Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/02/1975COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH P T p ? Regular Planning Commission Meeting m T p v v Place: City Council Chambers MINUTES m z Time: 7:00 p.m. IRA fe1 Date: October 2, 1975 ,...,e,. Present X X X X X X X EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R. V. Hogan, Community Development Director James D. Hewicker, Assistant Director - Planning Hugh Coffin, Assistant City Attorney STAFF MEMBERS Tim Cowell, Advance Planning Administrator David Dmohowski, Senior Planner Gail Pickart, Subdivision Engineer Joanne Bader, Secretary Motion X Minutes of the regular meeting of September 4, All Ayes 1975 were approved as written. M ion X In compliance with the recommendation of Aft X X X X X Assistant City Attorney Coffin, as stated in Abstain X X his memo of September 29, 1975, the minutes of the regular meeting of September 18, 1975 were approved as written with the revision that for clarification purposes, the wording of the motion for Modification No. 939 be changed to read as follows: "Motion was made that the Planning Commission deny the appeal of Modification No. 939, and uphold the decision of the Modifications Committee and make the following findings: 1. There are special circumstances applying to the parcel which do not exist for similar residential parcels in Big Canyon. The long dimension of the parcel is parallel to Big Canyon Drive, leaving the minor dimension of the site available for building purposes perpendicular to Big Canyon Drive. Should the 20 -foot setback be strictly applied, the flexi- bility of architectural design necessary to achieve a reasonable development of the site would be unduly restricted. 2. A principal purpose of the 20 -foot setback along Big Canyon Drive is to enable the maintenance of an open feeling Page 1 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH QAreu " October 2, 1975 MINUTES along the street; however, the zoning regulations also permit the construction of 8 -foot high fences within the setback area, and 2 -story dwelling units are permitted. By applying appropriate conditions of approval to the Modification .(restricting fence construction), the open feeling along Big Canyon Drive can be maintained, the development of the site will be consistent with the original intent of the zoning regulations, and the development as a whole will not be detrimental to the neighborhood. 3. That although an error did occur._ in issuing the building permit, the Modification will be appropriate and well within the exact language of the Ordinances set forth in Chapter 20.47 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. 4. That a greater attempt has been made to preserve a sense of openness along • that portion of Big Canyon Drive than other properties which have a greater height and maintain a fence along the property line thereby creating more of a "corridor" effect. 5. The Community Association maintains guides and regulations as to the exterior color which could be used, which will, therefore, reduce the visual impact of the structure to be built. 6. That the establishment and maintenance of the building would not, under the circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City, and the Modification is consistent with the respective interest of Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. and approve Modification No. 939 subject to the following conditions (deleting therefrom Condition No. 4 as imposed by the Modifications Committee): Page 2 • n �J COMMISSIONERS k 3 w CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 2, 1975 MINUTES �nuex 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, elevations and model display i at the Planning Commission meeting. 2. That no additional walls or fences shall be constructed within. the 20 -foot setback adjacent to Big Canyon Drive other than those walls indicated on the approved plot plan. 3. The height of the structure shall not exceed the approved elevations." Commissioner Heather abstained from voting on this matter as she was absent from the September 18, 1975 meeting and Commissioner Agee abstained as he did not have an opportunity to read the memo from the Assistant City Attorney. Item #1 Request to create two parcels of land for 12ESUB- development. DIVISION NO. 500 Location: Parcel No. 1 of Parcel Map 50 -45 (Resubdivision No. 371) and APPROVED Parcel No. 2 of Parcel Map 57 -2 0NDI- (Resubdivision No. 406) located at TIONALLY 1701 Quail Street, on the south- westerly side of Quail Street, southeasterly of Birch Street in "Newport Place ". Zone: P -C Applicant: Emkay Development Co., Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Engineer: Raub, Bein, Frost & Associates, Newport Beach Public hearing was opened in connection with this item and Bob Bein of Raub, Bein, Frost & Associates appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant. He concurred with the conditions as specified in the staff report. He then stated his under- standing that the six -foot sidewalk, as specified in Condition No. 3, will be constructed cancurrently with development in the p.arcel. Page 3 COMMISSIONERS . CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES eiSrsll N October 2, 1975 1RUCA - In other words, the sidewalk will not have to be built in Parcel 2 when Parcel 1 develops. He also commented on Condition No. 5 and stated that they do intend to dedicate the sewer easement and the sewer facilities in that easement to the City of Newport Beach and advised that they will do that by separate.document as part of the filing of the Parcel Map. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission make All Ayes the following findings: 1. That the proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. That the design of the subdivision or.the proposed improvements will not conflict with any easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. 8. That the discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision will not result in or add to any violation of existing require-, ments prescribed by a California Regional • Water Quality Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (Commencing with Section 1300) of the Water Code. Page 4 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH i p j0 Z ; RM CALL w • MINUTES October 2, 1975 INDEX 9. That the proposed resubdivision meets the development standards of the Planned Community and presents no problems from a planning standpoint. and approve Resubdivision No. 500, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a Parcel Map be filed. 2. That all public improvements be constructed as required by ordinance and the Public Works Department. 3. That a six -foot wide P.C.C. sidewalk be constructed along the Birch Street, Quail Street, and North Bristol Street frontages. 4. That vehicular access to Parcel 2 from North Bristol Street be taken at the master planned locations shown on the approved improvement plans for North Bristol Street. 5. That a 10 -foot wide easement be dedicated to the City if the existing sewer line across Parcels 1 and 2 is intended to become part of the public sewage collection system. 6. That the applicable conditions of approval for the Tentative Map of Tract No. 7382 be fulfilled (i.e., street trees, etc.) Item N2 USE Request to permit the construction of a hotel in the C -1 District. PERMIT N0. X767 Location: Lot 13, Block 21 of Newport Beach, located at 114 - 22nd Street, on DENIED the southeasterly side of 22nd Street between West Balboa Boulevard and West Ocean Front in Central Balboa. Zone: C -1 Applicant: R. L. Lawrence, Newport Beach Owner: Same as Applicant Community Development Director Hogan pointed out that this is, in the opinion of staff, a. Page 5 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH T X y > MINUTES ` '° z N October 2, 1975 sO rAJ - - - - mvCA marginal proposal in that it has both assets and liabilities. The major asset being that this is a new development in an area that needs much refurbishing and this new development, along with the other proposals that have been made in that area, should encourage this refurbishing and help it to be accomplished. He advised that on the other hand, the use itself is a major use of a relatively small piece of property. Traffic access is extremely difficult and parking, in the opinion of staff, will not be adequate on the property itself. and, consequently, in order to take care of the parking needs, the parking will have to be provided off site by the utilization of the existing public parking in that area and the buying of parking permits. Community Development Director Hogan then advised that the property can, in accordance with the zoning district, be used for other purposes without requiring a use permit and would have the same problem with parking for those other purposes and the ordinances very clearly provide that it's. • acceptable to acquire parking permits for the use of the public lots. However, parking surveys that have been conducted.in that area indicate that there is a shortage of parking so the question here is one of weighing the merits and demerits of this application. In response to a question by the Planning Commission as to whether this structure is a hotel or motel, Community Development Director Hogan advised that the parking requirements are those that would comply with a motel. The reason for this being that the hotel requirements as set forth in the ordinance, when originally designed, were designed to take into consideration a full - fledged hotel showing all the hotel attributes, i.e., it would contain shops, restaurants, meeting rooms, etc. Each of these would require parking in addition to the rental rooms parking requirement and, consequently, there would be joint usage of that parking which would reduce the parking required for individual rooms. He then advised that this is not true in this particular instance in that they do not have any additional facilities • to go along with the rooms and, consequently, staff believes the parking provisions should be those that would comply with a motel. Page 6 0 0 �:.OMMISSIONERS N CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 2, 1975 MINUTES INDEX Public hearing was opened in connection with this item and Richard L. Lawrence, 505 29th Street, Newport Beach appeared before the Planning Commission and stated that he would like to call this a hotel because it is an annex to a 9 -room hotel that was approved last year. He advised that this is the most unimproved alley in Newport Beach and felt that when this goes to the Coastal Commission, they will look favorably on it because they want the people inland to be able to come and enjoy this part of Newport Beach. He advised that although there are hotels around the Newport Center area, there are none around the Dory Fleet and the Pier. He stated that the hotel rooms he is . proposing are small and could never be used for anything other than hotel rooms. He advised that as of August 1, 1975 he bought out his partner totally and is in control of everything . he is doing there. He is presently in the process of refurbishing the Alley West restaurant and this refurbishing will be done between now and Christmas and from there he is waiting for hopeful approval of this request and then will go to the Coastal Commission with his Alley. West building and proposed mall and take it as one package. He advised that he is... looking into a street lighting district, removing any unsightly signs and repaving all alleys adjacent to this property. He stated that he has talked to almost everyone of the adjacent property owners and they were all cooperative and in favor of renewal of the area. Mr. Lawrence felt that this proposal will get a good start on a two- block City area. He advised that he has Planning Commission approval of one City block but wants ! to have a package deal with the Coastal Commission. He then commented on Condition No. 7 of the staff report which reads as follows: "7. That the alley system between - Balboa Boulevard and 22nd Street shall be improved for its full width by the applicant or thru an alley improve- ment district prior to the approval of the occupancy permit of the motel facility." Mr. Lawrence felt that paving the alley would take too long. He advised that the architecture of the new building will look like the old part of Newport Beach but will be a brand new building. He stated that he has room for five cars and an Page 7 COMMISSIONERS T r• � p m p � m = m < Z Qeu ee� � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 2, 1975 MINUTES INDEX eight -foot aisle to get through and that his idea is to go in one way and out the other. He advised that along with the proposal, they are going to have a parking area for over 30 bicycles. He advised that bicycles are a mode of transpor- tation in Newport Beach and especially in that area and felt the bicycle racks will encourage people to ride and lock up their bikes. He then discussed his plan to use hardly any signs and to put white light bulbs around the perimeter of the roof lines around the Alley West building and the annex hotel as is done on the Pavillion and Reuben E. Lee. He felt this would blend in with the area. Mr. Lawrence did not feel his parking p.roblem is so serious it can't be allowed. In response to Commissioner Parker's comment that if this is a success, it will cause a lot of traffic in the area, Mr. Lawrence replied that the area is crowded now with surfers, so if you clean up an area like this, the neighborhood and some of the blighted areas will be upgraded. He advised that traffic will be a problem anyway with the Newport Pier and Dory- Fleet. He did not feel there will ever be an end to the traffic problem and stated that the Coastal Commission wants inlanders to be able to come to Newport Beach. John Shea, 2214 West Ocean Front, Newport Beach, appeared before the Planning Commission and advised that he has mixed emotions regarding this proposal. He spoke in favor of a Specific Area Plan being completed in this area and advised that this proposal may or may not fit into the Specific Area Plan but felt that once building starts, a lot of options are removed. He then discussed the lack of parking in the area and advised that this shortage lasts until the early hours of the morning and spoke in favor of the applicant providing more parking. He stated that Mr. Lawrence originally purchased this property for use as a parking lot and felt that this would be the best use of the property. Mr. Shea stated that there is a lot of property in this area in the same position and felt that if the Planning Commission approves this request, there may be others desiring to do the same thing. Page 8 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH YC T m D m T f p p Z October 2, 1975 oAreu MINUTES mvcn There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Chairman Beckley advised that he tried the circulation plan referenced by staff, i.e., drove in from Balboa Boulevard and attempted to simulate coming out of the existing space and was able to make that alright, but the right -hand turn at the head of the alley really couldn't be negotiated without one reversal to back up and get another turn at it. Chairman Beckley then advised that he does not believe the traffic plan will work within the existing right -of -way that is there. He then added that this was done with a small -size automobile rather than a full -size automobile. Commissioner Agee advised that he liked and voted for Mr. Lawrence's upgrading of the original block and hopes to see it move forward; however, as far as this specific application is • concerned, he felt that it is an intensification of the use of the He area. advised.that he did not see that just because the Planning Commission approved an existing use with nine rooms, it's a justification to go ahead and approve an annex. He then agreed with Mr. Shea's point that if Mr. Lawrence's request is approved, others may request the same type of,thing. Motion X Motion that Use Permit No. 1767 be denied. Chairman Beckley commented on "Alternate Uses of the Site" No. 3 as stated in the staff report which reads as follows: "3. In combination with adjoining parcels that could be acquired at a later date." Chairman Beckley felt that by combining the property with parcels to the immediate south, potential exists for creating traffic circulation internally and this arrangement would have some merit. Commissioner Seely advised that he does like what Mr. Lawrence has in mind and would like to • see this combination.in use; however, considering Page 9 COMMISSIONERS 3 N otion 1 1 Ayes', • • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES October 2, 1975 INDEX the project in itself on the parking issue and the circulation issue, he cannot give this his support. X I Motion that Use Permit No. 1767 be denied. Item #3 AMENDMENT Request to establish a Planned Community Development Plan and Development Standards for "Delaney's Cannery Village" on the Lido Peninsula and the acceptance of an environmental document. N0. 453 RESET FOR NOV. Location: Portion of Lot 6 of Section 28 and 1975 Lot 2 of Section 33, Township 6 South, Range 10 West, San Bernardino Meridian, located at 700 Lido Park Drive on the south side of 28th Street, westerly of the Prolongation of Lido Park Drive, on the Lido Peninsula. Zone: P -C Applicant: Delaney's Cannery Village, Laguna Beach Owner: Mildred Stanley and Lloyd's Bank and Trust as trustee, Santa Ana Community Development Director Hogan advised that staff has requested in a memorandum that . Item #3 be reset for public hearing and renoticed for the November 6, 1975 Planning Commission meeting. The reason for this request is that the staff is doing some additional research as related to traffic and parking and they want to incorporate that research in their recommendations. Mr. Hogan advised that staff wants to do that in time to be able to distribute the written report to the Commission and also to the interested citizens who have been here and have indicated their interest in the proposal. Mr. Hogan also advised that staff wants to.correct a notice procedure in that the notices for this particular hearing were posted two days later than our normal practice; this is not a required posting but has been a practice that has been followed and staff wants to make sure the notices -are posted '`full 10 days prior to the hearing date. Mr. Hogan stated that.as Page 10 lotion 11 Ayes 0 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 2, 1975 MINUTES INDEX a consequence of both of these, staff has recommended that this matter be reset for public hearing on November 6, 1975. Commissioner Seely voiced disappointment that this matter does appear to have to be continued. He advised that it had been publicized that this matter would come before the Planning Commission and that they have received a great deal of correspondence concerning this matter. Commissioner Seely then discussed the possibility of adopting a Specific Plan District incorporating the entire Lido.Peninsula. Community Development Director Hogan advised that staff will respond to that in the staff report. X Motion was made that this matter bs!reset and renoticed for. the meeting of November 6, 1975. Item K Request to waive a portion of the required. USE PER - parking spaces in conjunction with the expansion MIT NO. of the Assistance League facilities in the 7� g C -1 -H District. Further request to permit an off -site parking agreement for the remaining APPROVED portion of the required parking spaces. CONDI- Location:. A portion of Lot 6, Tract 1117, TIONALLY located at 505 - 32nd Street, on the northerly side of 32nd Street between Via Oporto and Via Lido adjacent to the City Hall Annex. zone:. C -1 -H Applicant: Jerry Schoffner Co.,'Newport Beach Owner: Assistance League of Newport Beach, Newport Beach Public hearing was opened in connection with this item and Jerry Schoffner, 200 Newport Center Drive appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of the Assistance League. He advised that the parking lot has been kept secured and has always been locked and not been available to other people in the area. He further advised that all members of the Assistance League have a key to that.facility and have been instructed to use the facility Page 11 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH o�rell w October 2, 1975 MINUTES INUCA for the periods of time they are at the Assistance League. Mr. Schoffner felt the members will use this parking facility because they realize it is a condition in the granting of this request. He then concurred with the staff conditions as specified in the staff report. Amelia Lockey, member of the Property Committee for the Expansion of the Assistance League, appeared before the Planning Commission and stated that all members of the Assistance League have keys to the gate of the parking facility so that each member can use the facility at any time. She then advised that at the last meeting of the Assistance League, the gate was left unlocked so members would not have to unlock the gate. Following arrival of the members, the gate was relocked. In response to a question by the Planning Commission as to whether the Assistance League • has any plans to move from the property in the future, Ms. Lockey advised that the Assistance League has no such plans and that this property was purchased with the idea in mind of expanding the facility to make full utilization of the property. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion Following discussion as to whether the parking requirement would accompany this property if it were to be sold, motion was made that Planning Commission make the following findings: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, and is compatible with the surrounding land uses. 2. A waiver of 27 of the required parking spaces is justifiable for the following reasons: a. The Assistance League complex is a unique operation with peak usage occuring approximately 6 times per month. • b. That adequate on -site parking exists and on- street parking is available nearby to accommodate the day -to -day operation of the facility. c. That adequate additional parking is being provided off -site to accommodate peak usage. Page 12 COMMISSIONERS N CITY OF October 2, 1975 NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES INDEX 3. A portion of the required spaces on a .separate lot from the building site is also justifiable for the following reasons: I a. The site is owned by the property owner and will be maintained as an off - street parking lot for Assistance League members during daytime meetings in the conference room at all times. b. Parking on the subject lot will not create undue traffic hazards in the surrounding area. 4. The approval of Use Permit No. 1769 will not, under the circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the neigh- borhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. • and approve Use Permit No. 1769 subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan and elevation. 2. That an off -site parking agreement shall be approved by the City Council, guaranteeing that a minimum of 28 parking spaces shall be provided on the subject off -site parking lot located on 30th Street in Cannery Village for Assistance League members during daytime meetings in the conference room of the Assistance League facilities. ** 3. The off -site parking lot shall be accessible and usable for club members at all times during daytime meetings in the conference room. In addition, the applicant should also consider opening the off -site parking lot for Assistance League members working in the thrift shop and dental office. ** * *(NOTE: Conditions No: 2 and 3 were revised by . an amendment to this motion. (See Commissioner Heather's amended motion on the following page.) Page 13 Motion Ayes Noes is COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH October 2. 1975 MINUTES INMA 4. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from adjacent streets and adjoining property. Commissioner Seely advised that although he favors and supports the work of the Assistance League, if this were any other enterprise, he would be voting against the application. He did not feel this off site parking site could meet the requirement that it be located so as to be useful in connection wit the proposed uses on the building site, so he will oppose the motion. X Amended motion was made that Planning Commission X X X X X X make the four findings as stated in Commissioner X Parker's motion and approve Use Permit No. 1769 subject to Conditions Nos. 1 and 4 of Commissioner Parker's motion with the revision that Conditions No. 2 and 3 be revised to read as follows: 2. That an off -site parking agreement shall be approved by the City Council, guaranteeing tha a minimum of 28 parking spaces shall be pro- vided on the subject off -site parking lot located on 30th Street in Cannery Village for Assistance League members and staff.. 3. The off -site parking lot shall be accessible and usable for members of the Assistance League and staff for parking at all times. Item #5 Request to permit the construction of a single- family dwelling over a one -story commercial build- USE PER- MMTT N0. ing in the C -2 District. Further request to per- 1770 mit an off -site parking agreement for a portion of the required parking spaces. APPROVED CONDI- Location: Lot 18, Block 331, Lancaster's TIONALLY Addition, located at 426 - 31st Street, located on the southerly side of 31st Street,.between Newport Boulevard and Villa Way in Cannery Village. Zone: C -2 Applicant: Bert W. Tarayao., Corona del Mar Owner: Jack Williamson, Newport Beach .Public hearing was opened in connection with this item and Bert Tarayao, applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission and concurred with the Page 14 ,GOMMISSIONERS ?r,mm >Mm� A m m < A 72 Z 3 N RO All CITY OF October 2, 1475 NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES staff report and recommended conditions listed INDEX therein. He felt that this is a viable project in that it complies with the Zoning Ordinance and, although the area is not presently zoned C- R,under .the use permit a project of this nature is shown as permitted. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tiernan felt that if this request were to be approved, it would start a bad precedent for the area. He felt that this request was premature in that the Specific Area Plan should be completed first. otion X Following discussion, motion was made that Ayes X X �X X X Planning Commission make the following findings: Noes X X 1. The proposed development does not conflict with the General Plan, and is .compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. That the proposed development meets or exceeds all development standards • of the C -R (Commercial - Residential) District. 3. Adequate on -site parking spaces are being provided for the proposed residential development. 4. The required off - street parking spaces for the commercial portion of the structure on a separate lot from the building site is justifiable for the following reasons: a. The parking lot is only 350 feet t from the main building site; b. The applicant has a long -term lease for the use of the off -site parking lot; and c. The proposed development will not create undue traffic hazards in the surrounding area. 5. The approval of Use Permit No. 1770 will not, under the circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing and working in the • neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighbor - hood or the general welfare of the City. Page 15 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH p A Z N October 2, 1975 Q!. CAI I MINUTES and approve Use Permit No. 1770 subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan and elevations, except as noted in Condition No. 2. 2. The proposed development shall not exceed a building height of 26 feet above grade. 3. That an off -site parking agreement shall be approved by the City Council, guaranteeing that a minimum of 7 parking spaces shall be provided on the off -site lot located at 424 - 32nd Street. 4. That off -site parking lot shall be paved with asphalt, concrete or other street surfacing material. The required seven parking spaces shall be marked with approved markers . or painted white lines not less than 4 inches wide. The parking layout shall be approved by the Traffic Engineer. 5. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be screened from 31st Street and adjacent properties. Item #6 AMENDMENT Request to consider recodification of the Zoning Code, Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal NO. 454 Code, to include reordering and renumbering of existing chapters and sections, with revisions APPROVED to the text for purposes of clarification. The proposed amendment involves no substantive changes to the Code in terms of development standards or zoning requirements. Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach Advance Planning Administrator Cowell appeared before the Planning Commission and advised that staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend this reorganized Zoning Ordinance to the City Council with three technical amendments, including adding the • current sign regulations, adding the recently - amended definition of "building site" and deleting Chapters 20.73 and 20.74, which contain regulations from the Building Code and which should remain in the Building Code for the time- being. Page 16 COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH T P A < Z ; N 1 Motion All Ayes Motion All Ayes 0 n �J MINUTES October 2, 1975 INUCA Senior Planner Dmohowski appeared before the Planning Commission and answered questions relating to this project. Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter and there being no one desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion to recommend to the City Council that the new format for the reorganized Zoning Code, along with the three technical revision suggested by staff, be adopted. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Motion was made to recommend to the City Council 1976 that the four questions as recommended by the SPECIAL Community Development Citizens' Advisory Com- CENSUS mittee for the 1976 Special Census, i.e., QUESTIONS I 1. Condition of housing unit. (Determined by enumerator) 2. What is the composition of this household? 3. What percentage of the household income is spent for housing? 4. Does any member.of this household have a .permanent physical handicap? along with an additional question to identify the number of dwelling units that are seasonal in nature. There being no further business, Planning Commission adjourned at 9:10 p.m. i t I games r , ' ker,Se.cretary Newport Beach City Planning Commission Page 17