Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/07/1972COMMISSIONERS vw�xx ;,o < ? A Z m F P LL CALL Present 0 a CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES SPnf PIhor 7. 1Q77 .. ow ci, X XXX x EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R. U. Hogan, Community Development Director David R. Baade, Assistant City Attorney Benjamin B. Nolan, City Engineer STAFF MEMBERS James D. Hewicker, Asst. Community Development Director William R. Laycock, Senior Planner Rodney L. Gunn, Senior Planner Shirley Morgan Dorothea Banks Item #1 Request to permit commercial development on the USE first floor and residential uses on the second PERMIT' floor in the C -1 District. 1615. Locat on: Lot 30, Block 9, Resubdivision of CONT. TO Balboa Island, located at 114 Agate 3—EPf 2T Avenue between Park Avenue and an alley on Balboa Island. Zone: C -1 Applicant: James W. Read, Jr.,.Seal Beach Owner: Alfred Beach, Balboa Island Public hearing was continued and Assistant Communi y Development Director Hewicker reviewed the staff report with the Planning Commission. James W. Read, Jr., Seal Beach, appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of his applica- tion and answered questions pertaining to the request. Bill Hardesty, Real Estate Broker at Park and Agat appeared before the Planning Commission in favor of the request. Planning Commission discussed type of development, parking, zero side yards and changing the zo.ne to an R -1.5 District. Page 1. COMMISSIONERS . m r m n D N 9 D 0 P _DLL CALL Motion Second All Ayes Motion Second All Ayes E Motion Second All Ayes 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 7, 1972 X Following discussion, Planning Commission continued X this matter to September 21, 1972. X In view of the discussion relative to changing the RESOLU- X zone in connection with Item No. 1 to an R -1.5 District, Planning Commission adopted Resolution TION NO. 768 No. 768 declaring its intention to consider certain amendments to Title 20 of the Newport Beach.Municip 1 Code pertaining to rezoning the property located at 406, 408, 410, 500, 502, 504, 506 and 508 South Bay Front and Lots 21 through 33. Block 9, Section. 1, Resubdivision of Balboa Island, and Lots 7 through 19, Block 7, Section 1, Resubdivision of Balboa Island (located on the east and west side of Agate Avenue, south of Park Avenue) from the C -1 District to the R -1.5 District and set the public hearing for September 18, 1972 provided the time limit for publication could be met. Item #2 Request to amend the Planned Community Development AMENDMENT Standards for "North Ford ", to permit the expan- sion of land uses and the updating of the develop - NO. 326 ment.standards. CONT. TO T. 5 Location: Portion of Blocks 56 and 57, Irvinet Subdivision, lcoated between Jam - boree Road and MacArthur Boulevard and between Bison Avenue and the extension of Bonita Canyon Road. Zone: P -C Applicant: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant X At the request of the applicant, Planning Commission continued this matter to the meeting of October 5, 1972. Page 2. COMMISSIONERS 9wc+xx ;„ m� T n D ,Da y D O OLL CALF 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 7, 1972 Request to amend portions of Districting Map #11 from a C -1 District to an R -.2 or R -3 District. .INDEX tem #3 NMENDMEN 40. 332 Location: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9, ECOM- of Block 3, Newport Bay Tract, VIENDED located at 300, 302, 304, 306, 308, IS- 310, 312,.314 and 316 East Ba15oa PPROVAL Boulevard, between Coronado Street and an alley on Balboa Peninsula. Zone: C -1 Initiated By: The City of Newport Beach Public hearing was opened and Assistant Community Development Director Hewicker reviewed the staff report with the Planning Commission. He also introduced correspondence in opposition to any change of zone signed by property owners from the following addresses: 419 East Balboa Boulevard 300 East Balboa Boulevard 412 East Balboa Boulevard 205 Cypress 313 East Bay Avenue 309 East Bay Avenue 304 East Oceanfront 302 East Balboa Boulevard 820 South Bronson, Los Angeles 4611k Seashore 1746 Ocean Boulevard 4073 Balboa Boulevard 313 East Balboa Boulevard Also, a letter from Catherine Peterson, 1351 N: San Antonio, Pomona, owner of property in the subject block, was received in opposition of the change of zone. Planning Commission discussed and compared the ordinance governing the R -2 and R -3 Districts. Mr. A. W. Wallace, representing Mrs. Peterson, owner of the E1 Mar Motel appeared before the Commission and stated it was the owner's desire to keep the property zoned for commercial use and objected to the change of zone. Page 3. COMMISSIONERS D Tor S S; p T n D N 9 D O F p MOLL CALL Mo Se Mo Se Ay e No CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES. September 7, 1972 cond X sion recommend to the City Council that Amendment No. 332 be approved and the zone changed to an R -3 District. Planning Commission discussed this matter further and took the following actions: s X X X The substitute motion was voted on and failed for Noe es X X X X lack of a quorum. s X X X X The original motion was voted on and carried. es X X X Page 4. �nuex Mr. and Mrs. Lewis appeared before the Planning Commission and stated their objections to the report of the staff and the rezoning of the pro- perty. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was declared closed. tion X X F Following discussion, Planning Commission recom- cond X X m mended that this matter be disapproved and the proceedings be withdrawn. tion X X A A substitute motion was made that-Planning Commis - 0 0 COMMISSIONERS Dmcss�,� m � m�`D NyDO mFlnma am t� Z p Z T K P u CAL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 7, 1972 MINUTES ITENTATIV Request approval of the subdivision of 84.7 acres into 379 attached single family lots and one land- scape lot. Location: Portion of Blocks 93 and 96, Irvine Subdivision, located at the south- APPROVED west corner of San Joaquin Hills C NDI -, Road and Marguerite Avenue (Jasmine TI01N7FLLY Creek). Zone: P -C Applicant: M. J. Brock and Sons, Inc., Los Angeles Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Engineer: Ervin Engineering, Los Angeles Assistant Community Development Director Hewicker reviewed the application and staff report with the Planning.Commission. Because of the large number of correspondence re- ceived relative to the preservation of views across the property to the bay, the City Attorney was requested to give a legal opinion as to Planning Commission's responsibility and ability to rule on such a matter. He stated that it was outside the powers of the Planning Commission to restrict the use of property in any way to protect the private view of individuals. Bob Jaffe, Traffic Engineer for the City of Newport Beach, appeared before the Planning Commission and summarized a small area traffic study which had been done based on the.proposal and projected numbe of cars per unit. It was his opinion that the circulation pattern being planned would support the development. Traffic problems were discussed at length including signalization at various inter- sections, changing the location of the main entranc width of private streets, and enforcement of the , California Vehicle Code. The conceptual grading plan adopted at the same tim the Planned Community text was adopted was discusse by the Planning Commission as to its correlation with the grading plan submitted with the Tentative Tract Map. Assistant Community Development Directo Hewicker reviewed the two grading plans with the Page 5. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MIN- UTES &oLL CALL T T�N Z m 0 b T Z p September 7. 1972 ..o.,�,. Commission and pointed out the various contours, reflected on each. He also advised the Planning Commission that the previous concerns of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission had been satisfie . Planning Commission discussed recreation facilities paseos and trails throughout the area. Larry Moore, Associate Planning Administrator with The Irvine Company appeared before the Planning Commission and gave a brief history of the project in order to bring the Planning Commission and other up -to -date with respect to zoning; meetings with various homeowners associations to work out develop ment problems; and meeting with the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission in connection with recrea tional facilities. Ralph Martin, Partner in.Charge of Planning with Walt Richards & Assoc., the architects and planners for the project appeared before the Planning Commis sion and discussed the proposed project relative to its concept, density, topography, the off - center recreation area, and pedestrian circulation system. Larry Moore appeared before the Planning Commission and summarized some of the key points which include the concept of trying to get away from mass grading and abide by the natural contours of the topography a drastic reduction in density and height of struc- tures; and keeping in contact with the homeowners associations in an attempt to work out the various problems concerning each group. He also stated that all of the conditions as recommended in the staff report were acceptable with the exception of No. 6 which should be eliminated since the concerns of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission have been met, and No. 4 dealing with the location of the recreation facilities. It is intended that the tennis courts and swimming pools within the project be used by the residents of Jasmine Creek and the tennis courts and recreation area at the northwesterly corner is the City park for use by residents of the surrounding area. Planning Commission discussed the location of the recreation area, the conceptual grading plan as previously adopted, preservation of the canyons, • and natural topography of the project. Dennis Garrehy, Project Manager, with the Irvine Company, appeared before the Planning Commission Page 6. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH rac+xx ;, m� R 7 yV' YT TA p+ 0 MINUTES P Sou cau p September 71 1972 ,uncu and commented on the conceptual grading plan. Larry Moore again appeared before the Planning Commission and answered questions of the Commission relative to off - street parking, perimeter treatment of the project, pedestrian access within the pro-, ject (there will be no pedestrian access between Crown.Drive North and the reservoir), recreation facilities and the need for additional swimming pools, and parking around the recreation facilities. Planning Commission. recessed at 10:25 P.M. and reconvened at 10:35 P.M. Raymond W. Haas, 1421 Outrigger, Corona del Mar, appeared before the Planning Commission and dis- puted the traffic report. He also presented an overlay of a map which indicated that an entrance onto San Joaquin Hills Road would be better than the one proposed and a schematic map with overlays indicating the blockage of views from various streets in Harbor View Hills. Mr. Haas presented a petition which he read for the record and which • was signed by 445 persons requesting.consideration of their comments relative to traffic and encroach- ment of homeowner's views. Max Vickers residing in Spyglass Hills Unit No. 1, appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of Harbor View Ridge Homeowners Association and commented on the lack of recreation facilities in the area. Tom Peckenpaugh, 1321 Outrigger, Corona del Mar, appeared before the Planning Commission and commented on the City's obligation to its citizens relative to protection of views, Truth in Real Estate legislation, advertising a continuing view of the harbor to,potential homeowners, and re- design of the project to protect surrounding residents. Yvonne Howsell, resident of Harbor View Hills, appeared before the Planning Commission and commen ed on the problem of lack of schools in the area and the fact that children have to be bused to other schools outside the area. . Mrs. Smith, residing on Outrigger Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission in protest of The Irvine Company taking away her view for which she had to pay an extra $10,000. Page 7. COMMISSIONERS < Z A Z T F P OL CALL Moti Seco All • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES Sentember 7. 1979 " - INUCA on X Following discussion, Planning Commission recommend d nd X to the City Council that Tentative Map Tract 7967 Ayes be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That a minimum area of 2.0 acres of private recreation facilities be provided and so indi- cated on the Tentative Map. 2. That all residential lots on the Tentative Map have a minimum lot area of 2,400 sq. ft. 3. That a minimum of 190 guest parking stalls be provided in parking bays of two or more stalls per bay or on street. Said guest stalls shall be dispersed throughout the site to the satis- faction of the Director of.Community Developmen . 4. That all cul -de -sacs having a radius of 40 feet or less shall be maintained free and clear of obstructions. 5. That a plan for the preservation. of the existin trees surrounding the existing reservoir site shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development. 6. That street trees be planted within the develop- ment in accordance with the specifications of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department. 7. That detailed landscaping plans, including any perimeter walls and fences, and a watering system and schedule for installation, shall be prepared by a landscape architect and shall be subject to approval by the Director of Communit Development and the Director of Parks, Beaches and Recreation. Said landscaping may consist of lawn, trees, shrubbery and other plant materials. The landscaping and watering system shall be installed in accordance with the appro ed plan and shall be properly maintained. In the event installation of landscaping is not completed on schedule, the City of Newport Beach may require a reasonable guarantee for completion o said landscaping. 8. That all public improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 9. That Section 19.16.030 of the Subdivision Ordinance regarding map scale be waived pro- vided maps drawn accurately to a scale of Page 8. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DC mGrY m ;a T r• D N D➢ O T r N T Z T MINUTES ou CALL September 7, 1972 INDEX 1" = 100' are furnished to the Public Works Department. 10. That the boundary of the final tract map be checked by the County Surveyor before being submitted to the City for approval. 11. That all grading be in accordance with gradin plans and reports approved by the Public Works Director and a qualified Soils Engineer. Upon - completion of the grading, the Civil Engineer and the Soils Engineer shall certify that the grading has been completed according to the plans and the requirements of the grading ordin- ance. Reproducible copies of the "as- built" grading plans on standard size sheets shall.be furnished to the Public Works Department. In response to a specific question at public hearings for the Planned Community District .governing this property, representations were made to the effect that the g- rading along Marguerite Avenue would be governed by the • contours shown in the conceptual grading plan. To comply with the spirit of this portion of the plan, no building sites between the bottom of the easterly canyon and Marguerite Avenue shall be higher than 260 feet above sea level. Should there be substantial changes in street configuration and lot layout as a result of this condition, such changes will be presented to the Planning Commission for review at a public meeting. Special attention shall be given to design, construction and maintenance of erosion control measures during the grading operations. It shall be the responsibility of the developer to have a program for the control of siltation reviewed and approved by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. 12. That the following special conditions of approv 1 be applied to the private street system: a. The structural and geometric design shall be approved by the Public Works Department; and shall be in conformance with the Private • Street Policy, except as otherwise required herein. b. Construction shall be inspected by the Page 9. 0 0 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH D w c s s 3 p m n i N y D 0 £ m Z Z MINUTES Z A F CALL September 7, 1972 Public Works Department and a standard inspection fee paid. c. A satisfactory means of providing for per- petual operation and maintenance of the private street system shall be demonstrated prior to recordation of any final map. d. Satisfactory provision for future dedicatio of the rights -of -way, if desired, shall be, made. e. Satisfactory provision for City utilities, shall be made, with City rights superior to those of other utilities. f. Cul -de -sacs shall have a minimum curb line radius of 40 feet. 13. That the California Vehicle Code be enforced on the private street system. 14. That easements dedicated to the City be a minim of ten feet in width, with wider easements. provided where shown on the tentative map and where required by the Public Works Department. 15. That the Subdivision Ordinance requirements for local street widths of sixty feet of right -of- way and forty feet of paved surface be waived, and street widths be approved as shown on the tentative map. 16. That the existing Edison overhead electrical power lines traversing the site be relocated satisfactorily. 17. That vehicular access rights to Crown Drive North, San Joaquin Hills Road, and Marguerite Avenue be dedicated to the City; except for the street intersections as shown on the approved tentative map. 18. That the Subdivision Ordinance requirement for maximum street grades of 7% be waived; with steeper grades allowed, subject to approval by the Public Works Department, where made necessa for topographical reasons. 19. That the water capital improvement acreage fee be paid; and that storage capacity in San Joaquin Reservoir equivalent to one maximum Page 10. pm ^y. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF Do+�S2 ;p m r <N Z p Z P ou CALL r Se tember Mot 0 Mot Sec All 0 NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES 1979 119 V CA 71 MTF day's demand be dedicated to the City. 20. That the requirement for improvements on the southerly side of San Joaquin Hills Road be waived, except for the paseo in the Edison easement. Previous construction by others of the northerly half of San Joaquin Hills Road has satisfied the developers obligation under the City's capital improvement policy. 21. That two additional swimming pool sites of similar size to the one in the northwest quadrant will.be situated in the southeast and southwest quadrants of the project and clearly labeled for prospective buyers on any document that are used in connection with sales and tha utilities be brought to the site and stubbed for future useage. ion X Motion was made that an additional condition be added to the above as follows: "That all walk -ways in the greenbelt area be a minimum width of six feet." Motion died for lack of a second. ion X Another motion was made that the additional conditi n and X as discussed read as follows: Ayes 22. That all walkways in the greenbelt area be a minimum width of four (4) feet. Planning Commission recessed at 11 ;55 P.M. and reconvened at 12;10 A.M. Page 11 . 0 COMMISSIONERS DC T Gr Y T 3 P m n D N D y O P OLL CALL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH September 7. 1972 MINUTES Request to consider revisions to the Planned Community District regulations governing the :NO. Item #5 AMENDMEN 339 development of Versailles -on- the - Bluffs at Newport. ADOPTED Location: Portion of Lot 172, Block 1 and RES. 767 Lot 169, Block 2, Irvine's Sub- RECOM- division, located at the .southeast ENDING corner of Hospital Road and SuperiorDENSITY Avenue. BE CHANGED Zone: P -C Initiated By: The City of Newport Beach Community Development Director Hogan read Resolu- tion No. 7771 adopted by the City Council which directed the Planning Commission to reconsider the Planned Development Text for Versailles-on-the- Bluffs. He also.read the portion of the text dealing with density.as it presently exists and the conclusions and recommendations of the staff as stated in their report of September 6, 1972. Tom Peckenpaugh appeared before the Planning Commission representing Donald J. Scholz Co., Donald Scholz, and William Cagney. He requested that the City present its evidence as to why the ordinance should be changed after which he request- ed the opportunity to respond. When questioned, he stated he was aware of the staff report dated September 6, 1972 in connection with Item No. 5 and the contents thereof. Planning Commissioners commented on various aspect of the information.contained in the staff report and discussed the number of dwelling units to be considered for Phase II. Tom Peckenpaugh again appeared before the Planning Commission and voiced objections on the following issues: 1. That the General Plan Policies Report should only pertain to new projects; not to projects partially constructed. 2. That the absence of the freeway will improve the traffic situation around the project rather than cause more congestion. Page 12. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES MDLL CALL m n m s Z m September 7. 1972 iuneY 3. That the change in City Policy regarding duplexes and substandard lots have no bearing on the Versailles project but only reflects a' change in .City philosophy. 4. That the density in relationship to number of units is not the important thing; what is more important is the number of people the units will produce. 5. That the comparative areas were selectively incomplete and did not present a true picture. Mr. Peckenpaugh presented background information on the project, commented on the staff report, stated that the City had no right to make radical. changes in the basic structure of the ordinance, questioned the need for a use permit, pointed out that millions had been spent in preparation for the entire project including utilities and constru - tio.n of a clubhouse, commented on prior commitment made by the City and the City's moral and ethical • obligation to honor same, commented on the economi s of the property owners, and answered questions of the Planning Commissioners concerning previous statements made. As to the effect of the deletion of the Coastal Freeway, City Engineer Nolan stated that the street system in the area was designed to be compatible with the freeway construction and the deletion will have a significant effect on the overall traffic circulation pattern and.ce,rtainly will not result in an improvement to traffic circulation in the area. He also commented on the cul- de- sating of Superior Avenue. Community Development Director Hogan assured the Planning.Commission of their rights and obligation to reconsider zoning amendments of this type in that each Phase could be considered as a new project similar to any other development of pro- perty in the City which is closely related to an adjoining piece of property. Also, since the City began to pursue a general plan, a great deal of additional information had been gained about the City which was reflected in reports and adoption • of the General Policies Report. The City is following up on the plan by the implementation of policies which affect densities of other develop- ments in the City as well as Versailles. Page 13. COMMISSIONERS Motion lotion Motion Second 0tion CITY OF NEWPORT September 7, 1972 Mr. Hogan presented to copies of Minutes which City Affairs Committee of Commerce. BEACH MINUTES the Planning Commission had been received from the of the Newport Beach Chambe There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission further discussed density in an attempt to determine the number of units per acre to be permitted in Phase II of the Versailles project which covers all of the remaining property not presently developed. Motion was made to amend Text for the Versailles tion 2 limiting same to acre. the Planned Community project relative to Sec - 18 dwellings units per Following discussion and City.Attorney relative to Agee withdrew his motion. instructions from.the findings, Commissioner Based on the findings that changes have taken place in the community resulting in traffic con- gestion and increased density and the.fact that the City had recently adopted the General Policies Plan, it was recommended that the maximum number of dwelling units per acre be limited to 13.2.for the Phase II portion covering 20.8 acres. Motion died for lack of a second. Based on the findings that, changes have taken place since the initial draft and approval of the use permit, changes to the original and local transportation system have had an effect on the site, and data gathered in the process involved in the undertaking of the general plan program since the date of the original Planned Community ordinance indicates that a revision to the density for Phase II is in order, it was recommended to the City Council.that an amendment to the Planned Community District Regulations for the Versailles - on- the - Bluffs Planned Community be adopted limitin the density in Phase II to 18 dwelling units per acre. Substitute motion was made, based on the same findings, that the density be changed to 20 dwelli units per acre. Page 14. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH m (� T F �N x PZ A �L CALI ?1�i' September 7, 1972 Ayes Noes Motion Second All Ayes 0 MINUTES .MUG^ Motion died for lack of a second. XX X X X X X Vote was taken on the previous motion and Resolu- tion No. 767 was adopted. Item #6 INTERIM Request to consider adoption of the Interim Open Space Element of the Newport Beach General. Plan. PEN PACE Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach LEMENT PPROVED Public Hearing was opened and the matter reviewed by the Planning Commission. There b4ing none desiring to appear, and be heard, the public hearing was closed. X Planning Commission recommended to the City Council X that the Interim Open Space Element of .the Newport Beach General Plan be approved by the adoption of Resolution No. 769. Ltem . #7 . TREET. AME Request to change the name of a portion of that street designated as Bayside Drive which.will lie south of the Promontory Bay project to one of the following names: Seafarer Lane, Meridian Way, H NGE or Spinnaker Drive. PPROVED Location: Tract 3867 approved by City Council on June 12, 1972 and recorded on June 27, 1972. Zone: C -N -H and "U" Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach. Larry Moore, Associate Planning Administrator with The Irvine Company appeared before the Planning. Commission and stated that the property owners would like to have the name of "Harbor Island Drive" considered in connection with the request. Planning Commission discussed the selection of a name and the ramifications of recommending 'Harbor Island Drive." Richard Dorring, 525 Bayside Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission and stated that the property owners preferred the name of "Harbor Island Drive" Page 15. COMMISSIONERS v mGr22; p m OLL CALL Motion Second All Ayes • Motion Second All Ayes • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 7. 1972 ,unev X because it has character and is in keeping with.th prestige homes in the area. Following discussion which included the numbering. system, Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that Bayside Drive be changed to Harbor Island: Drive and numbered in such a way.as to avoid any conflict with Harbor Island Road. Request to realign lot lines to create two 27.5 foot wide lots where widths of 25 feet and 30 feet now exist. Item #8 RESUB- DIVISION NO. 360 Location: Lot 4 and the southwesterly 25 feet CONT. TO of Lot 6, Block 235 of the Corona E�-T del Mar Subdivision located at 304 Heliotrope Avenue on the southeasterly side of Heliotrope Avenue between Bayside Drive and Seaview Avenue in Corona del Mar. Zone: R -2 Applicant: Charles E. Hicks, Corona del Mar Owner: Same as Applicant X Planning Commission continued this matter to the X meeting of September 21, 1972. Item #9 Request to create one parcel of land for develop= RESUB- ment. DIVISION . 36 Location: Portion of Block 50, Irvine's Subdivision, located on the west- APPROVED erly side of Dove Street, northerly, CONDI- of Bowsprit Drive in "Newport TIONALLY Place." Zone: P -C Applicant: Emkay Development Co., Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc., Costa Mesa Page 16. COMMISSIONERS 7 mG1SS ;p T r T X NyT rn.n 9�O <N �mZZ Z j0 p OLL CALL Motion Second All Ayes Motion Second All Ayes • CITY OF N EWPORT . BEACH MINUTES SPnf PmhPr 7. 1Q79 Larry Wilson of Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc., appeare ` before the Planning Commission and stated they agreed with the conditions contained in the staff report. X Following discussion, Planning Commission approved X Resubdivision No. 361 subject to the following conditions: 1. That a Parcel Map be :filed. 2. That the applicable conditions of approval applied to the Tentative Map of Tract 7382 be completed. 3. That a minimum 6 foot wide sidewalk be con-- structed immediately behind the curb along the Dove Street frontage. Item #10 Request to realign lot lines to create one 40 foot wide parcel where portions of two lots now exist. Location: The southerly 13 feet of Lot 5 VONDI- and the northerly 27 feet of Lot 6, Block B, Tract 673, located at 714 Poppy Avenue on the easterly side of Poppy Avenue between Fourth and Fifth Avenues in Corona del Mar. Zone: R -1 Applicant: Howard Lopizich, Corona del Mar Owner: Same as Applicant. Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc., Costa Mesa Larry Wilson, of Raub, Bein, Frost & Assoc. appeared before the Planning Commission and stated that the conditions contained in the staff report were agreeable. X Following discussion, Planning Commission granted X an exception to the width of the lot in accordance with Section 19.12.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code finding that there are special circumstances and conditions affecting the property; that the exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the Page 17. COMMISSIONERS . DC mGrY m ;P m K N m a a T LL CALL n LJ Motion Second All Ayes 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. MINUTES September 7. 1972 am Rv applicant; and that the granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity in. which the property is located; and approved Resub- division Application No. 362 subject to the follow- ing condition: 1. That a Parcel Map be filed. Item #11 rENTATIVE Request to create one parcel for condominium development. VIAP Location: Lot 104 of Tract 3813, located at R CT . 012 5515 River Avenue, between River Avenue and Seashore Drive, west of ONT. TO 54th Street in West Newport. SEPT. 21 Zone: R -3 Applicant: C S T Engineering Co., Newport Beach Owner: Southern Pacific Transportation Co. Santa Ana Engineer: Same as Applicant x X Planning Commission continued this matter to the meeting of September 21, '1972. tem #12 INAL AP Request to create one lot for a 49 unit condomin- ium apartment building. Location: Lot 1 of Tract 1080., located RACT 027 northerly of East Bay Avenue between Fernando Street and Cypress Street ONT. TO on the Balboa Peninsula. EPT. Zone: R -4 Applicant: R. M. Galloway & Assoc., Inc. Newport Beach Owner: Newport Beach Properties, a Limited Partnership, Los Angeles Engineer: Same as Applicant Page 18. COMMISSIONERS m n D N D q (7 i CALL Motion Second All Ayes M�i o n Second All Ayes Motion Second All Ayes • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES . September 7. 1972 ,nuen X X Planning Commission continued this matter to the meeti.ng of September 21, 1972. Item #13 JSE ERMIT 176. Request for an extension of an existing use permit which allows a garage with light.repairs and service. Location: Lot 1 and a portion of Lot 2, Block ONT. TO P, Tract 323, loc.ated at 3016 East CT. 5 Coast Highway on the easterly side of East Coast Highway between Iris Avenue and Jasmine Avenue. Zone: C -1 Applicant: Coast Auto Service Center .(Les Schunk), Corona del Mar Owner: Same as Applicant. X X Planning Commission continued this matter to the meeting of October 5, 1972. tem #14 ISE ERMIT 545 Request to permit a 12 month extension for three off -site directional signs, one entrance sign and four flags for each model complex, in connection - with home sales. Location: Various points on Vista del Oro between Eastbluff Drive and Vista ONT. TO . 2 del Sol, in Northbluffs. Zone: R-4-B-2-UL-and R -3 -B and C -N -H Applicant: The Holstein "Co., Costa Mesa Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach X X Planning Commission continued this matter to the meeting of September 2.1, 1972. Page 19. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACII 9CTGry^'DO X LL CALL Motion Second All Ayes I-1 MINUTES September 7, 1972 INDEX Request to establish a pre - school in.an existing Item #15 USE church in the R -3 District. PERMIT 6 f .. Location: Lots 1 through 9, Block 114, Tract 626, located at 1400 West Balboa APPROVED Boulevard on the northwesterly ONE DI- corner of West Balboa Boulevard and TIONALLY 14th Street on the Balboa Peninsula. Zone: R -3 Applicant: Christ Church By The Sea Pre - School, Newport Beach Owner: United Methodist Church of Newport Beach Public hearing was opened and Assistant Community Development Director Hewicker gave a brief report on the matter and presented an item of correspondence received from Fred McDonald in opposition to the pre- school. Lavona McVicker, member of the Board of Directors of the.proposed pre - school appeared before the Planning Commission and stated they agreed with - the staff conditions. She also answered questions of the Planning.Commission pertaining to the request. There being no others,desiring to appear and be, heard, the public hearing was declared closed. X Planning Commission approved Use Permit Application X No. 1622 subject to the following conditions: 1. That the use of the premises for the pre - school shall be limited to weekdays (Monday through Friday), from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 2. That all playground equipment shall be removed from the off - street parking area prior to any services or church activities requiring the use of the lot. Page 20. COMMISSIONERS D T4r22; A mnD DM DD O -C ipZ T � A LL CALL r Motion Second All Ayes is CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 7, 1972 ,,.YGA Item #16 Request to permit the construction of a 104 unit USE senior citizen retirement home in the Unclassified District. PERMIT 1623 Location: Parcel 2, Resubdivision 234, loca- CONT. TO ted at 333 Placentia Avenue on the SEPT. 21 westerly side of Placentia Avenue between Hospital Road and Superior Avenue in Hoag Hospital area. Zone: Unclassified Applicant: Stivers /Huntington, Huntington Beach Owner: Morgan A. /Howard C. Sti.vers, Long Beach X At the request of the staff, Planning Commission X continued this matter to the meeting of September 21, 1972. Item #17 Request to permit the construction of a 4 unit USE apartment in the C -1 District. PERMIT T6T6 . Location: Lot 1, Block 13 of Balboa.Tract, located at 900 East Balboa Boule- APPROVED vard on the northeast corner of CONDI- A Street and East Balboa Boulevard TIONALLY in Central Balboa. Zone: C -1 Applicant: Robert L. Seiling, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Public hearing was opened in connection with the a ove request and reviewed by the Planning Commission. Robert Seiling, applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission and answered questions relativ to the request. Mr. and Mrs. Gustave Hilbert, 918 Balboa Boulevard appeared before the Planning Commission in opposi- tion to the request because of the increase in density and traffic congestion. Page 21. COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DO T Gr Y m 3 P mf+D NDD O '^cN ipZ A LL CALL Motion Second Aye's Abstain 40 Motion Second All Ayes i MINUTES September 7, 1972 INDEX There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission discussed this matter in connection with density, parking, and setbacks. X Following discussion, Planning Commission approved X Use Permit No. 1625, subject to the following X X X X X conditions: x 1. That construction be limited to a triplex only with a 10 foot setback from Balboa Boulevard, a 10 foot setback from Bay Avenue (vacated), and 4 foot side yard setbacks. 2. That all plans are to be reviewed and approved by the Department of Community Development 3. That a 10 foot radius corner cut -off be dedicated for street purposes at the corner of Balboa Boulevard and "A" Street. Item #18 Request to amend a portion of Districting Map AMENDMENT No. 1 from C -1 -H District to an R -2 District. NO. 334 Location: Lot 9 of Block 9, Seashore Colony CONT. TO Tract, located at 210 Grant Street, T between West Coast Highway and Canal Street in Newport Shores. Zone: C -1 -H Applicant: Patrick O'Connor, Newport Beach Owner: Ethyl Calvert, Newport Beach X At the request of the staff, Planning Commission X continued this matter to the meeting of September 21, 1972. Item #19 Request to amend a portion of Districting Map AMENDMENT No. 1 from a C -1 -H District to an R -2 District. NO. 335 Location: Lot 7 of Block 9, Seashore Colony CONT. TO Tract, located at 209 Fern Street, SEPT 21 between West Coast Highway and Cana Street.in Newport Shores. Page 22. COMMISSIONERS A AKOLL CALL Motion Second All Ayes r1 u Motion Second All Ayes Motion Second All Ayes n CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES September 7, 1972 IM YCII Zone: C -1 -H Applicant: Dr. Robert Nevin, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant. X X Planning Commission continued this matter to the meeting of September 21, 1972, at the request of the Staff. Item #20 AMENDMEN Request.to amend portions of Districting Map No. 10 from the R -3 District to the R -2 District. N0. 336 Location: Lots 1 through 10 of Block 1, New- CONT. TO port Tract, located at 111,.113, SEPT. 21 115, 117, 119, 121, 123, 125, 127, 129 East Bay Avenue, between Alvarado Street and Anade Avenue in. .Central Balboa. Zone: R -3 Initiated by,: Robert F. Hollingsworth, et al. Newport Beach X X Planning Commission continued this matter to the meeting of September 21, 1972. X There being no further business, Planning Commis - X sion adjourned at 3:30 A.M. dACQ01 INE E. HEATHER, Secretary v Planning Commission City of Newport Beach Page 23.