The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08/09/1979Present Motion All Ayes 40 0 1MISSIONERS Regul.ar Planning Commission Meeting Place: City Council Chambers Time: 7:30 P.M. S Date: August 9, 1979 8 �'a IA 1 ;City of Newport Beach x txl . V. Hogan, Community Development Director ugh Coffin, Acting City Attorney ames Hewicker, Assistant Director- Planning obert Lenard, Advance Planning Administrator red Talarico, Environmental Coordinator nutes Written By: Glenna Gipe otion was made that Agenda Item ontinued to a special adjourned ion meeting on August 16,1979 equest to consider amending the elopment Standards for the R -1, ricts in Old Corona del Mar. MINUTES Numbers 7 -12 be Planning Commis - at 6:30.P.M. ResidentialDe -. R -2 and R -3 Dis- NITIATED BY: City of Newport Beach ommissioner Balalis explained the purpose of the egistration Slips and Richard Hogan, Community evelopment.Director, generally explained the na- ure of the proposal and the specific area to hich it referred. ommissioner Beek stated his understanding regard - ng the Open Space Option and the Parking. he Public Hearing was opened regarding this item nd Brion Jeannette, Architect,.introduced the ivic Association, a group of architects which hav dentified concerns, including:Bert Tarayao, Dick, odd, Ron Yao and himself. on Yao then appeared before the Planning Commis - ion and shared slides illustrating the fabric of he community. -1- Item #1 AMEND- MENT NO. 524 CONTIN- UED TO SEPTEM- BER 6, 1979 ED Motion All Ayes August 9, 1979 11 Beach ick Dodd then appeared before t ission and described his intere orona del Mar as a family type as maintained a high degree of ensity, expressing his feeling ize of the unit does not reduce itionally expressed his concern ayered and complicated regulati tatement relaying the fact that ions are 1.3, not 1.5. In conc ented slides showing the variet reated by the present Open Spac ents. MINUTES he Planning Com- st regarding Old community which character and low that reducing the density. He ad- regarding the ons, including a the new regula- fusion, he pre- y which can be e Option require- Bert;Tarayao appeared bef re.the Planning Com- mission to present an analysis of lot sizes;iex -'- pressing his concern that the proposed regula- tions do not provide for solar installations, Motion was made to allow Bert Tarayao 5 addition- al minutes in which to speak. Brion Jeannette then appeared before the Planning Commission to numerate various items which have not been considered: 1. Solar Energy.- Storage Facilities 2. Open Space - Leave as Part of Standards - Solution - Require Cubic Footage.Such as 64 Cubic Feet - 4x4x4 - Space for Deck on. Second Floor - Min- imum Horizontal Dimension of 6 Feet. 3.. Changes Should Result in Less Massing Instead of Square Footage 4. Corner Lots - 1.75 x Buildable, But 25% More Open Space 5. Lots South of Pacific Coast Highway 6. Parking 7. Presents Slides - Retain Second Floor Setback - Retain Open Space - Provide For Third Floor — Allow Space for Storage Without Being Penalized mmissioner Haidinger inquired whether Mr. Jean - tte was suggesting that the Planning Commission -2- 0 L� COMMISSIONERS August 9., 1979 � JZ , I: City of Newport Beach MINUTES should not make any changes now, but only consider his items as just proposed, to which Mr. Jeannette replied that they.are responding toward those resi dents of Corona del Mar, stating that the existing Ordinance works well, but does not provide the openness that can be accomplished by his proposals and yet give the architect flexibility. Commissioner.All.en stated her understanding that there was no difference between the proposed new . standards and existing standards relating to park= ing, to which Mr. Hogan replied in the affirmative The Planning Commission recessed at 9:00 P.M. and reconvened at 9:10 P.M. he following 31 persons appeared before the Plan- ing Commission and spoke in support of Amendment o. 524 or expressed their support in writing: rmstrong, Ma..roaret, 702 Jasmine, Corona del Mar shbaugh, Delle M., 2.208 Waterfront Drive, Corona del Mar urton, Mary E:, 2920 Ocean Blvd., Corona del Mar ettorf, Deane and Betty, 221 Larkspur, Corona del Mar onger, Robert L., 3033 Bayside, Corona del Ma.r urtin, Mary E., 254 Poppy Avenue, Corona del Mar uncan, Ann, 230 Larkspur, Corona del Mar uncan,.Ron, 230 Larkspur, Corona del Mar ckhardt, Elizabeth, 315 Poinsettia, Corona del Mar odard, Mrs. Coy, 513 Begonia, Corona del Mar utchinson, Ann, 604 Acacia, Corona del Mar eeler, John T.,'224 Jasmine, Corona del Mar eeler, Velma S., 224 Jasmine, Corona del Mar 'Brien, Velma, 243 Poppy, Corona del Mar und, E.C., 704 Orchid Avenue, Corona del Mar und, R., 704 Orchid Avenue, Corona del Mar elson, Alice, 308 Poinsettia, Corona del Mar atterson, Lucile S., 618 Begonia, Corona del Mar ower, Diane E., 210 Orchid Avenue, Corona del Mar omine, Larry, 223 Larkspur, Corona del Mar ollins, Ellen M., 223 Poinsettia Ave., Corona del Mar -3- CALL August 9, 1979 M] Beach MINUTES Rollins, Judith M., 223 Poinsettia Avenue, Corona del Mar Rosenberg, Pauline, 314 Orchid Avenue, Corona del Mar Schroeder, Ernest, 239.Heliotrope, Corona del Mar Shutt, Shirley, 515 Goldenrod, Corona del Mar Stover, Allan T., 2316 Pacific Drive, Corona del Mar Succa, Richard, 715 Marguerite Avenue, Corona del Mar Sunderland, Mrs. L.S., 711 Orchid Avenue, Corona del Mar Sunderland, L.S., 711 Orchid Avenue, Corona del Mar Taylor, Mary F., 512 Larkspur, Corona del Mar Taylor, William C., 512 Larkspur, Corona del Mar Trittipo, Mr. &_Mrs. John R., P.O. Box 1605, Rancho Santa Fe, Santa Fe, CA 92067 Brigham, Dan, 2007 Bayside, Corona del Mar The following 96 persons appeared before the Plan- ping Commission and spoke in opposition to Amend - ment No. 524 or expressed opposition.in writing: Aune, Barbara, 1800 Antigua, Newport Beach 'Bailey,.Nigel, 220 Jasmine, Corona del Mar Be.ttingen, John, 2308 Pacific Drive, Corona del Mar 'Blackler, Allan, 2930 Seaview Avenue, Corona del Mar 11 Blackler, Carlene, 2930 Seaview Avenue, Corona del Mar ;Bradley, H. A., 417 Dahlia, Corona del Mar Brenner, Clyda, 616 Marguerite Corona del Mar Brenner, Zaverio, 616 Marguerite, Corona del Mar Britvich,.Darwin, 300 Kings Place, Newport Beach !Britvich, Robbie, 300 Kings Place, Newport Beach Bynon, Douglas B., 705 Jasmine, Corona del Mar hambers, Alice J., 702 Larkspur, Corona del Mar onger, Shirley A., 30.33 Bayside Drive, Corona del Mar ampier, A. Gayle, 715 Heliotrope Avenue, Corona del Mar ampier, G.C., 715 Heliotrope, Corona del Mar' avies, James F., 272 Evening Canyon, Corona del Mar . avis; Mrs. A. R., 1971 Mesa Drive, Santa Ana eCrona, L.E., 307 Catalina, Newport Beach -4- 0 August 9., 1979 111 Devi, Helen, 408 Dodd, Dick, 201 Donnelly, Paul, Emery, Pamela L. Mar Everson, Kendall Beach Fauts, Virginia, Fisher, Valerie Forney, Richard del Mar Fracalosy, Carol Mar Fracalosy, Mar MINUTES • Goldenrod, Corona del Mar Shipyard Way, Newport Beach 333 Poppy Avenue, Corona del.Mar , 2616 Cove Street, Corona del . W., 909 Almond Places Newport 307 Poppy Avenue, Corona del Mar Gay, 400 Goldenrod, Corona del Mar D., 3320 Seaview Avenue, Corona 317 Poppy Avenue, Corona.del Leo J- .,.317 Poppy Avenue, Corona del aynor, Jeff, 200 Marguerite, Corona del Mar eer, H. W., 2530 Seaview., Corona del Mar Dldsmith, Betty, 6061 Jasmine Avenue, Corona del Mar oldsmith, H. 0.,. 6061 Jasmine Avenue, Corona del Mar ietbrink, Jane, 621 Larkspur, Corona del Mar eitbrink, J., 621 Larkspur, Corona del Mar ill, Jeremy C., 7171 Orchid, Corona del Mar ill, Marilyn L., 240 Heliotrope, Corona del Mar. oeffliger, Wilma, 412 Goldenrod Avenue, Corona del Mar opper, Chris, 308 Jasmine, Corona del Mar otchkiss, James M.,`509 Narcissus, Corona del Mar uffman,. R. J., 708 Jasmine, Corona del Mar unt, Mary B., 428 Dahlia, Corona del Mar unt, William A., 428 Dahlia, Corona del Mar unter, JoCarol, 4220 Park Newport, Newport Beach acobs,.Clola M., 1314 W. Bay Ave., Corona del Mar acobs, John W., 1314 W. Bay Ave., Corona del Mar eannette, Bonnie, 400 Santa Ana Ave., Corona del .Mar eannette, Brion, 400 Santa Ana Ave., Corona del Mar obe, Albert, 2908 Ocean Blvd., Corona del Mar empler, I., 311 Poinsettia, Corona del Mar empler, Virginia, 311 Poinsettia, Corona del Mar oenig, Georgia.F., 200 Poppy, Corona del Mar adzoeff, Michael A., 211 Marigold, Corona del Mar adzoeff, Sharon J., 211 Marigold, Corona alouf, Ronald, 230 Orchid, Corona del Mar ann, M. C., 2304 Pacific Dr., Corona del -5- del Mar Mar 0 • MINUTES August 9, 1979 of Newport Beach Mowe, Bob, 315k Iris, Corona del Mar Nielsen, Marjorie, 707 Marguerite, Corona del Mar Paquette, Jeanine, 211 Goldenrod, Corona del Mar Radaffey, Phyllis, 2227 Pacific Drive., Corona del Mar Pappas, Christine, 513 Jasmine, Corona del Mar Plastino, Richard, 1307 Santanella, Corona del Mar Ratch, Janet, 1512 Lincoln Lane, Newport Beach Regan, Tom, 212 Marguerite, Corona del Mar Resident (left no name), 235 Goldenrod, Corona del Mar Resident (left no name),. 406 Goldenrod, Corona del Mar Reynolds, Mr. & Mrs. Bob; 314 Narcissus, Corona del Mar Reynolds, Paul & Joanne, 242 Heliotrope,.Corona del Mar Rizzo, Barbara & Joseph, 600 Marguerite, Corona del Mar Robers, R., 421 Heliotrope, Corona del Mar Rodeffer, E. 0., 2227 Pacific Drive, Corona del Mar Romine, V., Larkspur, Corona del Mar Salmonson, Richard, 1406 So. Bay Front, Balboa Shapiro, Paul, 3804 River Avenue, Newport Beach Simmons, Nancy, 315 Iris, Corona del Mar Spann, Helen, 307 Goldenrod, Corona del Mar Sprague, Jean W., 101 Bayside Place, Corona del Mar Sprague, Norman F., M.D., 207 Carnation Avenue,. Corona del Mar Sprague, Robert R., 101 Bayside Place, Corona del. Mar Springston, Geraldine, 614 -6142 Marigold, Corona del Mar Springston, Richard, 6.14 Marigold, Corona del Mar Stauffer, Jacqueline, 620 Jasmine, Corona del Mar Stauffer, L. Maurice, 620 Jasmine, Corona del Mar Tarayao, Bert W., 716 Larkspur Avenue, Corona del Mar Teh, Laurie, 1141 Old Mill Road, San Marino, CA Titus, Carole A.; 4801 Surrey Drive, Corona del Mar ieira, Don, 2800 Bay View Drive, Corona del Mar Vieira, Linda K., 2800 Bay View Drive, Corona del Mar Irle lI N N Motion 0 Motion E MINUTES August 9, 1979 of Newport Beach Wankier, Mrs. Marilyn, 211 -213 Iris, Corona del Mar Wankier, Weldon, 211 -213 Iris, Corona del Mar Welsh, Sally E., 1301 Oxford Lane, Newport Beach Welsh, .Terry, 1301 Oxford Lane, Newport Beach White, James R., 602 Acacia; Corona del.Mar Wilkinson, Lillian, 505 Narcissus, Corona del Mar. Williams, Barry, 306 Hazel Drive, Corona del Mar Williams, Gary G:, 610 Jasmine, Corona del Mar Williams, Kay, 306 Hazel, Corona del Mar Wilson, John, Jr., 433 Acacia, Corona del Mar Wolfshagen, Ron, 1815 Port Margate, Newport Beach ICommissioner.Haidinger expressed his feeling that Amendment No. 524 was a solution looking for a problem. otio.n was made to deny.Amendment No. 524. ommissioner Thomas expressed his feeling that here are.two thoughts to consider regarding this. roposal: 1) the long -term residents 2) people oving up, stating his belief that the needs of he community should be balanced with the needs of he individual. ubstitute Motion was made to incorporate into mendment No. 524 the following changes: 1) Great r architectural.flexibility 2) Heights stay.as resently incorporated 3) Reduce floor area 4) egarding Page No. 3, incorporate Items "A" and B" and "C" and delete Item "D" 5) Replace Item D" as presently worded with, "The area of that ortion of a building or buildings which exceeds maximum height of seventeen feet (17 ft.) or an verage height of thirteen feet (33 ft.) shall not xceed thirty -three and one -third percent (33 1/3% f the buildable area of the lot 6) Delete Item F ommissioner Allen inquired whether they need to eal with the Open Space Option, to which Mr. ogan replied that it is basically fulfilled by he Ordinance as it stands and as it has been mended. -7- f101 Ayes x Noes x Ix Motion I x 0 Motion 0 MINUTES August 9, 1979 M Beach Commissioner Beek suggested that Commissioner Thomas withdraw his Substitute Motion. Commissioner Thomas then withdrew his Substitute Motion. Original Motion was then voted on, which MOAN FAILED. Motion was made to approve Amendment No. 524, with the following changes to the proposed Ordinance: 1) 1.5 buildable as in proposed Amendment No. 524 2) Item "C" as proposed in Amendment No. 524 3) Delete Item "D ", as.proposed in Amendment No. 524 4) Substitute for proposed Item "D ", "The area. of that portion of a building.or buildings which ex- ceeds a maximum height of seventeen feet (17 ft.) or an average height of thirteen feet (13 ft.) shall not exceed thi.rty -three and one third percen (33 l/3 %) of the buildable area of the lot: 6) De- lete Item "F ". ommissioner Cokas suggested continuing.this item o September 6, 1979, appointing 6 individuals, ncluding architects, to.draw up a substitute rdinance that allows the flexibility in design an akes care of the mass problem, and bring said pro osed ordinance back to.the Planning Commission. n response to a question posed by Commissioner. alalis, Mr. Hogan replied that changing 60% of he buildable area to 33 1/3% would mean.a reduc- ion from 2908.8 to 2579.1. ubstitute Motion was made to continue Agenda Item o. 1, Amendment No. 524, to the regular Planning, ommission meeting of September 6, 1979. ommissioner Allen expressed her concern regarding n ordinance written by architects. ommissioner Balalis explained that they would ubmit only recommendations. ommissioner McLaughlin requested that Staff con - ider 1.25 of existing buildable while doing the nalysis. Ayes Noes 0 0 August 9, 1979 R1 Commissioner Allen stated her opposition to the Motion, as the Ordinance would be com- prised in part by architects that have a vested interest, to which Commissioner Beek agreed, due to his feeling that the residents of Corona del Mar should also have a part in comprising this Ordinance. Substitute Motion was then voted on, which MOTION CARRIED. The Planning Commission recessed at 10:30. P.M. and reconvened at 10:35 P.M. Request to establish a Planned Community Plan and Development Standards for the Aeronutronic. Ford site, and the acceptance of an Environ- mental Document. (LOCATION: A portion of Block 56, Ir- vine's Subdivision, generally bounded by Bison Avenue, Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and MacArthur Boulevard. 1PPLICANT: Ford Aerospace and Com- munications Corporation and Eagle Development Com- pany /Daon Corporation, Newport Beach. 10 MINUTES. INDEX Item #2 AMENDMENT N0. 532 CONTIN- UrD TO ADJOURN- TO MEET- ING OF AUGUST 16, 1979 0 • August 9, 1979 MINUTES itv of Newport Beach ZONE: P -C OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach AND Request to subdivide 215.15 ± acres into four Item # parcels for sale, lease or financing pur- poses in accordance with a prop.osed Planned RESUB- Community Development Plan and Development DIVISI Standards for the Aeronutronic Ford Plan- NO. 62 ned Community District. CONTIN LOCATION: A portion of Block 56, Ir -' UED TO vine's Subdivision,.gen- erally bounded by Bison ADJOUR ED MEE Avenue, Jamboree Road, ING OF Ford Road, and MacArthur.. AUGUST Boulevard. 16, 19 APPLICANT: Ford Aerospace and .Com- munications Corporation, and Eagle Development Com- pany /Daon Corporation, Newport Beach. ZONE: P -C OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport. Beach ENGINEER: Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, Newport Beach -10- F COMMISSIONERS a� 1ICity of August 9, 1979 )ort Beach AND MINUTES Request to subdivide 215.2.+ acres for the. purpose of developing 250 detached , single family resi deuces and an additional 50 to 100 attached.n.esi- dences. The project also includes public and private street landscape and recreation facilities related to the proposed residential developm nt and a lot for a proposed 465,000 sq.ft. expansion of the existing research and development facil- ities on the site. OCATION: A portion of Block 56, Irvine's Subdivision, generally bounded by Bison Avenue, Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and MacArthur Boulevard. PPLICANT: Ford.Aerospace and'Communications Corporation, and Eagle Development Company /Dann Corporation, Newport • Beach. ZONE: P -C ER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach INEER: Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, Newport Beach AND equest for the approval of a•Phasing Plan for he remaining development in the Aeronutronic ord Planned Community D.Istrict. OCATION: A portion of Block 56, Irvine's Subdivision, generally bounded by Bison Avenue,..Jamboree Road, Ford Road, and MacArthur Boulevard. PPLICANT.: Ford Aerospace and Communications Corporation, and Eagle Development Company /Dann Corporation, Newport Beach. • IIIIIIIIZONE: WNER: P -C The Irvine Company, Newport Beach -II- INDEX K -4 r- a August 9, 1979 of Newport Beach MINUTES ■ ROLL CALL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 [INDEX Motion Ayes Noes Abstain E E Initially, there was a long.discussion to post- pone this. item. Motion was made to postpone agenda .item nos. 2, 3, 4, and 5 to the end of the meeting. Mr. Morrissey of Ford - Aerospace and Communicatio Corporation appeared before the Planning Commission. He reviewed the revised development plan for the project site. Mr. Morrissey indi- cated that.the revised plan called for the development of 331,000 sq.ft. of industrial, 250 single family detached homes with a minimum 6000 sq.ft. lot size, a public park exactly as previously proposed and 50 attached homes at the intersection of Jamboree Road and Ford Road. He indicated that they had examined an alternati of 100 low- income units in place of the 50 attached units. Joe Stucker, Daon Southwest Corporation, presented the details of his company's affordable housing proposal to the Planning Commission. He indicated that within the limited time - frames.they had not been able to address all the complex issues related to affordable housing. Mr. Stucker noted that Orange County provides density bonuses for affordable housing, but that it is in conflict with City goalls for this project. He noted the County also waives building codes and park dedication codes to provide viable affordable housing opportun- ities. Mr. Stucker indicated that Daon Southwest Cor- poration had looked at how the private.sector by itself could provide affordable housing opportunities within. the City of Newport Beach. He noted that the cost of the units (100 attached) at the intersection of.Jamboree Road and Ford Road without any profit to the developer would be over $100,000.00 even with subsidy from the detached single fami.ly homes. -12- C MISSIONERS1 MINUTES o x F> s August 9, 1979 5' y y City of Newport Beach ROLL CALL III III I INDEX Based upon this i.nformation, he noted that without government subsidy provision of affbrd= able housing in this location, it is not feasible. At this time, he presented a low - moderate rent schedule to the Planning Commission and reviewed its contents. Mt. Stucker presented a concept of providing off - site affordable housing based upon a set of guidelines mutually acceptable to the City of Newport Beach aft-.d the applicants. He notedjthat the advantage of no increase in density was` possible.. Mr. Stucker reviewed the traffic effect of the revised proposal: He noted that -the project as proposed would not exceed the 30% rule until 1990 and even at total build -out of the site would only exceed.the 30% by 50,000 sq.ft. Commissioner Beek questioned why it was feasible • to provide existing units and not the construc- tion of new homes from a financial view. Mr. Stucker indicated that` the difference from a financial view lies in replacement costs diff- erential. He then went on to review and compare traffic impacts of the project. He also noted tha no homes would be located within the 65 CNEL either existing or proposed, noting that cars will be required to be less noisy in the future. Finally, he noted that the Applicants would be providing '$1,600,000 in off - site:improve-ments in conjunction with- project approval. Chairman Balalis asked if all streets withiln the project are designed as private streets. Mr. Stucker indicated that they were with the exception of.the entry street off Bison Avelnue to the -Public Park. The •App:licants then summarized the revised project and.asked that: .1.) Resubdivision proposed condition no. 41 be deleted.; 2.) Tentative Map condition no. 46 be deleted; 3.) The language of condition nos. 43 and 48 on pages 20 and 22 respectively be . changed from "for a structure" to "for a silte." -13- MINUTES ° m August 9, 1979 Di City of Newport Beach ■ ROLL CALL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 [INDEX • 0 Richard V. Hogan at this point reviewed the var- ious conditions dealing with "sewer capacity" for the Planning Commission and Applicants; Mr.. Morrissey indicated that they have no pro-; blem with the drafted conditions related to sewer capacities. He then requested that if the Planning Commission approves this project, that the approval become the bottom line and that the not be subject to further reductions in General Plan Amendment 79 -1. Richard V. Hogan stated that this could be accomplished if the Planning Commission so desired. Chairman Balalis stated that this was not at the Planning Commission's option, but would be decided by the City Council. Commissioner Cokas requested information on the control of off-site rentals. Mr. Stucker responded that the procedures have been developed by Orange County and would be accomplished through a.non- profit corporation. i. Commissioner Cokas questio.ned what the applicant were referring to in terms of "hard- costs." Mr. Stucker responded with the examples of roof failure; or those increases directly related to maintenance. The approach would be similar to a homeowner's association setting up for maint- enance expenses. Commissioner McLaughlin questioned the namei of the non-profit organization. Mr. Stucker responded it was the Orange Couinty Community Housing Corporation. Commissioner Thomas questioned on membership. Mr. Morrissey reviewed the Corporation's member- ship. -14- �0 Inxw�Cityof August 9, 1979 Dort Beach MINUTES E. R O L L CALL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INDEX Commissioner McLaughlin asked if the applicants had met recently with representatives of this non_ profit group. Mr. Morrissey responded that they had met.3 time with them. Chairman Balalis asked if Ford - Aerospace Company employees would be given 1st priority on the units.. Mr. Morrissey responded that they would. Commissioner Allen questioned applicants on location of road improvement costs. Mr. Morrissey noted that $1,600.00 would be spent adjacent to the site and $86,000.00 re- mote from the site. . Commissioner Allen stated.that the $1,600.010 would have been required even without the Traffic Phasing Ordinance and only an.additional $86,000.00 with it. Mr. Stucker noted that even though improvements were only adjacent to the site, they would benefit the City as a whole. Chairman Balalis questioned if the City of Newport Beach would have other road related financial burdens adjacent to this site. Don Webb responded that this project complete the Master Plan of Arterial Highways in this area. Commissioner Thomas asked who owns the rental units.presently.. Mr. Stucker responded that Daon Southwest owns one and has options on the other. Chairman Thomas questioned when existing tenant leases expires. Chairman Balalis indicated that they would.be • filled by attrition as existing leases expire. -15- MINUTES w August 9, 1979 ab' �Dj City of Newport Beach INDEX Mr. Stucker noted that they have accomplished a profile on the existing tenants and.that for the most part the tenants.are either very young or old. The young tenants are for the most part i.n the "empty - nester" category. This means high turn -over rates. Commissioner Cokas asked if they have a feel for turn -over potential. Mr. Stucker responded that he anticipates it will slow down as the .program is adopted. Mr. Stucker°indicated.tha.t th- ey,ha'd reviewed the Section '8 program and that it would be available to the City of Newport Beach as an alternative. Commissioner Haidinger questioned how it would work. Mr. Stucker.noted that it was not app- licable as it was not a part of the proposal • before, the Planning Commission. Commissioner Haidinger indicated at this potent that.he favors a subsidy program. His argument was that it places the burden on a broader base of people. He asked if the 100 unit option was no conger feasible. Mr. Stucker indicated that it was not. Commissioner Beek questioned why they had chosen a 15 year span. Mr. Stucker responded that this appeared to be a reasonable period. Commissioner Beek noted that he believes the Coastal Commission used a 15 year period with a 15 year option. Mr. Stucker responded that he believed that to be correct. Mr. Morrissey indicated it was their intent to provide a clear and honest effort to provide affordable rents and that they had provided .a range of. options to the City and were willing to manage the units if required. He indicated their willingness to do whatever is appropr -fate. . to establish and.maintain these units as afford- able housing. -16- C MISSIONERSI MINUTES August 9, 1979 y City of Newport Beach ROLL CALL INDEX Commissioner Beek responded "tha.t he believes the applicants effort to be sincere, but that the City of Newport Beach did not have its judgements made on this issue. Mr. Morrissey volunteered to work with the dity Attorney's office to draft an acceptable agree- ment.. Chairman Balalis noted it could be a condition of approval and they could.vote on it at this time. Commissioner Cokas discussed administration.. Commissioner Thomas commented that they need to establish the criteria and mechanics of the proposal. Commissioner Beek suggested that Mr: Morrissey prepare a draft agreement for review. Commissioner Thomas commented he would like.to see a priority clause for empl.oyee.s. Motion X Motion was.made by Commissioner Haidinger to Ayes X X X X X.continue this matter to the meeting of August 16, Noes 1979. ALL AYES - MOTION CARRIED. Abstain Set for public hearing on September 6, 1979, pro- Item #6 posed amendments to the Land Use, Residential Growth, Open Space and Circulation Elements of GENERAL the General Plan. PLAN AMEND - INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach MEN _TN 0. 79 -1 Motion x Motion was made to set for public hearing for SET FOR Ayes x x x x September 6, 1979,.Agenda Item No. 6, General PUBLIC Noes x 'P1an.Amendment 79 -1. PrATrNG S.EPTEM- * * * BER 6, i • -17- Motion All Ayes 0 MINUTES August 9, 1979 City of Newport Beach equest to subdivide 77 ± acres into ten lots for Item #7 ndustrial /office development and two lots for ublic streets in the North Ford Planned Commun- TEN.TA- ty, and the acceptance of an Environmental Docu TIVE MAP ent. OF TRACT eque.st to consider a NO. 10019 OCATION: A portion of Lots 224, 442 and 444, ng de- velopment in the Civic Plaza Planned Block 57 of Irvine's Subdivision; CONTIN -. unity District, and the located on property bounded by the UED TO PHASING extension of Bison Avenue, Camel- ADJOURN - back Street, Jamboree Road, the 1T- ING AUG -. extension .of Eastbluff Drive, and CONTIN- MacArthur Boulevard in the Plan- UTT San ned Community of North Ford. 1979 ONE: P -C A—DJ—OURN- PPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Santa WNER: Same as Applicant' Drive, and Jamboree otion was made to continue Agenda Item No. 7 to. special Adjourned Planning Commission meeting on ugust 16, 1979 at 6:30 p.m. ONE: P -C PPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach 9» eque.st to consider a Phasing Plan for the remain- Item #8 ng de- velopment in the Civic Plaza Planned Com- unity District, and the acceptance of an Environ- PHASING ental Document. PLAN OCATION: The Planned Community of Civic CONTIN- Plaza, generally bounded by San UED TU Joaquin. Hills Road, Santa Cruz A—DJ—OURN- Drive, San Clemente Drive, Santa ED MEET - Barbara Drive, and Jamboree TNT AUG- Road, in Newport Center. UST 16, ONE: P -C PPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach 9» Motion All Ayes 0 Motion All Ayes 0 MINUTES August 9, 1979 of Newport Beach NER: Same as Applicant otion was made to continue Agenda Item No. 8 to special Adjourned Planning Commission meeting on ugust 16, 1979 at 6:30 p.m. Pequest to create two parcels of land for develop - ent in K611 Center Newport: LOCATION: Parcel No: 2, Parcel.Map 114 -19 (Resdbdivision No. 567) .located at 4600 .MacArthur Boulevard, onipro- perty bounded by MacArthur Boiule- vard, Birch.Street and Von Karman Avenue in. Koll Center Newport., ONE: P -C PPLICANT: Aetna L.ife Insurance Co., c/o The Koll Company, Newport Beach WNER: Same as Applicant NGINEER: Robert Bein, Wil.liam Frost & Asso- ciates, Newport Beach otion was made to continue Agenda Item No.. 9 to special Adjourned Planning Commission meeting on ugust 16, 1979 at 6:30 p.m. equest to permit the expansion of an existing com ercial building on .a lot in a Specific Plan Area here a specific plan has not been adopted, and he acceptance of an Environmental Document. A odification to the Zoning Code is also requested, ince a tandem parking space is proposed (whiere th rdinance provides that all required parking space hall be accessible and usable). -19- INDEX c. B- SION 635 IN- TO URN - EET- AUG- 16, Item #10 SITE PLAN REVIEW N0—.2 3 CONTIN- UED TO ADJOURN - D MEET - ING AUG- UST 16, mn--� Motion All Ayes Motion All Ayes • August 9, 1979 M Beach MINUTES LOCATION: A portion of Lot 4, Tract No. 27, located at 470 North Newport Boule- vard, on the easterly side of North Newport Boulevard, between Bolsa Avenue and Westminster Avenue, ad- jacent to Newport Heights. JZONE: C -1 PPLICANT: Brion S. Jeannette, Newport Beach OWNERS: Brion and Bonnie Jeannette, Niewport Beach otion was made to continue Agenda Item No. 10 to a special Adjourned Planning Commission meeting on, 'August 16, 1979 at 6:30 p.m. equest to amend a previously approved use permi Item #11 hat allowed the construction of a restaurant wit t h n -sale alcoholic beverages so as to permit an USE P- dditional freestanding identification sign on the IT NO. ER ite. 1671 OCATION; Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 60 -30 (Re- CONTIN- subdivision No. 425) located at UED TO 3300 West Coast Highway, on the ADJOURN - northerly side of West Coast High- ED MEET= way, east of Newport Boulevard on Mariner's Mile. ING AUG- UST 16, 1979 ONE: Specific Plan Area No. 5 PPLICANT: Allyn Cano, dba. C.ha.Cha's Mexican Food, Newport Beach WNER: Byco, Inc., Newport Beach otion was made to continue Agenda Item No. 11 to special Adjourned Planning Commission meeting on ugust 16, 1979 at 6:30 p.m. 11P4i19 it 1 �n 1�c August 9, 1979 M Beach MINUTES Request to obtain approval for an existing.take- out restaurant facility (Island Fish .Factory:) on 'the site,.and to waive the required offstreet ;parking spaces in conjunction with said use. LOCATION: Lot 12, Block 4, Balboa Island, located at 322 Marine Avenue, on the .easterly side of Marine Avenue., between East-Bay Front and Balboa Avenue on Balboa Island. ZONE: C -1 PPLICANT: Mark Benabou, Balboa Island OWNERS: Howard Tucker and Paula Benabou, Balboa Island Von x Motion was made to continue Agenda Item No. 12 to ATf Ayes a special Adjourned Planning Commission meeting on ug.ust 16, 1979 at 6:30 p.m. There being no further business, the Planning ommission.continued its meeting to the special. %djourned Planning Commission meeting on August 6, 1979 at 6:30 p.m. I De ra Allen, Secretary Planning Commission City of Newport Beach i A/99 i -21- Item #12 USE PER- MIT NO. 1914 C.ONTIN- UED TO ADJOURN- ED MEET -, ING AUG- UST 16, 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Department of Community Development DATE: August 9, 1979 Paul Balalis, Chairman TO: Newport Beach Planning Commission FROM: Tim Haidinger SUBJECT: North Ford Development Dear Commissioner Balalis: You requested that Commissioners Allen, Thomas and I form a sub- committee to review the proposed development on the "North Ford" property and. make recommendations to the Planning Commission for its disposition. We have done so and this is our report. The subcommittee has met three times; once with representatives �- of The Irvine Company, and twice with the Community Development Department staff. Unfortunately, Commissioner Thomas was able to attend only a portion of one of these meetings and this report may not, therefore, reflect his views. BACKGROUND CONSIDERATIONS Our subcommittee has a general bias toward low density residential _development on this site as . we do toward low density development in much of the balance of the City: The contiguous Eastbluff property and probable residential Ford Aeronutronic development would make a logical residential tie -in. The Irvine Company has argued that the existing commercial development on the southwest portion of the North Ford property should be considered the contig- uous development and provide a bias toward the proposed commercial/ industrial project. We believe residential development is as logical as commercial. The subcommittee was extremely concerned about noise from the pro- posed Corona del Mar Freeway. We requested a supplemental analysis. by the staff to update the EIR with more precise CNEL noise contours. This supplemental data was distributed with the material for the Commission meeting of August 9th. The cost /revenue impact was considered and residential development is somewhat more favorable for the City than commercial development. TO: Paul Balalis, Chairman Newport Beach Planning Commission August 9, 1979, Page 3 We considered the possibility of permitting high density -low cost housing on th.is site but believe such development would not be appropriate. Again, this reflects our general bias toward low density residential development within the City. This project is not within the Coastal Commission Zone and, therefore, not subject to their requirements. Traffic was a concern of the subcommittee and we believe.that the development as described below would provide adequate phasing to permit the project to comply, with the "test of reasonableness" as required. We recommend that the Planning Commission so decide. CONCLUSION We recommend that the Planning. Commission change the General Plan.. to provide for residential development on this site at a density of three per parcel map net acre. We further recommend that no building be allowed inside a 65 CNEL line until after construc- tion of the Corona del Mar Freeway. Subsequent to development of the freeway, the Commission may wish, depending on its route and noise generation, to modify the General Plan for the remainder of the site. Ye truly yours, T OTHY R. RIBINVR Subcommittee C6aiAmjn DEBRA ALLEN Subcommittee Member TPH /kk