The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09/20/1979COMMISSIONERS Regular Planning Commission Meeting MINUTES Place: City Council Chambers x I Timer 7:30 P.M. a > Date: September 20, 1979 ity of Newport Beach ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I I INDEX Present Absent Motion Ayes Agnt E X- OFFICIO MEMBERS . V. Hogan, Community Development Director ugh Coffin, Acting City Attorney TAFF MEMBERS Jlames Hewicker, Assistant Director Planning Robert Lenard, Advance Planning Administrator don Webb, Assistant City Engineer Glenna Gipe, Secretary * * * Minutes Written By: Glenna Gipe Motion was made to hear only Agend Item No. 1 and x x o continue the remaining items to the regular * Manning Commission meeting of Oct ber 4, 1979. ichard Hogan, Community Developme t Director, rought to the attention of the Planning Commis - ion that they had had a request f r a temporary uilding for a bank on the corner f MacArthur oulevard and Coast Highway and that the Ordinance rovides that the Department of Co munity Develop- ent may grant a temporary use for a period of 0 days, with direction to said ba k that if they ntend to go for a longer period of time, they ust ask for a Use Permit from the Planning Commis ion. t this point, Chairman Balalis to ned the meeting ver to Vice - Chairman McLaughlin, due to a conflic f interest regarding this matter. ommissioner Allen inau -ired whether this would rant any permit approval for this site, to which r. Hogan replied that they must apply for aUse ermit from the Planning Commission if they inten o go for a period longer than the 90 days. * * * -i- September 20, 1979 a itv of Newport Beach MINUTES INDEX mmissioner Haidinger inquired wh mment regarding the Plan Check p the Planning Commission, to whi lalis expressed his feeling that wport Beach spends a lot of invo re items regarding plan checking ty or County. Mr. Hogan informed the Planning Coi he had authorized the plan checker time to catch up with the backlog last budget session, he had sugges wfees to cover all the processing o ith the intent that these fees wo ward assuring that processing. Commissioner Haidinger stated his (here was no mention made in the p v hat the plan checkers could avoid up the process. • Commissioner Allen inquired whethe regarding pay scale and overtime w Purview of the duty and function o Commission, to which Hugh Coffin, orney, replied that those decisio ally by the City.Council, but tha Commission could make recommendati 6uncil. ther there was per submitted h Commissioner the City of vement with than any other mission that to go on over - nd that at the ed increasing applications, Id then go;to bservation that per regarding doing to speed involvement s.within the the Planning cting City.At- s are made fi- the Planning ns to the City ommissioner Haidinger expressed his feeling that he job of the Planning Commission is to represen he community in all aspects of hov the community s developed, and that the operati ns of the Com- unity Development Department are xtremely im- ortant. j Items # Request to consider proposed amend.ents to the I and 2 band Use, Residential Growth and R creation and pen Space Elements of the General Plan, and the GENERAL reliminary review of a screen the--k Initial Study AP: EN[ WE—'J 79 -1 INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach ND 79 -2 CONTINUED T - -SEPTEM-BER 27, 1979 -2- x w September 20, 1979 M MINUTES R O L L CALL I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I INDEX quest to consider proposed amend ents to the rculation Element of the General�jPlan, and the ceptance of an Environmental Doc ment. ITIATED BY: The City of NewportlBeach he Public Hearing continued regar nd Keith Greer, Director of Commu or The Irvine Company, appeared b ing Commission and stated his int additional residential parcels: Rtment Site; a) San Joaquin Hil ur ou evard b) 10.5 acres c esult of the failure of the freew eloped d) will not now be utiliz urposes e) access to the site is ) will be affordable housing unit acuzzi h) access off San Miguel resents a diversity of housing op ing this item ity Developmen fore the Plan - ntion to cover 1) Baywo2 s Road /Mac there as a y.to be de- d for roadway. restrictive g) pool and rive i) re- ortunities. • in response to a question posed by Commissioner Beek; Mr. Greer replied that they re providing Or landscaped berms to mitigate t e noise im- I III n response to a question posed by Commissioner cLaughlin, Mr. Greer replied that he had referre o affordable housing in the sense of the moderat ncome level, as established by th County of range, without federal funding. ommissioner Balalis then posed a uestion, to hich Mr. Greer replied that they ould be main - aining a certain level of rent th t can qualify or the median income level. ) Bic Can on Site 10; a) On San J aquin Hills a jacent oa , to Big Canyon Drive b) 15 acres ) adult townhome community d) view oriented to ig Canyon e) provide for vehicular access from an Joaquin Hills Road f) private recreation enter g) variety of housing opportunities ) 160 units. In response to a question posed by Commissioner Beek, Mr. Greer replied that Big C nyon is a com- O ete community in the sense that it is complete -3- MINUTES Septeinber 20, 1979 �ab' �a 1 i 0 City of Newmt Beach I R O L L CALL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 I INDEX thin the Master Plan developed ) Block 800 in New ort Center; a) acific Mutual Building b 7 acre f the remaining residential sites rban highrise use e) appropriate idrise or highrise condominium f ty g) close to police and fire p ) traffic impacts to this communi imal i) 245 dwelling units propo r this parcel. adjacent to c) most urba d) ideal for for either :a adult commun= otection y would be mi- ed. response to a question posed by Commissioner len, Mr. Greer replied that the Oensity would 35 per acre and would be in'kee ing with the mmercial architecture of Newport Center. r. Greer then quickly recapped th hich he had made last week. ommissioner Balalis commented reg • entation by the Local Coastal Pro nd Game which identified concerns Ain parcels and regarding the mem F yckoff concerning affordable hous Mr. Greer responded with their fee doncerns raised by the Fish and Ga 4nd that the concern would be whet provided will be erosive in nature dr in some way harming them; he fu degarding the Local Coastal Progra isagreement with them that the be Mect the habitat is to discourage ating their feeling that develop tact, be compatible and not harmfu o respond regarding the airport, feeling that the impacts on the Jo are relatively minor; and in concl ffordable housing, he stated.thei Ork closely with the City to set arrive at solutions regarding affo Don Webb, Assistant City Engineer -he Planning Commission and point hich the riparian habitat has be reated by storm drains, stating ite the Fish and Game indicated S�ected is located opposite Santa -4- major points rding the pre - ram and Fish regarding cer- from Mayor ng, to which ing that the e were minor er the drainag or endangering ther responded , stating thei t way to pro - evelopment,, ent can, in ; he continued xpressing thei n Wayne Airpor sion, regardin willingness t uidelines and dable housing. appeared befor out areas in largely at the major eded to be,pro rbara Drive, ROLL CALL i 0 MINUTES m September 20, 1979 411 IR N 6tv of Newport Beach he most.logical place to take entry and where torm.drains are located and is a ianmade locatio hich..could possibly be relocated. He further ommented regarding the Castaways Site, stating hat.this habitat area was probabl created at he time the roadway fill was put n. ommissioner Beek expressed his di agreement.re- arding Mr. Webb's last statement, stating his nderstanding.that it was created s.a result of atural rainfall. egarding the West Bay Site, Mr. Wbb stated that he canyon has remnants of roadway in severah reas to serve the dike which crea ed.the dam. ill Banning, Beco, Ltd., appeared ing Commission and stated that th mately 500 acres, most of which i orporated areas closely aligned w each, though not in its official her requested that no action be t he Planning Commission or City Co erence to the General Plan, becau s premature and that they don't p ime to suggest the exact uses on everal reasons, including the fac erty is under an oil lease. before the Plan y owned approx- in the.unin- th Newport phere. He fur - ken either by ncil with re- e they feel it -esume at this he property for that the pro- he Planning Commission recessed a 8:35 p.m. and econvened at 8:45 p.m. on Hendrickson, The Irvine Compan ore the Planning Commission and r cteristics of their projects: 1) nd MacArthur Boulevard; a) approp inistrative, professional and fin ial b) unsuitable for residentia ).6 acres. r. Webb commented that in re -eval ransportation system, they need t -5- appeared be- layed the char - Jamboree Road iate for ad- nci.al/commer- .development tion of the have a mechan- x MINUTES September 20, 1979 Of Newport Beach I ROLL CALL I I I i. I I I I I I I INDEX 0 0 sm to get the extremely heavy left-turn move rom the northbound Jamboree Road nto Bristol treet and that one mechanism of d ing this would e to allow a loop -ramp, requiring an amendment o their freeway agreement. r. Hendrickson relayed that this area would like• y not be developed for at least 3 years and pos ibly beyond. He then continued r garding their ther projects: 2) San Die o Cree< North and outh; a) San Diego Creek North is a 12'acre site San Diego Creek North has General Plan zoning or retail and service /commercial c) appropriate or a hotel /motel location d) inappropriate for ny type of permanent residential ise , e) San• iego Creek South is a 47 acre sit f) San Diego reek South has General Plan zonin for general ndustry g) NIWA is considering t is site for a esilting basin. 3) North -Ford; a) 80 acres . ) adjacent uses in conformity witi the existing eneral Plan zoning c) first 30% appropriate for ight industrial zoning d) recomm nd no change n the General.Pl.an zoning for this site. New ort. Center; a) GPA 78 -2 mad a cut of 15,500 sq. t. of the proposed re dining develop• lent which should now receive very careful co:n- ideration developed to support tha fact that .here is appropriate substantiation for such a .ut b) they are willing to phase this area with raffic improvements c) shuttle system is pre - licated on density of development. 5) Corporate 'laza; a) 13 buildings are completed b the re- iaining portion is predicated on a Phasing Plan :o satisfy the test of reasonableness c) the ap- �ropriate use for the site is as currently plan- . ed. 6) Block 500;.a) in the easterly edge are :wo small,sites to contain a building each of .0,000 sq.. ft. 7) Block 600; a).should be cam - ileted out at a density comparable to the existin lensity in the block b) would possibly be approp •fate for a hotel site. 8) Civic Plaza; a) the •emaining 70% is subject to a P asTng Plan )) the other 30% is in the process of being built iith office buildings c) appropriate as a high- Ise site d) incorporates the ex e.nsion of the 1rt Museum Sculpture Garden. 9) lock 800; MINUTES September 20, 1979 Of Newport Beach I ROLL CALL I I I i. I I I I I I I INDEX 0 0 sm to get the extremely heavy left-turn move rom the northbound Jamboree Road nto Bristol treet and that one mechanism of d ing this would e to allow a loop -ramp, requiring an amendment o their freeway agreement. r. Hendrickson relayed that this area would like• y not be developed for at least 3 years and pos ibly beyond. He then continued r garding their ther projects: 2) San Die o Cree< North and outh; a) San Diego Creek North is a 12'acre site San Diego Creek North has General Plan zoning or retail and service /commercial c) appropriate or a hotel /motel location d) inappropriate for ny type of permanent residential ise , e) San• iego Creek South is a 47 acre sit f) San Diego reek South has General Plan zonin for general ndustry g) NIWA is considering t is site for a esilting basin. 3) North -Ford; a) 80 acres . ) adjacent uses in conformity witi the existing eneral Plan zoning c) first 30% appropriate for ight industrial zoning d) recomm nd no change n the General.Pl.an zoning for this site. New ort. Center; a) GPA 78 -2 mad a cut of 15,500 sq. t. of the proposed re dining develop• lent which should now receive very careful co:n- ideration developed to support tha fact that .here is appropriate substantiation for such a .ut b) they are willing to phase this area with raffic improvements c) shuttle system is pre - licated on density of development. 5) Corporate 'laza; a) 13 buildings are completed b the re- iaining portion is predicated on a Phasing Plan :o satisfy the test of reasonableness c) the ap- �ropriate use for the site is as currently plan- . ed. 6) Block 500;.a) in the easterly edge are :wo small,sites to contain a building each of .0,000 sq.. ft. 7) Block 600; a).should be cam - ileted out at a density comparable to the existin lensity in the block b) would possibly be approp •fate for a hotel site. 8) Civic Plaza; a) the •emaining 70% is subject to a P asTng Plan )) the other 30% is in the process of being built iith office buildings c) appropriate as a high- Ise site d) incorporates the ex e.nsion of the 1rt Museum Sculpture Garden. 9) lock 800; September 20, 1979 m itv of Newport Beach MINUTES �a large amount of Open Space. 0) Corporate laza, Phase 3; a) General Plan cu rent zoning �or administrative and professional financials/ ommercial b) request that the current General Ian zoning remain.as is. 11) New ort villa e nd Avocado /MacArthur; a) 33 acres lower art is general retail zoning c) upper part is admin- istrative /professional zoning d.) ompletion of he development of this area would bring along Tith it significant traffic improv ments in the orm of the MacArthur /Avocado couplet e) would contemplate mixing retail with soma residential in the site and perhaps a small am unt of office 12) Bayview, Laing Site; a) located at the north crest corner ond f Jamboree and Pacific Coast Highway ) 19 acres c) current General Plan zoning is or commercial, wi.th overlay of residential ) recommend that the General Plan for this area lot be changed. '13) Lower Area of Castaways; • �) suggested that the current General Plan re- M ar ding this area as it stands should be main- ned. t9 r. Hendrickson then briefly summarized all the above. Ernie Wilson, Langdon and Wilson Architects, then ppeared before the Planning Commission and sub - itted a letter requesting that Koll Center Nlew- �ort be exempted from the General Plan Amendment 9 -1 and be dealt with through the Phasing Plan rocess of Amendment No. 514. He reviewed that xhibit "A" is a recap of the numbers in the ;taff Report, Exhibit "B" indicates the Koll- etna property ownerships within Moll Center:New- aort, Exhibit "C" illustrates that Koll has taken dvantage of the 30% since October 1978 and other have not and that Alternate 2 should be recongize �o that all property owners within Koll Center be treated on an equitable basis; he clarified their ontention that the Ordinance as it now stands.al lows in the City that the density allowed was a umber plus a hotel, just as it has been and is din the Ordinance for Emkay's development, that particular development of which h s taken advan- • stage of the chance to build the h tel and than pwnership is exactly the same as oll's ownership In conclusion, he expressed their feeling that -7- September 20, 1979 x itv of Newport Beach he density reduction should be ap ommercial and office space as ind mendment No., 514, and that any in ow much footage.should be allowed s not in the Ordinance and theref aw.as they see it now,.but would ent to not only Amendment No. 514 he P -C text. MINUTES lied to the cated under erpretation of for a hotel re is not equire an amen but also-to n response to a question posed by Commissioner eek, Mr. Wilson replied that Exhi it "A" is all properties within the P -C text, regardless of Ownership, and Exhibit "B" is the wnership of Koll -Aetna only. IIn response to a question posed by Mr. Hogan, r. Wilson responded that he is not saying that ensity, can be transferred, and in fact they are haying that the only possible way to transfer is by an Amendment and that they are Dnly recognizin • the amount of square footage total owner by owner i Rat Allen, Langdon and Wilson Arch'tects, appear- ed before th.e Planning Commission ind stated that jn Amendment No. 514, there is 1,0 8,863 sq. ft. f building area permitted as of 0 tuber 1, 1979 nd that in order to total that nu ber, the 41,021 figure has to be added to the 728,069 fi- gure, which is added to the develo ed since Oc- iober 1, 1979 and in order for it to balance and qual the 1,058,000, the 141,021 figure must be ncluded. r. Wilson further elaborated that the 141,000 eet is on a separate block than the one being iscussed, where the major developable land is to ated and the ownership of these separate pierces s still under Koll's name and Koll owns density ights on several pieces of property and they can of transfer anything without a P -C text.amend- ent. ommissioner Allen pointed out that the figures elating to proposals dealing with the use per cre need to be corrected. so INDEX COMMISSIONERS x MINUTES - September 20, 1979 of Newport Beach INDEX I ob Brake, Latham and Watkins, Attorneys for The rvine.Company, appeared before th Planning Com- mlission to present to the Planning Commission:a Metter on the California Environme tal Quality Act, the subject of which included the site analy �is section of the Initial Study relating to the s 4 minimum potentially significant environmental impacts, with a maximum of 45 and ncluded in:tho umbers are 3 of the 4 potential a fects identifi in the CEQA guidelines as mandatinj an EIR and that the only effect that is not c ecked as havin otential.ly involved in any of the alternatives nder consideration is 21 - "B" and ie expressed hi eeling that there is a potential f a 21 - "B ": �ffect involved in any of the resi ential alter - natives under consideration. Also he pointed out that CEQA requires that Enviro mental Docu- ments should be prepared as early s possible in he planning process to enable env ronmental con - iderations to influence project, rogram and • esign and that these steps of ana ysis and eval- tiation must be completed prior to pproval of the project. In conclusion, he expres ed his feeling that it would be proper at this ti a to engage in the environmental study that will rovide the basic information necessary to rea h an intelli- lIent decision and that in any proj ct of the na- ure of a General Plan Amendment, EQA goes on to point out that the primary focus s ould be on Secondary effects, which would inc ude items such as: effects on the housing availa ility, employ - ent avail - ability and location, po ulation and egmagraphic patterns, economic we lbeing of the populus and effects on the airport. red Talarico., Environmental Coordinator, stated hat they have possibly mistakenly assumed that his is the complete Initial Study for the projec hich cannot be completed until they have a proje nd it is premature at this point to make a de- ermination at this time. �obert Shelton, The Irvine Company, appeared be- fore the Planning Commission and referred to the Koll Center project, stating their agreement with taff. He then briefly reviewed their presenta- • ion, stating their feeling that the most effec- COMMISSIONERS MINUTES September 20, 1979 of Newport Beach ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I ] INDEX ve way to bring about improvemen s to the rculat.ion system is to permit th kind of de= lopment that the General Plan cu rently contem- ates and to do it in the context of very ,care- 1 phasing. ommissioner Beek requested that toe term "build- ble acreage" be used throughout nd that the erm "buildable acreage" not inciu a bluffs, flood lains and habitat reserves. r. Hogan responded that "buildabl acreage" as eferred to in the GeneralPlan re ers only to re- idential.density designations. . ommissioner Beek suggested that a some future ime. they can discuss the boundari s of the areas hich they. determine to be unusabl when they.ob ain the technical material to det rmine such. • ommi.ssioner Allen stated her unde standing that ommissioner Beek''s intention was o generally etermine the number of dwelling u its per build- ble acre at this time and feed th habitat areas 11in at a later date. ommissioner Beek proposed the term, "usable Gres ommissioner.Balal ' is suggested using the present definition and discuss an alternate definition at a� later date. oMr.. Hogan informed the Planning Commission that th nly things that are presently excluded in the _ter 'buildable acre" are streets, publ c recreation areas and slopes greater than 2:1. Motion K lotion was made to use the term, " sable acreage" and that usable acres, being gross acres, will ex- Jude those areas which are protec ed habitat. areas, flood plains, coastal bluff. , blufftop set - �acks,as determined by City Counci , sights un- uildable for geologic or seismic easons and L -10- x v September 20, 1979 m Beach MINUTES ROLL CALL I III I I I I i I [INDEX rk or open space dedications, bu not excluding reets. Commissioner Balalis stated his opposition to the motion,.suggesting that Commission Beek come back to the next meeting with a more finite definition aind suggest same to the City Council. Motion x Substitute Motion was made that in all the areas that are concurrently being dealt. ith in our General Plan Amendment-and the Local Coastal Pro- gram Land Use Element that we will determine at some point at a later date what wi l be excluded from buildable acreage prior to to al density'com pjutation:.protected habitat areas, flood plains, coastal bluffs, blufftop setbacks is determined 6 City Council, sights unbuildabl for geologic or seismic reasons, and park or op n space dedi lotions, but not excluding streets but that in .erms of the present discussion, t e Planning .Com • mission will deal with buildable. a reage'in the' i*raditional manner. . n response to a question posed by Commissioner alalis, Mr. Hogan replied that th y had included n the public hearing notice a pos ible revision o the existing density cla.ssifica ion system and hat the definition of acreage cou d be a part of hat. Mr. Hogan.pointed out that this wo ld mean that the Planning Commission would not t this time be determining the number of units or the amount of development. Pr. Shelton again appeared before the Planning ommission.and expressed their feeling that if hey do not talk in terms of numbers of allowable dwelling units on the site, they make it difficul to project traffic and other envir nmental impact on any given site and that buildable acres are ad dressed ultimately when specific site planning oc curs. Ayes N s x x traw Vote was then taken on the S ion, which.MOTION CARRIED. bstitute Mo- Awnt * * *[Ix lx ' Motion Lotion was made to reconsider the tion. ubstitute Mo- -11- W MINUTES September 20, 1979 of Newport Beach I ROLL CALL I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 INDEX ugh Coffin, Acting City Attorney, .stated that oll Center, part of Newport Cente and North. ord are outside the Coastal Zone n would,not e subject to the Local Coastal Pr gram in any eqard. Ayes x x x Straw Vote was then taken on the M tion, which Noes x x MOTION CARRIED. Absent Motion x Motion was then made th t in all zones Ayes x x x substitute he Planning Commission deal with he following Noes x x oncerns specifically at a later t me, at which Absent * time all or some portion of the fo lowing may be excluded from the buildable acreag prior to total density computation: 1) protected habitat areas, Z) flood plains, 3) coastal bluffs 4) blufftop setbacks as determined by the City Council, �) sites unbuildable for geologic r seismic rea- 4ons, 6) park or open space dedica ions, 7) resi- dential areas which are greater th n 65 CNEL noise ones from highway traffic not inc uding air traf- ic, (but not excluding streets), ) and to be pplied in not only the coastal zo es, but in.all zones, upon which a Straw Vote was taken. Motion Mf�otion was made that Site Number 5, The Aeronu- Ayes x x x x Ironic Ford Site, be planned for tie adopted Plan- Absent * reed Community Text, upon which a S raw Vote was taken. Motion x iotion.was made that Koll Center b planned for 25,625 sq. ft. of courthouse, 10,0)0 sq. ft. of dffices on the "restaurant" site a the intersec- tion of Jamboree Road and MacArthu Boulevard and hat the remainder of the parcel b planned for esiden.tial at 8 dwelling units pe buildable acre Motion x ubstitute Motion was made that Ko 1 Center be lanned for 25,625 sq. ft. of.cour house, 10,000 Sq. ft. of offices on the "restaur nt" site at the intersection of Jamboree Road and acArthur B.oule- �rard and that the remainder of the parcel be plan• ed for residential at 17 dwelling units per g uildable acre. 0 -12- ROLL CALL 0 m September 20, 1979 81 Qtv of Newport Beach ommissioner Allen then expressed hat there are certain constraints ommercial that have been addresse ost obvious being the.problem rel urther expressing her feeling tha ional commercial to the City make hat the day will come that the ro eep_pace with the private develop t would be to their great advanta esidential. She.shared her.compu roximately 18 buildable acres aft he hotel•s.ite and the 1.8 acre co amboree. Road and MacArthur Boulev 20 units at 2,500 sq. ft: a unit. pproximately 800,000 sq. ft. MINUTES er feeling involved with before, the ted to traffic add.ing addi- it apparent dways will.not ent and that e to suggest, ation at ap- r excluding ner site at rd, suggesting o.arrive at- r. Hogan suggested that there sho ld be an oppor- unity for the property owner to c nsider loca- ions within the project for those amenities which re needed to go along with residential develop- ent, and that noise be considered as well. ' ommissioner Allen shared her finO ng that the irport noise projection shows tha Koll Center ill be outside the 60 CNEL. e Planning Commission recessed aft 10:45 p.m: d reconvened at 10:55 p.m. r. Hogan then stated that Office ite "C" has 7.5 acres and'immediately adjacen to that is etail Site "1" which has 1 acre tap is now a estaurant site and in Office Site "B" is 8.1 cre.s and Office Site "G" is 1 acr . ommissioner Allen.stated her int ice Site "G ", Retail Site "1" an ite be .as.p.resently planned.. Sh as not her intention to deal wit B" at all. r. Coffin reported that, the quar ort as issued by the.County of 0 bows a noise contour map.averagi -13- tion that Of- the industrial stated that it Office Site i rly noise nge Airport the 1978 MINUTES m September 20, 1979 IF a 9 ity of Newport Beach ROLL CALL INDEX i Oise figures and that at the inte section of ampus Drive and MacArthur Bouleva d the 65 CNEL ontour runs in that area basicalle along Mac - rthur Boulevard and below Campus rive and shows do 65 CNEL contours within that ar a.based on air - draft'noise alone: ommissioner Haidinger stated his, nderstan:ding hat CNEL is the community noise a uivalent level hich is an averaging of .energy im acts on.an . nnual basis and that sporadic air ort noise woul e more disruptive than continual 0ghway traffic oise. r. Coffin stated that the interpretation has al- ays been.that when the substitute motion suggest different action than the main motion, if it is pproved, it becomes the motion that was approved nd that if it fails, the original motion is then oted on. Motion x ubstitute Motion was made to accept the proposal f 25% of the remaining square footage. as shown n Alternate 1, Exhibit "C" and th Phasing.P'lan • nd that the.property owner will have the riglht o substitute any square footage for residential -14- ommissioner McLaughlin expressed ier.feeli.ngs hat the periodic landing and take off of the. jets are severely unacceptable. 4ommissioner Beek stated his under tanding that t substitute motion establishes the esidential, planning on Office.Site "C" and on all of Office • Site "B ", with the exception of th small portion ¢n the corner of MacArthur Boulevard and Jamboree Road, to which.Commissioner Allen agreed. Motion 4mendment to the Substitute Motion was made that Ayes x Office Site "A" be included in the residential Noes x x x planning at the s.ame intensity, up )n which a Absent * * straw Vote was taken. l— commissioner Haidinger expressed h understandin the proper procedure would be to voile on the Mhat otion, regardless of the outcome f the substi- tute motion. r. Coffin stated that the interpretation has al- ays been.that when the substitute motion suggest different action than the main motion, if it is pproved, it becomes the motion that was approved nd that if it fails, the original motion is then oted on. Motion x ubstitute Motion was made to accept the proposal f 25% of the remaining square footage. as shown n Alternate 1, Exhibit "C" and th Phasing.P'lan • nd that the.property owner will have the riglht o substitute any square footage for residential -14- COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1979 HE (as itv of Newport Beach MINUTES rposes at 2,000 sq. ft. per unit using all the ace including the square footage by which it wa duced, if the residential develo ment is of 0,000 sq. ft. or more. ommissioner Allen stated her unde standing that ommissioner Balalis' motion is to leave the op- ion of residential development up to the devel- per, stated that she would not su port the me- ion because the purpose of her re id.ential build ut suggestion was an attempt to f nd a develop- ent that would help solve some of the planning roblems within the City and she a pressed her eeling that it is the function of the Planning ommission to determine use. Motion x Amendment to Commissioner Balalis' Motion was rtade that the 25% figure suggested by Commissione B;alalis in his Substitute Motion be amended to �II0 %. Mr. Shelton appeared before the Pl; nning Commis - ion to inquire whether their figures refer to Office Site "C" and in what way th s incentive would apply to The Irvine Company ite, to which ommissioner Balalis replied that he Irvine ompany has under the current area allowable ,58,200.sq. ft. and that they intr duce a Phasing Flan on the P -C done as in the Emk y situation and that The'Koll Company and The rvine Company rpust necessarily decide collective y. AWnt I '* -15- ommissioner Beek - stated that he w uld abstain from voting on the amendment, as h would be . "no" on the substitute mo.ti n. Ayes x Straw voting Vote was then taken on the a endment to Com Noes x x x issioner Balalis' Substitute Moti n, which Abstain K FAILED.. Absent iOTION Ayes x x Straw Vote was then taken on Commi sioner Balalis Noes x x x ubstitute Motion, which MOTION FAILED. Absent I Ayes x Straw Vote was then taken on Commi sioner Allen's Noes x x x ubstitute Motion, which MOTION FAILED. AWnt I '* -15- 5' � n In WWI > MINUTES Sepirember 20, 1979 of Newr)ort Beach ROLL CALL I I I I I I I I I INDEX Ayes Noes x x Absent llll. 0 0 ommissioner Beek stated that his o'tion on the loor applies to Office Sites "C ", "A" and. "B, ", ith the exception of the small pa cel on the orner of MacArthur Boulevard and amboree Road. ommissioner Allen stated her support of the mo- ion because she would support any residential roposal that made.an effort in the direction in hich she was .looking to solve these problems; hat is, any proposal of less density. traw Vote was then taken on the M tion,.which OTION FAILED. ommissioner Haidinger inquired wh ther anything as being done regarding the parki g problem at oolihan's Restaurant, to which Janes Hewicker, ssistant Director- Planning, repli d that the ood park under construction at tha opposite end f the block is designed to provide parking for oolihan's Restaurant. r. Brake, Attorney for The Irvine Company, again ppeared before the Planning Commission and re- erred to his letter addressed to the Planning ommission, expressing his feeling that if what e had just heard occur was.repres ntative of the anner in which the Planning Commission intends o proceed, that he felt constrained to say that he Planning Commission is intendi g to violate very accepted principle of proper planning and he constitutional rights of his c ient. equest to amend .a previously approved use permit Item #3 hat allowed the construction of a restaurant with n -sale alcoholic beverages so as to permit an USE PER - dditional freestanding identification sign on Mrr_1T._ he site. 1671 TA-MYND ED OCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 60 -30 (Resubdivision No. 425) located CONTINUED 0 OCTOBEI 4 -16- COMMISSIONERS O g D_ w September 20, 1979 m MINUTES R O L L CALL X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INDEX at 3300 West Coast ighway, on'the northerly side of W st Coast High- way, east of Newpor Boulevard on Mariner's Mile. ONE: Specific Plan Area lo. 5 PPLICANT Allyn Cano, dba. C a Cha's Mexi- can Food, Newport B ach WNER: Byco, Inc., Newport Beach Motion x otioh was made to continue,this item to the re- Ayes x x xx x ular Planning Commission meeting n October 4, Absent * 1979, due to the lateness of the h ur. * * * equest to consider a Traffic Stud for a propose • evelopment and redevelopment of f ciliti:es at Hoag Memorial Hospital- Presbyteria . OCATION: Parcel 1, Record of Survey 15/30, located at 301 Newp rt Boulevard, on the southwesterly corner of Newport Boulevard and Hospital Road. ONE: A -P -H PPLICANT,: Hoag Memorial Hospital- Presbyter- ian, Newport Beach WNER: Same as Applicant Motion IIx J�otion was made to.continue this i em to the re- Ayes x x x X ular Planning Commission meeting n October 4, Absent * * 1979, due to the lateness of the hour. * ** -17- Item #4 TRAFFIC STUDY CONTINUED TO OCTOBEF 4, 1979 September 20, 1979 �n quest to amend a previously appr at permitted the construction of spital - Presbyterian facilities o to remodel and expand the exist mplex, and the acceptance of an cument. MINUTES ved use permit Hoag Memorial the site so ng hospital nvironmental quest to.permit a Traffic Study to permit the nstructi.on of a maximum of 140 a artment units 10.6 gross acres. CATION: Parcel No. 1, Pa. ce Map 45 -10 (Resubdivis'ion No. 11), and a�por tion of Blocks 92 and 93, Irvine's Subdivision, located at 1601 San Miguel Drive, on the northeasterly side of San Joaquin Hills Road., between MacArthur B ulevard,,and San Mi uel Drive in Harbor View Hills �Baywood Apartments). DNE: P -C' PPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach • I I I I I I I I�WNER: Same as Applicant -18- INDEX Item #5 USE PER- MIT N0. 1421 -C CONTINUED TO OC BER 4l Item #6 TRAFFIC STUB CONTINUED TO OCTOBEF 4, 979 OCATION: Parcel 1, Record of Survey 15/30, located at 301 Newport Boulevard, on the southwesterly corner of Newport Boulevard and Hospital Road. ONE: A -P -H PPLICANT: Hoag Memorial Hospi a1- Presbyter- ian, Newport Beach WNER: Same as Applicant Motion x Motion was made to. continue this i em to the re- Ayes x x x x ular Planning Commission meeting n October 4, Absent * * 979, due to the lateness of the h ur. * * quest to.permit a Traffic Study to permit the nstructi.on of a maximum of 140 a artment units 10.6 gross acres. CATION: Parcel No. 1, Pa. ce Map 45 -10 (Resubdivis'ion No. 11), and a�por tion of Blocks 92 and 93, Irvine's Subdivision, located at 1601 San Miguel Drive, on the northeasterly side of San Joaquin Hills Road., between MacArthur B ulevard,,and San Mi uel Drive in Harbor View Hills �Baywood Apartments). DNE: P -C' PPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach • I I I I I I I I�WNER: Same as Applicant -18- INDEX Item #5 USE PER- MIT N0. 1421 -C CONTINUED TO OC BER 4l Item #6 TRAFFIC STUB CONTINUED TO OCTOBEF 4, 979 m September 20, 1979 at I W itv of Newport Beach M MINUTES Motion x otion was made to continue this i em to the re- Ayes x x x ular Planning Commission meeting n October 4, Absent * 979, due to the lateness of the h ur. * * * equest to amend the Planned Commu ity Developmen Ian for Harbor View Hills so as t permit the xpansion Area No. 8 (Baywood Ap.ar ments) of the lanned Community for additional m lti- family esidential units, and the accepts ce of an nvironmental Document. OCATION: Parcel No. 1, Parcel Map 45 -10 (Resubdivision No. 11), and a por- tion of Blocks 92 aid 93, Irvine's Subdivision, locatel at 1601 San Miguel Drive, on th northeasterly side of San Joaquin Hills Road, between MacArthur B ulevard and San Miguel Drive in Harbor View Hills (Baywood Apar ments). ONE: P -C APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as Applicant Motion x Motion was made to continue this item to the re- Ayes x x K z x gular Planning Commission meeting n October 4, Absent * 979, due to the lateness of the h ur. * * * equest to combine one parcel and portion of locks 92 and 93 of Irvine's Subdi ision into one uilding site so as to permit the xpan.sion of he Baywood Apartment complex on the property. LOCATION: Parcel No. 1, Rarc (Resubdivision No. tion of Blocks 92 Subdivision, locat • Miguel Drive, on t side of San Joaqui between MacArthur San Miguel Drive i -19- Man 45 -10 11)', and a por d 93, Irvine's at 1601 San northeasterly Hills Road, ulevard, and Harbor View Item #7 AMENDMENT W. 536 CONTINUED TO OCTOBER , 1979 Item #8' RESUBDI- ISION Nom. n7 CONTINUED TO OCTOBEF 44, 116 September 20, 1979 M ONE: PPLICANT: WNER: NGINEER: MINUTES Beach Hills (Baywood Apartments). P -C The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Same as Applicant Robert Bein, Willia Frost, & As- sociates, Newport B ach INDEX Motion Ayes Absent x x x x x Potion cular j979, was made to.continue this i Planning Commission meeting due to the lateness of the h em to the re- n October 4, ur. * * * • Request ing mental to consider a Phasing Plan development in the Civic Plaza unity District, and the acceptant Document. for:the remain- Planned Com- . of an Environ- Item #9 PHASING LAS N OCATION: The Planned Community Plaza, generally bo of Civic nded by San CONTINUED TO OBEF ,, 1 Joaquin Hills Road, Drive, San Clemente Santa Cruz Drive, Santa Barbara Drive, and lamboree Road, in Newport Center. ONE: P -C PPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach WNER: Same as Applicant Motion Ayes Absent * x x x * K x x otion was made to continue this item ular Planning Commission meeting 979, due to the lateness of the h to the re- Dn October 4, ur. equest to allow front yard setbacks between 10 Item #10 MODIFICA- TrUR 0. eet and 15 feet,.measured from back or garages. on various custom single ential lots in Harbor Ridge (where of sidewalk, family resi - the P -C text 2457 -20- mry ROLL CALL September 20, 1979 Z MINUTES rovides that garage spaces facing an access CONTINUED. treet shall observe a 5 foot setb ck or a mini- TO OCTOBEF um setback of 20 feet, measured from back of. 4, 1979 idewalk). OCATION: 'Lot Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 15, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, and 29, Tract No. 9860, located n rtherly of E1 Capitan Drive anJ easterly of Spyglass Hill Road in Harbor Ridge ONE: P -C PPLICANT: The Irvine Pacific evelopment Company, Newport Be ch WNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Motion x Ootion was made.to continue thi.s.i em to the re- A s x x x x gular Planning Commission meeting n October 4, Aent * * 1979, due to the lateness of the hour. eques.t to establish a new and used automobile ales facility in the C -1 -H District. The exist- ng building on the.site will be utilized by :the xisting Donique's Antiques.retail sales use and he office for the proposed automobile sales fa- ility. OCATION:. Lots 14 through 17, Tract No. 1210 located at 600 West Coast Highway, on the northerly side of West Coast Highway, westerly of Dover Drive, across West Coast Highway from Bay Shores. ONE: C -1 -H. PPLICANTS: Donald Brodnax, Jr:, Donique's Antiques, Inc., an Greg Darling, Unique Motor Cars, Newport Beach I I I I I I I IpWNERS: Leonard Horwin and Arnold J. Go Beverly Hills -21- Item #11 USE PER - IFf T NO- 19118— CONTINUE_D� G" September 20, 1979 am MINUTES ROLL CALL I 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INDEX Motion IIxl oti.on was made to continue this i em to the re- Ayes x x x x ular .Planning Commission meeting n October 4, Absent * * 979, due to the lateness of the h ur. * * * equest to establish an offstreet arking lot on temporary basis in Block 600 of ewport Center n the C -O -H District, and the acc ptance of an nvironmental Document. OCATION: A. portion of Lot 22j Tract No. 6015, located at .67 Newport Cen- ter Drive, easterly of Santa Cruz Drive and northerly of Newport Center Drive in Blo k 600 of Newport Center. ONE: C -O -H APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach OWNER: Same as Applicant Motion x otion was made.to.continue this i em to the re Ayes x x x x ular Planning Commission meeting n October 4, Absent * 1979, due to the lateness of the h ur. * * * 0 I l i l l l 1 hi roposed.Amendments to the Plannin Commission ules of Procedure as they pertain to Substitute otions. NITIATED BY': The City of Newport) Beach otion was made to continue this item to the re- ular Planning Commission meeting on October.4, 949, due to the lateness of the hour. * * * -22- COMMISSIONERS � v w•9 September 20, 1979 m Beach MINUTES Motion x otion was made that the meeting b adjourned to Ayes x x x special Adjourned Planning Commi sion meeting Absent * n September 27, 1979 at 7:30 P.M. * * * e Planning Commission adjourned t 11:50 P.M. a special.Adjourned Planning Co mission.meet g on September 27, 1979 at 7:30 m. . Debra A11 an, Secretary Planning ommission City of N wport Beach .. • IIIIIIII! -23-