HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutesPlanning Commission Minutes 04/05/2007
J
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Planning Commission Minutes
April 5, 2007
Regular Meeting - 6:30 p.m.
file: / /F: \Users\PLN \Shared \Gvarin\PC min etal \2007 \04052007.htm
Page I of 5
I
04/20/2007
INDEX
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Eaton, Peotter, Hawkins, Cole, McDaniel, Toerge and
Hillgren:
Commissioner Peotter was excused, all others were present.
STAFF PRESENT:
David Lepo, Planning Director
Aaron Harp, Assistant City Attorney
ony Brine, Principal Civil Engineer
James Campbell, Senior Planner
Patrick Alford, Senior Planner
Ginger Varin, Planning Commission Secretary
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
None
I TING OF THE AGENDA:
POSTING OF
THE AGENDA
The Planning Commission Agenda was posted on March 30, 2007.
HEARING ITEMS
ITEM NO. 1
SUBJECT: MINUTES of the regular meeting of March 22, 2007.
Approved
Motion was made by Commissioner Hawkins and seconded by
Commissioner McDaniel to approve the minutes as corrected.
Ayes:
Hawkins, Cole, McDaniel, Toerge and Hillgren
Noes:
None
Excused:
Peotter
Abstain:
Eaton
ITEM NO.2
SUBJECT: Balboa Inn LLC (PA2006 -270)
PA2006 -270
Sienna Restaurant
105 Main Street
Continued to
April 19, 2007
est to amend Use Permit No. 3158 to allow live entertainment and
cing in association with the existing restaurant use. Additionally, a
aiver of the parking requirements related to the introduction of live
ntertainment is also requested. The property is located at 105 Main Street
file: / /F: \Users\PLN \Shared \Gvarin\PC min etal \2007 \04052007.htm
Page I of 5
I
04/20/2007
Planning Commission Minutes 04/05/2007
is within the Retail and Service Commercial designation of the
oa Specific Plan (SP -8) District.
Lepo stated that staff requests this item be continued to April 19,
allow additional time to analyze and review the project.
otion was made by Commissioner Hawkins and seconded
:)mmissioner McDaniel to continue this item to April 19, 2007.
Ayes: Eaton, Hawkins, Cole, McDaniel, Toerge and Hillgren
Noes: None
Excused: Peotter
dvanced Real Estate Services (PA2005 -196)
201 & 207 Carnation Avenue and 101 Bayside Place
application would allow the demolition of an existing 14 -unit apartme
ding and a single - family home and the construction of a 7- level, 9 -ui
Itiple- family residential condominium complex with subterranean parkh
a 1.4 acre site located bayward of the intersection of Ocean Bouleva
I Carnation Avenue. The existing General Plan, Coastal Land Use Ph
I Zoning Designations of a small portion of the site (584 square fee
.ild be changed to be consistent with the larger portion of the site (fro
- family residential to multi - family residential). The application includes
tative tract map for the creation of 9 "airspace" condominium units f
ividual sale and. The Modification Permit application requests 0
:roachment of subterranean portions of the building within the front ai
s yard setbacks. Lastly, the Coastal Residential Development Pern
Ilication relates to replacing lost units occupied by low or moderat
)me households. No units meeting this criteria are known to exist an
refore, no replacement of affordable housing is required.
Lepo noted that the applicant and the City are in agreement that thi:
should be continued to May 17, 2007 to allow re- circulation the revise(
lated Negative Declaration with the mandatory 30 -day commen
)d. Additionally, there are discussions related to the application of th(
and General Plan policies. He then suggested that the Chair oper
is Comment then close the hearing and continue this item to May 17th.
Commission inquiry, Mr. Lepo added that a comment had been receive
it there was a new potential view impact, and staff wants to address this.
,hairperson Cole asked if there will be a revised staff report. He wa,
nswered yes, and it would depend on discussions with the applicant.
owever, discussion of the current staff report, unless there is specific
irection or information, need not be considered.
commissioner Eaton asked if the re- circulated Mitigated NE
Declaration would also include resolving issues such as Mitigation Mi
V -2 being missing, and the difference between consistency with the
nd the MND. Will they be incorporated before it is re- circulated?
Lepo answered that the other changes will be incorporated to make
tight as possible. Again, relative to the recommendation and extent
ITEM NO. 3
PA2005 -196
Continued to
May 17, 2007
Page 2 of 5
i+
n
U
•
•
file: / /F: \Users \PLN \Shared \Gvaiin\PC min etal \2007 \04052007.htm 04/20/2007
Commission Minutes 04/05/2007
lurbance of the bluff face and the project that is the MND. The MND will
the project last seen by the Planning Commission. That is the projec
if we get different direction. In the event the MND is re- circulated anc
nes back for Planning Commission review and you determine additiona
�ges, then that would require a further revision to the project that k
ribed and the potential impacts as described in -the MND; the MNE
uld again have to be revised and re- circulated if changes are required tc
project that minimize impacts. The staff report presumed revisior
acted by the Planning Commission consistent with recommendations, bu
it that direction is given, the MND will still evaluate the project a:
continued on issue of consistency, re- circulation premise, etc.
missioner McDaniel noted his concern that members of the audie
wish to speak, can as well as have the ability to speak at the r
ing. There are going to be changes to issues and you can spe
giver, you may wish to wait until the next meeting when the changes
been made.
Harp noted that this item is going to be continued and the
ative Declaration is being re- circulated. You are welcomed to
evening; however, you may want to wait to see what those
so that comments can be more focused.
mmissioner Toerge asked if the consultant who helped with the MND
at the hearing? He was answered yes. He agrees that a project of
re is very complex and encouraged members of the audience to sp
v wish.
w vote was taken on this item being continued. All ayes,
lic comment was opened.
Beck asked if the property will be re- posted? Staff answered yes.
lic comment was closed.
was made by Commissioner Toerge and seconded
toner McDaniel to continue this item to May 17, 2007.
yes: Eaton, Hawkins, Cole, McDaniel, Toerge and Hillgren
Noes: JNone
Excused: Peotter
DITIONAL BUSINESS:
City Council Follow
Mr. Lepo noted that at the last meeting, the City Council heard t
appeal of the Planning Commission's determination relative to t
•
Use Permit for the Newport Beach Brewing Company and decided
take different action and amended conditions of the Use Pem
specifically to halt the sale of liquor, distilled spirits, after 11 :00 p.
ADDITIONAL
BUSINESS
Page 3 of 5
f'ite: /M: \tlsers\PLN \Shared \Gvarin \PC min etal \2007\040520071'an 04/2012007
Planning Commission Minutes 04/05/2007
Page 4 of�5
but allow the continued sale of beer and wine. Discussion continued on the
history of the allowance of the sale of liquor. Additionally,
consideration of the In -lieu Park Fee was continued again to the next
meeting.
b. Report from Planning Commission's representative to. the Economi
•
Development Committee
Commissioner Hawkins noted the Committee considered a motion i
connection with the parking consultant; and will address market
based parking.
C. Report from the Planning Commission's. representative_ to the
lProgram Implementation Committee
General Plan/Loca! Coasta._
Commissioner Eaton noted the Committee decided to appoin
representative members of the architectural and development
communities in Newport Beach to a sub - committee. They als
approved having the first public outreach meeting on May 16th in the
evening, location to be determined.
d. Report .from the Planning Commission's representative. to the
Intensive Residential Occupancy Committee
Commissioner Toerge noted the public testimony garnered at the
meeting was intense. Some of the issues were parking demands
disrespectful behavior towards the neighbors, off -site drug use
witnessed by neighbors, traffic, transport vans coming and going an
•
general noise. He noted there were complaints and un- substantiate
accusations of crimes associated with the occupants. There was
film crew there as well as quite a few attorneys purportedl
representing the Sober Living facility. He continued to discuss th
actions of the residents and how they handled themselves and gav
a brief history of the treatment of drug offenders and State an
Federal guidelines. The next meeting is April 12, 2007 an
representatives from the Alcoholic Drug Programs will be i
attendance.
e. Matters which a.Planni— Jnc_Commissioner would like Staff .to. reoort or
at subsequent meeting
None
f. Matters which a Planning_ Commissioner MM. wish to_place on .
future agenda for action and staff.report
Commissioner Eaton noted a packet of materials from the Plannin
Commissioner's Conference that he asked staff to distribute. H
also noted one of the sessions, without materials, dealt wit
lima nsionization ". Discussion continued.
•
Project status
Commissioner Hawkins asked about the status of the Orchid Plaz
file: //F: \Users \PLN \Shared \Gvarin\PC min etal \2007\04052007.htm
04/20/2007
Planning Commission Minutes 04/05/2007
Iprroject. Mr. Lepo noted he would get back to the Commission with
update.
Requests for excused absences
Chairman Cole noted that Commissioner Peotter has asked to
excused from the meeting of April 19, 2007.
ADJOURNMENT: 7:30 P.M.
ROBERT HAWKINS, SECRETARY
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION
•
E
Page 5 of 5
file: //F: \Users \PLN \Shared \Gvarin\PC min etal\2007\04052007.htm 04/20/2007