Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarinapark Resort Impact Report (PA2003-218)CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 3 July 8, 2004 TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: James Campbell, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Marinapark Resort and Community Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report (PA 2003 -218) 1700 West Balboa Boulevard APPLICANT: Marinapark LLC (Formerly Sutherland Talla Hospitality) Review the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR), receive public comments during the public hearing, and adopt the attached draft resolution recommending City Council certification of the Marinapark Resort and Community Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. DISCUSSION Background: The project background, project description, and a summary of the Draft EIR are provided in the report provided to the Planning Commission for the June 3rd study session. EIR Certification Process A Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the project and circulated for public comment from April 26, 2004, through June 9, 2004, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). During that time, affected government agencies and the public submitted written comments on the Draft EIR. The Planning Commission received public comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for this project at a study session on June 3, 2004, and then provided comment and requested clarification and additional information on various impacts analyzed in the document. Planning Commission comments and responses to those comments are included in the Final Environmental Impact Report together with comments received during the public circulation period for the Draft EIR and the respective responses to those comments. The Planning Commission now should recommend to the City Council whether or not to certify the Final EIR. A recommendation to certify the FEIR is appropriate upon finding that: 1) the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); 2) the Planning Commission reviewed and considered information contained in the Final EIR; and, 3) the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission as a representative body of the City as lead agency in preparation of the Final EIR. The City Council will hold public hearings and consider the Planning Commission recommendation on the Final EIR on July 13, 2004 and on July 27, 2004. On July 27t" the City Council may certify the Final EIR if, after reviewing the document and considering the Planning Commission recommendation, the Council makes the three findings noted above. Final EIR Summary: The Marinapark Resort and Community Plan Final EIR is comprised of the Draft EIR, a listing of persons and organizations that commented on the Draft EIR during the public circulation period, a compilation of those comments, and responses to those comments provided by the City as lead agency for the project pursuant to CEQA. Comments and Responses to Comments The Final EIR includes all written comments on the Draft EIR received through June 9th and comments received from three agencies after that date. Correspondence from each commenter is accompanied by responses to comments set forth in that correspondence. Responses were prepared by the City's EIR consultant and City staff. Responses may provide clarification on an issue by referral to an EIR section, may include additional discussion as clarification of an issue raised by the commenter and addressed in the EIR, or may indicate an additional or revised mitigation measure formulated in response to a comment. Comments not relating to environmental impacts may simply be noted for the record. In response to comments received, additional mitigation measures have been formulated and previously defined mitigation measures have been modified to further reduce adverse impacts. These mitigation measures and the reasons for their inclusion or modification are as follow: Mitigation Measure LU -1 Environmental impacts identified in the Draft EIR included those associated with bulkhead and groin wall placement, dredging, fill placement on the sandy beach, and extension of the slips beyond the pierhead line. Although the impacts associated with placement of this structure were determined to be less than significant, the project proponent has agreed to incorporate the modified dock specifications into the project as set forth in Mitigation Measure LU -1 to further reduce potential impacts. The modified dock eliminates the twelve boat slips originally proposed and replaces them with a 260 - foot long "marginal' dock. This will reduce the amount of dredge material from 1,750 cubic yards to a maximum of 500 cubic yards, reduce the amount of bay bottom that will be disturbed, and eliminate the need for approval to construct improvements beyond the pierhead line. Mitigation Measure HM -1 This new mitigation measure requires that the project proponent provide a listing of all hazardous materials and their quantities that may be used or stored on the project site during construction. The impact relative to hazardous materials used or stored on site during construction previously was determined to be less than significant with mitigation . and the new mitigation measure was added to further reduce the potential impact level in response to comments received on the Draft EIR. Mitigation Measure BR -6 Modification of the dock plan as in Mitigation Measure LU -1 results in a reduction in the area of benthic and shorebird foraging habitat that is disturbed and a consequent reduction in the amount of replacement habitat that must be developed off -site. Revision of this mitigation measure reflects the reduced habitat replacement area. Mitigation Measure HWQ -1 Modification of this mitigation measure adds a requirement that in -water construction activities be limited to the period from October 1 to March 31. This mitigation measure was modified in response to comments from the Regional Water Quality Control Board indicating this would be a condition of permit approval for construction of the dock. The time period restriction will prevent construction activities that would interfere with wildlife reproductive activities. Prepared by: Ja es W. Camp ell, Senior Planner Attachments Draft Resolution Submitted by: S aron Z. Wood Assistant City ager ATTACHMENT RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT REGARDING THE MARINAPARK RESORT AND COMMUNITY PLAN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BALBOA BOULEAVARD BETWEEN FIFTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH STREETS (STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 200311021). WHEREAS, Marinapark LLC (formerly Talla Sutherland Hospitality), 4500 Campus Drive, Suite 650, Newport Beach, California, has applied to the City of Newport Beach for approvals necessary to develop a 110 -mom luxury resort hotel, related ancillary facilities and community facilities on an 8.1 acre site on the north side of Balboa Boulevard between 150i and 180' Streets; and WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA requirements, a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft EIR was filed with the State Clearinghouse, which assigned State Clearinghouse Number 200311021; and WHEREAS, the NOP and an Initial Study were distributed to all responsible and trustee agencies and other interested parties for a 30 -day public review period commencing on November 4, 2003, and ending on December 3, 2003; and WHEREAS, in accordance with CEQA requirements, a Notice of Completion (NOC) of the Draft EIR was filed with the State Clearinghouse; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was distributed to agencies, interested organizations, and individuals by the City. The distribution list is available at the City of Newport Beach Planning Department; and WHEREAS, a 45 -day public review period for the Draft EIR was established pursuant to State law, which commenced on April 26, 2004 and ended on June 9, 2004; and WHEREAS, all comments received during the public review period for the Draft EIR were responded to in the Response to Comments document dated July 2004, distributed separately due to bulk and hereby designated by reference as Exhibit EIR -2 of this Resolution as if fully set forth herein. All comments and responses were considered by the Planning Commission during its review of the Environmental Impact Report; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2004, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at which time the Final Environmental Impact Report, comprised of the Draft Environmental Impact Report, a listing of persons and organizations that provided written comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report during the public circulation period, a compilation of those comments, and responses to those comments, was considered. Notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was duly given and testimony was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission at the hearings. WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report identifies potential significant impacts to the environment and certain mitigation measures designed to reduce or avoid these impacts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Conunission of the City of Newport Beach does hereby find that Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number 200311021) designated by reference as Exhibit EIR -1 of this Resolution has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines. In addition, the Planning Commission finds that the EIR adequately analyzes project - related impacts, identifies feasible mitigation measures and discusses project alternatives, and that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council certify Environmental Impact Report identified by State Clearinghouse No. 200311021. ADOPTED this 8d' day of July 2004, by the following vote, to wit: BY: Chairman BY: Secretary AYES: NOES: ABSENT 7 EXHIBIT EIR -1: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT [Distributed separately due to bulk. Available for public review at the City's Planning Department] ExHIBiT EIR -2: RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT EIR [Distributed separately due to bulk. Available for public review at the City's Planning Department] UM City of Newport Beach Planning Department To: Planning Commission / From: James Campbell, Senior Planner 1 VJ L Date: July 7, 2004 J / Re: Marinapark Resort & Community Plan Environmental Impact Report Attached are the two Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (one dated February 17, 2004 and the other dated April 9, 2004) for the Marinapark project EIR (SCH# 200311021). This Page Left Intentionally Blank JUL 06 2004 4:37PM HP LFISERJET 3200 P.2 PETRA E'mimn al&l Divlrion COSTA MESA • SAN OItGO • MURRIETA • SANTA CL4RITA • ONTARIO February 17,:).004 J.N. 1a3 -04 Mr_ Randy Mason CASH AND ASSOCIATES P.O, Box 27 i5 Huntington Beach, California. 92647 Subject: Limited phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment, Regent Marina Site, Located West of Bay Avenue and North of Newport Boulevard, City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, California Dear Mr. Mason: The Environmental Division of Petra Geotechnical Inc. (Petra) is plca-ced to present this Limited Phase tT P.rvironmental Site Assessment summary letter for the above- refernuced subject site. The purpose of this asscssment is Lo provide the clicnL with screening level information rcgardiag the potential for the presence of subsurface conteurination in the sediments to be dredged from the beach portion of the subject site during'oonstructior of a new marina. Thie investigation was conducted in accordance with the requested and authorized scope of work presented in our proposal 1061 -04 dated 7anuary 30, 2004. S TjTEE LOCATION The subject site is located northwest of the intersection of Bay Avenue and 1516 Street in the City of Newport Beach, California. According to the 1981 photo- revisod topographic map of the Newport Beach Quadrangle, prepared by the United States Geological Survey (USES), the site is located in the northeast portion of Section 33, Township 6 South. Rangc 10 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, at an clevation of approximately five feet above mean sea level. A site vicinity map is included as Figure I. A mobile hdmc park and swimming beach currently occupy the subject site. A site plan is included as Figure 2. $, *Mb 0 . A On February 3, 2006, Petra advanced two soil borings using hand tools in the northern portion of the site near the low tide Iine. Samples were collected at one- foot,'tbrae -feet, PETRA GEOTECHNICAL. INC. 3155-A A1r 4Y Avonue • Costs Meea . CA 92626 • TaI: (713) 549 -6921 n Fax: (lid) 640.7572 • omlronmpetts- Inn.com 169 -d 600 d 990 -1 99609996Y6 ONV13SI- 3190H -NH Ad00:90 YOOZ- 90 -10r, JUL 06 2004 4:37PH HP.LnSERJET 3200 CASFf AND ASSOCIATES Regent Marina Site, Newport Beach February 17,2004 J.N. 143-04 ?ago 2 and four -feet below ground surface (bgs) from the borings. Due to the saturated'oonditions of the sediments, and resulting caving conditions, the target depth of six feet was not reached. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS At the request of the client, gain sim- analyses were conducted on the samples obtained from the two borings. initially, ASTM Standard 1140 -00 (percent passing 0200) was proposed. However, due to the coarser nature of the sediments penetrated, AMTM Standard C 136 -96A was used to provide grain size analysis. The laboratory data sheets are attached to this letter. LABORATORY CEMACAI._ANALYSIS Soil samples collected were preserved on ice and transported to Orange Coast Analytical Laboratory in Tustin, California, an avitomncntal Laboratory Accreditation Prol�atu (ELAP) accredited laboratory, Lo be analyzed. Sample security was maintained and documented using sample labels and chain -of - custody records. Copiee of the official laboratory reports and chain -of- custody records are atahched. The 1.0, 3.0, and 4.0 bgs samples from cash boring Iocation were composited to one sample by the laboratory prior to analysis. The two composite samples were analysed for California Assessment Test Metals by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) merdwd 6010B/7471, polychlorinated biphcayls (PCBs) by EPA Method 8082, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) by EPA Method 8015M, semi volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270C, and drganochlorine pesticides (C)CPs) by EPA Method. 8081A. Grain Sire Analysis- The laboratory data sheets indicate the materials is the upper four feet are primarily too to medium grained send. The soil sample from Boring 2 at the four -foot depth contained some s:wL and clay size sediment P.3 160-4 100'd 690 -1 986oE996Y6 W1381- 3190H -N08d Nd00:90 Yo01- 90-1f1f JUL 08 2004 4:38PM HP LRSERJET 3200 CASH AND ASSOCIATES Regent Marina Site. Newport Beach February 17, 2004 J.N. 143 -04 Page 3 Metals- were not detected in elevated concentrations in either soil Rample. The concentrations detected were within anticipated ranges for California soils. PCBs- were not present in detectable concentrations in either soil sample. TPH- was detected at 10 milligrams per kilogram (mglkg) in soil from Boring 2_ . Tl'H concentration of 10 nwAg is insignificant and does not represent an environmental condition at these boring locations. SVOCs -were not present in detectable concentrations in either soil sample. OCPs- were not preRent in detectable concentrations in either soil sample. The results of this Limited Phase II Soil Assessment indicate concentrations of SVOCs, OCPs, and PCBs were not present in either soil sample obtained from the beach portion of the site. A concentration of 10 mglkg TPH was detected, bat is significant. In addition, the concentrations of metals detected in the two composite soil samples were within anticipated background ranges for metals. No further assessment or remediation is warranted at these locations. Petra appreciates the opportunity of providing services to Cash and Associates on'this project. If there are any questions or comments regarding the scope of work performed or methodology, please call the undersigned at (714) 549 -3921. Respectfully submitted, Potra Geotechnical, Inc. ENi7RONMENT4L DIVISION Brian VilIalobos Senior Project Geologist CSG 1299 �r,�ffi.vtaoMZOwuaa.o•1Pmre Irevumtlyl,Ikr.do7+ Attachments: • Figure 1 and Figure 2 • Laboratory Chonucat Reports David barrow Division Manager REA 20202 P.4 169-4 900'd 890 -1 9E60E996V6 OHVIRI- 3100H4U9 Hd00 :90 90ot-90 -inn JUL 06 2004 4:30PM HP LASERJET 3200 FIGURE'S a It PETM, P.5 169 -1 900'd 990 -1 MUMPS W1361- 3100H -HOH Hd00:90 9002 -90 -inn v JUL 06 2004 4:4OPM HP LRSERJET 3200 P.7 SITE PLAN PETR w JN 143-04 EWW ommmad Dlvwwn FIGURE 2 169 -1 800'd 890-1 98606986Y6 ONY1381- 3190H -4VOad M10 :90 YDOZ- 90 -Inr JUL 06 2004 4 :42PM HP LRSERJET 3200 P.8 LABORATORY CHEMICAL REPORTS MRA 169 -1 080 /600'd 890 -1 9880599898 ONVIRI- 3190H -NOH Ad10 :90 9001- 90 -1Of JUL 08 2004 4:42PM HP LnSERJET 3200 ORANGE COAST ANAL YTICAL,INC. 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 82780 (714) 832.0064 Fax (714) 832 -0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, A2 85040 (480) 736 -0960 Fax (4150) 738 -0970 L48QRAT0RYREPORTFORM Laboratory Name: ORANGE -COAST ANALYTICAL. INC. Address: 3002 Dow Suite 532 Tustin, CA 92780 Telephone: (714) 832 -0064 Laboratory Certification (ELAP) No.: 1416 Expiration Date: 2005 Laboratory Directors Name (Print) : Mark Noorani Client Petra Environmental Project No.: 143-04 Project Name: Cash Laboratory Reference: PTE 14624 Analytical Method: 6010B. 7471A. 8082 8081. 8270. 801515 Date Sampled: 02/03/04 Date Received: 02/03/04 Data Reported: 02/11/04 Sample Matrix: Soi Chain of Custody Received: Yes Laboratory Director's Signature:.,/ P.e 189 -d 090 /010 d :990 -1 5660899090 O iRi- 3190H-W08d nd9v90 9004 -90 -mr JUL 06 2004 4:42PM HP LRSERJET 3200 P -10 Petra Emi irofanenra! ATI-N: Mr. Brien Vlualobas 316SA AOway Costa Mesa. CA 926M Sample Oaaaripdon: Soo Laboratory pefaranaa u: PTE 14024 CllamPmject1D: Csah 011antprq/aortk 143.04 SEMJ VOLATILE ORGANICS BVQ=Z EPA 8T/00 Sample, — 02/03704 02103/04 Raeelved — 02/09!04 X1109104 EsOacled; 02!05104 02105104 02105/04 Aaelyxed: 02/09104 02!05104 02!09104 Reported: 02111104 02/11104 02111104 Lab SampteM MB 0402MIS 04020017 1'lfantSample K: — Composlis CobhpW10 SB -1.1.0 883 -1.0 SB -1.3.0 66.2.9,0 SB•1�.0 99 -24.0 Madan Factor i l 11 ANALYZE CAS # 110/k9 P9*9 Nwk9 Aoenaphthww 93323 <100 <100 Cleo Aftnaphftao . 206988 41DO <100 Cleo Anatno 02.63.3 clog <100 Cleo AMhraome 120 -12-7 <100 <IN 4100 38"onc acid 66.86-0 <1000 clam 41000 6anm(a)=Mrsams 58.553 <1oD <1 Do <100 Bar= (b) fluolanthane 205932 <250 450 4250 Bo= 0d Oaoranihene 207 -05.8 0250 4260 45D Borax (p,h,0 por)iona 191.24 -2 4250 4250 4250 am= (a) wan* 60.32.8 0250 4250 42M Bwo alcohol 10081.6 4100 Cleo <100 bla•(2- ehlaroet O* methane 111 -81 -1 4100 Cleo Cleo bls•a- ohlorost hy0 other 111.44-0 <100 Cleo Cleo bb-(2- ohloWnpropyq ether 108.60 -1 <100 4100 0100 b1a- (2- why1hwA pheakto 117-81-7 0700 Cleo <100 4•Bromophenyl ptwnyt other 101 -553 Cleo <100 <100 011W bamyl owlsixt0 85.68.7 4100 4100 CI e0 4•CMomanl0no 106.47.6 <IOD Cleo 4100 2- Chicron2phOraia o 91-0.7 0100 4100 4100 4CMaro•2- mathylphonol 593P7 4100 4100 <100 2- Chlarophenot 85.57.6 Ciw Cleo 4100 4CMarophanyl pharryl Bihar 7005.723 Cleo <100 4100 Chrysono 210.013 4100 <100 <100 Wmnz(0) aOMancene 53.703 Ciao Cleo 4100 Diberinfutan 1324WB ciao <100 ciao DFn -butyl phlbstate 64-74-2 Q50 <250 42M 15- 111chlarobaraom 641-73.1 C10D <100 4100 1, 4Dlehlomberizene 10648.7 0100 410D <100 1,2•01ohlarobarmna 95504 4100 ciao 4100 2,4•DIehiorophonal 120.83.2 <100 Ciao <180 Diethyl phWstato 64.88.2 <100 0100 4700 2 4- Dimetllylphenal 105 -67.8 <100 <100 .9100 Dirnothytphthatea 131 -113 <100 <100 Cl DO 4,6DInft o 2- mo%r/1phmn1 S34-52-1 410a0 <1 OM 41000 169-4 090/110'd 950 -1 5E60E99896 0NVIRI- 9100H -AM WdZ0:90 9002- 90 -1Or JUL 06 2004 4:42PM HP LMSERJET 3200 VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GO/Me (EPA 62700) (mtl med) Lobaratory Reyerenae R: pTE 14624 CoentPmfeetlD: ceeh e1leec Protactse 143.04 samprage — COM104 02!03100 Rbedvedr — 02leslo4 021o9w04 awnemd: 02015!04 OVOW04 1!2[0.5[04 Aoaly2ad: 02I09l04 WJWID0 02109!04 Reported: 0201104 oviltn'd 0201104 ,tat, Sempla tlr MB 04020016 04020017 COerd Sempla N: — Campoelle Compoelte se•1 -t.a sS -24.11 95-1-70 5623,0 9e -1-4.0 8e -24.0 Dllodon Fwm . 1 1 1 ANALYTE(eady CARP pdko pAlk9 M&O 2A- 01nihoMenal 51.295 41000 Clow 41000 2A- Difthr toluene 121 -14-2 4250 4250 4110 2,9- foiniVatduene 900.20.2 45D 4250 4250 OMCCtyf phaudde 117 -94-0 4260 4250 4750 Fluarenthem 20644-0 C1 Do 4100 ciao Fluorone Mn -7 4100 4100 000 Meyaetdaehsnzene 110-741 4100 4100 000 Homahlombutadlone 87-93 Hen elm 4100 H*x.+laroeyCbpQnwdbno 77.47 -4 600 <500 4500 HeeaNedareathmm 67.72.1 000 Cleo 4100 Imleno (1.2,3-od) pylena 193.395 <;M 4250 0250 19opharme 79.99 -1 line 4100 Cleo 2• WItyhlaphthalene 91 -57-6 1100 4100 <100 2- Meatylp37nnol 8549 -7 000 glen 41011 384- Me"phenel 1MW4,10944.5 <IW Cleo �1 no Napllaniens 91.20.3 41011 4100 4100 2- wanaallbm 99-74-4 4250 4250 4250 3- Nltroanl9ne 99.09 -2 <250 CM 4250 4-Nltrmfilum 100.01. 4250 a50 Mrabeniane 738.95.3 41 DO Cleo 4100 2- Nluephenei 99-756 <100 Cleo 4100 4•141trophanol tae -027 41000 011300 01000 N- NBresoMphatrylamNe as-M -8 1100 <100 4100 N- Nltrasadl.n.prapylalnlno 621.64 -7 4100 4100 19100 N•Nftmot9me91ylamlha 8Z -76.9 <700 4100 4100 Perbachbopheaal 97.965 Clean 41000 41000 phwmwffine 11SM -9 4100 Cleo 4100 Phenol 10845.2 ciao 4100 4100 FyrenB 129-00-0 Ica 1100 4100 1,2,4- TOehlmhe� 120 -82.1 C'1ao Cleo 4100 2,4,5-Trlahbm0eoal 96.854 4100 <1 00 <100 2,4,8•TAohW4phwM 88-09 -2 elan 4100 Cleo Aeeeprab/e Sunogete %RD %RC %RD Mw yFlumaphmai 25.118% ea 62 93 Pheae1-00 112 -120% 98 95 99 Wkmberaaeo-d4 16 -141% M 62 94 Z- Fh_abiPhwyl 39 -123'% 94 92 06 2,4,8•Tt1brom0phma1 14.14196 114 108 112 TorphBhyW14 46 -151% 97 96 96 M p.11 orange Coast Analytical, Inc_ 109 -d 060 /il0'd 890-1 9600699070 O IAI- 3100H -ADU M090 7002- 90 -1fif JUL 06 2004 4 :42PM HP LRSERJET 3200 Petra Emimmental ATTN: Mr. Brian Villelobos 3185-AAinaay Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Lsbora6ory Ratbremm ti: PTE 14624 Client Prglect ID: C2sh COerR Project k 143-04 EXMA CTABLE FUEL HYDROCARBONS (EPA 8016MJ: CCID Sample Description: Sail Sampled: — 02103/04 02/03/04 Received: 02/03/04 02/03/04 FJdrvotad: 02/05/04 02!05/04 02/05/04 Analyzed: 02!08104 02!08104 02/06/04 Raported: 02/11104 02111/04 02/11/04 Lab Sample #., M80205 04020016 04020017 Client Sample 0: Composite Composite 38 -1 -1.0 SB -2 -1.0 BB -1-3.0 82-2 -3.0 86-14.0 sB -2-4.0 Dilution Factor: 1 1 1 ANALYTE mg/kg m9/k9 mgtkg C7 -0 N.D. N.D. N.D. C10-11 N.D. N.D. RD, C12 -13 N.D. N.D. N.D. 014-15 N.D. N.D. N.D. C1 &17 N.D_ N.D. 0.17 016 -10 N.D. N.D. 0.68 C20-21 N.D. N.D. 0,82 C22-23 N.D. N.D. 1.4 C24 -25 N.D. N.D. 1.3 C26-27 N.D. N.D. 2,0 C20-30 N.D. N.D. 2.4 C3142 N.D. N.D. 0.86 C33-34 N.D. N.D. 0,36 C35 -38 N.D. N.D. 0,15 TOTAL c6.0 c8,0 10 EdractaMe Fuet Hydrocarbons (EFM are OUMMMatei against a dlasal #2 standard p. 12 s L09 -d OED /El0'd 850 -1 9FBOE55898 0NV1381- 3100H- Y10Zid WdZOt90 900Z- 90 -lnt JUL 06 2004 4:42PM HP LHSERJET 3200 Petra awfiranomm id AT'rN: Mr. Brian VMWobes 31 S6-A rurway Corm Mesa, CA 92626 LaboratoryRelbrence 1t; PTE 14624 Cgent Project lDt Cash CgantPf0cl4k 14304 OR(DANOCHLORNA7F.D PES71CIDES WA 8061A) sample Descrlptlorh sea Sampled: - 02!03/04 02/03/04 Received: - 02/03104 02/03104 15ttracfe4, 02/09/04 02109104 02109104 Analyzed: 02ri mm 02M 0104 02/10104 Reported.' 02/11/04 02/11/04 02J11/D4 Lab Sample lk M00209 04020015 04020017 L10eat Sample lk -- Composite Composite SB -1 -1.0 SB -2-1.0 SBA-3.0 S6-2 -3.0 SB -1-1.0 SS-241.0 DBudon Factor. 1 1 1 ANALYTE CAS N POW P9ft Pg*9 Aldrn 309.00 -2 <2.0 CC.O <2.0 alpha -SHC 31044 -5 <5.0 <5.0 CS.0 be1a6HC 819.55.7. t5.0 6.0 45.0 deba -BHC 319 -86-0 <10 <10 <10 gamrna.BHC (Undane) 58.80.8 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Chlordane 57-740 <30 X30 <30 4,4' -DDD 72 -54-8 <10 <10 <10 4,4' -PPE 72-559 <5.0 <5.0 45.0 4,4'-DDT 56.29-3 410 <10 <10 Diew n 80.51 -1 20 QO <2.0 EndasuNanl 958-B&B <10 <10 <10 Erldesullan 11 3321245-9 CEO <5.0 <5.0 Endesrltlan erdfato 1D31.07 -5 <5D <50 <so Endrin 72 -20.8 <10 <10 00 Endrin aldehyde 742183 -4 <15 <15 <15 HaptaMor 7644 -8 DLO QA 20 Hepbadlor epoxide 1024.573 <5.0 c5.0 <S -O Methoxychler 72 -43.5 <750 <150 <150 Toxaphene 8001.35.2 <4D <40 <40 Accoptable Surrogate URC %RC %RC %RC TCMX D -144% 86 05 64 p.13 1-:31, 109-4 060 10'd 050-1 5600695648 ONy1381- 3190H -WOtld WdZ090 VOOZ- 90 -V1r JUL 06 2004 4:42PM HP LASERJET 3200 Petra Evroku nantal ATTIC Mr. Brlan Vdlabboe 3185 -A Alrway Cos%Mesa, CA 92625 Laboratmy Werenoo ar PTE 14624 clentpmlealO; Cash. Caent Pro/ad rk 143-04 POLYt14LORWATED B/PNENYL'$ r6PA aOa2) SampleOaser*don: Boa Sampled: — 02103106 02t03104 Raca/vad: — 02403104. 02MO4 9rnactad; 02MWOA 02106104 02A3WD4 Analy[ad; 02108/04 02!08104 D2109l04 Reported; 02M1104 02!11104 D2H11D4 Lab Sample al• M80206 04020018 04020017 CllentSomplap; — Composb3 Cornpoeite SB -1.110 SS -2-1.a 68.1 -3A 55-23:0 S6 -14.0 SS -21.0 Oautlan Factor: 1 1 1 ANALYM t:AS 0 wft pa"g W*9 PCB -1018 12874-11 -2 <25 <25 <25 PCB -1221 11110428.2 <25 <25 <25 PCS-1232 111d1.18.5 <25 c25 <5 PCB -1242 534M214 X15 <25 <25 PCB -1248 12872 -29.6 c2S c25 <25 PCB -1254 11097 -9.1 <25 C25 as PCB -1260 11088.82-5 <x �Q5 c25 Aacsptshte Surrogate %RC %RC 96RC vim Oecachlorobiphanyl 42 -12E% 79 93 Y10 p.14 169 -d DEW 10'd 090 -1 98608996Y6 aNV138l- 3190H -'#W NdZ0190 MZ- 90 -V1r JUL 06 2004 4:42PM MP LASERJET 2200 Petra Envimnmenfal ATTN: Mr. Brien V0lslobos 3185- AARway Costa Mean, CA 92626 CCRMETALS Sample Descrlp8ont Sop Laboratory Reference #: PTE 14524 CftenfPro/ectfD: Cash Client Project P 143.04 Sampled: - 02/03/04 02103/04 Received. - 02/103 /04 02/03 /04 Reported. 02/11/04 02!11104 02/11104 Lab Sample A: M9 04020016 04020017 Client Sample C' - Composke Composite 68 -1.1.0 SR-2-1.0 $B -1 -3.0 SB -2-3.0 58 -1 41.0 SB -2 41.0 ANALYf E EPA DATE mg/kg mgft m ffAV METHOD TESTED Antimony 6010B 02/06/04 <5.0 <5.0 Arsenic 60108 02/06/04 <1.0 1.4 1.8 Barium 5010B 02!06 /04 <0.5 3.8 5,0 Beryllium 60108 0=6104 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Cadmium 60108 02(06104 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 Chromium (Total) 60106 02106/04 <0.5 2.1 2.5 Cobalt solos 02/08104 <0.5 <0.5 0.55 Copper 60106 02/06/04 <0.5 2.4 4.6 Lead Bolos 02108/04 <1.0 1.9 2.3 Mercury 7471A 02/06/04 <0.1 <0.1 0.33 Moybdenum 80108 02106104 0.0 10.0 <1.0 Nickel 50108. 02/06/04 ea.5 .1.1 1.4 Selenium 6010B 02/06/04 <5.0 <5.0 55.0 Sliver 60106 02/06/04 <0.5 <015 <0.5 Thallum 6010B 02/08/04 <5.0 <510 <5.0 Vanadium 80108 02/0B/04 <0.5 3.9 5.1 Inc 601'08 02/08/04 <0.5 5.5 8.1 P.15 109 -d 060/910'd 880 -1 96608996Y6 0Ntl13tl1- 3100H -W08d 4Vamo volim0 -11V JUL DS 2004 4 :42PM HP LRSERJET 3200 QA/QC REPORT for Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons (EPA 8078B) Reporting units: ppm 1. Matrix Spike (M3) / Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Data of Analysis: 02106/04 Laboratory Sample No: 04020009 Laboratory Reference No: PTE 14524 P. Is Definition of Terms R1 SP CONC MS MSD °h MS % MSD RPO ACP'i%MS(MSD) ACP RPD Result of Laboratory Sample Number Spike Concentration Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery Of MS: ((MS -RI) I SP) xt 00 Percent Recovery Of MSD: ((MSD -R1) / SP) x 1D0 Relative Percent Differanoe. ((MS -MSD) I (MS +MSD)) x 100 x 2 - Acceptable Range of Percent Acceptable Relative Percent Difference 2. Laboratory Control Sample Date of Analysis : 021019/04 Laboratory Standard No : OCA10748 Ana/yto SP CO/YC RESULTS % RECOVERY ACCEPTABLE % Extractable Fuel 100 89 89 55-130 Analyte R4 1bS M517 95 MS % 4rSD RPD A %P RPD Ct C Extractable Fuel 0.0 100 97 85 97 as 13 55 -137 23 Hydrocarbons Definition of Terms R1 SP CONC MS MSD °h MS % MSD RPO ACP'i%MS(MSD) ACP RPD Result of Laboratory Sample Number Spike Concentration Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery Of MS: ((MS -RI) I SP) xt 00 Percent Recovery Of MSD: ((MSD -R1) / SP) x 1D0 Relative Percent Differanoe. ((MS -MSD) I (MS +MSD)) x 100 x 2 - Acceptable Range of Percent Acceptable Relative Percent Difference 2. Laboratory Control Sample Date of Analysis : 021019/04 Laboratory Standard No : OCA10748 Ana/yto SP CO/YC RESULTS % RECOVERY ACCEPTABLE % Extractable Fuel 100 89 89 55-130 Hydrocarbons 189 -d 090/110 d 990 -1 99602998VB ONY1381- 3100Ni108d Adt0:90 YOOS- 90 -inr JUL 06 2004 4 :42PM HP LHSERJET 3200 p -17 QA/QC REPORT for Organochlorelated Pesticides (EPA 80811 Reporting units: ppb 1. Matrix Spike (MS) / Matrix Spike Dupllcate (MSD) DateofAnalysls' 02110/04 Laboratory Sample No: 04020016 Laboratory Reference No : PTE 14624 Anakte R1 SP CONC MS MSD %MS %MSD RPD ACp l4 ACP RPD Gamma -alC 0.0 20 14.0 17,0 70 as 19 29437 40 Heptac hlor 0.0 20 13.0 17.0 as 85 27 23-U13 40 Aldrin CIA 20 18.0 21,0 80 105 27 21 -1410 40 Dleldrin'," 0.0 50 1.0 6.0 2 12 143 12 -150 42 Endrin'," 0.0 50 1.1 7.0 2 14 146 14 -1610 38 DDT 0.0 50 35.0 47.0 70 94 29 35 -155 38 Definition of Terms R1 SP GONG MS MSD • MS • MSD RPD ACP % ACP RPD 2. Laboratory Control Sample Result of Laboratory Sample Number Spike Concentration Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery of MS: ((MS -R1) / SP) x 100 Pavicent Recovery of MSD; ((MSD -R1) / SP) x 100, . Relative Percent Difference: {(MS -MSD) / (MS +MSD)) x 100 x 2 Acceptable Range or percent for MS /MSD Acceptable Relative Percent Difference Matrix spike reeDverywas low due to matrix interferences, the laboratory control limit was acceptable, RPD exceeded the laboratory control limit, due to matrix Interferences_ Date of Analysis: 02/1 D/04 Laboratory standard No : OCA 1D911 AnsVe I SP COMC ResuMs 44 Recovery ACP % Gamma -BHC 20 17.0 85 29 -135 Heptachlor 20 17.0 85 33-130 Aldrin 20 17.0 85 31 -118 Dieldrin 50 44.0 B8 30 -137 Endrin 50 52.0 104 37 -146 DDT 50 43.0 Be 37 -146 L69 -d 060/810'd 890 -1 9EBOE596Y6 ONtl1381- 31DOH -W021d YIdE0c90 YODZ- 90-10f JUL 06 2004 4:43PM HP LRSERJET 3200 CWQC REPORT for Palychlorinated Biphenyl's (EPA 8082) Reporting units: ppb 1. Matrix Spike (MS) f Matrix spike Duplicate (MSD) Date of Analysis: 02109 /D4 Laboratory Sample No: 04020016 Laboratory Reference No: PTE 14624 P.18 Anafyta R7 SP CONC MS MSD %MS 64RW RPD ACP% ACPRPD PCs -1018 0.0 250 190 220 76 88 15 46-126 28 PCB-1260 0.0 250 190 240 76 96 23 42 -160 36 Definition of Terms R1 SP CONC MS MSD % MS % MSD RPD ACP % ACP RPD Result of Laboratory Sample Number Spike Concentration Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery of MS: ((MS -R1) I SP) x 100 Percent Recovery of MSD: ((MSD -R1) / SP) x 100 Relative Percent Difference: ((MS -MSD) / (MS +MSD)) x'100 x 2 Acceptable Range of Percent for M5 /MSD Acceptable Relative Percent Difference Z. Laboratory Control Sample Data of Analysis: 02109104 Laboratory Standard No: OCA 10981 Anafyte SP CONC Rearrifa % Recovery ACP % PCB -1016 250 230 92 46 -129 PCB -1260 250 240 96 40.159 189 -d DEO /Bl0 d 950 -1 SEBOE5569B Ob1V13a1- 3100H -WOild WdE0 90 YOOS- 9D -lflf JUL 06 2004 4:43PM HP LRSERJET 3200 QA/QC REPORT for Seml- Velatlte OrgaNe Compoutrds (EPA 62700) Reporling Units: no 1. Matrix Spike (MS) I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MOD) Date of Analysis: 02/09104, Laboratory Sample No: 04020016 Laboratory Reference No: PTE 14624 P -19 Anefyte Definition of Tans : R1 6P CDNC MS MSD • MS • MSD RFD ACP 4L ACP RPD 21 Laboratary Cortfrol Sample Result of Laboratory Sample Number Spike Conceribdon Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery of MS: {(MS -R1) / SP) x 100 Percent Recovery of MSD: AMSD -111)1 Sp) x 100 Relative Percent Difference: {(MS- MSD) 1(MS+M8D)) x 100 x 2 Acceptable Range or Percent for M8/MSD Acceptable Relative Percent Dif ersnce Date of Analysis: 02/09104 Laboratory Standard No' OCA103230, OWD324b Ana(W Phenol RI SP CONC MS Mao t6MS YAfSD RPD AC V% ACP RPD Phenol 0.0 100 68 69 69 fie 0 33-105 27 2-Chlomphonel 0.0 100 70 70 70 70 0 35 -10B 25 1,4- Didtombenzene 0.0 50 43 42 Be 84 2 38••108 2B N -ftw lamina 0.0 50 47 47 94 94 0 40•119 27 1,2,4- Tmfiwobenx0na 0.0 5D 42 41 84 82 2 37••113 24 4-Chloro-3-mudftylpheml 0.0 100 70 72 70 72 3 38-118 23 Acs hthene 0.0 fi0 40 35 78 3 32.114 27 PentxMom herd 0•D 100 65 89 65 83 3 15 120. 24 P ane 0.0 50 43 42 fl6 (f4 2 46.127 24 Definition of Tans : R1 6P CDNC MS MSD • MS • MSD RFD ACP 4L ACP RPD 21 Laboratary Cortfrol Sample Result of Laboratory Sample Number Spike Conceribdon Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery of MS: {(MS -R1) / SP) x 100 Percent Recovery of MSD: AMSD -111)1 Sp) x 100 Relative Percent Difference: {(MS- MSD) 1(MS+M8D)) x 100 x 2 Acceptable Range or Percent for M8/MSD Acceptable Relative Percent Dif ersnce Date of Analysis: 02/09104 Laboratory Standard No' OCA103230, OWD324b Ana(W Phenol SPCON'C tOD Resrrffs 71 %Recovery 71 RCP % 33 -110 2- Chloro henol 101 72 72 33-118 1,4- 12iohlombenzme 50 45 90 35 -113 N•Nacd ro bro 50 45 as 36-125 12,4- Trictdarobanzans 50 44 58 W121 4- Chbro-3-meth enol 10D 73 73 36-T 22 A ens hthene I 5D 41 62 37 -123 pentachic anal 100 Be 88 25.118 p Bo 1 46 82 42-126 299-4 OEO/OMD'd 890-1 9EBOE998y8 ONy13dl-3100H -yi08d AdEO:90 9001-90 -mr JUL 06 2004 4:43PM HP LHSERJET 3200 QA10C REPORT for Metals Reporting units: ppm 1. Matrix spike (MS)I Matrix Spike Oupllcate (MSD) Laboratoro Reference No * PTE 14624 P.20 Arralyre Tested QGSampfe R1 tbNC MS Spike Concerdtallon Added to Sample MSD WS )WsD RPD •ACP96 ACP RPD Antiman 02/06/04 04020009 0.0 20.0 8,98 8.81 45 46 7 '75 -126 20 ASenie 02/06/04 04020008 2.0 .20.0 19.7 19.8 69 86 1 75125 2D Barium 02/06f04 04020009 120 40.0 152 151 60 78 1 75 -126 20 Beryllium 02/0104 04020009 0.0 10.0 9,43 9.36 94 94 1 75.125 20 Cadmium 02106104 64020009 0.0 10.0 9.11 6.94 91 s9 2 75 -125 20 chramlum otal 02/06/04 04020009 14 20.0 32.9 1 311 1 86 88 4 75 -125 20 Cobalt 02/08 /04 04020009 8.9 20.0 26.4 26.7 1 68 64 3 76 -125 20 Copper 02106!04 04020009 32 20,0 62.1 50.9 101 95 2 75 -125 20 Lead 021061D4 04020009 6.4 20.0 23.2 22.9 84 83 1 78-125 20 Marou 02/06!04 04020009 0.0 1.00 1.08 1.10 toe 110 2 90 -120 .20 Mol bden m 02/08/04 04020009 0.0 20.0 17.4 17.3 87 e7 1 76 -125 2D Nickel 02/06/04 04020009 14 20.0 30.9 30.3 65 82 2 75 -125 20 Selenlum 02/06/04 04020009 0.0 20.0 15.3 15.2 77 78 1 76 -125 20 sliver 02/06/04 04020009 0.0 20.0 16.6 18.3 93 92 2 75 -125 ThaNlum' 02/06!04 04020008 0.0 O.D 14.1 14.0 71 70 1 75 -125 Vanadium 02/06/04 04020009 36 20.0 55.6 54.9 89 85 2 75-125 12� line 02/08/04 04020009 ' 51 40.0 949 83.5 85 81 2 6 -126 Definition of Terms : leafed R1 Result of OC Sample SP CONC Spike Concerdtallon Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD MaMxSplke Duplicate Results %MS Percent Recovery of MS: {(MS- R1) /SP)x100 %MSD Percent Recovery of MSD: f(MSD-R1) / SP) x100 RPO Relative Percent Difference: {(MS -MSD) / (MS *MSD)) x 100 x2 ACP % Acceptable Range of Percard for MSIMSD ACP RFD Acceptable Relative Percent Difference 80 -120 Matrix spike raeovervwas low, the method control sample recoverywas acceptable. 2. Laborafory Control Sample Anable leafed SbSOkruf ID SP CO/l!C Rosurts 44 Recovery ACA' % Antimony 02 /08/04 OCA 11028 20.0 17.9 90 60 120 Areenle 02108/04 OCA11028 20.0 18. 92 80 -120 Barium 02!08104 OCA11028 40.0 35,4 89 60-120 Be um 02106 /04 OCA11028 10.0 8,16 92 80-120 Cadmium 02/06 /04 OCA 11029 1D.0 9,02 so e0 -120 Chromium ofal 02106/04 OCA 11026 2010 18.3 92 80-120 Cobalt 02106!04 OCA 11025 20.0 18.3 82 80 -120 Copper 02/06/04 OCA 11028 20.0 18.4 92 807,20 Lead 02/Oe /04 OCA 11028 20,0 10.1 91 80 -'120 Mercu 02/06 /04 OCA 11008 1.00 1.03 103 80 =120 Molybdenum 0256 4 OCA 11028 20,0 19.7 94 80 -120 Nickel 02/08 104 OCA 11028 2D.0 182 91 80 -120 Selenium 02/09/04 OCA11028 20.0 17.4 1 87 So =120 SBvar 02/06 /04 1 OCA11028 20.0 17.7 89 80-120 Tha8lum 02/08 /04 OCA 11028 20.0 17.8 09 80-120 Vanadium 02/0004 I OCA 11028 20A 18.4 92 80 -'12D Zinc 02/06/04 OCA11028 40.0 35.8 90 80-120 nrnnae Coast Analvlfcal. Inc. 189 -d 080 /120'd 890 -1 9880895896 OHtll3ill-3100H-V109d t1dE0 90 t002- 90 -1f1f eo 2004 4:43PM HP LRSERJET 3200 37'. p. 21 Ri, Xx X1 Qr I I"- CL aNVIRI-RIVOH-Mi WdEO: 90 VOOZ-90-Inr 0 je v 0) r . :-T E �j iz� —JM- -FD S 9 E :7R p. 21 Xx X1 Qr I I"- CL aNVIRI-RIVOH-Mi WdEO: 90 VOOZ-90-Inr 0 je v 0) r . :-T E �j p. 21 Jf� Qr CL aNVIRI-RIVOH-Mi WdEO: 90 VOOZ-90-Inr je v 0) E �j iz� —JM- -FD S 9 E :7R Qr aNVIRI-RIVOH-Mi WdEO: 90 VOOZ-90-Inr JUL 06 2004 4:44PM HP LRSERJET 3200 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS LABORATORY REPORTS 0 PETRA p -22 169 -d OEO /EZO'd 890 -1' SE60E55896 ORV13N1-3190H -tNOad MEMO 900Z- 90 -Inf JUL 06 2004 4:44PM HP LASERJET 3200 I , cl ff . N 0 0. C 9 C7 �I CL ly W LLJ K Qaz aow J�m �W rr F W w vCLta 1 - Q ,I J G 0 H - V O _ {Q Q LL IL I , cl ff . N 0 0. C 9 C7 �I CL ly W LLJ K Qaz aow J�m �W rr F W w vCLta 1 - - !B8 -1 080 /Vi0'd 890 -1 988089998 P.23 OHV1381- 3100H -Vi M80:90 VOOZ- 90 -inr e a . s i JUL 06 2004 4:45PM HP LRSERJET 3200 p.24 Job No.: 4''3— o L69 -j M /9E0'd 890 -1 5E60E558Y8 ONV13a1- 3100H -iY083 Y(dE0 50 000Z- 99 -inr 'PETRA ANALYSIS • COARSE Client Name: & 6crj. Requested by: Boring No.: Tested by: tai% Sample No.: Checked by: Depth (It.): r Description: S ° ^� Date: Date:6/ iY . Date,.. Moisture Content of Total Air -Dry Soils Container No. W. of Air -Dry Soil t Cont. (gm.) WL of Air -Dry Soil+ (gm.) -12F 0 Dry M. of Sol] +Cont. (gm.) M. of Container (gm.) Wt. of Container (gm.) Dry WL of Soll (gm.) 3S,a, co Mofsture Content N /gtd After Wet Sieve Container No. W. of A4 -Ory Scil + Cont_ (gm.) WL of Container (gm.) Dry W. of Soil Retained #200 Sieve (9m.) U.S- Sieve Size mm. Cumulative We � t Dry Soil Retained (gm.) Spec. Required Percent C Retain Passing 6" (152.4) 3" (76.2) 1 7!2" (38.1) f 314" (19.0) 318" (9.5) !J ! No.4 (4.75) No. a (2.36) No. 16 (1.16) No. 3O (0.60) No. 6D (0.30) 2 3-I- No. 100 (0.15) Z 1 No. 200 (0.075) S • 9 , PAN Gravel: Cc = (030)a (010 x D60) _ Cu = D60 / 010 = Sand: Fines: GRP.Symbol: Remarks: L69 -j M /9E0'd 890 -1 5E60E558Y8 ONV13a1- 3100H -iY083 Y(dE0 50 000Z- 99 -inr JUL 06 2004 4:45PM HP LRSERJET 5200 P. 25 Job No.: ?-® 169 -d 060/920'd 990 -1 966099M ONV1381- 319011-HU0 AMU vooa- 96 -1nr COARSE AGGREGATES Client Name_ C,9s# !I, Requested by: Boring No.; JI —/ Tested by: Sample No.: Checked by: Depth (1): i f Description: 42*n sl Date: _ Date: G /owe Date: . Moisture Content of Total Air -Dry Soils Container No. IM. of Air -Dry Soil + Cant (gm.) WL of Air -Dry Soil arm.) 4-22. I, Dry Wt. of Soil 4. Cont. (gm.) M of Container (gm.) At. of Container (gm.) Dry Wt. of Soil (gm.) Moisture Content ( °6) �, L Attar Wet Slave Container No. M. of Air -Dry Soil +Cont. (gm.) Wt: of Container (grn.) Dry Wt. of Sail Retained #200 Sieve (gm.) U-S. Sieve Size mm. Cumulative Weight Dry Soil Retained (gm -) Spec. Required Percent 40 Retain Passing 6" (152.4) 3° (78.2). 1 112° (38.1) 314° (19.D) 3/8, (9.5) (�o No. 4 (4.75) g 9 i No. a (2.36) 1 yy 9 No_ 16 (1.18) No. 30 (0.60) 138•s 'i No. SO (0.30) W. 100 (0.15) No. 200 (0.075) PAN Gravel: Co = (O30)21(D10 x 0601 _ Cu = DW / 010 = Sand: Flees: GRP Symbol: Remarks: 169 -d 060/920'd 990 -1 966099M ONV1381- 319011-HU0 AMU vooa- 96 -1nr JUL 06 2004 4 :45PM HP LRSERJET 3200 Job No.: P.26 ..n:maa inn 189-4 060/1ZO d 890 -1 960E998178 0Ntl13a1 -31001 WOtld W00 :90 vooi- 80 -inr PETRA Client Name: Boring No.: Sample No.: Depth (fL).• SIEVE ANALYSIS O.. AGGREGATES CAd i'f 4- qrf Requested by: Z- Tested by: Checked by: I Description: Date: Date: 9- L 0 , Date: . Moisture Content of Total Air-Dry Soils Container No. Wt, of Air -Dry Soil + Cont. (gm.) W. of Air-Dry Soil +, (gm} Dry WL of Soft + Cont. (gm) •➢G/ Wt. of Container (gm.) Wt. of Container (gm.) , 8 Dry Wt of Soil (gm.) e, / Moisture Content (3•6) /, y After Wet Sieve Container No. Wt. of Air -Dry Soil+ Cart. (gm.) Wt. Of Container (gm.) Dry WL of Sol Retained #200 Sieve (gm.) U.S. Sieve Size � Cumulative Weight Dry Soil Retained (gm,) Sec. Required Percent Retain Passing 6• (152.4) 3" (76.2) 1 la* (3B.1) No. 4 (4.75) Q4 No. 8 (2.36) $•, g 4. No- 16 (1.18) gr No. 30 (0.60) . 6 ) 9, No. 50 (0.30) No. 100 (0.15)8 C No -20o (0.075) 3 6,j 7•�f PAN Gravel: Cc = (030)21(010 x 060) Cu = D60 D10 = Sand: Fines: GRP Symbol: Remarks: ..n:maa inn 189-4 060/1ZO d 890 -1 960E998178 0Ntl13a1 -31001 WOtld W00 :90 vooi- 80 -inr Q 'ry . ,� . ,� q. �� W° .� a� w RETRA GEOTECHNICAL. INC. 3185 -A Airway Avenue Costa Mesa. CA 92626 Tel: (714) 549 -8921 Fax: (714) 549-3400 EP. ;ETRnA;<r r COSTA MESA • SAN DIEGO • TEMECULA April 9, 2004 J.N. 204 -04 Mr. Steve Sutherland BAY PACIFIC, LLC. 4500 Campus Drive, Suite 650 Newport Beach, California 92660 Subject: Report of Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Regent Manna Site, Located West of Bay Avenue and North of Newport Boulevard, City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, California Dear Mr. Sutherland Petra is pleased to present this report of our recent limited Phase H Environmental Site Assessment. This report presents the results of environmental assessment work conducted on March 17, 2004. The work was conducted in accordance with our proposal number 1115 -04 dated February 27, 2004. Should you have any questions regarding this report please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Petra Geotechnical, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION r` i Brian Villalobos Senior Project Geologist C.E.G. 1298, C.Hg. 794 <w:1ENV1ROM2004\204 -04\Fina1 Report> David Darrow Division Manager R.E.A. 20202 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Report of Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment; Regent Marina Site, Located. West of Bay Avenue and North of Newport Boulevard, City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, California INTRODUCTION Petra conducted environmental site assessment work at the proposed Regent Manna site, Newport Beach, California. The work consisted of drilling and sampling three borings at a depth of 0.5, 2.5 foot and 5 feet below the mud line in the Rhine Channel to assess the environmental condition of submarine sediments on site. The five foot samples were archived. The soil samples were analyzed by dry weight in a State approved laboratory. In addition, representative samples of the subsurface sediments were collected for grain size analysis. FINDINGS The geologic and chemical information obtained indicates the following: • The Rhine Channel in the vicinity of the site is underlain by one to three feet of bay mud consisting of organic silty and clayey sand. Beneath the bay mud is medium and coarse sand with shell fragments. • Trace amounts of petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the one -half foot samples in all three borings and in the two and one half foot sample in Boring BP -2. The detected concentrations were less than 40 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). • Semi - volatile organic compounds (SVOCS). were not detected in any of the collected samples. • The organo- chlorine pesticide 4,4' -DDE was detected at a concentration of 13 micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg) in the one half foot sample in boring BP -3. • Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were not detected in any of the collected samples. • Metals concentrations were within the anticipated background range for soils in Southern California. BAY PACIFIC, LLC Limited Phase N Investigation Proposed Regent Marina April 9, 2004 J.N. 204 -04 Page ii CONCLUSIONS The limited phase two sampling of submarine sediments indicates that slight degradation of the sediments have occurred. Very low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons are present in the upper one -half foot of the bay mud. The hydrocarbons are not present at levels which require regulatory involvement or remediation. A single sample contained a very low concentration of a organo - chlorine pesticide (13 ug/kg 4,4 -DDE). This concentration is well below action levels for soils on land. TABLE OF CONTENTS age 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............... ............................... 1 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK .............. ............................... 1 3.0 FIELD SETTING ............... ............................... 2 3.1 Previous Site Use ........... ............................... 2 3.2 Site Location and Description . ............................... 3 3.3 Assessment Area ........... ............................... 3 4.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION ..................3 5.0 FIELD WORK ................. ............................... 3 5.1 Drilling and Soil Sampling .......................... . ....... 3 6.0 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL TESTING ........................ 4 6.1 Grain Size Analyses . ........ ............................... 4 6.2 Chemical Analyses. .......... ............................... 5 7.0 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ...... ............................... 6 8.0 CONCLUSIONS ................ ............................... 6 9.0 REFERENCES ................. ............................... 7 FIGURES APPENDIX A Boring Logs APPENDIX B Grain Size Laboratory Data APPENDIX C Chemical Laboratory Data Report of Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment; Regent Marina Site, Located West of Bay Avenue and North of Newport Boulevard, City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, California 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the a limited Phase H environmental site assessment conducted at the proposed Regent Marina site in Newport Beach. The work was conducted on March 17, 2004. The work was conducted according to our February 27, 2004 proposal. The purpose of the investigation was to assess the environmental condition of submarine sediments on site. Previous environmental sampling on the beach portion of the project was conducted for by Petra for Cash and Associates with results presented in a letter dated February 17, 2004. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK The approved scope of work to assess the bay sediments consisted of the following tasks: Task 1 - Soil Sample Collection Drill three borings to a depth of five feet below the "mudline" in a line east -west along the alignment of the proposed outer -most docks. The borings were to be drilled by using a vibrocore sampling system mounted on a drill barge. The vibrocore system allows for continuous soil retrieval to the total target depth. The soil core was logged in the field by a geologist. Samples were collected as follows: • Soil samples were collected from the sampling sleeve from the bay mud at a depth of one -half foot below the surface of the sediments. Soil samples were also collected at 2.5 and 5 feet below the sediment surface. The soil samples were placed in acetate tubes, capped and placed on ice for transportation to the laboratory for analysis. • Representative soil samples were also collected for grain size analysis. BAY PACIFIC, LLC April 9, 2004 Limited Phase Il Investigation J.N. 204 -04 Proposed Regent Marina Page 2 Task 2 - Laboratory Analysis Nine soil samples were collected (three from each boring) as discussed above. The soil samples from the one -half foot and two and one -half foot depth were analyzed as follows: • Six soil samples by dry weight for California Assessment Test Metals by EPA Method 6010B/7421. • Six soil samples by dry weight for PCBs by EPA Method 8082. • Six soil samples by dry weight for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8015M. • Six soil samples by dry weight for semi - volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8270C. • Six soil samples by dry weight for organo- chlorine pesticides by EPA Method 8081A. Task 3 - Grain Size Analysis Grain size analysis by ASTM Standard 1140 -00 (percent passing #200) and by ASTM Standard C136 -96A was conducted on soil samples collected from each boring. The analysis were conducted on representative samples of the sediment units penetrated. 3.0 FIELD SETTING 3.1 Previous Site Use Based on preliminary aerial photographic review obtained from Petra's in house aerial photographs the site has been occupied by a beach and the Rhine Channel since at least the early 1927. BAY PACIFIC, LLC April 9, 2004 Limited Phase H Investigation J.N. 204 -04 Proposed Regent Marina Page 3 3.2 Site Location and Description The site is located on 0.7 acres of land and bay located west of Bay Avenue and north of Newport Boulevard in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, California. The site is currently undeveloped. The site is occupied by a swimming beach on the south side and the Rhine Channel on the north. The Veterans Marina is located immediately to the south and mobile home park is located immediately to the east. The site location is shown on Figure 1 "Site Location Map." 3.3 Assessment Area The environmental assessment conducted during this investigation was confined to three locations on the seaward portion of the proposed marina site. The area of investigation is the area of proposed floating docks. Creation of the docks including installation of piles will require dredging and drilling. The assessment area is shown on Figure 2, " Site Plan." 4.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORK Petra completed a limited Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for Cash and Associates. The area of investigation for the investigation was the landward portion of the proposed marina site. The results of the investigation were provided by letter dated February 17. 2004. The previous investigation did not detect contamination of the beach "sediments on site. 5.0 FIELD WORK 5.1 Drilling and Soil Sampling Drilling and sampling was conducted on March 17, 2004. The vibrocore drilling technique was used to collect soil cores from the bottom of the bay. The vibrocore BAY PACIFIC, LLC Limited Phase II Investigation Proposed Regent Marina April 9, 2004 J.N. 204 -04 Page 4 system employs a vibrating head which is connected to an aluminum casing cut to the desired length of core penetration. The aluminum casing was cut to allow penetration of seven feet of sediment. The vibrating head is lowered until the casing is in contact with the surface of the submarine sediments. Vibration is applied until the aluminum casing has penetrated to the target depth allowing the vibrating head to come to rest on the surface of the sediments. A continuous core of sediment was extruded from the sample casing and geologically logged. Sediment samples were collected from the core and placed in brass sampling tubes. Sediment samples were collected from one 0.5, 2.5 and 5 feet from the top of the bay mud. The brass sampling tubes were capped with a teflon sheet and plastic cap, labeled, and placed in a cooler until transport to the laboratory for analysis. Samples, representative of the sediment types, were collected in plastic bags for grain size analysis. The boring logs of the sediment cores are provided in Appendix A. 6.0 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL TESTING. 6.1 Grain size Analysis Grain size analysis was conducted on the samples obtained from the three borings. The sediment samples from BP -I at one foot, BP -2 at one foot, and BP -3 at one foot were analyzed for grain size distribution by ASTM D 1140 -00. The test method provides an analysis of the percentage of sediment passing the #200 sieve which is the . demarcation between sand and clay /silt. The sediment samples from BP -1 at 2.5 feet, BP -2 at 4 feet, and BP -3 at 3 feet were analyzed for grain size distribution using ASTM C 136 -96a. The analysis provides a information to prepare grain size distribution curve of the fine and coarse aggregate materials. The sediment sample from BP -2 at 1 foot was analysed for grain size distribution using ASTM D 422 -90. The test method allows an assessment of the percentage of silt and clay sized sediment gains. BAY PACIFIC, LLC April 9, 2004 Limited Phase II Investigation 7N. 204 -04 Proposed Regent Marina Page 5 6.2 Chemical Analyses The submarine sediments were sampled from the vibrocore sleeve at points representing depths of 0.5, 2.5, and 5 feet below the surface of the bay mud. The 0.5 and 2.5 foot samples were submitted for laboratory analysis. The five foot samples were archived to be analyzed if the upper samples contained chemical contamination. The sample were submitted to Orange Coast Laboratories of Tustin, California The samples were analyzed as follows: • The 0.5 and 2.5 foot samples from BP -1, BP -2, and BP -3 were analyzed by dry weight for California Assessment Test Metals by EPA Method 6010B/7421. • The 0.5 and 2.5 foot samples from BP -1, BP -2, and BP -3 were analyzed by dry weight for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) by EPA Method 8082. • The 0.5 and 2.5 foot samples from BP -1, BP -2, and BP -3 were analyzed by dry weight for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8015M. • The 0.5 and 2.5 foot samples from BP -1, BP -2, and BP -3 were analyzed by dry weight for semi- volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8270C. • The 0.5 and 2.5 foot samples from BP -1, BP -2, and BP -3 were analyzed by dry weight for organo- chlorine pesticides by EPA.Method 8081A. The laboratory data indicated the following: • Trace amounts of petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the 0.5 foot samples in all three borings and in the 2.5 foot sample in Boring BP -2. The detected concentrations were 24 mg/kg in BP -1 at 0.5 feet, 39 mg/kg in BP -2 at 0.5 feet, 11 mg/kg in BP -2 at 2.5 feet, and 27 mg/kg in BP -3 at 0.5 feet. BAY PACIFIC, LLC Limited Phase ]I Investigation Proposed Regent Marina April 9, 2004 IN 204 -04 Page 6 • Semi- volatile organic compounds (SVOCS) were not detected in any of the collected samples. • The organo- chlorine pesticide 4,4' -DDE was detected at a concentration of 13 micrograms per kilogram (ug(kg) in the 0.5 foot sample in boring BP -3. • Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were not detected in any of the collected samples. • Metals concentrations were within the anticipated background for soils in Southern California. 7.0 GEOLOGIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS Geologic materials encountered during this investigation are described by depth in the boring logs presented in Appendix A. The sediments encountered consisted of 1.5 to three feet of silty clay and clayey sand "bay mud." The bay mud is dark blue gray in color, has a strong organic odor, and locally contains thin very fine sand layers and shell fragments. The bay mud was thickest in boring BP -2. Resting beneath the bay mud is dark blue gray sand. The sand was poorly graded and massive in BP -1 and BP -2. BP -3 contained some coarse sand layers. The contacts between the differing grain size layers is gradational. No debris or discoloration was observed in the sediment cores. 8.0 CONCLUSIONS The geologic and chemical data obtained during this investigation indicates the following: • Submarine sediments have been slightly degraded by TPH. The soil samples collected from the 0.5 foot depth contained less than 40 mg/kg TPH. The low concentrations of TPH which is may be the product of sediment washed in during stormwater run -off. BAY PACIFIC, LLC April 9, 2004 Limited Phase II Investigation J.N. 204 -04 Proposed Regent Marina Page 7 • The chemical 4,4' -DDE was detected in the 0.5 foot sample in BP -2. The bay mud sediment consist of organic silty and clayey sand. • The sediments beneath the bay mud consist of medium to coarse sand with shells. PETRA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. "Limited Phase lI Environmental Site Assessment; Regent Marina Site, Located West of Bay Avenue and North of Balboa Boulevard, City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, California" dated February 17, 2004. CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SANTA ANA REGION "Final Problem Statement for the Total Maximum Daily Load For Toxic Substances In Newport Bay and San Diego Creek," dated December 15, 2000. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY - REGION 9 "Total Maximum Daily Loads For Toxic Pollutants, San Diego Creek and Newport Bay, California" dated June 14, 2002 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Environmental Response Team, "Sediment Sampling "SOP# 2016, dated November 17, 1994. UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 1965, 7.5 Minute Topographic Map, Newport Beach Quadrangle, photo revised 1981. FIGURES It PETRA I ug�tr , SITE Light AA E,ifd' larbor u 2 SITE LOCATION MAP Ref: Portion of USGS NEWPORT BEACH QUADRANGLE, 7.5 Minute Topographic Series 1965, (Photorevised 1981) SCALE: 1 inch = 2000 feet it PETRA Environmental Division JN 204 -04 FIGURE 1 APPENDIX A BORING LOGS 4t PETRA Ott PETRA EXPLORATION LOG page ioft Project: Limited Phase II - ESA Boring No.: BP -2 Location: Regent Marina Date: 3/17/04 Job No.: 204 -04 Drilling Method: Vibracone Logged By: BV Drilling Co.: TEG Oceanographic Approved By: Depth (Feet) Lith- ology Material Description Depth to Water: Not Encountered Total Depth of Boring: 6 ft. W a r Samples Blows R R Per u e 6 in. n c Field and Laboratory Tests ell) OVA Other Lab (ppfn) (ppm) Tests Bay Mud, Silty Clay (CL): Dark bluish -gray; some thin fine sand stringers. Sand SP : Bluish -gray; saturated; poorly graded sand; medium sand; 10 % shell fragments (small). 5 PLATE A -2 Petra Geotechnical, Inc. PETRA EXPLORATION LOG page, of, Project: Limited Phase II - ESA Boring No.: BP -1 Location: Regent Marina Date: 3/17/04 Job No.: 204 -04 Drilling Method: Vibracone Logged By: BV Drilling Co.: TEG Oceanographic Approved By: Samples Field and Laboratory Tests Material Description W a Blows R R PID OVA Other Depth (Feet) Lith- olog-v Depth to Water: Not Encountered Total Depth of Boring: 6 R. e r Per u. e 6 in. n c Lab (ppm) (PP-) Tests Bav Mud. Clayey Sand (SC): Dark bluish -gray; fine - grained sand. --------------------------------- Sand (SP): Bluish -gray; poorly graded; medium to coarse sand; 20 % shells, broken fragments; saturated. ct 1.8 feet: Sharp contact. 5 @ 5.0 feet: Whole shell. PLATE A -1 Petra Geotechnical, Inc. 0 J Y C pUp Vp N E Z CL 111 F N P E T R A EXPLORATION LOG Page 1 of 1 Project: Limited Phase II - ESA Boring No.: BP -3 Location: Regent Marina Date: 3/17/04 Job No.: 204 -04 Drilling Method: Vibracone Logged By: BV Drilling Co.: TEG Oceanographic Approved By: Samples Feld and Laboratory Tests W Material Description a Blows R R pID OVA Other Depth Lith- e Per u e o c Lab (PP-) (Prim) (Feet) olo o' Depth to Water: Not Encountered Total Depth of Boring: 6 ft. r 6 in. Tests Mud. Clayey Sand (SC): Brownish gray in upper 4 inches becoming dark blue gray below; organic odor; sticky. 1Bav -------------------------------- Sand (SP): Coarse; 20 % shell fragments. :Sand -------------------------------- (SP): Medium sand; 20 % shell fragments. 5 Sand (SP): Medium to coarse sand; whole shells; blue gray; 20 % shell fragments. PLATE A -3 Petra Geotechnicai, Inc. APPENDIX B CHEMICAL LABORATORY REPORTS. II 11. :I I1 ��ffzz i p I Client Name: 2,01 � G LLCM Requested by (J Date: Tested by: 9 1� Date: 3 ' ° Checked by: Date: Sample No. I Wet Weight �aa ,8 I Before Wash I ,{,, ->_,, At`,er Wash Depth I Dry Weight . 3�aJ �S I Container I 37 Container 37 USCS L Wt. Cant. Soil & Cont. 13a , / .i Sail & Cant. I' 1$x_717 Color �L +a G' y.fiA^3 I M.C. % P'7, 1 I Wt. Cone `�=�, 9 [� W. Cont. Method Used: _ A Container 57 Wet Soil VVn- — B Time Soaked: Hrs. Dry Soil Wt. I �?�,) ®/ Soil Wt. % Pass #200 % Ret. #200 I 37, D Sample No. I Wet Weigh[ Before Wash - After Wash Depth - Dry Weight I Container Container USCS , Wt. Cant. Soil & Cant. Soil & Cont. Color I M.C. °!° Wt. Cant. I Wt. Cont. Method Used: _ A Container I Wet Soil Wt. —H Time Soaked: Hrs. Dry Soil Wt. Soil Wt. % Pass #200 % 1 #200 Sample No. I Wei Weigh[ Before Wash After Wash :_ �` Depth I Dry Weight Container can, tainer USCS Wt. Cant. Soil & Cant, Soil & Cont. Color I I M.C. % f W. Cant. W. Cont. Method Used: —A Container I Wet Soil Wt. — B Time Soaked: Hrs. Dry Soil W. I Soil b+R. % Pass #200 % Pet. #200 Sample No. Wet Weight I ` Before Wash Attar Wash ,M, Depth Dry Weight Container Container USCS I W. Cant. Sail & Cant. Soil & Cant. Color I M.C. % I Wt. Cant. I Wt. Cont. Method Used: —A Container I I Wet Soil W. _ B Time Soaked: Hrs. Dry Soil W. I Soil Wt. % Pass #200 % Pet. #200 CW.,MaVi_trd` z 3185 -A Airvay Avenue n 27620 Commerce Center Or. Ste. 103 ��-1! 12225 World Trade Or. Ste. 0 '� 3800 La Crescents Ave Ste. 209 Costa Mesa, CA 92825 --- Temecula, CA 92590 San Ciego, CA 92128 �'—' Glendale, CA 91211 H_°- .- r..._r,} =.nx.L�ki•.Y �'"`�a 2."w"e�."F..:•?e' 'W4- ls..]a= ra��"•R.��, -`A 4- �..Y- ^.:'it r.f� x^ "` - z^^$"d1L+ e..S�,..z -�,°, .'ss SCQIrL�A /'juIM, EC�IE /!f^R /!ti_hI1I1F'!L�"�'i /C.' = .tt''°�tN .v �'et+eeerrsr`.n's -w.w3 Client Name: lC:�v �pC /-/�iG �L Requested by: Date: Tested by: is. Date: Checked by: Date: Sample No. Q / Wet Weight g Ste, 3 Before Wash , Y:� After Wash Frx�. a�'- a Depth I Dry Weight �i. /3 I Container I I Container i USCS I t� Wt. Cant. Sail & Cont. 13 .%� Soil & Cont. c. 7.2 Color I M.C. % I wt. Cont. o Wt. Cont. Method Used _ A Container I / Wet Soil Wt. `D B Time Soaked: Hrs. Dry Sail Wt. 3j 7 �� Soil Wt. % y % Pass °200 2 % Ret. ;x200 Sample No. I — 3 Wet Weight ISM$, ly Before Wash T�� After Wash x: Depth I Dry Weigh[ Container Container USCS Wt. Cant_ p Soil & Cant. 3%? .S� I Soil & Cont. / �f Color M.C. % I 63, 7 Cant. Wt. Cont. Method Used: —A Container /Z Wet Sail W. — 9 Time Soaked: Hrs, Dry Sail Wt. 3 7�1 5� Soil Wt_ % Pass #200 S % Pet. #'200 S� Sample No. Wet Weight I I Before Wash '' -- " - - -: After Wash Depth Dry Weight Container Container USCS I Wt. Cant. O Soil & Cont. Sail & Cant. Color M.C. % W. Cont. Wt. Cont. Method Used: _A Container Wet Soil Wt. —9 Time Soaked: Hrs. Dry Sail W. Sail Wt. % Pass #'200 J % Ret. #200 Sample No. II .Wet Weigh[ I Before Wash I'�`:, ,��� After Wash ' Depth I I Dry Weight I Container Container USCS I Wt. Cant. Soil & Cant_ Soil & Cant. Color I I M.C. % I Wt. Cont. Wt. Cont. Methad Used: _A Container I I Wet Sail Wt. I H Time Soaked: Hrs. Dry Soil Wt. Soil Wt. % Pass #200 % Pet. #200 cW;MaCPWra`Forms 3185 -A Airway Avenue r 27 620 Commerce Center Or. Ste, 103 12-925 World Trade Or, Ste. 0 3800 la Crescenta Ave Ste. 203 Costa Mesa. CA 92626 u Temecula. CA 92590 San Diego, CA 92129 Glendale, CA 91214 oh ^1 �1 C +n am' Oh llln' Cnn C+n9 a6 I.a., nac Job No.: Y,2 v- (2Y Client Name: Sample Nc.'. Depth (ft.): Description: ny 'g f P'l u `: c. <<' C__ P , S Requested by: Tested by: Checked by: Date: Date: Date: 27620 Commerce Center Dr. Ste. 103 1225 World Trade Dr. Ste. 0 0 3800 ! a Crescents Ave Ste. 203 Costa Mesa, CA 92526 U a Temecula, CA 92590 San Diego, CA 92128 Glendale, CA 91214 Moisture Content of Total Air -Dry Soils Ph. (909) 699 -6193 Container No. Ph. (818) 541 -1231 Fax (714) 549 -1438 Z 0 M. of Air -Dry Soil+ Con(. (gm.) A.? Wt. of Air -Dry Soil+ Cont. (gm.) gQ . (� Dry M. of Soil+ Cont. (gm.) Wt. of Container (gm.) _ M. of Container (gm.) Dry Wt. of Soil (gm.) i g - 3) Moisture Content After Wet Sieve Container No. W(. of Air -Dry Soil + Cont. (gm.) Wt. of Container (gm.) Dry M. of Soil Retained ;x`200 Sieve (gm.) U.S. Sieve Size (mm.) Cumufative Weight Dry Soil Retained (gm.) Spec. I Required Percent % Retain Passing 3" (76.2) 314" (19.0) 3/8" (9-5) '4 • No. 4 (4.75)` 7 • Id'.S " v �ef Q No. 8 (2.36) No. 16 (1.18) No. 30 (0-60) a•�t'�. 35- No. 50 (0.30) 2,57%• 78 No. 100 (0.15) 1 7� • / I No. 200 (0.075) 7�/�• ON PAN qdC. Gravel: D10 D30 D60 CC = (030)2 / (D10 x 06Q) _ Cu= D601D10= Sand: Fines: GRP Symbol: Remarks: cw:mac PMM'FG 3185 -A Airway Avenue 27620 Commerce Center Dr. Ste. 103 1225 World Trade Dr. Ste. 0 0 3800 ! a Crescents Ave Ste. 203 Costa Mesa, CA 92526 U a Temecula, CA 92590 San Diego, CA 92128 Glendale, CA 91214 Ph. (714) 549 -8921 Ph. (909) 699 -6193 Ph. (858) 485 -5530 Ph. (818) 541 -1231 Fax (714) 549 -1438 Fax (9091 699.6197 Fax (858) 485 -8215 ra. (AIM Job No.: ' D °/— 0 Client Name: Sample No.: Depth (ft.): Description: (6 641— Z /L' 7 r Requested by: Tested by: 2, Checked by: Date: Date: Date: r- 12225 World Trade Dr. Ste. 0 3800 La Crescenta Ave Ste. 203 Costa Mesa, CA 92628 Temecula, CA 92590 San Diego, CA 92128 Glendale, CA 91214 Ph. (714) 549 -8921 Ph. (909) 699.6193 Moisture Content of Total Air -Dry Soils Ph. (818) 541 -1221 Fax (714) 5�9 -1438 Container No. Fax (858) 485 -8215 Fax (818) 541.1768 -_ �(o Wt. of Air -Dry Soil + Cont. (gm.) Wt, at Air -Dry Sail + Cont. (gm.) Dry Wt. of Soil + Cont. (gm.) Wt. of Container (gm.) Wt. of Container (gm.) 2, O Dry Wt. of Soil (gm.) I �� S - (� ! Moisture Content After Wet Sieve Container No. Wt. of Air -Dry Soil + Cant. (gm.) 'Wt. of Container (gm.) Dry Wt. of Soil Retained :200 Sieve (gm.) U.S. Sieve Size (mm.) Cumulative Weight Dry Soil Retained (gm.) Spec. Required now Percent % Retain Passing 3" (762) 1 1/2" (38.1) 3/4" (19.0) 3 18" (9.5) Na. 4 (4.75) No. B (2.36) ( (,O g, 7r L No. 16 (1.18) Q,i9 9Qi No. 3O (C. 60) No. 50 (0.30) No. 100 (0.15) No. 200 (0.075) %� /�. I I �•) PAN -�% 0 • �� 070 D30 D60 CC = (030)2 / (D 10 x DGO) _ ` Cu = D60 / D10 = 7Gravel: Fines: GRP Symbol: Remarks. C'NW.6petralrorms 0 3185 -A Amay Avenue 27820 Commerce Center Dr. Ste. 103 12225 World Trade Dr. Ste. 0 3800 La Crescenta Ave Ste. 203 Costa Mesa, CA 92628 Temecula, CA 92590 San Diego, CA 92128 Glendale, CA 91214 Ph. (714) 549 -8921 Ph. (909) 699.6193 Ph. (858) 485 -5530 Ph. (818) 541 -1221 Fax (714) 5�9 -1438 Fax (909) 699.6197 Fax (858) 485 -8215 Fax (818) 541.1768 -_ I Job No. :� y I Client Name: Sample No.: Depth (ft.):. Description: r &r f ,C ' -, c zz /C "'00— � � .> Requested by: Tested by: yi 5 Checked by: Date: Date: Date: Moisture Content of Total Air -Dry Soils Container No. 2 0 1 M. of Air -pry Sail + Cont- (g m.) Wt. of Air -Dry Soil +Cont. (gm.) SZ Z, SEA Dry W. of Soil +Cont. (gm.) I /`, / W. of Container (gm.) Wt. of Container (gm.) I O Dry Wt. of Soil (gm.) 39 • t Moisture Content After Wet Sieve Container No. j M. of Air -Dry Sail + Cont. (gm_) Wt. of Container (gm.) Dry Wt. of Soil Retained #200 Sieve (gm.) U.S. Sieve Size (mm.) Cumulative Weight Dry Soil Retained (gm.) Spec. Required Percent I Retain Passing 3" (76.2) 1 1(2" (38.1) 3/4" (19.0) 1112. 97-2- 3/8" (9.5) ,21 , SS— 9-;. No.4 (4.75) 3S, Z/ i .3 No.8 (2.36) 3 I 8S No. 16 (1.18) No. 30 (0.60) No. 50 (0.30) No. 100 (0.15) No. 200 (0:075) y731.r�2 �j PAN I yJ /• / Gravel: 010 D3O 060 Cc = (D3O)2 / (010 x 060) _ Gu= O6OlQ10= Sand: Fines: GRP Symbol: Remarks: CwwacV efra%Fwms 3185 -A Airway Avenue 27620 Commerce Center Dr. Ste. 103 12225 World Trade Dr. Ste. 0 3800 La Crescents Ave Ste. 203 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Temecula, CA 92590 San Diego, CA 92128 Glendale, CA 91214 Ph. (714) 549 -8921 Ph. (909) 699.6193 Ph_ (858) 485 -5530 Ph. (818) 541 -1231 Fax (714) 549 -1436 Fax (909) 699.6197 Fax (858) 485.8 215 Fax (813) 541 -17 68 Job '7 ' O i Client Name: aid -') f ^C-! / C_ l L C Requested by: Date: - Sample No.: p Tested by: �s� Date: Depth (ft.): 1 Checked by: Date: Description: GL Hydrometer NA. of Air -Dry Soil (gm.) / c% Deffocculant 125cc of 4% Solution /© O Wt. of Dry Soil (gm.) f Date Moisture Content of Total Air -Dry Soils Moisture Content of Total Air -Dry Soils Passing #10 AfterHydrometer &Wet Sieve Het, on #200 Sieve Specific Gravity (Gs) (Ass.) Actual Hydrometer Readings Wt. of Air -Dry Soil + Cont. (gm.) Retained (g 1 f— -7 r 2� Correction for Specific Gravity a r"_ r Dry Wt. of Soil +Cont. (gm.) a CS'R'"aT r Z 1 W. of Air -Dry Soil + Cont. (gm.) �' Wt. of Container (gm.) � u..,.G. '1 • , W. of Container :E. 3�`�. i"..N .y Moisture Content ( %) Dry Wt. of Soil (gm.) Wt. of Dry Soil (gm.) O lJ7. 3 3 Coarse Sieve Sieve after Hydrometer & Wet Sieve Hydrometer NA. of Air -Dry Soil (gm.) / c% Deffocculant 125cc of 4% Solution /© O Wt. of Dry Soil (gm.) f Date Time Elapsed Time (min.) Water Temperature °C of Dry Soil Actual Hydrometer Readings Retained (g ZZ a r"_ r a CS'R'"aT r Z 1 • �. �' ek �x0� L'usTvu1.6�1s L u..,.G. '1 • , eYnc2a�u�Mrluvi J ... :E. 3�`�. i"..N .y Hydrometer NA. of Air -Dry Soil (gm.) / c% Deffocculant 125cc of 4% Solution /© O Wt. of Dry Soil (gm.) f Date Time Elapsed Time (min.) Water Temperature °C Composite Correction 152 H Actual Hydrometer Readings ZZ a r"_ r a 2 Z 1 • �. �' ek �x0� L'usTvu1.6�1s L u..,.G. '1 • , eYnc2a�u�Mrluvi J ... :E. 3�`�. i"..N .y O ®® ° LIfi.i5ZA`l :1vtiy�jyyYj�hP 2 Hydrometer NA. of Air -Dry Soil (gm.) / c% Deffocculant 125cc of 4% Solution /© O Wt. of Dry Soil (gm.) f Date Time Elapsed Time (min.) Water Temperature °C Composite Correction 152 H Actual Hydrometer Readings 7 a r"_ r a 2 Z 1 5 O 30 2 /Y ® 60 2,1 o 120 .7 �d /-s°/ 52 250 v3 / gl_� 1440 Remarks: Soil Particle Total diameter Sample I (mm.) cW;uac\p rc f ms 3185 -A Airway Avenue 27620 Commerce Center Dr. Ste. 103 12225 World Trade Dr. Ste. 0 3800 La Crescents Ave Ste. 203 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Temecula, CA 92590 San Diego, CA 92129 Glendale. CA 91216 Ph. !7161 ids -909+ 11 1­1 — ^ _ APPENDIX C GRAIN SIZE LABORATORY DATA t PETRA i i ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL, INC. && . 3002 Dow, Suite 532, Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 832 -0064 Fax (714) 832 -0067 4620 E. Elwood, Suite 4, Phoenix, AZ 85040 (480) 736 -0960 Fax (480) 736 -0970 LABORATORY REPORT FORM Laboratory Name: ORANGE COAST ANALYTICAL, INC Address: 3002 Dow Suite 532 Tustin CA 92780 Telephone: (714) 832 -0064 Laboratory Certification (ELAP) No.: 1416 Expiration Date: 2005 Laboratory Director's Name (Print) : Mark Noorani Client: Petra Environmental Project No.: 204 -04 Project Name: Regent Marina Laboratory Reference: PTE 14688 Analytical Method: 60108 7471A. 8082 8081 8015CCID. 8270C Date Sampled: 03/17/04 Date Received: 03/17/04 Date Reported: 03/25/04 Sample Matrix: Soil Chain of Custody Received: Yes �f ' / Laboratory Director's Signature: �% Arx, �yr� Petra Environmental ATTN: Mr. Brian Villalobos 3185 -A Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Laboratory Reference #: PTE 14688 Client Project ID: Regent Marina Client Project #: 204 -04 EXTRACTABLE FUEL HYDROCARBONS (EPA 8015M): CC1D Sample Description: Soil Sampled: -- 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Received. - 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Extracted: 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Analyzed: 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Reported: 03/25/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 Lab Sample #: MB0317 04030101 04030102 04030103 04030104 04030105 04030106 Client Sample #: -- BP -1 @ 0.5 BP -1 @ 2.5 SP -2 @ 0.5 BP -2 @ 2.5 BP -3 @ 0.5 BP -3 @ 2.5 Dilution Factor: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ANALYTE mg /kg mg /kg mg /kg mg /kg mg /kg mg /kg mg/kg C7 -9 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. C10 -11 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. C12 -13 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. C14 -15 N.D. 0.13 N.D. 0.38 N.D. 0.42 N.D. C16 -17 N.D. 0.48 N.D. 1.2 0.27 0.88 N.D. C18 -19 N.D. 0.87 N.D. 2.0 0.41 1.2 N.D. C20 -21 N.D. 1.4 N.D. 2.7 0.62 1.8 N.D. C22 -23 N.D. 2.2 N.D. 3.5 1.1 2.6 N.D. C24 -25 N.D. 2.6 N.D. 4.2 1.2 2.9 N.D. C26 -27 N.D. 4.9 N.D. 6.6 2.7 5.1 N.D. C28 -30 N.D. 6.6 N.D. 10 2.7 6.0 N.D. C31 -32 N.D. 3.1 N.D. 4.8 1.2 2.8 N.D. C33 -34 N.D. 1.4 N.D. 2.9 0.67 2.0 N.D. C35 -36 N.D. 0.46 N.D. 1.2 0.15 0.81 N.D. TOTAL <8.0 24 <8.0 39 11 27 <8.0 Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons (EFH) are quantitated against a diesel #2 standard. INT_ Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. Petra Environmental ATTN: Mr. Brian Villalobos 3185 -A Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Laboratory Reference #: PTE 14688 Client Project /D: Regent Marina Client Project #: 204 -04 SEMI VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GVA4S (EPA 8270C) Sample Description: Soil Sampled: -- 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Received: -- 03/17/04 03/17104 03/17/04 Extracted: 03/23/04 03/23/04 03/23/04 03/23/04 Analyzed: 03/24/04 03/24/04 03/24/04 03/24/04 Reported. 03/25104 03/25/04 03/25/04 0325104 Lab Sample #: MB 04030101 04030102 04030103 Client Sample #: -- BP -1 @ 0.5 BP -1 @ 2.5 SP -2 @ 0.5 Dilution Factor: 1 1 1 1 ANAL YTE CAS # pg/kg pg /kg pg/kg pg/kg Acenaphthene 83 -32 -9 <100 <100 <100 <100 Acenaphthylene 208.96 -8 <100 <100 <100 <100 Aniline 62 -53-3 <100 <100 <100 <100 Anthracene 120 -12 -7 <100 <100 <100 <100 Benzoic acid 65 -85 -0 <1000 <1000 <1000 <1000 Benzo (a) anthracene 56 -55 -3 <100 <100 <100 4100 Benzo (b) fluoranthene 205 -99-2 <250 <250 <250 4250 Benzo (k) flucranthene 207 -08 -9 <250 <250 4250 <250 Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 191 -24-2 <250 <250 <250 <250 Benzo (a) pyrene 50 -32 -8 <250 <250 <250 <250 Senzyl alcohol 100 -51 -6 <100 <100 <100 <100 bis- (2chloroethoxy) methane 111 -91 -1 <100 <100 <100 <100 bis- (2- chloroethyl) ether 111 -44.4 <100 <100 4100 <100 bis- (2- chloroisopropyp ether 108 -60 -1 4100 <100 4100 <100 bis- (2- ethylhexyl) phthalate 117 -81.7 <100 <100 <100 <100 4- Bromophenyl phenyl ether 101 -55 -3 <100 <100 4100 <100 Butyl benzyl phthalate 85.68 -7 <100 <100 <100 <100 4- Chloroaniline 106.47 -8 4100 <100 <100 <100 2- Chloronaphthalene 91 -58-7 4100 <100 <100 <100 4- Chloro- 3- methylphenol 59.50.7 <100 <100 <100 <100 2- Chlorophencl 95.57 -8 <100 <100 <100 <100 4- Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 7005.72 -3 <100 <100 <100 <100 Chrysene 218.01.9 <100 <100 <100 4100 Dibenz(a,h) anthracene 53 -70-3 <100 <100 <100 -100 Dibenzofuran 132 -64-9 <100 <100 <100 <100 Di -n -butyl phthalate 84 -74-2 <250 <250 <250 4250 1,3- 01chlorobenzene 541.73 -1 <100 <100 <100 <100 1,4- Oichlorobenzene 106 -46-7 <100 <100 <100 <100 1,2- 01chlorobenzene 95 -50-1 <100 <100 <100 <100 2,4- Oichlcrophenol 120 -83 -2 <100 4100 <100 4100 Diethyl phthalate 84.66.2 <100 <100 <100 <100 2,4- Dimethylphenol 105 -67 -9 <100 <100 <100 <100 Dimethyl phthalate 131 -11 -3 <100 4100 <100 <100 4,6- Dinitro- 2- methylphenol 534-52.1 <1000 <1000 <1000 <1000 IN IT ... -. orange Coast Analytical, Inc. SEMI VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GUMS (EPA 8270C) (continued) Laboratory Reference #: PTE 14688 Client Project ID: Regent Marina Client Project #: 204 -04 Sampled: — 03117104 03/17/04 03/17/04 Received: -- 03/17/04 03/17104 03117/04 Extracted: 03/23/04 03/23/04 0323104 03123104 Analyzed: 03/24/04 03/24/04 03124/04 03/24104 Reported: 03/25/04 0325!04 03/25104 03/25!04 Lab Sample #: MS 04030101 04030102 04030103 Client Sample #: -- BP -1 Q 0.5 5P -1 @2.5 BP -2 0.5 Dilution Factor: 1 1 1 1 ANALYTE (con't) CAS # pglkg pglkg pglkg pglkg 2,4- Dinitrophenol 51.28-5 <1000 <1000 <1000 <1000 2,4- Dinitrotoluene - 121 -14-2 <250 <250 <250 <250 2,6- Dinitrotoluene 606-20 -2 4250 <250 <250 <250 Di- n -octyl phthalate 117 -84-0 <250 <250 <250 <250 - Fluoranthene 206 -44 -0 <100 <100 4100 <100 Fluorene 86 -73-7 <100 <100 4100 <100 Hexachlorobenzene 118 -74-1 <100 <100 4100 4100 Hexachlorobutadiene 87 -68-3 <100 <100 <100 <100 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 <500 4500 <500 <500 Hexachloroethane 67 -72 -1 <100 <100 <100 <100 • Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene 19339-5 <250 <250 4250 <250 Isophorone 78 -59 -1 <100 4100 <100 <100 2- Methylnaphthalene 91.57 -6 4100 <100 <100 <100 2- Methylphenol 95.48 -7 4100 <100 4100 <100 3 & 4- Methylphenol 108 -39- 4,106 -44 -5 <100 <100 <100 <100 Naphthalene 91 -20.3 <100 <100 <100 4100 2- Nitroanitine 88 -74-4 <250 <250 <250 <250 3- Nitroanitine 99 -09-2 4250 <250 <250 <250 ' 4-Nitroanillne 100 -01 -6 4250 <250 <250 4250 Nitrobenzene 98 -95 -3 <100 <100 <100 4100 2- Nitrophenol 88 -75-5 <100 <100 <100 4100 4- Nitrophenol 100 -02 -7 <1000 <1000 <1000 <1000 N- Nitrosodiphenylamine 86 -30-6 4100 <100 4100 4100 - WIN itrosodi- n- propylamine 621 -64 -7 <100 <100 <100 4100 N- Nitrosodimethylamine 62 -75 -9 4100 <100 <100 <100 Pentachlorophencl 87 -86-5 <1000 <1000 <1000 <1000 Phenanthrene 85 -01 -8 <100 <100 4100 4100 Phenol 108 -95-2 <100 400 370 <100 Pyrene 129 -00 -0 4100 <100 <100 <100 1,2,4- Trichlorobenzene 12482.1 <100 <100 <100 <100 ' 2,4,5 - Trichlorophenol 95 -95.4 <100 <100 <100 <100 2,4,6- Trichlorophenol 88 -06-2 <100 <100 <100 <100 Acceptable Surrogate %RC %RC %RC %RC %RC 2- Fluorophenol 23 -119% 90 83 77 87 Phenol -d6 32-120% 96 87 84 90 ' Nitrobenzene -d5 18-141% 100 85 91 89 2- Fluorobiphenyl 39 -123% 102 92 96 94 2,4,6- Tribromophencl 14 -141% 99 96 91 100 Terphenyl -d14 48-151% 107 97 104 94 INIT • -• Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. Petra Environmental ATTN: Mr, Brian Vllslobos 3185 -A Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Sample Description: Soil Laboratory Reference #: PTE 14688 Client Protect ID: Regent Marina Client Project #• 204-04 SEMI VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC/MS (EPA 8270C) Sampled: 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Received: 03/17/04 03117104 03/17/04 Extracted., 0323/04 03/23/04 03123/04 Analyzed: 0324/04 03/24/04 0324/04 Reported: 0325/04 0325104 03/25/04 Lab Sample #: 04030104 04030105 04030106 . Client Sample #: BP -2 @ 2.5 BP -3 @ 0.5 BP -3 @ 2.5 Dilution Factor: 1 1 1 ANAL YTE CAS # pg/kg pg/kg pg/kg Acenaphthene 83 -32 -9 <100 <100 <100 Acenaphthylene 208 -96 -8 <100 <100 <100 Aniline 62 -53 -3 <100 <100 <100 Anthracene 120 -12 -7 <100 <100 <100 Benzoic acid 65 -85.0 <1000 <1000 <1000 Benzo (a) anthracene 56 -55 -3 <100 <100 <100 Benzo (b) nuoranthene 205 -99-2 450 <250 <250 Benzo (k) ftuoranthene 207-08 -9 <250 <250 <250 Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 191 -24 -2 <250 <250 <250 Benzo (a) pyrene 50 -32 -8 <250 <250 <250 Benzyl alcohol 100 -51-6 <100 <100 <100 bis- (2- chlomethoxy) methane 111 -91 -1 <100 <100 <Ica bis- (2- chloroethyl) ether 111 -44 -4 <100 <100 <100 bis- (2-chloroisopropyp ether 108 -60 -1 <100 <100 <100 bis -(2- ethylhexyl) phthalate 117 -81 -7 <100 <100 <100 4- Bromophenyl phenyl ether 101 -55-3 <100 <100 <100 . Butyl benzyl phthalate 85-08 -7 <100 <100 102 4- Chloroaniline 106 -47 -8 <100 <100 <100 2- Chloronaphthalene 91 -58-7 <100 <100 <100 4- Chloro- 3- methylphenol 59 -50-7 <100 <100 <100 2- Chlorophenol 9557 -8 <100 <100 <100 4- Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 7005 -72 -3 <100 <100 <100 Chrysens 218 -01 -9 <100 <100 <100 Dibenz(a,h) anthracene 53.70 -3 <100 <100 <100 Dibenzofuran 132 -64.9 <100 <100 <100 Di -n -butyl phthalate 84 -74 -2 <250 <250 <250 1,3- Dichlorobenzene 541 -73 -1 <100 <100 <100 1,4- Dichlorobenzene 106 -46 -7 <100 <100 <100 1,2- Dichlorobenzene 95 -50 -1 <100 <100 <100 2,4- Dichlorophenol 120 -83 -2 <100 <100 <100 Diethyl phthalate 84 -66-2 <100 <100 <100 2,4- Dimethytphenol 105 -67 -9 <100 <100 <100 Dimethyl phthalate 131 -11 -3 <100 <100 <100 4,6- Dinitro- 2- methylphenol 534 -52 -1 <1000 <1000 <1000 INIT —• Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. SEMI VOLATILE ORGANICS SY GUMS (EPA 8270C) (continued) Laboratory Reference A PTE 14688 Client Project ID: Regent Marina Client Project #: 204-04 Sampled: 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Received: 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Extracted: 03123/04 03/23104 03/23104 Analyzed: 03/24/04 03/24/04 03/24104 Reported: 0325104 03125104 03125/04 Lab Sample #: 04030104 04030105 04030106 Client Sample #: BP -2 @ 2.5 SP -3 @ 0.5 BP -3 @ 2.5 Dflution Factor: 1 1 1 ANALYTE (cont) CAS # pglkg pglkg pglkg 2,4- Dinitrophenol 51 -28 -5 0000 <1000 <1000 2,4- Dindratoluene 121 -14 -2 4250 <250 <250 2,6- Dinitrotoluene 606 -20.2 <250 <250 <250 Di-n -octyl phthalate 117 -84-0 <250 <250 <250 — Fluoranthene 206 -440 <100 <100 <100 Fluorene 86 -73-7 <100 <100 <100 Hexachlorobenzene 118 -74 -1 <100 <100 <100 Hexachlorobutadlene 87 -68 -3 4100 <100 <100 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77 -47.4 <500 <500 <500 Hexachloroethane 67 -72.1 4100 <100 <100 Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) pyrene 193 -39 -5 <250 <250 <250 Isophorone 78 -59-1 <100 <100 <100 2- Methy(naphthafene 91 -57 -6 <100 <100 4100 2- Methylphenol 95 -48 -7 <100 <100 <100 3 & 4- Methylphenol 108 -39- 4,106 -44 -5 4100 <100 <100 ' Naphthalene 91 -20 -3 <100 <100 <100 2- Nitroaniline 88 -744 <250 <250 <250 3- Nitroaniline 99 -09-2 <250 <250 <250 4- Nitroaniline 100 -01-6 <250 <250 <250 Nitrobenzene 98.95 -3 <100 <100 <100 2- Nitrophenol 88.75 -5 <100 <100 4100 4- Nitrophenol 100.02 -7 <1000 <1000 <1000 N- Nitrosodiphenylamine 86 -30-6 <100 <100 <100 N- Nitrosodi-n- propylamine 621 -647 <100 <100 4100 N- Nitrosodimethylamine 62 -75 -9 <to0 <100 <100 Pentachlorophenol 87 -86 -5 <1000 <1000 <1000 Phenanthrene 85 -01 -8 <100 <100 <100 Phenol 108 -95.2 4100 4100 690 Pyrene 129 -00.0 <100 <100 <100 1,2,4 - Trichlorobenzene 120 -82 -1 <100 <100 <100 2,4,5 - Trichlorophenol 95 -95.4 <100 <100 <100 2,4,6- Trichlorophenol 88 -06.2 <ibo <100 <100 Acceptable Surrogate %RC %RC %RC %RC 2- Fluorophenol 23 -119% 83 92 87 Phenol -d6 32-120% 86 93 92 - Nitrobenzene -dS 18-141% 86 86 91 2- Fluorobiphenyl 39 -123% 93 92 96 2,4,6 - Tribromophenol 14 -141% 86 105 98 Terphenyl -d14 48-151% 95 92 95 INIT - • Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. Petra Environmental ATTN: Mr. Brian Villalobos Laboratory Reference #: PTE 14688 .3185 -A Airway Client Project ID: Regent Marina Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Client Project #: 204 -04 ORGANOCHLORINATED PESTICIDES (EPA 8081A Sample Description: Soil Sampled: - -- 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Received: -- 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Extracted: 03/18/04 03/18/04 03/18/04 03/18/04 Analyzed., 03/22/04 03/M04 03/22/04 03/22/04 Reported: 03/25/04 03125/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 Lab Sample #: ME0318 04030101 04030102 04030103 Client Sample #: - -- BP -1 @ 0.5 BP -1 @ 2.5 BP -2 @ 0.5 Dilution Factor: 1 1 1 1 ANALYTE CAS # pglkg pglkg pglkg pglkg Aldrin 309 -CO-2 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 alpha -8HC 319 -84-6 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 beta -BHC 319 -85 -7 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 delta -BHC 319-86 -8 <10 <10 <10 <10 gamma -BHC (Lindane) 58 -89-9 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Chlordane 57 -74 -9 <30 <30 <30 <30 4,4' -DDD 72 -54-8 <10 <10 <10 <10 4,4' -DDE 7255 -9 <5.O <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 4,4' -DDT 50 -29-3 <10 <10 <10 <10 Dieldrin 60 -57 -1 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 Endosulfan 1 95958 -8 <10 <10 <10 <10 Endosulfan II 33212 -659 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Endosulfan sulfate 1031 -07 -8 <50 <50 <50 <50 Endrin 72 -20-8 <10 <10 <10 <10 Endrin aldehyde 7421 -93-4 <15 <15 <15 <15 Heptachlor 76 -44-8 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 Heptachlor epoxide 1024 -57 -3 <5.0 <5.O <5.0 <5.0 Methoxychlor 72 -43 -5 <150 <150 <150 <150 Toxaphene 8001 -35 -2 <40 <40 <40 <40 Acceptable Surrogate %RC %RC %RC %RC %RC TCMX D -144% 65 113 55 75 INT_ Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. Petra Environmental . ATTN: Mr. Brian Villalobos 3185 -A Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Laboratory Reference* PTE 14688 Client Project ID: Regent Marina Client Project #: 204 -04 ORGANOCHLORINATED PESTICIDES (EPA 8081AJ Sample Description: Soil Sampled: 03/17104 03/17/04 03/17/04 Received: 03/17104 03/17/04 03117/04 Extracted: 03/18/04 03/16/04 03/18/04 Analyzed: 03/22/04 03/22/04 03122/04 Reported., 03125/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 Lab Sample #: 04030104 04030105 04030106 Client Sample A- BP -2 @ 2.5 BP -3 @ 0.5 BP -3 @ 2.5 . Dilution Factor. 1 1 1 ANALYTE CAS # pglkg pglkg pglkg Aldrin 309 -00 -2 <2.0 <20 <2.0 alpha -BHC 319 -84 -6 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 beta -BHC 319 -85-7 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 delta -BHC 319 -86 -8 <10 <10 <10 gamma -BHC (Undane) 58 -89 -9 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 " Chlordane 57 -74 -9 <30 <30 <30 4,4' -DDD 72 -54-8 <10 <10 <10 4,4' -DOE 72 -55-9 <5.0 13 <5.0 4,4' -DDT 50 -29 -3 <10 <10 <10 Dieldrin 60 -57 -1 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 Endosulfan1 959 -98 -8 <10 <10 <10 Endosulfan II 33212 -65-9 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Endosulfan sulfate 1031 -07 -8 <50 <50 <50 Endrin 72 -20 -8 <10 <10 <10 Endrin aldehyde 7421 -93-4 <15 <15 <15 Heptachlor 76 -44-8 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 Heptachlor epoxide 1024 -57 -3 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 Methoxychlor 72 -43 -5 <150 <150 <150 Toxaphene 8001 -35 -2 <40 <40 <40 Acceptable Surrogate %RC %RC %RC %RC TCMX D -144° 88 89 75, INT Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. Petra Environmental ATTN: Mr. Brian Villelobos 3185 -A Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Laboratory Reterencek PTE 14688 Client Project 1D: Regent Manna Client Project #: 204 -04 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL'S (EPA 8082) Sample Description: Soil Sampled: — 03117(04 03117104 03/17/04 Received: — 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Extracted: 03118104 03/18104 03/18/04 03/18/04 Analyzed: 03/19/04 03/19/04 03/19/04 03/19/04 Reported: 03/25/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 03125/04 Lab Sample #: M60318 04030101 04030102 04030103 Client Sample #: -- BP -1 @ 0.5 BP -1 @ 2.5 BP -2 @ 0.5 Dilution Factor: 1 1 1 1 — ANALYTE CAS# pg/kg pg/kg pg/kg pglkg PCB -1016 12674 -11 -2 <25 <25 <25 <25 PCB -1221 111104 -28 -2 <25 <25 <25 <25 PCS -1232 11141 -16 -5 <25 <25 <25 <25 PCB -1242 53469 -21 -9 <25 <25 <25 <25 PCS -1248 12672 -29-6 <25 <25 <26 <25 ' PCB -1254 11097 -69-1 425 <25 <25 <25 PCB -1260 11096-82 -5 <25 <25 <25 <25 Acceptable Surrogate %RC %RC %RC %RC %RC Decachlorobiphenyl 42 -129° 94 86 74 74 INT. Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. Petra Environmental ATTN: Mr. Brian Villalobos 3185 -A Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Laboratory Reference #: PTE 14688 Client Project ID, Regent Marina Client Project A 204 -04 POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL'S (EPA 8082 Sample Description: Soil Sampled: 03/17104 03/17/04 03/17/04 Received: 03117/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 Extracted: 03/18/04 03/18/04 03/18/04 Analyzed: 03/19/04 03/19/04 03/19104 Reported., 03/25104 03!25/04 03/25/04 Lab Sample #: 04030104 04030105 04030106 Client Sample #: BP -2 @ 15 SP -3 @ 0.5 SP-3 @ 2.5 Dilution Factor: 1 1 1 ANALYTE CAS # p9/kg p91k9 p9/k9 PCB -1016 12674 -11 -2 <25 <25 <25 PCB -1221 111104 -28-2 <25 <25 <25 PCB -1232 11141 -16-5 <25 <25 <25 PCB -1242 53469 -21 -9 <25 <25 <25 PCB -1248 12672 -29-6 <25 <25 <25 PCB -1254 11097 -69-1 <25 <25 <25 PCB -1260 11096 -82 -5 <25 <25 <25 Acceptable Surrogate %RC %RC %RC %RC Decachlorobiphanyl 42 -129% 63 74 80 INT -• Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. Petra Environmental ATTN: Mr. Brian Vilialobos 3185 -A Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Sample Description: Soil Sampled: Received: Reported: Lab Sample #: Client Sample #: ANALYTE EPA Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (Total) Cobalt Copper Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc METHOD 60106 50108 60108 60108 50108 60108 60108 60108 60106 7471A 60106 6010B 60106 6010B 60106 60108 60108 Laboratory Reference #: PTE 14688 Client Project ID: Regent Marina Client Project #: 204 -04 INT_ Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. - -- 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 -- 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/25/04 0325104 0325104 03/25104 MB 04030101 04030102 04030103 BP -1 @ 0.5 BP -1 @ 2.5 SP -2 @ 0.5 DATE mglkg mg /kg mg /kg mg/kg TESTED 0322104 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 0322104 <1.0 5.1 2.0 5.9 0322/04 <0.5 36 4.1 32 0322/G4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0322/04 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0322/04 <0.5 15 2.3 15 0322/04 <0.5 3.5 <0.5 3.1 0322/04 <0.5 24 1.2 42 0322/04 <1.0 14 <1.0 19 0322/04 <0A 0.50 <0.1 2.8 0322104 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 03/22/04 <0.5 9.7 1.2 9.0 0322/04 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 03/22/04 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0322104 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 03/22/04 <0.5 28 4.5 28 0322/04 <0.5 51 3.8 65 INT_ Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. Petra Environmental ATTN: Mr. Brian Villalobos 3185 -A Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Sample Description: Soil Sampled: Received: Reported., Lab Sample #: Client Sample #: ANALYTE EPA Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (Total) Cobalt Copper Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Vanadium Zinc INT -r METHOD 60108 60108 6010B 60108 60108 .60108 6010B 60108 6010B 7471A 60108 6010B 60106 60108 6010B 6010B 6010B Laboratory Reference #: PTE 14688 ClientProjectlD: Regent Marina Client Project #: 204 -04 CCR Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. 03/17/04 03/17/04 03117104 03/17/04 03/17!04 03/17/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 0325/04 04030104 04030105 04030106 BP -2 @ 2.5 BP -3 @ 0.5 BP -3 @ 2.5 DATE mg /kg mg /kg mg /kg TESTED 0322104 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 03/22104 4.0 4.9 1.6 0322/04 26 38 4.1 0322104 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0322/04 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0322/04 12 15 2.4 0322/04 3.1 3.1 <0.5 0322!04 14 75 1.7 0322/04 7.7 24 <1.0 0322/04 0.22 1.5 <0.1 0322/04 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 0322/04 7.4 9.0 1.2 0322104 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 0322/04 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0322104 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 03/M04 22 29 4.4 0322/04 35 90 3.B Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. Petra Environmental ATTN: Mr. Brian ViIlalobos 3185-A Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Sample Description: Soil Sampled, Received., Reported: Lab Sample # Client Sample #: ANALYTE Percent Moisture EPA DATE METHOD TESTED - -- 0323/04 Laboratory Reference ik PTE 14688 Client Project 1D: Regent Marina Client Project #." 204-04 -- 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 -- 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 03/25/04 MB 04030101 04030102 04030103 - -- BP -1 @ 0.5 BP -1 @ 2.5 8P -2 @ 0.5 UNITS - -- 38 13 49 % (W/w) INT_ Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. Petra Environmental ATTN: Mr. Brian Villalobos 3185 -A Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Sample Description: Soil Sampled., Received: Reported: Lab Sample #: Client Sample tl: ANALYTE Percent Moisture EPA DATE METHOD TESTED 03/23/04 Laboratory Reference #: PTE 14688 Client Project ID: Regent Marina Client Project #: 204-04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17/04 03/17!04 03/25/04 03/2S104 03/25/04 04030104 04030105 04030106 BP -2 @ 2.5 BP -3 @ 0.5 BP -3 @ 2.5 UNITS 32 42 17 -- % (w/w) INT Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. QA1QC REPORT for Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons (EPA 80156) Reporting units: ppm 1. Matrix Spike (MS) / Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Date of Analysis : 03/17/04 Laboratory Sample No : 04030049" Laboratory Reference No : PTE 14688 Definition of Terms R1 SP CONC MS MSD % MS % MSD RPD ACP %MS(MSD) ACP RPD 2. Laboratory Control Sample Result of Laboratory Sample Number Spike Concentration Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery Of MS: ((MS -R1)1 SP) x100 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD -R1) / SP) x 100 Relative Percent Difference: {(MS -MSD) / (MS +MSD)) x 100 x 2 Acceptable Range of Percent Acceptable Relative Percent Difference MSlMSD RDP exceeded the laboratory control limit. Recover met acceptance criteria, Sample is heterogeneous. Sample homogeneity could not be readily achieved. Date of Analysis: 03/17/04 Laboratory Standard No : OCA10748 Analyte SP CONC SP % RECOVERY ACCEPTABLE % Extractable Fuel 100 82 ACP ACP Analyte R1 MS MSD % MS % MSD RPD CONC RPD Extractable Fuel Hydrocarbons 65.0 100 122 197 57 132 47 55 -137 23 Definition of Terms R1 SP CONC MS MSD % MS % MSD RPD ACP %MS(MSD) ACP RPD 2. Laboratory Control Sample Result of Laboratory Sample Number Spike Concentration Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery Of MS: ((MS -R1)1 SP) x100 Percent Recovery Of MSD: {(MSD -R1) / SP) x 100 Relative Percent Difference: {(MS -MSD) / (MS +MSD)) x 100 x 2 Acceptable Range of Percent Acceptable Relative Percent Difference MSlMSD RDP exceeded the laboratory control limit. Recover met acceptance criteria, Sample is heterogeneous. Sample homogeneity could not be readily achieved. Date of Analysis: 03/17/04 Laboratory Standard No : OCA10748 Analyte SP CONC RESULTS % RECOVERY ACCEPTABLE % Extractable Fuel 100 82 82 55 -130 Hydrocarbons INIT Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. QA/QC REPORT for Metals Reporting units: ppm 1. Matrix Spike (MS) / Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) I ahnratnry Referenre No PTF 14669 Ana/yfe rested QC Sample R! CONC MS MSD %MS %MSD RPD ACP% ACP RPD Antimony' 03/22/04 A04030024 0.0 20.0 3.80 3.72 19 19 2 75 -125 20 Arsenic 0322104 A04030024 9.9 20.0 28.0 28.7 91 94 2 75 -125 20 Barium' 0322/04 A04030024 140 40.0 167 169 68 73 1 75 -125 20 Beryllium 03/22/04 A04030024 0.56 10.0 10.4 10.5 98 99 1 75 -125 20 Cadmium 03/22/04 A04030024 0.0 10.0 9.47 9.58 95 96 1 75 -125 20 Chromium (Total) 03/22/04 A04030024 21.0 1 20.0 37.6 38.5 83 88 2 75 -125 20 Cobalt 0322/04 A04030024 7.1 20.0 23.4 23.8 82 84 2 75 -125 20 Copper 0322/04 A04030024 23 20.0 41.6 43.0 93 100 3 75 -125 20 Lead 0322/04 A04030024 7.2 20.0 23.5 23.6 82 82 0 75 -125 20 Mercury 0322/04 A04030024 0.0 1.00 1.03 1.05 103 105 2 80 -120 20 Molybdenum' 0322104 A04030024 0.0 20.0 14.8 14.8 74 74 0 75 -125 20 Nickel 0322/04 A04030024 22 20.0 37.6 38.5 78 83 2 75-125 20 Selenium 0322/04 A04030024 1 0.0 20.0 16.7 1 17.0 84 1 85 2 75 -125 20 Silver 03/M04 A04030024 0.0. 20.0 19.51 19.8 98 99 2 75 -125 20 Thallium 03/22/04 A24030024 0.0 20.0 14.9 15.2 75 76 2 75 -125 20 Vanadium 0322!04 A04030024 30 20.0 46.5 47.3 83 87 2 75 -125 20 Zinc 0322104 A04030024 34 40.0 65.2 66.5 78 81 2 75 -125 20 Definition of Terms : te TDated R1 Result of QC Sample SP CONC Spike Concentration Added to Sample MS Matrix Spike Results MSD Matrix Spike Duplicate Results % MS Percent Recovery of MS: ((MS -R1) / SP) x 100 % MSD Percent Recovery of MSD: ((MSD -R1) /SP) x 100 RPD Relative Percent Difference: {(MS -MSD) / (MS +MSD)) x 100 x 2 ACP % Acceptable Range of Percent for MS /MSD ACP RPD Acceptable Relative Percent Difference 80 -120 Matrix spike recovery was low, the method control sample recovery was acceptable. 0322104 OCA 11028 Analyte te TDated Standard D SP CONC Results % Recovery ACP % Antimony 0322/04 OCA 11028 20.0 18.4 92 80 -120 Arsenic 03/22/04 OCA 11028 20.0 18.5 93 80 -120 Barium 0322104 OCA 11028 40.0 36.7 92 80 -120 Beryllium 0322/04 OCA 11028 10.0 9.67 97 80 -120 Cadmium 0322/04 OCA 11028 10.0 9.30 93 80 -120 Chromium (Total) 0322/04 OCA 11028 20.0 18.8 94 80 -120 Cobalt 0322/04 OCA 11028 20.0 18.5 93 80 -120 Copper 0322/04 OCA 11028 20.0 18.5 93 80 -120 Lead 0322/04 OCA 11028 20.0 18.2 91 80 -120 Mercury 0322104 OCA 11006 1.00 1.09 109 80 -120 Molybdenum 0322104 OCA 11028 20.0 18.3 92 80 -120 Nickel 0322/04 OCA 11028 20.0 18.7 94 80 -120 Selenium 0322/04 OCA 11028 20.0 18.5 93 80 -120 Silver 0322/04 OCA 11028 20.0 18.0 90 80 -120 Thallium 0322104 OCA 11028 20.0 18.1 91 80 -120 Vanadium 0322/04 OCA 11028 20.0 18.7 94 80 -120 Zinc 0322/04 OCA 11028 40.0 37.2 93 80 -120 INIT -- Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. =QC REPORT for Polychlorinated Biphenyl's (EPA 8082) Reporting units: ppb 1. Matrix Spike (MS) / Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Date of Analysis : 03/19/04 Laboratory Sample No : 03040102 Laboratory Reference No : PTE 14669 Analyte RI SP CONC MS MSO %MS %MSD RPD ACP% ACP RPD PCB -1016 0.0 250 190 200 76 80 5.1 46 -126 28 PCB -1260 0.0 250 320 330 128 132 3 42 -160 35 Definition of Terms R1 SP CONC MS MSD % MS % MSD RPD ACP % ACP RPD Result of Laboratory Sample Number - Spike Concentration Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery of MS: {(MS -RI) / SP) x 100 Percent Recovery of MSD: {(MSD -R1) / SP) x 100 Relative Percent Difference: {(MS- MSD) / (MS +MSD)) x 100 x 2 Acceptable Range of Percent for MS /MSD Acceptable Relative Percent Difference 2. Laboratory Contrbl Sample Date of Analysis: 03/19/04 Laboratory Standard No : OCA 10981 Analyte SP CONC Results % Recovery ACP % PCB -1016 250 220 as 1 46 -129 PCB -1260 250 230 92 1 40 -159 INIT — -. Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. QA/QC REPORT for Semi- Volatile Organic Compounds (EPA 8270C) Reporting Units: ng 1. Matrix Spike (MS) I Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Date of Analysis : 03/24/04 Laboratory Sample No : 04030102 Laboratory Reference No : PTE 14688 Analyte R1 SP CONC MS MSD %MS %MSD RPD ACP% ACP RPD Phenol 7.4 100 75 75 68 68 0 33 -108 27 2- Chlorophenol 0.0 100 76 74 76 74 3 35 -108 25 1,4- Dichlorobenzene 0.0 50 44 39 88 78 12 36 -106 26 N- Nitrosodipropylamine 0.0 50 50 50 100 100 0 40 -119 27 1,2,4- Tdchlorobenzene 0.0 50 43 43 86 86 0 37 -113 24 4- Chlorc -3- methyl henol 0.0 100 74 71 74 71 4 38 -118 23 Acenaphthene 2hiorophenol 0.0 50 40 41 80 82 2 32 -114 27 Per 0.0 100 1 4 24 Pyrene 0.0 50 1 48 49 96 98 2 46 -127 24 Definition of Terms: R1 SP CONC MS MSD • MS • MSD RPD ACP % ACP RPD Result of Laboratory Sample Number Spike Concentration Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery of MS: ((MS -R1) I SP} z 100 Percent Recovery of MSD: ((MSD-RI) / SP} x 100 Relative Percent Difference: ((MS -MSD) / (MS +MSD)} x 100 x 2 Acceptable Range of Percent for MSIMSD Acceptable Relative Percent Difference 2. Laboratory Control Sample Date of Analysis : 03/24/04 Laboratory Standard No : OCA10323d, OCA10324c Analyte SP CONC Results % Recovery ACP % Phenol 100 68 68 33 -110 2- Chlorophenol 100 73 .73 33 -118 1,4- Dichlorobenzene 50 45 90 35-113 N- Nitrosadipropylamine 50 54 108 36 -126 1,2,4- Tiichoorobenzene 50 45 90 35 -121 4- Chloro- 3- methylphenol 100 76 76 36 -122 Acenaphthene 50 41 82 31 -123 PentachioropIn nol 100 57 57 25-116 Pyrene 50 53 106 42 -126 INIT — Orange Coast Analytical, Inc. QA/QC REPORT for Organochlorinated Pesticides (EPA 8081) Reporting units: ppb 1. Matrix Spike (MS) f Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Date of Analysis : 03/22/04 Laboratory Sample No : 0403102 Laboratory Reference No : PTE 14669 Analyte R1 SP CONC MS MSD %MS %MSD RPD ACP'/ ACP RPD Gamma -BHC 0.0 20 22 19 110 95 15 29 -137 40 Heptachlor 0.0 20 22 21 110 105 5 23 -143 40 Aldrin 0.0 20 22 22 110 110 0 21 -140 40 Dieldrin` 0.0 50 49 1.3 98 3 190 .12 -150 42 Endrin' 0.0 50 53 1.3 106 3 190 14 -160 38 DDT 0.0 50 65 55 130 110 17 35 -155 38 Definition of Terms R1 SP CONC MS MSD % MS % MSD RPD ACP % ACP RPD Result of Laboratory Sample Number Spike Concentration Added to Sample Matrix Spike Results Matrix Spike Duplicate Results Percent Recovery of MS: ((MS -R1) / SP) x 100 Percent Recovery of MSD: {(MSD -R1) / SP) x 100 Relative Percent Difference: {(MS -MSD) / (MS +MSD)) x 100 x 2 Acceptable Range of Percent for MS /MSD Acceptable Relative Percent Difference Matrix spike recovery was low, the laboratory control sample recovery was acceptable. 2. Laboratory Control Sample Date of Analysis : 03/22/04 Laboratory Standard No : OCA10911 Analyte SP CONC Results % Recovery ACP % Gamma -BHC 20 19 95 29 -135 Heptachlor 20 19 95 33 -130 Aldrin 20 19 95 31 -118 Dieldrin 50 48 96 30 -137 Endrin 50 51 1C2 37 -146 DDT 50 55 110 37 -146 INIT —.—. Orange Coast Analvtical. Inc 'o I a O � U a a � a 'a (OD L. O :y U Y� Q C U C ca N 7 a w U LJ.. N N J co U J 2 Q U Z Q . 10' i o � ; a = w o = � � o W 2 tl U U N .Q N L U U r >oy a < C � c 0 O N E O m Z ¢ i r '54 k IV 1 ce) q y a m z )co p O N ,m E w co ? 51 / 0 � LL aco i- m �co r > > ' y Y L N N i. w _ — s ¢ ¢ y z m � o W W o a h q o � u�v 02 o V4i C\j N f (j n1 rj M 1 d/ d E E E MX m w m J m `° ty