson, M.D., Applicant, appeared be-
Planning Commission to state that the to-
Dotage on the subject property is 12,159
and his intention that the two nonconform-
ings would be brought up to the standards
t Beach and greatly improved and to state
Dwner of neighboring Lot 21 is in support
Dject. He concluded by stating his con -
mith the conditions, with the exception of
No. 7, adding that his intent to correct.
age problems would be only in the event
nproved the back property. He explained
property is receiving water from all the
properties, due to an existing drainage
in which the lot slopes.
son, Newport Heights, appeared before the
Commission to state his opposition to the
as he felt that it would create inferior
in relation to the majority of the lots
t Heights, and that he did not wish to
he considered as a negative precedent set.
, property owner south of the applicant,
before the Planning Commission on behalf
Dring property owners, to express his sup -
he project, as he felt it would be an as-
s property that the drainage problem be
go
C
INDEX
Item #6
RESUB-
D.IVISION
NO. 625
DENIED
•
•
COMMISSIONERS
9�F Ac ®mom pp�xxpmS. i
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROLL CALL
James Foster, 2207 16th Street, appeared before t
Planning Commission to express his concern as to
the aesthetics of the area upon splitting the lot
and to concur with the drainage problem in that
area, and he suggested an upgrading of the lot, i
cluding the building of a rental unit, in lieu of
a lot split.
Michael Allan, 2508 Holly Lane, appeared before t
Planning Commission to state that his general at-
titude would be one of splitting his lot into thr
parcels, upon the precedent that would be set wit
i
approval of this project.
Mr. Johnson again appeared before the Planning Co
mission to state his feeling that the lot size
standard of Newport Beach should be maintained de
pite the proximity to Costa Mesa.
Mr. Hart again appeared before the Planning Commi
sion to state his desire for approval of the;pro-
ject to correct the "swampy" condition of the are
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the Public Hearing for this item was close
i
In response to a question from Commissioner Beek,
Don Webb, Public Works Department Subdivision En-
gineer, stated that Condition No. 6 is essential
because the garage on Parcel No. 2 would be behir
the house on Parcel No. 1, and an easement for it
gress and egress would be necessary.
Motion
x
Motion was made that the Planning Commissionmake
the following findings:
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title
19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all
ordinances of the City, all applicable gener
al or specific plans and the Planning Commis
sion is satisfied with the plan of subdivi-
sion.
i
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
3. That two nonconforming residential units are
now located on the subject property. The pr
•
posed parcel map will eliminate sai xistir
-g-
MINUTES
INDEX
h
n-
he
e
h
m-
S-1,
s-
a .
d.
d
o-
g
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROLL CALL
nonconforming situation, since only a single
family dwelling will be maintained on each p
cel as permitted in the R -1 District.
4. That the proposed nonconforming features on
site that will be created with the approval
this application present no problem from a .
building or planning standpoint.
5. That if the exception were denied the petit-
ioner would be deprived of a substantial pro
perty right enjoyed by others in the area.
6. That the granting of this exception is compa
tible with the objectives.of the regulations
governing light, air and the public health.,
safety, convenience, and general welfare.
7. That the proposed resubdivision is in confor
mance with the General Plan, and that the pr
posed development is compatible with the ob-
jectives, policies, general land uses and pr
grams specified in said plan.
and approve Resubdivision No. 625, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That a parcel map be filed.
2. That all improvements be constructed as requ
ed by ordinance and the Public Works Depart-
ment.
3. That street improvements (curb, gutter, side
walk and pavement widening) be constructed a
long the 16th Street frontage to the design
standards and requirements of the City of
Costa Mesa.
4. That the sewer service be in accordance with
the requirements of the Costa Mesa Sanitary
District. In addition, individual sewer la-
teral connections shall be provided from the
public line to each dwelling unit.
5. That domestic water service be provided by t
City of Newport Beach. In addition, each to
-10-
MINUTES
•
I INDEX
ar
th
Df
M
D-
ne
t
•
0
COMMISSIONERS
y:
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROIL CALL
shall have a connection to the existingi publ
water main to the satisfaction of the Public
Works Department; and the services shall be
stalled under an encroachment permit obtaine
from the City of Costa Mesa.
6. That an easement for ingress and egress be p
vided across Parcel No. 2 for the benefit of
Parcel No. 1.
7. That a drainage study be prepared and any
drainage problems identified be corrected to
the satisfaction of the City's grading engin
eer.
8. That an agreement and.surety be provided to
guarantee completion of the public improve-
ments.
9. That a two car garage shall be constructed o
Parcel No. 1 for vehicular storage. A corne
of said addition shall be permitted to iencro
to within 4 feet of the southwesterly corner
of Parcel No. 1 as indicated on the applroved
plot plan.
0. That if it is the desire of the applicaint to
record the Parcel Map prior to the constru-
ction of the required garage, an agreement
and surety shall be provided to guarantee co
pletion of the garage..
1. That any expansion of the existing dwelling
unit on Parcel No. 2 shall be subject to the
review of the Modifications Committee.
Motion
x
An amendment to the motion was made that Findings
Ayes
x
No. 2 and 5 be deleted and that the.words "olr pla
Noes
x
x
x
x
x
x
ning" at the end of Finding No. 4 be deleted,.
Commissioner Haidinger stated his opposition to a
lot split in this particular case.
Commissioner Balalis stated his preference that t
lot be maintained as a single parcel, with a two -
unit condominium development on said parcel.
-11-
MINUTES
INDEX
is
in-
d
ro
n
r
ac
m-
n-
hi
COMMISSIONERS
s
ROLL CALL
Motion
Ayes
Noes
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
MINUTES
•
INDEX
ii-
>rde�a
ind
)er- Item #7
ium
=n- RESUB-
VISION.
NO.
1220,;
,.on DENIED
Road
rive
rt
I
rty
Y
in-
has
as-
ith
•
x
Original Motion was then changed to deny Resub
vision No. 625.
Richard Hogan, Community Development Director,
stated that there was the probability that thi
must necessarily be rezoned to an R -2 zone in
to allow it to be used for a condominium, with
General Plan Amendment involved.
x
x
x
K
x
Motion was then voted on, which MOTION CARRIED
x
x
The Planning Commission.recessed at 9:00 P.M.
reconvened at 9:10 P.M.
Request to create one parcel of land so as to
mit the construction of a residential condomin
complex on the site, and the acceptance of an
vironmental Document.
Location: A portion of Lot 37, Tract No.
located at 418 St. Andrews Road
the easterly side of St Andrews
between Clay Street and Cliff. D
in Cliff Haven.
Zone: R -3
Applicant: Michael Steiner, Costa Mesa
Owner: Same as Applicant
Engineer: R.M..G. Engineering, Inc., Newpo
Beach
Richard Hogan, Community Development Director,
stated that this property has only single fami
dwellings adjacent and would be the only prope
on this side of the street with multiple famil
dwellings and suggested that this item be cont
ued until such time as the Planning Commission
an opportunity to hear the possibility of recl
sification of that property to be consistent w
the development which exists there.
-12-
MINUTES
•
INDEX
ii-
>rde�a
ind
)er- Item #7
ium
=n- RESUB-
VISION.
NO.
1220,;
,.on DENIED
Road
rive
rt
I
rty
Y
in-
has
as-
ith
•
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROIL CALL
Item #8
K
RESUB-
DIVISION
ad
NT-72 8
J
APPROVED
TON DI-
j
The Public Hearing was opened regarding this itea
j
and Michael Steiner, Applicant and Owner, apppearf
before the Planning Commission to state his Hntel
tion to build three one - bedroom den units and twc
two- bedroom, two-bath-units and his general pre-
ference of building condominiums rather than ren•
tal apartments.
Roland Landrigan, Newport Heights, appeared befoi
the Planning Commission to state that there is ci
rently before the City Council a traffic study
dealing with the heavy .influx of traffic already
with the existing R -1 zoning that is basically pi
dominant through the two areas. He further ex-
pressed his concern with this particular devielop�
ment in taking a small lot of 6,000 sq. ft. from
single- family occupancy to a five - family occupant
multiplied by 12 to produce 60 families in an ar
designed for 12 families, including impacting of
the traffic situation that would result.
.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
•
heard, the Public Hearing for this item was clos
Commissioner Balalis stated his feeling that thr,
j
stories should not be allowed on a parcel as sma
as this, this being more adequate to serve our
needs as well as the property owners needs rathe
ree the property, just because they
than to zon
don't like the concept of the project, to an R -1
zone.
Motion
x!
Motion was made to deny Resubdivision No. 627.
All Ayes
Request to create one parcel of land .so as to co
I
struct a two unit residential condominium comple
on the site.
Location: Parcel No. 1 of Parcel Ma 119 -20
21 (Resubdivision No. 568), locat
at 230 North Newport Boulevard an
234 Catalina Drive, on the south-
easterly corner of North Newport
Boulevard and Catalina Drive, ad-
jacent to Newport Heights.
•
-13-
MINUTES
INDEX
1,
!d
-e
it
-e
a
:y
�a
ad
ae
11
i-
Item #8
K
RESUB-
DIVISION
ad
NT-72 8
J
APPROVED
TON DI-
TI NALLY.
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROLL CALL
Zone: R -2
Applicant: George D. Shambeck, Santa Ana
Owners': Hall, Shambeck and Foreman, Santa
Ana
Engineer: Hall & Foreman, Santa Ana
The Public Hearing was opened regarding this itei
and Hugh Foreman, one of the Applicants, appeare
before the Planning Commission to inform them
that the Site Plan Review and Map had been ap-
proved previously and the point in question now
whether a duplex or condominium will be built on
the site.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the Public Hearing for this item was clos,
In response to a question by Commissioner Balali.
Hugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney, stated tha
under the existing Condominium Conversion Ordin-
ance, this was not an application for converting
an existing building, but an instance of a Subdi
vision Map for the creation of a lot for, condo-
minium purposes under the Map Act, and that the
Council Policy refers to the conversion of. exist
ing residential units to condominiums and is not
dealing with vacant property.
Motion
x
Motion was made that the Planning Commission mak
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
y
the following findings:
Noes
x
1. That the map meets the requirements of Titli
19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all
ordinances of the City, all applicable gene-
al or specific plans and the Planning Commi
sion is satisfied with the plan of subdivis
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
and approve Resubdivision No. 628, subject to thi
following modified conditions:
1. That a parcel map be filed.
-14-
MINUTES
n,
9
is
!d.
t�
s—
!or
•
INDEX
I.
0
COMMISSIONERS
CmF
\S141
ROLL CALL
•
•
MINUTES
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
individual water services and sewer la-
Is, unless otherwise approved by the Pub -
dorks Department, connecting to a public
shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
a minimum of two parking spaces far each
ling unit shall be maintained for vehicu-
storage on the site at all times.
> establish a Planned Community Plan and
it Standards for the Aeronutronic Ford
the acceptance of an Environmental Docu-
A portion of Block 56, Irvine's Sub•
division, bounded by Bison Avenue,
Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and Mac-
Arthur Boulevard.
P -C
Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation and Eagle Development
Company /Dann Corporation, Newport
Beach
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
AND
subdivide 215.15 ± acres into four par-
;ale, lease or financing purposes in ac-
vith a proposed Planned Community Develop.
and Standards for the Aeronutronic Ford
)mmunity District.
A portion of Block 56, Irvine's Sub•
division, bounded by Bison Avenue,
Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and Mac -
Arthur Boulevard.
fa
Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation, and Eagle Development
Company /Dann Corporation, Newport
Beach
-15-
INDEX
Item #9
AMEND -
NMM -NO .
RESOLU-
T- 00 .
10�
CONTIN-
E�TO
MAY 16,
1979
Item #10
RESUB -.
IIN SIGN
0.. 629
CONTIN-
UET"M
WATIT,
3T79—
2. That
tera
lic
line
3. That
dwel
tar
Request ti
Developmei
site, and
ment.
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
i
Owner:
Request ti
cels for
cordance
ment Plan
Planned C
Location:
I
I
.Zone:
i
I
Applicant
May 10, 1979
individual water services and sewer la-
Is, unless otherwise approved by the Pub -
dorks Department, connecting to a public
shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
a minimum of two parking spaces far each
ling unit shall be maintained for vehicu-
storage on the site at all times.
> establish a Planned Community Plan and
it Standards for the Aeronutronic Ford
the acceptance of an Environmental Docu-
A portion of Block 56, Irvine's Sub•
division, bounded by Bison Avenue,
Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and Mac-
Arthur Boulevard.
P -C
Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation and Eagle Development
Company /Dann Corporation, Newport
Beach
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
AND
subdivide 215.15 ± acres into four par-
;ale, lease or financing purposes in ac-
vith a proposed Planned Community Develop.
and Standards for the Aeronutronic Ford
)mmunity District.
A portion of Block 56, Irvine's Sub•
division, bounded by Bison Avenue,
Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and Mac -
Arthur Boulevard.
fa
Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation, and Eagle Development
Company /Dann Corporation, Newport
Beach
-15-
INDEX
Item #9
AMEND -
NMM -NO .
RESOLU-
T- 00 .
10�
CONTIN-
E�TO
MAY 16,
1979
Item #10
RESUB -.
IIN SIGN
0.. 629
CONTIN-
UET"M
WATIT,
3T79—
ROIL CALL
MINUTES
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Robert Bein, William Frost and As-
sociates, Newport Beach
AND
subdivide 215.2 ± acres into 77 lots for
oily residential development, two lots for
im residential.development of 222 units,
for townhome residential development of
one numbered lot ( "85 ") for public park
one lettered lot ( "H ") for public park.
one numbered lot ( "78 ") for private re-
purposes, one lettered lot ( "F ") for
•eet purposes, five lettered lots ( "B,C,D,
'or private street purposes, one lettered
for private road landscape purposes, and
°ed lot ( "86 ") for the 465,000 sq. ft.
of the existing research. and development
on the site.
A portion of Block 56, Irvine's Sub-
division, bounded by Bison Avenue,
Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and Mac -
arthur Boulevard.
P -C
Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation, and Eagle.Development
Company /Daon Corporation, Newport
Beach
The Irvine Company, Newport.Beach
Robert Bein, William Frost and
Associates, Newport Beach
AND
)r the approval of a Phasing Plan for
development in the Aeronutronic Ford
city District. (Discussion)
•
INDEX
Item #11
CONTIN-
UED O
M Y 1
10-9—
•
the Item #1
Plan
PHASING
A portion of Block 56, Irvine's Sub-
division,.bounded by Bison Avenue,
Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and Mac-
Arthur Boulevard.
-16-
Owner:
Engineer:
Request ti
single fai
condominii
four lots
311 units
purposes,
purposes,
creationa'
public st
E, & G ")
lot ( "I ")
one numbe
expansion
facilitie
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner:
Engineer:
Request f
remaining
ned Commu
Location:
May 10, 1979
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Robert Bein, William Frost and As-
sociates, Newport Beach
AND
subdivide 215.2 ± acres into 77 lots for
oily residential development, two lots for
im residential.development of 222 units,
for townhome residential development of
one numbered lot ( "85 ") for public park
one lettered lot ( "H ") for public park.
one numbered lot ( "78 ") for private re-
purposes, one lettered lot ( "F ") for
•eet purposes, five lettered lots ( "B,C,D,
'or private street purposes, one lettered
for private road landscape purposes, and
°ed lot ( "86 ") for the 465,000 sq. ft.
of the existing research. and development
on the site.
A portion of Block 56, Irvine's Sub-
division, bounded by Bison Avenue,
Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and Mac -
arthur Boulevard.
P -C
Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation, and Eagle.Development
Company /Daon Corporation, Newport
Beach
The Irvine Company, Newport.Beach
Robert Bein, William Frost and
Associates, Newport Beach
AND
)r the approval of a Phasing Plan for
development in the Aeronutronic Ford
city District. (Discussion)
•
INDEX
Item #11
CONTIN-
UED O
M Y 1
10-9—
•
the Item #1
Plan
PHASING
A portion of Block 56, Irvine's Sub-
division,.bounded by Bison Avenue,
Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and Mac-
Arthur Boulevard.
-16-
COMMISSIONERS
i
1
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROLL CALL
Zone: P -C
Applicant: Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation, and Eagle Development
Company /Dann Corporation, Newport
Beach
i
Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Bleach
(Item Nos. 9, 10, 11 and 12 were heard concurrent
ly, due to their relationship.)
The Public Hearing was opened regarding these ite
and David Neish, with the firm, Urban Assist .ap-
peared before the Planning Commission to replresen
the Applicants, Eagle Development Company /Daon
Southwest Corporation. He relayed the history of
the project, including the facts that:. The exist
ing approved development plan was granted in 1958
allowing 2,650,000 sq. ft. of research and develo
ment facilities; the Aeronutornics Ford site com-
.
prises 215 acres with 993,000 sq. ft. of research
and development facilities developed in conforman
with the Newport Beach General Plan; the proposed
project consists of 610 dwelling units and the ex
pansion of the existing research and development
facilities to accommodate a total buildout of
1,361,000 sq. ft., or an additional 368,000.1t. r
maining to be built; and the net effect of the pr
posed project versus the approved plan is a reduc
tion of 1,239,400 square feet of research fa-
cilities and-the-construction of 610 proposed
residential units. He then relayed their objects
in the project, including: the reduction of traf
fic from the standpoint of the City, the surround
ing neighborhood and Aeronutronic Ford, to provid
a plan with a variety of housing types, designs a
price ranges attractive to a wide range of buyers
to make available to the Ford employees a priorit
to purchase these units, further reducing traffic
and finally, to develop a planned community envir
onmentally and physically sound, aesthetically at
tractive and an asset to Newport Beach.
Tom Morrissey, Director of Industrial Relations c
the Ford Aerospace and Communications Corporatior
appeared before the Planning Commission to preser
.
a brief historical perspective, an explanation c
I
i
_17_
MINUTES
ms
t
p-
ce
e-
0
e
nd
,
y
f
,
t
f
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
3
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROLL CALL
the proposed alternative plan and the research ani
development expansion. He stated that the proper
is approximately 40% developed at this time, havii
a little less than 1,000,000 sq. ft. He further
relayed that in 1976, the property was rezoned to
P -C, that in 1977 they asked for a change in the
General Plan to designate the property with a bro
er use to allow additional flexibility in plannin,
at which time the Planning Commission suggested r
sidential as an alternative and they acquired a
broad General Plan designation with the proviso fi
innovation to create something that would have a
positive traffic effect, which they proceeded to
do.
Wally Gaynor, President of Eagle Development Comp
then appeared before the Planning Commission to m
a brief presentation on the residential portion o'
the project. He stated that they have endeavored
to design a wide diversification of housing types
involving thorough market studies to determine su,
a) 132 Adult Living Condominiums (1140 sq.:
ft.) - Ford Road & Jamboree Road
b) 171 Young Family Condominiums (1535 sq.
ft.) - Ford Road on the Bluff
c) 79 Single Family Homes (2300 sq. ft.)
d) 90 Adult Villa Condominiums (1845 sq.
ft.) - MacArthur Boulevard
e) 138 Large Townhomes (2,000 sq., ft.)
!He stated that each area has its own recreational
facilities, including recreation center and pools
including a tennis court and an 11;j acre site for
a public park. In conclusion, he stated that the
overall density of this plan is 5.3 units to the
acre, as contrasted with the McLain project at 8.
units per acre and Eastbluff at 7.0 units per acr
Mr. Neish again appeared before the Planning Comm
sion to conclude by stating that many changes have
taken place, including a request for an alternati
plan to implement all the ingredients of the City
present -day desires, including a reduction of tra
fic from the original figure on an Average Daily
Basis by 39% and has reduced the P.M. Peak Hour f
gure by 44 %; the comparison of the residential po
-18-
MINUTES
INDEX
1
ty
I
id
d>
�r
Ln ,
Ik
F
;h
•
,
5
,
is-,
ie
's'
F-
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROIL CALL
tion of the project versus the industrial alterna
tive on the currently vacant 101.6 acres as a red
ction of 66% ADT and 85% P.M. Peak Hour. He stat
that in an effort to further reduce traffic, Ford
provides on -site eating facilities, precluding em
ployees from leaving the facility at the lunch an
dinner hours, 10 different staggered work shifts
reduce and eliminate peak congestion and park -and
ride programs to assist in reducing overall conge
tion. He added that the applicants will fund
$84,000 worth of traffic improvements to
the circulation system that is removed from
the subject property, as indicated in the EIR and
the Traffic Phasing Plan, and that in addition, a
nother $1,000,000 will be provided by the applica
for traffic improvements adjacent and contiguous
the site, including five new traffic signalsand 1
extension of Bison Avenue to MacArthur Blvd. He con-
eluded by stating that the project complies with
the General Plan, with the Park Dedication.0rdi-
nance and with the parking codes and that.the P -C
Text is consistent with the General Plan, and he
.
stated his Concurrence with the findings and.cond
tions.
Keith Cordrey, a Director of Sea Pine Community
Association, representing .61 owners, appeared be-
fore the Planning Commission to state a specific
objection to the traffic flow of this project. H
expressed his concern that the road approach now
Ford Road will be cut off and used as an access t
the residential area and that a third southerly
road will be developed on the.east side of the pr
ject, egressing on Ford Road, precisely across th
street from the entrance to his condominium, and
his further concern regarding the amount of.traff
that will be flowing on a 10- staggered shift; basi
including the noise level that would be involved
with the intended traffic signal at that intersec
tion. In conclusion, he asked that the Planning
Commission recommend consideration to the closin5
of the entrance to .Ford Motor Company on Ford Roa
and that Ford Road be confined primarily to resi-
dential traffic.
Henry Rider then appeared before the Planning Corr
mission to put on record that the Bluffs area is
having problems regarding an excess of water in t
-19-
MINUTES
u-
ed
d
to
s-
nt
to
:he
i-
e
on
0
o-
e
is
S,
d,
he
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
,\lop\
0�4 TiC
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
Bluffs area, and also to express his concern re-
garding the traffic congestion that he felt would
be inherent in the proposed project, and to state
his feeling that there were discrepencies in the
EIR.
Dwayne Merry, 2640 Basswood, appeared before the
Planning Commission to express his concern regard-
ing the increased traffic congestion and obstructe
view he felt would result from this proposed pro-
ject.
Commissioner Haidinger then expressed his feeling
that the density of the proposed project was too
high.
Motion
x
Motion was made that the Planning Commission ap-
prove Amendment No. 532, revising the Planned Com-
munity Development Plan and Development Standards
for the Ford - Aeronutronic Planned Community Dis-
trict, to wit:
"Fences, Hedges and Walls
Fences shall be limited to a maximum height
of seven (7) feet, except within the front
.yard setback where fences, hedges and walls
shall be limited to five (5) feet. Wing
walls, where an extension of a residential
or accessory structure is to be constructed
may be eight (8) feet in height. At street
intersections, no such appurtenance shall
exceed Spree- 434- €eet -4n- he4ght- above - street
pavemen8- grade. two (2) feet in height measur
ed from curb height within the triangTe— boun
ded, by the right -of -way lines and a connect -
ing line drawn between points thirty (30)
feet .distant from the intersection of the
right -of -way lines prolonged."
and that the Planning Commission make the findings
as stated in the Staff Report, and approve Resub-
division No. 629, subject to the conditions in the
Staff Report, with the suggested changes in Condi-
tions No. 30 and 38, to wit:
30. "That the applicant provide for da33y weekly
vacuum sweeping of all surface parking areas
within the industrial portion of the project
-20-
0
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROLL CALL
and weekly vacuum sweeping of all common par
ing areas of the residential portion of the
project.
38. The circulation systems improvements listed
below and identified on Pages 32 and 33 of t
"Draft EIR Aeronutronic Ford," or measures a
set forth in an approved Traffic Phasing Pla
shall be installed or guaranteed or bonded b,
the applicant, prior to the occupancy of any
buildings, with the exception of the redesig
of the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard/
Ford Road. The MacArthur Boulevard /Ford Roa
intersection shall be under construction pri,
to occupancy.."
and that the Planning Commission forward to the
City Council the alternative requested by the app
cants for 610 units and recommend that the City
Council disapprove the 610 units figure, and for-
ward to City Council the recommended approach to
the Planned Community, to wit:
.
1) A reduction in density from 132 Condo -.
miniums to 100 Condominiums.
2) A reduction in density from 173 Condo-
miniums to 48 Single Family Detachted
Homes.
3) A reduction in density from 77 Single
Family Detached to 44 Single Familiy De-
tached.Homes.
4) A reduction in density from 90 Single
Family Detached to 44 Single Family De-
tached Homes.
5) A reduction in density from 138 Si: ngle
Family Dwelling Units to 120 Single Fam•
ily Dwelling Units.,
for a total of 356 dwelling units on the property
and one numbered lot ( "85 ") for public park use, i
recommended by staff.
i
and recommend to the City Council approval of the
Tentative Map of Tract No. 10391 with the finding!
and subject to the conditions as stated in the Sti
i
Report.
i
I
!
-21-
MINUTES
INDEX
c-
ie
s
1,
7
i
�r
I
J
is
I
COMMISSIONERS
\10p\
City. of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROLL CALL
And approve the Phasing Plan for the remaining de
velopment in the Aeronutronic Ford Planned Commue
ity District and recommend same to the City Coun-
cil, with the Findings, and subject to the Con-
ditions, as stated in the Staff Report, and accel
the EIR as corrected.
Commissioner Balalis then expressed his concern
that no rental units had been provided within the
proposed project, as he felt that the balance of
rental units should be maintained within the Cit3
Motion
x
Amendment to the Motion was made to modify area
(5) of the Planned Community Text by changing
the units from 120 single family units to 250
apartment units, with a mix of 1, 2 and 3 bedrool
units, for a total of 486.units, of which 250 wot
be rental units.
In answer to a question from Commissioner Freder•
ickson, Don Webb, Public Works Department Subdi-
vision Engineer, responded that the two egresses
to which Mr. Cordrey referred were aligned becau!
of the necessity of a signalized intersection at
that point, and serves only the Ford industrial
development.and not the residential development.
Commissioner Cokas suggested ,a general reduction
in density to a total of 510 dwelling units, in-
cluding a few rental units, allowing the choice
of the specific types of units to be the respons
bility of the applicants.
Commissioner Beek stated that he would like to si
statistics on the work force involved and the pe,
centage that could afford housing discussed in tl
proposed project and he suggested the need for ii
dustry to subsidize employees' housing.
In response to Commissioner Beek, Mr. Morrissey
ted that they had not established a legal docume
that provides a right of first refusal to the Fo
employees, due to the Department of Real Estate
regulations that they are being cautious not to
violate.
Commissioner Balalis stated his understanding th
rental units could qualify as subsidized housing
-22-
MINUTES
I t INDEX
i
it
;e
i-
ae
ie
1-
>ta
it
,d
E
�t
•
COMMISSIONERS
vc vBiu OQ S,p �v t I
vest v���P(3y�,�o
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROIL CALL
Commissioner Agee stated that he could not suppor
the motion as he felt it defeated some of the maj
intents Ford has had with this project to provide
a mix in unit types for employees of all incomes;
and that he could support the amendment to provic
low -cost rental units.
Mr. Morrissey again appeared before the Planning
Commission to state that moderate -cost housing we
not one of their objectives, and he felt that the
attempt on the part of the Planning Commission wi
not a workable solution, and that the entire con(
of the proposed project would be changed. He fut
ther stated that a reduction in density and an ac
dition of low -cost housing would greatly increase
the cost of the units.
Commissioner Balalis again expressed his feeling
that something must be done about the rental mar-
ket in the area.
Mr. Morrissey then stated that they cannot subsi-
dize housing and be cost - competitive in their in.
dustry.
Commissioner Cokas then stated that low -cost hou!
ing will be determined by economics, not by.legi!
latio:n, and that it was not the Planning Commis-
sion's responsibility to solve that problem with
any one particular industry.
Mr. Morrissey stated that industry cannot come ul
with the answers unless all the mechanisms exist
the City, including federal subsidies, housing ai
thorities, means of administering these units, mi
of deciding who rents the units and the amount fi
which they will be subsidized.
Commissioner Beek further suggested a shopping co
ter with the proposed project to reduce density i
Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard.
Motion
x
Substitute motion was made that the total dwellii
of the proposed project be reduced to 510 and th
the applicant undertake to distribute them iln a
reasonable manner, including providing some rent.
units, and present their modified proposal to th
Planning Commission.
-P3-
MINUTES
INDEX
t
0
e
s.
s
ept
i
in
!-
!an
it
!n-
!n
igs
!t
it
COMMISSIONERS
FIrf
�p
T
ROLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
Noes
Abstain
Motion
Ayes
Noes
Abstain
Motion
All Ayes
.Motion
All Ayes
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
MINUTES.
•
INDEX
s-
is.,
.m.
is
w
in
It
e
ns
Iv-
it
i-
•ee
:er
f
Item 3
AMEND -.
F1€fi' -NO
T2-9—
CONTIN
Urg—Tb
MA—YY4-,
1979
Item #14
PHASING
PLAN
CONTIN-
D 76
MMW 2T ,
•
Mr. Neish then appeared before the Planning Commi
sion to request a special meeting in the near fu-
ture to continue discussion of this.
x
Motion was made to continue the Public Hearing or
Items 9, 10, 11 and 12 to a special Planning Comn
sion meeting on Wednesday, May 16, 1979 at 7:30 F
x
x
x
Straw Vote was taken on the Substitute Motion, 0
x
x
x
x MOTION FAILED.
x
Motion was then made that no more than 10% of the
x
x
dwelling units be rental units, upon which a Stre
x
x
x Vote was taken.
x
x
x
Motion was then made to continue Agenda Item Nos.
13 and 14 to the regular Planning Commission meet
of May 24, 1979, due to the lateness of the hour,
Request to consider an amendment to Title 20, Pal
VII, Chapter 7 of the Newport Beach Municipal Co(
to add regulations for condominiums and conversis
to the Special Use Regulations of the Zoning Codl
Initiated By: The City of Newport Beach
x
Motion was made to continue Item No. 13 to the
regular Planning Commission meeting of May 24,
1979, due to the lateness of the hour.
Request of California.Canadian Bank for the appri
al of a Phasing Plan for the remaining developmei
on their property in the Koll Center Newport Plai
ned Community District.
Location: The most westerly corner of Jambo
Road and Campus Drive in Koll Cen
Newport.
Applicant: California Canadian Bank, Newport
Beach
Zone: P -C
-24-
MINUTES.
•
INDEX
s-
is.,
.m.
is
w
in
It
e
ns
Iv-
it
i-
•ee
:er
f
Item 3
AMEND -.
F1€fi' -NO
T2-9—
CONTIN
Urg—Tb
MA—YY4-,
1979
Item #14
PHASING
PLAN
CONTIN-
D 76
MMW 2T ,
•
COMMISSIONERS
°�vaFOTpy�
FF y F� V FO O
C� � tap 2p 9GO
ROLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
0
Motion
Ayes .
Absent
•
MINUTES
City of Newport Beach
x
Motion wa!
regular P'
1979, due
Request tc
sale beer
space now
Location•
Zone:
i
Applicant
Owner:
x
Motion wa
x
x
x
x
x
regular P
*
1979, due
Commissio
Request t
of the ou
C -1 -H Dis
mental Do
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
May 10, 1979
made to continue Item No. 14 to the
anning Commission meeting of May 24,
to the lateness of the hour.
* * *
establish a take -out facility with on-
and wine in Lido Village where retail.
exists.
Parcel No. 1 of Parcel Map 59 -17
(Resubdivision No. 416) located at
3408 Via Oporto, on the easterly
side of Via Oporto between Central
Avenue and Via Lido in Lido Marina
Village.
C -1 -H
Lido Marina Village, A General:Part•
nership,.Newport Beach
Howard F. Ruby, General Partner, Los
Angeles
made to continue Item No. 15-to the
lanning Commission meeting of May 24,
to the length.of the regular Planning
r meeting agenda of May 10, 1979.
* * *
establish a commercial use consisting
:door sales of antique furnishings in the
trict, and the acceptance of an EnWiron-
:ument.
Lots 14 through 17, Tract No. 1210,
located at 600 West Coast Highway,
on the northerly side of West Coast
Highway, westerly of Dover Drive, a-
cross West Coast Highway from Bay
Shores
C -1 -H
Leon Donald Brodnax, Jr., Donique's
Antiques, Inc., Newport Beach
-25-
INDEX
Item #15:
USE PER -
MI NO. .
CONTIN-
UEDD U
WAY 2-4
Item #16'
USE PER
MIT NO.
1907,
CONTIN-
U FD__'
JU Vim,
1979— `
COMMISSIONERS
s �ppt.
ROLL CALL
Motion
Ayes
Absent
Motion
Ayes
Absent
Motion
Ayes.
Absent
MINUTES
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
Leonard Horwin and Arnold J. Gordon,
Beverly Hills
ide to continue Item No. 16 to the
ling - Commission meeting of June 7, .
the length of the regular Planning
!eting agenda of May 10, 1979.
* * *
!rmit the construction of commercial -
:omplex on three adjoining lots in the
and the acceptance of an Environmen-
A modification to the Zoning Code
asted, since a portion of the required
as are tandem spaces (where the Ordin-
: that all required parking spaces
!ssible and usable).
Lots 24 through 26, Block 331, Lan-
caster's Addition, located at 410,
412 and 414 31st Street, on the
southerly side of 31st Street, bet-
ween Newport Boulevard and Villa Wa.,
in Lido Village.
C -2
Roger McKinnon, Corona del Mar
Same as Applicant
ade to .continue Item No.. 17 to the
ring Commission meeting of May 24,
the length of the regular Planning
eeting agenda of May 10, 1979.
* * *
>nsider an amendment to Chapter 20 of
3each Municipal Code so as to require
for roller skate rental establishments
)tance of an Environmental Document.
The City of Newport Beach
ade to continue Item No. 18 to the
ning Commission meeting of May 24,
the length of the regular Planning
eeting agenda of May 10, 1979.
-26-
INDEx
.Item #17
USE PER-
Nr —N-
CONTIN-
UED 0
MAY 24S
1979
•
Item #18
AMEND -
Mrfff —N0..
532
CONTIN-
UED
MAY 24,
19•
Owner:
x
Motion was m
x
x
x
xx
x
regular Plan
*
1979, due to
Commission m
Request to p
residential
C -2 District
tal Document
is also requi
parking spac
ance provide
shall be aca
Location:
Zone:
Applicant:
Owner:
x
Motion was m
x
x
x
x
x
x
regular Plan
*
1979, due to
Commission m
Request to c
the Newport
a Use Permit
and the acce
Initiated By
x
Motion was m
X
x
x
x
x
x
regular Plan
*
.1979, due to
Commission m
May 10, 1979
Leonard Horwin and Arnold J. Gordon,
Beverly Hills
ide to continue Item No. 16 to the
ling - Commission meeting of June 7, .
the length of the regular Planning
!eting agenda of May 10, 1979.
* * *
!rmit the construction of commercial -
:omplex on three adjoining lots in the
and the acceptance of an Environmen-
A modification to the Zoning Code
asted, since a portion of the required
as are tandem spaces (where the Ordin-
: that all required parking spaces
!ssible and usable).
Lots 24 through 26, Block 331, Lan-
caster's Addition, located at 410,
412 and 414 31st Street, on the
southerly side of 31st Street, bet-
ween Newport Boulevard and Villa Wa.,
in Lido Village.
C -2
Roger McKinnon, Corona del Mar
Same as Applicant
ade to .continue Item No.. 17 to the
ring Commission meeting of May 24,
the length of the regular Planning
eeting agenda of May 10, 1979.
* * *
>nsider an amendment to Chapter 20 of
3each Municipal Code so as to require
for roller skate rental establishments
)tance of an Environmental Document.
The City of Newport Beach
ade to continue Item No. 18 to the
ning Commission meeting of May 24,
the length of the regular Planning
eeting agenda of May 10, 1979.
-26-
INDEx
.Item #17
USE PER-
Nr —N-
CONTIN-
UED 0
MAY 24S
1979
•
Item #18
AMEND -
Mrfff —N0..
532
CONTIN-
UED
MAY 24,
19•
►.I
City of Newport Beach
May 10, 1979
ROLL CALL
There being no further business, the Planning Co
mission adjourned at 12:20 a.m.
GEOR E COKAS, Secretary
City f Newport Beach
Planning Commission
GC /gg
i
I
i
'
-27-
MINUTES
m-
INDEX