Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/15/1974COMMISSIONERS 1T1m11' �1 A lam'' Present Absent Motion Ayes Absent MKILM CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Regular Planning Commission Meeting MINUTES Place.: City Council Chambers Time: 7:00 P.M. Date: Auqust 15. 1974 EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R. V. Hogan, Community Development Director David R. Baade, Assistant City Attorney Benjamin B. Nolan, City Engineer STAFF MEMBERS William R. Foley, Environmental Coordinator Shirley Harbeck, Secretary X Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 18, 1974, X X X X X were approved as written. X X Mo *ion X Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 1, 1974, A X X X were approved as written. Commissioner Beckley Abstain X X and Commissioner Hazewinkel abstained as they Absent X X were absent from the meeting. .Request to permit live entertainment in conjuncts with "Harry's N. Y. Bar and Gri11" Restaurant in "Newport Place ". Location: Parcel. 2 of Parcel Map 45 -23 (Resubdivision No. 347) located at 4248 Martingale Way, westerly of MacArthur Boulevard, between Martingale Way and.Dolphin- Striker Way in "Newport Place ".. Applicant: Harry's N. Y. Bar and Grill, Inc., Newport Beach Owner: W. W. Cruttenden, Jr., et al., Newport Beach Mon X Planning Commission continued this matter to the A X X X X X meeting of September 5, 1974, pending.receipt of Absent X X consultant's study on the restaurant parking problems within the City. Page 1. m T. Motion Ayes Absent �J 0 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AuOUSt 15. 197A MINUTES ,unav .oven Item #2 Request to establish the Planned Community.Devel- AMENDMENT opment Plan and Development Standards for the NO. 434 "Corporate Plaza" Planned Community in Newport Center, and the acceptance of an environmental document. REMOVED FROM =NDAR .Location: Portion of Block 93, Irvine's Subdivision, bounded by Pacific Coast.Highway, Newport Center Drive Farallon Drive and the future extension of Avocado Avenue, in Newport Center. Applicant: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant X Planning Commission removed this matter from the X X X X calendar pending completion of revisions and receipt of an Environmental Impact Report. Commissioner Hazewinkel stepped down.from the dais and•absteined from deliberation in connection with Item #3 and Item #4 because of a possible conflict of interest due to his involvement with the Irvine Company in the sale of some property. Item #3 and Item 04 were heard concurrently but separate action was taken on each item. Item #3 Request..to prezone 6.29 acres of unincorporated territory to the P -C (Planned Community) District.3 AMENDMENT Further request to amend the Planned Community Development Standards for "Harbor View Hills" by APPROVED reducing the permitted density in Area 11; updat- ing the statistical analysis for Areas 11 and 15; and other general changes in the Land Use Map and P -C Text. Location: The area to be prezoned is located easterly of New MacArthur Boulevard and the proposed extension of Spyglass Hill Road adjoining the Page 2. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACLi . R� CALL r 0 E MINUTIS August 15, 1974 San Joaquin Reservoir. Areas 11 and 15 of the Harbor View Hills Planned Community are located easterly of New MacArthur Boulevard on both sides of the proposed extension of Spyglass Hill Road. Zone: P -C City) A -1 County) Applicant: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Owners: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach; Irvine Ranch Water District, Irvine The Metropolitan Water District of Southern Cal.ifornia, Los Angeles Item #4 Request to subdivide 170.3 acres into 101 numbered TENTATIVE lots for single family development; 13 numbered MAPMAP TR1 lots.for condominium development, 2.numbered lots N5— to be developed as public park sites, 3 numbered lots to be developed as private recreational sites APPROVED 7 numbered lots to be developed as.landscape areas NAT= — and 21 lettered lots to be developed as private Ti0WLY streets; and the acceptance of an, environmental .document. Location: Portions of Blocks 91, 92, 97, and 98 of Irvine's Subdivision, in an area bounded by the existing "Spyglass Hill" development, the "Bren III "development, New Mac Arthur Boulevard, and the San Joaquin Reservoir site. Zone: P -C (within City- Limits); A -1 (in Orange County) Applicant: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Owners: The Irvine Company', Newport Beach; Irvine Ranch Water District, Irvine The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Los Angeles Engineer: Simpson - Steppat, Newport Beach Page 3. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACLI ?1 m y m D m P 00 rwi. 1 SIM, Aunuet 1r, 1Q7A MINUTES Community Development Director Hogan reviewed the requests with the Planning Commission and pointed out the major items for consideration,.to wit: 1. "Policy questions involved in the grading, site preparation and location of Spyglass Hill Road 2. The recreation and open space portion of the plan which includes the City's acceptance of the 14 acre nature park and the maintenance thereof. Also included in the.plan is an activity park consisting of 6 to 6.5 acres, the location and development to be considered by the Planning Commission. 3. The area is planned as a private community, thereby restricting access to the general public. 4. The location of the school boundaries which intersect the project. . 5. If the project is approved,, it will be neces- sary to institute an Amendment to the General Plan. Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Dave Neish, Manager of Planning Administration with The Irvine Company, appeared before the Commission and made introductory comments on the project a.nd background planning studies. He also thanked the staff for their time and efforts which went into the proposed project. Gary Cook, Project Manager with The Irvine Company, appeared before the Commission to comment on the planning goals of Sector IV and introduced the various men and firms involved in the planning process. He reviewed the Regional.Plan, the site as it presently exists, the planning parameters and goals for Sector IV, the conceptual plan, and the illustrative site plan. He als.o commented on the number and type of units proposed for each area, the winding roadway system,,bridges,' open space and recreation, trail system, public view sites, and contemplated grading. • Dave Neish again appeared before the Commission to comment on the staff reports and generally con- curred with the suggested conditions with some concerns. He pointed out that two public view Page 4. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH m F m a X i T P 3 R* CAL m August 15, 1974 MINUTES E ,ND X sites were proposed, one from Spyglass Hill Road and one from El Capitan. He expressed concern with Condition No. 2 relative to the requirement that a specific number of guest parking.spaces be pro-.. vided in Area B and suggested that the location and distribution of the guest parking spaces of the proposed development be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department in the future. Another area of concern was in connection with Condition No. 23 in that they felt 25% partic ipa.tion by The Irvine Company and 75% by the City in connection with the traffic signal..installation was more equitable based on the.fact that three of the four intersecting streets were arterial high- ways and according to City policy all improvements are funded by the City. Jack Keyes, 15 Point Loma Drive, Spyglass Hills, appeared before the Commission and read.a letter signed by James Roosevelt, 27 Point Loma Drive and Ron Robison, 23 Tiburon Way Drive, requesting delay of a final decision relative to the location of a children's play area pending.review of • alternate proposals under way by a subcommittee of the Spyglass Hill Homeowners Association. Walter Keeley, 16 Mission Bay.D.rive, appeared befo e the Commission and commented on the location of th children's play area and the location of Spyglass Hill-Road as outlined in a letter dated August 4, 1974 addressed to the Commission. He suggested moving Spyglass Hill Road to the east and construe - ing a.berm to reflect headlight glare and vehicle noise away from the residences on the westerly side. He felt the City should accept the canyon park in its natural state and objected to any alteration of the canyon or the construction of a children's park at the southerly end. He also requested that the matter of a.pa.rk location be. delayed for a period of thirty days in order to work out a compromise to the problem. In answer to questions regarding Spyglass Hill Road, City Engineer Nolan advised that the street has been designated as a secondary street on both the City and County Master Plan of Arterial High- ways for at least ten years or more and that traffic studies indicate the need for a low level arterial street in this location and any change in • design is not recommended. He advised, however, that Spyglass Hill Road is a modified secondary. street in that the paved width is 48 feet between curbs rather than the standard 64 feet and pro- Page 5. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACLI qC T D m D m �C fh ;. f T P Z P I RM CAL August 15, 1974 MINUTES r vides for four travel lanes and a paseo within the right -of -way which includes pedestrian and bike trails. The plan does not include parking lanes normally included in secondary streets, however grading of the right -of -way will be to the full width, Don Simpson,.Civil Envineer of Simpson - Steppat, appeared before the Commission and answered questions relative to the grading of Spyglass Hill Road and the feasibility of moving the roadway easterly. He also commented on the paseo which was eliminated along the easterly side of the.project along the Sall Joaquin Reservoir. Allen Backer, 7 Malibu Circle, appeared before the Commission and expressed concern with the grading of Spyglass Hill Road and the use of the proposed children's play area should same be constructed at the southerly end of the canyon. Gary Cook appeared before the Commission to. clarify the position of The Irvine Company in • connection with the location of the children's play area and advised that they are not proposing the location as indicated, but were- offering the site for whatever public usage was desired by the people, and that other alternatives were still being investigated. Courtland Paul, Landscape Architect, appeared before the Commission and reviewed cross- sections which indicated the grading and fill necessary to support Spyglass Hill Road and also additional grading necessary to provide park and play areas should the canyon park be improved. Mrs. Bowen, 14 Mission Bay Drive, appeared before the Commission in opposition to any glamour park in the canyon and urged the City of accept the canyon and keep it in its natural state, as well as accept the 6.5 acre area at the northerly end of the canyon for an activity park. Lloyd Lokka, 5 Malibu Circle, appeared before the Commission and commented on the park issue. Gary Cook reviewed a north /south cross - section of • the project indicating slope of the land. Don Simpson appeared before the Commission to answer questions relative to the loop roadway system, including percentage of grades and the Page 6. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEAC8 MINUTES R� CALL ^ August 15, 1974 E ,ND X necessity for some retaining walls. Jim Cooney with Walter Richardson and Associates appeared before the Planning Commission and. answered questions relative to parking for the: various units. Planning Commission discussed the. overall.appear- ance of the project in order to gain some visual aspect of the development because of the aesthetic concerns throughout the City. Dr. John Rajcic with the Irvine School District appeared before the Commission to answer questions relative to school data and the need for an additional school site, including the location of same. He also commented on the policy of the school board relative to deannexation and advised there would be no problem if an agreement was reached by all parties concerned. Planning Commission discussed the need for an additional school, however the site for same.was • not indicated at this time and it was suggested that a condition be added whereby a use permit would be required for approval of the school site. Planning Commission discussed the issue of private streets vs. public streets and the maintenance cost of same. Fred Sawyer, Environmental Analysis:Foundation, appeared before the Commission and pointed out the cost figures on maintenance as indicated in the environmental impact report. Planning Commission questioned the matter of private communities and Gary Cook responded, advising that their research indicated a desire and need for security and privacy by the consumers financially able to purchase these higher priced homes. He also advised that because of the topo- graphy of the land there would be fewer walls and fences around the individual homes than there are on projects containing flat lots, thereby creating an additional need for privacy and security. Newport Beach Police Chief Glavas appeared before the Planning Commission and commented on the • private community concept. He stated that where . denial of access is a factor in the private community and the street configuration is closed, then security is increased in terms of property Page 7. COMMISSIONERS I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACki T m f Yx m� Y Aceu m � p � Auaust. 15. 1974 MINUTES iuncv crimes and personal attacks. Val Murley, Chairman of the Citizens Environmental Committee, appeared before the Commission.. As an individual she was opposed to the private communit concept on a philosophical basis. On behalf of the Committee, she urged the City to accept the canyon for open space and leave same in its natural state. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission recessed.at 1.0:15 P.M. and. reconvened at 10:30 P.M. Planning Commission discussed stacking lanes at the entrance of the private community and it was felt there would be no problem as this situation is similar to that of Big Canyon. • The matter of parks was discussed and it was pointed out that if the 14 acre canyon area were accepted and left in its natural state, the cost of maintenance would be relatively small, whereby if same were developed with trails, picnic areas, etc., the cost of maintenance would increase accordingly. Planning Commission also discussed the City's liability in accepting the canyon; accessibility to the area by the public; and proximity to a proposed school site and usage by school children. Planning Commission also discussed the pedestrian circulation system throughout the project; alter - native park sites; density and the statistical analysis on the amendment to the planned community text; and guest parking for the project. They discussed at great length the matter of park sites and the matter of private communities and streets, including the philosophical views as well as the maintenance costs. Motion X Motion was made in connection with Amendment No. AMENDMENT Ayes X X X X 437, recommending to the City Council that the NO. 437 S A ain X 6.29 acres of unincorporated territory be pre - A ent X X zoned to the P -C (Planned Community) District. Page 8. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH m r M a x P 7 R CALL ^ August 15, 1974 MINUTES INDEX Motion X Motion was made to adopt Resolution No. 894 Ayes X X X X recommending to the City Council that Amendment Abstain X No. 437 be approved amending the Planned Community Absent X X Development Standards and Land Use Map for Harbor View Hills. Motion X Motion -was made to approve Tentative Map Tract TENTATIVE No. 8725 subject to the conditions as recommended MAP TRACT by the Staff with the following modifications: NO. 8725 That Condition No. 1 read as follows: "That devel opment shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, except as noted below." That Condition No. 8 provide that the City require and accept the 6.5 acre park site at the bottom of the canyon and that the City accept the offer of the 14 acre canyon area for the.proposed nature park. That Condition No. 32 be added to provide that plans for all building groups and parking layouts, and for walls and fence developments adjacent to • public streets shall be approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits. That the following words be added to Condition No. 7: "...and to minimizing headlight and other vehicular intrusions on adjacent residences." That an additional Condition No. 33 be included to provide that a use permit shall be submitted. for approval of any school site. That Condition No. 34 be added to provide that loop streets within the proposed development be public roadways. That Condition No. 35 be added to provide that a view site shall be established at the northeasterl curve of the loop street. That Condition No. 36 be added to provide that the applicant present plans for a paseo development along the reservoir to be considered and accepted by the City linking E1 Capitan, the loop road and the Bren tract. The issues of public access and public views were discussed at length by the Commission and it was felt that proposed Conditions Nos. 34, 35 and 36 should be acted upon individually, therefore the Page 9. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH m� t Z P P v oAS rAlI m Auauct 15. 197a MINUTES unev . uwrw original motion was withdrawn and the following actions taken. Motion X Motion was made that Condition No. 34 be added to Ayes X X provide that the loop roadway system of the devel- Noes X X opment be a public roadway system. Motion failed. Abstain X Absent X Motion X Motion was then made that Condition No. 34 be Ayes X X added to provide that the entire roadway system Noes X X within the proposed development be public roadways Abstain X Motion failed. Absent X Planning Commission was divided on the question of whether or not the street system should be public or private and recommended that the City Council. make the determination with respect to this matter Motion X Motion was made that Conditions Nos..35 and 36 as Ayes X X X previously discussed by included as conditions of N s X approval of the tentative map. Motion carried. P�tain X Assent X Motion X Motion was then made in connection with Tentative Ayes X X X Map Tract No. 8725 that the environmental document Noes X be accepted and that the tract map be approved Abstain X subject to the following conditions: Absent X 1. That development shall be in substantial con - formance with the approved site plan, except as noted below. ccir/� , 'J 2. That a minimum of 2 guest parking spaces► shall rJ be provided in Area 3 of the proposed develop- le�^8"" . ment, and that the location and distribution o said spaces shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development. 3. That the location of trash container storage q'11 and disposal of trash for this project,be reviewed and approved by the Department of General Services. 4. Fire department access and fire hydrant loca- tion shall be approved by the Fire Department. • 5. Cul -de -sacs shall be wide enough to meet the fire department requirements. Page 10. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RS CALL m August 15. 1976 MINUTES 6. That there shall be submitted a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions set- ting forth an enforceable method of. .insuring the installation and continued maintenance of the landscaping, walls, fencing and all physical features such as buildings, fire hydrants, utility facilities, parking areas, drainage facilities and recreation facilities acceptable to the Department of Community Development, a d in respect to legal enforceability, the City Attorney. 7. That detailed landscaping plans, including a watering system and schedule for insta.11ation shall be prepared by a landscape architect an shall be subject to approval by the Director of Community Development and the Director of Parks, Beaches and Recreation. Said landscaping may consist of lawn, trees, shrubbery and.oth r plant materials. The landscaping and waterin system shall be installed in accordance with he approved plan and shall be properly maintaine . In the event installation of landscaping is • not completed on schedule, the City .of Newpor Beach may require a reasonable guarantee for completion of said landscaping. In reviewing the.landscape plans, particularly for the Can on' areas,.specific attention shall be given to potential fire hazards and to minimizing head light and other vehicular intrusions on adjacent residences.. 8. That the City require and accept the 6.5 acre park site at the intersection of Spyglass Hill Road and New MacArthur Boulevard and that the City accept the offer of the 14 acre canyon area for the proposed nature park. 9. That a pedestrian easement shall be provided over Lot 2 (i.e. the 17 unit attached residen ial site on the westerly side of the proposed extension of Spyglass Hill Road.) between the activity park site and the native park site if both properties are accepted by the City. 10. That a thorough archaeological and paleontolo ical investigation of the site be conducted in accordance with the City's policies. 11. That a detailed accoustical study be made in regard to the military helicopter route and the'buildings be attenuated in accordance with State and local laws. Page 11. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACLi rt� D s�PAII I" August 15_ 197A MINUTES .0 wev r - •- -• - -mvcw 12. That all public improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 13. That Section 19.1.6.030 of the Subdivision Ordinance regarding map scale be waived pro- vided maps drawn accurately to a scale of 1" = 100' are furnished to the Public Works Department. 14. That the boundary of the final tract map be checked by the County Surveyor before being submitted to the City for approval. 15. That all grading be in accordance with grad- ing plans and reports approved by the Public Works Director and a qualified Soils Engineer Upon completion of the grading, the Civil Engineer and the Soils Engineer shall certify that the grading has been completed according to the plans and the requirements of the grading ordinance. Reproducible copies of the "as- built" grading plans on standard size • sheets shall be furnished to the Public Works Department. Special attention shall be given to design, construction and maintenance of desilting and erosion control measures during the grading operations. 16. That the following special conditions of approval be applied to the private street system:, a. The structural and geometric design shall be approved by the Public Works Department; and shall be in conformance with the Private Street Policy. b. Construction shall be inspected by the Public Works Department and a standard inspection fee paid. 17. That the California Vehicle Code be enforced on the private street system. 18. That easements dedicated to the City be a • minimum of ten feet in width, with wider easements provided where shown on the tenta- tive map and where required by the Public Works Department. Page 12: COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH m P RSCAII August 15, 1974 MINUTES INDEX 19. That the Subdivision Ordinance requirements for local street widths of sixty feet of right -of -way and forty feet of paved surface be waived, and street widths be approved as shown on the tentative map. 20. That vehicular access rights to Spyglass Hill Road be dedicated to the City; except for the street.intersectiohs as shown on the approved tentative; map. 21. That the Subdivision Ordinance requirement for maximum street grades of 7% be waived; with steeper grades allowed, subject to approval by the Public Works Department, where made necessary for topographical reasons. 22. That the water capital improvement acreage fee be paid; and that storage capacity in San Joaquin Reservoir equi.val.ent to one maxi- mum day's demand be dedicated to the City. 23. That a traffic signal be constructed at the • intersection of Spyglass Hill Road with new MacArthur Boulevard when warrants are met, with the funding to be 50% developer and 50% City. (Note: The wording in Capital Improve ment Policy regarding traffic signal funding responsibilities is not precisely applicable to this intersection. It is felt the recom- mended cost sharing is equitable, and satis- factorily represents the intention of the policy with regard to the developer's obliga- tions.) 24. That Ford Road between new MacArthur Boulevar and old MacArthur Boulevard be widened to fou lanes by the developer, including constructio of the portion on permanent alignment connect- ing to old MacArthur Boulevard. (The present connection to old MacArthur is on temporary alignment.) Construction shall be scheduled to start not later than January 1, 1977 and be completed not later than September 1, 1977 A separate agreement regarding the Ford Road Improvements shall be provided. 25. That the pedestrian and paseo system along • and crossing Spyglass Hill Road be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Additional sidewalk may be required on the westerly side of Spyglass Hill Road, and a pedestrian undercrossing or overcrossing may be required. Page 13. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACLJ o� Hsu m p N AUgUSt 15. 1974 MINUTES 26. That access to the 17 units on the westerly side of Spyglass Hill Road be designed to provide sight distance for a minimum of 40 mp. speeds. 27. That slopes, landscaping, walls, and fences b designed to provide adequate sight distance a all intersections. 28. That an agreement for slope maintenance along the westerly side of :Spyglass Hill Road be provided by The Irvine Company if the nature park .site area is not accepted by the City. The agreement shall be recorded and run with the land, and be bi.nding on any successor in.. interest in the land. 29. That adequate on -site parking be provided for , park sites inasmuch-as there will not be street parking available on Spyglass Hill Road; 30. That an'internal pedestrian circulation • system be provided to the satisfaction of.the Community Development Director; with sidewalk to be located along the private streets, or in approved.alternate locations. 31. That the City Limit boundary lines, the Irvin .Ranch Water District boundaries and County Sanitation District Ho. 5 boundaries in the northeasterly portion of the development shal be realigned to conform to the site plan. 32. Plans for all building groups and parking layouts, and for walls and.fence developments adjacent to public streets shall be approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits. 33. That a use permit shall be submitted for approval of any school site. 34. A view site shall be established at the northeasterly curve of the loop street. 35. Plans for approval and acceptance of a paseo adjacent to the reservoir linking E1 Capital and the Bren development shall be provided. Page 14. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH (1 p m <4 M p 3 CALL Motion Ayes Absent 40 MINUTES August 15. 1974 iuneY Item #5 Request approval of the Final Map of Tentative Map FINAL Tract No. 8638, establishing one lot with an area MAP of 1,.226 acres where six lots now exist so as to R CT permit the conversion of six apartment buildings. $ into a'36 unit condominium development. CONT. TO Location: Lots 2 through 7 o Tract 3606, USG.. 29 located at 1184 -1256 Rutland Road, on the east side of Rutland Road, between Mariners Drive and Bedford Lane, in Westcliff. Zone: R -3 Applicant: R. M. Galloway & Associates, Inc., Newport Beach Owner: Rutland Newport,Beach Company, c/o United Professional Planning, Sherman Oaks Engineer: Same as Applicant X Planning Commission continued this matter to the X X X X X adjourned meeting of August 29 , 1974. X x Item #6 Request approval of 'a modification that was denied MODIFICA- by the Modifications Committee so as to permit TIUN second floor balconies and wing walls to encroach 8 -13 4 feet 6 inches into the required 10 foot rear yard setback (i.e., Balboa Island Channel side) CONT. TO in conjunction with "The Cove" residential condo- minium development. Location: Lot 2,' Tract '80731 located at 939 Bayside Drive, on the southerly side of Bayside Drive, westerly of Marine Avenue. Zone: R -3 Appli.cant: The Irvine Co., dba, Irvine Pacific Development Co., Newport Beach, Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Appellant: Same as Applicant Page 15. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT .BEACL� m emi. r m as n t m a P ACALL r Motion Ayes Absent M on A s Absent • Motion Ayes Absent MINUTES Auaust 15.: 1974 x Planning Commission continued this matter to the X X X X X adjourned meeting of August 29, 1974. x x Item #7 Request to permit the construction of drive -in banking facilities in conjunction with a proposed savings and loan building.. Location: Lots 26 through 30, Tract 1210, VSE_ O located at 900 West Coast Highway, on the northerly side of West Coast Highway, westerly of Dover Drive, across West Coast Highway from the Balboa Bay Club. Zone: C -1 -H Applicant: Newport Savings & Loan, Newport Beach Owner: Tract No. 1210 Limited,,Newport Beach X Planning Commission continued this matter to the X X X X X adjourned meeting of August 29, 1974. x X Item #8 Request to establish one building site and elimi- RESUB- nate interior lot lines where five lots now exist 5 ON so as to remodel an existing commercial building 46 on the property. CONT. TO Location: Lots 26 through 30, Tract 1210, AUG. 29 located at 900 West Coast Highway, on the northerly side of West Coast Highway, westerly of Dover Drive, across West Coast Highway from the Balboa Bay Club. Zone: C -1 -H Applicant: Newport Savings and Loan - George Hoelzel, Newport Beach Owner: Tract No. 1210 Limited, Newport Beach Engineer: Engineering Technology, Newport Beach x Planning Commission continued this matter to the X X X X X adjourned meeting of August 29, 1974. x x Page 16. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. Z A ✓� R� CALL Motion Ayes Absent Motion Ayes Absent 0 Motion Ayes Absent Motion Ayes Absent 0 MINUTES August 15. 1974 1unev Item #9 Request.to consider the adoption of the Noise NOISE Element of the Newport Beach General. Plan. ELEMENT Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach CONT. TO AUG. 29 X Planning Commission continued this matter to the X X X X X adjourned meeting of August 29, 1974. x Item #10 Proposal to amend the Newport Beach Municipal Code NOISE by the adoption of a Noise Ordinance., ORDINANCE Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach CONT. TO XU G. 29 X Planning Commission continued this matter to the X X X X X adjourned meeting of August 29, 1974. X X Item #11 Appeal of Thomas E. S.teinfeld from a staff inter- pretation of the provisions of the Newport.Beach Municipal Code as they pertain to a proposed single family dwelling in the R- 2.District located APPEAL TTAAF -F. NNTERPRE- T TIC ON at 123 - 27th Street on.the Peninsula. WITHDRAWN X At the request of the applicant, Planning Commis- BY X X X X X Sion withdrew this matter from the calendar. APPLICANT X X X .X X X X X Motion was made to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting to August 29, 1974, at 7:00 P.M. in the X x City Council Chambers. Time: 12 :55 A.M. Commissioner Heather advised she would be unable to attend the adjourned meeting of August 29, 1974 and requested and received permission to be absent . from same. JAMES M� PARKER, Secretary Planning Commission City of Newport Beach Page 17.