HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/16/1979COMMr iONERI i Special Adjourned Planning Commission MINUTES
INUTES
K Place: City Council Chambers
_ d Time: 6:30 P.M.
D; Dat August 16, 1979
y 9 � In x w N City o� Newport Beach
ROLL CALL INDEX
Present X x XK x x x °
EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS
JR.V. Hogan, Community Development Director
Hugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney
i
;STAFF MEMBERS
James Hewicker, Assistant Director - Planning
Fred Talarico, Environmental Coordinator
lDon Webb, Assistant City Engineer
(Minutes Written By: Glenna Gipe
Request to establish a Planned Community Plan and Item #1
Development Standards for the Aeronutronic Ford
site, and the acceptance of an Environmental Docu AMENDMENT
ment. N0. 532
LOCATION: A portion of Block.56, Irvine's JAP,PROVED
Subdivision, generally bounded by
Bison Avenue, Jamboree Road, Ford
Road, and MacArthur Boulevard.
APPLICANT: Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation and Eagle Development
Company /Daon Corporation, Newport
Beach
ZONE: P -C.
OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Bleach
l
Request to subdivide 215.15 ± acres into fouir par Item #2
eels for sale, lease or financing purposes in ac-
cordance.with a proposed Planned Community Deve".,,RESUBDI-
lopment Plan and Standards for the Aeronutronic VISION N
Ford Planned Community District. 629
Be
COMMISSIONERS
n ?
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
of Newport Beach
MINUTES
ROLL CALL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INDEX ■
LIOCATION:
A portion of Block 56, Irvine's
Subdivision n, generally bounded by
Bison Avenue, Jamboree Road, Ford
Road, and MacArthur Boulevard.
ZONE:
P -C
APPLICANT:
Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation, and Eagle Development
Company /Daon Corporation, Newport
Beach.
OWNER:
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
ENGINEER:
Robert Bein, William Frost and
Associates, Newport Beach
AND
Request to subdivide 215.2 ± acres for the purpos
• of developing 250 detached single family resi-
dences and an additional 50 to 100 attached resi-
dences. The project also includes public and pri
vate street landscape and recreation facilities
related to the proposed residential development
and a lot for a proposed 465,000 sq. ft. expan-
sion of the existing research and development fa-
cilities on the site.
VOCATION: A portion of Block 56, Irvine's.
Subdivision, generally bounded by
Bison Avenue, Jamboree Road, Ford
Road, and MacArthur Boulevard.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation, and Eagle Development
Company /Daon Corporation, Newport
Beach. .
OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Robert Bein, William Frost and As-
sociates, Newport Beach.
-2-
Item #3
TENTATIVE
TRAT—T—N 0 .
1O 1
APPROVED
C'0RD-1—
TI LLY
ROLL
0
•
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
City of Newport Beach
AND
Request for the approval of a Phasing Plan for
the remaining development in the Aeronutronic
Ford Planned Community District.
LOCATION:
ZONE:
APPLICANT
OWNER:
MINUTES
A portion of Block 56, Irvine's
Subdivision, generally bounded1by
Bison. Avenue, Jamboree Road, Ford
Road, and MacArthur Boulevard.
P -C
Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation, and Eagle Development.
Company /Daon Corporation, Newport
Beach
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Richard Hogan; Community Development Director,
informed the Planning .Commission that they had ob
tained an agreement between the applicant and the
City concerning the development and control of
the portion of the project that is proposed for
low and moderate income housing for the 50 off-
site .units, which agreement had been distributed
to the Planning Commission.
the Public Hearing was opened regarding these itei
and Tom Morrissey, Ford Aerospace and Communica-
0 ons Corporation, commented regarding the indus-
trial portion of the site and its intended uses
and expansion, pointing out that there are approx
imately 993,000 sq. ft. of existing industrial
facilities and that the Master Plan calls for the
addition of approximately 338,000 sq. ft. of ad-
ditional industrial facilities, which are greatly
needed. He further commented that the additional.
square footage clusters in.and.among the existing
square footage and is not an expansion out into
a new a.rea', and that the space to be added will b
only for Ford- Aerospace use, and.will be added
over a period of 12 -15 years, part of which will
be replacment for facilities that they are - using
in the City of Irvine, at a point 5 miles distant
04hich had increased communication and transporta-
-3-
INDEX
Item .#4
PHASING
PL— 1—
APPROVED
CONDI-
TIONALLY
C MISSIONERS1 MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
" d August 16., 1979
W iED
City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL IINDEX
Lion costs. He commented that the proposed de=
uelopment makes an enormous reduction in what the
potential of the site was under the existing Use
Permit, coming close to the 30% rule, falling;
Within the rule of reasonableness.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner
Beek, Mr. Morrissey responded that they had inves
ted in the site currently approximately $40,000,0
iln 1959 -1960 dollars.
Commissioner Thomas suggested breaking down the
project in terms of discussion into 3 phases:
1) residential 2) industrial, and 3) low -cost
housing.
Commissioner McLaughlin inquired whether the rent
proposed are consistent with the ones proposed by
the Orange County Community Housing Corporation,
to which Mr. Morrissey replied that the Orange
. County Community Housing Corporation is using a
liable published by the County of Orange Environ-
mental Management Agency, entitled Housing Afford
Ability Table providin rental schedules based on
3 levels of income: 13 below County median,
2) at County median, and 3) 120% of County med-
ian, at which the Ford - Aeronutronic project ren-
tal schedule is at the low end of the Orange
County Environmental .Management Agency Housing
effordability Table, and that there will be no
ncumbrance upon the City with any State, County
Or Federal aid, and that the County Housing Com-
mission is not controlling rental units, but is
controlling resale units as an agreement with the
City, based on median escalation and median in-
come.
Commissioner McLaughlin then expressed her discom
fort regarding the phrase, "Tenants presently oc-
cupying property shall qualify under the adopted
4ffbrdable housing guidelines. ".
Commissioner Allen inquired whether there is a
Way to weight the scale of criterion or eligibi-
lity more heavily to those working in Newport
. Beach, to which Commissioner Bala.lis and Mr. Mor-
rissey suggested 100 %.
Z0
MINUTES
71ftSpecial Adjourned Meeting
August 16 ,1979
City of Newport Beach
INDEX
Clommissioner Beek expressed his feeling that it
Was their job to set up the criterion in such a
way that it does not pay anyone to quit their job
iin order to qualify, . stating his preference to
slee no reference to Newport Beach City boundaries
Ralph Kennedy, member of the Board of Directors
Of the.Orange County Community Housing Corpora-
tion, appeared before the Planning Commission to
state that incorporation occurred 1 year ago as
a non- profit.private corporation and that they
are under contract for one project and negotiat-
ing for 2 others, and that they would not want to
displace someone who is there and might qualify
for the very kind of housing they are trying to
increase.the supply of, and arrangements and
sicreening would occur.
Iln response to a further question by Commissioner
McLaughlin, Mr. Kennedy replied that there would
•
be a recorded restriction that the property must
be used only for that purpose and that Daon might
possibly sell it to the City or Housing Corpora-
tion or a private group, to which Commissioner
McLaughlin replied that she would be reluctant to
siee the City go into housing, to which Mr. Morris
sey replied that there are other options.
Iin response to.a question posed by'Commissioner
Ciokas, Mr. Morrissey replied that the renters
Iould be screened to qualify, and would necessar-
illy requalify annual.ly.
Commissioner Balalis posed a� consideration whethe
their intent was to accept the concept and leave
the administration as to what should be the
City's position, or take 1 of the 4 options to th
'City Council to accept at a later date, or a sug-
gestion by the Planning Commission at a later
date., or accept or modify the document before the
presently..
Hugh Coffin, Acting City Attorney, suggested that
iit would not be appropriate to include the detail
Of the low -cost rentals in this particular record
. ed document, but leave as flexible guidelines, as
the entire concept.on affordable housing could
-5-
COMMISSIONERS
n 2
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
of Newport Beach
MINUTES
I ROLL CALL I I I I J i l l I INDEX ■
0
•
be changed in a few.years, and would not require
amending the agreement itself.
Commissioner Balalis suggested adding to Paragrap
No. 2, ". . . . subject to the approval of thje .
City of Newport Beach. ".
Mr. Coffin commented that it is the City's right
to give control of the affordable housing to any
1 of the 4 groups: 1) Orange County Community
Housing Corpporation 2) Private Investment Cor-
poration 3) City of Newport Beach 4) Daon, and
he suggested in Paragraph No. 2, Page 3, that
guidelines must be established and amended and th
the initial adoption be subject to the approval o
the City of Newport Beach as well, and he comment
ed that this would not make the City a housing
authority, per say.
Ar. Morrissey commented regarding Commissioner
Beek's suggestions, 1) suggesting that they sub-
stitute the word "emp:loye.e," for-the word- "afford -
able" in the agreement, 2) that the agreement be
structured to assure that if the housing was tran
ferred to another organization, to assure that it
be appropriately maintained, stating Commissioner
Beek's preference that it become the property of
the agency that administers it, rather than tjhe
property of Daon .,.and Mr. Morrissey stated Dapn's
,illingness to transfer the property to a third
party on the basis that the third party assume an
incumbrance on the property, 3) consideration
regarding the operation of the property, about
Which the City has the ri.ght to select from a lis
of 4, with a possibility of increasing the length
of the .list, 4) regarding Paragraph 6, Commis-
sioner Beek suggested deleting all language after
the second half of the first sentence, to which
Mr. Coffin responded that in order to obtain an
injunction, sueing.would be necessary, and Daon's
intent was that injunction was the only relief,
rather than sueing for damages.
ff."
MINUTES
INDEX
Joe Stucker, Daon, appeared before the Planning
Commission and stated.that this paragraph must
remain in the agreement from their standpoint.
Mr. Morrissey suggested adding a paragraph.which
provides the option of transferring title on.the
property.
Mr. Hogan inquired whether it is the intent of th
Planning Commission in this regard if someone is
unemployed and in the low - income bracket, are the
to be prohibited from using this housing because
they are not employees
Special Adjourned
Meeting
s w
August 16, 1979
s
6tv of Newport
Beach
INDEX
Joe Stucker, Daon, appeared before the Planning
Commission and stated.that this paragraph must
remain in the agreement from their standpoint.
Mr. Morrissey suggested adding a paragraph.which
provides the option of transferring title on.the
property.
Mr. Hogan inquired whether it is the intent of th
Planning Commission in this regard if someone is
unemployed and in the low - income bracket, are the
to be prohibited from using this housing because
they are not employees
!IVz
Commissioner Cokas stated his understanding that
they are here to supply affordable housing and
not to tie a corporation into getting housing to
their employees.
Commissioner McLaughlin agreed that to exclude th
•
elderly to her was unacceptable.
Commissioner Beek suggested specific language to
amend Paragraph No. 2, Page 3, taking
Into account the age and income of the applicant,
and the length of time .he /she has already lived
in the property and his /her work location. ".
Motion
x
Motion was made to modify Paragraph No. 2, Page
Ayes
Y
x
x
to add, . ". taking into account the age
Noes
x
x
x
and income of the applicant, and the length of
Abstain
x
time he /she has already lived in the property
and his /her work location. ", upon which a Straw
Vote was taken.
Commissioner Beek then suggested, "That screeninc
of tenants shall be accomplished in accordance
tith guidelines.,established.by the agency. ".
Commissioner Thomas stated his preference that
the public be given the idea that this is not
solely a low - income project.
gommissioner Allen inquired whether leaving the
4greement as is limits them to those criterion
•
and precludes other criterion, to.which Mr. Coffi
!IVz
COMMISSIONERS
Io N
Motion
Ayes
Noes
Abstain
0
0
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
of Newport Beach
replied that he did.not feel that those 2 items
would limit other factors to be considered.
Motion was made to change: "affordable" housint
to "employee" housing throughout the agreemen ,
Upon which a Straw Vote was taken.
the Planning Commission recessed at 8:30 p.m. and
reconvened at 8:40 p.m.
Commissioner Beek commented regarding the request
oif the Board-of Elders of the Mariner's Church
that widening of the Jamboree Road /Bison Avenue.
iintersections plus signalization be made prior to
the commencement of the.project, to which Mr..
Morrissey replied that it might be possible to
phase it in toward the first of the project, and
Dlon Webb, Assistant City Engineer, commented that
glrading must precede paving and that substantial
glrading is necessary on Bison Avenue, requiring
special traffic treatment, normally not done in
the aforementioned sequence.
Commissioner Allen inquired regarding the indust-
rial portion as part of a Master Plan in planning
for a number of years, commenting regarding the
April 1978 report, in which Mr. Morrissey, Ford
erospace and Communications Corporation, made a
plresen.tation on the square footage of the existin<
ajnd proposed.d&velopm6nts of Ford- Aeronutronits,
he figures of which now are doubled.
Mr. Morriss -ey responded that the figures used in
the minutes were inaccurate.
flames Hewicker, Assistant Director- Planning, read
from Resolution No. 9472 of October 1978, regard -
il.ng the Ford- Aeronutronics project.
G'ommissioner Thomas inquired regarding the height
limit requirement,.to which Fred Talarico, Enviror
rental Coordinator, replied that for attached
rInits it-would be 37', with an average of 32', an(
i
II\ bum
COMMISSIONERS ':, Special Adjourned Meeting MINUTES
August 16, 1979
io
pity of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL INDEX
for detached units it would be 28'; with an aver-
age of 24', and Mr. Hewicker replied that the'
criteria used for these figures were the attached
units directly across Ford Road in the MacLeaO
Development and the detached units in Eastbluff.
Commissioner Beek expressed his feeling that if
the garages are permitted to come forward, that
the second floor should be restricted to the Same
setback as the body of the house, to which Mr.
Hewick.er responded that the reason for the 5' set
hack for the:garages is to provide,a shallow
enough depth for the garage to discourage the
parking of a car on.an apron with the back of the
cars protruding out beyond the sidewalk or curb,
specified as either 5' or 20'.
Mr. Morrissey then requested a revision of the
donditions to include: 1) Page 20; Condition
too. 43, referring to the assurance that sewers
. will be available, and 2) Page 22, Condition
No. 48, referring to the same subject, but with
al slightly different intent, revised from "`for th
site" to "for a structure ", so as to avoid a
requirement that they guarantee sewerage for all
residences if they should decide to build a ware-
house on the industrial site, so as to sever the
residential from the industrial requirement on
sewers 3) Page 20, Condition No. 26, a condition
on purchase and rental units covered adequately
in the new agreement; therefore, delete said con -
dition 4) Page 27, Condition No. 41, notifying
people regarding noise, units of which have been
removed as planned originally in the 65 CNEL, sai
condition, no longer applicable 5) Page 28, Con -
dition.No. 46, relating to homeowner's require-
ment to maintain the public park, an inappropriat
imposition to ask private homeowners to maintain
a public park, which homeowners will already.be
maintaining a very significant amount of open
space as.part of the project 6) change in usage
results in a very substantial traffic reduction,
and they requested that the wording be added that
said, "Any changes or modifications in the allow-
able intensity of development or revisions of the
r1
10
COMMISSIONERS Special Adjourned Meeting MINUTES
August.16, 1979
I City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL INDEX
existing density classification for the residen-
tial and indu.strial uses on the Aeronutronic -Ford
site General Plan Amendment No. 79 -1 be consis-
tent with Amendment No. 532, Resubdivision No.
629 and Tentative Map of Tract No. 10391, as op-
proved. ".
Motion x Motion was made to vote separately on the residen
Ayes x x x x tial and industrial proposals, upon which a Straw
Noes x x Vote was taken.
Motion K Motion was .made to approve the Alternate "B ",
250 detached units, 50 attached units and 50
off -site affordable units housing portion of the
project as proposed by the developer; with the
modifications in.the conditions as requested by
the applicant, and with the other conditions and
findings as recommended by the Staff.
Mr. Hogan suggested that there be added an ad-
ditional condition on the Tract Map which would
require that the developer enter into an agree -
ment guaranteeing the development and management
If the affordable housing project as approved by
the City.
fommissioner Haidinger stated his understanding
that this included 250 single family dwellings,
50 multi - family dwellings and 50 off -site afford-
able dwellings.
Mr. Coffin stated that the agreement regarding th
affordable housing would be on the Tract Map as
opposed to this Amendment, to allow for greater
control.
Motion x Amendment to the Motion was made to delete the
Ayes x $0 affordable_ housing units from the Motion and
Noes x x XK x x 11 wording which would include their considera-
ion, upon which a Straw Vote was taken.
i
Motion x Amendment to the Motion was made to send to t-he
City Council both the on -site and off -site af-
fordable units proposals as 2 alternatives (Al-
ternate A; 350 units,.100 of which are on= site;
• Alternate B, 250 single family, 50 attached, 50
bff -site affordable, as reflected in the Original
Motion.
-10-
�w
Special Adjourned meeting
August 16, 1979
itv of Newport Beach
MINUTES
ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I I INDEX ■
Ayes
Noes
Motion
Ayes
Noes
1W on
x
x
xix
Ayes
Noes I x I 1x 1x
mmissioner Thomas stated his preference to Send
rward only one alternative.
Straw Vote was then taken on the Amendment to:the
Motion, which MOTION CARRIED.
Commissioner Allen expressed her feeling that she
would like to support either alternative, as they
both show a laudable attempt, and she was in sup-
port of the project.
Mr. Morrissey stated that should Alternative "A"
b',e. adopted, there would be no affordable housing.
Commissioner McLaughlin stated her definite pre -
ference that the affordable housing be on -site.
Motion was made to reconsider the preceding Motion
upon which a Straw Vote was taken.
Amendment to the Motion was made to forward only
Alternative "A" (350. units, 100 of which are on-
Site affordable) to the City Council.
Pn response to a question posed by Commissioner
McLaughlin, Mr. Morrissey stated that the Orange
County Housing Community Association had stated
that building a density of 15 units or more an
acre is necessary to approach a break -even point
on affordable housing, and that Alternative "A"
provided only 100 units on 18 acres; or 5k units
per acre and only 1/3 the density necessary to
Support affordable housing.
was then taken on the Amendment, which
ED.
Motion
x
Amendment to the Motion was made that no private
Ayes
x
x
x
x
Streets be included, but that all streets be dedi-
Noes
x
x
x
dated, upon which a Straw Vote was taken.
Ayes
x
x
x
x
xx
Straw Vote was then taken on the Original Motion,
Noes
x
which MOTION CARRIED.
E
-11-
VoXC
3' w x CO
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
of Newport Beach
MINUTES
I ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I. I INDEX ■
Motion
Lotion was made that the industrial portion of
he project be accepted as proposed.
Commissioner Thomas..posed a question of Commis. -
sioner Beek, to which Commissioner Beek stated hi:
understanding that.20% of the facility was part
of the core of facilities which served the remain
ing, or 1/5 serves and 4/5 is being served, and
$/5 of the 4/5 has already been built., and toy
halt construction would be to waste 1/4 pf the
core facility.
r. Morrissey responded that they have made a
u rge investment in the community,'that .their,
history indicates a good track record, and that
they have changed a goodly portion of the site
to a less intense use and that they would like
to complete a. plan that does not waste the assets
which they have already put into the site.
. Commissioner Allen expressed her difficulty that
it is, in fact, a less intense use, as the indus-
trial portion covers almost the entire allowable
in the P -C Text, as the physical density of the
buildings is the same as the previous plan.
Mr. Morrissey responded that they were requested
to propose a change in use that.would reduce
traffic intensity, which they had done.
Commissioner Allen expressed her concern that
the residential gets most of the P.M. peak hour
traffic going the opposite direction; however,
the industrial still has 900 P.M. peak hour trips
an addition to the present figure with the ad
8ition of 1771 employees, leaving 4 intersections
over acceptable levels; and she commended the
residential effort., but expressed her concern
With the industrial effort.
Commissioner McLaughlin stated.that she shared
"the concern regarding the intensity of the in
-
du. but that if there was affordable hous-
ing, that she would find it a substantial miti-
gation measure.
-12-
C MISSIONERS1
1 F- w
I
Special Adjourned Meeting MINUTES
August 16, 1979
City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
straw Vote was then taken on the Motion, which
Noes
x
OEM TION CARRIED.
Motion
x
Motion was made to include that the changes made
Ayes
x
x
x
x
in connection with the General Plan Amendment
Noes
x
K
x
79 -1 will be consistent with any development plan
approved by the City Council for the Ford- Aeronu-
tronic site, upon which a Straw Vote was taken..
In response to a question posed by Commission r
Reek, Mr. Coffin replied that the Motion was a-
sically an expression of intent and that it des
not bind the Planning Commission in any way.
Motion
x
Motion was made that the Planning Commission
Ayes
x
x
XK
x
approve the Environmental Impact Report and re-
Noes
x
x
Commend that the City Council approve the Environ-
mental Impact Report and certify the Environmental
Impact Report is complete with the findings list -
ed below:
•
That the Draft Environmental Impact Report
is complete and prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act,
that its contents have been,considered in
the decisions on this project.
That based on the information contained in
the Draft EIR, the project incorporates suf-
ficient mitigation measures to reduce poten-
tially-significant environmental effects, an
that the project will not result i.n signifi-
cant environmental impacts.
and that the Planning Commission approve Amend-
nent No. 532 /Ordinance No. 180.7 and recommend tha
the City Council approve Ordinance No. 1807 /Amend
.
Oent No. 532, revising the Planned Community De-
velopment Plan and Development Standards for the
Fiord- Aeronutronic P -C District.
Motion
Motion was made that the Planning Commission make
Ayes
x
x
x
x
the following findings:
Noes
x
E
-13-
COMMISSIONERS
Iv
m
ROLL CALL
•
n
U
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
City of Newport Beach
MINUTES
I
1. That the map meets the requirements of Tlitle
19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code; all
ordinances of the City, all applicable gen-
eral or specific plans, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied with the plan.of
subdivision.
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
and approve Resubdivision No. 629 and recommend
same to the City Council, subject;to the follow-
ing conditions:
1. That a parcel map be filed.
P. That all improvements be constructed as re-
quired by ordinance and the Public Works
Department.
8. That Section 19.16.030 of the Subdivision
Ordinance providing that drawings of the, par
cel map at a scale.of 1" = 100' are provided
to the Public Works Department be waived,.
4. That Jamboree Road be widened on the easter-
ly side of the existing Ford entrance to pro
vide for a westerly parkway width of ten
feet, a southbound traveled way of forty -
eight feet curb -to -curb, double left -turn
lanes, and a right -turn lane; that existing
median improvements disturbed be replaced;
and that the traffic signal be modified as
necessary.
5. That all vehicular access rights to MacAirthu
Boulevard be released and relinquished to th
City.
The location of all accesses to Bison Avenue
Jamboree Road and Ford Road shall meet the
approval of the City Traffic Engineer.
7. That the remaining improvements along Bison
Avenue and easterly side of Jamboree Road
-14-
COMMISSIONERS Special Adjourned Meeting MINUTES
August 16, 1979
7
o 3' w' x w City of Newport Beach
L 1 INDEX
be comple.te.d, including ten -foot sidewalk
bike trail.
8. That the northerly side of Ford Road be
widened and improved to primary arterial
standards.
9. That a full width connection of Bison Ave-
nue to MacArthur Boulevard be constructed.
E That widening to provide a double left -turn
lane for south -bound Jamboree Road be pro-
vided. (This requirement may be reduced
or deleted if the North Ford Development can
be conditioned for this improvement.) This
condition requires additional right-of-way
not owned or under the control of the devel-
oper. In the event the developer cannot ac-
quire the right -of -way, the City may acquire
the right -of -way through its eminent domain
• powers, with the developer reimbursing the
City for all costs incurred.
1. That traffic signals be installed by the de-
veloper at the. intersections of:
a) Bison Avenue - Jamboree Road
b) .Bison Avenue — MacArthur Boulevard
Separate sureties and agreements may be pro-
vided for this work. The developer's obliga
tion for these signals may be reduced to 50%
if partial funding from the North Ford De-
velopment is obtained. The agreement will
provide for reimbursement to the developer
if funding from the North Ford Development i
received within five years of the completion
and acceptance of the signal.
That a twelve -foot minimum width separated
bicycle trail be constructed between Bison
Avenue and.Ford Road paralleling MacArthur
Boulevard. Trail design shall be approved
by Public Works Department. The structural
section of the trail shall be designed to
handle maintenance equipment and SCE vehicle
if in the Edison easement.
-15-
)MMISSIONERS MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
-, I i Gtv of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INDEX ■
13. That a minimum sixteen- .foot -wide strip of
land be dedicated for street and highwaypur
poses on the westerly side of MacArthur I
Boulevard, and that the remaining improv6
ments along the.westerly side of MacArthur
Boulevard be completed to major arterials
highway standards.
14. That all work within the MacArthur Boulevard
right-of- way be done under an encroachment
permit issued by the California Department
of Transportation.
15. That easements for public facilities be
shown on map.
16. That a standard agreement and accompanying
surety be provided to guarantee the.satis-
factory completion of public improvements
if it is. desired to record the parcel map be
• fore the public improvements are completed.
Sureties and subdivision agreements for ap-
plicable portions of these required condi-
tions may be substituted at the time subidi-
vision of these parcels are.filed. These
agreements will provide for the completion
of the improvements covered within 20 months
after the agreements are executed, unless
other time restraints are spelled out in
the condition covering the.improvement.'
17. That Water Capital Improvement acreage fees
be paid for all new development, including
the construction of new facilities on Parcel
4. For existing Aeronutronic Division faci-
lities on Parcel 4, the applicability of Wa-
ter Capital Improvement acreage fees shall
be subject to further .investigation.
a8. A landscape and irrigation plan for all com-
mon areas of the, residential portion of the
project and for the industrial expansion
portion of the project.shall.be prepared by
a licensed landscape architect.. The land-
scape plan shall integrate the installation
• of landscaping with the proposed constru!ctio
-16-
)MMISSIUNLKS Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
i I City of Newport Beach
MINUTES
ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I. I INDEX ■
40
schedule. (Prior to the occupancy of any
new industrial buildings or dwelling unit,
the licensed "landscape architect shall c�r-
tify to the Department of Community Develop-
ment that the landscaping has been installed
in accordance with the ,prepared plan.)
19. The landscape plan shall be subject to the
review of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Department and approval of the Community
Development Department.
20. The landscape plan shall include a maint$n-
ance program which controls the use of fer-
tilizers and pesticides.
21. The landscape plan shall place heavy emphasi
on the use of drought- resistant native vege-
tation.
2.2. That erosion.control measures be done on any
exposed slopes as soon as possible to reduce
erosion potential.
2,3. That erosion control measures shall.be One
on any exposed slopes within thirty days
after grading or as approved by the Grading
Engineer.
24. Development of the site will be subject to a
grading permit to be approved by the Depart-
ment of Community Development. Surface and
subsurface drainage shall be provided to the
satisfaction of the Community Development
Department and the Public Works Department.
25. That the grading plan shall include a com-
plete plan for temporary and.permanent drain
age.facilit'ies, to minimize any potential
1 impacts from silt, debris, and other water
pollutants.
26. That the graded slopes at all intersections
be designed to provide.sight distance for a
speed of 25 m.p.h. Landscaping, walls, and
-17-
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
n August 16, 1979
City of Newaort Beach
INDEX
other physical obstructions shall be consid-
ered in the sight distance requirements. Th
sight .dis.tance requirements may.be approp
riately modified at non - critical locations,
subject to approval of the City Traffic En-
gineer.
27. An erosion and dust control plan shall be
submitted with the grading permit applica-
tion and be subject to the approval of the
Community Development Department.
28. That an erosion and siltation control plan
be approved by the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region,
and that the plan be submitted to said Board
ten days prior to any construction activitie .
29. That the applicant provide for street sweep-
ing services for all non - dedicated streets.
• equal to that service provided by the City
for residential area streets.
•
�0. That the applicant provide for weekly vacuum
sweeping of all surface parking areas within
the industrial portion of the project and
weekly vacuum sweepi.ng of all common parking
areas of the residential portion of the pro-
ject.
31. That the applicant provide on -site retention
basins (i.e., grease traps) and for their
maintenance in the residential and industria
portions of the site, including parking area
of existing industrial development. The ba-
sins shall be sufficient to control first
flush polution from both existing and pro-
posed development.
i
$2. That grading shall be conducted in accordanc
with plans prepared by a Civil Engineer and
based on recommendations of a soil engineer
and an engineering geologist subsequent to
the completion of a comprehensive soil and
Im
COMMISSIONERS Special Adjourned'Meeting MINUTES
August 16,.1979
y x � >R pity of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL III III I INDEX
-19-
geologic investigation of the site. Perma-
nent reproducible copies of the "Approved
as Built" grading.plans on standard size
sheets shall be furnished to the Department
of Community Development.
33. That the project comply with the Uniform
Building Code - 1976 requirements.
34. That final design of the project provide fo
the incorporation of water - saving devicek fo
project lavatories and other water- using.fa-
cilities.
35. Prior to the occupancy of any new industrial
buildings, the sorting of recyclable materia
from other solid waste be provided for de-
velopment on Parcel No. 4.
•
36. The.following disclosure statement of tho
City of Newport Beach's policy regarding the
Orange County Airport shall be included in
all leases or sub - leases for space in the
project and shall be included in any Coven-
ants, Conditions and Restrictions which may
be recorded against the property.
Disclosure Statement
The Lessee herein; his heirs, successors and
assigns, acknowledge that:.
a) The Orange County Airport may not be
able to provide adequate air service
for business establishments which rely
on such service;
b) When an alternate air facility is avail
able, a complete phase out of jet ser-
vice may occur at the Orange County Air
port;
c) The City of Newport Beach may continue
to oppose additional commercial air ser
vice expansions at the Orange County
•
Airport;
-19-
i
WISSIONERS MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
x August 16, 1979
Cit V Q of New ort Beach
R O L L CALL I I I I I I I I I INDEX
d) Lessee, his heirs, successors and as-
signs, will not actively oppose any;ac-
tion taken by the City of Newport Bach
to phase out or limit jet air servi. e
at the Orange County Airport.
37. That should any resources be uncovered dur-
ing construction, that a qualified archaeo-
logist or paleontologist evaluate the site
prior to completion of construction activi-
ties, and that all work on site be done in
accordance with the City's Council Policies
K -5 and K -6.
38. The circulation systems improvements set
forth in the approved Traffic Phasing Plan,
shall be installed or guaranteed and bonded .
for by the applicant, prior to the occupancy
of any buildings.
• 39. That subdrains be installed in the canyons
draining toward MacArthur Boulevard and in
the low.area near the intersection of Jain-
Road and For Road, the latter to be
tied into the existing storm drain system
and the former into the downstream.canyon
area or as approved by the City's Engineerin
Geologist.
40. That prior to placing any compacted fill, al
existing fill, soft and compressible soil,
and topsoil shall be removed. All fill soil
placed on the property shall require com-
paction to a minimum relative compaction of
90 %. The aforementioned shall be subject to
the approval of the City's Engineering Geo-
logist and may be modified as site condi-
tions require.
41. The lighting of the industrial parking faci-
lities shall be.modified so as to provide
directional shielding to said fixtures so as
to not impact residential areas, in a manner
to be approved by the Community Development
Department.
Sp3l17
COMMISSIONERS ! MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
_ �] m August 16, . 1979
3��0 6i D
9 City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL 17ri I I I IINDEX
42. Prior to the extension of Bison Avenue, bio-
logi.cal surveys of the alignment shall be
accomplished and measures designed to pro-
tect the Orange County Turkish Rugging in-
corporated to the extent practicable and sub
jest to the review and approval of the Publi
Works Department and Community Development
Department.
43. Prior to the issuance of any building permit
for a structure, the applicants shall demon -
strate to the satisfaction of the Publics
Works Department and Community Development
Department that adequate sewer facilities
will be available for the structure. Such
demonstration shall include verification fro
Orange County Sanitation District No. 5.
44. Perimeter slopes along roadways shall be re-
graded to 2:1 as well as required 2:1 slopes
in the interior of the property,
45. The applicant shall demonstrate to the De-
partment of Community Development that mea-
sures are being taken to stagger work hours
on Parcel No. 4. These measures shall be
similar to, if not more comprehensive than,
plans already in effect at the existing fa-
cilities.
46. Applicant shall record as part of the Coven-
ants, Conditions and Restrictions on this
subdivision the following provisions:
Purchased Units
The employees of Ford Motor Company, or any
affiliate, working at the Newport Beach faci
lity of Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation, shall be given sixty (60) days'
notice of sale and opportunity to purchase.
prior to the dwelling units' first being mad
available to the general public. Said notic
shall be deemed roperly given by posting in
at least ten (10� conspicuous locations :in-
side of or on the Newport Beach corporate
property and by publication in the corporate
-21-
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
' Gtv of Newport Beach
INDEX
newsletter. Said notice shall no longer
be ;required after the original sale of the
dwelling units. Each employee would.be re-
quired to sign a representation at the t.ime
possession of the residence is delivered, '
stating: (i) that employee is at that time
still an employee of the Ford Motor Company,
or any affiliate, working at the Newport;
Beach facility. of Ford Aerospace and Comlmun-
icatio.ns Corporation and has no present in-
tention to leave that employment in the near
term, and (ii) it is his intention to use
the property as his principal residence..
The offers would be on terms and at prices
the same as or no higher than the terms and
prices which applicant would offer to the
public generally.upon expiration of the
priority period as described above. This
condition shall be subject to applicant's
• compliance with all laws, including speci-
fically the California Subdivided Lands
Act, under which the Department of Real
Estate regulates the sale of residences
to individuals.
Rental. Units
The employees of Ford Motor Company, or
any affiliate, working at the Newport Beach
facility of Ford Aerospace and Communication
Corporation, shall be given thirty (30)
days' notice and opportunity to lease or.
rent prior to the rental units' first being
made available to the general public. There
after, applicant shall give reasonable nio-
tice to Ford Aerospace and Communications
Corporation of any future vacancies. Ford
Aerospace and Communications Corporation
shall maintain a listing of available rental
units and shall exercise all reasonable
efforts to inform employees of Ford Motor
Company, or any affiliate, working at the
Newport Beach facility of Ford Aerospace and
Communications Corporation of their availa-
• bility. Applicant shall give priority to
Ford Motor Company employees, or any affil -
iate, working at the Newport Beach faciTity
-22-
ROLL
1MI551UNtK5
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
Gtv of Newport Beach
MINUTES
INDEX
of Ford Aerospace and Communications Cor-
poration in the rental of said units.
47. That the project landscape plan shall in-
clude an irrigation plan which minimizes
water use and prevents overwatering. The
plan shall be approved by the Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Department and the Department
of Community Development.
48. That prior to the occupancy of any building,
the applicant shall provide written verifi-
cation from Orange County Sanitation Dis -.
trict No. 5 that adequate sewer capacity .
is available to serve the building.
Motion K Motion was made that.the Planning Commission make
the following findings:
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title
• 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all
ordinances of the City, all applicable gien-
eral or specific plans, and the Planning!
Commission is satisfied with the plan of
subdivision.
2. That the proposed subdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
3. That .the site is physically suitable for the
type of development proposed.
4. That the site is physically.suitable for the.
proposed density of development.
6.. That an Environmental Impact Report has been
prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, and that its con-
tents have been considered in the decisions
on this project.
6. That based on the information contained on
the Environmental Impact Report, the project
incorporates mitigation measures to reduce
potentially- significant environmental effect ,
•
-23-
iMISSIONERS MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
0 August 16, 1979
N y N CItV of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INDEX
j and that the project will.not result inisig-
nifi.cant,environmental impacts. Furthers,
that the economic and social benefits to
the.Commumity override any presently antici-
pated negative environmental effects of the
project.
7. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvement will not substantially
and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or
their habitat.
$. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed'.improvements are not likely to taus
serious public health problems.
9. That the design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements will.n.ot conflict with
any easements, acquired by the public at
large, for access through or use of, propert
• within the proposed subdivision.
0'. That the discharge,of waste from the propose
subdivision will not result in or add to any
violation of existing requirements prescribe
by a California Regional Water Quality Con -.
trol Board pursuant to Division 7 (commeincin
with Section 1300) of the Water Code.
and approve the.Tentative Map of Tract No. 10391,
together with the Affordable Housing Agreement,
and recommend same to the City Council, subject
to the following conditions:
,, ,,, , ,
1. That a tract map be filed.
2., That the boundary of the final tract map be
j checked by the County Surveyor before.being
submitted to the City for approval.
3 That all improvements be constructed as re-
quired by ordinance and the Public Works
Department.
-24-
COMMISSIONERS
K
°m
�. WX
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
of Newport Beach
INDEX
4. That Section 19.16.030 of the Subdivision
Ordinance be waived providing that drawings,
of the tract map at a scale of 1" = 100',
are provided to the Public Works Department.
5. That Section 19.20.030 (f) of the Sub diVi-
sion Ordinance-be waived and grades of more
than 7% be permitted as approved by the Pub
lic Works Department.
-25-
6. That a standard subdivision agreement and
accompanying surety be provided to guarantee
the satisfactory completion of public im-
provements if it is desired to obtain build-
ing permits or record the tract map before
the public improvements are completed. Thes
agreements will provide for the completion
of the improvements covered within 24 months
after the agreements are executed unless
other time restraints are spelled out in the
•
condition covering the improvement.
7. That the design of.primate streets conform
with the City's private street policy, excep
where otherwise approved by the Public Works
Department.
8. That the structural section of the private
streets and drives be.designed in accordance
with standard civil engineering practice.
The design shall be approved and the con -
struction inspected by the Public Works De-
partment. The standard plan check and in-
spection fee shall be paid.
9. That the private streets shall have a street
light system approved by the Public Works
Department.
1b. That.the Cal.ifornia Vehicle Code be enforced
on the private streets.
ll. That delineation acceptable to the Police
Department and Public Works Department be
provided along the sidelines of the private
•
streets and drives.
-25-
�d
0
0
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
MINUTES
City of Newport Beach
INDEX
12. That the final design of on -site pedestrian
circulation be reviewed and approved by the
Public Works Department and the Community
Development Department.
13. That the..intersection of the private streets
and drives be designed to provide sight dis-
tance-for a speed of 25 MPH. Slopes, land-
scaping, walls and other physical obstructions
shall be considered in the sight distance
requirements. Landscaping within the sight
distance line shall not exceed twenty -four
inches in height. The sight distance re-
quirement may be appropriately modified at
noncritical locations, subject to approval of
the Traffic Engineer.
14. That a Traffic Control Plan shall be submit-
ted and approved by the City's Traffic En-
gineer.
15. That the location, width, configuration, and
concept of the private street and drive sys-
tem be subject to further review and approval
by the City's Traffic Engineer.
16
17.
18.
That if it is desired to have a control gate
on the entrance off Bison Avenue or Ford
Road, a turn - around.shall be provided prior
to the gate. The design of the controlled
entrance shall be reviewed and approved by
the Public Works Department.
That: the geometries and any proposed guard
house gates or other access controls from
Jamboree Road be subject to review and ap-
proval by the Public Works Department. Sigh
distance shall be provided for a speed of 55
MPH. In addition, adequate sight distance
shall.,be provided for bicycles on the bike
trail on the easterly side of Jamboree Road.
That all vehicular access rights to Ford
Road, except for one access to Street "A ", o
access to Lot_254, one
Division Facility and
entrances to the lower
-26-
access to Aeronutroni
the two existing drive
Aeronutronic Facility
�m
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
of Newport Beach
INDEX
be released and relinquished to the City.
19. That all vehicular access rights to Jamboree
Road, except for the existing plant entrance
and one entrance at least 850 ft. northerly
of Ford Road be released and relinquished
to the City.
20. That traffic signals be installed by the de-
veloper at Bi -son Avenue - Celtis Place /Lot
F and at Ford Road- Aeronutronic Division
Access Road.
21. That traffic signals be installed by the de -.
veloper at the intersections of:
a) Bison Avenue- Camelback /Lot B
b) Ford Road- Street "A" (500' West of Mac-
Arthur Boulevard)
• The implementation of this requirement shall
be subject to verification by the City of
traffic signal warrants. If the traffic
signal warrants are not met within a five-
year period after acceptance by the Council
of the public .improvements for the tract,
the developer shall be relieved from this
portion of the conditions of approval. Se-
parate sureties and agreements may be pro-
vided for this work. The developer's obli-
gation for these signals may be reduced to
50% if partial funding from.the adjacent
developments is obtained. The subdivision
agreement will provide for reimbursement
to the developer if funding from other
sources is received within five years of
the completion and acceptance of the signal.
22. That sight distance for the bike trail along
Bison, Jamboree, Ford.and,MacArthur be pro -
vided at all entrances and drives.
23. That the noise impact from Bison Avenue,
Jamboree Road, Ford Road and MacArthur
Boulevard be considered; that the dwelling
• units be designed to provide for sound at-
-P7-
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
" m August 16, 1979
I F I City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL III III I INDEX
tenuation in accordance with the requirejment!
of law and the recommendations of a qualifie(
-28-
acoustical engineer based on the ultimate
traffic projection for the.roadways; and
that noise attenuation walls and /or berms
be constructed to.reduce.noise levels in
outside living areas to 65 dB CNEL.
24:., That storage capacity in San Joaquin Reser-
voir equal to one maximum day's demand bie
dedicated to the City of Newport Beach.
25. That a hydrology and hydraulic study for
the site be reviewed and approved by the
Public Works Department prior to recorda-
tion of the tract map. Any modifications
to the existing storm drain system or ex-
tensions shown to be required by the study
shall be the responsibility of the develop -
e r..
26. That.easements for public facilities be
shown on the tract map.
7. That easements for ingress, egress and pub-
lic utility purposes on all private streets
be dedicated to the City.
28. That the location of fire hydrants be review•
ed and approved by the Fire Department and "
the Public Works Department.
29. That all weather vehicular access be provid-
ed to each of the storm drain and sewer in-
lets and manholes that are not immediately
adjacent to a paved roadway.
30. That a master plan of water, sewer and storm
drain facilities be prepared and approved
prior to recording any final map (s .
.31. That a location, width, and configuration
of the public utility easements be subject
to further review and approval by the Pub-
lic Works De artment prior to recording any
•
final map (s�.
-28-
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
?
051 d August 16, 1979
n
In w 9 City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL INDEX
132. That each dwelling unit.be served with an in
dividual water service and sewer lateral
connection to the public water and sewer
systems unless otherwise approved by the
Public Works Department.
33. That all applicable conditions of Resubdi-
vision No. 629 be fulfilled; and that Re-
subdivision No. 629 be recorded prior to
the recording of Tract No. 10391 or any;othe
subdivision of land shown on Tentative Tract
No. 10391.
34. That tennis court lighting facilities be de-
signed and installed so as not to impair
nighttime visibility on adjacent arterial
roadways (MacArthur Boulevard, Bison Avenue,
Ford Road, Jamboree Road). The City's Traf-
fic Engineer shall approve installations.
• 35. That bus turnouts shall be provided at loca-
tions to be determined by the Public Works
Department along Ford Road /Bison Avenue,
Jamboree Road and.MacArthur Boulevard
36. That a detailed geotechnical report be pre-
pared prior to approval of the final tract
map and before finalization of a grading
plan, subject to the approval of the Public
Works Department and the Community Develop=
ment Department.
37. That prior to the recordation of the Final
Map, the applicant shall deposit with the
City an in -lieu Park Fee in accordance with
Section 19.50.070 of the Newport Beach Mu-
nicipal Code.
38. that the noise impact on the active recrea-
tion.portion of the proposed public park
from Bison Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard be
mitigated, based on the recommendations of
a qualified acoustical engineer to a level
not to exceed 65 dBA CNEL. The aforemention
ed is to be based on future traffic condi-
tions for Bison Avenue and MacArthur Boule-
vard, established by the City Traffic Engin-
eer.
-29-
COMMISSIONERS Special Adjourned Meeting MINUTES
_ August 16, 1979
arm.
N City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I INDEX
39.
40
41
That irrigation waters, either by run -off
or by percolation, shall be excluded from
the 'natural area of.the Public Park site in
accordance.with a drainage plan to be rer
viewed by the Public Works Department and
approved by the Community Development De-
partment.
The applicant shall provide car wash facil.i-
ties within each residential area so that
run -off can be directed to sewer facilities
and not Upper Newport Bay.
The following disclosure statement of the
City of Newport Beach's policy regarding
highway associated noise shall be included
in any covena -nts, conditions and restriction
which may be recorded against the property,
or shall be included in any deed or other
conveyance document conveying any portion of
the property not subject to Covenants, Cond-
itions and Restrictions, and shall be in-
cluded in all leases or subleases for space
in the project.
Disclosure Statement
The property owner and /or lessee herein,
their heirs, successors and assigns acknow-
ledge that:
a) The property may be subject to excel -.
sive.ly =htgh noise levels f.rom.1*acArthur
Bowl- evard,.Jamboree Road, Ford Road
and &ison Avenue.
b) The City of Newport Beach has required
the installation of certain measures to
reduce highway associated noise in con -
junction with the approval of the de-
velopment of this property.
c) Any additional measures which may be
needed to reduce highway associated
noise are the sole responsibility of
the property owner and /or lessee.
-30-
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
w August 16, 1979
N W (A 9 City Of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL INDEX
d) The property owner, lessee,:their heirs
successors and assigns shall hold the
City of Newport Beach harmless from any
claim, suit.,.demand,.request or damages
resulting from or caused by highway, as=
sociated noise impacting upon or af-
fecting the property or any portion of
the property.
47. Prior to the City's approval of the geologic
studies for the site, that shall include de-
termination of the terrace deposits - bedroc
and groundwater conduction through the site,
interested adjacent homeowner associations'
• I I I I I I I I shall be given a reasonable opportunity to
review said studies.
-31-
42. The grading plan shall demonstrate that the
single- family lots are sufficient to provide
2:1 slopes to the satisfaction of the City's
Engineering Geologist.
43. The park site "natural area" (portions of
Lot 255 shall be stabilized in such a manner
so as to protect the biological resources
and prevent erosion. Measures taken shall
be reviewed by the Public Works Department
and approved by the Community Development
Department.
•
44. Prior to the recordation of the Final Tract
Map., the City's Engineering Geologist shall
review and approve geologic studies for the
site that shall include determination of the
Terrace Deposits- Bedrock and groundwater
.conduction through the site.
145. The proposed park site shall be rough - graded
prior to dedication to the City in accordabc
with a plan to be approved by the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Department and th!e De
partment of Community Development.
I
46. The maintenance. for the proposed park site
shall be provided for by applicant until
such time as home - owner associations are
formed which Will be responsible for the ul-
timate site maintenance.
47. Prior to the City's approval of the geologic
studies for the site, that shall include de-
termination of the terrace deposits - bedroc
and groundwater conduction through the site,
interested adjacent homeowner associations'
• I I I I I I I I shall be given a reasonable opportunity to
review said studies.
-31-
COMMISSIONERS
N 7C 41 7
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
of Newport Beach
INDEX
418. That a Public Easement be provided across
Lot "B" for Public Access to the Public
Park.
49. That the existing 16 -inch water main in
Bison Avenue be extended easterly from Camel
back -Street to MacArthur Boulevard.
50: A program for control of groundwater shall.b
provided to the satisfaction of the Depart-
ment of Community Development.
511. Discharge of surface drainage from the pro-
ject shall be performed in a manner to mini-
mize erosion downstream. Design of the sys-
tem shall include mitigation of downstream
erosion.
5'2. .Control of infiltration to the groundwater
system from the project shall be provided
• as part of the project design.
3. The velocity of concentrated run -off from
Lot "A" shall be evaluated and erosive velo-
cities controlled as part of the project
design.
Motion
x
Amendment to the Motion was made that prior to
Ayes
x
approval of the grading permit that the applir:
Noes
x
x
A
x.x
dant's screening procedures and technical emple-
mentation related to the agreement be finalized
between the City of Newport Beach and the Appli-
cant.
Ayes
K
x
x
x
x
driginal Motion was then voted on, which MOTION
Noes
x
OARRIED.
Motion
x
Motion.was made that the Planning Commission make
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
the following findings:
Noes
Y
x
1. That a.draft Environmental Impact Report on
the project has been prepared in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality
Act, and that its contents have been consid-
ered in the decisions on the project.
-32-
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
s 5' &°
N City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL I I I I I I 117DEX
2. That based on the information contained in
the Draft EIR, the project incorporates
significant mitigation measures to redu6O
potentially.significant environmental ef-
fects, and that.the project will not result
in significant environmental impacts.
3. That the Phasing Plan is consistent with
the Newport Beach General Plan and the Plan-
ned Community Development Plan for Ford-
Aeronutronics as proposed.
4. That based on the Phasing Plan and support-
ing information submitted therewith, there
is a reasonable.correlation between.projecte
traffic at time of completion and the capa-
city of affected intersections.
5. That the applicant has taken into considera-
ti.on in the preparation of his plan charac=
• teristics in the design of his development
which either reduce traffic generation or
traffic onto less i.mpact arterials or thmug
intersections in the least congested direc-
tion.
That in its collective judgment and recog-
nizing the rights of property owners to use
and develop their property, the reduction
in traffic impacts associated with the Chang
from industrial to residential uses on.the
site, is a significant step toward improving
traffic conditions within the City.
and approve the Phasing.Plan for the remaining
development in the Aeronutronic Ford P -C Dis-
trict, and recommend same to the City Council,
subject to the following conditions:
1. The circulation systems improvements listed
below and identified on Pages 7 through 10
of the Traffic Study dated May 8, 1979, shal
be installed and those beyond his control,
being a, d, f; i, j, 1 and m, shall be guar-
anteed and bonded for by the applicant prior
• to the occupancy of any buildings.
-33-
i
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
15-1 C W I N City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL INDEX
a) Add southbound optional through or nigh
turn lane o.n.Campus Drive at Bristol
Street North.
b) If the Corona del Mar Freeway is not ex
tended; add southbound right or through
lane at the Bristol Street North /Birch
Street intersection.
c) Convert northbound through lane to port
bound left turn lane at the intersectio
of Jamboree Road and Bristol Street
North.
i) Add northbound through and right turn
lanes, southbound left turn lane and
.:westbound right turn lane at the inter -
section of Jamboree.Road and Bison Ave -
nue.
j) Add northbound through and right turn
. lane, southbound left turn, westbound
left and.right turn lanes, and add sou
-34-
d) Add a southbound through lane at the
intersection of Bristol Street and
Campus Drive.
e) Convert northbound through lane to nort
bound left turn lane at the intersectio
•
of Bristol Street and Jamboree Road.
f) Add westbound through and westbound lef
turn lanes at the intersection of Coast
Highway and Jamboree Road.
g) Add northbound through lane and convert
right turn lane to optional through or
right at the intersection of Jamboree
Road and San Joaquin Hills Road.
h) Convert northbound, southbound and east
bound right turn lanes to optional
through plus right, and convert wesibou
through lane to left turn lane at the
intersection of Jamboree Road and East -
bluff Drive - Ford Road.
i) Add northbound through and right turn
lanes, southbound left turn lane and
.:westbound right turn lane at the inter -
section of Jamboree.Road and Bison Ave -
nue.
j) Add northbound through and right turn
. lane, southbound left turn, westbound
left and.right turn lanes, and add sou
-34-
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
5 1 r1A- N City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL INDEX
bound through lane at the intersection
of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive
North.
k) Add northbound right turn lane and con-
vert eastbound right turn lane to op-
tional through or right at the inter -
section of Jamboree Road and MacArthur
Boulevard.
1) Add northbound through and right turn
lane; add southbound left turn lane,
and add westbound right turn lane at
the intersection of Jamboree Road and
Campus Drive.
m) Add northbound left, through and right
turn lanes; and add southbound through
and left turn lanes at the intersection
• of MacArthur Boulevard and Campus Drive.
n) Add northbound left and right turn lanes,
southbound left turn lane and eastbound
left turn lane at the intersection of
MacArthur Boulevard and Ford Road.
Request to subdivide 77 ± acres into ten lots for Ite
industrial /office development and two lots for
public streets in the North Ford Planned Commun TEN
ity, and the acceptance of an Environmental Docu- MAP
men.t. TURA
100
LOCATION: A portion of Lots 224, 442, and
444, Block 57, of Irvine's Subdi- APP
vision, located on property bound- CON
ed by the extension of Bison Ave- TEL
nue, Camelback Street,.Jamboree
Road, the extension of Eastbluff
Drive, and MacArthur Boulevardin
the Planned Community of North
Ford.
ZONE:
me
P -C
-35-
[lip
I
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
of Newport Beach
APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as Applicant
ENGINEER: William G. Church Consulting Civil
Engineers, Inc., Newport Beach
Richard Hogan, Community Development Director,
stated that they had distributed for Planning
Commission consideration the recommendations of
the sub - committee dealing with the North Ford De-
velopment for which there are additional findings
for denial.
Commissioner Haidinger expressed his feeling
that the contiguous property was reasonably resi-
d;ential as much as:it was commercial and that the
poise was a major issue with him, statin4 that
about 2/3 of the property is outside the 65 CNEL
and about 1/3 is inside the CNEL line with what
is now the most likely location for the freeway,
and via the marginal, cost approach both the commer
c;ial and residential developments are profitable
to the.City, and that there would be no Coastal
Commission requirement for low -cost housing on
this property because it is not part of the Coast -,
al Commission Zone and the test of reasonableness
Was been met a.nd that, therefore, the final report
is that rezoning the property to single family.wit
3iper acre housing and that no development be al-
lowed within the 65 CNEL line, so that there i!s
no deterent to the construction of the freeway.
In conclusion, he expressed: his primary
t;wo -fold concern: 1) housing in that area which
would lead to a group of people being..opposed to
the freeway 2). the project is a quality project
a':s proposed and would not lead to the truck traf-
fic. (Note: Sub - committee Report Attached.)
Commissioner Cokas suggested that they stay with
the present plan.
The Public Hearing was opened regarding this item
and Ron Hendrickson, Irvine Company, appeared be-
-36-
CALL
Motion
Ayes x
Noes 1 x1
Motion
Ayes x x
Noes
•
J
MINUTES
Special.Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
of Newport Beach
fore the Plan.ning Commission to request 30, minute
for their presentation.
Motion was made that The Irvine Company be allowe
only 10 minutes for their presentation.
Motion was made that The Irvine Company be allow-
ed 30 minutes for their presentation.
Mr. Hendrickson then pointed out the location of
the project and briefly reviewed its history, ex
plaining that in 1978 The Irvine Company had a
self - imposed moratorium for development on its
project. He then described briefly the objectives
of the project and the types of uses presently at
:that location.
Steve Sandland, Project .Man.ager.for The Irvine
Company, appeared.before the Planning Commission
to describe the project and several of the sur-
rounding land uses and other elements that are
salient regarding this project. a) consists of
202,500 sq. ft. of multi- tenant business support
facilities b)..the 5 buildings are two types -
atrium building - U-shaped building c) 23,500
sq. ft.. of commercial - retail d) project is an
altered land form, grading having been done in
1968, sloping away from residential area and to-
ward areas that surround the property on the north
And east e) building design is low f) large set-
backs from the streets g) square feet of building
!to square feet of land ratio is .235, or the low -
est density of any commercial- industrial project.
In Newport Beach h) North Ford has the lowest
.trip generation per P.M. peak hour per acre of
any commercial. - industrial development in Newpport
!Beach with 14.2 trip generations per acre iJ pro-
.. ect will provide much needed road improvements to
(Jamboree Road, MacArthur Boulevard and the exten-
jsion of east bluff drive providing a much - needed
least -west kink in Newport Beach j) project shows
la net surplus to the City for both average and
arginal cost basis k) project doesn't block any
existing developments' view and doesn't impact
any scenic highways 1) the project is consistent
with public health, welfare and safety m) project
served for sewers by IRND n) development of this
-37-
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
City of Newport Beach
site will reduce the amount of siltation floating
unto the bay o) about 10% of.the site or 8 acres
are within the 70 CNEL contours; approximately
37% of the site is within the 65 CNEL and over 85%
of the site is within the 60 CNEL.
Bill Foley, Larry Seaman and Associates, appeared
befo.re the Planning Commission to state that it
makes little difference in projecting where the
Pines are; whereas, the elevation of the freeway
'does make a difference in the designing efforts in
an attempt to mitigate the problem.
Commissioner Thomas stated his understanding that
in the freeway construction that the lines would
not be at these locations, but significantly in,
because the noise is below grade and noise travels
'in straight lines and are subject to the design
constraints of the Corona del Mar Freeway.
• Mr. Sandland then read to the Planning Commission
a letter that he requested become part of the pub
lic record, as well as two letters from.The Irvin
Unified School District.
n summary, Mr. Sandland made the following points
that the subdivision presents no problems from
planning standpoint; b) the site is physically
uitable for this development; c) the site is
hysically suitable for this density of de.vel,op-
ent, and that all environmental issues have been
ddressed in the draft EIR; d) and this.project
oes not have any si,gn.ificant impacts that cannot
e mitigated.
ommissioner Thomas inquired whether the density
ormula is based upon the entire si.te or just the
eveloped portion of the site, to which Mr. Sand -
und replied that it includes the entire project,
/3 of which they are not proposing to develop.
Commissioner Thomas then inquired whether the trip
generation is the same basis of computation, to
which Mr. Sandland replied that it is the entire
site and the entire build -out of the P -C.
Im
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
:City of Newport Beach
Dick Cannon, The Irvine Company, appeared before
:the Planning Commission to emphasize that they
.seek approval only of a Tentative Tract Map and
certification of an EIR in order to develop 30%
of,the site and does not preclude any future ac-
tion that the Planning Commission may. wish to con
sider regarding the remaining 70% of the site,
which request for approval meets every requiremen
a) Subdivision Map Act b) California Environmen-
Ital Quality Act c) City's General Plan d) Zon-
iing Ordinance e) Traffic Phasing Ordinance f)
!The 65 Conditions.
In conclusion, Mr. Cannon expressed his feeling
that this project will be architecturally exciting
;and meet the needs of the community:
:Commissioner McLaughlin expressed her understand-
ing that Lot 1, Area 3, (10.3 acres) is to be de-
iveloped as commercial - :retail.
• �Regarding.the.noise levels, Mr. Hendrickson com-
mented that the use of MacArthur Boulevard as an
;entry for this site by delivery trucks would be
:of the least impact upon anything.
,Don Webb, Assistant City Engineer, commented that
!limiting trucks to certain entrances would require
.Road restrictions and that it is difficult, if not
:impossible, to do so on a major arterial highway
such as Jamboree Road or MacArthur Boulevard.
E
In response.to a question posed by Commissioner
Balal.is, Mr. Cannon replied that this is in no
way suitable for serii- trucks and trailers, but is
a multi - purpose small business park designed for
the small businessman, and is not designed to acorn
modate the major warehouse type user.
Mr. Sandland described the building itself as a
modular design with widths of approximately 24',
and a depth'of approximately 72', or approximately
1400 sq. ft.
-39-
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
a August 16, 1979
IA 91 City of Newport Beach
Commissioner Allen posed a question, to which Mr.
Hendrickson stated that the outbound P.M. peak
hour trip generation..is 30 %, and Wes Pringle .
stated that the 202,500 sq. ft. of industrial
P.M. outbound volume is 200.vehicles and the
28,500 sq. ft. of. retail is an additional 200'
trips, or a total of 400.
egarding Page 2, Section 1 -C of the P -C for Area
of this site, Commissioner Allen stated her unde
tanding that the outbound P.M. peak hour traffic
ust be limited to 637 trips, to which Mr. H6ndric
on responded that Area 3 was included in the afor
entione.d figures.
Motion
Motion was made that the Planning Commission hold
a Public Hearing to amend the P -C. on North Ford.
Hugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney, expressed
his reservation as to whether the present time
was an appropriate time at which 'to make a motion
•
Of this nature.
Motion
Substitute Motion was made that the Planning Com-
ission.make the "following findings:
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title
19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all
ordinances of the City, al.l applicable gener-
al or specific plans, and the Planning Commis
sion is satisfied with the plan of subdivi-
sion.
2. That the proposed subdivision presents no pro
blems from a planning standpoint.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the
type of development proposed.
. That the site is physically suitable for the
proposed intensity of development.
5. That an Environmental Impact Report has been
prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, and that its con-
tents have been considered in the decisions o
this project.
Im
Fib
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
of Newport Beach
MINUTES
6. That based on the information contained in
the Environmental Impact Report, the project
incorporates mitigation measures to reduce
potentially - significant environmental effects
and that the project will not result in sig-
nificant environmental impacts. Further, tha
the economic and social beneftis to the!com
munity override any presently anticipated ne=
gative environmental effects of the project.
That the design of the subdivision or the pro
posed improvement will not substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or theiir
habitat.
That the design of the subdivision or the pro
posed improvements are not 'likely to cause
serious public health. problems.
9. That the design.of the subdivision or.the
• proposed improvements will not conflict with
any easements, acquired by the public at larg
for access through or use of, property within
the proposed subdivision.
0
That the discharge of waste from the proiposed
subdivision will not result in or add to any
violation of existing requirements prescribed
by.a California Regional Water Quality Con-
trol Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing
with Section 1300) of the Water Code.
That the grading of Lots 1, 9 and 10 shall no
constitute vesting.
nd approve the Tentative Map of Tract No. 10!019
nd recommend same to the City Council,..subject to
he following conditions:
That a tract map be filed.
That the boundary of
checked by the County
submitted to the City
the final tract map be
Surveyor before bei.ng
for approval.
-41-
ZPM
MINUTES
17Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
1111 Gt V Of N ewp ort Beach
3. That all improvements be constructed as re-
quired by ordinance and the Public Works
Department.
4. That Section 19.16.030 of the Subdivision Or-
dinance be waived providing that drawings of
the tract map at a scale of 1" = 100' are
provided to the Public Works.Department.
5. That a standard subdivision agreement and
surety be provided to guarantee the satis-
factory completion of public improvements if
it is desired to obtain building permits or
record the tract map before the public im-
provements are completed.
6. That the final design of on -site pedestrian
circulation be reviewed and approved by the
Public Works Department and the: Community
Development Department
. 7. That a traffic control plan.shall be submitte
and approved by the City Traffic Engineer.
8. That the geometrics and any proposed access
controls from Camel.back Drive be subject to
review and approval by the Public Works De-
partment.
9 Traffic signals shall be installed by the de-
veloper at the intersection of:
a. Bison Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard
b.. Bison Avenue and Camelback Drive
C. Bison Avenue and Jamboree Road
0
Separate sureties and agreements may be pro-
vided for this work. The developer's obli-
gation for these signals may be reduced to
50% if partial funding from the Ford Aero-
nutronics Development is obtained. The agree
ment will provide for reimbursement to the
developer if funding from the Ford Aeronu-
tronics Development is received within 5
years of the completion and acceptance of the
signal.
-42-
i f i
MINUTES
Special'Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
of Newoort Beach
10. That a 12 -foot minimum width separated bicycl
trail be constructed between Eastbluff Drive
and Bison Avenue paralleling MacArthur Boule-
vard. Trail design shall be approved.by the
Public.Works Department. The structuralisec-
tion of the trail shall be designed to h1andle
maintenance equipment and Southern California
Edison vehicles.if in the Edison easement:
11. That the remaining improvements along the
westerly side of MacArthur Boulevard adjacent
to Lot 1 be constructed to a major arterial
.standard concurrently with the construction 'o
the Bison Avenue- MacArthur Boulevard inter-
section
12. That the westerly side of MacArthur Boulevard
northerly of Lot 1 to Eastbluff Drive be.wi-
dened to provide three lanes southbound. Se-
parate surety and agreement may be provided
• to guarantee the construction of these improv
ments at the time Lots 9 and 10 are developed
13.. That all work within the MacArthur Boulevard
right -of -way be done under an encroachment
permit issued by the California Department
of Transportation. All improvements within
the City of Irvine shall be approved by that
City.
•
14. That the street improvements be constructed.
on the east side of Jamboree Road,.to major ar
terial standards between Bison Avenue.and
Eastbluff Drive North. These improvements
are to include a southbound double left -turn
lane at Jamboree Road and Bison Avenue, with
the additional widening occurring on the
easterly side of Jamboree Road. Separate
sureties and agreement may be provided for
this construction. The City will work with
the applicant and Ford Aerospace and Communi-
cations Corporation and Eagle Development
Company /Dann Southwest.Corporation to ac-
complish the aforementioned.
-43-
•
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
City of Newport Beach
15. That 84.feet of right -of -way be dedicated and
full street improvements on , Eastbluff Drive
be constructed to secondary arterial stan-
dards between MacArthur Boulevard (realigned)
and Jamboree Road including the necessary mo-
difications to the traffic signals at Jam-
boree Road and MacArthur Boulevard and that
these improvements be completed within 2
years of the recordation of the first final
tract map, except that construction of the
portion adjacent to Lot 10 shall not begin
prior to January 1981.
16. That .vehicular access rights to Jamboree.
Road, Eastbluff Drive, MacArthur Boulevard
and Bison Avenue be relinquished to the City.
17. That bus turnouts shall be provided at loca-
tions to be determined.by the Public Works
Department along.Bison.Avenue between Mac-
Arthur and Camelback and Jamboree Road be-
tween Camelback and Eastbluff.
18. That the street-improvements on the northerly
side of Bison Avenue between Camelback and
MacArthur Boulevard and the traffic signal
at MacArthur Boulevard be constructed within
1k years of the recordation of the first fi
nal tract map.
19. That a settlement monitoring system be in-
stalled along Jamboree Road between Eastbluff
Drive and Camelback prior to commencement of
grading. This system shall be monitored for
1k years after completion of grading. Dif-
ferential settlement affecting the roadway
or utilities shall be repaired by the de-
veloper to the satisfaction of the Public
Works Department.
That permanent utilities (water, sewer and
storm drain).are not to be installed until
the predicted settlement has been verified by
soils engineer and certified to have taken
place to the extent that the utilities will
not have differential settlement problems.
-44-
INDEX
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
City of Newport Beach
21. That a Water Capital Improvement Acreage Fee
be paid.
22. That storage capacity.in San Joaquin Reser-
voir equal to one maximum day's demand be
dedicated to the City of Newport Beach.
23. That a hydrology and hydraulic study for the
site be reviewed and approved by the Public
Works Department prior to recordation of the
tract map. Any modifications to the existing
storm drain system or extensions shown to be
required by the study shall be.the responsi-
bility of the developer.
24. That easements for public facilities :be shown
on the tract map.
25. That the location of fire hydrants. be reviewe
and approved by the Fire Department and Publi
Works Department,.
• 26. That.allr weather vehicular access.be provided
to each of the storm drain and sewer inlets.
and manholes that are not immediately adjacen
to a paved roadway.
27. That a master plan of water, sewer and storm
drain facilities be prepared and approved
prior to recording of final map(s).
L
8. That the location, width, and configuration
of the public utility easements be subject to
further review and approval by the Public
Works Department prior to recording any final
map(s).
9. A landscape and irrigation plan for the pro -.
ject shall be prepared by a licensed land -
scape architect. The landscape plan shall
integrate the installation of landscaping wit
the proposed construction schedule. (Prior
to the occupancy of any buildings, the licen-
sed landscape architect shall certify to the
-45-
COMMISSIONERS
2'.1.1
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
i of Newport Beach
Department of Community Development that the
landscaping has been installed in accordance
with the. prepared plan.)
30. The landscape plan shall.be subject to the
review of the Parks,.Beaches and Recreation
Department and approval of.the Community De-
velopment Department.
31. The landscape plan shall include a mainten-
ance program which controls the use of fer-
tilizers and pesticides.
32. The landscape plan shall .place heavy emphasis
on the use of drought= resistant.native ve.ge
tatio.n.
33. That adequate sight distance be.maintained at
all intersections by the design of a limited
use area. The shape of this.area shall be
• approved by the City Traffic Engineer. No
walls, signs or landscaping that is more than
thirty inches above the street surface will
be permitted.
•
4. Development of the site will be subject to
a grading permit to be approved by the De-
partment of Community Development. Surface
and subsurface drainage shall be provided to
the satisfaction of the Community Development
Department and the Public Works Department.
5. That the grading.plan shall include a complet
plan for temporary and permanent drainage fa-
cilities to minimize any potential impacts
from silt, debris, and other water pollutants
6. Provisions should be made to carry concentrat
ed water in improved drainage devices.
7. Water should not be allowed to drain over any
slopes.
8. Siltation basins should be provided prior to
discharging water offsite.
COMMISSIONERS
I'm. :�
0
0
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
i of Newport Beach
39. Offsite drainage onto this site should be
provided for in this plan.
The contact between terrace materials and
bedrock should be established, the existing
groundwater regimen investigated and the
effects of the proposed development on this
system established prior to issuance of a
grading permit. Mitigation measures shall
be required as a condition of permit issuanc
if required.
1. An erosion and dust control plan shall be sub
mitted with the grading permit application
and be subject to the approval of the Commun-
ity Development Department.
2. That an erosion and siltation control plan
be approved by the California Regional Water
Quality Board - Santa Ana Region, and that
the plan be submitted to said Board ten days
prior to any construction activities.
3. That erosion control measures shall be done
on any exposed slopes within thirty days afte
,grading or as approved by the Grading Enginee
to reduce erosion potential.
4. That the applicant provide for weekly vacuum
sweeping of all surface parking areas within
the project.
5. That the applicant provide on. -site retention
basins (i.e., grease traps) and for their
maintenance. The maintenance program shall
be reviewed by the Director of General Ser-
vices and approved by the Department of Com-
munity Development.
That grading shall be conducted in accordance
with plans prepared by a Civil Engineer and
based on recommendations of a soil engineer
and an engineering geologist subsequent to
the completion of a.comprehensive soil and
geologic investigation of the site. Perma-
nent reproducible copies of the "Approved
as Built" grading plans on standard size
-47-
MINUTES
•
(c) Existing uncertified or uncompacted fill
should be excavated and objectionable
material removed. If approved by the
soils engineer, the soil can be replaced .
as compacted fill. ..i
(d) The ground surface beneath all proposed
fill areas should be stripped of loose
or unsatisfactory soil or alluvium if
it exceeds about 8 inches in depth.
This condition exists in the drainage
channel and areas of recent deposition
of eroded sand. These soils may be used
as compacted fill provided they are free
of deleterious materials. The resulting
surface should be approved by the soils
engineer prior to processing the natural
ground.
(e) The resulting clean, natural ground sur-
face should be scarified, brought to
about optimum moisture content, and com-
pacted to a minimum of 90 percent rela-
-48-
1 9
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
City of Newport Beach
LL CALL
INDEX
sheets shall be furnished to the Department
of Community Development.
47. That the following measures as identified in
the draft EIR .shall be incorporated as a
portion of the Grading Plan or other measures
as approved or required by the City's Grading
Engineer:
(a) Prior to the start of grading, all vege-
tation and trash should be removed from
cut and fill areas and the disposition
Approved by the soils engineer.
(b) Any abandoned utility lines or other
underground structures should be removed
destroyed, or abandoned in compliance
with specifications of the building of-
ficial.and recommendations. of the soils
engineer. Concrete or tile,irrigation
lines may be removed or crushed in place
•
at the discretion of the soils engineer.
•
(c) Existing uncertified or uncompacted fill
should be excavated and objectionable
material removed. If approved by the
soils engineer, the soil can be replaced .
as compacted fill. ..i
(d) The ground surface beneath all proposed
fill areas should be stripped of loose
or unsatisfactory soil or alluvium if
it exceeds about 8 inches in depth.
This condition exists in the drainage
channel and areas of recent deposition
of eroded sand. These soils may be used
as compacted fill provided they are free
of deleterious materials. The resulting
surface should be approved by the soils
engineer prior to processing the natural
ground.
(e) The resulting clean, natural ground sur-
face should be scarified, brought to
about optimum moisture content, and com-
pacted to a minimum of 90 percent rela-
-48-
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
City of Newport Beach
(j) Fill slopes should be compacted to 90
percent of maximum density to the :face o
the slope. This can be achieved by (.a)'
backrol "ling with a sheepsfoot every 3
feet as the fill is brought up, or (b)
overfilling the .slope and cutting back t
the compacted fill core.
(k) All trench backfills except for the bed -
ding and 6 inches of cover should be com
pacted to 90 percent of maximum.density.
-49-
tive compaction for a depth of 6 inches
below the existing or stripped surface.
(f) Where composite slopes (i.e., fill over
cut) are to be constructed, the cut. por-
tion should be made first and approved .
by the soils engineer before the fill is
placed,
(g) Where unbuttressed fill is to be placed
on slopes steeper than 5:1, essentially
level, equipment -width benches should
first be cut into bedrock or other com-
petent material approved by the soils
engineer and engineering geologist, .Thi:
may require a key or toe bench at the
toe of the fill. Where the fill is but-
tressed, as in the case of fill across a
drainage channel, smaller benches or
notches should be cut into competent ma-
terial so that a good bond is provided.
(h) Fill should consist of approved earth
material free of trash or. debris, roots,
vegetation, or other deleterious matter.
(i). Fill should be spread in thin lifts,
brought to approximate moisture content, .
and compacted to at least 90 percent of
maximum density." Maximum density will
be determined by ASTM Test Method D15577
70. Fill in drainage channels.over 3
feet in depth should be compacted to at
least 93 percent of maximum density.
(j) Fill slopes should be compacted to 90
percent of maximum density to the :face o
the slope. This can be achieved by (.a)'
backrol "ling with a sheepsfoot every 3
feet as the fill is brought up, or (b)
overfilling the .slope and cutting back t
the compacted fill core.
(k) All trench backfills except for the bed -
ding and 6 inches of cover should be com
pacted to 90 percent of maximum.density.
-49-
r.
Special Adjour.ned Meeting
August 16, 1979.
�I
y � CItV Of
MINUTES
(1) To reduce settlement from loads of the
weight and.bearing proposed, it is re-
commended by the soils engineer that Lot
7 and 8 and the northern portion of Lot
10 be provided with an uncompacted sur-
charge fill placed above the final de-
sign grade and later removed. Specifics
for the surcharging of individual lots
can be found in the soils analysis on
Pages 10 and 11 of Appendix B.
(m) Settlement readings for.all fill areas
should be monitored and recorded as sp
ified in the soils investigation. Ad-
ditionally, similar monitoring of the
adjoining Jamboree roadbed should also
be included.
(n) If prior to issuance of a grading permit
the question of groundwater migration
• has not been sufficiently addressed to
the satisfaction of the City's grading
engineer, a detailed subsurface geotech-
nical investigation will be performed
as prescribed by ,the Director of Coin-
munity Development and Public Works.
E
8. That the project landscape plan will demon-
strate that the project landscaping shall be
irrigated via a drip irrigation system, or
other measures as approved by the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation and Community Develop-
ment Departments.
9. That prior to the initiating of any grading
in the vicinity of the gray coast ariogonum,
.the applicant shall contact the arboretum of
the University of California,. who shall be
given an opportunity to salvage the existing
population. Demonstration of the aforemen-
tioned and the Universities' ability to sal-
vage the exi.sting population shall be made to
the Community Development Department prior
to the issuance of any grading permit..
-50-
0
0
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
'City of Newport Beach
0. That construction and grading activities be
done in accordance with the restriction on
hours as.delineated in the existing Newport
Beach codes.
1. That noise generated fro
equipment shall not exce
ured at the boundary of
prior to the issuance of
the aforementioned shall
the satisfaction of the
Department by a licensed
MINUTES
m rooftop .mechanical
ed 45 dBA when meas
the project. That
any building permits
be demonstrated to
Community Development
Acoustical Engineer.
That the walls of truck wells and loading doc
areas shall be designed, to include acoustical
or sound absorptive material.
3. That the slope of truck ramps shall be a.pprov
ed by the Community Development and Public
Works Departments and designed so as to mini-
mize the acceleration needed for egress from
the loading areas.
That the applicant shall provide a plan for
on -site parking facilities for each lot that
provides incentives for high occupancy v:e-
hicles. Said plan shall be reviewed by the
City's Traffic Engineer and approved by the
Department of Community Development.
That applicants shall work with the Directors
of Community Development and Public Works,
and the City Water Department to formulate a
water conservation program which will enable
all of the project components to reduce water
consumption.below. normal rates.
That should any resources be uncovered during .
construction, that a qualified.archaeologist
or paleontologist evaluate the site prior to
completion of construction activities, and th
all work on site be done in accordance with
the City's Council Policies K -5 and K -6.
Prior to inception of grading activities in
the northern portion of the site, a backhoe
trench shall be excavated under the super-
-51-
W.104
CALL
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
1- 1City of Newport Beach
vision of a qualified paleontologist so that
fossil- bearing strate may be defined and map-
ped. If additional resources are discovered,
the paleontologist will be empowered to tem-
porarily halt grading.in the immediate vici-
nity to facilitate irretrievable.fossilized
resources.
8. Direct access from "A" and "B" Streets within
200 feet of Camelback Street and Eastbluff
Drive shall be prohibited, unless otherwise
approved by the City Traffic Engineer.
9. Prior to.the extension of Bison Avenue, bio-
logical surveys of the alignment shall be.ac-
complished and measures designed to protect
the Orange County Turkish Rugging incorpora-
ted to the extent practicable and subject to
the review and approval of the Public Works
Department and Community Development Depart-
ment.
0. Prior to the issuance of any building permits
for the site, the applicants shall demonstrat
to the satisfaction of the Public Works De-
partment and Community Development Department
that adequate sewer facilities will be avail -
able for the project. Such demonstration°
shall include verification from Irvine Ranch
Water District.
1. Prior to the recordation of the Final Tract
Map, the City's.Eng.ineering Geologist shall
review and approve geologic studies for the
site that shall include determination of the
Terrace Deposits- Bedrock and groundwater con-
duction through the site.
2. That final design of the project provides for
the incorporation of water - saving devices for
project lavatories and other water - using faci
lities.
3. Prior to the occupancy of any buildings, a pr
gram for the sorting of recyclable material
• from other solid waste shall be provided.
-52-
MINUTES
6. That Lots 1, 9 and 10 shall not be developed
until a Traffic Phasing Plan for said lots is
approved.
nd approve the Draft Environmental Impact Report
nd recommend that the City Council certify the
nvironmental Impact Report is.complete, making
he findings listed below:
5.1010
-i
�
I n
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
Cit of _Newport- Beach
ml =CALL
INDEX
64. The following disclosure statement of the
City of Newport Beach's policy regarding the
Orange County Airport shall be included in all
leases or sub - leases for space in the pro-
ject and shall be included in any Covenants,,
Conditions and Restrictions which may be
recorded against the property.
Disclosure Statement
The Lessee herein, his heirs, successors and
assigns, acknowledge that:
a) The.Orange County Airport may not be abl.
to provide adequate air service for busi
ness establishments which rely on such
service;
b). When an alternate air facility is avail-
able, a complete phase out of jet s:ervic
•
may occur at the Orange County.Airport;
c) The City of Newport Beach may continue
to oppose additional commercial air sei•-
vice expansions at the Orange County Air
port;
d) Lessee, his heirs, successors and assign
,
will not actively oppose any action take
by the City of Newport Beach to phase ou
or limit jet air service at the Orange
County Airport.
5. That the project shall comply with the Uni-
form Building Code - 1976 Edition.
6. That Lots 1, 9 and 10 shall not be developed
until a Traffic Phasing Plan for said lots is
approved.
nd approve the Draft Environmental Impact Report
nd recommend that the City Council certify the
nvironmental Impact Report is.complete, making
he findings listed below:
5.1010
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
City of Newport Beach
That the Draft Environmental Impact Report is
complete and prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act, and tha
its contents have been considered.in the deci
sions on this project.
That based on the information contained in
the Draft EIR, the project incorporates suf-
ficient mitigation measures to reduce poten-
tially- significant environmental effects, and
that the project will not result in signifi-
cant environmental impacts.
Motion
x
lotion was made that the Planning Commission make
Ayes
x
x
xx
x
a finding that procedurally the Substitute Motion
Abstain
x
As
valid.
,ichard Hogan, Community Development Director,
xplained that the commercial is a portion of Lot
and the Tentative Tract divides the property, in-
o 10 lots, as proposed, and. that the Motion shoul
•
e one which would either approve the Tentative
ap or approve the Tentative Map, deleting a lot,.
ather than deleting the commercial aspect of.the
roject.
r. Cannon.then inquired whether there was an agre-
ent that the City would be comfortable with re-
arding this point.
r. Hogan suggested adding Lot .1 to one of the
onditions, which states that, "Lots 9 and 10 are
of to be developed until a Traffic Phasing Plan
or said lot is approved. ", to be revised to read,
Lots 1, 9 and 10 . . .
ommiss,ioner McLaughlin inquired as to what effect
his would have on the traffic, to which Mr. Pring
eplied that the removal of the commercial portion
uring the peak hour would delete 200 outbound
rips, or 400 P.M. peak hour trips and that the
ffect on critical intersections is very minimal.
ommissioner McLaughlin then inquired whether grad
lute ng of Lots 1, 9 and 10 would constitute vesting,
• o which Commissioner'Balalis suggested that this
e added as a condition that this would not consti .
vesting, and Mr. Coffin stated that according
-54-
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16,. 1979.
City of Newport Beach
D the Supreme Court, building permits are needed
6r vesting and that he would suggest this as a
inding, rather than a condition.
n response to another question posed by Commis -
ioner McLaughlin, Mr. Hendrickson replied that
hey would be required to provide all the neces-
ary erosion control measures to insure that there
ould not be further degradation to the back bay.
ommissioners Haidinger and Balalis expressed them{.
upport of the Motion. {
ommissioner Allen stated that she.wou.ld not sup -
ort the Motion, due to her feeling that the City
as in its General Plan the intent always specifie
hat industrial development was to be permitted
ithin the City to provide a tax base and therefor
o enhance the residential character of.the City;
n light of the economic study, industrial.does
. of provide the tax base that does low_ density re-
idential; and therefore, this is not consistent
ith the General Plan.
ommissioner Thomas stated that he would not sup -
ort the Motion, due to his.feeling that also in
he General Plan is that of minimizing alterations
f land form and protection of the Upper Bay and
hat the project is in close proximity to the Up-
er Bay and there is, therefore, the.possibility
f increased siltation.
ommissioner Beek stated that he could not support
he Motion due to his feeling that the General Pla
tates that we should maintain a high- quality re-
idential community and that there is already too
uch commercial and industrial within the City.
Ayes x x x x ubstitute Motion was then voted on; which MOTION
Noes x x ARRIED.
equest to consider a Phasing Plan for the remain - Item #6
ng development in the Civic Plaza Planned Commun-
• ty District, and the acceptance of an Enviroinmen- PHASING
al Document. PLAN
OCATION: The Planned Community.of Civic ONTIN-
Plaza, generally bounded by San VED TO
-55-
4MISSIONERS MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
±City of Newport Beach
Joaquin Hills Road, Santa.Cruz
Drive, San Clemente Drive., Santa
Barbara Drive and Jamboree Road,,
in Newport Center.
ZONE:. P -C
APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
NER: Same as Applicant
Motion is lotion was made to continue Agenda Item No. 6,
Phasing Plan, to the regular Planning Commission
eeting of August 23, 1979.
Motion x 3ubstitute Motion was made that the regular Plan -
Ayes XK x iing.Commission meeting of August 23., 1979 be can -
Noes x x x x 3elled, due to the fact that three Commissioners
ould not be in attendance at that meeting.
x x riginal Motion was then voted on, which MOTION
Noes x x x 11 AILED.
Motion
Ayes
Noes
x
x
x
YX
x
lotion was then made to continue Agenda Item No.
5, Phasing Plan, to the regular Planning Commissio
eeting of September 20, 1979.
Abstain
x
x
equest to create two parcels of land for develop-
Ite
ent in Ko.11 Center Newport.
RES
LOCATION: Parcel No. 2, Parcel Map 114 -19
DIV
(Resubdivision No. 567) located at
No.
4600 MacArthur Boulevard on propert
bounded by MacArthur. Boulevard,
CON
TO
Birch Street, and Von Karman Avenue
EMB
in Koll Center Newport.
197
ONE: P -C
PPLICANT
• I III IIIINGINEER
Aetna Life Insurance Co., c/o The
Koll Company, Newport Beach
Same as Applicant
Robert Bein, William Frost & Assoc-
iates, Newport Beach
I&I M.
R10
is
Motion
P0 Ayes
MINUTES
1Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
01h City of Newport Beach
kgenda Item No. 7, Resubdivision No. 635, was con -
linued to the regular Planning Commission meeting
if September 6, 1979, as per the applicant's re
luest.
equest to permit the expansion of an existing com
ercial building on a lot in a Specific Plan Area
here a specific plan has not been adopted, and
he acceptance of an Environmental Document. A
odification to the Zoning Code is also requested,
ince a tandem parking space is proposed (where
he Ordinance provides that all required parking
paces shall be accessible and usable).
OCATION: A portion of Lot 4, Tract No 27,
located at 470 North Newport Boule-
vard, on the easterly side of North
Newport Boulevard, between Bolsa.
Avenue and Westminster Avenue, ad-
jacent to Newport Heights.
ONE: C -1
PPLICANT: Brian S. Jeannette, Newport Beach
NERS:. Brio.n and Bonnie Jeannette, Newport
Beach
he Public Hearing was opened regarding this item
nd Brion Jeannette, Applicant, 400 Santa Ana
venue, appeared before the Planning Commission to
tate his concurrence with the conditions.as state
n the Staff Report.
n response to a question posed by Commissioner
cLaughlin, Mr. Jeannette replied that some of the
arking will be satisfied by some of the over
paces at Le Biarritz Restaurant about three lots
own, because the parking structure there handles
ore than the required parking for the restaurant,
hich puts them up by three parking spaces.
tion was made that the Planning Commission make
e following findings:
The proposed development is consistent with
the General Plan and will not preclude the
-57-
Item #7
SITE PLAN
REVIEW NO
23
ED.
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
a August 16, 1979
City of Newport Beach
attainment of the.General Plan objectives
and policies.
2. The.propos.ed development is a high - quality..
proposal and will not adversely affect the
benefits of occupancy and use of existing.
properties within the area.
The proposed development does not adversely
affect the public benefits derived from ex-
penditures of public funds for improvement
and beautification of street and public fa-
cilities within the area.
The proposed development promotes the mainten
ance of superior site location characteristic
adjoining major thoroughfares of City -wide
importance.
5. The project will not have any significant en-
vironmental impact.
• Adequate parking spaces and related vehicular
circulation will be provided in conjunction
with the proposed development.
?. That the establishment of one tandem parking
space will not, under the circumstances of
the particular case, be detrimental to the
health, safety, peace, comfort and general
welfare of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of such proposed use or be detri
mental or injurious to property and improve=
ments in the neighborhood or the general wet-
fare of the City and further that the propose
modification is consistent with the legisla-
tive intent of Title 20 of this Code.
and approve Site Plan Review No. 23, subject to
he following conditions:
j. That development shall be in substantial con-
formance with the approved plot plan, floor
plan, elevation, and signs.
That a minimum of one parking space for each
• 250 sq. ft. of net floor area shall be pro -
vided on the subject property.
-58-
COMMISSIONERS
y �I
MINUTES
Special Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
City of Newport Beach
LL CALL
subdivision
No. 425) located
at
CONTIN-
3300 West
Coast Highway, on
1he
UED TO
INDEX
side of West Coast
High-
AUGUST
way, east
of Newport Bouleva
d on .
23, 1979
Mariner's
3. That all mechanical equipment and trash
i
areas
shall be screened from North Newport Boule-
vard and from adjacent properties.
4. That all improvements be.constructed as
re-
quired by ordinance and the Public Works
De-
partment.
I5.
That street. improvements (curb, gutter,
side-
walk, and pave -out to existing P.C.C..
ave-
ment) be constructed along the Old New
ort
Boulevard frontage.. The street grades
shall
be designed by the Public Works Depart
ent.
W
L
That a standard subdivision agreement and ac-
companying surety be provided to guars tee
the satisfactory completion of the public im-
provements if it is desired to obtain a Build
ing Permit prior to completion of the public
improvements.
tequest to amend a previously approved use ermit Item #9
that allowed the construction of a restaura t with
)n -sale alcoholic beverages .so as to permit an USE PER
additional freestanding identification sign on MIT NO.
the site. 1671
ATION: Parcel 1
of Parcel Map 60 -30
(Re-
subdivision
No. 425) located
at
CONTIN-
3300 West
Coast Highway, on
1he
UED TO
northerly
side of West Coast
High-
AUGUST
way, east
of Newport Bouleva
d on .
23, 1979
Mariner's
Mile.
ONE: Specific Plan Area No. 5
PPLICANT: Allyn Cano, dba. Cha Cha's
Food, Newport Beach
WNER: Byco, Inc., Newport Beach
xi can
genda Item No. 9, Use Permit No. 1671 (Ame ded),
as continued,to the regular Planning Commi sion
eeting of August 23, 1979, as per the appl cant's
equest.
-59-
-vv-
IhmSpecial Adjourned Meeting
August 16, 1979
itv of Newport Beach
CALL
MINUTES
and DENY Use Permit No. 1914.
James Hewicker, Assistant Director - Planning, re-
layed that. they had received that afternoon an
additional letter from the B.al,boa Island Business
ssociation reiterating their earlier letter in.op
position to Use Permit No. 1914..
D;DITIONAL BUSINESS:
Motion otion was made to set for Public Hearing on Oct-
All Ayes tier 4, 1979, an Amendment to Chapter 20 of the
ewport Beach Municipal Code as it pertains to the
stablishment of a Low - Density Residential Districi
(Resolution No. 1045 - Amendment No. 539).
on x dtion was made that Commissioners Balalis,
A� Ayes a.idinger and McLaughlin be excused from the re-
ular Planning Commission meeting of August 23,
479.
here being no further business, the Planning
ommission adjourned at 11:30 P.M.
Debra Allen, Secretary
Planning Commission
City of Newport Beach
A /gg
- 61 -
faTIP
S