HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/21/1976COMMISSIONERS
� � s�4- City of Newport Beach
�'�%3� << Regular Planning Commission Meeting
• .6 Place: City Council Chambers
% Time: 7:00 P.M.
% natec Ortnher 21. 1976
MOLL CALL
Present
Absent
0
0
x
x
x
x
X
x
x
Ex- OFFICIO MEMBERS
R. V. Hogan, Commu
Hugh Coffin, Assis
Benjamin B. Nolan,
STAFF MEMBERS
James D. Hewicker,
Tim Cowell, Advanc
Dave Dmohowski, Se
Shirley Harbeck, S
Item Nos. 1 and 2
because of their r
Request to.permit
ed single - family d
and landscape area
Request to subdivi
ed lots for attach
development and on
as a landscape are
parking spaces.
Location: Lot
212
Vis
Ent
Zone: R-
Applicant: ID
Owner: Th e
Engineer: Val
I
i
Hu
MINUTES
fiuonx
nity Development Director
tant City Attorney
City Engineer
Assistant Director - .Planning.
e Planning Administrator
nior Planner
ecretary
were discussed concurrently.
elationship.
the construction of seven attach
wellings with related parking
S.
AND
de 1.65 acres into seven number- TENTATIVE
ed single - family residential
e numbered lot to be developed 8682
a, private driveways and guest _
89, Tract 5878, located at
2 Vista Entrada, westerly of
to del Oro and.easterly of Vista
rada in "The Bluffs."
4 -B -2 P.R.D.
H, a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa
Irvine Company, Newport Beach
ley Consultants, Inc.,
ntington Beach
Page 1.
COMMISSIONERS
City.
• �� ( October
woLL CALL
•
0
of Newport Beach MINUTES
21, 1976
permit the construction of seven attach
family dwellings with related parking
:ape areas.
LPIUI
> subdivide 1.75 acres into seven number -
)r attached single- family residential
it and one.numbered lot to be developed
;cape area, private driveways and guest
)aces.
Lot 125, Tract 5435, located at
1976 Vista Caudal, southwesterly
of Vista del Oro and northeasterly
of Vista Caudal in "The Bluffs."
R -4 -B -2 P.R.D.
IDH, a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Valley Consultants, Inc.,
Huntington Beach
Commission discussed the alternative
f action which could be taken in connec-
these requests for extension. It was
ut, however, that the action of the Plan -
ission would be advisory only since the
cil had previously made the final deter -
on these matters and, therefore, must
decision relative to the continuances.
n was opened to the public in connection
e matters.
co, Attorney with the firm of Fulop,
Burns & McKittrick, appeared before the
n on behalf of the applicant. He
on the numerous studies, reports, and
arings which have been held in connection
e matters and requested that the Planning
n take action to discuss the matters on
4, 1976, without further public hearings
ted in alternative No. 1 of the staff
Page 2.
INDMEX
em #2
E'
RMIT
3T-
11
Request ti
ed single
and lands
Request t
ed lots f
developme
as a land
parking s
Location:
Zone:
Applicant
Owner:
Engineer:
Planning
courses o
tion with
pointed o
ning Comm
City Coun
mination
make the
Discussio
with thes
Jim DeMar
Rolston,
Commissio
commented
public he
with thes
Commissic
November
as sugges
report.
permit the construction of seven attach
family dwellings with related parking
:ape areas.
LPIUI
> subdivide 1.75 acres into seven number -
)r attached single- family residential
it and one.numbered lot to be developed
;cape area, private driveways and guest
)aces.
Lot 125, Tract 5435, located at
1976 Vista Caudal, southwesterly
of Vista del Oro and northeasterly
of Vista Caudal in "The Bluffs."
R -4 -B -2 P.R.D.
IDH, a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
Valley Consultants, Inc.,
Huntington Beach
Commission discussed the alternative
f action which could be taken in connec-
these requests for extension. It was
ut, however, that the action of the Plan -
ission would be advisory only since the
cil had previously made the final deter -
on these matters and, therefore, must
decision relative to the continuances.
n was opened to the public in connection
e matters.
co, Attorney with the firm of Fulop,
Burns & McKittrick, appeared before the
n on behalf of the applicant. He
on the numerous studies, reports, and
arings which have been held in connection
e matters and requested that the Planning
n take action to discuss the matters on
4, 1976, without further public hearings
ted in alternative No. 1 of the staff
Page 2.
INDMEX
em #2
E'
RMIT
3T-
11
COMMISSIONERS, Q
City Ly OI j Newport ` Beach MINUTES
y M tnhar 97. 7Q7A
POLL CALL
- -
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard on these matters, discussion by the public
was closed.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission instruc
the staff to prepare a complete background repor
for discussion by the Planning Commission on
November 4, 1976.
The motion was discussed and staff pointed out
that no public notices had been given relative V
these requests for extension and in view of the
concern with these developments in the past as
well as the supposition. on the part of the sur-
rounding homeowners that the issues were dead, a
least for the time being, careful consideration
should be given to whatever action the Commissio
may take.
Commission Balalis commented on the issue and fe
.
that a public hearing should be held in connecti
with the continuances.
Commissioner Seely commented on the recent actio
by the Commission with respect to changing the
Municipal Code to provide for a public hearing i
connection with requests for extensions. He als
pointed out that the matter could be considered
a discussion item at the November 4th meeting an
if it was felt at that time that a public hearin
was desirable, the matter could then be set for
hearing.
Commissioner Heather felt that the new Commissio
ers should have the opportunity to review the
background information prior to any public heari
process.
Commissioner Seely suggested that the motion be
amended to include "and that staff be directed t
notify the homeowners association that the matte
would be a discussion item on November 4, 1976."
Commissioner Frederickson accepted the amendment
as a part of his original motion.
Oes
X
X
X
X
X
X
The motion instructing the staff to prepare a
Absent
X
complete background report for discussion by the
Commission on November 4, 1976, with notificatio
to the homeowners association was voted on and
carried.
Page 3.
It
)n
i
is
d
9
n-
ng
D
r
n
INOS.X
COMMISSIONERS
R City of
October 21,
ROLL CALL
Motion
Ayes
•sent
0
Newport Beach
1976
MINUTES
amend the Planned Community Development
lewport Place" to permit changes in the
ip and Text, and the acceptance of an
:al document.
The Planned Community of "Newport
Place," bounded by Birch Street,
MacArthur Boulevard, Jamboree Road,
and Bristol Street.
;a0
Stuart M. Ketchum, Los Angeles
Same as Applicant
jest of the applicant, Planning Commis-
cued this matter to the meeting of
1976.
permit the establishment of a delica-
taurant facility within Area 14 of the
aw Hills" Planned Community.
Lot 1, Tract No. 9014, located at
2632 San Miguel Drive, on the
southeasterly corner of San Miguel
Drive and Ford Road in the Newport
Hills Center (under construction).
P -C
Lucy and Jorge Luhan; and Mary and
Rocco Zavarella, Newport Beach
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
ring was opened in connection with this
, one of the applicants, appeared before
sion and concurred with the staff report
endations.
Page 4.
INDEX
M
Request to
Plan for "P
Land Use Mi
environmeni
Location:.
Zone:
Applicant:
Owner:
X
At the req
X
X
X
X
X
X
sion conti
X
November 4
Request to
tessen -res
"Harbor Vi,
Location:
Zone:
Applicants
Owner:
Public hea
matter.
Lucy Luhan
the Commis
and recomm
Newport Beach
1976
MINUTES
amend the Planned Community Development
lewport Place" to permit changes in the
ip and Text, and the acceptance of an
:al document.
The Planned Community of "Newport
Place," bounded by Birch Street,
MacArthur Boulevard, Jamboree Road,
and Bristol Street.
;a0
Stuart M. Ketchum, Los Angeles
Same as Applicant
jest of the applicant, Planning Commis-
cued this matter to the meeting of
1976.
permit the establishment of a delica-
taurant facility within Area 14 of the
aw Hills" Planned Community.
Lot 1, Tract No. 9014, located at
2632 San Miguel Drive, on the
southeasterly corner of San Miguel
Drive and Ford Road in the Newport
Hills Center (under construction).
P -C
Lucy and Jorge Luhan; and Mary and
Rocco Zavarella, Newport Beach
The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
ring was opened in connection with this
, one of the applicants, appeared before
sion and concurred with the staff report
endations.
Page 4.
INDEX
M
COMMISSIONERS
�� �G,swA�C C i ty
• October
of Newport Beach
21. 1976
NOLL CALL
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public hearing was closed.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission make th
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
following findings:
Absent
X
1. That the proposed use is consistent with the
Land Use Element of the General Plan and is
compatible with surrounding land uses.
2. The project will not have.any's.ignificant
environmental impact.
3. The Police Department has indicated that the,
do not contemplate any problems.
4. The approval of Use Permit No. 1806 will not
under the circumstances of this case be
detrimental to the health, safety, peace,
morals, comfort and general welfare of perso
residing and working in the neighborhood or
•
detrimental or injurious to property or impr
vements in the neighborhood or the general
welfare of the City.
and approve Use Permit No. 1806, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That development shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved plot plans.
2. That a minimum of one parking space for each
40 square feet of "net floor area" in the
restaurant facility shall be maintained in t
common parking lot.
3. That all mechanical equipment, storage, and
trash areas shall be screened from adjoin.ing
properties and public streets.
4. That all exterior signs shall be in accordan
with the approved sign standards permitted i
Area 14 of the "Harbor View Hills" Planned
Community.
5. That the delicatessen- restaurant facility
.
shall not be open for business prior to
9:00 A.M. or after 10:00 P.M., seven days a
week.
Page 5.
MINUTES
is
)e
he
ce
n
INOWX
COMMISSIONERS
City Of Newport Beach MINUTES
y October 21, 1976
MOLL CALL
6. That this approval shall be for a period of
two years, and any extension shall be subject
to the approval of the Modifications Committ4
General Plan Amendment 76 -3 consisting of eleven
parts as follows:
Part l: 76 -3 -A: An amendment to the Land Use
Element and Residential Growth Element
to change the designation of four lots
at the southeast corner of Dahlia and
Fifth Avenues in Corona del Mar from
"Retail and Service Commercial" to "Two
Family Residential."
Part 2: 76 -3 -B: An amendment to the Land Use
•
Element, Residential Growth Element,.an
Recreation and Open Space Element to
revise the open space and paseo system
in Harbor View Hills for consistency wi
adopted Planned Community development
plans.
Part 3: 76 -3 -C: An amendment to the Land Use
Element adjusting and clarifying Specif
Area Plan boundaries.
Part 4: 76 -3 -D: An amendment to the Land Use
Element adding "Administrative, Profes-
sional and Financial Commercial" as an
alternative to the existing "General
Industry" designation adjacent to Orang
County Airport, to reflect existing use
Part 5: 76 -3 -E: An amendment to the Land Use
Element changing the designation of
existing commercial uses on the south
side of Pacific Coast Highway easterly
of Bayside Drive from "Recreational and
Marine Commercial" to "Retail and Servi
Commercial," to reflect existing uses.
Part 6: 76 -3 -F: An amendment to the Land Use
Element text and Residential Growth Ele
ment text adding a discussion of the
possibility of residential development
on the undeveloped portion of the
Page 6.
ae
th
is
S.
ce
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
City
• October
of Newport Beach
21, 1976
POLL CALL
-
Aeronutronic -Ford site, to reflect the
previously - adopted General Plan Amendmel
No. 31.
Part 7: 76 -3 -G: An amendment to the Land Use
Element text adding a section pertainin!
to zoning and general plan consistency.
Part 8: 76 -3 -H: An amendment to the Land Use
Element text adding a statement to the
effect that the property near Island
Avenue and Balboa Boulevard, currently
zoned and developed for commercial pur-
poses, may remain in a commercial distr
until the commercial uses are discontin
ued, at which time rezoning to a resides
tial district will be considered.
Part 9: 76 -3 -I: An amendment to the Land Use
Element and Residential Growth Element.
•
changing the designati.on of property at
807 East Bay Avenue from "Retail and
Service Commercial". to "Two- Family
Residential."
Part 10: 76 -3 -J: An amendment to the Land Use
Element designating state - owned propert,
adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway betwe
the Santa Ana River and Newport Bouleva
for the preparation of a Specific Area
Plan.
Part 11: 76 -3 -K: An amendment to the Land Use
Element text revising the description o
permitted uses in areas designated
"General Industry" to permit separate
office uses in certain areas.
Planning Commission held separate discussions on
Parts 1, 3, 4, and 9. The remaining parts were
considered to be "housekeeping" items and since
no one requested separate discussion on any of t
issues, determination as to their disposition wa
made in the final motion.
Public hearing was opened in connection with the
•
amendment to the General Plan.
Part 1 - 76 -3 -A: Hal Pinchin, residing at 314h
Larkspur Avenue, Corona del Mar with place of
Page 7.
MINUTES
it
C,
/,
an
I
INOIX
COMMISSIONERS
` A0- City of Newport Beach MINUTES
October 21. 1976
POLL CALL.
business at 2727 East Coast Highway, app.eared
before the Commission on behalf of the Ad Hoc
Committee of the Corona del Mar Chamber of
Commerce. He commented on the traffic study
presently under way and requested that the mattes
be delayed until 1977, pending results of the
survey. He commented on the possibility that thl
lots in question may be needed for parking and
felt that residential development may suffer as
result of the adjoining commercial development.
George Hauser, 2575 Crestview Drive, owner of th
subject property, appeared before the Commission
and requested that the matter not be delayed any
further but that a decision be made at this time
Planning Commission discussed the effects of a
delay on this request and the need for either a
zone change or use permit in addition to the
change in the General Plan.
Commissioner Seely commented on the traffic stud,
being made as well as the unlikelihood that this
particular property Would-solve the parking prob
lems in the Corona del Mar area. He felt there
should be no further delay, that residential
property was more valuable and desirable than
commercial property and supported the requested
amendment.
Hal Pinchin appeared before the Commission to
answer questions regarding the requested delay
pending results of the survey. He advised that
the opportunity.for parking on commercially
zoned property was greater than it would be if
.the property were changed to residential because
of the opposition in the area to parking encroac
ments into residential neighborhoods. Also, he
felt that the cost to the City or a parking
district would be less if it were zoned.commerci
Commissioner Balalis commented that it was unfai
to the property owner to delay the matter at thi
time pending questionable and uncertain future
acquisition of the property and that the opportu
ity for further review existed because of the
•
need for a zone change or use permit prior to
Motion
X
development of the property. Therefore, motion
was made that Planning Commission recommend to t
City Council approval of an amendment to the Lan
Use Element and Residential Growth Element to
Page 8.
I
Z
al.
r
s
n-
he
d
INOEX
COMMISSIONERS
A.
City of Newport Beach
October 21 1976
MOLL CALL
change the designation of four lots at the south•
east corner of Dahlia and Fifth Avenues in Coron:
del Mar from "Retail and Service Commercial" to
"Two- Family Residential."
Commissioner Frederickson commented that the
Planning Commission had a great responsibility
in the development of the community and at the
same time had a responsibility to act as expedi-
tiously as possible on various req.uests presentee
He felt that the processing of a.traffic study,
receipt of the community's input, review by the
City, etc., would entail a lengthy period of time
and that it would be unfair to penalize the pro-
perty owner for what may be a long time program.
Assistant City Attorney Coffin pointed out that
the determination of basic land use was made at
the General Plan level and that future
.review
would not necessarily allow for reconsideration of
•
project but rather was more an administrative
function to bring the actual land use into con -
formance with the General Plan.
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
The motion to approve Part 1 - 76 -3 -A was voted
Noes
X
on and carried.
Absent
X
Part 3 - 76 -3 -C: Commissioner Seely commented o
the desirability of including the Lido Peninsula
in a Specific Area Plan because of the concern f
redevelopment and effects of traffic on the peni
sula. He felt that the plan of one area had an
impact on the plan of another in terms of traffi
parking, circulation, development, etc. and that
the cost of developing a Specific Area Plan must
be weighed against the adverse effects of delays
and piece -meal planning.
Planning Commission discussed notification
procedures and whether or not sufficient publica
tion had been made to include the Lido Peninsula
in this request. It was pointed.out that the
notification as published was adequate from a
legal standpoint.
John Shea, 2214 West Oceanfront appeared before
the Commission to comment on the development of
Specific Area Plans. He felt that the area bein
discussed was too large for one plan, that the
Page 9.
MINUTES
or
n-
c,
INOUX
COMMISSIONERS
s� \City of Newport Beach MINUTES
October 21, 1976
MOLL CALL
various areas within the proposed district had
little in common other than the matter of traffic
which could be handled by means other than throuc
the Specific Area Plan process, and that smaller
Specific Area Plan districts should be establishc
He also commented on the length of time it has
taken to develop past Specific Area Plans and
voiced concern with the length of time it would
take to develop a Specific Area Plan for the a.rei
in question. He voiced concern with interim .
development or redevelopment and the adverse
impacts which may be created on existing develop•
ment due to delays in the development of a Speci
Area Plan. In summary he felt that the size of
the area should be reduced, that interim approva'
should be very selective, that no.more parking
should be given away, and that the City should
"hurry" in the development of the Specific Area
Plan.
•
Planning Commission discussed priorities in the
development of the various Specific Area Plans
throughout the City and the possibility of
dividing this particular area into sections for
the purpose of zoning.
Community Development Director Hogan advised tha
the area could be divided into sections, however
it was the staff's opinion that the entire area
being recommended was interrelated with respect
to the main considerations which go into the
development of a Specific Area Plan.
Motion
X
Motion was made to adopt Part 3 - General Plan
Amendment 76 -3 -C with the following modification
that it be adopted with respect only to the
Cannery Village /McFadden Square area and the Lid
Peninsula.
Commissioner Agee advised of his opposition to t
motion because he felt the Central Balboa area
should be included in the Specific Area Plan are
Following discussion and clarification of the
issues in question and the areas to be covered,
•
Commissioner Seely withdrew his motion.
Motion
X
Motion was made to adopt separate boundaries for
each Specific Area Plan in the Cannery Village
area, the McFadden Square area, and the Central
Balboa area.
Page 10.
ih
,d
is
S
t
,
j
he
a.
INOux
r
COMMISSIONERS
C
City of Newport Beach
October 21, 1976
MOLL CALL
Planning Commission discussed.the boundaries in i
attempt to delineate the various sections. The
difficulty of the task without further informatic
was apparent and since the search for basic data
throughout the area was presently under way and
results would be available within approximately
60 days, it was suggested that the area be approl
as a whole at this time and separated after the
basic data was received.
Commissioner Heather expressed concern with the
notification procedure and felt that the publica•
tion was too general and that the affected propel
owners were not aware of the changes being consi,
ered.
Following clarification and assurance that the
area could be separated into sections and prior-
ities at a later date when more information was
available, Commissioner Agee withdrew his motion
Following discussion relative to notification of
Motion
X
property owners, motion was made that the Planni
Commission recommend to the City Council the
adoption of General Plan Amendment 76 -3 -C as
recommended in the staff report with the under-
standing that the staff would present a progress
report within 60 days at which time the area
could be further divided and the boundary lines
delineated.
Motion
X
An amendment to the motion was made to add the
Ayes
X
X
X
Lido Peninsula to the area defined. The amendme
Noes
X
X
X
failed.
Absent
X
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
The main motion was then voted on and carried,
Noes
X
Absent
X
Part 9 - 76 -3 -I: Since this matter had been
thoroughly reviewed and discussed in the past,
Motion
X
motion was made that Planning Commission. recomme
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
to the City Council the adoption of an amendment
Absent
X
to the Land Use Element and Residential Growth
•
Element changing the designation of property at
807 East Bay Avenue from "Retail and Service.
Commercial" to "Two- Family Residential."
Page 11.
MINUTES
,n
in
,e
I
it
n
INOKX I
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach MINUTES
•
October 21. 1976
MOLL CALL
Part 4 - 76 -3 -D and Part 11 - 76 -3 -K: Planning
Commission discussed the wording to be included
in the uses permitted in areas designated "Gener+
Industry" and changes were made in order to assui
that retail sales would be permitted only if the;
are ancillary to the primary uses allowed.
Motion
X
Following discussion, motion was made that Plann
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
Commission deny Part 4 - 76 -3 -D and approve Part
Absent
X
11 - 76 -3 -K with changes to the wording to assur
that retail sales would be permitted only.if the
are ancillary to the primary uses allowed in are
designated "General Industry"
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission accept
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
the Negative Declaration in connection with Gene
Absent
X
Plan Amendment 76 -3 and adopt Resolution No. 964
recommending to the City Council the adoption of
•
the following:
76 -3 -A: Amendment to the Land Use Element and
Residential Growth Element to change the designa
tion of the four lots at the southeast corner of
Dahila and Fifth Avenues in Corona del Mar from
"Retail and Service Commercial" to "Two Family
Residential."
76 -3 -B: Amendment to the Land Use Element,
Residential Growth Element, and Recreation and
Open Space Element to revise the open space and
paseo system in Harbor View Hills for consistenc
with adopted Planned Community Development Plans
76 -3 -C: Amendment to the Land Use Element adjus
ing and clarifying Specific Area Plan boundaries
76 -3 -E: Amendment to the Land Use Element chang
ing the designation of existing commercial uses
on the south side of East Coast Highway easterly
of Bayside Drive from "Recreational and Marine
Commercial" to "Retail and Service Commercial,"
to reflect existing uses and zoning.
76 -3 -F: Amendment to the Land Use Element text
•
and Residential Growth Element text adding 4
discussion of the possibility of residential
development on the undeveloped portion of the
Aeronutronic -Ford site, to reflect the previousl
adopted General Plan Amendment No. 31.
Page 12.
•e
in
,
r
Is
�a
,
Y
s
YA
I IN O EX
w I I ✓
COMMISSIONERS
°q e,�` City Of Newport Beach MINUTES
t4
• October 21, 1976
MOLL CALL
76 -3 -G: Amendment to the Land Use Element text
adding a section pertaining to zoning and Genera
Plan consistency.
76 -3 -H: Amendment to the Land Use Element text
adding a statement to the effect that the proper
near Island Avenue and Balboa Boulevard, current
zoned and developed for commercial purposes, may
remain in a commercial district until the commer
cial uses are discontinued, at which time rezoni
to a residential district will be considered..
76 -3 -I: Amendment to the Land Use Element and
Residential Growth Element changing the designat
of property at 807 East Bay Avenue from "Retail
and Service Commercial" to "Two- Family Residenti
76 -3 -J: Amendment to the Land Use.Element desig
nating State -owned property adjacent to West Coa
Highway between the Santa Ana River and Newport
Boulevard for the preparation of a Specific Area
•
Plan.
76 -3 -K: Amendment to the Land Use Element text
revising the description of permitted uses in
areas designated "General Industry" to permit
separate office uses in certain areas.
The following portion of General Plan Amendment
76 -3 was not recommended for adoption:
76 -3 -D An amendment to the Land Use Element
adding "Administrative, Professional and Financi
Commercial" as an alternative to the existing
"General Industry" designation adjacent to Orang
County Airport, to reflect existing uses.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
Planning Commission requested that the discussio
of the Project and Priority List be Out on the
Regular Agenda of November 4, 1976, in order tha
all the Commissioners could be present.
Chuck Rumbold, 215 Abalone, President of the
Little Balboa Island Property Owners Association
appeared before the Commission to comment on the
Page 13.
ty
ly
7g
io
31n
st
al
e
n
t
,
INDEX
r •,
COMMISSIONERS
°�� ���s�s��� City of Newport Beach
A. -
October 21, 1976
MOLL CALL
action taken in connection with Modification No..
1084 on property located at 214 Grand Canal and
expressed concern with the problems of illegal
units, code enforcement, and the need to review
and possibly amend the Municipal Code.
Planning Commission discussed the problems invol,
as a result of existing ordinances and policies
and requested the staff to prepare suggested
amendments to the ordinance for review at a stud;
session.
There being no further business, the meeting was
adjourned. Time: 10:25 P.M.
t
WILLIAM AGEE, S retary
Planning Commiss on
City of Newport Beach
Page 14.
MINUTES
INOi.X