Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4130 - Annexation of Adjacent Property1 ANBOLUTICN No. /a O • 2 3 WKETUS9 there has been filed with the City of Newport 4 Hesah, a request by 'William W. beaquist, and others, to have the 5 City consent to the annexation of certain adjacent property con - 6 slating of two square bloeke in the County of Orange, subetan- 7 tially described as bounded on the Last by Irvine Avenue, on the 8 North by 16th Street, on the hest by Banta Ana Avenue and on the 9 South by 15th Street; and 10 HERLAS, all steps were taken by the interested partie� 11 I towards the annexation of said parcel up to the point were the 12 City was enjoined from proceeding further by virtue of a Writ of 13 Mandate secured by the County of Orange; and 14 WHIRFAS, the Board of supervisors of the County of 15 orange did establish the boundaries of the proposed City of Cosh 16 Mesa as including the Westerly half of said Ueaquist Parcel; and 17 WHEREAS, the City of Costa Mesa became incorporated on 18 June 29, 1953, the boundaries thereof including the said 'gester34 19 half of the Seaquist parcel; and 20 WHYRrAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of 21 Newport Beach that the boundaries of the City of Newport reach 22 and the boundaries cif the City of Costa Mesa are indefinite and 23 uncertain in that it cannot be determined, without a Judgment of 24 a Court of competent jurisdiction, whether or not the said "+est- 25 erly half of said Seaquist Parcel should be included within the 26 City of Newport }leach or the City of Costa Mesa; and 27 "'HY.2ZEA8, it appears necessary and advisable that a pro. 28 oeedi be brought b the Ci ng gh F ty oi' Ne^,�port F3eeoh under the provi- 29 alone of seotion 51000, and following, of the Government Code of 30 the State of California to establish, define and determine the 31 boundaries of the two cities; 32 I Nh&, T MZYOAE0 BE 319 rK7,,B0U.-ED, that a proceeding be 1 1 . 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 • 28 • 29 30 31 32 - - - ILl- brought in the name of the City of He�:aort peach, under the pro- visions of sections 51000 and following, of the Government 0odt to have tho boundry line between the City of Newport Beach and the City of Cotta t?eta determined, defined and established inso- far as the same is indefinite and uncertain on the question of whether or not the Vesterly half of the said "euCQuist parcel should be included in the City of Costa Mesa or the Gity of New- .port Beach. The above and foregoing Aesolution was duly and regul- arly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Peach, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of September, 1953, by the following vote, to wit: AYES, CUUN010,01; 2", ........ izk BOYS, CCUNC1LWN: ABSENT COUNCILMEN: ATTrST: City ! Mrs 2 0¢ ' r q! STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) . COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ) • I, MARGERY SCHROUDER, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify that according to the records of the City of Newport Beach filed and maintained in my office, the foregoing Resolution No. 4130 was duly and regularly adopted, passed, and approved by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, California, at .a regular meeting of said City Council held at the regular meeting place thereof, on the 14th day of September � 1953, by the following vote, to wit: AYES, COUNCILMEN: Smith, Finch, Isbell, Bennett, Miller NOES, COUNCILMEN ABSENT, COUNCILMEN: Dated this None None 7th day of August 19 57 aannd� QAA4 City C1er an Ex- Officio Clerk of the City Council, City of Newport Beach, State of California.