Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4006 - Proposition 100 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 X18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 -n�SUT,UTIOrr No. y� G I. -TI '.Etgi S: Proposition 140. 10 would prohibit the proper and econoricel use of public funds ftar obvL -m) public purposes by the Joint action_ of all or the eitiMs and ot?zer r u,.lic agencies cc California; and 1117:M' 87 Pro ^osition 110. 10 do c3 not prohibit t %ie separate expenditure of public funds to urge icgialation of intezest to the City of Nevcort Peach but merely prevents the Cit, of Nmr,ort Zeacb from, ,dth sister municipaltities in urging the ar?ortion of state and federal legislation of intorest to all cities or opposing the enactrent of measures vhioh wo 'ld be im- ediately h� mlful to oil residents; and T�.I ERMSs Proposition VTo. log which in no .ray relates to pensions., is advance ^, lrf pension pro_oter George icLain to punish those who op osed and defeated a former ncLain pension program; I :HMIIAS, Proposition 'No. 10 does not prohibit private int- erests from influencing legislation on a collective basis but only prohibits coilect`.ve rapresent,�.tion of n tblio Interests -:nu. and VH HEASs Proposition ^o. 10 permanently destroys or damages a countless nuynber of quasi - public agencies whose only pur- pose is the advancement of good govern -aent anO the public interests such as the League of California Citics, the Shoreline :'fanning, District Attorneys s Irrigation Districts, .lire Ch1 efs s Su-pervisors, School Trustees and Sehool kdmin"istrstors kssockt:izns, anc& the California Conrcrenae of SocLGl 'whemsy and !TT R'A5, Proposition 10. 10 vo--ld cause the wasteful and extravagant expenditure of pul:lic fnsads to do inuivleaml.ly 1.,hat may nmr be Pe`l?eved econo?s,ically jointly y cities and other public agencies of California, including tie state and! its dopartments and agencies; pout t1lie-refores i 11 • 2) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MM 27 28 • 29 30 31 32 F (2) TIM CITE' COII_:CIL OF TI^ CITY 0" M: Or MACH DM E iOLVE AS FOLLOMSt that it is opposoc to the zdortion of Prorosition Ito. 10 because it would cause untold hares to the cities o5' California an their citizens and urges the electors Of the City Of Yciln-ort Beach to vote "No" on Propositicm !:o. 10 r:t tho "moven"bor l +thy lMt election. I lte.,teby certify that the aaova and foregoing resolution was duly and regularly sassed and adc ;tsd by 1i;Lm City Council of the GiVr of NesDort Beach at an adjourned rcgular meeting thereof held on t.:c 6th day of October' 19527 I3;- the fo?loving Grote, to- Vitt City Clerk AYTno3 C0T! -03. n'Y. —✓w J, o` i`a / /,�i Kelp �•l�� NOES, C07 CIL.M 4z -- ABSEidT CJiT_'CIL° idz %'� f mayor F- -I La STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ) I, MARGERY SCHROUDER, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify that according to the records of the City of Newport Beach filed and maintained in my office, the foregoing Resolution No 4006 was duly and regularly adopted, passed, and approved by the City Council of adjourned the City of Newport Beach, California, at a regular /meeting of said City Council held at the regular meeting place thereof, on the 6th vote, to wit: day of ` October AYES, COUNCILMEN NOES, COUNCILMEN: ABSENT, COUNCILMEN: - \;Dated this • , 1952, by the following Smith, Finch, Isbell, Bennett, Miller None None 8th day of October ) 1957. k C ty nd EX-_Officio Cler of the City Council, City of Newport Beach, State of California.