HomeMy WebLinkAboutNewport Auto Center (PA2002-227)CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. 4
July 17, 2003
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: Gregg B. Ramirez, Associate Planner
(949) 644 -3219, aramirez (a)city.newport- beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: Newport Auto Center
Use Permit No. 3660, Amendment No. 1 (PA2002 -227)
Request for an amended Use Permit to allow a 2,496 square foot expansion
of an existing 1,504 sqaure foot sales office /storage building (4,000 square
feet total) and a 6,302 square foot addition to an automobile repair and
service building at an existing automobile dealership.
APPLICANT:RHL Design Group for Auto Nation Inc. (dBA as Newport Auto Center)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit
No. 3660 subject to the findings and conditions of approval included within the attached
draft resolution.
DISCUSSION:
Introduction and Site Background:
The subject property is located on the southerly side of Coast Highway between the
recently constructed commercial center (Starbucks, Boats U.S.) at 353 East Coast
Highway to the west and the Promontory Point Apartments to the east. The subject
property is generally flat but eventually gives way to a steep bluff to the east.
At it's meeting of January 18, 1968 the Planning Commission approved Use Permit No.
1327 which permitted the development of an automobile sales and service facility on the
subject property. However, the Planning Commission approval included a condition of
approval, which prohibited direct access to the property from Bayside Drive. The
applicant appealed the decision to the City Council, which at it's meeting of February
13, 1968, voted to remove the condition prohibiting access from Bayside Drive. This
original development included 30,462 square feet of showroom, offices and service
areas.
Newport Auto Center
July 17, 2003
Page 2
11 i iuil'III
3! Ili
Subject Property
�iiV ++�ia�Illl
i ii I "f -t
4
�IRII i� -f til
I I'y a � unnii i I N(41ui "{yI;
lill 100 I 1y 4 1 Ilhlh VIII dim 200 400 Feet T
VICINITY MAP
5
445 East Coast Highway
(PA2002 -2271
Current
Development:
Automobile sales and service facility
To the north:
DeAnza Ba side Village mobile home park across East Coast Highway)
To the northwest:
Retail shopping center/ Professional offices
To the southeast:
Promontory Point residential apartment complex
To the west:
Single family homes (across Bayside Drive
7
Newport Auto Center
July 17, 2003
Page 3
At it's meeting of June 18, 1987, the Planning Commission approved an amendment to
Use Permit No. 1327, which requested an 8,109 square foot addition to the existing
showroom, offices and service areas of the dealership. Although the request was
approved, the rights granted by the use permit were never exercised and the use permit
subsequently expired.
At it's meeting of September 9, 1999, the Planning Commission approved use Permit
No. 3660 (an amendment to Use Permit 1327) that permitted a 2,660 square foot
addition to the existing automobile sales and service facility. The project included
additions to the showroom, offices and storage areas and an extensive remodel. The
majority of the additions and alterations approved by this Use Permit have been
completed with the exception of a remodel of a sales office /storage building, which is
proposed to be expanded and remodeled into a sales office /showroom under this
application.
Analysis:
The applicant proposes a 2,496 square foot addition to an existing 1,504 square foot
sales office /storage building and to alter the use to an automobile sales showroom with
sales offices. This work is identified as "new Bentley showroom" on the attached plans.
Additionally, the applicant proposes a 6,302 square foot addition to the existing
automobile service facility. This work is identified as "new Audi service building" on the
attached plans. The proposed additions (8,798 square feet total) and alterations are part
of an ongoing renovation of the dealership, which began as a result of the approval of
Use Permit No. 3660. The applicant has indicated these changes are in conjunction with
the re- organization of the Newport Auto Center venture. The dealership has
discontinued selling Chevrolets and will now sell new and used Porsche, Audi and
Bentley vehicles.
General Project Characteristics
Lot Area
185,591 square feet 4.20606 Acres
Square Footage
Existing: 36,498
Proposed: 8,798
Pro osed Total: 45,296 s uare feet
FAR
Maximum Permitted: 0.3
Proposed: 0.24
Parking Spaces
Total Spaces Required: 186
(111,000 sgft. of lot area)
Proposed Spaces: 300
Display Allocation: 104
Customer Allocation: 36
Service Allocation: 90
Employee Allocation: 70
Number of Employees
70
3
Newport Auto Center
July 17, 2003
Page 4
General Plan
The subject property is located in General Plan Statistical Area G1 and has a land use
designation of Retail and Service Commercial. Automobile dealerships with service
facilities are a permitted use within this land use designation. The maximum floor area
ratio (FAR) permitted by the General Plan for the subject property is 0.30. The lot area
of the subject property is 185,591 square feet. Therefore, the maximum permitted
structural square footage is 55,677 (185,591 x .30). The proposed project includes a net
increase of 8,798 square feet resulting in a total of 45,296 square feet, which is less
than the 55,677 (0.3 FAR) square foot maximum permitted by the General Plan.
Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General
Plan.
Zoning Code
The subject property is located within the Retail and Service Commercial (RSC) zoning
district. Automobile dealerships within the RSC zoning district require the approval of a
Use Permit by the Planning Commission. The proposed project complies with all
development regulations specified by the Zoning Code including floor area (0.5 FAR
maximum), building bulk, setbacks and the 26/35 height limitation zone.
On -Site Parking
The Zoning Code establishes a parking requirement for vehicles sales and rentals,
including storage and maintenance, at a rate of one space for each 1,000 square feet of
lot area. Based on this ratio, 186 parking spaces are required for the proposed project.
The plans show that 300 parking spaces are provided for vehicle display, vehicle
storage, vehicles in for service, employee parking and customer parking. Although the
Zoning Code requirement includes vehicle display, staff believes that a minimum of 186
parking spaces should be provided exclusive of vehicle display spaces (showroom and
outdoor) to adequately accommodate vehicles in for service and customer and
employee parking. This is based upon the parking demands beyond display and storage
experienced at other automobile dealerships in the City. Therefore, staff has included a
condition of approval requiring that a minimum 186 parking spaces be provided for
purposes other than display of vehicles be provided.
Traffic Impact Analysis
A traffic study is required pursuant to the Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) when a
project will generate in excess of 300 average daily trips (ADT). A copy of the TPO is
attached as Exhibit No. 2. The City Traffic Engineer prepared a preliminary estimate of
trips and concluded that a traffic study would be required. A traffic impact analysis was
4
Newport Auto Center
July 17, 2003
Page 5
then prepared by Kunzman Associates under the supervision of the City Traffic
Engineer pursuant to the TPO and its implementing guidelines (Exhibit No. 3).
The traffic analysis examined traffic generation and impacts and on -site circulation. The
proposed 8,798 square foot expansion was found to generate the following trip counts:
422 Average Daily Trips
17 AM Peak Hour Trips
23 PM Peak Hour Trips
Seven (7) intersections were identified by the Traffic Engineer for study. The projected
traffic was distributed to the road network in accordance with the TPO and sound traffic
engineering principals. The timeframe used for the analysis is through the year 2004.
Using this technique accounts for future increases in traffic due to committed projects and
anticipated build out of the General Plan through 2004.
Using this methodology none of the seven (7) study intersections were found to exceed
the one - percent (1%) threshold and therefore, no further studies are required and the
project is exempt from the requirements of the Traffic Phasing Ordinance
On -Site Circulation
The existing access points to the property are off East Coast Highway and Bayside Drive.
No changes to vehicular access are proposed. The traffic analysis concluded that access
and on -site circulation to be satisfactory for the site. No recommendations for changes or
improvements were suggested by the traffic impact analysis.
Signage
Signage for the dealership is required to conform with Zoning Code requirements. The
plans show a new monument sign adjacent to the Bayside Drive entrance and several wall
signs. The applicant (RHL Design Group) has indicated that the signage details are not
part of this application. Therefore, all signage will be reviewed for conformance with sign
development regulations prior to the issuance of building permits. Any deviation from the
standard sign regulations is required to receive approval of a Sign Program from the
Modifications Committee. The applicant has been informed that the new monument sign
on Bayside Drive is not permitted by the Zoning Code, since only one pole or monument is
permitted per lot.
Lighting
The existing facility provides exterior lighting at the front display area along East Coast
Highway and throughout the site. In order to eliminate the lighting impacts on adjoining
properties, the project has been conditioned to require that all light fixtures be screened
or hooded to eliminate light spillage onto adjoining properties. A condition of approval
S
Newport Auto Center
July 17, 2003
Page 6
(no. 26) has been included requiring that prior to the final building inspection, a
representative from the Planning Department or Code and Water Quality Enforcement
Division conduct an evening inspection to ensure that site lighting does not spill on to
adjoining properties. Additionally, in order decrease the possibility of night lighting
conflicts with surrounding residential properties, staff believes that after hours lighting
should be limited to security lighting only. A condition of approval (no. 27) that reflects
this limitation and allows the Planning Director to require additional lighting controls has
been included in the draft resolution
Hours of Operation
The applicant has proposed the following hours of operation:
DAY
SALES
SERVICE
Monday — Friday
7:00 AM — 8:00 PM
7:00 AM — 7:00 PM
Saturday
9:00 AM — 7:00 PM
8:00 AM — 4:00 PM
Sunda
10:00 AM — 6:00 PM
Closed
Staff believes that these hours are acceptable and that limiting the activities of the
dealership to early evening hours will prevent conflicts with surrounding residential
properties. A condition of approval has been included reflecting these business hours.
Building and Fire Department Requirements
The Building and Fire Departments have done a cursory review of the proposed project.
The Fire Department has indicated that an additional fire hydrant must be provided and
that an existing fire hydrant needs to be relocated. Conditions of approval for the
completion of this work during the course of construction have been included along with
standard Building and Fire Department conditions of approval.
Coastal Commission Review
Should the proposed additions be approved, the applicant would be required to receive
approval from the California Coastal Commission since the project is located within the
Coastal Zone and the proposed additional square footage exceeds ten percent of the
existing gross square footage.
Environmental Review:
This project has been reviewed and it has been determined that it is categorically
exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 1
(Existing Facilities). Under this exemption additions up to 10,000 square feet are
permitted if all public services and facilities are available and the site is not
environmentally sensitive as is the case in this instance. �0
Newport Auto Center
July 17, 2003
Page 7
Public Notice:
Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to property owners within
300 feet of the property (excluding roads and waterways) and posted at the site a
minimum of 10 days in advance of this hearing consistent with the Municipal Code.
Additionally, the item appeared upon the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at
City Hall and on the city website.
Conclusion:
Staff believes the request to expand the existing automobiles dealership is reasonable
and that the design and continued operation of an automobile dealership, as
conditioned, is appropriate for this location. Additionally, there is nothing to indicate that
the existing automobile dealership has been detrimental to the surrounding
neighborhood or the City.
As of the writing of this staff report, staff has received no comments regarding this
application.
Prepared by:
Gregg B. amirez, Associate P anner
Exhibits:
Submitted by:
Patricia L. Temple, Plafining Director
1. Resolution No. 2003 -_; findings and conditions of approval
2. Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO)
3. Traffic Study
4. Correspondence from applicant
5. Project Plans
EXHIBIT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2003- ; FINDINGS
AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
9
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO USE PERMIT NO. 3660 (PA2002 -227) FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 445 EAST COAST HIGHWAY
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS,
RESOLVES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was filed by Autonation Inc., Newport Auto Cars LLC with
respect to property located at 445 East Coast Highway, and legally described as Resubdivision
No. 202, Parcel No. 1, requesting approval of Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit No. 3660. The
amended use permit pertains to the expansion of an existing previously approved automobile
sales and service dealership on an existing legal lot in a commercial area that is zoned for
this use.
Section 2. A public hearing was held on July 17, 2003 in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A notice of the time, place and
purpose of the aforesaid meeting was given. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to
and considered by the Planning Commission at this meeting.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds as follows:
1. The location of the proposed expansion of the automobile sales and service dealership
requiring this use permit, and the proposed conditions under which it would be
operated or maintained, is consistent with the General Plan and the purpose of the
Retail and Service Commercial (RSC) District in which the site is located; will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or welfare of persons
residing or working in or adjacent to the neighborhood of such use; and will not be
detrimental to the properties or improvements in the vicinity or to the general welfare of
the city. The project has been conditioned to minimize impacts to the surrounding
neighborhood by limiting the hours of operation, requiring all vehicle off - loading to be
done on -site and requiring that lighting be designed and installed to not spill onto
adjoining properties.
2. The operational characteristics of the automobile dealership, including the hours of
operation are consistent with Municipal Code requirements. Any change in the
operational characteristics would require and amendment to the Use Permit, reviewed
by the Planning Commission
3. The project has been reviewed, and it qualifies for a categorical exemption pursuant to
the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 1 (Existing Facilities), which
allows additions up to 10,000 square feet if all public services and facilities are
available and the site is not environmentally sensitive.
i
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission Resolution No. _
Paae 2 of 5
Section 4. Based on the aforementioned findings, the Planning Commission approves
Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit No. 3660, subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit "A" and
the plans dated July 1, 2002.
Section 5. This action shall become final and effective fourteen days after the
adoption of this Resolution unless within such time an appeal is filed with the City Clerk or this
action is called for review by the City Council in accordance with the provisions of Title 20,
Planning and Zoning, of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17" DAY OF JULY 2003.
BY:
Chairman
Secretary
AYES:
EXCUSED:
NOES:
10
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission Resolution No. _
Paae 3 of 5
EXHIBIT "A"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO USE PERMIT NO. 3660
The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, floor
plans and elevations, dated July 1, 2002.
Amendment No. 1 to Use Permit No. 3660 shall expire unless exercised within 24
months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.91.050 of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code, unless an extension is otherwise granted.
3. Any change in operational characteristics, hours of operation, expansion in area, or
substantial modification to the floor plan, shall require an amendment to this Use
Permit or the processing of a new Use Permit.
4. This Use Permit may be reviewed, modified or revoked by the Planning Commission
or City Council should they determine that the proposed uses or conditions under
which it is being operated or maintained is detrimental to the public health, welfare or
materially injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or if the property is
operated or maintained so as to constitute a public nuisance.
Should this business be sold or otherwise come under different ownership, any future
owners or assignees shall be notified of the conditions of this approval by the current
owner or leasing company.
The applicant is required to obtain all applicable permits from the City Building and Fire
Departments. The construction plans must comply with the most recent, City- adopted
version of the California Building Code.
The facility shall be designed to meet exiting and fire protection requirements as
specified by the Uniform Building Code and shall be subject to review and approval by
the Newport Beach Building Department and the Fire Department.
8. The project shall comply with State Disabled Access requirements, including
handicapped parking requirements.
9. The establishment shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, County and City water
quality regulations for the life of this use permit.
10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, Fair Share Traffic Fees shall be paid in
accordance with Chapter 15.38 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
II
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission Resolution No.
Paae4of5
11. The exterior of the facility shall be maintained free of litter and graffiti at all times. The
owner or operator shall provide for daily removal of trash, litter debris and graffiti from the
premises and on all abutting sidewalks within 20 feet of the premises.
12. All proposed signs shall be in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 20.67 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code and shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer if
located adjacent to the vehicular ingress and egress.
13. The use of banners, pennants, balloons, wind signs, moving signs, or flashing or
animated electrical signs is prohibited.
14. The hours of operation of the establishment shall be limited to the following:
DAY
SALES
I SERVICE
Monday — Friday
7:00 AM — 8:00 PM
7:00 AM — 7:00 PM
Saturday
9:00 AM — 7:00 PM
8:00 AM — 4:00 PM
Sunda
10:00 AM — 6:00 PM
Closed
15. A Special Events Permit is required for any event or promotional activity outside the
normal operational characteristics of the approved use, as conditioned, or that would
attract large crowds, involve the sale of alcoholic beverages, include any form of on-
site media broadcast, or any other activities as specified in the Newport Beach
Municipal Code to require such permits.
16. The operator of the vehicle sales and rental facility shall be responsible for the control of
noise generated by the subject facility. The use of outside loudspeakers, paging systems
or sound systems shall be prohibited. The noise generated by the proposed use shall
comply with the provisions of Chapter 10.26 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
That is, the sound shall be limited to no more than depicted below for the specified
time periods:
17. A minimum of 186 parking spaces, excluding interior and exterior display spaces, shall
be provided on -site for use as service parking, customer parking and employee
parking The final design of all on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian
circulation systems shall be subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineer. 1
I
Between the hours of
7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.
Between the hours of
10:00 p.m. and 7:00am
interior
exterior
interior
exterior
Measured at the property line of
Commercially zoned property:
NIA
65 dBA
NIA
60 dBA
Measured at the property line of
Residentially zoned property:
N/A
60 dBA
NIA
50 dBA
Residential property:
45 dBA
55 dBA
40 dBA
50 dBA
17. A minimum of 186 parking spaces, excluding interior and exterior display spaces, shall
be provided on -site for use as service parking, customer parking and employee
parking The final design of all on -site parking, vehicular circulation and pedestrian
circulation systems shall be subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineer. 1
I
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission Resolution No.
Page 5 of 5
18. All employees shall park personal vehicles on -site.
19. The outdoor storage or display of materials, equipment or any other auto related parts or
merchandise shall not be permitted.
20. Vehicle service shall be performed entirely within the service buildings. No vehicle
service or repair shall take place in any parking space or drive aisle.
21. No vehicles shall be displayed in landscaped areas along East Coast Highway and
Bayside Drive.
22. Unloading or loading of cars from or on -to auto transport vehicles shall take place on -site.
The unloading, staging or storing of vehicles for sale or service off -site is prohibited.
23. No vehicles shall be displayed with open hoods, doors, trunks or tailgates.
24. Provisions shall be made for the storage and collection of used oil, lubricants and other
hazardous or toxic materials.
25. Washing of automobiles on -site shall be limited to only those vehicles owned by the
subject dealership or those that are otherwise on -site for servicing.
26. Site lighting shall be designed so light generated on -site does not spill on to adjoining
properties or right -of -way. Prior to the final building inspection, the project applicant shall
arrange an evening site inspection with the Planning Department or Code and Water
Quality Enforcement Division to ensure that site lighting does spill on to adjoining
properties.
27. After hours lighting is limited to security lighting. Should the City receive complaints
regarding after hours lighting, the Planning Director may require additional shields or
hoods on existing fixtures, the lowering of light standards, the reduction in the amount of
lighting used or any other measure necessary to eliminate light spillage on to neighboring
properties.
28. Prior to the issuance of building permits, any existing on -site fire hydrants found to be
blocked by parking spaces shall be relocated to a location approved by the Fire
Department.
29. Prior to the issuance of building permits, additional fire hydrants shall be installed as
required by the Newport Beach Fire Department.
13
EXHIBIT NO. 2
TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE (TPO)
14
Chapter 15.40
TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE*
Sections:
15.40.010
Findings.
15.40.020
Objectives.
15.40.030
Standards for Approval -
Findings— Exemptions.
15.40.035
Expiration.
15.40.040
Definitions.
15.40.050
Procedures.
15.40.060
Hearings— Notice.
15.40.070
Appeal— Review.
15.40.075
Proportionality.
15.40.080
Severability.
Prior ordinance history: Ords. 1765, 1777, 1787, 85 -30, 86 -20 and
942.
15.40.010 Findings.
A. The phasing of development with circulation
system improvements to accommodate project -gen-
erated traffic is important to maintaining the high
quality of the residential and commercial neighbor-
hoods in Newport Beach;
B. Traffic congestion caused by inadequate
phasing of circulation improvements and develop-
ment is harmful to the public health, safety and
general welfare due to the potential for delays in
emergency response, air quality impacts and an
overall reduction in the quality of life.
C. While some development may be important
to the continued vitality of the local economy, the
City should continue to require mitigation of traffic
impacts by project proponents to ensure the circula-
tion system functions as planned;
D. Circulation system improvements should not
alter the character of neighborhoods or result in the
construction of streets and highways which expand
the capacity of the roadway system beyond levels
proposed in the circulation element;
E. This chapter is consistent with the authority
of a public entity to ensure that project proponents
make or fund improvements that increase the capaci-
15.40.010
ty of the circulation system to accommodate project -
generated traffic. (Ord. 99 -17 § 1 (part), 1999)
15.40.020 Objectives.
The City Council has adopted this chapter to
achieve the following objectives:
A. To provide a uniform method of analyzing
and evaluating the traffic impacts of projects that
generate a substantial number of average daily trips
and/or trips during the morning or evening peak
hour period;
B. To identify the specific and near -term impacts
of project traffic as well as circulation system im-
provements that will accommodate project traffic
and ensure that development is phased with identi-
fied circulation system improvements;
C. To ensure that project proponents, as condi-
tions of approval pursuant to this chapter, make or
fund circulation system improvements that mitigate
the specific impacts of project traffic on primary
intersections at or near the time the project is ready
for occupancy; and
D. To provide a mechanism for ensuring that a
project proponent's cost of complying with traffic
related conditions of project approval is roughly
proportional to project impacts. (Ord. 99 -17 § 1
(part), 1999)
15.40.030 Standards for Approval—
Findings--Exemptions-
A. Standards for Approval. Unless a project is
exempt as provided in subsection (C), no building,
grading or related permit shall be issued for any
project until the project has been approved pursuant
to this chapter (approved). A project shall be ap-
proved only if the Planning Commission, or the City
Council on review or appeal, finds:
1. That a traffic study for the project has been
prepared in compliance with this chapter and Ap-
pendix A;
2. That based on the weight of the evidence in
the administrative record, including the traffic study,
one of the findings for approval in subsection (B)
can be made; and
569 (Newpw[ Beach 9-99)
Is'
15.40.030
3. That the project proponent has agreed to
make or fund the improvements, or make the contri-
butions, that are necessary to make the findings for
approval and to comply with all conditions of ap-
proval.
B. Findings for Approval. No project shall be
approved pursuant to this chapter unless the Plan-
ning Commission, or the City Council on review or
appeal, finds that:
1. Construction of the project will be completed
within sixty (60) months of project approval; and:
a. The project will neither cause nor make
worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at
any impacted primary intersection, or
b. The project including circulation improve-
ments that the project proponent is required to make
and/or fund, pursuant to a reimbursement program
or otherwise, will neither cause nor make worse an
unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any impact-
ed primary intersection, or
c. The project trips will cause or make worse an
unsatisfactory level of traffic service at one or more
impacted primary intersection(s) but the project
proponent is required to construct and/or fund, pur-
suant to a reimbursement program or otherwise,
circulation improvements, or make contributions,
such that:
(1) The project trips will not cause or make
worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at
any impacted primary intersection for which there
is a feasible improvement, and
(2) The benefits resulting from circulation im-
provements constructed or funded by, or contribu-
tions to the preparation or implementation of a
traffic mitigation study made by, the project pro-
ponent outweigh the adverse impact of project trips
at any impacted primary intersection for which there
is (are) no feasible improvement(s) that would, if
implemented, fully satisfy the provisions of Section
15.40.030 (13)(1)(b). In balancing the adverse im-
pacts and benefits, only the following improvements
and/or contributions shall be considered with the
greatest weight accorded to the improvements and/or
contributions described in subparagraphs (a) and (b)
below:
(a) Contributions to the preparation of, and/or
implementation of some or all of the recommenda-
tions in, a traffic mitigation study related to an
impacted primary intersection that is initiated or
approved by the City Council,
(b) Improvements, if any, that mitigate the im-
pact of project trips at any impacted primary inter-
section for which there is (are) no feasible improve -
ment(s) that, if implemented, would satisfy the
provisions of Section 15.40.030(B)(1)(b),
(c) Improvements that mitigate the impacts of
project trips on any impacted primary intersection
in the vicinity of the project,
(d) Improvements that mitigate the impacts of
project trips on any impacted primary intersection
operating, or projected to operate, at or above 0.80
ICU, or
d. The project complies with (1)(b) upon the
completion of one or more circulation improve-
ments; and:
(1) The time and/or funding necessary to com-
plete the improvement(s) is (are) not roughly pro-
portional to the impacts of project - generated trips,
and
(2) There is a strong likelihood the improve -
ment(s) will be completed within forty -eight (48)
months from the date the project and traffic study
are considered by the Planning Commission, or City
Council on review or appeal. This finding shall not
be made unless, on or before the date of approval,
a conceptual plan for each improvement has been
prepared in sufficient detail to permit estimation of
cost and funding sources for the improvement(s);
the improvement(s) is (are) consistent with the cir-
culation element or appropriate amendments have
been initiated; an account has been established to
receive all funds and contributions necessary to
construct the improvement(s) and the improvement
is identified as one to be constructed pursuant to the
five year capital improvement plan and as specified
in Appendix A, and
(3) The project proponent pays a fee to fund
construction of the improvement(s). The fee shall be
calculated by multiplying the estimated cost of the
improvement(s) by a fraction. The fraction shall be
(Newport Beath 9-99) 570 1 6
r
calculated by dividing the "effective capacity de-
crease" in the impacted primary intersection attrib-
utable to project trips by the "effective capacity
increase" in the impacted primary intersection that
is attributable to the improvement. The terms "effec-
tive capacity increase" and "effective capacity de-
crease" shall be calculated in accordance with the
provisions of Appendix A. Or:
2. The project is a Comprehensive Phased Land
Use Development and Circulation System Improve-
ment Plan with construction of all phases not antici-
pated to be complete within sixty (60) months of
project approval; and
a. The project is subject to a development
agreement which requires the construction of, or
contributions to, circulation improvements early in
the development phasing program, and
b. The traffic study contains sufficient data and
analysis to determine if that portion of the project
reasonably expected to be constructed and ready for
occupancy within sixty (60) months of project ap-
proval satisfies the provisions of subsections
(B)(1)(a) or (B)(1)(b), and
c. The Land Use and Circulation Elements of
the General Plan are not made inconsistent by the
impact of project trips (including circulation im-
provements designed to mitigate the impacts of
project trips) when added to the trips resulting from
development anticipated to occur within the City
based on the Land Use Element of the General Plan
and Zoning Ordinance, and
d. The project is required, during the sixty (60)
month period immediately after approval, to con-
struct circulation improvement(s) such that:
(1) Project trips will not cause or make worse an
unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any impact-
ed primary intersection for which there is a feasible
improvement,
(2) The benefits resulting from circulation im-
provements constructed or funded by, or contribu-
tions to the preparation or implementation of a
traffic mitigation study made by, the project pro-
ponent outweigh the adverse impact of project trips
at any impacted primary intersection for which there
is (are) no feasible improvement(s) that would, if
15.40.030
implemented, fully satisfy the provisions of Section
15.40.030 (B)(1)(b). In balancing the adverse im-
pacts and benefits, only the following improvements
and/or contributions dial/ be considered with the
greatest weight accorded to the improvements and/or
contributions described in subparagraphs (a) or (b):
(a) Contributions to the preparation of, and/or
implementation of some or all of the recommenda-
tions in, a traffic mitigation study related to an
impacted primary intersection that is initiated or
approved by the City Council,
(b) Improvements, if any, that mitigate the im-
pact of project trips at any impacted primary inter-
section for which there is (are) no feasible improve -
ment(s) that, if implemented, would fully satisfy the
provisions of Section 15.40.030 (B)(l)(b),
(c) Improvements that mitigate the impacts of
project trips on any impacted primary intersection
in the vicinity of the project,
(d) Improvements that mitigate the impacts of
project trips on any impacted primary intersection
operating, or projected to operate, at or above 0.80
ICU; and
3. The Planning Commission, or City Council
on review or appeal finds, by the affirmative vote
of five- sevenths (5/7) of the members eligible to
vote, that this chapter is inapplicable to the project
because the project will result in benefits that out-
weigh the project's anticipated negative impact on
the circulation system;
C. Exemptions. The following projects are ex-
empt from the provisions of this chapter:
1. Any project that generates no more than three
hundred (300) average daily trips. This exception
shall not apply to individual projects on the same
parcel or parcels of property, such as changes in
land use or increases in floor area, that in any twen-
ty four (24) month period cumulatively generate
more than three hundred (300) average daily trips;
2. Any project that, during any morning or
evening peak hour period, does not increase trips by
one percent or more on any leg of any primary
intersection;
3. Any project that meets all of the following
criteria:
571 fNawpa $tech 11 -99)
I}
15.40.030
a. The project would be constructed on property
within the sphere of influence of the City of New-
port Beach and that is within the jurisdiction of the
County of Orange or an adjacent city as of the
effective date of this ordinance; and
b. The project is subject to a vesting tentative
or parcel map, development agreement, pre-annex-
ation agreement and/or other legal document that
vests the right of the property owner to construct the
project in the County or adjacent city; and
c. The property owner enters into a development
agreement, pre - annexation agreement, or similar
agreement with the City of Newport Beach:
(I) That establishes the average daily trips gener-
ated by the project ( "baseline "),
(2) That requires the property owner to comply
with this chapter prior to the issuance of any permit
for development that would, in any twenty-four (24)
month period, generate more than three hundred
(300) average daily trips above the baseline for the
project, and
(3) That makes this chapter applicable to the
project immediately upon annexation;
d. The City Council determines, prior to annex-
ation, that the environmental document prepared for
the project fully complies with CEQA and the
CEQA Guidelines. (Ord. 99 -17 § 1 (part), 1999)
15.40.035 Expiration.
A. The Planning Commission, or City Council
on review or appeal, shall establish a specific date
on which the approval of the project shall expire
(expiration date). In no event shall the expiration
date be less than twenty -four (24) months from the
date of approval. The initial expiration date for
projects other than those described in Section
15.40.030(B)(2) shall be no more than sixty (60)
months from the date of approval unless subsequent
approval is required from another public agency. In
the event the project requires approval from another
public agency subsequent to approval pursuant to
this chapter, the date of approval shall be the date
of the action taken by the last public agency to
consider the project. Approval pursuant to this
chapter shall terminate on the expiration date unless
(Newport Beach 11 -99) 572
a building permit has been issued for the project and
construction has commenced pursuant to that permit
prior to the expiration date or the expiration date has
been extended pursuant to subsection (C).
B. Any project approved pursuant to this chapter
shall be considered a "committed project" until the
expiration date, if any, or until the final certificate
of occupancy has been issued if construction has
commenced on a portion or a phase of the project.
All trips generated by each committed project shall
be included in all subsequent traffic studies con-
ducted pursuant to this chapter as provided in ap-
pendix A. Committed projects shall be administered
in accordance with Appendix A.
C. The Planning Commission or City Council
may, subsequent to the date of approval, extend the
expiration date for any project.
D. The Planning Director and Traffic Manager
shall, at least annually, monitor the progress of each
project to ensure compliance with this chapter. (Ord.
99 -17 § I (part), 1999)
15.40.040 De$nitions.
The following terms used in this chapter shall
have the meaning indicated below:
"Circulation element" means the Circulation Ele-
ment of the General Plan of the City of Newport
Beach as amended from time to time.
"Circulation improvement(s)" or "improve -
ment(s)" means a modification to a primary intersec-
tion (possibly including a related roadway link) that
increases the capacity of the primary intersection.
"Date of approval" means the date the project is
approved, pursuant to this chapter, by the Planning
Commission or City Council on review or appeal.
"Feasible improvement" means a circulation
improvement that:
1. Is not inconsistent with the Circulation Ele-
ment at the date of approval and has not been iden-
tified as infeasible by the City Council at a public
hearing to initiate or approve a traffic mitigation
study; or
2. Is not inconsistent with any antendment(s) to
the Circulation Element initiated and approved in
conjunction with the project and is required to be
Ig
completed by the project proponent and/or the City
within the time frames required by this chapter.
"ICU" means the intersection capacity utilization
computed in accordance with standard traffic engi-
neering principles and the procedures outlined in
Appendix A.
"Impacted primary intersection" means any pri-
mary intersection where project trips increase the
volume of traffic on any leg by one percent (1%) or
more during any peak hour period.
"Level of traffic service" means the letter as-
signed to a range of ICUs in accordance with Ap-
pendix A.
"Members eligible to vote" means all members
of the Planning Commission, or the City Council on
review or appeal, lawfully holding office except
those members disqualified from voting due to a
conflict of interest.
"NBTAM" means the most current City Council
approved traffic analysis model for the City of New-
port Beach.
"Peak hour period" means the four consecutive
fifteen (15) minute periods between seven a.m. and
nine a.m. (morning) and the four consecutive fifteen
(15) minute periods between four p.m and six p.m.
(evening) with the highest traffic volumes (for each
primary intersection) as determined by the field
counts required by Appendix A.
"Primary intersection" means each intersection
identified in Appendix B and, with respect to indi-
vidual projects, any additional intersection selected
by the Traffic Manager pursuant to Section
15.40.050(B)(1).
"Project" means "project" as defined in the Cali-
fornia Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources
Code § 21000 et seq.), the CEQA Guidelines, and
relevant decisional law without regard to whether
any environmental document is required for the
project. The tetra "project" shall also mean any
application for a building or grading permit for
development that would generate more than three
hundred (300) average daily trips.
"Traffic engineer" means the traffic engineer
retained by the City to prepare the traffic study.
I •111
"Traffic Manager" means the person employed by
the City who occupies the position of Traffic and
Development Services Manager or similar position.
"Traffic mitigation study" means a study designed
to evaluate and recommend a plan to mitigate the
impact of an actual or potential unsatisfactory level
of traffic service at any primary intersection on
traffic volumes in any residential neighborhood in
the vicinity of that primary intersection.
"Traffic study" means the study prepared by the
traffic engineer in strict compliance with this chapter
including Appendix A.
"Unsatisfactory level of service" means a level of.
service at a primary intersection, which is worse
than level of service "D" (.90 ICU), during any
morning or evening peak hour period as determined
in accordance with Appendix A. (Ord. 99 -17 § 1
(part), 1999)
15.40.050 Procedures.
A. The Planning Commission shall determine
compliance with this chapter based on the traffic
study for the project, information from staff and/or
the traffic engineer, and the entire record of the
proceedings conducted with regard to the project.
The traffic study shall be prepared in compliance
with Appendix A.
B. Subject to review by the Planning Commis-
sion, or City Council on review or appeal, the traffic
manager, in the exercise of his/her professional
discretion, shall:
1. Direct the preparation of each traffic study by
a traffic engineer retained by the City and, in com-
pliance with Appendix A, determine those primary
intersections (or other intersections if the impact of
project traffic on primary intersections may not be
representative) that may be impacted by project
trips;
2. Ensure that each traffic, study is prepared in
compliance with the methodology described in Ap-
pendix A and independently evaluate the conclu-
sions of the traffic engineer;
3. Make recommendations to the Planning Com-
mission and/or City Council with respect to the
criteria for evaluating trip reduction measures, the
573 (New Bem6 9.99)
Iq
15.40.050
appropriate trip generation rates of land uses, and
the criteria for distributing project trips to ensure
that each traffic study reflects modem transportation
engineering practice.
C. Any finding or decision of the Planning Com-
mission with respect to any project that also requires
discretionary action on the part of the City Council,
such as an amendment to the general plan or zoning
ordinance, shall be deemed an advisory action. In
such cases the City Council shall take any action
required by this chapter at the same date and time
that the City Council considers the other discretion-
ary approvals required by the project.
D. The application for any building, grading or
other permit for any project subject to this chapter
shall be approved, conditionally approved or denied
within one year from the date on which the applica-
tion is deemed complete. In the event action is not
taken on an application within one year, the project
shall be deemed approved provided it is consistent
with the general plan and zoning ordinance of the
City of Newport Beach.
E. A fee as established by resolution of the City
Council to defray the expenses of administering this
chapter shall accompany the application for a traffic
study. The application for a traffic study shall be
submitted in compliance with Appendix A.
F. The City Council shall conduct a noticed
public hearing prior to initiating or approving any
traffic mitigation study and identifying as infeasible
any improvement at or new any primary intersec-
tion;
G. The City Council may establish reimburse-
ment programs to ensure that multiple projects af-
fecting the same primary intersection pay for im-
provements in proportion to their respective impacts.
The reimbursement programs shall be developed and
administered in compliance with Appendix A. (Ord.
99 -17 § 1 (part), 1999)
15A0.060 Hearings. -- Notice.
A. The Planning Commission, and the City
Council on appeal or review, shall hold a public
hearing on any project pursuant to this chapter. The
public hearing on the traffic study may be consoli-
(Newport Beach 9 -99)
dated with other hearings required by the project.
The hearing shall be noticed in the manner provided
in Section 20.91.030(C). of the Newport Beach Mu-
nicipal Code or any successor provision.
B. All findings required or provided for in this
chapter shall be in writing and supported by the
weight of the evidence in the entire administrative
record for the project including the traffic study.
(Ord. 99 -17 § 1 (part), 1999)
15.40.070 Appeal— Review.
A. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter,
any Planning Commission decision to approve a
project shall be final unless there is an appeal by the
project proponent or any interested person. The
appeal shall be initiated and conducted pursuant to
the procedures in Chapter 20.95 of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code or any successor provision;
B. The City Council shall have a right of review
as specified in Chapter 20.95 of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code or any successor provision;
C. The City Council shall be subject to the same
requirements as the Planning Commission relative
to decisions and findings required by this chapter.
(Ord. 99 -17 § 1 (part), 1999)
15.40.075 Proportionality.
A. In no event shall the Planning Commission
or City Council on review or appeal:
1. Impose any traffic related condition or condi-
tions on the approval of a project that would require
the project proponent to construct one or more cir-
culation improvement(s) if the total cost of traffic
related conditions and/or improvements is not
roughly proportional to the impact of project trips;
or
2. Impose any traffic related condition or condi-
tions on the approval of a project which would
require the payment of fees or costs that are not
roughly proportional to the impact of project trips.
B. The provisions of this chapter are intended to
address the specific and, in most cases, near term
impacts of project trips on impacted primary inter-
sections rather than the overall impact of project
traffic on the circulation system Chapter 15.38 of
574 P
15.40.075
the Newport Beach Municipal Code is intended to
address the overall impact of development on the
circulation system. Conditions or fees imposed
pursuant to this chapter shall be in addition to fees
required pursuant to Chapter 15.38 except as other-
wise provided in Chapter 15.38.
C. The provisions of this section shall not limit
or restrict the authority of the Planning Commission,
or City Council on review or appeal, to impose on
any project all feasible mitigation measures pursuant
to the provisions of applicable law, including CEQA
and the CEQA Guidelines.
D. The provisions of this section shall not re-
quire approval of any project if the Planning Com-
mission, or City Council on review or appeal, is
unable to make the findings required for approval
pursuant to this chapter.
E. The provisions of this section shall not re-
quire approval of any project which the Planning
Commission is authorized to deny or modify pursu-
ant to any State law or City ordinance, resolution or
plan.
F. The provisions of this section shall not limit
or restrict the authority of the Planning Commission,
or City Council on review or appeal, to impose
conditions, fees, exaction or dedications on a project
pursuant to:
1. A development agreement;
2. A reimbursement agreement, a reimbursement
program, or any agreement acceptable to the project
proponent;
3. The consent of the project proponent; or
4. An amendment. to the land use element or
zoning ordinance of the City of Newport Beach that
is required for approval of the project. (Ord. 99 -17
§ I (part), 1999)
15.40.080 Severability.
If all or a portion of any section or subsection of
this chapter is declared invalid, all of the provisions
of this chapter that have not been declared invalid
shall be considered valid and in full force and ef-
fect. (Ord. 99 -17 § 1 (part), 1999)
574 -1 (Newpw Beard 9.99)
al
APPENDIX A
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE
1. General.
These Administrative Procedures (Procedures) apply to any Project for which Traffic Study is required by
the Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO).
2. Application.
a. The proponent of any Project subject to the TPO shall:
i. file an application for a Traffic Study;
ii. pay the required fees; and
iii. sign an agreement to pay all costs related to the Traffic Study.
b. The application shall be accompanied by the following information:
i. A complete description of the Project including the total amount of floor area to be constructed
and the amount of floor area allocated to each proposed land use;
ii. A Project site plan that depicts the location and intensity of proposed development, the location
of points of ingress and egress, and the location of parking lots or structures;
iii. Any proposed Project phasing;
iv. Any trip reduction measure proposed by the Project proponent;
V. Any information, study or report that supports any request by the Project proponent to use trip
generation rates that differ from those used in the NBTAM or the most current version of the TTE
Manual or the SANDAG Manual; and
vi. Any other information that, in the opinion of the Traffic Manager, is necessary to properly
evaluate the traffic impacts of the Project or the Circulation System Improvements that could
mitigate those traffic impacts.
3. Traffic Studv Assumptions.
a. The definitions in Section 15.40.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code shall be applicable to these
Procedures.
(Newpm Bate 9-99) 574 -2 92
b. ICU calculations shall assume a lane capacity value of 1600 vehicles per hour of green (vphg) for both
through and turn lanes. No factor for yellow time shall be included in the lane capacity assumptions.
ICU calculations shall be made by calculating the volume to capacity ratios for each movement to three
decimal places, and then adding the critical movements to obtain an ICU with three decimal places.
The increase in the ICU attributable to Project trips shall be calculated to three decimal places. The
ICU shall then be rounded to two decimal places. For example, an ICU of .904 shall be rounded to
.90 and an ICU of .905 shall be rounded to .91.
c. Circulation System Improvements may be included in the Traffic Study for a Project provided that
the Traffic Manager determines:
The Improvement will be completed no more than one year after completion of the Project or
Project phase for which the Traffic Study is being performed; and
ii. The Improvement is included in the Circulation Element of the General Plan, and is defined in
sufficiently precise terms to allow the Traffic Engineer to conduct an ICU analysis; or
iv. The design of the Improvement is consistent with standard City design criteria or has been
approved by the City Council, or other public entity with jurisdiction over the Improvement, and
is defined in sufficiently precise terms to allow the Traffic Engineer to conduct an ICU analysis.
d. Traffic volumes shall be based on estimates of traffic volumes expected to exist one year after
completion of the Project, or that portion of the Project for which the Traffic Study is being performed.
The intent of this Subsection is to ensure use of the most accurate information to estimate traffic
volumes one year after Project completion. Traffic volume estimates shall be based on:
The most current field counts for each Primary Intersection with counts taken on weekdays dining
the morning and evening Peak Hour Period between February 1 and May 31;
ii. Traffic generated by Committed Projects as determined in accordance with the TPO and these
Procedures
vi. Projects reasonably expected to be complete within the one year after Project completion and
which are located in the City of Newport Beach or its sphere of influence;
iv. Increases in regional traffic anticipated to occur within one year after Project completion as
projected in the NBTAM or other accepted sources of future Orange County traffic growth; and
V. Other information customarily used by Traffic Engineers to accurately estimate future traffic
volumes.
e. For purposes of the traffic analysis of Circulation System Improvements, seventy percent (70 %) of
the incremental increase in intersection capacity (based on a capacity of 1600 vphg for each full traffic
lane) shall be utilized. Upon completion of any Circulation System Improvement, traffic volume counts
shall be updated, and any additional available capacity may then be utilized in future Traffic Studies.
574 -3 (Newport 13e 11 9.99)
J3
f. Trip generation rates for the land uses contemplated by the Project shall be based on standard trip
generation values utilized in NBTAM except as provided in this Subsection. The Traffic Engineer may,
with the concurrence of the Traffic Manager, use trip generation rates other than as specified in the
NBTAM when NBTAM trip generation rates are based on limited information or study and there is
a valid study of the trip generation rate of a similar land use that supports a different rate.
g. The Traffic Engineer may, with the concurrence of the Traffic Manager, reduce trip generation rates
for some or all of the land uses contemplated by the Project based on specific trip reduction measures
when:
The Project proponent proposes in writing and prior to commencement of the Traffic Study,
specific and permanent measures that will reduce Peak Hour Period trips generated by the Project;
and
ii. The Traffic Manager and Traffic Engineer, in the exercise of their best professional judgment,
each determine that the proposed measure(s) will reduce Peak Hour Period Project trips and the
specific reduction in Project trips that can reasonably be expected; and
iii. The Project proponent provides the City with written assurance that the proposed trip generation
reduction measure(s) will be permanently implemented. The Project proponent must consent to
make permanent implementation of the measure(s) a condition to the approval of the Project, and
the measure(s) shall be made a condition of the Project by the Planning Commission or City
Council on review or appeal.
h. In determining Project trips, credit shall be given for existing uses on the Project site. Credit shall be
given based on the trip generation rates in the NBTAM. In the alternative, the Traffic Manager may,
in the exercise of his/her professional judgment, authorize the use of trip generation rates in the ITE
Manual, SANDAG Manual, or on the basis of actual site traffic counts. In the event the Project site
has not been used for any purpose for a period of one (1) year prior to the filing of an application for
a Traffic Study, credit shall be limited to trips generated by the last known land use, if any, that could
be resumed with no discretionary approval. For any land use that is not active as of the date of the
application for Traffic Study, the Project proponent shall have the burden of establishing that the use
was in operation during the previous one (1) year period.
The purpose of this Paragraph is to ensure that trips that would be generated upon completion of a
Project approved pursuant to the TPO are incorporated into any subsequent Traffic Study conducted
prior to completion of the Project and/or post - Project field counts specified in Section Id.i. A
Committed Project is one that has been approved pursuant to the TPO, requires no further discretionary
approval by the City, and has received, or is entitled to receive, a building or grading permit for
construction of the Project or one or more phases of the Project In preparing a Traffic Study, trips
generated by Committed Projects shall be included subject to the following:
All trips generated by each Committed Project or that portion or phase of the Committed Project
for which no certificate of occupancy has been issued shall be included in any Traffic Study
conducted prior to the Expiration Date of that Committed Project;
(NC.PW Beach 9199) 574-4
.V+
ii. In the event a final certificate of occupancy has been issued for one or more phases of a
Committed Project, all trips shall be included in subsequent Traffic Studies until completion of
the first field counts required by Subsection 3(d)(i) subsequent to the date on which the final
certificate of occupancy was issued. Subsequent to completion of the field counts, those trips
generated by phases of the Committed Project that have received a final certificate of occupancy
shall no longer be included in subsequent Traffic Studies.
iii. The Traffic Manager and Planning Director shall maintain a list of Committed Projects and, at
least annually, update the list to reflect new Approvals pursuant to the TPO as well as completion
of all or a portion of each Committed Project. A Committed Project shall not be removed from
the Committed Project list until a final certificate of occupancy has been issued for all phases
and the field counts required by Subsection 3(d)(i) have been taken subsequent to issuance of the
certificate of occupancy.
iv. The total trips generated by Committed Projects shall be reduced by twenty percent (20%) to
account for the interaction of Committed Project trips.
For purposes of Chapter 15.40 and these Procedures, the following Levels of Traffic Service ranges
shall apply:
A
.00—.60 ICU
B
.61-30 ICU
C
.71—.80 ICU
D
.81—.90 ICU
E
.91-1.00 ICU
F
Above 1.00 ICU
4. Initial Traffic Study Procedures.
a. The Traffic Manager shall retain a qualified Traffic Engineer pursuant to contract with the City to
prepare a Traffic Study for the Project in compliance with the TPO and the methodology specified
in these Procedures.
b. The Traffic Manager shall advise the Traffic Engineer of the methodology and assumptions required
by these Procedures and provide the Traffic Engineer with a copy of the TPO and these Procedures.
c. The Traffic Manager, in consultation with the Traffic Engineer and in accordance with accepted traffic
engineering standards and principles, shall determine the most probable manner in which Project Trips
will be distributed throughout the Circulation System. The determination of Project trip distribution .
shall be consistent with:
the assumptions in NBTAM relative to the trip production and attraction characteristics of various
land uses; and
ii. previous trip distribution determinations for Projects of similar size and location;
574-5 (Ncwpon Reach 9-99)
't �
Trip distributions shall be in increments of 5% of Project Trips. In no event shall Project trips be removed
from any roadway on which a Primary Intersection is located except at a signalized intersection with
another roadway on which a Primary Intersection is located. The determination of Project trip distribution
shall, in all cases, reflect the most probable movement of Project trips throughout the Circulation System.
The Traffic Study shall clearly explain the rationale for the determination of Project trip distribution.
d. The Traffic Engineer shall determine if Project trips will increase traffic on any leg of any Primary
Intersection by one percent (1%) or more during any Peak Hour Period one year after Project
completion.
e. In the event the Traffic Engineer determines that Project generated trips will not increase traffic by
one percent (I %) or more on any leg of any Primary Intersection during any morning or evening Peak
Hour Period one year after Project completion the analysis will be terminated. In such event the Traffic
Study and worksheet shall be submitted to the Planning Commission with a recommendation that the
Project be determined exempt from the TPO pursuant to Section 15.40.030 C.2.
No mitigation shall be identified or required for any Primary Intersection unless Project trips increase
traffic on one or more of the legs of the intersection by one percent (1 %) or more during any morning
or evening Peak Hour Period.
5. Traffic Study Methodoloev.
a. The Traffic Engineer, in preparing the Traffic Study, shall evaluate the impact of Project trips generated
from all proposed land uses based on the assumptions specified in Section 3 and the methodology
specified in this Section.
b. In the case of conversion of an existing structure to a more intense land use, the incremental increase
in trips generated by the Project shall be evaluated. In the event the uses within the existing structure
changed during the preceding twelve (12) months, the differential shall be calculated on the basis of
the prior use or uses with the highest trip generation rates according to the NBTAM (or ITE Manual
or SANDAG Manual as appropriate).
c. Project trips shall be distributed in accordance with the determination specified in Subparagraph 4c.
d. The following ICU calculations shall be performed for each Primary Intersection where, one year after
Project completion, Project generated trips will increase traffic by one percent (1 %) or more on any
leg of the Primary Intersection during any morning and/or evening Peak Hour Period:
The existing ICU;
ii. The ICU, with Circulation System Improvements that will be in place within one year after Project
completion, based on all projected traffic including regional traffic increases and trips generated
by Committed Projects excluding Project generated trips; and
iii. The ICU in (ii) with Project trips;
(Newport Beath 9.99) 574 -6 a'�
iv. The ICU in (ii) with Project trips and any trip reduction measures approved by the Traffic
Manager;
v. The ICU in (ii) with Project trips and any mitigation resulting from Improvements;
vi. The ICU in (v) with trip reduction measures approved by the Traffic Manager.
e. The Traffic Study shall, for each Impacted Primary Intersection with an Unsatisfactory Level of Service
(ICU of .905 or more) that has been caused or made worse by Project generated trips, identify each
Feasible Improvement that could mitigate some or all of the impacts of Project trips. The Traffic Study
shall also determine the extent to which the Improvement provides additional capacity for critical
movements at the Impacted Primary Intersection in excess of the Project trips and any other information
relevant to the calculation of any fee required by the TPO.
f. The Traffic Study shall, for each Improvement identified pursuant to Subsection e., estimate the cost
of making the Improvement including the cost of property acquisition, design, and construction. The
Traffic Engineer may perform the cost estimate or, with the approval of the Traffic Manager, retain
a civil engineer or other qualified professional to prepare the cost estimates.
g. The determination of "effective capacity increase" and "effective capacity decrease" as described in
Section 15.40.030 B.l.d. shall be made as specified in this Subparagraph.
In determining the "effective capacity increase" attributable to any Improvement to any Primary
Intersection, the Traffic Engineer shall first calculate the ICU with existing, committed and
regional trips (Future W/O Project ICU). Then the ICU shall be calculated with existing,
committed and regional trips and the Improvement (Improved W/O Project ICU). The "effective
capacity increase" shall be determined by subtracting the Improved W/O Project ICU from the
Future W/O Project ICU.
ii. In determining the "effective capacity decrease" attributable to Project trips the Traffic Engineer
shall first calculate the ICU of the Primary Intersection with existing, committed and regional
trips, Project trips and the Improvement (Improved With Project ICU). The "effective capacity
decrease" shall be calculated by subtracting the Improved W/O Project ICU from the Improved
With Project ICU.
iii. For example, if the Future W/O Project ICU is .92 and the Improved W/O Project ICU is .82
the "effective capacity increase" is 10. If the Improved W/O Project ICU is .82 and the Improved
ICU With Project ICU is .87 the "effective capacity decrease" is 5. Assuming the cost of the
Improvement is $100,000 the contribution of the Project would be $50,000 ($100,000 multiplied
by 5/10).
h. The Traffic Study shall also provide the Planning Commission with any additional information relevant
to the findings or analysis required by the TPO.
5747 (Newport Beach 9-M
J--T .
6. Staff Analysis.
a. The Traffic Engineer shall transmit a draft Traffic Study to the Traffic Manager for review, comment
and correction. The Traffic Manager shall review the draft Traffic Study and submit corrections to the
Traffic Engineer within 15 days after receipt. The Traffic Engineer shall make the corrections within
ten (10) days of receipt and transmit the final Traffic Study to the Traffic Manager.
b. The Traffic Manager shall transmit the final Traffic Study to the Planning Department for presentation
to the Planning Commission.
7. Issuance of Permits.
The City shall not issue building, grading or other permits for a Project Approved pursuant to Section
15.40.030 B.1.b., 15.40.030 B.l.c., or 15.40.030 B.2. until each Improvement that has been assumed to
be in place for purposes of Project Approval, or is to be constructed or funded as a condition to Project
Approval, satisfies the following criteria:
a. The Improvement has been budgeted and committed for construction by or on behalf of the City; or
b. The State, County or other governmental agency making the Improvement has accepted bids for the
Project; or
c. The Improvement has been approved by the appropriate governmental jurisdictions and is to be
constructed by the Project proponent in conjunction with development of the Project or the Project
proponent has guaranteed construction of the Improvement through the posting of bonds or other form
of assurance.
8. Reimbursement Programs.
a. The City Council may establish Reimbursement Programs to ensure Project conditions are roughly
proportional to Project impacts and to facilitate the prompt construction of Improvements to mitigate
the impact of Project trips. A Reimbursement Program may be proposed by the City Manager to the
City Council whenever he/she becomes aware of the potential for multiple Projects to impact a Primary
Intersection and a Feasible Improvement may be required of one or more of the Projects because of
the impact of Project trips.
b. A Reimbursement Program shall have the following components:
i. Identification of the Feasible Improvement(s) including, without limitation, preliminary design
and cost estimates and the estimated date of completion of the Feasible Improvement(s);
ii. Calculation of the "effective capacity increase" attributable to the Feasible Improvement(s);
hi. The amount of the cost of the Feasible Improvement for which the City or Project Proponent shall
be entitled to reimbursement from subsequent or contemporaneous Projects;
(Newpon Beach 9.99) 574 -8 1e
EXHIBIT NO. 3
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
12
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
NEWPORT AUTO CENTER
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (REVISED)
Prepared by:
Carl Ballard and
William Kunzman, P.E.
✓�� y�y 3 Na. TR0058
S dr
May 6, 2003
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES
1111 TowN & COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 34
ORANGE, CA 92868
PHONE: (714) 973 -8383
FAx: (714) 973 -8383
EMAIL: MAIL @TRAFFIC -ENGINEER.COM
WEB: WWW.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM
30
May 6, 2003
Mr. David Keely, Associate Engineer
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92659 -1768
Dear Mr. Keely:
INTRODUCTION
The firm of Kunzman Associates is pleased to present the revised traffic impact analysis
for the Newport Auto Center Expanded Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) in the City of
Newport Beach. The existing automobile dealership is located at 445 Pacific Coast
Highway, hear the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside Drive (see Figure
1). The proposed expansion consists of a 4,000 square foot automobile sales
showroom, a 6,302 square foot addition to a repair and service building and demolition
on an existing 1,504 square foot sales office /storage building. Figure 2 illustrates the
project site plan.
This report summarizes our methodology, analysis, and findings. We trust that the
findings, which are summarized in the front of the report will be of immediate as well as
continuing value to you and the City of Newport Beach in evaluating this project.
Although this is a technical report, every effort has been made to write the report clearly
and concisely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation
engineering, a glossary of terms is provided within Appendix A.
FINDINGS
1. The proposed expansion consists of a 4,000 square foot automobile sales
showroom, a 6,302 square foot addition to a repair and service building and
demolition on an existing 1,504 square foot sales office /storage building.
2. The City of Newport Beach staff provided the Year 2001 morning and evening
peak hour approach volumes at each study area intersection. An ambient growth
rate of 1.0 percent per year was added to the approach volumes to calculate the
Year 2003 traffic conditions. The Year 2001 traffic volumes were expanded to
obtain the existing traffic volumes that would be experienced in Year 2003.
1111 TowN & COUNTRY ROAD, SUITE 34 r ORANGE, CA 92868 -4667 31
TELEPHONE: (714) 973 - 8383 ?' FACSIMILE: (714) 973 -8821
E -MAIL: MAIL @ TRAFFIC- ENGINEER.COM WEB: WWW.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM
3. The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 422 new daily
vehicle trips, 17 new vehicles per hour will occur during the morning peak hour
and 23 new vehicles per hour will occur during the evening peak.
4. The City of Newport Beach staff provided the approved and cumulative projects
in the study area. The approved projects consist of development that has been
approved but are not fully completed. Cumulative projects are known, but not
approved project developments that are reasonably expected to be completed or
nearly completed at the same time as the proposed project.
5. Comparison of the one - percent of the Year 2004 peak hour approach volumes
with the project peak hour approach volumes resulted in no study area
intersection exceeding the one- percent threshold and requiring additional
analysis.
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
Figure 3 identifies the existing roadway conditions for study area roadways. The
number of through lanes for existing roadways and the existing intersection controls are
identified.
Pursuant to discussions with City of Newport Beach staff, the study area includes the
following intersections:
Dover Drive (NS) at:
Westcliff Drive (EW)
Pacific Coast Highway (EW)
Bayside Drive (NS) at:
Pacific Coast Highway (EW)
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
San Joaquin Hills Road (EW)
Santa Barbara Drive (EW)
Pacific Coast Highway (EW)
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Pacific Coast Highway (EW)
The City of Newport Beach staff provided the Year 2001 morning and evening peak
hour approach volumes at each study area intersection (see Appendix B). An ambient
growth rate of 1.0 percent per year was added to the approach volumes to calculate the
Year 2003 traffic conditions. Year 2003 morning and evening peak hour intersection
turning movement volumes have been calculated and are shown on Figures 4 and 5,
respectively. The Year 2001 traffic volumes were expanded to obtain the existing traffic
volumes that would be experienced in Year 2003. 37-
2
TRAFFIC GENERATION
The traffic generated by the project is determined by multiplying an appropriate trip
generation rate by the quantity of land use. Trip generation rates are predicated on the
assumption that energy costs, the availability of roadway capacity, the availability of
vehicles to drive, and our life styles remain similar to what we know today. A major
change in these variables may affect trip generation rates.
Trip generation rates were determined for daily traffic, morning peak hour inbound and
outbound traffic, and evening peak hour inbound and outbound traffic for the proposed
land use. By multiplying the traffic generation rates by the land use quantity, the traffic
volumes are determined. Table 1 exhibits the traffic generation rates, project peak hour
volumes, and project daily traffic volumes. The traffic generation rates are from the
Newport Beach Traffic Analysis Model (NBTAM).
The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 422 new daily
vehicle trips, 17 new vehicles per hour will occur during the morning peak hour and 23
new vehicles per hour will occur during the evening peak.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Figure 6 contains the directional distribution of the project traffic for the proposed land
use. To determine the traffic distribution for the proposed project, peak hour traffic
counts of the existing directional distribution of traffic for existing areas in the vicinity of
the site, and other additional information on future development and traffic impacts in
the area were reviewed.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT
Based on the identified traffic generation and distribution, project morning and evening
peak hour intersection turning movement volumes have been calculated and are shown
on Figures 7 and 8, respectively.
METHOD OF PROJECTION
As part of the TPO analysis and CEQA based traffic impact analysis, an examination of
future traffic conditions is required. Future traffic conditions have been based upon the
analysis year of 2004 (one year after project completion). An ambient growth rate of 1.0
percent per year was added to the existing approach volumes (as calculated for Year
2003) to calculate the Year 2004 traffic conditions. Year 2004 (without approved,
cumulative, and project traffic) morning and evening peak hour intersection turning
movement volumes have been calculated and are shown on Figures 9 and 10,
respectively.
3s
3
TRAFFIC GENERATION
The traffic generated by the project is determined by multiplying an appropriate trip
generation rate by the quantity of land use. Trip generation rates are predicated on the
assumption that energy costs, the availability of roadway capacity, the availability of
vehicles to drive, and our life styles remain similar to what we know today. A major
change in these variables may affect trip generation rates.
Trip generation rates were determined for daily traffic, morning peak hour inbound and
outbound traffic, and evening peak hour inbound and outbound traffic for the proposed
land use. By multiplying the traffic generation rates by the land use quantity, the traffic
volumes are determined. Table 1 exhibits the traffic generation rates, project peak hour
volumes, and project daily traffic volumes. The traffic generation rates are from the
Newport Beach Traffic Analysis Model (NBTAM).
The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 422 new daily
vehicle trips, 17 new vehicles per hour will occur during the morning peak hour and 23
new vehicles per hour will occur during the evening peak.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Figure 6 contains the directional distribution of the project traffic for the proposed land
use. To determine the traffic distribution for the proposed project, peak hour traffic
counts of the existing directional distribution of traffic for existing areas in the vicinity of
the site, and other additional information on future development and traffic impacts in
the area were reviewed.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT
Based on the identified traffic generation and distribution, project morning and evening
peak hour intersection turning movement volumes have been calculated and are shown
on Figures 7 and 8, respectively.
METHOD OF PROJECTION
As part of the TPO analysis and CEQA based traffic impact analysis, an examination of
future traffic conditions is required. Future traffic conditions have been based upon the
analysis year of 2004 (one year after project completion). An ambient growth rate of 1.0
percent per year was added to the existing approach volumes (as calculated for Year
2003) to calculate the Year 2004 traffic conditions. Year 2004 (without approved,
cumulative, and project traffic) morning and evening peak hour intersection turning
movement volumes have been calculated and are shown on Figures 9 and 10,
respectively.
3q
9
TRAFFIC GENERATION
The traffic generated by the project is determined by multiplying an appropriate trip
generation rate by the quantity of land use. Trip generation rates are predicated on the
assumption that energy costs, the availability of roadway capacity, the availability of
vehicles to drive, and our life styles remain similar to what we know today. A major
change in these variables may affect trip generation rates.
Trip generation rates were determined for daily traffic, morning peak hour inbound and
outbound traffic, and evening peak hour inbound and outbound traffic for the proposed
land use. By multiplying the traffic generation rates by the land use quantity, the traffic
volumes are determined. Table 1 exhibits the traffic generation rates, project peak hour
volumes, and project daily traffic volumes. The traffic generation rates are from the
Newport Beach Traffic Analysis Model (NBTAM).
The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 422 new daily
vehicle trips, 17 new vehicles per hour will occur during the morning peak hour and 23
new vehicles per hour will occur during the evening peak.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Figure 6 contains the directional distribution of the project traffic for the proposed land
use. To determine the traffic distribution for the proposed project, peak hour traffic
counts of the existing directional distribution of traffic for existing areas in the vicinity of
the site, and other additional information on future development and traffic impacts in
the area were reviewed.
TRIP ASSIGNMENT
Based on the identified traffic generation and distribution, project morning and evening
peak hour intersection turning movement volumes have been calculated and are shown
on Figures 7 and 8, respectively.
METHOD OF PROJECTION
As part of the TPO analysis and CEQA based traffic impact analysis, an examination of
future traffic conditions is required. Future traffic conditions have been based upon the
analysis year of 2004 (one year after project completion). An ambient growth rate of 1.0
percent per year was added to the existing approach volumes (as calculated for Year
2003) to calculate the Year 2004 traffic conditions. Year 2004 (without approved,
cumulative, and project traffic) morning and evening peak hour intersection turning
movement volumes have been calculated and are shown on Figures 9 and 10,
respectively.
39
3
TPO ANALYSIS
The City of Newport Beach staff provided the approved projects in the study area for the
TPO analysis. The approved projects consist of development that has been approved
but are not fully completed (see Appendix C). The approved project morning and
evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes have been calculated and
are shown on Figures 11 and 12, respectively.
One - percent of the projected peak hour volumes of each approach of each study area
intersection were compared with the peak hour distributed volumes from the proposed
project. A summary of this TPO comparison is shown within Appendix D. If one -
percent of the Year 2004 (with approved and project traffic) peak hour volumes of each
approach were larger than the peak hour project approach volumes, no further analyses
are required. Year 2004 (with approved and project traffic) morning and evening peak
hour intersection turning movement volumes have been calculated and are shown on
Figures 13 and 14, respectively. If project peak hour approach volumes are higher than
one - percent of the projected peak hour volumes on any approach of any intersection,
the intersection would require analysis utilizing the Intersection Capacity Utilization
(ICU) methodology.
Comparison of the one - percent of the Year 2004 (with approved and project traffic)
peak hour approach volumes with the project peak hour approach volumes resulted in
no study area intersection exceeding the one - percent threshold and requiring additional
analysis (see Appendix D).
CEQA ANALYSIS
The City of Newport Beach staff provided the cumulative projects in the study area for
the CEQA analysis. Cumulative projects are known, but not approved project
developments that are reasonably expected to be completed or nearly completed at the
same time as the proposed project. The cumulative project traffic generation is included
within Appendix E. Figures E -1 to E -17 contain the directional distribution of the.
cumulative project traffic. The cumulative project morning and evening peak hour
intersection turning movement volumes have been calculated and are shown on Figures
15 and 16, respectively.
One- percent of the projected peak hour volumes of each approach of each study area
intersection were compared with the peak hour distributed volumes from the proposed
project. A summary of this comparison is shown within Appendix F. If one - percent of
the Year 2004 (with approved, cumulative, and project traffic) peak hour volumes of
each approach were larger than the peak hour project approach volumes, no further
analyses are. required. Year 2004 (with approved, cumulative, and project traffic)
morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes have been
calculated and are shown on Figures 15 and 16, respectively. If project peak hour
approach volumes are higher than one - percent of the projected peak hour volumes on
any approach of any intersection, the intersection would require analysis utilizing the
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology.
3b
4
Comparison of the one - percent of the Year 2004 (with approved, cumulative, and
project traffic) peak hour approach volumes with the project peak hour approach
volumes resulted in no study area intersection exceeding the one - percent threshold and
requiring additional analysis (see Appendix F).
SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION
The project site will continue to provide access to Pacific Coast Highway and Bayside
Drive. The Pacific Coast Highway accesses will continue to be restricted to right turns
in /out only. Pacific Coast Highway currently has a raised median adjacent to the project
site.
The Bayside Drive access will continue to provide full access. Bayside Drive currently
has a two -way left -turn median adjacent to the project site.
The internal circulation for the project site allows vehicles to utilize all three access
driveways to travel within the entire site. The Bayside Drive access allows vehicles to
exit the project site and reach Pacific Coast Highway to travel in the north /west
direction.
In summary, it is concluded that both access and internal circulation for the project site
is satisfactory.
With more than one entrance, good emergency access is assured because there are
two ways of reaching any point within the site.
CONCLUSIONS
1. Comparison of the one - percent of the Year 2004 peak hour approach volumes
with the project peak hour approach volumes resulted in no study area
intersection exceeding the one - percent threshold and requiring additional
analysis
2. On -site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with
detailed construction plans for the project.
3. Sight distance at each project access should be reviewed with respect to
standard Caltrans /City of Newport Beach sight distance standards at the time of
preparation of final grading, landscape, and street improvement plans.
4. As is the case for any roadway design, the City of Newport Beach should
periodically review traffic operations in the vicinity of the project once the project
is constructed to assure that the traffic operations are satisfactory.
3a'
It has been a pleasure to serve your needs on this project. Should you have any
questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES
7 j n T M
/ 3 No. TR0056 Z
Carl Ballard * r * William Kunzman, P. E.
Senior Associate sJAFf Principal
OF Professional Registration
Expiration Date 3 -15 -2004
#2667
6i"
Table 1
Project Traffic Generation'
' Source: NBTAM Trip Generation Rates
2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
39
Trips Generated
Trips Generated
Time Period
Per TSF2
By 8.798 TSF
Morning Peak Hour
Inbound
1.38
12
Outbound
0.59
5
Total
1.97
17
Evening Peak Hour
Inbound
1.07
9
Outbound
1.55
14
Total
2.62
23
Daily
47.91
422
' Source: NBTAM Trip Generation Rates
2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
39
Figure t
Project Location Map
40
Kunzmmn Associates 2667/1
Figure 2
Site Plan
r�
® 0
i O
/
J
Kunzman Associates 2667/2
Figure 3
Existing Through Lanes and Intersection Controls
Legend
0 = Traffic Signal
4 = Through Travel Lanes
D = Divided
U = Undivided
>> = Free Right Turn
Kunzman Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667/3
4L
10
dbb.s
-o
a�bbsl
dlbsl
dbbsl.s
�bbst.s
dlbz
-�
dbbso
��°11P
� -g°11P
I-44ItP
IS�htP
I�°11P
7�'°�tP
2�°11�°
Kunzman Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667/3
4L
10
157 a 1
1491 a 6
Figure 4
67 0 1
-1869= 4
1663 v 1
Year 2003
Morning
Peak Hour
Intersection
Turning
Movement Volumes
e
I `ego C
2�4 -
3� `h -
4`. =`ri 4
dbb•�a a
C-0 2
dbbsls a
a �
�bbsfis a
a d
dbbs79 a
o�
�bbs66 a
a d
dbbsln a
a d
dbbso a
a
0 9I� %
%1P %
%tP °
° �' %
%tP o
oIa69� %
%YP e
e st7� %
%tP
a.-0o�o Y
YM1-D �
So to
76� -013 ^
^« 5
57-O �
•�'
o`
6 -0"Yi= 2
Guz
Drive
�0�,�
Santa
veo
g`
F' � 7
783 1
y.
Rosa
513 -
<°
313 I
°
s
°oo
Drive
n 7P5 o
o I5I n
Qo
o p
m
3
s�
Bayside Drive Site
Pacific
Q
6 Sf
•�
wo
—
r
�o
7
FZ 60
Kunzman Associates
Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes.
2667/bbas
157 a 1
1491 a 6
-1951 3
67 0 1
-1869= 4
1663 v 1
4 -18 �
1791 a I
I1a9 � 9
97a v
I `ego C
2�4 -
3� `h -
4`. =`ri 4
dbb•�a a
C-0 2
dbbsls a
a �
�bbsfis a
a d
dbbs79 a
a �
�bbs66 a
a d
dbbsln a
a d
dbbso a
a
0 9I� %
%1P %
%tP °
° �' %
%tP o
oIa69� %
%YP e
e st7� %
%tP
a.-0o�o Y
YM1-D �
��st 7
76� -013 ^
^« 5
57-O �
� 6
6 -0"Yi= 2
2026 -o R
Rix 1
1731 -o v
veo
5853 F
F' � 7
783 1
1943 `
` 5
513 -
- 3
313 I
I43 0
n 7P5 o
o I5I n
n 131 a
a 1733
3
Figure 5
Year 2003 Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
296 v
Z6
6-6
1924 0
X150
VW a
0
4-55
1961 a
X40
x-15
2773 a
6mR7
L133 m
9 --4266 n
2576 0
7g °mx-2213e
bps4
1 ®�
4„ aX1975
i`'=
I-x2-X866
R °: n
6
j ° R
dbs6
a
dbbsss
a
dbbs
4
dbL
30 1
Js2s9
4
D 181 -j'
h Y P
D 171s
Y
R
D 93�
>21"
1 1 P
D ��
P
D 696=
°I T P
D 169-1'
1 1 P
I%77�
«SR
29 -+rNP
-En
15�
M0
919�1T1
5�
1465
0 103
n 111
a 1169
Kunzman Associates Intersection reference numbers ore in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667/bbos
12 44
Figure 6
Project Traffic Distribution
57 57 57 57
r
r
107 107
" 257 57
35� -
257 257
r
257 - - -- V ^\
Baysi �dri�e SI _ acMM
607h 407
407
r 357. 357 '.
Pacific Caast Highray i
357 )'
57
657
35% %,
Boyside Oriv
Kunz?wn Associates
15%15%
I'd
57
157
Santa
Rosa
357
1
207 207
Legend
107 = Percent To/From Project
2667/5
13 /f S
Figure 7
Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
Iv
I
sip
,v
2
0e
2v
20
Jv
2e
ego
dlbso
�0
a
0
dgbso
�I
a
eoo
dbbsa
}-p
a
ore
dbbso
�p
a
dbbso
d-0
a
0o
�lbso
d-5
a
0o
dbbsa
a2
a
D al4IYP
D
p�4IYP
D
o�gYP
D o�°IYP
D p�
%YP
D I- ?°�Y�°
D IshYl°
0--p
eoe
J -0e
1��
0--00
0
Oro
0
2�e
1-Do
Kunv n Associates intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes 2667(bbas
14 ¢�
15 4
7
Figure 8
Project
Evening Peak Hour Intersection
Turning Movement
Volumes
P
.
Santa
Cruz
Drive
,�
Santa
o°
a
yam;
m
Rosa
Drive
a =
P
—oo O
Oro.,- 6
6 -0= o
Site
o�, o
Dayside Drive
Pocir"
o� o
o� o
6
o4 /
/ 0
0
S�
0o
io
oe
se
7o
I
2
3 vp n
5 Lp 6
ip
bso
o h0
o n. a 4-0
a �{
dlbsp
a
a
dgbsfi a
dbb�o a
a
°
o�4IYP
ffl
°
o�'QIYP
°
{—'°IY�°
2
Kunz�r►an Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667Jbbos
15 4
7
hYl—D —
—oo O
Oro.,- 6
6 -0= o
o�, o
o� o
o� o
o4 /
/ 0
0
7
Figure 9
Year 2004 (Without Approved, Cumulative,
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning
And Project Traffic)
Movement Volumes
467 v
7496 v
68 0
1680 0
1297 v
7119 a
939 0
1
d! bsa
" O
a
P $r'
db6s45
4-969
a
3
dbba66
4-12
83
°'
a
4 °
�
dbbsn
4-19
a
5
X64
s67
4
6m
d7b�
4-109
s
3
4
7
d74b6s-0 b
=849 0
4
D 81.;
94�
Y
413P
251�h1
1
°e 1 P
0-0
591y
9313-0
76y
03 91
z74
ABA.
S-R
57-a
2 ZI
-
J64-0 �
•+�= . °a
16-0
S; ^ a .
15o
0-b
a e
a 151 1
438
n 1345
v i^
0
Kunzman Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667/bbos
fs 481
Figure 10
Year 2004 (lithout Approved, Cumulative,
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning
And Project Traffic)
Movement Volumes
299 0
, 0
58 0
2728 o
M o
2603 v
1
40
2 12
YF-
X1991
3
X32
1
�811
9
-
5
4-113
7
4-617
3-15{7
F'+eH
3-5511
3-56
3-15
bs135
9
YP
m-
1T
°
63—��
%iP
Rj
In��Sn
--
�
457�P
15�
IM
511
1758
8
Kun2man Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left comer of turning movement boxes. 2667/bbas
17 W4
1 +
Figure 11
a a
Z �
�2 3
Approved Project
3 �
�a a
Morning Peak
Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
s
l
lab- I
I e
� u
u� %
%1P ^
g
Santa
o`
Cruz
✓$
t° ^
Drive
o
Santo
0o
°
y.
a
Rosa
Drive
a -Z
P
-
57-0 «
m
« o
3
y
6ayside Drive Site Pocif,c
a 6
6
61 a
a
0`t
CxJ
�O
7
Iv 17v 67o
NN-
Kunxman Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667/bbas
1 +
+ta Z
a a
Z �
�2 3
a �
3 �
�a a
l
lab- I
I e
� u
u� %
%1P ^
^ u
us t
t° ^
^ 1
1 +lal—De 5
o�. :
57-0 «
« o
a 6
61 a
a
19 11
Figure 12
4 J
2 a
a1 4
Approved Project
dbso 4
7x °
Evening Peak
Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
�yg "
4 4
4 d
11e 2
"-I 4
� f4� %
%YP z
zss D
g
Santa
oc
Cruz
k
Drive
Santa
o� o
Rosa
Drive
M
�¢
alL�
o�. x
x o
o
3 �
s
Sayside Drive Site Pacific C
Q ky
3
7
2> I o Ipee WIo
Rpwm�
K,dnzman Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes.
2667/bbas
19 11
4 -o 4
4 J
2 a
a1 4
4 d
dbso 4
7x °
4 4
4 �
�yg "
4 4
4 d
11e 2
"-I 4
� f4� %
%YP z
zss D
D 1
14 �" %
%TA e
o� o
o�. x
x o
o
a
a
Figure 13
Year 2004 (With Approved And Project Traffic)
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
46! e
I IS o
136 >
18(n v
1409 o
I a
1
4-o
2 �
4-972
4 -1939
3
2u$
4-12
4 -1961
+ g
4-21
4-11
=
5
4-66
d-1
6.., a.
fin°
4-Io8
�11i6
m
r
4-855
4-1260
Jb-:4-0
bso
4
dbbs+s
141
7+
a
1 Jbbsel
4
�bb�68
4
dbbstn
4
D 811
? P
D
1083'
1 T
D
76'8
% T
D
264
�' ID
%'r
D
II +7-8
T P
0 1
2417 -D
tR 91
27+5 -D
__
5)-D
=
L34
R a a
592y
26�
401
52�
=
151
c N2
n 147
n 1637
fi g
0
Kunzman Associates Intersection reference numbers ore in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667/bbas
20 S2
Figure
Year 2004 (With Approved
14
And Project Traffic)
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
Kunz7wTL Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667/bbos
21 s3
e
"-1999
156 °
4-32
2853 °
4-56
_
2101 0
5
�4-16
4
4 °
�'
<-2769
1 °
2
3
$ c
4
ARE
o
4
F'O
dbbss6
4 -4649
4
n
4tbbs6a
4-5613
4
abbs223
4
djlolf
4
dba-265
4
E301
h Y P
D
187—
41
D
89-
T
D
95-
%? P
D
27 �
T
''
6
4
I868�0
Z R
�+�
rz s r
��
� � g
' g-' gg
1580
°' 3
1383
°
5-4,
° 104
519
° 1857
° 1600
° 0
Kunz7wTL Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667/bbos
21 s3
22
5'f
Figure 15
Cumulative Project
Morning Peak
Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
P
Santo
`sow
o�
Cruz
%
Drive
°jo
Santa
e
so a
Rosa
Dove
a d
dt a
a h
Boyside Drive Site 6 Patine
ty.
ycq.
hll° P
wa
J a
P °
° 61s�1Yt° °
° azs�°111° �
s�
�eo 6
7
8'
764
573 v
t ap
G-0
8
0'�'Q
6 �1tx70 zr 7
s-G3
MR2
a9z o
o e
e a
a l
Kunzman Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes.
2667/bbos
22
5'f
�tit3 �
�6-$It3 s
so a
a a
a d
dt a
a h
hll° P
P °
° 61s�1Yt° °
° azs�°111° �
�eo 6
694-0e a
a9z o
o e
e a
a l
5'f
7
a.
By
1
dbbz
Figure . 16
6
314e
2 0
n
aigb�o
t105
6-65{
Cumulative Project
Ov
dbbso
Evening Peak
Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
6-a
-6
P
914e
db�ss
0
6
8190
2509
X754
6
7570
7
�
�3/)
4 -1017
8,�
6�bbso
a
%11°
P
1
Santa
o oP
OCruz
po
tpo=
110109
Drive
tT
Santa
sP
Rosa
Drive
y
689
< 690
Site
Boyside Drive Pacrr"
6fy
r
�o
7
Kunzman Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667/bbos
By
1
dbbz
a0
6-0
-o
6
314e
2 0
n
aigb�o
t105
6-65{
a
Ov
dbbso
6
975e
dbba
6-a
-6
6
914e
db�ss
0
6
8190
2509
X754
6
7570
7
�
�3/)
4 -1017
8,�
6�bbso
a
%11°
P
I°
o oP
po
tpo=
110109
a x7�
tT
0
689
< 690
23
i
1
[.Y
24 56
Figure 17
Year 2004 (With Approved, Cumulative, And Project Traffic)
Morning Peak
Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
P
Santa
m�
4
Cruz va0
Drive y� Santa
7a�
Rosa
Drive
°
a Q
r—
s—D
s�
a
7153 —>
oz.
3
Site
Paci7 c I
Boyrside Drive c �
o _ .
n 1128
n 151
a 4{
n 2505
m
a
o�
477 v I7a1 v
�
1 7563 0 7984 a 1811 a 1579 0
1 ap
7 =1761
4-3144
3 4-17 4 1157 5 X66 6 o e. ,.. �II17 7 n. 4-1510
SS n n <-3551 -- � ` 4-11 `� F1 X H S 0-2631 � 3 0 � 4-]$�
dbbspa a
dbbq�g45a
dbbgspn dbbses a dbbas47l �bbsl4z7p4 dbbsgD
D 81-p
% I ID
D
110
I I 10
D ��
,pa
1 1 1
D
�3'
°It o
D
��
,p4
1 I I
D
111181'
� I I
D
T37--+
,p4
o—D
sl
lase —D
xss—D
ss-0
� ^ �
2T,
Kun=wn Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667/bbas
24 56
m�
^�
7a�
wig
°
sz�
r—
s—D
s�
a
7153 —>
oz.
n 1128
n 151
a 4{
n 2505
a
24 56
Year 2004 (With
Evening Peak Ho
Figure 18
Approved, Cumulative,
ur Intersection Turning
And Project Traffic)
Movement Volumes
7a7 0
�p
2266 o
agp3
I o
tyg
78fB o
�g46
4-56
5 0
=414
4-16
3711 v
s m
3
4-647 '^
4-7127
049
4-3g71
I
2 m m
3
"'
4$ m
T+ ^°•�
dbbsa
4-a
�•°P -'
dbbsss
4-570.1
4
3
4-fi475
•gym
d95�s 6
2T 141
s�
s w 4
lbbs
213 s 14
dSb6 ba
4
s°
a
D
ID
D
T P
D 27�
T
D 9�72
t T ID
D "
9I{
35�6Y9s �b
��T n
�
�
2
:
1MRZ
6�
�
oI
1
Kunzman Associates Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner of turning movement boxes. 2667/bbas
2s S}
Appendices
Appendix A — Glossary of Transportation Terms
Appendix B —Year 2001 Worksheets
Appendix C — Approved Project Data
Appendix D — TPO One - Percent Analysis Calculation Worksheets
Appendix E — Cumulative Project Data
Appendix F — CEQA One - Percent Analysis Calculation Worksheets
f
ws
Et
APPENDIX A
Glossary of Transportation Terms
'61
GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS
COMMON ABBREVIATIONS
AC:
ADT:
Caltrans:
DU:
ICU:
LOS:
TS F:
V /C:
VMT:
TERMS
Acres
Average Daily Traffic
California Department of Transportation
Dwelling Unit
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Level of Service
Thousand Square Feet
Volume /Capacity
Vehicle Miles Traveled
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The total volume during a year divided by
the number of days in a year. Usually only weekdays are included.
BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for
through traffic in a signal progression.
BOTTLENECK: A constriction along a travelway that limits the amount
of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location.
CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably
expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given
time period.
CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic
movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement
markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe
and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians.
CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all
red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the
clearance interval.
CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles,
persons, or other items are counted (in and out).
In, 2
CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for one complete
signal cycle.
CUL -DE -SAC STREET: A local street open at one end only, and with
special provisions for turning around.
DAILY CAPACITY: The daily volume of traffic that will result in a volume
during the peak hour equal to the capacity of the roadway.
DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by
some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds
per vehicle.
DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic - actuated signal.
DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the
through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually
expressed in vehicles per mile.
DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and
transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller.
DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of
a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon
which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to
design speed.
DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any
point in time.
DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion.
FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow.
FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver
freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic.
GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream,
rear bumper to front bumper.
HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a
traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper.
0
INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that
are connected to achieve signal progression.
LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors,
which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to
maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs.
LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire
embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and
producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle.
MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between
successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is
willing and able to cross or merge.
MULTI - MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit,
rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes.
OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green
at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent
intersection.
PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of
several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces
ahead and behind.
ORIGIN- DESTINATION SURVEY: A survey to determine the point of
origin and the point of destination for a given vehicle trip.
PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE): One car is one Passenger
Car Equivalent. A truck is equal to 2 or 3 Passenger Car Equivalents in
that a truck requires longer to start, goes slower, and accelerates slower.
Loaded trucks have a higher Passenger Car Equivalent than empty
trucks.
PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of
vehicles.
PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop
and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic
conditions. Also, fixed time signal.
p2
PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of
traffic through several signalized intersections.
SCREEN -LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all
trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic
models.
SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete
sequence of signal indications.
SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more
traffic movements.
STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement
of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through a
signalized intersection.
TRAFFIC- ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs
traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as
registered by the actuation of detectors.
TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to
another (destination).. For example, from home to store to home is two
trips, not one.
TRIP -END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination; i.e. each
trip has two trip -ends. A trip -end occurs when a person, object, or
message is transferred to or from a vehicle.
TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quality of trips produced and /or
attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per
dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space.
TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having
more than two axles.
UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the
other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the
peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area.
VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a
section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by
length of facility in miles.
�S
APPENDIX B
Year 2001 Worksheets
I% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: DOVER DRIVE & WESTCLIFF DRIVE 3290
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Minter /Spring 2001 AAA
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR APPROVED PROJECT
REGIONAL GROWTH PEAK HOUR
VOLUME VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
710
Southbound
448
Eastbound
653
Westbound
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
PVTERSECTION. DOVER DRIVE & WESTCLIFF DRIVE 3290
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Winter/Spring 2001 PM)
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR APPROVED PROJECTf
REGIONAL GROR7H PEAK HOUR
VOLUME VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1436
Southbound
290
. Eastbound
1088
Westbound
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT:
DATE: $
DO3290AM
LI Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
U Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
U Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w /systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90
LI Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project
Description of system improvement:
PROJECT - _ —• - —� - -- - - - -- • - - - -- - - - -- - — - - -' FORM II
DO3290AM /-
c
'
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
cgCrFp
INTERSECTION:
DOVER DRIVE & WESTCLIFF DRIVE 3290
µNAP
EXISTING
TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING
2001 AM
I EXISTING I
PROPOSED I EXISTING I EXISTING I REGIONAL I COMMITTED
I PROJECTED I PROJECT I PROJECT
Movement
I Lanes I
Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH 1, PROJECT
I V/C Ratic I Volume I VIC
I
Capacity I
Capacity Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume
I w/o Project I I Ratio
I
I
I I I
I Volume I I
1 NIL
I 3200 I
333 1 0.104 I
I I
I NT
I 1600 I
I 377 ( 1236 I I
I I I
I NR
I I
I I I I
I I I
I SL
I
I I I I
I I I I
ST
I 1600 1
I 397 I 0.248 I
I I I
SR
1 16001
1 51 1 0.032 I I
I I I I
I EL
I 3200 1
I 79 I 0.025 I
I I
ET
I
I I I
I I I
ER
j N.s.1
1 5741 I
I I
I WL
I I
I I
I I
f WT
I
I I I I
I I I
WR
I
I I I
I I I
EXISTING
I.C.U.
I 0.377 1
I
1 EXISTING +
REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W/PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U.
I I
EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. I
I I I
LI Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
U Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
U Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w /systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90
LI Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project
Description of system improvement:
PROJECT - _ —• - —� - -- - - - -- • - - - -- - - - -- - — - - -' FORM II
DO3290AM /-
c
D0329DPM
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION:
DOVER DRIVE & WESTCLIFF DRIVE 3290
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 2001 PM
I
I EXISTING I
PROPOSED I EXISTING I EXISTING I REGIONAL I COMMITTED I PROJECTED I PROJECT I PROJECT I
Movement
I Lanes I
Lanes PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio I Volume I V/C I
Capacity I
Capacity Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume I w/o Project I I Ratio I
I
I I
I I I I I Volume I I I
NL
3200 I
I 860 I 0.269 I I I I
I NT
I 16001
5761 0.360 I I ( I I I
NR
SL
I
I I I I I I I I
ST
I 1600 I
251 I 0.157
SR
I 16001
I 391 0.024 I I I I I
EL
I 3200 (
I 158 I 0.049 I I ( I I
ET
I
I I I I I I I
ER
I N.S. l
I 9301
f WL
I I
I I I I I I I
I WT
I
I I I I I I ! I
I WR
I I
I I I I I I
EXISTING
I.C.U.
I 0.475 I
EXISTING +
REG GROWTH + COMMITTED W /PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I I I
EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U. I I I
ID Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
U Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
I_j Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w /systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90
LI Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project
Description of system improvement — —
PROJECT FORM II
D0329OPM
I in�
1 % TRAFFIC VOL UME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. COAST HIGHWAY & DOVER DRIVE/BAYSHORE DRIVE 3060.
(Exisdng Traffic Volumes Based on Average Winter/Spring 2001 And
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
RFGIONALGRO-WTHI
VOLUME
I APPROVED PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
d % OF PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
.VOLUME.
PROJECT
.PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
147
Southbound
1452
Eastbound
2362
Westbound
2800
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
I % TRAFFIC VOL UMEANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: COAST HIGHWAY & DOVER DRIVEJBAYSHORE DRIVE 3060
(Exisfing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Wurter/Spring 2001 PM
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
R
APPROVED PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME,
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
101
Southbound
1884
Eastbound
1936
Westbound
6405
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
0 Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: DATE: ��
CH3050AM
- INTERSECTION CAPACI TY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
�ClFO
R��P
INTERSECTION: COAST HIGHWAY & DOVER DRIVE /BAYSHORE DRIVE 3060
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER /SPRING
2001 AM
----------
.`_ . .. .. ................I----- -`.... ................... . ........ ------ - -------- - ---' ---------------- ... ..................... ... -------- ........ .
I EXISTING I PROPOSED I EXISTING I EXISTING I REGIONAL I COMMITTED I PROJECTED I
............... . ...... .
PROJECT I PROJECT
1 Movement I Lanes I Lanes 1 _ PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio I
Volume I V/C
1 I Capacity I Capacity Volume I Ratio 1 Volume I Volume I w/o Project I
Ratio
I I I I I Volume I
I
- ---- - --- -- ---- -----
I--- -------- - ----- - --- --- - --- - --- - ------------- - - - - -- - ------- - -- - -- - ---- ---- - -- - -- ----- -- -- ----- -- - --------------- - - - - -- - ----- -------- - - - - -- -
1 NIL 1 1600 1 1 35 1 0.022 1 1 1 1
................
------ --
1
..................
.... ---... .........................................._.... ................................ . ..................... . ...................
1 NT 1 1 75 1 I 1
................. } 3200 - - ------------ - - - - -- - -- - ----------- } 0.035 • .................. . ..................... }
.............. }
. NR 1 1 37 1 I
.---------------
- -----------------
.................. .................. -------------------
j SL 1 4800. 1 1 1251 0.261 I I I
-
I
- -- ------ - - ---- - -- -------- .......
I----------- - - - - -- - - ----- --- - - - - -- - ------------- - - - - -- - - - - -- ._ .._.........- - - - - -- ................... ...................
1 ST 1 1600 1 1 72 1 0.045 1 1 1 1
°'- '-...... -
1
- - -- --
I-'--" ............ ............... . ........ ........... . ................ :--------------- - ------------------ ......................... ---
1 SR 1 1600 1 1 129 1 0.081 1 1 1 1
-....
1 I
............. ....................
I• °-- . --- '._.........• °=.... • '- -" °_ . • ............................""' ' - °- ..........................
1 EL 1 3200 1 191 1 0.028 I 1 I
I
I ................ I
- - ---- - - - - -- ...............'----- ...................
1 ET 1 1 2246 1 1 1
1
i............. } 4800 ...... ............................... } 0.473 - -------- ---------- ...................... } ................
}
} ER I I 25 1 1
I
°` - -° I
--------------- -- -- - --- -- - -- -- -. --- -- ---------------------
1 WL 1 1600 1 1 44 1 0.028 * I I I
I I
....... - -....... 1
............. .. .....................
1 WT I 4800 I I 18 --5 I 0.378 1
1....................... 1 I
... ............ ... '
1
- °"......... .................
------------------
j WR I N.S. 1 1 941 I
I
I I - ............ I
' -- _........• I -- 1
.. ---- -- ----------- .................. ... .
1 EXISTING I.C:U. 1 0.797 1
I
1
.... . ........... . ............... . ............... .... . ................ . ............... ................... .................. ' - -- ..- ..........
I EXISTING + REGIONAL GROWTH + COMMITTED W /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I
...............
1
• ' -- ........
1 ----------------- - --- - - --- - - - - -- - ---------------- - -- = ................ . ............... ................ - ' . ...............................
1 EXISTING + COMMITTED +. REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.
- ....................----
I I
-_..... .
- - ' ---'- . ............... . ---'- °- °--=' -- ' - - °-'-1------- - ' °- -' ..... ............................. -- ........................._
Split phase N/S direction
1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w /systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90
I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project
.......... ........................................................................ ....... ° °......._........."--"- ..................... ..... ................ . ..:..... ........... ............
Description of system improvement:
. .................. .......--'----- --'-- --.'.--'-'-'--'-""'-"'-"-...........................:........_..................... ................. °- .- .......... _. .........
PROJECT FORM II
r`H3060AM
CH306OPM
. ............... .. – ..
_.: Description of system improvement
.......... ................................ °---................ - --......... ................. ............... .. -• -- ................... .......... ... -• -- °----....
ROJECT FORM II
CH3D60PM
�l
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
p�p
9GFOR�,
INTERSECTION: COAST HIGHWAY
& DOVER. DRIVE /BAYSHORE DRIVE 3060
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
WINTER /SPRING 2001 PM
... ................
I
. . ............ . ....... — ........ . ,- ------ - °---- • .... -°--...... °-- --- .........
I EXISTING I PROPOSED I EXISTING I EXISTING I REGIONAL
.. ............ ------ - --------............ -------- - - - - -- - ----- ----- - -- -
I COMMITTED I PROJECTED I PROJECT I PROJECT I
Movement
I Lanes I Lanes
I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH
I PROJECT I V/C Ratio I Volume I V/C I
I
I Capacity I Capacity
I Volume I Ratio I Volume
I Volume I w/o Project I I Ratio I
I
I I
I I
Volume I I I
I--------- •-- ---
NL
- -------------- - ------------------
1 1600 1
- -- ------ - - - - - -- - ----- --- - - - -- - -- ------- - - - - -- --
1 20 1 0.013 1
--------------- .... ................... . .............. .............. I
1 1 1 I. 1
1
I NT
.. ....-- .........................
1
.. ............. ... ...............................
1 43 1
-- --- - ------------- - ----• - -------- - ----- - --- --- -- --- I
I 1 I
I•- ------ m- -•----
} 3200 • ..................
............... } 0.025 *...:.....- °----
- ---------- ------ --- } } I
I NR
1
1 38 1
1 1 I
I ................
1 SL
- - .......
1 4800 1
. ............... .................... -- --- - -- .
1 1636 1 0.341 1
................... ........... -- - - - --- - - --- ----- ............. I
I I I I
----- ----- -----
1 ST 1
- -- -------- - - -- - --- -------- ------
1600 1
.
69 1 0.043 1 I
1 1 1
{
I--------- --- ---
SR
- ------- - - ---- - -••----- ------ - --
1 1600 1
- - ------ -------- • •---- -- ----•- - --------- ------- -
1 179 1 0.112 1 1
------ -•----------- - - ------ -- --- - --- -- - ------ ---- --- - ------ •......
1 1 1 I
I..............................•
EL
. ..................
1 3200 1
. ............... . .............. . ... . ............ .
1 168 1 0.053 I
................... . ................... . .............. .............
I I I I
---------- - -- ---
i' ET
- ----- --•-•-- - -------- ---- - - ----
1
......----- -- - -- - -- -- -- - -- - -- - --------- - -- ---- -
1 1732 1 1
------------- - - - - -- - ---- ------- --- ---- - -- ----- ----- -- - ---- -- I
1
.............. }
4800 . ------------------
- --------------- } 0.368 • - °------- -.....................
}
ER
1
1 36 1 1
I I
I . . .............................
1 WL 1
..................
1600 j
. ............... . .............. . ... . ............ ......................
1 54 1 0.034 1 1
................... . .............. .............. 1
1 1 I I
- I
I-
I WT 1
- ............
4800 1
... ......................... ................ .
1 4415 1 0.920 « I
................... ...I ....... ...... - ----
I I I I
........
I -- ......._..• .................
I WR I
... ............. ..
N.S.1
. ... I ........... . .............. . .... ; ........... .
1 1936 1 1 1
... - - -- -- ---..... ................... . .............. . .....
1 1 1 I
--- I
I............................°
1 EXISTING I.C.U.
..........
1 1.339 1
.....-----
I
1
I........... ... .
1 EXISTING +
-- .... °- - . . ...................
REGIONAL GROWTH +
.
COMMITTED W /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.0 I I I
I.... .. ......: ............:...I
1 EXISTING +
- ---•-------- - -• - -- - ------- ;....... • •°....:. ...............................
COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.
--- - ------------- - - - - -- - --- --- ----• -- ..............
I
..................... ........ . .... .............
Sprit Phase N/S direction
. .... ........... . .............. . ................ ..
................... .................... ........................
1.1 Projected
+. project traffic I.C.U.
will be less than or equal to 0.90
1_1 Projected
+ project traffic I.C.U.
will be greater than 0.90
1_I Projected
+ project traffic I.C.U.
w /systems improvement will be less
than or equal to 0.90
I7-1 Projected
+ project traffic I -C.U.
with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project
. ............... .. – ..
_.: Description of system improvement
.......... ................................ °---................ - --......... ................. ............... .. -• -- ................... .......... ... -• -- °----....
ROJECT FORM II
CH3D60PM
�l
I % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION.• COAST HIGHWAY & BAYSIDE DRIVE. 5440
(Existing Traff c Volumes Based on Average Wimter/Spring 2001 AM)
APPROACH
DIREC71ON
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAR HOUR
REGTONALGROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
- PROSECT'ID
PEAK 14OUR
VOLUME
1 °/ OF PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
425
Southbound
66
Eastbound
3022
Westbound
1928
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
i
I % TRAFFIC VOL UME ANAL YSIS
INTERSECTION.• COAST HIGHWAY & BAYSIDE DRIVE 5440
( Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Winter/Spring 2001 P*
APPROACH
DUZECTION
EMSMO
PEAKHOUR.
VOLUvM
PEAKHOUR
REGIONAL GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1 %OFPROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUNS
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
499
Southbound
56
Eastbound
2684
Westbound
5463
r� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
0 Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
r
i
_.±
PROJECT: DATE:
t
r
v
CH5440AM
........................................................................................ ...............................
Description of system improvement>
Y
PROJECT
- 'H5440AM
I
1
-- ----° ............... ...............................
FORM 11
-+ z
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
' gLrFORta
INTERSECTION: COAST HIGHWAY & BAYSIDE DRIVE 540
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER /SPRING
2001 AM
... ................. . ............... .. .................. . ...... • ......... .................. -'................ . ..................... . ........... -. °--...
I I EXISTING I PROPOSED I EXISTING I EXISTING I REGIONAL I COMMITTED I PROJECTED
............... . ................. .
I PROJECT I PROJECT I
Movement I Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio
I Volume I V/C I
I Capacity I Capacity I Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume I w/o Project
I I Ratio I
I I I I I I I I I Volume
I I I
I----------- - - - - -- - ---- ---- -- ---- - - ------------ - - - - -- - -------- - -- --- - ------ - - - - --
I NL 1 1 395 1 1 1
I ------- -- - -- - -- } . ............ ........................ } .......... ............................... } .
............... } I
NT 4800 1 1 3 0.089 * I I
I
I.................. } ..................... .' .....-- } ------------------ ................ . } ................
} 1
I NR 1 1 27 1 I 1
I
I................. . ............... . ................... ................. ' ...............
I SL 1 1600 1 1 24 1 0.015 I 1 I 1
I
I I
................. ................ ' ----°- ...................-- ........................- ° °-'° ...... --------------------- - ------------- - - - - -- .....-
ST 1 1 6 1 1 1
- ° °-- ................. 1
I................. } 1600 - ---------- -- - ----- - - ----- - - ---- } 0.026 " -----------------
I SR 1 1 36 1 1 1
I
--- ------ - ------ - ----- -- - - - - -- - ------------ -- - --- . ---------------- . --------------- . ------------------ j EL 1 1600 1 1 40 1 0.025 1 1 1 1
I I
-
................. . ............... . ................... . ................ :............... . ............. ._.- . .......... ................ ................
I ET 1 4800 1 1 2596 I 0.541 I I I
.................
I I
( ---------- ---- - -- -- •--- - - - -- - ---- -------- - - - - -- - ------ I ......... . .............. - ' .................. . ..................... . ......... ------ - . .
ER 1 1600 1 1 386 j 0.241 1 1 1 1
'..................
............... . ...... ...........
1 I
................. ................ ....................... -- ........................ . ........ ............ ..................... .
I WL 1 1600 j 1 64 1 0.040 * I I I
............... . ..................
I I
I-- -------- - - ---- - --------- - - - - -- - ------- -- ---- - - - - -- - --------- - - -- -- - --------------- ................... . ..................... .................... -
I WT 1 1 1852 I 1 1
--- --- -- - - - - -- - - --•-- --- - ----- I
................. } 6400 . ................... ................. 0.291 }
........ — }
I WR 1 1 12 1 1 I
I
1 .. ............................... . ................... . ................ ......................................................... ...............................
I EXISTING I.C.U. 1 0.696 1
-- ...................
I
.
................. . ............... ....................
j EXISTING+ REG GROWTH+ COMMITTED W /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I I
I
I- -- -- ---- - - ---- - - -- --- --- - - - - -- - --- -----•- ---- --- - ---------- - - - - -- - ------ -- -- ---- - -- ------ - ------ - ---- ----- -- --- --- - - -- --°---- - - -- -- '
I EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.
................ .................
I I
. ............................... .................... ' .---'•.......... . .............. ...:................ . ..................... . ................... .
Split Phase N/S Direction
........ ...... . .............. -.. .
f
_
I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w /systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90
Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project
I_I 1 P 1 P 1 P P 1
........................................................................................ ...............................
Description of system improvement>
Y
PROJECT
- 'H5440AM
I
1
-- ----° ............... ...............................
FORM 11
-+ z
CH5055AM
EXISTING I.C.U. 1 0.664 1
........ °-- °- ' .............. .. ................... ..°............... ............................... ..... - --- -- --' -- .................... -
EXISTING + REGIONAL GROWTH + COMMITTED W /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS i.C.U. I I
---- . ...... .......... ...... . ............... . ......... ......... --------- -..... .................. I.
EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.
......– - - _ ............._..................... .-'- ----...................=--- . ..................... . ..... .............. .--------------- - - - - -- -----`---- -
I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w /systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90
1:1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project
-- ---------'– ..... ................... ............
Description of system improvement:
... . -'--'.....-- -..... ' ............. ......------------- . .................. . ....... . ............. . ............. ...... . ............... . ...... I.....
PROJECT FORM II
CH5055AM
-43
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
`"�
C'aClFO
R���
INTERSECTION:
COAST HIGHWAY & JAMBOREE ROAD 5055
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
WINTER /S °RING
2001 AM
... - ° .............. ...... '--...... .:
I I EXISTING I
.............. ,... . ................ . ............ ... ..................
PROPOSED I EXISTING I EXISTING I REGIONAL
. ............ – ....... . ................... .
I COMMITTED I PROJECTED
............... .................. .
I PROJECT I PROJECT I
Movement I Lanes I
Lanes I PK HR V/C I GROWTH
I PROJECT I V/C Ratio I
Volume I WC I
I Capacity I
Capacity I Volume I Ratio I Volume
I Volume I w/o Project I
I Ratio I
i I I
I I
I I Volume I
1 1
-- ------- ------- - -- -- ---- - - - - -- -
NL 1 1600 1
------------- - - - - -- - ---------------- .--------------- - --------- --- - - - - -- -
1 29 1 0.018 I
--------------------- - w .................. .
I I
--- -- -- - - - - -- - -- -- ---- -- - --- l
i.. ............................. ..
NT I
.... ........ ...-- .................. - --------- . ----- . ------------------ .
I 483 1 1
..................... .................... -
1
- -- ° °- ------- - - ..--- ---........
I
................. } 3200 -
------------ ---.... ' ................ } 0.178 * ---- ------- - - - - -- ......................
} ................
}
NR I
1 88 1 1
1
- . .. .............
SL 1 1600 1
... ............ -- ° °- . - ......... ° °- _ ...............................
1 177 1 0.111 * I
.. --- -- - -- -'--- ----- -- ----
I I
............................. °- I
I
................. ........... ._-- ......
ST 3200 1
............................... .
1 270 1 0.084 1 1
1 1
1
-- -- ------ -- - ---- - ----- - -- - -- ...
SR I N.S. 1
................... . ................ ......... - -' ....................
1 640 1 1 1
---- --- --- -- - - - -- -
1 1
- --- -- --- ---- -- - ---...._..------
1
................ ' ............... ....
EL 1 4800 1
................. . ................ ............... .....-------------- ......................
1 1047 1 0.218
..................... .
1
............... . .......... ....... 1
1
°. .......I ....................... .....
- ET 1
-...."....... . ................ ......... ._......'................ .
1 1986 1
..................... . ................... .
1
..... .......... ..................
I
............. } 6400 --------------
- - - - -- - -- - ---------- --- } 0.313
}
}
ER 1
1 14 1 1
1
................. . ............. I.. .........
WL 1 3200 1
.---'----- - .... °.....-.-- - ---- - - -- ...... . .......... ' ....... ............
1 123 1 0.038 1 1
...............................
1 I
-. ............................... I.
1 1
---------- ---- - — .......... I.. ...................
WT 1 6400 1
. '- -- – .......... °° ....................... -
1 1134 1 0.177 - I
--------------------- - ---- .-- ----- - ---- --
I
- -- ........................ I
I I
......................................
WR I N.S. 1
- -- - - - - - -- 1 ----
...............................
1 106 1 1 1
- ............. ........... . ..I ............. ................ I- -
1 1
------------ ----- --- - ---- ------ --- --
1 I
....__........._............. I
EXISTING I.C.U. 1 0.664 1
........ °-- °- ' .............. .. ................... ..°............... ............................... ..... - --- -- --' -- .................... -
EXISTING + REGIONAL GROWTH + COMMITTED W /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS i.C.U. I I
---- . ...... .......... ...... . ............... . ......... ......... --------- -..... .................. I.
EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.
......– - - _ ............._..................... .-'- ----...................=--- . ..................... . ..... .............. .--------------- - - - - -- -----`---- -
I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w /systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90
1:1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project
-- ---------'– ..... ................... ............
Description of system improvement:
... . -'--'.....-- -..... ' ............. ......------------- . .................. . ....... . ............. . ............. ...... . ............... . ...... I.....
PROJECT FORM II
CH5055AM
-43
CH5055PM
- Projected ts��
L,|Prn +Pn��� I.C.U. /�C�U�wi|ho|essLhano/equa|toV.9U
-
)_iPrc�)*cted+ project traffic >.C.U.will brAreako� than O.90
-
I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90
'
L(Pro/ccted+project traffic'(.C.U. with project irnprvvernonts will no less than (C.U. without project
..--.---. ....... -.-.- ----- ......... . ............... . .............. . ......... ......
.
Description of system improvement.
---- I---------- .......... . .................. . ..... ....... ''_.......... ................. ................. . ............. ..... .'`~' .... .............
PROJECT FORM 11
CH5V55Pw
7�
�
^�
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
�
' INTERSECTION:
COAST HIGHWAY & JAM BJREEROAD 5055
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
BASED 0N AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
WINTER/SPRING
2001 PM
... ................
(
'---^-_�'.~--�'��-_`'--'_---'-----`-
|D03T|NG|PROPV3ED|EX|3T|NG|
--'-..'-.----~+.-~-.---_'--.-.^'---^'.----,-.
EXISTING /RE[IVN8L|
COMMITTED |
PROJECTED
/ PROJECT |PRCUE(T|
| Movement Lanes /
Lanes / PKHR / Y/C ( GROWTH
/ PROJECT |
Y/CRaUn
/ Volume / Y70 |
/
| Capacity /
Capacity |Yo|un`* | Ratio / Volume
| Volume /w/nProject
I I Ratio |
l�
} l
| | /
( I
Volume
) ) i
w----.
|'--`-----^----`^--^^---`----'`-
) NL
| ]6}0 \
.............. ............... -^
1 27 j 0.017 >
....... ........... .^-----
) i
--
- - . ------ |
I \ >
. /
..............
� NT
....... ...................
|
............... ............... .- `^^
| 259 i
................... -'---'--.
I
. ...... ....... .............
| I
|----~-->
3200
---^''--------) 0l00 °—'`^^'-
-------~. }
. ..... -------- } /
( NR
!
( 60 (
(
i |
| -------
� SL
-.^'--- -
/ 1600 |
------------------ - ^----- -----`^--- -^---
/ 237 1 0148 *
. `~~'--- .-'`—~--.
/ /
-----~ --~--- /
| I |
-------- /
| -'------
| ST
--`'-^- -------^~-'--^--
/ 3200 /
----- - --'-^
| 626 | 0l96 (
'----`- ---------
) /
.^~~ . ....
| / |
i^—.^'---
| %R
------- -
| N.S. 1
`---`--- --------------- .^'--'^ ................
| 1055 ( (
................... ............
( /
.....
. ..... ........ .........
( / [
�--' �
> -----'--
| EL
-^------ ----^--'-
| 4.800 1
----^-- —^----- ...............
| 682 1 0,142 *
................ .-----
i /
--
. --~^~. . ......
! / |
....... �
�................
/ ET
- -------------- -`^-'--
/
~~`----' _.-'-- ... . ...............
| 1473 | [
---- '-��-�..----
- -------
/ (
� '-�----
} 6400 ---~~-----'----~^
} 0.235 .`-' ---~ -
'--------
...... } i
| ER
/
| 32 | /
� |
/ -'---'--
� YYL
-`^------ ---~----
3200 (
--'..-~... .............. . --- --- .
| 254 | 0.079 | [
.......... ........
/
.........
. --- '-- . .......... ~ |
/ | /
|
�...........
/ WT
------^-
| 6400 |
------~— ~----- . .............. ----~-'
/ 2241 ( 0.350 ° /
'-~~'-- ...................
|
/
----- .--~'-
l l
�
�----------------
) WR
---`------ -
i N.3.>
---~---- - - --_-, - '------ --------------- -
\ 130 | >
------------------- - -------------------
\
)
.............. - -------------
1 \
/------- ........
�D0S71NS|.C.U.
-'---'-- ---
-------------- - --------------- - -------------- ----------------- .''---'~'.
) 0740 1
. ...................
-
-------------- -------------
(
|
| -^-~-~--
/ EXISTING
---~~-`-~-'~^---~^'---'` - -------- -~'-- -^''-----
+ REGIONAL GR0YV74 + C0NM[F7E9 $VPROP0CE] IMPROVEMENTS
-`^'-----
(.C.U\
�
(
|
�|
|-------'-~-^----
/ DO3TNG
-'--'^-`'-
+ 0VNk4RTlED
------^- - -------------- - ---------------- -'
+ REGIONAL GROWTH � PROJECT {.C,U.
................ .'
------------- ��'- .`^^^--.
. .............
| �
- Projected ts��
L,|Prn +Pn��� I.C.U. /�C�U�wi|ho|essLhano/equa|toV.9U
-
)_iPrc�)*cted+ project traffic >.C.U.will brAreako� than O.90
-
I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90
'
L(Pro/ccted+project traffic'(.C.U. with project irnprvvernonts will no less than (C.U. without project
..--.---. ....... -.-.- ----- ......... . ............... . .............. . ......... ......
.
Description of system improvement.
---- I---------- .......... . .................. . ..... ....... ''_.......... ................. ................. . ............. ..... .'`~' .... .............
PROJECT FORM 11
CH5V55Pw
7�
�
^�
'
,
CM544OPW
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTlUZAT|8NANALYSIS
`
INTERSECTION: COAST H|GHWAY& DEDRIVE 5440
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON8VERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 0/|NTEWSPR|N8
2001 PM
... ................ . .............. ..... ------------- - --------------- ' --------------- - -'-----`'-----'-_- - ---,---'--
� I EXISTING i PROPOSED | EXISTING I[XO�lNGi REGIONAL ICOMNRTED� PROJECTED
-----_- ---``.�-
| PROJECT |PROJECTI
! Movement Lanes I Lanes ! PKUR / V/C I GROWTH PROJECT I V/CRotio
I Volume [ Y/C |
� I Capacity I Capacity ] Volume Ratio ) Volume Volume I w/o Project
j Ratio I
� I I I | / | I Yo}vrnn
I | 1
|-----^~---------^'------'-`^-----'-^-''-------'-------~--------'---'----
� NL 1 / 458 1 (
----`|
1 �
| ---------} . .................. . ...... -------- } ---'--- .~^- ........
. .............. > �
] NT 4800 / i 14 Ol04 * I
/ !
� -------> . .................. . ............... } .---'—. .^'-~.-^.^-)
.~^^^~-} /
� NR 1 / 27 / (
/ �
� ^----- --`^---- --`^~---- --------------- - -------------- - ---------------- - ------- -------------------
| St 1 1600 11 | 20j VDlJ| ! 1
- -------------- - ------------- /
1 ! (
) -_�_ -- .............. . ----`- ----- . .'---- .-'-''-. . ................... . .............
6
. .............. � ---^�^ �
|
�--^-~`.> l6OD- ------------------ - --------------- } U.0ZJ'---------------- ------'-->
.'-- --- i �
/ SR / | 38 | 1
/ �
i------- - ----~- - ................. . ............... . ....... --- '—'~^- .------.-----''-.
� EL | 1600 | / 61 | 0058 * / ' |
.-^-^~'. .-~^-~ |
| | |
---------------- .............. . .................. . 7 -------------- ^ -------------- - ---------------- ------------ -------------------
( [7 | 4800 1 1 2179 ( 0.454 / ( 1
-------- - ------------- (
/ | !
� ------- --`^---- --^--------`^-- ----` ----'-- '-------- - --------
/ ER 1 2680 1 1 444 ! 0.278 / |
----- - ------- |
/ i �
�---------------- - - - ------------------ - _____ - -------------- ---------------- - ------------------- - -------------------
/ VVL ) 1600 | / 52 | 0.035
- ------------ ^ r~^~~ |
/---------------- . ...... .................. ................ .............. . ................ ................... .................... .
� WT. | / 5380 | | [
............ ---�--� /
�
/----~~'-} 64OD- ------------------ - --------------- } (L845* ---------------- . ................... ) .^~~~-'}
|
| YyR | | 31 1 1 |
i
� --------- -------------- - ------------------ ---------------- - -------------- . .......... ..... -'-------- -------- -
/EXISTING I.C.U. | 1.010 1
-------------- ------- /
|
�---------------- - -------------- ------------------ ---------------- - -----`~ - ---------------- - ------------------- '------------------- -
� EUSOwG+REG GROWTH + COMMITTED WYPRDPOSED IMPROVEMENTS |.C4 | l
1
l
................ . .............. . .................. ................ .............. . ................ -'-^`^-''~. .^~-~`~-^. .-----.
/ EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT iC.U.
.------/
| �
... ........... '.... . .............. �� ........... .... . ............... . .............. ................ _................... . ................... .^,,,'...
Split Phase N/SDirection
. ............. .
F-1 Projected +Project traffit|.C.V. will bo less than urequal to 0.90
-
L/ Projected +project traffic LC.U. will bn greater than <l98
�
~
i-IPnojnntod +pn� project :|.C.V.w/syotemv improvement will ho less than or equal tnU.9V
Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. without project
... ............ - --------------------~----- ........`.. .................... ... ........... _ ................. _................... .. .... ........... ............... _ ...........
�
Description oi system improvement:
�
' . � �� . ............
i -----�- -'-----� -----^�-'---�-----''--'-�--`--'--------�'----�--'''-----'
' K]JECT FORM 11
CH544OPk4
_5
�
I % TRAFFIC VOLtME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION.• JAMBOREE ROAD & SAN JOAQTJW HILLS ROAD 5045
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average WznterlSpring 2001 And
APPROACH-
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
.PEA-KHOUR
REGIONAL GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
I% OF PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1306
Southbound
1631
Eastbound
377
Westbound
96
L� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than I % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
<_ J Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than I % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes. . .
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
(
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME'ALYALYSIS
INTERSECTION.• JAMBOREE ROAD & SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD 5045
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Wlnter/Spring 2001 P214)
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXLSTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUAs
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROV�,_,D PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1707
Southbound
2650
Eastbound
157
Westbound
1049
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than t % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
JA5045AM
I
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
- C,gGrFORN�A
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD 504.5
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER /SPRING
2001 AM
........................ ............................... ......... ..... .... ............... ................ - ----- -- ........I . ............... .
EXISTING I PROPOSED I EXISTING I EXISTING I REGIONAL I COMMITTED I PROJECTED I PROJECT I
......... ........
PROJECT
I Movement I Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I V/C Ratio I Volume I
V/C
I Capacity I Capacity I Volume I Patio I Volume I Volume I w/o Project I I
Ratio
I I I I I I I. Volume I I
i----------- - - - --- - -- ------- -- - --- - - ------------ - - - - -- - -------- -- - - -- ............. _ .......................-- .. - ..........---- - - -- -- ................
NL 1 1600 1 1 28 I 0.018 I I I I I
..............
I....................... .. ........ ................... . ... ....... °- ............... ................... -------------- - - - - -- ................... - --- --- -- - - -- -
NT 1 4800 1 1 1149 1 0.239 " I I I
---- I ------------
1 ----------------- - . ............ . ................... . ................. .
1 NR 1 1600 1 1 129 1 0.081 1 1 1 1 1
1 ........... ° ..... ......... ..:... . ....... .......... .. - ---............. ..........
1 SL 1 3200 1 1 519 1 0.162 " I I I I
I-- --- --- -- - - - --- - --------- -- ---- - ------------------- ......----- - - - - -- - -- ---- --- - - - - -- - _ - - - --
1 ST 1 4800 1 1 1071 1 0.223 1 1 1 1 1
I°-- ° .............•- °._._..... . ................... . ................ . ............... .......... ........ ........... .. . - ....I....... - ----- --- -- ---- -
I SR 1 1600 1 1 41 1 0.026 I I I I
----------------
I- ------ --- - -- - -------------- .... ................. ............_.........._ ......... _ - °-........ - -- . ........ .-------- .... ................... .. ...............................
1 EL 1 276 1 1
I................. } 4800 . _:........ ...... • . ................ } 0.068 * ...... .......... ................. } - .............. - -- ------ -- - -- }
................
L ET i 1 51 1 1
------------- - ---- -- - - ---- -------- - - - --- ....... -- ............... .............................................. .........— ......................... ......
I ER I N.S.1 I 50 I I I I I I
I------- .............-----......... ._................_........•... ..._......... . --- ---- ........................................... - ------- - - - - -- -
1 WL 1 1 69 1 1 1
-----------------
1 ................. } 4800 .........- ---- -- - - --------- - - - - -- } 0.017 . .................. .................. } ................ - ------ -- --- - -- } .......---------
-. -WT I I 11 1 I 1
j
I----- -- ------- -- - --- -- - - - -- -- ...... .......... . ................ . ........... : ... . ... .............. ..................... .................... - - - -- - -- ........ .
I WR I N.S. I. I is I I I I I I
--------------- - --------------- '... . ................ . ............... . ............. ..... . .................... . .... ............... . ............... ..................
I EXISTING I.C.U. 1 0.486 1
1
I i - ---- .......... • ... -- - ..... •-- . ----°-° ................... ............................. -- ....... - -- - ............... ............... .
1 EXISTING + REGIONAL GROWTH + COMMITTED W /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I I
I
i-- -- ----- -- --- - ---_-- -- -- -- -- - --- ---- ----- ------ - --------- -- - --- - --- z........... .............. ------------------ . ----------- .------ .. ............... ..................
I EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.
1
... ................. ...................... ..... *--- :......--- ------ - - - - -- - ------- ..------ ..------------------ - .............:....... ------------------ - --------- ------ .................
Split Phase E/W direction
.
1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w /systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90
1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U: with project improvements will be less than I.C.U. Without project
... ............. ..... .................... .................. -- ................. .. ............... - .................. _. ..................... .. ................... .. ................ ..............
. Description of system improvement:
. -- ............................................................ ..................- _.........._ ...... ............ .. ........... . ......... .. ................... .. .......... ...... .. I ...........
PROJECT =OPM II
JA5045AM
r
7--7-
JA5045PM
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSISP
'
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD 5045
EXISTING, TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
WINTER /SPRING 2001 PM
._ ................ . ."----.....-- - -................. . ...... ....... :. .............. . .............. -- -- ....... .:.......... ........ .......... .. ..-"--........ ............. .
EXISTING I PROPOSED I EXISTING I EXISTING I REGIONAL I COMMITTED I PROJECTED I PROJECT I PROJECT I
Movement I Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I
PROJECT I V/C Ratio I Volume I V/C I
{ Capacity I Capacity { Volume I Ratio I Volume I
Volume I w/o Project I { Ratio I
I I I I I
I Volume I I
---------------- - ---- -- -- - - - - -- - ---- ------ --- - - - -- - - ------- - - -- --- - -------------- - ------ -- -- - ----- -- ---
I NL 1 1600 1 1 74 1 0.046 " I
--- - -- -- ........ -- °'-' -- - ---- -- ................. -- ...........
I I I I
I---------- - ----- - --- ----- ---- -- - ---------- ........ . .......... .... • ..... I........ - ------ .......... ' ...................
1 NT 1 4800 1 1 1540 1 0.321 1 I
................... --- --- - - ---- . ........... I
1 1 1, I
I--- -- ------ --- -- - ----- I ........ - ---- ----- ----- - - -- - - ------- - - ---- - -------------- .---------------- - -----
1 NR 1 1600 1 1 93 1 0.058 ( !
'
------- - ---- -- - ------------------- ............... ' ............. I
I I I I
I--- ------ - - - --- - - --••-- - ----- - ---- ------ -•-- -- - ---------- .... . -"'-- -------- - - ----- ---- - - - - -- - ..................
SL 1 3200 1 1 507 1 0.158 1 1
—° ............ ' - -- - - - - -- .........-"— I
i 1
I-- --- - ----- ----- ' —............. -- ................. ....------------ ' ............. ................ ..............
1 ST 4800 I 1 1943 1 0.405 • I
- - -- . .... ......... ...... . .............. .............. I
I I I
{................ - - ---- --- - - ---- - ---- ------- ------ - --- --- ---- ----- - ------- - - - ---- - -------- -- - --- - ----
I SR 1 1600 1 1 200 1 0.125 1 1
- ---- --- -- -- --- - - - ------ -- - - ---- - -------- - - - - -- - ----- -------- I
1 1 1
I-------- - --- --- - ------•------- - ------------------ ......... I ------ . -------------- .---------------- - - ----
I EL 1 1 91 1 1
--- -- -- - - - - -- - --- ---- - ----- - - ---- ' ---------- --- - - ---- -- - - - - --
1 I
I------ ------- - -- } 4800 - - ----- ----- - - - --- - -------- - - - - -- } 0.025 - --------- ------- - -----------
-------- } ---------- - -------- - --- ------ - - - -- } --- - ---- °° I
ET 1 1 28 1 1
1 1
............... . .................. ................ • --° ....... .............. .................
ER I N -S. I 38 1 ! I
................. - - ------------ ............
1 1 I
I................ - -- ------ - - - - -- - ---•------ --•----• - -- --- ---- --- --- - ------- -- - --- . ---------------- - -------------------
1 WL 1 1 205 1 1
- --- - ------ -- ------- - ------ I....... - --- --- -- ----
1
I--------- - -- --- } 4800 - --- ------- --•--- -- - --- - - - --- ' } 0.054 * ---------------- ..:.-----
----- - - - --- ) ------- ------ - - - - -- ------------- } .......... 1
I WT 1 1 54 1 1
I
{ -- -- -------- -- - •--- ---- ------ - --- -----•---- -- -- - ---- -- - - ---- - - -- -------- - --- -- - - -- ---'° ..........
1 WR I N.S. 1 1 790 1 1 1
°'- .... — ... -- -------- ° .......
1
I------------ - - -- - - -- --- - °'--• - - -- ---- --- - ---- -- - I----- --------- - - ------ - - - --- - ------- ------ - -- ......------
1 EXISTING I.C.U. 0.530 1
-- -- - - -- - --- - --- -- -- -- -- -- ............... - ------------- I
I
I---------- - - ---- - --- ----- - -- — ......... ' - --....... - --
1 EXISTING + REGIONAL GROWTH + COMMITTED W /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
I
LC.U. I I 1
I----- ----- - - -- -- - -- ---•- ---- - -- - --- --- ---- - -- "'- . .......... .... . ..... .- .- ..... ................. -- ...................
EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.
-- -- ----.......... - " .. ' -- -'- ...
I . I
----- °......... . "' .......................---.............................................................
Split Phase E/W direction
....................... °----- -- ............................ -
1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
I _I Projected + project taffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w /systems improvement will be less than or
equal to 0.90
1 _1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less than
I.C.U. Without project
..... ............"' .. ............... -- ......... _ ....... .................... ...........I............-.................... ......._....................... --".......... -- .............. .
Description of system improvement: .
-- ........ ................. ......— -- ......... ... ...........I ..... ............ .... ................. -- ......... ....---- -... .... .............. -- ......... ,..................... .
PROJECT FORM 11
JA5045AM
in
I % TRAFFIC VOL EWE ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & S A_NTA BARBARA DRIVE 5310
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffu; 2002 AiV
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK14OUR
, VOLUME.
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL GROWTH
VOLUME
I APPROVED PROJECTS
PEAK. HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1 %OFPROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1529
Southbound
1259
Eastbound
97
Westbound
125
L+� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
i
1 % TRAFFIC VOL EXE ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION.• JAMBOREE ROAD & SANTA BARBARA DRIVE 5310
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2002 PM
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PHAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONALGROWTH
I VOLUME
APPROVED PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
I PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1 %OFPROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLT TNM
PROJECT
PEAR HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1460
Southbound
1945
Eastbound
44
Westbound
838
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: DATE:
I JA5310AM
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION. ANALYSIS
\42) t'
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & SANTA BARBARA DRIVE 5310
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2002 AM
( I EXISTING I PROPOSED I EXISTING I EXISTING I REGIONAL
I COMMITTED I PROJECTED I PROJECT I PROJECT
Movement I Lanes I Lanes I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH
I PROJECT I V/C Ratio .1 Volume I V/C
j I Capacity I Capacity I Volume . I Ratio I Volume
I Volume I w/o Project I I Ratio
I I I I I
'
I I Volume I I
I-•- ---- ---•------ - .- .....- --- - ---- --- --- -•- ° -- ----._. °- .... -° -- --....... - - ..- ......- .-- ....-
I NIL 1 1600 1 1 3 1 0.002 1
.......... - -- ........ -. -..- .... ............... . -- ...........
1 1 1 1
I-------- - - - --- - -- ---- ---- - --- - ---- ---- ---- - - -- - -- ------- - -- - -- - ----- •- --- - -- - - - -- ...... :...
NT I 4800 1 1 1338 1 0.279 "
...... . .......... --- - --- - - - - -- .. -. -.. ..... .......-.....----
I I I I
I---------- --- - - -- - --------- - - - - -- - -- ---------- -- - - -- - ---------- - - - - -- - -------- - -- - • - - ------ --- - - - - --
1 NR 1 1600 1 1 188 1 0.118 1
- -------------- -• - ---- - ------------- - - - - -- - - ----------............- .- .. -. -.
1 1 1
I................. ................ - -- ° -- ° . .... .. ....... ..... .. .. ............ ......... . ..... ..............
SL 1 3200 1 1 370 1 0.116
=
......... -- .................. . ............... .................
I I
I ----------------- - ------- I ..- ................ . ..................
I ST j 4800 1 1 887 1 0.185 1 1
1 1 1
--- -- --- --------- - ------ - -------- ------- ------ - - - --• - -- ------- --- --° . ............... ........... •- °-
SR 1 1,500 i 1 2 1 0.001 1 1
................ - ................... . ... ............ ..................
1 1 1
I------- --- - --- -- - ---- - -• --; -- - -- - ------------------ ....... ................ - ------ ......... - .........- -- ...- .....----
j EL 1 1-600 1 1 58 1 0.036 *
.............. ................... - - -- -- - - . .................
I I I I
I--- -- -- ----- ----- - ----- - - °- --.... -- .4...--- ...... ................ --....... - ........ .................. ....................
I ET I 1 6 1 I
- - -• ....... ...: - -- ............. - ......... ...
I
I. ... .. .. ...... } 1600 . ................... . ................ - - } 0.024 . .................. -
----------------- } ....... °----.... }
G. ER 1 1 33 1 1
1
I---- ------ ---- --- - ---- -- --- ----- - ------------- ------ - -- ° - ----------- . ............... . .................. .....-
WL I 65 1
-- ..................... - ................... . ------ .........
I
I----------- - -- - -- } 3200 - --- --- ---------- :................. } 0.020 * - ----- ----- - - - - -- ......................
} ................ }
I WT 1 1 0 1 1
1
.. ............... . ............... . ................... . ................ . ............... .................. ..
WR 1 1600 I 1 60 1 0.038 1
° :.....
--------- ........ .- ....... - ..----- -- --- - --- ........ ......
1 1
I- °- - -- - ---------- --- ------- - - - -•-- ...... ................. - ......... ........ ..... -............
I EXISTING I.C.U. 1 0.451 1
.......... ... ...... - - --- -...----............- °--°
i
I--- ------ -- ----- - -- . ........... . ................... . ................ . ............... . ........ -- - -- ---- I
I EXISTING + REGIONAL GROWTH + COMMITTED W /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. I I I
:
I... .......... ... . ............... . . ....... .. ....... ................... - ............... . .................. .
( EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.
..................... ... ............... . ............... ................. I
j I
... ........ ..... °-- - ............... . ................. - .. ................ . ............... . ................ ...
Split Phase E/W direction
.......... - --_..........._.. - ---'........... . .... ........ . -- -
1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U. will be less than or equal to 0.90
I_I Projected +. project traffic I.C.U. will be greater than 0.90
I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. w /systems improvement will be less than or equal to 0.90
I_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements will be less
than I.C.U. without project
-' ..... ............. . ............ - ..... .......... ......... .. ................. ................. -- .......... -........ ..
Descriotion of system improvement:
.... I................ -- ---- .- ............... ------- '....... .................... .
-
......................... ... ........ ... ... .. .. .... . . .... .. ...... ........... .. ............... .. ................... .. ...... -...........-...- ..... - ....... ------- - .. ............... ..............
PROJECT - FORM :l
IA5310AM
pa
JA531OPM
.. ........ _ .......................... ..... -...... ...... ...................
Description of system improvement:
PROJECT
IA531OPM
.. ..................- •. .............. .__ -- ---- ----------- -- -------- .......
FORM II
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSISP
�4 Fp RN
INTERSECTION:
JAMBOREE
ROAD & SANTA BARBARA DRIVE 5310
- EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED
ON AVERAGE
DAILY TRAFFIC
2002 PM
•....... - - °-.....
i
-'•- °— ............. • °'-- --..
I EXISTING I PROPOSED
. ......
I EXISTING
.............. .............. -' ................ '
I EXISTING I REGIONAL I COMMITTED I
.................. ............ ...."- °-'- -. .
PROJECTED I PROJECT 1 PROJECT I
1. Movement
1 Lanes I Lanes
I PH HR
I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT I
V/C Ratio 1 Volume I V/C 1
I
I Capacity I Capacity
I Volume
I Ratio I Volume I Volume I
w/o Project I 1 Ratio I
I
t I
I
I I I I
Volume I I I
NL I
1600 1
o
1 13
---------------- -- ------------ --- --- -
1 0.008 1 1 1
:
--------- .......... •- - - - - - -- .......'-- - --
I 1 I
•- ---- ° ° - - -- -
NT 1
------------- . - --" ..............
4800 1.
---
-........ • ...
1 1372
. ........ - . -_ ........... ....:................
1 0.286 * I I
................... ............... ' ............. 1
I I I
I-
NR 1
---------- - -•- --------- - - ----
1600 1
- -------- - - - - --
1 75 1
- - -- - ---------- - - - - -- . ................... .
0.047 1 1 1
................... - ------ -- - - ---- - ---••----- -- I
1 1 I
i- ------ - ---- -
1 SL 1
------ - -- --- - ------------------
3200 1
- ----- - --------
1 263 1
0.082 - I I
i
I I I
I-- -- --- -- --• - -- -
1 ST 1
---- ---- - ---- - --- -- ---- -- -- -- -
4800 1
- ----- --- - --- - -- -
1 1655 1
-------- --•- -- - ---- --------- -- - ---- ------- --- ---- -
0.345 1 1 1
------- ------ - - ---- ............... - --- --- -- ---- I
1 1 I
.............. .. .
I SR 1
. .. ---------- - ----•------ ---- - --
1600 1
- --------- -- ---- -
1 27 1
-- -- - - -- --- - ----- ----- ------ - ------------- - - - I -- -
0.0i7 1 1 1
------------ - - - - -- - --- ------ - - -- . ............. I
1 1 I
I- --- --- --- - ----- -
EL 1
- ------- ---- -- • ----- ----- - --- -- ..
1600 1
. ..... ......... ................
1 24 1
. ............... ..m .............. ...................
0.015 * I I
.................-- - - - --- I
I I I
................ -
I_ ET
---- ---- • --- -- - -- ---- --- ---- - - --
I
- --------- - - - - -- -
1 5
---- --- - - - --- • --------- - - - - --- - ------------ ------ -
1 1
- --- .............. - --- ----- ----- ' ............. I
i i
}
1600 - - ------ ------- ---
- -------- -...... }
0.013
o ER
.
1
- --
1 15
1 1
1 I
°'- .......... I
1 ................
I WL
---------- - ----- ------- - - - - --
I
- -- ---- ••----- -- -
1 422
---- ----- - - - -- - ------ ---- - - - - -- ...................
( 1
.................... - - -
I
--------- ---- -- }
3200 - -------- --- - ----
.... °- °---- °' }
0.137 . ................ .............. -- -- }
- - - °- °- ---- }
I WT
1
1 15
1 1
I - j
I-- ------ -------- -
WR 1
---- -- ---- - - -- - --------------- --
1600 1
- --- - --- -----_ -
1 401 I
- ,------ - - ---- - -_-----_---- ' ................... ...........
0.251 I I
---- -- -- . .............. ....... j
I I I
I'- °-='-"' -..•. - - --- ----- -- --------- ------ - - - - --
I EXISTING I.C.U.
- - --- -- - - -- - --- -
1
------- -- --- ---------°°-.......-
. 0.634 1
------- --- - °................... - - ----- - ----- i
I----------- -- '
j EXISTING +
'- ....... ............
REGIONAL GROWTH +
.....:......... ....'-
COMMITTED
-- -•'•
W /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS LC.0 I
I
I I
I
I--- ------- - - -- -
1 EXISTING +
------ --- - - -- - - -- ------- ------ • ------ --- --- --- -
COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH
------------- :..: ........... -- .. ................... . ....
+ PROJECT I,C.U.
.- -- ---- - ° - --- . .............. ....... -- -- --
- I I
.............. °"- - -----`- °---- . .................. .
Split Phase E/W direction
..... . ......... ..............
I ................. -' -- -................ -
.... .............. . ....... - ---- I.,...... .
I_1 Projected
+ project traffic I.C.U.
will be less
than or equal to 0.90
Projected
+ project traffic I.C.U.
will be greater than 0.90
I_I Projected
+ project traffic I.C.U.
w /systems improvement
will be less than or equal
to 0.90
I_I Projected
+ project traffic I.C.U.
with project
improvements will be less than I.C.U.
without project
.. ........ _ .......................... ..... -...... ...... ...................
Description of system improvement:
PROJECT
IA531OPM
.. ..................- •. .............. .__ -- ---- ----------- -- -------- .......
FORM II
1 % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANAL PSIS
INTERSECTION.: COAST HIGHWAY & JAMBOREE ROAD 5055
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average WinterJSpring. 2001 A31)
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL GROWTH
VOLUME.
APPROVED PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1 %.OFPROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
600
Southbound
1087
Eastbound
3047
Westbound
1363
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization ()CU) Analysis is required.
1Ye TRAFFIC VOLUME ANAL MY
INTERSECTION. COAST HIGHWAY & JAMBOREE ROAD 5055
(Existing Traffic Volume's Based on Average TFinter/Spring 2001 PM
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXLSTTNG
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONALGROWTHI
VOLUME
I APPROVED PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% 017 PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
346
Southbound
2718
Eastbound
2187
Westbound
26'.5
I Project Traffic is estimated to be less than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT:
DATE:
qIl
I% TRAFFIC VOL UME ANAL YSIS
INTERSECTION. COAST HIGHWAY & MACARTHUR BOULEVAitD 5335
(Ecisdng Traffic Volumes Based on Average TFuferlSpring 2001 AM)
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAKHOUR
REGIONALGROWTFI
VOLUME
APPROVED PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VoLuivE
1% OF PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
0
Southbound
912
Eastbound
1712
Westbound
2043
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes,
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1 % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION.• COAST HIGHWAY &MACARTHURBOULEVARD 5335
(Existing- Traffic Volumes Based on Average Winter/Spring 2001 PtY1
APPROACH
IDIRECTIOK
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAKHOUR
REGIONAL GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
0
Southbound
2527
Eastbound
1775
Westbound
2769
L._.� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than f % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 °! of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT:
DATE.
�3
0
Description nf system improvement:
- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
,H5335AM
�
2001 AM
�/PROJECT�
) VY0 |
/
Ratio /
l |
.'-~--|
I |
. ......... : .......
) )
...........
l |
..............
) )
.------!
I l
.-'-'-^.|
| |
l )
.--~----./
l )
�--�-`^^'/
| |
l |
. .---~-/
/ |
..^........ . .... .....''.
-- -- -
F0RMU
��
��
�INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
�
INTERSECTION: COAST HIGHWAY &�WACARTHURBOULEVARD 5835
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED OM AVERAGE DA|LY'TRAFRC
WINTER/SPRING
-�'---'----
j
------ ' ........ . ............. ..... . ............ ;... ............. '-. .................. .
I EXISTING I PROPOSED ( EXISTING | 80WNG / REGIONAL |
......... .. ........ ... '....... ' ....... ...............
C3&k'77D | PROJECTED | PR0JECl
� Movement
l Ldnes ) Lanes | PKHR | V/C I GROWTH |
PROJECT i YYCRaMh ) Vdonnr
|
| Capacity | Capacity | Volume I Ratio / Volume |
Volume I w/o Project /
}
l | l i | |
I Yn|unno )
|-------
/ NL
-~^---^- ---^--`-'- -----~^-- -`-''-'- ---- ............. .
l I | | 1 /
..................... .................... .~`'^^-�
1 |
|.................
� Nt
.---~-- . ^-`'^^-- .^~'--. .'-`^-. -`~'--- .-~----~^.
l I | 1 | |
.----'-^ ------'
| |
�-----------------
| MR
---------------- - -'--`.------'__.- .-.'-'_.~--~`~ .
)
__-,.~.-, -`--..._- . ..............
|-----------------
| SL
. ............... .^`^--~^. . ................ ................ . .................. - ---------------------
) 3200 l | 609 / 0.190 * |
- ------------------- . ...............
| |
1---'-~-'--`~^
} 3T
~~--'-^-- - ---------------- ---~`^~- ------------------ . ......
I ) | / / /
-------------- -------------------- ------'
/ l
..............
} SR
....... .......... ... ............ ............... . ......... ........ .'_'-~~--.
|Mfi ) | 303/ / /
................... `.............
} |
|----'--.-''.--.'.
| EL
................... .-'-`~^-'.^^'--~...................
/ 3200 | 5021 0,157° |
-`^-----^---------'---
/ |
/.................
� ET
--''~-.- . ................... ...'--'. .---. .-. .................. . .....................
/ 48V0| | l2]0| 0l521 /
................... . ...... ........
i |
...
\ ER
. ............... . . ......... ....... . ............ ................ . ... `-~''-.~^''---`^.
I
...... ........... . ...........
�.................
) YyL
- ------ -------- ------------------- ---------------- . ............... ................... .-'''`_'_.
| | | / / |
................... . ....... .......
i .|
| -'^~-^-
� Y��
----- . ---^--- .-'--^- -`-''-.~''----
) 48D0) / 1219 O.254- /
--^-----~^-'-'-- .~-'---
/ |
.................
-_.-`- . ... ....... ...... .-............. ............... ...................
....... . ....... ----------- . ........ ------
/ vYR
)M. S. l ) 824/ � ( |
/ /
|-^-------~--'-----~'---`-^-'~'-
~---. . .................. . ................
~^.-'-'-'^`................
) EXISTING I.C.U.
/ 0.501 | 1
|-----^`- .
| EXISTING +
............... ................... . ................ . ............... . .-`^----. ............. ....... .----^^--�
REGIONAL GROWTH + COMMITTED 0VPR0PVJEQ IMPROVEMENTS I.C.U. / /
'-
� EXISTING +
.'^.-'-_- .. .
............... . ... ......... ..... .'- ........... .......... . .................. . .....................
COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT iCU,
........ ...... . ............. ..... . ...... ------- .......... . ...... '........
. ................... .'~~~-_
.'^. . ------- '-...... . ..... .........
-
1-1 Projected
+ project, traffic /.C.U. will bc less than nr equal (n0.9O
-
(_| Projected
+ project tndfic|.C.U. will bw greater than O90
1_1 Projected
+ project traffic I.C.U. w/systems improvement will be less than
or equal to 0.90
~
1_1 Projected
�
+ project traffic I.C.U. with project improvements Will be less than I.C.U. without project
Description nf system improvement:
- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
,H5335AM
�
2001 AM
�/PROJECT�
) VY0 |
/
Ratio /
l |
.'-~--|
I |
. ......... : .......
) )
...........
l |
..............
) )
.------!
I l
.-'-'-^.|
| |
l )
.--~----./
l )
�--�-`^^'/
| |
l |
. .---~-/
/ |
..^........ . .... .....''.
-- -- -
F0RMU
��
��
CH5335PM
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: COAST HIGHWAY & MACARTHUR BOULEVARD 5335
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES BASED ON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC WINTER/SPRING 2001 AM
................ . ....... •...... . .................. . ..... ......... . .......... ............. -- ...................
I I EXISTING I PROPOSED I EXISTING I EXISTING I REGIONAL I COMMITTED.I
................... ............... ............. .
PROJECTED I PROJECT I PROJECT I
Movement I Lanes I Lanes
I PK HR I V/C I GROWTH I PROJECT
I V/C Ratio I Volume I V/C f
I Capacity I Capacity
I Volume I Ratio I Volume I Volume
I w/o Project I I Ratio I
I I I
1 1 1 1
1 Volume I I I
......... . -------------- ----------- -- -----
I NIL f I
• --------------- - ----------- -- • -- ------ - --- - - -- -- -- -----••- - --- ----
I I I I
....---------------- - ------------- - I
I I I I
I- --------------- - --•- --- ---- -• • -- ------ --- - -- -
1- NT 1 I
-- - --------------- - - ......... • . --- ....._...........- ----- ---.....°-------°..
' I I I I
...... °- -----.................. I
I I I I
I---- --- -- - --- --- • -------------- - -- ----- ---- --
f NR I I
........... .............. . ........... ................... ---..
I I I I
- ---- °--...-- - -- . ---- ......... • ...........
I I I I
--------------- -- ..... -- ------- ..-----------------
SL 1 3200 I
- - -------- - -- --- - -- ----- --• - --- - --- ------- - - - - -- . -------------------
1 1833 1 0.573 * 1999 -4� 90 I
.------------------- - ---- --•--- - --- - --
I I I I
--------- --- --• - -------------- - --- -------- ------
I ST I i
- --------------- - _
I I I I
I I I I
1 ................ . . .. .... . .. ... • ------ ------ - - ----
I SR I N.S. 1
- -- ---- -- -• --- ........ - - --- ---- ....... --- ........._........
1 694 I 1 1-
- -- -- ......... ............... ............. I
1 1 1 I
I------ ---- --- -- -- °-- -- - ----- - --------- --
I EL I. 3200 1
- --------- -- -- -- - ------- -- - - - -- - -- -- ------ ------ - -------------------
1 460 1 0.144 . I
• ----- -- ----- - - - - -- - - -- --- ---- ---- - --- ----- --- I
I I I I I
I------- -- - - - --- ---- ---- -- - ------------------
ET 4300 1
- -------------- :. .......... ... ................. .........................--
1 1315 1 0.274 1 I
°-- --- - - - - ---- ......... -- -- ---- I
I 1 I I
........................ ... . ... ...... ............................
ER I I
.......... . ......... —................
— -- ...... .. ...
I I I I I
.......--- - ' ............ 1
................... °
I I I
I- -- ---- -- - ----- • -------------- - - --- •-- --- - - - ---
i WL I I.
- -------- -- ----- • -- --- -- - ----- - --------------- - ------------------- -
I I I I I
------------------- - -- ------------ • - --- ....... i
I I I
................ . ....... - ----- • --- --------- - - ----
I . WT i 4800 1
- -- -- ----- - -- - -- - ----- ----- ---- • -------- - - - - - -- - - ------- -- -- -- --- ----
1 2170 1 0.452 -)99-91199 I 1
....
- - - ---- - .... .............. ............ 1
1 1 I
1 --- -------- - ---- - .............. ...................
I WR I N.S. 1
............... ............... . ........ ..--- . ......... -• ........ .
1 599 1 1 I 1
................... ......•............ - -- -- I
1
I--•-°--- -------• • - ----- --- ---- - --- -- ---- --- ------
I EXISTING I.C.U.
- •- ----------- -- - -------------- .---------------- - - --- --- --- - -- °° .
1 1.169 1
.............. - ................. -- - ---- -- I
I
!---------------- ------- -------- - --- ---- ----- --- - --
I EXISTING + REGIONAL GROWTH +
- ---------------
COMMITTED W /PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS I.C.0 I
I I
I... ............. . ------------- ' ---- ---.......... ...... -- -- - .... . ............ ... ......... — .... .. ... ............... .
I EXISTING + COMMITTED + REGIONAL GROWTH + PROJECT I.C.U.
_..._........` ..............................__...... ._......................_...... ................ -- ......... ..-....... ...,-------
--. -------------- - ......................°.....
I I
'........ ........... --- .......... °-- .
1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U.
will be less than or equal to 0.90
1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U.
will be greater than 0.90
1_I Projected + project traffic I.C.U.
w /systems improvement will be less than or equal
to 0.90
1_1 Projected + project traffic I.C.U.
with project improvements will be less than I.C.U.
without project
... ................. I------ - ---`- . ........... •...... . ............... . — ............ . ................ ..................... I ................ ' -- ........... .............. .
Description of system improvement:
- — =— -- -- — —
PROJECT — FORM 11
'H5335PM
0
APPENDIX C
Approved Project Data
KI
n
d
m
Ii
O
Q e
O
rn o
c �
x
tyo to
a �
u N
M
A J
H w
V
m
.o
a
m
O
z
Q
m
o° o° e o
EL
z z
O z o
V5 O m
Qa z Qa z V w U m
X(L X w o° Q -wi z
uj m w 2 a Y> m cr m m
D p= p m a w a.
U z} W W m LL w= O
E ¢ tp a W p a j j
Z m z m w 2 z y p m w
w w a X V �- O
d mV N z = a 0 z V N
w
0 0 ¢ oo w >
(L m LL H LL x Z V x U Z X
a
3
Z
R
m
a
R
G
N
V G)
C = 0
0 CL
d
0
CD
O L.
� V d
A) `
� ` c
9
F- j
O
Q
Q
Z
m
W'
W'
J;O N
W,
m
a
W: O 00
as
J'
Of I
W'
W'� N
W, ,
J r
Y
f0
m
a
Hi
W
Z
❑
ZiNN
3
W
Z
m
,
Z,
Z'(3)
Z; u� m
O
U
J.
F
Z
J
Q
Z,
0]
Z. 0)
3' LO
7
Z.
W
N ,
V W
m' n o
M O
0]' u7 in
Z,g
N;W
mm'om
.S. <
�m,��
N'
E 0
W'
Z,
Y
U'I v
C'<
Y
a�
a. u).
E
=
2;o
rZ nrn
c.
Y
(D co: r'o
as
J'
Of I
W'
W'� N
W, ,
J r
Y
f0
m
a
Hi
W
Z
3
W
Z
s
N
,
Z,
O
U
J.
❑
Z,
J
1
0]
Z. 0)
3' LO
7
Z.
N'X
N ,
~
m' n o
Z. U
:om
FW: •-
W
N;W
mm'om
m:O
W
N'
E 0
;
Z,
Y
U'I v
C'<
LO
a�
m:
Z:o
Z:
c
Fes-
¢a1
> LO r
J'
Q.: N
W'
W'� O
N
d
J' y
tA; V n
Z
ll�
❑
�-:
Z,
0
W
Z
fn
Jfr r
Z,
(fi
W
Z. ° CO
Y
1
Q�
Z. 0)
3' LO
Q
Z.
C,❑
N ,
U
mW
:om
FW: •-
W
N;W
Y
m:O
a U):o o° .
N'
E 0
_
Z,
rZ: Nr
C'<
LO
c�
m:
¢a
>' M
W'
V
W'
W: r
m
d
W'O W
❑
J
W
Z
:O
z
Z. ° CO
1
Q�
Z
J r
Q
Z.
W
N;W
m:O
m'Ni°r,
Z , in
3:
C'<
LO
m:
W
Fes-
Y
(D co: r'o
0-h,rr
ai
E;
_
n
Z; LO
z Z; w
c�
¢a�
rl4
7.
�
E
E
2§
E
220
0
c/c
coo
�.«
)k&
� @a
%CL3
§
CL
CL
\� -
e;V
§V LO
i,-
L;R ®
Lu. 00
!!I
f
\
/.
E: m
ƒ
}\
I�
§
.
):
LU @
\
Z.
Z'`
/
\
)'
{
�\
�
K)
'
);\
2;
■.§
\;G.
ZWZ
k :§
u a .
\
�2LU
! :! m
a
)
\y
\�,
z
z
!!I
f
\
/.
E: m
ƒ
}\
I�
§
z „
LU @
Z'`
/
{
�
K)
'
);\
2;
t.§
)
\
m,
a
�
m:
E
\
!!I
�
\�2 I
!!I
�
E :.
LU @
CUT
{
~
(
�'
\
I.
a
�
E
\
\
Z'
9
k
./
/ea
f
ƒ%
!!I
�
APPENDIX D
TPO One - Percent Analysis
Calculation Worksheets
/,
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: BAYSIDE DRIVE I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Winfer7Spring 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
i% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
434
4
2
440
4
2
Southbound
67
1
62
130
1
0
Eastbound
3083
31
103
3217
32
5
Westbound
1866
1 20
1 53
2039
20
8
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
IF % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: SAYSIDE DRIVE I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average WnteNSpifng 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
i %OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
509
5
1
515
5
4
Southbound
57
1
100
158
2
0
Eastbound
2738
27
83
2848
28
3
Westbound
5573
56
72
5701
57
8
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
C� Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion DATE: 3/20/2003
q
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: DOVER DRIVE I WESTCLIFF DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average WinfeNSpring 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
725
7
5
737
7
0
Southbound
457
5
1
463
5
1
Eastbound
666
7
0
673
7
1
Westbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
oProject Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 *A of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to % greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: DOVER DRIVE / WESTCLIFF DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average IMnterlSpring 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1465
15
2
1481
15
2
Southbound
296
3
2
301
3
1 0
Eastbound
1110
ii
3
1124
1 11
0
Westbound
0
0
0
I 0
1 0
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion DATE: 3/20/2003
q
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. DOVER DRIVE I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Mater/Spring 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
151
2
0
153
2
0
Southbound
1481
15
1 17
1513
15
1
Eastbound
2410
24
116
2550
26
3
Westbound
2856
29
72
2957
30
2
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
9% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. DOVER DRIVE I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average WrnteN3pring 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
103
1
0
104
1
0
Southbound
1922
19
13
1954
20
1
Eastbound
1975
20
95
2089
21
2
Westbound
6533
65
103
6701
67
1 5
L ^J Project Traffic is estimated to be less then 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion DATE: 3121V2003
q3
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD I SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD
(Existing TratOC Volumes Based on Average Iinter/SpHng 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1333
13
70
1416
14
1
Southbound
1663
17
119
1799
18
2
Eastbound
385
4
0
388
4
0
Westbound
99
1
12
112
1
0
�X Project Traffic is estimated to be less than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD I SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Winter /Spring 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1 °A OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1741
17
95
1854
19
3
Southbound
2703
27
1 104
2834
28
1
Eastbound
161
2
5
168
2
0
Westbound
1070
11
50
1131
11
0
I ^ Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required,
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion DATE: 3120!2003
QI
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD/ SANTA BARBARA DRIVE
(Existing TraIRc Volumes Based on Average KlnterlSpdng 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1560
16
61
1836
16
1
Southbound
1284
13
110
1407
14
2
Eastbound
99
1
6
"0"
1
0
Westbound
128
1
5
134
1
0
C� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD I SANTA BARBARA DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average INlnterlSpring 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1 %OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1489
15
92
1596
18
4
Southbound
1984
20
95
2099
21
2
Eastbound
44
0
3
47
0
0
Westbound
1 85
1 9
1 5
sea
9
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than t% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
lntermcdon Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion DATE: W2012003
210
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD l PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(E)dsting Tmffrc Volumes Based on Average MWer/Spring 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
613
6
1
620
6
0
Southbound
1109
11
108
1228 1
12
3
Eastbound
3108
31
105
3244
32
3
Westbound
1390
14
45
1449
14
5
Project Traffic is estimated to be lass than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. JAMBOREE ROAD I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average N4nier/Spring 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
353
4
3
359
4
0
Southbound
2773
28
93
2894
29
2
Eastbound
2231
22
124
2377
24
10
Westbound
2676
27
63 1
2767
28
4
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion DATE: 3/20/2003 q0
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. MACARTHUR BOULEVARD I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Tmfi9C Volumes Based on Average W/ntt lSpring 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1 %OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Southbound
930
9
15
855
10
2
Eastbound
1748
17
32
1796
18
2
Westbound
2083
1 21
1 27
2131
21
2
I-J Project Traffic is estimated to be less than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Wlnter/Spring 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Southbound
I 2578
1, 28
1 14
2617
1 25
1
Eastbound
1810
18
39
1867
19
5
Westbound
2824
28
16
2869
29
2
C7-7 Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion DATE: 3!2012003
11-
APPENDIX E
Cumulative Project Data
Table E -1
Cumulative Project Traffic Generation
Project
Mo ning Peak Hour
Evening Peak Hour
Daily'
Inbound
Outbound
Total
Inbound
Outbound
Total
South Coast Shipyard
35
20
55
41
38
79
892
St. Mark Presbyterian Church
36
30
66
42
44
86
N/A
Our Lady Queen of Angels
47
31
78
6
6
12
NIA
St. Andrews Church
3
1
4
11
10
21
NIA
Regent Newport Beach Resort
31
16
47
31
47
78
936
Bonita Canyon - Bluffs Commercial Center
92
77
169
199
175
374
4,820
Mariners Church
157
95
252
182
137
319
4,505
Exodus Community Center and Tarbut V"romh Expansion
331
253
584
240
333
573
5,365
Newport Coast - TAZ 1
Newport Coast - TAZ 2
Newport Coast - TAZ 3
Newport Coast - TAZ 4
532
1,080
169
185
810
3,611
592
620
1,342
4,691
761
805
793
1,901
592
614
529
1,480
339
377
1,322
3,381
931
991
13,088
70,778
9,306
9.843
Newport Ridge - TAZ 1
Newport Ridge - TAZ 2
Newport Ridge - TAZ 3
611
211
809
890
739
394
1,501
950
1,203
1,035
739
402
685
422
188
1,720
1,161
590
17,844
11,605
6,070
Lower Sayview Senior Housing
15
45
60
45
15
60
600
Bonita Canyon - Residential
39
183
222
1871
87 1
2741
2,827
Total
4,383
8,407
12,790
7,060 1
4,912 1
11,972 1
158,473
' NIA =Nat Available
Gq
Figure E -1
South
Coast Shipyard Traffic
Distribution
10%
20%
auto
Cruz �O
Drive ��
o y�
Santa
Rosa
00
y
m 5 P$a
°
Drive
�
of
75% 65%
Boyside Drive
Si fc
Wp
U
57
45%
10%
40%
30%
Legend
10% = Percent To/From Project
loo
Kunzmmn Associates
2667/6
Figure E -2
St. Mark Presbyterian Church Traffic Distribution
5% 5% 10% 20%
r
i
Cruz
A Drive Santo
a Rosa
Drive
i
t R
10%
10% - - - - - — 15 %—
Bayside Drive
U j
57 �$ ° 15
,
,
15%
1D%
10%
Legend
* -10% = Percent From Project
E- - -10% = Percent To Project
Kunzman Associates 266717
(62-
Figure E -3
Our
Lady of
Angels Traffic
Distribution
52
40%
l�rf
�y
$Celt
Cruz vp0
a
Drive Santa
Rom
202
Drive
°oy
mo
52
l02
Boyside Drive
Site
Poct.
202
D
o �v
c$
102
Legend
102 = Percent Ta/Fram Project
Kunzman Associates
2667/8
(62-
Figure E -4
St. Andrews Church Traffic Distribution
5%
30%
�fC'lF
�P
to
Cruz pp
Dri y� Santa
y. Rosa
° s Drive
t5 �$n
m °
� a
5%
c ��r•
Bayside Drive Si ocific _ yy
� 10%
wo
� 15%
25%
v
�o
10%
Legend
10% = Percent To/From Project
Kunzman Associates 2667/9
103
Figure E -5
Regent Newport Beach Resort Traffic Distribution
157
r
4�
$ onto
Cru
Drive Santa
Rosa
o� o ysP Drive
r�mm o��OS
507
Sayside Drive Si aaJfic
I
sfh 5
yo � 207 �a
357
2 �
5
o�
157.
Legend
107 = Percent To/From Project
Kunz-man Associates 2667/10
JOq
Figure E -6
Bonita Canyon — Bluff's Commercial Center Traffic Distribution
lox
Sant
oc Cruz 5%
Drive Santa
o y Rosa
O SR s Drive
o,�J' 159.
8ayside Drive Site PaciP� 10%
s� X'
H,- d
2�
5%
Lear nd
10% = Percent To /From Project
Kunzman Associates 2667/11
)es
/D6
Figure E -7
Mariners
Church Traffic Distribution
$
ac
Santa
Cruz
Qo
Drive
o
5% Santa
Rosa
�
Q
Drive
y
m
14%
Site
Site
� 9%
Bide Drive
Pacfec
CAS` 4%
Q
v
U
5%
Legend
10% = Percent
To /From Project
Kunzman Associates
2667/12
/D6
Figure E -8
Exodus Community Center And Torbut V'Torah Expansion Traffic Distribution
9
lC�f
3 Santa
G1z
Drive ,� 5% Santa
c Rosa
° g Drive
D ° 3
4) 14%
9%
Site 9a�ide Drive Jlte P odi �C c
�S! 4% w
d
v �
k o`
5%
Legend
10% = Percent To /From Project
Kun man Associates 2667/13
/01'
Figure E -9
Newport Coast TAZ 1 Traffic Distribution
onto
o Cruz
Drive oio Santa
Rosa
Drive
Q•� m
15% 20% 10%
Site
5%
Bayside Drive Site
38%
15%
a
53%
Legend
10% = Percent To/From Project
Kunzmmn Associates 2667/14
Figure E -10
Newport Coast TAZ 2 Traffic Distribution
5% 18%
onto
$
d Cruz
Drive G Santa
e y. Rosa
s Drive
d'
o >
15% 20%
5%
Bayside Drive Site 4.
� � a
ci m�
vs~
o"
48%
Legend
10% = Percent To/From Project
lKunz?wn Associates 2867/15
/0J
Figure E -11
Newport Coast TAZ 3 Traffic Distribution
5% 15%
onto
4 Cruz
Drive Santa
o yry Rosa
s Drive
ts ? P
F� �° o $a
iBz
15% 20%
SX
Dnyside Drive Site 4.
35%
d � �
U l
O
58%
Le end
10% = Percent To /From Project
Kunz man Associates 2667/16
X10
Figure E -12
Newport Coast TAZ 4 Traffic Distribution
5%
s, Santa
Cruz moo
Drive Santa
Rosa
o' ys Drive
m �
15%
9ayside Drive Site 5%
1
� � a
s
k�
20%
LeoT
10% = Percent To/From Project
Kunz-man Associates 2667/17
///
Figure E -13
Newport Ridge TAZ 1 Traffic Distribution
5% 19%
to
Cruz 5%
Drive Santa
o Rosa
° a ° Drive
o a
�Fe 13% 10% 10%
15X
20% 33%
9ayside Drive
Site ��7i. 53%
c
v
U >
Legend
10% = Percent To /from Project
Kvnzr an Associates 2667/19
112-
Figure E -14
Newport Ridge TAZ 2 Traffic Distribution
5% 20%
Santa r4�
Crux
Drive �� Santa
0 o y Rosa
° s Drive
� 9
m 5%
15%
Bayside Drive Site PaalPrc �.�- cy 2%
�bsJti e
3 �m
5
c
o�
!Mend
10% = Percent To/From Project
KunzTwn Associates 2667/19
//3
Figure E -15
Newport Ridge TAZ 3 Traffic Distribution
5% 16%
Santa
Cruz
Drive Santa
0o Rosa
6
DING
mm °0 5%
01
23% 10%
15%
Bayside Drive
Site'. 33%
r
O �m
i m
20%
Legend
10% = Percent To/From Project
Kunzman Associates 2667/20
/ /S�
Figure E -16
Lower Bayview
Senior Housing Traffic Distribution
45%
P
�c7
SOX
own �A
Cruz
Drive y�
yy
Santa
Rosa
a'
s
Dive
60%
25%
40%
9ayside Drive Site
Pacific
5%
r
157
Lead
10% = Percent To /From
Project
Kunzman Associates
2667/21
/ /S�
//h
Figure E -17
Bonita
Canyon
— Residential Traffic Distribution
s
r
g,
Santa sa,,
Cruz
Drive Santa
y. Rosa
o'
° s Drive
°
Q�
�
2
m
Q
5%
Site
Bayside Drive
PacitMC
�sfh'
¢
d
/ua
V i
4%
Leqend
10% = Percent To/From Project
Kunz?nan Associates
2667/22
//h
APPENDIX F
CEQA One - Percent Analysis
Calculation Worksheets
!/�
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: DOVER DRIVE! WESTCLIFF DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Wlnter/Spring 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1 °A OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
725
7
5
392
1129
11
0
Southbound
457
1 5
1 1
8
471
5
1
Eastbound
666
7
0
180
853
9
1
Westbound
0
0
0
0
0 1
0
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: DOVER DRIVE I WESTCLIFF DRIVE
(Existing TraHlc Volumes Based on Average WinteNSpring 200.3 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAKHOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOURII
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1465
15
2
209
1690
17
2
Southbound
296
3
2
6
307
3
0
Eastbound
1110
11
3
308
1432
14
0
Westbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % W Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion
DATE: 3/20/2003
I rr
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. DOVER DRIVE I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(E7dsting Trafllc Volumes Based on Average WlnterlSpring 2003 AN)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
I %OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
151
2
0
0
153
2
0
Southbound
1481
1 15
1 17
188
1701
17
1
Eastbound
2410
24
116
573
3123
31
3
Westbound
2856
29
72
1595
4552
46
2
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. DOVER DRIVE I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Tmffta Volumes Based on Average WinteASpring 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1 %OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
103
1
0
0
104
1
0
Southbound
I
I 2268
23
1
Eastbound
1975
20
95
979
3068
31
2
Westbound
6533
65
103
859
7560
76
5
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
C� Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than t% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion DATE: . 3120/2003
/ /C
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: BAY5IDE DRIVE I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average WfntenSpring 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
434
4
2
0
440
4
2
Southbound
67
1
62
0
130
1
0
Eastbound
3083
31
103
754
3971
40
5
Westbound 1
1966
20
53
1590
3629 1
36
1 8
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. BAYSIDE DRIVE I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average WinterlSpring 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1 %OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
509
5
1
0
515
5
4
Southbound
57
1
1 100
0
1 158
1 2
1 0
Eastbound
2738
27
83
1285
4133
41
3
Westbound
5573
58
1 72
862 1
6563
66
6
C� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than i % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
C ^I Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion DATE: 3/20 /2003
I.�
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD I SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD
(Existing TmfNc Volumes Based on Average Winter/Spring 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAKHOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1 %OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1333
13
70
1089
2505
25
1
Southbound
1663
17
119
762
2561
26
2
Eastbound
385
4
0
0
388
4
0
Westbound 1
99
1
12
140
252
3
0
L_ ^.J Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD! SAN JOAQUIN HILLS ROAD
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average YVInteNSpring 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
IPFAKHOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1741
17
95
688
2542
25
3
Southbound
2703
27
104
1 975
1 3809
36
1 1
Eastbound
161
2
5
0
168
2
0
Westbound
1070
1 11
50
94
1225
12
0
C�Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
C� Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion
DATE: 3/20/2003
/ot I
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSEC77ON: JAMBOREE ROAD I SANTA BARBARA DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Bas ad on Average Winter/Spring 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1 %OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1560
16
61
1095
2731
27
1
Southbound 1
1284
1 13 1
110
1 575 1
1982
20
1 2
Eastbound
99
1 1 1
6
0
106
1
0
Westbound
128
1 1 1
5
2
136
1
0
�X (Project Traffic is estimated to be less then 1 %of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
C� Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD I SANTA BARBARA DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Winter /Spring 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1489
15
92
890
2286
23
4
Southbound
1 1984
20
95
844
2943
29
2
Eastbound
44
0
3
0
47
0
0
Westbound
854
9
5
5
873
1 9
0
I� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Haut Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes,
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion
DATE: 3/2012003
122
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average WlnterlSpdng 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAKHOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJEC75
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
613
6
1
0
620
6
0
Southbound
1109
11
108
581
1809
18
3
Eastbound
3108
31
105
755
3999
40
3
Westbound
1390
14
45
2421
3870
39
5
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
u Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
1NTERSEC710N: JAMBOREE ROAD I PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average WMteNSpnng 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAKHOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1 % OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
353
4
3
0
359
4
0
Southbound
2773
28
93
619
3713
37
2
Eastbound
2231
22
124
1285
3662
37
10'
Westbound
2678
27
63
1 1263
1 4030
40
4
u Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion DATE: 3!2012003
��3
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD/ PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Trefgc Volumes Based on Average Wfiter/Spring 2003 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PFAK HOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
D
D
0
0
0
0
D
Southbound
930
9
15
573
1528
15
2
Eastbound
1746
17
32
1113
2909
29
2
Westbound
2083
21
27
2768
4899
49
2
Project Traffic Is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. MACARTHUR BOULEVARD / PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Winter/Spring 2003 PM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAKHOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
CUMULATIVE
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1 %OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Southbound
2578
26
14
737
3354
34
1
Eastbound
1810
18
39
1822
3689
37
5
Westbound
2824
28
16
1368
4237
1 42
2
Project Tragic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
C� Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: Newport Auto Center Expansion DATE: 312012003
EXHIBIT NO.4
CORRESPONDENCE FROM APPLICANT
iaf
wINC, ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ` ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
1101 South Bearh Haule va rd, Suite 207, Le Habra, CA 90631 -6366 Telephone: (562) 902 -802) Pooimire: (562) 902 -8026
Jehn W. Johnson, A"hitert E a t a b l i, h e d 1 9 6 6
JOHN W. JOHNSON
October 30, 2002
C'o -P,c, i den(
Prin ripal
Mr. James Campbell
Senior Planner /
City of Newport Beach / Planning Dep.
3300 Newport Blvd.
BRIAN F. Z I T A
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Ca -Pre s fdenl
Prinripnl
RE: Newport Auto Center
445 E. Coast Highway
Newport Beach, CA
RHL # 9254.50
JOHN H. HICKS
vire rrr,iden,
Dear Mr. Campbell:
Pri,,ipn)
Enclosed you will find our complete package of submittal materials for the CUP modification
for this project. We understand that the City will want to do some traffic analysis on this
project. The following project description will be helpful to the City in understanding the
CE, IL R. SPENCER
project proposal and performing your analysis of what we are proposing.
V,:e Prerid, ,t
Prinripnl
Project Description:
We are proposing to remodel and expand the showroom and service facilities of this existing
Newport Auto Dealership. Currently the dealership handles sales and servicing for several
ROY W . P E D IL U brands of automobiles and light trucks.
Rr,,i.,,,.,r pranngrr • Porsche
• Audi
• Bentley
• Rolls Royce
• Chevrolet
JOHN W. STROBEL
Regia„a) blunage,
A s s N, c t a t e The Newport Auto Center plans on changing their business to focus on just 3 luxury auto
brands:
• Porsche
• Audi
JESSE E. M ncins • Bentley
Regiannl .bfanager
A e, ar i a t e As a result of this change we are proposed to modify the facilities to handle this new focus of
the business. Each auto maker is already requiring that each brand have a unique presence in
the showroom and service departments. As such the current combined main showroom
housing the Porsche, Chevrolet, Rolls Royce and Bentley brands cannot accommodate this
requirement. In the year 2000 a separate showroom was constructed for Audi. Concurrently
A t.{ A' K . S H I M A tl U K U R O
R rg is nnl with this planning application we have applied for building permits for an interior remodeling
.flan nger
A „a r i a t e of the main showroom to convert this into a Porsche only display facility.
To complete the separation of the brands into individual showroom facilities we are proposing
to construct a new 4,000 SF showroom building for Bentley. This building will be located on
BIN THE R. WILSON Np rr sp--rr 11''nn •,L la&
R r,ginnnl :NnRn,q e, BELLEVUE, WA LA HABRA, CA MARF1pr61tt19k� .5k \925�.301'dbt%+�r 33Teit.I[F.'QOc
A„uriarr SACRAMENTO, CA SCOTTSDALE, AZ VANCOUVER, WA
L
d ROUP INC.
the site fronting Coast Highway, and take the place of a smaller 1,500SF sales office / storage
building that will be demolished to make way for this new showroom. This proposed structure
will be designed to be complementary in design of the current buildings on the site. Bentley
customers will utilize the Easterly drive on Coast Highway to enter the site, and will have
separate parking near the Bentley building. This will also serve as the point of entry for
Bentley service customers.
To meet the demand for Audi Service business, and to provide the manufacturer's required
dedicated facility for this work, we are proposing to add onto the existing service building 12
service bays and associated the office and parts department. This 6,300 SF addition will occur
near the rear of the site and be an extension of the existing service building.
When completed these new facilities will allow the dealership to serve 3 distinct auto markets
and provided the dedicated areas for each set of customers.
Also proposed is a new fascia element and walkway overhang at the existing Porsche service
department. This will replace a very weathered wood canopy structure.
At the rear entry from Bayside Drive, we are proposing to reconfigure the entry gate area to
allow for easier access for delivery trucks to enter the site, and install a directional sign for
customers entering the site from this street.
Project Data:
As proposed the completed project would have a total of 42,464 SF, vs. a current total of
36,498 SF. Elimination of the Chevrolet brand will eliminate a significant number of vehicles
from the site, offsetting the parking spaces eliminated by the Audi service addition. The new
Bentley showroom building will not eliminate any parking spaces, just move displayed cars
indoors.
Overall the proposal will not exceed the allowable FAR of 0.30. (0.24 proposed). Adequate
on site parking is provided for a total of 300 vehicles including display and service parking.
If you should have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at (562) 902 -8023,
ext. 210.
Sincerely,
RHL Design Group, Inc.
1..` —,
Larry Tidball
Project Architect
/z 9-
BELLEVUE, WA LA HABRA, CA MARTINEZ, CA PETALUMA, CA
SACRAMENTO, CA SCOTTSDALE, AZ VANCOUVER, WA
EXHIBIT NO. 5
PROJECT PLANS
pe
. O
a • gC
7 g °g��ki�ik a 9669 7 °3q6q l�yEy�yx '3 �9E � " "p� 939E d a
F f ggC rirtl Ea EkkF!! ? :"pk €�5� €ypE ;y4 #d }9x9: §i 4 � eiF `vri
s3 p � E A }'�9E9�riE� €'£y95 €i�ip¢i yyiB � qq fig €�j
fled.
�YY YG Y�YY Y��w Y3.°
_'ORR
� J �
MTMI
a 8
s �
y� e
i
7g7g
qen
a
o€
E qq9 &{ 9
xvrwAN leV� irus 3 � _— — _-
o��0a�
F � y
al
! 1111 E E! VD W
lip 111, f'
ef;j glib
E. {� €if'ea Pilo
8
gyp, g S E
sn 3
pa: p t
1:81 E €g Ed IF��e$o
ho e €€
'
€� E9 Ii8a:xa
A
�; gg
�Q:oie €E
3 =a3
All
fled.
�YY YG Y�YY Y��w Y3.°
_'ORR
� J �
MTMI
a 8
s �
y� e
i
7g7g
qen
a
o€
E qq9 &{ 9
xvrwAN leV� irus 3 � _— — _-
o��0a�
F � y
al
! 1111 E E! VD W
lip 111, f'
ef;j glib
E. {� €if'ea Pilo
8
sn 3
� J �
MTMI
a 8
s �
y� e
i
7g7g
qen
a
o€
E qq9 &{ 9
xvrwAN leV� irus 3 � _— — _-
o��0a�
F � y
al
! 1111 E E! VD W
lip 111, f'
ef;j glib
E. {� €if'ea Pilo
8
` 1 N
pp s� g Yi IiP °
p !
p S E
[ 9
b '
x
v
°
y
G
y g1
•• �x CMG] 00 MCI i P
vl f
o
ti
ElEITIDDE
on Min
�09$CD9
o �
i
� oog ;
� 3
al�
k:
i. R R ?5 §! 2
a �� �' r ��
q € a pr -i
& v '• ?
i i Y � s" 9
ea' =. v' ---� S
A
S
e � � �
l3/
�_
u
q
rg�
0
�ygg
S}
g
17�
MiL
I�'
0 ❑
1
--1
a p ;
�
C
1
1
1
D 3 ipg
✓ e
n
D 1 p
0 D e
�r�la �e ranllvm
6 ;
..,,...,...1' J.....,® `BSI D
7�.�
c D
x.56,.
i�l . g BgEoi
6 `0 ngaW71�i1` li
. 7
Y l
F O
6�6�D
I
4� r.
C1
! l
® Q 11 9
1 e
t
�6
pq no
O O
1110
itic oo O
_
X32
, 7-7,*
L
10
x x x x
IN,
Li
L.................
,
,I
I
5t5
/0
0 0 0 <S> 0 0 <.> <b
f
iM
1,57
rl
I
ml
Ll
I
0
g1d
0 0 0 0100' 0I >0
I
Ills �
§ | A!
|\ /000000+x, T . !
k,
k�
�
�
}
° {§
\� }
)
§�
.[
.!
�.
e
d,
p
Y
p
�
9
@Y
2�
I
I
I
I
I
1
0
1
9
I
I
1
- -1
I
I
1
e
I
I
1
1
A
I
I
I
1
1
1
�
I
I
I
I ii
I
1
a
c
1
I
9
p
I
I
X
I
I i
1
1F
1
I
I �
1
1
e
I
1
1
I{
a
B
--------------
I
_
l
1 Sa a 1
1
1 I
1 I
I
I
1
I 1
I
1 I
I
}
�
i
n
/3 �
-