HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/20/1990COMMISSIONERS REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
0 A\�&Y PLACE: City Council Chambers
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
4'INA&T BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Present
Absent
Chairman Debay was absent.
x x x
EX- OFFICIO OFFICERS PRESENT:
James Hewicker, Planning Director
Robin Flory, Assistant City Attorney
x x x
William R. Laycock, Current Planning Manager
Don Webb, City Engineer
Dee Edwards, Secretary
s x x
Minutes of August 23, 1990:
Minutes of
8 -23 -90
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve the
Ayes
*
*
1990, Planning Commission Minutes. MOTION CARRIED.
Abstain
Absent
*
■ x ■
Public Comments:
Public
Comments
No one appeared before the Planning Commission to speak on
non - agenda items.
x x x
Posting of the Agenda:
Posting
of the
James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the Planning
Agenda
Commission Agenda was posted on Friday, September 14, 1990, in .
front of City Hall.
x * x
•
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
�O N$
��
0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Request for Continuances:
Request
for
Mr. Hewicker stated that the applicant, Eugene A. Ceiko, has
Continuance
requested that Item No. 7, Modification No. 3729, property located
at 2515 Bamboo Street, be continued to the October 4, 1990,
Planning Commission meeting so as to provide additional time to
prepare for the appeal regarding the construction of a wall and
wrought iron fence.
Motion
Motion was made and voted on to continue Item No. 7 to the
Ayes
*
•
*
*
t
October 4, 1990, Planning Commission meeting. MOTION
Absent
,
CARRIED.
Resubdivision No 936 (Continued Public Hearing)
Item No. I
8936
•
Request to resubdivide three lots and a portion of a fourth lot into
three parcels of land, each for two family residential purposes, on
property located in the R -2 District. The proposal also includes an
Removed
exception to the Subdivision Code so as to allow the creation of
from
parcels which are less than 5,000 sq.ft. in area and less than 50 feet
Calendar
in width.
LOCATION: Lots 3, 4, 5 and a portion of Lot 6, Block 132,
Corona del Mar, located at 2612 - 2616
Ocean Boulevard, on the northeasterly side of
Ocean Boulevard, between Dahlia Avenue
and Fernleaf Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONE: R -2
APPLICANT: Thomas L. Kistinger, Corona del Mar
OWNER: Same as applicant
ENGINEER: Duca McCoy, Inc., Corona del Mar
James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that subsequent to the
•
July 19, 1990, Planning Commission meeting, the applicant
-2-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
A
. �
0 � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
submitted plans indicating that the two existing structures cross the
proposed interior lot lines. He said that on the basis that the
existing dwellings must be removed from the property, the City
Attorney's Office has suggested that Finding No. 3 in Exhibit "A"
be amended as follows to indicate that the property is currently
developed with two single family dwellings.which will cross over the
proposed lot lines: "That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint so long as the existing
structures on the site are removed prior to the recordation of the
parcel map."
The continued public hearing was opened in connection with this
item, and Mr. Thomas Kistinger appeared before the Planning
Commission wherein he concurred with the findings and conditions
in Exhibit "A", as amended. Mr. Kistinger stated that there is an
interest by two inheritors of the estate to market the property
.
located on two lots located at 2616 Ocean Boulevard; however, he
indicated that he would demolish the second structure located on
the third lot located at 2612 Ocean Boulevard so as to develop said
property. Mr. Kistinger suggested that the subject property be
subdivided as two parcels of 36.67 feet wide by 110 feet deep, and
73.33 feet wide by 110 feet deep so that the structure located at
2616 Ocean Boulevard would be retained for the time being. Mr.
Kistinger stated that if the property would be developed and
marketed as he has testified, that four additional dwelling units
would not be built and Condition No. 13 in Exhibit "A" pertaining
to park dedication fees would not be applicable.
Discussion ensued between Mr. Kistinger and the Planning
Commission with respect to the feasibility of the property owners
marketing the subject parcels and opening escrow before the
Planning Commission acts on the requested resubdivision. Mr.
Hewicker explained that the property owners would not have to
process the parcel map procedure if they marketed three lots as
Lots 3, 4, 5 and a portion of Lot 6, and demolished the existing
structures.
-3-
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
September 20, 1990
A � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Following a discussion regarding the type of action the applicant
wanted to follow with respect to the subject application, Mr.
Hewicker suggested that Resubdivision No. 936 be removed from
calendar until the applicant made a final decision. Mr. Kistinger
agreed with the Mr. Hewicker's recommendation.
Resubdivision No. 940 (Public Hearing
item No.2
Request to permit the resubdivision of one lot and portions of two
8940
other lots and a portion of abandoned Carnation Avenue into a
single parcel of land for three unit residential condominium
Approved
purposes on property located in the MFR (2140) District.
LOCATION: Lot 10, and portions of Lots 8 and 12, Block
•
231, Corona del Mar, and a portion of
abandoned Carnation Avenue, located at 308
Carnation Avenue, on the southeasterly side
of Carnation Avenue, between Bayside Drive
and Seaview Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONE: MFR (2140)
APPLICANT: Richard Duggan, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
ENGINEER: Robin Hamers and Associates, Inc., Costa
Mesa
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Richard Duggan, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission. In response to a question posed by Acting Chairman
Di Sano, Mr. Duggan concurred with the findings and conditions
in Exhibit "A'.
•-4-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
III
Jill
I
INDEX
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Resubdivision No. 940
Ayes
*
*
subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ". MOTION
Absent
CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision.
2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City,
all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning
Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision.
3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from
a planning standpoint.
4. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section
66415 of the Subdivision Map Act.
CONDITIONS:
1. That a parcel map be recorded prior to the issuance of
building permits unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department and the Planning Department. That the
parcel map be prepared using the State Plane Coordinate
System as a basis of bearing.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
•
-5-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
'd
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
3. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual water
service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and
sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department.
4. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to
issuance of any building permits.
5. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and
pedestrian circulation systems be subject to fiuther review
by the City Traffic Engineer. That no diagonal parking will
be permitted along the Carnation Avenue (private street)
frontage.
6. That a standard agreement and accompanying surety be
provided to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public
improvements if it is desired to record a parcel map prior
to completion of the public improvements.
7. That curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement be reconstructed
along the Carnation Avenue frontage. All work shall be
completed under an encroachment permit issued by the
Public Works Department or by signed plans approved by
the City Engineer. All street, drainage and utility
improvements shall be shown on standard improvement
plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer.
8. That a non - exclusive easement for ingress and egress be
dedicated to the City over the Carnation Avenue frontage
(private street) and that an easement for public emergency
and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes over
Carnation Avenue be dedicated to the City.
9. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the
applicant and approved by the Public Works Department,
along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain
facilities for the on -site improvements prior to the issuance
of grading permits or building permits. Any modifications
•
-6-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
.o SC NO\CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
111
Jill
INDEX
or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer
systems shown to be required by the study shall be the
responsibility of the developer.
10. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and
by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by
proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen.
Traffic control and transportation of equipment and
materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and
local requirements. A minimum 24 foot roadway width shall
be maintained at all times along Carnation Avenue (private
street) to provide access for the adjacent properties.
11. That overhead utilities serving the site shall be
undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in
accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code.
12. That the California Vehicle Code be enforced on the
private streets and drives, and that the delineation
acceptable to the Police Department and Public Works
Department be provided along the sidelines of the private
streets and drives.
13. That a minimum six inch rise be provided between the
existing alley flow line and the high point of the proposed
driveway prior to descending into the subterranean garages
along the alley unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department.
14. That the intersection of the private streets and drives be
designed to provide sight distance for a speed of 25 miles
per hour. Slopes, landscape, walls and other obstruction
shall be considered in the sight distance requirements.
Landscaping within the sight line shall not exceed twenty-
four inches in height. The sight distance requirement may
be modified at non - critical locations, subject to approval of
the Traffic Engineer.
-7-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
�o �
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
15. That the site plan for the future construction shall be
reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department
prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. That
a minimum 5 foot setback be provided from the private
alley at the rear of the property.
16. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission
approval of this application prior to the recordation of the
parcel map.
17. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been
recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an
extension is granted by the Planning Commission.
•
Resubdivision No. 941 (Public Hearing
item No.3
R941
Request to permit the resubdivision of portions of two existing lots
and a portion of abandoned Carnation Avenue into a single parcel
Approved
of land for two unit residential condominium purposes on property
located in the MFR (2140) District.
LOCATION: Portions of Lots 12 and 14, Block 231, Corona
del Mar, and a portion of abandoned
Carnation Avenue, located at 312 Carnation
Avenue, on the southeasterly side of
Carnation Avenue, between Bayside Drive
and Seaview Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONE: MFR (2140)
APPLICANT: Richard Duggan, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
ENGINEER: Robin Hamers and Associates, Inc., Costa
Mesa
•
-8-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
A 'P CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Richard Duggan, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission wherein he concurred with the findings and conditions
in Exhibit "A ".
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Resubdivision No. 941
Ayes
subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A". MOTION
Absent
CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision.
2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City,
all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning
Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision.
3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from
a planning standpoint.
4. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 19.08.120 of the Municipal Code and Section
66415 of the Subdivision Map Act.
CONDITIONS:
1. That a parcel map be recorded prior to the issuance of
building permits unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department and the Planning Department. That the
parcel map be prepared using the State Plane Coordinate
System as a basis of bearing.
•
9_
September 20, 1990 MINUTES
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
2. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
3. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual water
service and sewer lateral connection to the public water and
sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department.
4. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to
issuance of any building permits.
5. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and
pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review
by the City Traffic Engineer. That no diagonal parking will
be permitted along the Carnation Avenue (private street)
frontage.
6. That a standard agreement and accompanying surety be
provided to guarantee satisfactory completion of the public
improvements if it is desired to record a parcel map prior
to completion of the public improvements.
7. That curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement be reconstructed
along the Carnation Avenue frontage. All work shall be
completed under an encroachment permit issued by the
Public Works Department or by signed plans approved by
the City Engineer. All street, drainage and utility
improvements shall be shown on standard improvement
plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer.
8. That a non - exclusive easement for ingress and egress be
dedicated to the City over the Carnation Avenue frontage
(private street) and that an easement for public emergency
and security ingress, egress and public utility purposes over
Carnation Avenue be dedicated to the City.
9. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the
.
applicant and approved by the Public Works Department,
-10-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
A
'904. \� \ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain
facilities for the on -site improvements prior to the issuance
of grading permits or building permits. Any modifications
or extensions to the existing storm drain, water and sewer
systems shown to be required by the study shall be the
responsibility of the developer.
10. That disruption caused by construction work along roadways
and by movement of construction vehicles shall be
minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment and
flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of equipment
and materials shall be conducted in accordance with state
and local requirements. A minimum 24 foot roadway width
shall be maintained at all times along Carnation Avenue
(private street) to provide access for the adjacent properties.
11. That overhead utilities serving the site shall be
undergrounded to the nearest appropriate pole in
accordance with Section 19.24.140 of the Municipal Code.
12. That the California Vehicle Code be enforced on the
private streets and drives, and that the delineation
acceptable to the Police Department and Public Works
Department be provided along the sidelines of the private
streets and drives.
13. That the intersection of streets and drives be designed to
provide sight distance for a speed of 25 miles per hour.
Slopes, landscape, walls and other obstruction shall be
considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping
within the sight line shall not exceed twenty -four inches in
height. The sight distance requirement may be modified at
non - critical locations, subject to approval of the Traffic
Engineer.
14. That a minimum six inch rise be provided between the
existing alley flow line and the high point of the proposed
driveway prior to descending into the subterranean garages
S
-11-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
A
�O�
A CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
Ill
Jill
I
INDEX
along the alley unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department.
15. That the site plan for the future construction shall be
reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department
prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. That
a minimum 5 foot setback be provided from the private
alley at the rear of the property.
16. That the applicant shall obtain Coastal Commission
approval of this application prior to the recordation of the
parcel map.
17. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map has not been
recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an
extension is granted by the Planning Commission.
•
! i f
Resubdivision No. 942 (Public Hearing)
item No.4
Request to resubdivide an existing lot into a single parcel of land
8942
for two unit residential condominium purposes on property located
in the R -2 District.
Approved
LOCATION: Lot 10, Block 643, Corona del Mar, located at
608 Poinsettia Avenue, on the southeasterly
side of Poinsettia Avenue, between Third
Avenue and Fourth Avenue, in Corona del
Mar.
ZONE: R -2
APPLICANT: CKM, Corona del Mar I, Corona del Mar
ENGINEER: Alpine Consultants, Inc., Laguna Hills
•
-12-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
r o
0 ,
CITY OF NEWPORT 6EACH
ROLL CALL
H
11H
INDEX
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item. There
being no one to appear before the Planning Commission, the public
bearing was closed at this time.
notion
Motion was made to approve Resubdivision No. 942 subject to the
Ayes
*
*
*
*
findings and conditions in Exhibit "A'. Acting Chairman Di Sano
Absent
*
stated that inasmuch as the applicant did not appear that the
conditions of approval shall be imposed on the resubdivision.
Motion was voted on, MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That the design of the subdivision will not conflict with any
easements acquired by the public at large for access through
or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.
•
2. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances of the City,
all applicable general or specific plans and the Planning
Commission is satisfied with the plan of subdivision.
3. That the proposed resubdivision presents no problems from
a planning standpoint.
4. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code and Section
66415 of the Subdivision Map Act.
CONDITIONS:
1. That a parcel map be recorded prior to occupancy unless
otherwise approved by the Public Works and Planning
Departments. That the parcel map be prepared using the
State Plane Coordinate System as a basis of bearing.
2.' That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
.
-13-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
1 f CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
3. That arrangements be made with the Public Works
Department to guarantee satisfactory completion of the
public improvements if it is desired to record a parcel map
prior to completion of the public improvements.
4. That each dwelling unit shall be served with an individual
water service and sewer lateral connection to the public
water and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the
Public Works Department.
5. That any deteriorated or displaced portions of sidewalk
along the Poinsettia Avenue frontage. be reconstructed
under an encroachment permit issued by the Public Works .
Department.
6. That all vehicular access to the property be from the
adjacent alley unless otherwise approved by the City
•
Council.
7. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to
issuance of any building permits.
8. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and
by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by
proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen.
Traffic control and transportation of equipment and
materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and
local requirements.
9. That access and parking shall be subject to further review
and approval by the Traffic Engineer..
10. That overhead utilities serving the site be undergrounded to
the nearest appropriate pole in accordance with Section
1924.140 of the Municipal Code.
•
-14-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
N \
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
11. That the existing fence and low block wall that is located in
the required 5 foot rear yard setback, adjacent to the alley,
be removed.
12. Tbat a park dedication fee for one dwelling unit shall be
paid in accordance with Chapter 19.50 of the Municipal
Code.
13. That this resubdivision. shall expire if the map has not been
recorded within 3 years of the date of approval, unless an
extension is granted by the Planning Commission.
Use Permit No. 3390 (Public Hearing)
Item No.5
Request to establish a take -out restaurant with incidental dining
UP3390
specializing in the sale of bakery goods and which will include
other food and beverage items and incidental seating on property
Approved
located in the P -C District. The proposal also includes a request
to waive a portion of the required off- street parking spaces. The
proposed hours of operation are from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. daily.
LOCATION: Lots 11, 12, 14, 15, and portions of Lots 16
and 17, Tract No. 815, located at 632 Lido
Park Drive; on the northwesterly corner of
Lido Park Drive and 28th Street, on the Lido
Peninsula.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Connie McKinney, Newport Beach
OWNER: Levon Gugasian, Newport Beach
James Hewicker, informed the Planning Commission of previous
uses on the subject site. He indicated that the only change on the
premises from the previous take -out establishment is the upstairs
i
-15-
COMMISSIONERS
0
°1 w
September 20, 1990
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
R L CALL
INDEX
office space inasmuch as it was formerly occupied by Mr. Delaney,
of Delaney's Restaurant. Mr. Hewicker explained that the office
did not require an additional parking space inasmuch as Delaney's
Restaurant exists on the subject property.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Edwards
regarding on -site parking and waiving development standards, Mr.
Hewicker explained that the previously permitted retail use in the
commercial space would have generated a requirement of four
parking spaces, and that there are four parking spaces that are
located on -site that are available for use by the applicant; however,
if the proposed take -out restaurant would have been located in a
new building, 21 parking spaces would be required unless a portion
of said spaces were waived.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Ms. Connie McKinney, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission wherein she concurred with the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A" with the exception of Condition No. 7
regarding the installation of grease interceptors. In response to a
question posed by Commissioner Merrill, Ms. McKinney stated that
the establishment would serve bakery products, and coffee, in
addition to a limited breakfast and luncheon menu.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards, Ms.
McKinney replied that she was of the opinion that 90 percent of
the customers would reside in the adjacent area.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Ms.
McKinney stated that she was not aware if a grease interceptor is
currently on the premises. Mr. Hewicker explained that a grease
interceptor would be necessary only if it were required by the
Building Department and the Public Works Department. He
indicated that the foregoing condition is required for the majority
of the restaurants inasmuch as the City has concerns with respect .
to grease entering the sewer system. Robin Flory, Assistant City
Attorney, concurred that a major concern is that grease is going
through the City's interceptors and the majority of the restaurants
.
-16-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
A
�O \CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
have installed grease interceptors. She indicated that grease
interceptors are also required by the Uniform Plumbing Code.
Commissioner Pomeroy agreed that grease cannot be allowed in
the City's sewer system.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards, Ms.
McKinney replied that including herself, there would not be more
than three employees.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Glover regarding
the Specialty Food Ordinance, William Laycock, Current Planning
Manager, replied that the Ordinance states that grease interceptors
shall be installed as required by the Building Department and the
Public Works Department. He stated that the Development
Standard indicates the Modifications Committee, the Planning
Commission, or the City Council may determine that the condition
is not necessary.
In response to a question posed by Acting Chairman Di Sano
regarding the requirement for grease interceptors for all
restaurants, Ms. Flory indicated that 95 percent of the restaurants
currently have grease interceptors and the requirement would be
based on the recommendation of the Building Department and the
Public Works Department.
Commissioner Pomeroy stated that on the basis staff has suggested
Motion
*
that the waiver of parking could be allowed, motion was made to
Ayes
*.
*
*
approve Use Permit No. 3390 subject to the findings and conditions
Absent
*
in Exhibit "A ". Motion was voted on, MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed development is consistent with the Land
Use Element of the General Plan and the Local Coastal
-17-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
,e
�O ��
• '4 � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
11
Jill
INDEX
Program, Land Use plan, and is compatible with the
surrounding land uses.
2. That the project will not have any significant environmental
impact.
3. That adequate parking is available on -site and off -site in the
28th Street End Parking Lot to accommodate the proposed.
facility and the existing Delaney's Restaurant.
4. That the waiver of the development standards as they
pertain to walls, utilities, parking lot illumination,
landscaping, and a portion of the required parking will not
be detrimental to adjoining properties.
5. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3390 will not, under
the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of
persons residing and working in the neighborhood, or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in
the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with
the approved plot plan, seating plan and floor plan.
2. That the development standards pertaining to traffic
circulation, walls, landscaping, parking lot illumination, and
that all the required additional parking spaces (17 spaces)
shall be waived.
3. That the seating and dining area shall be incidental to the
take -out restaurant and any introduction of table service will
require amending the use permit. A maximum of 18 seats
shall be permitted in the interior of the facility.
-18-
COMMISSIONERS
dh ONI\Ok\
A
September 20, 1990
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
R L CALL
INDEX
4. That no tables or seating located outside of the subject
facility shall be used exclusively by customers of the take -out
restaurant facility but shall remain available for use by the
general public at all times. No tablecloths shall be
permitted on the tables outside the facility.
5. That the hours of operation shall be limited between the
hours of 6:00 am. and 10:00 p.m. daily, and that any
increase in hours shall be subject to the approval of an
amendment to Use Permit No. 3390.
6. That trash receptacles for patrons shall be located in
convenient locations inside and outside the building.
7. That grease interceptors shall be installed on all fixtures in
the take -out restaurant where grease may be introduced into
the drainage systems in accordance with the Uniform
Plumbing Code, unless otherwise approved by the Building
Department and the Public Works Department.
8. That kitchen exhaust fans shall be designed to control
smoke and odor to the satisfaction of the Building
Department.
9. That all signs shall conform to the provisions of Chapters
20.06 of the Municipal Code.
10. That no on -sale or off -sale of alcoholic beverages shall be
permitted on the premises unless the Planning Commission
approves an amendment to this use permit.
11. That the pedestrian walkway in front of the facility shall be
kept clean and regularly maintained. Said walkway shall be
swept, vacuumed, or washed in such a manner that any
debris or wastewater does not enter the storm drain system
or the Bay.
•
-19-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
�0 \ A CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
12. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be
screened from view and adjoining properties.
13. That a washout area for refuse containers be provided in
such a way as to allow direct drainage into the sewer system
and not into the Bay or storm drains unless otherwise
approved by the Building Department and the Public Works
Department.
14. That the employees the proposed facility shall park their
vehicles on -site at all times.
15. That Coastal Commission approval shall be obtained prior
to the establishment of the take -out restaurant facility and
prior to issuance of building permits for the tenant
improvements associated with this approval.
•
16. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify
conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to
the City Council the revocation of this use permit upon a
determination that the operation which is the subject of this
amendment causes injury, or is detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the
community.
17. That this use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24
months from the date of approval as specified in Section
20.80.090 A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
! i t
-20-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
0
db ' 'k\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Use Permit No. 3392 (Public Hearine)
Item No.6
Request to establish a billiards club with approximately 16 billiard
UP3392
tables as well as incidental dining and the service of on -sale
alcoholic beverages, including a full service bar on property located
Not
in the Newport Place Planned Community.
approved
LOCATION: Parcel 3 of Parcel Map 45 -23 (Resubdivision
No, 346), located at 4250 Martingale Way, at
the southeasterly terminus of Martingale Way,
in the Newport Place Planned Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: QUE Enterprises, Inc., Santa Ana
.
OWNER: Walter Johnson, Laguna Hills
James Hewicker, Planning Director, referred to the pamphlet "How
Do Pool & Billiard's Demographics Measure Up ?" that was
distributed to the Planning Commission and to the memorandum
that was addressed to the Planning Commission from the Chief of
Police dated September 20, 1990, regarding the subject application.
Mr. Hewicker explained that the foregoing memorandum described
the concerns that the Police Department had regarding the subject
use and it cited the problems of the Shark Club in Costa Mesa by
the Costa Mesa Police Department during the past three months.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Drew Hilinski, Tustin, and Tim Flathers, Orange, applicants,
appeared before the Planning Commission wherein they concurred
with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A'.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr.
Flathers replied that the proposed establishment would differ from
the foregoing Shark Club from the standpoint of the general
operation of the club, the dress code requirements, the cost per
•
-21-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
O
�0 \ • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
hour to participate in billiards play, and the high caliber of the
club's customers. Mr. Flathers explained that billiards clubs are
located throughout the United States, and continues to be a
growing trend. In response to the memorandum from the Police
Department, Mr. Flathers explained that the applicants did not
have time to respond to the objections; however, he addressed the
brochures and letters explaining the type of operation that they are
proposing to establish. Mr. Flathers explained that the intent is to
allow local business executives and visitors to the area the
opportunity to play billiards during the lunch hour. Mr. Flathers
indicated that the billiard club will install $8,000.00 billiard tables,
and the intent is to invest $500,000.00 in interior decorating so as
to provide a high quality atmosphere. Mr. Flathers concluded that
the applicants are willing to cooperate with the City, and the
statements by the Police Department are totally out of text of what
the applicants proposed. Mr. Flathers further replied that food
service will be available to the customers during the lunch hour.
Mr. Hilinski further responded that the proposed establishment will
consist of approximately 15 tables that will be clearly visible, and
the atmosphere will provide quiet background music that will allow
customers to talk and play billiards.
In response to a question posed by Acting Chairman Di Sano, Mr.
Flathers replied that the ambiance of the proposed facility will be
much better than The Shark Club, and he described the paintings
and lighting that are proposed for the club.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Merrill regarding
gambling as stated in the memorandum from the Police
Department, Mr. Flathers replied that the tables will be installed
at four different areas, and one employee will be located in each
area to assist and monitor the activities. Mr. Flathers further
replied that the intent is not to attract gamblers and 'pool hustlers'
to the facility. Mr. Hilinski replied that the establishment will
employ between 15 to 20 employees, no more than 10 employees
at one time, and that 15 employees are calculated in the number
of required parking spaces.
•
-22-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
& \� \ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INOEX
Commissioner Pomeroy stated that he has played billiards in his
home and at family billiards parlors for many years. He indicated
that the family billiards parlors are in total contrast to the type of
establishment that the negative comments from the Police
Department are indicating, and the applicants are attempting to
establish an up -scale establishment that will appeal to individuals
like himself who would like to participate in billiards in a
comfortable atmosphere where he would not have to associate with
disorderly individuals.
Commissioner Edwards concurred with the foregoing statements;
however, he addressed his concerns with respect to how the
proposed establishment will police the activities in a more positive .
manner than the report submitted by the Police Department
relating to The Shark Club. Mr. Flathers reported that The Shark
Club attracts customers who are between 21 years to 30 years old,
as opposed to the location of the subject facility that will attract
•
older business people. Mr. Flathers emphasized that the club will
not allow any type of misconduct.
Mr. Hilinski stated that the proposed facility will charge $12.00 per
hour so as to eliminate a particular group of people, and the
establishment will be in a high rent district.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
Motion
Motion was made to approve Use Permit No. 3392 subject to the
findings and conditions in Exhibit "X. Commissioner Edwards
indicated that the proposed establishment would not be a negative
impact, that the primary problems of a "pool hall" are associated
with drinking, and he addressed the Police Department's
memorandum.
Commissioner Glover stated that she would not support the motion
on the basis that the City has enough restaurants for entertainment
purposes, that the establishment would not enhance the City, that
she has respect for the Police Department's concerns, and the City
-23-
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
� September 20, 1990 A Nl\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
is not as urban as other areas of the United States that have similar
facilities.
Acting Chairman Di Sano supported the motion on the basis that
the Planning Commission may recommend the revocation of the
use permit to the City Council if the facility would be detrimental
to the community. He explained that the applicants should be
given the opportunity to demonstrate that the establishment is a
good business.
Ayes
*
*
*
Motion was voted on to approve Use Permit No. 3392 subject to
Noes
*
*
*
the findings and conditions in Exhibit 'W. The motion was NOT
Absent
*
APPROVED.
Robin Flory, Assistant City Attorney, informed the applicants that
they may appeal the decision of the Planning Commission in
conjunction with the use permit to the City Council for further
•
review of the application.
Modification No. 3729 (Public Hearing)
Item No.7
Request to consider an appeal of the Modification Committee's
Mod 3729
approval of the subject application which included a request to
construct a wall and wrought iron fence that would encroach 10
Cont ' d to
feet into the required 10 foot front yard setback along Bamboo
10 -4 -90
Street. Said fence would range from 6 feet 11± inches to 7 feet
5± inches, where the Zoning Code allows a maximum of 3 feet in
height for any construction in the required 10 foot front yard
setback. The Modification Committee's approval limited the height
of the wall and wrought iron fence to 6 feet in height measured
from natural grade and required that it maintain a 5 foot front yard
setback adjacent to Bamboo Street.
24
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
, September 20, 1990
dh ONIIo CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
LOCATION: Lot 58, Tract No. 4893, located at 2515
Bamboo Street, on the northwesterly side of
Bamboo Street, between Bixia Street and
Bison Avenue, in Eastbluff.
ZONE: R -1 -B
APPLICANT: Eugene A. Cerko, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
APPELLANT: Same as applicant
James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the applicant has
requested that this item be continued so as to provide additional
time to prepare for the appeal.
on
*
*
Motion was made and voted on to continue this item to the
s
October 4, 1990, Planning Commission meeting. MOTION
Absent
CARRIED.
Amendment No 714 (Continued Public Hearin el
Item No.8
Request to consider amending Title 20 of the Newport Beach
A714
Municipal Code so as to permit social clubs in the "Specialty
(R1234) .
Retail' (SR) area of the Cannery Village /McFadden Square
Approved
Specific Plan Area (SP -6), subject to the securing of a use permit
in each case.
INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach
James Hewicker, Planning Director, explained that the purpose of
this Amendment would be to address the issue of the Alano Club
(Newport Club) located in Cannery Village, subject to the securing
of a use permit.
-25-
COMMISSIONERS MINUTES
� September 20, 1940
O tlad d
�o \ 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
In response to a question posed by Commissioner PersSn with
respect to an expansion that would include the downstairs facilities,
Mr. Hewicker replied that the Alano Club has expanded to the
downstairs area that has allowed functions that have attracted a
large number of people. He explained that the City would like to
have the ability, through the use permit procedure, to regulate the
activities that have included large gatherings and to also control
parking requirements. Mr. Hewicker further replied that
representatives of the Alano Club understand that the
organization's activities were expanded without discretionary
approval, and if the club did not obtain the necessary use permit,
the activities would need to be confined to the second floor of the
building.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item. There
being no one to appear before the Planning Commission, the public
Dion
hearing was closed at this time.
*
Motion was made and voted on to adopt Resolution No. 1234,
Ayes
*
*
*
*
*
*
recommending to the City Council Amendment No. 714. MOTION
Absent
CARRIED.
Amendment No. 716 (Public Hearing)
Item No.9
Request to consider amending Title 20 of the Newport Beach
A716
Municipal Code so as to establish the Retail and Service
(R1235)
Commercial (RSC), Recreational and Marine Commercial (RMC),
Approved
and Administrative, Professional, and Financial Commercial (APF)
Districts.
INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach
James Hewicker, Planning Director, made a brief presentation with
respect to the proposed Amendment.
•
26
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
A
�O \CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Don Webb, City Engineer, referred to Section 20.33.045,
SETBACKS, C, Building Location, and he suggested that the
following be added to the paragraph: "..space for the 'pedestrian
and' traffic movements..." on the basis that if there is a zero setback
and a narrow sidewalk, there would be a better opportunity to
require a wider sidewalk.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item. There
being no one to appear before. the Planning Commission, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to adopt Resolution No. 1235,
Ayes
recommending to the City Council the adoption of Amendment No.
Absent
*
716. MOTION CARRIED.
x x x
.
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
Discussion
Items
Establishment of Grade
#1
Request for the Planning Commission to establish grade for the
Establish
purpose of measuring building height in accordance with Section
.
Grade
20.87.200 of the Municipal Code for an existing developed site on
property located in the 24/28 Foot Height Limitation District.
withdrawn
LOCATION: A portion of Block D, Corona del Mar,
located at 2323 Bayside Drive, on the westerly
side of Bayside Drive, below Pacific Drive, in
Corona del Mar.
ZONE: R -1
APPLICANTS: John A. and Sylvia Michler, Corona del Mar
OWNERS: Same as applicants
-27-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
,o a�
�0
A \ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
James Hewicker, Planning Director, indicated that the Planning
Commission has seldom been requested to establish grade for the
purpose of measuring building height. He stated that at the subject
location there is a row of properties that were graded and
improved in the 1950's wherein portions of the lots were generally
padded for residences and portions of the lots maintained heigher
elevations for garages adjacent to Bayside Drive. Mr. Hewicker
addressed his concern that the request to establish a different grade
on the subject property could.be the first request that may end up
changing how grade is interpreted for the entire row of the
properties.
Commissioner Pers6n and Mr. Hewicker discussed the procedure
of notifying adjoining property owners and Homeowner's
Associations of a request to consider establishing grade for
measuring height inasmuch as said applications are considered
•
"Discussion Items. ", and Mr. Hewicker commented that as a
courtesy, the City notifies the adjoining property owners.
Commissioner Pers6n expressed his concern that the requests could
have a detrimental affect on surrounding property owners and
Homeowner's Associations, and he suggested that in the future the
requests be considered in a public hearing forum.
Commissioner Pers6n and Commissioner Edwards addressed their
concerns with respect to establishing grade for the subject property
inasmuch as it would be detrimental to the adjoining lots.
Mr. John Michler, applicant, and Mr. Mahesh Massand, architect,
appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Massand described
from a model of the project, the proposed height of the structure
from Bayside Drive and from the bay, the view corridor that would
be provided from Bayside Drive, and the existing retaining wall that
has created two different pad elevations on the property. Mr.
Hewicker stated that the applicant is requesting to establish a
higher plane from which the grade would be made, and to allow
the structure to be built 29 feet above that grade. Mr. Michler
agreed to modify the height of the structure. Mr. Hewicker stated
that instead of requesting that the Planning Commission change the
•
-28-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
A
gs� �°� : °off
��' '' \ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
grade and the applicant be given 'carte blanche' of the design, the
applicants should work with the existing grade and work under the
procedures of a use permit or a variance. Mr. Michler concurred
with Mr. Hewicker's suggestion to reapply for another application.
Mr. Michler determined that the proposed project would have less
of an impact on the adjoining community on the basis that a 20
foot setback is proposed adjacent to Bayside Drive whereas if the
project were developed in accordance with the Zoning Code, the
property could be developed with a 5 foot front yard setback
adjacent to Bayside Drive, a 29 foot high wall could be constructed
on a side yard setback line, and a 19 foot high wall could be
located along the other side yard setback line.
Following a discussion between Mr. Michler and Commissioner
Glover, Mr. Hewicker explained that by establishing grade there
•
would not be change in the setback off of Bayside Drive.
In response to statements made by the Planning Commission with
respect to the applicant's request, Mr. Michler informed the
Commission that he would agree to withdraw the subject
application and refile a new application. Mr. Hewicker explained
the provisions that would allow the applicant to apply for a use
permit.
Mr. Jeff Dahl, Architect, 318 - 31st Street, appeared before the
Planning Commission on behalf of the adjoining neighbors wherein
he stated Mr. and Mrs. Farley's concerns with respect to the
project's negative impact on their courtyard.
Mr. Massand reappeared before the Planning Commission wherein
be indicated that the applicant would agree to meet with the
neighbors regarding their concerns.
Mrs. Robin Farley, 319 Bayside Drive, appeared before the
Planning Commission whereby she agreed to meet with Mr. and
Mrs. Michler and their architect regarding the proposed project.
•
-29-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
o�
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Mr. Michler reappeared before the Planning Commission whereby
he agreed to withdraw the Establishment of Grade application and
to meet with the neighbors concerning the proposed project.
Planning Commission Interpretation
PC
Interpreta
Request to clarify the interpretation of certain provisions of the
tion
Zoning Code pertaining to alterations and remodeling of
nonconforming commercial and industrial structures.
Commissioner Pers6n stated that he agreed with staff concerning
Ordinance No. 90 -22 regarding remodels wherein he indicated that
the restrictions on interior remodels for nonconforming residential
•
structures should not apply to nonconforming commercial or
industrial buildings; however, he suggested that commercial and
industrial buildings should be considered in a separate Ordinance.
Mr. Jeff Pence, 725 Via Lido Soud, appeared before the Planning
Commission. He addressed the commercial building that is
currently being remodeled at 3305 Newport Boulevard, and he
described the improvements that are being built.
Motion -
Motion was made and voted on to adopt an interpretation of the
Ayes
*
*
*
*
Remodel Ordinance to the effect that it does not include
Absent
*
nonconforming commercial or industrial buildings; to direct staff to
review the issue and to consider the adoption of a new Ordinance
or to amend the existing Ordinance to address commercial and
industrial concerns. MOTION CARRIED.
The Planning Commission made the determination that it was not
necessary to require discretionary action for basic tenant interior
alterations in nonconforming commercial or industrial buildings.
•
-30-
COMMISSIONERS September 20, 1990 MINUTES
�O \ N5
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ROLL CALL
III
Jill
I
INDEX
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
Add ' i
Business
Planning Director Hewicker informed the Planning Commission
that the League of California Cities Convention will be held in
Anaheim, October 21 - 24, 1990, and the Planning Commissioner's
Institute will be held in Monterey, March. 20 -22, 1991.
League
of cal
cities
PC
Institute
ADJOURNMENT: 9:10 P.M.
Adjourn-
ment
r►:
THOMAS EDWARDS, SECRETARY
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
•
-31-