HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/04/1977COMMISSIONERS
of Newport Beach
ar Planning Commission Meeting
• t+ Place: City Council Chambers
f� Time: 7:00 P.M.
°a Date: August 4, 1977
MOLL CALL
Present
X
X
X
X
X
X
Absent
X
EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS
R. V. Hogan, Community Development Director
Hugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney
Kenneth Perry, Assistant City Engineer
STAFF MEMBERS
James D. Hewicker, Assistant Director - Planning
Shirley Harbeck, Secretary
Motion
X
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 21, 1977,
s
X
X
X
X
were approved as written.
� tain
X
Absent
X
X
ELECTION OF'OFFICERS
Motion
X
Motion was made that Jacqueline Heather be
nominated for the office of Chairman.
Motion
X
Motion was made that nominations be closed.
Ayes
X
X
X
'X
X
Jacqueline Heather was elected to the office of
Abstain
X
Chairman.
Absent
X
Motion
X
Motion was made that William Frederickson be
nominated for the office of.lst Vice Chairman.
Motion
X
Motion was made that nominations be closed.
Ayes.
X
X
X
X
X
X
William Frederickson was elected to the office o
Absent
X
1st Vice Chairman.
Motion
X
Motion was made that George Cokas be nominated .
for the office of 2nd Vice Chairman.
Motion
Motion was made that nominations be closed.
Page 1.
MINUTES
INOU[
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
Auaiict 4
NOLL CALL
Ayes
Abstain
Absent
Motion
Motion
Ayes
Abstain
Absent
1977
MINUTES
. •
INORX
kas was elected to the office of 2nd Vice
s made that Paul Balalis be nominated for
of Secretary.
s made that nominations be closed.
lis was elected to the office of Secretary
ier Lynch stepped down from the dais and
from deliberation on Items #1 and #2 due
ible conflict of interest.
)nd #2 were heard concurrently because of
itionship.
Item #1
create one parcel of land for single
;idential development
A portion of
X
Irvine's
X
X
X
X
George Co
Drive, on the
northerly
X
C NDI-
Surrey Drive.,
northerly
of Cameo
Chairman.
X
X
Motion wa
the offic
X
Motion wa
X
X
X
X
X
Paul Bala
x
x
Commissio
refrained
to a poss
Items #1
their rel
Request t
family re
Location:
Zones:
Applicant
Owner:
Engineer:
1977
MINUTES
. •
INORX
kas was elected to the office of 2nd Vice
s made that Paul Balalis be nominated for
of Secretary.
s made that nominations be closed.
lis was elected to the office of Secretary
ier Lynch stepped down from the dais and
from deliberation on Items #1 and #2 due
ible conflict of interest.
)nd #2 were heard concurrently because of
itionship.
Item #1
create one parcel of land for single
;idential development
A portion of
Block 95 of
Irvine's
Subdivision,
located at
4700 Surrey
APPROVED
Drive, on the
northerly
side of
I—TIUWLY
C NDI-
Surrey Drive.,
northerly
of Cameo
Highlands Drive in Cameo Highlands.
R -1 -B (City of Newport Beach);
A -1 (Unincorporated Territory of
Orange County)
Robert H. Shelton, Newport Beach
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach •
Page 2.
COMMISSIONERS
9 P 1 2 < city
1
• � �s�°t ( August
of Newport Beach
4, 1977
POLL CALL
Request to prezone Unincorporated Territory of
Orange County on the northerly side of Surrey Dri
in Cameo Highlands to the R -1 -B District.
Location: A portion of Block 95 of Irvine's
Subdivision, located at 4700 Surrey
Drive, on the northerly side of
Surrey Drive, northerly of Cameo
Highlands Drive in Cameo Highlands.
Zone: A -1 (in the Unincorporated Territc
of Orange County).
Applicant: Robert H. Shelton,. Newport Beach
Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
The continued public hearings were opened in
•
connection with these two items.
Robert Shelton, 4600 Dorchester Road, appeared
before the Commission and requested the opportuni
to comment or answer questions after others have
had an opportunity to speak.
John Wills, Vice President of the Community
Association for Cameo Highlands /Cameo Shores,
appeared before the Commission and advised they
had met and that the Board of Directors generally
approved the resubdivision and rezoning and .
encouraged Mr. Shelton to join the Association
in order that the architectural features.of the
development could be reviewed by the community
association.
There being no others desiring.to appear and be
heard, the public hearings were closed.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission make th
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
following findings:
Ahse n t
X
X
1. That the proposed map is consistent with
applicable general and specific plans.
2. That the design or improvement of the propos
subdivision is consistent with applicable
general.and specific plans.
Page 3.
MINUTES
INOax,
Item #2
AMENDMENT..
veN3.498
APPROVED
,ri
!d
R -555
COMMISSIONERS
City Of Newport Beach MINUTES
Auqust 4, 1977
/TOLL CALL
3. That.the site is physically suitable for the
type of development proposed, pending possibl
removal and replacement with compacted fill
prior to development.
4. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed density of development.
5. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements will not cause substanl
environmental damage or substantially and avc
ably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat
6. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
7. That the design of the subdivision or the pre
posed improvements will not conflict with and
easements, acquired by the public at large,
for access through or use of, property withil
the proposed subdivision.
8. That the discharge of waste from the proposes
subdivision will not result in or add any
violation of existing requirements prescribes
by a California Regional Water Quality Contra
Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing witl
Section 1300) of the Water Code.
9. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
and approve Resubdivision No. 555, subject to th
following conditions:
1. That the approval of this resubdivision be
contingent upon the annexation to the City o'
Newport Beach of the portion of the parcel
presently outside the city boundary.
2. That a parcel map be filed.
3. That all improvements be constructed as requ
ed by Ordinance and the Public Works Departmi
4. That the curb and gutter and sidewalk be
constructed along the Surrey Drive frontage.
5. That a water capital improvement fee of $900
per acre be paid prior to recordation of the
parcel map.
Page 4.
e
:i
�i
r
i
A
I
1r.
?n
INDiX
F-1
L
0
COMMISSIONERS
City of. Newport Beach
Aunuct 4. 1977
NOLL CALL
6. That a standard subdivision agreement and
security be provided to guarantee satisfactor
completion of the public improvements if it 1
desired to record the parcel map before the
improvements are constructed (parcel map muss
be recorded prior to obtaining a building
permit).
7. That a minimum 15 foot front yard setback shi
be observed along the Surrey Drive frontage
of the site and said setback shall be reflect
on Districting Map.No. 33.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission recommel
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
to the City .Council the approval of Amendment No,
Absent
X
X
498.
Request to accept an offsite parking agreement fl
the required parking spaces in conjunction with
expansion of an existing commercial building in
Corona del Mar.
Location: Lot 3, Block X, Tract No. 323 (i.e
building site) located at 3331 and
3337 East Coast Highway, on the
southerly side of East Coast Highw-
between. Marguerite Avenue and Mari
gold Avenue in Corona del Mar; Lot!
29 and 31, Block 239, Corona del M
(i.e. offsite parking lot) located
at 329 and 331 Marigold Avenue, on
the northwesterly side of Marigold
Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
Zones: C -1 and R -1
Applicant: Julius V. Evans, Corona del Mar
•
Owner: Same as Applicant
Discussion was opened in connection with this
matter and Julius Evans, 4709 Seashore, appeared
before the Commission and concurred with the sta
report and recommendations. He answered questio
Page 5.
MINUTES
y
s
11
0
it
:he
ly
Ir
Ff
1s
INOKX
A -498
Item #3
OFFSITE
PR G
9KnXNT
APPROVED
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
Aum,c+ A 1077
MOLL CALL
of the Commission and advised that the marked nam
spaces would probably remain, that the Goodwill
has promised to remove the collection box from th
premises, and that landscaping would be installed
There being no others desiring to appear and be,
heard, the public discussion was closed.
Following discussion of various parking lot stand
ards, and especially those pertaining to walls an
Motion
X
wheel stops, Planning Commission made the followi
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
findings:
Absent
X
1. The offsite parking area is directly across a
alley from the subject commercial site, and
therefore, is so located to be useful to the
proposed development.
2. The offsite parking spaces will not create
undue traffic hazards in the surrounding area
In fact, the proposed parking layout of the
subject parking lot will create better vehicul
maneuverability and automobile storage than n
exists.
3: The commercial site and the offsite parking 1
are in the same ownership.
4. The City Traffic Engineer has no objections
with the offsite parking arrangement.
and approved the offsite parking agreement, subje
to the following conditions:
1. That an offsite parking agreement shall be
approved by the City Council, guaranteeing
that a minimum of 15 parking spaces shall be
provided on Lots 29 and 31, Block 239, Corona
del Mar, for the duration of the proposed
expanded commercial building located at 3331
and 3337 East Coast Highway.
2. That the offsite parking lot shall be improve
with wheel stops and marked with approved
traffic markers or painted white lines not
less than 4 inches wide in accordance with th
approved parking layout.
3. That signs be provided on the rear of the pro
posed expanded commercial building indicating
Page 6.
MINUTES
•
INOKX
e
e
d
ng
n
•
ar
ow
of
17
el •
COMMISSIONERS
2 l c
2
MOLL CALL
n
LJ
•
City of Newport Beach
Au ust 4, 1977
MINUTES
)llowing statement. "No Parking - Loadinj
)nly."
I solid masonry wall with a rounded
?te cap shall be installed pursuant to
)n 20.30.045 B of the Newport Beach
!pal Code.
)create two parcels of land for single
>idential development where a portion of
)w exists.
Portion of Lot 28, Newport Heights,
located at 647 Irvine Avenue, on. the
northwesterly side.of Irvine Avenue
between Margaret Drive and Holly
Lane in Newport Heights.
R -1
Robert F. McGiffin, Newport Beach.
Same as Applicant
Tri- Engineering Service, Santa Ana
aring was opened in connection with this
ngler, architect, appeared before the
n on behalf of the applicant and concurs
staff report. He emphasized several
tlined in the staff report and felt this
as reasonable in view of the fact that
cant has been turned down on previous
to develop the property.
ner Balalis suggested splitting the
in the opposite direction with an access
to the rear parcel over the front parcel
ess easement could also be used as a
iveway for the two parcels.
Commission discussed this configuration
Spangler and Mrs. McGiffin and they
this would be an adequate solution.
Page 7.
INOKX
Item #4
RESUB-
b=ON
W. 556
APPROVED
MAbr---
Tr LY
TT—
REVISED
the fi
Zone I
4. That
concr
Secti
Munic
Request t
family re
one lot n
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner:
Engineer:
Public he
matter.
Frank Spa
Commissio
with the
points ou
request w
the appli
attempts
Commissio
property
easement,
which acc
common dr
Planning
with Mr.
concurred
MINUTES
)llowing statement. "No Parking - Loadinj
)nly."
I solid masonry wall with a rounded
?te cap shall be installed pursuant to
)n 20.30.045 B of the Newport Beach
!pal Code.
)create two parcels of land for single
>idential development where a portion of
)w exists.
Portion of Lot 28, Newport Heights,
located at 647 Irvine Avenue, on. the
northwesterly side.of Irvine Avenue
between Margaret Drive and Holly
Lane in Newport Heights.
R -1
Robert F. McGiffin, Newport Beach.
Same as Applicant
Tri- Engineering Service, Santa Ana
aring was opened in connection with this
ngler, architect, appeared before the
n on behalf of the applicant and concurs
staff report. He emphasized several
tlined in the staff report and felt this
as reasonable in view of the fact that
cant has been turned down on previous
to develop the property.
ner Balalis suggested splitting the
in the opposite direction with an access
to the rear parcel over the front parcel
ess easement could also be used as a
iveway for the two parcels.
Commission discussed this configuration
Spangler and Mrs. McGiffin and they
this would be an adequate solution.
Page 7.
INOKX
Item #4
RESUB-
b=ON
W. 556
APPROVED
MAbr---
Tr LY
TT—
REVISED
COMMISSIONERS
City Of Newport Beach MINUTES
� yr 7� i�,A 1� �� OS •
rp i��•A C
August 4, 1977
MOLL CALL
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Motion
X
Following discussion, motion was made that Planni
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
Commission make the following findings:
Absent
X
1. That the proposed map is consistent with
applicable general and specific plans.
2. That the design or improvement of the propose
..subdivision is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
type of development proposed.
4. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed density of development.
5. That the design of the subdivision or the
Proposed improvements will not cause substan-
tial environmental damage or substantially ar
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat.
6. That the design of the subdivision or.the prc
posed improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
7. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements will not conflict with
any easements, acquired by the public at larc
for access through or use of, property withir
the proposed subdivision..
8. That the discharge of waste from the proposec
subdivision will not result in or add to any
violation of existing requirements prescribec
by a California Regional Water Quality Contrc
Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing wiV
Section 1300) of the Water Code.
9. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
major problems from a planning standpoint.
10. That there are special circumstances or
conditions affecting the property to wit:
(a) The site is located directly across the
street from the high school and any
Page 8.
D
INOEX
•
•
COMMISSIONERS
s s << City of Newport Beach
• � � }$ti f August 4. 1977
MOLL CALL
development of the site will be affectec
by normal school activities including
noise and automobile and pedestrian
traffic.
(b) The development of a large single famil3
dwelling on the site .does not appear to
be economically feasible at this time as
evidenced by information furnished by ti
applicant.
11. That an exception is necessitated by the face
that existing lot length and lot area require
ments were adopted subsequent to the origina'
subdivision of the area when it was located ,
the unincorporated territory of Orange Count;
12. That if the exception were denied the petitic
would be deprived of a.substantial property
.
right enjoyed by others in the area..
13. That the granting of this exception is compa
ible with the objectives of the regulations
governing light, air and the public health,
safety, convenience, and general welfare.
and approve Resubdivision No. 556 with the lot 1
being drawn part way between the front and rear
property line and parallel to Irvine Avenue in.s
a manner as to provide that the rear parcel shal
contain a minimum of 4,000 square feet, and that
20 foot easement be provided on one side of the.
property to accommodate a common driveway betweei
the two parcels, subject to the following
condition:
1. That a Parcel Map be filed.
Request to accept an offsite parking agreement f
a portion of the required parking spaces in con-
junction with the proposed Josh Slocum's Restaur
facility (formerly knwon as La Rendezvous Restau
rant).
Location: Portion of Lot H, Tract 919 (i.e.
building site), located at 2601 We
Page 9.
MINUTES
le
I_
n
f.
Ine
Ine
Ach
I.
a
I
Dr
ani
s
INOUX
Item #5
OFFSITE
PGR� IMT
APPROVED I
C
TMWLY
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
August 4, 1977
MOLL CALL
Coast Highway, on the southerly sic
of West Coast Highway across from
Tustin Avenue on Mariner's Mile;
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 73 -22 (Resut
division No. 487) (i.e. offsite
parking lot), located on the south-
easterly corner of Avon Street and
Tustin Avenue in the Mariner's MilE
Square complex.
Zone: Specific Area Plan No. 5
Applicant: Joseph A. Minney, Newport Beach
Owner: Minney Family Enterprises, Inc.,
Newport Beach
Discussion was opened in.connection with this
matter and Joseph Minney, 601 Cliff Drive, appeat
before the Commission and concurred with the stal
report and recommendations. However, he requestE
that the restaurant be allowed to open at 4:30 P.
instead of 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday. Plar
ning Commission discussed the hours of operation
for'Saturday.and Sunday and it was suggested that
8:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. be permitted. Mr. Minney
reviewed the plans and elevations with the Plannl
Commission.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public discussion was closed.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission make thl
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
following findings:
Absent
X
1. The offsite parking lot is approximately 350
feet from the restaurant site and is so
located to be useful to the restaurant facill
2. The offsite parking spaces will hot create
undue traffic hazards in the surrounding arei
3. That a minimum 5 year lease agreement for the
offsite parking spaces will be approved by
the property owner after a one year trial
period if no problems occur. The existing
offsite parking agreement is on an annual
basis only.
4. The Police Department has indicated that the3
Page.10.
MINUTES, I
•
e
,ea
'f
A
M.
I-
n q
ty
INDIM
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
y Aunuct 4. 1977
MOLL. CALL
do not contemplate any problems with the
offsite parking lot.
and approve the offsite parking agreement, subjec
to the following conditions:
1. That the operation of the restaurant shall be
limited to the hours of 4:30 P.M. thru 2:00 F
Monday through Friday and from 8:00 A.M. thri
2:00 A.M., on Saturday and Sunday provided V
applicant can obtain.an amended lease agreeme
These hours may be adjusted by the Planning
Commission provided satisfactory parking can
be provided in another location.
2. That an offsite parking agreement shall be
approved by the City Council, guaranteeing tt
a minimum .of 26 parking.spaces shall be pro-
vided at the rear of Mariners Mile Square on
•
.Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 73 -23 during all hours
the facility..
of operation of restaurant
3. That a valet service shall be provided on thl
restaurant site during all hours of operat.iol
4. That a diagram shall be provided at the entrl
of the restaurant complex showing the locatis
of the offsite parking spaces for the benefi,
of the customers.
5. That 16 parking spaces shall be maintained of
the restaurant site in accordance with the
aprpoved parking layout. Said parking space:
shall be marked with approved traffic marker+
or painted white lines not less than 4 inches
wide. Wheel stops shall be provided adjacen
to the westerly side property line so as to
keep-parked automobiles from damaging the
existing fence between the subject property
the adjoining Ancient Mariner Restaurant si.ti
6. That the parking arrangement be subject to
review by the Modifications Committee one ye
after approval of the offsite parking agreem,
by the City Council.
Page 11.
MINUTES
t
e
!n
iat
I.
Inc
In
I
,
s
t
snd
a
it
?nt
INORX
COMMISSIONERS
9�M bC lt4j, �,AM 19 y`'i(1
POLL CALL
City of Newport Beach MINUTES
0
August 4, 1977
#7, and #8 were:heard concurrently
their relationship.
I amend a portion of Districting Map No-9
•2 District to an R -3 District.
Lots 3 through 7. Block 219, Section
A, Newport Beach, located at 207 -209
211 -213 and 215 19th Street, on the
westerly side of 19th Street between
West Balboa Boulevard and West Bay
Avenue on the Balboa Peninsula.
1AWA
Jerry Shoffner Co., Newport Beach
Plou, Huntsman, Plou Estate, and
Schutshick, Anaheim
i permit the construction of a seven unit
11 condominium project that exceeds the
nit in the 24/28 Foot Height Limitation..
A portion of the proposed development.
)aches to within 7 feet of the rear
line (where the Ordinance requires a 10.
yard). In addition, a 16 foot t separa-
!en the two proposed residential buildings
:e is proposed (where the Ordinance
:hat inner courts providing access to
i dwelling groups shall be a minimum 20
E.
Lots 3 through 7, Block.219, Section
A, Newport Beach, located at 207 -209•
211 -213 and 215 19th Street, on the
westerly side of 19th Street between
West Balboa Boulevard and West Bay
Avenue on the Balboa Peninsula.
FEVA
Jerry Shoffner Co., Newport Beach
Page 12.
INCILX
Item #6
AMENDMENT
NT7U9—
APPROVED
Item #7
APPROVED
CMffr_—
TMWLLY
Items #6,
because o'
Request ti
from an R.
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owners:
Request t
residenti
height lii
District.
also encr,
property
foot rear
ti on betw
on the si
requires
double roi
feet wide
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
#7, and #8 were:heard concurrently
their relationship.
I amend a portion of Districting Map No-9
•2 District to an R -3 District.
Lots 3 through 7. Block 219, Section
A, Newport Beach, located at 207 -209
211 -213 and 215 19th Street, on the
westerly side of 19th Street between
West Balboa Boulevard and West Bay
Avenue on the Balboa Peninsula.
1AWA
Jerry Shoffner Co., Newport Beach
Plou, Huntsman, Plou Estate, and
Schutshick, Anaheim
i permit the construction of a seven unit
11 condominium project that exceeds the
nit in the 24/28 Foot Height Limitation..
A portion of the proposed development.
)aches to within 7 feet of the rear
line (where the Ordinance requires a 10.
yard). In addition, a 16 foot t separa-
!en the two proposed residential buildings
:e is proposed (where the Ordinance
:hat inner courts providing access to
i dwelling groups shall be a minimum 20
E.
Lots 3 through 7, Block.219, Section
A, Newport Beach, located at 207 -209•
211 -213 and 215 19th Street, on the
westerly side of 19th Street between
West Balboa Boulevard and West Bay
Avenue on the Balboa Peninsula.
FEVA
Jerry Shoffner Co., Newport Beach
Page 12.
INCILX
Item #6
AMENDMENT
NT7U9—
APPROVED
Item #7
APPROVED
CMffr_—
TMWLLY
COMMISSIONERS
s s City
• � t,��D� ( August
MOLL CALL
•
of Newport Beach
4, 1977
Plou, Huntsman, Plou Estate, and
Schutshick, Anaheim
establish one lot where five lots now
as to permit the construction of a seven
dential condominium project on the pro-
MINUTES
Lots 3 through 7, Block 219, Section
A, Newport Beach, located at 207 -209-
211 -213 and 215 19th Street, on the
westerly side of 19th Street.between
West Balboa Boulevard and West Bay
Avenue on the Balboa Peninsula.
R -2
Jerry Shoffner Co., Newport Beach
Plou, Huntsman, Plou Estate, and
Schutshick, Anaheim
Same as Applicant
ised that the new requirements for park
n.would be applicabl.e to this development
mended the addition of a condition to
the tentative map, to provide that the
r shall pay a fee for park and recreation
es as prescribed pursuant to Chapter 19.5
wport Beach Municipal Code.
arings were opened in connection with
lopment.
214 North Grand Avenue, Anaheim, appeared
e Commission and concurred with the staff
nd recommendations. He commented on the
nt and the favorable response which has
ived from the neighbors.
n, 213 20th Street, appeared before the
n in opposition to the development as he
ould add to the density and congestion of
Page 13.
INOWX
1104
Y
Owners:
Request t
exist so
unit resi
perty.
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owners:
Engineer:
Staff adv
dedicatio
and recom
Item #8,
subdivide
al purpos
of the Ne
Public he
this deve
Jim Plou,
before th
reports a
developme
been rece
Bob Rubie
Commissio
felt it w
Plou, Huntsman, Plou Estate, and
Schutshick, Anaheim
establish one lot where five lots now
as to permit the construction of a seven
dential condominium project on the pro-
MINUTES
Lots 3 through 7, Block 219, Section
A, Newport Beach, located at 207 -209-
211 -213 and 215 19th Street, on the
westerly side of 19th Street.between
West Balboa Boulevard and West Bay
Avenue on the Balboa Peninsula.
R -2
Jerry Shoffner Co., Newport Beach
Plou, Huntsman, Plou Estate, and
Schutshick, Anaheim
Same as Applicant
ised that the new requirements for park
n.would be applicabl.e to this development
mended the addition of a condition to
the tentative map, to provide that the
r shall pay a fee for park and recreation
es as prescribed pursuant to Chapter 19.5
wport Beach Municipal Code.
arings were opened in connection with
lopment.
214 North Grand Avenue, Anaheim, appeared
e Commission and concurred with the staff
nd recommendations. He commented on the
nt and the favorable response which has
ived from the neighbors.
n, 213 20th Street, appeared before the
n in opposition to the development as he
ould add to the density and congestion of
Page 13.
INOWX
1104
Y
COMMISSIONERS
1\&0 Clty
� Auauct
of Newport Beach
a_ 1077
MOLL. CALL
the area. He also opposed the height and setback
of the proposed development.
Staff pointed out that the development would
actually reduce the number of permitted units,
thereby reducing the intensity and traffic
congestion. .
Jim.Plou appeared before the Commission and advis
that the only portion of the building . which woulc
encroach into the height limit was a..stairway roc
and the encroachment into the setback consisted c
an open stairway.
Barbara Bolton, 208 20th Street, appeared before.
the Commission in opposition to the height and
setback encroachments.
Jim Huntsman, 709 Wasco, Anaheim, one of the pro-
perty owners, appeared before the Commission and
felt that the proposed development would be a
great.improvement both as to appearance and park!
over that which presently exists.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearings were.closed.
Commissioner Balalis commended the applicant on
the proposed development and felt there must be
some confusion on the part of those opposed to ti
project since the number of units were..actually
reduced by three over that which could presently
be constructed. He also commented on the height
and setback encroachments which he felt were min(
in nature.
Motion
X
Planning Commission recommended to the City
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
Council that Amendment No. 499 be approved and
Absent
X
that a front yard setback of 5 feet be reflected
on Districting Map No. 9.
Motion
X
Planning Commission made the following findings:
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
Absent
X
1. That the proposed use is consistent with the
Land Use Element of the General Plan and is
compatible with surrounding land uses.
Page 14.
.MINUTES
•
INO1<X
s
e�
I
If
f
R
le
Ir
n
L
A -499
UP -0351
COMMISSIONERS
City.
• ��� Auacut
of Newport Beach
§A LMvzl
MOLL CALL
2. The project will not.have any significant
environmental impact.
3. The proposed development will result in more
public visual open space, since a landscape
corridor is being provided in the middle of
the site between two buildings where no space
is required. Furthermore, open space in exce
of Ordinance requirements are proposed along
the front and side yards of the property.
4. The proposed flat roofs over the stairwells
adjacent to pitched roofs over the main port!
of the structures will result in a more
desirable architectural treatment of the
building and a stronger and more appealing
visual character of the area than is require(
by the basic height limit.
•
5. The increased building height of the propose(
development will not result in undesirable of
abrupt scale relationships between the struc-
tures and the existing two and three story
residential buildings located on 19th Street.
6. The structure will have much less floor area
than could have been achieved without the
use permit.
7. That the establishment, maintenance or opera•
tion of the use of the property or building
will not, under the circumstances of the parm
titular case, be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, comfort and general welfare o,
persons residing or working in the neighbor-
hood o.f such proposed use or be detri.mental
injurious to property and improvements in thl
neighborhood or the general welfare of the C-
and further that the modification required f(
the separation between buildings and the pro•
posed rear yard encroachment is consistent
with the legislative intent of Title 20 of
this Code.
8.: The approval of Use Permit No. 1835 will not
•
under the circumstances of this case be detr•
mental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons.
residing and working in the neighborhood or
be detrimental or injurious to property or
Page 15.
MINUTES
ass
ion
r
it
INORX
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach MINUTES
QFE`� ;1
�1 Aunuct d_ 1Q77
NOLL CALL
.
improvements in the neighborhood or the
general welfare of the City.
and approved Use Permit No. 1835, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That development shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved plot plan and
elevations.
2. That there shall be submitted a declaration c
covenants, conditions and restrictions settir
forth an enforceable method of insuring the
installation and continued maintenance of the
exterior of both buildings and all common are
improvements including, but not limited to
landscaping, ingress, egress, utility facil=
ities, and parking acceptable to the Departme
of Community Development, and in respect to
legal enforceability, the City Attorney.
3. That the Ordinance requirement for the minimu
number of offstreet parking spaces shall be
maintained on the property at all times: .Twc
accessible garage spaces shall also be main-
tained for each dwelling unit on the site.
4. That the proposed stairway that encroaches it
the required rear yard shall be of open wood
or wrought iron construction.
5. That the existing unused driveway approaches
be closed up.
6. That all applicable conditions of approval of
Tentative Map Tract No. 10017 be completed.
7. That Amendment No. 499 shall be adopted prior
to development on the property in question.
Motion
X
Planning Commission made the following findings:
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
Absent
X
1. That the proposed map is consistent with appl
cable general and specific plans.
2. That the design or improvement of the propose
subdivision is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans.
Page 16.
0
INCIRX
f
9
a
nt
In
tol
TT -10017
d
COMMISSIONERS
vc�� 9( ooh pos9A ��t i
City of Newport Beach
A- ..,+ A 1077
aoLL. GAIL
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
type of development proposed.
4. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed density of development when the-pro-
perty is rezoned to the R -3 District.
5. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements will not cause substan•
tial environmental damage or substantially ai
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat.
6. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements are not likely to caus.l
serious public health problems.
7. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements will not conflict with
any easements, acquired by the public at lar,
•
for access through or use of, property withii
the proposed subdivision.
8. That the discharge of waste from the propose,
subdivision will not result in or add to any
violation of existing requirements prescribe
by a California Regional Water Quality Contr
Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing wit'
Section 1300) of the Water Code.
9. That the proposed subdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
and approved Tentative Map Tract No. 10017, subj
to the following conditions:
1. That a Final Tract Map be filed.
2. That all improvements be constructed as
required by ordinance and the Public Works
Department.
3. That all of the conditions of approval for U
Permit No. 1835 be fulfilled.
•
4. That the public water and sewer lines be
extended so that each residential unit has a
individual water service and sewer lateral
connection to the public system.
Page 17.
MINUTES
M
le
I
i
11
I
se
n
=. -i > =s
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach
Auaust 4. 1977
MOLL CALL
5. That easements dedicated to the City be a
minimum of 15 feet in width.
6. That a standard subdivision agreement and
security be provided to guarantee satisfactor
completion of the public improvements if it 1
desired to record the tract map before the
improvements are constructed (tract map must
be recorded prior to obtaining building
permits).
7. That Amendment No. 499 shall be approved.
8. That the subdivider shall pay a fee for park
and recreational purposes as prescribed purse
to Chapter 19.50 of the Newport Beach Munich
Code.
Request to consider an amendment to Title 20 of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code pertaining to
parking requirements in the M -1 -A District.
Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach.
Public hearing was opened in connection with thi!
matter and there being no one desiring to appear
and be heard, the public hearing was closed.
Motion
X
Following discussion, motion was made that Plann,
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
Commission recommend to the City Council the
Absent
X
adoption of Amendment No. 497.
Request to consider and amendment to Title 15 an,
Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code as
they pertain to the recodification of existing
sign regulations.
Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach
Motion
Y
Planning Commission continued this matter to the
Ayes
X
Y
meeting of September 1, 1977, and directed the
Absent
staff to prepare a new ordinance to include the
Page 18.
MINUTES
•
\ INOWX
y
s
lan
>al
Item
AMENDMENT
N0 0
APPROVED
in
Item #10
i AMENDMENT
NO.. 493
CONT. TO
SEPT I
COMMISSIONERS
vc�mv< �o�sP�S9SL ��
City. of Newport Beach MINUTES
3 1
• � v � o�p Sm ;� 01 ..
S np p C
soZ August 4. 1977
POLL CALL
Motion
Ayes
Absent
Motion
Ayes
Absent
Motion
Ayes
Absent
the Newport Harbor Chamber of
k * *
ie City Council that the City
:ept and agree to the conditions
requested Categorical Exclusion
t. (Continued Discussion).
ie City of Newport Beach
continued this. matter to the
3, 1977.
k * *
rchitectural features in excess
ight limit. (Discussion)
rly 12.5 feet of Lot 17 and
18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24,
230 of Lancaster's Addition to
rt Beach, located at 2920
rt Boulevard, on the southeast
r of 30th Street and Newport
vard, in Cannery Village.
nd M -1
is M. Dalaney, Newport Beach
Mrs. Robert Reed, Newport Beacf
enneth Gabriel, Newport Beach
n, Planning Commission approved
open ornamental rail which will
tural character of the building.
* * *
adopted Resolution No. 994,
aring for September 1, 1977,
Plans for the Cannery
uare Specific Area Plan area.
Page 19.
INDtX
Item #11
recommendations of
Commerce. .
Recommendation to t
of Newport Beach ac
to which the City's
has been made subje
Initiated by: T
X
Planning Commission
X
X
X
X
X
X.
meeting of.August 1
X
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Request to permit a
of the permitted he
Location: Weste
Lots
Block
Newpo
Newpo
corne
Boule
Zone: C -1 a
Applicant: Franc
Owners: Mr. &
Mr. K
X
Following discussio
X
X
X
X
X
X
the request for an
X
add to the architec
X
Planning Commission
X
X
X
X
X
X
setting a public he
X
to consider Concept
Village /McFadden Sq
the Newport Harbor Chamber of
k * *
ie City Council that the City
:ept and agree to the conditions
requested Categorical Exclusion
t. (Continued Discussion).
ie City of Newport Beach
continued this. matter to the
3, 1977.
k * *
rchitectural features in excess
ight limit. (Discussion)
rly 12.5 feet of Lot 17 and
18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24,
230 of Lancaster's Addition to
rt Beach, located at 2920
rt Boulevard, on the southeast
r of 30th Street and Newport
vard, in Cannery Village.
nd M -1
is M. Dalaney, Newport Beach
Mrs. Robert Reed, Newport Beacf
enneth Gabriel, Newport Beach
n, Planning Commission approved
open ornamental rail which will
tural character of the building.
* * *
adopted Resolution No. 994,
aring for September 1, 1977,
Plans for the Cannery
uare Specific Area Plan area.
Page 19.
INDtX
Item #11
COMMISSIONERS
9c� �,c oo��p� y9 zc �L
F 09ip O�•p%S�p�f �S
City of Newport Beach
August 4. 1977
MOLL CALL
Commissioner Hummel requested a report from the
Department of Public Works relative to the closin
of.unused curb cuts along Coast Highway in Corona
del Mar.
There being no further business, Planning Commiss
adjourned the meeting. Time: 8:30 P.M.
PAUL L. BALALIS, Secretary
Planning Commission
City of Newport Beach
Page 20.
MINUTES
INOKX
0