HomeMy WebLinkAboutCarty Residence (PA2004-079)CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. 3
June 17, 2004
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Gregg B. Ramirez, Associate Planner
(949) 644 -3219, aramirezCcDcity .newaort- beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: Appeal of Modification Permit No. 2004 -028
130611308 South Bay Front
(PA 2004 -079)
APPLICANT: Don Carty for Amy Jo Gottfurcht, Owner
BACKGROUND
On April 8, 2004, the applicant submitted a Modification Permit application requesting
approval of a Modification Permit to allow a carport parking space to encroach 4 feet
into the required 5 -foot alley setback in conjunction with the replacement of an existing
open staricase with an elevator. On May 5, 2004 the Modifcations Committee voted 3 -0
to deny the request (Exhibit No. 1). The required parking space depth is 18 feet plus 6
inches for the solid obstruction at the front. Due to the location of the existing stair and
proposed elevator, the depth remaining for the parking space is 14 feet 6 inches, which
equates to a 14 foot parking space per Code when the additional 6 inches for the
obstruction is accounted for. The property is located on Balboa Island within the R1.5
Zoning District which allows single family dwellings and duplexes.
The required 5 -foot alley setback is different than other setbacks given that the Code
requires it to be kept clear of all obstructions including planters, fences walls, other
accessory structures and required parking spaces. The purpose of this regulation is to
provide adequate room for backing out of garage /carport spaces and provide sufficient
area for vehicular maneuverability in the alley. This request, and all others for
encroachments into alleys, have been opposed by the Public Works Department and
Traffic Engineer.
The applicant disagreed with the Modifications Committee's action, on April 21, 2004,
the applicant filed the subject appeal.
1306/1308 South Bay Front
June 17, 2004
Page 3
DISCUSSION
The duplex provides two covered carport spaces (one for each unit). The space in
question is actually non - conforming because a staircase encroaches into the front 4
feet. The Code does allow a maximum 4 foot encroachment into the front of the parking
spaces however, the encroachment must maintain a minimum clearance of 4 feet to
allow vehicles to tuck under. Built-in cabinets are a typical example of this type of
encroachment. In this case, the stair provides the minimum 4 foot clearance for only
approximately two- thirds of the required width (8 feet 3 inches) of the parking space
therefore, the parking space is non - conforming.
The Modification's Committee denial was based on the fact that although the existing
carport space is non - conforming, it does afford some opportunity for lower /smaller
vehicles to tuck under a portion of the staircase and limit the amount vehicle overhang
into the alley setback. The addition of the solid elevator wall would limit the depth of the
parking space to 14 feet causing vehicle overhang into the setback and reduce the
effective maneuvering area within the alley. Based on a review of the plans, the
Modifications Committee also found that adequate space exists within the duplex to
accommodate the elevator. Finally, the Modifications Committee made the finding that
approval of this request could be precedent setting.
In addition to the Modification Committee's findings, staff would like to point out that the
location of the elevator door might hinder the use of the adjacent space. Should a
vehicle pull completely into the space it is likely that the elevator door would be
obstructed. This has the potential to cause the vehicle using that space to park behind
the elevator door which may result in, depending on the type of vehicle, both parked
vehicles encroaching into the 5 foot alley setback.
Finally, this particular alley is highly traveled due to its location off Marine Avenue and is
located at a "T" intersection with another alley which heightens the need for adequate
maneuvering area for vehicles.
Appeal
The applicant submitted an appeal letter rebutting the findings of the Modifications
Committee (Exhibit No. 2). In this letter they cite that the existing carport space is
already non - conforming, that vehicles parked in the 5 foot setback currently do not
impede vehicular maneuverability in the alley and the addition of the elevator will not
decrease the depth of the existing space. Additionally, the applicant cites that the
proposed location is the best design option since it provides convenient access to the
upstairs unit, will not reduce the square footage of either of the units and its location
outside the existing walls will limit engineering and construction costs.
1306/1308 South Bay Front
June 17, 2004
Page 4
Comments From the Public
As of the writing of this report, staff has received 19 letters in support of the modification
as requested. Of these, four (120 Onyx, 115 Marine, 1302 and 1316 South Bay Front)
are likely to routinely use the alley adjacent to the property. Although the others come
from Balboa Island residents and property owners, their properties are located more
than a block away and would likely use alternate routes to access their properties.
Environmental Review
The project qualifies for a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) exemption from the California
Environmental Quality Act which exempts the remodel and addition to the existing
single family residence from CEQA review.
Public Notice
Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to property owners within
300 feet of the property and posted at the site a minimum of 10 days in advance of this
hearing consistent with the Municipal Code. Additionally, the item appeared upon the
agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the city website.
CONCLUSION
Staff believes the open nature of the staircase provides an opportunity for a low or small
vehicle to tuck under a portion of the stair helping to limit the amount of overhang into
the alley setback. The replacement of the staircase with an elevator will permanently
eliminate any possibility of utilizing that space. Additionally, the location of the elevator
door facing the conforming carport space may result in both parked vehicles
encroaching into the 5 foot alley setback in order to provide a path of travel to the
elevator. Finally, granting this approval may set a precedent for approving
encroachments into required alley setbacks, which is not supported by the Public Works
Department and City Traffic Engineer especially in this case due to the location of the
subject property at the "T" intersection and it's proximity to Marine Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the decision of the Modifications
Committee and deny the encroachment of the carport parking space into the required 5
foot alley setback.
1306/1308 South Bay Front
June 17, 2004
Page 5
ALTERNATIVES:
The Planning Commission has the following additional options for the appeal:
1. Grant the appeal and approve Modification Permit No. 20044028 as requested by
the applicant.
2. Modify any aspect of the approved Modification Permit deemed necessary.
Prepared by:
Gregg B. Ramirez, Associate P nner
Exhibits:
Submitted by:
PA4xilA�t
Patricia L. Temple, Plai ning Director
1. Modification Permit Letter dated May 5, 2004
2. Appeal Application and Applicant Correspondence
3. Letters in Support of the Application
4. Project Plans
EXHIBIT NO. 1
Modification Permit Letter dated May 5, 2004
9
May 5, 2004
CITY OF NEWPORT
BEACH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663
(949) 6443200 FAX (949) 644 -3229
Don Carty
13563 E. Broadway
Whittier, CA 90601
Application No:
Applicant:
Address of
Property Involved:
Legal Description:
Request Denied
MODIFICATION PERMIT NO. MD2004 -028
(PA2004 -079)
Staff Person: Javier S. Garcia, 644 -3206
Appeal Period: 14 days after approval date
Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
(PA2004 -079)
Don Carty
1306 & 1308 South Bay Front
Lot 4, Block 1, Section 4, Balboa Island Tract
Request for the addition of an elevator that will access the second floor and will
reduce the depth of the existing carport parking space. The proposal includes a
request to allow the carport parking space to encroach 4 feet into the required 5-
foot rear yard setback at the alley.__
On May 5, 2004, the Modifications Committee unanimously voted (3 ayes and 0 noes) to
disapprove the subject application and made the following conditions and findings for
denial:
FINDINGS FOR DENIAL:
1. The Modifications Committee determined that in this case, the proposal would be
detrimental to persons, property and improvements in the neighborhood, and
that the applicant's request would not be consistent with the legislative intent of
Title 20 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
2. The approval of the proposed rear yard setback encroachment and substandard
parking space could set a precedent for the approval of other similar requests
which could be detrimental to the neighborhood.
3. There is no justification for allowing the proposed encroachment, since adequate
space exists within the buildable area of the site for the elevator.
I
May 5, 2004
Page 2
4. Structures on sites adjoining the subject property generally maintain the required
rear yard setback.
5. The proposed encroachment into the required 5 -foot rear yard setback at the
alley would negatively impact the ability of vehicles to maneuver within the
narrow alley and could adversely impact vehicular access to parking spaces
across the alley from the subject property.
6. The proposed encroachment would create a parking space of substandard depth
on a lot that provides only one parking space per dwelling unit where the Zoning
Code requires two per dwelling unit.
7. The applicant was unwilling to consider suggested alternative sites for the
elevator or to diligently pursue construction alternatives to maximize or maintain
the depth of the existing parking spaces.
The decision of the Committee may be appealed to the Planning Commission within 14
days of the date of the decision. Any appeal filed shall be accompanied by a filing fee of
915.00. Please contact the Planning Department for full particulars.
MODIFICATIONS COMMITTEE
By
Javi S. Ga ia, AICP, Senior Planner
Chairperson
JG:mem
c: Jacobson Family Properties, LP
1130 E. Missouri Avenue, Suite 400
Phoenix, AZ 85014
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Appeared in Opposition: None
Appeared in Support: None
FAUSERSIPLN\Shared\PA's1PAs - 20041PA2004- 0791MD2004 -028 deny.doc
1
EXHIBIT NO. 2
Appeal Application and Applicant Correspondence
f,
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Modification Application No. Rermit
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MAY 19 2004
PM
11121314116
Name of Appellant 552 -2229
or person filing: Amy Jo Gottfurcht Phone ( 31 0) 275 -5551
Address: 357 North Canon Drive, Beverly Hills CA 90210
Date of Planning Director's decision: May 5 2004
Regarding application of: Don Cart
(Description of application filed with Staff) Pl as see attar•hPd
Reasons for Appeal: Please see attached
for
Appellant requests that the meeting date be set for Thursday,
June 17, 2004.
Date l�
PLANNING DEPT. ASSISTANT or STAFF
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Appeal filed and Administrative Fee received:
20
Hearing Date. An appeal shall be scheduled for a hearing before the Planning Commission within thirty (30)
days of the filing of the appeal unless both applicant and appellant or reviewing body consent to a later date
(NBMC Sec. 20.95.050)
cc: Appellant
Planning (Furnish one set of mailing labels for mailing)
File
APPEALS: Municipal Code Sec. 20.95.0408
Appeal Fee: $714.00 pursuant to Resolution No. 98 -52 adopted on 7 -27 -98
(Deposit funds with Cashier in Account #2700 -5000)
F:1Users\PLN\Shared\Forms 20MOld Formsl1forms\Staffappeal.doc
May 18, 2004
Modification Permit No. MD 2004 -028
(PA2004 -079)
Page 1
1306/1308 South Bay Front, Balboa Island, California
Rebuttal to the Findings and Decision of the
Modifications Committee (5/5104)
Description of application filed with Staff
Application filed to provide an 86 year old disabled owner /resident with access to her
upstairs residence. This access would be made available by replacing the current back
stairwell with a small elevator. The elevator would merely replace the current space
occupied by the stairwell and will not reduce any of the current parkin? space area.
Reason for App
We believe the decision of the Modifications Committee to deny the request may have
been made on inaccurate information and/or a mischaracterization of the consequences of
the request. The addition of the elevator will: 1) cause no reduction in the size of the
current parkin? area; and 2) continue to allow for a total of 19 feet 5 inches between
the elevator and the property line, adequate space to park a car. We hope the Planning
Commission will re- consider and approve the request for the elevator.
The request was denied specifically because:
"Request for the addition of an elevator that will access the second floor and will reduce
the depth of the existing carport parking space. The proposal includes a request to allow
the carport parking space to encroach 4 feet into the required 5 -foot rear yard setback at
the alley."
The Planning Department's description of the requested work is not correct. The
proposed elevator will not create any new `variances" to the current zoning/setback
requirements. The current parking spaces have, since the owner's purchase of the unit in
1969, been the exact same size and have encroached 4 feet into the current required 5-
foot rear yard set -back. The current stairwell and water heater . closets (which are
partially under the current stairwell) prevent the parking space from coming right up to
the exterior wall of the residence structure. The addition of the elevator will not change
the current depth of the current parking space. The elevator will merely replace the
stairwell.
May 18, 2004
Modification Permit No. MD 2004 -028
(PA2004 -079)
Page 2
In view of the City's concerns and as required, the Homeowner mailed a notice of the
request to approximately 100 residents. No complaints were registered. While one letter
was initially received (from the tenant behind the unit), when they learned that there
would be no change to the current parking, they showed support for the request. Other
neighbors are also supportive of the initiative.
The homeowner has lived on Balboa Island since 1969 and is a well - respected individual.
She very much needs the elevator to access her unit. To deny it, when it continues to
allow for 19'5" of linear feet for parking, and makes no change to the current parking
area, would be unreasonable.. In view of the City's Mission Statement and the above
circumstances, we hope this request will be approved upon appeal.
Rebuttals to the Findings for Denial
Finding No. I
The modifications Committee determined that in this case, the proposal would be
detrimental to persons, property and improvements in the neighborhood, and the
applicant's request would not be consistent with the legislative intent of Title 20 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code.
Rebuttal No. I
The current parking area with or without the elevator will be the same and will continue
to allow adequate space for parking. Given the linear footage available for parking after
the installation of the elevator, two -way traffic will continue to move easily throughout
the alley. Neighbors and visitors have been freely using the alley since I have lived there
since 1969. If the neighbors are all in accord with the change, I believe they are the best
persons to evaluate the potential detriment. No complaints or concerns have been raised.
Finding No. 2
The approval of the proposed rear yard setback encroachment and substandard parking
space could set a precedent for the approval of other similar requests which could be
detrimental to the neighborhood.
Rebuttal No. 2
The current parking spaces have been in the same places since 1969 when the unit was
purchased. The buildings /parking spaces were built to current code at the time and those
l;z
May 18, 2004
Modification Permit No. MD 2004 -028
(PA2004 -079)
Page 3
changes are grandfathered. If other residents are protected under grandfathering laws,
and their changes do not reduce parking access, then they should be permitted to make
changes also. Our builder did everything in his power to ensure that the elevator would
not change the parking area, which it does not. We have also complied with other
requests by the City.
Finding No. 3.
There is no justification for allowing the proposed encroachment, since adequate space
exists within the buildable area of the site for the elevator.
Rebuttal No. 3
While adequate space technically exists with the buildable area, the resident needs the
elevator to be close to the parking area (for groceries, etc.) To try to place the elevator
within the back of the unit would mean compromising the entire exterior back wall which
supports both the upstairs and downstairs units. This would require major engineering,
foundation work, framing, and other structural changes. Furthermore, these units are not
large and are built only to accommodate a family of four comfortably. There is no family
room or other amenities that are included in most homes of today. To ask the
homeowner to take valuable square footage from both homes in order to accommodate
her elevator is very onerous. This change could substantially reduce the value of the
property.
Finding No. 4
Structures on sites adjoining the subject property generally maintain the required rear
yard setback.
Rebuttal No. 4
Many Balboa Island homes were built long before the
are well within the current required setbacks. In fact,
property is out of code as are many others on that block.
will remain the same with or without the elevator.
Finding No. 5
current codes were in effect and
the structure just adjacent to the
Again, the parking area (19'5 ")
The proposed encroachment into the required 5 -foot rear yard setback at the alley would
negatively impact the ability of vehicles to maneuver within the narrow alley and could
13
May 18, 2004
Modification Permit No. MD 2004 -028
(PA2004 -079)
Page 4
adversely impact vehicular access to parking spaces across the alley from the subject
property.
Rebuttal No. 5
The "encroachment into the required 5 -foot rear yard setback" is NOT proposed - -it is
already there and will remain there so long as the current home remains in existence.
Two -way traffic has easily passed through the alley since 1969. The alley behind
1306(1308 is-one of the widest on the Island.
Finding No. 6
The proposed encroachment would create a parking space of substandard depth on a lot
that provides only one parking space per dwelling unit where the Zoning Code requires
two per dwelling unit.
Rebuttal No. 6
Again, the (2) parking spaces have been in their current location since 1969 and were
provided under current law at that time. The fact that there is now a 4 parking space
requirement does not affect the property under the current grandfathering laws. After the
installation of the elevator, 19'5" still exists between the elevator and the property line.
While we realize this places the car(s) within the current rear -yard set -back, there is no
change from the present parking area.
Finding No. 7
The applicant was unwilling to consider suggested alternative sites for the elevator or to
diligently pursue construction alternatives to maximize or maintain the depth of the
existing parking spaces.
Rebuttal No. 7
We did consider other possibilities, however we believe the extensive structural work
required to place the elevator inside the dwelling is unreasonable relative to our other
proposed option. In addition, by taking current square footage (required to accommodate
this elevator) from both dwellings, would adversely affect the property value. Again the
parking that remains once the elevator is installed in place of the current stairwell is
identical.
Thank you for hearing our appeal.
Iq
.J
C�
0
4�
�
�
•�
a
-
�
�
a�
�-+
a
Q
o�
�
�
w
o
c�
o
°
as
�
�,^t
�
V ^l
/4�
f 1
_W
�
�
�
O
[' '
T
• �
Q
[' f
�
C
O
�
�
O
4.1
� �
0
Y�I
�
�
�
�
�
p
p Q
N
�
'� �
4
S_'
• r.�{
V
��
�
V
O
II'`
�
c
v
v
.� �
��
�j G
��
v
rl
�
0.
'G Q
Q, q
Y-->
.J
a�
cry
O
cn
W
O
�
4-1
,'
. � it 4�
4�
v
o
C � n
o 4-j ., o
'v O M co
a�
c`nn
v c
a)
.� O
N
l�
U
a o
w
O N
U
O m
O
-0 y
O
a� O
°
00 ii V
■
0
.5
O
U A-.
H
�n
C)
4-J
a�
,b
c
o
0
o
0
4-J
cn
a
\
Lr)
0
w
�_
4-JO
O
\
cl
U
x
c.
r.
O
cn
N
4--j
. C
cU
v
O
z
w
z
Q ,
■
0
\
00 Ln
�
o
4-J
a�
a4
o
0
o
0
4-J
cn
\
Lr)
0
w
4-JO
O
\
cl
U
Ov
CZ
O
cn
. C
cU
v
O
z
w
z
0
\
00 Ln
�
o
4-J
TJ
Cd
a4
o
0
o
0
4-J
cn
\
Lr)
0
w
\
M
1l
cn
•.-q
N
°
cn V
v) U o U
U a.4 U
M v0 0 �
O c� C-+ cn
O O b10
u O 4a
U ct t4 m
Uq O J
j
CL4 4-J
0 c c
O p ra 4-4
to U � �
7t1
O m cd can
4 9 o
c� .�
V
p cn Cl) a O
a
,t
N
O
O
---j
�^^ll
W
T
.9
4-j
Cli
n
..
O
v
O
�1 i
4-4
UD
v+J
C�Ci
r
•
u
�..{
•
-j
0
�
O
Uc�
lci
4
U
U
O
0
O
N
O
c�
W
.r'
4�
C�
4�
+r
r'�f
I
C
Y
N
CJ�;
• rj
c�c I
��tt1
`v
O
`^ ,
�Wn
`J+�IJ
`J�;
V
0
?y',
�1_...:.._.._
5 °:
k,4
',Y �m�
4,
`.t�-
ff'
OI
i
�.
�,
F:.:
��..,,..
:.:£;
-.
�1_...:.._.._
5 °:
k,4
z
Fool
C
O
O0
B
�
� \`
\�
\ `f
� `
2
� O �
� O
� O
c
O l
cn (+-a
4-' V
° (U d
(U 's 4-4
O
N O 7S ~'
0
aQ (U r4 ° o
bio
aL ago bL a)
V4
O
V V V O
O O O O u O O 'v 'N
�� Q le7'
EXHIBIT NO. 3
Letters in Support of the Application
1316 S Bay Front, Newport Beach, CA 92662
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
June 3, 2004 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028.
Dear Commission Members,
JUN 0 S 2004
7 819110111112111213141516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 1314 S. Bay Front, Newport Beach, CA 92662. It is our belief
that the Modification Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application
previously submitted by the Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa. Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobsons and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
B1
110 Marine Ave, Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 0 8 2004
7 819110111 X12 11 12131415�6
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 115 Marine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92662. It is our
belief that the Modification Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application
previously submitted by the Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobsons and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you,
120 Onyx Ave, Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
vks Gp�QPPT ,3SP N
G�
of NE`NF�R 4
SUN 0 1 \023, 5 VO
6
NMa1g11p 1 1
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 120 Onyx Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92662. It is our belief
that the Modification Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application
previously submitted by the Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobsons and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you,
I/ flpl.�Tl
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. M02004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of
Bay Front. I own the property at 1111 N. Bay Front. It is our be]
Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application pn
Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired me
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by t
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, bent
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encourages
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portii
,removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the F
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island .to man
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobson and I
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety cone(
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Commit
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you,
eal of a decision made
elevator at 1308 South
that the Modification
)usly submitted by the
i stacked units at 1306
cation would not be
Committee. To the
the neighborhood and
individuals to second
of the 1308 unit. The
X and replacing it with
dng for either unit, nor
,er within the adjoining
ve no reason to believe
r guests to continue to
to the neighbors.
and to grant approval
A 1�
PO Box 5562, Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 0 9 2004 PM
71819110111112 11 1213141516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 121 Onyx Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92662. It is our belief
that the Modification Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application
previously submitted by the Jacobson.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should riot negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobsons and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modification Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you,
A40
30
1311 Emerald Bay, Laguna Beach, CA 92651
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 0 9 2004 PM
7 �819110 X11 X12 11 121314,516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 201 Marine Ave.. It is our belief that the Modification
Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application previously submitted by the
Jacobson.
We:are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south.end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should -not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobson and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you, 2 `
3`
117 Amethyst Ave., Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 0 9 2004 PM
71819110 1l l 112 ,112131415 6
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 117 Amethyst Ave.. It is our belief that the Modification
Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application previously submitted by the
Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, -nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobsons and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you
9-
546 S. Bay Front, Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit lvo. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 0 9 2004
AM PM
71819110111112111213141516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 125 Amethyst Ave.. It is our belief that the Modification
Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application previously submitted by the
Jacobson.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It. is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modification to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobson and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you, 1
" 4
s p -.
Jr
35
112 Marine Ave, Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
PLANNING RECEIVED
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 0 8 2004
71819,10,1 l 112111213141516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 112 Marine Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92662. It is our
belief that the Modification Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application
previously submitted by the Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobson and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
you, J
J" ;tom
A
200 Main Street #206, Huntington Beach, CA 92648
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 0 8 2004
7�819110111 112111213141516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 324 Marine Ave.. It is our belief that the Modification
Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application previously submitted by the
Jacobson.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobson and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
T you,
35
PO Box 5469, Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 0 8 2004
AM PM
7189110 1l l X12 Il 1213141516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 109 Grand Canal, Newport Beach, CA 92662. It is our belief
that the Modification Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application
previously submitted by the Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobsons and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
M1111
201 Onyx Ave., Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 0 8 2004 PM
71819110111112 111213141516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 201 Onyx Ave.. It is our belief that the Modification
Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application previously submitted by the
Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by.all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors, or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobson and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you,
51
1500 S. Bay Front, Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
SFGFjVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NE`NPORT BEAGI'I
3UN o s 2004 ?
? 819�10I1111211,213;41516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 1500 S. Bay Front. It is our belief that the Modification
Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application previously submitted by the
Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and.replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within. the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobson and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you,.
/J
45— Oo• .
3�
112 Amethyst Ave, Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard .
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 0 7 2004 PM
AM 19110111112111213141516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of.an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 112 Amethyst Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92662. It is our
belief that the Modification Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application
previously submitted by the Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental.to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobsons and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you,
�C\
Ill Grand Canal, Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 0 7 2004 PM
71819110111112 X11213141516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 111 Grand Canal, Newport Beach, CA 92662. It is our belief
that the Modification Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application
previously submitted by the Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors.or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobsons and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you,
an
June 6, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Daniel R. Miller
20252 So. New Britain Lane
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
Re: Modification Permit No. MD2004-028
Dear Planning Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN 10 2004 PM
M 19 11011l11 2 11 1213141516
As a Balboa Island property owner at 206 Marine Avenue - the Post Office Building - I am in support of
an approval of the above referenced Permit, submitted by the owner of the property at 1308 South Bay
Front Apparently, this has required an appeal of the recent Modification Committee denial, and is
under review by the Planning Commission.
As was represented to me by the property owner and proposed builder at the property site today, the
improvement would not result in any change to the current parking situation, nor affect the existing
alley access. Furthermore, l believe that any alternatives to the builder's currently- proposed plan
would be too structurally complex and unreasonable in cost. With no visible negative impact, and with
no apparent property-owner objections, I hope that the Commission will exercise some flexibility
through its zoning - regulations oversits to afford Mrs. Jacobson, a long -time city resident, preferred
access to her own property.
I feel that the "letter of the law" with regards to zoning regulations should be interpreted to the benefit
of the residents and tax - payers of the City. I know that my father, a former Newport Beach Mayor,
would have wanted that If the only objection to a property improvement is the law itself, with no
anticipated safety concerns or substantive reasons for denial, please take a judicious and empathetic
course in this matter, and reverse the earlier decision of the Modifications Committee.
Sincerely,
� C4
Daniel Miller
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re:, Modification Permit No. MD2004 -028
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
JUN '1 a 2004
AM 71819110111112 111213 {41516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 1111 N. Bay Front. It is our belief that the Modification
Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application previously submitted by the
Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee.. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
.removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobson and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank.you,
130Z' 3o. Bay Front
Balboa Island, Ca 92662
P.O. Box 267, Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3, 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Modification Permit.No. MD2004 -028,.
Dear Commission Members,
RE G Dep PRTasp H
GN OF ��WPO5
�uN ;1 � 2004 pM
�Met9'Lp111112 �12131�1�16
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 1304 S. Bay Front. It is our belief that the Modification
Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application previously submitted by the
Jacobsons.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighbors or other residents of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has.not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobsons and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you,
1303 N. Bay Front, Newport Beach, CA 92662
June 3; 2004
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Atlas: Mr. Greg Ramirez
3300 Newport Boulevard
Building C, Planning Dept.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Mod,ficaticnPormitNt MD260440M
Dear Commission Members,
RECEIVED BY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
`
JUN 10 2004 PM
7 8�9�10 �1 1 1121112,3141516
This letter is being sent to voice our support of the Jacobson Family's appeal of a decision made
by the Modification Committee relating to the proposed installation of an elevator at 1308 South
Bay Front. I own the property at 1303 N. Bay Front. It is our belief that the Modification
Committee was in error when it decided to decline the application previously submitted by the
Jacobson.
We are personally familiar with the Jacobson's property (consisting of two stacked units at 1306
and 1308 South Bay Front). It is our belief that the desired modification would not be
detrimental to the property nor the neighborhood, as suggested by the Committee. To the
contrary, we feel that positive modifications to units, such as this, benefit the neighborhood and
the entire island. The addition of an elevator to allow easy access by all individuals to second
floor units is definitely a positive action — one that should be encouraged.
Parking for the two units is currently at ground level below a portion of the 1308 unit. The
removal of the existing staircase currently situated at south end of unit 1306 and replacing it with
a small elevator to the upstairs unit should not negatively affect. the parking for either unit, nor
the ability of the neighborsor.other residents -of Balboa Island to maneuver within the adjoining
alley. Parking at the units has not been a problem in the past and we have no reason to believe
that the modification would change the ability of the Jacobson and their guests to continue to
park in the space without difficultly and without creating a safety concern to the neighbors.
We encourage you to reverse the decision of the Modifications Committee and to grant approval
of the Jacobson Family's application for the installation of the elevator.
Thank you,
as
�1