The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07/24/1980xI xlxlxlx XIXIXIx STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Donald Webb, Assistant City Engine Fred Talarico, Environmental Coord Craig Bluell, Senior Planner Catharine Hinton, Secretary mission ey ator Minutes written by: Catharine Hinton and James Hewicke MINUTES ELECTION OF OFFICERS Chairman: Motion was made to nominate Commissioner Haidi.nge x Motion was then voted on, which MOTION CARRIED. First Vice Chairman: INDEX. ELECTION. OF OFFICERS Motion was made to nominate Commissioner Allen. Motion was made to nominate Commissioner McLaughli . Motion to elect Commissioner Mc Lau hlin was then voted on, which MOTION CARRIED. . i. Second Vice Chairman:. Motion was made to nominate Commis ioner Allen. Mb.tio.n was then voted, which MOTIO CARRIED. - 1 - ■ ■ Regular Meeting of the Planning Con )MMISSIONERS Place: City Council Chambers Time: 7:30 P.M. Date: July 24, 1980 J 5 F (1-1' City of Newport Beach x x x x x x x EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT James D. Hewicker, Planning Directo Robert Burnham, Assistant Ci "ty Atto xI xlxlxlx XIXIXIx STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Donald Webb, Assistant City Engine Fred Talarico, Environmental Coord Craig Bluell, Senior Planner Catharine Hinton, Secretary mission ey ator Minutes written by: Catharine Hinton and James Hewicke MINUTES ELECTION OF OFFICERS Chairman: Motion was made to nominate Commissioner Haidi.nge x Motion was then voted on, which MOTION CARRIED. First Vice Chairman: INDEX. ELECTION. OF OFFICERS Motion was made to nominate Commissioner Allen. Motion was made to nominate Commissioner McLaughli . Motion to elect Commissioner Mc Lau hlin was then voted on, which MOTION CARRIED. . i. Second Vice Chairman:. Motion was made to nominate Commis ioner Allen. Mb.tio.n was then voted, which MOTIO CARRIED. - 1 - ■ ■ 71 N x N 3 July 24, 1980 z MINUTES t Beach Secretary: Motion Motion was made to nominate Commiss oner Cokas. Ayes Motion was then voted on, which MOT ON CARRIED. Noes Abstain Commissioner Thomas asked that the tape of the May 22, 1980 meeting be reviewed to determine if his .request for excused absences wa� on the record Motion x Minutes of the Regular Planning Com ission Meeting All Ayes of July 10,,1980, were approved subject to a change on page 28, paragraph 3, to tate: "Commissioner Haidinger's amendme. t was voted on and carried" rather than "amended motion." i Minutes of the Regular Planning Com ission Meeting of June 19, 1980 were not completed and were post- poned to the Regular Planning Commi sion Meeting of August 7, 1980. Motion I IxI 1111 Motion was made to continue Item No. 7, Amendment All Ayes No. 548, to the Regular Planning Co mission Meet ing of August 21 1980. j .Request of Eagle Development Compan and Daon Cor- poration for Planning Commission co firmation and determination of compliance with re pect to cer7 tain conditions of approval attache to the Tenta- tive Map of Tract No. 10391. LOCATION: A portion of Block 56 lIrvine Sub - division; generally bo nded by Bison Avenue, Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and MacArthur Boulevar . ZONE: P -C - 2 _ INDEX Item #1 TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 10391 1MISSIONERS MINUTES July 24, 1980 w W City of Newpor t Beach 'PPLICANT:. Daon Corporation and agle. Develop - ment. OWNER: Same as Applicant Planning Director Hewicker explain d the nature of the applicants' request and indicated that the Staff was recommending that the .Planning Commis- sion find the proposed changes in substantial con- formance with the approved Tentative Map, particu- larly as it pertains to the provision which would allow the construction of the wall and the reduc- tion of sound in the outdoor living areas adjacent to the intersection of Jamboree and Bison Roads. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Thomas, Mr. Hewicker stated that tin separate final maps will be presented at th August 7th meeting. The discussion was opened regar.din� this item, and Dennis O'Neil, representing the Daon Corporation and Eagle Development Company, app scants, appear- ed before the Commission. In response to a ques- tion by Chairman Haidinger regarding Condition No. 38, which addresses itself to he noise impact on the park, Mr. O'Neil stated that the applicants were in total agreement, and the park would be delivered as the condition requires. Responding to Commissioner Beek's question concerning the wall, Mr. O'Neil replied that because of Mr. Beek's sug- gestion and those of other Commissioners, they had, come up with a wall treatment withiangles and dif- ferent types of masonry that are b�th aesthetically pleasing and will satisfy the requirements regard- ing noise attenuation. In a reply to Chairman Haidinger's question concerning hove the sound level was calculated, Mr. O'Neil alswered that not only was the topography of the ian taken into con ideration, but the field engineer Ialso calculated here the end of the grade would.be�.; in order to , lace his monitor so that :the most accurate reading possible could be obtained. He fuher stated, in responding to Commissioner Beek's concern- ing future noise level, their traffic people and noise engineers did take into consideration a "worse case" situation in projectirhg future traffic flows in that area, as well as the, stringent fed- • .eral laws being placed on new vehi0 es. - 3 - CC>MMISSIONERS July 24, 1980 s � 5 F x In Gtv of Newport Beach MINUTES Motion I I I I 11x1 Motion was made to approve the a llcants' re ues pp PP q All Ayes with the finding as set forth under Exhibit A of the Staff report, which MOTION CARRIED. Request to amend the Land Use and Residential Item #2' Growth Elements of the General Planlfor portions of the County territory within the Orea commonly GENERAL .known as the "County Triangle," gen .0rally bounded PLAN by Superior Avenue on the east, Production Place AMEND on the north, and Newport Beach City boundary on RENT 'NO.. the west. Revisions include possible changes in 80 -2 the land use designations and development inten- sities and are designated as General Plan Amend - ment No. 80 -2. Cont. to August 21, INITIATED BY: The City of Newportl Beach 91 8_0 Planning Director Hewicker explained that the pur pose of the public hearing was to aillow the Plan- • ning.Commission to take testimony and to give the Staff direction as to which of the lternatives should be evaluated in the preparation of the en- vironmental document. Mr. Hewicker further ex- plained that the hearing should then be continued following this fact finding and information gathe ing session. Mr. Hewicker then explained the actions which had been taken by the City Council and the Local Agency Formation. Commission leading up to this hearing, and.the information which had been assembled to this point. I. In response to a question by Commissioner Beek, Senior Planner Bluell explained that the County Triangle is an area that is redeveloping and. that the few single- family lots which are interdispers are being replaced with multi-family units. F.oll ing a brief explanation of the differences in the alternatives as presented.in the Staff Report, and in response to Chairman Haiding is question regarding trend growth, Mr. Bluell. xplained that the Staff considered the most recent projects con strutted, under construction and /or approved and combined their total size to compute the trend growth residential density of twenty dwelling units per acre, which is less than the residentia - 4 - COMMISSIONERS ROLL CALL 0 July 24, 1980 of Newport Beach MINUTES density permitted under the County' s zoning. As to industrial and commercial development, Mr. Bluell indicated that this data was taken from the best information available.' The public hearing was opened regarding this item Mr. Earl Lane, representing the Got en State Mo- bilehome Owners' League, 760 - 725 est Lomita Boulevard, Harbor City, appeared be ore the Comm. mission to urge the protection of t e mobilehome parks in the area, perhaps with an rdinance similar to the Mobilehome Park Zoni�ig established by the City of Lakewood. Mr. Dick Hogan, Plannin,g.Consultant, 1300 Dove Street, Newport Beach, then appearel before the Commission. In response to a conce n of Commis- sioner Allen regarding an.increase rom fifteen dwelling units to twenty units per, cre and.a possible precedent being set by app�oving this increase, Mr. Hogan stated that at I;he time the current General Plan's provisions wire adopted, the language therein stated, in eff ct, fifteen dwelling.units per acre unless the lanning Com- mission or the City Council determined that in specific areas densities could be higher, and an exception was made for a. tower apartment project in Newport Center. Mr. Hogan then tated he rep- resents two clients owning property in the County Triangle, both of whom are in the process of developing condominiums. He indica ed that two of the properties have been approved by County Planning Commission for condominiums with densi- ties of twenty -two and twenty dwelling units, respectively, and the other two projects have densities of eighteen and twenty. H{e stated they have no objection to the City's adoption of Alter natives 2 or 8, with the exception that they woul like to see the intensity of develo ment on Alter native 8 be twenty -two units, in order to elimin- ate the possibility of a nonconforming developmen He also requested that the Planning Commission adopt a general recommendation that items under process in the County be accepted ap approved, if annexation occurs before. the processing on these developments have been completed. IIn reply to a - 5 - INDEX • COMMISSIONERS July 24 , 1980 5 City of Newport Beach question by Commissioner Balalis, he had no problems with parking or tions for the developments he repr an environmental document had been the County but that a traffic anal necessary. Mr. Ron Dick, a resident at 843 We spoke on behalf of four families i area and thanked,the Commission, t Mr. Hewi.cker for considering this indicated they are in favor of Alt To Commissioner Beek's question co development of his land for higher Dick explained that the higher den under Alternative No. 8 would incr of his property and therefore, the numeration received at the time of as permitting the mobilehome parks In other words, he felt this alter provide, for everything.the reside.n ested in. MINUTES Hogan state eight regula- ents, and tha repared for . is was not 15th Street, the affected Staff and nexation. He native No. 8. erning the ensity, Mr. ty permitted se the value mount of re- ale, as well o remain. tive would are inter Concerning a question by Commissionler Thomas re- garding the mobilehome preservation, Mr. Bluell explained there are 213 mobilehome� spaces total divided among three parks currentl existing in the affected area. Mr. Don Bendetti, #5 Inverness Lane, Newport Beach, appeared before the Commission as repres.entativc of the ownership of Newport Terrace, one of the mobilehome parks in the affected area. Mr. Ben detti recommended that Alternative No. 2 be adopted; he wished to keep the present County zoning essentially in force with the issuance of a. use permit to operate the mobile ome parks if the area was annexed to the City. He explained that Newport Terrace was built more than twenty - two years ago, and the owners have no plans to redevelop it at the time. 'It is an old park that is obsolete in many ways, and the future of the park is very definitely in doubt from his point of view. He stated that there is constant deterioration of utilities and and rground systems . and an on- going patch and maintena ce program is in existence. He further mentione that there are no funds available from the owners to make any is COMMISSIONERS Daly 24, 1980 3 3 City Of Newport Beach MINUTES ROLL CALL INDEX major renovations to the parkas it now exists. Therefore, before any, mobilehome park zoning is recommended on a permanent basis, h felt the Commission should be aware of the problems that could exist.. Al though the owners will make every effort to keep the mobilehome park open, there is the possibility of the park's closing, putting many people out of their living area. He felt these people may then look to the Planning Com- mission for an explanation. In response to a question from Commissioner.Thomas, Mr. Bendetti stated the one thing that they are opposing is the permanency of the mobilehome park zoning, as he feels the future of these parks is in doubt. Mr. Lane, who spoke previously, addressed his remarks to Mr. Bendetti concerning the services that were deteriorating in the Newport Terrace Park. His suggestion was that Mr. Bendetti look into the possibility of raising th.e rent to the park tenants a certain amount, each month. Costs . could be amortized over a five year period to replace deteriorating utilities. At the time the cost of the replacement has been satisfied, the increase should be lifted. He again urged the Commission to consider Alternative No. 8. In response to Commissioner Balalis' questions concerning possible availability o additional mobilehome spaces, Mr. Lane respond d that he would like to see such a provision,) as well as the opportunity of converting the rental spaces to an own- your -own lot situation, as suggested by Commissioner Balalis. Mr. Lane further sug- gested that parks be designated as half - family, half - adult, with lots provided predominately for double coaches. He also.suggested the possibi. lit) of an ordinance to allow mobile homes on single- family lots in the City. Mr. Bendetti stated his . opinion that since he was also a developer, he did not feel mobile homes were the answer to low- and moderate -cost housing in this area, but rather with a proper increase in density, an attractive, very good, low- to moderate -cost house could be constructed.on this property. • _ 7 _ C MISSIONERS1 July 24, 1980 N y 7 V't Y of N4 MINUTES In response to further discussion with Commis- sioner Beek concerning mobilehome size and space requirements, Mr. Lane suggested th t a copy of Title 25, Chapters 2 and 4, of the tate laws which apply to mobilehome zoning requirements, be obtained for complete information. j Motion x Motion was made that the Staff proceed with a review of Alternative No. 8, MOTION WITHDRAWN. Motion x Amended motion was.made that the Staff evaluate. Alternative No. 7 as an alternative to Alterna- tive No. 8, MOTION AMENDED. OWNER; The Centennial Group Incorporated, Tus ti n ENGINEER: Dale Price and Associaltes Item #3 RESUB- DIVISION NO. 661 APPROVED CONDI- TIONALLY Following a discussion between the ICommission and Staff regarding the best way to proceed and still follow the requirements and procedures of the California Environmental Quality Acct, Commissioner Motion x Balalis. withdrew his motion and Commissioner Cokas Ayes x x x YX amended his motion to only review Alternative Noes x x No. 7 but include a review of the mobilehome parts, • which MOTION CARRIED. The public hearing was then continu d to August 21: 1980. Request to permit the conversion of individual medical offices in two existing buildings to office condominiums. LOCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel,Map 64 -32, Resub- division No. 661, located at 355 Placentia Avenue, northwesterly of Hoag Memorial Hospital. ZONE: A -P APPLICANT:. Robert A. Belzer, Tus in OWNER; The Centennial Group Incorporated, Tus ti n ENGINEER: Dale Price and Associaltes Item #3 RESUB- DIVISION NO. 661 APPROVED CONDI- TIONALLY COMMISSIONERS MINUTES: July 24, 1980 City of New t Beach ROLL CALL INDEX Planning Director Hewicker explaineb that the Public Works Department has request d two addi- tional conditions as follows: 7. That ten feet of ,additional right -of- way be dedicated for street a d high Way purposes on the westerly ide.of Placentia Avenue. 8. That the'existing parking fac'lities be relocated behind the new r ght -of- way line along Placentia Avenue. In response to a question by Commis ioner Cokas, Mr. Hewicker explained that there w uld be suf- ficient distance behind the existing right -of -way line to accommodate the requested d dication; however, it might involve the remov l of required parking spaces. Assistant City Engineer Webb indicated that there were 158 parkiing spaces.pro- vided on site, 18 spaces in excess of the 140 • spaces required for the existing development. In addition, Mr. Webb also indicated that there were no plans to modify the intersection of Superior Avenue and Placentia Avenue and that the dedica -. tion was required in anticipation of future traffi back up. Commissioner Allen disclosed a posslible conflict and was excused from the dial. j In reply to a question by Commissioner McLaughlin concerning the 140 parking spaces required for the two buildings, Planning Director Hewicker ex- plained that the parking requirement for commer- cial use is based upon total square footage rather than the amount of space per business suite. He further explained that the parking ould not be assigned but would be a part of the common im- provement. The public hearing was opened regarlding this item Bob Belzer, 161 Fashion Lane, Tustin, the appli- cant, appeared before the Planning Commission and stated his concurrence with the conditions as set . forth in the Staff Report, includinlg the two ad- ditional conditions. 9 - COMMISSIONERS1 July 24, 1980 1 31 City of Newport Beach MINUTES . Concern was raised by the Commissio, and Staff as to what would happen to, the area cu rently occu- pied by parking and landscaping if Ithey were re- quired to be relocated behind the. n w right -o-f -way line for Placentia.Aven,ue. In response to Commissioner Cokas' 6ncern. that the right -of -way would not be properly landscaped or maintained, Mr. Hewicker suggest ad that Condi- tion 7 be modified to include the ;p rase "the additional dedicated right -of -way b landscaped until such time as it is required f r road pur- poses ". A question was posed by Commissioner Beek concern ing the amount and source of money. required for the removal of the parking spaces and the subse- quent restriping required. Mr. Chunk McBurney, Dale Price and Associates, representing the appli cant, replied that during initial investigation, this problem was discussed and it was proposed . that the parking be left in its present condition until such time as the street was widened. How - ever, he does understand the problems and sugges- ted that.a provision be put in the CC &R's that would require the association of owners at such time as the City uses their widening ability, to remove the parking stalls. In response to.a question regarding the timing of at improvements, Mr. Webb indicated thdepending upon the development of the County Triangle Area it would probably be approximately three to five years. before widening of the street would take place. Motion x Motion was made to approve Resubdivision No. 661 with the findings and subject to the conditions as set forth under Exhibit A of the Staff Report, including the additional Conditions No. 7 and No. 8, and the requirement that the dedicated right - of -way be landscaped until such time as it is re- quired for road purposes. Motion x Motion was made to amend Condition No. 8 to allow the existing parking spaces and landscaping to • remain in place and be used until such time as the right -of -way was required for street widening. - 10 - COMMISSIONERS I s ft, _D 7 f N x N 9 July 24, 1980 21 Beach MINUTES Ayes x x x x The amended motion was then voted oh, which MOTIW Noes x x CARRIED. Absent x Ayes x x x x x The original motion was then voted �n, which. . Absent x MOTION CARRIED. Request, to create one parcel of lanJ where six lots now exist so as to permit the interior.re- modeling of an existing commercial tructure con - taining residential apartments abov2. LOCATION: Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21, Block 22 of Newport Beach Tract, located at 2203 and 220P Balboa Boule yard, one block westerl of the New- port Pier. • ( I ( ( I I I ( APPLICANT: Rush N. Hill 0 OWNER: Al and Margaret Forgit,lNewport Beach In response to a question by Commis loner Thomas, Mr. Hewicker indicated that he co,ulo not explain the discrepancy in the Staff Reportl regarding the number of parking spaces that would be required under current standards. The public hearing was opened rega and Rush Hill, 220 Newport Center plican.t, appeared before the Commi noted that while the existing use conforming as to its parking, the would be reduced with a proposed c 625 sq.ft. to a courtyard. Mr. Hewicker then added that since was acutally reducing.the amount o on the building, even though there as to the existing square footage, it would have a bearing on the Pla sion's decision. He explained tha - 11 - ing this item ive, the ap- ion. Mr. Hill s legal non - nconformity version.of he applicant square footage s a question e didn't feel ing Commis, - the parking INDEX ESUB- COMMISSIONERS 3 m Al July 24, 1980 ity of Newport Beach MINUTES requirements for office use would a�tually be less than for commercial uses, which are based on a gross square footage, including storage space, utility space, etc. i In response to Chairman Haidinger, kr. Hill state that the .square footage figure given in the Staff Report is correct, and that he has po problems with the findings and conditions inithe Staff Report. Motion x Motion was made to approve Resubdiv�sion No. 662 Ayes x x x Ix with the findings and subject to th conditions Noes x as set forth under Exhibit A of thetStaff Report, Absent Jas MOTION CARRIED. I Commissioner Allen returned to the Pias (see comment under Additional Business).; Request to permit the temporary use of property in the P -C District for boat and ma ine products, sales, and the acceptance of.an Env'ronmental Document. LOCATION: A portion of Block 54 pf the Irvine Subdivision located at; 300 East Coast Highway on the northwe terly corner of Bayside Drive, westerly of the Newport Dunes Area. ZONE: P -C APPLICANT: Spoiler Yachts, Incorpprated OWNER: The Irvine Company; Log -term Lease held by De Anza Baysido, Newport Beach The public hearing was opened regarding this item and Dale Anderson, 2081 Golden Eye, Costa Mesa, representing the applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Anderson indicated that 12 _ INDEX PERMIT COMMISSIONERS ROLL July 24, 1980 Nn r r'. he had read the Staff Report and co the findings and conditions for app addition, he explained that they wo placing any boats and that the boat formerly located on this site had b another area of the surrounding sto Commissioner Allen expressed her ca movement of .large boats on trailers with normal traffic using the Coast Anderson assured the Commission tha of boats which could create a trafi would be done at night, in accordan sioner Allen's suggestion. He also that they cannot move the boats dur fic hours, as they are restricted i State highway during those hours. they have installed two gates on ,th i tate movement both on and off the In response to Commissioner Beek's • cerning people visiting his facilil son assured.the Commission that th€ easy access for customers. Replyir Haidinger's question concerning sec Anderson said they have installed c barbed -wire fencing to protect agai MINUTES. curred with oval. In Id not be dis that were en moved to age yard. cern that the would confiicl Highway,. Mr. the movement c problem e with Commis- explained ng peak traf- om using any e also stated lot to facil• ot. uestion con- , Mr. Ander- e would be to Chairman rity,.Mr. ainlink and st theft. Planning Director Hewicker noted that Condition No. 5 in the Staff Report would require the re moval of any nonconforming signs onf the property. Mr. Richard Naylor, 300 East Coast resident of De Anza Bayside Villag€ park containing 291 residents, app€ the Commission. Mr. Naylor denied claim of very little traffic on Bay cause of existing restaurant, marir tial traffic. He explained that dt ent bridge construction, approximal of the storage anal parking areas fc ramp have been lost, and as a resul using the launch facilities park th and trailers on Bayside Drive. Du€ ation and the normal everyday trafi ®1111111■ - 13 - ighway, a a mobilehome red before he applicant's ide Drive be- and residen- to the pres- ly one -half the launch persons it vehicles to this situ- c, it was felt INDEX COMMISSIONERS tzs x 7 N 7C N July 24, 1980 MINUTES i City Of Newport Beach INDEX the Spoiler Yacht facility will conitribute more traffic; creating an intolerable situation. He also voiced his concern that this mlkaiy be a public hearing after the fact in. that the .applicant has already occupied the property and hps posted notice at his former location of the move to 300 East Coast Highway. In response to a question by Commissioner Beek concerning the parking .problem, Mr. Naylor indi- cated the heavy launch ramp operation and associ- ated traffic would create a physical impossibility for customers of Spoiler Yachts to have easy access to. their sales office, thus (further in- creasing the problem. In response to statements by Mr. Naylor, Mr. An- derson stated that he was also an owner at De Anza Bayside.Village with'a double -wide mobile home, and he concurred that parking problems did exist on the highway, especially since the start • of construction on the new bridge. He further explained when the launch ramp is full, a sign indicating that the ramp is closed is posted, which stops fur.ther traffic. He agreed that on . weekends, people do park on Bayside Drive, which is legal parking in the designated area. He said it was necessary for customers to come to their, office at the water's edge because the gate on the driveway to the launch ramp is a locked gate, not an open access area. During the summer, he indicated that their average three to four cus- tomers a day would not create a. traffic jam. Motion x Motion was made to approve Use Permit No. 1943 with the findings and subject to the conditions of approval as set forth under Exhibit A of th,e Staff Report. Commissioner Allen requested that a condition be added which would require any boatlmovement ob- s.tructing traffic to be done at night. In re- sponse to Commissioner Allen, Assistant City Engineer Webb suggested wording to prohibit move -. ment of boats onto the lot which would block traffic on Coast Highway during the peak traffic • times. Planning Director Hewicker indicated the - 14 - 0 0 July 24, 1980 1 City of Newport Beach Staff would come up with a conditio suggested that the Commission may w sider placing a time limit on the U after which it would either be revi Modifications Committee or the Plan In response to Chairman Haidinger, stated that this would be a tempora site and that within eighteen month Bayside,Village would be contacting plans for the redevelopment of the Responding to Commissioner McLaughl regarding barbed -wire fencing along Mr. Anderson explained that the cha barbed -wire fencing had existed pre the lot and Coast Highway for secur and the fencing he had installed wa area only. Commissioner Beek then voiced his :s motion despite his concerns about p suggested the.park residents contac Traffic Affairs Committee concernin on overnight parking. Mr. Frank Edwards, a resident of De Village, representing 290 residents fore the Commission and asked the q you issue a business license, does only a particular piece of ground, encompass City streets ?" The reaso he explained, is that when you laun cost is $4.00, which covers both th parking fee, and since the Vehicles parked on Bayside Drive, he wanted City collects the revenue. MINUTES He also sh to con= e Permit, wed by the ing Commissio Ir. Hewicker y use of the , De Anza the City with rea. n's concern Coast Highway nlink and iously betweei ty purposes, in the inner port of the king. He the City's a prohibitio Anza Bayside appeared.be- estion, "When hat encompass r does. it for asking, h a boat, the launch and are being o know if the Commissioner Allen suggested that the wording of the condition concerning the moveme t of boats on the Coast Highway include both delivery and re- moval. It was also suggested that uch movements be limited to the hours between 3:0 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. Commissioner Allen also expressed h r concern with the parking problem; however, Ishe indicated that she thought it was more related to the boat - 15 - INDEX Ayes Noes E • COMMISSIONERS 7 N W 3 July 24, 1980 W • MINUTES.. launching facility than the applicaht -s r equest. She also encouraged the residents tb contact the Traffic Affairs Committee regardin,g1the parking of boat trailers on City streets. Commissioner Balalis expressed his •oncern re- garding the noise from the diesel a gines on the truck trailers if boat movements were limited to the early morning hours. Commissioner Haidinger suggested that the condi- tion be worded to require that no b ats be brought .in that would block traffic on the oast Highway. x x x x x x The motion was then voted on, whichjMOTION CARRIE x including the following added condi3O ons: 11. That the delivery, removal or any other movement of boats eithe on, onto or from the site,shall b done in such a manner that the mov ment of traffic on the Coast, Highw y is not obstructed. I 12. That this approval shall exte�d for a period of two years with,an re- quest for an extension to be eviewed and acted upon by the Modifications Committee. Request to permit the construction two -story office building located i Mile Specific Plan Area. LOCATION: A portion of Lot B, Tr located at 2436 West C east of Tustin Avenue Mile. . INDEX f 3,986 sq.ft.lItem #6 the Mariners' SITE PL ct No. 919, NO. ast Highway, n Mariners' APP ZONE: SP -5; Mariners' Mile APPLICANT: Jay.Evarts OWNER: Gil Forrester, Waterfr nt Homes M[i= July 24, 1980 x Citv of Newport Beach MINUTES ROLL CALL I I I I III I I I INDEX. The discussion was opened regarding this item and Mr. Jay Evarts, the applicant and project architect; appeared before the Planning Commis- sion and stated his concurrence wi h the condi- tions.as, set forth in the Staff Report. In response to a question by Commissioner Thomas, Mr. Hewicker explained that this site is differ -. ent than the recreation and marinelcommercial are of the Mariners' Mile Specific PlanlI in that it is designated for retail and service dommercial uses which permits retail sales by yacht� brokers, boats, marine supplies, etc., as well as offices for personal and professional services offered to the general public, commercial ecreation, hotels and motels and other uses which are, in. the opinion of the Planning Commisslion, of a similar nature. Motion x Motion was made to accept the Nega ive Declara- tion and to make the findings as s t forth under . Exhibit A of the Staff Report, and approve Site Plan Review No. 26 subject to the onditions as set forth under Exhibit A of the S aff Report. Commissioner Thomas indicated his .dpposi,tion to the motion based on his .previously expressed sentiment that office uses were being developed on every available site in the City. IAy.es M otion was then voted on, which MO1fION CARRIED. Noes lxlxlxl,,Ixl,,Ixl Request to consider an amendment tc Titles 19 and Item #7 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal ode as it pertains to the. mailing of public n.c variance, use permit, zoning, changE applications to occupants and resi erty within a prescribed distance of INITIATED BY: The City of Newport t,ices for and similar ents of prop- a property. Beach AMENDMENT, N0.:548 CONTINUED TO AUGUST 21,9 COMMISSIONERS s �i X n �p o L D M July 24, 1980 TI ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: MINUTES At.the request.of Commissioners Balalis and McLaughlin, the Staff was i.nstructod to investi- gate the display of the spas locat6d at 600 West Coast Highway and bring the Use Pe mit for the . Spa Makers back on the meeting of ugust 21, 1980 if they do not comply with the app oval granted by the Commission. i Commissioner Haidinger expressed his thanks to Commissioner Balalis on behalf of the entire Commission for his excellent work 4s Chairman during the past year. ! Commissioner Allen asked that a br of comment be placed in the record to the effect that she was • disappointed when she excused hers if because of a conflict on Item #3, that she wa not notified when the item had been voted on, and did, in fact miss the next item's presentation Item #4. Commissioner Balalis noted that th conference room does have a speaker system. ADJOURNMENT: There.being no further business, t e Planning Commission adjourned at 10:57 p.m. to a Joint Meeting with the City Council on J ly 28, 1980. George Co Planning City of N s, Secretary mmission port Beach INDEX. DJOURN- M