HomeMy WebLinkAboutpc agenda (2)PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 3300 NEWPORT BLVD.
Thursday, February 8, 2007
Workshop — 4:00 p.m.
Regular Meeting - 6:30 p.m.
JEFFREY COLE
Chairperson
ROBERT HAWKINS EARL MCDANIEL
SCOTT PEOTTER
BARRY EATON
MICHAEL TOERGE
BRADLEY HILLGREN
Planning Commissioners are citizens of Newport Beach who volunteer to serve on the Planning
Commission. They were appointed by the City Council by majority vote for 4 -year terms. At the
table in front are City staff members who are here to advise the Commission during the meeting.
They are:
DAVID LEPO, Planning Director GINGER VARIN, Planning Commission Secretary
AARON C. HARP, Assistant City Attorney
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
Regular meetings of the Planning Commission are held on the Thursdays preceding second and fourth
Tuesdays of each month at 6:30 p.m. Staff reports or other written documentation have been prepared
for each item of business listed on the agenda. If you have any questions or require copies of any of the
staff reports or other documentation, please contact the Planning Department staff at (949) 644 -3200.
The agendas, minutes and staff reports are also available on the City's web site. The address is:
hftp://Www.city.newport-beach.ca.us/.
It is the intention of the City of Newport Beach to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance
beyond what is normally provided, the City of Newport Beach will attempt to accommodate you in every
reasonable manner. Please contact Ginger Vann, Planning Commission Secretary at (949) 644 -3232,
at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if
accommodation is feasible.
APPEAL PERIOD: Use Permit, Variance, Site Plan Review, Resubdivision, and Modification
applications do not become effective until 14 days after the date of approval, during which time an
appeal may be filed with the City Council. General Plan and Zoning Amendments are automatically
forwarded to the City Council for final action.
If in the future, you wish to challenge in court any of the matters on this agenda for which a public
hearing is to be conducted, you may be limited to raising only those issues, which you (or someone else)
raised orally at the public hearing or in written correspondence received by the City at or before the
hearing.
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
Council Chambers - 3300 Newport Boulevard
February 8, 2007
Workshop — 4:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
CURRENT BUSINESS
Ethics Training - AB 1234
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL:
REGULAR MEETING
6:30 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS:
6:30 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: Public comments are invited on non - agenda items generally considered to
be within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Planning Commission —
Speakers must limit comments to 3- minutes. Before speaking, please state
your name for the record.
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCES:
ITEM NO. 1 Approval of minutes
ACTION: Approve as written and order filed.
ITEM NO. 2. Santa Ana River Vision Plan — Advisory Committee Formation
SUMMARY: The Planning Commission is to appoint a member to serve on the City's Santa Ana
River Trails Advisory Committee.
ACTION: By minute order of the Chairman, appoint one Planning Commission member to the
City's Santa Ana River Trails Advisory Committee.
CEQA
COMPLIANCE: Not defined as a project and, therefore, not subject to the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
ALL TESTIMONY GIVEN BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS RECORDED. SPEAKERS
MUST LIMIT REMARKS TO THREE MINUTES ON ALL ITEMS. (Red light signifies when three
minutes are up; yellow light signifies that the speaker has one minute left for summation.)
ITEM NO. 3. Planning Commission Email Policy
SUMMARY: Establish a policy for a -mails relating to Planning Commission Agenda items.
ACTION: After discussion and comment, adopt Policy by minute order.
CEQA
COMPLIANCE: Not defined as a project and, therefore, not subject to the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
ITEM NO. 4. Planning Department Web Site
SUMMARY: Receive oral report from staff.
CEQA
COMPLIANCE: Not defined as a project and, therefore, not subject to the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
ITEM NO. 5. Standard project conditions of approval.
ACTION: Comment, then receive and file "Conditions of Approval"
CEQA
COMPLIANCE: Not defined as a project and, therefore, not subject to the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
ITEM NO. 6. Update on Planning Department Organization
SUMMARY: Receive oral report from staff.
CEQA
COMPLIANCE: Not defined as a project and, therefore, not subject to the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
ITEM NO. 7. Isla Vista Homes (PA2004 -123)
1499 and 1515 Monrovia Avenue
SUMMARY: Continued from Planning Commission Agenda of January 4, 2007. General Plan
Amendment, Zone Code Amendment, Tract Map and Modification Permit to develop
44 detached residential condominium units on a 3.25 acre site. The general plan
designation would be changed from General Industry to Multi - Family Residential and
the zoning district would be changed from M -1 -A (Controlled Manufacturing) to MFR
(Multi - Family Residential). The applicant has requested that this item be removed
from the agenda.
ACTION: Receive and file.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
a) City Council Follow -up -
b) Report from Planning Commission's representative to the Economic Development Committee -
c) Report from the Planning Commission's representative to the General Plan /Local Coastal
Implementation Committee -
d) Matters which a Planning Commissioner would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting -
e) Matters which a Planning Commissioner may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff
report -
f) Project status —
g) Requests for excused absences -
ADJOURNMENT:
Ethics and Public Service
Laws and Principles
Session Objectives
1. To alert you to the wide range of laws that
govern your service and when to ask
questions
2. To encourage you to think beyond legal
restrictions and provide tools for doing so
3. Help you comply with AB 1234 requirements
COURSE SUFFICIENCY
Conflict of Interest. Perquisites of Office. Government Transparency
The training regarding conflicts of interest, perquisites of office and governmental transparency should
include the following:
(1) Laws relating to personal financial gain by public servants, including, but not limited to:
a) Laws prohibiting bribery (Pen. Code Sections 68 & 70).
b) Conflicts of interest under the Political Reform Act (Gov. Code Sections 87100, 87103).
c) Contractual Conflicts of Interest (Gov. Code Section 1090 et seq., Charter Sec. 608).
d) Conflicts of Interest and Campaign Contributions (Gov. Code Section 84308).
e) Conflicts of Interest When Leaving Office (Gov. Code Sections 87406, 87407).
(2) Laws relating to claiming perquisites of office, including, but not limited to:
a) Limitations on the Receipt of Gifts (Gov. Code Sections 86203, 89503, 89506).
b) Honoraria Ban (Gov. Code Section 89502).
c) Misuse of Public Funds (Pen. Code Section 424, Gov. Code Section 8314.
d) Prohibitions against gifts of public funds (Cal. Const. art. XVI, Section 6).
e) Mass mailing restrictions (Gov. Code Section 89001).
f) Prohibitions against acceptance of free or discounted transportation by transportation
companies (Cal. Const. art XII Section 7).
(3) Government transparency laws, including, but not limited to:
a) Economic interest disclosure under the Political Reform Act (Gov. Code Section 87200,
et. sq.).
b) Brown Act (Gov. Code Section 54950 et. seq.) (Charter Sec. 411)
c) Public Records Act (Gov. Code Section 6250 et. seq.).
d) Charitable Fundraising (Gov. Code Section 82015(b)(2)(b)(iii)
(4) Laws relating to fair processes, including, but not limited to:
a) Common law bias prohibitions.
b) Due process requirements.
c) Doctrine of Incompatible Offices (Gov. Code Section 1099).
d) Competitive bidding requirements for public contracts (Charter Sec. 1110)
e) Disqualification from participating in decisions affecting family members (anti - nepotism
laws). (Charter Sec. 610)
AB 1234
• AB 1234 requires officials who receive
compensation or are reimbursed for expenses to
take 2 hours of training in ethics principles and
laws
Course adequacy and sufficiency has been
established through consultation with the FPPC
(Fair Political Practices Commission) and the
Attorney General
• Financial Gain, Perks & governmental
transparency
Public Service Ethics is Different
• Laws play a bigger role
• Perception as important as reality
Gut is not a reliable guide
Ethics versus
Ethics Laws
Ethics Laws
Law = Minimum standards
What we must do
• Ethics is what we ought to do
— Above and beyond law's minimum
requirements
Thinking Beyond Ethics Laws
• Law tends to be starting point for most
ethical analyses in public service
• Floor for ethical conduct—not the ceiling
— Where do you want to set your sights as a
public servant?
• Just because it's legal, doesn't mean it is
ethical (or public will perceive it to be so)
Understanding Ethics Laws
• What They Cover
• When You Need to Ask
Questions
• Resources for Further Reference
Four Groups of Ethics Laws
In the binder
1. Personal financial gain
2. Personal advantages and
perks
3. Governmental
transparency & secrecy
4. Fair processes
Group 1:
, z
Personal Financial Gain Issues
• Public Policy Principle: Public
servants should not benefit
financially from their positions
PERSONAL FINANCIAL GAIN
Public officials:
• Must disqualify themselves from participating in decisions
that may affect (positively or negatively) their financial
interests (see reverse for list of types of financial interests).
• Cannot have an interest in a contract made by their agency.
• Cannot request, receive or agree to receive anything of
value or other advantages in exchange for a decision.
• Cannot influence agency decisions relating to potential
prospective employers.
• May not acquire interests in property within
redevelopment areas over which they have decision -
making influence.
PERSONAL ADVANTAGES Ec PERKS
Public officials:
• Must disclose all gifts received of $50 or more and may not
receive gifts aggregating to over $360 (2006) from a single
source in a given year.
• Cannot receive compensation from third parties for
speaking, writing an article or attending a conference.
• Cannot use public agency resources (money, travel
expenses, staff time and agency equipment) for personal or
political purposes.
• May only be reimbursed for actual and necessary expenses
consistent with their agency's reimbursement policy.
• Cannot participate in decisions that may affect (positively
or negatively) their personal interests.
• Cannot accept free transportation from transportation
companies.
• Cannot send mass mailings at public expense.
• Cannot make gifts of public resources or funds.
♦ Cannot receive loans over $250 from those within the
agency or those who do business with the agency.
GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY
Public officials:
® Must disclose their financial interests.
• Must conduct the public's business in open and publicized
meetings, except for the limited circumstances when the
law allows closed sessions.
• .Must allow public inspection of documents and records
generated by public agencies, except when non - disclosure
is specifically authorized by law.
• Must disclose information about significant ($5000 or
more) fundraising activities for legislative, governmental or
charitable purposes.
FAIR PROCESSES
Public officials:
• Have a responsibility to assure fair and competitive agency
contracting processes.
• Cannot participate in decisions that will benefit their
immediate family (spouse /domestic partner or dependent
children). .
• Cannot participate in. quasi - judicial proceedings in which
they have a strong bias with respect to the parties or facts. ..
• Cannot simultaneously bold certain public offices or
engage in other outside activities that would subject them
to conflicting loyalties.
• Cannot participate in entitlement proceedings — such as
land use permits — involving campaign contributors (does
not apply to elected bodies).
• Cannot solicit campaign contributions of more than $250
from permit applicants while application is pending and
for three months after a decision (does not apply to elected
bodies).
• Cannot represent individuals before their agency, for one
year after leaving agency service.
• Must conduct public hearings in accordance with due
process principles.
I® INSTITUTE FOR
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
KEY CONCEPTS
✓ A public agency's decision should be based solely on
what best serves the public's interests.
✓ The law is aimed at the perception, as well as the reality,
that a public official's personal interests may influence a
decision. Even the temptation to'act in one's own interest
could lead to disqualification, or worse.
✓ Having a conflict of interest does not imply that you
have done anything wrong; it just means you have
financial or other disqualifying interests.
✓ Violating the conflict of interest laws could lead to
monetary fines and criminal penalties for public
officials. Don't take that risk.
BASIC RULE
A public official may not participate in a decision - including
trying to influence a decision - if the official has financial or,
in some cases, other strong personal interests in that decision.
When an official has an interest in a contract, the official's
agency may be prevented from even making the contract
WHEN TO SEEK ADVICE FROM
AGENCY COUNSEL
The rules are very complex. Talk with your agency counsel 1)
early and often 2) when an action by your public agency 3)
may affect (positively or negatively) 4) any of the following:
✓ Income. Any source of income of $500 or more
(including promised income) during the prior 12
months for you or your spouse/domestic partner.
✓ Business Management or Employment. An entity for
which you serve as a director, officer, partner, trustee,
employee, or manager.
✓ Real Property. A direct or indirect interest in real
property of $2000 or more that you or your immediate
Family {spouse /domestic partner and dependent
children) have, including such interests as ownership,
leaseholds (but not month -to -month tenancies), and
options to purchase. Be especially alert when any of
these are located within 500 feet of the subject of your
decision.
✓ Personal Finances. Your or your immediate family's
(spouse /domestic partner and dependent children)
personal expenses, income, assets, or liabilities.
✓ Gift Giver. A giver of a gift of $360 or more to you in the
prior 12 months to you, including promised gifts.
✓ Lender /Guarantor. A source of a loan (including a loan
guarantor) to you.
✓ Contract. You or a member of your family would have
an interest (direct or indirect) in a contract with the
agency. .
✓ Business investment An interest in a business that you
or your immediate family (spouse /domestic partner and
dependent children) have a direct or indirect investment
worth $2000 or more.
✓ Related Business Entity. An interest in a- business that
is the parent, subsidiary or is otherwise related to a
business where you:
• Have a direct or indirect investment worth $2000
or more; or
• Are a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee,
or manager.
• Business Entity Owning Property. A direct or indirect
ownership interest in a business entity or trust of yours
that owns real property.
• Campaign Contributor. A campaign contributor of
yours (applies to appointed decision- matldng bodies
only).
✓ other Personal Interests and Biases. You have
important, but non - financial, personal interests or biases
(positive or negative) about the facts or the parties that
could cast doubt on your.ability to make a fair decision.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXT?
Agency counsel will advise you whether 1) you can
participate in the decision and, 2) if a contract is involved,;
whether the agency can enter into the contract at all.
Counsel may suggest asking either the Fair Political Practices
Commission or the State Attorney General to weigh in.
EVEN IF IT'S LEGAL, IS IT ETHICAL?
The law sets only minimum Standards. Ask yourself whether
members of the public whose opinion you value will
question whether you can act solely in the public's interest. If
they might, consider excusing yourself voluntarily from that
particular decision-making process.
Generous support for this publication provided by
10,401 RICHARDS I WATSON I GERSHON
NIM ATTORNEYS ATLAW -A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
WS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY SAN FRANCISCO
W Wwiwgiaw.cam
For additional copies of this checklist, visitwww.ca- ilg/ilgpubs Copyright (1) 2006 by the Institute for Local Government
SKIJ: 1504 Price: $5 (for set of five)
Examples of Laws
• Bribery and related crimes
• Financial interest disqualification
requirements
• Revolving door restrictions
"See course list
Bribery
• Rule: Public officials may not solicit,
receive or agree to receive a benefit in
exchange for their official actions
• Penalties: Loss of office, forever
disqualified from holding office, prison
time, fines, restitution, attorneys fees and
headlines
Case Study: Strippergate
• Council members charged under federal law
with tying campaign contributions to their
actions to help repeal the city's "no touch"
rule adopted for adult businesses
• Strip club owners were cooperating/wearing
wires during conversations
Strippergate, continued
• Jury convicted; council members resigned
• Judge ultimately threw out most charges for
one official, one sentenced to serve 21 months
in Federal prison
• Even so, official was financially ruined and
emotionally devastated
Similar Crimes
• Receiving rewards for doing an
official act — e.g. appointing
someone to public office
• Embezzlement -- converting
public funds or property to your
own
Disqualification Based on
Financial Interests
• Rule: You may not make, or participate in
making or in any attempt to use your position
to influence a decision if your financial
interests are affected by the decision
• Effect can be positive or negative
Disqualification versus
Abstention
• Abstention => voluntary
• Disqualification => Legally required
— Does not imply wrongdoing
What
Kinds of
Interests?
See reverse of
Handout
in binder
.4ANMt :.pt[MµY3 a �tgKf
:.w+w
MmY:tliR
hti'am
wwYS.r�w °anavw.smw
13 N T -MMENS
KEY CONCEPTS
✓ Gift Giver. A giver of a gift of $360 or more to you in the
✓ A public agency's decision should be based solely on
I prior 12 months to you, including promised gifts.
what best serves the public's interests.
✓ Lender /Guarantor. A.source of a loan (including a loan
✓ The law is aimed at the perception, as well as the reality,
guarantor) to you.
that a public official's personal interests may influence a
✓ Contract. You or a member of your family would have
decision. Even the temptation to act in one's own interest
an interest (direct or indirect) in a contract with the
could lead to disqualification, or worse.
• Having a conflict of interest does not imply that you
agency. .:
have done anything wrong; it just means you have
✓ Business Investment An interest in a business that you
financial or other disqualifying interests.
or your immediate family (spouse /domestic partner and
• Violating the conflict of interest laws could lead to
dependent children) have a direct or indirect investment
monetary fines and criminal penalties for public
worth $2000 or more.
officials. Don't take. that risk.
✓ Related Business Entity. An interest in a business that .
is the parent, subsidiary or is otherwise related to a
BASIC BOLE
business where you:
A public official may not participate in a decision — including
- Have a direct or indirect investment worth $2000
trying to influence a decision — if the official has financial or,
or more; or
in some cases, other strong personal interests in that decision.
• Are a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee,
When an official has an interest in a contract, the official's
or manager.
agency may be prevented from even making the contract
,/ Business Entity Owning Property. A direct or indirect
ownership interest in a business entity or trust of yours . .
WHEN TO SEEK ADVICE FROM
that owns real property.
AGENCY COUNSEL
✓ Campaign Contributor. A campaign contributor of
The rules are very complex. Talk with your agency counsel 1)
yours (applies to appointed decision - making bodies
early and often 2) when an action by your public agency 3)
only).
may affect (positively or negatively) 4) any of the following:
of Other Personal Interests and Biases. You have
✓ Income. Any source of income. of $500 or more
important, but non - financial, personal interests or. biases
(including promised income) during the prior 12
(positive or negative) about the facts or the parties that
months for you or your spouse /domestic partner.
could cast doubt on your ability to make a fair decision..
✓ Business Management or Employment., An entity for
which you serve as a director, officer, partner, trustee,
WHAT WILL HAPPEN NEXTd
employee, or manager.
Agency counsel will advise you whether l) you can
✓ Real Property. A direct or indirect interest in real
participate in the decision and, 2) if a contract is involved,.
property of $2000 or more that you or your immediate
whether the agency can enter into the contract at all.
family (spouse /domestic partner mid dependent
Counsel may suggest asking either the Fair Political Practices
children) have, including such interests as ownership,
Commission or the State Attorney General to weigh in.
leaseholds (but not month -to -month tenancies), and
options to purchase. Be especially alert when any of
EVEN IF IT'S LEGAL, IS IT ETHICAL? .
these are located within 500 feet of the subject of your
The law sets only, minimum standards. Ask yourself whether
decision.
members of the public whose opinion you value will
✓ Personal Finances. Your or your immediate family's
question whether you can act solely in the public's interest. If
(spouse /domestic partner and dependent children)
they might, consider excusing ,yourself voluntarily from that
personal expenses, income, assets, or liabilities.
particular decision - making process.
Generous support for this publication provided by:
1104V RICHARDS I WATSON j GERSHON
VIA, ATTORNEYSATL9W- APROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
LOS ANGELES ORANGE COUNTY SAN FRANCISCO
www.rwglawxom
For additional copies of this checklist, visit w vca- ilglilgpubs Copyright 0 2006 by the Snstitute for Local Government .
SKU: 1604 Price: $5 (for set of five)
8 STEP ANALYSIS
1. Is he /she a public official
2. Making or participating or in position to influence
decision
3. Financial interest
4. Directly or indirectly involved
5. What is the materiality standard for the interest
6. Is it reasonably foreseeable the decision will have a
material financial effect
7. The effect distinguishable from effect on public generally
8. If disqualified — is participation legally required
If You Are Disqualified
• Don't discuss or influence (staff or
colleagues)
• Identify nature of conflict at meeting
• Leave room (unless matter on
consent)
• Limited exceptions
— Owned property
— Owned/controlled business
Penalties
• Invalidate decision
• Misdemeanor (could result in loss of office)
• Fines ($5,000 to $10,000 per violation)
• Attorneys fees (yours and others)
• Embarrassment (personal/political)
Warning!
Special Rules for Contracts
• Disqualification may not be enough
— Direct or indirect interest
— Limited exceptions
• May have to refund money paid
Felony: $1,000 fine, imprisonment,
and loss of office
• Gov. Code § 1090 & Charter § 608
Case Study: The Travel Store
• Elected official in travel business
— Twice failed to disclose on SEI
• Voted on consent calendar
• Included approval of payments to her travel
agency ($28,481 total)
• Possible fine under PRA: $76,000 (ultimate fine:
$29,000)
Future Employment Issues
• New revolving door prohibition
— Electeds and top managers
— Cannot represent people for pay for a year after
leaving their agency
— Effective July 1, 2006
• No participation in decisions involving
future employers
EdBest Practices
• Avoid temptation to look at public service
as an opportunity for financial gain
• Look at every decision and ask yourself
whether it involves some kind of financial
interest for you
Group 2: Perks
• Public Policy Principles:
— Democratic equality
— Public servants should not receive
special benefits by virtue of their
positions
Two Kinds of Perk Rules
1. Perks that others offer you
2. Perks that you give
yourself/use- of- public-
resources issues
Gifts Don't Always Have Bows
• Meals, food and drink (including
receptions)
• Entertainment (concerts & sporting events)
• Certain kinds of travel and lodging
Perks Others Offer
• Report $50 and up (over a year)
• Limit $360 per year
• Exceptions for some kinds of
travel, informational materials
• May also be a disqualifying
interest (over $360 in prior 12
months)
Penalties
• Up to $5,000 per violation
• Own attorneys fees ($3,000 - $30,000)
• Others' attorneys fees (for private actions to
enforce law)
Other Perks Others Offer
• No free transportation from transportation
carriers
• No honoraria (fees) for speaking or writing
Use of Public Resources Issues
• Personal use of public resources
(including staff time and agency
equipment) prohibited
• Political use of public resources
also prohibited
Example:
Expense Reimbursement
• Familiarize yourself with your agency's
policies/limits
— What kinds of expenses
— What rates for food, lodging and transportation
— The importance of documentation
• Note: Spouse /partner expenses not reimbursable
Consequences of Violations
• Civil penalties: $1,000 /day fine + 3X
value of resource used
• Criminal penalties: 2 -4 year prison
term + disqualification from office
• Can also have income tax implications
Case Study: Sacramento
Suburban Water District
• Staff and directors misusing public resources
• Investigative report by Sacramento Bee
— Use of agency credit card for personal purposes
— Misreporting of income
— Double - dipping on expense reimbursements
• Legislative response: AB 1234
Political Use of Public Resources
• By individuals or agency itself (support
of ballot measures)
• Mass mailing restrictions
— Goal: restrict incumbents' advantages
• Gifts of public funds
Example: First Five Commission
• Agency resources used to produce pro -
preschool ads
• Legal? Maybe
• Ethical? Director resigned
OdBest Practice
• Avoid perks and the temptation to
rationalize about them
— Legally risky
— Public relations headache
Group 3:
Transparency Laws -
Public Policy Principles:
It's the public's business
• Public trusts a process it can see
Brown Act's Declaration of Intent
In enacting this chapter, the Legislature finds and declares that the
public commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies
in this State exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business. It is the
intent of the law that their actions be taken openly and that their
deliberations be conducted openly.
The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies
which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give
their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to
know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on
remaining informed so that they may retain control over the
instruments they have created.
Transparency Rules
• Conduct business in open
and publicized meetings
• Allow public to participate
in meetings
• Allow public inspection of
records
Conducting Business
at Open Meetings
• A majority may not consult outside an
agency - convened meeting
• Key concept: what constitutes a meeting
— Example: Serial communications
• Exceptions for certain kinds of events
— As long as a majority does not consult among
themselves
o z s
Him �s �g a
Ng 3�g�� s`s a a� a 19
• °` ��$m gel <� y �����s�ge- x °.� T'- ��..gbSY9� 6e
5 ° lit
vs 24
�§o yy�ea fy: Yg =`Fa- 'etas
n
9A �
i a- °d6.8L
a.8
'E
ygg k ° a
0 !fail
e s
�a ud= 5 ; I � ; d ill! a <
Z aE.3 <.$�.xs ygg.gGGg
3t OZ ituas
Consequences of Violations
• Nullification of decision
• Criminal sanctions for intentional violations
(up to 6 months in jail /$1000 fine)
• Intense adverse media attention
Public Records
• Agendas and meeting materials
• Other writings prepared, owned, used or
retained by agency (including electronic)
• Penalties: Adverse media attention +costs
and fees if litigated
Financial Interest Disclosure
• Transparency includes obligation for high
level public servants to disclose financial
interests
— Assuming office
— Annually while in office
— Upon leaving office
Charitable Fundraising
• Rule applies to elected officials
• Disclose $5,000 or more from single source
• Charitable, legislative or governmental
purpose
MA Best Practices
• Assume all information is public or will
become public
• Don't discuss agency business with
fellow decision - makers outside
meetings
Group 4: Fair Process Laws
• Public Policy Principle: As a
decision - maker, the public expects you
to be impartial and avoid favoritism
Fair Process Laws
• Due process requirements and rules against
bias
Nasha
— Clark v. Hermosa Beach
• Incompatible office prohibitions
Fair Process Laws, continued
• Competitive bidding requirements
— State law requirements
— Charter requirements
— Principles:
• Everyone has a right to compete for agency's business
• That competition produces the best price for taxpayers
• Example:
— Council member steered contracts to sister's firm and
apparently received kickbacks
Fair Process Laws, continued
• Disqualification requirements if
decision involves family members
• Campaign contribution restrictions
(appointed bodies)
• Soliciting campaign contributions
from employees
• Charter requirements
91 Best Practices
• Think fairness and merit -based
decision - making in your decisions
• Keep politics separate from
relationships with City staff
Resource for Further Reading
Beyond the Law:
Public Service Ethics
Principles
Ethics = Values
• Six universal ethical values:
— Trustworthiness
— Loyalty
— Responsibility
• Community interest
— Respect
— Fairness
— Compassion
Source: Institute for Global Ethics
Applying Values to
Public Service
Trustworthiness:
• I am truthful with
my fellow
officials, the public
and others.
Ev
When we talk about the values that ought to guide one's public service, what kinds of values do we mean? The following provides
some ideas on values that can inform one's public service and suggests examples of what those values mean in practice.
Trustworthiness
I remember that my role is first and foremost
to serve the community.
I am truthful with my fellow elected officials,
the public and others.
I avoid an actions that would cause the
public to question whether my decisions are
based on personal interests instead of the
publics interests.
I do not accept gifts or other special
considerations because of my public position.
I do not knowingly use false or inaccurate
information to .support my position.
I do not use my public position for
personal gain.
I carefully consider any promises f make
(including campaign promises), and then
keep them.
Fairness
• I make decisions based on the merits of the
issues.
• I honor the law's and the public's expectation
that agency policies will be applied
consistently.
• I support the public's right to know and
promote meaningful public involvement.
• I support merit -based processes for the award
of public employment and public contracts...
• I am impartial and do not favor those
who either have helped me or are in a .
position to do so.
• I promote equality and treat all people
equitably.
• I excuse myself from decisions when my or
my family's financial interests may be affected
by my agency's actions.
• I credit others' contributions in moving our
community's interests forward.
• i maintain consistent standards, but am
sensitive to the need for compromise,
"flunking outside the box," and improving
existing paradigms.
Responsibility
• I work to improve the quality of life in the
contmunW.' and promote the best interests of
the public.
• I promote cite efficient use of agency resources.
• I do not use agency resources for personal ar
political benefit
• f represent the official positions of the agency
to the best of my ability when authorized to
do so.
• i MACitly state that my personal opinions do
not represent the agency's position and do not
;dlow the inference that they tin.
I mike responsafdity for nay own actions, event
when it is uncomfortiible to do so.
• I do not use information that I acquire in my
public capacity for personal advantage.
• I do not promise that which I have reason to
believe is unrealistic.
• I disclose suspected instances of impropriety
to the appropriate authorities, but I never
make false charges or charges for political
advantage.
• I do not disclose confidential information
without proper legal authorization.
• I am proactive and innovative when setting
goals and considering policies.
• I consider the broader regional and statewide
implications of the agency's decisions and
issues.
• I promote intelligent innovation to move
forward the agency's policies and services.
Respect
• I treat fellow officials, staff and. the public
with courtesy, even when we disagree.
• I focus on the merits in discussions, not
personality traits or other issues that might
distract me from focusing on what is best far
the community.
• I gain value from diverse opinions and build
consensus.
• 1 follow through on commitments, keep
others informed, and make timely responses.
• I am approachable and open- minded, and I
convey this to others.
• I listen carefully and ask questions that add .
value to discussions.
• I involve all appropriate stakeholders in
meetings affecting agency, decisions.
• I come to meetings and I come to them
prepared..
• I work to improve the quality of life in my
community.
Compassion _
• I realize that .some people are intimidated
by the public process and try w make their
interactions as stress -tree as possible.
• I convey the agency's care for and
commitment to its community members.
• I am attuned to; and care about, the needs
and concerns Iof the public, officials, and staff.
• 1 recognize my responsibility to society's less
fortunate.
• I consider appropriate exceptions to policies
when there are unintended consequences or
undue burdens.
Loyalty
• I safeguard confidential information.
• I avoid employment, contracts and other
financial, political and personal interests that
can conflict with my public duties.
• I prioritize competing issues based. on .
objective benefits and burdens to the public
interest, not to myself, my family, friends or .
business associates.
• l don't oppose final decisions once they have, .
been made by the decision makers, except
.: through internal lines of communication. -
I put loyalty to the public's interests above
personal and political loyalties.
The interesting - and somewhat unique
— aspect of public service ethics is that iti:
not excl usively an introspective process
A
public official can be absolutely confident
that he or she is able to put, personal
interests or relationships aside, but the
public may still question whether:indeed
that is so.
Public perception, therefore,, matters a
great deal in one's analysis of what the
"right thing to do'. is in public service.
This is because, as public servants, public
officials are stewards of the public's trust
in the public's governing institutions.
In short, public service ethics is not
only about doing the right thing; but
also about the public's confidence
that indeed the right thing has been
be negative can have Us own tialis
o
7o step; or at times tiptoe, along the
trail toward good govemrnent, here
is a simple (but not necessarily easy)
process:.
• First Step: Figure out what "the right
thing' to do is.
• Second Step:.Fgure out what the
public's perception of
"the right thing to do" would fie.
• Third step: when needed, balance
the 'first two steps and follow the
path which best supports public
service values.
Analyzing Ethical Dilemmas
Two kinds of dilemmas:
• Two competing "right values"
• Doing the right thing costs more than one
wants to pay
Example
• Campaign contributor wants you to do
something
You are not convinced it's in the best interests of the
community
• Right versus right dilemma (loyalty versus
responsibility)
Doing the right thing (acting on responsibility) then
becomes a personal cost dilemma
Questions to Ask
• What would make the public
feel best/inspire public
confidence?
• What would you want to read
about on the front page?
• How do you want to be
remembered?
Key Lessons
L6CAL OFFICIALS:,.
ETHICS.
.. CHECKLIST:���-
Questions to
Ask in Stickgv I
S!ituati
• The law sets minimum standards for ethical
behavior
— Violations of ethics laws carry stiff penalties
— When in doubt, ask and ask early
• It's your choice how high you want to set your
sights above the minimum requirements of the law
d Yp�j w
� o N
O O L d v
d '
O N
C
io
C
W
C
° M1.
N
+�
O
O
O
E v a
u
3 N o R
d Yp�j w
� o N
O O L d v
d '
G
C
W
C
° M1.
N
+�
O
O
O
E
Q
C^
N Y•
a
c
v
v L E
'�-
i
p r. �
LOCTa
G
LOV
� :E
03
j
'UYC
N
•
C
W
•�
61 C °
W
C
° M1.
N
+�
i
p r. �
•N � v
G
R
� :E
�
j
N
•
C
W
C C
C
«
L
� Y
�
� R
C�
�
v
O
�
,
Q
2■aƒ
�.
2A
/
�
,
.
2■aƒ
�.
R
7b4
S\ §)|=
AB 1234 Compliance
• Sign in
• Proof of participation certificate
• Provide to clerk as public record
• Consider going beyond the minimum in
terms of education
Questions?
0
AB 1234 INSTRUCTOR'S MANUAL
PROVIDER EVALUATION
[your identifying Your feedback is a vital part of our efforts in providing ethics education
information] and continuously improve our coursework. Please take a minute and let us
know what you think.
NAME: (optional)
OFFICE: City Attorney's Office (Helpful)
ORGANIZATION: City of Newport Beach (Optional)
PLEASE RATE: The quality of the program 5 4 3 2 0
The quality of the written materials 5 4 3 2 0
The session provided me with information I will use in
analyzing ethical and legal issues I confront as a public 5 4 3 2 1
official.
I have a clearer understanding of my general ethical
obligations as a public offwial as a result of attending this 5 4 3 2 1
session.
I have a clearer understanding ofpublic service ethics laws as
a result of attending this session. 5 4 3 2 1
Comments /Suggestions?
[insert date, time and location for your records[
www.ca- ilg.org
LINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AB 1234 NsTRucToEes MAmuAL
F,
L 1pisTrrum FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT www.ca-ilg.org
4
Participant Name:
Course Date & Time:
Location:
AB 1234 DFST UCToR°a MANUAL.
AB 1234 Ethics Education
Proof of Participation Certificate
Eligible Credit: 2 Hours (Requires Attendance for Entire Session)
This course is an overview course on all public service ethics issues necessary to satisfy the requirements
of Article 2.4 of Chapter 2 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, including the following:
Laws relating to personal financial gain by public servants, including, but not limited to, laws prohibiting
bribery and conflict -of- interest laws.
Laws relating to claiming perquisites ( "perks ") of office, including, but not limited to, gift and travel
restrictions, prohibitions against the use of public resources for personal or political purposes,
prohibitions against gifts of public funds, mass mailing restrictions, and prohibitions against acceptance
of free or discounted transportation by transportation companies.
Governmegt transparency laws, including, but not limited to, financial interest disclosure requirements
and open government laws.
. Laws relating to fair processes, including, but not limited to, common law bias prohibitions, due process
requirements, incompatible offices, competitive bidding requirements for public contracts, and
disqualification from participating in decisions affecting family members; and
General ethical principles relating to public service.
The !insert provider name! affirms that this course satisfies the guidelines issued by the Fair Political
Practices Commission and Attorney General for course sufficiency and accuracy.
To be completed by participant:
By signing below, 1 certify that 1 signed in at this session, participated in the activity described above and am
entitled to claim ethics education credit hour(s).
Participant Signature
NOTE TO PARTICIPANT: Please provide a copy of this proof of participation to the custodian for such
records at your agency. In addition, we recommend you make a copy of this proof of participation for your
own records to retain for at least five years. These certificates are only available at this program;
duplicates will not be issued.
www.ca - ilg.org L.' iNSTrruTE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT