Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/06/1972COMMISSIONERS w Oil.CALL � N A m > CALL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Regular Planning Commission Meeting Place: Council Chambers Time: 7:30 P.M. nn +a• .luiv 6,. 1079 MINUTES INDEX Present, x x x x x x Absent. x EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R. V. Hogan, Community Development Director David R. Baade, Asst..City Attorney Benjamin B. Nolan,.0 ty Engineer. STAFF MEMBERS William R. Foley, Senior Planner VFilliam R. Laycock, Senior Planner Helen Herrmann ELECTION OF OFFICERS Chairman Dosh pointed out that the.situation this year differed from previous years inasmuch as his term of office and that of Commissioner Adkinson had expired on June 30th.and that as of this date new Commissioners had not been appointed. He aske Assistant City Attorney Baade to outline the pro - visions in the City Charter as well as in the.Rule of Procedure of the Planning Commission regarding the Election of Officers, Assistant City Attorney Baade summarized the wording in the Rules of;Pro -. cedure of.the Planning Commission as well as Section 704 of the Charter and stated that - whether.' or not this would be a practicable time to hold an election would be a question of fact for the Commis- sion to determine.. Chairman Dosh noted that there would be two new members of.the Commission and asked that the.,Commi - sion decide on the best arrangement for the benefi of the Commission and the orderly progression of business. Commissioner Glass stated that due to the length Motion x of the agenda, he would, move that the existing Second x officers continue until the new Commissioners were Ayes x x x x Y appointed and that the Election of .Officers be hel Abstain x at.that_ time: Absent. x The Minutes of- June 14, 1972 and June 15, 1972 were discussed and Commissioner Agee stated that he had looked over the Minutes of these meetings and there were.a.few places where actions and vote had not:been recorded, although in substance the conclusion of the Minutes had turned out correctly. Pa�e 1. COMMISSIONERS N � N � N L CALL 1 N s o CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH July 6, 1972 MINUTES INDEX It was pointed out that the meeting of June 14, 19 ,2 was held.in the Girl Scout�Headquarters Building where there.were some problems with recording. Commissioner Agee stated that since the conclusion Motion x in the Minutes of June 14, 1972 were.correct, he Second x would move for approval. All Ayes Following further discussion regarding the Minutes Commissioner Martin stated that.he had been lookin over the Minutes of June 14, 1972 and found that there was no indication of any votes taken and that in view of.this; with apologies; he would request that the.issue of the approval of the Motion x Minutes of 14, 1972 be reopened and that.the Second x .June motion to approve be.reconsidered. All Ayes Following the above action, Commissioner Martin Motion x moved that approval'of.the Minutes of June 14, 197 Second x be deferred until "such time as the staff has had All Ayes an opportunity to go back over the records and include all of the motions as they occurred and the votes on those motions. He stated that this is had been a very important meeting and that the. action taken should be as clear as possible. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Regarding the Minutes of June 15, 1972, Commissioner Agee stated that on Page 8, he remembered casting a lone negative vote on an amendment to the motion that had to do with the phasing of.the development with the transportation; however, since the condi- tions as outlined were correct, he would not hold Motion x up approval of the Minutes. The Minutes of June 15, Second x 1972 were approved as written. All Ayes The staff was instructed.in the future to record all motions, substitute:motions, amendments to motions and votes taken as this was a history to pass on to the City Council and also for the record of the Planning Commission. Chairman Dosh noted that requests for.either con - tinuance or withdrawal of Items 4, 5, 6, 14, 16, 20 and 21 had been received and if there was no one present who desired to be heard on these items, the appropriate action would be taken. These items.. will be listed in the Minutes.in their numerical sequence. .Page 2. COMMISS19NERS y N L CALL Motion No Seconc Motion Second Ayes Noes Absent CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES Julv 6 1972 INDEX Request to amend the conditions of approval and to permit off -site parking in conjunction with "The Item. #1 USE PERMIT NOo 562 Galley" restaurant. CONDITION - Location: Lot 10, Block 11, of Balboa Tract, ALLY located at 810 East Balboa Boulevard AlTATVED on the north side of East Balboa Boulevard between Main Street and "A" Street on the Balboa Peninsula. Zone: C -1 Applicant: Lynn Strauss, Newport.Beach Owner: Dr. Robert Andrews, Costa Mesa Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the Commission and Senior Planner Foley explained that in this particular structure there was no way to, include the double doors previously required as a condition of approval of this use permit. Mr. Lynn Strauss, the applicant, was.present and stated he agreed with the recommendations of the staff. There was a discussion regarding the off -site park- ing which the applicant proposed to provide on the parking lot of the Balboa Market. Commissioner Glass stated that he felt it would be more practical to provide the parking on the Muni - x cipal Parking Lot and therefore, he made a motion for denial, which failed for lack of a second. Commissioner Martin stated...he.felt it would.b.e. unfair to make.this:particular operator provide spaces on the Ocean Front if they could be provided . X elsewhere. Commissioner Agee agreed and moved x that the application be approved,.subject to the x x x, following conditions: X X 1. That all conditions of approval remain in effect except as noted below.' 2. That Condition No. 7 imposed on�May 4, 1972 be deleted. 3. That Condition No. 8.imposed on May 4, 1972 be amended to provide.15 parking spaces for Page 3. 9 COMMISSIONERS S f S CALL m m CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH July 6, 1972 MINUTES INDEX a period of 4 months: 4. That the City Council approve the off= site parking. 5. That the parking agreement be approved by the City Attorney.. Request to permit a maintenance.and equipment.yard and 6 holes of a.9 hole golf course and driving range to be located in an Unclassified District. Referred back to the Planning Commission by the City Council on appeal. Item #2, USE PERMIT N0�94 CONDITION - ALLY AiFRTV E D Location: Portion of Lots 101, 102 and 103 and abandoned Birch Street of Tract 706 located at 2301 Mesa..Drive, southeast of Irvine Avenue and.northwest of Anniversary Lane between Mesa Drive and Anniversary Lane.adjoining the Orange County Airport Clear Zone. Zone: Unclassified Applicant: Pacific Coast Mfg. Co., Golf Division Glendale Owner:: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach, Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the Commission and noted that this had been referred back to the Planning Commission by the City Council on appeal on the grounds that -the applicant.had been working with the homeowners in the immediate area and felt that a number of problems had been. resolved, He also reviewed correspondence from a Mr. Stoddard, a.report from the Chief Engineer of the Flood Control District, a letter from the attorney representing the applicant addressed to the City Council and a letter from the.President of the Newport Beach Upper Bay Association. Senior Planner Foley noted that the Board of Supervisors on the.previous.day had authorized -the County Department of Real. Property Services to enter into lease negotiations with Mr. Lane for the expansion of this golf facility into the County Clear Zone.- He noted further that a letter had been.received from the Irvine Company indicating that concurrent.with approval of this project, they had agreed to negotiate annexation procedures for that portion northerly of Mesa Drive presently Page .4. COMMISSIONERS y s w 3y £ o S CALL s CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH July 6, 1972 MINUTES INDEX not in the City. Mr.. Foley also noted that two petitions bearing a total.of approximately 233 signatures had been received from the Association. of Upper Bay Horse Owners and Neighbors asking that safe access routes be developed for equestrian access and that -they supported the project if they could get their horses.to public lands for riding; the second.petition.urged the retention of horse: trails along the flood control channel. Mr. Foley had also Contacted Capt..Hamilton of the Police Department-who stated that pedestrian undercrossing can cause real problems. Mr. Tully Seymour, attorney for the applicant, addressed the Commission at length regarding this - project and questioned some of the suggested condi- tions. Mr. George Lane, President of Pacific Coast Manufacturing Company addressed.the Commission re -.. garding the type of installation they proposed and answered questions.of-the Commission.. Mr. Norman Tyler, Western Regional Lighting Engineer for Harvey Hubbell Company, manufacturers of lighting • equipment addressed.the Commission and answered. questions regarding the lighting. He stated that he .did not believe there would be a problem with this installation. The following persons spoke in favor: Mary Sheppard who handles the publicity for the Upper Newport.Bay Association submitted a petition with 43 signatures in support of the project; Mr. George DeVries and Mr. Jim Curci also spoke-in favor of the project. The following persons.spoke in opposition: Mrs.. A. R. Davis of 1971 Mesa.Drive who owns the propert adjacent to the proposed driving range; she also read into the record a petition with 10 signatures requesting that a limit be set on the hours of. operation of the driving range. Mr. Carl Thomas of 2041 Mesa Drive also.spoke in opposition. Mr: Jack Mullan of 2031 Mesa Drive:spoke in the dua role as a homeowner and as Co- Chairman of the Upper Bay Homeowners Association. He stated.that: the three.main.concerns , of his group were the lighting, the availability of the horse trails and the under- pass at Mesa Drive; they never came to an agreement regarding the hours of operation and expressed oppo sition to residential uses for the property; it•was generally conceded that a golf course was a compati le use: Mr..Dale Harmon, President.of the Associated Riding Page 5. COMMISSI9NERS N &L CALL m CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH July 6, 1972 MINUTES INDEX Clubs of Orange County addressed the Commission regarding the horse trails. Following a discussion.regarding annexation, lighting, fences, a.surface or subterranean pedes- trian crossing.at Mesa Drive, hours of operation, recreational trails, the driving range and other Motion x related matters, the application was approved, Second x subject to the - following conditions: All Ayes 1. That the Irvine Company shall initiate. annexation procedures with the Local Agency Formation Commission and request in writing, that the City Council take appropriate action to annex that portion of- -the project lying northerly of Mesa Drive. (See Page 7 for amendment to this condition.) 2. That all public improvements including the location and design of the access.points to the clubhouse from Irvine Avenue.be subject to review and approval by the appropriate . City and County Departments. 3. That-the lighting facilities plan for the entire development shall be reviewed by a qualified electrical engineer and.cer-tified to the Director of Community Development, and the F.A.A. as to its compatibility with surrounding development. All lights:.shall be shielded so as to confine.direct rays to the premises.. Maximum of 1 foot candle of light spillage allowable onto adjacent rest- denti,al property. Intensified lighting to the specifications of the Public Works Department and the Traffic Engineer to be provided at.either the crosswalk or under- pass; whichever is constructed. 4. That -a plan showing the location,.heights an materials of all fences shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development.: Maximum height of fence.at any property line of adjoining residential prop -, erty to be 6 feet, 5. That a landscape and irrigation plan for the entire.devel.opment be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development, 6. That a surface or subterranean. pedestrian. crossing at Mesa Drive be.provided to the Page 6. COMMISSIONERS 9 N � y m y O 7� �p N£ S .L CALL�_�5N mz} CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH .luly 6. 1972 MINUTES INDEX satisfaction of the.Department of Community Development and the Traffic Engineer. 7. That the hours of operation and illuminatio be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 10:00 P:M. 8. That a 10' easement along the easterly end, of the project southerly of Mesa Drive be dedicated for pedestrian and equestrian access. 9. That a 20 foot setback for future flood control channel and recreational trails be observed.from the existing flood control ch nnel. 10: That the parking for all clubhouse.uses. shall conform to City standards. 11. That the materials for the construction of the maintenance building shall be approved. by the Department of Community Development and shall be selected to harmonize with the clubhouse. • 12. That the driving range be relocated to either. lie within the first 3 holes in the center of the property or adjacent to the Irvine Avenue side of that parcel, and that there . shall be a fairway located between. any resi- dential property and any driving ranger Following the above action, Commissioner Agee made a motion to amend condition No. l to add the folio - Motion x ing words to the last sentence "and that these Second x procedures for annexation be successful ". Condition All Ayes No. 1, as amended, reads as follows: 1. That the Irvine:Company shall initiate. annexation procedures with the.Local Agency Formation Commission and request in writing that the.City Council take appropriate action to annex that.portion of;the project lying northerly of Mesa Drive,.and that these procedures for annexation be success- ful. Chairman Dosh called a five minute recess and the Commission reconvened at 10:25 P;M. with all members • present (Commissioner Adkinson being absent). Page 7. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 0 Motion No Seco Motion Second Ayes Noes Abstain Absent 0 x MINUTES Julv 6 1972 INDEX Item #3. Request to construct two residential units over commercial.shops.in the C -1 District. USE PERMI N DENIED Location: Lot 13, Block 7, Section l of Balboa Island located at 121 Agate Street between Park Avenue and Bay Street on Balboa Island. Zone.: C -1 Applicant: James Read Owner: Mark Sandusky Chairman Dosh reviewed this application with the Commission and noted that it had been continued from the meeting of:June:.l, 1972 and that the.., applicant had suMitted revised plans. Mr. James Read, the; applicant, was present and stated that he had read, and concurred; with the staff's recommendations.. The Commission discussed this application from a density standpoint; as well as the question,of tandem.parking. x Commissioner Glass made a motion for approval,. subject to the recommendations of the staff, which failed for lack of a second. Commissioner Glass withdrew his motion: x Following further discussion, the application was.. x denied. x x x x x x Item #4. Request to permit duplexes to be constructed on VARIANCE two R -3 lots with areas of 2100 sq.ft. where the AT-7T021 Districting Regulations'require at least .2400 sq. ft. IN wr Location: Lots.6.and 7, Block 9, East Newport. JULY-To Tract, located at 607 and 609 West, Balboa Boulevard, on the southerly side of- West..Balboa Boulevard between 6th Street and 7th Street, on the Balboa Peninsula. Page 8. COMMISSIONERS w w CALL "w-s Motion Second All Ayes 0 Motion Second All Ayes Motion Second All Ayes CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES Julv 6_1972 INDEX Zone: R -3 Applicant: Terrance Martin, Balboa Owner:. Same as.applicant. This application was continued, until July 20., 1972 X at the request.of the applicant. Item #5., Request to create 2 parcels of land for restaurant RESUBDI -- sites, 1 parcel for office use, and 1 parcel for. VT-U—N off - street parking. N 57—M Location: Lot 1 and a portion of.Lot 2, of CONTINUED Tract 3232; located at the southeast l7NT-I-F- corner of Marine Avenue.and Bayside U=20 Drive adjacent to the Balboa Island bridge. Zone:. C -1 -H Applicant: The Irvine Company, Newport,Beach Owner: Same as applicant. X, This application was continued until July 20, 1972 x at the request of'the applicant.. Item #6. Request.to amend the Planned Community Development AMENDMENT Standards for "North Ford" to permit the expansion N6 of land uses and the updating of the development. standards." CONTINUED BUTTE Location: Portion of Block'56.and 57, Irvine!s JUE 20 Subdivision, located between Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard and between Bison Avenue and the extension of Bonita Canyon.Road Zone: P -C Applicant:. The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Owner: Same as applicant. X. This application was continued until July 20., 1972 x at the request of.the applicant. Page 9. COMMISSI9NERS 9 y N LL CALL m fD July 6 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 1972 MINUTES INDEX Item V. RESU.BDI- I'� Request to divide an existing R -1 parcel into two R-1 lots. NO. 346 Location: Lot 32, Tract 1133 located at 251 Ocean View Drive in Newport.Heights. DENIED Zone: R -1 Applicant: Kenneth W. Woodson Owner: Same as applicant. Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the Commission. Mr. Kenneth Woodson, the applicant.was present and read into the record his rebuttal of the staff's reasons.for recommendation of denial. Mr. Miller F. Wilson, who owns Lot 31 next to Mr. Woodson and Mr. Beal, who also lives next door, spoke in favor of the application and stated if the application were approved, they would like to make similar requests. A discussion ensued regarding the traffic hazard on Cliff Drive, the steepness of the slope and Motion Second No Vote. x x increase in density, following which Commissioner Agee made a motion for denial, seconded by Commis - sioner Hazewinkel: No vote was taken on this motion at this time. Taken Motion Second Ayes Noes Absent x x x x x x x x x Following further discussion, Commissioner Glass made a substitute motion for approval, subject to the recommendations of the staff. This.motion failed to carry. Commissioner Agee made a motion to vote.on the original motion for denial. This motion carried and the application was denied. Item.#B. Motion Second Ayes Noes Absent x x x x x x x x x Request to create 3:parcels of land for restaurant development. RESUBDI- ION N0. Location: Lot 4, Tract 7770, located on the westerly side of MacArthur Boulevard CONDITIO and east of Dolphin- Striker Way and Martingale Way in. "Newport Place ". ALLY APWVED Page 10. COMMISSIONERS 5 O !N 10 VL(O S N 1A+(0'7; L CAI F Motion Second All Ayes n L-A CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES July 6, 1972 INDEX Zone: P -C Applicant: Emkay Development Company, Inc. Newport Beach Owner: Same as applicant Engineer:. Raub, Bein, Fr.ost.and Asso.,.Costa Mesa Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with.the Commission. Mr. Robert Bein represented the applicant and stated they were in agreement with the conditions recommended in the staff report. Mr. Bein pointed out the access to the.parcels and stated there would be.mutual easement agreements - between the 3 parcels. x Following. discussion, Resubdivision Application No. x 347 was approved, subject to the following-condi- tions: 1. That a Parcel Map be filed: 2. That sidewalk be constructed on the Dolphin - Striker Way and Martingale Way frontages. 3. That separate water and sewer services be provided to each.parcel to the satis- faction of the Public Works Department: 4. That there be.a document recorded satis- factory to the City Attorney and the Director of-Community Development.pro -. viding for the common use of the off - street, parking areas,on Parcels 1, 2-and 3. 5.. That the conditions of approval of Tract No. 7770 regarding street trees, street` design, .etc., be fulfilled, Item #9. RESUBDIV Request to create 2 parcels of land for residential use. 5I0 NT.-348- Location: Portion of Block,D of Corona del Mar Tract, located at 2209 Bayside Drive,. on the southerly side of Bayside Drive between El Paseo Drive and Carnation Avenue in Corona del Mar.. Page 11. COMMISSIONERS N 3 3 A(�O� CALL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH July 6, 1972 MINUTES INDEX Zone: R -1 Applicants: Edward H. Willits and Nancy Willits Sattler, Owners: Same as applicants. Engineer: Raub, Bei.n, Frost & Asso., Costa Mesa. Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the Commission and noted that this particular property had.been before the Commission on two previous.. occasions; one as a resubdivision requesting four 40 foot wide lots, which was denied, and.the other a tentative tract map requesting 6 single family lots which was subsequently withdrawn. Senior Planner Laycock read into the record a communication from Dr. and Mrs. B. N. Desenberg In support.of the application: These neighbors had objected to-the two previous applications. • Director of Community Development Hogan stated tha .. the staff was recommending a seventh condition of approval to.read "that setback lines be shown-on the parcel map when filed ". He noted further that this condition would be added to all tentative map ' in the future. Mr. Edward Willits was present and stated he was in agreement with the conditions recommended in the staff.report, as well as the additional recom- mended.condition regarding setback lines° Motion x Fol.lowing.discussion, Resubdivision:No. 348 was Second x approved, subject to the following conditions: All Ayes 1. That all structures be removed along. the easterly property line of Parcel 1. so that a minimum 4 foot side yard setback shall be maintained. 2. That a Parcel Map be filed. 3. That an offer of dedication be made for an.additional 10 feet..of street..right -of -. way along the southerly side ofBayside Drive over both. Parcels 1 and 2; with pro - vision for acceptance when the existing residence-on Parcel 2 is demolished. 4. That an appropriate easement be dedicated Page.12. E 0 COMMISSI9NERS N '3 S L CALL tD CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Julv 6. 1972 MINUTES INDEX for the existing 18" water line crossi.ng the northerly corner. of Parcel 2. 5. That separate water and sewer services satisfactory to the Public Works Depart- ment be provided to each parcel. 6. That the construction or reconstruction of dwelling units.;on either parcel be accomplished in such a manner that an adequate driveway turn- around area is provided on-site-so that vehicles leaving need not back out onto Bayside Drive.. 7. That yard setback lines be indicated on the parcel map when filed. Item #10 Request approval of the Final.Map to permit a sub- FINAL MAP division.of 7:022 acres into..40 residential lots TRACT NO. and one landscape lot. 797 Location: Portion of Block 51, Irvine °s Subdivi CONDITION - sion,.located at the.northeast corner ALLY of Eastbluff Drive and Vista del Oro APMVED in "Northbluff ". Zone: R -3 -B Applicant: George and William Holstein Co., Inc: Costa Mesa Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport.Beach. Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc., Costa Mesa Chairman Dosh reviewed this Final Map with the Commission and noted that the extension of the tract boundary to the centerline of Eastbluff Oriv , as required by Condition No. 12 on the Tentative Map had not been accomplished. The staff recommended that a condition regarding setback-lines, similar to that.required in the previous application (Condition Noe 7) be added to this Final Map.. ° Mr. Robert Bein represented the applicant and stat d he was not aware that Condition No. 12 had.not bee complied with and that he would work it out with t e Public Works Departmento He stated further that h Page .13. COMMISSI9NERS a G pG��N �cvp £aa �° N CALL � � M? Motion Second All Ayes r] 9 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES 10v 6. 1979 INDEX did not believe the requirement for setback lines on this particular Tract was necessary; the Commis- sion suggested that the words "where applicable" be added. x Following discussion, Final Map Tract Noo 7167 was. recommended to the City Council for approval; x subject to the following conditions: 1. That all conditions.of approval applied to the Tentative Map of Tract 7167 be fulfilled. 2. That a.200 scale:reproduction of the Final Map of Tract 7167 be submitted to the. Department of.Community Development to facilitate.the continuous updating of the City's Districting Maps. 3. That yard setback lines, where applicable, be indicated on the Final Map and be approved by the Director of Community Development. Item #11. Request approval of the Final Map to subdivide FINAL MAP 3.853 acres into 17 lots for attached residential TR development; 2. lots to be.developed as landscape areas, and l lot to be.developed as a private 78 street. CONDITION ALL Location:. Portion of Block 56 of Irvine's Sub- APPROVED division, located on the northerly side of Big Canyon Drive, easterly of.Jamboree Road in "Big Canyon ". Zone: P -C Applicant: Deane Development Co., Newport Beach. Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport.Beach Engineer: V -T:N., Irvine Chairman Dosh reviewed.this.Final Map with.the Commission. Mr, Dan Wiseman represented Deane Development Company and stated they were in.agreement with the conditions recommended by the staff. Page 14. COMMISSI9NERS W N S £N y. RoN N N � J CALL ° %D m � Motion Second All Ayes 0 Mion and All Ayes CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES July 6, 1972 INDEX Following discussion; Final Map Tract 7800 was x recommended to the City Council for approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the conditions of approval applied to the Tentative Map Tract 7800 be fulfilled. 2. That a 200 scale reproduction of the Final Map of Tract 7800 be submitted to the Department of Community Development to facilitate the continuous updating of the City's Districting Maps. 3. That yard setback lines, where applicable, be indicated on the Final Map and be approved by the Director of Community. Development. Item 112. Request approval of the.Final Map to subdivide FINAL MAP 6.443 acres into 26 lots for attached residential TRACT NO. development, 2 lots to be developed as landscape 7TO areas and 2 lots to be. developed as private street . CONDITION Location: Portion of Block 56 of Irvine's Sub - ALLY division located on the north side APTRVED of Big Canyon Drive, easterly of Jamboree Road in 'Big Canyon ". Zone: P -C Applicant: Deane Development Company, Newport Beach Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Engineer: V.T.N., Irvine Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the commission. Dan Wiseman represented Deane Development Company and .stated they were in agreement with the condi- tions recommended by the staff. Following discussion, Final Map Tract 7809 was x recommended to the City Council for approval, x subject to the following conditions: 1. That the conditions.of approval applied to Tentative Tract No. 7809 be fulfilled. Page 15. 0 0 COMMISSI9NERS 1 N N MM CALL m m CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH July 6, 1972 MINUTES INDEX 2. That .a 200 scale reproduction of Final Map No. 7809 be submitted to the Depart- ment of Community Development to facilitate continued.updating,of the Newport.Beach Districting. Maps. 3. That yard setback lines, where applicable, be indicated on the Final Map and be approved by the Director of Community Developments Item #13 VARIANCE Request to permit.two identification signs on a proposed six story office building, each.371 sq.ft. in area, when the P.C: Development Standards permit maximum 200 sq.ft. signs. DENIED Location: Portion of Block 50 of Irvine's Sub - division, located on the westerly side of Dove Street, easterly of Birch Street.in "Newport Place ". Zone: P -C Applicant: Bank of.California, Los Angeles Owner:. Johson and Mape Construction Company Chairman Dosh reviewed the application and:the staff report with the Commission. Director of Community Development Hogan noted that any allowance for a larger than permitted sign should not,:be considered a variance but would have to be:a revision to the P -C Standands. Upon being questioned whether the Emkay Development Company had approached the Department regarding an amendment to the P -C Ordinance,.the answer was negative: Mr..Eugene Brebsemeister of Heath and Company was present.and displayed a rendering of -.the signs whin he explained in detail. He also displayed a map showing.the distance from the buildingQ to both. MacArthur Boulevard and Birch Street (approximately 1500 feet in each direction). He stated that they feel there.is a hardship and that their request is reasonable. Mr. Ertl est Haynes of Heath and Company was also present and addressed the Commission. The Commissiov discussed this application at length Page 16. COMMISSIONERS y s m N i•Y� N NON Ro CALL ADS 3 Motion Second All Ayes Motion Second No Vote Taken Motion Second Ayes Noes Absent 0_. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES Julv 6. 1972 INDEX and it was the consensus of opinion that any signs in "Newport Place" should conform to the standards x outlined in the Planned Community Development x Standards, therefore, the application was. denied. Item #14. Request -to construct a three story triplex in the C -1 District. USE PERMIT N , Location: Lot l in Block 1 of Bay Front. Section WITHDRAWN of Balboa Tract.and Lot l in Block 13 of the Balboa Tract, located at 900 E.REFUND OF Balboa Boulevard, on the. .Balboa F Peninsula. FILING FEE PPR VE Zone: C -1 Applicant: Charles R. Hoose Owner; Leo Gogerty The staff pointed out that the applicant had re- quested that this application be withdrawn and that the filing fee of $150.00 be refunded. x x A motion to accept the.applicant's request for withdrawal with a full refund of the filing fee was made by Commissioner Glass and seconded by Commissioner Heather. No vote was taken on this motion. Commissioner Agee:stated that he felt.when an appli cation was filed it required staff time and he did . not .think the.full fee should be refunded, therefor x he made a substitute motion that the application be x withdrawn and $75.00 of the filing fee be refunded x. x x x to the applicant. This motion carried. x x x Item #15. Request to amend Use Permit No. 1551 to permit a standard roof sign for Kentucky Fried Chicken "take out" restaurant. JISE PERMIT 605 ONDITION- Location: Parcel 2, 3, and a portion of Parcel 1, located on the northwesterly side ALLY PPR VED of:301;h Street, west of Newport: Boulevard. Page 17. COMMISSIONERS _ 4 N 1= CO U+ £ K OIL CALL m m 3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH July 6, 1972 MINUTES INDEX Zone: C -1 Applicant: Heath & Company, Inca Owner: William Cagney Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the. Commission. Mr. Eugene Breesemeister of Heath and Company addressed the Commission and stated they were in. accord with.the staff report with the exception of Item D. under the recommended conditions. Mr. Don Steinke, the original applicant, was prese t and stated he had listened to the recording of the. meeting when the original application was approved and at that time he had asked to come back if he needed a sign; he has found that the volume of business without the bucket is not the same as when they have a bucket. Following a discussion regarding the size and ion x location of.the sign on the building, the applica- Second x tion was approved, subject to the following condi- Ayes x x x x tions: Noes x x Absent x 1. That the proposed roof sign shall meet all requirements as.specified in Section 15.16 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, with specific reference to the following provisions. A. That the sign- .shall not exceed 28 feet.in height.at any point from ground level to the top of the sign. B. That the distance between the top of the roof line and the top of the sign shall not exceed 13 feet in height. C. That the.sign shall not exceed 64 square feet in size. D.. That the sign shall not in any way protrude through or extend beyond an existing building parapet and -that • the provisions of Section 15.16:290 of the-Newport Beach.Municipal Code shall apply to projecting signs. Following the above action, and not as a condition Page 18. COMMISSIONERS s 3 R CALL M8'Ci on Second. All Ayes CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES 10v A- 1Q79 INDEX of approval, but as a guideline for the Commission in future applications of.this type, the applicant was requested to inform the staff within 6 months to one year as to the increase in the volume of his business. Item #16. USE PERMIT Request to obtain a permit for a "take -out" window in an existing restaurant. N0. 606 Location: Lot 1, Block 21, Newport Beach Tract, located at 2108 3/4 West Ocean Front on the northeasterly side of Ocean Front between McFadden Place and 20th CONTINUED I JULY 20 Street. Zone, Applicant: Craig W. Jones Owner: Philip Rapp X x This application was continued until July 20, 1972 at the request of the applicant in order that-he could amend his application. Item #17. USE PERMIT Request:to permit the addition of approximately 2000 sq.ft. of space to the existing Irvine Industrial.Complex Headquarter facility in the Unclassified zone. 60 ONDITION- Location: Portion of Block 50 of.Irvine's. Subdivision located at 2122 Campus Drive, east.of MacArthur Boulevard. ALL PFRU ED Zone: Unclassified Applicant; Irvine Industrial Complex Owner:. Same as applicant. Chairman Dosh reviewed the application with the Commission and a discussion ensued regarding re- locatable buildings. Mr. Ray Kimmey represented the Irvine Industrial Complex: He answered questions of.the - Commission and stated that this addition would be the same type of construction as the existing building. Page 19. COMMISSI9NERS 6 L CALL > Motion Second Ayes Noes Absent 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES Julv 6. 1972 INDEX x Following discussion, the application was approved X subject-to the following conditions: x x xx x x 1. That development be, according to the x approved plot plan, except for minor modifications which may be approved.by the Community Development Department.. 2. That additional right -of -way be dedicated for MacArthur Boulevard to provide for future widening to six (6) through lanes, with separate left and right turning lanes for vehicular traffic; and that construction of.the improvements on the MacArthur Boulevard frontage be delayed pending permanent development of the property. 3. That a landscape and irrigation plan be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department which incorporates the existing landscape improvements and encompasses additional area sufficient to landscape the proposed building. Item #1$. Request to permit the installation and maintenance USE PERMI of a temporary sign. Location: Lots 1 through 8 of Tract 6947 locate CONDITION at the southwesterly corner of Privat Driv.eway - and Jamboree Road. AVFWED Zone: Unclassified Applicant: Park Newport Apartments, Newpprt,.Beach Owner: Park Newport, Ltd. Chairman Dash reviewed the staff report, which recommended.denial, with the Commission. Senior Planner Foley noted that a letter had been received from the applicant indicating:that they had read the staff report and agreed that 3 of their construction signs were non - approved.. They were offering to remove all 3 of the existing signs and replace them with this new sign. They also had indicated that their construction schedule was to complete construction by October and lands- caping and final clean up by November. They were Page 20. COMMISSI19NERS wy N � . fD d £N ' r 5 � m CALL m 5 > Motion Second Ayes Noes •sent 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES July 6, 1972 INDEX willing to accept a condition that would limit the sign to 6 months and would also be removing the 3 existing signs on the site that identified the contractor. Mr. Foley stated that on this basis tie request was much more reasonable. Mr. Foley added that of the original 3 signs approved, at the present time there was the entrance sign and one other and if this application were approved, there would be a total of 3 signs. Mr. Bruce Harrington, attorney, represented the applicant and explained the map attached to the staff .report and answered questions regarding the sign logo, Upon being questioned, Mr. Harrington stated that the 3 non - approved signs would be removed whether or not.the application were approved. Following discussion, the application was approved x subject to the following conditions: x x x x 1. That the existing temporary construction x signs which are designated on the vicinity map attached to the staff report as "Existing Contractors Signs" be removed. . 2. That approv4l of this application be until October 1, 1972. 3. That the existing temporary leasing signs shall also be removed by October 1, 1972. Item #19. Request to amend Section 20.47.070 of the Newport AMENDMENT Beach Municipal Code pertaining to appeal proced- R-7-M � ures for Modification applications. APPROVED Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach Chairman Dosh reviewed this proposed amendment with.the Commission. Commissioner Martin.expressed concern about the 5 day appeal period and felt it should be stretche from 5 to 10 or 14 days so that people would have sufficient time to.appeal. A discussion ensued in which it was pointed out that the Modifications Committee had been created to handle minor matters so that applicants would not be held up for long periods of time before they could begin alterations or building.. Page 21. COMMISSIONERS s N c+ IRL CALL F Motion Second Ayes Abstain Absent tion cond All Ayes tion cond 1 Ayes CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES July 6, 1972 INDEX It was also noted that another amendment would be on the July 20, 1972 agenda dealing with notifica- tion procedures; that the..amendment. before the Commission this evening dealt only with providing for an appeal to the City Council from Planning Commission decisions. Following further discussion, Commissioner Martin moved that Amendment No. 328 be recommended to the x x xx x x City Council for approval with the following change: That line 6 of the proposed ordinance, x x Section 20.47:070 Appeal be changed to read from five (5) days to seven, 7) calendar days. Item #20 Request to update the existing Planned Community AMENDMENT District Regulations for Harbor View Hills. NO. 329 Initiated by: The Irvine Company, Newport.Beach CONTINUED x This application was continued until July 20, 1972 J L 20 x at the request of the applicant. Item #21. Request to permit a subdivision of 39.0 acres into TENTATIVE a Planned Residential Development consisting of., 118 residential lots, two landscaped lots and one MAP TRACT N 5 recreational area. CONTINUED Location:. Portion of Blocks 91, 92, 97 and 98 of UNTIL Irvine's Subdivision, located southerly of Ford Read, easterly of.New MacArthur J 20 Boulevard, and northerly of Eastgate. Drive. Zone: P -C Applicant: Donald L. Bren,.Newport Beach Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport-Beach Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost & Associates Costa Mesa x This application was continued until June 20, 1972 X, at the request of the applicant. Page 22. COMMISSIQNERS � a N N � N N � N o m N 3 1 L CALL � m m � s CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES July 6, 1972 INDEX Request to amend a portion of .Districting Map No. Item #22. AMENDMENT 46 fron an R -4 -UL District to an R -3 District. NU_. 30 Location: Portion of Lot 1, Tract 463; located APPROVED on the westerly side of Superior Avenue, north of Pacific Coast Highway. Zone: R -4 -UL Initiated by: The City of Newport.Beach Owner: Grant Company of Calif:, Anaheim Chairman Dosh reviewed this amendment which had been initiated by the Planning Commission and it was pointed out.that if a more restrictive zoning, as suggested by the staff, were to be recommended the amendment would have to be republished for another hearing. Mr. Warren Toman represented the Grant Company and stated that they had refined their.original. plan from 14 units per acre to 12.3 units per.acre for a total of about.105 apartment units with a maxi- mum height of two stories. He noted further that they had purchased a parcel of ground that was zoned and it had not occurred to them.that. there was a possibility that the property would be rezoned. He stated that they felt they would have more flexibility of design under the R- 4- UL.District:an would be willing to enter into an agreement', as well as C.C.& R's and deed restrictions, stipulati g that the maximum amount of units would be 105. The Commission discussed this at length, as well as the difference in setbacks and density in the R -4 -UL, R -3 -B -2 and R -3 Districts. It was pointed out to Mr. Toman that the R -3 District would allow approximately 119 units; so this zone would:be appropriate for the 105 units they intended to construct. Mr. Tomas was advised that he could either request a continuance, or the Commission could take action on the R -3 District this evening; that the Commis- sion action-was a.recommendation to the City Council and that Mr. Toman would have an.opportuni y to discuss this matter again when it was before the City Council. Page 23. COMMISSIONERS s N � y RILL CALL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH lulv 6. 1972 MINUTES INDEX Mr. Toman asked the Commission to take action on the R -3 zoning with the understanding that if ther was a problem in design, they could comeback with an appeal. Motion x Amendment No: 330 recommending a change in zone. Second x from R -4 -UL to R -3 was recommended to the City All Ayes Council for approval. Chairman Dosh noted.that:this was the last Planning Commission meeting that Helen Herrmann would be attending as secretary as she was transferring to the Public Works Department. Director of Community Development.Hogan was asked to prepare a resolution of appreciation and thanks for her efforts during the years she had served in this capacity. On motion of Commissioner Heather, seconded by. Commissioner Glass, and carried; the meeting was adjourned at 12 :45 P.M. cqu ine E. Heather, Secretary Newport Beach City Planning Commission Page 24.