HomeMy WebLinkAbout0.0d - Public Comments - Item 1 and 3 - Mosher - PA2013-211Public Comments
Item No. O.Od
Planning Commission
11/21/13
Nov. 21, 2013, Planning Commission Agenda Comments
Comments by: Jim Mosher( immosher(a)vahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach 92660 (949-
548- 6229).
Item No. 1 Minutes of November 7, 2013
The following minor corrections to the draft minutes are suggested
Pages 2 and 3: There is an inconsistency in the way Jaime Murillo is referred to. In the "Roll
Call" on page 1, he is listed as an "Associate Planner," but in seven places on pages 2 -3 he is
given the title "Senior Planner," as he was in the staff report to that item and in the staff report
to Item 3 on tonight's agenda. Should the "Roll Call" listing be corrected to say "Senior'?
Page 2, paragraph 4: "...Linda Isle residents, mobile home residents, Say Shores Bayshores
residents, and adjacent/nearby Home Owner Associations."
Page 2, paragraph 5: "... and the use of established grades in measuF e measuring building
heights, ..." and "Recommendations will be provided by staff and Burin ?j the future
development phase."
Page 2, next to last paragraph: "... the mobile home park and their project site is part of the
three parcel map ...... and "He reported that the project, thus far, has taken three and a -hat #
years (314) a half (3%) years ..." [no dash; I also fail to understand why every number needs
to be repeated in parenthesis]
Pages 3, paragraph 2 and page 4, paragraph 1: "Pearson's Point Port"
Page 4: in the last paragraph before "VIII. NEW BUSINESS ": "Mr. �,•^^ Erskine indicated
Item No. 3 Miramar Drive Code Amendment (PA 2013-211)
In Attachment No. PC 1 (Draft Resolution Recommending Approval):
Section 3.1: "...to accommodate increased vehicular maneuverability through the alley
a 0 -foot rear setback will not impact in vehicular maneuverability..."
Section 3.2: "Changing the rear setback to the standard 0 -foot requirement would not result in a
significant change to the existing development pattern of the neighborhood..."
Section 3.3: "Changing the sethaGk frem rear setback from 6 feet to 0 feet would result in a
buildable area and allowable floor area that is consistent with other lots in the vicinity."