Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHoag Health Center (PA2007-013)CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT January 17, 2008 C4 Agenda Item 3 !moo SUBJECT: Hoag Health Center (PA 2007 -013) !� 500 -540 Superior Avenue • Amendment to Use Permit No. 2006 -010 • Traffic Study No. 2007 -002 • Certification of Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH. No. 2006101105) APPLICANT: Newport Beach Healthcare Center, LLC PLANNER: Jaime Murillo, Associate Planner (949) 644 -3209, imurillo (c�city.newoort- beach.ca.us SUMMARY The applicant is requesting to amend Use Permit No. 2006 -010 (redevelopment of the former Newport Technology Center) to: (1) convert 232,414 square feet of general office and research and development (R &D) floor area to medical office use; and (2) authorize the construction of an additional 20,586 square feet of medical office space, for a total of 350,000 gross square feet of medical office floor area. The following are required in order to implement the project as proposed: Certification of Final Environmental Impact Report; and 2. Preparation of a traffic study pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance); and 3. Amendment to Use Permit No. 2006 -010 to allow the conversion of the balance of general office and R &D space on the site to medical office use. The project was continued from the November 15, 2007 Planning Commission meeting as a result of a new significant impact that was identified (see Environmental Review, page 14 of this staff report) requiring recirculation of a limited portion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for an additional 45 -day public review period. This staff report is intended to replace and supersede the November 15, 2007, staff report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. Receive staff presentation, receive applicant's presentation, open public hearing, and receive public comments. 2. Adopt resolution (Exhibit 1) certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH. No. 2006101105) and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 3. Adopt resolution (Exhibit 2) approving the amendment to Use Permit No. 2006- 010 and finding the preparation of Traffic Study No. 2007 -002 in compliance with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance, subject to findings and conditions. 3?�' ss •:53sL ^_'_8bae:TM a gx'''""1'e �¢, 11 Nil. �eSLWLEION:PL, 15 y u sas� • 9vx 1111 • ,y ° ",, Project Location 15[5 w i `j•l4�iv �. _ W. ` `•] e33Y�. 9J �'.. a�'��(niP 2919 - _ f� �'['�1♦ii , �9Hi�.�6� � � �ly_5M:if 2 • \la's;' •.� .e95 d ' "Ei1 - � -ti. ✓ti�cy�/-. Y':.�nt SEi • � imi s �? . '�e[9n• - ' - iSf 160 Sf53' _ a... 195 ]D]E 15i � •11xxf: •rf _ ]]bai .fiGy l.Md y11 ]#A J[ I�DE, I 1314 1_I3i� id„ _ lrK i °] 3303 iMi'J,:F • �Sy SdIE imp 1 .SSi 1x10 H'ti _ 1-p1 mow• Si� i`5 13] Zp 1 NS •he � ._F 3rSi; SJ3i l25e' SRl lf5l �� _ .ly' el 4 13001x11 ?SZ44. 9 wY] 1 xlvn 31[R0. xdd. PL'AN x - r n OWN–. _ yy t. w,? ON-SITE Medical Commercial Medical Controlled Manufacturing General office and R &D uses CC -M District M -1 -A Governmental, Educational City of Newport Beach NORTH Public Facilities [PF] and institutional Facilities Corporation Yard GEIF General Old Newport Blvd- Specific EAST Commercial Office Plan (SP -9) /Retail & Service Office and commercial uses CC-G) Commercial RSC Multi - Family Residential Multiple -Unit Residential [MFR] ! Administrative, Multiple - Family Residential and SOUTH [RMjlPrivate Institutions Professional, Financial Flagship Medical Care Center [Pl) APF Harbor Homes Trailer Part and WEST RM 1 CO -M MFR I M-1 -A Su Briar Medico€ Center J Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 3 Proiect Description The applicant is requesting approval of an amendment to the existing Use Permit to convert the remaining 232,414 square feet of general office and R &D floor area, of the total existing 329,414 square feet of floor area, to medical office use. The applicant is also seeking preliminary approval to construct an additional 20,586 square feet of floor area for a cafe or medically - related retail space. To allow for future flexibility, the future additional square footage is assumed to be medical office use, resulting in total development of 350,000 square feet of medical office floor area. The total new medical office floor area requested as part of this amendment is 253,000 square feet (232,414 + 20,586). Although there is currently no precise plan for the additional 20,586 square feet of floor area, the applicant is requesting approval of a building to be located between the two parking structures as shown on the proposed site plan (Exhibit 1) with a height not to exceed the 32 -foot base height limitation. Given the location and height limitation of the proposed building envelope in relationship to the existing buildings on -site, the new building will be shielded from view from the residential developments to the west and south, as well as any views from Newport Boulevard. The applicant is also seeking to expand the previously - permitted shuttle service from two round -trips per hour to four round -trips per hour, and to extend the interim one -year parking provision permitting ancillary parking at Hoag Health Center for Hoag Hospital for an additional one year to facilitate completion of Hoag's construction of its Lower Campus. Project Setting The project site is located at 500 -540 Superior Avenue, west of Newport Boulevard, east of Superior Avenue, and north of Dana Road. The area in the vicinity of the site is developed with a variety of land uses, including medical facilities, industrial and office uses as well as residential development. The site is approximately 13.7 acres in size and is developed with general office and R &D land uses. The site is currently improved with four buildings totaling 415,493 square feet of floor area and a four - level, above - grade parking structure. Demolition of one of the four buildings (86,079 sq. ft.) is contemplated, which would leave a total of 329,414 square feet of useable gross floor of medical office, general office, and R &D uses. Background In early 2001, the Planning Commission and City Council reviewed and approved Use Permit No. 3679 and a traffic study for the construction of the Newport Technology Center. The project consisted of demolition, reconstruction, and renovation of the former S Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 4 Raytheon Company facility, resulting in approximately 415,500 square -feet of R &D space. The Use Permit also allowed the structures to exceed the base 32 -foot height limit to the maximum 50 -foot height limit. A year after project completion, a use permit amendment was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 2004 to change the range of uses allowed to occupy the Newport Technology Center to provide for additional leasing flexibility. The Use Permit authorized 43 percent (178,661 gross square feet) of the project site to be occupied by commercial office uses (except medical or dental office or clinics), with the remaining 57 percent (236,831 gross square feet) occupied by industrial/R &D uses; however, leasing of Newport Technology Center still proved unsuccessful. Hoag Hospital purchased the site in 2006 in order to accommodate its medical office needs in support of the hospital. On December 7, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Use Permit No. 2006 -010 and adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH. No. 2006 - 101105) authorizing conversion of 97,000 square feet of the R &D /general office use to medical office use. In order to satisfy the increased medical parking requirements, an 86,079 square -foot building was proposed for demolition and a parking structure was proposed to be constructed in its place. Demolition of this building would have resulted in a reduced overall project gross floor area of 329,414 square feet. After the allocation of 97,000 square feet for medical office uses, the remaining floor area allocation was approved as follows: 136,000 square feet for general office use and 96,414 square feet for R &D use. The parking structure was also permitted to exceed the maximum building bulk limitation for the site. On -site parking was increased from 1,332 parking spaces to 1,985 parking spaces, including 697 spaces within the new parking structure. The Use Permit authorized a shuttle service that consists of a 20- passenger van that carries physicians and patients between Hoag Hospital and Hoag Health Center during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. The shuttle service was limited to two round -trips per hour between the two facilities and was prohibited from traveling on local roads through the residential areas. No ancillary parking is permitted at Hoag Health Center for Hoag Hospital, except during an interim period (expired December of 2007) to facilitate completion of Hoag's construction of its Lower Campus. With the exception of the shuttle service and interim ancillary parking, the Use Permit has not been exercised; however, plans to demolish the office building and construct the new parking structure are currently under review by the City and building permits are expected to be issued early this year. Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 5 DISCUSSION Analysis General Plan The project site is located within the West Newport Mesa area of the Land Use Element of the General Plan and is designated as CO -M (Medical Commercial Office). Within the West Newport Mesa area, existing development is characterized by residential, office, retail, industrial, and public uses. The CO -M land use designation is intended to provide primarily for medical - related offices, other professional offices, retail, short-term convalescent and long -term care facilities, research labs, and similar uses. The project site, in particular, is allocated a development limitation of 350,000 square feet of floor area (Anomaly No. 74). The General Plan includes goals and policies related to development. A complete consistency analysis of each of the applicable General Plan policies appears within the Draft Environmental Impact Report on pages 4.1 -11 through 4.1 -18 and concludes that the project is consistent with each of the adopted goals and policies. Land Use Goal 6.6 (LU 6.6) promotes medical service uses that support Hoag Hospital and facilitate residential development in the West Newport Mesa area. Policy LU 6.6.1 (Hospital Supporting Uses Integrated with Residential Neighborhoods) states: LU 6.6.1: Prioritize the accommodation of medical - related and supporting facilities on properties abutting the Hoag Hospital complex [areas designated as "CO -M (0.5)° (Figure LU 18, Sub Area A)] with opportunities for new residential units [areas designated as "RM (18 1ac)] and supporting general and neighborhood - serving retail services (CG (0.75)" and "CN (0.3)], respectively. This policy is applicable to the proposed project and indicates that future development should be compatible with the future mix of land uses in the area and should also complement and support the major medical activity (i.e., Hoag Hospital) in the area. Project implementation is consistent with the policy as it results in the conversion of existing general office and research & development floor area to medical office floor area to support Hoag Hospital. Implementation of the project would not compromise the character and /or integrity of the mixed uses with the West Newport area and is consistent with the Land Use Element. Parking With completion of the second parking structure permitted under the previous use permit, a total of 1,985 parking spaces will be provided onsite: 861 spaces within the existing parking structure; 697 spaces within the new parking structure; and, 427 surface parking spaces. Based on the Zoning Code requirements for medical office uses, a total of 1,750 parking spaces are required as shown in the following calculations: Medical 1 350,000 1 1/200 sq. 235 1. The total parking count is anticipated to vary mechanical, electrical, and structural components. Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 6 spaces As shown, the project will provide parking in excess of the Zoning Code requirements. Shuttle Operation Of The previously approved shuttle operation consisted of a single 20- passenger van that provides transportation services for physicians and patients between Hoag Hospital and the project site between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The shuttle service is limited to two round -trips per hour between to the two facilities. The shuttle is prohibited from traveling on local roads and through residential areas, and permitted only on the City's arterial system (i.e. Newport Boulevard, Superior Avenue, Placentia Avenue, and Hospital Road). The shuttle is to be used by physicians who have offices in Hoag Health Center, as well as by patients visiting physicians at Hoag Health Center who require further medical services such as lab work, x -rays, and medical tests to be provided at Hoag Hospital. In order to further reduce the number of personal vehicle trips between Hoag Hospital and the Hoag Health Center sites, the applicant is requesting to increase the frequency of the shuttle trips to four round -trips per hour (i.e., every 15 minutes) and clarify that Hoag staff (in addition to physicians) needing to attend meetings or perform other duties at either Hoag Health Center or Hoag Hospital may also utilize the shuttle. Although this proposal increases the frequency of the shuttle trips, none of the trips would occur on the residential streets and would reduce personal vehicle trips between the hospital and proposed health center facilities. LSA Associates has reviewed the potential effects the proposed increase in shuttle trips may have and concluded that a significant reduction in personal vehicle trips is expected and, therefore, a reduction in traffic- related air quality and noise impacts is expected (Exhibit 4). Ancillary Parking The previously approved interim one -year parking provision permitting ancillary parking to occur at Hoag Health Center for Hoag Hospital to facilitate completion of Hoag's construction of its Lower Campus expired in December of 2007. The applicant states that construction of the Lower Campus is still on -going and is requesting to extend the arrangement for an additional year. Staff believes an additional year is appropriate given the fact that the Hoag Health Center site is not yet fully occupied and a parking surplus currently exists. Should the Planning Commission choose to extend this interim provision, staff recommends that the following condition be implemented to insure M Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 7 adequate on -site parking is provided to serve tenant spaces within the Hoag Health Center development: No ancillary parking shall be permitted to occur at the project site for the use of Hoag Hospital, except during the interim period, which concludes on December 7, 2009, to facilitate the completion of Hoag Hospital's construction of the Lower Campus. Use of the Hoag Health Center parking by Hoag Hospital personnel shall only be allowed so long as the minimum Zoning Code required number of parking spaces to facilitate the operation of on -site uses is provided. Traffic Study A traffic study is required pursuant to the Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) when a project will generate in excess of 300 average daily trips (ADT). A traffic study was prepared by Kunzman Associates under the supervision of the City Traffic Engineer pursuant to the TPO and its implementing guidelines. The traffic analysis also included a cumulative impact analysis to assess project- related impacts pursuant to CEQA. For the preparation of this traffic study, trip generation rates were derived from two sources. The City of Newport Beach trip generation rates are based on the Newport Beach Traffic Analysis Model (NBTAM)1 and were used for analysis of Newport Beach intersections. The City of Costa Mesa trip generation rates are derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 70 Edition (2003) 2 and were used for evaluation of Costa Mesa intersections. The TPO analysis was required only for primary intersections in the City of Newport Beach. For the purposes of studying the cumulative impacts, the traffic study analyzed intersections in the City of Costa Mesa, utilizing the ITE trip generation rates. The project will generate 12,743 additional trips per day based on the NBTAM trip generation rates, including 449 additional a.m. peak hour trips and 1,084 p.m. peak hour trips. Based on the ITE trip generation rates utilized to analyze impacts at intersections in the City of Costa Mesa, a total of 8,758 additional trips are anticipated as a result of project implementation, including 297 additional a.m. peak hour trips and 779 trips during the p.m. peak hour. Based on consultation between the Cities of Newport Beach and Costa Mesa staff, the following 32 intersections were evaluated: At the time the traffic study was prepared, the TPO required the use of NBTAM trip generation rates for the analysis of Newport Beach intersections; however, on July 24, 2007, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2007 -12 amending the TPO to delete references to NBTAM and made the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation the primary source for calculating trip generation rates in the City. 2 The ITE trip generation manual is based on hundreds of trip generation surveys nationwide for a range of land use types. It is the most commonly accepted data source for trip generation rates, including the County of Orange and the City of Costa Mesa, and recently determined to be the most appropriate source of inputs for traffic studies prepared for the City of Newport Beach. M Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 8 TPO Analysis- Potential impacts to the 14 intersections in the City of Newport Beach were analyzed using the one percent methodology required by the TPO. The one percent methodology provides that if any leg of any of the 14 evaluated intersections experience a peak hour traffic volume increase larger than one percent, additional analysis is required utilizing the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. ICU values are calculated based on the volume of traffic using the intersection compared to the capacity of the intersection. A Level of Service (LOS) rating (A through F) is then assigned to the intersection based on the ICU value. The City of Newport Beach considers LOS A through D to be operating at acceptable levels, while LOS E and F are considered to be operating at unacceptable levels. According to the City's established significance threshold criteria, a significant impact would occur if project - generated traffic would cause an intersection to deteriorate from LOS D or better to LOS E or F. For intersections operating at LOS E or F under existing conditions, a significant lb Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 9 impact would occur if project - generated traffic would increase the ICU value by 0.01 or more. Based on the TPO ICU /LOS analysis, all 14 study intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Therefore, pursuant to the TPO, no mitigation is required. Cumulative Traffic Analysis- The cumulative analysis reflects the future (2009) development scenario that includes development of `cumulative" projects identified by the Cities of Newport Beach and Costa Mesa as well as the proposed project. Reasonably foreseeable projects and approved projects that are not included in the committed project list were added to project - related traffic and evaluated. The analysis of Newport Beach intersections using NBTAM rates showed that all of the intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. The analysis indicates that 2 intersections in the City of Costa Mesa, using the ITE trip rates, are currently forecast to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS E) in the 2009 with approved projects and cumulative projects. The intersections are: -Superior Avenue /17th Street (LOS F during the a.m. and LOS E during p.m. peak hours) -Newport Boulevard /18th Street - Rochester Street (LOSE during the p.m. peak hour) As indicated in the table below, when the project - related traffic is added to the future traffic scenario for 2009, the project- generated traffic results in an ICU value increase of 0.01 or more at the same two intersections forecasted to operate at unacceptable levels without the project. The degradation of the 2 intersections with the project - related traffic will result in a significant impact at the two intersections. The following mitigation measures prescribed for the proposed project would reduce ICU values to levels that are less than pre - project ICU values, reducing potential project - related traffic impacts at these intersections to a less than significant level: MM 4.2 -1 Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a medical office tenant improvement permit which would cause the site to exceed 155,000 square feet of medical office floor area, the project applicant shall be required to restripe to provide a westbound left turn lane, shared lefbthrough lane, through lane, and right turn lane at the Superior Avenua/1 J"' Street intersection. This improvement would require modification to the traffic signal phasing and interconnect with the l� Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 10 Newport Boulevard/i70' Street intersection. The applicant shall work in conjunction with the City of Costa Mesa to complete this improvement. MM4.2 -2 Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a medical office tenant improvement permit which would cause the site to exceed 285,000 square feet of medical office floor area, the project applicant shall pay a fair share fee to the City of Costa Mesa through the City's established fee program, provided that the City has established a mechanism to accept a fair share fee, to provide a southbound throughAight turn lane at the Newport Boulevard/18"' Street - Rochester Street intersection. The southbound improvement would require right-of-way acquisition. The applicant shall not be subject to the fair share fee if the City of Costa Mesa has not adopted a mechanism for collecting the fair share fee prior to buildout of the project (i.e., 350,000 square feet). As discussed in more detail within the Environmental Review section of this report, the City of Costa Mesa does not currently have a mechanism for accepting the fair share fee contribution from the project applicant to pay for the Newport Boulevard /18th Street - Rochester St. improvements; therefore, implementation of the mitigation measure to the impact cannot be assured and is considered legally infeasible. The impacts to that intersection will remain significant and unavoidable and will necessitate the adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations finding that the benefits of the project outweigh the impact prior to approving the project. Traffic Signal As part of the previously approved project ( 97,000 sq. ft. of medical office use), a traffic signal warrant analysis was performed for a potential signalized intersection at Superior Avenue and the main project driveway (central driveway). The analysis indicated that a traffic signal was warranted due to project - related traffic volumes; however, project access could function adequately without the signal. Additionally, since there is a lack of available right -of -way precisely where the signal would be located, a condition of approval was included requiring the applicant to post a 10 -year bond for the installation of the traffic signal at the main project driveway and for roadway improvements (medians, striping, planting) prior to the issuance of any permit for medical offices at the site to allow the City to acquire the required right -of -way. As a result of the increased traffic volumes associated with the currently proposed project (350,000 sq. ft. of medical office use), it is anticipated that a signalized intersection at Superior Avenue and the main project driveway will be required in order to avoid on -site circulation and site access problems. The City Traffic Engineer has determined that a traffic signal must be in place prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a medical office tenant improvement permit that would cause the site to exceed 110,000 square feet of medical office floor area. The City will be responsible for completing the traffic signal and street improvements upon acquisition of the right -of- way and the applicant will be required to reimburse the City for all costs associated with the improvements, including acquisition costs. Therefore, staff is recommending the following conditions of approval: • The applicant shall be responsible for all costs, expenses and fees for all roadway improvements along Superior Avenue across the property frontage, as deemed necessary by the City. The �0�-' Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 11 roadway improvements shah include, but not be limited to, the widening of Superior Avenue to the ultimate width, construction of medians and landscaping, all signing and striping work, and the installation of the traffic signal at the main project driveway (center driveway). The roadway improvement costs shall include, but not be limited to, all design, construction, project management, acquisition, relocation assistance and other costs, consultant fees, expert fees, attorney fees, permit fees, and any litigation expenses related in any way thereto. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any new medical office tenant improvement, the applicant shall post a new 10 -year performance bond (or other form of security satisfactory to the City Attorney) with the City to guarantee payment of all fees, costs and expenses identified in this condition. The City will determine the bond amount by reasonably estimating the fees, costs and expenses identified in this condition. if at any point it is determined that the bond amount is insufficient to cover the actual or projected fees, costs, and expenses identified in this condition as determined by the City, Hoag shall increase the bond amount accordingly. • Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a medical office tenant improvement permit which would cause the site to exceed 110,000 square feet of medical office floor area, the installation of the traffic signal at the main project driveway and the widening of Superior Avenue, as referenced in Condition No. 40, shall have first been completed, and the traffic signal shall be in full operation. Should the City be unable to complete the improvements within a reasonable timeframe, the applicant may elect to complete the improvements per the approval and direction of the Public Work's Department and shall reimburse the City for all costs and expenses associated with such an arrangement. Use Permit Findings Section 20.91.075 of the Zoning Code requires that the Planning Commission make certain findings for use permit requests. These findings and facts in support of such findings are listed and discussed below. 1. That the proposed location of the use is in accord with the objectives of this code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project is located in the M -1 -A (Controlled Manufacturing) Zoning District, which provides for a wide range of moderate to low intensity industrial uses and limited accessory and ancillary commercial and office uses. Business and Professional Office uses are permitted within the M -1 -A zone, with the exception that medical offices are permitted with the approval of a use permit. Otherwise, there are no specific operational criteria for medical office uses in the Zoning Code. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this designation and complies with all development standards. It should be noted that the City is currently in the process of updating the Zoning Code for consistency with the recently adopted General Plan. The proposed zoning designation for the site is OM (Office- Medical), which is intended to provide for medical- related offices, other professional offices, retail, short-term convalescent and long -term care facilities. Medical office uses are anticipated to be permitted by right within this new OM designation; therefore, the project should not conflict with future zoning implementation. 2. That the proposed location of the use permit and the proposed conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will be consistent with the General Plan and the purpose of the district in which the site is located, will not be detrimental IN Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 12 to the public health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or welfare of persons residing or working in or adjacent to the neighborhood of such use, and will not be detrimental to the properties or improvements in the vicinity or to the general welfare of the city. The proposed medical office use, pursuant to the conditions of approval, is consistent with the Medical Commercial Office (CO -M) land use designation of the General Plan Land Use Element, which provides primarily for medical - related offices, other professional offices, retail, short-term convalescent and long -term care facilities, research labs, and similar uses. The proposed overall total gross floor area of the site is consistent with the 350,000 square foot development limitation assigned for the site. Staff believes the project will not be detrimental to the public or properties in the vicinity, or to the general welfare of the City for the following reasons: • The 232,414 square feet of general office and R &D floor area to be converted to medical office floor area will be limited to interior remodeling within the existing building, with no changes to the exterior appearance. The future addition of 20,586 square feet of floor area is conditioned to be limited within a building envelope located between two parking structures with a height not to exceed the 32 -foot base height limit. Given the location and height limitation of the proposed building envelope in relationship to the existing buildings on -site, the new building will be shielded from view from the residential developments to the west and south, as well as any views from Newport Boulevard. • With the completion of the previously- approved parking structure, the site will provide a total of 1,985 parking spaces on -site, exceeding the minimum code requirement by 235 spaces, thereby providing sufficient parking to accommodate the proposed project. • The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the proposed shuttle operation and has approved a route and operation that will avoid travel on streets adjacent to residences and convalescent homes. • The increased frequency in the number of the shuttle trips per hour will serve to reduce personal vehicle trips between the hospital and the proposed health center facilities. The reduction of personal vehicle trips would have the effect of further reducing potential traffic, noise and air quality impacts. • The project has been conditioned to include installation of the traffic signal at the main project driveway and completion of the related roadway improvements (medians, striping, widening, planting) prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit that results in the conversion equal to, or in excess of, 110,000 square feet medical office floor area. N '1 Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 13 • The project has been conditioned so as to control and reduce excess lighting and to avoid off -site light spillage. The traffic study has determined that ft of project implementation will not result traffic circulation in the City of Newport vicinity of the project site. increased traffic generated as a result in significant impacts to intersections or Beach, and more specifically, within the All potential environmental impacts have been analyzed in the Initial Study and Draft EIR (DEIR) and were found to be less than significant with the incorporation of specific mitigation measures, with the exception of the long -term operational emissions and traffic impact to the intersection of Newport Boulevard /18th Street - Rochester Street in the City of Costa Mesa. As discussed in the Environmental Review section of this report, no feasible mitigation measures exist that would reduce these impacts to less than significant levels; therefore, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted that finds that the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects. • With the approval of the applications with conditions of approval (including all mitigation measures) designed to minimize or avoid areas of concern, the use can be found compatible with, and not detrimental to, the surrounding neighborhood or City. 3. That the proposed use will comply with the provisions of this code, including any specific condition required for the proposed use in the district in which it would be located. The Zoning Code requires the approval of a use permit for medical office uses. The proposed conditions of approval and mitigation measures for this project will ensure that all potential conflicts with surrounding land uses are minimized to the greatest extent possible, or are eliminated. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Prior to taking action on the requested Use Permit amendment and Traffic Study, the Planning Commission must first review, consider and certify the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The City contracted with Keeton Kreitzer Consulting to prepare an Initial Study and EIR for the proposed project (Exhibit No. 5). The Initial Study was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based upon the analysis of the Initial Study, the following environmental topics were identified as potentially affected by the implementation of the proposed project: Air Quality, Land Use and Planning, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Noise, Traffic/Circulation, and Utilities. These topics were the subject of the EIR analysis, and potential impacts were identified; b Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 14 however, in those instances, specific mitigation measures have been included to reduce the potentially significant adverse effects to a less than significant level, with the exception of two impacts related to air quality and traffic that are discussed in the Unavoidable Adverse Impacts discussion section below. The Initial Study indicated that impacts related to Aesthetics and Cultural Resources will be less than significant with mitigation. These topics were not discussed further in the EIR. The issue areas identified to be affected at either a no impact or a less than significant level are: Agricultural Resources, Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, Hydrology and Water Quality, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services, and Recreation. These topics were not discussed further in the EIR. Keeton Kreitzer Consulting prepared a DEIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2006101105) that focused upon the environmental issues identified as "potentially affected." The DEIR was completed and circulated for a mandatory 45 -day review period that began on September 11, 2007 and concluded on October 25, 2007, and was previously transmitted to the Planning Commission. Comments were received from several interested parties, including the City's Environmental Quality Affairs Committee, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the City of Costa Mesa. The consultant and staff have prepared written responses to each of the comments received on the adequacy of the DEIR. Subsequently, Caltrans and the City of Costa Mesa submitted follow -up comments, for which responses have also been prepared and included in the Final Response to Comments (Exhibit 6 & 7). An Errata was also prepared which provides minor clarifications and correction to the DEIR (Exhibit 8). Recirculated Partial Draft Environmental Impact Report (RPDEIR) During the initial 45 -day public comment period for the DEIR, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) made the following comment: Comment No. 2 This project is anticipated to adversely impact intersection turning pockets. It should be noted that demands at turning pockets are at or reaching capacities. Please provide the storage length analysis for left and right turn pockets at the intersections on Newport Boulevard and PCH within the study area. As a result of the comment, a new analysis was performed to determine queuing impacts and the adequacy of the turning pockets within the Caltrans intersections within the study area. Based on the new analysis, the vehicle storage length of the northbound, left -tum pocket at the intersection of Newport Boulevard /Hospital Road was determined to be deficient with the addition of project- related trips. A new mitigation measure (MM 4.2 -3) has been prescribed to require the lengthening of the left turn pocket to provide sufficient vehicle storage length and to ensure this impact can be reduced to a level of less than significant. As a result of this new significant information identified, a Recirculated Partial Draft Environmental Impact Report (RPDEIR) was prepared to disclose the deficiency noted r, Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 15 above (Exhibit 9). Pursuant to CEQA, the RPDEIR was recirculated for an additional mandatory 45 -day public review period (began November 16, 2007 and concluded December 31, 2007) to allow the public tin opportunity to comment on the new information prior to the certification of the Final EIR. No comments were received on the adequacy of the RPDEIR (although as previously stated, follow -up comments were received in regards to the City's Response to Comments). Alternatives The DEIR discusses project altematives as required pursuant to CEQA. These alternatives include a No Project Alternative (slower build -out of the site under the existing General Plan), a No Development Alternative (allowing for redevelopment of the site in accordance with the previous approval of Use Permit No. 2006 -010), Reduced Intensity Alternative (resulting in the conversion of the remaining existing floor area to medical office without the additional 20,586 square feet of floor area requested by the applicant), and Non - Medical Office Alternative (assuming the remaining 232,414 square feet of office and R &D floor area are fully converted to general office use only). Although in some cases the alternatives are considered to have reduced impacts and considered environmentally superior, neither of the alternatives were found to achieve several of the project's objectives related to providing adequate health care services. The project objectives are identified in Section 1.1.4 of the DEIR (page 1 -2). Unavoidable Adverse Impacts As previously stated, all of the potentially significant adverse impacts associated with the proposed project can be reduced to a less than significant level through the implementation of mitigation measures, with the exception of the following two impacts: Impact 4.3 -1 Project implementation will result in pollutant emissions from both mobile and stationary sources that would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District significance thresholds for CO, ROC, NO., and PM10, in both winter and summer months. Because the responsibility for the control of pollutant emissions associated with mobile sources lies with State and federal agencies, no mitigation measures are available to reduce the potentially significant mobile- source emissions to a less than significant level. Therefore, these project - related emissions impacts remain a significant unavoidable adverse impact. Impact 4.2 -3 Project implementation will result in significant cumulative impacts to the Newport Boulevard /18th Street- Rochester Street intersection, which is forecast to operate at a LOS E (ICU 0.941) during the p.m. peak hour with addition of project - related traffic. As previously indicated in the Traffic Study discussion, because the City of Costa Mesa does not currently have a mechanism for accepting the fair share fee contribution from the 11 Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 16 project applicant for the Newport Boulevard /1 eh Street - Rochester Street improvements, implementation of the requisite mitigation measure to address that impact cannot be assured and is, therefore, considered legally infeasible. As a result, the project - related cumulative impact identified for the Newport Boulevard /18`h Street - Rochester Street intersection will remain significant and unavoidable. If the City of Costa Mesa subsequently establishes a mechanism to accept a fair share fee for the necessary improvements within the time specified by Mitigation Measure No. 4.4 -2, the applicant will be required to pay fees in accordance with the mitigation measure. If the Planning Commission believes the benefits of the project outweigh the two unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, the preparation of a Statement of Overriding Considerations is required in order to approve the project. A draft Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared for the Planning Commission that identifies a number of economic and social benefits of the project related to the growing demand and need for medical office space and out - patient care facilities in the City of Newport Beach and in the County of Orange (Attached as Exhibit B of Draft Resolution Certifying the EIR; Exhibit 1). SUMMARY Proposed conversion of the site for full medical office use is reasonable use of the site and should provide for medical services and support for Hoag Hospital. The project is consistent with the long -range goals and policies of the General Plan, and will result in no adverse environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated, with the exception of two impacts that necessitate the adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission certify the Environmental Impact Report, and approve the requested applications. Public Notice Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the property (excluding roads and waterways) and posted at the site a minimum of 10 days in advance of this hearing consistent with the Municipal Code. The environmental assessment process has also been noticed in a similar manner and all mandatory notices per the California Environmental Quality Act have been given. Finally, the item appeared upon the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the city website. Alternatives 1. If the Planning Commission determines that not all the facts in support of the findings can be made, the Planning Commission should direct staff to prepare findings and a resolution denying the request and return at the next Planning Commission meeting date with such resolution for adoption. 2. The Planning Commission may suggest specific modifications to the project determined to be needed in order to make required findings for approval. If this is N� Hoag Health Center January 17, 2008 Page 17 done, the item should be continued if the changes are reasonable and easy to incorporate. 3. If the Planning Commission finds there is insufficient information regarding the additional 20,586 square feet of floor area requested in order to make required findings for approval, the Planning Commission may deny that portion of the request and only approve the conversion of the 232,414 square feet of general office and R &D floor area to medical office use. The applicant would then be required to apply for a subsequent use permit amendment once precise plans for the construction of the additional floor area are prepared. Prepared by: J Mme Murillo, Associate Planner Submitted by: David repo, P nning Director EXHIBITS 1. Draft Resolution of Certification 2. Draft Resolution of Approval 3. Project Plans 4. Shuttle Analysis 5. Draft EIR (distributed separately due to bulk) 6. Response to Comments on DEIR; November 2007 7. Response to Comments on RPDEIR; January 2008 8. Errata 9. Recirculated Partial Draft EIR F. AUsemWLMShamcftPA 's1PAs- 20071PA2007- 0131Pianning CommissionlPC1_17 20081PA2007- 013PCrptFina1011708.doc IA