Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/07/1979COMMISSIONERS is u Fp � o ROLL Pres ti 1 Mot' All to City of Newport Beach Regular Planning Commission Meeting Place: City Council Chambers Time: 7:30 P.M. n.+.. .7 ..no 7 1Q79 . CALL ent K x YX x x x j EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R. U. Hogan, Community Development Director Hugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney STAFF MEMBERS James D. Hewicker, Assistant Director - Planning Fred Talarico, Environmental Coordinator Robert Lenard, Senior Planner Michael Ocorr, Senior Planner bon Webb, Assistant City Engineer Glenna Gipe, Secretary Minutes Written By: Glenna Gipe on x Minutes of the regular Planning Commission meetin Ayes of May 10, 1979 and May 24, 1979 and of the.sPeci Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 1979 were proved as written. on x Motion was made to continue Agenda Item No. 4.to Ayes regular Planning Commission meeting of June 21, 1 due to the Applicant's request, and to continue A genda Item No. 13 to the regular Planning Commiss meeting of June 21, 1979, as per the.Staff's sugg tion, due to the length of the Agenda of June.7, :1979. Request to consider an amendment to Chapter 19.10 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code as it pertain to Condominium Conversions and the consideration an Environmental Document. Initiated By: City of Newport Beach Michael Ocorr, Senior Planner, presented to the P Wing Commission a review of the discussion made a ,the action taken regarding the Condominium Conver sion Ordinance at the regular Planning Commission meeting of May 24, 1979. MINUTES INDEX 11 1p- the 379 ion as- Item #1 of AMEND - F4 ENiN 0 ; CONTIN- U�D —0 Ian ATJ 1R- nd NEB FILET I N G JUNE, 1979 COMMISSIONERS ROLL City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 CALL Commissioner Balalis.stated his preference to in= clude in the format of this ordinance only Sectio dealing with condominium conversion projects and new condominium projects. In response to a question posed by Commissioner M Laughlin, Richard Hogan, Community Development Di rector, responded that the City Council did not s cifically direct that the vacancy rates would app to new condominium projects, but directed that th ordinance should cover both new condominium proje and condominium conversions, and have asked the P nning Commission to report back to them as to the recommendations in the treatment of each of these so that the recommendation could be different for conversion as compared to a new project. Commissioner Balalis stated his intent to look at the two areas differently, as he was not in favor setting limits for vacancy rates of new construc- tion. Richard Hogan, Community Development Director, su gested dividing the ordinance into two sections: a) new condominiums b) condominium conversions. Commissioner Balalis commented regarding the Coun ty's Mean Income, inquiring as to whether the Cit . takes a survey every other year, to which Mr. Oco stated that the census has 48% no response, and M Hogan commented that the SCAG housing criteria us the County Mean Income for all the Cities in the County as a recommendation to define affordable housing and low /moderate income families. The Public Hearing continued regarding this item Raymond Watson, 2501 Alta Vista Drive, appeared b fore the Planning Commission to state his.interes in the item, informing the Planning Commission th he is presently converting a project in Los Angel He advised that condominium conversions can retur to the community some of the profits that they pr vide the owners and builders, stat.ing his feeling that conversion of apartments to selling units pr vides a rare opportunity to provide housing for those of more moderate incomes not available with new projects or rentals. -2- MINUTES INDEX is io )e ly :t la it a 52 V rr r. es and t at es. n 9- 0 R, Mo Ay No COMMISSIONERS vc m m n T } City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 )LL CALL - Commissioner McLaughlin inquired as to the Coastal Commission's vacancy rate, to which Mr. Watson:sta ed that 5% was indicated, as determined by HUD; F stated his understanding that the big issue i 'then that if in fact you are going to extract something out of the development that is for the..benefit of the moderate income, an ordinance must necessarily be set to create a mechanism for doing so. Lion II Motion was made to continue the public hearing re- :s x x x x x Ngarding Amendment No. 529, Condominium Conversions as x Ito follow the public hearing regarding Agenda Itea No. 12. Request to establish a restaurant.facility with on sale alcoholic beverages in the former Baltz Mor- tuary facility in the C -1 District. The proposal o requests the acceptance of an offsite parking a reement for the required parking spaces in the fo er Baltz Mortuary parking lot at 409 Orchid. Avenu in the R -2 District, and the Security Pacific Bank parking lot at 327 Narcissus Avenue in the R -1 Dis rict. Location: A portion of Lot 2 and Lot 3, Bloc U, Tract No. 323, located at 3520 East Coast Highway, on the northea erly side of East Coast Highway, b tween Narcissus Avenue and Orchid Avenue in Corona del Mar. Zone: C -1 Applicant: Manto, Brady Enterprises, Inc., db La Strada, Laguna Niguel Owner: United California Bank as Trustee Lola Bernice Baltz, Santa.Ana In response to a question from Commissioner Beek garding valet parking, Richard Hogan, Community D velopment Director, responded.that the valet park was for the control and assured use of those park lots, and to assure the movement of the cars to t parking lots and vacant parking spaces. -3- MINUTES INDEX e s Item #2 al USE PER- - MIT NO. r- 1908 e APPROVED CONDI- TIONALLY st 3 Fo re '-_ in in ie COMMISSIONERS ROLL CALL o }�Fpa� o 2 z MINUTES City of Newport Beach June 7; 1979 �. INDEX The Public Hearing continued regarding this item an Alex Bowie, representing the Applicant, appeared be fore the Planning Commission to review a few aspects of the proposal, including parking available and hours of operation, as set forth in the Staff Re- port, stating their intention of providing one park- ing space per 40 sq. ft. of restaurant area and ex- pressing his feeling that the 29 spaces behind the restaurant will take care of substantially all the seating capacity of 64 people; and if employees park in the offsite parking lot at Security Pacific Bank, that would leave 18 spaces for the small amount of overlap within the restaurant. He concluded by sta- ting his concurrence with the conditions as set forth in the Staff. Report. Rose Borrillo, 328 Narcissus Avenue, appeared before the Planning Commission to state her opposition to the parking at 327 Narcissus Avenue in the bank park- ing lot, as in 1969 when the bank needed extra park- ing, they had agreed to a Use Permit and that parkin on that lot is already three R -1 lots deep into the residential area, and also that at that time they had agreed to the additional, parking for the bank use only. Eugene Borer, Corona del Mar, appeared before the Planning Commission to express his concern regarding the hours of operation of the restaurant. Commissioner Cokas inquired whether they had resear- ched possible off - premise parking on the other side f Pacific Coast Highway, to which Mr. Bowie respon- ded that they had done so and that they felt the off site parking at Security Pacific Bank was more de- sirable. Lee Muir, Architect, Dana Point, stated that they had appeared before the Planning Commission to in- vestigate all parking on the same side of the street and that one of the lots investigated was committed to the snack shop with a similar arrangement and that the Post Office uses the lot during the day, that is behind the restaurant now, that they have excess property and the owner of that property is also the owner of the Shell Station; and that there is parking at the Shell Station and they had agreed to provide the off -site parking, but since one of the conditions for approval is that the parking lot be striped for parking, it would be impractical to have striping on the Shell Station property, he felt -4- N I" L N P COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 OU CALL Commissioner Balalis suggested that the Planning Commission request that the Applicant use the ex- cess parking of the Shell Station and.the Post Of fice, which would be much more appropriate. ;Richard Hogan, Community Development Director, co mented that the Valet Parking is a requirement of jthe Ordinance and that the Planning Commission ;could at their discretion eliminate that require- ment. Mr. Bowie then stated that they would be willing .use the Shell Station and Post Office off -site pa ing in -lieu of the Security Pacific Bank parking. Mr. Hogan additionally commented that the require ments for striping the parking lot is a part of t :off- street parking standards that have been adopt by resolution of the City Council and that in mak :the approval of an off -site parking lot, this is !recommendation of the Planning Commission to the iCity Council that an off -site parking agreement 6 t ;approved and the City Council then would have the right to approve an off -site parking agreement as ,recommended by the Planning Commission, which cou if the Planning Commission so recommended, elimir 'the requirement for the striping if the Planning Commission felt that was appropriate for the City and for that particular business. otion x Motion was made that'the Planning Commission make 11 Ayes the following findings: 1. That the proposed use is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and' is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The project will not have any significant er ronmental impact, providing that adequate of street parking spaces are provided. 3. That the off -site parking lots are so locate to be useful to the proposed restaurant use, 4. That the off -site parking spaces will not create undue traffic hazards in the surrounc 1 ing area. i -5- MINUTES INDEX m, to rk he ed in a ie ld iat vi f- M COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 ROIL CALL 5. That the applicant is a long -term lessee of the subject off -site parking lots. 6. The City Traffic Engineer has approved the p posed off -site parking arrangement. 7. The approval of Use Permit No. 1908 will not under the circumstances of this case, be det mental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons resid ing, and working in the neighborhood or be de trimental or injurious to property and impro ments in the neighborhood or the general wel fare of the City. and approve Use Permit No. 1908, subject to the f lowing conditions: 1.. That development shall.be in substantial con formance with the approved plot plans, floor plans and elevations, except as noted below. 2. That the parallel parking spaces adjacent to the alley to the rear of the restaurant site shall be set back at least 4 feet from the a ley right -of -way. 3. That the required 5 foot.rear yard setback o the off -site parking lot on Orchid Avenue sh remain open and unobstructed. Landscaping shall also not be permitted in said area. 4. That a minimum of one parking space /40 sq. f of "net public area" shall be provided. 5. That an off -site parking agreement shall be proved by the City Council for the duration the restaurant use on the property in questii and that the off -site parking be confined to the site of the former mortuary parking lot, and the sites of the Shell Station and Post I fice. The parking lot on the Shell Station need not be striped. 6. That parking attendants shall be provided to park automobiles of restaurant customers at all times during regular business hours. 7. That the restaurant operation shall not open for business prior to 5:00 p.m., Monday throe -6- MINUTES INDEX ro I ri ve it I- i L1 t. ip )f �n if ighl • COMMISSIONERS 9 °CS} 90� OF,p tQ 900 . City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 ROIL CALL Friday, and shall close by 11:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday and by 12:00 a.m. Friday an Saturday, unless additional parking spaces a provided in an approved offsite location. 8. That all mechanical equipment and trash area shall be screened from adjoining properties and from adjoining streets and alleys. 19. That a washout area for trash containers sha be provided in such a way as to allow direct drainage into the sewer system and not into the storm drains. 0. That the existing parkway tree on East Coast Highway causing damage to the existing sidew be removed and replaced as required by the D partment of Parks, Beaches and Recreation, a that the tree damaged sidewalk be replaced. !1. That approximately 16 sq. ft. of displaced c Crete sidewalk adjacent to the parking lot b replaced on Orchid Avenue just north of the alley. 2. That a resubdivisiop be filed to create one building site for the restaurant use. 3. That arrangements be made with the Public Wo Department to guarantee the .completion of im provements within the public right -of -way. IThe Planning Commission recessed at 9:00 p.m. and ,reconvened at 9:10 p.m. Request to amend a previously approved.site plan a Beverly Hills Federal Savings and Loan facility on the property so as to revise the approved plan! related to signs. Location: Lot 5, Block W, Tract No. 323, loci ted at 3744 East Coast Highway,, on the northwesterly corner of East . Coast Highway and Poppy Street in Corona del Mar. -7- MINUTES INDEX d re s it 31 id in 'od Item #3 SITE PLL N REVIEW - NO. 14 APPROV- ED CON - DITION- ALLY COMMISSIONERS vim 9` Fm o} p� v 3 °fs Fp o i 2 ROIL Moti City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 CALL Zone: C -1 Applicant: QRS Corp., c/o Bob Van Gerpen, Los Angeles Owner: Beverly Hills Federal Savings and Loan, Beverly Hills Richard Hagan, Community Development Director, stated that this item was an item continued at the direction of the Planning Commission for re- commendation by the staff, which had since been completed and included in the Staff Report. The discussion continued regarding this item and John Blankie, Assistant Vice President of Beverly Hills Federal Savings, appeared before the Planning Commission to state his concurrence with the conditions as set forth in the Staff Report. Richard Hogan, Community Development Director, commented that the signs in this project inclu- ded a pole.sign seen from both directions, a sign along the front of the property, as ori- ginally proposed, and a small sign indicating parking. on x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make the following findings: 1. The signs, as modified, will be consistent with the requirements of Chapter 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and will not preclude the attainment of General Plan ob- jectives and'po'licies. 2. The signs, as modified, will not adversely affect the adjoining residential area nor affect benefits of occupancy and use of the Coast Highway frontage. . 3. The signs, as modified, will not adversely affect the public benefit derived from the expenditure of public funds spent for the the improvement and beautification of the -g- MINUTES 0 INDEX • 0 COMMISSIONERS ROLL CALL • 0 is City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 Coast Highway and Poppy Street frontage. 4. The signs, as modified, promote the maint- enance of superior site location character- istics adjoining a major thoroughfare of city -wide importance. and approve Site Plan Review No. 14, subject to. the following conditions: 1. That the ground sign as approved by the Planning Commission on July 6, 1978, shall be permitted. 2. That the proposed pole sign on the Coast Highway frontage shall not exceed the height of the building and shall not ex- ceed an area of 56 sq. ft. per face. '3. That the proposed sign on Poppy Street shall only give direction to the parking lot and shall not exceed 6 sq. ft. per face with the bottom of the sign to coincide with the top of the planter. 4. That the Traffic Engineer shall review and approve the location of both signs. 5. That all remaining applicable conditions of the previously approved site plan shall be met. Request to establish a flower stand in the open in the C -1 District, and the acceptance of an en- vironmental document. Lots 1 and 2, Block AA, Tract No 323, located at 3617 East Coast Highway, on the southeasterly cor- ner of .East Coast Highway and Orchid Avenue in Corona del Mar. M 06 MINUTES INDEX SE PER- NTI COMMISSIONERS v� ROLL CALL Motion All Ayes City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 C -1 Christine Leckie, Corona del Mar Lee Simmons, Corona del Mar ing Commission continued Item No. 4 to it Planning Commission meeting of June i establish a commercial use consisting :door sales of antique furnishings in District, and the acceptance of an En- .1 Document. MINUTES • INDEX Lots 14 through 17, Tract No. 1210, located at 600 West Coast Highway, FEP on the northerly side of West Coast Highway, westerly of Dover Drive, across West Coast Highway from Bay Shores. C -1 -H Leon Donald Brodnax, Jr., Doni- que's Antiques, Inc., Newport Beach Leonard Horwin and Arnold J. Gordon, Beverly Hills Hearing was opened regarding this item. eely, Attorney, representing the Appli- ared before the Planning Commission to history of the project,.reviewing the -10- Zone: Applicant Owner: x The Plann the regul 21, 1979. Request ti of the ou- the C -1 -H vironmenti Location: Zone: Applicant: Owners: The Public and Hall � cant, appe relay the June 7, 1979 C -1 Christine Leckie, Corona del Mar Lee Simmons, Corona del Mar ing Commission continued Item No. 4 to it Planning Commission meeting of June i establish a commercial use consisting :door sales of antique furnishings in District, and the acceptance of an En- .1 Document. MINUTES • INDEX Lots 14 through 17, Tract No. 1210, located at 600 West Coast Highway, FEP on the northerly side of West Coast Highway, westerly of Dover Drive, across West Coast Highway from Bay Shores. C -1 -H Leon Donald Brodnax, Jr., Doni- que's Antiques, Inc., Newport Beach Leonard Horwin and Arnold J. Gordon, Beverly Hills Hearing was opened regarding this item. eely, Attorney, representing the Appli- ared before the Planning Commission to history of the project,.reviewing the -10- COMMISSIONERS v F 0 9 y o ROLL • • City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 CALL highlights of the Staff Report, stating that the Applicant has planned improvements for the pro- perty, informing the Planning Commission that the 8 X 40 shipping containers from Europe are delivered to the Newport Beach facility on a periodic basis for unloading, and that the an- tiques are delivered disassembled and must be unloaded, assembled and priced, taking a period of 3 days for this unloading process. He ex- pressed his feeling that theirs was a viable business, selling items characteristic of New- port Beach, developing a cosmopolitan attitude reflected in the sales of these antique items. Fe additionally stated his feeling that the screening was sufficient to conceal the contain- ers. Commissioner Frederickson expressed his concern relevant to the size of the containers and their position, and asked what the opportunity would be to warehouse them elsewhere and bring to said lo- cation for sale, to which Mr. Seely stated that it would be very difficult to transfer.the anti- ques from another location. Mr. Seely stated his feeling that Condition No. 15 is not necessary. Commissioner Beek stated his understanding that the building is 46' X 28', larger than the 40' X 8' shipping.container and that everything de- livered in the shipping container could go in- side the building three times over,.and he ex= pressed his concern that should the shipping . container stay on the premises, the items can be put back in them overnight rather than in the building; and he further suggested that there be a condition to insure that the anti- ques would not be reloaded back into the ship- ping container or that the shipping.container can only be on the property at most 3 days, to Which Mr. Brodnax, Applicant, stated that it Would be very difficult to comply with this sug- gested condition, as doing this would not allow for organization or time to unload, assemble, clean, price and inventory the items. -11- MINUTES INDEX MINUTES INDEX COMMISSIONERS O's Fp 1: s01 i ROLL Mot City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 CALL Commissioner McLaughlin stated her understanding that the Applicant could not comply with Conditio 3, 4, 14 and 15. Richard Hogan, Community Development Director, st ted that 1) a business of this type which displa on the outside of the building in the past has al ways been required to be conducted within the bui ing and that their concern was that an approval o this nature would set a precedent for additional requests of this type; and he further stated a co cern that 2) the unloading, assembling, cleaning pricing and inventory would be conducted outside. Commissioner McLaughlin asked if they met the par ing requirements, to which James Hewicker, Assis- tant Director - Planning, stated that if the outdoo sales area where they intend to deliver and unloa is included in the count, they met the parking re quirements. Commissioner Balalis expressed his feeling that t problem is that the area has a tendency to appear visually like a high -class swap meet, and he sugg ted that the applicant take the position-that the items be assembled elsewhere, brought to the site and remain inside the building. Mr. Seely expressed his agreement that the site a present looks less than satisfactory and that it was for this reason that they were requesting the Use Permit that they might insure that they can u grade and make necessary improvements, and also t it would be necessary for the unloading and asserr ling of the items to take place on.the same site sale. on x Motion was made that Use Permit No. 1907 be apprc ed, with the findings and subject to the conditic as set forth in the Staff Report. Commissioner Beek then suggested the following amendments: that Condition Ho: 3 be changed.to i quire any storage of assembled furniture to be cc ducted within the building, that Condition No. i' and 15 be stricken and that Condition No. 18 be r dified to add,". for a period of one year." -12- MINUTES • INDEX )s a- yg 1 f n- , k- r d he es C p- ha b- of v- ns -e- n- io • ■ COMMISSIONERS MINUTES City of Newport Beach ' s pFp�1ry June 7, 1979 °2 ROL Mot Pi 6A CALL Commissioners Haidinger and McLaughlin expressed :their opposition to the motion. Commissioner Beek then withdrew the motion. ion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make :the following findings: 1. The use as proposed, including the outdoor storage and assembly of furnishings is not c patible with permitted uses normally found i the C -1 District. 2. That the sale, storage and assembly of furni ings is a use normally carried out within a building and is not similar to other uses su as new and used car and boat sales, nursery sales and other uses permitted outdoors. '3. That the existing site is not of sufficient size to adequately carry out the operation .a proposed by the applicant and meet the requi ments for parking, trash storage, and indoor assembly and storage of furnishings as requi ed by the City. 4. The approval of Use Permit No. 1907 will, un the circumstances of this case be detrimenta to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfor and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimenta or injurious to property or improvements in neighborhood or the general welfare of the C 'and deny Use Permit No. 1907. 'Commissioner Frederickson stated his support of t motion, due to the appearance of the site and its implications. Commissioner Balalis recommended that a 6' high fence.be constructed and screened by heavy landsc ing and allow the proposed outdoor sales area to store the containers and to allow the applicants the opportunity to assemble the furniture over a short period of time and move them into the exist building and conduct the sales within the existin building. -13- om n s ch s re- r- der 1 t' 1 the ity he aS ing 9 INDEX COMMISSIONERS V,� v< s 2 ROLL CALL Ayes Noes Abstain City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 MINUTES INDEX be d- pli- lack owed it id my and that shat ing Mr. Seely stated his feeling that it would not )ro- de- Item #6 .feasible for them to store all the furniture ii area t. RESUB- DrMION side. In response to a question from Commissioner Ha, inger, Mr. Hogan replied that denial of this al cation would allow the applicant time to come I with a different proposal, and would yet be al' to bring a truck up to the premises, unload th+ truck, put the materials inside the building ai sell the materials inside the building, as in other business operation. Commissioner Frederickson addressed the motion stated his preference to not meet the issue at time and give the applicants time to evaluate had been said and the feelings behind it to br it back to the next meeting with an alternate posal. x x x x Motion was then voted on, which MOTION CARRIED x Request to create 8 parcels of land for office velopment and one common lot area to be develo for parking,.ingress and egress, and landscape and the acceptance of an Environmental Documen Location: Parcel No. 3, Parcel Map 86 -33, (Resubdivision No. 529), locate 1601 Quail Street, on the south erly side of Quail Street betwe Quail Street and Spruce Avenue, Newport Place. Zone: P -C Applicant: scant: Myers - 0. Hill Ltd. dba Upper port Plaza, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Engineer: Hunsaker & Associates, Costa Me The Public Hearing was opened regarding this i and Bob Hill, one of the.Applicants, appeared fore the Planning Commission to state his conc -14- MINUTES INDEX be d- pli- lack owed it id my and that shat ing )ro- de- Item #6 )ed area t. RESUB- DrMION 34 i at APPROVED Nest- an T ON LLY in New- sa tem I be- ur- • COMMISSIONERS NN\ 046 ohm s Oy 4 14 City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 ROIL CALL rence with the conditions, with the exception of two conditions; the first was with reference to Condition No. 14, as discussed with staff, to ad after "restrictions ", " or conditions to ground .lease ", to which Hugh Coffin, Assistant Ci Attorney, stated that the Attorney's office does not have any objection to said change in Conditi o No. 14, as it will not be a sale, but a lease si uation. Mr. Hill further suggested a change to :Condition No. 27, as the landscaping is minor an 'requirement to put in drought- resistant vegetati o 'is inconsistent with the Emkay Planned Community and would not be consistent with the other land - scaping in the area and that they would like that condition eliminated. Richard Hogan, Community Development Director, st ted the reason for Condition No. 27 was related t the recent emphasis of City Council in its enviro mental concerns to require drought- resistant plan ing. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Beek, Mr. Hogan replied that there is not at this .time a written policy adopted by the City Council but is a directive and has been added to projeicts 'in the recent past that have come before the City Council. Motion x:Motion was made that the Planning Commission make All Ayes :the following findings: 1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable gener or specific plans and the Planning Commissio is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 2. Th.at the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. 3. That the granting of the lot size exception .will not be detrimental to the public welfar or injurious to other property in the vicini in which the property is located. 4. That the proposed office development will ma tain the intended unity and character of the entire development. Therefore, the Developm Considerations as outlined in the Planned Co munity Development Standards are being met, -15- MINUTES INDEX d ty n t- d n a- 0 n- t- al n e ty in en m- an COMMISSIONERS V, �� m 9� ROLL CALL �� p0 vu 9 ; oy MINOTO City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 INDEX - the requested site exception is approved. and approve Resubdivision No. 631, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a parcel map be filed. 2. That all the applicable conditions of approval of Resubdivision No. 529 be fulfilled. 3. That a 6' wide P.C.C. sidewalk be constructed immediately behind the curb and gutter along Quail Street. 4. That vehicular access to the site from the pub lic streets be subject to further review and approval by the Public Works Department. 5. That the plan for on -site circulation and par -1 king be prepared and certified as to workabil- ity and safety by a registered professional traffic engineer. The plan shall be subject t review and approval by the City Traffic Engin- • eer and by the Community Development Depart- ment. An approved copy of the plan shall be on file with the City prior to recordation of the parcel map. 6. That the graded slopes at all intersections be designed to provide sight distance for a speed, of 25 MPH. Landscaping, walls, and other phy- sical obstructions shall be considered in sigh distance requirements. The sight distance re- quirements may be appropriately modified at non - critical locations, subject to approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 7. That an on -site pedestrian system be provided and that it be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the parcel map recordation. 8. That a hydrology and hydraulic study for the site be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior.to the recordation of. the parcel map. Any modification to the exist- ing storm drain.system or extensions shown to -16- 4 r- L COMMISSIONERS t �2 City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 ROLL CALL be required by the study shall be the respor sibility of the developer. 9. That on -site fire hydrants be provided as rE quired by the Public Works Department and 0 Fire Department. 10. That a standard subdivision agreement and SL ety be.provided to guarantee satisfactory cc pletion of the public improvements if it is desired to obtain building permits or recorc the parcel map before the public improvement are completed.. 11. That easements for public utilities be showr on the parcel map. 12. Street naming and addressing shall be approN by the Fire Department. 13. That the occupancy of the proposed office bl dings on the site shall not occur until all conditions of approval of the approved Trafi Phasing Plan for Newport Place have beenmei 14. That there shall be submitted a declarati'.on covenants, conditions and restrictions or cc ditions to ground lease setting forth an en- forceable method of exterior of each buildir and all common area improvements, including, but not limited to landscaping, ingress, eg- ress, and parking acceptable to the Departme of Community Development, and in respect to gal enforceability, the City Attorney. 5. That all development standards of the P1ann( Community shall be met (i.e., building set- backs, landscape requirements, parking, sigi etc.). 6. The following disclosure statement of the C' of Newport Beach's policy regarding the Orai County Airport shall be included in all llea! or s.ub- leases for space in the project and shall be included in any,Covenants, Conditil and Restrictions which may be.recorde.d agail the property. 1 -17- MINUTES e r- m- s ed it 'ic of n- ig !nt le !d is, ty ige ;es ins ist INDEX COMMISSIONERS MINUTES City of Newport Beach 4�y June 7, 1979 o t 2 ROLL CALL INDEX Disclosure Statement The Lessee herein, his heirs, successors and assigns acknowledge that: a) The Orange County Airport may not be able to provide adequate air service for busi -. ness establishments which rely on such service. b) When an alternate air facility is avail- able, a complete, phase out of jet service may occur at the Orange County Airport. c) The City of Newport Beach may continue to oppose additional commercial air service expansions at the Orange County Airport. d) Lessee, his heirs,.successors and assigns will not actively oppose any action taken by the City of Newport Beach to phase out or limit jet air service at the Orange County Airport. 7. Final design of the project shall provide for the incorporation of water - saving devices for project lavatories and other water -using faci- lities. 8. The final design of the project shall provide for the sorting of recyclable material from other solid waste. 9. Development of the site will be subject to a grading permit to be approved by the Departmen of Community Development. Surface and sub- surface drainage shall be provided to the sa- tisfaction of the Community Development Depart ment and the Public Works Department. 0. An erosion and dust control.plan shall be sub- mitted with the.grading permit .application and be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. 1. The grading plan shall include a complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilitie -18- Rf rA L 0 COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 2 AL CALL to minimize any potential impacts from silt debris, and other water pollutants and shal' be approved by the Water Quality Control Boi At a minimum, the drainage facility plan should include grease traps or some equival( device designed to trap oil, grease, and otl contaminates. 22. The erosion and siltation control plan shall be approved by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and Santa Ana Region. 23. Planting shall be done on any exposed slope within thirty days after grading or as apprc ed by the City to reduce erosion potential. 24. Should any resources be uncovered during gra ing, a qualified archaeologist or paleontolc gist shall evaluate the site prior to complE tion of grading activities, and in accordant with City Policies K -6 & K -7. 25. That a landscape and irrigation plan for all common areas shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan.sha be subject to the review of the Parks, Beach and Recreation Department and approval of th Community Development Department. 26. The landscape plan shall include a maintenan program which controls the use of fertilizer and pesticides. 27. That the applicant shall provide for weekly vacuum sweeping of all surface parking areas (Request to create one parcel of land for office c Idominium development. !Location: Parcel No. 4; Parcel Map 108 -27, 2 (Resubdivision No. 557), located a 5120 Birch Street, on the southwes erly side of Birch Street between Von Karman Avenue and Jamboree Roa in Koll Center Newport. -19- MINUTES INDEX it !n e YJ v- d- e 11 es e ce S an B t t- i •Item #7 RESUB- DIVISION NO. 32 APPROVED C0NDI- T3TNTL L Y R( M A COMMISSIONERS 9 � r v�s'F y alp 2c y`c Z City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 AL CALL Zone: P -C Applicant: Courthouse Plaza Associates, Ltd., Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Engineer: Shaller & Lohr, Inc., Newport Bea( The Public Hearing was opened regarding this iten and Don.Lohr, Shaller & Lohr Engineering, represe ing the Applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission to state their concurrence with the cc ditions as set forth in the Staff Report. )tion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make 11 Ayes the following findings: 1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all dinances of the City, all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning Commissic is satisfied with the plan of subdivision. 2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning.standpoint. and approve Resubdivision No. 632, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a parcel map be filed. 2. That all applicable conditions of approval i Resubdivision No. 632 be fulfilled. 3. That there shall be submitted a declaration covenants, conditions and restrictions setti forth an enforceable method of insuring the installation and continued maintenance of al services to be carried out by the management company. Said services shall include, but r be limited to, installation, maintenance, re habilitation, and replacement of the struct- ures, the landscaping, the parking areas anc all other common areas. Said C.C. & R.'s st be reviewed and approved by the City Attorne and the Director of Community Development. I i -20- MINUTES i INDEX h i n n or n • ,T. of ng 1 of al y • COMMISSIONERS 9cin 9f ��F o� P� va f F yCS,} yu Opp 'LC q`p . q!. 1 ROLL CALL • • MINUTES City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 !xisting damaged drive apron, curb and .lk section on Birch Street.be repaired satisfaction of the Public Works Depart. f it is to remain for access. r standard subdivision agreement and sure• provided to.guarantee satisfactory com- in of the public .improvements if it is de. to record the Parcel. Map before the pub - iprovements are completed. .permit the construction of second floor ons on an existing nonconforming single !ling that encroaches to within 4 feet.of )rive (where the.Districting Map indicate: `oot front yard is required). The propos• `loor addition also encroaches.6 feet .inti ad 10 foot front yard along Crestview Lot.53, Tract No. 1140, located at 2580 Crestview Drive, on the south- westerly corner of Crestview Drive and Arbor Drive in Bayshores. R -1 Robert J. Doner, Newport Beach Robert J. and Evelyn M. Doner, New- port Beach Same as Owners e to a question posed by Commissioner Beek cker, Assistant Director - Planning, stated there is reversed frontage, the required followed on the reversed frontage all the he property line, and that on this particu cation, there is a 10' setback on both Drive and Arbor Drive, as designated. tricting Map, applying to the full dimen= e building, and that at one point in time permit was issued, that allowed the 4' set estview-Drive and that the Districting Map d following the construction of the build- -21- INDEX I- E7 4. That e sidewi to the ment i 5. That i ty be pleti( sired tic it Request to room addit- family dwe' Crestview I that a 10 ed second the requiri Drive. Location: Zone: Applicant: 0wner: Appellants In respons James Hewi that where setback is way down t lar modifi Crestview 60 the Di s sion of th a:building back .on Cr was change ing. June 7, 1979 !xisting damaged drive apron, curb and .lk section on Birch Street.be repaired satisfaction of the Public Works Depart. f it is to remain for access. r standard subdivision agreement and sure• provided to.guarantee satisfactory com- in of the public .improvements if it is de. to record the Parcel. Map before the pub - iprovements are completed. .permit the construction of second floor ons on an existing nonconforming single !ling that encroaches to within 4 feet.of )rive (where the.Districting Map indicate: `oot front yard is required). The propos• `loor addition also encroaches.6 feet .inti ad 10 foot front yard along Crestview Lot.53, Tract No. 1140, located at 2580 Crestview Drive, on the south- westerly corner of Crestview Drive and Arbor Drive in Bayshores. R -1 Robert J. Doner, Newport Beach Robert J. and Evelyn M. Doner, New- port Beach Same as Owners e to a question posed by Commissioner Beek cker, Assistant Director - Planning, stated there is reversed frontage, the required followed on the reversed frontage all the he property line, and that on this particu cation, there is a 10' setback on both Drive and Arbor Drive, as designated. tricting Map, applying to the full dimen= e building, and that at one point in time permit was issued, that allowed the 4' set estview-Drive and that the Districting Map d following the construction of the build- -21- INDEX I- E7 COMMISSIONERS 9 City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 ROLL CALL Commissioner Beek then expressed his feeling that to let the applicant build on top of the garage at the 4' line would impact the neighbor's view o the place and that a reasonable compromise would to hold them to the required setback if they will be within 20 -25 feet of the corner and place the upstairs unit further onto the house and not back on the garage and, therefore, further from the al ley. The Public Hearing was opened regarding this item and Robert Doner, Applicant, 2580 Crestview Drive appeared before the Planning Commission and state that the Bayshores Community Association did not object to the construction and did not feel that was detrimental to the general architectural them carried out in Bayshores. He further relayed the single objection from Mr. & Mrs. O'Brien was to t extent that they didn't believe that any further croachment of the side yard setbacks on Crestview Drive was justified because it would obstruct the view of anyone coming out of the alley and would down the green area available 'in Bayshores. He e pressed his feeling that they were confused as to their intent, because those objections would not ply in this case. He explained that subsequent t that they met with their arc.hitect attempting to work out some method by which they could arrange compromise, the basis of this appeal.. He stated tl in order to set the second story back 6' they cou go no further to the south because they would be touching the 4' setback on the southwest portion the property and would have to cut the width less the staircase to the point at which it would not I practical. Commissioner Frederickson posed a question regard. ing Commissioner Beek's suggestion, to which Mr. Doner replied that architecturally Mr. Beek's sug• gestion would not meet with the approval of the Bi shores Architectural Committee, because they woulc have a second floor on the front portion of the building in the middle of the "L"-shaped corner. Motion x Motion was made that the Planning.Comm.ission make following findings: t -22- MINUTES • INDEX f be I it es he en cu •x- �p 3 L is Id )f )e ty I t • COMMISSIONERS F y(SS} yu` pip 1Q y_O City of Newport Beach June 7., 1979 ROLL CALL 1': That all new construction conforms with re= quired yard setbacks. 2. That the existing 19'8" garage depth is ade- quate in size for the storage of two vehicl e 3 That the proposed construction, as amended, will not obstruct views from adjoining resit ential property and will be in keeping with other development in the neighborhood. 4r That the proposal will not be detrimental tc persons, property or improvements in the nei borhood and that the modification as approve will be consistent with the legislative into of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. and approve Modification No. 2388 (Appeal), subje to the following conditions: • 1. That development shall be in substantial coy formance with the approved plot plan and el( vations, except as .noted in Condition No. 2. 2. That all new construction shall conform tool required ten foot front yard setback. 3i. That the.existing two car garage shall main• tain a width of eighteen feet, inside dimen• sion, in conjunction with the proposed deve' ment. Commissioner Beek then stated his feeling that tI reason the Modification Committee denied a simili request in 1973 still applies; that is, that if i ciroachments are to be permitted in side yard set• backs, the changes should occur through the appri Hate amendment procedures, with hearings before Planning Commission and City Council, rather that separate modification requests. Ayes x x x Motion was then voted on, which MOTION FAILED. Noes x.x x x Ayes x x x x x x Motion was made to sustain the findings of the Mi Noes x ification Committee and deny the applicant's regi of Modification No. 2388: i -23- MINUTES S. gh !d !nt pct I ;he „ le Ir gin- IP- th y' yd- aes INDEX COMMISSIONERS v F yes} 9u o�'r'ifaf Gp City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 ROLL CALL The Planning Commission recessed at 10:25 p..m, a reconvened at 10:30 p.m. Request to consider a Traffic Study for a propos 13,000 sq. ft. expansion of the Hughes Aircraft ` Company facilities. Location: Portion of Lot 169, Block 2, Iry -. ine's Subdivision, located at 500 Superior Avenue, on the southeast- erly side of Superior Avenue betwe Dana Road and Industrial Way adja- cent to the City of Newport Beach Corporation Yard. Zone: M -1 -A Applicant: Hughes Aircraft Company, Newport Beach (Note: Commissioner Cokas refrained from partici pation in this matter, due to a conflict of inter est.) Commissioner Haidinger stated his understanding that there are no Traffic Phasing Ordinance issue to which Richard Hogan, Community Development Di- rector, agreed. The Public Hearing was opened regarding this item and Herb Bueller, Applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission to state his concurrence with all the items set forthfin the Staff Report. Helen Hargreaves, 454 Orion Way, appeared before the Planning Commission to state her objection to any additional building being placed on Hughes' grounds, due to the traffic that.would be impactei Commissioner Beek stated his understanding that tl only thing up for Planning Commission consideratic regarding this item is the Traffic Phasing Ordinar ce approval and that they have no other discretior ary power over this construction. MINUTES INDEX nd ed Item #9 ei ie in COMMISSIONERS 2 City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 ROLL CALL Motion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make Ayes x x x x x x the following findings: Abstain 1. That a Traffic Study for the proposed projec has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code an City Policy S -1, and; that based on the Tra fic Study, 2. The traffic projected one year after project completion during any 2.5 hour peak traffic period on each leg of each critical intersec tion will be increased less than 1% by traff generated from the project during that 2..5 h period. and approve the Traffic Study for the proposed 13,000 sq. ft. expansion of the Hughes Aircraft pany facilities. * * * . Request to consider a Traffic Study for a propose office building containing 19,264 sq. ft. Location: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 104/37, lo( ted at 3701 Birch Street, at the n northerly corner of Birch Street.e Bristol Street North, near the Ore County Airport. Tone: M -1 -A Ajpplicant: The 3701 Birch Company Owner: Irvine Industrial Complex Richard Hogan, Community Development Director, s{ ted that the discrepencies as they exist between genda Item No. 10 and 11 would, i.f reconciled, n( make any difference in the findings. Commissioner Beek asked regarding the I.C.U. of I Arthur Boulevard and Campus Drive; to which Fred Talarico, Environmental Coordinator, replied tha the I.C.U., Winter- Spring 1978, is .94, to which Commissioner Beek expressed his concern that thi! project will put 18 additional cars through said intersection. -25- MINUTES INDEX t d f is ou om �d JItem #10 (TRAFFIC :a- STUDY ios nd APPROVED n9 :a- A- )t lac COMMISSIONERS v m 7� PO SPFV S o,�FP i ROLL Moti Ayes Noe <_ City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 CALL The Public Hearing was opened regarding this item and Ray Pickens, Newport Beach, appeared before t Planning Commission to state his concurrence with the conditions as set forth in the Staff Report. on x Moti'o`n was made that the Planning Commission make x x x x x the following findings: x x 1. That a Traffic Study on the proposed project has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code and City Policy S -1, and; 2. That based on that Traffic Study, the propos project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service on a "major ", "primary-modified", or "primary" street. and approve the Traffic Study for a proposed offi building containing 19,264 sq. ft. Request to consider a Traffic Study for a propose office building containing 72,000 sq. ft. Location: Lots .B, 9 and 10 of Tract 5169, to ted at 4401, 4423 and 4443 Birch Street, on the westerly side of Bi Street approximately 700 feet nor- therly of Dove Street, near the Orange County Airport. Zone: M -1 -A Applicant: National Education Company Owner: Irvine Industrial Company The Public Hearing was opened regarding this item and Bob Craft, Langden & Wilson Architects, appea ed before the Planning Commission to state his co currence with the conditions as set forth in the Staff Report. Commissioner Beek expressed his concern regarding the addition of 40 cars at the corner of MacArthu I -26- MINUTES 0 INDEX 1, ed ny ce • I ca rchAPPROVED I r- n- r 0 COMMISSIONERS vc v 9F 0 9 y o f P N' v�s'F V" Opp yp VLp � oy City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 ROLL CALL Boulevard and Campus Drive, or less than 1 %, whey the current traffic is 2,8.88, or more than 1 %. Motion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make Ayes x x x x x the following findings: Noes x 1. That a Traffic Study on the proposed project has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the Municipal Code and City Policy S -1, and; 2. That based on that Traffic Study, the propos project will neither cause nor make worse ar unsatisfactory level of traffic service on a "major ", "primary- modified ", or "primary" street. and approve the Traffic Study for a proposed offi building containing 72,000 sq. ft. • Request to establish an educational seminar and training facility in an existing building in the M -1 -A District. Location: Lots 11, 12, 50 and 51, Tract No. 3201, located at 3922 Campus Drive on the northeasterly corner of Can pus Drive and Quail Street, across Campus Drive from the Orange Count Airport. Zone: M -i -A Applicant: est, an Educational Corporation, P port Beach Owner: Campus Square Trust, Los Angeles The Public Hearing was opened regarding this iten and Marcy Remcof.f, Applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission to state her concurrence witt the conditions as set forth in the Staff Report. Motion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make All Ayes the following findings: i -P7- . MINUTES e1 INDEX ed ny ce Item #12 USE PER- MIT NO. (APPROVED y CONDI- TIONALLY COMMISSIONERS 9 F v S� vU OAP 20 90 �oz t City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 ROLL CALL 1. That the proposed use does not conflict with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. That the project will not have any significa environmental impacts.. 3. Adequate offstreet parking spaces are being provided for the subject school facility. 4. The Police Department has indicated that the do not contemplate any problems. 5. The approval of Use Permit No. 1911 will not under the circumstances of this case be detr mental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons resid ing and working in the neighborhood or be de trimental or injurious to property or improv ments in the neighborhood or the general wel fare of the City. and approve Use Permit No. 1911, subject to the f lowing conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial con formance with the approved floor plan and pl plan_ 2. That a maximum of 300 students shall be per - mitted in the school use at any one session. 3. Classroom activity shall not be permitted on the site prior to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. However, said seminars and training sessions may occur during daytime and evening hours on weekends. 4. That a seating plan for the main assembly ar( shall be submitted to and approved by the ,F.ii Department. 5. That all provisions of the Uniform Building Code shall be.met in conjunction with the change of occupancy on the site. -28- MINUTES 0 INDEX nt Y i- �1 • )t !a -e • COMMISSIONERS s� y ROLL CALL Motion All Ayes 0 MINUTES City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 subdivide 77 ± acres into ten lots for I /office development and two lots for pub - ts in the North Ford Planned Community, :ceptance of an Environmental Document. A portion of Lots 224, 442 and 444, Block.57 of Irvine's Subdivision, to cated on property bounded by the ex- tension of Bison Avenue, Camelback Street, Jamboree Road, the extension of Eastbluff Drive, and MacArthur Boulevard, in the Planned Community of North Ford. P -C The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Same as Applicant. William G. Church Consulting Civil Engineers, Inc., Newport Beach ing Commission continued Item No. 13 to ar Planning Commission meeting of June 21, er the Staff's suggestion, due to the the June 7th Agenda. ssion regarding the Condominium Conversion Amendment No. 529, was resumed and Com- Beek suggested a change on Page 5 in Sec - 3.30, Item A; to add "present and project - eding "buildings ", and suggested that the in Section 20.73.30, Item E, be revised to addition, a grading and siltation control 1 be submitted prior to filing of a tenta- t map or recordation of a parcel map. ". in, Assistant City Attorney, suggested that 0.73.30, Items E and F, be submitted fol- em G within the Ordinance. ner Balalis expressed his.feeling that a the application contents items would be icable to new condominium projects. -29- INDEX Item #13 TENTA- TIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 10019 CONTIN- UED TO JUNE 21, 1979 Request t iindustria tic stree and the a Location- Zone: Applicant Owner: Engineer: x The Plann the regul 1979 as p length of The discu Ordinance missioner t.ion 20.7 ed" prece phrasing read, "In plan shal tive trac Hugh Coff Section 2 lowing It Gommissio number of I i more appl June 7, 1979 subdivide 77 ± acres into ten lots for I /office development and two lots for pub - ts in the North Ford Planned Community, :ceptance of an Environmental Document. A portion of Lots 224, 442 and 444, Block.57 of Irvine's Subdivision, to cated on property bounded by the ex- tension of Bison Avenue, Camelback Street, Jamboree Road, the extension of Eastbluff Drive, and MacArthur Boulevard, in the Planned Community of North Ford. P -C The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Same as Applicant. William G. Church Consulting Civil Engineers, Inc., Newport Beach ing Commission continued Item No. 13 to ar Planning Commission meeting of June 21, er the Staff's suggestion, due to the the June 7th Agenda. ssion regarding the Condominium Conversion Amendment No. 529, was resumed and Com- Beek suggested a change on Page 5 in Sec - 3.30, Item A; to add "present and project - eding "buildings ", and suggested that the in Section 20.73.30, Item E, be revised to addition, a grading and siltation control 1 be submitted prior to filing of a tenta- t map or recordation of a parcel map. ". in, Assistant City Attorney, suggested that 0.73.30, Items E and F, be submitted fol- em G within the Ordinance. ner Balalis expressed his.feeling that a the application contents items would be icable to new condominium projects. -29- INDEX Item #13 TENTA- TIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 10019 CONTIN- UED TO JUNE 21, 1979 R M A COMMISSIONERS v n }sp'P Cy 2 City of Newport Beach June 7, 1979 OLL CALL Commissioner Cokas suggested two individual sec- tions within the ordinance; one involving new con minium projects and one involving condominium con versions. Regarding Page 2, Section 20.73.05, Pa graph 1, he stated his preference that the words "...including students, elderly persons on fixed incomes, and others..." be deleted, as he felt th was limiting, and in conclusion he suggested that the last sentence be revised to read, "Said vacan rate shall be established each year during the months of April and October, and as approved by t Director of Community Development. ", to be added Section 20.73.10, Item J. Commissioner Frederickson suggested a summer mont and a winter month in the determination of the va cancy rate, to which Richard Hogan, Community De- velopment Director, replied that a summer determi nation would not establish a normal vacancy facto that would relate to the conversion of a condomin ium, due to the number of tourists in residence d ing the summer months. otion x Motion was made that the provisions of this ordin 11 Ayes ance with regard to Vacancy Rate Regulations and Findings of Approval shall comply to conversion o a total project consisting of five or more dwelli units and that there be a sample taken of at leas 75% of these by the Director. of Community Develop ment for the City of Newport Beach, upon which a Straw Vote was taken. Commissioner Beek stated his feeling that buildin should not be converted unless. they are on a lot a size that corresponds with the current Zoning Code, and Mr. Hogan suggested that Section 20.73. Item G, be revised to read, "That the project con forms to zoning and building codes in effect at t time of approval; and the subject lot size is no less than would be required for a new development of the same size. ", to which the-Planning Commiss verbally agreed. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Cokas, James Hewicker, Assistant Director- Plannin replied that Section 20.73.40, Item D, does not presently exist anywhere in the current codes of -30- MINUTES • INDEX do ra is cy he to i r ur • f ng t g of 60 he LID 9, th • COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach c� °s June 7, 1979 ROIL Motion Ayes Noes Motion Ayes Noes Afotion All Ayes i MINUTES osed by ere is by the ntiol 9 ing e an D, Item Dnly was ng re- rsions, 'ham= !vision neeti ng I Com- a ry h INDEX City, and in response to a second question p Commission Beek, Mr. Hewicker stated that th presently an amendment to the Code initiated Planning Commission in which for each reside unit, there would be a minimum of two parkin spaces, and for residential projects contain more than four dwelling units, there would b added proviso for guest parking. x Motion was made to eliminate Section 20.73.4 x x x x N D, and that Section 20.73.40, Item E, apply x x to new condominiums, upon which a Straw Vote taken. — x Motion was made to continue the Public Heari x x x x x g:arding Amendment No. 529,, Condominium Conve x x to an Adjourned Meeting in the City Council b.ers, June 21, 1979, at 2:00 p.m. * * x ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: x Motion was made to set a rehearing on Resubd No. 625 for the regular Planning Commission i of June 21, 1979. There being no further business, the Planning mission adjourned at 11:40 p.m. GEORGE COKAS, Secret City of Newport Bea( Planning Commission GC /g9 -31- i MINUTES osed by ere is by the ntiol 9 ing e an D, Item Dnly was ng re- rsions, 'ham= !vision neeti ng I Com- a ry h INDEX