Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0_Davidson-Took Variance_PA2012-108CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 20, 2012 Meeting
Agenda Item 3
SUBJECT: Davidson -Took Variance (PA2012 -108)
201 Sapphire Avenue
Variance Permit No. VA2012 -004
APPLICANT: Ian Harrison
PLANNER: Jaime Murillo, Associate Planner
(949) 644 -3209, jmurillo @newportbeachca.gov
PROJECT SUMMARY
The project consists of the demolition of the existing single -unit dwelling and
construction of a new 1,440- square -foot, single -unit dwelling and two -car garage. The
proposed structure would maintain the required 10 -foot front setback from the easterly
property line adjacent to Sapphire Avenue and the 3 -foot side setbacks from the
northerly and southerly property lines; however, the applicant is requesting a variance to
encroach 7 feet into the required 10 -foot rear setback adjacent to the westerly property
line. The applicant is also requesting to exceed the maximum permitted floor area
limitation for the property of 1,100 square feet by an additional 340 square feet (PC1-
Project Plans).
RECOMMENDATION
1) Conduct a public hearing; and
2) Adopt Resolution No. _ approving Variance Permit No. VA2012 -004
(Attachment No. PC 2).
Davidson -Took Variance
September 20, 2012
Page 2
LOCATION
GENERAL PLAN
VICINITY MAP
p
zo9
1,
no
u „3
209
A_ u
-9
��a'6
I 209
�•• p6 + - .ere tR
Single -unit dwelling
NORTH
RT
MY
Property
I
201,
202 t12
]0] r
X202 � I
v'�.
m
1
RT
,�z..._�
am
9g enexm
IA
-e
OF— 10110
`�
R -BI
r
^f lam.
136
to 11
.F ❑
• C
.'t•,a \
L'
i ,I
ri � F
6J
e
125 9
..
,z,
GENERAL PLAN
ZONING
LOCATION
GENERAL PLAN
ZONING
CURRENT USE
ON -SITE
Two -Unit Residential (RT)
Two -Unit Residential,
Balboa Island R -BI
Single -unit dwelling
NORTH
RT
R -BI
Single-unit dwelling
SOUTH
RT
7R-BI
Single-unit dwelling
EAST
RT
R -BI
Two -unit dwelling
WEST
RT
R -BI
Single -unit dwelling
Davidson -Took Variance
September 20, 2012
Page 3
INTRODUCTION
Project Setting
The property is located at the northwesterly corner of Sapphire Avenue and Park
Avenue on Balboa Island. The lot measures 30 feet in width and 45 feet in length, and
totals 1,350 square feet in area. The lot is legally described as a portion of Lot 1, Block
9, Section 2 of Balboa Island. The sub - standard lot size is a result of a subdivision of
the original Lot 1 that occurred prior to the City's subdivision ordinances that were
enacted beginning in 1959; therefore, it has been determined to be a legally created lot.
As a result of this prior subdivision, the property is significantly smaller than the
surrounding 2,550 square -foot (30- foot -wide by 85- foot -deep) lots that are typical of
Balboa Island (PC3- Maps illustrating surrounding lot sizes). The property also does not
have alley access.
Currently, the property is developed with a small (approx. 610 sq. ft.), single -unit
dwelling that was constructed in 1947. No on -site parking is provided. The existing
structure encroaches into the setbacks as follows: 0.2 feet into the required 10 -foot front
setback adjacent to Sapphire Avenue, 0.2 feet into the required 3 -foot side setback
adjacent to the Park Avenue, 0 feet into the required 3 -foot side setback adjacent to the
northerly side property line, and 4.7 feet into the required 10 -foot rear setback adjacent
to the westerly property line.
Immediately to the west is a single -unit dwelling developed on the remaining 1,200 -
square -foot portion of the original Lot 1 (40 feet wide by 30 feet deep). To the north,
east and west are typical single- and two -unit dwellings developed on standard size lots.
General Plan and Local Coastal Plan
The property is designated Two -Unit Residential (RT) and (RT -E) by the Land Use
Element of the City's General Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan, which are intended to
provide for a range of two -unit dwellings such as duplexes and townhomes. The
construction of a new single -unit dwelling is consistent with these designations.
Zoning Code
The property is zoned Two -Unit Residential, Balboa Island (R -BI) by the Zoning Code,
which allows a maximum of two residential dwelling units located on a single legal lot.
The proposed single -unit dwelling is consistent with this zoning designation. The
proposed project will conform to all applicable development standards of the R -BI
zoning district, with the exception of the requested encroachment into the rear setback
and increased floor area. Each of these requests are discussed in more detail below.
Davidson -Took Variance
September 20, 2012
Page 4
Variance Requests
To determine if the requested variances are appropriate, staff first analyzed the
proposed setbacks for compatibility with the surrounding development, then the
proposed floor area variance was analyzed for equity.
Setback Encroachment Variance
With the exception of a few similarly oriented lots, all standard size lots in Balboa Island
maintain alley access and are subject to a 5 -foot rear alley setback. In this case, the
subject property is sub - standard in size and lacks alley access as a result of a prior re-
subdivision. The lack of alley access triggers the requirement by the Zoning Code for a 10-
foot rear setback that is intended for larger -sized lots and is not required for typical lots on
Balboa Island. Application of a 10 -foot rear setback and 10 -foot front setback would
equate to approximately 44.4percent of the lot depth. In comparison, application of the
standard 10 -foot front setback and 5 -foot rear alley setback on the typical 85 -foot deep lot
in the vicinity would equate to only 17.6percent of the lot depth.
The applicant is proposing to maintain the 10 -foot front setback, preserving the
neighborhood pattern of development along Sapphire Avenue; however, is proposing to
encroach 7 feet into the required 10 -foot rear yard setback. Staff believes the applicant's
request is reasonable in this case due to the extremely short depth of the lot. The
proposed 3 -foot rear setback is intended to match the standard 3 -foot side yard setback
on the abutting property, thus providing the same amount of air, light, and separation as
would exist with other dwellings in the area that maintain 3 -foot side yard setbacks
between structures.
Although the City has a process for establishing alternative setback areas where the
orientation of an existing lot is not consistent with character or orientation of other lots in
the vicinity, the applicant is requesting additional floor area beyond what would be allowed
utilizing the revised buildable area based on the alternative setbacks; therefore, a variance
is requested for both setback encroachment and floor area.
Floor Area Variance
The Zoning Code permits structures within the R -BI District to have a total gross floor
area, or Floor Area Limit (FAL), equal to 1.5 times the buildable area of the lot, plus an
additional 200 square feet. The buildable area of a lot is defined as the lot area minus
the area of required setbacks. Using this formula, the maximum allowable gross floor
area for the subject lot is 900 square feet plus 200 square feet, for a total of 1,100
square feet. The proposed single -unit dwelling has a gross floor area of 1,440 square
feet. Table 1 below compares the floor area to land area ratios of the subject lot, the
typical lot in the vicinity, and the proposed project.
Davidson -Took Variance
September 20, 2012
Page 5
Table 1: Propertv Development Standards Comparison
(1) Maximum floor area limit utilizing proposed setbacks would equate to 1,152 sq. ft. + 200 sq. ft.;
however, the applicant is requesting the proposed additional floor area.
Applying standard setbacks to the subject property results in a smaller percent of
allowed buildable area when compared to typical lots on Balboa Island and thus less
allowable floor area. The primary reason is the rear property line is not adjacent to an
alley as most typical lots; therefore, the required rear yard setback is 10 feet instead of
typical 5 -foot alley setback. This is an unusually large setback for not only a property of
this size, but for any typical lot within the vicinity and for Balboa Island. As illustrated in
Table 1, the buildable area of the subject lot is only 45percent of the total lot area; the
buildable area of the larger, typical lot equates to 77percent of the total lot area.
To establish a recommendation, staff used a floor area to lot area ratio (FAR) to
determine an appropriate floor area, a method that has been used in the past when
analyzing similar requests. Strict application of the Zoning Code requirement of the 1.5
floor area limit allows a maximum of 900 gross square feet (excluding the additional
200 - square -foot allowance), which results in a FAR of 0.67. The FAR of a typical lot
Subject Lot
Typical Lot in
Subject Lot
Code
Standards
the Block
Proposed
Front Setback
10 ft.
10 ft.
10 ft.
(Sapphire Ave)
Side Setback (Park Ave)
3 ft.
3 ft.
3 ft. (4 ft. garage)
Side Setback (North)
3 ft.
3 ft.
3 ft.
Rear Setback
loft
5 ft. (alley)
3 ft.
'variance
required
Gross Lot Area
1,350 sq. ft.
2,550 sq. ft.
No change
(30 ft. x 45 ft.)
(30 ft. x 85 ft.)
Buildable Area
600 sq. ft.
1,680 sq. ft.
768 sq. ft.
(45% of lot)
(77% Of lot)
(57% of lot)
Maximum Floor Area
1,440 sq. ft''
Buildable Area x
1,100 sq. ft.
2,720 sq. ft
"variance required
1.5 FAL + 200 sq. ft.
Floor Area to Land Area
Ratio (FAR) excluding
0.67
0.99
0.92
200 sq. ft. allowance
Floor Area to Land Area
Ratio (FAR) including
0.81
1.07
1.07
200 sq. ft. allowance
(1) Maximum floor area limit utilizing proposed setbacks would equate to 1,152 sq. ft. + 200 sq. ft.;
however, the applicant is requesting the proposed additional floor area.
Applying standard setbacks to the subject property results in a smaller percent of
allowed buildable area when compared to typical lots on Balboa Island and thus less
allowable floor area. The primary reason is the rear property line is not adjacent to an
alley as most typical lots; therefore, the required rear yard setback is 10 feet instead of
typical 5 -foot alley setback. This is an unusually large setback for not only a property of
this size, but for any typical lot within the vicinity and for Balboa Island. As illustrated in
Table 1, the buildable area of the subject lot is only 45percent of the total lot area; the
buildable area of the larger, typical lot equates to 77percent of the total lot area.
To establish a recommendation, staff used a floor area to lot area ratio (FAR) to
determine an appropriate floor area, a method that has been used in the past when
analyzing similar requests. Strict application of the Zoning Code requirement of the 1.5
floor area limit allows a maximum of 900 gross square feet (excluding the additional
200 - square -foot allowance), which results in a FAR of 0.67. The FAR of a typical lot
Davidson -Took Variance
September 20, 2012
Page 6
within the block is 0.99. The applicant's requested variance to exceed the 1.5 floor area
limit with a single -unit dwelling that has a gross floor area of 1,240 square feet
(excluding the additional 200 - square -foot allowance) results in a 0.92 FAR, which is
consistent with the typical lots within the vicinity. Therefore, the proposed structure
would not be out of proportion to the other dwellings within the immediate neighborhood
and throughout Balboa Island.
Since the additional 200 - square -foot allowance applies to all properties within Balboa
Island, regardless of size, staff believes excluding the 200 - square -foot allowance is
important in order to obtain an equitable comparison of FAR. However, it should be
noted that when the allowance is included in the FAR calculation comparison, the
proposed structure would still maintain a FAR calculation consistent with other typical
lots in the vicinity (1.07 FAR).
Variance Findings and Summary
Pursuant to Section 20.52.090 of the Zoning Code, the Planning Commission must
make the following findings in order to approve a variance:
1. There are special or unique circumstances or conditions applicable to the subject
property (e.g., location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other physical
features) that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity under an identical
zoning classification;
2. Strict compliance with Zoning Code requirements would deprive the subject property of
privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zoning
classification;
3. Granting of the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights of the applicant;
4. Granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with
the limitations on other properties in the vicinity and in the same zoning district;
5. Granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of
the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public
convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in
the neighborhood; and
6. Granting of the Variance will not be in conflict with the intent and purpose of this Section,
this Zoning Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan.
Staff believes sufficient facts exist to support the variance request for both the increased
floor area and rear setback encroachment.
Davidson -Took Variance
September 20, 2012
Page 7
As previously discussed, the subject property is sub - standard in size due to re-
subdivision that occurred prior to the City enacting subdivision regulations and lacks
alley access. Given its small size, application of standard setbacks results in a
disproportionate reduction in buildable area and thus less allowable floor area. The
application of the 10 -foot rear setback in particular, is unusually larger and not typical of
other lots in Balboa Island and further limits the buildable depth of the lot. The proposed
encroachment into the rear setback is reasonable in this case due to the extremely short
depth of the lot and affords the property owner a more usable buildable lot depth. The
proposed 3 -foot rear setback is also consistent with the standard 3 -foot side yard setback
and would ensure the protection of air, light, and separation that exists with other
properties in the vicinity.
The proposed gross floor area of the dwelling is consistent with the FAR of typical lots
on Balboa Island. The equitable FAR preserves private property rights, while ensuring a
special privilege is not granted and results in a dwelling that is proportionate to others
on Balboa Island and consistent with the neighborhood development pattern. In addition
the design of the structure includes articulation and modulation through the use of
several balconies and building offsets to minimize bulk and enhance the aesthetics of
the structure.
Alternatives
The Commission has the option to deny the request if it is found that the applications
are inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Code or that the project might
prove detrimental to the area (PC4: Resolution for Denial). Denial would allow
construction of a 1,100 square -foot dwelling with the Zoning Code required setbacks.
The Commission also has the option to propose a revised project that contains altered
amounts for gross floor area and setback encroachments.
Environmental Review
The project is categorically exempt under Section 15302, of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 2 (Replacement or
Reconstruction), which allows for the reconstruction of existing structures where the
new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have
substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. In this case, an
existing single -unit dwelling would be demolished and a new single -unit dwelling would
be reconstructed on the same site. The project is also categorically exempt under
Section 15303, of the CEQA Guidelines - Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of
Small Structures), which allows for the construction of up to three single -unit dwellings
in a residential zone, in urbanized areas.
Davidson -Took Variance
September 20, 2012
Page 8
Public Notice
Notice of this application was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to all owners of
property within 300 feet of the boundaries of the site (excluding intervening rights -of-
way and waterways) including the applicant and posted on the subject property at least
10 days prior to the decision date, consistent with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
Additionally, the item appeared on the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at
City Hall and on the City website.
Prepared by: Submitted by:
aime Murillo, Associate Planner Br n la Wisnesl i, rICP, Deputy Director
ATTACHMENTS
PC 1 Project Plans
PC 2 Draft Resolution for Approval with Findings and Conditions
PC 3 Maps Illustrating Surrounding Lot Sizes
PC 4 Draft Resolution for Denial
F: \Users \PLN \Shared \PA's \PAs - 2012 \PA2012 - 108 \PA2012 -108 PC rpt.docx
Te m pl ate. d otx: 07/31/12
Attachment No. PC 1
Project Plans
I?
m
(Y
5" BLC
6" BU
61H
Q
4
Cn
4
4
In
6 -2"
i6" BLOCK MALL, 6' -0" HIGH
31' -10"
PL 45.00'
10' -0'
SETBACK
6" BLOCK WALL, 3'-6" HIGH � I
GONG. DRIVEWAY
-j
PER STD- 160 -L -B l 3' -0°
AND STD -163 -1-
4'1 16-0"
3' -2"
SETBACK
PARK AVI
SITE / GRADING / DRAINAGE PLAN
DESIGN LOADS
LIVE LOADS:
ROOF
20 PSP
FLOOR
40 PSF
II LATERAL LOADS MEW BUILDING)
WIND:
1. GOVERNING CODES FOR THIS PROJECT:
BASIC WIND SPEED
85 MPH, EXPOSURE G
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
IW = 1.0
BUILDING CATEGORY
11
SEISMIC:
USE GROUP
I
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
IE = 1.0
SOIL 517E CLASS
50
MAPPED SPECTRAL
0.188
RESPONSE ACCELERATION
WAY MUST BE REVIEW ED AND APPROVED BY THE
® 0.25 PERIOD, 55
WELLED
SHALL BE DO INTO THE EXISTING CONCRETE
MAPPED SPECTRAL
0.110
RESPONSE ACCELERATION
ROADWAY AND CONCRETE GUTTER CURB.
--------------------------------------
I
PERMIT AND MAY REQUIRE THE EXECUTION OF AN
SPECTRAL RESPONSE
1.241
COEFFICIENT, BOB
ENGROAGHMENT AGREEMENT. THERE 15 NO GUARAN-
SPECTRAL RESPONSE
0.110
COEFFICIENT, 5D1
TEE THAT ENCROACHMENTS SHOWN ON THE 517E
I
/ /�yv�y���0��yv�wO�yv /wv
CATEGORY
PLAN WILL BE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORK5
BASIC SEISMIC FORGE
LIGHT - FRAMED WALLS
RE515TING SYSTEM
SHEATHED WRH WOOD
I I
I
w% v�wv�yv
0.192W
SEISMIC RESPONSE
0.192
COEFFICIENT, G5
4. PROVIDE 2 LAYERS OF 5ANDBA65 AT PROPERTY
RESPONSE MODIFIGAT10N
6.5 FOR SHEAR WALL
-
3.5 FOR RIGID FRAMES
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
EQUIVALENT LATERAL
USED
FORGE
TION 5EWER CONTRACTOR OR AN A UGENSED GENERAL
4. USE OF LOW WATER CONSUMPTION PLANTS AND
APPROVAL FROM GENERAL 5ERVIGE5 DEPARTMENT.
FOUNDATION NOTE ><4.
ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR.
B. SOILS ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE
6. TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED IN PARKWAY
22.
WHEN REQUIRED, FENCE BARRIER AND WALKWAY COVER
FOUNDATION AND GRADING PLANS. SOILS
ENGINEER TO INSPECT AND CERTIFY FOOTING
ABUTTING THE BUILDING 51TE IF A NEW BUILDING 15
CONSIDERATION, SUN AND SHADE EXPOSURES AND
TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER Or 3306.5, 3306.6 AND
EXCAVATION AND DESIGN BEARING PRE55URE,
CONSTRUCTED, PER MUNICIPAL (ODE SECTION
EXISTING STREET TREES SHALL BE PROTECTED IN
3306.1.
GRADING AND COMPACTING OF 51
13A9.010.
23.
IN ADDITION TO PROTECTION OF PEDESTRIANS, PROVIDE
PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE. FOR OVER -
T PROVIDE TREES IN THE PARKWAY ADJOINING THIS
THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVES.
CONSTRUCTION FENCING 12" TO 64" HIGH.
EXCAVATION AND RECOMPAGTION DURING
POTENTIAL OVERWATERING AND IRRIGATION RUNOFF.
GK WALL
Z
i I
8.00
15.
ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT,
W
Q
O
5. HOM50lAINER TO ROUTINELY GLEAN CATCH BASINS
INCLUDING DUCT OPENIN65, TO BE ABOVE
18.
NEW CONGRETE 51DBAALK, CURB AND GUTTER, CURB
AND DRAIN LINES OF DEBRIS.
ELEVATION bb' NGVO29 (8d NAVD88) MEAN
ACCESS RAMPS, AND STREET PAVEMENT MAY BE
I
I II I
REQUIRED BY THE CITY AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUG-
6. CATCH BA51N5 WITH GRAVEL FILLED OPEN BOTTOMS
�
TON, SAID DETERMINATION SHALL BE MADE AT THE
INCORPORATED IN DRAIN SYSTEM TO PROVIDE
DISCRETION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR.
FILTRATION OF RUNOFF PRIOR TO DISCHA96E INTO
O
THE BAY.
\
UP
I�
MGM
I
I
2 CAR GARAGE--
1
I a t I
C
-- - - - - --
I
i
T
m---
JOB 8
L
- -- - -, • n\ --- ---- - -- - --
DRAWN BY
m
z
PLOT DATE
l
J
REVISION
i CURB ELEVATION = 9.00'
i tg \ •�\ ' �
~x
IL
/\
xN
W
ULING
MULLING i
o0
SI IEET
�`I FWENTY-0 11
IFINI5H SLAB ELEVATION = 9A0'
„I
STONE
/A
PAVING �\
I
J
I I
j�\
I
I
\
-F4
GK VNALL
6HI-
VA
- - - -- - - - -- ------------------------ - - - - --
=n
,____________________.
PL 45.00'
4
n
PROVIDE EIGHT DISTANCE PER
57D -110 -L AT CORNER
8fy r
4
111
W
MAX.MAX.
MAX,
GONG. DRIVEWAY
-j
PER STD- 160 -L -B l 3' -0°
AND STD -163 -1-
4'1 16-0"
3' -2"
SETBACK
PARK AVI
SITE / GRADING / DRAINAGE PLAN
DESIGN LOADS
LIVE LOADS:
ROOF
20 PSP
FLOOR
40 PSF
II LATERAL LOADS MEW BUILDING)
WIND:
1. GOVERNING CODES FOR THIS PROJECT:
BASIC WIND SPEED
85 MPH, EXPOSURE G
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
IW = 1.0
BUILDING CATEGORY
11
SEISMIC:
USE GROUP
I
IMPORTANCE FACTOR
IE = 1.0
SOIL 517E CLASS
50
MAPPED SPECTRAL
0.188
RESPONSE ACCELERATION
WAY MUST BE REVIEW ED AND APPROVED BY THE
® 0.25 PERIOD, 55
WELLED
SHALL BE DO INTO THE EXISTING CONCRETE
MAPPED SPECTRAL
0.110
RESPONSE ACCELERATION
ROADWAY AND CONCRETE GUTTER CURB.
® 1.05 PERIOD, 51
PERMIT AND MAY REQUIRE THE EXECUTION OF AN
SPECTRAL RESPONSE
1.241
COEFFICIENT, BOB
ENGROAGHMENT AGREEMENT. THERE 15 NO GUARAN-
SPECTRAL RESPONSE
0.110
COEFFICIENT, 5D1
TEE THAT ENCROACHMENTS SHOWN ON THE 517E
SEISMIC DESIGN
D
CATEGORY
PLAN WILL BE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORK5
BASIC SEISMIC FORGE
LIGHT - FRAMED WALLS
RE515TING SYSTEM
SHEATHED WRH WOOD
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PER III SEC. 108.
STRUCTURAL PANELS
DESIGN BASE SHEAR
0.192W
SEISMIC RESPONSE
0.192
COEFFICIENT, G5
4. PROVIDE 2 LAYERS OF 5ANDBA65 AT PROPERTY
RESPONSE MODIFIGAT10N
6.5 FOR SHEAR WALL
FACTOR, R
3.5 FOR RIGID FRAMES
ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
EQUIVALENT LATERAL
USED
FORGE
U
N
w
V J
U I
SITE NOTES PROJECT NOTES
SITE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE GENERAL 5ERV-
IGE5 DEPARTMENT (949/644 - 3083). APPROVAL
FROM GENERAL 5ERVIGE515 REQUIRED ON THE
BUILDING INSPECTION GARD PRIOR TO FINAL
INSPECTION,
6. SURVEYOR SHALL MONUMENT PROPERTY CORNERS
BEFORE STARTING GRADING, WITH PERMANENT
MONUMENT5. 5URVEYOR TO FILE A CORNER RECORD
OR A RECORD OF SURVEY WITH THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY SURVEYOR. EVIDENCE OF FILING SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO
FOUNDATION INSPECTION.
9. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN AN ENGROAGHMENT PER-
MIT FROM PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO PERFORMING
ANY OFF -SITE WORK.
10. A CITY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT 15 REQUIRED
FOR ALL NON - STANDARD PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS
WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -O WAY.
11. NO TRENCHES OR EXCAVATIONS 5 FEET OR MORE
IN DEPTH INTO WHIGH A PERSON 15 REQUIRED TO
DESCEND OR OBTAIN NECESSARY PERMIT FROM THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIV15ION OF INDUSTRIAL
SAFETY.
12 FENCES AND WALLS VUTHIN THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS
TABLE 3306.1 PROTEGTION OF PEDESTRIANS
OF
HEIGHT OF
DISTANCE FROM
TYPE OF
1. GRADING:
19.
WHERE THE EX15'ING DRIVEWAY APPROACH 15 R5-
1. GOVERNING CODES FOR THIS PROJECT:
OVEREXGAVATION GUT: 125 CUBIC YARDS
REQUIRED
MOVED AND WHERE THE NEW DRIVEWAY APPROACH
2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)
OVEREXGAVATION FILL: 125 GUBIG YARDS
OR LE55
15 CONSTRUCTED, A MINIMUM 12" WIDE X 12" DEEP
2001 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CM(G)
2. ALL PLANTING TO BE NON -INVASIVE.
NONE
FULL DEPTH GONGRETE PATGHBAGK SHALL BE
2001 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC)
3. ALL ENCROACHMENTS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RI6HT -0F -
BARRIER AND
CONSTRUCTED ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE
NEW DRIVEWAY APPROACH, SUCH PATGHBAGK PANEL
2001 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (GEG)
WAY MUST BE REVIEW ED AND APPROVED BY THE
FIN15H FLOOR ELEV.
WELLED
SHALL BE DO INTO THE EXISTING CONCRETE
200 CALIFORNIA ENERGY STANDARDS (GEE)
2001 1 CALIFORNIA FIRE GORE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT UNDER A SEPARATE
5 FEET OR MORE
ROADWAY AND CONCRETE GUTTER CURB.
40% OPEN.
PERMIT AND MAY REQUIRE THE EXECUTION OF AN
GONVERED
CIVIL ENGINEER.
1/4 THE HEIGHT OF
ENGROAGHMENT AGREEMENT. THERE 15 NO GUARAN-
20.
ALL PRIVATE IRRIGATION SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL
1r5QUIR D
2. ED150N COMPANY APPROVAL 15 REQUIRED FOR
TEE THAT ENCROACHMENTS SHOWN ON THE 517E
5 FEET OR MORE
BE INSTALLED AND POSITIONED IN A MANNER THAT
TI
METER LOCATION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
PLAN WILL BE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORK5
BARRIER
WILL NOT CAUSE IRRIGATION OVBR5PRAY ONTO THE
SERVICE TO E
UNDERGROUND IF RELOCATED
DEPARTMENT.
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PER III SEC. 108.
PUBLIC BOARDWALK.
SEA NEW SERVICE 15 INSTALLED. FIELD INS -
5 FEET OR MORE
6 FEET
DRAIN - SIZE PER PLAN
PECTORE, TO REVIEW AND APPROVE FUTURE
4. PROVIDE 2 LAYERS OF 5ANDBA65 AT PROPERTY
21,
ALL WORK RELATED TO WA5TEWATER N PUBLIC RIGHT -0F -
UNDERGROUND SERVICE REQUIREMENT PRIOR
-INE5 FOR ER05ION CONTROL PER NBMG, TYP.
WITHIN THE ALLEY / 5TREET AND SHALL HAVE A
WAY SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A C-42 LICENSED SANTA-
TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT.
5. REMOVAL OF ANY CITY TREES REQUIRES PRIOR
TION 5EWER CONTRACTOR OR AN A UGENSED GENERAL
4. USE OF LOW WATER CONSUMPTION PLANTS AND
APPROVAL FROM GENERAL 5ERVIGE5 DEPARTMENT.
FOUNDATION NOTE ><4.
ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR.
B. SOILS ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND APPROVE
6. TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PLANTED IN PARKWAY
22.
WHEN REQUIRED, FENCE BARRIER AND WALKWAY COVER
FOUNDATION AND GRADING PLANS. SOILS
ENGINEER TO INSPECT AND CERTIFY FOOTING
ABUTTING THE BUILDING 51TE IF A NEW BUILDING 15
CONSIDERATION, SUN AND SHADE EXPOSURES AND
TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER Or 3306.5, 3306.6 AND
EXCAVATION AND DESIGN BEARING PRE55URE,
CONSTRUCTED, PER MUNICIPAL (ODE SECTION
EXISTING STREET TREES SHALL BE PROTECTED IN
3306.1.
GRADING AND COMPACTING OF 51
13A9.010.
23.
IN ADDITION TO PROTECTION OF PEDESTRIANS, PROVIDE
PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE. FOR OVER -
T PROVIDE TREES IN THE PARKWAY ADJOINING THIS
THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVES.
CONSTRUCTION FENCING 12" TO 64" HIGH.
EXCAVATION AND RECOMPAGTION DURING
SITE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE GENERAL 5ERV-
IGE5 DEPARTMENT (949/644 - 3083). APPROVAL
FROM GENERAL 5ERVIGE515 REQUIRED ON THE
BUILDING INSPECTION GARD PRIOR TO FINAL
INSPECTION,
6. SURVEYOR SHALL MONUMENT PROPERTY CORNERS
BEFORE STARTING GRADING, WITH PERMANENT
MONUMENT5. 5URVEYOR TO FILE A CORNER RECORD
OR A RECORD OF SURVEY WITH THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY SURVEYOR. EVIDENCE OF FILING SHALL BE
SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR PRIOR TO
FOUNDATION INSPECTION.
9. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN AN ENGROAGHMENT PER-
MIT FROM PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO PERFORMING
ANY OFF -SITE WORK.
10. A CITY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT 15 REQUIRED
FOR ALL NON - STANDARD PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS
WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -O WAY.
11. NO TRENCHES OR EXCAVATIONS 5 FEET OR MORE
IN DEPTH INTO WHIGH A PERSON 15 REQUIRED TO
DESCEND OR OBTAIN NECESSARY PERMIT FROM THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DIV15ION OF INDUSTRIAL
SAFETY.
12 FENCES AND WALLS VUTHIN THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS
TABLE 3306.1 PROTEGTION OF PEDESTRIANS
OF
HEIGHT OF
DISTANCE FROM
TYPE OF
GHE16H
CONSTRUCTION
PROTECTION
WATER QUALITY BEST
TO LOT LINE
REQUIRED
8 FEET
LESS THAN 5 FEET
CONSTRUCTION
OR LE55
BUILDING, EXCAVATIONS ADJACENT TO A PUB -
RAILINGS
5 FEET OR MORE
NONE
WM
LIG WAY REQUIRE PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
1`6
BARRIER AND
1. PLANTING AREAS AND VINE POCKETS INCORPORATED
LE55 THAN 5 FEET
CONVERED
FIN15H FLOOR ELEV.
NATURAL GRADE. THE UPPER 6 -0" MUST BE AT LEAST
WALKWAY
(E)
5 FEET OR MORE
BARRIER AND
40% OPEN.
BUT NOT MORE THAN
GONVERED
CIVIL ENGINEER.
1/4 THE HEIGHT OF
WALKWAY
2. SURFACE DRAINAGE DIRECTED INTO LANDSCAPE
CONSTRUCTION
PROVIDE LOW FLUSH TOILETS PER CODE; 1.6
MORE THAN
5 FEET OR MORE
AREAS ON PROPERTY TO RETAIN 516NIFIGANT
8 FEET
BUT BETWEEN 1/4 AND 1/2
BARRIER
THICKNESS, MINIMUM.
THE HEIGHT OF
12.
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PER III SEC. 108.
CONSTRUCTION
THE WATER METER AND SEWER GLEANOUT THAT
5 FEET OR MORE
6 FEET
DRAIN - SIZE PER PLAN
DIAMETER PER PLAN
BUT EXCEEDING
CONSTRUCTION
13.
THE HEIGHT OF
FENCING
WITHIN THE ALLEY / 5TREET AND SHALL HAVE A
CONSTRUCTION
6RADIN6 OPERATION SOILS ENGINEER TO
VERIFY COMPETENT SOIL AT EXTENT OF
EXGAVATION PRIOR TO BAGKFILL AND
RECOMPACTION.
4. PROVIDE PRE55URE REGULATOR IF WATER 15
EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN EIGHTY POUNDS
PER SQUARE INCH (80 F51).
S. SEPARATE APPLICATION PERMIT 15 REQUIRED
FOR DEMOLITION, RETAINING WALLS, GRADING/
DRAINAGE, PATIO COVERS, FENCES OVER 3
FEET HIGH AND POOLS/5PA5.
6. FEMA FIN15H FLOOR ELEVATION CERTIFICATE
MUST BE COMPLETED BY A LICENSED SURVEY-
OR AND SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPART-
MENT INSPECTOR AFTER THE FIRST FLOOR 15
POURED AND BUILT.
9. CONTRACTOR TO HAVE LAB TEST FOR SOIL
5ULFATES PRIOR TO GALLING FOR FOUNDA-
TION INSPECTION AND SHOW SULFATES ARE
NEGLIGIBLE OR COMPLY WITH TABLE 19-A -4.
10. TEMPORARY 5HORING 15 REQUIRED FOR EX-
GAVATION WHIGH REMOVES THE LATERAL SUP
16. UTILITY DEPARTMENT TO IN5PEGT MAIN 55*NFR
HOOK -UP PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL. EXISTING
LATERAL TO BE CHANGED AND GLEAN -OUT
(406 -L) INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH CITY
STANDARDS IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS OCCUR. THIS WILL BE DETERMINED
BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR.
A. ALTERATIONS TO THE BUILDING SEWER 15
DONE.
B. ADDITIONAL PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRE
INCREASE IN 51ZE OF BUILDING LINE.
G. WHEN IT 15 FOUND THAT THE BUILDING
55^1ER 15 INSTALLED IN AN ILLEGAL OR
UNSANITARY MANNER.
D. IF AREA OF STRUCTURAL REMODEL
ADDITION 15 GREATER THAN 50% OF
EXISTING AREA.
E. WHEN 6 OR MORE FIXTURE UNITS (PER UPC,
1 -3) ARE ADDED TO AN EXISTING SYSTEM
(LAY: 1 UNIT, TOILET: 3 UNITS. SINK: 2 UNITS,
LAUNDRY: 2 UNITS, BATHTUB, SHOWER: 2
UNITS), ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULE AND
GIRCUIT DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR
SERVICE EXCEEDING 400 AMPS.
11: A PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGROAGH-
MENT PERMIT INSPECTION 15 REQUIRED BEFORE
THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT PERMIT FINAL GAN
BE ISSUED. AT THE TIME OF PUBLIC WORKS DE-
PARTMENT INSPECTION, IF ANY OF THE EXIST-
ING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SURROUNDING THE
51TE 15 DAMAGED BY THE PRIVATE WORK,
NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER,
AND ALLEY /STREET PAVEMENT WILL BE RE-
QUIRED AND 100% PAID BY OWNER. SAID DE-
TERMINATION AND THE EXTENT OF REPAIR
WORK SHALL BE MADE AT THE DISCRETION OF
THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR.
18. ALL LANDSCAPING IN PUBLIC RIGHT -O WAY
FRONTING PROJECT 51TE SHALL BE REPLACED
BY CITY STANDARD LANDSCAPING TO THE
5ATI5FAGTION OF THE GENERAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT.
19. PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF SOILS AND FOUNDA-
TION INVESTIGATION REPORT BY A LICENSED
6EOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. PROVIDE'PINAL'
REPORT, WET STAMPED, SIGNED AND DATED.
20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ADJACENT PROP-
ERTY OWNERS BY CERTIFIED MAIL 10 DAYS
PRIOR TO STARTING EXCAVATION WORK:
}
tint >J
4x� G
A, C ti
i
y �
LEGEND
BW
BACK OF WALK
TN
TOP OF VIAL_
TG
TOP OF CURB
SHALL NOT EXCEED 6' -0" AS MEASURED FROM
WATER QUALITY BEST
FL
PORT FROM A PUBLIC WAY OR AN EXISTING
HP
9.00' NAV88.
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
FIN15HED SURFACE
BUILDING, EXCAVATIONS ADJACENT TO A PUB -
13.
FENCES AND WALLS WITHIN THE FRONT YARD 5E7-
NATURAL GRADE
WM
LIG WAY REQUIRE PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
1`6
BACKS 5HALL NOT EXCEED 5-0" AS MEASURED FROM
1. PLANTING AREAS AND VINE POCKETS INCORPORATED
GRADE BREAK
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT.
FIN15H FLOOR ELEV.
NATURAL GRADE. THE UPPER 6 -0" MUST BE AT LEAST
INTO -HE HARD5GAPE PAVING DRAINS TO LAND-
(E)
SHORING MUST BE DESIGNED BY A REGISTERED
EA
40% OPEN.
5GAPE AREAS WHEREVER POSSIBLE.
GARAGE FINF.M FLOOR
CIVIL ENGINEER.
14.
05TANC-E FROM FACE OF FOUNDATION TO PROPER-
2. SURFACE DRAINAGE DIRECTED INTO LANDSCAPE
11.
PROVIDE LOW FLUSH TOILETS PER CODE; 1.6
-A
TY LINE TO BE ZONING 5ETBAGK PLUS WALL FIN15H
AREAS ON PROPERTY TO RETAIN 516NIFIGANT
PLANTING AREA
GALLON MAX.
5 - 5ENER LINE
THICKNESS, MINIMUM.
AMOUNTS OF NIA -'ER RUNOFF ON -SITE.
12.
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION PER III SEC. 108.
15.
THE WATER METER AND SEWER GLEANOUT THAT
A65, SDR 35 DRAINLINE
DRAIN - SIZE PER PLAN
DIAMETER PER PLAN
SERVE THE NEW RESIDENCE SHALL BE LOCATED
3. ROOF GUTTER OOlAN5POUT5 DAYLIGHT OR FLOW
13.
MINIMUM DESIGN 501E BEARING 15 1000 P5F
WITHIN THE ALLEY / 5TREET AND SHALL HAVE A
INTO LANDSCAPED AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE.
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON 5HEET SGN ,
IER
TRAFFIC -GRADE BOX AND COVER. SB GLEANOUT
4. USE OF LOW WATER CONSUMPTION PLANTS AND
FOUNDATION NOTE ><4.
SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER GITY 5TANDARD
PROPER IRRIGATION TECHNIQUES AND TAKING INTO
14.
120 DEGREES AT
MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE
#401
CONSIDERATION, SUN AND SHADE EXPOSURES AND
nw
H
�-I- SHOWERS AND TUB/SHOWERS TO BE PRO -
IR
16.
EXISTING STREET TREES SHALL BE PROTECTED IN
501L TYPES. PLANTS SHALL BE GROUPED IN AGGOR-
VIDEO BY THE USE OF PRESSURE BALANCE OR
PLAGE.
DANCE TO THEIR WATER NEEDS IN ORDER TD AVOID
THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVES.
11.
ALL UTILITY 5ERVIGE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE
POTENTIAL OVERWATERING AND IRRIGATION RUNOFF.
Z
MADE UNDERGROUND.
15.
ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT,
W
Q
O
5. HOM50lAINER TO ROUTINELY GLEAN CATCH BASINS
INCLUDING DUCT OPENIN65, TO BE ABOVE
18.
NEW CONGRETE 51DBAALK, CURB AND GUTTER, CURB
AND DRAIN LINES OF DEBRIS.
ELEVATION bb' NGVO29 (8d NAVD88) MEAN
ACCESS RAMPS, AND STREET PAVEMENT MAY BE
`` LEVEL (M.5.1-J.
REQUIRED BY THE CITY AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUG-
6. CATCH BA51N5 WITH GRAVEL FILLED OPEN BOTTOMS
�
TON, SAID DETERMINATION SHALL BE MADE AT THE
INCORPORATED IN DRAIN SYSTEM TO PROVIDE
DISCRETION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR.
FILTRATION OF RUNOFF PRIOR TO DISCHA96E INTO
O
THE BAY.
16. UTILITY DEPARTMENT TO IN5PEGT MAIN 55*NFR
HOOK -UP PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL. EXISTING
LATERAL TO BE CHANGED AND GLEAN -OUT
(406 -L) INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH CITY
STANDARDS IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS OCCUR. THIS WILL BE DETERMINED
BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR.
A. ALTERATIONS TO THE BUILDING SEWER 15
DONE.
B. ADDITIONAL PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRE
INCREASE IN 51ZE OF BUILDING LINE.
G. WHEN IT 15 FOUND THAT THE BUILDING
55^1ER 15 INSTALLED IN AN ILLEGAL OR
UNSANITARY MANNER.
D. IF AREA OF STRUCTURAL REMODEL
ADDITION 15 GREATER THAN 50% OF
EXISTING AREA.
E. WHEN 6 OR MORE FIXTURE UNITS (PER UPC,
1 -3) ARE ADDED TO AN EXISTING SYSTEM
(LAY: 1 UNIT, TOILET: 3 UNITS. SINK: 2 UNITS,
LAUNDRY: 2 UNITS, BATHTUB, SHOWER: 2
UNITS), ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULE AND
GIRCUIT DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR
SERVICE EXCEEDING 400 AMPS.
11: A PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGROAGH-
MENT PERMIT INSPECTION 15 REQUIRED BEFORE
THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT PERMIT FINAL GAN
BE ISSUED. AT THE TIME OF PUBLIC WORKS DE-
PARTMENT INSPECTION, IF ANY OF THE EXIST-
ING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SURROUNDING THE
51TE 15 DAMAGED BY THE PRIVATE WORK,
NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER,
AND ALLEY /STREET PAVEMENT WILL BE RE-
QUIRED AND 100% PAID BY OWNER. SAID DE-
TERMINATION AND THE EXTENT OF REPAIR
WORK SHALL BE MADE AT THE DISCRETION OF
THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR.
18. ALL LANDSCAPING IN PUBLIC RIGHT -O WAY
FRONTING PROJECT 51TE SHALL BE REPLACED
BY CITY STANDARD LANDSCAPING TO THE
5ATI5FAGTION OF THE GENERAL SERVICES
DEPARTMENT.
19. PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF SOILS AND FOUNDA-
TION INVESTIGATION REPORT BY A LICENSED
6EOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. PROVIDE'PINAL'
REPORT, WET STAMPED, SIGNED AND DATED.
20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ADJACENT PROP-
ERTY OWNERS BY CERTIFIED MAIL 10 DAYS
PRIOR TO STARTING EXCAVATION WORK:
}
tint >J
4x� G
A, C ti
i
y �
LEGEND
BW
BACK OF WALK
TN
TOP OF VIAL_
TG
TOP OF CURB
INV
NVERT ELEVATION
FL
FLOW LINE
HP
H16H POINT
F5
FIN15HED SURFACE
SOO
55A✓ER CLEAN OUT
NG
NATURAL GRADE
WM
WATER METER
1`6
FIN15H GRADE
68
GRADE BREAK
FF
FIN15H FLOOR ELEV.
TG
TOP OF &RATE ELEV.
(E)
FASTIN6
EA
EDGE OF ALLEY
6FF
GARAGE FINF.M FLOOR
BM
BENCHMARK
TO
TOP OF DRAIN ELEV.
T5
TOP OF STEP
-A
- MATER LINE
A6
PLANTING AREA
-
5 - 5ENER LINE
�/\
SLOPE DRAINS
U
M N,
A65, SDR 35 DRAINLINE
DRAIN - SIZE PER PLAN
DIAMETER PER PLAN
SLOPE @ 1% MIN. TYP.
PERFORATED ORAN LINE
VICINITY MAP
ME at
" SHE it
1.I
E 1", Is
rnapque5t
D,
P
ti F s
r' .m
Va' r
M14�
°ranwn [Cy; E
A Ri= SDGNCr_ [ %_)K
SANDY DAVIDSON TOOK.
ZO i 5mrt wr[ AVIINUE- I3ALP)OA 15i_AND
IAN J.N. HARRISON ARCHITECT
BUILDING CODE
INFORMATION:
OCCUPANCY: R3N
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V -B
51FRINKLERED: NO ( <50005F)
DEFERRED SUBMITTALS
ELEVATOR
SPA
DEFERRED SUBMITTALS TO BE REVIEWED
BY THE PROJECT ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
OF RECORD AND CERTIFIED PRIOR TO
5U5MITTAL FOR PLAN REVIEW.
NORTH
..ns TOn!p�lo:
E C:
Ric, c
rin, na c
> t
:nq`• r T:
Fn IN
C6
0
I&, a�[K
c
G
m
v�
7Id ..c
h,r.
@21711 nlapQnen Portions <v21P 11 i\ nV = t<,, Imemlay
SHEET INDEX
C 1
D
8
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
i
° m
'm_
SITE DETAILS
SGN
x '.
y
GINF'.RAL NOTES
TES
ROOF PLAN
EXCEPTING THE WE5T 40 THEREOF
A2
SCI IEDULES
SD
1
m
OWNER
BUILDABLE TO LOT AREA RATIO
ELEVATIONS
SD2DII
A3
IINILSURAI,
SANDY DAVID50N -TOOK
A Ri= SDGNCr_ [ %_)K
SANDY DAVIDSON TOOK.
ZO i 5mrt wr[ AVIINUE- I3ALP)OA 15i_AND
IAN J.N. HARRISON ARCHITECT
BUILDING CODE
INFORMATION:
OCCUPANCY: R3N
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V -B
51FRINKLERED: NO ( <50005F)
DEFERRED SUBMITTALS
ELEVATOR
SPA
DEFERRED SUBMITTALS TO BE REVIEWED
BY THE PROJECT ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER
OF RECORD AND CERTIFIED PRIOR TO
5U5MITTAL FOR PLAN REVIEW.
NORTH
..ns TOn!p�lo:
E C:
Ric, c
rin, na c
> t
:nq`• r T:
Fn IN
C6
0
I&, a�[K
c
G
m
v�
7Id ..c
h,r.
@21711 nlapQnen Portions <v21P 11 i\ nV = t<,, Imemlay
SHEET INDEX
C 1
SITE PLAN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
C2
SITE DETAILS
PROJECT DATA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PFMOL15H EXISTING 5TRUCTURE, CONSTRUCT NEW
3 5TORY 5NGLE FAMILY RE5IDENGE AND
ATTACHED GARAGE
AGNARCH] I ECI AL
GENERAL NOES
AD1 DETAILS CTURAL
AD2 DFINIS C,URAI.
S1
FOUNDATION PLAN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A1
HOOK PLANS
LOT 1, BLOCK 9, SECTION 2, BALBOA ISLAND
SGN
1152.00
PER M.M. 6/31 RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CA.
GINF'.RAL NOTES
TES
ROOF PLAN
EXCEPTING THE WE5T 40 THEREOF
A2
SCI IEDULES
SD
1
TYP. LOT BUILDABLE AREA
OWNER
BUILDABLE TO LOT AREA RATIO
ELEVATIONS
SD2DII
A3
IINILSURAI,
SANDY DAVID50N -TOOK
TYP. LOT BUILDABLE AREA
STRUCTURAL
201 SAPPHIRE AVENUE
A4
BUILDING SECTIONS A -D
BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662
2520/2550
a", ado in ey to- wbotsoe or, r e they
to t sign d to a third port,, without the
_press written pamissbn and consent of
849/615 -8536
A5
BUILDING SECTIONS E +F
TRU `SURAL
PROPERTY ADDRESS
,IIVIS AI
ELECTRICAL PLANS
201 SAPPHIRE AVENUE
A6
(Q
I�
BALBOA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA 92662
AGNARCH] I ECI AL
GENERAL NOES
AD1 DETAILS CTURAL
AD2 DFINIS C,URAI.
S1
FOUNDATION PLAN
S2
FRAMING PLANS
ALLOWABLE:
ti1R.R
SGN
1152.00
2 GAR GARAGE =
GINF'.RAL NOTES
TES
TOTAL ALLOWABLE =
1352.00
LOT AREA
IIII SURAL
SD
1
TYP. LOT BUILDABLE AREA
DIrI
BUILDABLE TO LOT AREA RATIO
= 106.61%
SD2DII
IINILSURAI,
= 1440 5F
TYP. LOT BUILDABLE AREA
STRUCTURAL
S
D 3
DETAILS
= 98.82%
2520/2550
a", ado in ey to- wbotsoe or, r e they
to t sign d to a third port,, without the
_press written pamissbn and consent of
IAN �LN- HARRISON, ARCHITECT
SD4
TRU `SURAL
,IIVIS AI
SD5
DE I AILS
(Q
I�
DE
SD6
`jL,LIRw
TITLE 24 FORMS
124
AREA SUMMARY:
FIRST FLOOR = 324.59
SECOND FLOOR 545.10
THIRD FLOOR = 213.30
TOTAL DWELLING = 1050A9
GARAGE = 381
TOTAL STRUCTURE =
1439.68
BALCONIES =
213.88
ALLOWABLE:
o 0
24 X 32 X 1.5 =
1152.00
2 GAR GARAGE =
200.00
TOTAL ALLOWABLE =
1352.00
LOT AREA
= 1350 SF
PROPOSED BUILDABLE AREA
TYP. LOT BUILDABLE AREA
= 2120 5F
BUILDABLE TO LOT AREA RATIO
= 106.61%
2120/2550
PROPOSED
= 1440 5F
TYP. LOT BUILDABLE AREA
OZ
WITHOUT 200 5F GARAGE
= 2520 5F
BUILDABLE TO LOT AREA RATIO
= 98.82%
2520/2550
a", ado in ey to- wbotsoe or, r e they
to t sign d to a third port,, without the
_press written pamissbn and consent of
0
UJ
L
O
did
0
z
0
Q
z
Z
a
t
E
6
to
N
0
U
a)
N
`o
0
on
c
m
6
c
6
a
on
7
N
U
4
z
o 0
Md
�
0
LASED ARCy
v �IN.HARR�STFC'�
�?
OZ
* No.
C 6947
s��FjV -D�-Z
SOP CAEIFGR
IAN J . HARRISON, ARCHITECT
hereb, ax orearca, r ifs r Icaw
cop,right and tF pra,rty T,I in bra Plans.
These pions are not to be reproduced, copied o r
a", ado in ey to- wbotsoe or, r e they
to t sign d to a third port,, without the
_press written pamissbn and consent of
IAN �LN- HARRISON, ARCHITECT
(Q
I�
U
W
w
U
N
nw
F�
�J J
ON
w
e<
Z
W
Q
O
.-J
I
�
O
�
I�
N
O
(O
I�
MGM
I�
JOB 8
DAVID50N -TOOK
DRAWN BY
pdw
PLOT DATE
9/1 /2012
REVISION
BY
DALE
SI IEET
�`I FWENTY-0 11
0
UJ
L
O
did
0
z
0
Q
z
Z
a
t
E
6
to
N
0
U
a)
N
`o
0
on
c
m
6
c
6
a
on
7
N
U
4
JT10
SEO� 0N0
MPP OFOP LSVPN
0p'Kg � 9. 55 gR�GK _
W
rZ -7:1b
SA 6 82 D
o SINGLE STORY
I-'-I � 136 128 O
o T WOOD RESIDENCE 16,6 951 gw c
SCALE 1 " =10'
O 12.6' F� Lp 35
R�GK tw
gVOGK � aEG O
8 0 1
N8959'50 "E WF 45.03' EG 3 ?- 9w ZG W
9 ¢g F AA\ WOOD BR10K /�� NPS 6 F� W
Y Q
ro 196 BR�GK
1 g� v OAF 1 3� w FS 1 V9 o
FF m FS 65 F5 o°U WF
TWO STORY o 201 SAPPHIRE a F5 0 '00 25 61
wF Z 1TFS SINGLE STORY 8s5 a zz ew
LIJ STUCCO RESIDENCE 5.a' 98 ?5
J o 53 WOOD RESIDENCE ggT qq ° G
Q W
°
�GK FS Uy FS o 7 2T
2g
_ B2 'IF
F
G 56 Vo
6 O WALK 7 jG jOP X Q
g FREE FS un
9 6 2
9 FS 155 5 9
7 2 <5 G FS N9000 '00 "E -G 85.01 1 -
EG
F ?g 1 ?6 1.1 NPS wF 7 25 _ 9 WF 7 2q 679
gW gW W CONC Bw SG SIDEWALK 6`N g05 X
6 g1
1 �� 61 09 65 O1 X
665 6F 2 6 F 9 6 8
G IG ?0
G TOP X
PARK AVENUE (60' WIDE)
GENERAL GRADING
SPECIFICATIONS
U s Vi
�^�
GRADING AND FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
PROPERTY LINE
6.
ALL EXISTING FILLS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER OR REMOVED BEFORE
FOUNDATION DESIGN
M
I. SURVEYOR SHALL PERMANENTLY MONUMENT PROPERTY CORNERS OF OFFSETS BEFORE
O
U
FINISH SLAB @ DWELLING
CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS, ISOLATED FAD - FOOTIN65 OR A COMBINATION OF BOTH MAY BE
3. ALL LOOSE, POROUS, 50-rT AND FILL FOUND DURING 6RADIN6 MUST BE REMOVED TO FIRM
p
(9.00 M51-) )
ANY EXI5TIN6 IRRIGATION OR G15TERNS SHALL BE REMOVED OR CRUSHED IN PLACE AND
UTILIZED FOR THE DESIGN OF THE FOUNDATION TO SUPPORT THE PROP05ED STRUCTURES
7
z
2" TRENCH DRAIN W/ 1/4" FXFAN51ON
IAN J.N. HARRISON, ARCHITECT
thereby ev'e-ly reserves Is commen Iew
EQUAL EQUAL
to be signed to s third party, without the
express wtlllen permission and --n. of
IAN J.N. HARRISON, ARCHITECT
-
- v
� AI I FOR
R Y MEANS OF A GRADE BE
� TIED TO6ETHE 6
PROVIDED ALL F001 L �5 SHOULD BE
JOINT (FELT) EACH SIDE. THIOKOL
-
I v
CODE (NBMG). THE PROJECT SOILS REPORT AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE FERI JT.
E (NB
g.
- I - I I
I r E
THE EN6INEERIN6 6EOLOGI51 AND 501!5 ENGINEER SHALL, AFTER CL_ARING AND PRIOR
> O
SEALER WITH COLOR TO MATCH
F -F
- � T THICK.
R LF COMP ACTING ROCK LAYER AT LAST 2 FEET
WI IH A CRUSHED O, ANGULAR I" 5E
(.� Q
(E) WALL AT
T
FINISH DECK.
F
DWELLING SLAB
PROPERTY LINE
TOP 15 REMOVEABLE FOR GLEANING
REPORT.
ROCK BE UTILIZED. A SIEVE ANALYSIS MUST BE RUN BY THIS OFFICE PRIOR TO TO IMPORT.
4. SANITARY FAGILITIE5 SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE 51TE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION
w
O
BEARING VALUE
CONCRETE WALK
PERIOD.
z
CANYON. CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT F FILL EACH RESPECTIVE CANYON
I.
WITH 5WALE TO
x - V
5. NORK HOUR5 ARE LIMITED FROM 7:00 AM TO 6:30 FM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY;
z z
THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE 53JBDRAINS SHALL 6E SURVEYED IN HE FIELD FOR LINE
DRAIN 1% MIN.
. m 4
q A MODERATE AMOUNT OF GRADING 15 ,ANTICIPATED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE.
- G- I SUNDAY- G
8:C0 AM 10 6:00 PM SATURDAYS AND NO WORK ON .,UNDAY., OR HOLIDAYI FER
i.
(2010 MIN. AT SOIL)
z
OTHERWI5E. THE FOO T IN65 M05T REST ON PROPERLY RE- COMPACTED SOIL THAT 15 AT
IT 15 REGOMMENDED THAT ALL SURFACE NHIGH 15 LOOSE THAT WILL SUPPORT PATIO,
1% MIN.
w
AND GRADE
I EAST 18" THICK.
10/ MIN. (2% AT SOIL)
6. NOISE, EXCAVATION, DELIVERY AND REMOVAL 54AL! BE CONTROLLED, PER SECTION
a Q
ALL TRENCH BAGKFILI-5 SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 9G% RELATIVE COM-
2
V
RECEIVE FILL OR BACKFILL, BE 5GARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 8 ', HATERED OR DRIED i0
10 -28 OF THE NBMG.
4
_
CONTINUOUS DRAIN, GONNEGT TO
-. - -
,
-
4" DIA. ASS, 5DR 35 DRAINLINE
OBTAINED WITH DEAD LOAD AND LIVE LOAD ONLY.
v
5. NHERE FILL OR BACKFILL 15 REQUIRED, IT SHOULD BE PLACED IN A MAXIMUM OF 6
c0
(O
W/ 1% MIN. SLOPE. ELEVATIONS PER
EARTH PRESSURES
_
I IG
AND A R COMP ACTED AT NEAR OPTIMUM MOISTI,RE CONTENT
L005E LAYERS AND EACH !AYE
8. PERMITTEE AND GONIRAGTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTEGTM6
II.
GRADING PLAN
AT LEAST 9070 GONPAGI ION. GLEAN SITE SOILS MAY BE UTILIZED AS FILL MATERIAL.
UTILITIES.
COMPACTED SAND BASE PER
-
8„
LATERAL LOAD5 WILL BE RE515TED BY THE FRICTION BETWEEN THE FLOOR SLAB AND
..
I SOILS REPORT
REVISION
BY
0 4
SL'BGRADE AS HELL AS THE I ASSIVE RESISTANCE OF THE ..OILS AGAINST FGOI INGS.
o PROJEGI. ALL
CAPABLE OF DEVELOP ING THE BEARING STRENGTH REOUIRtD FOR THE
4..
12.
I SHALL I I I
L,ANCSGAPIN6 OF ALL SLOPES ..HALL BE IN ACCORDANCE KITH CHAPTER IS OF THE NBMG.
SITE02 TRENCH DRAIN
1 -1/2" =1' -O" 5
SITE03 DRAINAGE
SWALE
13.
I N R GRADIN,o BY AN
' HA INVESTIGATED BOTH DURII � AND AFTER
ALL GUI SLOPED SHALL BE
w
z
b. INHERE SOIL IS REQUIRED FOR FOOTING SIDFORT, THE OVER - EXCAVATION
10. CESSPOOLS AND SEPTIC TANK5 SHALL BE ABANDONED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM
J
2
TOP OF DRAIN ELEVATION
(TD) PER GRADING PLAN
FINISH SURFACE, SLOPE TO DRAIN
PER GRADING PLAN
I / - I
I I U / I
N D BY THE WILDING OFFIGIA_.
PLUM 151115 � CODE AND APPROVE
01= TWENTY -ONE
4 POTENTIAL OLO6IGAL
N ANY 6EOLO6IGAL HAZARDS OR POIENTIA! GE
EXGAVATI01 DISCLOSE
�
STONE OR BRICK VENEER
w
I
3.
- - I I
F .r.P. FOR
A MAY BE TAKEN A5 38 AND TO PGF OF E
THE ACTIVE LATERAL PRESSURt
HARD5GAPE
II. HAUL ROUTES FOR IMPORT AND EXPORT OF MATERIALS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE
1 6" GONG. BLOCK
�
THE GTY 6RADIN6 ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.
CANTILEVER AND RESTRAINED CONDITIONS.
FULLY GROUTED
CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER AND PROCEDURES SHALL CONFORM TO GRAFTER IS OF THE
LANDSCjAREA
STONE /BRICK VENEER
SLOPE YP.
W/ M ASONRY ANCHORS
FINISH GRADE
WHERE SUPPORT AND ,BUTTRESSING OF GUT AND NATURAL 5L OFE5 15 DETERMINED NECE5-
4.
1 PER EACH 2.6'1 5F
4" THICK GONG. SLAB
I I
I F A
� N6INEER SHALL
\EKING GEOL0615T AND 501!5 E NGINEER THE AILS E
SARY BY THE EI >II E
W/ #4 @ 24" EACH WAY
12, POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AWAY FROM ALL BUILDINGS AND SLOPE
INVERT ELEVATION (INV)
5.
UNIT WEIGHT OF THE 501E FOR M015T AND SATURATED CONDITIONS SHOULD BE TAKEN AS
PER GRADING PLAN
PRIOR TO GONSTRUGTION.
100 ESE AND 80 PSF, RESFEGTIVELY.
INS IF REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT OR REQUIRED BY THE APPROVING AGENCIES.
13. FAILURE TO REQUEST INSPECTIONS ,AND /OR HAVE REMOVABLE EP05ION CONTROL OR
15.
CJ z
DRAIN PIPE PER PLAN
FINISH
GRADE ry
#4 REBAR @ 24" O.G.
XU 00 0po VERT. AND HORIZ.
- -- - °4°°
PER GRADING PLAN
I.
-- 0 4" PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE IN
RUN AT THE TIME OF ROU6H GRADING.
GRAVEL. DRAIN TO FRENCH DRAIN
4
2 AT BOTTOM.
I FOUNDATION' SUBMITTED I I
I D TO T415 OFFICE PRIOR
II. A GRADING PLAN AND A FOUNDATION PLAN SHOULD BE SLBI ITTE G
INLET TO BE HIGHER THAN THE INLET
I6.
I -
r I
WHEN GUT PADS ARE 3ROU6HT TO NEAR GRADE THE EN�INEERIN6 GEOLOGIST SHAL_
2.
ELEVATION OF THE NEAREST DRAIN
I I - � D IN ACCORDANCt WITH
RA GRADING MEET ING IS REEQUIP E
TO STARTING, THE G DING. A FREE
ASTM 2751, ASTM DI521,ASTM DS034, OR A5TM D1 785.
DETERMINE IF THE BEDROCK EXTENSIVELY FRACTURED OR FAULTED AND WILL READILY
KEBABS @ 12" O.G. EACH WAY. THIS SHOULD BE UNDERLAIN BY A MOISTURE BARRIER.
THE GI TY OF NENPORT BEAGH 6RADIN6 CODE.
° WEEP HOLES @ 24" O.G.
BOTTOMLESS CATCH BA51N
\
- - ALL 6RADIN6 OPERATIONS AND THE
- < INED 10 OBSERVE
12. GEO ET, A INC. ING. SHOULD BE
WITH 3/4" CRUSHED ROCK
K
#4 REBAR CONTINUOUS
18" MIN. I
3.
I F N
BARRIER N' AN MEDIUM TO COARSE SAND
THE MOISTURE BAR, IE, SHOULD CONSIST OF 2" OF GL_
v
TOP AND 807TOM
1.
THE ENGINEERING GEOL0615T SHALL PERFORM PERIODIC INSPECTIONS DURING 6RADIN6.
z
2" MIN.
. MUST
GRANGE IN THE GONSULT,ANTS OCCUR, GEOETKA, Z. MUST BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING AND
T
f
ALL JOINTS SHALL BE MADE 50 A5 TO PRESERVE
m
EROSION CONTROL
51TEOI CATCH BASIN
511 = 1' -0" 6
51TE11 STEM WALL AT PATIO 3/4" = 1' -0" 2
AND TREE REMOVAL
4" CONCRETE OR be TOP501L
I. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLANS ARE REQUIRED FROM OCTOBER 15 TO MAY 15.
IRON GRATE
I TY, THE CIVIL ENGINEER, THE SOILS ENGINEER, THE ENGINEERING 6E0L0615T, OR THE
FILTER CLOTH
LAP 6" AT TOP
I.
I SHOULD R A \' R-
SPECIAL NOTE ..HOULD BE TAKEN DU, ING THE GR DING 50 AS TO LOCATE ALL UI DE
2. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE FROM OCTOBER IS TO MAY 15.
\ \ \ \ \ \ a.
INLET PIPE
\ \ \ \ \
GROND ITEMS. E.G: PIPE, CONDUIT, STORAGE TANKS, SEPTIC TANK5, CESSPOOLS OR
\ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \ \
THE PERSON IN CHARGE OF THE GR,ADIN6 NORK AND TO THE CITY 6RADIN6 ENGINEER.
REGOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE MEASURES, IF NECESSARY, SHALL BE SUBMITTED
LEACH LINES, NATER HELLS, IRRIGATION FIFE, ETC.
THE END OF EACH WORKIG DAY WHENEVER THE FIVE-DAY PROBABILITY OF RAIN 30
N
TO THE CITY 6RADIN6 ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL
2.
ANY SEPTIC TANK FOUND SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE.
O
ASS FOR 35 DRAINLINE PER PLAN
\O��D
-
\�� \
o'J
PERFORATION AT BOTTOM
%� \� % \�\ -
QO %0 / / \ \ / /"�
- ���D� /��
CONCRETE CATCH BASIN
ANY SEEPAGE PIT OR CESSPOOL FOUND SHALL BE PUMPED DRY AND FILLED WITH GLEAN
SLOPE @ 1% MIN.
SAND. THE TOP AND SIDES SHOULD BE BROKEN AND REMOVED IF THEY ARE NI T HIN
4. LAN05GAPIN6 PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL, WORK GONPLETED AND A
CRUSHED ROCK
\ \ \ \
\ \ \
5 FEET OF THE FINISHED GRADE IF A WATER HELL IS FOUND IT SHALL BE GUT OFF AND
\ \ \
FILL BOTTOM 12" OF BASIN WITH
\ \ \
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATIONS, A5- GRADED 6ROUND SURFACE ELEVATIONS, LOT DRAIN-
\ \ \ \
GRAVEL
-
- o I F
r TTY RAGN ENGN_ER.
PERMIT, N 355 WAIVED BY THE G 6 6
GLOSUR_ OF P E U L
NOTE:
V A A
.AAA
�
A Ac -
AAA
FRENCH DRAIN OCCURS FROM
%A % /A/
V A A
VAA
• % /A %A %/ ;o
A A A
A A
-
BUILDING LINE TO PROPERTY
\
5. TEMPORARY DE5ILTOF BASINS, WHEN REQUIRED, SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED
LINE- SEE 6RADIN6 PLAN FOR
SPEGIFIGATIONS
S /S",
\ / / \\ \
ANY VITRIFIED CLAY LEAG4ING LINES MAY BE BROKEN IN PLACE.
\ % /\ / / / /j \ / /j \ \ /
\ % \ \/ j \\ / /j\ / /j\ \111\1 /j
12"
STATE THE NUMBER OF YARDS OF GUT AND /OR FILL MOVED DURING THE OPERATION.
5.
51TEOI FRENCH DRAIN
1y2.' = 1' -0" 7
517331 PRECAST CONCRETE BOTTOMLESS CATCH BASIN NOT TO SCALE 3
I
I
LY REMOVED AND THE CAVITY BACKFILL ED AS DESCRIBED IN THE 6RADIN6 SECTION.
HANDRAIL SHALL BE ENTIRELY
I 3,_pzn
BP_O,P I
AND ELEVATIONS OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS. SUMMARIES OF FIELD AND LABORATORY
6.
ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
i
z
FOR FUTURE LANDSGAPIN6 USE.
ADJACENT -
� QUIRE
F SENTATIVE. , E
� R R THEIR REPRE
ENGINEER, 501!5 ENGINE ER GTY 6R,ADIN6 ENGINE_ 0
� SOILS
� � THEIR EFFECT ON THE REG OMMENDATIONS MADE IN THE L
DU, ING GRADIN,o AND IHE
EN6INEERINS INVE5TI6ATION REPORT. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN
PROPOSED BUILDING LINE
BUILDING
72 z
>
LINE
BRIDGE CURING 6RADIN6 WHICH SHOULD BE GONDUGTED IN THE MANNER NOTED BELON.
o _ I / r
- N SCHEDULED 48 HOURS PRIOR 10 START Or PAVINJ
� PAVING MEET! o SHALL BE SGHE
2. A P , C
r
- -
ACCORDANCE THE JOB SPEGIFIGATIONS.
OF WORK IN AG..O, DAN6C
8.
IT 15 RECOMMENDED THAT THE DEMOLITION BE OBSERVED SO .45 TO PREVENT DEBRIS
r ^ CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT EXISTING
- .0
-
A GEOLOGIC GRADING REPORT PREPARED BY THE EN6INEERIN6 6E0LOGIS I, A FINAL
NEN SLAB/ FOOTING I
�I I
WALLS AND /OR FENCES AND USE
LIGHT DEMOLITION AND GRADING
1" MAX.
\��
m
wK
8.679
EGIJIPMENT
%�\ �\ D
-
I
I I
o
0 -
m
n 4 BAR AT EACH N05E
I' -O" F P"
LINE Or EXISIIN6 SIE �
TED IN THE APPROVED 61RADIN6 PLAN. THE ENNNEEERIN6 GEOLOGIST SHALL PROVIDE
_v
F6
WHERE OCCURS
WRITTEN APPROVAL AS THE ADEQUACY OF THE SITE FOR THE INTENDED USE AS AFFECT-
I. GRADED 5LGPE5 SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 2 HORIZONTAL TO I VERTICAL.
ED BY THE GEOLOGIC FACTORS.
I.
o
o
EXPANSION JOINT
BE STRIPPED OF ALL VEGETATION THAT IS PRESENT AND THE DEBRIS REMOVED FROM
a
TION OUT TO THE FINISH SURFACE.
v
I
EXIS- IIN6
D
a U.
NATURAL - 3 /
\
#4 BAR @ 12" O.G.
2.
THE TOPSOIL SHOULD BE OVER - EXCAVATED SUCH THAT A 3' -0" THICK BLANKET OF
GRADE
Om
i
//�
///
/
/\ -
�N6 NATURAL GRADE
a<4 BAR GOVT.
\ •
4'
\\
iv
EXTEND AT LEAST 5 FEET BEYOND THE FOOTFRINT OF THE STRUCTURE EXGEFT NHEN
\/
RESTRICTED BY AN ADJOININ6 STRUCTURE OR LIMITED BY ,A PROPERTY LINE GONDI T ION.
COMPACTION EFFORT APPLIED TO THE FILL AREAS.
/\
I
PROPERTY LINE
SEE PLATE E (DETAIL 8162).
\
° GEOTEGHNIGAL ENGINEER TO
PROVIDE INSPECTION + MONITORING
12" 6" MIN.
DURING EXCAVATION OPERATION,
0
DEPTH OF
I
WHERE
OVER - EXCAVATION
i ^CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY
OCCURS
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS BY
T WO THIRDS WIDTH OF FOOTING
CERTIFIED MAIL TEN DAYS PRIOR
OR 1'-O" MIN.
TO STARTING EXCAVATION WORK.
51TE33 EXCAVATION @ PROPERTY LINE 112" = I' -O" 8
SITEO6 CONCRETE STEPS
1
1° =1. -D° 4
JT10
SEO� 0N0
MPP OFOP LSVPN
0p'Kg � 9. 55 gR�GK _
W
rZ -7:1b
SA 6 82 D
o SINGLE STORY
I-'-I � 136 128 O
o T WOOD RESIDENCE 16,6 951 gw c
SCALE 1 " =10'
O 12.6' F� Lp 35
R�GK tw
gVOGK � aEG O
8 0 1
N8959'50 "E WF 45.03' EG 3 ?- 9w ZG W
9 ¢g F AA\ WOOD BR10K /�� NPS 6 F� W
Y Q
ro 196 BR�GK
1 g� v OAF 1 3� w FS 1 V9 o
FF m FS 65 F5 o°U WF
TWO STORY o 201 SAPPHIRE a F5 0 '00 25 61
wF Z 1TFS SINGLE STORY 8s5 a zz ew
LIJ STUCCO RESIDENCE 5.a' 98 ?5
J o 53 WOOD RESIDENCE ggT qq ° G
Q W
°
�GK FS Uy FS o 7 2T
2g
_ B2 'IF
F
G 56 Vo
6 O WALK 7 jG jOP X Q
g FREE FS un
9 6 2
9 FS 155 5 9
7 2 <5 G FS N9000 '00 "E -G 85.01 1 -
EG
F ?g 1 ?6 1.1 NPS wF 7 25 _ 9 WF 7 2q 679
gW gW W CONC Bw SG SIDEWALK 6`N g05 X
6 g1
1 �� 61 09 65 O1 X
665 6F 2 6 F 9 6 8
G IG ?0
G TOP X
PARK AVENUE (60' WIDE)
GENERAL GRADING
SPECIFICATIONS
U s Vi
�^�
GRADING AND FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
GENERAL
6.
ALL EXISTING FILLS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER OR REMOVED BEFORE
FOUNDATION DESIGN
M
I. SURVEYOR SHALL PERMANENTLY MONUMENT PROPERTY CORNERS OF OFFSETS BEFORE
O
U
ANY BEFORE ANY ,ADDITIONAL FILLS ARE ADDED.
ANY
CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS, ISOLATED FAD - FOOTIN65 OR A COMBINATION OF BOTH MAY BE
3. ALL LOOSE, POROUS, 50-rT AND FILL FOUND DURING 6RADIN6 MUST BE REMOVED TO FIRM
STARTING 6RADIN6.
1.
ANY EXI5TIN6 IRRIGATION OR G15TERNS SHALL BE REMOVED OR CRUSHED IN PLACE AND
UTILIZED FOR THE DESIGN OF THE FOUNDATION TO SUPPORT THE PROP05ED STRUCTURES
NATIVE 501L AND REPLAGED AS COMPACTED SOIL AT 90 %. GIJRIN6 THE COURSE OF
l� � -
� NPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL
2. ALL SHALL CONFORM TO CHAPTER 15 OF THE E
IAN J.N. HARRISON, ARCHITECT
thereby ev'e-ly reserves Is commen Iew
t F
SOILS EN61N_ER.
AGKFI ED AND APPROVED BY THE � L
B LL
to be signed to s third party, without the
express wtlllen permission and --n. of
IAN J.N. HARRISON, ARCHITECT
-
- v
� AI I FOR
R Y MEANS OF A GRADE BE
� TIED TO6ETHE 6
PROVIDED ALL F001 L �5 SHOULD BE
I - - -
� I 10 RIDGE THE �OITON I
6RADIN6 OPERATIONS, IF PUNTING OCCURS IT IS ADVISABLE B
-
I v
CODE (NBMG). THE PROJECT SOILS REPORT AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE FERI JT.
E (NB
g.
- I - I I
I r E
THE EN6INEERIN6 6EOLOGI51 AND 501!5 ENGINEER SHALL, AFTER CL_ARING AND PRIOR
L<
F -
N N FACTION. THE FROJ_6T CN61NE ER MLoI GOM
MINIMAL MITIGATION FROM POTENTIAL LIQUE
F -F
- � T THICK.
R LF COMP ACTING ROCK LAYER AT LAST 2 FEET
WI IH A CRUSHED O, ANGULAR I" 5E
(.� Q
TO THE PLACEMENT OF FILL IN CANYONS, INSPECT EACH CANYON FOR AREAS OF
PLY KITH THE CITY'S MINIMUM REQUIREMENT5 WHEN THEY EXCEED ANY PART OF THIS REPORT.
NOTE THAT IN NO CASE SHOULD GRUSHED MISCELLANEOUS BASE OR HASHED ROUNDED
3. DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY WATERING AND /OR DUST PALLIATIVE.
ADVERSE STABILITY AND DETERMINE THE PRESSURE OF OR POSSIBILITY OF FUTURE
REPORT.
ROCK BE UTILIZED. A SIEVE ANALYSIS MUST BE RUN BY THIS OFFICE PRIOR TO TO IMPORT.
4. SANITARY FAGILITIE5 SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE 51TE DURING THE CONSTRUCTION
w
ACCUMULATION OF SUBSURFACE HATER OR 5PRIN6 FLOW. IF NEEDED, DRAINS WILL BE
DESIGNED AND GONSTRUGTED PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF FILL IN EACH RE5PEGTIVE
BEARING VALUE
THE DENSIFIGATION OF THE ROCK 5HOIJLP BE OBSERVED /PROBED AND APPROVED BY A
REPRESENTATIVE OF THIS OFRGE; IN SL'GH GASES LIGHTWEIGHT TRACK EQUIPMENT IS
PERIOD.
z
CANYON. CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT F FILL EACH RESPECTIVE CANYON
I.
A BEARING /ACNE OF 1,000 ESP MAY BE USED, THE FOO- I r 5 SHOUL D D BE A- LEAST IS"
RE GOMM NDC _ D.
5. NORK HOUR5 ARE LIMITED FROM 7:00 AM TO 6:30 FM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY;
o
THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE 53JBDRAINS SHALL 6E SURVEYED IN HE FIELD FOR LINE
HIDE AND A MINIMUM 18" BELOW THE LOWEST ADJACENT FINISH GRADE UNLE55 NOTED
-
q A MODERATE AMOUNT OF GRADING 15 ,ANTICIPATED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE.
- G- I SUNDAY- G
8:C0 AM 10 6:00 PM SATURDAYS AND NO WORK ON .,UNDAY., OR HOLIDAYI FER
i.
_
z
OTHERWI5E. THE FOO T IN65 M05T REST ON PROPERLY RE- COMPACTED SOIL THAT 15 AT
IT 15 REGOMMENDED THAT ALL SURFACE NHIGH 15 LOOSE THAT WILL SUPPORT PATIO,
5EGTION 10 -28 OF THE NEW.
w
AND GRADE
I EAST 18" THICK.
SIDEWALK SLABS, OR ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING, AND ALL SURFACES NHIGH NIL!
6. NOISE, EXCAVATION, DELIVERY AND REMOVAL 54AL! BE CONTROLLED, PER SECTION
10.
ALL TRENCH BAGKFILI-5 SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 9G% RELATIVE COM-
2
THE ABOVE BEARING VALUES MAY BE INGREA5ED BY I/3 WHEN RESISTING LOAD5 CAUSED
RECEIVE FILL OR BACKFILL, BE 5GARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 8 ', HATERED OR DRIED i0
10 -28 OF THE NBMG.
FACTION AND APPROVED BY THE COMPAOTION AND APPROVED BY THE MENU MAY
BY NIND OR SEISMIC FORGES, PROVIDING THE RESULTANT SIZE 15 NOT LE55 THAN THAT
NEAR OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND RE- COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 9O %.
1. THE STAMPED SET OF APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES.
REQUIRE GORING OF CONCRETE FLATNORK PLACED OVER UNTESTED 6,AGKFILLS TO
FACILITATE TE5TIN6.
N
OBTAINED WITH DEAD LOAD AND LIVE LOAD ONLY.
v
5. NHERE FILL OR BACKFILL 15 REQUIRED, IT SHOULD BE PLACED IN A MAXIMUM OF 6
(O
EARTH PRESSURES
_
I IG
AND A R COMP ACTED AT NEAR OPTIMUM MOISTI,RE CONTENT
L005E LAYERS AND EACH !AYE
8. PERMITTEE AND GONIRAGTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTEGTM6
II.
THE STOCKPILE OF EXCESS MATERIALS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY GRADING
AT LEAST 9070 GONPAGI ION. GLEAN SITE SOILS MAY BE UTILIZED AS FILL MATERIAL.
UTILITIES.
ENGINEER.
I.
LATERAL LOAD5 WILL BE RE515TED BY THE FRICTION BETWEEN THE FLOOR SLAB AND
IMPORTED FILL SOIL SHOULD BE PREDOMINANTLY GRANULAR, NON- EXPAN5IVE AND
REVISION
BY
0 4
SL'BGRADE AS HELL AS THE I ASSIVE RESISTANCE OF THE ..OILS AGAINST FGOI INGS.
o PROJEGI. ALL
CAPABLE OF DEVELOP ING THE BEARING STRENGTH REOUIRtD FOR THE
9. ,APPROVED DRAINAGE PROVISIONS AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES MUST BE USED TO
12.
I SHALL I I I
L,ANCSGAPIN6 OF ALL SLOPES ..HALL BE IN ACCORDANCE KITH CHAPTER IS OF THE NBMG.
A COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION OF 0.4 MAY BE USED BETWEEN SLABS, FOOTINGS AND
-
IMPORT 501L MUST BE APPROVED BY THIS OFFICE PRIOR TO BRINGING TO THE SITE.
- I I
I PROPERTIES DURING GRADING OPERATION.
PROTECT ADJOINING TROPE E
13.
I N R GRADIN,o BY AN
' HA INVESTIGATED BOTH DURII � AND AFTER
ALL GUI SLOPED SHALL BE
SLBGRADE.
b. INHERE SOIL IS REQUIRED FOR FOOTING SIDFORT, THE OVER - EXCAVATION
10. CESSPOOLS AND SEPTIC TANK5 SHALL BE ABANDONED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM
ENGINEERING 6EOL0615T TO DETERMINE IF ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS EX15T. SHOULD
2
_ - I TAKEN TO E 250 PGF OF E.F.P.
51 TANGS OF THE AIL MAY BE E B
IHE PASSIVE Rt 5
MUST TEND 2/3 THEM
- I I
- R II
N NIDIH 01 THE FOOTING ON EITHER SCE.
MST EXTEND 2/3 THE
U
I / - I
I I U / I
N D BY THE WILDING OFFIGIA_.
PLUM 151115 � CODE AND APPROVE
01= TWENTY -ONE
4 POTENTIAL OLO6IGAL
N ANY 6EOLO6IGAL HAZARDS OR POIENTIA! GE
EXGAVATI01 DISCLOSE
- r v
- r UU
r RECOMMEND ND AND SUBMIT TREATMENT TO
HAZARDS THE ENGINE _RIND 6EOLGoIST SHALL REG01 1 e
3.
- - I I
F .r.P. FOR
A MAY BE TAKEN A5 38 AND TO PGF OF E
THE ACTIVE LATERAL PRESSURt
- I
I I I I F ,
1. ALL I I TAINING HALLS AND UTILITY TRENCHES BACKFI_L_D SHOULD BE
NG POOLS, Re
II. HAUL ROUTES FOR IMPORT AND EXPORT OF MATERIALS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE
�
THE GTY 6RADIN6 ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.
CANTILEVER AND RESTRAINED CONDITIONS.
t
TESTED AT A MAXIMUM OF 2 FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT.
ED AT
CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER AND PROCEDURES SHALL CONFORM TO GRAFTER IS OF THE
NBMG.
14.
WHERE SUPPORT AND ,BUTTRESSING OF GUT AND NATURAL 5L OFE5 15 DETERMINED NECE5-
4.
AATIVE PRESSURE MUST BE ADJUSTED FOR ALL 5URGHAR&E LOADS.
8. COMPACTION STANDARD: A5TM 0- 1557 -02.
I I
I F A
� N6INEER SHALL
\EKING GEOL0615T AND 501!5 E NGINEER THE AILS E
SARY BY THE EI >II E
12, POSITIVE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AWAY FROM ALL BUILDINGS AND SLOPE
OBTAIN APPROVAL OF DESIGN, LOCATION AND CALCULATIONS FROM THE CITY ENGINEER
5.
UNIT WEIGHT OF THE 501E FOR M015T AND SATURATED CONDITIONS SHOULD BE TAKEN AS
q, HATER SOLUBLE SULFATE CONTENT HILL BE DETERMINED AT THE CONCLUSION OF 6RAD-
AREAS.
PRIOR TO GONSTRUGTION.
100 ESE AND 80 PSF, RESFEGTIVELY.
INS IF REQUESTED BY THE CLIENT OR REQUIRED BY THE APPROVING AGENCIES.
13. FAILURE TO REQUEST INSPECTIONS ,AND /OR HAVE REMOVABLE EP05ION CONTROL OR
15.
THE EN6INEERIN6 GEOLOGIST AND 501L5 ENGINEER SHALL IN5FEGT AND TEST THE CON-
SLAB ON GRADE
10. IF REQUIRED BY THE APPROVING AGENCY, EXPANSION INDEX TABLE (UBG 18 -2) WILL BE
HAVE REMOVABLE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ON 51TE AT THE APPROPRIATE TIMES
SHALL RESULT IN FORFEITURE OF THE GON5TRUCTION 51TE CLEANUP DEPOSIT.
5TRUGTION OF ALL BUTTRESS FILL5 AND ATTEST TO THE STABILITY OF THE SLOPE AND
I.
ALL FOOTINGS SHOULD BE REINFORCED WITH AT LEAST (4)S REHABS, (2) AT TOP AND
RUN AT THE TIME OF ROU6H GRADING.
ADJACENT STRUCTURES UPON COMPLETION.
4
2 AT BOTTOM.
I FOUNDATION' SUBMITTED I I
I D TO T415 OFFICE PRIOR
II. A GRADING PLAN AND A FOUNDATION PLAN SHOULD BE SLBI ITTE G
R R
I .. ALL PLASTID DRAINAGE FIFE SHALL GON5151 OF PVC O, A65 PLASTIC AND EITHER
I6.
I -
r I
WHEN GUT PADS ARE 3ROU6HT TO NEAR GRADE THE EN�INEERIN6 GEOLOGIST SHAL_
2.
,
THE SLABS ON GRADE SHOULD 6E AT LEAST 5" THICK AND BE REINFORCED WITH 114
I I - � D IN ACCORDANCt WITH
RA GRADING MEET ING IS REEQUIP E
TO STARTING, THE G DING. A FREE
ASTM 2751, ASTM DI521,ASTM DS034, OR A5TM D1 785.
DETERMINE IF THE BEDROCK EXTENSIVELY FRACTURED OR FAULTED AND WILL READILY
KEBABS @ 12" O.G. EACH WAY. THIS SHOULD BE UNDERLAIN BY A MOISTURE BARRIER.
THE GI TY OF NENPORT BEAGH 6RADIN6 CODE.
15, NO PAINT PLASTER CEMENT, SOIL, MORTAR, OR OTHER RESIDUE SHALL BE ALLONED TO
TRANSMIT WATER. IF CONSIDERED NEGE55ARY BY THE ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST AND
- - ALL 6RADIN6 OPERATIONS AND THE
- < INED 10 OBSERVE
12. GEO ET, A INC. ING. SHOULD BE
- -
- -- I I SHALL
ENTER STREETS, CURBS, 6U1 IERS, OR STORM DRAINS. ALL MATERIAL ,4WD HASTE .,hALL
r PLACED.
N R A COMPACTED TILL BLANKET HILL CC
SOILS 6 DINES �
3.
I F N
BARRIER N' AN MEDIUM TO COARSE SAND
THE MOISTURE BAR, IE, SHOULD CONSIST OF 2" OF GL_
- - I -
i
REQUIRED TESTING FOR IMPLEMENIIN� THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THIS REPORT. IF A
BE REMOVED FROM THE 51TE PER NBMG 11.32020.
1.
THE ENGINEERING GEOL0615T SHALL PERFORM PERIODIC INSPECTIONS DURING 6RADIN6.
PLACED 2" ABOVE A 10 -MIL PVC, SHEET OF COMPARABLE IMFERVICUS MATERIAL
THE IMFERVIOU5 CHARACTER.
. MUST
GRANGE IN THE GONSULT,ANTS OCCUR, GEOETKA, Z. MUST BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING AND
T
ALL JOINTS SHALL BE MADE 50 A5 TO PRESERVE
ALL LIABILITY WILL SHIFT THE CLIENT AND HIS ANTS OF RECORD.
EROSION CONTROL
18.
NOTIFICATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE; IF, IN THE COURSE OF FULFILLING THEIR RE5PON51BIL-
DEMOLITION
AND TREE REMOVAL
I. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLANS ARE REQUIRED FROM OCTOBER 15 TO MAY 15.
I TY, THE CIVIL ENGINEER, THE SOILS ENGINEER, THE ENGINEERING 6E0L0615T, OR THE
I '/ � 1 WITH
TE5TIN6 FACILITY FINDS THAT THE HARK IS N01 BEING GONE IN GONFORNANGE
I.
I SHOULD R A \' R-
SPECIAL NOTE ..HOULD BE TAKEN DU, ING THE GR DING 50 AS TO LOCATE ALL UI DE
2. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE FROM OCTOBER IS TO MAY 15.
APPROVED 6RADIN6 P! AN5, THE DISGREPANGIES SHALL BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY TC
GROND ITEMS. E.G: PIPE, CONDUIT, STORAGE TANKS, SEPTIC TANK5, CESSPOOLS OR
3. BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 AND MAY 15, EROSION CONTROL MEA51JRE5 SHALL BE IN PLACE AT
THE PERSON IN CHARGE OF THE GR,ADIN6 NORK AND TO THE CITY 6RADIN6 ENGINEER.
REGOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE MEASURES, IF NECESSARY, SHALL BE SUBMITTED
LEACH LINES, NATER HELLS, IRRIGATION FIFE, ETC.
THE END OF EACH WORKIG DAY WHENEVER THE FIVE-DAY PROBABILITY OF RAIN 30
N
TO THE CITY 6RADIN6 ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL
2.
ANY SEPTIC TANK FOUND SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE.
PERCENT. GJRIN6 THE REMAINDER OF THE YEAR, THEY SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END
OF THE DAY WHENEVER THE DAILY RAINFALL PROBABILITY EXGEED5 50 PERCENT.
DOCUMENTATION
3,
ANY SEEPAGE PIT OR CESSPOOL FOUND SHALL BE PUMPED DRY AND FILLED WITH GLEAN
SAND. THE TOP AND SIDES SHOULD BE BROKEN AND REMOVED IF THEY ARE NI T HIN
4. LAN05GAPIN6 PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL, WORK GONPLETED AND A
I.
AN AS- BIJILT PLAN SHALL BE PREPARED BY THE CIVIL EN6INLER INCLUDING ORIGINAL
5 FEET OF THE FINISHED GRADE IF A WATER HELL IS FOUND IT SHALL BE GUT OFF AND
CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE RECEIVED BY THE CITY 6RADIN6 ENGINEER PRIOR TO
GROUND SURFACE ELEVATIONS, A5- GRADED 6ROUND SURFACE ELEVATIONS, LOT DRAIN-
GAPPED, 5 FEET BELON FINISHED GRADE.
-
- o I F
r TTY RAGN ENGN_ER.
PERMIT, N 355 WAIVED BY THE G 6 6
GLOSUR_ OF P E U L
- I I I t R AND
- SUBSURFACE
PATTERNS AND LOCATION'S I N5 AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL SURFACE
AGE PAITE L G 0
- - � I I
r r F 4 4
N R SHALL PROVIDE NRI TEN APPROVAL THAT DRAINAJE FACILITIES. THE CIVIL
EE
4.
N ABED FROM THE SITE.
A EXCAVATED AND CLEARED
ANY METAL PIPE FOUND SHALL 8E
5. TEMPORARY DE5ILTOF BASINS, WHEN REQUIRED, SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED
_N6L
THE NORK HAS DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FINAL APPROVED 6RADIN6 PLAN AND
ANY VITRIFIED CLAY LEAG4ING LINES MAY BE BROKEN IN PLACE.
FOR THE GJRATION OF THE PROJECT.
STATE THE NUMBER OF YARDS OF GUT AND /OR FILL MOVED DURING THE OPERATION.
5.
o
ANY TREE THAT HAS TO BE REMOVED, DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION, SHOULD BE COMP LETE-
REQUIRED INSPECTIONS
2.
I o r r
A SOILS GRADING REPORT PREPARED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER, IN6LUDINS LOCATIONS
LY REMOVED AND THE CAVITY BACKFILL ED AS DESCRIBED IN THE 6RADIN6 SECTION.
1. A PRE- GRADING MEETING SHALL BE SCHEDULED 48 HOURS FRIOR TO START OF 6RADIN6
AND ELEVATIONS OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS. SUMMARIES OF FIELD AND LABORATORY
6.
ANY ROOT FOUND SHALL BE EXCAVATED AND CLEARED FROM THE 51TE OR MUL GHED
HITH THE FOLLONIN5 FER50N5 PRESENT: ONNER, 6RADIN6 CONTRACTOR, DE516N CIVIL
RE5ULT5 AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED DATA AND COMMENTS ON ANY GHAN&E5 MADE
FOR FUTURE LANDSGAPIN6 USE.
� QUIRE
F SENTATIVE. , E
� R R THEIR REPRE
ENGINEER, 501!5 ENGINE ER GTY 6R,ADIN6 ENGINE_ 0
� SOILS
� � THEIR EFFECT ON THE REG OMMENDATIONS MADE IN THE L
DU, ING GRADIN,o AND IHE
EN6INEERINS INVE5TI6ATION REPORT. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN
1.
ALL CAVITIES SHOULD 6E GUT IN A "V" SHAPE 50 THAT COMPACTION EQUIPMENT WILL NOT
ED FIELD INSPECTIONS HILL BE OUTLINED AT THE MEETING.
APPROVAL AS TO THE ADEQUACY OF THE 51TE FOR THE INTENDED USE AND COMPLETION
BRIDGE CURING 6RADIN6 WHICH SHOULD BE GONDUGTED IN THE MANNER NOTED BELON.
o _ I / r
- N SCHEDULED 48 HOURS PRIOR 10 START Or PAVINJ
� PAVING MEET! o SHALL BE SGHE
2. A P , C
r
- -
ACCORDANCE THE JOB SPEGIFIGATIONS.
OF WORK IN AG..O, DAN6C
8.
IT 15 RECOMMENDED THAT THE DEMOLITION BE OBSERVED SO .45 TO PREVENT DEBRIS
WITH THE FOLLONING PERSONS PRESENT: ONNER, PAVING CONTRACTOR DE516N CIVIL
ENGINEER, SOILS ENGINEER, CITY GRADING ENGINEER OR THEIR REPRESf= NTATIVE. REQUIRE
3.
-
A GEOLOGIC GRADING REPORT PREPARED BY THE EN6INEERIN6 6E0LOGIS I, A FINAL
II I I
FROM REMAINING ON OR BEING BURIED ON SITE. THE DEMOLITION' ION OF THE BELOW GRADE
ED FIELD INSPECTIONS WILL BE OUTLINED AT THE MEETING.
DESCRIPTION OF THE GEOLOGY OF THE SITE, INCLUDING ANY BEN INFORMATION DLGLO-
ITEMS SUCH AS PIPES AND TREE ROOT SYSTEMS MUST BE CHECKED BY THE SOIL ENGINEER
SEP DURING THE GR,ADIN6 AND THE EFFECT OF SAME ON RECOMMENDATIONS INGORPORA-
OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE.
6RADIN6 FILLS AND GUTS
TED IN THE APPROVED 61RADIN6 PLAN. THE ENNNEEERIN6 GEOLOGIST SHALL PROVIDE
GRADING BUILDING AND PARKING AREAS
( )
WRITTEN APPROVAL AS THE ADEQUACY OF THE SITE FOR THE INTENDED USE AS AFFECT-
I. GRADED 5LGPE5 SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 2 HORIZONTAL TO I VERTICAL.
ED BY THE GEOLOGIC FACTORS.
I.
PRIOR TO THE CONTROLLED 6RADIN6 OPERATIONS, THE CONSTRUCTION AREA SHOULD BE
2. FILL 5LOFE5 SHALL BE COMPACTED TO NO LE55 THAN 90 PERCENT RELATIVE GOMFAG-
BE STRIPPED OF ALL VEGETATION THAT IS PRESENT AND THE DEBRIS REMOVED FROM
TION OUT TO THE FINISH SURFACE.
THE 51TE OR STOCKPILED AND MULCHED FOR LATER USE IN THE PLANTER AREAS.
3. ALL FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED THROUGHOUT TO A MINIMUM OF 90 PERCENT RELATIVE
2.
THE TOPSOIL SHOULD BE OVER - EXCAVATED SUCH THAT A 3' -0" THICK BLANKET OF
COMPACTION AS DETERMINED BY A5TM 1 TEST METHOD 1557, AND APPROVED BY THE
RE- GOMPAGTED 501L 15 PROVIDED IN THE BUILDING AREA. ALL OVER - EXCAVATION MUST
SOILD ENGINEER GOMPACTION TESTS SHALL BE PER - FORMED APPROXIMATELY EVERY
EXTEND AT LEAST 5 FEET BEYOND THE FOOTFRINT OF THE STRUCTURE EXGEFT NHEN
TWO FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT AND OF 515FIGIENT QUANTITY TO ATTEST TO OVERALL
RESTRICTED BY AN ADJOININ6 STRUCTURE OR LIMITED BY ,A PROPERTY LINE GONDI T ION.
COMPACTION EFFORT APPLIED TO THE FILL AREAS.
SEE PLATE E (DETAIL 8162).
4, AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL SHALL BE CLEARED OF ALL VEGETATION AND DEBRIS, SCAR
FIED AND APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLAGIN6 OF THE FILL.
5. FILLS SHALL BE KEYED OR BENCHED INTO COMPETENT MATERIAL.
P
z 0
U] u z
'3000
U s Vi
�^�
2 u
@1
Q
S
u��
Nr z
U
z H, z
M
O
U
�NSED A&
/SX�G'�
Q� O
2
* No. C 6947
.P/. FjV
9TFOP CA FOF
IAN J.N. HARRISON, ARCHITECT
thereby ev'e-ly reserves Is commen Iew
cep 91g h; na other property rights In these p Ian
n pons or, ,oft b oe docea, c,i aeo
chanp do in any to ohos m , n r ar th yr
to be signed to s third party, without the
express wtlllen permission and --n. of
IAN J.N. HARRISON, ARCHITECT
zz �z
O
o
L<
O
Q
(.� Q
1 �
�z�oo
�
r�
V
w
(W
V
z
w
N
N
(�
W wQ
z
z
w
O
LJ„I
w
I�
O
Q
z
z o
I�
N
�
(O
n
F�
M
JOLT DAVIDSON -TOOK
DRAWN BY
pdW
111,01 Dn I I-: 2/14/2011
REVISION
BY
DAFL-
SIAFIT
C2
01= TWENTY -ONE
tV
TO
I
O
C
3. -1 K., 23' -T S' -1 W.
THIRD FLOOR PLAN VT = ro,
(V
lYl
C
v
3,11,". 23' -111 3'-1'G�,
SECOND FLOOR PLAN VV =1'-0"
n
rc
m
5' -1 K., 23' -9" S' -1 W.
FIRST FLOOR PLAN VT = ro"
WALL LEGEND
2X4 ® 16" O.G.
2X6 ® 16" O.G.
3X4 @ 16" O.G.
2X3 @ 16" O.G.
42" HIGH
GUARDRAIL
WALL5 < 5-0" TO
PROPERTY LINE TO BE
1 -HOUR CONSTRUCTION
PROVIDE FIRE BLOCKS AND
DRAFT STOPS AT 10' -0" O.G.
(5' -0" O.G. AT RATED WALLS)
KEYNOTES
❑1 5/8" TYPE X GY5UM BOARD ALL WALL5,
GEILIN65, BEAM5, P05T5 AND COLUMNS,
SMOOTH FIN15H TYPICAL AT GARAGE
�2 TANKLE55 WATER HEATER
�3 COMBUSTION AIR VENT5
® 1 -HOUR RATED SHAFT AD1 15
❑5 PROVIDE 5/8" TYPE'X' GYP. BD. ON WALL5
AND CEILING OF ENCL05ED U5EABLE
SPACE UNDER STAIRS
© DRYER VENT, LENGTH NOT TO EXCEED 14' -0"
42" WIDE FIREBOX METAL FIREPLACE. DESA
ICC= E5R -2542. EXTERIOR COMBUSTION AIR
DUCTS SHALL BE L15TED COMPONENTS OF THE
FIREPLACE, AND INSTALLED PER FIREPLACE
MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS.
PROVIDE 2" CLEARANCE TO COMBUSTIBLES
AY FIREPLACE OPENING
® TILE HEARTH. MIN. 2" THICK
® LINE OF WALL ABOVE
10 6" MIN. TREAD WIDTH AT NARROW END.
10" MIN. TREAD WIDTH AT 12" FROM
NARROW END
11 SOFFIT
12 42" HI6H GUARDRAIL
13 WATER CLOSET TO BE MIN. 30" WIDE WITH 3
MIN. 24" CLEAR IN FRONT OF TOILET, TYP. AD2
14 5HATTER -PROOF ENCLOSURE
15 CERAMIC TILE WALLS TO 5' -0"
OVER PLASTER, TYP.
16 30" X 30" ATTIC AGGE55
1l ROOF DRAIN W/ OVERFLOW 4
ADi
18 METAL CHIMNEY FLUE
19 45" HIGH COUNTER
20 WINDOW SEAT. 15" ABOVE FIN15H FLOOR
21 16X8 SMART VENT WITHIN 12" OF ADJ. GRADE
MODEL: 1540 -520 E5R-20'14
22
23 LINE OF ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE
24 SLOPE TO DRAIN, 1/4:12 MIN.
25 36" WIDE FIREBOX METAL FIREPLACE
5TAIINLE55 STEEL IGG4 ER- 350'1. DESA
6A5 ONLY - DIRECT VENT
26 SHOWER HEAD AND DRAIN
2l CLOSET SHELVING SYSTEM
28 LAUNDRY BOX
29 MEDICINE CABINET
FACTORY -BUILT FIREPLACES, CHIMNEYS, AND ALL
OTHER COMPONENTS SHALL BE L15TED AND INSTALLED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR LISTING AND MANUFAC-
TURER INSTRUCTIONS.
z
Q d
N 7
Q o
°
u
'Big,
I I
qL ARC
v LN. HARRST<<.'
Q� O
Z
* No. C 6947
V�
�CF CALIF°
IAN J.N. HARRISON, ARCHITECT
horeby saprossly reserves its c n low
copyright and Other property rights In lbess plans.
These plans a not to be reproduced, copied o r
oh .... d in any tor' whots oeveq n e the,
to be assigned to o Ibird party, without the
evpress writ'.¢. perrnlss and c ent of
•ARCHITECT.
IAN J.N. HARRISON,
v7J
f�
I�
O
O
((w
N
I/w
1�
N
r ^�
v J
ON
w
�
w
O
�Q
J
I�
m
I�
JOB R DAVID5ON -TOOK
DRAWN BY
pdw
PLOT DATE 9/5/2012
REVISION
BY
D ATE
SI IEET
Al
OF TWENTY -ONE
V
L
V
O
i�
IN
0
z
0
z
z
Q
r
a
E
6
c
0
U
i
71
0
V
0
N
O
0
c
0
a'
0
on
r
N
Z
Q
J
d
Q
J
LL
O
0
0
z
a
Q
A4
I
I
A4
I
I
I
I
I'_ t
BALCONY
�— ` -- — — — — — — — — — — — -
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
l I
T
O
A
A4
I
I
-1 ----------
II
TYP / T
4:12
II
II
—�I
—,I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
�----- - - - - --
II
II
10:12 "�rl
II
N II
II
O II
II
II
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I II
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
_- ,
I L,
14Y2:12 Q v I
ROOF PLAN
8:12
A4
I
KEYNOTES
II 11
5TANDIN6-5EAM METAL ROOFING
II II GLA55'A'A55EM5LY
II II
II II
- - CHIMNEY TO BE 2' -0" ABOVE ROOF
WITHIN 10' -0" WITH SPARK ARRESTOR
AND SHROUD 12" MAX. HEIGHT, TYFIGAL
II
A:�RVOE
PROJECTIONS LESS THAN 3'-0" TO
PROPERTY LINE TO BE 1 -HOUR
GON5TRUGTION, TYPICAL
I � I I I PROPERTY LINE
I ROOF VENT. 14450. IN. OPENING
WITH GORROSION RESISTANT WIRE MESH
I GUARDRAIL
I 1 REQUIRED WINDOW5 TO BE 30 "OA'r1AY FROM
_ PROPERTY LINE.
FIREPLACE DIRECT VENT
-,
VY = r-w
I
I
A4
z
z
cG U
��j�go
II
ry
II
z
II
II
�
II
II
IL
I
I
I
I
0
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
LLl
I
I
�
02
I
I
6947
`7'T9 FN.
�OP CAC\FD
IAN J.N. HARRISON. ARCHITECT
hereby expressly reserves its common law
wpyrigbf end other pr cup, ty rights in these plons.
These glens ore not to be reproduced. copied or
rnanged in any form wh.tsoeve,, n e they
II
v J
W
I____________________
-I
I I
8:12
I I
I I
I I
L
VY = r-w
I
I
A4
z
z
cG U
��j�go
z
� d
5
0
u
FO
P
02
* No. C
6947
`7'T9 FN.
�OP CAC\FD
IAN J.N. HARRISON. ARCHITECT
hereby expressly reserves its common law
wpyrigbf end other pr cup, ty rights in these plons.
These glens ore not to be reproduced. copied or
rnanged in any form wh.tsoeve,, n e they
to be ..signed be . third port,, xRhoot the
express writt en permission nd consent of
IAN J.N. HARRISON,nARCHITECT.
v J
W
IIW
I�
W
I^W
ICI
o
^
Z
I--I
w
U
N
I/w
I�
zz
W
O
W
JOB # DAVIDSON -TOOK
DRAWN 13Y
pdw
PLOT DATE
3/10/2011
KFVLSION
BY
DATE
SEILET
A2
OF IWI:NI1' -ONIF.
O
'U
U
O
N
6
z
0
a
x
z
Z
a
t
a
a
E
6
N
0
0
i
N
0
U
0
a
`o
6
0
i
0
c
0
ti
7
d
tl
O
O
K
N
a
N
O
0
0
0
0
GUARDRAIL
31.25
1n
3RD FLOOR
21.75
6
61
(V
N
12
8
I�
2
12
a 4
i
ILIA.
RIDGE
31.92
N
12
L11 12 10
-
J ROOF PL
35.58
ROOF PL
34.1-1 I� 1
- O
N
it
Zia
m 12
3RD FLOOR � 4' 3RD FLOOR
21.15 j 21.15
1-21
2ND FLOOR
15T FLOOR
~ q.00
121
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION (NORTH) VT- =11 -011 REAR ELEVATION (WEST) VT� =rw
1I
�I 10 - -�
;r - i►,�� II�III�I�III
15T FLOOR
DO 12
12 a 8
�10
12
n �2
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION (SOUTH)
RIDGE
31.92
ROOF PI-
30.83
1n
3RD FLOOR
12 8 I n
V4„ = 1' -011
21.15
15T FLOOR
L1.00
N
12 12
ROOF PL _ 10 D 8
36.08
12
8� a8
II I II
12 [4 11 1 Ila
41/2 D
3RD FLOOR
21.15 - - - - -
2
r —I —
r _ I
r _ I
12 r —I
8� _I
cYl _
2ND FLOOR _ _ _ _ FFF
17.61
Ll
r
I
15T FLOOR _ -
~ q.00
FRONT ELEVATION (EAST)
V4" = rw
ROOF Fl-
15T FLOOR
9.00
z N
°7
KEYNOTES
F-11
LARAMITE SLATE 5HIN&LE5
ICC# E5R -1841, CLA55 'A' ASSEMBLY
121 1
STUCCO SIDING
I3I
_
®
CARRIAGE LIGHT
u51MULATED
STONE VENEER
was
OVER PLASTER. MAX. 15 # /5F
�NSED ARC,y/
LN. HARj�,sT��'�
ICC# ESR -1215
CINATURAL
GRADE
AT
FINISH GRADE
S
CHIMNEY SHALL EXTEND 36" MIN. ABOVE HIGH-
IAN J.N. HARRISON, ARCHITECT
hems expressly reserves its wmmon low
and ntl iher property rights in these pions.
These plans pro of to by r,,,Adecpd, copied o
nto
EST POINT WHERE CHIMNEY PA55E5 THROUGH
IAN J.N. HARRISON,
ROOF OR 24" ABOVE HIGHEST POINT OF
ROOF WITHIN 10' -0" WITH SPARK ARRESTOR
ROOF PL
AND SHROUD 12" MAXIMUM HEIGHT X 24" X
30.83
48" MAX. HORIZ. SECTION.
q
(2) 16" X 8" SMART VENTS, MODEL 1540 -520
w
ESR -2014
3RD FLOOR
O
WITHIN 12" OF FINISH SURFACE
21'15 RIDGE
HEIGHT ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE FIN15HED
5HEATHIN6.
THE HE16HT OF THE ROOFING MATERIAL
HAS BEEN CON5IDERED TO A55URE THE FINAL
FIN15HED HEIGHT 15 BELOW THE CITY ALLOWABLE.
ROOF Fl-
15T FLOOR
9.00
z N
°7
z
U
g o
m d
_
0
was
I I
�NSED ARC,y/
LN. HARj�,sT��'�
VG
\� OZ
* No. C 6947
AT
F�F
CA�1F�
IAN J.N. HARRISON, ARCHITECT
hems expressly reserves its wmmon low
and ntl iher property rights in these pions.
These plans pro of to by r,,,Adecpd, copied o
nto
changed in any whosoever, n e :hey
to be assigned to a third party, v�rhoe: fhe
express written n
permissio and cons 0
consent
IAN J.N. HARRISON,
z
0
w
w
w
G.L.I
O
I�
L L-I
w
X
w
N
(�
W
�zJ
w
GL
O
�Q
Iw
JOR # DAVID5ON -TOOK
DRAWNHY
pdw
PLOT DATE 4/- 7/2011
P11-VISION
Ill'
DA I F
SI EFT
A3
OFTWGNTY ONE
Attachment No. PC 2
Draft Resolution for Approval with
Findings and Conditions
RESOLUTION NO. ## ##
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING VARIANCE NO.
VA2012 -004 FOR AN ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REAR
SETBACK AND AN INCREASE IN ALLOWED FLOOR AREA
ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE -
UNIT DWELLING LOCATED AT 201 SAPPHIRE AVENUE
(PA2012 -108)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
1. An application was filed by Ian Harrison, with respect to property located at 201 Sapphire
Avenue, and legally described as a portion of Lot 1, Block 9, Section 2 of Balboa Island
requesting approval of a variance.
2. The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single -unit dwelling and
construction of a new single -unit dwelling and two -car garage on a sub - standard size
lot. The applicant is requesting a variance to encroach 7 feet into the required 10 -foot
rear setback and to exceed the maximum permitted floor area limitation for the
property (1,100 square feet) by an additional 340 square feet.
3. The subject property is located within the Two -Unit Residential, Balboa Island (R -BI)
Zoning District and the General Plan Land Use Element category is Two -Unit Residential
(RT).
4. The subject property is located within the coastal zone. The Coastal Land Use Plan
category is Two -Unit Residential (RT -E).
5. A public hearing was held on September 20, 2012 in the City Hall Council Chambers,
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and
purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal
Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the
Planning Commission at this meeting.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION.
1. This project has been determined to be categorically exempt under Section 15302, of
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 2 (Replacement or
Reconstruction), which allows for the reconstruction of existing structures where the
new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have
substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced. In this case, an
existing single -unit dwelling would be demolished and a new single -unit dwelling would
be reconstructed on the same site.
Planning Commission Resolution No. ####
Paqe 2 of 7
2. This project has also been determined to be categorically exempt under Section
15303, of the CEQA Guidelines - Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small
Structures), which allows for the construction of up to three single -unit dwellings in a
residential zone. in urbanized areas.
SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS.
The proposed project exceeds the maximum allowable floor area limit for the property and
encroaches 7 feet into the required 10 -foot rear setback. In accordance with Section
20.52.090 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the following findings for approval of a
variance and facts in support of such findings are set forth:
Finding:
A. There are special or unique circumstances or conditions applicable to the subject property
(e.g., location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other physical features) that do
not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity under an identical zoning
classification.
Facts in Support of Finding:
A -1. Standard size lots in Balboa Island maintain alley access and are subject to a 5 -foot rear
alley setback. In this case, the subject property is sub - standard in size and lacks alley
access as a result of a prior re- subdivision of a standard size lot.
A -2. The lot measures 30 feet in width and 45 feet in length, and totals 1,350 square feet in
area.
A -3. The surrounding standard size lots in Balboa Island measure 30 feet wide by 85 feet
deep and total 2,550 square feet in area.
Finding:
B. Strict compliance with Zoning Code requirements would deprive the subject property of
privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under an identical zoning
classification.
Facts in Support of Finding:
B -1. Applying standard setbacks to the subject property results in a smaller percent of
allowed buildable area, which results in a lower floor area ratio (FAR) than other
typical lots on Balboa Island. Additionally, the rear property line is not adjacent to an
alley as most typical lots are within the vicinity and throughout Balboa Island;
therefore, the required rear yard setback is 10 feet instead of the typical 5 -foot alley
setback. This is an unusually large setback for not only the subject property, but for a
Tmplt: 0 5/1 612 01 2
Planning Commission Resolution No. ####
Paqe 3 of 7
typical lot within the vicinity and for Balboa Island. Strict application of these default
setbacks on this small lot results in a buildable area that is only 45- percent of the total
lot area; the buildable area of the larger, typical lot equates to 77- percent of the total
lot area.
B -2. Strict application of the Zoning Code requirement of the 1.5 floor area limit to the
subject site allows a maximum of 900 gross square feet (excluding the additional 200 -
square -foot allowance), which results in a floor area to land area ratio (FAR) of 0.67.
The allowed FAR of a typical lot within the vicinity is 0.99.
B -3. The lack of alley access results in a 10 -foot rear setback that is intended for larger -sized
lots and is not required for the typical lot throughout Balboa Island. Application of a 10-
foot rear setback and 10 -foot front setback would equate to approximately 44.4 - percent
of the lot depth. In comparison, application of the standard 10 -foot front setback and 5-
foot rear alley setback on the typical 85 -foot deep lot in the vicinity would equate to only
17.6- percent of the lot depth.
Finding:
C. Granting of the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights of the applicant.
Facts in Support of Finding:
C -1. The requested variance to exceed the 1.5 floor area limit with a single -unit dwelling
that has a gross floor area of 1,240 square feet (excluding the additional 200- square-
foot allowance) results in a 0.92 FAR, which is more consistent with the typical lots
within the vicinity and allows the property owner the right to a dwelling with a similar
FAR to other dwellings on Balboa Island.
C -2. The application of the 10 -foot rear setback is unusually larger and not typical of other
lots in Balboa Island and significantly limits the buildable depth of the lot. The
proposed encroachment into the rear setback is reasonable in this case due to the
extremely short depth of the lot and affords the property owner a more usable buildable
lot depth.
Finding:
D. Granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with
the limitations on other properties in the vicinity and in the same zoning district.
Facts in Support of Finding:
D -1. The proposed gross floor area of the dwelling results in a FAR of 0.92, which is less
than the 0.99 FAR of typical lots in Balboa Island, ensuring that the increased floor
area does not result in a special privilege not enjoyed by other property owners in this
vicinity.
Tmplt: 0 5/1 612 01 2
Planning Commission Resolution No. # # ##
Paqe 4 of 7
D -2. The proposed 3 -foot rear setback does not result in a special privilege in that is consist
with the standard 3 -foot side yard setback on the abutting property and other dwellings in
the area that maintain 3 -foot side yard setbacks between structures.
Finding:
E. Granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of
the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public
convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in
the neighborhood.
Facts in Support of Finding:
E -1. The proposed dwelling would provide adequate setbacks consist with the neighborhood
pattern of development and would ensure the protection of air, light, and separation that
exists with other properties in the vicinity.
E -2. The size of the proposed dwelling is in proportion to the other dwellings within the
immediate neighborhood and throughout Balboa Island.
E -3. The design of the structure includes articulation and modulation through the use of
several balconies and building offsets to minimize bulk and enhance the aesthetics of
the structure.
Finding:
F. Granting of the Variance will not be in conflict with the intent and purpose of this Section,
this Zoning Code, the General Plan, or any applicable specific plan.
Facts in Support of Finding:
F -1. The intent of a rear setback is to provide adequate separation for light, air, and usable
outdoor living space adjacent to other residential properties. However, in Balboa
Island, most properties abut an alley in the rear and do not have usable rear yards, but
instead utilize their front yards for outdoor living space. The proposed 3 -foot rear
setback is consistent with the standard 3 -foot side yard setback on the abutting property
and other dwellings in the area that maintain 3 -foot side yard setbacks between
structures. Additionally, the proposed design maintains the required 10 -foot front setback
providing for usable outdoor living space consist with the other properties in the vicinity.
F -2. The intent of floor area limits (FAL) is to ensure each residential structure can construct
a reasonable size dwelling in relationship to its lot size; however, in this case, utilizing
the FAIL disproportionally reduces buildable area on this site due to the sub - standard lot
size and larger rear setback requirement. Utilizing FAR as more equitable development
limit in this case allows for the construction of a reasonable size dwelling that remains
consistent with the development of other swellings in the vicinity.
Tmplt: 0 5/1 612 01 2
Planning Commission Resolution No. # # ##
Paqe 5 of 7
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby approves Variance No.
VA2012 -004, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated by reference.
2. This action shall become final and effective fourteen days after the adoption of this
Resolution unless within such time an appeal is filed with the Director of Community
Development in accordance with the provisions of Title 20 Planning and Zoning, of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN
ABSENT:
BY:
MIN
Michael Toerge, Chairman
Fred Ameri, Secretary
Tmplt: 05/16/2012
Planning Commission Resolution No. ####
Paqe 6 of 7
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(Project- specific conditions are in italics)
PLANNING
The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, floor
plans and building elevations stamped and dated with the date of this approval. (Except
as modified by applicable conditions of approval.)
2. Variance No. VA2012 -004 shall expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date
of approval as specified in Section 20.54.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code,
unless an extension is otherwise granted.
3. The project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless
specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval.
4. Prior to issuance of building permits, approval from the California Coastal Commission
shall be required.
5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall pay any unpaid
administrative costs associated with the processing of this application to the Planning
Division.
6. Development of the site shall be limited to a single -unit dwelling and shall not exceed a
maximum gross floor area of 1,440 square feet.
7. The proposed structure shall be limited to a maximum encroachment of 7 feet into the
rear 10 -foot setback, with the exception of decorative architectural features (e.g. belt
courses, ornamental moldings, pilasters, and similar features) which may encroach an
additional 6 inches and roof overhangs, brackets, cornices, and eaves which may
encroach an additional one -foot.
8. To the fullest extent permitted by law, applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold
harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees,
and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages,
actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and
expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court costs) of
every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly
or indirectly) to City's approval of the Variance No. VA2012 -004. This indemnification
shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of
suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action,
causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by applicant, City, and /or the
parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The applicant shall indemnify the City for
all of City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the
indemnification provisions set forth in this condition. The applicant shall pay to the City
Tmplt: 05/1612012
Planning Commission Resolution No. ####
Paqe 7 of 7
upon demand any amount owed to the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements
prescribed in this condition.
Building Division Conditions
9. The applicant is required to obtain all applicable permits from the City's Building Division
and Fire Department. The construction plans must comply with the most recent, City -
adopted version of the California Building Code.
Public Works Conditions
10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, City Council approval shall be obtained for
the proposed new driveway access from Park Avenue in accordance to Council Policy
L -2.
11. An ADA compliant curb ramp shall be installed at the corner of Park Avenue and
Sapphire Avenue per City Standard STD - 181 -L -A through STD - 181 -L -D.
12. The proposed structure shall provide a minimum of 6 inches of rise from the gutter flow
line along Park Avenue to the garage finish floor.
13. The driveway slope shall comply with City Standard STD - 160 -L -B.
14. The driveway approach shall comply with City Standard STD - 163 -L.
15. All damaged or broken concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the project frontage
(Park Avenue and Sapphire Avenue) shall be reconstructed.
16. The proposed block wall located along the Park Avenue frontage shall be eliminated or
reduced in height to a maximum of 36 inches to provide adequate sight distance for
vehicles backing out of the proposed garage and pedestrian sight distance at the
intersection of Park and Sapphire.
Tmplt: 05/1612012
Attachment No. PC 3
Maps Illustrating Surrounding Lot Sizes
7
08
4- 4.`.f,"f
1 50-09
BALBOA AVENUE
0
ra
4
13
—Ap
m
im
PARK AVENUE
F F---J0 N07T - ASSESSOR'S BLO2.F0 ASS JS o R , Ap 1
MARCH 194 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 50 PACE 09
A BALBOA ISLE, SW THREE MM. 7-15 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
TWO U.N. 6-31
Subject
Property
m
Subject
�Property� nr inn � u
PARK
to.
J
W
1
Q
W
R
4
4
N
M'
W
Q
C
O
u
12
AVENUE
° O
r/
w
R O
N
II
O
£er>
14
IS
10 �
E
14
Oto
O
19
ly
5�
21
r
ra
O
O
r
n
O
0
° O9
17 0
-
O
n
O
r
0
0
4
B
R.
OB
7
YI
1 F
n'• a
I
O
R
O
O
19
e
` 10
17 Z
en
..
b
M'
W
Q
C
O
u
12
AVENUE
° O
/e��r•
e 01
23
J
N
II
12
13
14
IS
10 �
M'
W
Q
C
O
u
12
AVENUE
W Z
C
Q
I ,
° O
/e��r•
e 01
23
J
f
2O
s
24
2
O
23
19
14
Oto
O
19
ly
5�
21
r
ra
O
O
1
tB
L
O
21
° O9
17 0
-
O
n
O
1
19
W Z
C
Q
I ,
° O
2$ i
J
f
j
O
2
TW
5
� II
12
®
O
19
IS
Q
r
ra
O
o
L
O$
21
W Z
C
Q
I ,
° O
2$ i
RON-°
f
j
O
2
[
5
;O
O
12
13
O
O
Q
r
ra
O
o
L
O$
21
-
O
n
O
1
19
0
O
B
R.
9
t
7
n'• a
n
W Z
C
Q
I ,
1
j
W
Q
ti
i
ti
Q
ti
050- 1 1
1 " = 60'
rora
48 -16
BALBOA ISLE., SEC. TWO MM 6 -31 ,vOrE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 4 ASSESSOR'S AIAP
MARCH 1949 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 050 PACE II
" "
THREE M M. 7 -/5 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
!RE
;O
O
12
13
i4
IS
1
j
W
Q
ti
i
ti
Q
ti
050- 1 1
1 " = 60'
rora
48 -16
BALBOA ISLE., SEC. TWO MM 6 -31 ,vOrE - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 4 ASSESSOR'S AIAP
MARCH 1949 PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 050 PACE II
" "
THREE M M. 7 -/5 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
PARK
Z Property
09 LoqS6oro
LL
LU
W
lu
q
AVENUE 0
v
I I - M 14
q(@@ 77
�s @ la I6 4
@,r
48-15
4
I BA480A ISLE, SEC TWO MM. 6 -J/ N07F - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK a ASSESSOR'S MAP
MARCH 1949 PARCEL' - NUMBERS BOOK 50 PACE /0
SHOWN IN CIRCLES coam, OF oRANac
(D
O
(D
@
O
I6
O
IT
6
O
16
LU
W
lu
q
AVENUE 0
v
I I - M 14
q(@@ 77
�s @ la I6 4
@,r
48-15
4
I BA480A ISLE, SEC TWO MM. 6 -J/ N07F - ASSESSOR'S BLOCK a ASSESSOR'S MAP
MARCH 1949 PARCEL' - NUMBERS BOOK 50 PACE /0
SHOWN IN CIRCLES coam, OF oRANac
IHIS AMP KAS PQZPAREO FOR ORANGE
CORYrY ASSESSOR B£P'. WRPOSES ONE Y.
DIE ASSESSOR WfES NO CUARMIIEE AS !O
NS ACCMPACY " ASSUACS ANY LIABILITY
FOR OTHER USES. YA1I rO BE REPMOOCEO. 13
ALL RIWIS RESL'RIEO.
0 COPYRICMT ORAYYC£ COWYY ASSE55M PJ I I I J I I I
o SALBOA
7
Subject
Property
Location
MARCH 1949
ao'
J
W
Q
C
4
Q
N
eR'
J
W
Q
O
U
IO'
RY
AS
O
a
® R
deI
O� Ig
E5
W
J
C
—
( /
es
©
24
®
EI
O
EO
O
9
19
©
O
21
O
R
O8
9
L._
33 — —
O
Y
®
I6
f
to
f
e
6
n
II
I6
°y 12
35 s
Is
W
O9
R
xI
/a
9
eR'
J
W
Q
O
U
IO'
RY
L'
/'
o 9
IV
SR'
deI
W
J
R
W
J
C
—
O
es
©
®
EI
O
EO
©
9
19
O
n O
—7W0 3a- z
L._
33 — —
®
7
f
O
EI
(OI
°y 12
35 s
O
W
O9
19
9
OS'
PO
14
I 1 I I
AVENUE
050 -12
L-
�.
^! O
/'
o 9
IV
SR'
deI
W
J
R
W
J
C
1- = 60'
4 O
es
©
M
n O
I
O
EI
(OI
Pp
O
O9
19
PO
to
IB
II
17
h
h
12
6
CNE
W
e
u PARK
AVENUE m
NOTE — ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 8 ASSESSOR'S MAP D
BAL80A ISLE., SEC. 7WO MM. C -3I PARCEL NUMBERS BOOK 050 PAGE 12
" ° THREE MN. 7 -I5 SHOWN IN CIRCLES COUNTY OF ORANGE
Attachment No. PC 4
Draft Resolution for Denial
RESOLUTION NO. ## ##
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DENYING VARIANCE NO. VA2012-
004 FOR AN ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REAR SETBACK
AND AN INCREASE IN ALLOWED FLOOR AREA ASSOCIATED
WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE -UNIT
DWELLING LOCATED AT 201 SAPPHIRE AVENUE (PA2012-
108)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
1. An application was filed by Ian Harrison, with respect to property located at 201 Sapphire
Avenue, and legally described as a portion of Lot 1, Block 9, Section 2 of Balboa Island
requesting approval of a variance.
2. The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing single -unit dwelling and
construction of a new single -unit dwelling and two -car garage on a sub - standard size
lot. The applicant is requesting a variance to encroach 7 feet into the required 10 -foot
rear setback and to exceed the maximum permitted floor area limitation for the
property (1,100 square feet) by an additional 340 square feet.
3. The subject property is located within the Two -Unit Residential, Balboa Island (R -BI)
Zoning District and the General Plan Land Use Element category is Two -Unit Residential
(RT).
4. The subject property is located within the coastal zone. The Coastal Land Use Plan
category is Two -Unit Residential (RT -E).
5. A public hearing was held on September 20, 2012 in the City Hall Council Chambers,
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and
purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal
Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the
Planning Commission at this meeting.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION.
1. Pursuant to Section 15270 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines, projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves are not subject to
CEQA review.
Planning Commission Resolution No. ####
Paqe 2 of 3
SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS.
The Planning Commission may approve a variance only after making each of the required
findings set forth in Section 20.52.090 (Variances). In this case, the Planning Commission
was unable to make the required findings based upon the following:
1. The proposed Variance for the proposed single - family residential unit is not consistent
with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the NBMC and that findings required by Section
20.52.090 are not supported in this case. The proposed project may prove detrimental
to the community.
2. The design, location, size, and characteristics of the proposed project are not
compatible with the single- or two -unit dwellings in the vicinity. The development may
result in negative impacts to residents in the vicinity and would not be compatible with
the enjoyment of the nearby residential properties.
3. The sub - standard size of this property does not preclude the construction of a
reasonable size dwelling of 1,100 square feet that would be compatible with
surrounding lots. The proposed dwelling can be redesigned to comply with the
required development standards and approval of the Variance is not necessary to
preserve this substantial property right.
SECTION 4. DECISION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach hereby denies Variance No.
VA2012 -004.
2. This action shall become final and effective fourteen days after the adoption of this
Resolution unless within such time an appeal is filed with the Director of Community
Development in accordance with the provisions of Title 20 Planning and Zoning, of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Tmplt: 05/1612012
Planning Commission Resolution No. ####
Paqe 3 of 3
AW
M
Michael Toerge, Chairman
Fred Ameri, Secretary
Tmplt: 05/1612012
ADDITIONAL
MATERIALS
RECEIVED
David g n n=Took V a r| a n rF
�c
\�\
3Am�
g tot m& - --
.�
�
0
0
Construction of a new 1,440 SF dwelling
Variance No. VA203.2 -004
7 -foot encroachment into zo -foot rear setback
Exceed maximum permitted floor area limit of 1,1oo SF by an additional 340 SF
Project located at 201 Sapphire Ave.
Balboa Island
Northwesterly corner of Sapphire Ave. and Park Ave.
07/13/2012
Community Development Department - Planning Division
2
07/13/2012
7
.-
EARN A4E
V
r M r IF oft
I@
,c94 FOIEN�I
209 112
204 - . �•'{.
r
202 t!2
I., A
E8ti fP tt =_e z -� �16-111
I� ,2)
fi J 126
i 125 I ��
124, 12244�� �1
p• I'
,23
u
,22
—1211/2
120 1/2 121
0 _
130
Community Development Department - Planning Division
3
204
` ` •■a
I ZUZ 1'1
A � =
07/13/2012
1 0- --V
11
1.
r`4
f
45 .�•
6
� 1- 11 1
Community Development Department - Planning Division
4
v
Q
--•
Buildable Area = Lot Area— Setback Area
Maximum Floor Area = (Buildable Area x 1.5) + zoo SF
07/13/2012
Community Development Department - Planning Division
r
30 ' Wide
5
4S' Deep
J
Buildable Area = Lot Area— Setback Area
30 ' Wide
Maximum Floor Area = (Buildable Area x 1.5) + zoo SF
07/13/2012
Community Development Department - Planning Division
Buildable Area
600 SF
(45 % of lot)
o
o
v m
Max Floor Area
m Ln
o `i
1,soo SF
z v
o!
(o.67/0.8i FAR)
LL
J
Buildable Area = Lot Area— Setback Area
30 ' Wide
Maximum Floor Area = (Buildable Area x 1.5) + zoo SF
07/13/2012
Community Development Department - Planning Division
4S' Deep
Buildable Area = Lot Area— Setback Area
0
H 11
m
0
L
LL
J
30 ' Wide
Maximum Floor Area = (Buildable Area x 1.5) + zoo SF
07/13/2012
Community Development Department - Planning Division
7
Buildable Area
768 SF
(57 % 0fl0t)
>- m
v
Q m
Proposed
z M
Floor Area
Q�
1,440 SF
111miI
(0.92/.1.07 FAR)
Buildable Area = Lot Area— Setback Area
0
H 11
m
0
L
LL
J
30 ' Wide
Maximum Floor Area = (Buildable Area x 1.5) + zoo SF
07/13/2012
Community Development Department - Planning Division
7
ec
va
9V
0
- -- PARK AVENUE — —
07/13/2012 Community Development Department - Planning Division
rain✓ar
•RMO.bXa
WiL
va
min
OR
mini
- -- PARK AVENUE — —
07/13/2012 Community Development Department - Planning Division
rain✓ar
•RMO.bXa
WiL
va
•
Sub- standard size lot w/ no alley access
L 10-foot rear setback creates a disproportionate
reduction in buildable area
■ 3' rear setback consistent w/ 3- side setbacks
Proposed floor area is consistent FAR of typical
lots
Preserves property rights, while maintaining
neighborhood compatibility
07/13/2012
Community Development Department - Planning Division
9
ll, e
•
Conduct a public hearing
Adopt resolution approving Variance No.
VA2012 -004
07/13/2012
Community Development Department - Planning Division
`'A
10
1
For more information contact:
Jaime Murillo
949-644 -3209
jmurilloQa newportbeachca.gov
www.newportbeachca.gov
* The description of the existing facility as having "six dispensers" might be slightly misleading. I believe the
existing station has three islands, each of which has two two -sided dispensing stations, as well as separate
diesel dispensers on two of the islands. That would suggest something like 14 to 16 vehicles (I don't recall if
the diesel dispensers are two- sided) could be fueling at one time.
* The long- established, if somewhat seedy, "Minute King" convenience /liquor store on the Irvine Avenue
property immediately abutting the service station on the south might call into question the need for the
proposed new convenience store, which might possibly result in an over - concentration of opportunities for
alcohol sales to motorists.
Starting on page 12 of the 104 page PDF
* In Condition of Approval 15, the reference to "per condition of approval LIGHTING, No.2" is unclear. Is this
supposed to be a reference Condition 14? Or is it a reference to some other City document?
• In Condition 16, 1 suspect "adequate SITE distance" is supposed to be "adequate SIGHT distance."
• The relevance of Condition 25 to Alcohol Sales (the topic under which it is found) is not immediately obvious.
Isn't this really a fire /safety issue? And does the condition refer to exits from the building? or from the
property?
* In Condition 31, "under the control of the license" is probably meant to be "under the control of the
LICENSEE "?
• In Condition 38, "CalGree Section 5.701" should probably be CalGreen Section 5.701" (missing "n ")
• In Condition 46, "knox box" is probably meant to be "Knox box ".
• In Condition 48, "along the Bristol Street Irvine Avenue frontages" is probably meant to be "along the Bristol
Street AND Irvine Avenue frontages" (as in Condition 47).
• In Condition 49, "full depth AC patchback" could well be correct, but I don't know what "AC" stands for.
• In Condition 57, "closed driveway shall replaced by" should be "closed driveway shall BE replaced by ".
• In Condition 61(b), "30 minutes" seems a very long time for trucks and heavy equipment to be idling.
Item 3 (3 Davidson -Took Variance (PA2012 -108))
General comments:
* It is unclear from the report what the name "Davidson- Took" signifies.
* The report also does not make immediately clear that additional City Council approval will be needed for the
requested driveway access to Park Avenue (Condition of Approval 10).
* Is the 3 -foot rear setback, which could in places be reduced to 2.5 feet (per Condition of Approval 7),
adequate for fire access?
Starting on page 16 of the 31 page PDF:
In Statement 2, "and construction of a" should be "and construct a ". Alternatively, "to demolish an" could be
"demolition of an ".
In Required Findings D -2, "that is consist with" should be "that is consistent with ".
In F -2, "Utilizing FAR as more equitable development limit" should be "Utilizing FAR as A more equitable
development limit" and 'other swellings in the vicinity" should be "other DWELLINGS in the vicinity"
Yours,
Jim Mosher