HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/16/1957MINUTES, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING,
CITY HALL COUNCIL
NUHPORT BEACH, CA
ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT
MAY 169 1957 8:00 P.M.
CHAMBERS
,IFORNIA
REED' COPELIN, HAYTON,
LOiJGIviOOR, SMITH, BRIGGS,
LIND, RUDD.
COM1viISSIONERS ABSENT : KEENE
MINUTES APRIL 18, 1957
Minutes of the meeting of April 189 1957 were
approved on motion of Commissioner Copelin,
seconded by Comm. Reed and carried subject to
the conditvn that the vote on Use Permit No.
315 be changed to read:-
AYES : Lind, Smith , Longmoor
& Copelin
NOES : Rudd, Keene & Reed
COs�iISSIONiRS ABSENT : Briggs & Hayton
VARIANCES
#367 1. BIEGLR, Everett E. 3015 Avon St. Newport Beach
2. Portion of Lot F Tract 919 Zone C -1 -H
3. Posted May 6, 1957 Published May 9, 1957
4. An encroachment of 15' into a required front yard
setback of 201.
5. Balance of lot is being used by trailer locations.
6. DISCUSSION Note findings.
7. FINDINGS This dwelling is being built in a
commercial district and under Section
9105.4 (g), Ord. No. 635, a.201 front
yard setback is required. There being
no protests received the Committee
recommended approval.
8. On motion of Comm. Rudd, seconded by Comm Hayton,
Variance application No. 367 was GRANTED by the
follvwing roll call vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
Page - 2 -
VARIANCES
#368 1.
ROY, Arthur J. 511 Irvine Avenue Newport Beach
2.
Lot 22 Block 39 1st Add. to Newport Heights
3.
Posted May 67 1957 Published May 9, 1957 Zone R -1
4.
Encroachment of 1' into required side yard setback of
5.
Would like to add bedroom, bath and family room and
attach to existing garage because family has outgrown
present dwelling.
6.
DISCUSSION : Note findings.
7.
FINDINGS : The Committee in their report set forth
that the approval of this application
would not be detrimental to the general
welfare of persons residing in the neigh-
borhood and recommended that it be granted
subject to the-condition that the garage on
the rear of the lot be used for the parking
of cars only.
8.
On motion of Commissioner Copelin, seconded by Comm. Smith
Variance application No. 368 was GRANTED subject to the
above condition by the following roll call vote, to wit:
ALL AYES.
#369 1.
GUSTAVINO, Joe and Tahwahnah Rue 465 Morning Canyon Rd.
2.
Lot 44 Tract 1237 Zone R -2 -B
3:
Posted May 6, 1957 Published May 9, 1957
4;
Encroachment of 4' into a required rear yard setback
of 19'.
5.
DUE to irrGgl,lar size and shape of lot, we are unable
to construct a pr_p._- i,.relij ng wl � = u� �•.. � -,i„ ..- .'
setback.
6.
DISCUSSION Submitted to the Commission was a
petition signed by 19 persons protesting
the encroachment of 4' into the 19' rear
yard setback. The petition referred to
other matters not under the jurisdiction
of the Planning Commission.
7.
FINDINGS A report from the Committee set forth
that policy already established by the
Commission favors encroachments to the
minimum 15' rear setbacks in a "B" District.
The property to the rear of Lot 44 has
Page - 3 -
• VARIANCES
;369 (con'd from
Page 2)
a rear yard setback of approximately
15'.
After careful consideration of all the
evidence at hand the Commission found
and determined that the desired rear
yard encroachment would not be detrimental
to the general welfare of persons residing
in the neighborhood.
8. On motion of Commissioner Reed, seconded by Comm. Hayton,
Variance application No. 369 was GRANTED by the following roll
call vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
71`370
1. HAHN, Richard G. 203 Via Ithaca Lido Island
2. Lot 765 Tract 907 Zone R -1
3. Posted May 6, 1957 Published May 9, 1957
40 Encroachment of 1' into a required side yard setback of 4'
and permission to construct a 6' fence on front property
line.
5. Applicant contends information was obtained from the Lido
Isle Community Association and the Building Dep &rtment re-
garding setbacks prior to drawing of plans which apparently
were erroneous. To do over plans at this time would result
in further delay and considerable expense.
6. DISCUSSION Note findings.
7. FINDINGS Policy already established by the Commission
prohibits a fence in excess of 3' on the front'
property line. The Committee in their findings
stated that other buildings in this area had
conformed to required side yard setbacks and since
a definite hardship was not established at time
of the hearing, a recommendation of denial was
made.
8. On motion of Commissioner Lind, seconded by Comm. Rudd, Variance
application No. 370 was DENIED by the following roll call vote,
to wit: ALL AYES.
/ 1
1. JDJELL9 Ward E. 324- 326 -328 Larkspur
•
Page - 4 -
#371
Corona del Mar
2. NE 25' of Lot 26 & all of Lots 28 & 30. Tract CDM Zone R -2
3. Posted May 6911957 Published May 99 1957
4. Waiver of side yard setbacks on south side line of lot 309
north and south side lines of Lot 28 and north side line of
Lot 26 to enable construction of 6 units on existing 3 R -2
lots adjoining R -3 property.
5. Larkspur is a:
North side of
26928 & 30 in+
the alley to
ment under co:
6. DISCUSSION :
•
7. On motion of
carried, the
until the ne:
49
i unimproved and inaccessible street from the
Lot 25 to Bayside Drive, thus making Lots
accessible except from alley. Directly across
;he east on Lots 27,29 & 31 is a seven unit apart -
istruction.
A discussion was held with the applicant and
persons who were present to inquire about the
parking problem.
Inspection of the plans disclosed that the
proposed garages for this development would
be off Bayside Drive and cars coming out of
the garages would back directly onto Bayside
Drive. Commissioner Hayton stated he would
object to this arrangement as it would create
a traffic hazard. He further stated "?ode are
objecting to the application as submitted from
the viewpoint of crossing property lines in
creating this type of development, but because
of the topography we feel it is an advantage
to grant it. Normally we wouldn't ".
0n suggestion of the Commission the applicant
requested that the application be held over
until the next regular meeting in order that
amended plans could be submitted showing. -
a turning basin for cars backing out of the
garages before entering Bayside Drive.
;ommissioner Hayton9 Seconded by Comm. Rudd, and
applicants request to hold this application over
regular meeting was approved.
• Oage - 5 -.
VARIANCES
#372
1. MACCO CORPORATION Corona del Mar
2. Lot V/- /eo,'^CZ. Tract 2813 Zone "U"
3. Posted May 6, 1957 Published May 9, 1957
4. A minimum front yard setback of 10'.
5. This is requested to establish a staggered setback pattern
similar to the existing section of Irvine Terrace.
6. DISCUSSION : Note findings.
7. FINDINGS The Committee reported this variance request
to be in keeping with policy established for
this area in permitting staggered setbacks and
in the absence of any protes.ts recommended
approval.
8. On motion of Commissioner Hayton, seconded by Comm. Reed,
Variance application No. 372 was GRANTED by the following roll
call vote, to wit: ALL AYES
• #373
1. DAVIS, Laura G. 3412 Via Lido Newport Beach
2. Lot 4 Tract 1235 Zone C -1 -H
3. Posted May 6, 1957 Published May 9, 1957
4. Waiver of off - street parking to permit erection of second
floor over a present existing building.
5. DISCUSSION : The applicant was not present because of
illness. Her son appeared on her behalf and
requested that the hearing on this application
be set over until the next regular meeting.
6. On motion of Commissioner Copeli.n, s_ ^ -nded by Comm. Rudd,
the hearing on Variance application No. was set over until
the next regular meeting by the following role nil vote,
to wit: ALL AYES.
1]
r]
L
0
0
•
0
Page - 6 -
VARIANCES
§374
1. FILES, Ralph H. 1914 Ocean Front Newport Beach
2. Lot 9 Block 19 lst Add. to Newport Beach Zone.R -4
3. Posted May 6, 1957 Published May 9, 1957
4. Encroachment of 21611 into a required rear yard setback of
5' for 2nd floor overhang only.
5. Extremely short lot (781) requires encroachment into rear
yard setback with second floor. Very difficult to build a
building of this size on this lot.
6. DISCUSSION : Mr. Gerald Sparks represented the applicant
and his remarks to the Commission set forth
that a definite hardship existed because of
the smallness of the lot. He further set forth
that encroachments of this type existed in
the same block.
7. FINDINGS The Committee in their report to the Commission
stated that policy established by the Commission
previously permitted encroachments of this
type for duplexes only. Although this lot is
zoned R -4, only two units can be built as the
size of the lot would prohibit additibnal'.units.
It was observed that other dwellings in this
block had similar overhangs. There were no
protests and the Committee recommended approval.
8. On motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Comm. Briggs,
Variance application No. 374 was GRANTED by the following roll
call vote, to wit:
AYES Reed, Hayton, Longmoor
Smith, Briggs, Lind &
Rudd.
NOES : Copelin
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT Keene
#375
1. BRASCH,.John & 1JHITNEY9 H.C. 709 -& 702.Iris Ave. CDk1 ...
2. Lots 2 & 4 Block 736 Tract CDM Zone R -2
3. Posted May 6, 1957
Published May 9, 1957
2. Would lower standard of building requirements,
h There are two more houses in this block
without garages, This would make an in-
tolerable situation,
4, We feel definitely that they should have
a garage with each house. This could be.
attached to the house or separate, even
if they are just single garages.
Mr. Donald Harwood, Attorney, represented
the applicant. He stated that the drain,,.
ditch and the unimproved alle y made it im-
possible for the applicant to construct garages
on the rear portion of the lots. Nr< Harwood
felt this condition created a definite hardship
and that the variance should be approved.
Page _. 7 ..
•
VARIANCES
1375 icon'? from
Pago 6)
4.
Construction of one single family residence on each lot
with provision for off - street parking without attached garage
or carport.
5.
The subject property slopes from Iris Street to a gully and
drainage ditch, which renders 16! of the rear of said lots
unusable for any purpose. The lots are also bisected by an
existing sewer and easement or right of ,ray; as shown on
the attached plot plan. No construction may be placed either
on the rear 16' or over any portion of the above mentioned
sewer easement. The only practical and physically feasible
location for garages or carports; would be from the rear of the
lots at such time as the alley is established and maintained
is dedicated. If applicant is required to erect permanent
garage facilities at this time; a substantial portion of both
lots will be rendered useless for all future purposes, and will
result in abnormal hardship in view of the fact that the exist-
ing sewer right of way prevents the constiuction of garages as
an integral part of the proposed dwellings,
6.
DISCUSSION . Presented to the Commission were four
•
letters submitted by property- owners in
Block 736, Corona del Mir who stated they
objected to the variance request for the
following reasons:. --
1. No hardship or seep grades are involved
in this location
2. Would lower standard of building requirements,
h There are two more houses in this block
without garages, This would make an in-
tolerable situation,
4, We feel definitely that they should have
a garage with each house. This could be.
attached to the house or separate, even
if they are just single garages.
Mr. Donald Harwood, Attorney, represented
the applicant. He stated that the drain,,.
ditch and the unimproved alle y made it im-
possible for the applicant to construct garages
on the rear portion of the lots. Nr< Harwood
felt this condition created a definite hardship
and that the variance should be approved.
i
n
LJ
i S
Page - 8 -
VARIANCES
;375 (con'd from
Page 7)
7. FINDINGS After consideration of all the evidence pre-
sented, the Commission found and determined
that there did not exist a hardship which
would warrant the approval of this application.
It was the opinion of the Commission that plans
could be drawn without too much added expense
which would include garages as required under
the existing ordinances.
8. On motion of Commissioner Reed, seconded by Comm. Hayton,
Variance application No. 375 was DENIED by the following roll
call vote, to wite ALL AYES
1. MILLER, Bradstreet Jr.
2. Lot 4 Block 238
3. Posted April 8, 1957.
3806 River Ave.
Canal Section
USE PERMITS
if314
Newport Beach
Zone R -2
4. The addition of a living room and kitchen to an existing
structure which is non - conforming.
5. DISCUSSION This application was considered at the last
regular meeting of the Commission but was set
over in order that the applicant could amend
his plans to show accessability to the garage.'
The garage is 17' in depth, however the zoning
code requires a 20' depth.
The applicant was present at this hearing
but did not submit plans showing the change
in garage depth as requested by the Commission.
6. FINDINGS i Because of the garage being unaccessable the
Committee stated it would be poor planning
to approve the application as submitted.
7. On motion of Commissioner Copelin, seconded by Comm. Rudd,
Use Permit application No. 314 was DENIED by the following
roll call vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
Page - 9 -
• USE PERMITS
#316
1. WHITE, W. Glenn 1112 W. Ocean Front Newport Beach
2. Lot 4 Block 11 Tract 234 Zone R -1
3. Posted April $, 1957.
4. The addition of a two bedroom house on a lot which now has
a non- conforming dwelling.
5. DISCUSSION This dwelling is non - conforming as there
exists a 1211 side yard setback and a 3' setback
is required. If an additional unit was built,
on this lot the present dwelling would become
an accessory building requiring a 5' setback
from the alley and would be in excess of the
permitted.height of 151..
This application was considered at the last
regular meeting of the Commission but was set
over on recommendation of the Commission in
order that additional plans could be submitted
• showing attachment of.the proposed new building
to the existing unit.
6. FINDINGS The applicant complied with the request of the
Commission by furnishing an amended plan to show
attachment of the proposed unit to the existing
dwelling. A recommendation of approval was
made by the Committee subject to the condition
that the kitchen unit in the existing building ba
removed.
7. On motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Comm. Rudd,
Use Permit application No. 316 was APPROVED ' subject to the
above condition by the following roll call vote, to Wit; ALL AYES
#319
1. MARSHALL, Hugh C. 511 Tustin Avenue Newport Beach
2. Lot 22 Block 35 lst Add. Newport Heights Zone R -1
3. Posted May 6, 1957.
4. Addition of room to existing non - conforming dwelling.
• 5. DISCUSSION The Commission was advised that the.existing
dwelling is 73' back from the front property
line and that the zoning code requires a maximum
setback of 35'. It was further noted that the
existing garage as shown on the plot plan was
being used for dwelling purposes.
Page - 10
• USE PERMITS
#319 (con "d from
Page 9)
Submitted to the Commission was a petition
signed by nine persons who objected to the
approval of this application for the following
reasons-
"We do feel that any such addition to the above
mentioned residence would only result in the
determent of normal growth and progress in
values and beauty of the surrounding neighbor -
hood."
6. FINDINGS The Committee in their report stated that the
existing structure is in such bad condition that
it would be poor planning to approve the addition
requested. Recommendation of denial was also
made on the basis of no provisions being made
by the applicant to provide a covered car space.
as required by the zoniig ordinance;
7. On motion of Commissioner Rudd, seconded by Comm. Copelin,
Use Permit application No. 319 was DENIED by the.following
• roll call vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
#320
�. McCARTHY, Jack 105 7th Street Balboa, California.
2. Lot 3 Block 8 East Newport Zone R -3
3. Posted May 6, 1957.
4. Addition of two bedroom and bath to existing non - conforming
dwelling.
5. DISCUSSION Note findings.
6. FINDINGS Investigation of this property by the Committee
revealed no provisions for off- street parking.
The applicant stated that existing plans did not
provide for a garage or carport, therefore the
Committee recommended denial.
7. On motion of Commissioner Smith,.seconded by Comm. Rudd, Use
Permit application No. 320 was DENIED by the following roll
call vote, to wits ALL AYES.
Ar. Edwards further set forth that this application
should be denied as it would be detrimental to
the health and general welfare of persons residing
in the neighborhood.
(. FINDINGS The Commission, after considering all the evider"co
on file and that presented at the hearing, found
and determined that the granting of this application
would be detrimental to the health, safety, peace,
morals, comfort and general welfare of persons
residing in the neighborhood.
7. On motion of Commissioner Rudd, seconded by Comm. Smith, Use
Permit No. 321 was DENIED by the following roll call vote, to
wit: ALL AYES.
Page - 11 -
•
USE PERMITS
%321
1.
FEATURELINE:.INC. 4323 West Coast Hwy. Newport Beach
2.
Por.of Sec. 28 T63 R10W SBBM Banning Tract Zone C -1 -H
3.
Posted May 6, 1957•
4.
Operation of a family type yacht anchorage.
5.
DISCUSSION : The applicant was present and stated that
he had nothing to add to his application
but would be glad to answer any questions.
Commissioner Longmoor inquired as to how
many boats would this "Family Type Yacht
Anchorage" accomodate.. Mr. Campbell, President
of Featureline Inc. stated "probably a minimum
of 25 or a maximum of 35 boats ".
Mr. L.L. Holbrook of 623 36th St. asked "Does
this include the renting of boats for people_
who come there ". Mr. Cambell stated that there
would not be any boat rentals.
.
Mr. James Edwards, President of the Newport
Isle Association, addressed the Commission
and in his remarks stated, among other things,
that commercial use of waterfrontage in this
strictly 100% residential area should be pro-
hibited, would result in deterioration and de-
preciation of property values, channel is
narrow and is heavily congested, people who
rent slips from private individuals do not use
toile;: facilities provided for them and that
children use this channel for swimming.
Ar. Edwards further set forth that this application
should be denied as it would be detrimental to
the health and general welfare of persons residing
in the neighborhood.
(. FINDINGS The Commission, after considering all the evider"co
on file and that presented at the hearing, found
and determined that the granting of this application
would be detrimental to the health, safety, peace,
morals, comfort and general welfare of persons
residing in the neighborhood.
7. On motion of Commissioner Rudd, seconded by Comm. Smith, Use
Permit No. 321 was DENIED by the following roll call vote, to
wit: ALL AYES.
E
i
1. THE IRVINE COMPANY
a
Bayshore Drive
Page - 12 -
USE PERMITS
#322
Newport Beach
2. Lots 2- 3- 4- 5- •6- 7- 15- 16- 18- -19 -20 Tract 2095 Zone "U"
3. Posted May 6, 1957.
4. Construction of single family dwellings in an unclassified zone.
5. DISCUSSION . Note findings.
6. FINDINGS . Under Section 9103.8, Ord. No. 635, a Use
Permit must be secured for any construction
in an "unclassified" zone.
In the absence of any protests a recommendation
of approval was made by the Committee.
7. On motion of Commissioner Reed, seconded by Comm. Rudd, Use
Permit application No. 322 was APPROVED by the following
roll call vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
#323
1.
DICKERMAN, Don
4323
W. Coast
Hwy.
Newport Beach
2.
Por. Section 28 T6S
R10W
SBBM
Zone
C -1 -H
3. Posted May 6, 1957.
4. On -Sale Liquor.
5. DISCUSSION The applicant addressed the Commission
and stated that he had previously operated
several restaurants, and had always been
complimented on having a clean and high
type service. He presented to the Commission
several letters which testified as to the
class of service rendered.
Speaking against the granting of this.
application were:- Mr. Stewart, 13 Balboa
Coves, Mr. Roscoe, 21 Balboa Coves, Mr.
Collins, 14 Balboa Caves, Mr. Reed, 8 Balboa
Coves. These protestants based their ob-
jections on the fact that this establishment
would be only eight (8) feet away from the
nearest residence, that a playground was to
be errected in vicinity, noise created by
such an operation and the e..�y accessibility
to the water would create a hazardous
condition.
r1
U
•
Page - 13 -
USE PERMITS.
#323 (con'd
from Page 12)
6. FINDINGS After hearing all the evidence from those
for and against this application, the
Commission found that the granting of this
use permit would be detrimental to the
health, safety, peace, morals, comfort
and general welfare of persons residing
in the neighborhood.
7. On motion of Commissioner Rudd, seconded by Comm. Copelin,
Use Permit application No. 323 was DENIED by the following
roll call vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
#321+
1. MACCO CORPORATION Tract 2813 Corona del Mar
2. Tract 2813
3.
5.
6.
Posted May 6, 1957.
Zone "Unclassified"
The erection of temporary tract sales signs in the
locations indicated on the map submitted with application.
DISCUSSION . Note findings.
FINDINGS Temporary signs
subdivision may
first securing
9105.1 (i).
for the advertising of a
be permitted, subject to
Use Permit under Section
The Commission recommended approval subject
to the condition that the size, design and
location be approved by the Architectural
Committee and that they be permitted for a
period of two (2) years only.
7. On motion of Commissioner Reed, seconded by Comm. Rudd,
Use Permit application No. 324 was APPROVED subject to the
above conditions, by the following roll call vote, to wit:
ALL AYES
•
0
•
• *'Page - 14 -
USE PERMITS
#325
1. HARRIS, Vincent 2504 Cliff Drive Newport Beach
2, Lot 2 Block 2 Tract 919 Zone R -1
3. Posted May 6, 1957.
4. Addition of a living room to a non - conforming dwelling: -
5. DISCUSSION Note findings.
6. FINDINGS A use permit is required for the addition
of a room to this dwelling as the garage is
being used for dwelling purposes and the
structure is beyond' the 35' maximum setback.
The Committee recommended approval subject to
the condition that the garage be restored to
its original use. V
7. On motion of Commissioner Lind, seconded by Comm. Rudd,
Use Permit application No. 325 was APPROVED subject to the
above condition by the following roll call vote, to wits ALL AYES.
#326
1. EASTMAN, Clinton 505 St. Andrews Rd. Newport Beach
2. Lot 21 Tract 1718 Zone R -3
3. Posted May 6, 1957.
4. The operation of a private school in an R -3 District.
5. DISCUSSION : Note findings.
6. FINDINGS : Schools may be permitted in a residential
district subject to first securing a use
permit under Section 9105.1 (f).
The Committee in their report stated that
if this application were approved it would
set a precedent and would create a "home"
type of business, a condition which the
Commission has discouraged in the past.
7. On motion of Commissioner Reed, seconded by Comm. Hayton,
Use Permit application No. 326 was DENIED by the following
roll call vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
• • Page - 15 -
USE PERMIT
• #327
1. FINK, Charles 0. & FOWLER, Margaret M. 6902 W. Coast Hwy.
2. Wsly 55' of Lots 3, 4 & 5 Seashore Colony Tract Zone C -1 -H
3. .Posted May 6, 1957.
4. On -Sale beer.
5. DISCUSSION : Note findings.
60 FINDINGS : A use permit is required as this property
is within 200' of a residential district.
Because of the submission of a pretest from
a residential property owner adjacent to this
proposed establishment, the,Commission found
and determined that the approval of Use Permit
No. 327 would be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort and general
welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood.
7. On motion of Commissioner Copelin, seconded by Comm. Reed,
Use Permit application No. 327 was DENIED by the following
• roll call vote, to wit:
AYES : Reed, Copelin, Longmoor,
Smith, Briggs & Rudd.
NOES : Hayton & Lind
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT : Keene
1. KEY, Charles V. 702 Marigold Avenue
2. Lot 4 Block 740 Tract CDM
3. Posted May 6, 1957.
#328
Corona del Mar
Zone R -2
4. Addition of a screened garden room to non - conforming dwelling.
5. DISCUSSION A non - conforming condition exists as the
front setback is in excess of the maximum
35' and there is no provision for off - street
parking.
• The applicant was present and stated that he
did not at the present time have any plans
for providing a garage as required by'the
zoning code.
• SPage - 16 -
• USE PERMITS
#328 (con'd
from Page 15)
6. FINDINGS The Committee found, upon investigation
of this property, that the original garage
had been converted into living quarters,
In view of this fact and on the basis o£.
the applicant presenting no plans for the
provision of a garage a recommendation of
denial of this use permit was made.
7. On motion of Commissioner Hayton, seconded by Comm. Reed,
Use Permit application No. 328 was DENIED by the following
roll call vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
#329
1. COOK, R.S. 310 Marine Ave. Balboa Island
2. Lot 6 Block 14 Section 4 Tract BI Zone C -1
3. Posted May 6, 1957.
4. Addition and alteration to non- conforming dwelling.
• 5. DISCUSSION . Note findings.
6. FINDINGS Portions of the existing building projects
to the property line resulting in a non-
conforming dwelling.
There were no protests received, therefore
a recommendation of approval was rendered.
7. On motion of Commissioner Lind, seconded by Comm. Rudd, Use
Permit application No.., 329 was APPROVED by the following roll
call vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
AMENDMENTS
#35
l.; First hearing on Resolution of Intention No. 609 to amend
Article IX, Chapter IV of the Municipal Code by adding Section
9253 to establish a fee for each lot in a new subdivision.
2.. On motion of Commissioner Copelin, seconded by Comm. Reed,
Amendment No. 35 was set over for a 2nd hearing by the following
• vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
• *Page - 17 -
AMENDMENTS
0 #36
1. First hearing on Resolution of Intention No. 610 to amend
Article IX, Chapter V of the Municipal Code by adding
Section 9105.4. (h) to establish regulations governing
SWIMMING POOLS.
2. On motion of Commissioner Copelin, seconded by Comm. Reed
Amendment No. 36 was set over until the next regular meeting
by the following vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
#37
1. THE IRVINE COMPANY Corona del Mar
2.
Lots 1
to 180,
Inclusive,
& Lots 183, 184
& 185.
Tract
2813
3.
Posted.May
6,
1957
Published
May 2,
1957
lst Hearing
4. The Petitioner desires to amend Section 9103.81 of Ordinance
No. 635 so as to cause this property to fall within an R -1
District.
. 5. In the absence of any protests, Commissioner Rudd moved the
Commission hold this application over until the next meeting
for a 2nd Hearing, seconded by Comm. Lind and carried by the
following vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
#38
1. First hearing on Resolution of Intention No. 611 to hold
public hearings on the area known as the "Tustin Avenue and
22nd Street Annexation" to zone from a "Unclassified" district
to zoning districts available in zoning Ordinance No. 635 that
would be appropriate for land uses existing or proposed.
2. Posted May 6, 1957 Published May 2, 1957
3. The first hearing was for general discussion with the property
owners.
4. Present at the 1st Hearing on this matter was one property
owner, Mr. Frank Glochner. Mr. Glochner was advised by the
Commission that this particular area under consideration would
probably be zoned for single family residences.
5. On motion of Commissioner Copelin, seconded by Comm. Lind,
Amendment No. 38 was set over for a 2nd hearing at the next
• regular meeting by the following roll call vote, to wit:
ALL AYES.
• •Page - 13 -
AMENDMENTS.
#39
1. First hearing on Resolution of Iritention No. 612 to
establish setbacks on the property adjacent to the
abandonded Bay Avenue.
2.
Blocks
O- P -Q -R -S
East Side Addition
3.
Posted
May 6, 1957
Published May 2, 1957
4. On motion of Commissioner Longmoor, seconded by Comm. Copelin,
Amendment No. 39 was set over for a 2nd Hearing at the next
regular meeting,with the instructions that the City Engineer
furhish a map showing proposed setbacks, by the following
roll call vote, to wit: ALL AYES.
TENTATIVE MAPS
#f3232
1. Presented to the Commission were copies of the tentative map
of tract No. 3232 being a subdivision of a portion of Block
94 of Irvine's Subdivision.
• 21 A letter was furnished by the City Engineer which set forth
that the tentative map conforms in all respects to the Sub-
division Map Act and all applicable provisions of the Sub -
division Ordinance of the City of Newport Beach.
3. On motion of Commissioner Lind, seconded by Comm. Copelin,
Tentative Map No. 3232 was APPROVED by the following roll call
vote,.to wit: ALL AYES.
C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Presented to the Commission was a letter from the Orange
County Planning Commission regarding a petition to re -zone
certain areas in the Newport Mesa Tract from an R -4, Sub-
urban-Residential District, to an M -1, Light Industrial
District, and an R -3, Apartment District.
On motion of Commissioner Briggs, seconded by Comm. Lind
and carried, the Planning Staff was instructed to write to
the Orange County Planning Commission in protpgst of this
change in zoning for the reason that this is /potential
annexation area. and if annexed it would be zoned M -1 -A,.
I'1
U
0
• *age - 19 -
C 0 Iv! M U N I C A T I 0 N S
Received by the Commission was a memorandum dated May
16, 1957 signed by Margery Schrouder,. City Clerk -
Treasurer with an attached copy of a petition signed
by thirty -nine residents of the Newport Heights area
requesting, an ordinance to restrict and regulate,
through the Planning Cimmission, all advertising signs.
On motion of Commissioner Rudd, seconded by Comm. Copelin
and carried this matter was referred to the Architectural
Committee for preparation of architectural standards and
a proposed amendment to the Code covering signs.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
On motion of Commissioner Copelinj seconded by Comm.
Smith and carried, resolution of Intention No.,613
was adopted to hold public.heaYings during June and
July 1957 to delete Sections 9103.62 (d) and Section
910302 (a) of Ordinance No. 635 regarding inflammable
materials.
Commissioner Longmoor presented to the Commission a
lenghiy report regarding a recommendation of the
Planning Commission to the City Council on petitions
received for annexations in the area known as the
•'Last Corridor ".
On motion of Commissioner Reed, seconded by Comm. Copelin
and carried this report was approved by the Commission
and Commissioner Longmoor was instructed to present same
to the City Council for their recommendation to the
petitioners.
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Business at hand being declared completed the meeting
was adjourned on motion of Commissioner Copelin, seconded
by Comm. Hayton and carried.
• Ray Y. opelin
Secretary