HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-03-14_GP-LCP IC Agenda Meeting PacketAGENDA
General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee
March 14, 2007
3:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Approve Action Minutes from February 28, 2007 Meeting
Attachment 1 3:30-3:35
2. Report on Interview with Hogle-Ireland led Zoning Code Re -Write
Consultant Team
Direction to staff and recommendation to Council
3:35-4:00
3. Direction to Staff on Zoning Code Re -Write Advisory Committee
Attachment 2 4:00-4:30
4. Items for Future Agenda
4:30-4:35
5. Public Comments on non -agenda items 4:35-4:45
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL PLAN/LCP IMPLEMENTAION
COMMITTEE
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES 2-28-07
Action Minutes of the General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee`iheld at the City Council
Chambers, City of Newport Beach, on Wednesday, February 28! 2007.
Members Present:
X
Ed Selich, Mayor Pro Tem, Ch
X
SteveRosansk , Mayor
X
Leslie Daigle, Council Member
X
Barry Eaton, Planning Commissioner
X
Robert Hawkins, Planning Commissioner
X
Michael Toer e, Planning Commissioner
Staff Renresentatives:
X
Sharon Wood, Assistant City Manager
X
David Le o, Planning Director
X
Robin Clausen, Assistant City Manager;,:.
X
Patrick Alford, SeniorPlanner
X
GreggRamirez, Senior Planner
Committee Actions
Agenda
Chairman Sefich motioned"to a recommend that the City Council approve the
draft Ordin`anbe Amending Municipal Code Regarding Development
Absent
actio=inute 2-28-07.doc
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MEMORANDUM
TO: General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee
FROM: Gregg Ramirez, Senior Planner
DATE: March 8, 2007
RE: Zoning Code Re -Write - Technical Advisory Committee
As part of the public outreach for the Zoning Code re -write, the Implementation
Committee has determined that it would be beneficial to create a technical
advisory committee to assist in the review of the zoning code. The principal
question is whether there should be two separate advisory committees. If there
were two, one committee would focus on the entire document and one would
focus on the residential design policies and any potential changes to residential
district development regulations. At the City Council public hearing concerning
residential design criteria, public testimony by design professionals indicated the
willingness to participate in a committee. However, since serving on this
committee would necessitate a substantial time commitment, it's unclear whether
they would be willing to participate in discussions on all aspects of the code re-
write. Below are recommendations regarding the size, creation and
responsibilities of the advisory committee(s).
A small group of 2-4 design professionals and/or developers.
• All members should be prepared to make a commitment to serve for the
duration of the code re -write.
• All members must be able to keep up with schedule to effectively
participate.
• The advisory committee should be sounding board only. They should be
tasked only with providing comments and suggestions and not actively
involved in the writing of the document.
• The advisory committee would be a sub -committee to the GP
Implementation Committee and participate in discussions at all Committee
meetings where the zoning code is on the agenda.
• A list of candidates will be compiled by the Committee and staff, and the
Committee will appoint members or make recommendations to the City
Council.