HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/06/1991COMMISSIONERS REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
PLACE: City Council Chambers
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
po DATE: June 6; 1991
"-\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Present
*
*
*
All Commissioners were present.
EX- OFFICIO OFFICERS PRESENT:
James Hewicker, Planning Director
Robin Flory, Assistant City Attorney
William R. Laycock, Current Planning Manager
Patricia Temple, Advance Planning Manager
Don Webb, City Engineer.
Dee Edwards, Secretary
Minutes of May 23, 1991:
Minutes
of
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve the May 23,
5/23/91
Ayes
*
*
*
*
*
*
1991, Planning Commission Minutes. MOTION CARRIED.
Abstain
*
: s :
Public Comments:
Public
Comments
No one appeared before the Planning Commission to speak on
non - agenda items.
Posting of the AizeDda:
Posting
of the
James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the Planning
Agenda
Commission Agenda was posted on Friday, May 31, 1991, in front
of City Hall.
COMMISSIONERS
June 6, 1991
MINUTES.
o'O �d�_O�
• ��' �� .� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Request for Continuances:
Request
for
James Hewicker, Planning Director, requested that Item No. 8,
Continue
Amendment No. 736, regarding the proposed revision of noise level
standards for mechanical equipment in residential areas be
continued to the June 20, 1991, Planning Commission meeting in
anticipation of the length of the subject Planning Commission
meeting.
Motion
Motion was made and voted on to continue Amendment No. 736
All Ayes
to the June 20, 1991, Planning Commission meeting. MOTION
CARRIED.
x x x
A Site Plan Review No 62 (Continued Public Hearing)
stem No.1
Request to permit the construction of a combined.
commercial /residential development in the Old Newport Boulevard
Specific Plan Area where a Specific Plan has not yet been adopted.
sPR62
UP 3415
Approved
AND
B. Use Permit No. 3415 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to permit the construction of a dwelling unit on property
located in the C -1 District.
LOCATION: A portion of Lot 3, Block 8, Tract No. 27,
located at 472 North Newport Boulevard, on
the southeasterly side of North Newport
Boulevard, between Bolsa Avenue and
Westminster Avenue, in the Old Newport
Boulevard Specific Plan Area.
ZONE: C -1
PLICANT: Majid Dezand, Newport Beach
•
OWNER: Same as applicant
-2-
COMMISSIONERS
June 6, 119, 91 MINUTES
,o
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
James Hewicker, Planning Director, responded to a previous
inquiry with respect to mixed use development on North Newport
Boulevard where office or commercial uses were proposed on the
second floor, and be commented that one previous mixed use
application on North Newport Boulevard was approved by the
Planning Commission with office use on the second floor but was
denied by the City Council. Chairman Debay stated that she was
not aware of a combined commercial /residential development that
had office and residential uses on the same floor. Mr. Hewicker
stated that a typical mixed use is office or commercial on the
ground floor, and residential on the second floor.
Commissioner Glover expressed her concern with the deterioration
of the subject property. Mr. Hewicker stated that if a building is
allowed to deteriorate to the point where it would become a
hazard, staff would contact the Building or Fire Departments to
inspect the property and the property owners would be notified of
•
the violations.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Languis appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf
of the applicant. In response to a question posed by Chairman
Debay, Mr. Languis concurred with the findings and conditions in
Exhibit 'W'. Mr. Languis stated that the commercial and
residential uses are accessed by separate exterior stairways, and the
uses are divided by a one hour separation in accordance with the
Uniform Building Code. Chairman Debay and Mr. Unguis
discussed the design of the parking layout.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
Baring was closed at this time.
ommissioner Person stated that the number of parking spaces are
in compliance with the Zoning Code, and the Floor Area Ratio
Motion
represents a reasonable development. Motion was made to
approve Site Plan Review No. 62 and Use Permit No. 3415 subject
o the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A'.
ommissioner Pomeroy stated that based on the requirements of
he Building and Zoning Codes, and the separation of the
.
ommercial and residential developments on the same floor, the
nixed use should function properly.
-3-
COMMISSIONERS
June 6, 1991
MINUTES.
� o,o
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
low I
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Commissioner Glover did not support the motion on the basis that
the proposed project is an "in -fill" development on North Newport
Boulevard located on a very small lot, and the affect the parking
would have on the area. She recommended a Specific Area Plan
for North Newport Boulevard inasmuch as the area is developing
into a broad mixture of uses, and said Plan would give the Planning
Commission a better handle on the area.
Commissioner Pers6n compared the size and square footage of the
subject property with his property located in Cannery . Village
wherein he concluded that the subject property is larger than the
typical mixed use lot that the Planning Commission has approved
throughout the City.
Commissioner Edwards stated that the proposed project appears to
be better than what is currently on the site, and it would appear
that the use is a decent utilization of the property. Commissioner
Glover responded that the deterioration of the property is not
enough reason to approve a project so as to improve the area, and
she indicated that it is up to the property owner to maintain the
property. She further responded to Commissioner Pers6ds
foregoing statement wherein she explained that the feeling of the
Cannery Village is different from North Newport Boulevard.
Chairman Debay pointed out that the applicant is required to
record a Covenant guaranteeing the future use of the property. She
explained that the development would consist of no more than one
dwelling unit, the on -site parking layout must be approved by the
City Traffic Engineer, and the design is in compliance with City
requirements.
Commissioner Di Sano supported the motion. He concurred that
it would benefit the Planning Commission if a Spec Area Plan
existed; however, he said that the development is in general
character of the area and is a good utilization of the property.
Motion was voted on to approve Site Plan Review No. 62 and Use
Ayes
*
*
*
.
Permit No. 3415 subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit
No
W'. MOTION CARRIED.
i
-4-
COMMISSIONERS
June 6, 1991
MINUTES
,o
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
A. Site Plan Review No. 62:
Findings:
1. That development of the subject property in the SPR
Overlay District will not preclude implementation of specific
General Plan objectives and policies.
2. That the value of property is protected by preventing
development characterized by inadequate and poorly
.
planned landscaping, excessive building bulk, inappropriate
placement of structures and failure to preserve where
feasible natural landscape features, open spaces, and the
like, resulting in the impairment of the benefits of
occupancy and use of existing properties in such area.
3. That benefits derived from expenditures of public funds for
improvement, acquisition and beautification of streets,
parks, and other public facilities are maximized by the
•
exercise of reasonable controls over the layout and site
location characteristics of the proposed development.
4. That unique site characteristics are protected in order to
ensure that the community may benefit from the natural
terrain; harbor and ocean, to preserve and stabilize the
natural terrain, and to protect the environmental resources
of the City.
5. That the site does not contain any unique landforms such as
coastal bluffs.
6. That the development is compatible with the character of
the neighborhood and will contribute to the orderly and
harmonious development of surrounding properties and the
City.
That there are no environmentally sensitive areas on -site
which should be protected.
S. The property does not contain arty areas of unique geologic
hazards.
-5-
COMMISSIONERS
June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
9. The development is consistent with the General Plan of the
City of Newport Beach.
10. That there are no archeological or historical resources on-
site.
11. That the proposed development has been designed so as to
prevent any adverse effect on the adjoining residential
property.
12. That the project will comply with all applicable City and
State Building Codes and Zoning requirements for new
buildings applicable to the district in which the proposed
project is located.
Conditions:
1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial
•
conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans and
elevations, except as noted below.
2. That all conditions of approval for Use Permit No. 3415
shall be fulfilled.
3. That this Site Plan Review shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in
Section 20.60.060 H of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
B. Use Permit No. 3415:
Findings:
1. That the proposed development is consistent with the
General Plan, and is compatible with surrounding land uses.
2. That adequate off - street parking and related vehicular
circulation are being provided in conjunction with the
proposed development.
S
3. That the design of the proposed improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
-6-
COMMISSIONERS
June 6, 1991
MINUTES
O'd �'d��`�Cn
��� �� .� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
for access through or use of property within the proposed
development.
4. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 19.08.1020 of the Municipal Code and Section
66415 of the Subdivision Map Act.
5. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 20.80.060 of the Municipal Code.
6. The approval of Use Permit No. 3415 will not, under the
circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of
persons residing and. working in the neighborhood or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in
the neighborhood or the
Conditions:
•
1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved site plan, floor plans and
elevations, except as noted below.
2. That the applicant shall record a covenant, guaranteeing the
future use of the property shall be limited to commercial
space and no more than one dwelling unit.
3. That the two covered Parking Spaces No. 3 and 4 on the
approved site plan shall be for the exclusive use of the
residential unit on the site.
4. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
5. That a standard use permit agreement and accompanying
surety be provided in order to guarantee satisfactory
completion of the public improvements, if it is desired to
obtain a building permit prior to completion of the public
improvements.
•
6. That the commercial and residential unit be served with
individual water service and sewer lateral connection to the
-7-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
public water and sewer systems unless otherwise approved
by the Public Works Department.
7. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and
pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review
by the City Traffic Engineer.
8. That the intersection of the private drive and North
Newport Boulevard be designed to provide sight distance for
a speed of 35 miles per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls and
other obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance
requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not
exceed twenty -four inches in height.
9. That a curb, gutter, 8 foot wide sidewalk and street paveout
be constructed along the North Newport Boulevard frontage
under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works
Department.
10. That street, drainage and utility improvements be shown on
standard improvement plans prepared by a licensed civil
engineer.
11. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the
applicant and approved by the Public Works Department,
along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain
facilities for the on -site improvements prior to the issuance
of building permits. Any modifications or extensions to the
existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be
required by the study shall be the responsibility of the
developer.
12. That the Public Works Department plan check and
inspection fee be paid.
13. That disruption caused by construction work along roadways
and by movement of construction vehicles shall be
minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and
flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment
•
and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state
and local requirements.
-8-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
0
0 \� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
14. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to
the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section
19.24.140 of the Municipal Code.
15. That a sign which will be visible from the street shall be
provided at the front of the building, indicating the location
of the commercial parking at the rear of the property.
16. That all proposed signs shall be in conformance with the
provisions of Chapter 20.06 of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code. Said signs shall be approved by the City
Traffic Engineer if located adjacent to the vehicular ingress
and egress to the site.
17. That one handicapped parking space shall be provided
unless waived by the Building Department. Said parking
space shall be used solely for handicapped self - parking.
•
One handicapped sign on a post and one handicapped sign
on the pavement shall be required for the handicapped
space.
18. That the lighting system for the proposed project shall be
designed in a manner so as to conceal the light source and
minimize light and glare to the adjoining residential
properties to the east. The lighting plans shall be prepared
and signed by a licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter
from the Engineer stating that, in his opinion, this
requirement has been met.
19. That the applicant shall construct a 6 foot high block wall
along the easterly property line adjacent to the "R" classified
property. The height of said wall shall be measured from
the adjoining residential grade.
0. That all trash areas and mechanical equipment shall be
shielded or screened from North Newport Boulevard and
adjoining properties
•
-9-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
o.o �p p pcn
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
21. Landscaping along North Newport Boulevard shall conform
to Std. 110 -L unless otherwise approved by the Traffic
Engineer and the Public Works Department.
22. That the proposed dwelling unit shall be sound attenuated
to a maximum of 45 dBA CNEL for interior living areas
and 65 CNEL for exterior living areas, as measured from
the area expected to experience the highest sound levels.
Measurement. and certification of compliance with this
condition shall be completed prior to the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy by a registered engineer practicing
in acoustics.
23. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify
conditions of approval to this Use Permit or recommend to
the City Council the revocation of this Use Permit, upon a
determination that the operation which is the subject of this
Use Permit, causes injury, or is detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the
community.
24. That this use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24
months from the date of approval as specified in Section
20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
x x x
A
A. Site Plan Review No. 64 (Public Hearing)
Item No.2
Request to allow the construction of a one story structure on
SPR 64
property located in the C -1 District of the Corona del Mar Specific
Area Plan where a Specific Plan has not yet been adopted. The
UP 3419
application also includes modifications to the Zoning Code so as to
allow the new construction and an existing 7 foot high wrought iron
R 958
fence to encroach 10 feet into the required 10 foot rear yard
Approved
setback adjacent to an alley, and the new construction to encroach
5 feet into the required 5 foot rear yard setback adjacent to a
residential lot.
•
AND
-10-
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
June b, 1991
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
B. Use Permit No. 3419 (Public Hearing)
Request to permit the establishment of a facility specializing in the
sale of automobiles with on -site repairs and the use of a portion of
the on -site parking to be utilized for outdoor display of used
vehicles for sale. The proposed development includes the
construction of a 17 foot± high building on the westerly portion of
the subject property adjacent to the alley which will house a facility
for automobile detailing and minor maintenance and repairs.
AND
C. Resubdivision No. 958 (Public Hearing)
Request to combine two lots into a single building site for
commercial purposes.
iLOCATION:
Lots 2 and 3, Tract No. 1045, located at 3216 -
3222 East Coast Highway, on the
northeasterly side of East Coast Highway
between Larkspur Avenue and Marguerite
Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONE: C -1
APPLICANT: Tony Carlini, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
Don Webb, City Engineer, indicated that the Public Works
Department recommended that a minimum 5 foot rear yard
setback be provided adjacent to the alley. He explained that the
applicant and the Planning Department indicated that since the
ower poles and wrought iron fence exist adjacent to the alley that
setback should not be required wherein he stated that the power
oles and the fence are not as permanent as the building. Mr.
Webb stated that the property owner across the alley constructed
i residential building with a 12 foot rear yard setback whereby a 5
•
oot setback is required, and said property owner could reconstruct
building within 5 feet of the alley. He suggested that the
-11-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
following finding and condition replace Site Plan Review No. 64,
Finding No. 16 and Condition No. 7 as recommended by the
Planning Department:
Finding No. 16: That the approval of the modification to allow a
5 foot building and fence encroachment into the rear yard setback
adjacent to the "R" classified property and a 5 foot building and
fence encroachment adjacent to the northerly alley, will not, under
the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety,
peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing and
working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to
property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general
welfare of the City and that the proposed modification is consistent
with the legislative intent of Title 20 of this Code.
Condition No. 7: That the proposed maintenance building shall be
permitted a zero setback on the property line adjacent to the "R"
•
classified property. Said building and the wrought iron fence shall
be permitted a 5 foot setback from the property line adjacent to
the northerly alley.
Commissioner Pomeroy and Mr. Webb discussed a photograph that
was taken of the existing commercial building located on the alley.
William Laycock, Current Planning Manager, explained that the
subject building may have been constructed when the Zoning Code
required setbacks 7 feet from the center line of an alley. Mr.
Webb stated that it is difficult to maneuver an automobile in a 14
foot wide alley, and he addressed the "L" shaped alley.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Anthony Carlini, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission. In response to questions posed by Chairman Debay,
he concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A" and
the aforementioned modified finding and condition.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pers6n, Mr.
Carlini replied that two sales people will be employed by the
automobile dealership, and major automobile servicing will be
located at another facility.
-12-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Di Sano
regarding the foregoing modified finding and condition, Mr. Carlini
replied that the amended condition would prohibit him from
constructing an automobile detailing area. He said that he
measured setbacks in the alley and the result was that 2 -1/2 foot
setbacks exist on the lower level, and 1 foot setbacks at the second
story level of adjoining buildings. Mr. Carlini explained that he
could not understand how the community would be affected if he
would be allowed to build where the fence currently exists, and the
telephone poles remained on the alley. In further response to
Commissioner Di Sano, Mr. Carlini explained that delivery trucks
drive through the alley to the Quiet Woman Restaurant, and said
trucks do not have difficulty maneuvering in the alley. He stated
that the modified setback would prohibit him from full utilization
of the property.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr.
Carlini explained that minor maintenance proposed by the
establishment consists of installation of chrome wheels, seat covers,
brake pads, steering wheel, lights, etc. He said that there would
not be any engine work on the premises. Mr. Carlini stated that
the neighbors have been complimentary of the remodeling, and the
property would become a prestigious automobile franchise.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Merrill, Mr.
Carlini stated that no automobile alarms or stereos would be
installed in the automobiles and they would not test the equipment
on the premises. Mr. Carlini explained that the vehicles arrive from
the factory with alarms and stereos.
Mr. Doug Ashton, 418 -1/2 Larkspur Avenue, appeared before the
Tanning Commission. Mr. Ashton complimented the applicant on
the property improvements, and he did not object to a new
structure. He expressed concerns regarding noise emitting from
radios or an outdoor speaker system, mechanical tools, or engines.
He requested that customers not park automobiles in the alley.
Chairman Debay addressed Condition No. 12 in Exhibit "A ", Site
Plan Review No. 64, regarding no outdoor loudspeaker or paging
system.
-13-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards
regarding alley parking, Mr. Ashton replied that there is a concern
with respect to delivery trucks blocking the alley and stopping at
the Quiet Woman Restaurant, and occasionally a restaurant
customer will park in the alley late at night. In reference to
vehicular access and circulation in the alley, Mr. Hewicker stated
that staff observed on this date that when the neighbors park in the
2 or 3 foot rear yard setback adjacent to the alley, the automobiles
overhang in the right -of -way. He further stated that the residents
on the opposite side of the alley have setbacks to accommodate the
egress /ingress and their automobiles are parked parallel in said
setback.
Commissioner Pomeroy stated that in addition to the foregoing Site
Plan Review No. 64, Condition No. 12 in Exhibit "A" regarding
noise, Condition No. 13 addresses vehicle maintenance and
detailing, Condition No. 14 restricts car washing to the interior of
.
the maintenance building, and Condition No. 15 limits the hours of
operation between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. daily. Commissioner
Di Sano stated that the use permit could be recalled by the
Planning Commission for review if noise from the facility would be
detrimental to the neighborhood.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time. .
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr.
Laycock replied that Base FAR uses include automobile repair
facilities. Mr. L.aycock further replied that Condition No. 15 in
Exhibit "A ", Site Plan Review No. 64, states that the operation
would be allowed to operate between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.,
seven days a week. Commissioner Edwards expressed a concern
regarding the proposed operating hours on Saturdays and Sundays.
Commissioner Pomeroy suggested modified hours for maintenance
and detailing from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through
Saturday. He indicated that the requested hours for sales would
not interfere with the neighbors. Mr. Carlini reappeared before the
Planning Commission and he explained that automobile detailing
would be conducted Monday through Friday. Commissioner
-14-
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
June 6, 1991
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Pomeroy suggested that Condition No. 15 in Exhibit "A ", Site Plan
Review No. 64, be modified to state "'That the hours of operation
for automobile sales shall be limited between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00
p.m. daily. Automobile detailing and maintenance shall be limited
between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and
10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Saturday."
Commissioner Di Sano suggested a "No Parking" sign in the alley
behind the subject property. Mr. Carlini stated that he had
previously considered said sign.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Site Plan Review No.
64, Use Permit No. 3419, and Resubdivision No. 958, subject to the
findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ", including Site Plan Review
No. 64, modified Condition No. 15 regarding the hours of operation
All Ayes
and added Condition No. 17, regarding "No Parking" signs.
MOTION CARRIED.
A. Site Plan Review No. 64
Findings:
1 That development of the subject property will not preclude
implementation of specific General Plan objectives and
policies.
2. That the value of property is protected by preventing
development characterized by inadequate and poorly
planned landscaping, excessive building bulk, inappropriate
placement of structures and failure to preserve where
feasible natural landscape features, open spaces, and the
like, resulting in the impairment of the benefits of
occupancy and use of existing properties in such area.
3. That benefits derived from expenditures of public funds for
improvement, acquisition and beautification of streets,
parks, and other public facilities are maximized by the
exercise of reasonable controls over the layout and site
•
location characteristics of the proposed development.
-15-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
P
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
4. That unique site characteristics are protected in order to
ensure that the community may benefit from the natural
terrain, harbor and ocean, to preserve and stabilize the
natural terrain, and to protect the environmental resources
of the City.
5. That the site does not contain any unique landforms such as
coastal bluffs.
6. That the development is compatible with the character of
the neighborhood and will contribute to the orderly and
harmonious development of surrounding properties and the
City.
7. That there are no unique site characteristics or
environmentally sensitive areas on -site which should be
•
protected.
8. The property does not contain any areas of unique geologic
hazards.
9. The development is consistent with the General Plan of the
City of Newport Beach.
10. That there are no archeological or historical resources on-
site.
11. That the proposed development has been designed so as to
prevent any adverse effect on the adjoining residential
property.
12. That the design of the proposed improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed
development.
13. That public improvements may be required of the applicant
per Section 19.08.1020 of the Municipal Code and Section
•
66415 of the Subdivision Map Act.
-16-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
,a � d�
O d
Ab N CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
WCALL
INDEX
14. The project will substantially comply with all applicable City
and State Building Codes and Zoning requirements for new
buildings applicable to the district in which the proposed
project is located.
15. Adequate off - street parking and related vehicular circulation
are being provided in conjunction with the proposed
development.
16. That the approval of the modification to allow the requested
building and existing fence encroachments into the rear yard
setbacks adjacent to the "R" classified property and adjacent
to the northerly alley, will not, under the circumstances of
this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort, and general welfare of persons residing and
working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious
to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the
general welfare of the City and that the proposed
modification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title
20 of this Code.
Conditions:
1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial
compliance with the approved site plan, floor plans,
elevations and parking plan, except as noted below.
2. That there shall be a minimum of 8 parking spaces provided
on the subject property.
3. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and
pedestrian circulation systems be subject to furtber review
by the City Traffic Engineer.
4. That the existing driveway apron on East Coast Highway
shall be narrowed by 10t feet in width so as to align with
the opening in the front of the building.
5. That the delivery and /or the pick -up of vehicles for sale
shall be restricted to the site, or where no alternative exists,
-17-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
in the alley. No such deliveries shall take place on East
Coast Highway, Larkspur Avenue or Marguerite Avenue.
6. That all employees at the facility shall park on -site.
7. That the proposed maintenance building shall be permitted
a zero setback on the property line adjacent to the "R"
classified property and shall be located directly inside and
adjacent to the existing wrought iron fence located on the
property line adjacent to the northerly alley.
8. That all conditions of approval of Use Permit No. 3419 and
Resubdivision No. 958 shall be fulfilled.
9. That all signs shall be in conformance with the provisions of
Chapter 20.06 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code unless
an exception permit is approved by the City. Said signs
shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer if located
adjacent to the vehicular ingress and egress to the site.
10. That existing and proposed exterior lighting for the
proposed project shall be designed and installed in a
manner so as to conceal the light source and minimize light
and glare to the adjoining residential properties and East
Coast Highway.
11. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be
screened from East Coast Highway, the alley and adjoining
properties.
12. That no outdoor loudspeaker or paging system shall be
permitted in conjunction with the proposed facility.
13. That all vehicle maintenance and detailing shall be confined
to the interior of the maintenance building.
14. That car washing shall be restricted to the interior of the
maintenance building only and must be provided in such a
•
way as to insure direct drainage of wash water into the
sewer system and not into the storm drains.
-18-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
11
Jill
INDEX
15. That the hours of operation for automobile sales shall be
limited between 10:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. daily. Automobile
detailing and maintenance shall be limited between 10:00
a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 10:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m. Saturday.
16. That this Site Plan Review shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in
Section 20.60.060 H of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
17. That the applicant shall install "no parking" signage adjacent
to the alley.
B. Use Permit No. 3419
Findings:
1. That the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan
•
and is compatible with surrounding land uses.
2. That the establishment, maintenance of operation of the use
of the property or building will not, under the circumstances
of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety,
peace, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in
the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
Conditions:
1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial
compliance with the approved site plan, floor plans,
elevations and parking plan, except as noted below.
That all conditions of approval of Site Plan Review No. 64
and Resubdivision No. 958 shall be fulfilled.
3. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify
conditions of approval to this Use Permit or recommend to
the City Council the revocation of this Use Permit, upon a
•
-19-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
determination that the operation which is the subject of this
Use Permit, causes injury, or is detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the
community.
4. That this Use Permit shall expire unless exercised within 24
months from the date of approval as specified in Section
20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
C. Resubdivision No. 958
Findings:
1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision.
•
2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City,
all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning
Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision.
3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from
a planning standpoint.
4. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section
66415 of the Subdivision Map Act.
Conditions:
1. That a parcel map shall be recorded prior to occupancy of
the new maintenance building. The Parcel Map shall be
prepared so that the bearings relate to the State Plane
Coordinate System. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with
tag) shall be set on each lot corner unless otherwise
approved by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be
protected in place if installed prior to completion of
construction project.
•
-20-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991
'Pow •�� •c
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
2. That all improvements shall be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
3. That arrangements be made with the Public Works
Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of
the public improvements, if it is desired to record a parcel
map or obtain a building permit prior to completion of the
public improvements.
4. That the two 3± inch diameter drains through the planter
wall outletting onto the East Coast Highway sidewalk shall
be removed and put into parkway drains, per City Std. 184-
1, that outlets through the curb into East Coast Highway.
5. That an 8 inch thick slab of concrete shall be placed in the
alley setback area adjacent to the northeasterly side of the
existing structure.
6. That the spall section of concrete sidewalk on East Coast
Highway shall be reconstructed. All work within the East
Coast Highway frontage shall be completed under an
encroachment permit issued by the California Department
of Transportation and all work within the alley shall be
completed under an encroachment permit issued by the
Public Works Department.
7. That overhead utilities serving the site shall be
undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in
accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code.
8. That all conditions of approval of Site Plan Review No. 64
and Use Permit No. 3419 shall be fulfilled.
9. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been
recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an
extension is granted by the Planning Commission.
•
-21-
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
June 6, 1991
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
A. Use Permit No. 3420 (Public Hearing)
Item No.3
UP 3420
Request to permit the conversion of an existing legal,
nonconforming duplex which exceeds the height allowed in the
24/28 Height Limitation Zone and which exceeds 1.5 times the
R 957
buildable area of the site, into a two unit residential condominium
project on property located in the R -2 District.
Cont 'd a to
6 -20 -91
AND
B. Resubdivision No. 957 (Public Hearing)
Request to resubdivide an existing lot and portion of a second lot
into a single parcel for residential condominium purposes on
property located in the R -2 District.
LOCATION: Lot 10 and the southerly 15 feet of Lot 12,
•
Block 131, Corona del Mar, located at 208-
210 Carnation Avenue, on the southeasterly
side of Carnation Avenue between Seaview
Avenue and Ocean Boulevard, in Corona del
Mar.
ZONE: R -2
APPLICANT: Lloyd Rasner, Corona del Mar
OWNER: Same as applicant
awes Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that a Uniform Building
Code requirement has existed since 1988 stating that any residential
building containing more than 5,000 square feet has to provide fire
sprinklers, and he addressed the feasibility of the Planning
Commission waiving required conditions to comply with the Zoning
Code. Robin Flory, Assistant City Attorney, referred to the staff
report, discretionary Condition No. 4, stating that "All wiring shall
comply with NEC 1988 and City of Newport Beach ordinance
equirements for the spa in courtyard area. This area must also
•
-22-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
meet the minimum 5 foot fencing requirement with self closing
gates. ", and she explained that if the applicant could show that the
wiring on the spa were completed pursuant to permit, then the
discretionary condition could be waived; however, if it were not
completed the condition would require that the wiring be done to
Code. She further explained that the minimum 5 foot high fencing
is mandatory and cannot be waived. It was determined that the
foregoing condition is not discretionary. Ms. Flory explained that
the discretionary conditions as listed in the staff report are
provisions in the Uniform Building Code that the Planning
Commission may waive with a 4/5 vote.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and .
Mr. Lloyd Rasner, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission. Mr. Rasner stated that inasmuch as recent projects
in the area have been condominiums, the proposed condominium
conversion would be following a trend. He stated that adequate
parking would be provided. Mr. Rasner indicated that it would be
a financial hardship to comply with all of the conditions; however,
he concurred with the foregoing discretionary Condition No. 7 in
Exhibit "A" for Use Permit No. 3420, regarding the wiring for the
spa. Mr. Rasner objected to equipping the legal, non - conforming
building with the fire sprinkler system, and he addressed Condition
No. 6, Use Permit No. 3420 in Exhibit "A ", regarding seismic
requirements.
Mr. Jerry Tucker, 466 Flower Street, structural engineer, appeared
before the Planning Commission. Mr. Tucker referred to
Condition No. 3, Use Permit No. 3420 in Exhibit "A ", requesting
the floor ceiling assembly shall be one hour fire resistive
construction, and he explained that the existing structure was built
with a one hour floor ceiling assembly between the first and second
floors; however, he stated that to construct a one hour floor ceiling
assembly between the second and third floors would result in
negating the radiant ceiling heating system inasmuch as 3,000
square feet of drywall would have to be replaced. In reference to
Condition No. 6 regarding seismic requirements, Mr. Tucker
explained the reconstruction that would be required would be a
-23-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
financial burden, and he indicated that less construction could be
considered to make the building safe. In reference to Condition
No. 8, Use Permit No. 3420 in Exhibit "A ", energy requirements,
Mr. 'Bicker explained that windows and insulation would have to
be replaced and installed. In reference to Condition No. 9, Use
Permit No. 3420 in Exhibit "A ", fire sprinkler system, Mr. Tucker
explained that the request would be a financial hardship to the
applicant. Mr. Tucker concluded that waiving the foregoing
conditions would not adversely affect the overall safety or structural
integrity of the building.
Mr. Tucker and Mr. Hewicker discussed the feasibility of the
applicant contacting the Director of the Building Department
regarding the foregoing conditions, and pursuant to their meeting,
the Building Department would make recommendations to the
Planning Commission.
•
Commissioner Pomeroy referred to the Planning Commission's
previous consideration of an application for a residential
condominium conversion in the Eastbluff area. He suggested that
the Planning Commission review the Condominium Conversion
Ordinance's structural requirements. Mr. Hewicker stated that the
City Council would be reviewing the Condominium Conversion
Ordinance at the City Council meeting of July 8, 1991.
motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to continue Use Permit No. 3420
and Resubdivision No. 957 to the Planning Commission meeting of
June 20, 1991. The continuance would allow the applicant and
structural engineer to meet with the Director of the Building
Department concerning the application, and as a result of said
Ayes
*
*
*
*
*
meeting, the Building Department would make recommendations
Abstain
to the Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED.
•
_24_
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
• o� Pow
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Variance No. 1175 (Public Heari ne)
Item No.4
Request to permit additions and alterations to convert an existing
V1175
duplex into a single family dwelling which will exceed the allowable
1.5 times the buildable area of the site on property located in the
Approved
R -1.5 District. The proposal also includes a modification to the
Zoning Code so as to accept the existing garage which is
substandard in width to satisfy the parking requirement.
LOCATION: Lot 20, Block 14, Section 3, Balboa Island,
located at 327 -327'2 Sapphire Avenue, on the
westerly side of Sapphire Avenue between
Balboa Avenue and North Bay Front, on
Balboa Island.
ZONE: R -1.5
.
APPLICANTS: Gregory P. and Loretta A. Zimmerman, West
Covina
OWNER: Preston Zillgitt, Santa Ana Heights
James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that a letter had been
received from Beth Cooper, 322 Sapphire Avenue, in opposition to
the variance.
Don Webb, City Engineer, stated that the existing garage has an
average width of 16 feet which was acceptable when the building
was constructed; however, he said that it is only convenient to park
one automobile in the garage. Mr. Webb distributed a drawing of
the garage with two automobiles clipped to the drawing showing
how the automobiles would fit in the garage. He explained the
difficulty to maneuver an automobile into the garage. Mr. Webb
stated that the building was constructed to provide for an
additional parking space in the open area that is proposed for
enclosure inasmuch as the existing fence has a bi -fold gate that
opens to an 11 foot opening. He recommended alternate Condition
No. 10 in Exhibit "A' as stated in the staff report: 'That the
•
-25-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
proposed facility shall incorporate two on -site parking spaces which
meet the minimum size requirements of the Zoning Code, and said
spaces shall remain clear and accessible for the storage of
automobiles at all times." In response to a question posed by
Chairman Debay, Mr. Webb explained that to park two
automobiles in the garage, the front wall would have to be moved
forward and it would be difficult because of the existing
configuration inasmuch as the garage door is 11 feet 10 inches
wide, and the normal garage door width for a two car garage would
be at least 15 feet. In response to a question posed by
Commissioner Glover, Mr. Webb replied that the area enclosed by
the bi -fold gate would meet the Zoning Code requirements for an
additional parking space; however, he explained that the fence
would have to be modified to provide sight distance adjacent to the
alley. Commissioner Glover and Mr. Webb discussed the location
of the circular stairway if a parking space would be constructed in
•
the area the stairway is proposed.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Tom Merrell, Planning Consultant, representing the applicants,
appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Merrell addressed
the parking concerns, and he concurred that the existing garage
makes it difficult to maneuver and park two automobiles. He
explained that the applicants intend to remove all of the interior
obstructions to enable them to park two automobiles in the garage.
Mr. Merrell pointed out that the conversion from a duplex to a
single family home reduces the number of required parking spaces.
He indicated that it would create a hardship on the applicants to
convert the patio area into a parking space. He stated that the
applicants met with the adjacent neighbors regarding their parking
concerns. Mr. Merrell explained that the applicants have requested
to enclose the patio so as to unify two units into one unit, and it
would be difficult to make a home livable and functional sitting on
an irregular shaped lot if a part of the area would be used for an
open space area. Mr. Merrell stated that the proposed enclosed
area is within the existing building, and it would not affect the mass
or bulk of the structure, and would not intensify the use because
one family would be residing on the premises. Mr. Merrell stated
•
-26-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
that the findings could be made to approve the variance because
there are duplexes and single family dwellings in the neighborhood
that are of similar size, and the irregular shaped lot is a hardship
and needs to be addressed. Mr. Merrell concurred with the
findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ", including Condition No. 9,
which would prohibit a second family dwelling on the property.
Commissioner Edwards addressed alternate Condition No. 2 in
Exhibit "A", "That the proposed gross structural area shall not
exceed 2,492 square feet, a maximum gross floor area of 2,090
square feet of living space and a maximum of 402 square feet of
garage area." Mr. Merrell replied that the applicants could modify
some of the upstairs area; however, the reduction of square footage
would not be sufficient to create a single family dwelling. He
explained that the applicants could not live with the condition as
written; however, they could mitigate the degree of nonconformity.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pomeroy
regarding a carport, Mr. Laycock explained that one parking space
would be included in the buildable area regardless if the area
would be open or enclosed.
Mr. and Mrs. Greg Zimmerman, applicants, 14852 Elm Avenue,
Irvine, appeared before the Planning Commission, Mrs.
Zimmerman addressed their desire to reside on Balboa Island, and
the neighbors' positive response to the proposed remodelling to a
single family dwelling. She stated that two automobiles will be
parked in the irregularly shaped two car garage. Mrs. Zimmerman
stated that there is no intention to provide a second dwelling on
the premises. She indicated that enclosing the interior patio is
essential to combine the existing duplex into one single dwelling.
In reference to the second story balcony, Mrs. Zimmerman
explained that the balcony is not necessary for a single family
dwelling, the existing railing does not meet the required height
limit, and an enclosed balcony would be aesthetically pleasing. She
concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ", based on
the additional square footage.
•
-27-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
Commissioner Pomeroy stated that there is a problem with the
Floor Area Ratio within the City, and the City's regulation is
inappropriate. He suggested a Floor Area Ratio that would vary
between 1.25 FAR to 1.75 FAR, 1.75 FAR on the smallest, most
difficult lot, and 1.25 FAR on the larger lot.. He further suggested
that 200 square feet be counted for enclosed or garage parking, and
a property owner should not be penalized to enclose numerous
automobiles. Commissioner Pomeroy stated that the subject
variance is a reasonable solution, it is a reduction in intensity of
use, and there would be less parking than required for a duplex.
Motion
Motion was made to approve Variance No. 1175, subject to the
findings and conditions in Exhibit 'W'.
Commissioner Di Sano stated that the required findings can be
made to support the variance: the irregular shaped lot; there would
be less intensification of use; the covenant would prohibit a second
dwelling on the site; and it would appear the neighbors support the
variance.
Commissioner Pers6n supported the motion. He explained that if
an addition had been requested to a single family dwelling, he
would not have supported the motion; however, because the
request is to convert a duplex to a single family dwelling, he would
support the motion.
Commissioner Merrill did not support the motion based on added
square footage, an additional bedroom, building into the existing
patio area, enclosing the balcony, and he said taking parking out of
the patio area adds to the bulk on the lot.
Commissioner Glover supported the motion on the basis that the
neighbors will contact the applicants if the garage is not being
properly utilized.
-28-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES.
O� �p�pcn
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
I
I
J
I
INDEX
Chairman Debay supported the motion on the basis of the irregular
shaped lot and the buildable area, and the conversion of a duplex
to a single family dwelling.
Ayes
*
*
*
*
Motion was voted on to approve Variance No. 1175, subject to the
No
*
findings and conditions in Exhibit 'W'. MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applying to the land and building referred to in this
application, which circumstances or conditions do not apply
generally to land, buildings and /or uses in the same District
inasmuch as the subject property is irregular in shape and
smaller than the typical lot on Balboa Island.
2. That the granting of the variance is necessary for the
•
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights of
the applicant, inasmuch as the proposed project is generally
comparable to the size, bulk and height to other buildings
in the surrounding neighborhood. Furthermore, the
irregularly shaped lot has less buildable area than other
small lots on Balboa Island, since the site has a larger front
yard setback than other lots.
3. That the granting of such application will not, under the
circumstances of the particular case, be materially
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and
general welfare of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of the subject property and will not under the
circumstances of the particular case be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property
improvements in the neighborhood.
4. That the proposed building maintains the required front
yard, side yard and alley setback and will not under the
circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons
•
-29-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
d d
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed
use or be detrimental or injurious to property and
improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare
of the City.
5. That the design of the proposed improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed
development.
6. That the conversion of the existing duplex to a single family
dwelling will reduce the parking demand and decrease the
traffic congestion associated with the existing duplex.
structure.
7. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 20.82.050 of the Municipal Code.
CONDMONS:
1. That the development shall be in substantial conformance
with the approved plans, except as noted below.
2. That the proposed gross structural area shall not exceed
2,838 square feet (a maximum gross floor area of 2,436
sq.ft. of living area and a maximum of 402 sq.ft. of garage
area).
3. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
4. That arrangements be made with the Public Works
Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of
the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a building
permit prior to completion of the public improvements.
•
-30-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
O� � �d O • ��A .
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
5. That a 5 foot by 5 foot corner cut -off at the intersection of
the two alleys be dedicated to the public.
6. That the displaced concrete at the intersection of the two
alleys be reconstructed with 8 inches of concrete in the five
foot comer cutoff area under an encroachment permit
issued by the Public Works Department.
7. That all vehicular access to the property be from the
adjacent alleys, unless otherwise approved by the City
Council.
8. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to
the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section
19.24.140 of the Municipal Code.
9. That the development of the subject property shall be
limited to a single family dwelling and that a covenant be
recorded against the property ensuring no second family
dwelling shall be permitted unless the existing structure is
removed.
10. That the existing garage shall remain clear and accessible
for the storage of two automobiles at all times. Cabinets
and other obstructions along the sides of the garage shall be
removed to provide said accessibility.
11. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission
approval of this application prior to the issuance of building
permits.
12. That this variance shall expire unless exercised within 24
months of the date of approval as specified in Section
20.82.090A of the Newport
Y ■ i
-31-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Variance No. 1176 (Public Hearing)
Item No.s
Request to permit additions and alterations to an existing single
V1176
family on property located in the R -1 District Portions of the
proposed construction, consisting of parapet walls and finials, and
coast / a to
a turret, will exceed the permitted height limit in the 24/28 Foot
6/zo/91
Height Limitation Zone.
LOCATION: Lot 1, Tract No. 3867, located at 842 Harbor
Island Drive, on the northerly side of Harbor
Island Drive, at the easterly terminus of
Harbor Island Drive, adjacent to the Channel
entrance to Promontory Bay.
ZONE;: R -1
•
APPLICANT: Dale Cexton Architect and Associates, Orange
OWNER: Dan Tsujioka, Newport Beach
Commissioner Glover addressed the letter that was received by the
Planning Commission from Villageway Management on behalf of
the Promontory Bay Community Association regarding the
Association's objection to the subject application. Robin Flory,
Assistant City Attorney, explained that the Association's review of
the subject project does not affect the Planning Commission's
review of the project inasmuch as staff considers City requirements
only. She further explained that if the Planning Commission
approved the variance, it would be at the discretion of the
Association to take whatever action necessary to enforce the
CC&R's and to prevent the applicant from building even if the
variance had been approved by the City.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Dale Cexton, architect, appeared before the Planning
Commission. Mr. Cexton addressed concerns regarding the
roposed parapet walls exceeding the permitted height limit.
James Hewicker, Planning Director, explained that parapet walls
-32-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
cannot exceed the permitted height limit. Commissioner Pomeroy
stated that a parapet wall is required to comply with the same
criteria as a roof or a ridge. William Laycock, Current Planning
Manager, referred to the plans that were submitted to the Planning
Commission prior to the public hearing indicating, in color, the
parapet walls and the turret that exceed the average 24 foot height
limit.
The Planning Commission and Mr. Hewicker addressed the conflict
that occurred between staff and the applicant based on the height
limit of the parapet walls. Discussion ensued regarding Promontory
Bay Community Association's opposition to the variance.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to continue Variance No. 1176 to
Ayes
*
*
*
*
the June 20, 1991, Planning Commission meeting so as to allow
No
additional time for the applicant and the Association to address
•
their concerns regarding the variance. MOTION CARRIED.
Y Y Y
The Planning Commission recessed at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened at
9:10 P.M.
Amendment No. 740 (Public Hearing)
item No.6
Request to amend the Newport Place Planned Community
A740
Development Regulations so as to reduce the current allocation to
retail square footage and increase the allocation to office square
(Res.1256)
footage in Professional and Business Offices Site No. 5.
Approved
LOCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 88 -174
(Resubdivision No. 866), located at 4100
Newport Place Drive, on the northeasterly
corner of Dove Street and Newport Place
Drive, in the Newport Place Planned
Community.
-33-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
� o
N
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
11
Jill
I
INDEX
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Newport Place Development Corp., Irvine
OWNER: Same as applicant
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Bob Alleborn appeared before the Planning Commission on
behalf of the applicant.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
Motion was made to recommend approval of Amendment No. 740,
Resolution No. 1256, to the City Council.
Commissioner Pomeroy supported the motion based on the success
of the proposed use.
Chairman Debay supported the motion based on the request to
reduce the retail square footage and increase the office square
footage.
Commissioner Di Sano supported the motion based on the reality
of the proposed uses.
Motion
Motion was voted on to recommend Amendment No. 740,
All Ayes
Resolution No. 1256, to City Council. MOTION CARRIED.
s s :
-34-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
A. Amendment No. 739 (Public Hearing)
Item No.7
Request to consider amending Districting Maps No. 6 and 23 so as
A739
to reclassify property located in the R -4 District to the P -C District;
removing the Specific Plan designation from the site; and adopting
(Res.1257)
Planned Community District Regulations on property commonly
Tamed
known as the Balboa Bay Club; and the acceptance of an
environmental document.
AND
B. Traffic Study No. 75 (Public Hearing)
Request to approve a traffic study in conjunction with the
redevelopment of the Balboa Bay Club property.
LOCATION: A portion of Lot 171, Block 54 of Irvine's
Subdivision, located at 1221 West Coast
Highway, on the southerly side of West Coast
Highway, adjacent to the Bayshores
residential area.
ZONE: R -4
APPLICANT: International Bay Clubs, Inc., Newport Beach
OWNER: The City of Newport Beach
Robin Flory, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the lease
regarding the Balboa Bay Club property will not be addressed by
the Planning Commission during the subject public hearing, and
concerns with respect to the lease should be referred to the City
Council for their consideration.
Patricia Temple, Advance Planning Manager, addressed the
proposed redevelopment of the property including the. height limit
proposed for the development, the noise associated with the service
access drive and loading dock, and light spillage resulting from
.
-35-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
automobiles moving on the parking structure. She stated that the
Environmental Impact Report includes detailed visual impact
analyses depicting that significant improvement on West Coast
Highway will occur because of the view corridor access the property
where no views currently exist. She indicated that views from the
parks on Cliff Drive and Kings Road will not be affected. Ms.
Temple stated that there will be varying impacts to marina and bay
views from residences on Kings Road, with some views being
diminished and changed, and some improved, as the result of the
changed locations and heights of the buildings. The noise impact
and light spillage are addressed in the staff report, and Condition
Nos. 84 and 85 in Exhibit "A" address said concerns. The
development of the club portion of the property will increase the
project from 155,303 square feet to 275,512 square feet, an increase
of 77 percent. When the Terrace Apartment facility is included in
the calculation, the increase in floor area is 30 percent. The
development plan includes a public access program which is set
•
forth in detail in the EIR. Ms. Temple advised that 26,600 square
feet of the new facility will be reserved for the exclusive use of
Balboa Bay Club members, and said square footage represents less
than 10 percent of the Club redevelopment. She said that the
balance of 248,912 square feet will be accessible to the general
public on a reservation or space available basis. Areas of the
facility that will be set aside for members use are the athletic
facility, and club areas. She said the beach will be available to club
members and hotel patrons. Casual use by members of the general
public is available throughout the hotel public areas, portions of the
restaurants and entertainment lounge, and the general grounds of
the club portion of the property, including walkways on the bayside
of the property.
Ms. Temple distributed copies of a revised Resolution that includes
references to the Districting Maps, and it includes findings relative
to height. She also requested that Condition No. 36 be deleted
inasmuch as the condition is a duplicate of Condition No. 1. Ms.
Temple stated that Ms. Jeanne Fobes, 328 Aliso Avenue, Newport
Beach, telephoned her opposition to the application on the basis
•
-36-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
\�\N\\ a CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
"that the property should be used by all the people and not just a
few:'
The public bearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Dennis O'Neil, 18881 Von Karman, Irvine, appeared before
the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant. Mr. O'Neil
stated that the development proposed is within the use provisions
of the General Plan and the Local Coastal Program. He addressed
several issues of concern that had been previously expressed:
private view impairment is an issue over which the City does not
have jurisdiction; building height of the structures proposed will be
no higher than the existing structures on the club portions of the
facilities i.e. 35 feet above grade; the project coverage will be
increased by less than 29 percent; the traffic generated from the
project as proposed will not have a significant impact on the traffic
circulation and the project meets all of the Traffic Phasing
Ordinance criteria; traffic signal required will be installed in the
.
future regardless of whether the project goes forward; and the
public access and public views is enhanced and increased. Mr.
O'Neil stated that the applicant concurs with the findings and
conditions for approval in Exhibit "K.
Mr. Bill Ray, Balboa Bay Club, appeared before the Planning
Commission. Mr. Ray reviewed the changes, demands, and needs
of the membership and the general public that have occurred
during the past years. Mr. Ray presented a brief history of the
Balboa Bay Club since 1948 and the development of the property.
He indicated that at present the property is dated, inefficient to
operate, and it is a gross under - utilization of a valuable community
asset. He said that in 1987, the Club commissioned a survey of the
membership that resulted in 2,000 hours of work by the members
identifying their changing needs of the Club, and those needs have
been incorporated in the proposed plan by qualified architects. Mr.
Ray stated that the proposed plan was examined by the general
membership, Community Associations, Civic Groups, and an
attempt was made to be sensitive to the immediate neighbors in
Bayshores and the public that would be affected by the proposed
plan. Mr. Ray said that an attempt was made to achieve a visual
•
-37-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
• 'Pow •�� •`
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
I
I
Jill
I
INDEX
enhancement of the property from West Coast Highway, Bayshores,
and sites above West Coast Highway that could view the property.
He explained that an attempt was made to maximize the on -site
orientation consisting of a variety of different combinations of
building forms and locations. The proposal is the result of a very
extensive analysis of how optimum use of the property can be
achieved within the limitations of the General Plan.
Mr. Ray described from an aerial exhibit on display, the building
footprints of the proposed buildings. He explained that presently
the entire bay frontage of the property is occupied by buildings
which extend to the property line at Bayshores. The proposed plan
from Bayshores includes a corridor which varies from 75 feet at the
first building setback down to 45 feet at the water; the buildings
have been moved back 20 feet from the existing bulkhead which
would enhance the water view; an access has been provided from
the Bayshores side of the property that starts at the curve of West
Coast Highway to a distance of 90 feet and ramps down to
approximately 9 feet below the existing grade level; above the
grade level a fence is proposed up to 10 feet to conceal service
vehicles and noise; where the ramp and the fence commence at
West Coast Highway a parking area will be provided that extends
below ground and a level that extends 3 feet above ground and the
lights from the parking area will not intrude on the Bayshores
residents; an access from Bayshores through the subject property
was discussed with the Bayshores residents; a view corridor of the
water has been created of approximately 100 feet between the
proposed buildings; the exclusive club areas of the property include
an athletic club, the clubhouse and a portion of the restaurant; the
general public may enter the property subject to a reservation
requirement; the general public may use a parking ramp to a
separate lobby in the proposed guest facility area; a restaurant and
bar will be located off of the proposed lobby for the general public;
a public walkway will be provided that extends down to the beach
along the entire frontage of the club property; the entire frontage
of the property will be landscaped and will provide a substantial
visual enhancement from West Coast Highway; and he concluded
•
-38-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
\\I� �
0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
11
Jill
INDEX
that the applicants have a desire to develop the proposed project
before the 21st Century.
In response to a question posed by Chairman Debay regarding
public access by reservation, Mr. Ray explained that public access
depends upon if space is available in the restaurants or hotels
inasmuch as the people staying on the property would have first
priority. Mr. Ray further explained that the City requires that the
traffic signal be installed prior to construction so as to mitigate
construction vehicles.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Glover regarding
public access to the restaurants, Mr. Ray explained that the Club
will reserve the right to require a reservation. He further explained
that the public may pass through the guard gate providing there is
parking space available on the property. Commissioner Glover
concluded that the meaning of 'casual use' would be if a member
•
of the general public parked their automobile and walked on the
public access. Mr. Ray concurred that the foregoing would be
considered a 'casual visitor', and said visitor would be allowed to
drive and park on the property if parking space is available. Mr.
Ray further replied to Commissioner Glover that a landscaped plan
is in existence so as to buffer West Coast Highway, and the intent
is to conceal or soften the proposed buildings.
Mr. Ray and Commissioner Pers6n discussed the location of
existing buildings and the proposed buildings from the aerial
drawing. Mr. Ray stated that the proposed building locations
occupy significantly less areas of ground coverage, and he
addressed the view corridors from West Coast Highway and
Bayshores. Mr. Ray and Commissioner Pers6n discussed the views
that would be visible and impacted from the bluff area above West
Coast Highway.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards
regarding the proposed parking structure adjacent to Bayshores,
Mr. Ray explained that the access road adjacent to Bayshores is 26
feet wide, and the underground parking structure also consists of
•
-39-
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
June 6, 1991
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
11
fill
INDEX
a second level that extends 3 feet above the existing grade level.
He said the fence on the Bayshore side of the property is an
undetermined height; however, an 8 or 10 foot fence is being
considered. Mr. Ray further explained that the fence and
landscaping will provide noise mitigation. Mr. Tom Deemer,
President of the Balboa Bay Club, appeared before the Planning
Commission, and he explained that the 15 foot planter area consists
of 7 -1/2 feet on the Bayshores side and 7 1/2 feet on the Club side
with the fence running down the middle of the property, and
extensive landscaping is proposed on both sides of the fence.
Mr. Brent Reynolds, a member of the Cliff Haven Homeowner's
Association, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr.
Reynolds addressed the redevelopment of the Balboa Bay Club;
and the proposed 77 percent expansion program. He stated that
the residents oppose the rezoning of the subject property; however,
he said the residents support a renovation of the apartments. He
•
stated that they oppose the increased density, a higher noise level
on West Coast Highway, and increase in traffic. Mr. Reynolds
explained that the residents support public access to the restaurant.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Glover, Mr.
Reynolds explained that he is a Director of the Cliff Haven
Homeowner's Association and he represents the Kings Road area
of said Association. He said the residents of Kings Road requested
that he represent them at the public hearing.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pers6n regarding
the Terrace Apartments, Ms. Temple explained that the Terrace
Apartments are a part of the application to the extent that the
Planned Community Development Plan provides that the facility
that exists is accounted for in the zoning. Additionally, the Balboa
Bay Club has indicated that there is an intent to improve the
facade so as to unify the theme of the property. She said that the
Balboa Bay Club would not be required to come before the
Planning Commission to renovate the facade.
Mr. John Miller, Box 1475, Newport Beach, appeared before the
Planning Commission, and he expressed his concern regarding the
-40-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
� o
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
lease. Ms. Flory explained that the issue of the extension of the
lease is not a consideration of the Planning Commission. She
further explained that the Planning Commission can consider the
rezoning as a commitment of the property to a long term specific
use, but the Planning Commission may not consider a lease.
Chairman Debay suggested that concerns with respect to the lease
be addressed directly to the City Council. Mr. Miller opposed
rezoning inasmuch as it is currently zoned for the present usage,
and further usage should be considered when the Balboa Bay Club
lease is reviewed by the City Council. In response to a question
posed by Commissioner Edwards, Ms. Flory explained that the
agreements that are currently in effect makes the issue of the
rezoning of the property and the adoption of the Development Plan
a condition to be resolved before the City will consider the lease.
She stated that the rezoning does not necessarily commit the City
to an extension of the lease. Commissioner Edwards concluded that
prior to any consideration of the City Council relative to the lease,
•
a determination must be made with regard to the zoning change;
however, when the Planning Commission makes a decision with
regard to the zoning change, the Commission is required to take
into account whether or not long range planning i.e. long range
term of utilization of property is taken into account. Ms. Flory
explained it is a planning consideration as to the use of the
property, and the redevelopment of the property as proposed to be
rezoned is a commitment to the continued use as proposed.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Glover, Ms.
Flory explained that approval of the subject proposal would not be
a commitment to the extension of the lease. Commissioner
Edwards stated that it is a condition preceding the consideration of
the extension of the lease. Ms. Flory stated that the City Council
will consideration the conditions of the lease.
Jim Dale, 434 Tustin Avenue, appeared before the Planning
Commission, and supported the subject proposal and proposed
uses. He stated that the Balboa Bay Club is a good citizen and has
been a good steward of the City property over the years. He said
that what the applicant is attempting to do is plan for the future,
-41-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
o �d d dcn
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
and for the positive benefit of the City and the residents. Mr. Dale
addressed the rental fees to the City and that the expansion would
enhance said income. He stated that as non - members of the Bay
Club, the organizations he is a member of benefit from the Bay
Club frequently.
Ms. Mary Peikert, 811 Kings Road, appeared before the Planning
Commission. She explained that her property is situated across
from the proposed hotel facility, and she said that her concern
would be the noise emitting from the hotel to her property on
Kings Road. Ms. Temple explained that an analysis of the noise
that would be generated by the redevelopment of the Bay Club was
included in the draft EIR, and the main source of long -term noise.
impact is the increased traffic generation from West Coast Highway
inasmuch as the elevation does not change. Ms. Temple explained
that a determination was made there would not be a significant
change to residents because of the distance from the center line of
•
West Coast Highway. Ms. Temple further explained that the short
term noise from construction will be noticeable by the residents.
Ms. Peikert emphasized that she was concerned with the noise that
would be emitted from the proposed increased height of the hotel
building to her property. Mr. Ray reappeared before the Planning
Commission, and he explained that the height of the buildings will
not increase; however, some of the buildings will have a change in
height. Ms. Peikert and Mr. Ray discussed the height of specific
buildings from the aerial drawing.
Mr. Don Olson, a resident of Balboa Bay Club for 15 years and a
member of the aforementioned Balboa Bay Club committee,
appeared before the Planning Commission in support of the
proposed project. He explained that the Bay Club is not currently
providing the proper use of the property; that the City is not
benefiting from the maximum revenue; and the proposed
improvements of the property will benefit not just Bay Club
members but also the general public.
Mr. J. D. Walling, 1113 Kings Road, appeared before the Planning
Commission to state his opposition to any height increase, the
-42-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
O`d d'Q �d�s1
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
increase in traffic, and noise. He supported improvement of the
property, but he said not at the expense of the residents on the
bluff.
Mrs. Ruth, Reynolds, 1301 Kings Road, appeared before the
Planning Commission to express her opposition to a height
increase. She referred to a letter signed by her husband, Charles
G. Reynolds, Sr. dated June 6, 1991, to the Planning Commission.
Mrs. Reynolds read a prepared statement addressing their concerns
that the project would block views of the bay which would reduce
the value of their property. In response to a question posed by
Chairman Debay, Mrs. Reynolds replied that the residents would
agree to meet with the applicants to review the plans of the
proposed project.
Commissioner Pers6n and Ms. Temple explained that buildings
that are currently 35 feet high are proposed to be demolished and
.
new 35 foot buildings will be constructed at different locations;
therefore, the view impact from the bluff above West Coast
Highway will be different than what currently exist. In response to
comments made by Commissioner Pomeroy regarding the impact
of views, Ms. Temple explained that the view shed as addressed in
the EIR and by staff is considered from West Coast Highway and
Kings Road, and because of the proposed orientation of the
buildings, some of the residents on the bluff will have their view
shed diminished, some views will be shifted, and some views will be
improved. In response to Commissioner Pers6Ws statements
regarding protecting views from private property, Mr. Hewicker
explained that the City attempts to preserve or enhance public
views from roads, parks and public facilities, and to the extent that
public views are enhanced or improved, some of the benefits affect
private property.
Mr. James Adams, 1610 Kings Road, appeared before the Planning
Commission, and he addressed his concerns regarding the proposed
increase in building height, the proposed view corridor, the public
view that would be affected from Ensign Park, and the noise
reverberation to the residents on Kings Road.
-43-
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
June 6, 1991
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Mr. Lon Wells, Corona del Mar, appeared before the Planning
Commission in support of the project on the basis that the
redevelopment of the property is progress and is needed by the
City and the community. He addressed the traffic signal that will
be installed on West Coast Highway at the entrance to the Bay
Club that will slow the traffic down. and reduce the noise on the
bluffs. .
Mr. Peter Marr, 2401 Bayshores Drive, appeared before the
Planning Commission, is a member of Balboa Bay Club, and in
support of the redevelopment of the property. He addressed his
concerns regarding the hotel that is proposed to be constructed
adjacent to the Bayshores community and the impact that the hotel
will have on the area. Mr. Marr indicated that hotel rooms that
include patios will be facing Bayshores, and be expressed his
concern that noise would emit from said hotel rooms to the
•
residential area.
Mr. Frank Eisendrath, Kings Place, appeared before the Planning
Commission. He compared Newport Beach with Chicago and he
addressed his concerns that the City has a lack of free public parks
with access to the Harbor; that the residents on Kings Road would
be heavily impacted by any future development of the Balboa Bay
Club; and a view corridor is a bad solution for creating a good
view. He addressed Exhibit 17 in the staff report stating: "that an
increased height would result in a more desirable architectural
treatment of the building and a more appealing visual character of
the area ", and he commented that said statement would not be
indicative of the Terrace Apartment building. Mr. Eisendrath
suggested that the proposed landscaping be reviewed by the Kings
Road residents. He addressed the proposed 2.0 Floor Area Ratio
if the parking structure would be included in the square footage,
and he rebuked a statement contained in the staff report regarding
the economical and social benefits to the community by stating that
approximately one -third of the members are residents of Newport
Beach.
-44-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
11
Jill
INDEX
Mr. John R. Bertone, 2632 Circle Drive, Bayshores, appeared
before the Planning Commission. He stated that the Balboa Bay
Club committee contacted the residents of Bayshores; however, he
pointed out that the height of the proposed wall has not been
determined.
Mr. Charles Winfield, 1021 Kings Road, appeared before the
Planning Commission. He addressed concerns regarding the
proposed 35 foot height limit.
Mr. Rojas appeared before the Planning Commission and he
expressed concern regarding the proposed height limit. In response
to Mr. Rojas, Ms. Temple explained that the existing height of the
Terrace Apartments of 55 feet will not be reduced when the
apartments are renovated. Mr. Rojas addressed the foregoing
statements regarding public access of the club facilities, and he
questioned if public land should be phased out for private purposes
•
in exchange for public land being used for public purposes. He
explained that he has no intent to say that what has been done at
the Bay Club has not been done well, or run well, but if it would
be left to the voters, a good debate would ensue.
Mr. Jim DeBoom, 1743 Bayport Way, appeared before the
Planning Commission in support of the proposed redevelopment.
He indicated the number of public organizations on a pre - arranged
basis that use the Bay Club for the service of food, fellowship, and
programs.
Mrs. Barbara DeBoom, 1743 Bayport Way, appeared before the
Planning Commission in support of the proposed redevelopment.
She stated that the Chamber of Commerce utilizes the Balboa Bay
Club for many Chamber events.
Mr. Bill Hamilton, 3620 Fifth Avenue, appeared before the
Planning Commission in support of the proposed project. Mr.
Hamilton referred to foregoing statements regarding the proposed
restaurant, and he commented that many public restaurants within
the City require reservations. He addressed the public events that
•
-45-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
c�
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
are held at the Balboa Bay Club, and he commented that the
community appreciates access to the facility.
Mr. Dennis O'Neil reappeared before the Planning Commission.
He concluded that foregoing testimony has been addressed in the
documents that have been provided by staff. The applicants are
attempting to bring the redevelopment into compliance with the
General Plan, and have made every attempt to make the use of the
property compatible with the neighbors.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
Commissioner Pers6n addressed the compliance of the proposed
project with the General Plan. He stated that the applicant has
attempted to improve the property and to enhance public views
on
*
from public places. Motion was made to approve Amendment No.
739 (Resolution No. 1257), Traffic Study No. 75, and
Environmental Impact Report No. 143 subject to the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A '.
Commissioner Glover expressed her concern with the view impact
that the project located on public property could have on the public
driving on West Coast Highway, and she asked if the view corridor
is an unfettered view. Ms. Temple explained that landscaping, and
a portion of the guard gate will be within the view corridor. In
response to a question posed by Commissioner Glover with regard
to 'view corridor', Ms. Temple explained that four findings are
included in the Height Chapter of the Zoning Ordinance that must
be made, and one finding that is most commonly associated with
the imposition of view corridor acquirement on property is "The
increased building height would result in more public visual open
space and views than is required by the basic height limit in any
zone. Particular attention shall be given to the location of the
structure on the lot, the percentage of ground cover, and the
treatment of all setback areas. ", meaning that by siting the buildings
and locations so as to create public visual open space or view
corridor a secondary height limit can be achieved. Commissioner
•
-46-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
•Aa � �,F
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Glover concluded that the public needs to know what will be
contained in the view corridor from West Coast Highway.
Commissioner Merrill supported the motion; however, he said that
the mitigation measures do not address the noise emitting from the
hotel as expressed by the residents of Bayshores, and reflective
noise from the Balboa Bay Club to the residents on the bluff.
Discussion ensued regarding the mitigation of noise that would
affect Bayshores and bluff residents. Ms. Temple stated that the
only way to address the noise would be to require no balconies,
and no openable windows or doors on the Bayshores side of the
property.
Commissioner Person amended the motion to add the mitigation
of noise on the Bayshores side of the property by appropriate
•
measures, such as enclosing balconies and windows.
Commissioner Pomeroy requested the maker of the motion to
consider reflective noise as the noise impacts Kings Road. The
maker of the motion concurred with the request.
Commissioner Pomeroy stated that residents of Kings Road will
have view impact that will be perceived as negative; however, he
said that will be offset by the residents who will have their views
improved. He stated that the view impacts, the view corridor, the
public access to the property, and removal of the buildings from the
bulkhead will improve public views from the bay and from West
Coast Highway. He said that the property will be significantly
improved and what is proposed is good, long -term planning.
Commissioner Glover supported the motion. She requested more
precise information concerning the mitigation of noise, and the
height between Bayshores and Balboa Bay Club be considered so
as to address the public's concerns.
Commissioner Di Sano supported the motion on the basis that the
roject complies with the General Plan•, the facilities will be
-47-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
a 0� � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
improved; there will be more benefit to the public; better
utilization of the property; less building footprint on the ground;
open space is improved with the view corridors; the buildings are
moved back from the bay; and over -all the redevelopment is a well
thought out utilization of the property.
Chairman Debay supported the motion and the foregoing
statements by the Commissioners.
In response to a question posed by Chairman Debay, Ms. Temple
explained that staff will address the expressed concerns pertaining
to reflective noise by contacting an acoustic consultant for
recommendations, and said information will be forwarded to the
City Council.
Motion was voted on to approve Amendment No. 739 (Resolution
No. 1257), Traffic Study No. 75, and Environmental Impact Report
•
No. 143, deleting Mitigation Measure No. 36 that was a duplicate
of Mitigation Measure No. 1 and adding Mitigation Measure No.
6 regarding the effect the noise emitting from the hotel would
All Ayes
have on the Bayshores community, subject to the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A". MOTION CARRIED.
A. Environmental Impact Report 4
in i
1. That an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared
for the project in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA
Guidelines and City Policy.
Z. That all potential significant environmental effects which
could result from the project have been identified and
analyzed in the EIR.
That based upon the information contained in the
Environmental Impact Report, mitigation measures have
•
-48-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
O`� �pd�p�n
3�.p �i. .
d �' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
4. The grading permit shall include a description of haul routes
designed to minimize traffic conflicts, access points to the
site which are safe (including flagmen), and a watering
program designed to minimize the dust impacts of haul
operations. The applicant shall , subject to the City Traffic
Engineer's approval, install the traffic signal at the entrance
prior to the commencement of construction to assist in said
safety control.
5. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan shall be
submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building
Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit. A
copy of the plan shall be forwarded to the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region.
6. Grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans
prepared by a civil engineer incorporating the
recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering
geologist subsequent to the completion of a comprehensive
soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent
reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading plans
shall be furnished to the Building Department prior to the
issuance of building permits.
7. Prior to demolition of existing structures, a complete plan
for litter and debris control for the demolition, grading, and
construction phases to ensure that no debris is permitted to
enter Newport Harbor shall be approved by the Planning
and Marine Departments.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project
proponent shall submit final soils engineering and geologic
studies to the Director, Building Department, City of
Newport Beach, for approval. These reports will primarily
involve further assessment of potential soil- related
constraints and hazards such as slope instability, settlement,
liquefaction, ground water conditions, or related secondary
seismic impacts where determined to be appropriate by the
•
-50-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
[� G q yid
a �0� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
been identified and incorporated into the project to reduce
potentially significant environmental effects to a level of
insignificance in all areas, and that the only remaining
environmental effects are significant only on a cumulative
basis. Further, that the economic and social benefits to the
community override the remaining significant environmental
effect anticipated as a result of the project.
4. That the information contained in the Environmental
Impact Report has been considered in the various decisions
made relative to this project.
Mitigation Measures:
1. Construction activities will be conducted in accordance with
Newport Beach Municipal Code, which limits the hours of
construction and excavation work to 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays. No
person shall, while engaged in construction, remodeling,
digging, grading, demolition, painting, plastering or any
other related building activity, operate any tool, equipment
or machine in a manner which produces loud noise that
disturbs, or could disturb, a person of normal sensitivity who
works or resides in the vicinity, on any Sunday, or on any
holiday.
2. Grading operations shall be performed in a manner
intended to protect surrounding properties from impact
during the construction period by including dust control and
erosion control activities and operation hour restrictions.
The Director, Building Department, City of Newport Beach
shall ensure the continued enforcement of these measures
during construction.
Development of the site shall be subject to a grading permit
approved by the Building and Planning Departments.
•
-49-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
0 I
• ' Ok
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Building Department, City of Newport Beach. The report
shall include evaluation of potentially expansive soil and
recommended construction procedures and /or design
criteria to minimize their effect of these soils on the
proposed development. All reports shall recommend
appropriate mitigation measures and be completed in the
manner specified in the Newport Beach Grading Code and
State Subdivision Map Act.
In addition to the above criteria, the following specific items
shall be required:
a. Dewatering induced ground subsidence shall be
addressed. A settlement monitoring program shall
be designed to identify any settlement before existing
area improvements are damaged.
b. Buildings shall be designed to resist hydrostatic uplift
forces without the use of pumps or other mechanized
devices which may fail.
C. Shoring designs shall be prepared
9. All new construction shall be inspected by the City of
Newport Beach Building Department to ensure compliance
with Section 2312(a) Earthquake Regulations, Uniform
Building Code, 1988 Edition.
10. Treatment of extracted water shall be conducted in a
manner and at a location approved by the City of Newport
Beach City Engineer and the Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board.
11.. Suspended solids (e.g., sand) shall be separated from
extracted water in accordance with applicable water quality
standards and disposed of at a location approved by the
Public Works Department and the Grading Engineer.
-51-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
db o`O 6p d.p�
�� �� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
12. Provision shall be made, as necessary, for the treatment of
hydrogen sulfide to comply with water quality standards and
to control odors from the dewatering process.
13. If the applicant intends to use an ocean disposal site for
excavated materials, the City of Newport Beach Public
Works Department shall be provided with evidence that all
appropriate permits from the Army Corps of Engineers and
the City of Newport Beach have been obtained. Such
evidence shall be submitted to and verified by the Public
Works Department prior to the issuance of a grading
permit.
14. Recommendations included in the February 19, 1990 LeRoy
Crandall & Associates' Geotechnical Report shall be
incorporated into project design where appropriate. The
Building Department shall verify the application of the
•
appropriate recommendations prior to the issuance of
grading permits.
15. A supplemental subsurface investigation shall be performed
subsequent to demolition of the existing buildings to obtain
subsurface data in those areas inaccessible during previous
studies.
16. The groundwater level shall be lowered to a depth at least
five feet beneath the excavation bottom. The dewatering
system shall be designed and performed by qualified
engineers with previous experience in this type of
construction. Selection of the engineer shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits.
17. The upper ten feet of soil material shall be removed.
Remaining soil to a distance at least five feet below and
beyond the proposed structure shall be densified as
described in the Geotechnical Report as verified or
amended by subsequent subsurface investigation.
•
-52-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
�,� .+
0 ��' �" \ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
18. A detailed preconstruction survey shall be prepared to
document the present condition of all buildings and facilities
within the zone of influence of the dewatered investigation.
Photographs, crack surveys, and installation of a reference
benchmark beyond the zone of influence shall be included
in the preconstruction survey. Areas within at least 30 feet
of the proposed excavation shall be monitored for any
settlement and lateral movements due to possible deflection
of the shoring system. Groundwater observation wells
within the zone of influence shall be installed. The specific
parameters of the study shall be provided to the City
Engineer for review prior to issuance of the grading permit.
19. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, based
upon the geotechnical information described above, the
project applicant will be required to enter into an
agreement and post a bond guaranteeing the repair of the
•
public street system, utilities or other public property that
might be damaged during the dewatering excavation process
and the construction of subterranean improvements.
20. If found necessary by the City of Newport Beach, based
upon the geotechnical information described above, the
project applicant will be required to enter into an
agreement guaranteeing the repair of all damage to private
property caused by the dewatering excavation process and
the construction of subterranean improvements.
1. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
shall be obtained from the Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board. Water extracted from dewatering
wells shall meet current Environmental Protection Agency
requirements prior to discharging into the Bay. If necessary,
the water shall be desilted prior to discharge.
Light construction equipment shall be used for earthwork
operations. No heavy equipment shall be used.
•
-53-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
O� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
23. A grading plan, submitted to the Director, Building
Department, City of Newport Beach, shall include a
complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage
facilities to minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris,
and other water pollutants. Prior to recordation of any final
parcel map or prior to issuance of certificates of use and
occupancy, whichever comes first, said improvements shall
be constructed in a manner meeting the approval of the
Director, Building Department, City of Newport Beach.
24. All outfalls into the bay shall have flapgates attached to the
storm drain outlets to serve as a backflow prevention device,
subject to approval of the Director, Public Works, City of
Newport Beach.
25. Existing on -site drainage facilities shall be improved to the
satisfaction of the City of Newport Beach City Engineer. A
hydrology and hydraulic study and a master plan of water,
sewer and storm drain for on -site improvements shall be
prepared by the applicant and approved by the Public
Works Department prior to recording the tract map. Any
modifications to the existing storm drain system shall be the
responsibility of the developer.
26. A landscape plan, prepared by a licensed landscape
architect, shall be submitted which includes a maintenance
program that controls the use of fertilizers and pesticides.
The plan shall be reviewed by the Parks, Beaches and
Recreation Department and approved by the Planning and
Public Works Departments. Prior to the issuance of an
occupancy permit, a licensed landscape architect shall certify
to the Planning Department that the landscaping has been
installed in accordance with the approved plan.
"
27. Landscaped areas shall be irrigated with a system designed
to avoid surface run -off and over - watering.
-54-
COMMISSIONERS June. 6, 1991
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
28. Drainage facilities and architectural features shall be
designed to prevent run -off from entering the garage
structure, keep the garage floor slab dry from seepage, and
remove oil and grease from run -off prior to discharge into
the public storm drains. Verification of these design
features shall be made by the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of building permits.
29. A hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by the
applicant and approved by the Public Works Department,
along. with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain
facilities for the on -site improvements prior to issuance of
any grading or building permits. Any modifications or
extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer
systems shown to be required by the study and the City shall
be the responsibility of the developer. The private water
system will have to be upgraded to meet current City
•
standards.
30. A condition survey of the existing bulkhead along the bay
side of the property shall be made by a civil or structural
engineer, and the bulkhead shall be repaired in
conformance with the recommendations of the condition
survey and to the satisfaction of the Building Department
and Marine Department. The top of the bulkhead is to be
a minimum elevation of 9.00 above M.LLW. (627 MSL).
31. A dust control program in compliance with South Coast Air
Quality Management District Rule 403 shall be
implemented during demolition, excavation and
construction. This program shall include such measures as:
containing soil on -site until it is hauled away, periodic
watering of stockpile soil, and regular vacuum sweeping of
streets used for the haul operation to remove accumulated
material.
-55-
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
June 6, 1991
� d,0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
37. Any mechanical equipment and emergency power
generators shall be screened from view, and noise associated
with said structures shall be sound - attenuated so as not to
exceed the mechanical equipment noise standards set forth
in the Newport Beach Municipal Code. The latter shall be
based upon the recommendations of a qualified acoustical
engineer and approved by the Building Department. The
applicant shall present to the City Engineer a written
commitment that the loading dock shall be operated only
within the hours specified by the City of Newport Beach
Municipal Code for construction activities.
38. Applicant shall apply for a waiver of City noise abatement
regulations to allow for dewatering and pouring of the
subterranean garage slab. The continuous concrete pour
shall be scheduled on a non - summer weekend outside of the
•
peak traffic period.
39. At the time the City approves the requested waiver of City
noise abatement regulation to allow for dewatering and
pouring of the basement slab, the City Engineer shall
determine if it is necessary to require barriers or baffles and
distance the electric pumps as far as possible from adjacent
residential uses to reduce noise from construction
equipment so as not to exceed the mechanical equipment
noise standards set forth in the Newport Beach Municipal
Code. If required, the developer shall install such measures
prior to beginning any activities for which a waiver was
granted.
40. Pouring of the subterranean garage slab shall be scheduled
to encompass only one night time period. The schedule for
any continuous concrete pour shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer.
41. Electric pump motors shall be required for dewatering
equipment to reduce noise levels.
•
-57-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
0� q�� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
A
I
I
I
I
I
INDEX
32. Major soil disturbance shall take place between 8:00 a.m.
and 4:00 p.m. when winds are stronger to reduce the
amount of dust settling out on nearby receptors, and to
obtain better areawide dispersion of any fugitive dust.
33. A fan - assisted ventilation system shall be installed in the
venting system for the subterranean garage for use in peak
periods when natural ventilation is not sufficient.
34. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the project
proponent shall produce evidence acceptable to the
Director, Building Department, City of Newport Beach that:
a. All construction vehicles or equipment, fixed or
mobile, operated within 1,009 of a dwelling shall be
equipped with properly operating and maintained
•
mufflers.
b. All operations shall comply with the City Noise
Ordinance.
C. Stockpiling and /or vehicle staging areas shall be
located as far as practicable from dwelling units.
35. All non - residential structures shall be sound attenuated
against the combined impact of all present and projected
noise from exterior noise sources to meet the interior noise
criteria as specified in the Noise Element and /or Noise
Ordinance.
36. That all hotel facilities facing the Bayshores area, including
guest rooms, be designed to eliminate potential noise
spillage which could result from radios, televisions, etc. as
well as noisy party activity. This can be accomplished by
designing the facility with no openable doors or windows
facing the Bayshores property line, and /or through
enclosure of the proposed balconies.
.
-56-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
• ,POD �� �
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
42. An improved loudspeaker /paging system shall be installed
to direct speakers away from surrounding residential areas.
A written evaluation of the proposed system shall be
prepared by an acoustical engineer and approved by the
Director, Building Department, City of Newport Beach.
43. Noise resulting from outdoor functions such as parties, large
gatherings and weddings which include music shall be
limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., or as
otherwise permitted by the approval of a Use Permit.
44. Pursuant to Chapter 15.45 of the Newport Beach Municipal
Code (Fair Share Traffic Contribution Ordinance), the .
applicant shall contribute funds towards traffic and
circulation improvements.
45. Traffic control and transportation of equipment and
•
materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and
local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed
and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the
issuance of demolition, grading or building permits.
46. Earthwork hauling operations, major concrete placement
and other construction operations requiring more than 32
trips per day or 4 trips per hour by trucks shall be
coordinated with the City Traffic Engineer and CalTrans
Permits Division. During high peak traffic times or if
operations are causing significant traffic congestion, the
operations may be restricted by the City Traffic Engineer
and /or Caltrans.
47. Prior to the commencement of each construction phase and
related parking provisions, the project proponent shall notify
the Traffic Engineer, City of Newport Beach, of the start
date for that particular construction phase. Thereafter, as
deemed necessary by the Traffic Engineer, the City will
monitor the parking provisions to ensure compliance with
the proposed phasing plan.
•
-58-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991
0 '\ \� \ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
48. A traffic signal shall be constructed on West Coast Highway
at the main entrance to the Bay Club prior to the
commencement of demolition or construction.
49. The westerly driveway shall be used as a limited access drive
only. It is not to be used for access to the residential units,
without being reconstructed to provide adequate sight
distance and design to be approved by the Public Works
Department.
50. Parking shall be provided on -site or in approved off -site lots
for all employees, members and guests, and all employees
will be required to park in these provided facilities.
51. No construction equipment storage on West Coast Highway
or deliveries or off - loading will be made in the West Coast
Highway right of way. Sidewalk along West Coast Highway
shall be kept open at all times except when being repaired
or replaced.
52. The on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian
circulation systems shall be subject to further review by the
Traffic Engineer, and sidewalks shall be provided between
Coast Highway and the building entrances.
53. The intersection of West Coast Highway and Main Entrance
.
drive and easterly drive shall be designed to provide sight
distance for a speed of 50 miles per hour and sidewalk
bicycle traffic. Slopes, landscape, walls and other
obstructions shall be considered in the sight distance
requirements. Landscaping within the sight line shall not
exceed 24 inches in height. The sight distance requirement
may be modified at non - critical locations, subject to
approval of the Traffic Engineer.
54. A turnaround shall be provided prior to the guard gate
unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Department.
The design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed and
•
-59-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
,o
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
approved by the Public Works Department and Fire
Department.
55. Deteriorated sections of concrete sidewalk shall be
reconstructed along the West Coast Highway frontage; the
unused drive apron shall be removed and replaced with
curb, gutter and sidewalk; the new drive apron shall be
constructed per City Standard 166 -L; and curb access ramps
shall be provided at the westerly drive entrance on West
Coast Highway. All work shall be completed under an
encroachment permit issued by the California Department
of Transportation.
56. The easterly access drive shall. be a minimum width of 26
feet clear. This driveway shall be designed for right turn
movements only for ingress and egress.
•
57. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, construction
staging, materials storage and a parking plan showing how .
workers will be able to park without using on -street parking
must be submitted and approved by the Public Works
Department:
58. Food odors shall be controlled through compliance with Air
Quality Management Rule 402 which states that a person
shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such
quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause
injury, detriment, nuisance or annoyance to any considerable
number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the
comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the
public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause,
injury or damage to business or property.
59. The Edison transformer serving the site shall be located
outside the sight distance planes as described in City
Standard 110 -L.
•
-60-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991
� o.o
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
60. To ensure consistency between the UCP public access
policies and the proposed project, public access
opportunities will be implemented in the Planned
Community Development Plan text for the proposed project.
61. Pedestrian access shall be provided throughout the areas of
the Club portion of property identified in the public access
plan as available for use by the general public.
62. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a landscape and
irrigation plan for the project shall be prepared by a
licensed landscape architect. The plan will be subject to
approval by the Director, Planning Department and the
Director, Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Department, City
of Newport Beach.
63. All mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened
.
from public streets, alleys and adjoining properties.
64. Signage and exterior lighting shall be approved by the
Planning and Public Works Departments.
65. Street signs, benches, planters and other similar features on-
site or adjacent to the project site shall be designed with a
common theme compatible with the overall architectural
style of the project. The design shall be approved by the
Planning, Public Works, and Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Departments prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.
66. Views of roof -top equipment shall be screened from upslope
properties.
67. Existing overhead utilities on the project side of Coast
Highway shall be put underground to the satisfaction of the
Public Works Department.
68. Based on a fire flow requirement for sprinklered facilities of
this nature, the following existing connections shall be
-61-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
upsized to provide for 2,000 gallons per minute fire flow
(subject to Fire Department review and approval of design
plans):
Upsize the connection at Coast Highway from 6
inches to 12 inches and install an 8 -inch meter;
Upsize the connection at Bayshore Drive from 4
inches to 8 inches and install a 6 -inch meter.
69. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Fire
Department shall review the proposed plans to determine
the adequacy of emergency access. The Department may
require indoor fire protection features, such as overhead fire
sprinklers, if it determines that such measures are necessary
to provide adequate fire protection.
.
70. Fire Department access shall be approved by the Fire
Department prior to the issuance of building permits.
71. The Southern California Gas Company has developed
several programs which are available and would provide
assistance in selecting the most effective application of
energy conservation techniques. Prior to the issuance of
building permits, the applicant shall meet with
representatives of the Gas Company to discuss applicable
energy conservation techniques that are appropriate for
incorporation into the project.
72. The facility installation will conform to applicable Public
Utilities Commission regulations. The applicant shall
comply with adopted State energy conservation standards
per Sections 1451 -1542 of Title 20 of the California
Administrative Code and Sections P 20 -1451 through P 20-
1452 of Title 24 of the Code.
73. Final design of the project shall provide for the
incorporation of water - saving devices for project lavatories
•
-62-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
and other water -using devices. This shall be verified by the
Building Department prior to issuance of occupancy permits.
74. Water improvement plans shall be approved by the Fire
Department, the Utilities Department and the Public Works
Department, City of Newport Beach, prior to issuance of a
grading permit.
75. The water distribution and appurtenances shall conform to
the applicable laws and adopted regulations enforced by the
Orange County Health Department and the Utilities
Department.
76. Drought - resistant vegetation shall be used in landscaping to
reduce the demand for irrigation water.
77. All proposed sewer improvements shall be approved by the
•
Director, Public Works, City of Newport Beach.
78. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a bus turnout, if
determined by the City Traffic Engineer to be necessary
based on roadway cross sections, travel volumes or.speeds,
should be provided at the existing bus stop location.
79. In conjunction with the provision of a bus turnout, the area
adjacent to this turnout shall include a paved passenger
waiting area complete with a bus shelter and bench. A
paved, lighted and handicapped accessible pedestrian
accessway shall be provided between this stop and the
project buildings.
80. In conjunction with the provision of a bus turnout, a
concrete bus pad sufficient to support the weight of a bus
(see OCTD's Design Guidelines for Bus Facilities) shall be
provided at this transit stop if it is determined by CalTrans
that the material used to construct Coast Highway is not
sufficient to support continued transit use of the bus stop.
•
-63-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT. BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
81. County Sanitation District fees shall be paid prior to
issuance of any building permits.
82. That prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for
the site, the applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction
of the Director of Public Works Department and the
Director of the Planning Department that adequate sewer
facilities will be available for the project. Such
demonstration shall include verification from the Orange
County Sanitation District and the Citys Utilities
Department.
83. Prior to issuance of building or grading permits, a master
plan of water and sewer facilities shall be prepared for the
site. The applicant shall verify the adequacy of existing
water and sewer facilities and construct any modification of
facilities necessary for the project. The master plan shall
•
include provision for the relocation of existing water and
sewer facilities.
84. That the parking structure shall be designed so as to
preclude light spillage from automobiles on residences in
the Bayshores community. This is to be achieved via the
ramp and circulation design of the structure, the installation
of screen walls or planting, or a combination thereof.
85. All parking and loading areas shall comply with the noise
control criteria set forth below.
A. The following noise standard shall be established for
all exterior noise - sensitive areas within residential areas
located within one hundred (100) feet of a parking or
loading area:
Noise Level Time Period
55 DBA 7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.
50 DBA 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.
64
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
dd,d
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
B. Exterior noise - sensitive areas shall include all yards,
decks, patios, terraces, balconies and rooftops and other
private open areas of a residential lot designed and used for
outdoor living and recreation with the exception of
driveways and parking areas.
C. Noise generated from loading areas shall not exceed:
(1) The exterior noise standard for a cumulative
period of more than thirty (30) minutes in any
hour; or
(2) The exterior noise standard plus five (5) DBA
for a cumulative period of more than fifteen
(15) minutes in any hour; or
•
(3) The exterior noise standard plus ten DBA
(10) for a cumulative period of more than five
(5) minutes in any hour; or
(4) The exterior noise standard plus fifteen (15)
DBA for a cumulative period of more than
one (1) minute in any hour; or
(5) The exterior noise standard plus twenty (20)
DBA for any period of time.
D. In the event the ambient noise level exceeds any of
the first four (4) noise limit categories above, the cumulative
period applicable to said category shall be increased to
reflect said ambient noise level. In the event the ambient
noise level exceeds the fifth noise limit category, the
maximum allowable noise level under said category shall be
increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level.
E. The following noise standard shall be established for
all interior noise - sensitive areas within residential areas
•
-65-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
. o� � �pqY• pCn`9
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
located within one hundred (100) feet of a parking or
loading area:
Noise Level Tune Period
55 DBA 7:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.
45 DBA 10:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m.
F. Interior noise - sensitive areas shall include any
habitable room meeting the requirements of the Housing
Code for sleeping, living, cooling, or dining purposes,
excluding such enclosed places as closets, pantries, bath or
toilet rooms, service rooms, connecting corridors, laundries,
unfinished attics, foyers, storage spaces, cellars, utility
rooms, garages and similar spaces.
•
G. Noise generated from loading areas shall not exceed:
(1) The interior noise standard for a cumulative
period of more than five (5) minutes in any
hour; or
(2) The interior noise standard plus (5) DBA for
a cumulative period of more than one (1)
minute in any hour; or
(3) The interior noise standard plus ten (10)
DBA for any period of time.
B. Traffic Study No. 75.
indin
1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the
impact of the proposed project on the morning and
afternoon peak hour traffic and circulation system in
accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code and City Council Policy S -1.
•
-66-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
�+d,d
! ��� �� � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
2. That the traffic study indicates that the project will neither
cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of service on
any major, primary- modified, or primary street.
C. Amendment No. 739.
Adopt Resolution No. 1257, recommending adoption of
Amendment No. 739 to the City Council.
Amendment No. 736 (Public Hearing)
Item No.s
Request to consider amendments to Title 15 and Title 20 of the
A736
Newport Beach Municipal Code so as to revise noise level
(Cbnt,d
standards for mechanical equipment in residential areas.
to
6/20/91
TIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach.
James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that staff has requested
that this item be continued to the June 20, 1991, Planning
Commission meeting.
Motion
Motion was made and voted on to continue Amendment No. 736
All Ayes
to the June 20, 1991, Planning Commission meeting.
t i f
The Planning Commission recessed at 11:30 p.m. and reconvened
t 11:35 p.m.
•
-67-
COMMISSIONERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Amendment No. 734 (Public Hearing)
Item, N0.9
Request to consider amending Title 20 of the Newport Beach
A� =34
Municipal Code so as. to allow skylights to exceed the allowable
(Res.I260)
building heights.
INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item. There
being no one to appear and be heard regarding this item, the
public hearing was closed at this time.
Motion
Motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 1260, recommending to
Ayes
*
the City Council the adoption of Amendment No. 734.
Noes
Commissioner Edwards did not support the motion on the basis
•
that the height limit is the height limit.
Motion was voted on, MOTION CARRIED.
Discussion Item•
Discussion
Items
No. 1
General Plan Amendment No. 91 -2
Request to initiate an amendment to the Newport Beach General
GPA 91 -2
Plan as follows:
Initiated
A. 407 Bolsa Avenue: A request to amend the
Land Use Element of the Newport Beach
General Plan to redesignate the easterly 95±
feet of Lots 5 and 6, Block 6, Tract No. 27
from Retail and Service Commercial to Two
Family Residential.
INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach
-68-
COMMISSIdNERS June 6, 1991 MINUTES
• 0' 1\0k\
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Commissioner Glover asked if a portion of Bolsa Avenue would be
converted to a park. Don Webb, City Engineer, explained that a
park is under consideration by the City Council.
Ail ayes
Motion was made and voted on to initiate General Plan
Amendment No. 91 -2. MOTION CARRIED.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
add l i
Business
The Planning Commission voted to direct staff to place the
discussion of a variable FAR concept for residential development
Variable
on a future Planning Commission Agenda.
FAR
•ADJOURNMENT:
11:50 p.m
Ad36urra ent
THOMAS EDWARDS, SECRETARY
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
69-