HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-9 - San Diego Creek Bicycle Bridge•
RESOLUTION NO. 93 -9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH APPROVING IN CONCEPT PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE
SAN DIEGO CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL BICYCLE
BRIDGE OVER BONITA CREEK (C -2900)
WHEREAS, the San Diego Creek Regional Trail is a Class I bicycle trail
extending from Upper Newport Bay Regional Park in Newport Beach northward to Jeffrey
Road in the City of Irvine; and
WHEREAS, this trail is heavily used by recreational cyclists and hikers, as
well as UCI students, faculty and other commuters; and
WHEREAS, the existing bridge over Bonita Creek is nearing the end of its
design life; and
WHEREAS, in order to maintain and enhance the recreational utility of this
trail the City of Newport Beach has prepared plans and specifications for a replacement
bridge; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act an Initial
Study has been conducted to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed
project. The Initial Study concluded that the project could not have a significant effect on
the environment, therefore a Negative Declaration has been prepared; and
WHEREAS, the Negative Declaration was circulated for public review on
December 15, 1992 to all Responsible Agencies and other interested parties as required by
CEQA; and
WHEREAS, all comments on the Negative Declaration regarding potential
impacts of the project are addressed through recommended mitigation measures or
conditions of approval to eliminate or substantially reduce those potential impacts.
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based upon the information
contained in the Initial Study, comments received, and all related documents, the City
Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project, as conditioned or as
1
•
modified by mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study, could have a significant
effect on the environment, therefore a Negative Declaration has been prepared. The
Negative Declaration adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the
project, and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA, and is hereby approved. The Negative
Declaration reflects the independent judgement of the City Council and was reviewed and
considered prior to approval of the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves in
concept the plans and specifications for the San Diego Creek Trail Bridge as described in
the Public Works Department staff report of February 22, 1993.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all of the mitigation measures identified
in the Negative Declaration are hereby adopted as conditions of approval for the project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the monitoring requirements of Public
Resources Code Sec. 21081.6 (AB 3180 of 1988) will be met through the design of the
project, required compliance with City building, grading, and other codes and ordinances,
and required compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. A Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program for the project is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated
herein by reference.
ADOPTED this 22nd day of Feb. . 1993.
ATTEST:
City Clerk 6'
• Attachment:
.re 57 \j
Exhibit A: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
1-: \WP51 \PLA14NW G \JOHN- D \CNB \PW\BnCF,BRG \CC -MO.1
2
EXHIBIT A
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
San Diego Creek Regional Trail Bicycle Bridge
I. OVERVIEW
This mitigation monitoring program was prepared in compliance with Public Resources
Code Section 21086.6 (AB 3180 of 1988). It describes the requirements and procedures to
be followed by the applicant and the City to ensure that all mitigation measures adopted as
part of this project will be carried out. Attachment 1 summarizes the adopted mitigation
• measures, implementing actions, and verification procedures for this project.
U. MITIGATION MONITORING PROCEDURES
Mitigation measures can be implemented in three ways: (1) through project design, which
is verified by plan check and inspection; (2) through compliance with various codes,
ordinances, policies, standards, and conditions of approval which are satisfied prior to or
during construction and verified by plan check and /or inspection; and (3) through
monitoring and reporting after construction is completed. Compliance monitoring
procedures for these three types of mitigation measures are summarized below.
A. Mitigation measures implemented through project design.
Upon project approval, a copy of the approved project design will be placed in the
official project file. As part of the review process for all subsequent discretionary or
ministerial permits, the file will be checked to verify that the requested permit is in
conformance with the approved project design. Field inspections will verify that
construction conforms to approved plans.
B. Mitigation measures implemented through compliance with codes, ordinances,
policies, standards, or conditions of approval:
Upon project approval, a copy of the approved project description and conditions of
approval will be placed in the official project file. As part of the review process for
all subsequent discretionary or ministerial permits, the file will be checked to verify
that the requested permit is in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances,
policies, standards and conditions of approval. Field inspections will verify that
construction conforms to all applicable standards and conditions.
C. Mitigation measures implemented through post - construction monitoring.
If any mitigation measures require verification and reporting after construction is
completed, the City will maintain a log of these mitigation monitoring and reporting
requirements, and will review completed monitoring reports. Upon submittal, the
City will approve the report, request additional information, or pursue enforcement
remedies in the event of noncompliance. Final monitoring reports will be placed in
the official file.
F: \ ... \ JOHN- I) \CNB \PW \BBCB-BRG \MM -COVER
•
F
O
a
a�
�W
U
00
G
o�Q
d 3
O
E
A
Y
0
e
O
a
Y
P
0
.s
F�
o.
0
Y
c
V
E�
O
N
W- u u WO O F y O m
E 'Q
s •�
03 e o aQ
"mo w 11
B oU a
E2�p W Zit t7� "�
8 d 8 s ®$„ m Q W G
fV
cO�•�a�;,`2
m u
WWS$ gory
W w �OOp , .9 0
0 y 0 4 p
$ E VIP
Ep r u y $y0;
.gym o �•G
v�b:s �W °•a W'So
Nf
ae�
— a c
m W
E a $ W a
8 is � •�, w
8 0 0
p u y
Y Z E m•L
�' O O
�
Ffmif 15
a 8•s e&
6
a
V
O
Q
Y
O
Y
O
e o
w'fS
mc3
aQ
aQ
4
0
8
o
o
a�
W- u u WO O F y O m
E 'Q
s •�
03 e o aQ
"mo w 11
B oU a
E2�p W Zit t7� "�
8 d 8 s ®$„ m Q W G
fV
cO�•�a�;,`2
m u
WWS$ gory
W w �OOp , .9 0
0 y 0 4 p
$ E VIP
Ep r u y $y0;
.gym o �•G
v�b:s �W °•a W'So
Nf
ae�
— a c
m W
E a $ W a
8 is � •�, w
8 0 0
p u y
Y Z E m•L
�' O O
�
Ffmif 15
a 8•s e&
6
a
O�
0.
O
d
O
OQ
a�
v
s
u
C
u
a
u
P_
0•
a
.9 F
>
0 .
g�
.5
u
u
a
i
a
r
w
a
O
w
O
w
O
3
3
3
=s
=s
=s
DWOOe��a�
_��
Woo
o
�
e
w q °E Q R F°
Q 6
o
o e
o
, i5 9
c 0
�e
W
m
p � 4
O
�i
8
0
0
o
3
3ms
dm
DWOOe��a�
_��
Woo
�0
w q °E Q R F°
Q 6
c o
o 8"S w0, u S's
g u
, i5 9
c 0
�e
W
rE¢w�`5a`o2°
3 ��
K P
OQ�e
kg�
S3B�=
yQ 6h 5'
wWS 'u w c'
e
i
N