HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/08/1984WAISSIONERS REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
�
A 0 PLACE: City Council Chambers
E � v � � m TIME: 7:30 p.m.
z c m> m = DATE: November 8, 1984
M = s ° m Cit
X
n
L_J
Motion
All Ayes
Motion
All Ayes
IX
x
P
MINUTES
INDEX
All Present.
EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT: I
James D. Hewicker, Planning Director
Robert H. Burnham, City Attorney
x * �
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
William R. Laycock, Current Planning Administrator
Robert Lenard, Advance Planning Administrator
Donald Webb, City Engineer
Dee Edwards, Secretary
x • x
Minutes of October 18, 1984
Motion was made for approval of the minutes of the
Planning Commission meeting of October 18, 1984, which Minutes
MOTION CARRIED. 1 10 -18 -84
Request for Continuance
Staff recommended that Agenda Item No. 3 (Resubdivision Request
No. 787) be continued to the Planning Commission Continu,
meeting of December 6, 1984.
Motion was made to continue Item No. 3 to December 6,
1984, which MOTION CARRIED.
A. Traffic Study .(Continued Public Hearing) Item #1
Request to consider a traffic study so as to permit the Traffic
construction of a two story office - retail building in Study
the C -1 -Z District.
0 11111111 AND
y
of
Newort
Beach
X
n
L_J
Motion
All Ayes
Motion
All Ayes
IX
x
P
MINUTES
INDEX
All Present.
EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT: I
James D. Hewicker, Planning Director
Robert H. Burnham, City Attorney
x * �
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT:
William R. Laycock, Current Planning Administrator
Robert Lenard, Advance Planning Administrator
Donald Webb, City Engineer
Dee Edwards, Secretary
x • x
Minutes of October 18, 1984
Motion was made for approval of the minutes of the
Planning Commission meeting of October 18, 1984, which Minutes
MOTION CARRIED. 1 10 -18 -84
Request for Continuance
Staff recommended that Agenda Item No. 3 (Resubdivision Request
No. 787) be continued to the Planning Commission Continu,
meeting of December 6, 1984.
Motion was made to continue Item No. 3 to December 6,
1984, which MOTION CARRIED.
A. Traffic Study .(Continued Public Hearing) Item #1
Request to consider a traffic study so as to permit the Traffic
construction of a two story office - retail building in Study
the C -1 -Z District.
0 11111111 AND
ROLL
•
•
M /V\D 11UNM)
November
8, 1984
X s
c O O
z c m j m z
C z N O i o o
M 9 a m> m m
City
of
Newport
Beach
9 2
B. Use Permit No. 3114 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to permit the construction of a two story
office - retail building and related subterranean parking
spaces in the C -1 -Z District, in the Corona del Mar
Specific Plan where a Specific Plan has not been
adopted. The proposal also includes a modification to
the Zoning Code so as to allow the use of substandard
aisle widths with wider than standard parking spaces
and compact spaces. Architectural roof -top features
are also proposed in excess of height limits in the
32/50 Foot Height Limitation District. The proposal
also includes the acceptance of an environmental
document.
AND
C. Resubdivision No. 792 (Public Hearing)
Request to establish a single parcel of land and
eliminate interior property lines where five lots
presently exist so as to permit the construction of a
retail commercial /office complex on the property.
LOCATION: Lots 16, 18, 20, and 22, Block 732,
Corona del Mar Tract and Lot 1, Block L,
Tract No. 323, located at 2600 East
Coast Highway, on the northeasterly
corner of East Coast Highway and Dahlia
Avenue, in Corona del Mar. -
ZONE: C -1 -Z
APPLICANT: Ernest George, Corona del Mar
OWNER: Same as applicant
ENGINEER: Duca- McCoy, Inc., Corona del Mar
Commissioner Koppelman informed the Planning Commission
that she has read the September 20, 1984, Planning
Commission minutes and is prepared to participate in
the Planning Commission's action on this matter.
Planning Director Hewicker stated that staff has been
informed that there is concern regarding the project's
landscaping and subterranean parking structure. Staff
has recommended that the plans be revised so as to
include 5 foot landscaping on the exterior sides of the
property along East Coast Highway, Dahlia Avenue and
2
MINUTES
Use Permit
No. 3114
Resubdivi-
sion
No. 792
Approved
Condition-
ally
ROLL
•
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
Fifth Avenue. Staff did not research the question of
pumping waste water out of the subterranean garage.
Commissioner Person referred to Condition No. 21,
stating that the developer should submit a liability
policy in lieu of a posted bond. City Attorney Burnham
advised that Condition No. 21 may be amended to read
that the developer provide for a bond or other form of
insurance to guarantee payment of damage done during
the construction phase. Mr. Burnham also indicated that
staff has recommended the deletion of Condition No. 10.
Current Planning Administrator, Mr. William Laycock,
advised that Staff has recommended the addition of
Condition No. 31, stating that all of the employees
shall park their automobiles on -site.
The public hearing opened in connection with this item,
and Mr. Ernest George, 2865 East Coast Highway, Corona
del Mar, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr.
George stated that the square footage of the project
has been reduced by half and includes only one floor of
a subterranean garage. Mr. George commented that he
does not agree with Staff that he should provide 5 foot
landscape setbacks on the three exterior sides of the
project; however, he stated that there are plans to
have trees planted on the corner of the site. Mr.
George said that the requested setbacks will reduce the
project by 1740 sq. ft. with no additional benefits to
the City.
Mr. George advised that the current proposal as is .83
times the buildable area of the site. A reduction of
383 feet as requested by Staff will permit a structure
of .81 times the buildable area. Mr. George stated that
he has tried to comply with the Planning Commission
demands by providing one parking space for every 250
sq. ft. of floor area and reducing the project from
28,000 sq. ft. to 14,407 sq. ft. Mr. George requested
that if the Planning Commission feels that the 5 foot
setbacks are necessary, then he would like to propose
that the original project be approved including the
setbacks.
Mr. George confirmed with Planning Chairman Winburn
that he agrees with all of the findings and conditions
in the Staff Report with the exception of Conditions
No. 2 and 3.
3
MINUTES
xx
c o
�
mr
v
a C
m
a m
z
M s
0
a r
n x
c a
0
a >
O o
x m
0
O
m a
M m
Z 9
S
9 2
M m
ROLL
•
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
Fifth Avenue. Staff did not research the question of
pumping waste water out of the subterranean garage.
Commissioner Person referred to Condition No. 21,
stating that the developer should submit a liability
policy in lieu of a posted bond. City Attorney Burnham
advised that Condition No. 21 may be amended to read
that the developer provide for a bond or other form of
insurance to guarantee payment of damage done during
the construction phase. Mr. Burnham also indicated that
staff has recommended the deletion of Condition No. 10.
Current Planning Administrator, Mr. William Laycock,
advised that Staff has recommended the addition of
Condition No. 31, stating that all of the employees
shall park their automobiles on -site.
The public hearing opened in connection with this item,
and Mr. Ernest George, 2865 East Coast Highway, Corona
del Mar, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr.
George stated that the square footage of the project
has been reduced by half and includes only one floor of
a subterranean garage. Mr. George commented that he
does not agree with Staff that he should provide 5 foot
landscape setbacks on the three exterior sides of the
project; however, he stated that there are plans to
have trees planted on the corner of the site. Mr.
George said that the requested setbacks will reduce the
project by 1740 sq. ft. with no additional benefits to
the City.
Mr. George advised that the current proposal as is .83
times the buildable area of the site. A reduction of
383 feet as requested by Staff will permit a structure
of .81 times the buildable area. Mr. George stated that
he has tried to comply with the Planning Commission
demands by providing one parking space for every 250
sq. ft. of floor area and reducing the project from
28,000 sq. ft. to 14,407 sq. ft. Mr. George requested
that if the Planning Commission feels that the 5 foot
setbacks are necessary, then he would like to propose
that the original project be approved including the
setbacks.
Mr. George confirmed with Planning Chairman Winburn
that he agrees with all of the findings and conditions
in the Staff Report with the exception of Conditions
No. 2 and 3.
3
MINUTES
COWAISSIONERS
November
8, 1984
x F
In reply to Commissioner Turner's question, Mr. George
G O Q
2
y
advised that the additional 383 sq. ft. could be added
m
2 N o r 0 0
iIM A � = T m
{ City
of
Newport
Beach
z
substitute motion to amend Condition No. 2, to include
4
MINUTES
In reply to Commissioner Turner's question, Mr. George
advised that the additional 383 sq. ft. could be added
between the buildings if the 5 foot setbacks are
required. Mr. Hewicker stated that the .Staff proposed
that the space remain between the buildings and reduce
the buildings by 383 sq. ft.
Mr. George confirmed Commissioner Koppelman's inquiry
by replying that if the Fifth Avenue setback would be
eliminated and if the Dahlia Avenue and East Coast
Highway 5 foot setbacks remained, that this would help
the project. Mr. George stated that without the
setback he would have an additional 500 sq. ft, for the
building or the courtyard.
Mr. Hewicker advised Commissioner Turner that the
property across Fifth Avenue of the proposed project is
presently being considered for multi - family residential
use as a Senior Citizens Center.
•
The public hearing was closed at this time.
Commissioner Turner advised that a maintenance problem
could develop if there would be a 5 foot setback along
East Coast Highway, which has a very heavy traffic
area, because it is very possible that the public would
throw trash in that area.
Motion
x
Commissioner Turner made a motion to approve Use Permit
No. 3114 with a revision to Condition No. 2, deleting a
5 foot setback from East Coast Highway; delete
Condition No. 10; Condition No. 21 should be revised to
"or other form of assurance "; add Condition No. 31
"That all employees shall park their automobiles
on- site ". Commissioner Winburn clarified the motion
with Commissioner Turner by stating that without the
setback area on East Coast Highway, that the square
footage of the building would remain the same; however,
the additional space would be added to the courtyard
area.
Commissioner Person stated he will support the motion
and complemented Mr. George on his revised proposal.
Commissioner Koppelman commented that because the
project is in a very visible area of Corona del Mar,
S#itute
that she would like to see additional landscaping on
Motion
x
East Coast Highway. Commissioner Koppelman made a
substitute motion to amend Condition No. 2, to include
4
MINUTES
COMMISSIONERS
a0v
f
a =
v m
C
z c
m m z
W D
S Z r S
C 2
N O S 0 O O
i a m
O m D M m
12 9
= a= m m
ROLL CALL
I Ayes
Noes
IMotion.'
All Ayes
Motion
Ves
•
Ix x
x
x
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
the 5 foot setback on East Coast Highway and Dahlia
Avenue, and to delete the 5 foot setback on Fifth
Avenue. Conditions No. 10, 21, and 31 will remain as
stated in the previous motion.
Commissioner Turner stated that he would not support
the substitute motion in consideration of the future
development on Fifth Avenue which would be looking only
at the building without any landscaping and, as previ-
ously stated, he feels there would be a maintenance
problem on East Coast Highway because of the trash.
The substitute motion was voted on, and MOTION CARRIED.
A motion was made to approve the Traffic Study, subject
to the findings and conditions of Exhibit "A ", which
MOTION CARRIED. -
A motion was made to
subject to the findings
which MOTION CARRIED.
Environmental Document
FINDINGS:
approve Resubdivision No. 792,
and conditions of Exhibit "A ":,
1. That an Initial Study and Negative Declaration
have been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act, and that
their contents have been considered in the de-
cisions on this project.
2. That based on the information contained in the
Negative Declaration, the project incorporates
sufficient mitigation measures to reduce poten-
tially significant environmental effects, and that
the project will not result in significant en-
vironmental impacts.
Traffic Study
FINDINGS:
1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which
analyzes the impact of the proposed project on the
circulation system in accordance with Chapter
15.40 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and City
Policy S -1.
a
MINUTES
0
I�
u
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project -
generated traffic will be less than one percent of
existing, plus committed, plus regional traffic
during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of a
critical intersection, will add to an unsatisfac-
tory level of traffic service at critical inter-
section which will have an Intersection Capacity
Utilization of greater than .90.
3. That the Traffic Study suggests a circulation
system improvement which will improve the level of
traffic service to an acceptable level at all
critical intersections.
4. That the proposed project, including the circu-
lation system improvement will neither cause nor
make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic
service on any "major ", "primary- modified" or
"primary" street.
CONDITION:
1. That a raised median be constructed in East Coast
Highway to prevent left turns from Dahlia Avenue
onto East Coast Highway. The median shall be
designed to CalTrans standards and constructed
under an Encroachment Permit issued by the
California Department of Transportation. The
median must be completed prior to occupancy of any
buildings constructed in the subject property.
Use Permit No. 3114
FINDINGS:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the Land Use
Element of the General Plan.
2. The proposed office - retail building is in keeping
with the desired character of the specific plan
area as identified by the General Plan.
3. The proposed use will not preclude the attainment
of the Specific Area Plan objectives stated in the
Land Use Element of the General Plan.
4. The proposed use is a high quality development
which will serve to protect and preserve property
A
MINUTES
INDEX
F F
C O
O
2
m
c
z c
m
o m
a
m n
A
z r
O
C 2
N
O L
O
O o
M m
0
m D
T
Z z
z
a z
m m
0
I�
u
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project -
generated traffic will be less than one percent of
existing, plus committed, plus regional traffic
during the 2.5 hour peak period on any leg of a
critical intersection, will add to an unsatisfac-
tory level of traffic service at critical inter-
section which will have an Intersection Capacity
Utilization of greater than .90.
3. That the Traffic Study suggests a circulation
system improvement which will improve the level of
traffic service to an acceptable level at all
critical intersections.
4. That the proposed project, including the circu-
lation system improvement will neither cause nor
make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic
service on any "major ", "primary- modified" or
"primary" street.
CONDITION:
1. That a raised median be constructed in East Coast
Highway to prevent left turns from Dahlia Avenue
onto East Coast Highway. The median shall be
designed to CalTrans standards and constructed
under an Encroachment Permit issued by the
California Department of Transportation. The
median must be completed prior to occupancy of any
buildings constructed in the subject property.
Use Permit No. 3114
FINDINGS:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the Land Use
Element of the General Plan.
2. The proposed office - retail building is in keeping
with the desired character of the specific plan
area as identified by the General Plan.
3. The proposed use will not preclude the attainment
of the Specific Area Plan objectives stated in the
Land Use Element of the General Plan.
4. The proposed use is a high quality development
which will serve to protect and preserve property
A
MINUTES
INDEX
"MISSIONERSI November 8, 1984 MINUTES
of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL I III III I _TINDEX E
x
a
c o
values and to encourage other high quality devel-
�
x
opment in the area.
m
2 C
D m
z
m a
a
z r
LI
2
c z
w
o z
o
o
M m
0
m D
Z a
z
y Z
T
M
of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL I III III I _TINDEX E
values and to encourage other high quality devel-
opment in the area.
5. The proposed development does not adversely affect
the public benefits derived from expenditures of
the public funds for improvement and
beautification of streets and public facilities
within the area.
6. The proposed development promotes the maintenance
of superior site location characteristics adjoin-
ing major thoroughfares of City -wide importance.
7. Adequate parking spaces and related vehicular
circulation will be provided in conjunction with
the proposed development.
8. The project will comply with all applicable City
and State Building Codes and Zoning requirements
for new building applicable to the district in
which the proposed project is located, except
those items requested in conjunction with the
proposed modifications.
9. The proposed number of compact car spaces consti-
tutes 19 percent of the required off - street
parking spaces which is within limits generally
accepted by the Planning Commission in the past.
10. That the proposed substandard aisle width will not
have a detrimental effect on parking and circu-
lation inasmuch as the width of the parking stalls
has been increased in proportion to the reduction
in aisle width.
11. That the roof -top architectural features in excess
of the permitted height limit are ornamental
features which will add to the character of the
building, and will not block any views.
12. That the proposed development will intensify the
need for on -site, off - street parking in comparison
to past and current uses of the subject property.
13. The approval of Use Permit No. 3114 will not,
under the circumstances of this case, be detri-
mental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing
and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental
7
COMMISSIONERS November 8, 1984 MINUTES
of Newport Beach
INDEX
x x
a
or injurious to property or improvements in the
m
C
z c
m>
m
z
Q p
9
Z
S
C 2
0 3
z
o
0 0
m
0
m
m m
S S
z
z
2
z
9 Z
M m
of Newport Beach
INDEX
or injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS
1. That development shall be in substantial confor-
mance with the approved revised plot plan, floor
plans, elevations and sections, except for any
changes in design which may be necessitated by
other conditions of approval set forth below.
2. That the building shall maintain a minimum setback
of 5 feet from all property lines adjacent to East
Coast Highway and Dahlia Avenue. This setback.
area shall be appropriately landscaped to provide
a buffer between the sidewalk area and the commer-
cial building.
3. That the gross floor area of the structure shall
not exceed 14,111 sq. ft. (.81 times the buildable
.
area of the site).
4, That all conditions of approval of Resubdivision
No. 792 and the Traffic Study shall be fulfilled.
5. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project
shall be prepared by a licensed landscape archi-
tect. The landscape plan shall integrate and
phase the installation of landscaping with the
proposed construction schedule. Prior to occupan-
cy, a licensed landscape architect shall certify
to the Planning Department that the landscaping
has been installed in accordance with the approved
plan.
6. The landscape plan shall be approved by the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Department, the Public
Works Department and the Planning Department.
7. That on -site parking, vehicular and pedestrian
circulation systems shall be subject to further
review by the Traffic Engineer.
8. That the intersection of the private drive with
the public street shall be designed to provide
sight distance for a speed of 25 miles per hour.
•
Slopes, landscaping, walls and other obstructions
shall be considered in the sight distance require-
ments. Landscaping within the sight distance line
shall not exceed 24 inches in height.
8
COMMISSIONERS
•
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
9. The incline of the ramp from the parking structure
to street level shall not exceed 15%.
10. Deleted
11. The driveway and ramp down to the first parking
level shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide with a
minimum center line radius of 25 feet. other
ramps shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide with
shear walls held back a minimum of 5 feet from the
parking aisles.
12. Columns, walls and other supports shall not
encroach into parking stalls at any point.
13. The access controls to the parking structure shall
be located so that cars are not required to wait
within the public right of way while the controls
are activated. The access control shall be
designed in a manner that does not prevent custom-
ers from gaining access to the parking garage
without the use of a pass card or other token.
14. Any device or method proposed to be used to
prevent vehicles from entering the parking struc-
ture via the exit ramp shall be approved by the
Traffic Engineer.
15. Handicapped parking shall be provided in a manner
and quantity approved by the City Traffic Engineer
and the Building Department.
16. That a maximum of 19 percent of the required
parking spaces shall be compact spaces.
17. The following disclosure statement of the City of
Newport Beach's policy regarding the John Wayne
Airport shall be included in all leases or sub-
leases for space in the project and shall be
included in any Covenants, Conditions and Restric-
tions which may be recorded against the property.
Disclosure Statement
The Lessee herein, his heirs, successors and assigns
acknowledge that:
a) The John Wayne Airport may not be able to provide
adequate air service for business establishments which
rely on such services;
E
MINUTES
INDEX
x
a
c o
a v mr
v
z c
m
m z
M a
a
z r x
= z
N
0
v S o 0
a m
o
m a m m
z a
z
a z m m
•
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
9. The incline of the ramp from the parking structure
to street level shall not exceed 15%.
10. Deleted
11. The driveway and ramp down to the first parking
level shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide with a
minimum center line radius of 25 feet. other
ramps shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide with
shear walls held back a minimum of 5 feet from the
parking aisles.
12. Columns, walls and other supports shall not
encroach into parking stalls at any point.
13. The access controls to the parking structure shall
be located so that cars are not required to wait
within the public right of way while the controls
are activated. The access control shall be
designed in a manner that does not prevent custom-
ers from gaining access to the parking garage
without the use of a pass card or other token.
14. Any device or method proposed to be used to
prevent vehicles from entering the parking struc-
ture via the exit ramp shall be approved by the
Traffic Engineer.
15. Handicapped parking shall be provided in a manner
and quantity approved by the City Traffic Engineer
and the Building Department.
16. That a maximum of 19 percent of the required
parking spaces shall be compact spaces.
17. The following disclosure statement of the City of
Newport Beach's policy regarding the John Wayne
Airport shall be included in all leases or sub-
leases for space in the project and shall be
included in any Covenants, Conditions and Restric-
tions which may be recorded against the property.
Disclosure Statement
The Lessee herein, his heirs, successors and assigns
acknowledge that:
a) The John Wayne Airport may not be able to provide
adequate air service for business establishments which
rely on such services;
E
MINUTES
INDEX
ROLL
•
•
'VVVUJJIVwCKJ
November
8, 1984
F x
x
_ C v v m
z c m a m z
C Z N p X 0 0
m
City
of
Newport
Beach
Y 9 9 Z m
b) When an alternate air facility is available, a
complete phase out of jet service may occur at the John
Wayne Airport;
c) The City of Newport Beach will continue to oppose
additional commercial air service expansions at the
John Wayne Airport;
d) Lessee, his heirs, successors and assigns will not
actively oppose any action taken by the City of Newport
Beach to phase out or limit jet air service at the John
Wayne Airport.
18. That all proposed signs shall be in conformance
with the provisions of Chapter 20.06 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code and shall be approved
by the City Traffic Engineer if located adjacent
to the vehicular ingress and egress.
19. That the project shall be designed to eliminate
light and glare spillage onto adjacent properties.
20. That a plan for the excavation and removal of
material for the subterranean parking structure,
including haul routes and hours of operation,
shall be approved by the City's Grading Engineer
and the Public Works Department.
21. That a bond or other form of insurance shall be
posted with the Planning Department by the
developer if the driving of sheet piling is
necessary on the site during construction. Said
bond or other form of assurance will guarantee
that any damage to adjoining public or private
property will be repaired at the expense of the
developer.
22. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas
shall be screened from East Coast Highway, Dahlia
Avenue, Fifth Avenue, adjacent properties and from
the alley abutting the site.
23. Development of the site shall be subject to a
grading permit to be approved by the Building,
Public works and Planning Departments.
24. That a grading plan, if required, shall include a
complete plan for temporary and permanent drainage
facilities, to minimize any potential impacts from
silt, debris, and other water pollutants.
10
MINUTES
ROLL
�J
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
25. The grading permit shall include, if required, a
description of haul routes, access points to the
site, watering, and sweeping program designed to
minimize impact of haul operations.
26. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan, if
required, shall be submitted and be subject to the
approval of the Building Department and a copy
shall be forwarded to the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region.
27. That grading shall be conducted in accordance with
plans prepared by a Civil Engineer and based on
recommendations of a soils engineer and an engi-
neering geologist subsequent to the completion of
a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of
the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the
"Approved as Built" grading plans on standard size
sheets shall be furnished to the Building Depart-
ment.
28. A subdrain system shall be installed subject to
the approval of the Building Department.
29. That the Planning Commission may add and /or modify
conditions of approval to this use permit, or
recommend to the City Council the revocation of
this use permit, upon a determination that the
operation which is the subject of this use permit
causes injury, or is detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare
of the community.
30. This use permit shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
31. That all employees shall park their automboiles
on -site.
11
MINUTES
A
c o
r v
z c
m
o m
z
W a
a
Z r
O z
c z
H
o S
O O
M m
O
m a
r,
Z a
z
a z
r m
ROLL
�J
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
25. The grading permit shall include, if required, a
description of haul routes, access points to the
site, watering, and sweeping program designed to
minimize impact of haul operations.
26. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan, if
required, shall be submitted and be subject to the
approval of the Building Department and a copy
shall be forwarded to the California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region.
27. That grading shall be conducted in accordance with
plans prepared by a Civil Engineer and based on
recommendations of a soils engineer and an engi-
neering geologist subsequent to the completion of
a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of
the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the
"Approved as Built" grading plans on standard size
sheets shall be furnished to the Building Depart-
ment.
28. A subdrain system shall be installed subject to
the approval of the Building Department.
29. That the Planning Commission may add and /or modify
conditions of approval to this use permit, or
recommend to the City Council the revocation of
this use permit, upon a determination that the
operation which is the subject of this use permit
causes injury, or is detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare
of the community.
30. This use permit shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
31. That all employees shall park their automboiles
on -site.
11
MINUTES
NVi ONUNtK_�)
November
8, 1984
x x
c o
Resubdivision No. 792
£ a v =
- C m o r v m
a C m a
FINDINGS:
C_ 0 v x O O
M 9= m> m m
City
of
Newport
Beach
s a
ROLL CALI
MINUTES
INDEX
Resubdivision No. 792
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances
of the City, all Applicable general or specific
plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied
with the plan of subdivision.
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
3. That the design of the development or the proposed
improvements will not conflict with. any easements
acquired by the public at large for access through
or use of property within the proposed develop-
ment.
CONDITIONS:
•
1. That a parcel map be filed.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required
by ordinance and the Public Works Department.
3. That a subdivision agreement and accompanying
surety be provided to guarantee satisfactory
completion of the public improvements if it is
desired to record the parcel map or obtain a
building permit prior to completion of the public
improvements.
4. That a 15 foot radius corner cutoff at the corner
of Dahlia Avenue and Fifth Avenue be dedicated to
the public.
5. That all vehicular access rights to East Coast
Highway be released and relinquished to the City
of Newport Beach.
6. That street, drainage and utility improvements be
shown on standard improvement plans prepared by a
licensed civil engineer.
7. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared
•
and approved by the Public Works Department, along
with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain
facilities for the on -site improvements prior to
12
MINUTES
INDEX
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
recording of the parcel map. Any modifications or
extensions to the existing storm drain, water, or
sewer systems shown to be required by the study
shall be the responsibility of the developer.
8. That access ramps be constructed per City Std.
181 -L at the intersections of Fifth Avenue and
Dahlia Avenue and East Coast Highway and Dahlia
Avenue; that the existing drive aprons located on
East Coast Highway and Dahlia Avenue be removed
and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk; that
the existing sidewalk along East Coast Highway be
reconstructed at a uniform cross slope; that
deteriorated and displaced portions of curb and
gutter along East Coast Highway, Dahlia Avenue and
Fifth Avenue be reconstructed; that the curb
returns at the intersections of East Coast Highway
and Dahlia Avenue and Fifth Avenue and Dahlia
Avenue be reconstructed with 25 foot radius; that
the deteriorated sidewalk along Dahlia Avenue be
removed and replaced with full width sidewalk with
tree wells and trees as approved by the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Department; that the one
existing tree shall be root pruned or removed as
recommended by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Department; and that sidewalk be constructed along
the Fifth Avenue frontage. All work within the
East Coast Highway right of way shall be completed
under an encroachment permit issued by the
California Department of Transportation.
9. County Sanitation District Fees shall be paid
prior to issuance of any building permits.
10. That the existing sewer be relocated so that it
will not be under the proposed structure; that the
new location be approved by the Utilities Depart-
ment and the Public Works Department; that the
existing sewer easements be vacated and a new
easement be dedicated to the City if needed, and
that all of the above be completed prior to
issuance of any building permits unless otherwise
approved by the Public Works Department.
11. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map
has not been recorded within 3 years of the date
of approval, unless an extension is granted by the
Planning Commission.
13
MINUTES
INDEX
s s
c O
O
r v
Z G
m
m
Y
C D
a
Z r
2
0
M m
0
m a
M T
Z 9
Z
S a
T m
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
recording of the parcel map. Any modifications or
extensions to the existing storm drain, water, or
sewer systems shown to be required by the study
shall be the responsibility of the developer.
8. That access ramps be constructed per City Std.
181 -L at the intersections of Fifth Avenue and
Dahlia Avenue and East Coast Highway and Dahlia
Avenue; that the existing drive aprons located on
East Coast Highway and Dahlia Avenue be removed
and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk; that
the existing sidewalk along East Coast Highway be
reconstructed at a uniform cross slope; that
deteriorated and displaced portions of curb and
gutter along East Coast Highway, Dahlia Avenue and
Fifth Avenue be reconstructed; that the curb
returns at the intersections of East Coast Highway
and Dahlia Avenue and Fifth Avenue and Dahlia
Avenue be reconstructed with 25 foot radius; that
the deteriorated sidewalk along Dahlia Avenue be
removed and replaced with full width sidewalk with
tree wells and trees as approved by the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Department; that the one
existing tree shall be root pruned or removed as
recommended by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Department; and that sidewalk be constructed along
the Fifth Avenue frontage. All work within the
East Coast Highway right of way shall be completed
under an encroachment permit issued by the
California Department of Transportation.
9. County Sanitation District Fees shall be paid
prior to issuance of any building permits.
10. That the existing sewer be relocated so that it
will not be under the proposed structure; that the
new location be approved by the Utilities Depart-
ment and the Public Works Department; that the
existing sewer easements be vacated and a new
easement be dedicated to the City if needed, and
that all of the above be completed prior to
issuance of any building permits unless otherwise
approved by the Public Works Department.
11. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map
has not been recorded within 3 years of the date
of approval, unless an extension is granted by the
Planning Commission.
13
MINUTES
INDEX
ROLL
•
'V\/V \I3JIlJINCK3
November
8, 1984
77
C O O
x
.
m
z c m> m z
C a m p; 0 0
A z 9 Z T m
City
of
Newport
Beach
x
A. Use Permit No. 3115 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to permit the reconstruction and expansion of
the existing Fun zone property in the C -1 District to
include the removal of the existing buildings and the
construction of four new single story buildings which
will include expanded facilities for retail sales,
take -out restaurants and related outdoor seating,
outdoor flower sales, and the continuation of the
arcade, ferris wheel and carousel attractions. The
proposal also includes the following: a request to pay
an annual in -lieu fee to the City for a portion of the
required off-street parking spaces; the approval of
off -site parking agreements for a portion of the
required off - street parking spaces on the following
properties: Site No. 1, located on the southwesterly
corner of Washington Street and East Bay Avenue (209
Washington Street); Site No. 2, located on the easterly
side of Washington Street between East Balboa Boulevard
and East Bay Avenue (204 Washington Street); Site No.
3, located on the southerly side of East Balboa Boule-
vard between Palm Street and Washington Street (603
East Balboa Boulevard); and Site No. 4, located on the
southerly side of East Bay Avenue between Adams Street
and Palm Street (505 and 507 East Bay Avenue). The
proposal further includes a modification to the Zoning
Code so as to allow the use of tandem parking spaces
with valet parking on Sites No. 1, 2, and 3, and
compact spaces and tandem parking spaces on Site No. 4;
an exception to the Sign Ordinance so as to allow the
construction of three metal arched roof signs with
Tivoli lighting; the approval of architectural roof -top
cupolas that exceed the basic 26 foot height limit; and
the acceptance of an environmental document.
AND
B. Variance No. 1116 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to waive a portion of the required off- street
parking spaces and to permit a ferris wheel in the
public boardwalk to exceed a height of 35 feet in the
26/35 Foot Height Limitation District.
m
14
MINUTES
item No.2
Use Permit
No. 3115
Variance
No. 1116
Resubdivi-
sion
No. 724
Approved
Condition-
ally
r1
U
•
COMMISSIONERS
November 8, 1984 MINUTES
t Beach
)n No. 724 (Revised) (Continued Public
Request to revise a previously approved resubdivision
which established a single building site and removed
interior property lines where eight parcels presently
exist. The proposed revisions include the applicant's
request to revise or delete previous conditions of ap-
proval in conjunction with a revised concept of devel-
opment for the Fun Zone property.
LOCATION: Lots 1 through 7, Block B, Bayside Tract
and portions of Section 35, Township G
South, Range 10 West, San Bernardino
Meridian, located at 600 East Bay
Avenue, bounded by East Bay Avenue,
Washington Street, Palm Street and
Newport Bay, in Central Balboa.
ZONE: C -1
APPLICANT: Yavar Industries, Newport Beach
OWNERS: Same as applicant
ARCHITECT: Rick Dayton, Balboa Island
Commissioner Person stepped down from the dais and
refrained from deliberation on this agenda item due to
a potential conflict of interest.
Commissioner Koppelman stated that she has read the
previous Planning Commission minutes regarding this
item and is prepared to participate in the Planning
Commission's action on this matter.
Planning Director Hewicker reviewed the previous
Planning Commission actions regarding this item. Mr.
Hewicker stated that the applicant was not able to
provide the additional 5 parking spaces as requested by
the Planning Commission at the October 18, 1984,
meeting. Therefore, the following courses of action may
be taken by the Planning Commission: Exhibit "A"
contains the three parking sites totaling 30 parking
spaces including modifications, as presented at the
Planning Commission meeting of October 18, 1984.
Exhibit "B" would deny the entire project on the basis
that the parking is not satisfactory. Exhibit "C" would
approve the project and would provide 12 parking spaces
in the vacant lot across the street from the project at
209 Washington Street. The additional 23 parking space
15
INDEX
x x
c o
�
m
z c
) m
z
W a
M
a r O
z
c a
,"'
W
°
° 3 °
m
°
City
_ M
a
ma
a a r
r
m
of
November 8, 1984 MINUTES
t Beach
)n No. 724 (Revised) (Continued Public
Request to revise a previously approved resubdivision
which established a single building site and removed
interior property lines where eight parcels presently
exist. The proposed revisions include the applicant's
request to revise or delete previous conditions of ap-
proval in conjunction with a revised concept of devel-
opment for the Fun Zone property.
LOCATION: Lots 1 through 7, Block B, Bayside Tract
and portions of Section 35, Township G
South, Range 10 West, San Bernardino
Meridian, located at 600 East Bay
Avenue, bounded by East Bay Avenue,
Washington Street, Palm Street and
Newport Bay, in Central Balboa.
ZONE: C -1
APPLICANT: Yavar Industries, Newport Beach
OWNERS: Same as applicant
ARCHITECT: Rick Dayton, Balboa Island
Commissioner Person stepped down from the dais and
refrained from deliberation on this agenda item due to
a potential conflict of interest.
Commissioner Koppelman stated that she has read the
previous Planning Commission minutes regarding this
item and is prepared to participate in the Planning
Commission's action on this matter.
Planning Director Hewicker reviewed the previous
Planning Commission actions regarding this item. Mr.
Hewicker stated that the applicant was not able to
provide the additional 5 parking spaces as requested by
the Planning Commission at the October 18, 1984,
meeting. Therefore, the following courses of action may
be taken by the Planning Commission: Exhibit "A"
contains the three parking sites totaling 30 parking
spaces including modifications, as presented at the
Planning Commission meeting of October 18, 1984.
Exhibit "B" would deny the entire project on the basis
that the parking is not satisfactory. Exhibit "C" would
approve the project and would provide 12 parking spaces
in the vacant lot across the street from the project at
209 Washington Street. The additional 23 parking space
15
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS November 8, 1984 MINUTES
r 1
LJ
of Newport Beach
requirements would be satisfied by entering into an
agreement between the applicant and the City, that
would be acceptable to the Planning Commission and the
City Council as outlined in Exhibit "C ", Condition No.
24 of the Staff Report. Mr. Hewicker emphasized to the
Planning Commission that there are no guarantees that
the City would participate in an agreement; however,
such an agreement has been discussed with the City
Attorney, Mr. Robert Burnham.
City Attorney Burnham recommended the following
condition in the event there is an alteration to the
project in the future:
"That an amendment to the Use Permit shall be
required prior to (a) the sale of alcoholic
beverages on site; (b) any conversion of a
take -out restaurant to a conventional restau-
rant as defined in the Zoning Code; (c) the
establishment of any conventional restaurant
as defined in the Zoning Code; (d) provision
of live entertainment, dancing or amplified
music; (e) or any change in the method or
manner of any business that could adversely
affect the health, safety and welfare of
persons who work or reside in the area."
The public hearing opened in connection with this item
and Mr. Rick Dayton, Dayton & Associates - Architects,
224 Sapphire Avenue, Balboa Island, representing the
applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission.
Mr. Burnham clarified the recommended condition to Mr.
Dayton by stating that the square footage, intensity,
and character of the development would have to remain
the same as approved by the Planning Commission.
Mr. Dayton stated that the applicant would agree to
participate with the City in a parking agreement. Mr.
Dayton further stated that there have recently been new
inquiries for other off -site parking lots; however, the
applicant presently proposes the 4 off -site parking
sites discussed in the Staff Report.
Mr. Curt Herberts, Newport Beach, read a letter to the
Planning Commission that he received from the Coastal
Commission informing Mr. Herberts that the JBS Develop-
ment Company has applied for a one year extension. Mr.
Hewicker explained to the Planning Commission that the
applicant has written to the Coastal Commission
16
INDEX
x�
c o
0
m
z C
M
m
z
m JJ
Jl
z r
L1 2
o;oo
W m
0
m s
m m
=a
2
a a'"
m
r 1
LJ
of Newport Beach
requirements would be satisfied by entering into an
agreement between the applicant and the City, that
would be acceptable to the Planning Commission and the
City Council as outlined in Exhibit "C ", Condition No.
24 of the Staff Report. Mr. Hewicker emphasized to the
Planning Commission that there are no guarantees that
the City would participate in an agreement; however,
such an agreement has been discussed with the City
Attorney, Mr. Robert Burnham.
City Attorney Burnham recommended the following
condition in the event there is an alteration to the
project in the future:
"That an amendment to the Use Permit shall be
required prior to (a) the sale of alcoholic
beverages on site; (b) any conversion of a
take -out restaurant to a conventional restau-
rant as defined in the Zoning Code; (c) the
establishment of any conventional restaurant
as defined in the Zoning Code; (d) provision
of live entertainment, dancing or amplified
music; (e) or any change in the method or
manner of any business that could adversely
affect the health, safety and welfare of
persons who work or reside in the area."
The public hearing opened in connection with this item
and Mr. Rick Dayton, Dayton & Associates - Architects,
224 Sapphire Avenue, Balboa Island, representing the
applicant, appeared before the Planning Commission.
Mr. Burnham clarified the recommended condition to Mr.
Dayton by stating that the square footage, intensity,
and character of the development would have to remain
the same as approved by the Planning Commission.
Mr. Dayton stated that the applicant would agree to
participate with the City in a parking agreement. Mr.
Dayton further stated that there have recently been new
inquiries for other off -site parking lots; however, the
applicant presently proposes the 4 off -site parking
sites discussed in the Staff Report.
Mr. Curt Herberts, Newport Beach, read a letter to the
Planning Commission that he received from the Coastal
Commission informing Mr. Herberts that the JBS Develop-
ment Company has applied for a one year extension. Mr.
Hewicker explained to the Planning Commission that the
applicant has written to the Coastal Commission
16
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
F F
C O o
2
m
Z C m y m Z
W ]] JJ Z r Cl S
C 2 N OK 0 0
9 m O m D T 71
= a 2 p S T m
City of
November 8, 1984
Beach
MINUTES
ROLL CALL I I I I J i l l _ 1 INDEX
17
informing same of a change in ownership, and that the
applicant has requested an extension of the former
Coastal Commission permit with the desire that this
application would be permitted under the former permit.
Mr. Hewicker stated that he contacted the Coastal
Commission informing them that the previous City
permits issued to JBS Development are no longer in
effect. The Coastal Commission stated they do not
automatically deny a request for an extension. Mr.
Hewicker recommended that a Coastal Commission Public
Hearing should be held before the Coastal Commission
automatically extends the permit to the applicant. Mr.
Herberts stated he opposes the old project but approves
the demolition.
Mr. Jim Salter informed the Planning Commission that
JBS Development Corp. and James B. Salter are not
involved in the current project.
Mr. Paul Langone, 2033 E. Ocean Boulevard, stated that
.
he supports the project. Mr. Langone informed the
Planning Commission that the Bank of America and Laguna
Federal Savings and Loan will be leaving downtown
Balboa, and he feels that the project would be
beneficial to the Balboa area.
Commissioner Goff queried if the applicant would be
willing to a Condition of Approval to the effect that
the applicant would contribute a percentage of costs
towards a parking structure at a future date. Mr.
Dayton assured the Planning Commission that the appli-
cant would agree to such a Condition of Approval.
Mr. Doug Cavanaugh, 114 Garnet Avenue, Balboa, stated
that he opposes the tandem parking spaces in the Balboa
downtown area because of the possible traffic hazards
around the parking areas, and he also stated that it
would not enhance the appearance of the area.
Mary Jane Sanborn, President of the Merchants Asso-
ciation and Balboa Improvements Association, expressed
concern regarding the Completion Bond and recommended
to the Planning Commission that the current Fun Zone be
demolished within the next six months. Ms. Sanborn
stated that there is much debris on the current site
•
that needs to be removed. Ms. Sanborn opposed the idea
of removing homes and buildings in order to provide
adequate parking for the project and recommended
in -lieu parking fees. Ms. Sanborn stated that the
17
COMPAISSIONERSC November 8, 1984 MINUTES
•
•
of Newport Beach
Merchants Association has been meeting with the City to
discuss the parking plans in the Balboa area.
City Attorney Burnham responded to Ms. Sanborn by
stating that a provision can be included in the Use
Permit that the applicant could be required to post a
Completion Bond. Mr. Burnham further explained that
the City cannot require the applicant to proceed with
the Use Permit but the City can take necessary
procedures to assure the safety of the citizens. Mr.
Dayton commented that a Performance Bond would also be
required by the lending agency.
Mr. Burnham replied to Commissioner Kurlander's comment
regarding the site being a public nuisance that he
believes the City's Building Department has taken the
necessary steps to contact the property owner regarding
the hazards in the area. Mr.. Hewicker commented that
there are procedures in the Municipal Code that abate
nuisances.
Mr. Paul Balalis, 1129 E. Balboa Boulevard, spoke in
opposition to the applicant's proposed parking sites.
Mr. Balalis recommended that the applicant should
provide on -site parking, or formulate a cash agreement
with the City in order to provide a joint parking
facility. Mr. Balalis opined that if Exhibits "A" or
"C" would be approved, there would be insufficient
parking for the project.
Mrs. Virginia Herberts, 2290 Channel Road, Newport
Beach, stated that the project site needs to be cleaned
up immediately.
Mr. Marshall Riconosciuto, representing the applicant,
responded to Mrs. Herberts by commenting that every
effort is being made to maintain the project area and
that there has been a maintenance improvement in recent
months. Mr. Riconosciuto recommended that the Planning
Commission approve the project, that the parking
problems can be solved before a Building Permit is
issued, and that the applicant is willing to partici-
pate in the long -range parking issue with the City.
Commissioner Turner clarified Mr. Riconosciuto's
statements by stating that if . the Findings and
Conditions of Exhibit "C" are approved, that the
applicant's current parking proposals would be
substituted with City approved parking sites prior to
KE
INDEX
xx
c o �
m
Z c
m
y m z
W s
D
Z r i
C z
m
p S 0 0
0
a
O
m a
Z
Z
i m
s z _
•
•
of Newport Beach
Merchants Association has been meeting with the City to
discuss the parking plans in the Balboa area.
City Attorney Burnham responded to Ms. Sanborn by
stating that a provision can be included in the Use
Permit that the applicant could be required to post a
Completion Bond. Mr. Burnham further explained that
the City cannot require the applicant to proceed with
the Use Permit but the City can take necessary
procedures to assure the safety of the citizens. Mr.
Dayton commented that a Performance Bond would also be
required by the lending agency.
Mr. Burnham replied to Commissioner Kurlander's comment
regarding the site being a public nuisance that he
believes the City's Building Department has taken the
necessary steps to contact the property owner regarding
the hazards in the area. Mr.. Hewicker commented that
there are procedures in the Municipal Code that abate
nuisances.
Mr. Paul Balalis, 1129 E. Balboa Boulevard, spoke in
opposition to the applicant's proposed parking sites.
Mr. Balalis recommended that the applicant should
provide on -site parking, or formulate a cash agreement
with the City in order to provide a joint parking
facility. Mr. Balalis opined that if Exhibits "A" or
"C" would be approved, there would be insufficient
parking for the project.
Mrs. Virginia Herberts, 2290 Channel Road, Newport
Beach, stated that the project site needs to be cleaned
up immediately.
Mr. Marshall Riconosciuto, representing the applicant,
responded to Mrs. Herberts by commenting that every
effort is being made to maintain the project area and
that there has been a maintenance improvement in recent
months. Mr. Riconosciuto recommended that the Planning
Commission approve the project, that the parking
problems can be solved before a Building Permit is
issued, and that the applicant is willing to partici-
pate in the long -range parking issue with the City.
Commissioner Turner clarified Mr. Riconosciuto's
statements by stating that if . the Findings and
Conditions of Exhibit "C" are approved, that the
applicant's current parking proposals would be
substituted with City approved parking sites prior to
KE
INDEX
"MISSIONERS
ROLL
0
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
the time the Building Permit is issued to the
applicant.
The public hearing was closed at this time. Mr. Burnham
stated that Conditions No. 46 and 47 of Exhibits "A"
and "C" should be deleted. Mr. Burnham recommended a
new condition, stating that "prior to installing the
ferris wheel on any property subject to an easement or
right owned or held by the City, that the applicant
shall enter into an agreement with the City and
approved by the City Council, that fully protects the
City against any loss or damage from injuries that are
in any way related to the operation or use of the
ferris wheel." Mr. Burnham further explained that the
City Council has limited 'power to lease or convey
waterfront property.
Mr. Hewicker responded that it was his understanding at
the October 18, 1984, Planning Commission meeting that
the reconveyance and new easement would be given to the
City which would give the developer the right to have
the ferris wheel in that location. Commissioner Turner
commented that a quitclaim would be issued to the
developer and the developer would issue another ease-
ment in favor of the City. Mr. Burnham stated that
there may be a problem with the City quitclaiming
waterfront property and that is why he is proposing
this new condition.
MINUTES
Mr. Burnham confirmed Commissioner Goff's statement
that the project will not be able to proceed until
Condition No. 24 of Exhibit "A" or Exhibit "C" has been
satisfied with the Planning Commission and City
Council.
Mr. Hewicker responded to Commissioner Turner that
Staff had previously projected 65 employee parking
spaces in conjunction with the proposed development,
and that the 35 parking spaces had been based on an
added increment of employees.
Commissioner Eichenhofer commented that the developers,
with upfront money, and the City purchase property in
the area, so that all of the downtown Balboa area would
benefit, instead of the proposed small parking sites.
Commissioner Koppelman asked Staff if a provision could
be included in Exhibit "C "'s findings stating that the
existing parking spaces that are presently existing in
the Municipal Parking lots are regularly used to their
19
x x
c o
�
f
a
m
v
r v
Z c
m
s m
z
W a
a
z r
x
C Z
N
0
O S o
0
M m
o
m a m
m
Z a
Z
9 2 T
m
ROLL
0
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
the time the Building Permit is issued to the
applicant.
The public hearing was closed at this time. Mr. Burnham
stated that Conditions No. 46 and 47 of Exhibits "A"
and "C" should be deleted. Mr. Burnham recommended a
new condition, stating that "prior to installing the
ferris wheel on any property subject to an easement or
right owned or held by the City, that the applicant
shall enter into an agreement with the City and
approved by the City Council, that fully protects the
City against any loss or damage from injuries that are
in any way related to the operation or use of the
ferris wheel." Mr. Burnham further explained that the
City Council has limited 'power to lease or convey
waterfront property.
Mr. Hewicker responded that it was his understanding at
the October 18, 1984, Planning Commission meeting that
the reconveyance and new easement would be given to the
City which would give the developer the right to have
the ferris wheel in that location. Commissioner Turner
commented that a quitclaim would be issued to the
developer and the developer would issue another ease-
ment in favor of the City. Mr. Burnham stated that
there may be a problem with the City quitclaiming
waterfront property and that is why he is proposing
this new condition.
MINUTES
Mr. Burnham confirmed Commissioner Goff's statement
that the project will not be able to proceed until
Condition No. 24 of Exhibit "A" or Exhibit "C" has been
satisfied with the Planning Commission and City
Council.
Mr. Hewicker responded to Commissioner Turner that
Staff had previously projected 65 employee parking
spaces in conjunction with the proposed development,
and that the 35 parking spaces had been based on an
added increment of employees.
Commissioner Eichenhofer commented that the developers,
with upfront money, and the City purchase property in
the area, so that all of the downtown Balboa area would
benefit, instead of the proposed small parking sites.
Commissioner Koppelman asked Staff if a provision could
be included in Exhibit "C "'s findings stating that the
existing parking spaces that are presently existing in
the Municipal Parking lots are regularly used to their
19
ROLL
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
maximum capacities, and therefore, could not be used as
part of . the 23 parking spaces that are still
outstanding. Mr. Hewicker. confirmed that this could be
included as a finding.
Commissioner Goff agreed with Commissioner
Eichenhofer's statement regarding upfront money towards
a parking structure agreement with the City. Mr.
Burnham stated that because the City has not been
approached regarding this matter, it would be difficult
to decide on a monetary amount.
Mr. Burnham informed Commissioner Turner that if the
Planning Commission approves Exhibit "C",-that it would
not be in the form of a denial, but would inform the
applicant that the Planning Commission does not approve
the proposed parking sites and that the Planning
Commission would be recommending that the applicant
submit new parking proposals to the Planning Commission
at a later date. if the City would construct a parking
lot, then the applicant could possibly use that site
for their employee parking sites.
Commission Chairman Winburn stated that Exhibit "C ",
Condition No. 24, asks that the applicant find 23
additional parking spaces. Staff has required only
one -half of the necessary employee parking, none of
which is on -site, which has been the choice of the
applicant. Chairman Winburn opined that the parking
lots should be utilized for the employees, and that
valet parking would not be recommended. Chairman
Winburn commented that the applicant consider the new
parking areas that will be available in the business
area.
Mr. Hewicker responded to Commissioner Turner's state-
ment that there are no in -lieu parking spaces avail-
able. Commissioner Koppelman, referring to Exhibit "C ",
Condition No.. 24, inquired if the applicant would be
able to demolish buildings in order to produce addi-
tional parking sites and if there is any way that this
could be prevented. Mr. Hewicker indicated that by
approving Exhibit "C ", the Planning Commission has
automatically rejected two of the previously proposed
sites.
Commissioner Kurlander stated that he cannot approve
Exhibit "A" because of the fragmented parking lots, and
Exhibit "C" would only be placing the project on hold
until the developer submitted 23 additional parking
20
MINUTES
INDEX
F
O
'o
x
_
v
9 m
z c
C
m
m z
W x
m
2 r 6] x
c z
0
v 3 0 0
i z
m a
Z
9 2 i m
ROLL
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
maximum capacities, and therefore, could not be used as
part of . the 23 parking spaces that are still
outstanding. Mr. Hewicker. confirmed that this could be
included as a finding.
Commissioner Goff agreed with Commissioner
Eichenhofer's statement regarding upfront money towards
a parking structure agreement with the City. Mr.
Burnham stated that because the City has not been
approached regarding this matter, it would be difficult
to decide on a monetary amount.
Mr. Burnham informed Commissioner Turner that if the
Planning Commission approves Exhibit "C",-that it would
not be in the form of a denial, but would inform the
applicant that the Planning Commission does not approve
the proposed parking sites and that the Planning
Commission would be recommending that the applicant
submit new parking proposals to the Planning Commission
at a later date. if the City would construct a parking
lot, then the applicant could possibly use that site
for their employee parking sites.
Commission Chairman Winburn stated that Exhibit "C ",
Condition No. 24, asks that the applicant find 23
additional parking spaces. Staff has required only
one -half of the necessary employee parking, none of
which is on -site, which has been the choice of the
applicant. Chairman Winburn opined that the parking
lots should be utilized for the employees, and that
valet parking would not be recommended. Chairman
Winburn commented that the applicant consider the new
parking areas that will be available in the business
area.
Mr. Hewicker responded to Commissioner Turner's state-
ment that there are no in -lieu parking spaces avail-
able. Commissioner Koppelman, referring to Exhibit "C ",
Condition No.. 24, inquired if the applicant would be
able to demolish buildings in order to produce addi-
tional parking sites and if there is any way that this
could be prevented. Mr. Hewicker indicated that by
approving Exhibit "C ", the Planning Commission has
automatically rejected two of the previously proposed
sites.
Commissioner Kurlander stated that he cannot approve
Exhibit "A" because of the fragmented parking lots, and
Exhibit "C" would only be placing the project on hold
until the developer submitted 23 additional parking
20
MINUTES
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
November 6, 1964
F F
a O Q
t m
z c m> m v z
C
�_ 0 O r o o
i z m n= r
City
of
Newport
Beach
z m{
ROLL
Motion
Substitute
Motion
u
Ayes
Noes
Absent
Ayesx
Ayes
Noes
Absent
Motion
Ayes
Absent
•
x
x
x x
x
X
x x x
spaces to the City. Commissioner Kurlander made a
motion to deny the project.
Commissioner Goff made a substitute motion to approve
the project, subject to the findings and conditions of
Exhibit "C ", including an additional finding in
conjunction with inadequate available parking in the
Municipal parking lots; and the addition of Condition
No. 61, an amendment to the operational characteristics
of take -out restaurants; and Condition No. 62, relating
to the ferris wheel; and to delete Conditions No. 46
and 47.
Commissioner Turner stated he would support the substi-
tute motion in order to enable the applicant to return
with a parking solution satisfactory to the City.
Chairman Winburn stated she would support the substi-
tute motion stating that she does not support the
in -lieu fees that are currently being used since the
fees do not actually provide for the parking. She added
that the applicant should be able to provide parking or
that an agreement could be made with the applicant
requiring a specific dollar amount in the event a
permanent parking site could be built with the City.
Commissioner Eichenhofer stated she would support the
substitute motion, emphasizing that she approves the
project's trash compactor.
The Substitute Motion was voted on and MOTION CARRIED.
Chairman Winburn made a motion to approve Variance No.
1116, which MOTION CARRIED.
Chairman Winburn made a motion to approve Resubdivision
No. 724 (Revised), which MOTION CARRIED.
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
1. Approve the Negative Declaration and supportive
materials thereto; and
2. Make the Findings listed below:
FINDINGS
1. That the environmental document is complete and
has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , the
State EIR Guidelines and City Policy.
21
MINUTES
INDEX
•
•
COMMISSIONERS1 November 8, 1984 MINUTES
Beach
2. That the contents of the environmental document
have been considered in the various decision on
this project.
3. That in order to reduce adverse impacts of the
proposed project, all feasible mitigation measures
discussed in the environmental document have been
incorporated and are expressed as conditions.
4. That based upon the information contained in the
Initial Study, Negative Declaration and supportive
materials thereto, that if the mitigation measures
are incorporated into the project, it will not
have a significant adverse impact on the environ-
ment.
The Findings made with regard to the Environmental
Document described above apply to the action taken for
Use Permit No. 3095, variance No. 1116 and
Resubdivision No. 724 (Revised).
USE PERMIT NO. 3115
FINDINGS
1. That the proposed development is consistent with
the General Plan; the Land Use Plan of the Local
Coastal Program as conditionally certified by the
Coastal Commission and accepted by the City
Council; and is compatible with surrounding land
uses.
2. That the waiver of the take -out restaurant devel-
opment standards will be of no further detriment
to adjacent properties inasmuch as the proposed
take -out restaurants are part of a larger overall
development which in some ways is not conducive to
such standards, but is designed in a way that
meets the purpose and intent of such design
standards.
3. That the three proposed metal arched roof signs
with Tivoli lighting comply with all applicable
provisions of the Sign Ordinance and that their
size, number and location have been considered in
the overall design and character of the subject
project.
4. That the roof -top architectural features in excess
of the permitted height limit are ornamental
Z'
INDEX
z
C
c O
O
-
v
e y
m
z c
C
m
m
z
W M
C z
W
N
Z r O
v 3 0
m
2
0
`�Iv of
Z W
Z
D T
9 2
m
Y
Beach
2. That the contents of the environmental document
have been considered in the various decision on
this project.
3. That in order to reduce adverse impacts of the
proposed project, all feasible mitigation measures
discussed in the environmental document have been
incorporated and are expressed as conditions.
4. That based upon the information contained in the
Initial Study, Negative Declaration and supportive
materials thereto, that if the mitigation measures
are incorporated into the project, it will not
have a significant adverse impact on the environ-
ment.
The Findings made with regard to the Environmental
Document described above apply to the action taken for
Use Permit No. 3095, variance No. 1116 and
Resubdivision No. 724 (Revised).
USE PERMIT NO. 3115
FINDINGS
1. That the proposed development is consistent with
the General Plan; the Land Use Plan of the Local
Coastal Program as conditionally certified by the
Coastal Commission and accepted by the City
Council; and is compatible with surrounding land
uses.
2. That the waiver of the take -out restaurant devel-
opment standards will be of no further detriment
to adjacent properties inasmuch as the proposed
take -out restaurants are part of a larger overall
development which in some ways is not conducive to
such standards, but is designed in a way that
meets the purpose and intent of such design
standards.
3. That the three proposed metal arched roof signs
with Tivoli lighting comply with all applicable
provisions of the Sign Ordinance and that their
size, number and location have been considered in
the overall design and character of the subject
project.
4. That the roof -top architectural features in excess
of the permitted height limit are ornamental
Z'
INDEX
ROLL CALI
•
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
features which will add to the character of the
building, and will not block any views.
5. That the establishment, maintenance or operation
of the use of the property or building will not,
under the circumstances of the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort
and general welfare of persons residing or working
in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improve-
ments in the neighborhood of the general welfare
of the City, and further that the proposed modi-
fications to allow tandem and valet parking spaces
on Off -site Parking Lot No. 1 is consistent with
the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Munici-
pal Code.
6. That Off -site Parking Lot No. 1, is located so as
to be useful to the employees of the Fun Zone
project.
7. That parking on the subject off -site lot will not
create undue traffic hazards in the surrounding
area.
8. That the applicant has entered into an appropriate
lease for the off -site parking lot which is of
sufficient duration for the proposed development.
9. That the parking area at Off -Site Parking Lot No.
4 is too small to provide additional parking
spaces for the Fun Zone project and still maintain
adequate off - street parking for the existing
residential units. Furthermore, the proposed use
of tandem and compact spaces for the commercial
use is unworkable in this particular case. The
encroachment of the residential parking spaces
into the required 10 foot rear yard setback will
also obstruct vehicular maneuverability in the
adjoining 10 foot wide alley.
10. That the development of many small off -site
parking lots in the Central Balboa area is incon-
sistent with the overall design and character of
the area.
11. That the approval of in -lieu parking spaces in
conjunction with this project is not justified,
inasmuch as the existing Municipal parking lots in
23
MINUTES
INDEX
X x
C o
x
_
9 m
z C
C
m
o m z
W M
a
z r 0 Z
C z
0
a r O O
W m
O
m a+ m
Z 9
Z
y Z T m
ROLL CALI
•
•
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
features which will add to the character of the
building, and will not block any views.
5. That the establishment, maintenance or operation
of the use of the property or building will not,
under the circumstances of the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort
and general welfare of persons residing or working
in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improve-
ments in the neighborhood of the general welfare
of the City, and further that the proposed modi-
fications to allow tandem and valet parking spaces
on Off -site Parking Lot No. 1 is consistent with
the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Munici-
pal Code.
6. That Off -site Parking Lot No. 1, is located so as
to be useful to the employees of the Fun Zone
project.
7. That parking on the subject off -site lot will not
create undue traffic hazards in the surrounding
area.
8. That the applicant has entered into an appropriate
lease for the off -site parking lot which is of
sufficient duration for the proposed development.
9. That the parking area at Off -Site Parking Lot No.
4 is too small to provide additional parking
spaces for the Fun Zone project and still maintain
adequate off - street parking for the existing
residential units. Furthermore, the proposed use
of tandem and compact spaces for the commercial
use is unworkable in this particular case. The
encroachment of the residential parking spaces
into the required 10 foot rear yard setback will
also obstruct vehicular maneuverability in the
adjoining 10 foot wide alley.
10. That the development of many small off -site
parking lots in the Central Balboa area is incon-
sistent with the overall design and character of
the area.
11. That the approval of in -lieu parking spaces in
conjunction with this project is not justified,
inasmuch as the existing Municipal parking lots in
23
MINUTES
INDEX
COWAISSIONERS
A x
a o m
ti
r
z c
m s m z
a
A z r o
C Z 2
N 0 3 0 o 0
_
M Z
m a
Z A Z T m
ROLL CALL
•
is
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
Central Balboa are regularly used to their maximum
capacities throughout the year.
CONDITIONS
1. That development shall be in substantial confor-
mance with the approved plot plan, floor plan, and
elevations except as noted below.
2. That all applicable conditions of Resubdivision
No. 724 (Revised) shall be fulfilled.
3. That prior to the issuance of building permits,
the Fire Department shall review. the proposed
plans and may require automatic fire sprinkler
protection.
4. The Fire Department access to the site and build-
ings shall be approved by the Fire Department.
5. That all on -site fire protection (hydrants and
Fire Department connections) shall be approved by
the Fire and Public Works Departments.
6. A landscape and irrigation plan for the project
shall be prepared by a licensed landscape archi-
tect. (Prior to the occupancy of any structure,
the licensed landscape architect shall certify to
the Planning Department that the landscaping has
been installed in accordance with the prepared
plan) .
7. The landscape plan shall be subject to the review
of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department,
the Public Works Department and approval of the
Planning Department.
8. The landscape plan shall include a maintenance
program which controls the use of fertilizers and
pesticides.
9. The landscape plan shall place heavy emphasis on
the use of drought- resistant native vegetation and
be irrigated via a system designed to avoid
surface runoff and over - watering.
10. Street trees shall be provided along the public
streets as required by the Public Works Department
and the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department.
24
MINUTES
INDEX
COMMISSIONERSC I November 8, 1984 MINUTES
of Newport Beach
INDEX
x x
c o
�
E
a v
m
y
9
r v
Z c
m
s m
z
9
a
Z r
O x
C
m
larly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition.
T O
M
O
m a
2 a
2
S Z
T m
of Newport Beach
INDEX
11. Landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of
weeds and debris. All vegetation shall be regu-
larly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition.
12. That landscape plan shall be designed so as to be
visually cohesive with the character of the
Central Balboa area. Palm Street shall be planted
with palm trees. East Bay Avenue, Washington
Street, and Edgewater Place shall be landscaped
with trees in such a manner as to achieve a canopy
effect similar to Main Street in the Central
Balboa area.
13. Street signs, tables, benches, planters, and other
similar features onsite or adjacent to the project
site shall be designed with a common theme and
shall be approved by the Public Works; Parks,
Beaches and Recreation; and Planning Departments.
14. The structures shall retain a single design theme
.
(both interior and exterior). Signage shall be of
a similar design throughout the buildings, and
shall be approved by the Planning Director. There
shall be overall utilization of wooden lap siding
on the exterior facade, complementing the Balboa
Pavilion and the Laguna Federal Savings and Loan
buildings.
15. All mechanical equipment, vents, and other service
equipment shall be shielded or screened by archi-
tectural design.
16. That any mechanical equipment or outdoor music
shall not exceed a sound level greater than 55 Dba
at the bulkhead line and the easterly, southerly
and westerly property lines. Sound attenuation
shall be based upon .the recommendations of a
qualified acoustical engineer, and be approved by
the Planning Department.
17. Final design of the project shall provide for the
incorporation of water - saving devices for project
lavatories and other water -using facilities.
18. Any construction on the site shall be done in
•
accordance with the height restriction. This
shall apply to any landscape materials, signs,
flags, etc., as well as structures, except as may
be modified by the approval of this use permit.
25
COMMISSIONERS
November
8, 1984
x
19. With the exception of the approved security
c o
o �
y x m
.
lighting, nighttime lighting shall be limited to
r v
z c m s m z
z N O$ o 0
i? 9 . T
City
of
Newport
Beach
z a m
ROLL
MINUTES
II "11
19. With the exception of the approved security
lighting, nighttime lighting shall be limited to
that which is customary for normal business
operations and consistent with the proposed
project design and architectural style. Outlining
of the proposed structure, including the ferris
wheel, shall be permitted in a manner consistent
with that of the Pavilion. The outlining, if
accomplished, shall use smaller and dimmer bulbs
than the Pavilion. Said lighting plans shall be
approved by the Planning Director.
20. Fugitive dust emissions during demolition and
construction shall be minimized by watering the
site for dust control; containing excavated soil
onsite until it is hauled away, and periodically
washing adjacent streets to remove accumulated
materials.
21. The following disclosure statement of the City of
•.
Newport Beach's policy regarding the John Wayne
Airport should be included in all leases or
sub- leases for space in the project and should be
included in any Covenants Conditions, and Re-
strictions which may be recorded against any
undeveloped site.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The lessee, his heirs, successors and assigns,
herein, acknowledge that:
a) The John Wayne Airport may not be able to
provide adequate air service for business
establishments which rely on such service;
b) When an alternate air facility is available,
a complete phase out of jet service may occur
at the John Wayne Airport;
c) The City of Newport Beach will continue to
oppose additional commercial area service
expansions at the John Wayne Airport;
d) Lessee, his heirs, successors and assigns,
•
will not actively oppose any action taken by
the City of Newport Beach to phase out or
limit jet air service at the John Wayne Air-
port.
26
MINUTES
II "11
COMMISSIONERS I November 8, 1984 MINUTES
of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL { I I I I I I I I INDEX M
•
•
22. That the applicant shall be required to obtain the
services of a licensed inspection agency, suitable
to the Building Department, to check the engineer-
ing and inspect the installation of the proposed
ferris wheel and carousel, and that said agency
shall certify in writing to the Building Depart-
ment, the adequacy of said engineering and instal-
lation prior to the operation of the equipment.
23. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the
applicant shall deposit $15,000 with the City for
non - standard off -site improvements at the end of
Washington Street, adjacent to the subject proj-
ect. The applicant shall also submit plans for
said improvements which shall be subject to the
approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation,
Public Works, and Planning Departments. The
applicant shall also agree to participate in the
implementation of a tram shuttle system, should it
occur, on a pro rata basis, based on square
footage equal to other merchants in the area.
24. That prior to the issuance of an Approval in
Concept, for this project, the applicant shall
enter into an Off -site Parking Agreement with the
City of Newport Beach providing 12 parking spaces
at 209 Washington Street (Lot 7, Block 7, Balboa
Tract). In addition, the applicant shall enter
into a second agreement, acceptable to the Plan-
ning Commission and the City Council, which
specifies the manner in which the remaining
parking requirement of 23 spaces will be sat-
isfied. In the event this second agreement
requires participation by the City in providing
said spaces, the agreement shall specify the
amount to be paid to the City for each space, the
manner in which the City will provide said spaces,
and the terms and conditions under which funds
would be returned to the applicant if said spaces
are not provided within a specified time limit.
25. That the employees shall be required to park
within the off -site parking areas provided.
26. That provision shall be made for bicycle parking
on the site for a minimum of 25 bicycles.
27
a F
c o
�
_
v
e y
m
z c
a
m
m
z
W M
S
z r
0 2
z
N
0 3
0 0
z
m a
Z
z
9 2
r m
of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL { I I I I I I I I INDEX M
•
•
22. That the applicant shall be required to obtain the
services of a licensed inspection agency, suitable
to the Building Department, to check the engineer-
ing and inspect the installation of the proposed
ferris wheel and carousel, and that said agency
shall certify in writing to the Building Depart-
ment, the adequacy of said engineering and instal-
lation prior to the operation of the equipment.
23. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the
applicant shall deposit $15,000 with the City for
non - standard off -site improvements at the end of
Washington Street, adjacent to the subject proj-
ect. The applicant shall also submit plans for
said improvements which shall be subject to the
approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation,
Public Works, and Planning Departments. The
applicant shall also agree to participate in the
implementation of a tram shuttle system, should it
occur, on a pro rata basis, based on square
footage equal to other merchants in the area.
24. That prior to the issuance of an Approval in
Concept, for this project, the applicant shall
enter into an Off -site Parking Agreement with the
City of Newport Beach providing 12 parking spaces
at 209 Washington Street (Lot 7, Block 7, Balboa
Tract). In addition, the applicant shall enter
into a second agreement, acceptable to the Plan-
ning Commission and the City Council, which
specifies the manner in which the remaining
parking requirement of 23 spaces will be sat-
isfied. In the event this second agreement
requires participation by the City in providing
said spaces, the agreement shall specify the
amount to be paid to the City for each space, the
manner in which the City will provide said spaces,
and the terms and conditions under which funds
would be returned to the applicant if said spaces
are not provided within a specified time limit.
25. That the employees shall be required to park
within the off -site parking areas provided.
26. That provision shall be made for bicycle parking
on the site for a minimum of 25 bicycles.
27
COAVAISSIONERS
November 8, 1984
s
27. That no alcoholic beverages shall be sold or
0
c o �
£ y v m
consumed on the premises unless a use permit is
v
z c m s m z
c z H O S O O
9 = T
City
of
Newport
Beach
a m
MINUTES
INDEX
27. That no alcoholic beverages shall be sold or
consumed on the premises unless a use permit is
approved by the Planning Commission in each case.
28. That any tables in the pedestrian easement area be
for general public use and that no food be served
to customers at the tables by adjoining restau-
rants.
29. That outdoor flower sales shall be permitted
on -site, but shall not be permitted in the public
walkway.
30. That grease interceptors shall be installed on all
fixtures where grease may. be introduced into the
drainage systems in accordance with the provisions
of the Uniform Plumbing Code if required by the
Building Department.
31. That the hours of operation of the Fun Zone
•
property shall be limited from 5:00 a.m. to 12:00
midnight, Sunday through Thursday, and 5:00 a.m.
to 2:00 a.m., Friday and Saturday and recognized
holidays.
32. That an entirely enclosed trash storage room shall
be provided for the proposed project. Said room
shall be secured at all times and shall be acces-
sible to the project tenants and management only.
33. That a centralized trash compaction system shall
be provided for the proposed project and shall be
used for the compaction and handling of all trash
generated from the project.
34. That a commercial trash pick -up shall be provided
three times a week during the winter months and
six times a week during the summer months.
35. That a cleanup program for public walkways and
on -site pedestrian circulation areas shall be
conducted on a daily basis. Said cleanup program
shall include steam cleaning all public and
private pedestrian walkways adjacent to and within
the subject property and that said cleaning shall
•
be provided twice a month during the summer season
during the remainder of the year.
and once a month
28
MINUTES
INDEX
ROLL
November 8, 1984
Beach
x x
c o
�
f
a v
m
y
9
a washout area with drain that shall be connected
z c
m
o m
z
m a
C z
a m
a
m
0
z r o
v i o
,
x
o
T
`�'y
2 9
2
m a
a 2 'n
T
VI
ROLL
November 8, 1984
Beach
MINUTES
INDEX
36. That the trash storage room shall be equipped with
a washout area with drain that shall be connected
to the sanitary sewer system.
37. That the applicant shall provide a $5,000 cash
deposit to the City of Newport Beach which shall
be deposited in an interest bearing account to the
benefit of the applicant for the purpose of
insuring the required steam cleaning of public
sidewalks and private.onsite pedestrian walkways
adjacent to and within the subject project.
38. That the applicant shall provide a minimum 6 ft.
high wrought iron fence and /or gate at each
entrance or other point of access to the property
from the adjacent public sidewalk and surrounding
the proposed ferris wheel.
39. That applicant shall provide security lighting for
the subject project which shall be subject to the
•
Police Department and Planning Department approval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
40. That the security lighting shall be designed and
maintained in such a manner as to conceal the
light source and to minimize light spillage and
glare to the adjacent area. The plans shall be
prepared and signed by a Licensed Electrical
Engineer; with a letter from the Engineer stating
that, in his opinion, this requirement has been
met.
41. Public bathrooms shall be provided for the subject
project and shall be available for use by the
existing marina, bayward of the site. Said
bathrooms shall be fully secured after closing
hours with the exception that said facilities
shall be available to the marina at all times.
42. The applicant shall provide a site security plan
for the proposed project which shall be subject to
the approval of the Police Department. Said plan
shall fully describe proposed security measures
for the project site (i.e., lighting, fencing
patrols, key card access system).
.
43. All onsite drainage shall be approved by the
Building Department.
29
MINUTES
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS1 November 8, 1984 MINUTES
ROLL
of Newport Beach
x x
c o
�
44. The applicant shall show evidence of having
x
v
y
m
2 C c
m
m
2
W a
D
z r
0 x
C z
H
o>
a
O O
M M
m a
T
Z a
Z
z
M z
M
r m
ROLL
of Newport Beach
44. The applicant shall show evidence of having
received a completion bond from the project
general contractor guaranteeing the completion of
the proposed project. The form and content of
said bond shall be satisfactory to the City
Building Department and City Attorney's Office.
45. That all signs shall conform to the provisions of
Chapter 20.06 of the Municipal Code. .
46. Deleted
47. Deleted
48. The relocation of public utilities shall be
coordinated with and approved by local utility
companies and public agencies as appropriate.
49. A system of barriers and overhead protection shall
be required during demolition processes in order
•
to prevent debris from falling into adjacent
streets and Newport Bay.
50. During any closure of adjoining streets or walk-
ways which may be required during the proposed
construction phases, alternative pedestrian
circulation shall be provided to the satisfaction
of the City of Newport Beach Planning and Public
Works Departments.
51. The building contractor shall examine existing
streets to ensure that trucks assigned to. the
project can negotiate required turns and demon-
strate such to the satisfaction of the Public
Works and Building Departments.
52. Construction workers shall utilize public parking
lots at Palm Street and Main Street.
53. Prior to occupancy of the buildings, the applicant
shall provide written verification from Orange
County Sanitation District No. 5 that adequate
sewer capacity is available to serve the project.
54. That any fortune telling (i.e. palm reading) use
•
on the property shall be subject to any new
regulations that the City adopts prior to the time
the project is developed.
30
COWAISSIONERS
C 0
55. This use permit shall expire unless exercised
a
=
a
z c m
r a
m
m
z
W 0
z L r
O 2
M= z H
O i
COMMISSIONERS
November
8, 1984
xx
62. Prior to installing the ferris wheel on any
c o �
property subject to an easement or right owned or
zc m j
ROLL
MMISSIONERS November 8, 1984
X
c o 0
x
v r v m
A T City of Newport Beach
c z 0 o 3 0 0
W
5. That the granting of a variance to allow a waiver
of a portion of the required off - street parking
spaces, will not under the circumstances of the
particular case, be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of
such proposed use or detrimental or injurious to
property and improvements in the neighborhood or
the general welfare of the city inasmuch as: the
applicant is required to provide 35 off -site
parking spaces for the estimated net increase in
project employees; that the proposed land -uses
contained within the project are not destination
uses which will increase the need. for customer
parking in the area;. and that the proposed project
will not significantly increase the parking demand
of the area.
6. That the granting of a waiver of a portion of the
required parking is justified in that such a
waiver will allow for a lower intensity develop-
ment which will maintain more of the historical
character of the Fun Zone.
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be in substantial confor-
mance with the approved plot plan, floor plan,
elevations.
2. That the ferris wheel shall be the only portion of
the project that shall be allowed by a variance to
exceed the height limit.
3. That all the conditions of approval for
Resubdivision No. 724 (Revised) and Use Permit No.
3115 shall be fulfilled.
RESUBDIVISION NO. 724 (REVISED)
FINDINGS
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances
of the City, all applicable general or specific
plans, and the Planning Commission is satisfied
with the plan of subdivision.
33
MINUTES
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
November
8, 1984
o
EC
m � m Z
C= H o 3 0 O
I z a m= m m
City
of
Newport
Beach
z
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
3. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed
improvements will not conflict with any easements
acquired by the public at large for access through
or use of property within the proposed subdivi-
sion.
CONDITIONS
1. That all conditions of the Use Permit No. 3115 and
variance No. 1116 shall be fulfilled.
2. That the Conditions of Approval for Resubdivision
No. 724 as approved by the Planning Commission on
June 10, 1982, shall be null and void.
3. That a parcel map be recorded.
• 4. That all improvements be constructed as required
by ordinance and the Public Works Department.
5. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompa-
nying surety be provided in order to guarantee
satisfactory completion of the public improvements
if it is desired to record a parcel map or obtain
a building permit prior to completion of the
public improvements.
6. That the on -site pedestrian circulation systems be
subject to review by the Traffic Engineer.
7. That landscape plans shall be subject to review
and approval of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Department and Public Works Department.
S. That a condition survey of the existing bulkhead
along the bay side of the property be made by a
civil or structural engineer, and that the
bulkhead be repaired in conformance with the rec-
ommendations of the conditions survey and to the
satisfaction of the Building Department and Marine
Department. The top of the bulkhead is to be
raised to a minimum of elevation 9.00 above
• M.L.L.W. (6.26 MSL).
9. That curb access ramps be constructed at the
corner of East Bay Avenue and Washington Street
34
MINUTES
ROLL
•
•
November 8, 1984 MINUTES
of Newport Beach
and at the corner of East Bay Avenue and Palm
Street which may require the relocation of an
existing palm tree at the corner of East Bay
Avenue and Palm Street.
10. That the existing deteriorated concrete sidewalk
and curb along the Palm Street, East Bay Avenue
and Washington Street frontages be constructed
with curb, gutter and sidewalk and that any unused
driveway aprons be removed and replaced with curb,
gutter and sidewalk. An 11' wide sidewalk width
along Palm Street shall be maintained, and an
easement for pedestrian purposes shall be granted
to the City. An 8' wide sidewalk .shall be con-
structed on East Bay Avenue and additional right
of way as required shall be dedicated to the City
for pedestrian purposes.
11. That a storm drain inlet at the Washington Street
and Palm Street street ends be constructed and
that a valve be installed in the storm drain lines
unless otherwise approved by the Public works
Department.
12. That the existing overhead utilities along the
Washington Street and Palm Street frontages shall
be undergrounded.
13. That the existing deteriorated street lights
around the perimeter of the site be replaced with
new street lights as approved by the Public Works
Department and Utilities Department, unless other-
wise approved high - pressure sodium -vapor
luminaries with a multiple wiring system shall be
provided.
14. That a corner cutoff, acceptable to the Public
Works Department, at the corner of Washington
Street and East Bay Avenue and at the corner of
Palm Street and East Bay Avenue be dedicated to
the public for pedestrian purposes.
15. That street, drainage and utility improvements be
shown on standard improvement plans prepared by a
licensed civil engineer.
16. That the applicant shall contribute twenty -five
(25) percent of the cost of signaliaation of the
intersection of East Balboa Boulevard and Palm
35
INDEX
s s
c O
O
£
y 9
m
y
9
r v
z c
m
m
z
a
z r
Z
c a
C z
v S
0
O
O
0
O
m
Z S
z
z
a a
r
m
November 8, 1984 MINUTES
of Newport Beach
and at the corner of East Bay Avenue and Palm
Street which may require the relocation of an
existing palm tree at the corner of East Bay
Avenue and Palm Street.
10. That the existing deteriorated concrete sidewalk
and curb along the Palm Street, East Bay Avenue
and Washington Street frontages be constructed
with curb, gutter and sidewalk and that any unused
driveway aprons be removed and replaced with curb,
gutter and sidewalk. An 11' wide sidewalk width
along Palm Street shall be maintained, and an
easement for pedestrian purposes shall be granted
to the City. An 8' wide sidewalk .shall be con-
structed on East Bay Avenue and additional right
of way as required shall be dedicated to the City
for pedestrian purposes.
11. That a storm drain inlet at the Washington Street
and Palm Street street ends be constructed and
that a valve be installed in the storm drain lines
unless otherwise approved by the Public works
Department.
12. That the existing overhead utilities along the
Washington Street and Palm Street frontages shall
be undergrounded.
13. That the existing deteriorated street lights
around the perimeter of the site be replaced with
new street lights as approved by the Public Works
Department and Utilities Department, unless other-
wise approved high - pressure sodium -vapor
luminaries with a multiple wiring system shall be
provided.
14. That a corner cutoff, acceptable to the Public
Works Department, at the corner of Washington
Street and East Bay Avenue and at the corner of
Palm Street and East Bay Avenue be dedicated to
the public for pedestrian purposes.
15. That street, drainage and utility improvements be
shown on standard improvement plans prepared by a
licensed civil engineer.
16. That the applicant shall contribute twenty -five
(25) percent of the cost of signaliaation of the
intersection of East Balboa Boulevard and Palm
35
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS) November 8, 1984 MINUTES
of Newport Beach
X
C o
street which shall be required prior to the
x
_
v
v
m
C
z c
m
m
z
W a
9=
r
0 x
C a
m
a r
0 0
M m
o
M>
M M
Z s
z
M z
r m
of Newport Beach
street which shall be required prior to the
issuance of building permits.
17. That all activities that require full or partial
street closures, parking prohibition, heavy truck
traffic, large or heavy loads or similar activ-
ities shall be approved by the Police Department
and City Traffic Engineer; that trucks shall
utilize Washington Street and Palm Street for
ingress and egress; and that closure of Palm
Street shall be prohibited at any time.
18. That a 23- foot -wide surface easement be granted to
the City for pedestrian use adjacent and southerly
of the existing 12- foot -wide pedestrian easement
located along the bay side of the property.
19. That a minimum 15 -foot clear pedestrian easement
area be maintained within the easement area that
will exist from the proposed building line to the
bulkhead line. The exact location and design of
.
said area shall be subject to the approval of the
Planning Department, Public Works Department, and
Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department.
20. That the owner shall grant public access rights to
the City to enter into an agreement with the City
to keep the area from the bulkhead to the proposed
structure free from hindrances to public access
and to repair and keep the area in a good and safe
condition at their sole cost and expense.
21. That all landscaping and non - standard paving
surfaces within the public right -of -way and
pedestrian easement be approved by the Public
Works Department and that a license agreement be
provided for maintenance of the non - standard
improvements.
22. That during the construction period, a minimum
12- foot -wide surface pedestrian way be maintained
along the bay on weekends and holidays between
April 1 and June 15 and September 15 and Octo-
ber 15; and that the 12 -foot pedestrian way be
maintained at all times between June 15 and
•
September 15.
23. That the proposed bridge for the existing pier
located westerly of Washington Street be
36
COMMISSIONERS
November
8, 1984
MINUTES
C x
C o �
x
v A v m
z c m> m z
c z w v S O O
9 T m
City of
Newport
Beach
z M a
n
ROLL CALL
INDEX
0
redesigned so that it is parallel and adjacent to
the existing bulkhead.
24. That the proposed canopies be permitted within the
public right -of -way provided they are a minimum of
9 feet above sidewalk grade.
25. That special paving treatment common to the.
project shall be provided for the public sidewalk
areas on Palm Street, East Bay Avenue, and
Washington Street in a manner acceptable to the
Public Works and Planning Departments.
x �
The Planning Commission recessed at 9:00 p.m. and
reconvened at 9:10 p.m.
Resubdivision No. 787 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to resubdivide an existing parcel of land into
two parcels for development on property located in Area
2 of the North Ford Planned Community.
LOCATION: Parcel No. 1 of Parcel Map No. 41 -26,
located at 1101 and 1133 Camelback
Street, on the westerly side of
Camelback Street, between Bison Avenue
and MacArthur Boulevard, in the North
Ford Planned Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Rodgoway /Borkovetz Associates, Los
Angeles
OWNER: United States Postal Service, Los
Angeles
ENGINEER: Same as applicant
Staff advised that the applicants have requested that
this item be continued to the Planning Commission
Meeting of December 6, 1984.
37
Item. No. 3
Resubdivi-
sion
No. 787
Continued
to
12 -6 -84
COMMISSIONERS
x F
C 0 n
f
_
ti
T r v m
2 c
m ) m 2
m a
a r o x
I Z
a O 0 0
M
0 T
0 m a T
>
Z 9
z
2 a a r m
ROLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
•
•
November 8, 1984
itv of Newport Beach
Motion was made to continue this item to the Planning
Commission Meeting of December 6, 1984, which MOTION
CARRIED.
x x x
A. Use Permit No. 3112 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to permit the construction of 2, two -unit
residential condominium projects and related garages on
properties located in the R -2 District.
AND
B. variance. No. 1117 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request for a variance to the Zoning Code so as to
allow 2, two -unit residential. condominium developments
to each exceed 1.5 times the buildable area of the
sites in the R -2 District.
AND
C. Resubdivision No. 789 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to resubdivide two existing lots into two lots
for residential condominium purposes.
LOCATION: Lots 13 and 15, Block 636, Corona del
Mar Tract, located at 613 and 615
Jasmine Avenue, on the northwesterly
side of Jasmine Avenue, between Third
Avenue and Fourth Avenue, in Corona del
Mar.
ZONE: R -2
APPLICANT: Bert W. Tarayao, Corona del Mar
OWNER: Same as applicant
ENGINEER/
ARCHITECT: Same as applicant
Planning Director Hewicker advised the Planning
Commission that the project has been redesigned and,
therefore, does not need a variance.
38
MINUTES
INDEX
Item No.4
Use Permit
No. 3112
Variance
No. 1117
Resubdivi-
sion
No. 789
Approved
Condition-
ally
M /V\hNUNEK5
November
8, 1984
ax
C o
The public hearing opened in conjunction with this item
x
v
_ C v m
2 G m y m =
and Mr. Bert Tarayao, applicant, appeared before the
C Z 0 Q; 0 0
M z z a z T m
City
of
Newport
Beach
Planning Commission. Mr. Tarayao stated that he
ROLL
MINUTES
The public hearing opened in conjunction with this item
and Mr. Bert Tarayao, applicant, appeared before the
Planning Commission. Mr. Tarayao stated that he
concurs with the findings and conditions of approval in
Exhibit "A ". Mr. Tarayao commented that he is
considering a solar water system for the project and
requested Mr. Webb's opinion regarding the water
service for each individual unit. Mr. Webb stated that
the City requires each condominium to. be metered
separately for water service. However, he advised Mr.
Tarayao to contact the Public Works. Department for
further details.
The public hearing was closed at this time.
Motion
Commissioner Kurlander made a motion to approve Use
All Ayes
Permit No. 3112 subject to the findings and conditions
of Exhibit "A ". MOTION CARRIED.
X
Commissioner Kurlander made a motion to approve
.Motion
Resubdivision No. 789 subject to the findings and
Ayes
conditions of Exhibit "A ". MOTION CARRIED.
Use Permit No. 3112
FINDINGS:
1. That each of the proposed units has been designed
as a condominium with separate and individual
utility connections.
2. The project will comply with all applicable
standard plans and zoning requirements for new
buildings applicable to the district in which the
proposed project is located at the time of ap-
proval.
3. The project lot size conforms to the Zoning Code
area requirements in effect at the time of ap-
proval.
4. The project is consistent with the adopted goals
and policies of the General Plan.
5. That adequate on -site parking spaces are available
for the proposed residential condominium projects.
•
6. The approval of Use Permit No. 3112 will not,
under the circumstances of this case, be
39'
MINUTES
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
MINUTES
ROLL CALL 1 INDEX
•
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing
and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental
or injurious to property and improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be in substantial confor-
mance with the approved plot plan, floor plans,
section and elevations, except as noted below.
2. That all conditions of approval of Resubdivision
No. 789 be fulfilled.
3. That one garage space and a minimum of one carport
space shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
4. That the gross floor areas of each of the proposed
structures shall not exceed 3,348 sq.£t. (1.5
times the buildable areas of the two lots).
5. This use permit shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
Resubdivision No. 789
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances
of the City, all applicable general or specific
plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied
with the plan of subdivision.
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
3. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed
improvements will not conflict with any easements,
acquired by the public at large, for access
through or use of, property within the proposed
subdivision.
40
x
a
c o
�
x
z c
m
o m
z
W a
S
=
2
=
O z S
0 o 0
0
m D
2 9
9 2
r m
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
MINUTES
ROLL CALL 1 INDEX
•
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing
and working in the neighborhood or be detrimental
or injurious to property and improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be in substantial confor-
mance with the approved plot plan, floor plans,
section and elevations, except as noted below.
2. That all conditions of approval of Resubdivision
No. 789 be fulfilled.
3. That one garage space and a minimum of one carport
space shall be provided for each dwelling unit.
4. That the gross floor areas of each of the proposed
structures shall not exceed 3,348 sq.£t. (1.5
times the buildable areas of the two lots).
5. This use permit shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
Resubdivision No. 789
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances
of the City, all applicable general or specific
plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied
with the plan of subdivision.
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
3. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed
improvements will not conflict with any easements,
acquired by the public at large, for access
through or use of, property within the proposed
subdivision.
40
COMMISSIONERS
November 8, 1984 MINUTES
xx
co
F y r L m
c m 1 m z
�m N or
a z A a r m
City f Newport Beach
Y p
ROLL CALL
INDEX
CONDITIONS:
1. That a parcel map be recorded.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required
by ordinance and the Public Works Department.
3. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompa-
nying surety be provided in order to guarantee
satisfactory completion of the public improvements
if it is desired to record a parcel map or obtain
a building permit prior to completion of the
public improvements.
4. That each dwelling unit be served with an indi-
vidual water service and sewer lateral connection
to the public water and sewer systems unless
otherwise approved by the Public Works Department.
5. That all vehicular access to the two properties
•
shall be from the adjacent alley.
6. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map
has not been recorded within 3 years of the date
of approval, unless an extension is granted by the
Planning Commission.
A. Use Permit No. 1897 (Amended) (Continued Public
Item No.5
Hearing)
Use Permit
Request to amend a condition of the previously approved
No. 1897
Use Permit No. 1897 which allowed the establishment of
a combined commercial /residential structure in the C -1
District. The proposed amendment is to allow 800±
sq.ft. of commercial floor area for a take -out ice
cream shop, whereas the existing use permit limits the
commercial floor area on the subject property to 500
sq.ft.
AND
B. Use Permit No. 3116 (Continued Public Hearing)
Use Permit
No. 3116
Request to establish a take -out ice cream shop with two
•
take -out service windows adjacent to the public
sidewalk on property located in the C -1 District, and
Approved
to waive a portion of the required off - street parking
Condition -
ally
spaces.
41
COMPAISSIONERS1 November 8, 1984 MINUTES
ROLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
•
n
U
x
t Beach
LOCATION: Lot 13, Block 21 of Newport Beach Tract,
located at 114 22nd Street, on the
easterly side of 22nd Street between
West Balboa Boulevard and West Ocean
Front in the McFadden Square area.
APPLICANT: Charles H. Cathcart, Huntington Beach
OWNER: Vic Sherreitt, Balboa Island
The public hearing opened in conjunction with this item
and Mr. Charles H. Cathcart, 9392 Breakwater,
Huntington Beach, applicant, stated that he agrees with
the findings and conditions of Exhibit "A ".
Commissioner Turner made a motion to approve Use Permit
No. 1897 (Amended) and Use Permit No. 3116 subject to
the findings and conditions of Exhibit "A ". MOTION
CARRIED.
Use Permit No. 1897 (Amended)
FINDINGS:
1. That the expanded storage area to be used in
conjunction with a take -out ice cream shop will
not significantly increase the parking demand for
the subject property.
2. The approval of Use Permit No. 1897 (Amended) will
not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort,
morals and general welfare of persons residing and
working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or
injurious to property and improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That all previous applicable conditions of Use
Permit No. 1897 shall be fulfilled except as
provided in the following Condition No. 2.
2. That a maximum of 500 sq.ft. of retail commercial
or office space shall be permitted on the
property, except that 812± sq.ft. of gross floor
area shall be permitted in conjunction with any
take -out food establishment on the property. The
applicant shall record a restrictive covenant, the
form and content of which is acceptable to the
42
INDEX
C x
10.
r 9
m
z c
m
o m
z
s
OJ
z r
_0°
;°City
0=
z s
°
m a
of
2
'3'
T
m
ROLL CALL
Motion
All Ayes
•
n
U
x
t Beach
LOCATION: Lot 13, Block 21 of Newport Beach Tract,
located at 114 22nd Street, on the
easterly side of 22nd Street between
West Balboa Boulevard and West Ocean
Front in the McFadden Square area.
APPLICANT: Charles H. Cathcart, Huntington Beach
OWNER: Vic Sherreitt, Balboa Island
The public hearing opened in conjunction with this item
and Mr. Charles H. Cathcart, 9392 Breakwater,
Huntington Beach, applicant, stated that he agrees with
the findings and conditions of Exhibit "A ".
Commissioner Turner made a motion to approve Use Permit
No. 1897 (Amended) and Use Permit No. 3116 subject to
the findings and conditions of Exhibit "A ". MOTION
CARRIED.
Use Permit No. 1897 (Amended)
FINDINGS:
1. That the expanded storage area to be used in
conjunction with a take -out ice cream shop will
not significantly increase the parking demand for
the subject property.
2. The approval of Use Permit No. 1897 (Amended) will
not, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort,
morals and general welfare of persons residing and
working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or
injurious to property and improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That all previous applicable conditions of Use
Permit No. 1897 shall be fulfilled except as
provided in the following Condition No. 2.
2. That a maximum of 500 sq.ft. of retail commercial
or office space shall be permitted on the
property, except that 812± sq.ft. of gross floor
area shall be permitted in conjunction with any
take -out food establishment on the property. The
applicant shall record a restrictive covenant, the
form and content of which is acceptable to the
42
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
November 8, 1984
City Attorney, binding the applicant and
C 0 x
successors in interest in perpetuity to the above
W= H a 3 0 0
W a = c T
City
of
Newport
Beach
; _
MINUTES
INDEX
City Attorney, binding the applicant and
successors in interest in perpetuity to the above
stated floor area limitations.
Use Permit No. 3116
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed development is consistent with
the Land Use Element of the General Plan and the
adopted Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan, and
is compatible with surrounding land uses.
2. That there is adequate parking on the subject
property for the proposed restaurant employees.
3. The project will not have any significant environ-
mental impact.
4. That the waiver of the development standards as
they pertain to a portion of the parking, parking
•
lot illumination, circulation, walls, building
setbacks landscaping and utilities, will be of no
further detriment to adjacent properties inasmuch
as the site has been developed and the structure
has been in existence for many years.
5. That the proposed use does not represent an
intensification of use that will result in an
increased parking demand for the area.
6. The approval of Use Permit No. 3116 will not,
under the circumstances of this case, be detri-
mental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing
and working in the neighborhood, or be detrimental
or injurious to property and improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be in substantial confor-
mance with the revised floor plan (i.e. the
deletion of the take -out service windows, and the
addition of the service counter).
•
2. That the development standards related to a
portion of the required off - street parking spaces,
parking lot illumination, building setbacks,
43
MINUTES
INDEX
•
n
U
COMMISSIONERS
November 8, 1984
F7,-9
c m
W
z m a O o
p Z � m
City
of
Newport
Beach
circulation, walls, landscaping, and utility
requirements, are waived.
3. That no on -sale or off -sale alcoholic beverages
shall be sold or consumed on the premises unless
the Planning Commission approves an amendment to
this use permit.
4. That the hours of operation shall be restricted to
the hours between 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., daily.
5. That there shall be no seating within the take -out
restaurant.
6. That all signs shall conform with the requirements
of Chapter 20.06 of the Newport Beach Municipal
Code.
7. That a trash compactor shall be installed.
8. That the new storage area adjacent to the existing
stairway shall be removed and the converted
residential storage area shall be re- established
at such time as the first floor of the building is
used for any purpose other than a take -out food
establishment. The applicant shall record a
restrictive covenant, the form and content of
which is acceptable to the City Attorney,
providing for the building restoration by the
applicant and /or successors in interest in
perpetuity.
9. That no cooking, or any food preparation other
than ice cream or related products, shall be
permitted in the take -out restaurant facility
unless an amended use permit is approved by the
City at a later date. Said amendment could
require the addition of kitchen exhaust fans,
washout areas for trash containers, and grease
interceptors.
10. That the sidewalk on 22nd Street shall be kept
clean and regularly maintained. Said sidewalk
shall be swept, vacuumed or washed in such a
manner that any debris or waste water does not
enter the storm drain system.
44
MINUTES
INDEX
ROLL CALL
is
•
November 8, 1984
t Beach
11. That trash receptacles shall be provided in
convenient locations inside and outside of the
subject building.
12. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas
shall be screened from the adjoining alley, and
properties.
13. That the two employees shall .park their
automobiles on -site at.all times.
14. That the Planning Commission may add and /or modify
Conditions of Approval to this use permit, or
recommend to the City Council the .revocation of
this use permit, upon a. determination that the
operation, which is the subject of this use
permit, causes injury or is detrimental to the
health, safety or welfare of the community.
15. That this use permit shall expire if not exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
Tentative Mao of Tract No. 11937 (Public Hearing)
Request to reconsider an approved Tentative Tract Map
for the Villa Point Apartments relative to compliance
of the project with the Housing Element of the General
Plan as amended June 25, 1984.
LOCATION: Portions of Block 55 and 94, Irvine's
Subdivision, located at 1200 East
Coast Highway, on the northeasterly
corner of Jamboree Road and East Coast
Highway, across from Irvine Terrace.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Irvine Pacific, Newport Beach
OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Adams /Streeter, Civil Engineers, Irvine
Planning Director Hewicker stated that. the purpose of
this item is to enable the Planning Commission to
45
MINUTES
item No.6
Tentative
Map of
Tract No.
11937
Approved
Condition -
ally
x
XX o
v
m
c
z c
m
a m
z
U
= r
C
C2
= x
0
0
o
Oi00}City
m a
o
o
of
Z
� z
T
m
November 8, 1984
t Beach
11. That trash receptacles shall be provided in
convenient locations inside and outside of the
subject building.
12. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas
shall be screened from the adjoining alley, and
properties.
13. That the two employees shall .park their
automobiles on -site at.all times.
14. That the Planning Commission may add and /or modify
Conditions of Approval to this use permit, or
recommend to the City Council the .revocation of
this use permit, upon a. determination that the
operation, which is the subject of this use
permit, causes injury or is detrimental to the
health, safety or welfare of the community.
15. That this use permit shall expire if not exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
Tentative Mao of Tract No. 11937 (Public Hearing)
Request to reconsider an approved Tentative Tract Map
for the Villa Point Apartments relative to compliance
of the project with the Housing Element of the General
Plan as amended June 25, 1984.
LOCATION: Portions of Block 55 and 94, Irvine's
Subdivision, located at 1200 East
Coast Highway, on the northeasterly
corner of Jamboree Road and East Coast
Highway, across from Irvine Terrace.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Irvine Pacific, Newport Beach
OWNER: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Adams /Streeter, Civil Engineers, Irvine
Planning Director Hewicker stated that. the purpose of
this item is to enable the Planning Commission to
45
MINUTES
item No.6
Tentative
Map of
Tract No.
11937
Approved
Condition -
ally
COMMISSIONERS
Motion
All Ayes
•
Motion
Ayes
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
review the previously approved Tentative Tract Map for
Villa Point relative to compliance of the project with
the Housing Element as amended June 25, 1984.
Commissioner Kurlander made a motion to approve the
Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937 without changes to the
previously- applied conditions, but with an additional
Finding No. 7. MOTION CARRIED.
117. That the project as conditioned is consistent
with the Housing Element of the General Plan
as amended June 25, 1984, in that the project
meets or exceeds all criteria set forth
therein."
Tentative Mao of Tract No. 12105 (Public Hearing)
Request to reconsider an approved Tentative Tract Map
for the Big Canyon Villa Apartments relative to compli-
ance of the project with the Housing Element of the
General Plan as amended June 25, 1984.
LOCATION: Portions of Block 56 and 92 of Irvine's
Subdivision, located at the
southwesterly corner of MacArthur
Boulevard and Ford Road, in the Big
Canyon Planned Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, dba Irvine Pacific,
Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as Applicant
ENGINEER: Adams /Streeter, Irvine
Planning Director Hewicker stated that the purpose of
this item is to enable the Planning Commission to
review the previously approved Tentative Tract Map for
Big Canyon villa relative to compliance of the project
with the Housing Element as amended June 25, 1984.
Commissioner Kurlander made a motion to approve the
Tentative Map of Tract No. 12105 without changes to the
previously - applied conditions, but with additional
Finding No. 6. MOTION CARRIED.
46
MINUTES
INDEX
Item No.7
Tentative
Map.of
Tract No.
12105
Approved
Condition -
ally
x
a
C O O
2
_
v
a � m
Z c
C
m
Z m z
a=
r z
C z
0
W
O
m a a
z z
z
a z m
Motion
All Ayes
•
Motion
Ayes
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
review the previously approved Tentative Tract Map for
Villa Point relative to compliance of the project with
the Housing Element as amended June 25, 1984.
Commissioner Kurlander made a motion to approve the
Tentative Map of Tract No. 11937 without changes to the
previously- applied conditions, but with an additional
Finding No. 7. MOTION CARRIED.
117. That the project as conditioned is consistent
with the Housing Element of the General Plan
as amended June 25, 1984, in that the project
meets or exceeds all criteria set forth
therein."
Tentative Mao of Tract No. 12105 (Public Hearing)
Request to reconsider an approved Tentative Tract Map
for the Big Canyon Villa Apartments relative to compli-
ance of the project with the Housing Element of the
General Plan as amended June 25, 1984.
LOCATION: Portions of Block 56 and 92 of Irvine's
Subdivision, located at the
southwesterly corner of MacArthur
Boulevard and Ford Road, in the Big
Canyon Planned Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, dba Irvine Pacific,
Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as Applicant
ENGINEER: Adams /Streeter, Irvine
Planning Director Hewicker stated that the purpose of
this item is to enable the Planning Commission to
review the previously approved Tentative Tract Map for
Big Canyon villa relative to compliance of the project
with the Housing Element as amended June 25, 1984.
Commissioner Kurlander made a motion to approve the
Tentative Map of Tract No. 12105 without changes to the
previously - applied conditions, but with additional
Finding No. 6. MOTION CARRIED.
46
MINUTES
INDEX
Item No.7
Tentative
Map.of
Tract No.
12105
Approved
Condition -
ally
•
Motion
COM
x
November 8, 1984 MINUTES
Beach
"6. That the project as conditioned is consistent
with the Housing Element of the General Plan
as amended June 25, 1984, in that the project
meets all criteria set forth therein."
� • x
>f Correction for 4
18
Request to reconsider an approved Certificate of
Correction for a Final Tract Map for. the Superior
Avenue Medical office project relative to compliance of
the project with the Housing Element of the General
Plan as amended June 25, 1984.
LOCATION: Tract No. 11018, located at 1455
Superior Avenue, on the northwesterly
side of Superior Avenue, between
Placentia Avenue and Hospital Road, in
the West Newport Triangle area.
ZONE: A -P (0.8)
APPLICANT: Heltzer Enterprises, Los Angeles
OWNER: Same as applicant
Planning Director Hewicker stated that the purpose of
this item is to evaluate the approval of the Certifi-
cate of Correction for Tract No. 11018 relative to the
provisions of the Housing Element as amended June 25,
1984.
The public hearing opened in connection with this item.
Mr. Don Atkinson, 550 Newport Center Drive, Newport
Beach, representing the applicant, appeared before the
Planning Commission.
Mr. Don Jackson, 1455H Superior Avenue, Newport Beach,
stated that the development is adjacent to his property
and was inquiring about the project's setbacks. Staff
informed Mr. Jackson to contact the Planning Department
the following day as that information was not available
because the current item on the agenda only pertained
to the Tract Map.
Commissioner xurlander made a motion to approve the
Certificate of Correction for Tract No. 11108 without
47
INDEX
Item No.8
Correction
Tract No.
11018
Approved
Condition-
ally
F F
°
::E
p y
=
2
P 9
m
z c
m
o m
z
W D
`aN
9
a
° X
0
2
°�Cityof
= z
m D
m
z
� a
T
x
November 8, 1984 MINUTES
Beach
"6. That the project as conditioned is consistent
with the Housing Element of the General Plan
as amended June 25, 1984, in that the project
meets all criteria set forth therein."
� • x
>f Correction for 4
18
Request to reconsider an approved Certificate of
Correction for a Final Tract Map for. the Superior
Avenue Medical office project relative to compliance of
the project with the Housing Element of the General
Plan as amended June 25, 1984.
LOCATION: Tract No. 11018, located at 1455
Superior Avenue, on the northwesterly
side of Superior Avenue, between
Placentia Avenue and Hospital Road, in
the West Newport Triangle area.
ZONE: A -P (0.8)
APPLICANT: Heltzer Enterprises, Los Angeles
OWNER: Same as applicant
Planning Director Hewicker stated that the purpose of
this item is to evaluate the approval of the Certifi-
cate of Correction for Tract No. 11018 relative to the
provisions of the Housing Element as amended June 25,
1984.
The public hearing opened in connection with this item.
Mr. Don Atkinson, 550 Newport Center Drive, Newport
Beach, representing the applicant, appeared before the
Planning Commission.
Mr. Don Jackson, 1455H Superior Avenue, Newport Beach,
stated that the development is adjacent to his property
and was inquiring about the project's setbacks. Staff
informed Mr. Jackson to contact the Planning Department
the following day as that information was not available
because the current item on the agenda only pertained
to the Tract Map.
Commissioner xurlander made a motion to approve the
Certificate of Correction for Tract No. 11108 without
47
INDEX
Item No.8
Correction
Tract No.
11018
Approved
Condition-
ally
s
Motion
All Ayes
November 8, 1984 MINUTES
bayfront properties of similar size within the R -2
District.
2. That approval of the request to reduce the
required front yard setback on the subject prop-
erties will not result in the obstruction of any
existing public views.
3. That reduction of the required front yard setback
from 35 feet to 20 feet will increase the
buildable area of the subject properties to a
level which is consistent with the buildable area
of surrounding properties.
: � x
Amendment No. 611 (Public Hearing)
Request to consider amending Title 20 of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code so as to permit fortune - telling
uses in various areas in the City of Newport Beach.
INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach
Commissioner Goff made a motion to approve the proposed
amendments to Chapter 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal
Code regarding fortune - telling businesses. MOTION
CARRIED.
Resubdivision No. 791 (Public Hearing)
Request to establish a single parcel of land and
eliminate an interior property line where two parcels
presently exist at the Balboa Yacht Club.
LOCATION: A portion of Block 94 of Irvine's
Subdivision and Parcel "A" of Lot Line
Adjustment 80 -2, located at 1801 Bayside
Drive, on the southerly side of Bayside
Drive across from Irvine Terrace.
ZONE: 0 -S
APPLICANT: Balboa Yacht Club
OWNER: Same as applicant
ENGINEER: Coast Surveying, Santa Ana
49
INDEX
Item No.10
Amendment
No. 611
Approved
Condition-
ally
Item No 11
Resubdivi-
sion
No. 791
Approved
Condition -
ally
x x
c o
0
_
a
v
m
Z
0
v r
o
0
City
of
Newport
Beach
a=
9 t
m
bayfront properties of similar size within the R -2
District.
2. That approval of the request to reduce the
required front yard setback on the subject prop-
erties will not result in the obstruction of any
existing public views.
3. That reduction of the required front yard setback
from 35 feet to 20 feet will increase the
buildable area of the subject properties to a
level which is consistent with the buildable area
of surrounding properties.
: � x
Amendment No. 611 (Public Hearing)
Request to consider amending Title 20 of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code so as to permit fortune - telling
uses in various areas in the City of Newport Beach.
INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach
Commissioner Goff made a motion to approve the proposed
amendments to Chapter 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal
Code regarding fortune - telling businesses. MOTION
CARRIED.
Resubdivision No. 791 (Public Hearing)
Request to establish a single parcel of land and
eliminate an interior property line where two parcels
presently exist at the Balboa Yacht Club.
LOCATION: A portion of Block 94 of Irvine's
Subdivision and Parcel "A" of Lot Line
Adjustment 80 -2, located at 1801 Bayside
Drive, on the southerly side of Bayside
Drive across from Irvine Terrace.
ZONE: 0 -S
APPLICANT: Balboa Yacht Club
OWNER: Same as applicant
ENGINEER: Coast Surveying, Santa Ana
49
INDEX
Item No.10
Amendment
No. 611
Approved
Condition-
ally
Item No 11
Resubdivi-
sion
No. 791
Approved
Condition -
ally
ROLL
Ayes
Ns
Motion
All Ayes
•
IWAISSIONERS
November
8, 1984
X
c o
x
.
_
C M m
z c m a m z
C z v 3 o o
Y A m>
z T m
1 City
of
Newport
Beach
� z
Ix
Ix
changes to the previously - applied Conditions, but with
additional Findings No. 3, 4, and 5.
"3. That the project as approved is consistent
with the General Plan."
114. That the Housing Element of the General Plan
does not identify the project site as ade-
quate or appropriate for residential develop-
ment."
115. That the proposed use of the site is
appropriate due to the close proximity of the
site to Hoag Memorial Hospital, its location
on a primary arterial roadway, and the
relationship of the site to surrounding
commercial land uses."
Commissioner Goff stated that since he opposed the
original project he would oppose the motion.
Motion voted on and MOTION CARRIED.
x
Amendment No. 610 (Public Hearing)
Request to amend a portion of Districting Map N0.3 so
as to reduce the front yard setback adjacent to the.
Rivo Alto Channel, between 33rd and 34th Streets, from
35 feet to 20 feet.
INITIATED BY: The City of Newport Beach
The public hearing opened in connection with this item
and Mr. Fred Woodworth, 3304 Marcus Avenue, Newport
Beach, appeared before the Planning Commission. Mr.
Woodworth stated that the proposed change in the
setback will enable added expansion for development.
The public hearing was closed at this time.
Commissioner Eichenhofer made a motion to approve the
findings of Exhibit "A" for approval of Amendment No.
610. MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed front yard setback is consistent
with the front yard setbacks required for other
48
MINUTES
Item #9
Amendment
No. 610
Approved
Condition-
ally
COMMISSIONERS) November 8, 1984 MINUTES
ROLL
of Newport Beach
x x
c o �
i
a v m
y
9
r v
Z c
m
s m z
M a
a
r n x
C z
m
v$ O o
a
a m
O
m a n m
E a
Z
a 2 m
ROLL
of Newport Beach
INDEX
The public hearing opened in connection with this item
and Mr. Terry Welsh, 1000 Quail Street, Newport Beach,
representing the applicant, appeared before the
Planning Commission. Mr. welsh stated that the
applicant agrees with the findings and conditions of
Exhibit "A ".
Mr. Welsh responded to Chairman Winburn's inquiry
stating that the reason for the resubdivision at this
time is to consolidate the two land parcels in the
event the Balboa Yacht Club would expand development of
the facility in the future.
The public hearing was closed at. this time.
Motion
x
Commissioner Goff made a motion to approve
All Ayes
Resubdivision No. 791, subject to the findings and
conditions of Exhibit "A ". MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
•
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances
of the City, all applicable general or specific
plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied
with the plan of subdivision.
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
3. That the design of subdivision or the proposed
improvements will not conflict with any easements
acquired by the public at large for access through
or use of property within the proposed
subdivision.
CONDITIONS:
1. That a parcel map be filed.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required
by ordinance and the Public Works Department.
3. That a subdivision agreement and accompanying
surety be provided to guarantee satisfactory
•
completion of the public improvements if it is
50
INDEX
COMMISSIONER) November 8, 1984 MINUTES
r 1
U
4. That the displaced and tree damaged portions of
sidewalk be reconstructed and the trees root
pruned as necessary along the Bayside Drive
frontage. All work shall be completed under an
encroachment permit issued by the Public Works
Department.
5. That a 10 foot wide storm drain easement be
dedicated to the City and that the location be
approved by the Public Works Department. The
easement should be shown on the parcel map unless
otherwise approved by the Public Works Department.
6. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map
has not been recorded within 3 years of the date
of approval, unless an extension is granted by the
Planning Commission.
51
a 0
0
9
A T
P 9
=
m
z c
c Z
m,
m
m
p r
0
z
0
City of Newport
Beach
a
ROLL CALL
INDEX
desired to record the parcel map or obtain a
building permit prior
to completion of the public
improvements.
r 1
U
4. That the displaced and tree damaged portions of
sidewalk be reconstructed and the trees root
pruned as necessary along the Bayside Drive
frontage. All work shall be completed under an
encroachment permit issued by the Public Works
Department.
5. That a 10 foot wide storm drain easement be
dedicated to the City and that the location be
approved by the Public Works Department. The
easement should be shown on the parcel map unless
otherwise approved by the Public Works Department.
6. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map
has not been recorded within 3 years of the date
of approval, unless an extension is granted by the
Planning Commission.
51
November 8, 1984 MINUTES
of Newport Beach
KULL CALL
F
a
C O
O
INDEX
2
-
9
r T
m
Z a
c
m
s rn
z
c z
W
W t
0 0
D m
O
m s
r
= 9
2
2 a
M m
'�
November 8, 1984 MINUTES
of Newport Beach
KULL CALL
INDEX
Resubdivision No. 794 (Public Hearing)
Item No.12
Request to resubdivide an existing parcel of land into
Resubdivi-
two parcels for single family residential development
sion
on property located in the R -1 -B -2 District. The
No. 794
proposal also includes an exception to the subdivision
Code inasmuch as Parcels No. 1 and No..2 are less than
Denied
10,000 sq.ft. in area; less than 90 feet in width; and
Parcel No. 1 is less than 100 feet in depth. A
modification to the Zoning Code is also required
inasmuch as the existing structure on Parcel No. 1 will
remain 5 ft. -6 in. side yard setbacks where 10 feet is
required, and a 6 foot rear yard setback where 10 feet
is required.
is
•
LOCATION: Parcel No. 1 of Parcel Map 30 -47
( Resubdivision No. 277), located at 1711
Irvine Avenue, on the westerly side of
Irvine Avenue between Holiday Road and
20th Street, across from the Baycrest
residential area.
ZONE: R -1 -B -2
APPLICANT: Warren H. Lortie, Huntington Beach
OWNER: Dolores Wienenga, Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Emerald Engineering, Huntington Beach
The public hearing opened in connection with this item
at this time. Mr. Warren H. Lortie, 600 Heliotrope
Avenue, 'Corona del Mar, appeared before the Planning
Commission on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Lortie
commented that the owner's family has lived in the
residence for 40 years. The structure was relocated
in 1957 with the intent that a resubdivision would
occur in front of the house at a later date. The
owners were not aware of the rezoning of the area after
that time. Mr. Lortie stated that there was also a
small resubdivision in the 1960's, at which time the
owners gave some of their property to the tract
development. Mr. Lortie cited that the applicant's
project would be less than the current zoning
requirement which is a minimum land parcel of 10,000
sq. ft.; however, the parcel would be acceptable to the
R -1 -B District which is across Irvine Avenue and across
from the applicant's current residence. Mr. Lortie
also stated that the applicant has requested to
52
COMMISSIONERS
November
e, 1984
rx
c o �
x
m
c Z w o g o o
9= T T
City
of
Newport
Beach
2 a
construct a 2 -story home on the front parcel of land.
The front parcel is currently being utilized as a
parking area.
Mr. Lortie responded to Commissioner Turner by stating
that the proposed driveway is 20 feet on Parcel No. 1;
however, the Fire Department has requested 26 feet
which requires an additional 6 foot easement on Parcel
No. 2.
Mr. Dave Thorp, 1700 Irvine Avenue, spoke in opposition
to the resubdivision and stated that he would like to
see the property remain as one parcel of land.
Mr. Welch, 1717 Irvine Avenue,. stated that he opposes
the 2 -story structure because there are currently many
people residing on the property, and many vehicles in
the parking area, and another house would only create
more congestion.
The public hearing was closed at this time.
An x Commissioner Turner made a motion to deny Resubdivision
All Ayes No. 794, subject to the findings in Exhibit "A ".
Chairman Winburn stated that she concurs with
Commissioner Turner's motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed resubdivision is inconsistent
with the established size and shape of a majority
of other lots in the general vicinity of the
subject property.
2. That the granting of the exceptions are not
compatible with the objectives of the regulations
governing light, air and public health, safety,
convenience, and general welfare.
3. That there are no special circumstances or con-
ditions affecting the subject property which
justify the granting of the requested exceptions.
4. That the granting of the exceptions will be
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property in the vicinity in which the
• property is located inasmuch as the proposed
parcels will be smaller and narrower than a
majority of the lots in the area which are located
in the R -1 -B -2 District.
53
MINUTES
INDEX
COMMISSIONERS
x z
n
f C
p a
=
z c
y r v
m a m
m z
W A
A z r
L) 2
C z
0 p;
o o
2 s
o m a
= A z
i m
ROLL CALL
is
November 8, 1984
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission recessed at 9:45 p.m, and
reconvened at 9:50 p.m.
• x
Resubdivision No. 795 (Public Hearing)
Request to establish a single building site and
eliminate interior property lines where three parcels
presently exist, so as to allow the construction of a
shipyard with marine oriented retail and office uses.
LOCATION: A portion of Lot H, Tract No. 616,
located at 2439, 2505, and 2507 West
Coast Highway, on the southerly side of
West Coast Highway, between Tustin
Avenue and the Balboa Bay Club in the
Mariner's Mile Specific Plan Area.
ZONE: SP -5
APPLICANT: Coast Surveying, Inc., Santa Ana
OWNER: Mariner's Mile Marine Center Ltd.,
Newport Beach
ENGINEER: Same as applicant
Planning Director Hewicker commented that the Planning
Commission previously approved a Site Plan Review for
this project. Mr. Hewicker stated that it is not
irregular for an applicant to apply for a resubdivision
of the land parcel at a later date. Mr. Hewicker
further stated that the height and location of the
property does not have .anything to do with the
resubdivision. Mr. Burnham stated that the only reason
for not approving the resubdivision would be if the map
did not comply with all of the ordinances. Mr. Burnham
responded to Commissioner Person's inquiry regarding
the map conforming to the ordinances, by stating that
the tract maps and parcel maps are limited to the
design and improvement of the lot as opposed to the
structure that would be developed on the lot.
The public hearing opened in connection with this item,
and Mr. James Evans, representing the applicant, stated
54
MINUTES
Item No.13
Resubdivi-
sion No.
795
Approved
Condition -
ally
M /V\I»IUNtK�)
November
8, 1984
X s
C O n
that the owner approves the findings and conditions
2
z C m z m z
contained in Exhibit "A ".
C a N a g o o
2 n= 9 a T m
City
of
Newport
Beach
Mr. Robert Clark, President of the Newport Heights
ROLL
MINUTES
INDEX
that the owner approves the findings and conditions
contained in Exhibit "A ".
Mr. Robert Clark, President of the Newport Heights
Community Association, stated that they are concerned
with the height limitations in Mariners Mile, and
inquired if the Association would be able to discuss
the subject under Additional Business at the end of the
Planning Commission Meeting.
Commissioner Kurlander commented that the height limit
in Mariners Mile could be discussed at the next Study
Session. Mr. Hewicker cited that the City Council has
appointed an Ad -Hoc Committee to study the Mariner's
Mile area. Commissioner Person stated that since
representatives from the Community Association have
attended the Planning Commission Meeting, that he would
like to give the representatives several minutes for a
presentation during Additional Business.
Commissioner Kurlander stated he has no objections to
•
their presentation; however, he believes that the
Association should go to the Ad -Hoc Committee.
Motion
X
Commissioner Goff made a motion to approve
All Ayes
Resubdivision No. 795, subject to the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A ". MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code, all ordinances
of the City, all applicable general or specific
plans and the Planning Commission is satisfied
with the plan of subdivision.
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
CONDITIONS:
1. That a parcel map be filed.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required
by ordinance and the Public Works Department.
•
3. That the applicant execute an irrevocable offer to
dedicate a public walkway easement 10 feet in
55
MINUTES
INDEX
U
COMMISSIONERS November 8, 1984 MINUTES
of Newport Beach
width to permit access for pedestrians from West
Coast Highway to the bay and a 10 foot wide
lateral access easement across the waterfront,
subject to the limitation that the City will not
exercise or require the irrevocable offer to
dedicate so long as the property is operated as a
boatyard or any other permitted use which would
involve an operation rendering such public walkway
easements a hazard to pedestrians. Said irrevoca-
ble offer shall be executed and recorded prior to
or concurrent with the recordation of the parcel
map.
4. That all conditions of Site Plan Review No. 36, as
approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting
of August 9, 1984, be fulfilled.
5. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map
has not been recorded within 3 years of the date
of approval, unless and extension is granted by
the Planning Commission.
x
A. Use Permit No. 3117 (Public Hearing)
Request to permit the construction of a two -unit
residential condominium and related garages on property
located in the R -2 District.
mi
B. Resubdivision No. 793 (Public Hearing)
Request to establish a single parcel of land for
residential condominium purposes where one lot
presently exists.
LOCATION: Lot 14 of Block 532 of the Corona del
Mar Tract, located at 512 Dahlia Avenue,
on the southeasterly side of Dahlia
Avenue between Second Avenue and Third
Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONE: R -2
APPLICANT: Arthur G. Guy, Jr., Newport Beach
OWNER: Richard Hucklebridge, Et Al, Lancaster
ENGINEER: William H. Duncan, Newport Beach
56
Item No.14
Use Permit
No. 3117
Resubdivi-
sion
No. 793
Approved
Condition-
ally
�x
C o
0
x
_
a
v
m
z c
C
m
a m
z
W M
X
z r
G 2
C z
m
o i
o 0
ma
�ci
z7o
Z
9 2
T m
of Newport Beach
width to permit access for pedestrians from West
Coast Highway to the bay and a 10 foot wide
lateral access easement across the waterfront,
subject to the limitation that the City will not
exercise or require the irrevocable offer to
dedicate so long as the property is operated as a
boatyard or any other permitted use which would
involve an operation rendering such public walkway
easements a hazard to pedestrians. Said irrevoca-
ble offer shall be executed and recorded prior to
or concurrent with the recordation of the parcel
map.
4. That all conditions of Site Plan Review No. 36, as
approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting
of August 9, 1984, be fulfilled.
5. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map
has not been recorded within 3 years of the date
of approval, unless and extension is granted by
the Planning Commission.
x
A. Use Permit No. 3117 (Public Hearing)
Request to permit the construction of a two -unit
residential condominium and related garages on property
located in the R -2 District.
mi
B. Resubdivision No. 793 (Public Hearing)
Request to establish a single parcel of land for
residential condominium purposes where one lot
presently exists.
LOCATION: Lot 14 of Block 532 of the Corona del
Mar Tract, located at 512 Dahlia Avenue,
on the southeasterly side of Dahlia
Avenue between Second Avenue and Third
Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONE: R -2
APPLICANT: Arthur G. Guy, Jr., Newport Beach
OWNER: Richard Hucklebridge, Et Al, Lancaster
ENGINEER: William H. Duncan, Newport Beach
56
Item No.14
Use Permit
No. 3117
Resubdivi-
sion
No. 793
Approved
Condition-
ally
ROLL
Motion
All Ayes
•
•
MANSSIONERS
November
s, 1984
X
c o
x
z c m Z m z
C Z N O X 0 0
M a m a m
z m
City
of
Newport
Beach
A Z
The public hearing opened in connection with this item,
and Mr. William Duncan, 2436 West Coast Highway,
Newport Beach, appeared before the Planning Commission.
Mr. Duncan stated that the owner agrees with the
findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ".
Commissioner Koppelman made a motion to approve Use
Permit No. 3117 and Resubdivision No. 793, subject to
the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ". MOTION
CARRIED.
USE PERMIT NO. 3117
FINDINGS:
1. That each of the proposed units has been designed
as a condominium with separate and individual
utility connections.
2. The project will comply with all applicable
standards, plans and zoning requirements for new
buildings applicable to the district in which the
proposed project is located at the time of ap-
proval.
3. The project lot size conforms to the zoning Code
area requirements in effect at the time of ap-
proval.
4. The project is consistent with the adopted goals
and policies of the General Plan and the Local
Coastal Program, Land Use Plan.
5. That adequate on -site parking spaces are available
for the proposed residential condominium develop-
ment.
6. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the
use of building applied for will not, under the
circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the
health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general
welfare of persons residing and working in the
neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to
property and improvements in the neighborhood or
the general welfare of the City.
57
MINUTES
,i
I
v�ivir��ivivL�J
November
8, 1984
z
c O
C
n
_
z c
C
y
m
r v
a m
m
x
C z
W m
2 9
0
z
0
v s
m z
9 2
o 0
T m
m m
j City
of
Newport
Beach
3. That each dwelling unit be served with an indi-
vidual water service and sewer lateral connection
to the public water and sewer systems unless
otherwise approved by the Public Works Department.
4. That all vehicular access to the site shall be
from the adjacent alley.
5. That Orange County Sanitation District fees shall
be paid prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
6. That this resubdivision shall expire if the map
has not, been recorded within 3 years of the date
of approval, unless an 'extension is granted by the
Planning Commission.
Use Permit No. 3118 (Public Hearing)
Request to permit the use of a temporary relocatable
building for a maintenance supervisor's office in the
custom lot area of Harbor Ridge.
LOCATION: Lot 8 of Tract No. 9858, located at 42
Ridgeline Drive, on the northeasterly
side of Ridgeline Drive adjacent to the
San Joaquin Reservoir, in the Harbor
Ridge residential area of the Harbor
View Hills Planned Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Harbor Ridge Association, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
The public hearing opened in connection with this item
and Mr. Jim Butler, President, Harbor Ridge Homeowners
Association, 35 St. Tropez, Corona del Mar, appeared
before the Planning Commission. Mr. Butler stated that
the Homeowners Association accepts the responsibility
for not applying for a Use Permit and also that there
is not a restroom facility in the trailer; however,
there is one nearby.
Mr. Butler cited that the trailer is being used as a
temporary facility until the Homeowners Association
59
MINUTES
Item No.l
Use Permi
No. 3118
Denied
COMMISSIONERS
Ec o
v 9 y m
C z H O S O O
X = a = T m
A
November 8, 1984
City of Newport Beach
ROLL CALL
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be in substantial confor-
mance with the approved plot plan, floor plans and
elevations, except as noted below.
2. That two garage spaces shall be provided for each
dwelling unit.
3. That the gross floor area of the structure shall
not exceed 3,528 sq.ft. (1.5 times the buildable
area of the site).
4. That all Conditions of approval of. Resubdivision
No. 793 shall be fulfilled.
5. This use permit shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as
specified in Section 20.80.090 A of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
•
RESUBDIVISION NO. 793
FINDINGS:
1. That the map meets the requirements of Title 19 of
the Newport Municipal Code, all ordinances of the
City, all applicable general or specific plans and
the.Planning Commission is satisfied with the plan
of subdivision.
2. That the proposed resubdivision presents no
problems from a planning standpoint.
3. That the design of the.subdivision or the proposed
improvements will not conflict with any easements
acquired by the public at large for access through
or use of property within the proposed subdivi-
sion.
CONDITIONS:
.
1. That a parcel map be recorded.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required
by ordinance and the Public Works Department.
58
MINUTES
INDEX
COMPAISSIONERS November 8, 1984 MINUTES
•
•
of Newport Beach
constructs a permanent facility that will house a
Supervisor and that can also be utilized for meetings,
etc. Mr. Butler stated that there is a definite need
for on -site supervision to manage Harbor Ridge which
consists of 146 acres, 326 homes, and $13,500,000.
worth of assets, and that the area cannot be managed
out of a truck. Mr. Butler responded to Commissioner
Goff that the Association believes that in a minimum of
one year there will be a permanent facility.
Commissioner Turner inquired what kinds of activity is
the trailer being used for. Mr. Butler stated that the
Maintenance Supervisor uses the trailer for an office
to manage the Harbor Ridge area by overseeing the
contractors, sub - contractors, homeowners' needs and
requirements. Mr. Butler commented that the trailer
does not house equipment. Mr. Butler responded to
Chairman Winburn by stating that the Supervisor will be
moving around the Harbor Ridge area in a truck rather
than the contractors arriving at the trailer.
Mr. Hewicker queried Mr. Butler about what type of work
is done by this person, and Mr. Butler replied that the
Supervisor oversees what goes on at the sites that are
under construction; i.e. that the contractors' trucks
are not illegally parked and that there is not an
illegal piling of lumber; that he answers homeowners'
complaints; and he takes care of numerous other day to
day activities.
Mr. Butler responded to Commissioner Koppelman's
inquiry that the Homeowners Association would like to
begin construction on the office facility in one year,
depending upon the City's approval, and also depending
upon the necessary funds. The Homeowners will be
constructing and funding the permanent facility in
phases.
Mr. Butler replied to Mr. Hewicker that the office
facility will not be used as a landscaping maintenance
facility.
Commissioner Goff opined that the building contractors
should be responsible at the construction sites.
Mr. Butler cited that the office facility will be used
only for the Homeowners Association Management.
Commissioner Person discussed the possibility of
placing the trailer in the Metropolitan Water
INDEX
F F
c O
O
'i
A 9
m
a
L
r t
2 c
m
a m
2
0 A
A
Z r
c 2
O L
O O
o o
A m
0
0
m a
m T
Z A
2
A a
m m
•
•
of Newport Beach
constructs a permanent facility that will house a
Supervisor and that can also be utilized for meetings,
etc. Mr. Butler stated that there is a definite need
for on -site supervision to manage Harbor Ridge which
consists of 146 acres, 326 homes, and $13,500,000.
worth of assets, and that the area cannot be managed
out of a truck. Mr. Butler responded to Commissioner
Goff that the Association believes that in a minimum of
one year there will be a permanent facility.
Commissioner Turner inquired what kinds of activity is
the trailer being used for. Mr. Butler stated that the
Maintenance Supervisor uses the trailer for an office
to manage the Harbor Ridge area by overseeing the
contractors, sub - contractors, homeowners' needs and
requirements. Mr. Butler commented that the trailer
does not house equipment. Mr. Butler responded to
Chairman Winburn by stating that the Supervisor will be
moving around the Harbor Ridge area in a truck rather
than the contractors arriving at the trailer.
Mr. Hewicker queried Mr. Butler about what type of work
is done by this person, and Mr. Butler replied that the
Supervisor oversees what goes on at the sites that are
under construction; i.e. that the contractors' trucks
are not illegally parked and that there is not an
illegal piling of lumber; that he answers homeowners'
complaints; and he takes care of numerous other day to
day activities.
Mr. Butler responded to Commissioner Koppelman's
inquiry that the Homeowners Association would like to
begin construction on the office facility in one year,
depending upon the City's approval, and also depending
upon the necessary funds. The Homeowners will be
constructing and funding the permanent facility in
phases.
Mr. Butler replied to Mr. Hewicker that the office
facility will not be used as a landscaping maintenance
facility.
Commissioner Goff opined that the building contractors
should be responsible at the construction sites.
Mr. Butler cited that the office facility will be used
only for the Homeowners Association Management.
Commissioner Person discussed the possibility of
placing the trailer in the Metropolitan Water
INDEX
COAAANISSIONERS November 8, 1984 MINUTES
n
•
of Newport Beach
District's land area. Mr. Butler stated that the only
area within Harbor Ridge that the trailer can possibly
be is where it is now located, and that the Homeowners
Association has plans to landscape around the area. Mr.
Butler stated that there is access to the Water
District property through the Harbor Ridge area. Mr.
Butler further stated that they feel the trailer should
be in a more appropriate and easy access area than on
the Water District property.
Ms. Marjorie Campbell, President and Owner of Campbell
Property Services, 247 LaVerne, Long Beach, appeared
before the Commission. Ms. Campbell stated that it has
been her experience that large homeowners associations
that have an on -site Supervisor such as Harbor Ridge,
are better managed. The resident homeowners previously
had many complaints regarding the conditions of the
vacant lots and the various actions of the contractors.
The Maintenance Supervisor monitors all requests
through the trailer facility where he has a phone as
well as an office area to be used for general office
work, such as submitting bids for on -site jobs.
Mrs. Sharon Vogt, 44 Ridgeline Drive, appeared before
the Planning Commission strongly opposing the trailer.
Mrs. Vogt presented pictures of the trailer taken from
the Vogt house. Mrs. Vogt cited several reasons for
opposing the trailer: that the trailer is 35 yards from
the Vogt house; the trailer installation is against the
Harbor Ridge Planned Community Text and CC &R's; there
are more desirable areas that can be used for an
office; a Harbor Ridge newsletter stated that the
trailer is a permanent on -site facility; the workmen
are using the restroom facilities that should only be
used by homeowners; the Water District will not allow
landscaping surrounding the trailer because the Water
District must have access to the water pipe; and how
much will the Vogt land value be affected until a
permanent structure is constructed?
Mrs. Vogt responded to Chairman Winburn's question that
potted plants and trees would not be large enough to
shield the trailer. Mrs. Vogt commented that she
considers the trailer and surrounding area as a
maintenance yard and believes that this will set a
precedent for other residential areas in Newport Beach.
Commissioner Turner inquired where an alternate office
facility could be situated. Mrs. Vogt replied that
61
C F
C o
�
_
v
y
m
z c
C
m
o m
z
W a
a
=
0 2
C 2
H
9
;
0 0
a s
O
M
m n
=
71 2
T m
n
•
of Newport Beach
District's land area. Mr. Butler stated that the only
area within Harbor Ridge that the trailer can possibly
be is where it is now located, and that the Homeowners
Association has plans to landscape around the area. Mr.
Butler stated that there is access to the Water
District property through the Harbor Ridge area. Mr.
Butler further stated that they feel the trailer should
be in a more appropriate and easy access area than on
the Water District property.
Ms. Marjorie Campbell, President and Owner of Campbell
Property Services, 247 LaVerne, Long Beach, appeared
before the Commission. Ms. Campbell stated that it has
been her experience that large homeowners associations
that have an on -site Supervisor such as Harbor Ridge,
are better managed. The resident homeowners previously
had many complaints regarding the conditions of the
vacant lots and the various actions of the contractors.
The Maintenance Supervisor monitors all requests
through the trailer facility where he has a phone as
well as an office area to be used for general office
work, such as submitting bids for on -site jobs.
Mrs. Sharon Vogt, 44 Ridgeline Drive, appeared before
the Planning Commission strongly opposing the trailer.
Mrs. Vogt presented pictures of the trailer taken from
the Vogt house. Mrs. Vogt cited several reasons for
opposing the trailer: that the trailer is 35 yards from
the Vogt house; the trailer installation is against the
Harbor Ridge Planned Community Text and CC &R's; there
are more desirable areas that can be used for an
office; a Harbor Ridge newsletter stated that the
trailer is a permanent on -site facility; the workmen
are using the restroom facilities that should only be
used by homeowners; the Water District will not allow
landscaping surrounding the trailer because the Water
District must have access to the water pipe; and how
much will the Vogt land value be affected until a
permanent structure is constructed?
Mrs. Vogt responded to Chairman Winburn's question that
potted plants and trees would not be large enough to
shield the trailer. Mrs. Vogt commented that she
considers the trailer and surrounding area as a
maintenance yard and believes that this will set a
precedent for other residential areas in Newport Beach.
Commissioner Turner inquired where an alternate office
facility could be situated. Mrs. Vogt replied that
61
�VVVH»wrvCRJ
November
8, 1984
7,Z; z C
P 9
City
of
Newport
Beach
ROLL
there is a vacant facility that stores equipment near
the tennis courts on Coventry that could be converted
to an office.
Mrs. Campbell responded to Commissioner Goff's question
regarding the facility on by stating that the pool area
has a cabana which includes a pool and jacuzzi, and
that the building contains all pool equipment including
a heater and filter. Mrs. Campbell explained that the
Maintenance Supervisor needs more than telephone space
for a working area.
Mr. Thomas Vogt, 44 Ridgeline Drive, stated that the
reasons the Vogt's purchased their property was because
of the view, a guaranteed greenbelt and it is an
unattached property. Mr. Vogt commented that he
recommended alternate sites for the maintenance trailer
to Mr. Sutler, and that the Homeowners Association
Board was violating the CC &R's with no consideration
for citizen rights and City codes. Mr. Vogt cited the
• Homeowners Association has an Architectural Committee,
Maintenance Committee, maintenance company, landscaping
company, and pool maintenance which are all included in
the CC &R's. Mr. Vogt read several sections from the
CC &R's to confirm the Homeowners Association's
by -laws.
Mr. John Seelert, 720 North Fern, Orange, Harbor Ridge
Maintenance Supervisor, cited that he received
permission from the Metropolitan Water District to use
the 40 ft. wide easement in the Water District area on
a temporary basis. Mr. Seelert stated that he had no
intent of not applying for a permit from the City. He
further explained that trees will be planted against
the trailer in order to camouflage the trailer, and not
on the easement. Mr. Seelert also stated that the pool
house would be too noisy for an office because of the
pool equipment. The Irvine Company trucks and equipment
are working in close proximity to the trailer because
they are constructing caretaker buildings for the
Metropolitan Water District.
Commissioner Kurlander questioned Mr. Seelert regarding
the amount of time he spends in the trailer. Mr.
Seelert replied that he is in the trailer approximately
2 hours a day. Mr. Seelert emphasized that the trailer
does not contain any maintenance equipment. Mr. Seelert
stated that there are too many homes surrounding the
area to temporarily install the trailer that is
6
MINUTES
COMMISSIONERS
F F
a O
=
A
L 9
m
1 c
z c
m> m
z
Z
9 = r
c 2
O S
o o
O O
a m
IC
0
o m D
m m
Y 9
Y p Y
m m
ROLL CALL
I Motion
•
I All Ayes
i
x
November 8, 1984
of Newport Beach
presently being considered for the permanent office
building.
Mr. Hewicker explained that the office requirement is
for the Homeowners Association and not for the Campbell
Company; therefore there would not be a zoning
conflict.
Commissioner Person stated that he believes that the
trailer and related uses are not compatible with the
residential area. Commissioner Person opined that the
Homeowners Association should locate the trailer in a
more suitable area in an area that will not be for
residential use.
Commissioner Person made a motion to deny Use Permit
3118, subject to the findings contained in Exhibit "A"
of the Staff Report.
Commissioner Kurlander stated that he would support the
motion because he believes that there are other
homeowners in the area that would not want the trailer
near their residence.
Commissioner Goff stated that he would support the
motion because he believes that there are other
solutions to the problem.
Motion voted on and MOTION CARRIED.
FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed trailer is both visually and
functionally incompatible with the adjoining
residential property.
2. That the needed office facilities should be
located in permanent facility designed in a manner
so as to be compatible with the surrounding
residential character of the area.
3. The approval of Use Permit No. 3118 will, under
the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to
the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and
general welfare of persons residing and working in
the neighborhood and be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the neighborhood or
the general welfare of the City.
63
MINUTES
C0M /V\bNUNLK5
November 8, 1984
MINUTES
C o
Fcz
-
y
v
m
9
w
=
c r
m >
o
T
0
m
City
of
Newport
Beach
a=
ROLL CALL
I
Tr
I
I I
I
I
INDEX
ON
Motion
All Ayes
0
A D D I T I O N A L B U S I N E S S:
Mr. Clark and Mr. Jeannette discussed the possibility
of reducing the permitted height limits in Mariner's
Mile with the Commission. The Commission suggested
that they discuss their concerns with the Mariner's
Mile Ad Hoc Review Committee. Mrs. Whitford discussed
the Anderson commercial project with the Commission.
Mrs. Slayback indicated .to the Commission that
employees in the Mariner's Mile area are parking their
automobiles on the adjoining residential streets.
The Planning Director discussed his .intention to
approve a temporary dock assembly site on a portion of
the Castaways site with the Commission. The Commission
concurred with the Planning Director's decision. .
The Planning Director reviewed the proposed residential
development of Mr. Segerstrom on the Balboa Peninsula
with the Commission. It was determined that the
proposed residential structure that exceeds the basic
height limit in the R -1 District, should be processed
with a use permit application, instead of a variance
application, or by establishing a new grade on the
property.
The Planning Commission scheduled a Study Session on
December 6, 1984, at 3:00 p.m., to review the proposed
Cannery village /McFadden Square Specific Area Plan with
the consultants, and to provide time for the City
Attorney to review various items with the Commission.
The Commission voted to cancel the Planning Commission
meetings of November 22, 1984, and December 20, 1984.
A D J O U R N M E N T: 11:20 p.m., adjourned to a joint
meeting with the Parks, Beaches, and Recreation
Commission on November 15, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers.
JOHN KURLANDER, SECRETARY
Newport Beach City
Planning Commission
64
Mariner's
Mile
Castaways
Segerstrom
Study
Session
Ur
iDII01II1