HomeMy WebLinkAbout09/21/1938•
10
SEPTEMBER 21, 1936
THE NEWPORT BELCH CITY PLANNING COMMISSION met in regular
session Wednesday, September 21, 1935 at 7:30 p.m, in the
Council Chambers, City Hall.
Meeting called to order by the Secretary.
In the absence of the Chairman, it was necessary to elect a
temporary Chairman.
Com. Seeger moved that Com. Briggs act as temporary
Chairman, Seconded by Com. Estus. Motion carried.
Harry Estus, who was 'appointed to succeed Com. Joe
Schnitker and serve the unexpired portion of his term, attend-
ed his first meeting.
ROLL CALL -
Commissioners present: Seeger, Williams, Briggs, Find1W,
Estus.
Commissioners absent: Hopkins, Patterson, Whitson,
Hodgkinson.
Comsultant Tilton and Bldg. Insp. Nelson attended.
MINUTES -
Coma Seeger moved that the reading of the minutes of
the regular adjourned meeting held August 29th be dispensed
with, as all members had received copies thereof, and that
they be approved as written. Seconded by Com. Williams.
Motion carried and so ordered by the Chairman.
COMMUNICATIONS
Secretary read a letter from the City Clerk informing
the commission that the action of the Planning Commission
(Resolution 135) in the case of G. B. Stanford had been
disapproved. Secretary moved that this communication be
filed. Seconded by Com. Estus. Motion carried and so- order-
ed by the Chairman.
Secretary read a letter from A. E. Williamson, of the
Automobile Club of Southern California requesting the en-
dorsement by the Planning Commission of certain measures
appearing on the November ballot hiving to do with long
range planning. The letter was accompanied by literature
on the measures. Com. Findlay moved that this '. letter to-
gether with the accompanying literature be filed. Seconded
by Com. Estus. Motion carried and so ordered by the Chairman.'
Secretary read a letter from Mr. Hellis of the Irvine
Company_ thanking the commission for their.action is approv-
ing the picnic grounds to be constructed adjoining Bay Side
Drive. -Com. Estus moved that this communication be filed.
Seconded.by Com. Williams. Motion carried and so ordered.
HEARINGS -
SECOND HEARING ON REZONING LOTS 1 -5 inc., BLOCK 22,
EASTSIDE SUBDIVISION, BALBOA FROM R -1. to R -2.•
Secretary read the application of Mrs. Marian R. Delano
for rezoning of Lots 1 -8 incl., Block 22, Eastside.sub-
division from R -1 to R -2 classification to. allow 'construct-
ion of a duplex on Lot 4. He stated that this was the
second and final hearing on this matter.
Secretary read letters of protest from Geo. R. Coffin,
Jr., Edward Bouton. and William P. Boland. Mr. Boland's
letter was accompanied by a petition signed by 6 property ,
owners in the district protesting such rezoning; also a
letter of protest from Mr. P. R. Plumb signed by 7 surround-
ing property owners.
Secretary read five letters in favor of the rezoning'
from Mrs. Mirian C. Blaich, Clellan K. Priest, Ethel B. Hill,
Clare Germain and Mrs. Mirian R. Delano.
Chairman inquired if anyone present wished to speak
on this matter.
Edward Bouton, owner of property at 1305 East Central
Ave. stated that he wished to protest this change to allow
rental property in this neighborhood. Although there are
a number of houses constructed before the ordinance went
into effect which are non - conforming, he felt that if any
change in zoning is to be made it should be.to zone the
whole district as R -1. This is a high class district far_
enough away from the business district to be comparatively
quiet and it would decrease the value of all property in
this neighborhood to lower the restrictions and allow rental
• property to be built.
Mr. Kirk, owner of 1208 East Central Ave. also protest -
ed a change in zoning to allow construction of duplex or
rental houses.
No one present spoke in favor of the rezoning.
No further discussion.
Com. Seeger moved the adoption of Resolution No. 142
recommending that the petition of Mrs. Mirian H. Delano for
rezoning of Lots 1 -8 incl. Block 22, Eastside subdivision,
Balboa from R -1 to R -2 be denied and no change in zoning be
made and that the Secretary be instructed to transmit the
same to the City Council as the recommendation of this com-
mission and a copy filed as -a part of the minutes of this
meeting. Seconded by Com. Findlay.
Roll Call vote:
Ayes: Briggs, Seager, Williams, Findlay, Estus.
Noes: None.
Motion carried and so ordered by the Chairman.
RE- HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR VARIANCES
Secretary read a letter from the City Council referring
• the application of Mrs.: James Fleming for 50% front, 50%
side and 50% rear yard variances on Easterly 25 ft, of Lots
27 & 29,331k 7, Sec 5, Balboa Island back to the Planning
Commission for re- hearing because of protests received by
the City Council, protestant® claiming insufficient notice
of the hearing had been given.
Secretary stated that this matter had been re- advertised
and postcard notices sent to surrounding property owners,
the addresses for which were taken from the tax rolls. He
considered this re- hearing unnecessary inasmuch as the post-
card notices are not required by ,ordinance and are sent as
a courtesy only.
Chairman ddclared the matter re- opened for hearing and
inquired if anyone present wished to speak on this matter.
'Mr. Dutcher, owner of property in the same block as
Mrs. Fleming's stated that he had appeared before the City
Council to protest the granting of the front yard variance;'
and wished to make the same protest before this commission.
He stated that he had not been notified in time to appear
at the first hearing. He protested the granting of the
front yard variance because he considered it unfair to allow
anyone to build out beyond the 10 ft. setback line. As his
house sets back 30 ft. from the street, allowing this vari-
ance will obstruct his view down Park Ave. He also stated
that Mr. Escobar, the adjoining property 'owner objects to
the granting of this variance for the same reason.
Mrs. Doris McFarland presented a map showing setback ce
all houses on Park Ave. She spoke in favor of the variances
as requested stating that 85% of the houses on Park Ave. are
within 3 ft. of the property line because Park, is the side yarc
of their property. Whether the Flemings are allowed to build
within 5 or 10 ft, of the front property line will make
little difference as both Escobar's and Dutcher's houses set:
on the back of the lot.
Com. Seeger inquired how close Mr. Dutcher's house was
to the rear property line.
Mr. Dutcher stated that it was within 4 ft. of the rear
lot line and Escobar's is within 3, ft.
Mr. Granger Byer spoke in favor of the variances stating
that Channel Island has many 60 ft. lots which were subdivid4
ed before enactment of Ordinance 440. Most of the houses
built upon these lots are built right up to the front pro-
perty line or within 3 ft, of it. The lot in question and
one other are the only ones left whose front property line
is on Park 'Ave. and the only ones, therefore, who would have
to stay 10 ft. back. All the others could build within 3 ft/
of the property line.
Coma Seager stated that he regretted that the commission
could not allow a 3 ft, setback to conform with other build-
�. iags on the street. Just because someone subdivided this
lot to face on Park Ave, it seems unfair to require them
to set back 10 ft. when the majority of the houses are within
3 ft. of the property line. He asked Mr. Tilton's opinion
is
ti
77
.
on this matter.
Mr. Tilton stated that the commission should analyse
all of the problems of a particular ease and find whether,
there are peculiar circumstances making the granting of
variance necessary. It should be the general policy of
the commission to encourage the type of building which will
add value to the neighborhood.
Mr. Hyer stated that this house would be a distinct im-
provement to the neighborhood and be believed the variances
should be granted so that ,a house can be constructed, rather
than allow the lot to remain vacant.
No further discussion.
Com. Estus moved the adoption of Resolution No. lot
"
recommending that a 50%, 5 ft. front, a 50%, 18 aide and
a 50%, 5 ft. rear yard variance be granted to Mrs. James
Fleming on the Easily 25 ft. of Lots 27 & 29, Blk 7, Sec 5,
Balboa Island and that the same be transmitted to the City
Council by the Secretary as the recommendation of this
commission and a copy filed as a part of the minutes of this
meeting. Seconded by Com. Findlay.
Roll Call vote:
Ayes: Briggs, Seeger, Williams, Findlay, Estus.
Noes: None.
Motion carried and'so ordered by the Chairman.
TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR MOTOR -COURT -
Mr. Durfee presented plans for a Motor Court to be con -
structed on Coast Highway for the approval of the commission.'
They were discussed informally.;
Com. Seeger moved that this commission go on record as
tentatively approving this project providing the plans can
be worked out to conform to the ordinance as to a 10 ft.
setback on the Highway. Seconded by Com, Findlay.
Motion carried and so ordered by the Chairman.
PUBLIC MEETINGS FOR DISCUSSION OF BOND ELECTION.
Com. Williams announced that the citizens of Corona
del Mar are holding a public meeting September 30 for dis-
cussion of the forthcoming bond election having to dowith
municipal improvements. She urged other sections of Newport
Beach to do the rime.
Com. Seeger stated that the public should understand
what they are voting for. From the standpoint of justice .
to the public they should know thw whole story and be in-
formed as to the advantages or disadvantages of these con-
templated improvements; this is not being done. It is not
the function of this body to do it, although we have a
certain amount of responsibility in the matter since it is
our plan.
Mr. Tilton's opinion was that this is a comprehensive
program including items which are worthy of support.
0
Ir
These new facilities are things which will attract people
to the city. It, is up to the people to .decide whether
they are 'buying something well worth the cost. It is the a.
duty, of Civic Organisations to give publicity to a' project
of this kind, not the Planning Commission. He suggested tht
the commission might write to the Chamber of Commerce and
the Newspaper asking that some publicity be given this bond
issue so that the public may be informed.
Com; Seeger moved that the Secretary be instructed to
write a letter to the Chamber of Commerce stating that the
Planning Commission feels that it is desirable that public,
meetings be held for the purpose of informing the public on
the items contained in the forthcoming bond election and
giving opportunity for questions and explanations of all the
features of it. Seconded by Com.. Williams.
Motion carried and so ordered by the Chairman.
REPORT ON PACIFIC SOUTHWEST PLANNING CONFERENCE
Secretary Seeger reported on the Planning Conference
held in Santa Barbara. He stated that he bad been impressed
by the high type of men interested and engaged in the work
of planning and with the importance and value of planning,
especially the adoption of a Master Plan. The National
Government was well represented at the conference, there be-
ing 4 or 5 men from the Department of the Interior and 4 or
5 from the National Parks, showing that the government real-
izes the value of planning. He explained that the National
Government has a Master Plan of every National Park in the
country. No work is done without consulting this plan and
-working toward its ultimate completion. The most valuable
service we can give to the City of Newport Beach is to work
upon and adopt a Master Plan; if this is properly worked
out, any emergency that arises is easily solved through this
plan. Lot us get at our Master Plan.
Com. Findlay suggested that a Variance Committee be
appointed to receive applications, attend to the routine
connected with advertising, posting, and inspection of the
property. This committee could then present their findings
and recommendation and the commission would not take up all
the time of each meeting handling variances, and,could devote
part of every meeting to working on the Master Plan.
All members concurred with this suggestion.
ADJOURNMENT -
On motion of Com. Williams, seconded by Com. Seeger
and carried the meeting adjourned.
Re ectfully�s'ubmitted,
r
HOWARD W. STAGER,
SECRE