Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/23/19791 COMMISSIONERS Regular Planning Commission Meeting Place: City Counc.il Chambers Time: 7:30 P.M. Date: August 23, 1979 F City of Newport Beach LL CALL Present x x x Commissioners McLaughlin, Bal.alis and Haidinger Absent were absent. * * * H;ugh.Coffin, Acting City Attorney AFF MEMBERS dames Hewicker, Assistant Director - Planning Oob Webb, Assistant City Attorney Glenna Gipe, Secretary * * * inutes Written By: Glenna Gipe MINUTES • Request to consider a Traffic Study for a proposed"-Item #1 development and redevelopment of facilities at Hoag Memorial Hospital - Presbyterian. TRAFFIC Motion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission con- CONTIN- Ayes x x.x tinue Agenda Item No. 1, Traffic Study for Haag UED TO Absent * * Hospital, to the regular Planning Commission meet SEPTEMB iing of September 20, 1979, as.per the applicant's 20, 97 request. iequest.to amend a previously approved use permit Item #2 hat permitted the construction of Hoag Memorial ospital- Presbyterian facilities on the site so USE PER 's to remodel and expand the existing hospita com MI7 NO. lex, and the acceptance of an Environmental ocu -- 1421 -C ent. CONTIN- LOCATION: Parcel 1, Record Survey 15/30, lo- Eta TO cated at 301 Newport Boulevard; on SEPTEMB the southwesterly corner, of Newport eeF, 7 Boulevard and Hospital Road. ZONE: A -P -H PPLICANT: Hoag Memorial Hospital- Presbyterian, Newport Beach COMMISSIONERS MINUTES August 23, 1979 C:ity of Newport Beach OLL CALL INDEX OWNER: Same as Applicant Motion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission con - Ayes x x x x tinue Agenda Item No. 2, Use Permit No. 1421 -C, Absent to the regular Planning Commission meeting of September 20, 1979, as per the applicant's request Request to amend a previously approved use permit Item #3 that allowed the construction of a restaurant with . 0.n -sale alcoholic beverages so as to permit a-n ad- USE PER - ditional freestanding identification sign on the MIT NO. site. 11671 LOCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 60 -30 (Re- APPROVED subdivision No. 425) located at CONDI- 3300 Wfst Coast Highway, on the TIONALLY northerly side of West Coast High- way, east of Newport Boulevard on Mariner's Mile. NE: Specific Plan Area No. 5. PLICANT: Allyn Cano, dba. Cha Cha's Meki- can Food, Newport Beach NER: Byco, Inc., Newport Beach he Public Hearing was opened .regarding this item nd John Howenstein, representing the Applicant,. rom the Graphics Co. that designed and manufac- ures signs; appeared before the Planning Commis - ion to state that the sign they had designed for ha Cha's Restaurant would be aesthetically pleas - ng and compatible with the building. He demon - trated to the Planning Commission the proposed ppearance of the ground sign and the pole.sign lternative. ames Hewicker, Assistant Director - .Planning, state 'hat the ground sign would be 9'6" in height and 'he logo would encompass approximately 45 sq. ft. nd the pole sign involves 12' to the bottom, and ould be approximately 40 sq. ft., and the letter- -2- 1 1MISSIONERS MINUTES August 23, 1979 a� D y City of Newport Beach ing used is.channel letters recessed into tile. Mr. Howenstein expressed his feeling that the pol sign would be more appropriate than the ground sign to eliminate any last minute decisions as tc where the restaurant is. Commissioner Allen inquired whether the Citizen's Savings parking lot and Cha Cha's parking lot are continuous, to which Mr. Hewicker answered in the affirmative. Mr. Hewicker then explained that the reason the applicant was presently before the Planning Com- mission was due to the fact that he has a Use Permit for the restaurant, and that they are ad- dressing the sign with th.e restaurant use. I;n response to a question posed.by Commissioner Beek, Mr. Howenstein replied that the.lighting is neon tubing contained within each individual let- ter. In response to a question posed by Commission r Beek, Mr. Hewicker replied that the 'only sig that could be erected on the Specific Area Plana for Mariner's Mile without the Planning Commission approval are those uses which are automatically permitted under the Specific Area Plan, and any use requiring Use Permit or Site Plan Review gives the Planning Commission an opportunity to review the signing with the other discretionary.action. In response to a question posed by Commissioner rihomas, Mr. Hewicker replied that this particular roposal does not conform with the sign ordinance in that they are asking for two ground.signs or a single highway frontage and are normally pe�- itted to have one sign, but that Staff is of the 'pinion that they should have an equal signing pportunity. ommissioner Cokas stated that he would prefer the onument sign, as he felt that it was most in keep ng with the decor; however, that he preferred the esign of the letters themselves in the pole sign. mgm Motion Ayes Noes Absent • x x August 2.3, 1979 on r r a , MINUTES commissioner Beek inquired how high off the ground ;he.pole sign would have to be to be considered cut of the way of site distance for vehicles com- ing out of the driveway, to which Don Webb, As- istant City Engineer, replied that the minimum iow would be 8'. mmissioner Beek then stated his preference for pole sign 5' high on the bottom side, 45 sq. ft. d with more subdued lettering and decor than the oposed sign: tion was made that the'Planning Commission make e following findings: That the sign, as revised, is properly re= lated to the site and is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood and surrounding sites and is not detrimental to.the.ord.erly and harmonious development of their sur- roundings and of the City. That the sign as revised is in keeping with the desired character of the Specific Area Plan area as identified by the General Plan and the Specific Area Plan. That a sign which "attempts to direct the movement of traffic" would be a violation of the Sign Ordinance and could jeopardize the health, safety, and general welfare of the community due to the proposed sign's lo.ca- tion with a major traffic intersection. ynd approve the Monument Sign with the design.and lecor of the Pole Sign, subject to the following 'onditions: That the display surface area be limited to a maximum of 45 sq. ft. per face. That the overall height of the sign, includ- ing any base, be limited to 9 feet. That the location of the sign shall be sub - ject to the approval of the Traffic Engineer. That no flashing animation or movement, eithe actual or suggested be permitted. ME INDEX COMMISSIONERS MINUTES August 23, 1979 City of Newport Beach LL CALL INDEX 51. That all "temporary ".signs be removed from th site prior to the issuance of a Sign Permit. 6. That any landscaping or irrigation facilities removed by the construction location of this sign be replaced. 7. That South Coast Regional Commission approval be obtained for this sign prior to the is- suance of a Sign Permit. Request to adjust a common property line between Item #4 two lots. RESUB- OCATION: Lots A and B, Tract No. 6927, 10- DIVISION cated at 1801 Bayside Drive, on NO. 638 the southwesterly side of Bayside Drive, adjacent to the Balboa Yacht WITHDRAWN Clubhouse facility.. • 'ONE: C -1 -H PPI_ICANT: The Balboa Yacht Club, Newport.Beac 'WNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach NGINEER: Same as Owner genda:Item Flo. 4, Resubdi-vision No. 638, was, ithdrawn, as per the applicant's request. equest to consider an amendment to Section 20.02. 50 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code so as to educe height limits and establish building height n relation to curb height on the bluff side of cean Boulevard between Carnation Avenue and Poppy venue, in Corona.del Mar, and the acceptance of n Environmental Document. NITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach • ames Hewicker, Assistant Director- Planning, state . hat this item was initiated at the request of the 11ity Council and that it is a request to discuss -5- 911L>C 0 0 MINUTES. August 23, 1979 of Newport Beach he question of building heights on.the bluff side f Ocean Boulevard between Poppy.Avenue and Carna- ion Avenue in Corona del Mar and as set forth in he Staff Report, heights of buildings on the bluf ide of Ocean Boulevard are primarily regulated ither by City Council action in reviewing indi= idual curb -cut applications o.r by the Planning ommission in reviewing individual applications or either Use Permit or Variance to exceed the eight limit. He informed the Planning Commission hat the City Attorney has indicated that there s a question regarding the ability of the City ouncil to regulate the height of structures,throu he curb -cut procedure and the City has initiated n amendment which would pla`ce.this type of regu- ation in the Zoning Ordinance. In conclusion; e stated that Amendment No. 537 would allow ad- itional residential uses on the bluff side of cean. Boulevard to continue -in their existing stat r would allow them to be remodeled as long as ny remodeling did not exceed the height of the xisting curb , and that room additions or new onstruction on vacant parcels would require that he new roof heights would not exceed the top of he curb. He stated that there are several va- ant pieces of property on Ocean Boulevard, and hree vacant parcels adjacent to Inspiration oint which would not be regulated by this Amend - ent, and that at the West end of Ocean Boulevard oward China Cove there is a vacant parcel which i through lot between lower Ocean Boulevard and. ay Lane that is currently owned by.Don Callendar, lso to which this.Amendment would not apply, and hat additionally there is one remaining undevelop d parcel on the main portion of Ocean Boulevard o which this application would apply, at the ex- ension of Ocean Boulevard and Heliotrope extended r property owned by Mr. Darwin Britvich, and that e has a request currently before the City Council or a.curb -cut for that particular site. ugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney, stated that he ordinance may codify the existing half dozen eight restrictions that are set by a curb -cut hich they have consistently stated is of doubtful egal validity. 9M INDEX MINUTES August 23, 1979 1111 City of _Newport Beach In response to a question posed by Commissioner Beek, Mr. Hewicker demonstrated the .locations ;to which the ordinance would apply. :Commissioner Beek inquired whether this was 'a problem which could be solved by giving names 'to the right -of -ways for Ocean Boulevard. 'The Public Hearing was opened regarding this item land Darwin Britvich, 300 Kings Place,. appeared !before the Planning Commission to submit a letter !to the Planning Commission for the record,.wh,ich !included the following general comments: 1). that 'he has a building height set and curb -cut which 'is his at the present time 2) that the ordinance 'does not specifically refer to his property 3) 'that he regarded,the passing of this ordinance as unconstitutional, since it is directed at the Iregulation of building by a specific individual i4) that the ordinance,might be unconstitutional (regarding the restriction on homeowners' rights • -to use their property without due .process of law 5) that an.EIR would.be inappropriate and irrele- vant to any decisions as to whether to allow con - struction. He further expressed his feeling that they are talking about height problems that were not properly spelled out to the notice to the .,homeowners in that area. In response to a question posed by Commissioner 'Thomas, Mr. Coffin explained that this Negative 'Declaration relating to this Amendment is just dealing with the Ordinance Amendment itself. Mr. Hewicker indicated the letters from Ann and Lee Spencer and Mr. W.R. Tighe, as distributed to the Planning Commission. Motion x'Motion was made that the Planning Commission ap- prove Amendment No. 537, and recommend that the !City Council adopt same. 'Commissioner Beek stated his support of the motio !due to the reasons that this limits the height of !the buildings to the.height of the curb and that !there would be no restriction placed on Mr. Brit- r1 -7- MINUTES August 23, 1979 I I 1 City of Newport Beach vich beyond what he is.claiming as his maximum height at the present time. Mr. Hewicker explained that this amendment states that regardless.of the height of the building:, the top of the curb cannot be exceeded, but it does not say that the, height limits do not have to be met as specified under the Zoning Ordinance. In response to a comment from Mr. Br.itvich, Com- Missioner Beek restated his feeling that the Amendment does not take from him anything which he now has. In response to a question asking what harm this Amendment would bring him, Mr. Britvich responded that there is a possibility that at certain points on his building there would, be a maximum height of 29' which might be taken from the uppermost point on his property which would in effect exceed • curb height, but that in granting the permit to Vim for encroachment, in effect providing the -curb cut for-him, that he accepted curb heights and that City Council cannot place restrictions upon a curb -cut or encroachment permit arbitrarily. Commissioner Beek suggested an additional finding, ?That the proposed project will have a beneficial ¢ffect on the environment by preserving public views from the. adjoining public street and view. park. Mr. Coffin suggested that the finding already in. the Negative Declaration must be made to be consis tent with the California Environmental Quality :ontrol Act, but that an additional finding could to added. Ayes x x x K Motion -was then voted on that the Planning Commis - Absent * * Sion make the following findings as contained with in the Negative Declaration: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of City Council Policy K -3 pertaining to procedures and guide lines to implement the California Envionmen- tal Quality Act, the Environmental Affairs • Committee has evaluated the proposed project and determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environ- ment. N August 23, 1979 M MINUTES 2. That the proposed project will have a bene- ficial effect on the environment by preserv- ing public views from the adjoining public street and view park. and approve Amendment that the ,City Council CARRIED. * No. 537, and recommend adopt same, which MOTION * * Motion x Motion was then made that the Planning Commission Ayes x x x recommend to the City Council that they adopt Absent k k names for the two lower portions of the right -of- ays of Ocean Boulevard adjacent to Inspiration hint and China Cove. * * * Request to remodel and enlarge an existing take- out restaurant facility (Sugar -n- Spice) in the C -1 mistrict, and to waive the required offstreet park • ing spaces. LOCATION: Lot 6, Block 14, Balboa Island, lo- INDEX Item #6 cated at 310 Marine Avenue, on the DENIED easterly side of Marine Avenue be- tween East Bay Front and Balboa Avenue on Balboa Island. (Sugar - n- Spice) ZONE: C -1 APPLICANT: Bettie Banto, Balboa Island OWNER: Same as.Applicant The Public Hearing was opened regarding this item and Kathleen Felling, 309 Grand.Canal, appeared before the Planning Commission and stated her op- position to approval of this Use Permit, as she felt that it would be detrimental to the safety, Fomfort and general welfare of the 26 private en- trances on the Grand Canal whose only access to their homes is the alley on which is this business and that this business would add traffic that IMI 0 MINUTES Augusl 23, 1979 LoJ.1 would be detrimental to the safe and continuous flow of traffic in the alley. Mark Benabou then appeared before the Planning Commission and stated his opposition to the Use Permit, expressing his feeling that if the City Were going to make certain restrictions for him, the same should hold true for everyone. Jerry Jones, representing the Owner., appeared be- fore the Planning Commission and expressed his feeling that the owner of the property is not re- sponsible for the carelessness of the buyer,.and that this type of restaurant facility is needed in this area. He informed the Planning Commission that the Health Department is now requiring of them some minor modifications and a 10' X 10' dry storage area regardless of whether or not there is any change in type of food service He also sta- ted that 95% of the Sugar -n -Spice business is valk -by and express.ed his feeling that this would not add to traffic congestion. James Hew_icker, Assistant Director- Planning, ex plai.ned that these Health Department reauirements are like other codes which address the issue of non= conforming buildings which require that when one remodels or does maintenance repair up to a certain percentage of the value of the property, that beyond a certain point the structure must be brought up to the code standards. gob Millar, 116 Crystal Avenue., appeared before the.Planning Commission to express his feeling that it is.time for the Planning Commission to begin limiting the amount of activity on a lot as small as 35' X 85', to require additional .park- ing and to limit business on Marine Avenue. athleen Felling again appeared before the Plan- ing Commission to express,her feeling that consi- eration needs to be given to the business deli - ery that each of these businesses requires and he traffic congestion 'to which this contributes. -10- TV11:33KANEK,3 ' August 23, 1979 City of Newport Beach MINUTES, Jerry Jones again.ap.peared before. the Planning Commission and stated that behind the businesses on Marine Avenue there is an 8'.right -of -way off the alley which is specifically for delivery.for the businesses and that there is a loading zone each end of Marine Avenue. Bob Millar again appeared before the Planning Commission to refute the previous statement, sta- ting that the buildings are built out to the 10' alley. Kathleen Felling again appeared before the Plan - Oing Commissiron to express her observation that the applicant's parking place is always occupied by the person operating the business and is not Available for business deliveries. Mr. Hewicker explained that there is a 10' setback between the:back of the building and the alley right -of -way line and an additional 5' between the • property line and the center line:of the.alley. Motion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make the following findings for denial:. 1: That the proposed development will be detri- mental to the safe and continuous flow of ve- hicular traffic on Marine Avenue. Added con- gestion will also be encountered with the ex- panded take- out restaurant facility due to increased demand for parking in an area with already limited. parking capacities. 2. The approval of Use Permit No. 1912 will under the circumstances of.this case, be de- trimental to the health, safety, peace, mor- als, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the gen- eral welfare of the City. and DENY Use Permit No. 1912. Commissioner Allen stated her support of the Moti • suggesting that they go one step further and,con- -11- Ayes Absent 0 0 X August 23, 1979 M Beach MINUTES cider referring this general problem to the City Litter Committee to consider alleviating some of the problems .these take -out windows are creating. Commissioner Thomas also stated his support of. the Motion, adding that there is a personal res- ponsibility regarding litter on the part of each business owner. Motion was then voted. on, which MOTION CARRIED. The Planning Commission recessed at 9:20 P.M. and reconvened at 9:30 P.M., Request to remodel and expand an existing res'tau- rant facility with on -sale alcoholic beverages (Franciscan Restaurant) in the C -N —H District. The proposed development includes the conversion of a portion of the existing restaurant,complex into a private club with alcoholic beverages and dancing to recorded-music. The proposal also in- cludes a modification from the required parking standards so as to allow valet parking and tandem parking spaces. LOCATION: A portion of Lots 7 and 8,.Tra:ct No. 4225, located at 1617 Westcliff j Drive, on the southwesterly side of Westcliff Drive, between Irvine Avenue and Dover Drive, in the West cliff area (Franciscan Restaurant). ZONE: C -N -H kPPLICANT: Circa Designs /James Skaug, Newport Beach WNER: The Irvine Company; Newport Beach AND equest to establish one building site and elimi- ate an interior lot line where portions of two -12- Item #7 USE PER - IT N0. 1915 APPROVED CONDI- TIONALLY Cl MINUTES ItAugust 23, 1979 12 1 1,11C,itv of Newport Beach lots now exist so as to permit the remodeling and expansion of the existing commercial building on the property. I LOCATION:. A portion of Lots 7 and 8, Tract No. 4225, located at 1617 Westclif Drive, on the southwesterly side of Westcliff Drive, between Irvine Avenue and Dover Drive, in the Westcliff area (Francisca.n Resta- urant). ZONE: C -N -H APPLICANT: Circa Designs /James Skaug, Newport Beach OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach ENGINEER: Van Dell and.Associates Inc., Ir- vine (Agenda Item Nos. 7 and 8 were heard concurrently, due to their relationship.) The,Public Hearing was opened regarding these,. item And James Skaug, repr.esenting.the Applicant, ap- peared before the Planning Commission to state his Concurrence with the conditions, with one excep- tion: Condition No. 2 relative to the parkinlg requirement, as they are 8.parking.spaces short and by restriping the lot, 3 spaces will be re= captured, and that additionally there are app "roxi - matel.y 350 sq. ft.. of hallway which is now being construed as occupied area and requires the 8 ad -. ditional.parking spaces; however, this, hallway area will'not be occupied, but rather a thoroiugh fare and should not be included in the square foot age figures that require parking spaces. In.con- clusion, he informed the Planning.Commission that pn the process of securing this Use Permit, they have been required to bring up the standards of the entire building, not just for the 20% space, which they had done. -13- ESUBDI- PPROVED MINUTES August 23, 1979 w I City of Newport Beach Imple Commissioner Allen inquired whether the parking requirement makes allowance for the fact that the club is open only in the evening, to which Mr.. Skaug replied that nighttime use requires ad- ditional parking; however, at night they take ad- Vantage of all the additional parking in the area that is utilized during the day by the office use Games Hewicker, Assistant Director - Planning, in- formed the Planning Commission that the entryway O ll be.occupied by people and should be included in determining the square footage for parking., and would not include in the calculations areas occupied by a service bar or waiter station or areas of that nature. Mr.. Skaug circulated a petition representing the number of merchants and tenants in the immediate area walking to said restaurant for ;lunch as op- posed to taking their automobile. • In response to a question posed by.Commissioner Qokas, Mr. Hewicker explained that they were shor 8 parking spaces, but by restriping.the lot ac- cording to the original plan, they gained back 3 spaces, and would, therefore`, be short 5 parking spaces on a'1/40 sq. ft. basis. Commissioner Allen inquired whether this waiver would be a precedent- setting situation, to which Mr. Hewicker replied in the negative. Motion x Motion was made that the Planning Commission make the following findings:' 1. That the proposed use is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The project will not have any significant environmental impact, providing that adequate offstreet parking spaces are provided. 3. The Police Department has indicated that they do not contemplate any problems. i -14- 1MISSIONERS MINUTES August 23, 1979. 1.9 l a , t I e City of Newport Beach INDEX 4. That the proposed tandem parking spaces, wil not, under the circumstances of the particu- lar case,, be detrimental to the health, safe ty, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighbor- hood of such proposed use or.be,detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City, and further that the proposed modifications are consistent with the legis- lative intent of Title 20 of this Code. 5. The approval of Use.Permit No..1915 will not, under the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfare of per- sons residing and working in the neighbor- hood or be detrimental.or injurious to pro- perty and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. • and approve Use Permit No. 1915,.subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial con formance.with the approved plot plan, floor plans and elevations, except as noted below. 2. That a minimum of one parking space /42 sq. ft. of "net public area" shall be provided for the restaurant facility. -15- 3: That a parking attendant .(or attendants),. shall be provided on -site at all times during regular business hours of the restaurant and private club uses. That all mechanical equipment and .trash areas shall be screened from adjoining properties and from adjoining streets. 6. That the proposed recorded music shall be confined to the interior of the building. 6. That there shall be no sound amplification used outside of the structure. • 7. That the hours of operation of the club shall be bet - ween the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m., except on Saturdays, Sundays and Holidays. -15- MINUTES August 23, 1979 City of Newport Beach 8. That all exterior lighting and signs shall b approved by the Department of Community De- velopment. Only one pole sign shall be per- mitted by the restaurant facility and the pr v.ate club for identification purposes.. -16- 9. That a washout area for trash containers shall be provided in.such a way as to allow direct drainage into the sewer system and not into the storm drains. p. That all provisions of the Uniform Building Code shall be required in conjunction with the expanded restaurant use'. 1, That all conditions of.approval of Resubdi- visi.on No. 639 shall be fulfilled. In response to a question posed by Commissioner §eek, Mr. Hewicker replied that an 82' stall would ',require a 26' aisle, and they have a 28' aisle, • making parking easily assessible. Commissioner Beek expressed his feeling that he does not.find the tandem parking spaces satisfac- tory; that he does not want to approve valet park - 1ng, to which Mr. Skaug replied that they have �bundant parking which is not valet. Motion x Amendment to the Motion was made that a minimum Ayes x of one parking space /50 sq. ft. of "net publiic. Noes x x area" shall be provided for the restaurant faci- Absent * * lity. Ayes x X. K Original Motion was then voted on, which MOTION Noes x CARRIED. Absent Motion Motion was then made that the Planning Commission Ayes x x x K make the following findings: Absent 1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City, all applicable gen- eral or specific plans and the PlanningCom- mission is satisfied with the plan of sub- division. • -16- COMMISSIONERS I I MINUTES August 23, 1979 (Lit Y of Newport Beach ROLL CALL INDEX Z. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from a planning standpoint. aind approve Resubdivision No. 639, subject to.the following conditions: 1. That a parcel map be filed. 21. That a firewall, shall be constructed along the northwesterly side property line that meets the requirements of the Uniform.Build- ing Code. 0 Motion Ayes x Absent 0 Request to permit a Traffic Study to permit.the Item' #9 construction of a maximum of 140 apartment units on 10.6 gross acres. TRAFFIC STUDY VOCATION: Parcel No. 1, Parcel Map 45 -10 (Resubdivision No. 311), and a CONTINUE portion of Blocks 92 and 93, Ir- TO SEPT- vine's Subdivision, located at EMBER 20 1601 San Miguel Drive, on.the 1979 northeasterly side of San Joaquin Hills Road, between MacArthur Boulevard and San Miguel Drive in Harbor View Hills (Baywood Apart- ments). i ZONE: P -C I 4PLICANT: The Irvine Company., Newport Beach OWNER: Same as Applicant Motion was made that the Planning.Commission con- tinue this item to the regular Planning Commis- sion meeting of September 20, 1979, as per the applicant's request. Request to amend the Planned Community Develop- Item #10 ment Plan for Harbor View Hills so as to permit the expansion Area No. 8 (Baywood Apartments) AMENDMENT of the Planned Community for additional multi- NO. 536 family residential units, and the acceptance of -17- Moon ti Absent COMMISSIONERS Fq 9T f��WE MINUTES August 23, 1979 M Beach do Environmental Document. OCATION: Parcel No. 1, Parcel Map 45 -101 (Resubdivision No. 311), and a portion of Blocks 92 and 93, Ir- vine's Subdivision, located at 1601 San Miguel Drive, on the northeasterly side of San Joaquin Hills Road, between MacArthur Boulevard and San Miguel Drive in Harbor View Hills (Baywood Apart- ments). ZONE: P -C i APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as Applicant Motion was made that the Planning Commi.sston con- tinue this item to the regular Planning Commissioi meeting of September 20, 1979, as per the appli- cant's request. ,Request to combine one parcel and a portion of Blocks 92 and 93 of Irvine's Subdivision into one Iuilding site so as to permit the expansion of the Baywood Apartment complex on the property. LOCATION: Parcel No. 1, Parcel Map 45 -10' (Resubdivision No. 311), and a portion of Blocks 92 and 93, Ir- vine's Subdivision, located at 1601 San Miguel Drive, between MacArthur Boulevard and San Miguel Drive in Harbor View Hills (Bay- wood Apartments). ,ONE: P -C APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as Applicant ENGINEER: Robert Bein, William Frost & As- sociates, Newport Beach -18- INDEX CONTINUED TO SEPT- EMBER 20, 1979 COMMISSIONERS MINUTES August 23, 1979 ity of Newport Beach ROLL CALL INDEX Motion Notion was made that the Planning Commission con - Ayes x x tinue this item to the regular Planning Commissio il Absent * * meeting of September 20, 1979, as per the appli- cant's request. Motion Ayes Absent 11x Absent * Motion Ayes Absent Motion Ayes Absent • x1* * * * Request to consider an amendment to Section Item # 20.87.140 of the .Newport Beach Municipal Codel as it pertains to the definition of the term "Dwell AMENDM ing Unit", and the acceptance of an Environme!ntal 1N0. 53 Document. INITIATED BY: The City Motion was .made that th tinue this item to the sion meeting of October Planning Commission may of Newport Beach e Planning Commission con - regular Planning Commis - 4, 1979, so that the appoint a sub - committee. * * * ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: Motion was made that the Planning Commission dis- puss at the September 6, 1979 Study Session and * place on a subsequent evening agenda a proposed amendment.to the Commission's Rules of Procedure pertaining to substitute and amended motions. * * * Motion was made that the subject of "prohibiting Hissing within the land adjacent to the Water * thed °.be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration on August 27, 1979. * * * There being no further business, the Planning Commission adjourned at 10:20 p.m. �t. Debra Allen, Secretary City of Newport Beach Planning Commission .. -19- CONTINUED TO CTOBER ,l DDITION-