Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/02/1976[* COMMISSIONERS 44 City of Newport Beach Regular Planning Commission Meeting Place: City Council Chambers • $ Time: 7:00 P.M. ti Date: Seotember 2. 1976 MOLL CALL Present Motion All Aye: 0 Motion All Aye X X X X X X X EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R. V. Hogan, Commu Hugh Coffin, Assis Benjamin B. Nolan, STAFF MEMBERS James D. Hewicker, Shirley Harbeck, S X Minutes of the Reg were approved as w Request to permit "Snack Shop" resta the expansion of I sales area, and tc teristics of the S serving of beer ar establish a parkir tially zoned prop( of the required pe tion also include ing agreement and off -site parking i to within five (5; on Narcissus Avenl indicates a minim) Location: C -1 Applicant: Far Owner: Jam X Planning Commissi meeting of Septeml nity Development Director taut City Attorney City Engineer MINUTES Assistant Director - Planning ecretary ular Meeting of August 19, 1976 ritten. the remodeling of an existing urant /bakery so as to permit he dining, reception and bakery change the operations charac- ubject restaurant to include the d wine. Further request to g lot on the adjoining residen- !rty so as to provide a portion Irking off -site. Said applica- a request for an off -site park- a modification to permit the rea and screen wall to encroach feet of the front property line ie where the Districting Map Im 20 foot front yard setback. and R -2 West Services, Inc., Irvine as D. Ray, Corona del Mar an continued this matter to the per 16, 1976. - 1 - INOKX Item #1 USE PERMIT 1800 CONT. TO SEPT. 16 COMMISSIONERS BOLL CALL E Motion All Ayes City of Newport Beach September 2, 1976 MINUTES 3 permit the extension of a previously use permit that allows additional travel in the Newport Dunes Trailer Park. Portion of Blocks 54 and 94, Irvine's Subdivision, located at 1131 Back Bay Drive, northerly of East Coast Highway and westerly of Jamboree Road in Newport Dunes. Unclassified Newport Dunes, Inc.; Newport Beach Same as Applicant er was opened for discussion and Mary ood, Assistant Vice President and House for Newport Dunes, 3000 Mission Boule- Diego, appeared before.the Commission questions. She advised that the stand - were for irrigation of landscaping, that e no plans for increasing the number of nd that negotiations were under way for ration of an Environmental Impact Report ction with the redevelopment of the any new uses would wait until after that ng no further discussion, motion was made ning Commission grant the extension of t No. 1117 (Amended), subject to the condition: this approval shall be for a period of ears, and any extension shall be subject e approval of the Modifications Committee or structural alterations and room and ditions to two existing single - family , in the C -1 District. Lots 9 and 10, Block 21 of the Newport Beach Tract located at 106 and 108 22nd Street in the McFadden Square Specific Plan Area. - 2 - I IN O EX Item #2 USE PERMIT 1117 AMENDED EXTENSION GRAIfT_ED Item #3 USE PERMIT 1796 REMOVED FR M ULENDAR Request t approved trailers Location: Zone: Applicant Owner: This matt Juanita W Attorney vard, San to answer up pipes there wer spaces, a the prepa in conjun Dunes and time. X There bei that Plan Use Permi following 1. That two y to th Request f garage ad dwellings Location: MINUTES 3 permit the extension of a previously use permit that allows additional travel in the Newport Dunes Trailer Park. Portion of Blocks 54 and 94, Irvine's Subdivision, located at 1131 Back Bay Drive, northerly of East Coast Highway and westerly of Jamboree Road in Newport Dunes. Unclassified Newport Dunes, Inc.; Newport Beach Same as Applicant er was opened for discussion and Mary ood, Assistant Vice President and House for Newport Dunes, 3000 Mission Boule- Diego, appeared before.the Commission questions. She advised that the stand - were for irrigation of landscaping, that e no plans for increasing the number of nd that negotiations were under way for ration of an Environmental Impact Report ction with the redevelopment of the any new uses would wait until after that ng no further discussion, motion was made ning Commission grant the extension of t No. 1117 (Amended), subject to the condition: this approval shall be for a period of ears, and any extension shall be subject e approval of the Modifications Committee or structural alterations and room and ditions to two existing single - family , in the C -1 District. Lots 9 and 10, Block 21 of the Newport Beach Tract located at 106 and 108 22nd Street in the McFadden Square Specific Plan Area. - 2 - I IN O EX Item #2 USE PERMIT 1117 AMENDED EXTENSION GRAIfT_ED Item #3 USE PERMIT 1796 REMOVED FR M ULENDAR r COMMISSIONERS 0 ROLL CALL Motion All Ayes 0 0 City of Newport Beach September 2, 1976 C -1 Dell M. Williams, Corona del Mar Dr. C. W. Ackerman, Corona del Mar MINUTES est of the applicant, Planning Commis - d this matter from the calendar. permit the construction of first and r room additions and a second floor ingle family dwellin with the follow - orming features: 1.3 A one car garage Ordinance now requires two garage The existing garage has a depth 4 inches t (where the Ordinance depth of 20 feet, inside measurement); yard setback of 2 feet ± (where the iow requires a rear yard setback of 2 ies when abutting a 20 foot wide alley). sd development also includes a second, :overed, parking space with a width of Iches ± (where the Ordinance requries a feet). All new construction conforms •ed yard setbacks, except that the scond floor deck encroaches 6 inches t squired 2 foot 6 inch rear yard setback. Lot 25, Block D, Tract No. 518, located at 2025 East Ocean Boule- vard, on the southerly side of Ocear Boulevard between L and M Streets or Peninsula Point. R -1 Mr. and Mrs. Ronald E. Dahl, Balboa Same as Applicants John W. and Dianne L. Castanha, Balboa ring was opened in connection with this nha, appellant, 2019 E. Ocean Boulevard peared before the Commission to.comment - 3 - INOEX 0 Item #4 MODIFI- AT_ION 1051 APPEAL DENIED Zone: Applicant: Owner: X At the requ Sion remove Request to second floc deck on a E ing nonconi (where th.e spaces); f of 19 feet requires a 3.) A rear Ordinance r feet 6 incf The propose partially c 8 feet 6 it width of 9 With requii proposed se into the re Location: Zone: Applicants Owners: Appellants Public hea matter. John Casta Balboa, ap C -1 Dell M. Williams, Corona del Mar Dr. C. W. Ackerman, Corona del Mar MINUTES est of the applicant, Planning Commis - d this matter from the calendar. permit the construction of first and r room additions and a second floor ingle family dwellin with the follow - orming features: 1.3 A one car garage Ordinance now requires two garage The existing garage has a depth 4 inches t (where the Ordinance depth of 20 feet, inside measurement); yard setback of 2 feet ± (where the iow requires a rear yard setback of 2 ies when abutting a 20 foot wide alley). sd development also includes a second, :overed, parking space with a width of Iches ± (where the Ordinance requries a feet). All new construction conforms •ed yard setbacks, except that the scond floor deck encroaches 6 inches t squired 2 foot 6 inch rear yard setback. Lot 25, Block D, Tract No. 518, located at 2025 East Ocean Boule- vard, on the southerly side of Ocear Boulevard between L and M Streets or Peninsula Point. R -1 Mr. and Mrs. Ronald E. Dahl, Balboa Same as Applicants John W. and Dianne L. Castanha, Balboa ring was opened in connection with this nha, appellant, 2019 E. Ocean Boulevard peared before the Commission to.comment - 3 - INOEX 0 Item #4 MODIFI- AT_ION 1051 APPEAL DENIED COMMISSIONERS Cc City of Newport Beach September 2, 1976 MOLL CALL on his appeal which was based on two points: 1. That the carport does not meet minimum requir ments and does not, in his opinion, conform to similar development in the area; and 2. That although he does not wish to prevent improvement by his neighbors on the subject property, the proposed development would be a detriment to his quality of living. He further commented on his opposition to the proposed two -story addition on the front portion of the property because it wou block out light and air to his property. Commissioner Agee pointed out that there was no legal authority to restrict development on the subject property and commented on the fact that zoning sets certain standards whereby a property can be developed and if the property is not developed to its capacity, adjacent properties may enjoy greater benefits such as more light an air for an interim period of time. Commissioner Hummel questioned the appellant wit . respect to the carport and parking and Mr. Casta advised that an automobile parked in the space would not upset him since he would not be able t see it, however, he did feel that property value would be decreased by allowing additional livinc space without requiring enclosed parking. Commissioner Balalis pointed out the possibility that the plans could be drawn whereby a modifice tion would not be required and therefore Mr. Castanha's objection to the two -story addition was not a valid reason to deny the improvements. Ann Dahl, 2025 East Ocean Boulevard, applicant and owner of the property, appeared before the Commission and concurred with the staff report and the decision of the Modifications Committee She commented on their right and desire to imprc the property and advised they had 14 signatures on a petition agreeing that the appeal should bl denied since the proposed construction would up• grade the neighborhood rather than downgrade.it Mrs. Dahl presented pictures of the property in question, a plot plan indicating the location o• the neighbors signing the petition, a map showi • the location of other carports and open parking spaces in the same block, and pictures of their property as well as the Castanha property indi- cating the light situation. She also commented - 4 - MINUTES e- ld h n 0 s ng INOUX COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach September 2. 1976 MOLL GALL that the carport was more of an open parking spa than a carport because of its design under a cantilevered deck. John Castanha, appellant, appeared in rebuttal a questioned the number of carports in the area. Community Development Director Hogan advised tha the number was not germane to this request becau carports are permitted by Code. The issue pendi is the size of the carport and whether it would satisfactorily provide for the parking of an automobile. John Castanha further requested that the Commis- sion reveal which Commissioners had actually reviewed the site. He was advised by the Commis Sion that the question was inappropriate because the Commission is not required to view sites, however, each Commissioner does spend much time individually reviewing the various si.tes and preparing for the hearings and may respond to th question during the course of discussion. • Commissioner Seely advised he had reviewed the s and commented on a reverse of the present situat as well as the balance between benefits and detr ments between properties when redevelopment.or imp.rovement occurs. He pointed out that the. community itself had established the type of development desired aswas evidenced by the devel ment standards adopted for the area and emphasiz the fact that the Dahls had the right to develop and improve their property the same as other properties in the community. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission deny 0 appeal of Modification No. 1051 and uphold the decision of the Modifications Committee, based c the following findings: 1. The existing parking space is of adequate depth for vehicular storage. 2. The second required parking space is partial covered and is of adequate width for the par ing of an automobile. 3. The existing nonconforming features on the site are very minor in nature. - 5 - MINUTES n t se ng e it io i- op ed Ily •k- INOE.X COMMISSIONERS r Q {, City OI f Newport ` Beach MINUTES • �s°i September 2, 1976 ROLL CALL 4. The existing rear yard encroachment is simil to other encroachments on adjoining residen- tial properties, and does not impede vehicul circulation on the 20 foot wide alley. 5. The approved plans provide that all new con - struction shall conform to required yard set backs. and subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial con formance with the approved plot plan and ele tions, except as noted in condition.No. 2.. 2. That the proposed second floor deck shall.nc encroach into the required 2 foot 6 inch rea yard setback. 3. That the two on -site parking spaces shall be accessible and usable for vehicular storage • at all times. Commissioner Frederickson advised.that he had reviewed the property and was well aware of the local problems because he also resides on Penin- sula Point. He commented that since property wi at such a premium and there was so little of it, the only way for expansion was "up," resulting in two -story structures. Commissioner Freder.icl son inquired as to what 'assurance the City had that the two parking spaces would be maintained as.required by condition No. 3, especially sincf he noticed a beautiful garden and plant materia' in the area designated for parking. Community Development Director Hogan advised of the City's Code Enforcement program which was a part of the Community Development Department as well as the City ordinance relative to obtainin, a Residential Building Report each time a prope is sold. Commissioner Hummel advised he had also reviewe the property and observed the planted area whic Obviously must be removed to provide for the required parking. He commented on development • in the area as well as the property in question and felt there was no legal reason to deny the proposed improvements. However, he voiced cone that ultimate build -out of each property could - 6 - INDEX ar a va• t. r is I 1 COMMISSIONERS R ; MOLL BALI. 0 All Ayes 0 City of Newport Beach September 2, 1976 a City of two - story, wall -to -wall, Ihich he felt was not very satisfactory Ipeful that some way could be found !velopment could be staggered to the ; amenities could be preserved and yet old be allowed the right to use their .o some reasonable extent. :ion with the findings established, City Attorney Coffin suggested that an finding be made as follows: MINUTES ;he modification will not under the istances of the particular case, be rental to the health,.safety, peace, t and general welfare of persons ing or working in the neighborhood or :rimental or injurious to property and re ments in the neighborhood or the 11 welfare of the City and the modifica- is consistent with.the legislative : of Title 20 of the Newport Beach ipal Code. .ommission concurred with the additional discussion, motion was voted on and create two parcels of land for it. Parcel 2 of Parcel Mpa 67 -21. (Resubdivision No. 473) located at 1001 and 1101 Quail Street, on the southwesterly side of Quail Street between Spruce Avenue and Dove. Street in "Newport Place." P -C Howard Richardson, Newport Beach Hal Watkins and Margaret C. Richard son, Newport Beach Donald E. Stevens, Inc., Costa Mesa - 7 - inionx Item #5 RESUB- DIVISION 531 APPROVED CONDI- TIONALLY result in housing, 1 and was hi whereby do point tha people woi property In connec Assistant additiona 6. That circuo detril comfo resid be de impro gener, tion inten Munic Planning finding. Following carried. Request t developme Location: Zone: Applicant Owners: Engineer: a City of two - story, wall -to -wall, Ihich he felt was not very satisfactory Ipeful that some way could be found !velopment could be staggered to the ; amenities could be preserved and yet old be allowed the right to use their .o some reasonable extent. :ion with the findings established, City Attorney Coffin suggested that an finding be made as follows: MINUTES ;he modification will not under the istances of the particular case, be rental to the health,.safety, peace, t and general welfare of persons ing or working in the neighborhood or :rimental or injurious to property and re ments in the neighborhood or the 11 welfare of the City and the modifica- is consistent with.the legislative : of Title 20 of the Newport Beach ipal Code. .ommission concurred with the additional discussion, motion was voted on and create two parcels of land for it. Parcel 2 of Parcel Mpa 67 -21. (Resubdivision No. 473) located at 1001 and 1101 Quail Street, on the southwesterly side of Quail Street between Spruce Avenue and Dove. Street in "Newport Place." P -C Howard Richardson, Newport Beach Hal Watkins and Margaret C. Richard son, Newport Beach Donald E. Stevens, Inc., Costa Mesa - 7 - inionx Item #5 RESUB- DIVISION 531 APPROVED CONDI- TIONALLY COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach MINUTES September 2, 1976 ROLL CALL City Engineer Nolan advised that the applicant did not intend to immediately develop the proper and had requested that physical construction of the sidewalk.be deferred until such time as plan were developed indicating location of -the.dri..ve- "way approaches. Public Works Department had no- objection to the deferment and felt that a standard bond and agreement could be posted to cover the situation without any modification of the recommended conditions of approval. Public hearing wa.s opened in connection with thi matter. J. A. Faerigan with Stevens Engineering, 1828 . Fullerton Avenue, Costa Mesa, appeared before tl Commission on behalf of the applicant and answer questions pertaining to the request. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Sion X Motion was made that Planning. Commission make ti AT1 Ayes following findings: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the propo! subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for thi type of development proposed. 4. That the site is physically suitable for th proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substai tial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or th habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the p posed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. • 7. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not conflict wit any easements, acquired by the public at _ 8 _ INDEX ty 3 e ed e e �i •o I COMMISSIONERS 9��! City of Newport Beach M y� S 0\0 t September 2, 1976 MOLL GALL large, for access through or use of, propert within the proposed subdivision. 8. That the discharge of waste from the propose subdivision will not result in or add to any violation of existing requirements prescribe by a California Regional Water Quality Contr Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing wit Section 1300) of the Water Code. and approve Resubdivision No. 531, subject to th following conditions: 1. That a parcel map be filed. 2. That all public improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Wor4 Department. 3. That a 6 -foot wide P.C.C. sidewalk be con- structed immediately behind the curb along • the Quail Street frontage. Request to permit the installation of an identi fication.ground sign and automobile display are+ adjacent to Jamboree Road in conjunction with tl "Beach Imports" and "Newport Datsun" automobile sales and service facilities in "Newport Place. The proposed development also includes the con- struction of a new service building on the site Location: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 64 -26 ( Resubdivision No. 462) located a 848 -888 Dove Street, southeasterl of Dove Street and northwesterly of Jamboree Road in "Newport Plac Zone: P -C Applicant: James H. Parkinson, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant • Commissioner Seely questioned orientation of th display area towards Jamboree Road, as it was h understanding that because of the arterial natu of the highway, no development such as this wou occur. i - 9 - MINUTES INDEX Y d d of h e s Item #6 USE s PERMIT ie 1803 DENIED t e iS re Id 11 COMMISSIONERS 90 � a � s� City of Newport Beach Seotember 2. 1976 . FROLL CALL Assistant Community Development Director Hewicke commented on the inadvertent issuance of permits for the new construction and advised that staff subsequently contacted the applicant in order to clarify any misunderstanding as to what had been approved in the past and advised of their need t apply for a new use permit if the construction were to continue as planned. Public hearing was opened in connection with thi matter. James Harris, Architect, appeared before the Commission on behalf of the applicant and concur with the staff report and recommendations. He answered questions of the Commission relative to landscaping, maintenance, and the desire to re- landscape to the satisfaction of Emkay Developme Community Development Director Hogan commented c the external illumination of the display area ar the.City's requirement for installation and shielding of lights so that glare did not become • a hazard to motorists on Jamboree Road. Commissioner Frederickson commented on the lack of maintenance on the cars and the grounds and felt that something should be done to establish daily maintenance. Larry Sommers with Emkay Development, appeared before the Commission and advised of their orig- inal objections to any signs along Jamboree Roac because they did not want the area to become another Harbor Boulevard. However, now that the Rolls -Royce agency has been established further south on Jamboree Road, and in reviewing their signs, felt that similar identification signs would be appropriate for the subject site. Mr. Sommers also advised they had no objection to ti display area, but were very concerned with the landscaping and would require that it be replan with turf and permanently maintained to their satisfaction. Commissioner Seely commented on his original concern that signing be directed towards the interior of the Emkay Development and not towar • Jamboree Road; that while the Rolls -Royce sign may not be offensive, he had not heard of any enthusiasm towards it; that the people in the area felt that Jamboree Road was an entrance to - 10 - MINUTES r \ INCEX 0 s re n ,n d le :e is COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach MINUTES • y September 2. 1976 MOLL CALL Newport Beach and its residential areas; voiced concern that the development in question had bee poorly maintained in the past and did not feel that the additional display area would improve the situation; and felt that from a safety stand point, the proposed location was not a desirable place to construct a raised display area because of the distraction to high speed traffic along Jamboree Road and.the close proximity to the intersection of Jamboree Road with Bristol Stree and future freeways. Public hearing was closed in connection with thi matter. Commissioner Agee commented on his understanding of the original concept that development would b directed towards the interior of the planned community and felt that the original concept should be followed. Commissioner Hummel concurred with Commissioners Seely and Agee and felt that all merchandising and displays should be directed towards the interior streets and should not be visable from Jamboree Road, and that minimal signing be pro - vided as there are other ways in which to advise the public of their presence. Commissioner Balalis felt that Jamboree Road should not have any kind of display area or sigr that would create any further hazards than alree exist. Notion X Notion was made that Planning Commission deny. Use Permit No. 1803, based on the following findings: 1. That the proposed display areas and signing were not compatible with the surrounding lal uses. 2. That the establishment of the proposed sign• ing and display areas with their proximity I a major thoroughfare at its point of inter- section with other highly traveled roadways would be detrimental to traffic and create • potential traffic hazards in that particular area. 3. That the proposed development would be detr mental to the general welfare of the neigh- borhood. INORX n t s` e S ll III COMMISSIONERS 9Q V� T S S S A. aoy BOLL 6`• Noe! City of Newport Beach September 2, 1976 CALL Commission the motion Commission establishi and felt c an area ha part of th merchandis would pres site and Y industrial Commissior a motion 1 the displz a motorist Commissior there wer( effective traffic it X X X X X Following X X carried. Request ti tennis coi Crest Est+ Location: Zone: Applicant Owner: Community one of th be out by want to g the Commi the light adjacent MINUTES er Heather advised of her opposition to inasmuch as she was a part of the which approved the planned community ng the area for automobile dealerships lisappointed that the potential of such .d not been realized. She felt that ie problem was due to the lack of ing and marketing and this use permit .ent the opportunity to upgrade the ielp to strengthen the commercial and complex. ter Frederickson advised he could support ;o permit a sign, but did not feel that ty areas had any value and could attract ;'s attention at the wrong time. er Seely commented on signs and felt alternatives that would be just as and with less potential impact on the t the area. discussion, motion was voted on and INOEX Item #7 permit the illumination of an existing JUSE art (under construction) in the Canyon PERMIT rtes residential development. 1 1802 Lot 1, Tract 8406, located at 2700 Pacific View Drive, northeasterly of Pacific View Drive and southerly on San Miguel Drive. R -3 -B Canyon Crest Estates, Newport Beach Same as Applicant Development Director Hogan advised that e conditions recommended that the lights 11:00 P.M., however, the Commission may ive this further consideration. Also, ssion may want to establish a height for s because of their relationship to residential buildings. - 12 - PROVEDI COMMISSIONERS Clty of Newport Beach MINUTES • ��°t September 2, 1976 ROLL CALL Planning Commission questioned and discussed the lighting as it pertained to intensity and height and hours of operation approved for other tennis courts in the City. Public hearing was opened in connection with thi matter. Joe Gioscia, 1743 New Hampshire, Costa Mesa, wit the Troy Investment Fund, 4321 Birch Street, partner of Canyon Crest Estates, appeared before the Commission and advised that the height of 18 feet for the lights, as shown on the plan,.wa a maximum dimension and that a reduction to 15 feet above the playing surface would be agreeabl He concurred with the staff report and the recon mended conditions, including those pertaining tc height and hours of operation, as they do not want unhappy residents in the development. There.being no others desiring to appear and be • heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission make tl All Ayes following findings: 1. That the proposed use is consistent with th Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The project will not have any significant environmental impact, providing that adequa provisions are made to screen the tennis court lighting from motorists on San Miguel Drive. 3. The Police Department has indicated that th do not contemplate any problems. 4. The approval of Use Permit No. 1802 will no under the circumstances of this case be det mental to the health, safety, peace, morals comfort and general welfare of persons resi ing and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. . and approve Use Permit No. 1802, subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial - 13 - e. I- ie to ey t, ri d- INOEX COMMISSIONERS 9plp 9( City of Newport Beach September 2. 1976 BOLL CALL conformance with the approved plot plan and section. 2. That the lighting system shall be designed with a maximum height of 15 feet above the tennis court surface and maintained in such a matter as to conceal the light source and to eliminate light and glare from creating a hazard to motorists on San Miguel Drive. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating that, in his opini this requirement has been meta 3. That if the lighting system design proves to be ineffective in eliminating light and glar to motorists on San Miguel Drive, the systen shall be redesigned and /or modified.to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and the Public Works Department. . 4. Trees or shrubs of sufficient variety, numbe be between the tennis and size shall planted court facility and San Miguel Drive so as tc screen the court lights from the arterial street. A landscape plan shall be submittec to and approved by the Director of Parks', Beaches and Recreation incorporating the abc mentioned landscape requirements. Said Ian( scaping shall be implemented in accordance with the approved plan, and the landscaping shall be permanently maintained. 5. That the windscreen shall be installed as proposed by the applicant. 6. All tennis court lights shall be out by 10:00 P.M. daily. 7. The tennis court facility shall only be uti' ized by residents and guests of Canyon Cres- Estates. No tournament games open to the public shall be permitted. - 14 - MINUTES e )ve I - INDEX COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach • y September 2, 1976 POLL CALL Request to consider an amendment to Title 19 anc Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code clarifying the responsibility for providing the names of owners and addresses for required notil cation. Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach Public hearing was opened in connection with th matter and there being no one desiring to appeal and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission recomm All Ayes to the City Council that Amendment No. 471 be adopted. Request to consider an amendment to Chapter 20. of the Newport Beach Municipal Code as it perta to height limits for chimneys and vents, archit tural.features, flag poles and parapet walls, elevator and mechanical penthouses and mechanic equipment. Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach Public hearing was opened in connection with th matter and there being no one desiring to appea and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Following discussion, motion was made that Plan All Ayes ning Commission recommend to the City Council t Amendment No. 472 be adopted. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: Motion X Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 960, All Ayes setting a public hearing for October 7, 1976, t consider an amendment to Section 20.80.090 of • the Newport Beach Municipal Code eliminating th provision for the extension of previously apprc ed permits when said permits have not been exercised within the time specified. - 15 - MINUTES 'i - is >nc )2 ins ec- al is r hal 7 e v - INOEX Item k8 AMEND- MENT 471 APPROVED Item #9 AMEND- MENT 472 APPROVED MMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach • September 2, 1976 ROLL CALL MINUTES Motion X Commissioner Heather requested and received All Ayes permission to be absent from the Planning Commis- sion meeting of September 16, 1976. Motion All Ayes • • There being no further business, motion was made to adjourn the meeting. Time: 8.:55 P.M. moo.® WILLIAM AGEE, Secretary Planning Commission City of Newport Beach - 16 - INOex