Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-01-17_AgendaA G E N D A General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee January 17, 2007 3:30 p.m. City Council Chambers Conference Room I. Implementation Tasks (Attachment 1) II. LCP Land Use Plan Amendment(s): Discussion of options III. Zoning Code Revision: Major issue areas/timeline/RFP (Attachments 2 and 3) IV. Planned Community Revisions (Attachment 4) V. Single and Two Unit Residential design regulations VI. Public Participation VII. Schedule next meeting(s) VIII. Topics for future meetings IX. Public comments on non -agenda items Attachment No. 1 Implementation Tasks GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION TASKS January 12, 2007 1. Interim Zoning Resolution (including ability to require development agreements) Staff, January 9, 2007 2. Procedures to implement single- and two-family design policies Staff, March 27, 2007 3. Zoning Code and Specific Plan rewrite Consultant, with staff input and review, December 11, 2007(tentative) 4. CLUP amendment Staff, April 27, 2007 to Coastal Commission 5. Housing Element certification by HCD EIP and staff, March 2, 2007 6. Park Dedication Fee (Quimby Act) Staff, February 27, 2007 7. ED Strategic Plan Staff, ADE and EDC, April 24, 2007 8. Fair Share Fee update Consultant, TBD 9. Airport Area infrastructure study and fee(s) Consultant (same as Fair Share Fee), TBD 10. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and In -lieu fee Consultant (amend existing contract to update fee and incorporate new Housing Element policies), April 24, 2007 11. In -lieu parking fee Staff, February 27, 2007 12. Subdivision Code amendment re: residential subdivisions Staff, May 22, 2007 13. LCP Implementation Plan Staff, concurrent with/trailing Zoning Code rewrite 14. City Council Policy on development agreements Staff, February 27, 2007 15.Traffic signal synchronization Public Works staff, master plan June 2007 16. PC rewrite/revisions Property owners for major ones, their schedule Staff or consultant for smaller ones, with Zoning rewrite or second phase (Get time and cost estimates with Zoning RFP responses) 17. Banning Ranch Pre -Annexation and Development Agreement City Council, staff and property owners, TBD 18. Harbor Area Management Plan Harbor Commission and staff, September 2008 19. Run-off and Pollution Reduction Plan Coastal/Bay Water Quality Committee and staff, ongoing 20. Database refinements and maintenance Staff, refinements TBD, maintenance ongoing 21. Fiscal Impact Model training ADE and staff, February 23, 2007 Lower Priority • Municipal Code amendments re: property maintenance standards • Building Code amendments re: green buildings ■ Amend City Council Policies on historic, archaeo and paleo resources Attachment No. 2 Zoning Code Revision Issues ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED IN ZONING REWRITE DRAFT January 12, 2007 1. New districts, including additional residential density categories and possibly multiple new mixed-use districts (consistent with GP) 2. Unified map (GP and Zoning)? 3. Inclusionary housing requirements 4. Flexible zoning provisions (ED Strategic Plan) 5. Incentives/restrictions for waterfront uses 6. Incentives for marine businesses in West Newport Mesa 7. Prohibition of on -shore facilities for off -shore oil and gas production 8. Stronger waterfront access requirements (also in LCP IP and Subdivision Code) 9. Public views 10. Revision of definitions section 11. Revision of Use Classifications/Tables 12. Review of Modification Permit Chapter (Is there a better way?) 13. Review of accessory structure regulations 14. Review of eating and drinking establishment regulations 15. Review of Chapter 20.86 (Low and Moderate Income in the Coastal Zone) 16. Convert Specific Plans to conventional zoning or overlay zones 17. TDR 18. Lot consolidation incentives (West Newport, Old Newport Boulevard, Mariners' Mile) 19. Fix height and grade regulations (easier to understand and administer fairly) 20. Residential setbacks on map or in more general regulation? 21.Alternatives to FAR for regulating size and bulk of houses 22. Minimum standards for residential outdoor living area/open space 23. Residential neighborhood character (design standards, guidelines, review?) (Include alleys) 24. Interfaces with non-residential uses and buffering requirements 25. Revise parking standards and establish in -lieu fee 26. Establish lighting standards 27. Non -conforming provisions 28. Real Specific Plan for West Newport Mesa? 29. Real Specific Plan (or overlay) for Balboa Peninsula? Balboa Village separate? 30. Extend (or eliminate) Mariners' Mile Specific Plan? Overlay for pedestrian village? (Should City do MU/residential standards quickly?) 31. Height change for inland Mariners' Mile properties? 32. Comprehensive plan for Newport Center? (or individual property owners do PC amendments and City rewrite zoning?) 33. New Airport Office district 34. Standards for parking on residential lots in Corona del Mar 35. New provisions for rebuilding non -conforming floor area in Corona del Mar 36. Should the Zoning Code be "removed" from the Municipal Code? (Taken out of the blue folder). This would be for formatting purposes to allow the use of more graphics, exhibits and diagrams to aid in the interpretation and use of the code. "'The entire structure and most processes and regulations need to be evaluated. This list should be considered a starting point only. Attachment No. 3 Zoning Code Revision Timeline 1 2 3 4 5 Notes TENTATIVE SCHEDULE—ZONING CODE REWRITE January 12, 2007 Committee approval and circulation of Request for Proposals Proposals due Committee selection of consultant(s), fee negotiation, and City Council approval of PSA Iterative drafting and staff/Committee review City Council approval (1st reading) Allows 6 months. Consultant(s) may not find this feasible. February 14, 2007 March 16, 2007 April 24, 2007 October 26, 2007 January 2008 Is this enough time for review by staff who administer the Code (and are busy with current projects)? Does not incorporate any public participation process, or interim review/study sessions with Planning Commission and/or City Council. Allows 4 public hearings at Planning Commission and 5 at City Council, with Friday delivery of City Council staff reports following Planning Commission hearings. Attachment No. 4 Planned Community Revisions ) IL 5 0< \ } / 0 \ \/E — §E/ / �\0o. kƒ)� eoo+ EEtc: , _ §S (On E / k)o (D (D oƒ/]\ . { )±EuW oAAA < co ■= 5 a a f ID n . # m 2 w e a ( / ¥ \ \±p/ \so / e<0 m « m 0 = 42 ° - co \ �( o3gf -oc, /#]k ) o ±\ �« ��\\ ewe CO m3 $/®/=j,2C15 som�u ma/o4 o- 2�- $�°o� o20o <� ��E §/f/0D ./$fE/0�<ooc=<0 o\§\2]o,okm m>co o,:[t000]f\ .<� of < <t=oE §§ u,/ §w& w * * * « & I< _ { � ` \Eƒ kf 2 § U) ]/0 S E2 ) \j acu ( / k >m 0 0 ) \ ] } \ ® 4) \ E - - cm c E 00 - \ § En a) ° f ) 0 f k k co \ 0 u E of E o 2 f 7\\ o w 0 )_ co _ C\\ m Q k a§ 2 Q o �/ f RLo ON 0C.0 as a -0 (3) a a § 2 2 =m Cc EL a= ƒ$ �°efof m , - c) .-- U) < £ 1 >1 to a) /} k\\3\/\Sj < < o �� ))E 0 k2 �e==5=o�agg 0M> CU =3 ..E= CU ) moo= ]2 - E a00 gE � :3 C 3 o=� -ea§#g ]m°o2g§ 2 '00-0W =3 (n /) Ea/-3-3-3%t))\mD - El cl m= G)�3»{N o'=omr� =G /o e : ..0 7/bb°-_0 Et ;amu 7\%®x®«0§&2 ®^5\\)f@§8 = tea?; o$o&oU=-0 5"">0 R 6\a o*a A of,Wo±mo\z ILo■=f\ozoe oo= / (D k \ % § 5 § \. \ kS \ $ z § = °/ § o ƒ / $ 0 0 , 6 0 \ 2 3 0§ I[ m 0 7 t o a a a / \-W Q CL/ \ \ j /\\ 7 \j ZE )©to 0 bf 5 w ^ n/ Q- 4<< \Caa) / ==a 2\> b co E :cam E§\ / § j\j®` @e@ �)\� r_a)(D o \//) 73 '07§ }-- & nE_ E o > § /\\ j 1 10878 00 0a \ ® kf [ _) a _ƒ\\ {// > �/ % m\7 k\_ { )a) # ke 7d\%7 2=� J Mcu k °° m§,=- < 0 DCTM Eo< -U) wed 2ƒ a,¥EQ - r2_E �a� ®%-»o \#/*Da8� ®ems E%Ge@ 52c =)CAa—CO 20 I:®o o> m \E#E/ [k= mx (D a) °oC)Ch _0� m«e °&° %Rw�e,�=m °^& o\U) ) o §%\\§S2§mC-)<< @@\)m@ `e®'M87 ==ro oo@of* * * w 000=��o zzzC) Z §2\7 z oe\ / § m E \_ $ { 2 � �} °\ o m \ E CL }\ \ a) § }� \ ) 2# g 7f@; \ , G c\ - ° ]0 / §§ �b \/ / §tet> 2] G § o/Qe 3 _m a.< =z = osa= = o = ) E § k � ; § { c 2 7 = ) k{ ®{ 22^2)\ƒ/ R\ a _ Ch §e mf+»g=me .� 2 cn cu f [ \�RcALO ` / \ / / E 2 z,m co0 kms« k® #$E m,mo� k§ < < X57± )\ \(D M �/ ! -°«°¥)7±tn )«°-E«9» 2�(D f/ - 5720 207.= ons 2=.2. «e rr CU U) k«ae=2§«-0� Roaae 7e eco eo=o 00 a 2�°°=� o=m�uoe-�� no=mo no �,oc o�oo�_a,ao o-oo oc c= a E« ® _ _ _- ; %f�aco cusp \k\§)C:cu m @m ==&=U) -E o��:=moo=gym=moo=moo oe�r�em�o@om�<oEzoe=eezeez ) < 0 C 7 cu _ \ §F \ $§ [ j\ q m0 ) ez 0 7& \ 0 3 ) \ 0f \ 2 m\ § / J 2 _ » k = 2 , o = e = _ _ k1 { �/ C k� {{ {k a2 \ \) / dj j z zz }b k % � 14, � / §a / ) z/ 04 2 k %■ �§ U) K Z kk ge oa §m z� w §/ LLb Eƒ �� M R _� %± §} \\ w§ f_f k0 kk F- LU \$ § (D o n }LU / LU g«o $� §bB E/ aqo \> 22LU 0- «-■ 2 §} §§j os F -w? 03 m \ IL $' mU) -J �k (2q IL oGZ 7LU L) \2 F33 7\ 0< /\ �k� &/ k0§ p7 z0P w w _\\ 7 LL ) §; §$$ $ E o _E 000 a I ° @} R@@ ° o \ ma 000_ § / e ee §�(\ 2 ) ) )* &m&o % \\\} \ \ \ \\ u \ &U )-§E� £3= �T"cu CL / .0 5C: oesao o-�, ; j $ G2}/\c))000 I±-�n,2E==b [=,&`4002!%E/f =Io<7==mazzwI& 14, � / §a / ) z/ 04 2 k %■ �§ U) K Z kk ge oa §m z� w §/ LLb Eƒ �� M R _� %± §} \\ w§ f_f k0 kk F- LU \$ § (D o n }LU / LU g«o $� §bB E/ aqo \> 22LU 0- «-■ 2 §} §§j os F -w? 03 m \ IL $' mU) -J �k (2q IL oGZ 7LU L) \2 F33 7\ 0< /\ �k� &/ k0§ p7 z0P