HomeMy WebLinkAbout1a_Correspondence_Mosher_Draft_MinutesItem 1a: Additional Materials Received
Comments on Draft Minutes of January 3, 2013 PC Meeting
The following suggested changes to Item 1 on the January 17, 2013, Newport Beach Planning
Commission agenda are submitted by: Jim Mosher ( iimmosher(a)_vahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road,
Newport Beach 92660 (949- 548 -6229)
Page 2:
First line under Item 3: "... addressing the applicants applicant's request ...
Fifth paragraph from end: "Mr. Sham was concerned about the precedence precedent
the requested height was setting."
Page 3:
Sixth paragraph from end: "... adhering to the premipern predominant line of existing
development..."
Final sentence: "A prerninent predominant line of development is established and he
saw no visual impact."
Page 4:
Fourth line from end of long paragraph: "... and a unifying paint color palate palette. "
Fourth paragraph from end: "He commented that the Gallo's currently has parking
available ..."
Final paragraph: "... a preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) had been
Gendlwte prepared M..."
Page 5:
Seventh paragraph: "Commissioner Brown commented positively 14411 Felevans e
relative to keeping Gallo's blue awning..."
Page 6:
Motion at top of page: I am not suggesting any change to the minutes, but I believe the
audio recording might reveal the motion that was voted on actually included a reference
to "Variance No. VA2012- 007, "since that was the wording of the recommended action
on the agenda and in the staff report. I believe "Variance No. VA2012- 002, "per the
resolution which I assume was signed, and the draft minutes, is correct. I might further
comment that it remains unclear to me if a "variance" exists as a separate numbered
document (or file of documents ?) apart from the resolution, and if so what that document
looks like or where it can be inspected. If it is separate, it would seem important that the
Commissioners (and public) be able to review it to know for sure what is being approved.