The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11/04/1976COMMISSIONERS Q Q 9p�`�C City of Newport Beach MINUTES m v�,vs°��ss ;s�i Regular Planning Commission Meeting . s Place: City Council Chambers ., Time: 7:00 P.M. z Date: November 4. 1976 POLL CALL Present Absent Motion Ayes Absent LJ Motion Ayes Abstain Absent Won Ayes Absent x X x x x x EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS R. V. Hogan, Commu Hugh Coffin, Assis Benjamin B. Nolan, STAFF MEMBERS James D: Hewicker, Tim Cowell, Advanc Shirley Harbeck, S x Minutes of the Reg X X X X X X were approved as w X x Minutes of the Reg X X X X X were approved as w X X Request to amend t Plan for "Newport Land Use Map and T environmental docu Location: The Pla Mac and Zone: P -( Applicant: Stu Owner: San X At the request of X X X X X X removed from the c x Pac INOEX city Development Director Cant City Attorney City Engineer Assistant Director - Planning a Planning Administrator ecretary ular Meeting of October 7, 1976, ritten. ular Meeting of October 21,1976, ritten. he Planned Community Development,AMENDME Place" to permit changes in the N0. 473 ext, and the.acceptance of an ment. REMOVED Planned Community of "Newport ce," bounded by Birch Street, Arthur Boulevard, Jamboree Road, Bristol Street. art M. Ketchum, Los Angeles e as Applicant the applicant, this matter was alendar. e 1. COMMISSIONERS 9P� of OO,F PR,S��G��F� City of Newport Beach � _ MINUTES - tp f��9i4 .p�+1RP • �woz November 4, 1976 POLL CALL Request to change the operational characteristics of the existing Lido Buffet Restaurant in Robinsc Department Store to include the service of beer a wine. Location: Lot Q, Tract No. 6015, located at No. 2 Fashion Island, in Fashion Island. Zone: C =O -H Applicant: Associated Dry Goods Corporation dba J. W. Robinson Co., Los Angele Owner: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Public hearing was opened in connection with thi: matter. • Jim McCoy, 2208 Port Lerwick Place, General Manac of Robinson's Newport, appeared before the Commis sion in connection with this matter. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission make thl Ayes X X X X X X following findings: Absent X 1. That the proposed use is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is compatible with surrounding land uses. 2. The project will not have any significant environmental impact. 3. The Police Department has indicated that the; do not contemplate any problems. 4. Adequate offstreet parking spaces are being. provided in the Fashion Island common parkin lot for the existing Lido Buffet Restaurant facility. The service of beer and wine with meals in the restaurant complex will have no significant impact on the parking demand. 5. The approval of Use Permit No. 1807 will not under the circumstances of this case be detr mental to the health, safety, peace, morals, Page 2. INOEX Item #2 USE n's I PERMIT nd 1807 's ie i- APPROVED CONDI- TIONALLY COMMISSIONERS City of • °z November 4, MOLL CALL 0 Motion Ay es Absent 0 Newport Beach 1976 MINUTES •t and general welfare of persons.resid- id working in the neighborhood or be aental or injurious to property or impro- :s in the neighborhood or the general ^e of the City. /e Use Permit No. 1807, subject to the condition: development shall be in substantial ^ma.nce with the approved floor plan. > create one parcel of land for office - I development and one residual parcel )rtion of an existing lot now exists. A portion of Lot 1, Tract No. 463, located at 1505 Monrovia Avenue, westerly of Monrovia Avenue and its intersection with 15th Street, northerly of the "Newport Crest" residential condominium project. P -C United California Bank, Los Angeles BEECO Ltd., Newport Beach Robert Bein, William Frost & Assoc. Newport Beach Commission continued this matter to the f November 18, 1976. o permit interior alterations and first d floor room additions on an existing mily dwelling. The proposed development ed 1.5 times the buildable area of the e R -1.5 District. Portions of Lots 13 and 14, Block Page 3. IN 0 W CONT. TO Item #4 VARIANCE 1059 APPROVED ONDI- TIONALLY comfoi ing al detril vemen, wel fai and appro- following 1. That confo Request t industria where a p, Location: Zone: Applicant Owner: Engineer: Planning X Y X Y meeting a Request t and secon single fa will exce lot in th Location: Newport Beach 1976 MINUTES •t and general welfare of persons.resid- id working in the neighborhood or be aental or injurious to property or impro- :s in the neighborhood or the general ^e of the City. /e Use Permit No. 1807, subject to the condition: development shall be in substantial ^ma.nce with the approved floor plan. > create one parcel of land for office - I development and one residual parcel )rtion of an existing lot now exists. A portion of Lot 1, Tract No. 463, located at 1505 Monrovia Avenue, westerly of Monrovia Avenue and its intersection with 15th Street, northerly of the "Newport Crest" residential condominium project. P -C United California Bank, Los Angeles BEECO Ltd., Newport Beach Robert Bein, William Frost & Assoc. Newport Beach Commission continued this matter to the f November 18, 1976. o permit interior alterations and first d floor room additions on an existing mily dwelling. The proposed development ed 1.5 times the buildable area of the e R -1.5 District. Portions of Lots 13 and 14, Block Page 3. IN 0 W CONT. TO Item #4 VARIANCE 1059 APPROVED ONDI- TIONALLY COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach • November 4, 1976 POLL CALL 6, Section 5, Balboa Isle, located at 1603 Balboa Avenues, on the southerly side of Balboa Avenue between Abalone Avenue and Crystal Avenue on Balboa Island. Zone: R -1.5 Applicants. Roland R. and Donna J. Hammond, Balboa Island Owners: Same as Applicants Public hearing was opened in connection with this matter. Roland Hammond, 1603 Balboa Avenue, applicant, appeared before the Commission and concurred with the staff report and recommendations. William Coulter, 307 E. Bayfront, Balboa Island, • appeared in favor of the request. Mary Madison, owner of property at 1601 Balboa Avenue and 222 Abalone, and member of the Board Directors of the Balboa Island Improvement Assoc - tion, appeared before the Commission in favor of the request. She advised that although the Asso( iation wrote a letter in opposition to exceeding the square footage allowed under.the R -1.5 zonin! this matter was discussed and they took a stand not to go against anyone on a small piece of property and advised the Hammonds to go ahead on their project. Mrs. Dick Young, 1600 Balboa Avenue, and owner o property at 1605 Balboa Avenue, appeared before the Commission in favor of the request. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission make th Ayes X X X X X X following findings: Absent X 1. That there are exceptional or extraordinary • circumstances applying to the land, referred to in the application, which circumstances o conditions do not apply generally to land in the same district, since the site is approximately 30% smaller than the typical lot on Balboa Island. Page 4. MINUTES )f 3> INDEX COMMISSIONERS �sv1Gi�mF City Of Newport Beach MINUTES R 9C 9i4 oi° ft im p�� Ap C • �2 Nnvamhar 4. 1976 ROLL CALL 2. That the granting of the application is neces sary for the preservation and enjoyment of . substantial property rights of the applicants in that the proposed dwelling will be of comparable size to other main dwellings constructed in the R -1.5 District. The exception in this case is that the main. . dwelling is the only dwelling proposed where most lots in the R -1.5 District would support two dwelling units. 3. That the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, and is compatible witF surrounding land uses. 4. That the granting of such application will n under the circumstances of the particular ca materially affect adversely the hea.lth or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the property of the applicant and will not under the circumstances of the particular case be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property improvements in the neighborhood. and approve Variance No. 1059, subject to the following conditions: 1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations. 2. That the two car garage spaces shall be maintained for vehicular storage at all time 3. That the new driveway approach to the propos second garage space on the site shall be approved by the City Council. The design of said driveway approach shall take into consideration the location or relocation of existing fire hydrant on Balboa Avenue. • Page 5. ot, se, or S. e th INDEX COMMISSIONERS 9 °m +( oo� F y� City of Newport Beach November 4. 1976 POLL CALL Request to permit the construction of first and second floor room additions on an existing singl family dwelling with two garage spaces (where the Ordinance now requires three on -site parking spaces for single family dwellings containing 2,000 square feet or more of interior living space). Location: Lot 41, Block A, Tract No. 673, located at 240. Hazel Drive, on th southeasterly side of Hazel Drive southwesterly of East Coast Highw in Corona del Mar. Zone: R -1 Applicants: Budge and Lynn Collins, Corona de Mar • Owners and Appellants: Same as Applicants Additional correspondence and petitions in favor of the request were distributed to the Commissio for their review. Public hearing was opened in connection with thi matter. Brion Jeanette, Architect, appeared before the Commission on behalf of the applicants. He commented on the request and advised that althou the original modification was approved, the appl cation was withdrawn because of threats voiced a the meeting to stop construction in any way possible and the potential delays as a result of the appeal process. He commented on the desire to begin construction as soon as possible becaus the weather was good, financing had been obtain.e the contractor had been secured and the Collins were leaving on vacation, therefore, permits wer secured with the understanding that the third parking space would be provided. Although the third space could be provided, it would be more desirable to eliminate it since the applicants d not intend to use the space which would be locat in front of the front door. Also, the third parking space would require a new curb cut which would eliminate an on- street parking space used Page 6. MINUTES , iy 1 s ]h i- t e d, D ed IN 0 W COMMISSIONERS {, City ly Of Newport l Beach MINUTES • �$i November 4, 1976 NOLL CALL by the entire neighborhood. For these reasons,. they reapplied for the modification which was subsequently denied by the Modifications Committ, They feel that denial was unjustified because nothing has changed since the original modificat was approved. Further in support of the approva Mr. Jeanette advised that no bedrooms were being added, that the house was being upgraded, the to was small and in many instances, development exceeded the requirements of the ordinance. He presented additional signatures in support of th request as well as a map showing all the residen in the area who had signed petitions in favor of keeping the on- street parking space. He answere questions of the Commission relative to the appe Frank Clendenen, 250 Poppy, appeared before the Commission in opposition to the request as he felt that the three parking spaces were not out line as required by the ordinance. • Douglas Krauter, 234 Poppy, appeared before the Commission to comment on the intent of the ordin ance and felt that the question of parking shoul have been settled at the beginning of constructi and not after completion. Phil Landsdale, 242 Hazel Drive, appeared before the Commission to comment on the "request. He fe that the development improved the area and that on- street parking was more valuable than a drive way. He also advised that his home contained mo square footage than that of the subject house an he had only a two car garage. Dorothy Krauter, 234 Poppy, appeared before the Commission and felt that this request would set precedent. She also commented on preservation o view areas in the City. Mary Curtin, 254 Poppy, appeared before the Comm sion and advised she felt that three -car parking should be required on -site because of future changes in family requirements as well as proper ownerships. • Jack Reilly, 222 Hazel,appeared before the Commi sion in favor of the request and felt that the trade - off to allow parking on the street was mor beneficial to the neighborhood. Page 7. INDEX ae !or I, is i ►1. )f i )n It re d a f is ty s- e COMMISSIONERS 1 1 S City of Newport Beach November 4. 1976 POLL CALL Brion Jeanette appeared before the Commission in rebuttal to the opposition and advised that many of the homes on Hazel were larger than that on tl subject property and only had two- car.garages. Also, parking was allowed only on one side of Ha making the on- street space more valuable to the neighborhood. There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Agee commented that the Commission had an obligation to listen to the residents in the area as to what they wanted and it was clear that the majority of the people would rather hav Motion X on- street parking than another garage. Therefor motion was made that Planning Commission overrul the decision of the Modifications Committee and grant the appeal, thereby approving the modifica tion with the following.findings: • 1. The proposed room additions are minor in nature, and no bedrooms are being added in conjunction with the proposed development. 2. Requiring the third parking space on the sub ject property would eliminate an on- street parking space, which is more beneficial to all of the residential properties on Hazel Drive. 3. The proposed development meets or exceeds al of the other Residential Development Standar (i.e. floor area limit, open space option, building height, etc.) for Corona del Mar. In support of the motion, Commissioner Balalis commented on his involvement with the establish- ment of the Residential Building Standards and t initial idea that if square footage was being increased through the addition of bedrooms, it w more than likely that the number of people livin in the house would be increased, thus the need f additional parking. In this particular case, th number of bedrooms has actually decreased, although the square footage has increased,.and • therefore, the modification is justified. Commissioner Frederickson commented on the prese vation of an on- street parking space which would be used by others in the neighborhood; was conce Page 8. MINUTES ie ce , I is ie as I )r e r- rn4d INDEX COMMISSIONERS 9QF 9f p °'S �� 5.9 g0 OAR City of Newport Beach November 4. 1976 MOLL CALL with the applicants' deviation from what was agreed upon prior to construction; and pointed out-that although it would be easier to maintain the requirement for on -site parking spaces if no precedent was set, preservation of on- street parking was more important. Commissioner Seely commented on the parking situ tion and pointed out that the applicant has been consistent in his request and felt satisfied tha the findings were as applicable now as when the matter was first heard before the Modifications Committee. Commissioner Hummel commented that this hearing and discussion reinforced his feeling that the entire old Corona del Mar area was in dire need i a Specific Area Plan. He voiced concern with th parking problems in the area but felt that the circumstances.of this case warranted granting thi modification. • Commissioner Heather advised of her opposition ti the motion, because she felt the maneuvering of the applicant was not done in good faith and fel that the request would set a precedent. Ayes X X X X X Following discussion, the motion was voted on an Noes X carried. Absent X Items 6, 7, 8, and 9 were heard concurrently because of their relationship. Request to permit the construction of seven attac ed single - family dwellings with related parking and landscape areas. Location: Lot 89, Tract 5878, located at 2122 Vista Entrada, westerly of Vista del Oro and easterly of Visi Entrada in "The Bluffs." Zone: R -4 -B -2 P.R.D. Page 9. MINUTES I- if INOKX Item #6 :h USE PERMIT 1730 EXTENSI1 IDENIED a COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach MINUTES 9 • ��s02 - Plnve ml.e.. A 1070 POLL GALL • INDEX IDH, a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa. The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Valley Consultants, Inc., Huntington Beach subdivide 1.65 acres into seven number - )r attached single- family residential it and one numbered lot to be developed ;cape area, private driveways and guest )aces. Lot 89, Tract 5878, located at 2122 Vista Entrada, westerly of Vista de Oro and easterly of Vista Entrada in "The Bluffs." R -4 -B -2 P.R.D. IDH, a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Valley Consultants, Inc., Huntington Beach permit the construction of seven USE >ingle- family dwellings with related EMIT A landscape areas. 11731 Lot 125, Tract 5435, located at EXTENSION 1976 Vista Caudal, southwesterly DENS of Vista del Oro and northeasterly of Vista Caudal in "The Bluffs." R -4 -B -2 P.R.D. IDH, a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Page 10. Applicant Owner: Engineer: Request t ed lots f developme as a land parking s Location: Zone: Applicant Owner: Engineer: Request t attached parking a Location: Zone: Applicant Owner: INDEX IDH, a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa. The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Valley Consultants, Inc., Huntington Beach subdivide 1.65 acres into seven number - )r attached single- family residential it and one numbered lot to be developed ;cape area, private driveways and guest )aces. Lot 89, Tract 5878, located at 2122 Vista Entrada, westerly of Vista de Oro and easterly of Vista Entrada in "The Bluffs." R -4 -B -2 P.R.D. IDH, a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Valley Consultants, Inc., Huntington Beach permit the construction of seven USE >ingle- family dwellings with related EMIT A landscape areas. 11731 Lot 125, Tract 5435, located at EXTENSION 1976 Vista Caudal, southwesterly DENS of Vista del Oro and northeasterly of Vista Caudal in "The Bluffs." R -4 -B -2 P.R.D. IDH, a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Page 10. COMMISSIONERS 9A �m1A City of Newport Beach C s Qp 1s ; • s °i November 4, 1976 MOLL GALL 0 • MINUTES Valley Consultants, Inc., Huntington Beach D subdivide 1.75 acres into seven number - Dr attached single - family residential nt and one numbered lot to be developed scape area, private driveways and guest paces. Lot 125, Tract 5435, located at 1976 Vista Caudal, southwesterly of Vista del Oro and northeasterly of Vista Caudal in "The Bluffs. R -4 -B -2 P.R.D. IDH, a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa. The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Valley Consultants, Inc., Huntington Beach City Attorney Coffin advised that the before the Commission were whether or not ermits and two tentative tract maps should ed, therefore, the evidence taken.should that question only. He pointed out that s or modifications to the existing condi- ld be made at this meeting. Also, any the Commission would only be a recommend. the City Council since that body will ake the final decision as to the exten- Development Director Hogan advised that t to the approval of these applications, igation was made of the soils and drain - e Northbluff area and as a part of that tion, checks were made in the Bluffs area r advised that these matters were heard e Coastal Commission and subsequently them; that the location of the two would be outside the jurisdiction of the :ommission after January 1, 1977; that a Page 11. INOE.X NTATIVE EXTENSION' DENIED Engineer: Request t ed lots f developmei as a land parking s Location: Zone: Applicant Owner: Engineer: Assistant requests two use p be extend relate to no change tions cou action by ation to have to m sions. Community subsequen an invest age in th investiga He furthe before th denied by projects Coastal C MINUTES Valley Consultants, Inc., Huntington Beach D subdivide 1.75 acres into seven number - Dr attached single - family residential nt and one numbered lot to be developed scape area, private driveways and guest paces. Lot 125, Tract 5435, located at 1976 Vista Caudal, southwesterly of Vista del Oro and northeasterly of Vista Caudal in "The Bluffs. R -4 -B -2 P.R.D. IDH, a Joint Venture, Costa Mesa. The Irvine Company, Newport Beach Valley Consultants, Inc., Huntington Beach City Attorney Coffin advised that the before the Commission were whether or not ermits and two tentative tract maps should ed, therefore, the evidence taken.should that question only. He pointed out that s or modifications to the existing condi- ld be made at this meeting. Also, any the Commission would only be a recommend. the City Council since that body will ake the final decision as to the exten- Development Director Hogan advised that t to the approval of these applications, igation was made of the soils and drain - e Northbluff area and as a part of that tion, checks were made in the Bluffs area r advised that these matters were heard e Coastal Commission and subsequently them; that the location of the two would be outside the jurisdiction of the :ommission after January 1, 1977; that a Page 11. INOE.X NTATIVE EXTENSION' DENIED COMMISSIONERS p Q City Of Newport } Beach � MINUTES • $y November 4. 1976 POLL CALL portion of the Coastal Commission's consideratiol consisted of soils and geologists reports submit, both by the applicant and by persons in the Bluf• opposed to the proposed development. In this connection, Mr. Hogan advised that the City had received both of the reports and upon review of the reports as well as the original conditions imposed on the use permits and tentative maps, felt that the conditions were sufficient to allot the staff the flexibility of requiring adequate studies to determine what would be:required of tl developer to satisfy the need for drainage, soil stability, landscaping and irrigation. Mr. Hogai further advised that staff had no knowledge of changes in circumstances which would warrant den of the extensions and see no problems with the extensions as requested. Discussion was opened to the public. . Jim DeMarco, Attorney for the applicant, appeare before the Commission and advi.sed they had nothi to add at this time and requested the opportunit, to respond later should there be any opposition to the request. John Stewart, 440 Vista Grande, appeared before the Commission and recommended that the tentativ tract maps be extended but that the use permit extensions either be denied or the matters be se for public hearing. The reason for this request was based on changes in the Uniform Building.Cod pertaining to lot lines which may be in conflict with the enforcement of the C.C.& R.s of the Bluffs Homeowners Association; the sites represe the only two vistas on the public street; and th problems with drainage. Marie Buckey, 2187 Vista Entrada, appeared befor the Commission and requested that a public heari be set concerning these extensions in order that the information relative to drainage, ground wat seepage, soil erosion, etc., could be reviewed. Also, there are new people in the area who may want to be heard. • Planning Commission discussed the issue of drain age and the conditions which were imposed when t developments were approved. There was some conc that the conditions were not as explicit as they Page 12. 7s Ie I 71 i 19 i t it ng a he ern INDEX COMMISSIONERS City of Newport Beach • °oy November 4.• 1976 ROLL BAIL should be and needed clarification. It was poinl out that the only way changes could be made to.t) conditions was by denial of the extensions and subsequent submittal of new applications for the projects. Planning Commission discussed the proposed ordin- ance recently recommended for adoption by the Cii Council pertaining to the termination of an appl- cation should it not be exercised within the allotted time period. They also compared the subject request with that of the extension grant( and additional conditions imposed several weeks ago in connection with Tract 8725. John Stewart appeared before the Commission and voiced concern that the conditions imposed on thl use permits and tentative tract maps were not explicit enough to guarantee correction of the drainage problem to the degree they desired and . advised that if there was some way to make the conditions more explicit in order to assure this then they had no objections. Commissioner Seely commented on the proposed ord ance relative to termination of applications not exercised within the allotted period of time and the reasons behind such an ordinance, mainly tha, the passage of time alone created changes in .circumstances and attitudes. Jim DeMarco, Attorney, appeared before the Commi! sion on behalf of the applicant and advised that the conditions and number of houses in the devell ment existed because that was what the surroundil homeowners wanted. He commented that the only additional significant information was the claim that certain drainage problems may or may not exist and since the staff had expressed the opin that the problems could be handled through the, existing conditions, felt that the applications should be extended. At this time, discussion was closed to the publi since no others desired to appear and be heard. • Planning Commission discussed the various course! of action which could be taken, following which Motion X motion was made to deny the requests for extensi based on the Commission's recent recommendation Page 13. MINUTES :e I N zu in C )p Ig >n INDEX ' COMMISSIONERS A M v S 2 City `y Of Newport L Beach MINUTES .p �f • ��sO1' nln.... mV. .. .. A ia79Z ROLL CALL to amend the Municipal Code providing that appli tion requests be terminated if not exercised wit' the period of time allowed. Commissioner Frederickson opposed the motion beta he felt that the projects had been discussed and altered to the point that problems had been work out, including the conditions relative to draina and did not feel evidence had been presented contrary to allowing the projects to proceed. Commissioner Agee commented in support of the motion because it was previously agreed by the Commission that the concept of time was importan to the point of amending the Municipal Code. Commissioner Seely reiterated his position with respect to basic changes as a result of the pass of time and voiced concern that the Planning Com mission had the responsibility of making a recom mendation relative to drainage without benefit o • all the reports which had been made. Commissioner Balalis brought up the question of whether or not a condition could be added with t consent of the applicant at a public hearing., similar to the action taken in connection with Tract 8725. Staff pointed out that the process in that instance was different in that a formal application for alterations was filed with the City together with the appropriate fee and the matter was set for hearing and.treated in the sa manner as a new application. Ayes X X Following discussion, the motion was voted on an Noes X X X X failed. Absent X Motion X Motion was made that the Planning Commission set public hearing for December 2, 1976, to consider the requests for extensions. Commissioner Frederickson voiced opposition to t motion because he felt that the present conditio were adequate and that the extensions should be granted without further delays. • Commissioner Agee voiced opposition because he felt a public hearing would not serve any purpos for either the homeowners or the applicant. Page 14. ;a li ad 3e t F ne ne 7 In he ns e INDEX , . COMMISSIONERS "�� City of Newport Beach F' yL ;A otP S 3 Cc S •sOy Nnvamhar d_ 1976 ROLL CALL Commissioner Seely commented that the only alter• native other than denial or setting a public heal ing was to approve the extension to which he was opposed and, therefore, would have to support th motion. The adding of conditions at the public hearing w further discussed and Assistant City Attorney Coffin pointed out that this could be accomplish, only if the applicant requested alterations to tl tentative maps or the use permits but that no conditions could be added with respect to the extensions. Staff further pointed out that if i was the desire of the Planning Commission to hol a public hearing and be in a position to conside new evidence and add or change conditions, then the extensions should be denied and the applican instructed to reapply. Following discussion, the motion was withdrawn. MIS on X Motion was made to reconsider Commissioner Seely Ayes X X X X X original motion. Noes X Absent X Motion X Motion was made that Planning Commission recomme Ayes X X X X X to the City Council the denial of extensions in Noes X connection with Use Permit Nos. 1730 and 1731 an Absent X Tentative Maps of Tract Nos. 8682 and 8681. Appeal of Harold J. Benson from interpretation b the Director of Community Development of the conditions placed on the approval of Modificatio No. 993. Property located at 214 Orchid Avenue Corona del Mar. Motion X Since this matter had been resolved, Planning Ayes X X X X X X Commission removed this item from the agenda. Absent X • Planning Commission recessed at 9:25 P.M. and reconvened at 9:35 P.M. Page 15. MINUTES Is ?d le t i r t is n d y n in INDEX Item #10 APPEAL BENSON REMOVED FF R�— CALENDAR COMMISSIONERS ss� • s t,��i < City of Newport Beach November 4, 1976 MOLL CALL -- The project list of the Current Plans and Projec Division was reviewed and discussed. It was fel that a lot of the items were housekeeping matter and could be disposed of in a relatively short time. Also,.there were certain items which, whe completed, would help to relieve everyday proble and eliminate some of the workload thereby provi ing additional time for more import issues. Plan ning Commission suggested that the housekeeping items be separated from the others and that new lists be prepared for review at a future study session. The Advance Planning Division project list was reviewed and discussed. Planning Commission als discussed changes in current procedures in order that the establishment of the various Specific Area Plans could be done in a more expeditious • manner. Motion X There being no further business, motion was made Ayes X X X X X X to adjourn. Time: 10:45 P.M. Absent X 1 WILLIAM AGEE, S cretary Planning Commis ion City of Newport Beach • Page 16. MINUTES INDEX Item #11 is PROJECT t AND s PRIORITY LI T n ms d- n