HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/15/1978COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
Regular Planning Commission Meeting
Place:. City Council Chambers
Time: 7.00 p.m.
na+a. .Luna 1r. 1Q7R
Noll. CALL
Present
*
X
X
X
X
*Arrived at 7:15 p.m.
EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS
R. V. Hogan, Community Development Director
Dennis O'Neil, City Attorney
Benjamin B. Nolan, City Engineer
STAFF MEMBERS
James D. Hewicker, Assistant Director - Planning
David Dmohowski, Advance Planning Administrator
Joanne Bader, Secretary
* * *
Motion
X
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 18, 1978
Ayes
X
X
X
were approved as written. Commissioner Balalis
Abstain
X
abstained as he was absent from that meeting.
sent.
X
CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission remove
All Ayes
Agenda Item No. 11 (Final Map Tract No. 10274)
from the Consent Calendar; continue the publ.ic
hearings on Agenda Items No. 4, 5, 6, 7, 16, 19,
and 23 to the meeting of July 6, 1978; continue
the public hearing on Agenda Item No. 20 to the
meeting of July 20, 1978; continue the public
hearings on Agenda Items No. 2 and 3 to the
meeting of August 3, 1978; remove Agenda Item Nc
8 from the agenda; and approve Agenda Items No.'
9 and 10 subject to the findings and /or conditic
as set forth in the staff report. These actions
are reflected appropriately throughout these
minutes.
* * *
Request to consider the following proposed amenc
ments to the Newport Beach General'Plan:
78 -1 -A: A proposed amendment to the Land Use
and Residential Growth Elements to
.
change the designation on the 17.2 ac
Caltrans parcel at the northwest corn
of Superior Avenue and West Coast High
way from "Multi- Family Residential". tc
-I-
MINUTES
ns
a
re
er
INDKX
COMMISSIONERS
O
p 1
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
MOLL CALL
"Medium- Density Residential" and
establishing a maximum number of
dwelling units to be permitted on the
subject site.
78 -1 -B: A proposed amendment to the Land Use
and Residential Growth Elements to
designate a 2.3 acre parcel, adjacent
to.the Newport Terrace development
(former City dump site) and currently
in the City of Costa Mesa, for "Mediu
Density Residential" use, in connecti
with prezoning and annexation of the
subject property to the City of Newpo
Beach.
78 -1 -C: Proposed amendments to the Land Use,
Residential Growth and Circulation
Elements in connection with the Gener
Plan Review to include:
1. Possible reduction in allowable
intensity of development on the
major commercial /industrial
undeveloped sites, including, but
not limited to, the following:
(a) Newport Center
(b) Koll Center Newport
(c) Emkay Newport Place
(d) Castaways Commercial Site
(e) Bayview Landing Site
(f) Aeronutronic -Ford Industrial
Site
(g) San Diego Creek Sites.
2. Possible reduction in the number .
dwelling units allowable on the
major residential undeveloped sit
including, but not limited to, th
following:.
(a) Aeronutronic -Ford Residentia
Site
(b) Westbay Site
(c) Newporter North
(d) Freeway Reservations near
MacArthur Boulevard
(e) Fifth Avenue Parcels
(f) Caltrans Parcels West Newpor
(g) Beeco Property
-2-
MINUTES
•
Iweax
n-
Dn
rt
al
0
of
es,
e
0
.t I a
11
COMMISSIONERS
\ov eWpOr}
Beach MINUTES *
June 15, 1978
MOLL CALL
.. 1
(h) Newport Heights R -2 District
(i) Roger's Gardens Site and
Vacant Residential Parcel
to the South
(j) Castaways Residential Site
(k) Cliff Haven Residential
District.
3. Development of a phasing plan to
coordinate new development with
planned improvements in the
circulation system.
4. Revision to the existing density
classification system to use
numerical density categories..
5. Assessment of possible reductions
in.allowable development in terms
of fiscal impacts and environmental
.
considerations.
Community Development Director Hogan advised that
staff is suggesting that this matter be continued
to allow for the new Planning Commissioners to be
appointed and to allow for completion of the
Traffic Model.
Inasmuch as the Traffic Model will not be
completed until September, Commissioner Balalis
suggested that the Planning Commission continue
the portions of General Plan Amendment 78 -1 that
are not dependent on Traffic Model data to the
first meeting in July and consider the remaining
portions at the General Plan Amendment session in
October.
Advance Planning Administrator Dmohowski advised
that the Newport Heights Homeowners Association
has informally withdrawn its request for a
change in land use designation in the Newport
Heights area from Two - Family Residential to
Single - Family Residential after becoming apprised
of the newly- revised R -2 standards. The
Association feels that these new standards would
address its concern with respect to the size and
bulk of duplex development in this.area.
-3-
INOIX
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
MOLL CALL
June 15, 1978
MINUTES
Advance Planning Administrator Dmohowski
advised that four portions of General Plan
Amendment 78 -1 do not require data from the
Traffic Model, i.e.,
1. Proposed land use designation change from
Two - Family Residential to Single - Family
Residential in the Newport Heights R -2
District. (General Plan Amendment No. 78 -1 -C
2 -h)
2. Proposed amendment
Zoning Regulations
in the Cliff Haven
which would result
typical lots in th
Plan Amendment No.
to the General Plan and
to prohibit resubdivisions
Residential District
in lots smaller than
at neighborhood. (General
78 -1 -C 2 -k)
0
INOWX
Proposed amendment to the Land Use and
Residential Growth Elements to designate a
2.3 acre parcel, adjacent to the Newport
Terrace development (former City dump site)
and currently in the City of Costa Mesa, for •
"Medium- Density Residential" use, in
connection with prezoning and annexation
of the subject property to the City of
Newport Beach. (General Plan Amendment No.
78 -1 -B)
Proposed "housekeeping" revisions to the
Circulation Element, as follows:
a. Amend Master Plan of Streets and Highways
to indicate proposed realignment of
Superior Avenue at intersection with
Coast Highway.
b. Amend Master Plan to show extension of
Balboa Boulevard north of Coast Highway
shifted to a more - westerly alignment.
c. Amend Circulation Element to reflect
on -going widening of Coast Highway between
the Santa Ana River and Newport Boulevard.
Public hearing was opened in connection with this
item and David Shores, 12 Tribute Court, appeared
before the Planning Commission on behalf of the
Newport Crest Homeowners Association. He
requested that the Planning Commission confirm
at this time its straw vote of February 16, 1978
-4-
I
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
/TOLL CALL
to establish a maximum of ,5 DU's per bui.ldable
acre with a maximum of 64 DU's on the Caltrans
property.
David Simms, representing the State of Californ
appeared before the Planning Commission and
requested that the Planning Commission not take
action on General Plan Amendment 78 -1 -A until
the results of the Traffic Model tests are know
He stated that the Caltrans West. and Caltrans E
properties were put up for auction within the
last month; however, no bids were received
because the prospective bidders were told by th
City of Newport Beach that no development would
be permitted on those two pieces of property.
With respect to Mr. Simms' statement concerning
allegations that the City of Newport Beach woul
not permit development on the Caltrans property
City.Attorney O'Neil stated for the record that
this is not the position of the City of Newport
'
Beach.
Advance Planning Administrator Dmohowski advise
that inquirers about the Caltrans property
were informed of the General Plan designation a
zoning on the property. They were also apprise
of recent developments with regard to the Traff
Phasing Policy and possible adoption of a City
Ordinance relating to this matter; however,
Mr. Dmohowski stated that at no time did the
City staff tell anyone that development would n
be considered on either of these sites.
Carmen Hubbard, owner of property in the Newpor
Heights area, appeared before the Planning
Commission and requested that the Newport Heigh
R -2 District item be set for a date certain.
Staff reiterated the fact that the Newport
Heights Homeowners Associated has indicated tha
it wishes to withdraw the Newport Heights R -2
District item from consideration as it feels th
the revised R -2 standards would address its
concerns. Therefore, staff advised that this
matter could be deleted from this General Plan
Amendment at this time.
-5-
MINUTES
INO<X
is
8.
as
d
d
nd
d
is
of
t
is
t
at
COMMISSIONERS
Clty Of {Newport Beach MINUTES' .
June 15, 1978
MOLL CALL
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission contir
All Ayes
the public hearing on the following three
portions of General Plan Amendment 78 -1 to the
meeting,of July 6, 1978: 1) Part "B" relative
to the prezoning and annexation to the City of
Newport.Beach of the 2.3 acre parcel adjacent
to the Newport Terrace development; 2) that
portion of Part "C" relating to the Cliff Haver
Residential District; and 3) the "housekeeping'
revisions to the Circulation Element. Further;
that the proposed land use designation change
in the Newport Heights R -2 District be deleted
from this General Plan Amendment, and that the
remaining portions of this Amendment be conside
at the General Plan Amendment session in Octobe
Request to consider the approval of the draft
report on "Parking Program Feasibility" of the
"Parking Needs and Economic Feasibility Study
of the Central Newport Beach Area" (Public
Hearing)'.
Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission considered this Consent'
Calendar item at the outset of the meeting. Tt
following action was taken:
Motion
X
Planning Commission continued this matter to.
All Ayes
the meeting of August 3, 1978.
Request to consider an amendment to Title 20
of the Newport Beach Municipal Code establishir
regulations for developments located on or
adjacent to bluffs, to include building setbacl
from the edge of bluffs and other development
standards.
Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission considered this Consent.
Calendar item at the outset of the meeting. TF
-6-
IweILx
ue
re
r.
Item #2
e
ig Fqu. 5u/
.s ONT. TO
e
COMMISSIONERS'
90 9 City of Newport Beach
POLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
0
Motion
All Ayes
Ll
June 15, 1978
MINUTES
INOIX
action was taken:
Commission continued this matter to
ng of August 3, 1978.
Item #4
> permit the construction of seven
tingle family dwellings with.related
Id landscape areas, and the acceptance
ironmental document.
Lot 89, Tract 5878, located at
2122 Vista Entrada, westerly of
of Vista del Oro and easterly
of Vista Entrada in "The Bluffs."
R -4 -B -2 P.R.D.
Holstein Industries, Costa Mesa
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
.ommission.considered this Consent
item at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
:ommission continued this matter to
ig of July 6, 1978.
Item #5
subdivide 1:65 acres into seven TENTA
lots for attached single - family fi!V -MAP
0 development and one numbered Tot to TRACT
)ed as a landscape area, private drive- N.88682
guest parking spaces.
CONT. TO
Lot 89, Tract 5878, located at JULY 6,
.2122 Vista Entrada, westerly of 7978
Vista del Oro and easterly of
Vista Entrada in "The Bluffs.."
R -4 -B -2 P.R.D.
Holstein Industries, Costa Mesa
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Valley Consultants, Inc., Huntingto
Beach
-7-
x
following
Planning
the meeti
Request ti
attached
parking al
of an env
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner:
Planning i
Calendar
following
x
Planning
the meeti
Request t,
numbered
residenti
be develo
ways and
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner:
Engineer:
MINUTES
INOIX
action was taken:
Commission continued this matter to
ng of August 3, 1978.
Item #4
> permit the construction of seven
tingle family dwellings with.related
Id landscape areas, and the acceptance
ironmental document.
Lot 89, Tract 5878, located at
2122 Vista Entrada, westerly of
of Vista del Oro and easterly
of Vista Entrada in "The Bluffs."
R -4 -B -2 P.R.D.
Holstein Industries, Costa Mesa
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
.ommission.considered this Consent
item at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
:ommission continued this matter to
ig of July 6, 1978.
Item #5
subdivide 1:65 acres into seven TENTA
lots for attached single - family fi!V -MAP
0 development and one numbered Tot to TRACT
)ed as a landscape area, private drive- N.88682
guest parking spaces.
CONT. TO
Lot 89, Tract 5878, located at JULY 6,
.2122 Vista Entrada, westerly of 7978
Vista del Oro and easterly of
Vista Entrada in "The Bluffs.."
R -4 -B -2 P.R.D.
Holstein Industries, Costa Mesa
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Valley Consultants, Inc., Huntingto
Beach
-7-
COMMISSIONERS
9�A IV\
a
ItCII CALL
Motion
All Ayes
Motion
All Ayes
City of Newport. Beach
June 15, 1978
MINUTES
INOIX.
ommission considered this Consent
tem at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
ommission continued this matter to
g of July 6, 1978.
Item #6
permit the.construction of .seven JUSE PER-
ingle family dwellings with related MIT NO.
id landscape areas, and the acceptance. 73i 1
ronmental document.
Lot 125, Tract 5435, located at CONT. TO
1976 Vista Caudal, southwesterly. JULY 66
of Vista del Oro and northeasterly _
of Vista Caudal in "The Bluffs."
R -4 -B -2 P.R.D.
Holstein Industries,
Costa
X
I •
The Irvine Company,
Newport
Beach
Planning (
Calendar i
following
Planning 1
the meetil
Request t(
attached
parking al
of an env-
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner:
.Planning i
Calendar
following
X
Planning i
the meetil
Request ti
numbered
dential d
developed
and guest
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
MINUTES
INOIX.
ommission considered this Consent
tem at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
ommission continued this matter to
g of July 6, 1978.
Item #6
permit the.construction of .seven JUSE PER-
ingle family dwellings with related MIT NO.
id landscape areas, and the acceptance. 73i 1
ronmental document.
Lot 125, Tract 5435, located at CONT. TO
1976 Vista Caudal, southwesterly. JULY 66
of Vista del Oro and northeasterly _
of Vista Caudal in "The Bluffs."
R -4 -B -2 P.R.D.
Holstein Industries,
Costa
Mesa.
I •
The Irvine Company,
Newport
Beach
.ommission considered this Consent
item at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
:ommission continued this matter to
Ig of July 6, 1978.
) subdivide 1.75 acres into seven
lots for attached single - family resi-
avelopment and one numbered lot to be
as a landscape area, private driveways
parking spaces.
Lot 125, Tract 5435, located at
1976 Vista Caudal,. southwesterly
of Vista del Oro and northeasterly
of Vista Caudal in "The Bluffs."
R -4 -B -2 P.R.D.
Holstein Industries, Costa Mesa
-8-
COMMISSIONERS
city
\\%\ June
POLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
•
Motion
All Ayes
r1
u
of Newport Beach
15, 1978
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Valley Consultants, Inc.,
Huntington Beach
MINUTES
Commission considered this Consent
item at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
;ommission continued this matter to
Ig of July 6, 1978.
INOLX
I create four parcels of land for RESUB-
11 development where a portion of one DIVISION
Gists, and the acceptance of an NF 584
ital document.
REMOVED
A portion of Lot D, Tract No. 919, FWR--
located at 2919 Cliff Drive, on Aff MD A
the southerly side of Cliff Drive,
between Beacon Street and Santa Ana
Avenue in Newport Heights.
R -1
Sheldon Purington, Newport Beach
Barbara E. Gartler, Newport Beach
Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach
Commission considered this Consent
item at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
Commission removed this item from the
Owner:
Engineer:
Planning
Calendar
following
X
Planning
the meetil
Request ti
residenti+
lot now e:
environmei
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner:
Engineer:
Planning
Calendar
following
Planning
agenda.
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Valley Consultants, Inc.,
Huntington Beach
MINUTES
Commission considered this Consent
item at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
;ommission continued this matter to
Ig of July 6, 1978.
INOLX
I create four parcels of land for RESUB-
11 development where a portion of one DIVISION
Gists, and the acceptance of an NF 584
ital document.
REMOVED
A portion of Lot D, Tract No. 919, FWR--
located at 2919 Cliff Drive, on Aff MD A
the southerly side of Cliff Drive,
between Beacon Street and Santa Ana
Avenue in Newport Heights.
R -1
Sheldon Purington, Newport Beach
Barbara E. Gartler, Newport Beach
Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach
Commission considered this Consent
item at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
Commission removed this item from the
COMMISSIONERS
9
°o @. a� s
MOLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
MINUTES
•
INOKX
approve a Final Map to subdivide 6.569 IFINAL MAP
fifteen numbered lots for residential RACT N0.
it, one numbered, lot for open space 9861
and one lettered lot for street purposes
Portions of Blocks 91, 92, 97 and
98 of Irvine's Subdivision, in
an area bounded by the existing
"Spyglass Hill" development, the
"Bren III" development, Broadmoor
Seaview, San Miguel Drive, and the
San Joaquin Reservoir site. This
is a portion of Tentative Tract
No. 8725 - Sector IV of Harbor
View Hills, known as "Harbor Ridge'.'
P -C
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach
Commission considered this Consent
Item at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
PPROVED
PONDI-
IONALLY
Commission approved the Final Map of Trac
ject to the following condition:
all applicable conditions of approval for
entative Map of Tract No. 8725 shall be
lled.
o approve a Final Map to subdivide 6.60
o seventeen numbered lots for residential
nt, one numbered lot for open space
and one lettered lot for street purposes
Portions of Blocks 91, 92, 97 and 91
of Irvine's Subdivision, in an area
bounded by the existing "Spyglass
Hill" development, the "Bren III"
-10-
0
Request tl
acres intl
developmei
purposes,
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner:
Engineer:
Planning
Calendar
following
X
Planning
9861, sub
1. That
the T
fulfi
Request.t
acres:int
developme
purposes,
Location:
MINUTES
•
INOKX
approve a Final Map to subdivide 6.569 IFINAL MAP
fifteen numbered lots for residential RACT N0.
it, one numbered, lot for open space 9861
and one lettered lot for street purposes
Portions of Blocks 91, 92, 97 and
98 of Irvine's Subdivision, in
an area bounded by the existing
"Spyglass Hill" development, the
"Bren III" development, Broadmoor
Seaview, San Miguel Drive, and the
San Joaquin Reservoir site. This
is a portion of Tentative Tract
No. 8725 - Sector IV of Harbor
View Hills, known as "Harbor Ridge'.'
P -C
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach
Commission considered this Consent
Item at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
PPROVED
PONDI-
IONALLY
Commission approved the Final Map of Trac
ject to the following condition:
all applicable conditions of approval for
entative Map of Tract No. 8725 shall be
lled.
o approve a Final Map to subdivide 6.60
o seventeen numbered lots for residential
nt, one numbered lot for open space
and one lettered lot for street purposes
Portions of Blocks 91, 92, 97 and 91
of Irvine's Subdivision, in an area
bounded by the existing "Spyglass
Hill" development, the "Bren III"
-10-
0
COMMISSIONERS
PIOLL GAIL
tion
11 Ayes
0
City of Newport Beach MINUTES
June 15, 1978
development, Broadmoor Seaview,
San Miguel Drive, and the San
Joaquin Reservoir site. This i.s
a portion of Tentative Tract No.
8725 - Sector IV of Harbor View
Hills, known as "Harbor Ridge."
P -C
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach
mmission considered this Consent
:em at the outset of the meeting, The
Iction was taken: . .
Immission approved the Final Map of Trac
subject to the following condition:
1 applicable conditions of approval
Tentative Map of Tract No. 8725 shall
'i11ed.
approve the Final Map of Tract No.
iividing 5.507 acres into one lot for
Imily residential condominium
: and one lot for commercial development
Lot 182, Tract No. 2813, located
at 2101 and 2121 East Coast Highway
and 777 Avocado Avenue on property
bounded by East Coast Highway,
Avocado Avenue, Kewamee Drive, and
Zahma Drive, adjacent to Irvine
Terrace.
C -1 and R -3
Bank of Newport, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
-11-
INOLX
Y
Zone:
Applicant:
Owner:
Engineer:
Planning CI
Calendar i
following
X
Planning CI
No. 9862,
1. That a'
for thi
be ful
Request to
10274, sub,
multiple f
developmen
Location:
Zones:
.Applicant:
Owner:
development, Broadmoor Seaview,
San Miguel Drive, and the San
Joaquin Reservoir site. This i.s
a portion of Tentative Tract No.
8725 - Sector IV of Harbor View
Hills, known as "Harbor Ridge."
P -C
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach
mmission considered this Consent
:em at the outset of the meeting, The
Iction was taken: . .
Immission approved the Final Map of Trac
subject to the following condition:
1 applicable conditions of approval
Tentative Map of Tract No. 8725 shall
'i11ed.
approve the Final Map of Tract No.
iividing 5.507 acres into one lot for
Imily residential condominium
: and one lot for commercial development
Lot 182, Tract No. 2813, located
at 2101 and 2121 East Coast Highway
and 777 Avocado Avenue on property
bounded by East Coast Highway,
Avocado Avenue, Kewamee Drive, and
Zahma Drive, adjacent to Irvine
Terrace.
C -1 and R -3
Bank of Newport, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
-11-
INOLX
Y
COMMISSIONERS
\�$\\OL
City of Newport Beach
June 15. 1978
AOLI CALL
Community Development Director Hogan advised th
the approval of Final Map Tract No. 10274 is a
ministerial action inasmuch as the Tentative
Tract Map has been approved and the Final Tract
Map complies with the approved Tentative Map.
Discussion was opened to the public and Mr. Karr
Foy Yee, owner of Kam's Restaurant in Corona de
Mar and also property owner within 300' of the
Bank of Newport project, appeared before the
Planning Commission. Mr. Kam Foy Yee voiced
concern that he was never notified of the
Planning Commission public hearings relative
to the Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map of
this.project. He added that perhaps other
property owners were not notified of these publ
hearings. In view of the foregoing, Mr. Kam Fc
Yee requested that the Planning Commission
rehear the entire Bank of Newport proposal so
that everyone may be given an opportunity to
speak and be heard thereon.
In answer to a question by the Planning Commis
sion, Mr. Kam Foy Yee advised that he opposes
this project in view of the additional traffic
which would be generated as well as the air
pollution which would result from the exhaust
fumes of this additional traffic. He spoke
in opposition to the 8' wall which is proposed
to surround his restaurant as this would ezclu
the landscaping and also to the removal of tre
which would result.
Community Development Director Hogan advised
that the public hearing notices were sent out
as required by law to the property owners in
accordance with the information furnished to
the City by the Title Company. He added that
this matter was also advertised in the newspap,
and that subject property was posted.
City Attorney O'Neil felt that the City has
satisfied the requirements of the Ordinance in
giving notice to the appropriate property owne
He added that although there may have been som
mistake or inadvertence on the part of the Tit
Company, that is.not the City's responsibility
Mr. O'Neil expressed that if the Final Map
complies with all of the conditions of the
Tentative Map, the Planning Commission has no
-12-
MINUTES
•
INOIX
1
1
is
y
•
as
ar
^s.
le
9
COMMISSIONERS
Q
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
POLL GALL
alternative but to approve the Final Map.
However, if the Planning Commission feels there
was some infringement of due process, the Planni
Commission could reconsider the entire Bank of
Newport application. However, Mr. O'Neil added
that staff would recommend against this latter
action.
Barry Allen, 1021 White Sails Way, Corona del Ma
appeared before the Planning Commission. He
stated that he purchased the newspaper that the
City Clerk indicated should contain the notice
of the Planning Commission public hearing
regarding project; however, he found no
.this
mention of this matter contained in said newspa
Therefore, Mr. Allen felt that perhaps sufficie
notice was not given with respect to this
application. With regard to the 50' flag pole
which is proposed for this project, Mr. Allen
felt that this flag pole should be lowered to a
height not to exceed the top of the building anc
voiced concern that this could start a precedent
He then questioned the amount of funding being
provided by the Bank of Newport for the.signal
at the intersection of Avocado and Coast Highwa3
as he felt there was some discrepancy between tt
percentage considered by the City Council and
that percentage considered by the Planning
Commission.
Community Development Director .Hogan advised
Mr. Allen that a 50' flag pole would be auto-
matically permitted in this area without Plannil
Commission review, as provided for under Sectiol
20.02.062 of the Zoning Code, to wit:
"20.02.062 FLAG POLES. ..Flag poles,
shall be permitted in the 26/35 and 32/50
Foot Height Limitation Zones not to
exceed a.height of 50 feet. All other
flag poles in excess of the height limits
noted above may be permitted subject to
the approval of the Planning Commission."
Dennis Harwood, Attorney at Law, appeared befor,
the Planning Commission on behalf of the Bank o'
Newport and reiterated that the matter before tl
Planning Commission is to approve a Final Map
Tract which contains no deviation from the appri
Tentative Tract Map.
-13-
MINUTES
ng
r
per
nt
e
I
F
ie
)ved
INOIx
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
MINUTES
DOLL CALL
Paul Ruffing, Ficker & Ruffing Architects,
appeared before the Planning Commission and
advised that after working out al.l the formulas in
the design of the building, the maximum height
of the building will be 36'.
Following discussion by the Planning Commission as
to the methodology used in arriving at the one -.
sixth percentage of the signal to be paid by the
Bank of Newport, Paul Ruffing reappeared before
the Planning Commission and advised that the State
will be responsible for two - thirds of the cost
of this signal and that the City will be
responsible for the remaining third of the cost.
Therefore, the portion to be paid by the Bank of
Newport has been defined as one -sixth of the total
cost of the signal, or one -half of the City's
apportionate share. Mr. Ruffing added that he
asked Caltrans whether a contribution for the
signal would help accelerate the schedule for its '
installation and was told that this would not help
from the State's standpoint because the State does
not take contributions.
City Engineer Nolan stated that the City has
reiterated its request to the State for this signal
and that the City anticipates funding within the
next fiscal year.
Mr. Kam Foy Yee reappeared before the Planning
Commission and expressed that he feels it is the
City's responsibility to see that all appropriate
people are.notified of public hearings.and not the
responsibility of the Title Company.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the discussion was closed to the public.
Motion
X
Motion was made that the Final Map of Tract 10274
Ayes
X
X
X X
be approved, subject to the following conditions:
Abstain
X
1. That Condition No. 27 be amended to establish
that the developer's obligation for the future
traffic signal at East Coast Highway and
Avocado Avenue shall be 16.7% (i.e., 1/6) of
the estimated cost of said traffic signal.
2. That all applicable conditions of approval for
the Tentative Map of Tract No. 10274 shall be
fulfilled.
Commissioner Balalis abstained from voting
as he did not vote on the previous Bank of Newport
applications.
-14
•
INO /X
•
n
U
COMMISS;ONERS
City of Newport
• \\ \\ \ \ \\ June 15, 1978
Beach
MINUTES
INCKX
Item #12
AMENDMENT
NO. 505
THIS MAT -
W S
CONSID-
VE..
UNDER
ADDITION -
BUSINESS
`
ACLL CALL
Request to amend a portion of Districting Map No.
35 from the Unclassified District to. the.P -C
District. The proposal also includes an amendmen-
of the Planned Community Development Plan for
Koll Center Newport so as to permit the increase
in the building site and the allowable building
area of Office Site C, and the acceptance of.an
environmental document.
Location: Parcel 2, Parcel Map 68 -19
(Resubdivision No. 477) and a
portion of Block 50, Irvine's
Subdivision, located on the
easterly side of MacArthur
Boulevard, between Campus Drive
and Birch Street in and adjoining
Koll Center Newport.
•
Zone: P -C, Unclassified
Applicant: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Owner: Same as Applicant
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission consider
All Ayes
this item under Additional Business inasmuch
as the Traffic Analysis and Procedures will be
considered at that time and this matter is
related to same.
Request to permit the construction of an office
building that exceeds the basic height limit
within the 26/35 Foot Height Limitation District,
and the acceptance of an environmental document.
A modification to the Zoning Code is also
requested, since a portion of the required
offstreet parking spaces encroach into the
required 5 foot front yard setback along 20th
Street.
Location: Lot 13; Block 220, Section A,
Newport Beach, and property.
bayward of Lot 13 to the U.S.
-15-
INCKX
Item #12
AMENDMENT
NO. 505
THIS MAT -
W S
CONSID-
VE..
UNDER
ADDITION -
BUSINESS
COMMISSIONERS
"I \-
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
POLL CALL
Government Bulkhead Line,
located at 227 20th Street, on
the westerly side of 20th Street,
on The Rhine Channel, on the
Balboa Peninsula.
Zone: C -2
Applicants: Ed Zeimer and Charles Pigneri,
Balboa
Owners: John V. Juelson, Anthony D. Vasi;
and James P. Davis, Newport Beacf
Commissioner Balalis refrained from deliberatiol
on this matter due to a conflict of interest.
Public hearing was opened in connection with th
item and Jack Carter, Architect with Lee, Klage
& Associates, appeared before the Planning
Commission on behalf of the Owner. Mr. Carter
advised that revisions have been made to this
structure as a result of concerns expressed at
May 18, 1978 Planning Commission meeting
relative to density and view preservation. He
then reviewed these revisions and advised that
these changes represent a decrease in the propo
net floor area of the structure of approximatel
750 square feet. Mr. Carter also commented tha
the building setbacks from the 20th Street and
The Rhine Channel frontages of the property
have been increased so as to enhance views of t
bay from adjoining properties.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission make
Ayes
X
X
X
X
following findings:
Abstain
X
1. That the proposed use is consistent with t
Land Use Element of the General Plan and
is compatible with surrounding land uses.
2. The project will not have any significant
environmental impact.
3. The increased building height will result
more public visual open space and views
-16-
MINUTES
is
s
the
sed
y
t
he
the Ihe
n ')
•
INCIX
r
L
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
NOLL CALL
than is required by the basic height limit.
4. The increased building height will result
in a more desirable architectural treatment
of the building and a stronger and more
appealing visual character of the area than
is required by the basic height limit.
5. The increased building height will not resu
in undesirable or abrupt scale relationship
being created between the structure and
existing developments.or public spaces.
6. The .structure will have no more floor.area
than could have been achieved without the
Use Permit.
7. Adequate offstreet parking and related
vehicular circulation is being provided in
conjunction with the proposed development.
/
8. The Police Department has indicated that th
do not contemplate any problems.
9. That the establishment, maintenance or
operation of the use of the property or
building will not, under the circumstances
of the particular case, be detrimental to
the health, safety, peace, comfort and
general welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of such propose
use or be detrimental or injurious to
property and improvements in the neighbonc(
or the general welfare of the City and
further that the proposed modification
for the offsite parking spaces in the requi
front yard is consistent with the legislate
intent of Title 20 of the Municipal Code.
10. The approval of Use Permit No. 1868 will
not, under the circumstances of this case
be detrimental to the health, safety, peat(
morals, comfort and general welfare of
persons residing and .working in the neigh -
borhood or be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the neighborho(
'
or the general welfare of the City..
-17-
MINUTES
It
s
ey
d.
,od
red
ve
1I
)d
INCK)(
COMMISSIONERS
" 1\
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
ROLL CALL
.
and approve Use Permit No. 1868, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That development shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved. plot plan,
floor plans, and elevations.
2. That the uses permitted within.the project
be limited to:
a. Marine - oriented offices such as yacht
brokers, marine surveyors, and marine
designers.
b. Marine- oriented retail uses.
c. .Professional service offices.
3. That adequate provisions be taken to insure
that no debris, siltation or foreign materi,
be permitted to enter the bay during
demolition and construction.
4. That the marina bayward of the site shall b,
reserved solely for the use of the.adjacent
upland tenants unless seven additional
parking spaces are provided in an approved
location.
5. That the Harbor Permit shall be transferred
to the new property owner(s)..
6. That the existing marina comply with curren
City standards (electrical, plumbing,
structural, etc.)
7. That a resubdivision be filed.
8. That all improvements be constructed as
required by ordinance .and the Public Works
Department.
9. That the driveway approach have a bottom
Width of 24 feet and that the existing fire
hydrant be relocated so that is is 5
feet from the driveway approach.
10. The owner shall grant public access rights
the City and enter into an agreement with
-18 -.
MINUTES
•
. INOax.
11
0
r
to I •
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
NOLL CALL
.
the City to keep the proposed boardwalk
free from obstructions and to repair and
keep the boardwalk in a good and safe
condition at his sole cost.and expense.
11. That the unused portion of the existing
driveway approach be closed up and curb and
gutter and sidewalk be constructed.
12. An engineer's report on the adequacy of the
existing bulkhead, including inspection and
evaluation of all tie rods and deadman .
anchors shall be provided prior to issuance
of a building permit for the proposed
project. The engineer shall also evaluate
potential loss of soil through the bulkhead
wall as part of the report.
Request to permit the construction of a savings
and loan complex in a Specific Plan Area, where
a specific plan has not been adopted, and the
acceptance of an environmental document. A
modification to the Zoning Code is also request
since a proposed enclosed trash area and a
landscape planter encroach to within 5 feet of
the rear property line (where the Ordinance
requires a 10 foot rear yard in the C -1 Distric
when abutting an alley).
Location: Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block Q,
Tract.No. 323, located at 3150
East Coast Highway on the north-
easterly corner of East Coast
Highway and Larkspur Avenue in
Corona del Mar.
Zone: C -1
Applicant: Mutual Savings and Loan Associat
Pasadena
Owner: Dillon R. Cox, E1 Cajon
Public hearing was opened in connection with
.
this item and there being no one desiring to
.
appear and be heard, the public hearing was
closed.
-19-
MINUTES
Irooax
Item #14
SITE
PLFN
REVIEW
ed
APPROVED
CONDI-
TIONALLY
ion
COMMISSIONERS
1
0 `ao R1\
City. of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
NOLL CALL
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission.make
All Ayes
the following findings:
1. The proposed development is consistent
with the General Plan and will not preclude
the attainment of the General Plan
objectives and policies.
2. The proposed development is a high - quality
proposal and will net adversely affect the
benefits of occupancy and use of existing
properties within the area.
3. The proposed development does not adversely
affect the public benefits derived from
expenditures of public funds for improvemen
and beautification of street.and public
facilities within the area.
4.. The proposed development promotes the
maintenance of superior site location
characteristics adjoining major thorough -
fares of City -wide importance.
5. The project will.not have any significant
environmental impact.
6. Adequate parking spaces and related vehicul
circulation will be provided in conjunction
with the proposed development.
7. That the establishment, maintenance or
operation of the use of the property or
building will not, under the circumstances
of the particular case, be detrimental tot
health, safety, peace, comfort and general
welfare of persons residing or working
in the neighborhood of such proposed use or
be detrimental or injurious to property and
improvements in the neighborhood or the
general welfare of the City and further tha
the proposed encroachments into the require
rear yard on the site are consistent with
the legislative intent of Title 20 of the
Municipal Code.
and approve Site Plan Review No. 1.2, subject.to
the following conditions:
1. That development shall be in substantial
-20-
MINUTES
t.
ar
he
L. J
INO<X
0
J
COMMISSIONERS
P?
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
POLL CALL
conformance with the approved plot plan,
perspective, and section.
2. That a minimum of one parking space for each
250 sq. ft. of net floor area shall be
provided on the subject property.
3. That all mechanical equipment and trash area
shall be screened from East Coast Highway,
Larkspur Avenue, adjacent properties, and
from the alley abutting the property.
4. That all signs.shall meet the requirements o
the Sign Code.
5. That all conditions of approval for Resub-
division No. 582 be fulfilled.
6. That all improvements .be constructed as
required by Ordinance and the Public Works
Department.
•
7. That the unused driveway approach on East
Coast Highway shall be closed up and curb
and gutter and sidewalk constructed. This
work shall be done under an encroachment
permit issued by the California Department
of Transportation.
8. That the alley approach on Larkspur Avenue b
widened to a width of 19 feet.
Request to establish one building site and
eliminate interior lot lines where three lots n
exist so as to permit the construction of a
savings and loan complex on the property.
Location: Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block Q,
Tract No. 323, located at
3150 East Coast Highway on
the northeasterly corner of
East Coast Highway and
Larkspur Avenue in Corona de
Mar.
.
Zone: C -1
-21-
MINUTES
e
INOIX
Item #16
RESUB-
ow DIVISION
N0. 582
APPROVED
CONDI-
ITr ONALLY
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
June 15,1978
MOLL CALL
Applicant: Mutual Savings and
Loan Association, Pasadena
Owner: Dillon R. Cox, E1 Cajon
Engineer: Psomas & Associates,
Los Angeles
Public hearing was opened in connection with
this item and there being no one desiring to
appear and be heard, the public hearing was
closed.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission make
411 Ayes.
the following findings:
1. That the map meets the requirements of
Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal
Code, all ordinances of the City, all
applicable general or specific plans and th
Planning Commission is satisfied with the
plan of subdivision.
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
and approve Resubdivision No. 582, subject to
the foll.owing conditions:
1. That a parcel map be filed.
2. That all improvements be constructed as
required by ordinance and the Public Works
Department.
3. That all vehicular access rights to East
Coast Highway be released and relinquished
to the City of Newport Beach.
4. That a corner cutoff with a radius of 10
feet be dedicated to the public for street
.purposes.
5. That the curb return at East Coast Highway
and Larkspur Avenue be reconstructed to a
radius of 20 feet. The work shall be
done under an encroachment permit obtained
from the California Department of 7 ranspor-
tation.
-22-
MINUTES
•
INOtX
•
COMMISSIONERS
:1 Ap
4
MOLL CALL
•
Motion
Ali Ayes
0
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
amend the Planned Community Develop -
for Koll Center Newport so as to
eral changes in the Land Use Map and
The Planned Community of Koll
Center Newport on property
bounded by MacArthur Boulevard,
Jamboree Road and Campus Drive.
P -C
Koll Center Newport
Aetna Life Insurance Co.,
Hartford, Connecticut
MINUTES
ommission considered this Consent
tem at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
ommission continued this matter to the
July 6, 1978.
change the operational characteristics
sting The Rigger Restaurant facility
the service of beer and wine.
Lot 0, Tract No. 6015, located at
16 Fashion Island, in the Fashion
Island shopping center.
C -O -H
The Jolly Roger Inc., dba The
Rigger Restaurant, Irvine
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
firing was opened in connection with
and there being no one desiring to
d be heard, the public hearing was
-23-
INOWX
Item #16
WENDMENT
Y . 508 .
XNT. TO
JULY 6,
1978
`Item #17
Request to
ment Plan
permit gen
Text.
Location:
Zone:
Applicant:
Owner:
Planning
Calendar 1
following
X
Planning
meeting o1
Request ti
of the ex
to includ
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner:
Public he
this item
appear an
closed.
amend the Planned Community Develop -
for Koll Center Newport so as to
eral changes in the Land Use Map and
The Planned Community of Koll
Center Newport on property
bounded by MacArthur Boulevard,
Jamboree Road and Campus Drive.
P -C
Koll Center Newport
Aetna Life Insurance Co.,
Hartford, Connecticut
MINUTES
ommission considered this Consent
tem at the outset of the meeting. The
action was taken:
ommission continued this matter to the
July 6, 1978.
change the operational characteristics
sting The Rigger Restaurant facility
the service of beer and wine.
Lot 0, Tract No. 6015, located at
16 Fashion Island, in the Fashion
Island shopping center.
C -O -H
The Jolly Roger Inc., dba The
Rigger Restaurant, Irvine
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
firing was opened in connection with
and there being no one desiring to
d be heard, the public hearing was
-23-
INOWX
Item #16
WENDMENT
Y . 508 .
XNT. TO
JULY 6,
1978
`Item #17
COMMISSIONERS:
v
City of Newport. Beach
June 15. 1978
POLL CALL
Motion
X
Motion was made that.Planning Commission make
All Ayes.
the following findings:.
1. That the proposed use is consistent with
the Land Use Element of the General Plan
and is compatible with surrounding land use!
2. The project will not have any significant
environmental impact.
3. The Police.Department has indicated that.thi
do not contemplate any problems.
4. The approval of Use Permit -No. 1870 will
not, under the circumstances of this case
be detrimental to the health, safety, peace
morals, comfort and general welfare of
persons residing and working in the
neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the
City:
and approve Use Permit No. 1870,.subject.to the
following condition:
1. That development shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved floor plan.
Request to establish a 5'6" x11'0" lighted roof
sign where the Code requires an Exception.Permi
for roof signs.
Location: Lot 60, Tract No. 1210, located
at 1610 West Coast Highway,
on the northerly side of West
Coast Highway, across West Coast
Highway from the Balboa Bay Cl.ut
Zone: C -1 -H
Applicants: Joseph and Sara Vallejo, Newporl
Beach
Owner: Tract 1210 Ltd., Newport Beach
-24-
MINUTES
,y
t
INOIX
•.
0
cOMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
ROLL CALL
Community Development Director Hogan pointed
out that the Applicant, in this particular
instance, was not the one who originally
erected this sign illegally. He advised,.
however, that this does not change staff's
recommendation for denial of this Exception .
Permit.
'Discussion was opened to the public and Sara
Vallejo, Applicant, appeared before the
Planning Commission to review the merits of
this proposal. She felt that since this shop
will depend on 100% wal.k -in. trade, good
signing is necessary. She added that the
location of the business in relation to the
bend in the Coast Highway requires a sign that
can be observed from either direction. She
expressedthat she does not believe this propos<
would be detrimental to the neighborhood nor ti
approval of this permit would set a precedent
inasmuch as the conditions surrounding the nee
•
for a roof sign in this case are unique. In
view of the foregoing, Ms. Vallejo urged
approval of Exception Permit No. 8.
There being no others desiring to appear and
be heard, the discussion was closed to the
public.
Following discussion relative to the hours of
sign illumination, wattage of the sign and nee
Motion
X
for same, motion was made that Planning
Ayes
X
X
X
Commission make the following finding:
Noes
X
X
1. The location of the business in relation t
the bend in the Coast Highway requires a
sign that can be observed from either .
direction. The proposed roof sign would b
no higher than a pole sign. Pole signs. ,
when permitted can be 25 feet in height. .
and approve Exception Permit No. 8, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That the sign be in substantial conformanc
with the plans as submitted.
2. That the required permits be obtained and
proper inspections made.
3.. That the sign be turned off at 10:00 p.m.
-25-
MINUTES
iat
e.
INERX
COMMISSIONERS
woLL GALL
Motion
All Ayes
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
approval of Exception Permit No. 8
for.a two -year period, at the end
time the matter will be reviewed by
Fications Committee.
MINUTES
lend a portion of Districting Map
;he C -1 District to the R -2 District.
Lots 1 through 9, Block 3,
Newport Bay Tract, Lots 6 and 7,
Block 1, Balboa Tract, and
Lots 9 through 16, Block 3,
Balboa Tract, located at 300
328 East Balboa Boulevard, 203 -
205 Cypress Avenue, and 404 -
416 East Balboa Boulevard, on the
northerly side of East Balboa
Boulevard between Coronado Street
and Adams Street, on the Balboa
Peninsula.
City of Newport Beach
mission considered this Consent
n at the outset of the meeting. The
tion was taken:
mission continued this matter to
Df July 6, 1978.
ermit an existing patio structure and
D encroach over existing property
Lots 13, 14 and 47, Tract No. 7052
located at 2427 Vista Nobleza, on
the westerly side of Vista Nobleza
westerly of Vista del Oro in North
Bluffs.
R -4 -B -2 P -R -D
Mr. and Mrs. Theodore L. Freeman,
Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
-26-
•
INDEX
i1
LJ
Item #20
MODIFI-
CATION
NO. 2239
CONT. TO
JUL�d,
1978
•
4. That the
shall be
of such
the Modi
Request to al
No. 11 from
Location:
Initiated by
Planning Com
Calendar ite
following ac
X
Planning Com
the meeting.
Request to p
greenhouse t
lines.
Location:
Zone:
Applicants:
Owner:
approval of Exception Permit No. 8
for.a two -year period, at the end
time the matter will be reviewed by
Fications Committee.
MINUTES
lend a portion of Districting Map
;he C -1 District to the R -2 District.
Lots 1 through 9, Block 3,
Newport Bay Tract, Lots 6 and 7,
Block 1, Balboa Tract, and
Lots 9 through 16, Block 3,
Balboa Tract, located at 300
328 East Balboa Boulevard, 203 -
205 Cypress Avenue, and 404 -
416 East Balboa Boulevard, on the
northerly side of East Balboa
Boulevard between Coronado Street
and Adams Street, on the Balboa
Peninsula.
City of Newport Beach
mission considered this Consent
n at the outset of the meeting. The
tion was taken:
mission continued this matter to
Df July 6, 1978.
ermit an existing patio structure and
D encroach over existing property
Lots 13, 14 and 47, Tract No. 7052
located at 2427 Vista Nobleza, on
the westerly side of Vista Nobleza
westerly of Vista del Oro in North
Bluffs.
R -4 -B -2 P -R -D
Mr. and Mrs. Theodore L. Freeman,
Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
-26-
•
INDEX
i1
LJ
Item #20
MODIFI-
CATION
NO. 2239
CONT. TO
JUL�d,
1978
•
4
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
/TOLL CALL
This Consent Calendar item was considered at
the outset of the meeting. The following actior
was taken.
Motion
X
Planning Commission continued this item to the
All Ayes
meeting of July 20, 1978.
Request to construct a three story single
family dwelling that exceeds the basic height
limit within the 24/28 Foot Height Limitation
District.
Location: A portion of Lot 8, Block F,
Seashore Colony Tract, on the
southerly side of Seashore Drive
between Colton Street and
Lugonia Street in West Newport.
'
Zone: R -2
Applicant: Gilita Inc., Newport Beach
Owner: Same as Applicant
Public hearing was opened in connection with
this matter and Wally Seminik, resident of
6807 Seashore Drive, appeared before the
Planning Commission. Mr. Seminik spoke in
opposition to the proposed height of this build
and voiced concern that approval of this projec
could start a precedent. He also commented tha
he feels a three -story building on this small
lot would look awkward.
Gil Ferguson, Applicant, appeared before the
Planning Commission and advised that this build
meets every criteria of the City and Coastal
Commission except that it is proposed to be an
average height of 27'6" in the 24/28 Foot
Height Limitation District. He commented that
this building would not be built to the maximum
bulk that is allowable by the City or the
Coastal Commission. He then voiced concern
-27-
MINUTES
ing
t
t
ing
INOtIf
Item #21
USE PER
MIT N0.
87� 1
APPROVED
TIONKLY
COMMISSIONERS
v
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
POLL CALL
with Condition No. 2 as outlined in the staff
report.which provides that two stairways shall
be constructed from ground level to the third
floor as required by the Uniform .Building Code.
Mr. Ferguson advised that one elevator and one
stairway are proposed for this building and
questioned whether this would be sufficient to
comply with the Uniform Building Code with .
respect to its requirement that two means of
access and egress be provided for a three -story
building.
There being no others desiring to appear on thi!
matter, the public hearing was closed.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission make V
All Ayes
following findings:
1. That the proposed use is consistent with thi
Land Use Element of the General Plan and
is compatible with surrounding land uses.
2. The project will not have any significant
environmental impact.
3. The proposed development will result in more
public visual open space, since the structui
will maintain front and side yards in excess
of Ordinance requirements. The removal of
existing building encroachments in the
Seashore Drive right -of -way will. also creat
more public visual open space in the area.
In addition, the existing nonconforming
one car garage that encroaches to the westei
side property line will be removed so as to
provide the required 4 foot side yard setba
The removal of a brick wall along the rear
property line will also create better
vehicular maneuverability along the adjoinii
15 foot wide alley.
4. The proposed structure with its open patio,
stairways and balconies will result in a
more desirable architectural treatment of tl
building and more appealing visual characte
of the area than is required by the basic
height limit.
5. The increased building height of the propose
development will not result in undesirable
-28-
MINUTES
Ie
•e
.ly
:k.
Ig
I
!d
Ir
0
INO<X
•
COMMISSIONERS
9
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
IAOLL GALL
abrupt scale relationships between the
structure and the existing one, two, and
three story development on adjoining
properties.
6. The structure will have less floor area tha
could have been achieved without the u.se
permit. A' floor area of 2,200 sq. ft. i is
proposed, where the Ordinance would permit
2,530 sq. ft. t of floor area, based upon
two times the buildable area of the lot as
permitted in the R -2 District.
7. The approval of Use Permit No. 1871 will
not, under the circumstances of this case,
be detrimental to the health, safety, peace
morals, comfort and general welfare of pees
residing and working in the neighborhood or
be detrimental.or. injurious to property or
improvements in the neighborhood or the
general welfare of the City.
and approve Use Permit No. 1871, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That development, shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved plot plan,
floor plans, and elevations, except as note
in Condition of Approval No. 2.
2. That access be provided as required by the
Uniform Building Code.
3. That the two proposed parking spaces shall
be maintained for vehicular storage at all
times.
4. That the curb and the pavement strip be
completed along the Seashore Drive frontage
5. That the existing gas meter and water meter
be removed from the street and located in
the standard locations in the alley.
6. That the work be done under an encroachmeni
permit issued by the Public Works Departmer
-29-
MINUTES
,
ons
t.
INOax
COMMISSIONERS
=ppPy` ya City of Newport Beach MINUTES
June 15, 1978
ROLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
Request to amend a previously approved use
permit that permitted the construction of the
University Athletic Club facility so as to
enclose the existing open volleyball court
on the property, and the acceptance of an
environmental document.
Location: Parcel No. 1 of Parcel 'Map 7.5 -39
(Resubdivision No. 500) located
at 1701 Quail Street, on the
southwesterly side of Quail Street,
southeasterly of Birch Street in
Newport Place.
Zone: P -C
Applicants: Robert Zukin and W. Clark Graves,
Newport Beach
Owners: Same as Applicants
Public hearing was opened in connection with
this item and Gordon Glass, Architect, appeared
before the Planning Commission on behalf of the
Applicants. He advised that the Applicants have
submitted the preliminary drawings to Emkay
Development, who is administering the P -C text,
and that Emkay Development has sent the Applicants
a letter of approval. He then advised that the
proposed addition has been reduced from 4440 sq.
ft. to 4277 sq. ft. and, consequently, results in.
a 10 -foot rear yard setback instead of a 3 -foot .
rear yard setback as originally proposed.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Motion was made that Planning Commission make the
following findings:
1. That the proposed development does not
conflict with the intent of the Planned
Community Development Plan and the General
Plan.
-30-
INOtx,
Item #22
USE PER-
MIT NO.
7
APPROVED
CONDI-
TIONALLY
0
COyM•M19SIONSRS
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
MOLL CALL
2. That the amended athletic club facilities
will be compatible with existing and
planned office uses which will surround the
site.
3. That adequate on -site parking spaces are
being provided for the use of the proposed
development.
4. The project will not have any significant
environmental impact.
5. The Police Department has indicated that th
do not contemplate any problems.
6. The approval of Use Permit No. 1771 (Amende
will not, under the circumstances of this
case be detrimental to the health, safety,
peace, morals, comfort and general welfare
of persons residing and working in the
neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious_
'
to property and improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the
City.
and approve Use Permit No. 1771 (Amended),
subject to the following condition:
1. That development shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved plot plan,
floor plans and elevations.
Request to construct a two story single family
dwelling where portions of the structure (i.e.
a turret and a chimney) exceed the basic
height limit within the 24/28 Foot Height
Limitation District.
Location: Lot 17, Block 1, Section 5,
Balboa Island, located at 126
Grand Canal, on the southeaster
corner of The Grand Canal and
Park Avenue on Balboa Island.
Zone: R -1.5
Applicants: Mr. and Mrs. Raymond Zeff,
Balboa Island
Owners: Same as Applicants
-31-
MINUTES
ey
d)
ly
INOIX
Item #23
VARI-
ACE
N0. 1069
CONT. TO
JULY 6,
178
COMMISSIONERS
AA 9� �4 01
MOLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
MINUTES
•.
\' 6nieax.
commission considered this Consent
item at the outset of the meeting.. The
action was taken:
commission continued this matter
sting of July 6, 1978..
amend the Planned Community
nt Plan for Newport Place so as to
the allowable number of stories
)fessional and business office sites
anned Community.
The Planned Community of Newport
Place on property bounded by
MacArthur Boulevard, Jamboree
Road, Bristol Street North,
and Birch Street.
P -C •
Emkay Development and Realty
Company, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
Item #2!
7 create two parcels of land for RESUB-
nt where one parcel of land now DIVISI01
nd the acceptance of an environmental N0. 585
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 57 -
27 (Resubdivision No. 415) located
at 1301 Dove Street, on the
westerly side of Dove Street
between Westerly Place and
Quail Street in Newport Place.
P -C
Emkay Development and Realty
Company, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
Robert Bein, William Frost &
Associates, Newport Beach
-32-
Y I
Planning
Calendar
following
X
Planning
to the me
Request t
Developme
increase
in the pr
in the P1
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner:
Request t
developme
exists, a
document.
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner:
Engineer:
MINUTES
•.
\' 6nieax.
commission considered this Consent
item at the outset of the meeting.. The
action was taken:
commission continued this matter
sting of July 6, 1978..
amend the Planned Community
nt Plan for Newport Place so as to
the allowable number of stories
)fessional and business office sites
anned Community.
The Planned Community of Newport
Place on property bounded by
MacArthur Boulevard, Jamboree
Road, Bristol Street North,
and Birch Street.
P -C •
Emkay Development and Realty
Company, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
Item #2!
7 create two parcels of land for RESUB-
nt where one parcel of land now DIVISI01
nd the acceptance of an environmental N0. 585
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 57 -
27 (Resubdivision No. 415) located
at 1301 Dove Street, on the
westerly side of Dove Street
between Westerly Place and
Quail Street in Newport Place.
P -C
Emkay Development and Realty
Company, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
Robert Bein, William Frost &
Associates, Newport Beach
-32-
Y I
COMMISSIONERS /�
City of .Newport Beach MINUTES
• PA t7< �� O .
4P* June 15. 1978
4
NOL.L CALL
Agenda Items No. 24 and 25 were heard concurrent
because of their relationship.
.Public hearing was opened in connection with
these items and Kevin Hanson appeared before the
Planning Commission on behalf of Emkay Developm
and Realty Company and concurred with the analys
and conditions of approval contained in the sta
report.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Motion X
X M
Motion was made that Planning Commission adopt
411 Ayes R
Resolution No. 1010 recommending to the City
Council that Amendment No. 510 be adopted to all
the maximum building height not to exceed 10
stories above ground level on Parcel l of
Resubdivision No. 585. Further, that this acti o
ent
is
ff
ow
n
he
ion
Co
INOOM
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
June 15, 1978
and approve Resubdivision No. 585, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That a Parcel Map be filed.
That the remaining sections of 6 -foot wide
P.C.C. sidewalk along Quail Street, Westerly
Place, and Dove Street frontages shall be
completed.
That the separate water and sewer service
connections to each parcel shall be made in
a manner satisfactory to the Public Works
Department.
That vehicular access from Parcel No. 1 to
Dove Street be limited to one driveway
approach centered on a prolongation of the
centerline of Newport Place Drive.
5. That the driveway approach locations from
Parcel No. 2 to Quail Street and Westerly
Place shall be reviewed and approved by the
Public Works Department.
That the landscaping and grading plans
affecting sight distances at the driveway
approaches and the intersection of Quail
Street and Westerly Place shall be reviewed
and approved by the Public Works Department.
MINUTES
That Fire Department access shall be approved
by the Fire Department.
On -site fire hydrants and water mains shall be
approved by the Public Works and Fire
Departments.
That building addressing shall be approved by
the Fire Department.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Motion was made that Planning Commission recommend
to the City Council that the. procedures as
proposed by staff for implementing Council Policy
S -1 be approved.
-34-
INOIX
r 1
LJ
4
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport
• \'o \ \A \ \\ June 1.5, 1978
Beach
1. MINUTES
POLL CALL
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission make the
All Ayes
finding that the traffic analyses prepared for
the. Bayside Square Office Building and the .
Westcliff Grove Residential Project, in compliance
wi.th Council Policy S -1, demonstrate that the
projects will contribute less than 1% to the peak
hour volumes, and will not have a significant
impact on the circulation system.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission make the.
Ayes X
X
X
X
finding that the traffic analysis prepared for
Abstain
X
the Bank of Newport Office and'Residential
Project, in compliance with Council Policy S -1,
demonstrates that the project will contribute
less than 1% to the peak hour volumes, and will
not have a significant impact on the circulation
system.
•
Agenda Item No. 12
Amendment No. 505 (Referred back to Planning
Commission by City Council to determine.conformanci
with Council Policy S -1)
Request to amend. a portion of Districting Map
No. 35 from the Unclassified District to the P -C .
District. The proposal also includes an-amendment
of the Planned Community Development Plan for
Koll Center Newport so as to permit the increase
in the building site and the allowable building
area of Office Site C, and the acceptance of an
environmental document.
Location: Parcel 2, Parcel Map 68 -19 (Resub-
division No. 477) and a portion of
Block 50, Irvine's Subdivision,
located on the easterly side of
MacArthur Boulevard, between
Campus Drive and Birch Street in an
adjoining Koll Center Newport.
Zone: P -C, Unclassified
S
Applicant: The Irvine Company, Newp.ort.Beach
Owner: Same as Applicant
_35_
INOLX
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
June 15, 1978
MINUTES
MOLL CALL
Motion
411 Ayes
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission make the
finding that the traffic analysis prepared for
Koll Center Newport, in conformance with the
criteria established in Council Policy S -1,
demonstrates that the project will contribute les
than 1% to the peak hour volumes at the locations
studied and that the additional office space will
not result in a significant impact on traffic.
City Attorney O'Neil reported on the recent Unite
States Supreme Court case of Jane Monell v.
Department of Social Services o�tle C y of New
York, et al. wherein the Court decided that local
governmental officials can be sued in .their
official capacity for violating a person's civil
rights. He advised that further ramifications
on this case will be reported on in the near
future.
Motion
X
Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.:1011
All Ayes
setting a public hearing for July 20, 1978 to
consider the relocation of a section from the
Building Code to the Zoning Ordinance relating
to relocatable buildings.
Motion
X
There being no further business, Planning
All Ayes
Commission adjourned p.m. .
i
ZPAUL.
. BALALI Secretary
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
-3.6-
El
0
INOLX
E
I%