HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/10/1994COMMISSIONERS
�'dA°drClocfn�d dr Nd
CITY `OF NEWPORT BEACH MINUTES
REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
PLACE: City Council Chambers
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
DATE:
November 10 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Present
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
All Commissioners were present.
sss
EX- OFFICIO OFFICERS PRESENT:
James Hewicker, Planning Director
Robin Clauson, Assistant City Attorney
William R. Laycock, Current Planning Manager
Patty Temple, Advance Planning Manager
Don Webb, Public Works Director
Dee Edwards, Secretary
.
Minutes of October 20, 1994
Minutes
of
Commissioner Ridgeway requested that page 15 of the October 20,
10/20/94
1994, minutes be corrected to state Commissioner Ridgeway
commented that Fashion Island parking requirements would not meet
the discounters parking requirements. -
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve the corrected October
Ayes
Abstain
*
*
*
*
*
*
20, 1994, Planning Commission minutes. MOTION CARRIED.
s s s
Public Comments:
Public
Comments
No one appeared before the Planning Commission to speak on
non- agenda items.
s t :
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
RW
ROLL CALL
!7
INDEX
Posting of the Agenda:
Posting
of the
James Hewicker, Planning Director, stated that the Planning
Agenda
Commission Agenda was posted on Friday, November 4, 1994, in
front of City Hall.
Use Permit No 1905 (Amended) (Public Hearing)
Item No.
Request to amend a previously approved use permit which
UP1905A
Approved
permitted the establishment of George's Camelot Restaurant with
on -sale beer and wine and an outdoor eating area on property
located in the RSC -H District. The proposed amendment involves
a request to expand the existing restaurant into an adjoining
commercial space which was previously occupied by a take -out
.
restaurant. The proposal also includes a request to waive any
additional required off- street parking.
LOCATION: Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 59 -17 (Resubdivision
No. 416), located at 3420 Via Oporto, on the
northeasterly side of Via Oporto, between
Central Avenue and Via I1do, in Lido
Marina Village.
ZONE: RSC -H
APPLICANT: Lido Marina Village, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Ridgeway,
James Hewicker, Planning Director, explained that the application
is a request to expand George's Camelot Restaurant and to change
the operational characteristics of the restaurant.
Commissioner Adams commented that there may be parking
implications if the expansion was not for overflow use only.
i
-2-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November 1),
1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Commissioner Edwards and Mr. Hewicker discussed the feasibility
of adding a Consent Calendar to the Planning Commission Agenda
for the purpose of processing items similar to the subject request
when staff is unable to determine appropriate findings for denial.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item.
There being no one to appear and be heard, the public hearing
was closed at this time.
Motion
*
Motion was made to continue Use Permit No. 1905 (Amended) on
the basis that no one appeared before the Planning Commission
on behalf of the applicant inasmuch as the Commission had
questions concerning the expansion of the restaurant.
Substitute
Commissioner Ridgeway made a substitute motion to approve Use
Motion
*
Permit No. 1905 (Amended) subject to the findings and conditions
in Exhibit "A".
.
The public hearing was reopened and Mr. Walter Heim, architect,
365B North Newport Boulevard, appeared before the Planning
Commission on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Heim indicated that
he had not read the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A", and,
therefore, the Planning Commission requested that Item No. 1 be
discussed after Agenda Items No. 2 and No. 3 to allow Mr. Heim
additional time to review Exhibit "A".
Motion
*
Motion was made and voted on to continue Item No. 1 following
All Ayes
Items No. 2 and No. 3. MOTION CARRIED.
Following the public hearings of Items No. 2 and No. 3, Mr. Heim
reappeared before the Planning Commission. Mr. Heim concurred
with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A".
In response to a question posed by Mr. Hewicker, Mr. Heim stated
that the restaurant's expansion would be used on a regular basis
during the winter months when the outdoor eating area would not
be available, and for large dinner parties. He said that handicap
restrooms would also be available.
•
3-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
10 1994
ROLL CALL
,
nND EX
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
substitute
The substitute motion was voted on to approve Use Permit No.
Motion
1905 (Amended) subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit
k11 Ayes
"A ". MOTION CARRIED.
Findings:
1. That the proposed development is consistent with the
General Plan and the Local Coastal Program, Land Use
Plan, and is compatible with surrounding land uses.
2. The project will not have any significant environmental
impact.
.
3. That adequate parking exists to serve the subject
restaurant.
4. That the design of the project or proposed improvements
will not conflict with any easements acquired by the public
at large or access through or use of property within the
proposed development.
5. That the waiver of the development standards as they
pertain to walls, landscaping, parking lot illumination, and
a portion of the required parking spaces will not be
detrimental to adjoining properties.
6. The approval of Use Permit No. 1905 (Amended) under
the circumstances of this case will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare
of persons residing and working in the neighborhood, or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in
the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
•
-4-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Novemher
0, 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Conditions:
1. That the subject project shall be in substantial conformance
with the approved location plan and floor plan, except as
noted below.
2. That all previous applicable conditions of approval of Use
Permit No. 1905 and 1905 (Amended), as approved by the
Planning Commission on April 19,1979, September 24, 1981
and October 7, 1993, respectively, shall be fulfilled.
3. That grease interceptors shall be installed on all fixtures in
the restaurant facility where grease may be introduced into
the drainage systems in accordance with the provisions of
the Uniform Plumbing Code, unless otherwise approved by
the Building Department.
•
4. That all restaurant employees shall park their vehicles in
the Lido Marina Village Parking Structure.
S. That the development standards as they pertain to walls,
landscaping, parking lot illumination, and a portion of the
required parking spaces shall be waived.
6. The applicant shall make all required alterations to that
portion of the building used for restaurant purposes which
may be determined to be necessary by the Building and
Fire Departments. The applicant shall obtain a building
permit for all such alterations.
7. That the applicant shall obtain the approval of the Coastal
Commission prior to the issuance of any building permits
or the use of the expanded portion of the restaurant.
8. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify
conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to
the City Council the revocation of this use permit, upon a
determination that the operation which is the subject of this
-5-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November 11%
1994
R LL CALL
INDEX
use permit, causes injury, or is detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the
community.
9. That this Use Permit shall expire unless exercised within 24
months from the date of approval as specified in Section
20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
Use Permit No. 3499 (Amended) Public Hearing)
Item No..
Request to amend a previously approved use permit which
UP3499A
Approved
permitted the establishment of a full service graphic design studio
which also includes an instructional facility specializing in print
advertising design, on property located in the Newport Place
Planned Community. The proposed amendment involves a request
to permit additional students, and to expand the facility into
existing vacant office areas within the building which will be used
for a library, a lecture room, and two additional classrooms.
LOCATION: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 61 -9 (Resubdivision
No. 423) located at 3901 MacArthur
Boulevard, on the northwesterly comer of
MacArthur Boulevard and Jamboree Road,
in the Newport Place Planned Community.
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: Platt College, Anaheim, Inc., Newport Beach
OWNER: Nikko Capital Corp., Newport Beach
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Bill Lockwood, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission. Mr. Lockwood concurred with the findings and
conditions in Exhibit W.
-6-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November 10� 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
lotion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Use Permit No. 3499
X11 ayes
(Amended) subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit W.
MOTION CARRIED.
Fin in :
1. That the proposed development is consistent with the
General Plan, and is compatible with surrounding land
uses.
2. That the number of parking spaces provided is adequate for
the proposed design studio and instruction facility.
3. That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the
.
use of the property or building will not under the
circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the
health, safety, peace, comfort and general welfare of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such
proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and
improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare
of the City.
Conditions
1. That the expanded school facility shall be operated only in
conjunction with a design studio, and that the development
shall operate in accordance with the following conditions.
2. That the use of the facility shall be consistent with the
approved plot plan and floor plan.
3. That the total number of students and employees shall not
exceed 110 persons in the building at any one time. Any
-7-
COMMISSIONERS
.201.\10MONNWilook\
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
[t LL CALL
ttdDEX
additional increase in the number of people shall be subject
to approval of an amendment to this use permit.
4. That the applicant shall maintain at least 56 parking spaces
in the parking lot located immediately adjacent to the
facility at all times that the facility is in operation.
5. That all employees shall park their vehicles on -site at all
times.
6. That the Planning Commission may add to or modify
conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to
the City Council the revocation of this use permit, upon a
determination that the operation which is the subject of this
use permit, causes injury, or is detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the
community.
7. This 24
use permit shall expire unless exercised within
months from the date of approval as specified in Section
20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
Use Permit 3543 (Public Hearing)
item No.
Request to permit the establishment of an automobile repair
UP3543
facility on property located in the M -1 -A District.
Approved
LOCATION: Lot 24, Tract No. 5169, located at 4222
Campus Drive, on the southeasterly side of
Campus Drive, between Dove Street and
MacArthur Boulevard, across from the John
Wayne Airport.
ZONE: M -1 -A
APPLICANT: Naim Malik, Tustin
-8-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Nnveml�r 11)
100d
ROLL CALL
INDEX
OWNER: Donald R. Lawrenz Sr., Newport Beach,
(Long term Lessee)
James Hewicker, Planning Director, reviewed the subject
application. He said that subsequent to when the application was
filed, the Planning Commission received a letter from David
Bradburno, representing E. W. Spinney, Jr. dated November 9,
1994, indicating that Mr. Spinney, property owner, objected to the
filing of the use permit; however, the parties leasing the property
have 30 years remaining on the lease. Mr. Hewicker suggested
that the issue be addressed between the lessee and the property
owner.
Mr. Hewicker also discussed a letter dated November 10, 1994,
from W. N. Shattuck Inc., the property owner of adjoining property
located at 4242 and 4262 Campus Drive, the site of a proposed car
rental facility. The letter states that the adjoining property owner
.
has an easement across the subject property that would provide
vehicular access to Birch Street. Mr. Hewicker explained that when
the Planning Commission approved the use permit for the subject
automobile rental facility, it was approved with a chain link fence
around three sides of the property. Mr. Hewicker advised that the
plan for the car rental facility does not indicate a driveway or
access to the subject property which would allow the rental facility
to have access to Birch Street. He suggested that the issue be
resolved between the two parties. Mr. Hewicker stated that the
space between abutting properties could be closed off so as to
provide additional Parking Spaces No. 7 and No. 8 on the plot
plan. If the area would be left open, the parking spaces would not
be provided. Discussion followed between the Planning
Commission and staff with respect to Mr. Hewicker's foregoing
comments.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Frank Malik, 4360 Campus Drive, and Mr. Frank Lawrence,
attorney for the applicant, 4340 Campus Drive, appeared before
the Planning Commission. Mr. Lawrence stated that a precedent
has been set at three sites on Campus Drive for automobile uses
-9-
COMMISSIONERS
•pi Ao� c � $s'�p
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
SEX
similar to the subject request. He concurred with the findings and
conditions in Exhibit "A ".
Commissioner Gifford addressed the aforementioned letter from
Mr. Spinney, Jr. indicating concerns that the proposed use could
cause accidental contamination, and she asked if the existing lease
precludes the lessee from applying for a permit for a different use.
Mr. Lawrence responded to the negative. Mr. Malik replied that
there would be a disposal for the oil, etc. that is picked up every
two weeks, and there would be no contamination on the property.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr.
Stan Hassan, 4222 Campus Drive, attorney representing the long
term lessee, Donald R. Lawrenz, appeared before the Planning
Commission to address the concerns regarding the easement. He
expressed doubt that an easement exists at the rear of the subject
property and the property located on Birch Street, and he said that
.
the property owner that owns the Campus Drive building also
owns the Birch Street building. He said that an arrangement
could be made to eliminate the foregoing two required parking
spaces and to relocate the two parking spaces on the Birch Street
side of the easement. In reference to the proposed parking plan,
Mr. Hassan stated that the existing parking area has substantially
more parking spaces than the proposed parking area. The number
of parking spaces would be reduced with the establishment of the
car rental agency on the adjoining property inasmuch as a fence
would be constructed along the common property line which would
eliminate access to some of the existing parking spaces on the
subject property. There is an easement by reservation to The
Irvine Company on the property between 4242 Campus Drive and
4222 Campus Drive. He said that until such time as the fence is
built, substantial parking would be available, and he suggested that
the parking area not be restriped until the parking spaces are
eliminated.
Mr. Hewicker stated that if there would be a mutual easement
between the subject property and the adjoining property, and the
rental automobile agency is not able to construct the fence along
-10-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
the common property line, then the conditions of approval would
not be complied with in Use Permit No. 3530 that permitted the
automobile rental facility.
Mr. Hassan emphasized that the required number of parking
spaces would be in compliance with the subject use permit.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
lotion
*
Commissioner DiSano made a motion to approve Use Permit No.
X11 Ayes
3543 subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit 'W'. He
suggested that the private matters be addressed by private
attorneys. Motion voted on, MOTION CARRIED.
Findings:
.
1. That the proposed use is consistent with the Land Use
Element of the General Plan and is compatible with
surrounding land uses.
2. That the design of the proposed improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed
development.
3. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 20.80.060 of the Municipal Code.
4. That, with the restriping of the subject parking lot,
adequate parking will exist on -site to serve the automobile
repair facility and the other tenants.
5. That the establishment of the subject business will not have
any significant environmental impact.
6. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3543 will not, under
the circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health,
•
-11-
L
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of
persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in
the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
Conditions:
1. That the development shall be in substantial conformance
with the approved plot plan and floor plan, except as noted
below.
2. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the. Public Works Department.
3. That the on -site parking configuration shall be restriped so
as to provide parallel parking along the northeasterly side
of the subject building, and that the existing access to the
property to the southeast shall be closed and additional
parking spaces shall be provided in its place. The revised
on -site parking plan and vehicular and pedestrian
circulation systems shall be subject to further review and
approval of the City Traffic Engineer.
4. That the ingress and egress to the subject property shall be
one -way and shall be clearly identified by markers and
signage as approved by the City Traffic Engineer.
5. That all repair and service activities, including the storage
of auto parts, shall be located inside the building.
6. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be
screened from adjacent properties as well as from Campus
Drive.
7. That no vehicle waiting for service shall be parked outside
of the building for a period longer than twenty -four hours
unless it is in the process of being serviced. No vehicle
-12-
COMMISSIONERS
AOL
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
imp—,
NmWem–be-r 40, 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
shall be considered to be in process of being serviced for a
period longer than one week.
8. That the approval of this application shall permit minor
engine and electrical repair, tune -ups, oil and filter changes,
transmission service, installation of water pumps, fan belts,
radiator hoses, and the rotation of tires. No painting,
detailing, body work or other operations of a similar nature
shall be permitted on -site unless an amendment to this use
permit is approved by the Planning Commission.
9. That the applicant shall make all necessary alterations to
the existing structure as required by the Building
Department and the Fire Department so as to comply with
Section 503 of the Uniform Building Code.
10. That no car washing shall be permitted on the site unless
.
an amendment to this use permit is approved by the
Planning Commission.
11. That all signs shall meet the requirements of Chapter 20.06
of the Municipal Code.
12. That all employees shall park on -site at all times.
13. That the Planning Commission may add or modify
conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to
the City Council the revocation of this use permit, upon a
determination that the operation which is the subject of this
use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the
community.
14. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24
months from the date of approval as specified in Section
20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
i t i
-13-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November I
), 1994
1W
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Variance No. 1201 (Public Hearinel
Item No.
Request to permit the construction of a single family dwelling
v1201
which exceeds the maximum allowable height in the 24/28 Foot
Height Limitation District on property located in the R -1 District.
Approved
The height of the proposed dwelling will not exceed the height of
the top of curb on Ocean Boulevard. The proposal also includes
a modification to the Zoning Code so as to allow the proposed
dwelling to encroach 10 feet into the required 10 foot front yard
setback adjacent to Ocean Boulevard; and the acceptance of an
environmental document.
LOCATION: Lot Tract No. 1257, located at 3619
,15,
Ocean Boulevard, on the southerly side of
Ocean Boulevard between Orchid Avenue
and Poinsettia Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONE: R -1
APPLICANT: Charles L. Howell, Laguna Beach
OWNER: William H. Parker, Newport Beach
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Charles Howell, applicant, appeared before the Planning
Commission, and he concurred with the findings and conditions in
Exhibit "A".
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
lotion
*
Motion was made and voted on to approve Variance No. 1201
.11 Ayes
subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ", and the
revised environmental findings provided in the addendum to the
staff report. MOTION CARRIED.
•
-14-
MINUTES
! Tlr%F r%W WTT. tiTDADT 1MtM a ry
A a va aI"VV A va. A ua Aa as Nownabor 1 D, 1994
MW
ROLL CALL
INDEX
A. Environmental Document: Accept the environmental
document, maldng the following findings and imposing the
following mitigation measures:
1. That based upon the information contained in the Initial
Study, comments received, and all related documents, there
is no substantial evidence that the project, as conditioned
or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the
Initial Study, could have a significant effect on the
environment; therefore, a Negative Declaration has been
prepared. The Negative Declaration adequately addresses
the potential environmental impacts of the project, and
satisfies all the requirements of CEQA, and is therefore
approved. The Negative Declaration reflects the
independent judgement of the Planning Commission and
was reviewed and considered prior to approval of the
project.
•
2. An Initial Study has been conducted, and considering the
record as a whole, there is no evidence before this agency
that the proposed project will have the potential for an
adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. On the basis of the evidence in the
record, this agency finds that the presumption of adverse
effect contained in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations (CCR) has been rebutted.
Therefore, the proposed project qualifies for a De Minimis
Impact Fee Exemption pursuant to Section 7535(c) of Title
14, CCR.
3. The mitigation monitoring requirements of Public
Resources Code Section 21081.6 will be met through
required compliance with applicable codes, standards,
mitigation measures, and conditions of approval adopted in
connection with the project. The Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program for the project is attached to the
Negative Declaration and is hereby adopted.
-15-
COMMISSIONERS
%7NM0N\0\1'Q0k
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Nwomber 10,
1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Mitigation Measures:
1. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the
applicant shall demonstrate to the Planning
Department and Building Department that
construction operations shall utilize methods to
reduce pollutant emissions to the greatest extent
feasible. Such methods may include, but may not be
limited to, the following:
a) Use of low - emission construction equipment;
b) Rideshare . program and incentives for
construction employees;
c) Suspend grading operations during first and
second stage smog alerts;
.
d) Maintain construction equipment with
properly tuned engines;
e) Use of low - sulfur fuel for stationary
construction equipment;
f) Use of on -site power instead of portable
generators;
g) Coordinate construction operations to
minimize traffic interference.
2. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit the
applicant shall demonstrate to the Planning and
Building departments that all appropriate structural
and non - structural best management practices will
be incorporated into the project as required by the
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Drainage Area Management Plan.
•
-16-
COMMISSIONERS
�
%JV11+-001QkkVnZ\tr
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
IMEX
3. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the
applicant shall demonstrate to the Building
Department that the lighting system shall be
designed, directed, and maintained in such a manner
as to conceal the. light source and to minimize light
spillage and glare to the adjacent residential uses.
The plans shall be prepared and signed by a
licensed Architect or Electrical Engineer, with a
letter from the Architect or Engineer stating that, in
his or her opinion, this requirement has been
satisfied.
4. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant
shall demonstrate to the Planning Department that
the project will comply with Council Policies K -5
and K -6 regarding archaeological and
paleontological resource investigation, surveillance
.
and recovery.
B. Variance No. 1201. the subject variance with the
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applying to the land, building or use referred to in the
application, which circumstances or conditions do not apply
generally to land, buildings and /or uses in the same district
inasmuch as the subject property maintains a very steep
slope which is significantly different than the other lots on
the upland side of Ocean Boulevard.
2. That the granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights of
the applicant, inasmuch as the proposed building is of
comparable or lesser height to other buildings on the bluff
side of Ocean Boulevard.
-17-
COMMISSIONERS
IN �k)n
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
R L CALL VINDEX
3. That the granting of such application will not, under the
circumstances of the particular case, be materially
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and
general welfare of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of the subject property and will not under the
circumstances . of the particular case be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property
improvements in the neighborhood.
4. That the modification to allow the proposed building
encroachments within the ten foot front yard setback, will
not under the circumstances of the case, be detrimental to
the health, safety,. peace, comfort, and general welfare of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such
proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and
improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare
.
of the City, and further that said modification is consistent
with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the Municipal
Code.
5. That the design of the proposed improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed
development.
6. That public improvements may be required of the
developer per Section 20.82.050 of the Municipal Code.
Conditions:
1. That the proposed development shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved site plan, floor plans,
elevations and sections, except as noted below.
2. That the applicant shall provide verification during the
course of construction that the proposed development fully
complies with the approved plans. Required verification
•
-18-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
shall be prepared and certified by a licensed land surveyor
or civil engineer prior to final inspections of rough framing.
3. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
4. That a standard agreement and accompanying surety be
provided in order to guarantee satisfactory completion of
the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a grading
or building permit prior to completion of the public
improvements.
5. That no grading of the slope within the Ocean Boulevard
rigbt -of -way shall take place which will reduce the usable
area at the top of slope adjacent to Ocean Boulevard, and
that the existing public walkway presently located along the
Ocean Boulevard frontage shall stay in its present location.
•
6. That be
an encroachment agreement executed and
approved by the City Council to provide for the
construction and maintenance of retaining walls and other
improvements to be constructed within the Ocean
Boulevard right -of -way.
7. That a barrier or railing be constructed at the top of any
retaining walls higher than thirty (30) inches.
8. That the existing sewer located along the northerly property
line be relocated to the satisfaction of the Utilities
Department. A sewer plan shall be prepared by a
registered civil engineer and shown on the City's standard
plan and profile sheets. An easement for sewer facilities
shall also be provided for the new sewer main if deemed
necessary by the Public Works Department.
9. That the proposed roadway slope be evaluated by a
geotechnical engineer to determine the impact of
constructing a retaining structure with recommendations as
•
-19-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Nmzenlber 10, 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
to the maximum allowable slope and the general stability
of the area.
10. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to
issuance of any building permits.
11. That the Public Works Department plan check and
inspection fee be paid.
12. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and
by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by
proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen.
Traffic control and transportation of equipment and
materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and
local requirements.
13. That maintenance of the vehicular access to Ocean
.
Boulevard is the responsibility of those residences taking
access from the drive and the City shall not be requested
to perform maintenance of the drive.
14. That the applicant shall obtain the approval of the Coastal
Commission prior to the issuance of building permits.
15. That this variance shall expire unless exercised within 24
months of the date of approval as specified in Section
20.82.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
•-20-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
rAA-.Use Permit No. 3517 (Continued Public Hearing)
Item No..
Request to permit the establishment of a 24 hour Taco Bell drive -
UP3517
through, take -out restaurant facility, with indoor and outdoor
TS 99
ancillary seating, on property located in the RSC -H District. The
proposal also includes: a request to waive a portion of the
Approved
required off -street parking spaces; a modification to the Sign Code
so as to allow two free standing pole or ground signs where the
Sign Code permits only one free standing sign per building site;
and an exception to the Sign Code so as to allow a restaurant logo
on the special purpose directional signs, whereas the Sign Code
prohibits such logos on directional signs; and the acceptance of an
environmental document.
AND
.
B. Traffic Study No. 99 (Continued Public Hearing)
Request to approve a traffic study in conjunction with a drive -
through, take -out restaurant facility on property located in the
RSC -H District.
LOCATION: Lots 48 through 53 and a portion of Lot 54,
Tract No. 1210, located at 1400 West Coast
Highway, on the northerly side of West Coast
Highway, across from the Balboa Bay Club.
ZONE: RSC -H
APPLICANT: Taco Bell Corp., Irvine
OWNER: City National Bank, Los Angeles
Chairman Glover stated that the memorandum from the City
Attorney's Office dated November 4, 1994, explained that there
would not be a conflict of interest if she participated in the subject
public hearing; however, she elected to step down from the dais at
the Planning Commission level because of the controversy
-21-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
surrounding the issue. Commissioner Ridgeway stepped down
from the dais because of a possible conflict of interest.
James Hewicker, Planning Director, discussed the letter from the
Police Department dated November 2, 1994, that is attached to
the staff report. The Police Department recommends that the
hours of operation be the same as McDonald's Restaurant on
West Coast Highway, or be limited between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00
p.m. daily, and if a 24 hour operation would be approved that a
uniformed private security guard be on the premises from 11:00
p.m. to 6:00 am. The Police Department recommends that a 1
foot -candle of illumination at ground level be evenly dispersed
throughout the parking lot; that no loudspeakers be allowed on the
property; and that the parking lot be chained and secured. He
said that conditions were added to the staff report subsequent to
the October 6th Planning Commission meeting as follows:
Condition No. 25 was amended in revised Exhibit "A" to require
•
that there be an employee with a remote order unit during peak
hours of operation; added Condition No. 47 stating that there
would be no logo on the retaining wall; and added Condition No.
48 recommending that the retaining wail be constructed with a
stucco type surface with integral color or of masonry block with no
surface treatment. Mr. Hewicker also addressed the
aforementioned memorandum from the City Attorney's Office
concerning a possible conflict of interest.
Mr. Hewicker stated that the hours of operation at McDonald's
Restaurant located on West Coast Highway are from 6:00 a.m. to
1:00 am. during the summer months Monday through Thursday
and from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday; and the rest
of the year, the hours of operation are from 6:00 a m. to 11:00
p.m. Sunday through Thursday and from 6:00 a.m, to 12:00
midnight Friday and Saturday.
Commissioner Pomeroy addressed the applicant's request for a 24
operation wherein he stated that the applicant previously indicated
that they would be willing to mitigate the residents' concerns by
closing the parking lot and the indoor dining room, and only
-22-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Novefabef 1994
-0,
ROLL CALL
INDEX
allowing the drive- through traffic so as to eliminate the concerns
regarding noise and activity in the parking lot. Commissioner
Pomeroy and Commissioner Edwards discussed the need for a
security guard if the take -out restaurant would be operated as
previously stated by the applicant.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Adams with
respect to the lighting and the chained parking lot, Mr. Hewicker
stated that the Police Department requested that the parking lot
lighting be sufficient to enable them to readily observe the parking
lot, and the residents requested that the lights not be visible from
their residences located on the bluff. William Laycock, Current
Planning Manager, replied that the recommendation is that the
parking lot would be chained only if the take -out restaurant would
be completely closed during specific hours at night. Mr. Hewicker
and Commissioner Adams discussed the circulation of the parking
lot and the parking spaces that would be chained off.
•
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Pomeroy, Mr.
Hewicker stated that a uniformed security guard is not required to
be located on the McDonald's Restaurant premises.
Commissioner Pomeroy and Commissioner Edwards discussed the
Police Department's request for a uniformed security guard if the
Planning Commission would approve a 24 hour operation. Mr.
Hewicker stated that subsequent to when McDonald's Restaurant's
application was approved, the Police Department has taken a keen
interest in the City's restaurant operations. He said that parking
lots where take -out restaurants are located can become attractive
to young adults, and the intent of the Police Department is to
prohibit the use of the parking lot as a gathering place when the
businesses are closed.
In response to a question posed by Acting Chairman Gifford with
respect to Condition No. 9, revised Exhibit "A'; Don Webb, Public
Works Director, explained that one foot candle power would be
considered a very low light level but adequate to observe a parking
lot.
•
-23
COMMISSIONERS
,0� °����0 ���''�o
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
The public hearing was reopened at this time, and Mr. James
Person appeared before the Planning Commission on behalf of the
applicant. He concurred with the findings and conditions in the
revised Exhibit "A", and with Mr. Hewicker's aforementioned
comments. He agreed with Commissioner Pomeroy's comments
regarding the uniformed security guard during the hours of 11:00
p.m. and 2:00 a.m. The one -foot candle power would reflect a
minimum amount of light for safety purposes, and the restaurant
usually installs a six-foot candle power of light. In response to the
comparison of the Jack -In -The -Box Restaurant and Carl's Jr.
Restaurant, Mr. Person stated that the take -out restaurants are
located in shopping centers, and the disturbances occurred in the
parking lots of the shopping centers and not because of the take-
out restaurants. Taco Bell is committed to be a good corporate
citizen and the restaurant would resolve the problem if one would
arise.
.
In response to a question posed by Acting Chairman Gifford, Mr.
Person replied that in the event that the Planning Commission
would grant the 24 hour operation and the dining area would be
closed, the applicant would be willing to chain the parking lot as
required.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Adams, Mr.
Person replied that the applicant requested a 24 hour operation;
however, the applicant would consider a 5:00 a.m. opening and
closing hours similar to McDonald's Restaurant.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr.
Person explained that "a non - spillage six-foot candle is used by the
take -out restaurant for liability purposes.
Commissioner Pomeroy supported extended operating hours
similar to McDonald's Restaurant during the summer months of
5:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Sunday through Thursday, and from 5:00
a.m, to 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday, and if the take -out
restaurant would prove to be a good citizen to the residents, the
•
-24-
�
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Nwrember 1),
1994
R LL CALL
INDEX
applicant could come back to the Planning Commission with a
request for a 24 hour operation. Mr. Person stated that a daily
2:00 a.m. closing would make the operation more economically
feasible.
Commissioner Edwards stated that he would support the hours of
operation similar to McDonald's Restaurant, and that Condition
No. 50, revised Exhibit "A ", requiring a uniformed private security
guard, be eliminated.
Commissioner Adams asked if the take -out restaurant would close
the dining room earlier than 1:00 a.m, or 2:00 am. Mr. Person
stated that in the event the Planning Commission would approve
hours of operation from 5:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. seven days a week,
the applicant would be willing to close the dining room and the
parking lot at 11:00 p.m
Ms. Barbara Yeager, 1401 Kings Road, appeared before the
Planning Commission. She stated that 14 residents on Kings Road
and the Cliff Haven Community Association have requested that
the hours of operation be limited to the same operating hours as
McDonald's Restaurant. She requested that the Planning
Commission approve the Police Department's recommendations.
She pointed out that the Taco Bell Restaurant located at the
corner of Newport Boulevard and 17th Street in Costa Mesa is
open 24 hours a day. The Police Department's comments are a
direct result of the negative impact of 24 hour restaurants and fast
food establishments, i.e. 54 calls to the Jack -In- The -Box
Restaurant and 55 calls to McDonald's Restaurant since the
beginning of 1993.
Mr. John Sturgess, 601 Cliff Drive, appeared before the Planning
Commission. He stated that the community does not oppose Taco
Bell or a business that is requesting to be a part of Mariner's Mile;
however, it needs to be confirmed and understood that the
residents would be immediately impacted by the take -out
restaurant. He addressed the Police Department's memorandum;
and he requested that the Planning Commission consider the
•
-25-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November
0 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
implication that the hours of operation would have on the
residents' security.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
Commissioner DiSano expressed his approval of the applicant's
request for a 24 hour operation; however, he also recognized the
residents' concerns.
Commissioner Pomeroy stated that the potential.for disturbances
are related to the parking lot and the outdoor dining area as
opposed to the drive -thru restaurant. He suggested longer
operating hours, but to restrict the dining room to close at 11:00
p.m. and to eliminate Condition No. 50, Exhibit "A ': That a
uniformed, private security guard be on duty between the hours of
11:00 p.m. and 6:00 am. daily. That the private firm have adequate
direction from the business owner on policies relating to private
.
persons' arrests for trespassing and disturbance of the peace.
Motion
*
Motion was made to approve Use Permit No. 3517 and Traffic
Study No. 99 subject to the findings and conditions in revised
Exhibit "A", with the following modifications to Use Permit No.
3517: Amend Condition No. 3 as follows: the operating hours be
restricted from 5:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.; the dining room be closed
from 11:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. and the parking lot be cordoned off
from 11:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m., with a plan to be approved by the
City Traffic Engineer; and eliminate Condition No. 50.
Commissioner Edwards made a substitute motion to approve Use
Substitute
Permit No. 3517 and Traffic Study No. 99 subject to the findings
Motion
*
and conditions in Exhibit "A", and to amend Condition No. 3, Use
Permit No. 3517, as follows: open for business from 6:00 a.m. to
1:00 a.m. Sunday through Thursday, and from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00
a.m. Friday and Saturday during the summer months; from 6:00
a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and from 6:00 a.m.
to 12:00 midnight Friday and Saturday during the rest of the year;
and to eliminate Condition No. 50.
•
-26-
COMMISSIONERS
��<G�l'nCli�O�P. dr 9 EL f Tgrvxr nim T#JV1I71Pn1Pgr RF A (`N
MINUTES
November 10, 19%
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Acting Chairman Gifford supported the substitute motion on the
basis that the operating hours are appropriate. She stated that the
operating hours would be a satisfactory compromise between the
interests of the residents and the needs of the business.
Commissioner Adams stated that offering an extension to 2:00 a m
throughout the year with the dining room closed would mitigate
the residents' concerns. He determined that with the parking lot
chained off and the dining room closed after 11:00 p.m. each night
that there would be a better guarantee that there would be less
disturbance in the area.
Commissioner Pomeroy supported the original motion inasmuch
as it would be a better environment for the neighbors if the dining
room would be closed.
Ayes
*
*
Substitute motion was voted on, MOTION DENIED.
*
**
t
*
*
Commissioner DiSano stated that if there would be problem
regarding the operation, the residents should immediately contact
Code Enforcement so as to address the neighbors' concerns.
Condition No. 43, revised Exhibit "A ", states that the Planning
Commission.... may add to or modify conditions of approval of this
use permit, and the Planning Commission may recommend
revocation.... of this use permit upon a determination that the
operation of the take -out restaurant causes injury or is detrimental
to the health, safety, peace, or general welfare of the community.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Edwards,
Commissioner Adams explained that the proposed operating hours
in the original motion were based on the applicant's concession
from their original request of 24 hours; that 5:00 a.m. would allow
patrons to stop for coffee; and extended hours to 2:00 am. would
allow business in the drive -thru restaurant.
Ayes
No
*
Original motion was voted on, MOTION CARRIED.
Absent
0
-27-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
R LL CALL
INDEX
A. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT:
Findines:
1. That based upon the information contained in the Initial
Study, comments received, and all related documents, there
is no substantial evidence that the project, as conditioned
or as modified by mitigation measures identified in the
Initial Study, could have a significant effect on the
environment, therefore a Negative Declaration has been
prepared. The Negative Declaration adequately addresses
the potential environmental impacts of the project, and
satisfies all the requirements of CEQA, and is therefore
approved. The Negative Declaration was considered prior
to approval of the project.
2. An Initial Study has been conducted, and considering the
record as a whole there is no evidence before this agency
that the proposed project will have the potential for an
adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which wildlife depends. On the basis of the evidence in the
record, this agency finds that the presumption of adverse
effect contained in Section 753.5(d) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations (CCR) has been rebutted.
Therefore, the proposed project qualifies for a De Minimis
Impact Fee Exemption pursuant to Section 7535(c) of Title
14, CCR.
3. That during the course of construction, pollutants from
machinery, delivery trucks, and workers' vehicles would be
released. That in addition, dust would be generated by
earthmoving and construction operations. That the
following mitigation measures incorporated below are
required in order to reduce these impacts below the level
of significance.
•
-28-
COMMISSIONERS
"INIMINMON\07\�§
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
4. That it is conceivable that the proposed Taco Bell
operation would exceed allowable noise limits in the
adjacent residential neighborhood, if no mitigation were
incorporated into the design of the project. That through
proper design (e.g., orientation and enclosure of the -drive-
through menu ordering board), equipment(e.g., menu -order
speakers), and restrictions on hours of operation, the noise
level could be reduced to comply with County standards.
That in order to ensure that the proposed project would be
designed and equipped so that noise levels are not
increased, the following mitigation measures have been
incorporated below and that the adoption of these
requirements as conditions of approval on the project
would ensure that no significant noise impacts are
generated.
5. That the proposed project could produce light and glare
•
that could adversely affect nearby residential properties.
The primary external light would consist of decorative
lighting features around the new building, directional signs
and security lighting as required. That the following
mitigation measures incorporated below, would ensure that
any exterior lighting is designed such that potential impacts
from nuisance glare would not be significant.
6. That although there is an existing 15 -foot high retaining
wall along the eastern 30 feet of the site, the new proposed
retaining wall could have a significant adverse effect on the
aesthetics of the bluff unless mitigated with landscaping to
soften its appearance. That the following mitigation
measure incorporated below will reduce this potential
impact below the level of significance.
•
-29-
COMMISSIONERS
��� �f� o �
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
w=mber 10, 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
MITIGATION MEASURES:
1. All grading activities shall comply with the dust
suppression provisions of the City's Grading and
Excavation Code (NBMC Sec. 1S.04.140) and
AQMD Rule 403.
2. Construction operations shall utilize methods to
reduce pollutant emissions to the greatest extent
feasible. Such methods include the following:
a) Use of low - emission construction
equipment
b) Rideshare program and incentives for
construction employees
.
c) Suspend grading operations during
first and second stage smog alerts
d) Maintain construction equipment with
properly tuned engines
e) Use of low - sulfur fuel for stationary
construction equipment
f) Use of on -site power instead of
portable generators
g) Coordinate construction operations to
minimize traffic interference
3. That prior to issuance of a building permit, a detailed noise
analysis report shall be prepared describing the noise
generation potential for the project based on the detailed
project design, noise attenuation features, and equipment
specifications. The report shall demonstrate that the
project will not exceed allowable noise levels as described
•
-30-
���tnp0 C�' �OlL�is
I
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
in the County of Orange Noise Control Ordinance with
respect to the residential properties adjacent to the project
site. The report shall be subject to review and approval by
the Planning Director.
4. That prior to the issuance of any building permit, the
applicant shall demonstrate to the Building Department
that the lighting system has been designed, directed, and
maintained in such a manner as to conceal the light source
and to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent
residential uses. That the plans shall be prepared and
signed by a licensed Architect or Electrical Engineer, with
a letter from the Architect or Engineer stating that, in his
or her opinion, this requirement has been satisfied.
5. That prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, a
detailed landscaping and irrigation plan prepared by a
.
licensed landscape architect or landscape contractor shall
be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Building
Departments. That the plan shall include appropriate plant
materials of sufficient size to partially obscure the retaining
wall from view and blend visually with the natural slope.
That examples of appropriate plant materials may include,
but not limited to, bougainvillea (planted above the wall so
as to cascade down the wall face) and creeping fig (planted
at the base of the wall). That prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy, landscaping and irrigation shall be
installed according to the approved plan.
B. TRAFFIC STUDY NO 99:
FINDINGS:
1. That a Traffic Study has been prepared which analyzes the
impact of the proposed project on the peak -hour traffic and
circulation system in accordance with Chapter 15.40 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code and City Policy S -1.
•
-31-
COMMISSIONERS
� 41
Of"f��`U�,o�O
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
2. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project- generated
traffic will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory
level of traffic on any 'major,' 'primary- modified,' or
'primary' street.
3. That the Traffic Study indicates that the project- generated
traffic will not be greater than one percent of the existing
traffic during the 2.5 hour peak period on five of the six
study intersections and that the ICU analysis for the
intersection of West Coast Highway and Tustin Avenue,
indicates that the ICU values of 0.87 in the A.M. Peak and
0.73 in the P.M. Peak, will not be altered beyond an
acceptable level of service upon the addition of the project.
C. USE PERMIT NO. 3517:
.
3
Findings:
1. With the exception of on -site parking, the project will
comply with all applicable City and State Building Codes
and Zoning requirements for new buildings applicable to
the district in which the proposed project is located.
2. As conditioned, the proposed project use is consistent with
all elements of the General Plan and is compatible with
surrounding land uses.
3. That the proposed retaining wall is consistent with the
policy interpretation requiring that the siting of new
buildings and structures sball be controlled and regulated
to insure, to the extent practical, the preservation of public
views, the preservation of unique natural resources, and the
alteration of natural landforms along bluffs and cliffs has
been minimized to the greatest extent practical, given the
fact that the subject property is severely constrained by the
extension of the bluff which narrows the lot depth and
which necessitates relocation of the existing retaining wall.
•
-32-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November'0,
1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
4. That the design of the proposed improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed
development.
5. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 20.80.060 of the Municipal Code.
6. That the proposed restaurant is expected to generate nearly
1,400 trips per day. Approximately 760 of these trips will
specifically be traveling to this restaurant, with the
remaining trips coming from motorists already on West
Coast Highway for another reason. This is a 1.5% increase
in existing traffic. Increases of 1% or greater are
considered significant increases in traffic and therefore, will
contribute to the need for the widening of West Coast
Highway.
7. That the waiver of the take -out restaurant development
standards as they relate to a portion of the perimeter
fencing and a portion of the required parking (10 parking
spaces) will not be detrimental to adjacent properties
inasmuch as, in the absence of the West Coast Highway
widening, the permittee will provide all but one of the
required parking spaces, and approximately 50% of the
patrons will use the drive - through facility.
8. That adequate provision for traffic circulation is being
made for the drive- through and take -out restaurant facility.
9. That the proposed modification so as to allow four wall
signs where the Sign Code permits only three walls signs
per building site will not, under the circumstances of this
case be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals,
comfort and general welfare of persons residing and
working in the neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in the neighborhood or the
general welfare of the City, and further that the proposed
•
-33-
COMMISSIONERS
�01�°c � o
9 �o 7k,
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November A 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
modification is consistent with the legislative intent of Title
20 of the Municipal Code.
10. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3517 will not under
the circumstances of this case be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, and generat welfare of
persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be
detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the
neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
CONDITIONS:
1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with
the approved plot plan, floor plans, and elevations except
as noted in the following conditions.
2. That a lot line adjustment to combine the lots into one
.
building site, shall be processed and recorded prior to
issuance of grading or building permits, unless otherwise
approved by the Planning Department . and the Public
Works Department.
3. That the hours of operation of the proposed facility shall be
restricted between 5:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m.; that the dining
room be closed between 11:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m.; that the
parking lot be cordoned off between 11:00 p.rrL and 5:00
am. with a plan to be approved by the City Traffic
Engineer.
4. That the service of any alcoholic beverages in conjunction
with the take -out restaurant facility is prohibited unless an
amended use permit is approved by the City.
5. That the proposed landscaping shall be regularly
maintained free of weeds and debris. All vegetation shall
be regularly trimmed and kept in a healthy condition.
•
-34-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November 10, 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
6. That landscape plans shall be subject to review and
approval of the City Traffic Engineer, Planning Department
and the Public Works Department.
7. That a minimum of 48 off -street parking spaces (including
10 spaces in the drive - through lane) shall be provided on-
site until such time as West Coast Highway is widened to
its Master Plan configuration. Upon the implementation of
the widening of West Coast Highway, the property shall be
restriped to provide 29 parking spaces and space in the
drive- through lane sufficient to accommodate 10 vehicles.
8. That all employees shall park their vehicles on -site.
9. That the parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with
fighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily
discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons on or
about the parking lot. This requirement shall include a
report from a qualified lighting engineer, certifying the
parking lot is illuminated at a minimum level of one foot
candle power, evenly dispersed, measured at ground level.
10. That the development standards pertaining to the wall
along the westerly side property line and a portion of the
required parking spaces (10 spaces) for the take -out
restaurant shall be waived.
11. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and
pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review
by the Traffic Engineer prior to issuance of any grading or
building permits for the subject facility.
12. That the required number of handicapped parking spaces
shall be designated within the on -site parking area and shall
be used solely for handicapped self - parking. One
handicapped sign on a post and one handicapped sign on
the pavement shall be required for each handicapped space.
.
-35-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
R LL CALL
INDEX
13. That all signs shall be in conformance with the provisions
of the Newport Beach Municipal Code and shall be
approved by the City Traffic Engineer if located adjacent
to any vehicular ingress and egress.
14. That only three wall identification signs, one 25 foot high
(100 sq. ft. per face) pole sign, and one drive- through menu
sign located on the West Coast Highway side of the
building (the fourth wall sign) shall be permitted, in
conjunction with the take -out restaurant. No signs shall
be permitted on the northerly side of the building facing
the bluff.
15. That the proposed directional signs shall not exceed 6 sq.ft.
and shall not include the restaurant name or logo.
16. That the proposed pole sign located within the dedication
.
area be positioned so that sight distance is maintained in
accordance with the City's sight distance standard 110 -L.
17. That a trash removal program shall be developed by the
applicant acceptable to the Planning Department. That the
program shall include provision for cleaning the on -site
parking area every 30 minutes for trash. In addition, the
applicant shall be responsible for regularly scheduled pick-
up of trash in the area surrounding the restaurant facility.
18. That the driveways shall be designed in accordance with
City Standard 166 -L and that the intersection of West
Coast Highway and the private drives be designed to
provide sight distance for a speed of 45 miles per hour.
Slopes, landscape, walls and other obstruction shall be
considered in the sight distance requirements. Landscaping
and signs within the sight line shall not exceed twenty -four
inches in height. The sight distance requirement may be
modified at non - critical locations, subject to approval of the
Traffic Engineer.
•
-36-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
14. That the unused drive aprons be removed and replaced
with curb, gutter and sidewalk and that the deteriorated
and displaced sections of sidewalk be reconstructed along
the West Coast Highway frontage under an encroachment
permit issued by the California Department of
Transportation
20. That the headlight glare from the drive- through lane shall
be screened from. view of westbound traffic on West Coast
Highway by use of landscaping or other device acceptable
to the City Traffic Engineer.
21. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
22. That arrangements- be made with the Public Works
Department in order to guarantee satisfactory completion
of the public improvements, if it is desired to obtain a
.
grading or building permit prior to completion of the public
improvements.
23. That the owner shall execute an Irrevocable Offer of
Dedication, the form and content of which are to be
approved by the City Attorney and Public Works Director,
for 12 feet of right -of -way for street and highway purposes
along the West Coast Highway frontage of the property.
The offer shall be executed and recorded prior to the
issuance of any building permit. The agreement shall be
executed by the owner of the property and the applicant for
the permit shall include the following provisions: that the
irrevocable offer of dedication shall be for 20 years from
the date of approval of the subject use permit; that the City
or other agency shall not accept the dedication until such
time as funds have been programmed for the construction
of the widening of West Coast Highway; that the building
setback shall be a minimum of 17 feet (12 foot irrevocable
offer plus 5 foot setback for landscape purposes, unless
otherwise approved by the Public Works Department) from
-37-
110 .n0� disco
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
C�
1994
-01
ROLL CALL
INDEX
the existing West Coast Highway property line; that
buildable area be based on the parcel areas including the
area subject to the offer of dedication; and that the
implementation of this plan be provided for in the recorded
dedication agreement.
24. That permittee shall execute an encroachment agreement
pursuant to which permittee is authorized to use the area
described in the irrevocable offer of dedication for parking
purposes until such time as West Coast Highway is
widened.
25. That the drive - through facility shall be operated in such a
manner that vehicles will not be allowed to block access
driveways. This shall be monitored at all times by the
applicants' representatives at the site. An employee with a
remote order unit shall be used during peak hours of
.
operation to expedite the orders so there will not be back-
ups in the stacking lane onto West Coast Highway. If back-
ups occur, the incoming customers shall be directed to
bypass the drive- through facility. If a traffic congestion
problem occurs on West Coast Highway related to the
drive- through facility that is not immediately corrected, the
Planning Commission may recommend to the City Council
revocation of this Use Permit.
26. That a drainage study be prepared by the applicant and
approved by the Public Works Department prior to
issuance of any grading or building permits. Any
modifications or extensions to the existing storm drain, shall
be the responsibility of the developer.
27. That a surface drainage collection system shall be installed
on the bluff side of the proposed and existing retaining
walls, to collect all tributary drainage and to convey it by
private underground storm drain to West Coast Highway,
unless otherwise approved by the City Grading Engineer
or Building Department.
•
-38-
its f�hp Id�sr0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
28. That a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation report
of the subject property and the adjacent bluff shall be
submitted for review to the City Grading Engineer prior to
issuance of building or grading permits. This report shall
include the evaluation of the present and future gross
surficial stability of the slope located at the rear of the site.
A condition survey report regarding the existing retaining
wall shall also be performed and submitted prior to
issuance of building or grading permits.
29. That all grading be done in accordance with grading plans
and reports approved by the City Grading Engineer or
Building Department and a qualified soils engineer. Upon
completion of the grading, the civil engineer and the soils
engineer shall certify that the grading has been completed
in accordance with the plans and the requirements of the
grading ordinance.
.
30. That the applicant shall execute an indemnity agreement
approved as to form and content by the City Attorney
holding the City harmless from any future liability or
damages resulting from any soil slippage resulting from the
grading on the site, pursuant to the requirements of the
Land Use Element of the General Plan as relates to
Coastal Bluffs.
31. That the development of site shall be subject to a grading
permit to be approved by the Building Department, Public
Works Department and Planning Departments.
32. That a grading plan, if required, shall include a complete
plan for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to
minimize any potential impacts from silt, debris, and other
water pollutants.
33. The grading permit shall include, if required, a description
of haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and
•
-39-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
sweeping programs designed to minimize impact of haul
operations.
34. The velocity of concentrated runoff from the project shall
be evaluated and erosive velocities controlled as part of the
project design.
35. That grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans
prepared by a Civil Engineer and based on
recommendations of a soil engineer and an engineering
geologist subsequent to the. completion of a comprehensive
soil and geologic investigation of the site. Permanent
reproducible copies of the "Approved as Built" grading
plans on standard size sheets shall be furnished to the
Building Department.
.
36. That disruption caused by construction work along
roadways and by movement of construction vehicles shall
be minimized by proper use of traffic control equipment
and flagmen. Traffic control and transportation of
equipment and materials shall be conducted in accordance
with state and local requirements. There shall be no
construction storage or delivery of materials within the state
right -of -way..
37. That trash receptacles for patrons shall be located in
convenient locations inside and outside the building.
38. That all mechanical equipment and trash areas shall be
screened from adjoining properties and from adjoining
streets. The mechanical equipment shall be sound
attenuated to 55 dBA measured at the property lines.
39. That a washout area for refuse containers be provided in
such a way as to allow direct drainage into the sewer
system and not into the Bay or storm drains, unless
otherwise approved by the Building Department.
i-40-
COMMISSIONERS
l+i7`v nF N1+ ,tI7Pn12T RFAf`Ti
MINUTES
W
ROLL CALL
WD EX
40. That grease interceptors shall be provided on all fixtures in
the restaurant facility where grease may be introduced into
the drainage systems in accordance with the provisions of
the Uniform Plumbing Code, unless otherwise approved by
the Building Department.
41. That exhaust fans shall be designed to control smoke and
odor, unless otherwise approved by the Building ,
Department.
42. That one restroom for each sex shall be provided and shall
be made readily available to patrons of the facility during
all hours of operation. Said restroom facilities shall be
accessible to the handicapped.
43. That the Planning Commission, or City Council on review
or appeal, may add to or modify conditions of approval to
.
this use permit, and the Planning Commission may
recommend revocation of, and the City Council may
revoke, this use permit upon a determination that the
operation of the take -out restaurant causes injury or is
detrimental to the health, safety, peace or general welfare
of the community.
44. Permittee shall comply with all provisions of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code, applicable County ordinances, and
relevant provisions of State law. Any violation of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code, applicable County
ordinance or relevant State law shall be the basis for
revocation of this Use Permit.
45. The mitigation measures imposed in conjunction with
approval of the environmental document (negative
declaration) shall be conditions of approval to the Use
Permit.
46. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24
months from the date of approval as specified in Section
i
-41-
COMMISSIONERS
tiN\(t\\V
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
20.80.090 A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
47. That no logo or surface feature shall be permitted on the
retaining wall.
48. That the retaining wall be a stucco type surface with
integral color or be constructed of masonry block with no
surface treatment, and that the surface or type of masonry
used shall extend throughout the entire wall.
49. That the menu board speaker shall be installed on the
West Coast Highway side of the building so as to minimize
noise impact to the adjoining residential properties. No
other loudspeakers other than the menu board speaker
shall be utilized in conjunction with the proposed
operation.
.
50. Deleted.
The Planning Commission recessed at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened
at 9:10 p.m.
Use Permit No. 3429 (Amended) Continued Public Hearing)
item No.
Request to amend a previously approved use permit that permitted
UP3429
the construction of a hand car wash and detailing facility which
Approved
also permitted the sale and dispensing of gasoline, on property
located in the RSC -H District. Said approval also allowed a
portion of the proposed building to exceed the 26 foot basic height
limit in the 26/35 Foot Height Limitation District. The proposed
amendment involves a request to allow the sale of soft drinks and
pre - prepared food items for customers and employees in
conjunction with permitted retail sales on the property; and a
request to permit a background type music system in the outdoor
customer seating area. The proposed amendment also includes a
request to approve an off -site parking agreement for employee and
•
-42
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Novenber-'A,
1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
additional overflow parking on the adjoining Marakesb Restaurant
property.
LOCATION: Parcel No. 1, Parcel Map 282/40, 41
(Resubdivision No. 988), located at 1200
West Coast Highway (car wash site); and
Lots 37 and 38, Tract No. 1210, located at
1100 West Coast Highway (off -site parking
lot), on the northerly side of West Coast
Highway, across from the Balboa Bay Club.
ZONE: RSC -H
APPLICANT: Warren Levy, Newport Beach
OWNER: Golden Empire Trading Company, Corona
del Mar
•
James Hewicker, Planning Director, requested that the Planning
Commission consider the food service, the screening of the
washing, drying, and detailing of automobiles that occur on the
site, and the elimination of the music system that was installed in
the outdoor customer seating areas. The applicant is not prepared
to discuss additional parking off -site; however, staff would continue
to monitor the problem.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Adams, Mr.
Hewicker explained that breaks in the curb separating the abutting
properties would be needed if and when the applicant secures the
use of the off -site location for employee parking. Commissioner
Adams and Mr. Hewicker discussed the access to the adjoining
property.
The public hearing was reopened at this time, and Mr. Jerry King,
979 Sandcastle Drive, Corona del Mar, appeared before the
Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant. Mr. King
concurred with the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ". Mr.
King stated that the applicant would come back to the Planning
.
-43-
COMMISSIONERS
t •
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Commission with an off -site parking agreement in the near future
so as to bring the use permit in compliance with the conditions of
approval.
In response to questions posed by Chairman Glover and
Commissioner Adams, Mr. King replied that there is no food
preparation for sale on site. The outdoor speaker system would be
eliminated on the sides and at the rear of the building, and the
two outdoor speakers would remain at the front of the building.
The current operating hours of the car wash and detailing facility
are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. daily. Mr. Hewicker stated that
the City has had problems over the years with paging devices, etc.
being used out of doors along West Coast Highway inasmuch as
the speakers have been a nuisance to the adjacent residents, and
in conclusion he said that staff opposes the outdoor speakers.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
Motion
*
Motion was made to approve Use Permit No. 3429 (Amended)
subject to the findings and conditions in Exhibit "A ".
Substitute
Substitute motion was made and voted on to approve Use Permit
Motion
*
No. 3429 subject to the findings and conditions is Exhibit "A ", with
Ayes
*
*
*
*
*
*
the substitute Finding No. 7 and Condition No. 8 provided in the
No
*
staff report to deny the introduction of the outdoor speaker
system. MOTION CARRIED.
Fin in :
1. That the proposed development is consistent with the Land
Use Element of the General Plan, and is compatible with
surrounding land uses.
2. That the design of the proposed improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed
development.
.
-44-
COMMSSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November 10,
1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
3. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 20.80.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal
Code.
4. That adequate parking will exist on -site to serve the car
washing /auto detailing, the incidental food service use and
related retail use.
5. That without a formal off -site parking arrangement, the
expansion of the on -site detailing operation cannot be
accommodated and necessitates scaling back to the
previously approved configuration of the car wash and
detailing facility.
6. That the establishment of the proposed food service use in
conjunction with the car wash facility will not have any
significant environmental impact.
•
7. That the approval of Use Permit No. 3429 (Amended) for
the addition of the food service use will not, under the
circumstances of this case, be detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of
persons residing and working in the neighborhood or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in
the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City.
However, the addition of the use of the proposed outdoor
music system will, under the circumstances of this case, be
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort
and general welfare of persons residing and working in the
neighborhood or be detrimental or injurious to property
and improvements in the neighborhood or the general
welfare of the City and may establish a precedent for other
similar uses in the future.
Conditions:
1. That the development shall be in substantial conformance
with the approved plot plan, and floor plan, except as noted
•
-45-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November 10, 19%
ROLL CALL
MMEX
below.
2. That all previously applicable conditions of approval of Use
Permit No. 3429 (Amended) shall remain in effect except
as conditioned below.
3. That the introduction of underground gasoline tanks and
retail gasoline sales is prohibited unless an amendment to
this use permit is approved by the Planning Commission
4. That all car wash equipment, including containers for the
storage of towels, vacuum cleaners, detailing equipment,
trash containers and other mechanical equipment shall be
screened from West Coast Highway and adjoining
properties.
5. That landscaping shall be utilized to minimize the visual
•
impact of the detailing and washing /drying activities
located on the property to the satisfaction of the Planning
Department. Said landscaping shall measure a minimum
of 4 feet in height adjacent to the front property line along
West Coast Highway and shall be installed in accordance
with plans approved by the Planning Department and shall
be permanently maintained. The landscaping shall be
designed so that sight distance is maintained adjacent to the
driveway in accordance with the City's sight distance
Standard 110-L.
6. That the automobile detailing operation shall be scaled
back to the original level as approved by Use Permit No.
3429 (Amended) as approved on March 19, 1992 and shall
not he expanded until such time as an amendment to this
use permit is approved and a formal off -site parking
arrangement is first approved by the Planning Commission.
7. That at least 8 parking spaces shall be provided on -site for
customers or employees. No washing, drying, or detailing
-46-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November
10 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
of automobiles shall be permitted in said parking spaces at
any time.
8. That the use of outdoor loudspeakers for paging or outdoor
speakers for music shall be prohibited.
9. That the indoor and outdoor seating shall be limited to use
by employees or by customers having their automobiles
washed or detailed and shall not be available to the general
I
public.
10. That the entire site shall be maintained in a clean and
orderly manner. .
11. That the outdoor sale or display of cellular phones, coffee
drinks, food items or other merchandise shall be prohibited.
12. That the hours of operation of the food service use shall be
•
limited between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., daily
and shall only be open while the car wash facility is in
operation.
13. That the cleaning of automobile engines shall not be
permitted unless the detailing area maintains a drain which
is connected to the sewer system and has a grease trap.
The design and installation of the above facilities shall be
approved by the Utilities Department.
14. That the Planning Commission shall review this application
on January 5, 1995 to ensure that the applicant has
complied with all the conditions of approval required by
the City. If the applicant has failed to comply with all of
the conditions of approval, the Planning Commission may
consider setting a public hearing, recommending to the City
Council the revocation of Use Permit No. 3429
(Amended).
i-47-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
15. That the Planning Commission may add or modify
conditions of approval to this use permit, or recommend to
the City Council the revocation of this use permit, upon a
determination that the operation which is the subject of this
use permit causes injury, or is detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of the
community.
16. This use permit shall expire unless exercised within 24
months from the date of approval as specified in Section
20.80.090A of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
A. Tentative Map of Tract No. 15012 (Public Hearing)
Item No.'
Request to subdivide 26 acres of land into 119 numbered lots for
single family detached residential development;1 numbered lot for
public park purposes and 22 lettered lots for public open space,
TTM15012
SPR 71
private open space, private streets and future public street
Approved
purposes; and the acceptance of an environmental document.
AND
B. Site Plan Review No. 71 (Public Hearing)
Request to approve a Site Plan Review for the development of 119
single family detached dwelling units and 0.8 acres of private open
space on property located in the Upper Castaways Planned
Community.
LOCATION: A portion of Lot 2, Tract No. 1125 and a
portion of Lot 165, Block 53, Irvine's
Subdivision, located at 900 Dover Drive, on
the southeasterly side of Dover Drive,
between West Coast Highway and Westcliff
Drive.
•
-48
COMMISSIONERS
IL
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
ZONE: P -C
APPLICANT: The Irvine Company, Newport Beach
OWNER: Same as applicant
Patty Temple, Advance Planning Manager, reviewed the proposed
development for the Upper Castaways property. The development
would be the first project to proceed under the terms and
agreements contained in the Circulation Improvement and Open
Space Agreement ( CIOSA) approved by the City Council. CIOSA
has also been approved by the California Coastal Commission.
The Agreement authorized development and specified the limits
of subsequent project review. The development must be approved
within the context of the approved Planned Community text and
the provisions of the Agreement. The Agreement sets forth the
rights of the City in the review of the tentative map. The City has
the right to review and modify the project within the normal
•
responsibilities under the Subdivision Map Act; however, the City
does not have the right to modify project development standards
beyond those in the adopted Planned Community text, specifically
no additional modifications to development standards can he made
in areas such as heights, building setbacks, parking requirements,
etc.
The proposed project is a detached single family subdivision which
would allow for 119 dwelling units, or 32 dwelling units less than
the 151 dwelling units allowed by the Development Agreement.
The tentative tract map also includes parcelization for public park
dedication as required by the Agreement. No actions are being
taken at this time in regard to specific plans for the parks, the City
has no conceptual plans for the park, and the subject actions do
not authorize the City's park development.
Ms. Temple addressed the revised conditions for the Tentative
Map of Tract No. 15012 and Site Plan Review No. 71 that were
distributed to the Planning Commission prior to the subject public
hearing. The following revised conditions reflect the on -going
•
-49
COMMISSIONERS
9NN$fOR.0�0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
discussions between City staff and The Irvine Company in order
to resolve the outstanding issues discussed in the original staff
report:
Tentative Map of Tract 15012. Condition No. 1: The added
language sets forth that all open space dedication requirements
including size and location shall be deemed to be fully satisfied by
The Irvine Company consistent with the terms of the CIOSA
Agreement related to the Upper Castaways parcel. Ms. Temple
stated that the additional language was necessary because of the
exclusion from the map of the future access for Lower Castaways.
Condition No. 13: The requirement makes provisions for lighting
installation within the trail and a requirement that the City pay for
any construction costs of the trail in excess of The Irvine
Company's proposed width of 8 feet.
Condition No. 14: Clarification was made regarding Lot "V". That
.
the storm drain system would be constructed by the developer and
maintained by the City.
Condition No. 15: Clarifies the location of application of the
condition within Lot "V".
Condition No. 16: The condition would limit the developers
responsibility costwise related to the repair of the slope in Lot "U".
Condition No. 19: The access road would no longer be an
emergency access road but would provide full park access to the
view park.
Condition No. 21 and No. 22: The street frontage improvements
would be required to be made within six months of occupancy of
the first residential unit other than the model complex.
Condition No. 31: Would allow latitude with regard to the
requirements for tract grading, and it would allow the Public
Works Department additional discretion.
•
-50-
COAMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Nowmbex
0,1994
ROLL CALL
UqDEX
Condition No. 42 and Condition No. 4 (Site Plan Review No. 71):
The required setback of the development on Dover Drive would
be a 25 foot property line setback and it would provide adequate
landscaping in the area. It would require that the Planned
Community District Regulations for Upper Castaways be amended
to reflect the modified setback if approved by the Planning
Commission prior to or concurrent with the approval of the Final
Map.
Condition No. 43: The condition applies to Lot "V ".
Condition No. 47: The added condition corrects the notes on the
tentative map.
Site Plan Review No. 71: Condition No. 1: The condition
acknowledges that the plans and elevations submitted are
•
conceptual.
Condition No. 5: The condition applies the automatic irrigation
requirements to the common areas only.
Condition No. 7: Added condition requires that all chimney heights
conform to the requirements of the Newport Beach Municipal Code,
unless otherwise approved by the Modifications Committee.
Ms. Temple referred to staff's responses to Dr. J. D. Vandersloot's
letter dated November 10, 1994, and to the letter from Newport
Harbor Lutheran Church dated November 10, 1994, that were
distributed to the Planning Commission prior to the subject public
hearing. In reference to Dr. Vandersloot's letter regarding the
preservation of the on -site wetlands adjacent to Dover Drive, she
stated that the issue was addressed in the certified program EIR
adopted as part of the CIOSA Agreement. In reference to the
letter from the Newport Harbor Lutheran Church, she stated that
the primary concerns are in relationship to park development
plans and approvals. She said that currently there is no park
facility approval being made, and as the City develops park plans
•
-51-
MINUTES
ATE% \irDADT 1210 AO�TX
\f„-/' �.!
\ ✓O�
\ va a a va avi VV a vat a �uaav�a
R LL CALL
INDEX
and proceeds with development that the processes will be subject
to additional environmental review as part of the program EIR
processed and defined by the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Don Webb, Public Works Director, referred to the aforementioned
revised conditions in the tentative map of tract 15012, and he
addressed Condition No. 31 wherein he stated that Dover Drive
between Westcliff Drive and West Coast Highway is designated as
a six-lane arterial roadway. The existing four lane roadway is
adequate at the present time; however, 17th Street in Costa Mesa
is designated as a six-lane arterial roadway to Irvine Avenue and
the City anticipates as growth continues and traffic increases on
17th Street that traffic on Westcliff Drive will be increased. At the
intersection of Westcliff Drive and Dover Drive it will be
necessary to have southbound two right -turn lanes; therefore, a
third lane will be necessary for through traffic coming from Dover
Drive across Westcliff Drive. Mr. Webb stated that a right turn
lane would also be constructed going north on Dover Drive to
Westcliff Drive. Mr. Webb stated that regrading would occur
opposite Cliff Drive to provide an eight percent accessway to the
open space park and that site distance would be improved at the
curve on Dover Drive. A traffic signal will be installed at the
intersection of Dover Drive and Cliff Drive to enable the people
to move in and out of the proposed park safely, and the signal
would allow pedestrians to safely come out of the Cliff Haven area
to access the park. A third lane on Dover Drive is proposed
through the Cliff Drive intersection so as to enable the
automobiles to make a safe right turn off of West Coast Highway
through the intersection of Dover Drive and Cliff Drive, and then
the roadway would be tapered down to two lanes before 16th
Street. He explained that revised Conditions No. 21 and No. 22,
of the tentative map would address intersection capacity and safety
improvements. He said that landscaping would be provided in the
graded areas.
In response to a question posed by Chairman Glover, Mr. Webb
explained that going northbound on Dover Drive from West Coast
-52-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Nnyernht-.r 10,
1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Highway that three lanes at Cliff Drive will be reduced to two
lanes before 16th Street. The median will be moved going south
on Dover Drive so as to provide a left turn lane into the proposed
park. Chairman Glover stated that she had a concern that the
traffic signal and three lanes on northbound and southbound
Dover Drive between Cliff Drive and 16th Street would urbanize
the residential area, and the traffic would move faster. She did
not want to encourage the public to drive through the residential
areas to Costa Mesa.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Ridgeway with
regard to the circulation plan, Mr. Webb stated that the County's
projections between Dover Drive and West Coast Highway were
estimated to be approximately 36,500 automobiles a day which
would justify a six -lane facility. The proposed improvements would
not be a full widening of the roadway.
Commissioner Adams opined that a traffic signal would make it
.
less desirable for the public to travel through the residential
neighborhood. It is necessary to have safe vehicular access into the
proposed park, and there is a need for signalization at the Cliff
Drive and Dover Drive intersection.
Chairman Glover stated that the proposed residential development
does not warrant a traffic light at the intersection.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards,
Commissioner Adams concurred with the proposed three lanes
from West Coast Highway to Dover Drive and Cliff Drive, and
narrowing to two lanes to 16th Street.
Commissioner DiSano concurred with Commissioner Adams'
aforementioned comments. He said that the safety issue is more
of a concern than the potential harm that could come with the
traffic signal adjacent to a residential area.
Commissioner Pomeroy concurred with Commissioner Adams'
comments. He said that the safety issue and access to the park
•
-53-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
RE CALL
INDEX
and improved sight at the curve on Dover Drive are important
issues, and the traffic signal would slow down the traffic.
Commissioner Adams stated that it is a policy that crosswalks are
not installed unless there is a signalized intersection, and the
pedestrian access to the proposed park is necessary.
In response to questions posed by the Planning Commission, Mr.
Webb referred to the proposed circulation plan on display and he
explained the frontage improvements, including curb, gutter, and
sidewalk, that are proposed on Dover Drive between Cliff Drive
and Westcliff Drive. In reference to the access road, Mr. Webb
stated that an 8% grade, instead of a 10% or 12% slope, would be
easier for the public to walk and to ride bicycles, and it would give
handicap people the ability to utilize the trail. Mr. Webb
described the proposed plan of the meandering bluff top trail.
In response to a question posed by Chairman Glover regarding
revised Condition No. 13, Ms. Temple replied that the original
conditions requested that the bluff top trail be 12 feet wide;
however, subsequent to when the applicant originally requested an
8 foot trail the applicant agreed to the revised condition primarily
because the City would agree to pay the cost difference between
the 8 foot trail and the 12 foot trail. Chairman Glover supported
an 8 foot trail because of her concern regarding excessive asphalt,
and that asphalt would also be used to construct the roadways.
Commissioner Pomeroy and Commissioner Ridgeway agreed that
an 8 foot trail is not adequate for pedestrians and bicyclists.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr.
Webb explained that the CIOSA Agreement in the open space
areas indicated that the City is to take the parcel as it exists.
There are approximately three areas where erosion has occurred
on the bluff top, and staff considered the erosion to be the result
of deferred maintenance which should be repaired prior to the
City accepting the rigbt -of -way. The Irvine Company agreed to the
request up to a cost of $30,000.00, which would be more than
adequate to handle the erosion areas.
-54-
�dAO coo �s'�
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November. 10� 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Chairman Glover referred to revised Condition No. 13 regarding
the installation of lighting in the trail design, and she expressed
opposition to the lighting inasmuch as lighting would encourage
the public to use the trail at night and, therefore, it could become
a problem area
Commissioner Adams referred to revised Condition No. 14
regarding the storm drain system, and he asked if the developer
would comply with the request? Mr. Webb replied that the
applicant agreed that the storm drain system would be constructed
to City's standards and it would be a 12" to 18" storm drain below
grade. In response to a question posed by Commissioner
Ridgeway, Mr. Webb replied that it is intended that the drainage
system would be draining towards Polaris Street and enter into the
public drain system at roughly the same spot the private drain
system for the street system will enter.
In response to a question posed by Chairman Glover, Mr. Webb
described the distance from the wall to the curbline adjacent to
Irvine Terrace.
Commissioner Adams expressed a concern regarding the loss of
the existing eucalyptus grove, and that the proposed trees could
cause view impairments of the residential property in the future.
The public hearing was opened in connection with this item, and
Mr. Tom Redwitz, Vice President of Development Entitlement for
The Irvine Company, appeared before the Planning Commission.
He stated that the proposed plan represents over five years of
planning with the community, and it is a part of CIOSA that was
approved by the City in 1992 and the California Coastal
Commission. The Agreement calls for dedication of over 150
acres of open space to the City and a financial commitment of
over $20 million toward circulation improvement. With the start
of the Upper Castaways project the City will begin to receive the
benefits of the Agreement including donation of land for an
activity park and a view park with some outstanding views in the
City.
-55-
�''aMmOf��0� a 0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Mr. Norman Witt, Vice President of Coastal Community Builders,
a Division of The Irvine Company appeared before the Planning
Commission. He addressed the amount of open space area that
would be provided in the development, and he addressed the
improvement of the bluff top trail in addition to bluff top
stabilization along the entire edge. Mr. Witt stated that the intent
is to thin the widow maker eucalyptus trees, and replace the trees
with other trees. The Irvine Company concurs with the findings
and conditions in Exhibit "A ".
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Ridgeway, Mr.
Redwitz reappeared before the Planning Commission and he
replied that the proposed_bluff top trail is to be a public trail and
not a private trail.
In response to a questions posed by the Planning Commission, Mr.
Bill Burton, Landscape Architect, appeared before the Planning
•
Commission, and he explained that the eucalyptus trees located in
the middle of the development are damaged and the applicant is
concerned with the public's health and safety if the trees would
remain. The wind row of eucalyptus trees would remain on the
parcel.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Adams
regarding revised Condition No. 19, Mr. Webb and Mr. Witt
described the bluff top trail as it would connect to the access road.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr.
Witt stated that the applicant requested an 8 foot wide bluff top
trail for aesthetics. The trail would be used for pedestrian and
biking purposes, and it would also be used for emergency and
maintenance vehicles. He agreed that it would be difficult to
maneuver a fire engine on an 8 foot wide trail and that it could
cause damage to the edge of the trail.
Dr. Jan VanderSloot, 2121 - 16th Street, appeared before the
Planning Commission. He referred to his aforementioned letter
dated November 10, 1994. He expressed a concern regarding the
•
-56-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
wetlands on Upper Castaways, and he asked where are the
wetlands going to be mitigated off -site? He said that the fresh
water wetlands could be an asset to the park, and the public would
enjoy the birds and other wildlife. He also expressed a concern
that three lanes on Dover Drive would be tapered off to two lanes
at 16th Street, and he suggested that Dover Drive be widened to
three lanes from West Coast Highway to Westcliff Drive so as to
keep the traffic off of the residential streets.
Commissioner Ridgeway referred to the Mitigation Monitoring
Program Summary, Biological Resource, and he asked if a wetland
delineation study had been performed. Ms. Temple explained that
Mitigation Measure No. 16, was adopted in the CIOSA
Agreement, and it sets forth the requirements for staging the
mitigation requirements for wetlands fill. Prior to grading, it is
necessary for the City to comply with the requirements of the
mitigation measure by doing the formal wetland delineation and
•
processing the appropriate permits through the Department of
Fish and Game, and U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, if required.
Commissioner Pomeroy and Mr. Webb discussed the projected
traffic impacts through the year 2010 that was addressed in the
General Plan, and the increase in traffic that was projected from
outside the City of Newport Beach.
Mr. Allen Beek, 2007 Highland Avenue, appeared before the
Planning Commission, and he referred to his written comments
that were previously distributed to the Planning Commission. He
said that Newport Heights is a desirable community, and the
proposed development is completely incompatible with the
surrounding areas inasmuch as it would be a gated community.
The Irvine Company had no meetings with the Mariner's
Community Association to try to create a compatible
neighborhood. He stated that a street along the front of the bluff
would provide access to the park, it would provide drainage to
keep the water from going over the face of the bluff, and it would
set back the development from the edge of the bluff. Mr. Beek
suggested merging the left turn lanes into the right turn lane off of
•
-57-
COMMISSIONERS
� N�9�y�,of- ��O'PO
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
NAvember 10 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
West Coast Highway to Dover Drive, and he stated that Dover
Drive does not have enough traffic to warrant more than four
lanes. The wetlands should be preserved.
Rev. Bill Kirlin- Hackett, Newport Harbor Lutheran Church, 798
Dover Drive, appeared before the Planning Commission. He said
that the intent is not to hinder the development. However, he
expressed concerns regarding the landscaping plans; the possible
future widening of Dover Drive on the Church's frontage; the
parking plan; the negative impact that construction would have on
the church; and the height limit of the dwellings would impede the
Church's view.
Commissioner Pomeroy pointed out that the issue before the
Planning Commission is not the proposed park. Rev.. Kirlin-
Hackett requested an agreement concerning the widening of Dover
Drive and the impact that the widening would have on the
Church's Dover Drive frontage. Commissioner Ridgeway
.
concurred with Commissioner Pomeroy; however, the concerns
regarding the landscaping could be addressed by the Planning
Commission. Rev. Kirlin- Hackett stated that the access road and
the turn- around could affect the Church. Mr. Webb stated that
the proposed plan of the Upper Castaways park site and the active
park site on 16th Street will be the subject of discussions and
hearings of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission as the
plans are developed. The City Council will provide funding to
allow the design to begin on the facilities, and it is a desire that
the design process and public hearings would be completed in a
time frame that the park facilities would be developed at the same
time as the proposed development. With reference to the parking
issues related to the park, the precise location of the roadway, and
what parking facilities will be provided in conjunction with the
roadway are subjects that will be addressed through the public
hearing process by the PB &R Commission.
In response to a question posed by Chairman Glover, Mr. Webb
explained that when Dover Drive is widened the City has two
options. The CIOSA Agreement has very strict conditions on how
.
-58-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
the City can develop the property that The Irvine Company
dedicates for open space. He said that the City would like to work
with the Church on providing a replacement area, and Exhibit "F'
allows that to occur. He said that if Dover Drive would not be
widened it would not be necessary to take any of the Church's
property.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Adams, Rev.
Kirlin- Hackett stated that the Church rarely uses the angle parking
on 16th Street. Commissioner Adams explained his support of
bonding improvements so that decisions relating to the widening
of Dover Drive could appropriately be made with the planning of
the park. .
Mr. Tom Hyans, President of Central Newport Beach Community
Association, appeared before the Planning Commission. He stated
that based on the width of the sidewalk on the Balboa Peninsula
.
that bicycles and pedestrians do not mix well on a sidewalk less
than 20 feet wide. Mr. Hyans stated that it is feasible that the
Balboa Peninsula could lose the in -lieu park fee funds because of
the Upper Castaways project. Mr. Hewicker explained that some
of the in -lieu park fee funds were designated for City parks, and
he recommended that Mr. Hyans contact the Community Services
Department. In response to a question posed by Mr. Hyans, Mr.
Webb replied that funds for planning and engineering would come
from in -lieu park fees. Commissioner Gifford suggested that Mr.
Hyans contact the City Council to form a Pedestrian Trails
Committee.
There being no others desiring to appear and be heard, the public
hearing was closed at this time.
Commissioner Edwards requested a clarification of the turn-
around area and the path adjacent to the church. Mr. Witt
reappeared before the Planning Commission and he replied that
the path is for private use by the residents of the community.
-59-
COMMISSIONERS
\�G�'QnCrO.A.d'9��L ! TPFN7 ATT 1VPA DnDrr RFA[`T -i
MINUTES
Vi" &%i VV a
November A 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Edwards, Mr.
Webb replied that improvements could be bonded for under the
CIOSA Agreement. He said that in order to provide access into
the Upper Castaways it is necessary to do some grading to create
a softened slope to prohibit constant maintenance and erosion, and
potential hazardous conditions. Commissioner Adams discussed
the park plan improvements and the widening of Dover Drive.
Commissioner Gifford stated that insofar as the improvements
could be bonded for that the improvements could be reviewed in
conjunction with the proposed park. She supported a reduced
width of the bluff top trail to 10 feet or 8 feet, and if the trail
meandered it would slow down the bicycle traffic. Mr. Webb
explained his concern that emergency and maintenance vehicles
would have a difficult time responding on a narrow meandering
trail. Mr. Webb stated that the State Standard indicates that to
accommodate a combination bicycle /pedestrian trail that a 12 foot
wide trail is necessary, and that 8 feet is only wide enough for a
two -way trail without pedestrians.
Commissioner Edwards and Ms. Clauson addressed the City's
liability concerning the State Standards and the bicycle and
pedestrian use of the bluff top trail.
Commissioner DiSano addressed the health, safety, and welfare
conditions of the bluff top trail. He determined that the location
would attract the public, and the Planning Commission should
make certain that the City has a less chance of being sued in areas
that are going to be open to the public.
Commissioner Adams opined that the volume of traffic on the
bluff top trail would be relatively low compared to the Back Bay
trail that is 12 feet wide. He explained that emergency vehicles
could negotiate adequately on a 10 foot wide trail that does not
meander too much. In response to a question posed by
Commissioner Adams, Mr. Webb replied that the City's Master
Plan of Bikeways does not designate the trails as a specific class.
The proposed trail is on the Master Plan that was adopted in 1972.
�r�� 4'f•A�p�d�s"y0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November 1% 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
An 8 foot trail is the minimum width that the State requires for
two-way bicycle traffic, and if there would be significant bicycle
and pedestrian traffic that the trail should be 12 feet wide.
In response to questions posed by Commissioner Pomeroy
regarding bonding for improvements to Dover Drive and site
improvements, Mr. Webb explained that in order to provide a
landing for vehicles on the site that it would be necessary to grade
an access road, and therefore, grading money would have to be
spent. He recommended that grading be done at the same time,
and The Irvine Company would be doing the work and not under
a separate City contract_ Commissioner Adams stated that The
Irvine Company will be grading on the residential site and
repairing the bluff, and he questioned why The Irvine Company
would have to touch the balance of the park or the area adjacent
to Dover Drive until the access road is constructed and the traffic
signal is installed. He suggested a delay until there is a
.
comprehensive look at the park and a reevaluation of the
channelization of Dover Drive. Mr. Webb stated that the CIOSA
Agreement states that in lieu of constructing fronting
improvements that The Irvine. Company would provide for the
grading of Dover Drive, and conditions on the tentative tract map
and the site plan conform to the agreements. If the improvements
are bonded then it would eventually become a City project which
could become more expensive. The intention of the City Council
was to construct the park at the same time as the proposed project
is developed; therefore, the construction of the park would not be
delayed. Commissioner Adams suggested that when the park is
developed that the park contractor and not The Irvine Company
construct the Dover Drive improvements because the park
requires the improvements and not the residential development.
Ms. Temple suggested that the Planning Commission consider an
additional mitigation measure regarding the potential
abandonment of oil wells if found on -site. She addressed revised
Condition No. 42 of the tentative tract map, and revised Condition
No. 4 of the site plan regarding the 25 foot setback, and she
suggested that the conditions be amended to state that the
•
-61-
q'p 7
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Ntwember 10,
1994
ROLL CALL
INMEX
subdivision be redesigned along Dover Drive to comply with a 25 foot
property line setback from the ultimate right -of -way line, on the basis
that the aforementioned language would be consistent with the
Planned Community tent.
Mr. Redwitz concurred with the revised conditions. In reference
to the bonding and widening of Dover Drive, Mr. Redwitz referred
to the aforementioned revised Condition No. 21 of the tentative
tract map, and he suggested that the condition be amended if the
Planning Commission approved bonding for the improvements.
Ms. Temple suggested that these improvements shall be completed
within 6 months of occupancy of the first residential unit (other than
models) be eliminated from revised Condition No. 21.
Motion
*
Motion was made to approve Tentative Map of Tract No. 15012
and Site Plan Review No. 71 subject to the findings and conditions
in Exhibit "A" as revised by staff, add Condition No. 47 to the
tentative tract map regarding the abandonment of oil wells.
Commissioner DiSano suggested that revised Condition Nos. 19,
and 21 be modified to indicate that The Irvine Company would
bond for the improvements.
Mr. Redwitz and staff considered amending Condition No. 26 of
the tentative tract map to include the bonding for a water main.
Mr. Redwitz referred to Condition No. 13 of the tentative tract
map and he suggested that the condition be modified to include
bonding.
Chairman Glover supported the motion. She emphasized her
objection to the widening of Dover Drive.
Commissioner Ridgeway supported the motion. He complimented
The Irvine Company and their management of the project.
Commissioner Pomeroy stated that the residents of Newport
Beach will benefit from the public improvements that will be on
the site.
-62-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
IND EX
All Ayes
Motion was voted on to approve Tentative Map of Tract No.
15012 and Site Plan Review No. 71, as amended. MOTION
CARRIED.
A. Environmental Document
Findings:
1. That CEQA allows a program EIR to be used to simplify
the task of preparing environmental documents on later
parts of the program. Among several uses the program
EIR can provide the basis in an Initial Study for
determining whether the later activity may have significant
effects (CEQA Guidelines, section 15168, subd.(d).)
2. CEQA further allows that a negative declaration may be
issued in reliance upon an existing EIR prepared for an
earlier project, if the project for which the negative
.
declaration is prepared will not cause any significant effects
or in the case of a mitigated negative declaration no effects
which cannot be eliminated or reduced to a level of
insignificance. (Guidelines, section 15070. subd.(b) and
15153, subd.(c).)
3. The Initial Study analyzed the proposed site plan and
tentative map for the Upper Castaways residential
development based on information contained in the
previously certified 1992 Final CIOSA Program EIR and
any new information which has become available regarding
the project,
4. The assumptions and conclusions of the 1992 Final CIOSA
Program EIR have been found to be valid and appropriate
for use in evaluating the current proposal. The Initial
Study has found that there are no new potential significant
adverse impacts which cannot be eliminated or mitigated to
a level of insignificance.
•
-63-
COMMISSIONERS
�\%NRCM�ONW\6&
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Nnvember 1)
1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Mitigation Measures:
1. That all mitigation measures applicable to the project set
forth in Final Environmental Impact Report No. 148 be
complied with as set forth in the approved mitigation
monitoring program.
2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit or commencement of
grading, whichever comes first, the City or applicant
(whoever is responsible for grading and construction of the
access road), shall prepare a detailed landscape plan for
review and approval by the City of Newport Beach
Planning, Public Works, and General Services Departments.
This plan shall provide for both interim and permanent
landscaping which will prevent erosion, soften the visual
impact of the grading, and be consistent with surrounding
vegetation within the future view park. The use of native
and drought- tolerant vegetation shall predominate.
.
3. Graded slopes shall vary in steepness with the majority of
slopes at a steepness of 3:1.
4. At the time park facility plans are prepared by the City for
the future view park, a lighting plan shall be prepared and
evaluated for the access road. lighting shall be only the
minimum necessary to provide safe access for use of the
road during standard hours of operation for the park. If
provided, lighting shall be designed to eliminate any light
spillage past the edge of the property along Dover Drive.
5. The City of Newport Beach shall provide adequate parking
for the future view park area on Upper Castaways. A
specific parking plan shall be prepared concurrent with
preparation of park facility plans for the view park.
Parking shall be convenient to either trail access or the
paved access road.
6. Prior to the approval of the Final Tract Map, the applicant
shall verify the location of any plugged and abandoned oil
•
-64-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
wells on site. If any abandoned wells are on -site, the
applicant or property owner shall plug the well(s) to meet
the standards of Department of Conservation Division of
Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources. If a well occurs
within the development area, the plugging shall occur prior
to the issuance of any grading permits. If a well occurs
within the dedication area, an agreement committing to the
completion of plugging shall be executed prior to the
acceptance of dedication, and the plugging shall occur prior
to the issuance of any grading permits. If any structures
are over or in close proximity to any well, a gas venting
system shall be installed as required by the State
Department of Conservation and the City Grading
Engineer.
Tentative Map of Tract No. 15012:
.
Findings:
1. That the design of the subdivision improvements will not
conflict with any easements acquired by the public at large
for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision.
2. That public improvements may be required of a developer
per Section 19.08.020 of the Municipal Code and Section
66415 of the Subdivision Map Act.
3. That grading and drainage improvements are required
along the bluff top trail in order to prevent continued
erosion of the natural bluffs.
4. That the access drive is required at Dover Drive and Cliff
Drive for maintenance, emergency rescue and police patrol
access to the bluff top area to replace the access lost from
16th Street. The grading for frontage improvements along
the Dover Drive frontage provides required sight distance.
S. That a traffic signal is needed at Dover Drive and Cliff
•
-65-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
I
I
November I.),
1W4
R L CALL
L
INDEX
Drive due to the increase in vehicular traffic and pedestrian
crossing activity.
6. That Resubdivision No. 972 provides access to Lower
Castaway across a portion of Tentative Tract No. 15012 and
that Tentative Tract No. 15012 is required to be consistent
with a currently approved map.
Conditions:
1. That the Tentative Tract Map be revised to delete the area
from the tentative map that is proposed as the access road
for the Lower Castaways site in conformance with
Resubdivision No.. 972, currently being processed; that an
accompanying construction easement for constructing the
future access road be provided; and that an easement for
ingress and egress be provided across the future Lower
•
Castaways access road for the park access road to be
constructed with the proposed tract. Notwithstanding this
condition, all open space dedication requirements including
size and location shall be deemed to be fully satisfied by
The Irvine Company consistent with the terms of the
CIOSA Agreement related to the Upper Castaways parcel.
2. That a final map be recorded. That the final map be
prepared so that the Bearings relate to the State Plane
Coordinate System. The final map shall be prepared on
the California coordinate system (NAD83) and that prior
to recordation of the final map, the surveyor /engineer
preparing the map shall submit to the County Surveyor a
digital- graphic file of said map in a manner described in
Section 7 -9 -330 and 7 -9 -337 of the Orange County
Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual,
Subarticle 18. That prior to recordation of the final map,
the surveyor /engineer preparing the map shall tie the
boundary of the map into the Horizontal Control System
established by the County Surveyor in a manner described
in Section s 7 -9 -330 and 7 -9 -337 of the Orange County
Subdivision Code and Orange County Subdivision Manual,
•
-66-
COMMISSIONERS
�
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
N- Minber 1)
IQQA
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Subarticle 18. Monuments (one inch iron pipe with tag)
shall be set On Each Lot Corner unless otherwise approved
by the Subdivision Engineer. Monuments shall be
protected in place if installed prior to completion of
construction project.
3. That all improvements be constructed as required by
Ordinance and the Public Works Department.
4. That a standard subdivision agreement and accompanying
surety be provided in order to guarantee satisfactory
completion of the Public improvements if it is desired to
record a tract map or obtain a building permit prior to
completion of the public improvements.
5. That each dwelling unit be served with an individual water
service and sewer lateral connection to the public water
and sewer systems unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department and the Building Department.
6. That the on -site parking, vehicular circulation and
pedestrian circulation systems be subject to further review
by the Traffic Engineer and the Fire Department.
7. That the design of the private streets and drives conform
with the City's Private Street Policy (LA), except as
approved by the Public Works and Fire Departments. The
basic roadway width shall be a minimum of 32 feet parking
one side and 36 feet parking both sides. The location,
width, configuration, and concept of the private street and
drive systems shall be subject to further review and
approval by the City Traffic Engineer and Fire Department.
8. That the intersection of the private streets and drives be
designed to provide sight distance for a local street in
conformance with City standard 110 -L. Slopes, landscape,
walls and other obstruction shall be considered in the sight
distance requirements. Landscaping within the sight line
•
-67-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
shall not exceed twenty-four inches in height. The sight
distance requirement may be modified at non - critical
locations, subject to approval of the Traffic Engineer.
9. That the California Vehicle Code be enforced on the
private streets and drives, and that all traffic control devices
shall be shown on a plan approved by the Public Works
Department.
10. That if it is desired to have a control gate at the entrance,
a turnaround shall be provided prior to the gate. The
design of the controlled entrance shall be reviewed and
approved by the Public Works, Fire and Police
Departments.
11. That easements for public emergency and security ingress,
•
egress and public utility purposes on all private streets be
dedicated to the City and that all easements be shown on
the tract map unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department.
12. That asphalt or concrete access roads shall be provided to
all public utilities, vaults, manholes, and junction structure
locations, with width to be approved by the Public Works
Department.
13. That a 12 foot wide bluff top trail shall be constructed with
a connection on the north at Grove Lane and a connection
on the south at Dover Drive. The trail shall be structurally
designed to handle maintenance and emergency vehicular
traffic. The Trail shall be located a minimum of 15 feet
from the top of proposed slope, unless otherwise approved
by the Public Works Department and the City Grading
Engineer. The design of the trail shall be approved by the
Public Works Department, General Services Department,
Utilities Department, Fire Department, Police Department
and the Community Services Department. Provisions to
install lighting in the future shall be included in the trail
.
-68-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
design. The City shall pay for construction costs in excess
of 8 feet. Bonding will be required for these
improvements.
14. The bluff top open space area shall be designed in Lot "V"
to convey the drainage away from the top of slope to be
picked up by a storm drain system to be constructed by the
developer and maintained by the City. All landscaping
inland of the bluff top trail shall be planted and maintained
by the developer /association. An agreement shall be
required for maintenance of the landscape and approved as
to form by the City Attorney's office.
15. That the heavily eroded areas with near vertical faces along
the bluff top within Lot "V" shall be repaired and all
drainage directed away from the bluff top edge. The
locations to be repaired shall be reviewed and approved by
the City.
I
16. That prior to the developer dedicating the View Park, Lot
"U ", to the City, all heavily eroded areas with near vertical .
faces along the bluff top shall be repaired and all drainage
directed away from the bluff top edge. The City shall pay
all costs associated with this repair in excess of $30.000.00.
Provisions regarding a release of liability of the developer
shall be included in the dedication documents.
17. That a bus turnout and shelter pad be constructed on
Dover Drive just north of 16th Street as approved by the
Public Works Department and the Orange County Transit
Authority.
18. That the active park site, proposed Lot 120, be graded at
2% with site drainage conveyed to the storm drain system
unless otherwise approved by the Public Works
Department. Erosion control shall be provided on the site
as required by the City Grading Engineer.
•
-69-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November 10 1224
ROLL
CALL
INDEX
19. That a 24 foot wide access road be constructed in
the
proposed Open Space Lot 'U' from the intersection
of
Dover Drive and Cliff Drive along the alignment of the
old
Castaways Road and connect to the bluff top trail. The
access road shall be a maximum 8% grade with a tam
around. The road shall be designed to accommodate heavy
vehicles and Fire Department apparatus. The design ii
to
be approved by the Public Works Department. That
the
design and grades of the access road be compatible
dth
the proposed grades for the proposed Lower Castaways
access road. That bonding for the improvements will
be
required.
20. That the developer contribute 50% of the cost of instal
ing
a traffic signal at the intersection of Dover Drive and
liff
Drive prior to the occupancy of the first housing unit wil
hin
.
the proposed tract development.
1. That frontage improvements be constructed on Dc
ver
Drive between Cliff Drive and 16th Street to provid
3
lanes in each direction at Cliff Drive tapering to 2 lane
in
each direction at 16th Street. These improvements sh
be
completed within 6 months of occupancy of the f
' st
residential unit (other than models). Bonding will
be
required for these improvements.
2. That frontage improvements be constructed on Dover
Drive at Westcliff Drive to provide a north bound through
lane and a right turn lane. These improvements shall
be
completed within 6 months of occupancy of the f
irst
residential unit (other than models).
That construction access to the development be from 16th
Street and that the last 100' of baul road adjacent to 15th
Street shall be paved with asphalt with another 100'
of
aggregate adjacent to the asphalt to clean truck tires
ess
an alternate plan is approved by the Public Works
-70-
Q `Ir .a di
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Department. A plan for cleaning the trucks must be
approved by the Traffic Engineer.
24. That street, drainage and utility improvements be shown of
standard improvement plans prepared by a licensed civil
engineer.
25. That a hydrology and hydraulic study be prepared by the
applicant and approved by the Public Works Department,
along with a master plan of water, sewer and storm drain
facilities for the on -site improvements prior to recording of
the tract map. Any modifications or extensions to the
existing storm drain, water and sewer systems shown to be
required by the study shall be the responsibility of the
developer. The condition includes all areas covered by the
subdivision map.
•
26. That an easement for water purposes be dedicated across
lot "N" and a water main constructed between Street "D"
and the Dover Drive at Cliff Drive intersection with a fire
hydrant connection as approved by the Utilities, Fire and
Public Works Departments. Bonding will be required for
these improvements.
27. That a IT diameter water main be constructed between
16th Street and Polaris Drive and connect to the existing
12" lines in 16th Street and Polaris Drive. That the
proposed 10' wide easement through lot "O" be relocated
westerly of Lot "O" in order to align with the 12" water
main in Polaris Drive.
28. That the easterly property line of Lot 38 be moved westerly
15' in order to provide an adequate easement for the
proposed 12" water main unless otherwise approved by the
Public Works Department.
29. That storm drain facilities designed to empty into the
Polaris Storm Drain System shall be approved by the
•
-71-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November I (� 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Orange County EMA prior to issuance of any grading or
building permits.
30. That prior to issuance of any grading or building permits
for the site, the applicant shall demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Department and the
Planning Department that adequate sewer facilities will be
available for the project. Such demonstration shall include
verification from the Orange County Sanitation District and
the City's Utilities Department.
31. That an additional 28 feet of right -of -way be dedicated to
the public for street and highway purposes along the Dover
Drive frontage in order to provide a minimum of 128 feet
of right -of -way. That the 28 foot width be graded to future
curb grade along the entire length of the Dover Drive
frontage with a 2% cross fall at the time of the proposed
.
tract grading unless otherwise approved by the Public
Works Department, and that a 10 foot wide concrete
sidewalk be constructed along the tract frontage between
Westcliff Drive and Cliff Drive.
32. That County Sanitation District fees be paid prior to
issuance of any building permits.
33. That the Public Works Department plan check and
inspection fee be paid.
34. Disruption caused by construction work along roadways and
by movement of construction vehicles shall be minimized by
proper use of traffic control equipment and flagmen.
Traffic control and transportation of equipment and
materials shall be conducted in accordance with state and
local requirements. A traffic control plan shall be reviewed
and approved by the Public Works Department. There
shall be no construction storage or delivery of materials
within the Dover Drive right -of -way.
•
-72-
MINUTES
\�LF�ACrn�� if dl9��rL !� *TV 9-%= IMMIT710l110T RL` A f�T.T
WW
va a A va am"w a va_ a uuaavaa
November 1994
ROLL CALL
-0,
INDEX
35. That a fire protection system acceptable to the Fire
Department be installed by the developer and tested by the
Fire Department prior to storage of any combustible
materials or start of any structural framing.
36. That the Coastal Bluff property line Setback from the edge
of the bluff shall be located no closer to the edge of the
bluff than the point at which the top of the bluff is
intersected by a line drawn from the solid toe of the bluff
at an angle of 26.6 degrees to the horizontal. In no case
shall a property line be located closer than forty (40) feet
from the edge of a bluff or any eroded area of the bluff
unless the area is restored.
37. That utility and private access easements be dedicated and
improved between Dover Drive and "F' Street and between
Polaris Drive and "C' Street. The improvements shall be
•
reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department.
38. That the landscape plans shall be subject to the review of
the Public Works, Police and General Services
Departments and any landscaping adjacent to or within the
view trails and parks shall be subject to review by the
Community Services Department.
39. That 16th Street be restriped to provide clear ingress and
egress to the site.
40. That all above grade utility enclosures shall be located in
such a manner as to provide a minimum 4'0" clear width
sidewalk on private streets and 8'0" width on public streets.
41. That the slopes adjacent to the tract located in the park
sites have a maximum slope of 4 to 1 unless otherwise
approved by the Public Works Department.
42. That the subdivision be redesigned along Dover Drive to
comply with a 25 foot property line setback from the
-73-
COMMISSIONERS
t� 4 :t-
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
��
ultimate right -of -way line. The Planned Community
District Regulations for Upper Castaways shall be amended
to reflect this modified setback prior to or concurrent with
the approval of the Final Tract Map.
43. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, detailed plans and
recommendations for repair of the existing bluff top
erosional features in Lot °V" shall be provided for the
review and approval of the City Grading Engineer.
44. An increase in the rate of groundwater recharge related to
the proposed development and related irrigation systems
may adversely affect bluff stability and increase the current
rate of bluff retreat. Plans and recommendations
mitigating these effects shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Grading Engineer prior to issuance of any grading
permits.
.
45. Minimum fire flow requirement is 1000 gpm at 20 psi
residual pressure.
46. The location of all fire hydrants shall be reviewed and
approved by the Fire Department. A hydrant shall be
provided in the view park in the vicinity of the access road.
47. That the notes on the Tentative Tract Map be modified as
follows:
a) Delete note #13.
b) The single family acreage changed to 26 acres.
c) Summary note for Lot "V" changed from private to
public.
•
-74-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
ROLL CALL
INDEX
Site Plan Review No. 71:
Findines:
1. That the development of Upper Castaways will not
preclude implementation of specific General Plan
objectives and policies if in accordance with the plans as
modified by the condition for approval.
2. That the value of the property is protected by preventing
development characterized by inadequate and poorly
planned landscaping, excessive building bulk, inappropriate
placement of structures and failure to preserve where
feasible natural landscape features.
Conditions:
.
1. That development shall be in substantial conformance with
the approved conceptual grading plan, site plan, floor plans
and elevations, except as modified in the following
conditions and those imposed on the Tentative Tract Map.
2. That a minimum of two parking spaces per dwelling unit be
provided, plus two guest parking spaces per unit. Of the
guest spaces, a minimum of one per unit shall be provided
on- street or in commonly accessible parking bays.
3. That a minimum of 50% of the dwelling units shall comply
with the 24 foot height limit as defined in the Newport
Beach Municipal Code. A maximum of 50% of the
dwelling units may exceed this height to the maximum 32
foot limit provided for the PC Text.
4. That the subdivision be redesigned along Dover Drive to
comply with a 25 foot property line setback from the
ultimate right -of -way line. The Planned Community
District Regulations for Upper Castaways shall be amended
•
-75-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
on
ed
Nowmber- 1%
1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
to reflect this modified setback prior to or concurrent with
the approval of the FinalTract Map.
5. Landscape plans for common areas shall incorporate
automatic irrigation systems equipped with an override
keyed to continuous moisture measurement devices unless
otherwise approved by the City Grading Engineer.
6. That this site plan review shall expire unless exercised
within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in
Section 20.01.070 K of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
7. That all chimney heights conform to the requirements of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code, unless otherwise
approved by the Modifications Committee.
•
Discussi
General Plan Amendment 94 -3
Item No.
Request to initiate amendments to the Newport Beach General
Plan, as follows:
GPA 94 =3
A. Ca1Tr
A. CalTrans West
Inititat
Caltrans West consists of approximately 17 acres of vacant land
located west of Superior Avenue, north of Pacific Coast Highway,
and south of the Newport Crest Condominium complex.
The preferred future use of the site is recreation /open space with
active recreational uses accommodated on the site. Specific park
improvements and the possible phasing of park uses if entitlement
is transferred off -site shall be consistent with the Recreation and
Open Space Element.
The site is presently allocated 152 dwelling units subject to
provisions intended to facilitate the transfer of all of this
-76-
on
ed
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
RUE CALL
INDEX
entitlement to other properties with special incentives relative to
the transfer of entitlement to properties within the Caltrans West
service area (as specified in the Recreation and Open Space
Element) combined with a commitment of the owner of the
transferee parcel to construct park improvements on -site. The
transfer of entitlement shall generally proceed in accordance with
the following:
1. The property owner shall be entitled to transfer all or a
portion of the residential entitlement to any other. parcel
within the City subject to the approval of a traffic study in
the event of a transfer of 35 units or more and a City
Council finding of General Plan consistency;
2. The property owner shall be entitled to convert the
residential entitlement to any other land use on a traffic
equivalency basis and transfer the modified entitlement to
any other parcel within the City subject to a traffic study
(pursuant to Chapter 15.40 of the Newport Beach in the
event the transferred entitlement would generate more than
300 average daily trips and subject to a City Council finding
of General Plan consistency;
3. The transfer of entitlement shall constitute a permanent
reduction in the entitlement allocated to the site and shall
be accompanied by a written agreement signed by the
property owner acknowledging that the reduction does not
constitute a taking of property;
4. The transfer of entitlement to any site within service area
1, accompanied by a commitment on the part of the owner
the transferee parcel to construct park improvement shall,
subject to City Council approval, entitle the owner of the
transferee parcel to park dedication, or park in lieu fee
credit as determined by the City Council but in event less
than a credit equal to the number of acres improved.
•
-77-
COMMISSIONERS
Nt, Q a 0�0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
Nwcember I
), 1994
ROLL CALL
INDEX
The development entitlement shall be subject to strict
compliance with the conditions, mitigations, and findings
adopted by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach
in conjunction with the approval of Resolution No. 83-43 to
the extent that Resolution was applicable to Caltrans West.
The designation of single family attached shown on the
Land Use Plan (MAP) represents only the housing type
anticipated to be constructed and is not intended to restrict
the type of development approved on -site or off -site. This
parcel may be developed with a mixed use project
incorporating some or all of the residential product types
authorized by the Land Use Element.
Patty Temple, Advance Planning Manager, stated that the
initiation would facilitate an on -going discussion between the City
.
and Caltrans regarding the ultimate entitlements and the potential
acquisition of Caltrans West as a park site.
Motion
*
Motion was made to initiate General Plan Amendment No. 94 -3
(A)•
Chairman Glover stated that she would not support the motion.
Ayes
*
*
*
*
*
*
Motion was voted on, MOTION CARRIED.
No
s s s
B. 424 Old Newport Boulevard
424 old
Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Element to
Newport B
redesignate a portion of the property located at 424 Old Newport
Initiated
Boulevard from Retail and Service Commercial to Tlvo Family
Residential. This request would allow for subdivision and
development of the rear portion of the property fronting on
Westminster Avenue for exclusive residential use.
•
-78-
COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
R L CALL
INDEX
Motion
All Ayes
Motion was made and voted on to initiate General Plan
Amendment No. 94 -3 (B). MOTION CARRIED.
Additional Business:
"
Add'1
Business
The Planning Commission commended Chairman Glover
regarding her election to the City Council.
Motion
All Ayes
*
A motion was made and voted on to direct staff to place the
Election of Officers on the Planning Commission Agenda of
December 8, 1994. MOTION CARRIED.
Adjournment: 11:47 P.M.
Adjourn
s s s
TOD RIDGEWAY, SECRETARY
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
.
-79-