HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/29/1973a - COMMISSIONERS
Specie
Place:
Z p p p Time:
R CALL Date:
Present
Motion
Ayes
Noes
Abstained
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Planning Commission Meeting
City Council Chambers
7:00 p.m.
November 29. 1973
rage I of 8
MINUTES
INDEX
xXXXx
EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS
David R. Baade, Assistant City Attorney
STAFF MEMBERS
James D. Hewicker, Assistant Director - Planning
Rod Gunn, Advance Planning Administrator
Tim Cowell, Senior Planner
Joanne Bader, Secretary
Minutes of the Special Meeting of November 8; 1973
X
X
X
X
were approved as written.
X
Discussion - Water Quality in Newport Bay
Item A -1
DISCUS -
Robert S. Stone, Director of Environmental
Health, Orange County Health Department.
Sr0 -ql
Robert E. Moore, Manager, Santa Ana
WATER
Watershed Planning Agency.
UALITY
Jim Anderson, Executive Officer, Santa Ana
IN NEW -
PORT BAY
Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Robert Stone of the Orange County Health Depart-
ment appeared before the Planning Commission.
Mr. Stone discussed the water quality of
Newport Bay. In the course of his discussion
he passed out copies of the Laws and Regulations
for water quality and a summary of the findings
of a survey the Health Department conducted
in late 1972 and early 1973 to find possible
sources of water pollution. He discussed the
potential health hazards water pollution may
have on the public and informed the Commission
of a Comprehensive Environmental Quality
Study the Orange County Health Department has
proposed for Newport Bay.
Jim Anderson of the Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board appeared before the
Planning Commission. Mr. Anderson discussed
Page 1.
0
rage 2 of 8
'`COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
r• m
i Z p p MINUTES
T November 29, 1973
INDEX
the Water Quality Control Act of 1970 in which
water quality objectives were set for the
State of California. He also informed the
Commission of sewage and soil discharge
requirements and the Siltation Control Program.
Bob Moore of the Santa Ana Watershed Planning
Agency, which is acting as a Consultant.to
the Regional Water Quality Board, appeared
before the Planning Commission. Mr. Moore
reviewed with the Commission the many factors
relating to water supply, water quality and
water use. Mr. Moore then introduced Larry Davis,
Consultant, Water Resources Engineers, to
the Commission, who is presently in the process
of developing a comprehensive water plan for
the Santa Ana Watershed. Mr. Davis reviewed
the future projections of the watershed and
the effects of chanelization of the upper
bay. He commented on how certain activities
could affect the upper bay. He told the
Commission the reasons he felt there should
be some regard for a buffer area around the
upper bay shore line and he discussed the
elements that the Water Quality Management
Plan may be comprised of. Mr. Moore then
reappeared before the Commission and summarized
Mr. Davis'
speech and the current status of
the
consultant program.
The Planning Commission recessed at 9:30 p.m.
and reconvened at 9:40 p.m.
Request to consider the acceptance of the
Recreation and Open Space
Item A -2
Element of The Newport
Beach General Plan Environmental Impact
Report EIR /NB - 73 -041.
ENVIRON-
MENTAL
Initiated by.: The City of Newport Beach
REPORT
Mr. Gunn advised the Commission that the
EIR NB -
73 41
Recreation and Open Space Element was approved
on November 8, 1973 but
-0
that the Enviroenta
Impact Report was continued until this meeting.
He further stated that the Environmental
Affairs Committee had reviewed the Environmental
Page 2.
COMMISSIONERS
D M Z S S A N
• � � T p M
Z P �
ROLL GAIL
Motion
All Aye
0
0
Page 3 of 8
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MINUTES
November 29, 1973
INDEX
Impact Report and had accepted it.
Item A -2
ENVIRON-
X
Motion to accept Environmental Impact Report
S
EIR /NB - 73 -041.
MENTAL
IMPACT
REPORT
EIR NB -
3
APPROVED
Request to consider the adoption of the Conserva-
Item A -3
tion of Natural Resources Element of the
eeport Ueacn General Plan and acceptance
CONSERVA
o T E nv1ronmenta 1 TM_P_a_C_t___Fe_po rt EIR /NB - 73 -043.
TION OF
Initiated
Initiate: The City of Newport Beach
RES� ROES
Mr. Gunn discussed the report with the Commission
-0FETHET
and informed them that on November 8, 1973,
NEWPORT
the staff submitted 32 suggested revisions
BEACH
for this element. Mr. Cowell added that on
G�VERAL
November 12, 1973 City Council suggested an
PLAN
addition to the proposed amendment by the
Citizens Environmental Community Advisory
Committee, which would be added to Section 6
on Energy Conservation. He then read this
report to the Commission.
Chairman Agee opened the public hearing.
Frank Robinson, Newport Beach, read page 10,
item 4 of the Element to the Commission.
Mr. Robinson suggested that something be
done to change the Uniform Building Code to
upgrade the quality of the grading ordinance
to make it more effective. He used as an
example the east bluff where some of the land
was graded and left bare for four or five
years and a huge amount of it ended up in
the bay. He also discussed the fact that
grading control in the past has had to do
mostly with safety.
Valerie Murley, Chairman of the Citizens
Environmental Quality Control Advisory Committee,
commented that the Commission has all of the
Committee's recommendations and that she has
reviewed all of the recommendations and find
none in conflict with the Committee's.
Page 3.
Page 4 of 8
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
T R
F
T ya m i
• A = P M
Z P P
ROLL CALL
Motion
Ayes
Noes
Motion
All Ayes
•
Motion
All Ayes
0
Motion
All Ayes
MINUTES
November 29, 1973
�nvtx
There being no others desiring to be heard,
Chairman Agee closed the public hearing.
At this time there was a general discussion
between the Commissioners as to whether
Page 26,, Item 5 is out of context and whether
it would better be fitted in the Transportation
Element.
X
X
X
X
X
X
Motion to replace Item 5 to read "Acts to
encourage maximum reduction of air pollution
from mobile sources."
X
Motion for adoption as drafted including
cou.ncil's addition pertaining to speed and
energy, 32 suggested revisions by staff, and
the following:
1. Section 5, second paragraph should read:
"Even though the area has not been
extensively studied, well over thirty
(30) archaeological sites have been
discovered and recorded in Newport
Beach; most of these are adjacent to
and around the Upper Bay. These
sites are on record with the Archaeologi-
cal Survey Office at UCLA."
2. Section 5, Proposal, Item 3 should read:
"Notify Archaeological Research, Inc.
(ARI) and appropriate academic institu-
tions prior to any large scale improve-
ments on undeveloped publicly -owned
Item A -3
CONSERVA-
TION OF
NATURAL
property to determine if any scientific
resources exist.
RESOURCES
ELEMENT
X
Motion to accept Environmental Impact Report.
APPROVED
Request to consider the adoption of The Housing
Element of the Newport Beach General Plan
Item A -4
THE HOUS-
and acceptance of Environmental Impact Report
EIR /NB - 73 -042.
ING ELE-
Initiated by; The City of Newport Beach
MENT OF
THE NEW-
PORT
BEACH
GENERAL
X
Motion was made to continue this matter to the
Special Meeting of January 10, 1973.
PLAN
Page 4.
CONT. TO
JAN. 10
Page 5 of 8
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
• f+ m
T A m
Z p A
ROLL CALL r
0
0
MINUTES
November 29, 1973
INDEX
Request to consider an amendment to the Land
Item B -1
Use Element of the Newport Beach General-71an.
Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach
LAND USE
L�—�MENT
Mr. Gunn read portions of the staff report to
OF —THE
NEWPORT
the Commission. Mr. Gunn explained the
BEACH
staff report and informed the Commission that
GENERAL
a commercial center would be appropriate in
PLAN
terms of the number of families in the area
and the distance to the nearest existing
convenience shopping areas but it appears it
would not be compatible to the flora and
fauna reserve. He further stated that a
neighborhood shopping center is not essential
in this area and for that reason the staff
is requesting the Planning Commission consider
an amendment to the Land Use Element of the
Newport Beach General Plan. The residents of
the area are asking the Commission to
reconsider the sentence in the Element that
reads:
. "Alternative uses may include a commercial
center at the southeast corner of
Irvine Avenue and University Drive
to serve the residents of the area."
Chairman Agee opened the public hearing.
Frank Robinson, Newport Beach stated that if
the alternative to Open Space is low density
residential, there would be some dedication
of the area as part of the normal requirements
for park areas which could, in turn, be con-
solidated into this area. He stated that this
area is needed for recreation and that this is
the only area where you can get a complete
panoramic view of the entire bay.
Ray Williams, President of Friends of Newport
Bay stated that they are in agreement with.the
first choice of land use which is to leave it
as open space. He informed the Commission that
the bluffs and uplands are good fossil sites which
he hopes will be available for study. He
further stated that this bay is unique and,
therefore, it is a valuable facility for
educational purposes. He stated that a
commercial area would be incompatible with
the refuge below, would add congestion, air
pollution, run -off problems and noise. He
mentioned that the bay is unique and that a
Page 5.
Page 6 of 8
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
(1 T
• � � T �pF T
m
Rou tau p p November
4
MINUTES
29, 1973
INDEX
shopping center is not; therefore, the shopping
center should be put somewhere else.
Dr. Simpson, Newport Beach stated that he
concurred with the staff recommendation. He
felt that the opinion among the residents
of the area is almost unanimous against having
a commercial development.
Valerie Murley, Chairman Citizens Environmental
Quality Control Advisory Committee, stated
that the Committee supports the deletion of
this commercial development and that these
uplands are essential for preservation.
She felt that it should be stated in the
General Plan that only the least intensive
uses would be supported.
Mrs. Howard Baab, Newport Beach informed the
Commission that she has presented the City
with a petition which was signed by 1500
people who entirely support the position of
'
the Friends of Newport Bay. The Commission
questioned why Mrs. Baab's petition included
people out of the bay area. At this time
Mrs. Baab read the history of the petition.
Larry Moore of the Irvine Company agreed that
if at all possible, the upper area should be
open space, but also stated that if it can't
be done then there has to be some reasonable
alternatives. Mr. Moore stated that the
Irvine Company is asking that this area be
residential with a neighborhood shopping
center on the corner. He brought up the fact
that the staff reported that a neighborhood
shopping center is not essential. Mr. Moore
mentioned that a neighborhood shopping center
is never essential in a given area but they
do have to go somewhere. He stated that this
is an appropriate area for a shopping center.
Frank Robinson, Newport Beach stated that he
was not addressing his position as to whether
or not a shopping center was appropriate or
not. Mr. Robinson mentioned that he merely
stated that he sees no reason to take a special
'
area and use it as a shopping center site.
Mr. Robinson felt that of all the'types of
development to go around the bay, this is the
most incompatible.
Page 6.
Page 7 of 8
COMMISSIONERS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
r• T
• T A T D� wl�
ROIL CAIL ^`
Motion
Ayes
Noes
0
•
MINUTES
November 29, 1973
INDEX
Gus Patrick of Costa Mesa said that this is a
beautiful bay and should be left alone.
There being no others desiring to be heard,
Chairman Agee closed the public hearing.
At this time the Commission discussed the
Item B -1
advantages and disadvantages of a neighborhood
LAND USE
shopping center.
ELEMENT
Motion that the Land Use Element of the General
OF THE
NEWPORT
X
X
Plan be amended to delete as an alternative use
BEACH
X
X
X
X
the retail and service commercial aspect of
GENERAL
this particular site and accept recommended
PLAN
wording. Motion failed.
FAILED
Request to consider an amendment to the Master
Item B -2
Plan of Bikeways portion of The Recreation and
pen pace Element of The Newport Beach General
MASTER
Plan.
PLAN OF
Initiated by: The City of Newport Beach.
BIKEWAYS
Mr. Gunn discussed the report and explained that
at the November 8, 1973 Special Meeting of
the Planning Commission, a draft was inadver-
tently given to the Planning Commission that
did not include all the suggestions of the
Citizens Bikeways Advisory Committee. Alan
Beek, appeared before the Commission and
requested that the Commission remove the two
bicycle trails on the far.side of Corona del Mar
from the controversial trails map and to
remove the Balboa Island bicycle trails from
the controversial trails map. He also
mentioned the paragraph, suggested by the
staff for the controversial trails map,
which says that these additional segments were
considered for designation but were rejected
due to public objection. He stated that in
most cases they were not rejected due to
public objection, but were rejected due to
a single individual. He said the bicycle
trails on Balboa Island in particular were
removed by the Committee and put back on in a
meeting where the majority of the committee
was absent and the minority had control.
Page 7.
.COMMISSIONERS
a
Z<
Al CALL
Motion
Ayes
Abstain
Motion
Ayes
Abstains
0
Motion
All Ayes
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Page 8 of 8
MINUTES
November 29. 1973
INDEX
Harry Kamp, member of the Bicycle Advisory
Committee appeared before the Commission and
stated that he agreed with Mr. Gunn in
that he felt the suggested material is
correct as approved by the Committee on
October 1, 1973. Mr. Kamp felt that Mr. Beek
was speaking only for himself and did not
express the opinion of the Bicycle Advisory
Committee.
X
X
Motion to amend the bikeways section by
X
X
X
X
X
including suggested changes as indicated in
e
X
Items 1 - 5 of the staff report.
X
X
Motion to change the first sentence of the
'
X
X
X
X
X
X
last paragraph on page 50 of the Bikeways
Item B -2
Text to read:
"There are several additional segments
MASTER
PLAN F
of the public right -of -way system which
BIKEWAYS
were considered for designation as
.bikeways on the Master Plan, but which
APPROVED
were separated for further study."
INFORMATION - Proposed Plan for a Park and
Item B -3
Preserve in Upper Newport Bay by the,Friends
of Newport Bay.
INFO. -
The Commission had a general discussion
PLANOFOR
regarding this proposal. Mr. Williams
A
PARK
clarified the map opposite page 6.
AND
PRE-
* * * * * * * * * *
SERVE IN
UM —R
X
There being no further business, Planni 9
NEWPORT
BAY
Commission adjou ned a 11 P.M.
S PH OSENER, JR., Sec tary
nning Commission
City of Newport Beach
Page 8.