HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-08-29_GP-LCP IC Agenda Meeting PacketAGENDA
General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee
August 29, 2007
3:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
1. Approve Action Minutes from August 15,2007 Meeting 3:30-3:35
Attachment No. 1
2. General Plan/LCP Implementation - Master Task List
Update From Staff and Committee Comments
Attachment No. 2 3:35-3:45
3. Fair Share Fee Update
Review Fair Share Fee Update report and provide direction to staff
Attachment No. 3 3:45-4:30
4. Zoning Code Rewrite —Part 1 -Zoning Code Applicability
Discuss draft of Part 1 and direct staff to make any necessary changes
Attachment No. 4 4:30-5:00
5. Zoning Code Rewrite — Reduction of Zoning Administrator Applications
Report from staff at meeting
5:00-5:15
6. Items for Future Agenda
5:15- 5:20
7. Public Comments on non -agenda items 5:20-5:30
Attachment No. 1
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL PLAN/LCP IMPLEMENTAION
COMMITTEE
DRAFT ACTION MINUTES August 15, 2007
Action Minutes of the General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee held at the City Council
Chambers, City of Newport Beach, on Wednesday, August 15, 2007`
Members Present:
X
Ed Selich, Mayor Pro Tem, Chairman
E
Steve Rosansk , Mayor
X
Leslie Daigle, Council Member
X
Barry Eaton, Planning Commissioner
X
Robert Hawkins, Planning Commissioner
X
Michael Toer e, Planning Commissioner
Advisory Groun Memhers Present:
Staff Representatives:
X Sharon Wood, Assistant City Manager
David Lepo, Planning Director
Robin Clauson, City Attorney
X James Campbell, Senior Planner
X GreggRamirez, Senior Planner
E = Excused Absence
Committee Actions,"'
1. Agenda Item No 3 -Zoning Code Rewrite —Approach to Zoning Code Update
Discuss Approach to Zoning Code Update paper and review draft standards for Child
Care Facilities
Motion: Committee directed staff to include more prescriptive regulations
for certain land uses to achieve the goals of reducing the number of uses that
would require discretionary approvals, providing a more user friendly code and
Mark Cross
X
Larry Frapwell
William Guidero
Ian Harrison
X
Brion Jeannette
X
Don Krotee
Todd Schooler
Kevin Weeda
X
Dennis Wood
Staff Representatives:
X Sharon Wood, Assistant City Manager
David Lepo, Planning Director
Robin Clauson, City Attorney
X James Campbell, Senior Planner
X GreggRamirez, Senior Planner
E = Excused Absence
Committee Actions,"'
1. Agenda Item No 3 -Zoning Code Rewrite —Approach to Zoning Code Update
Discuss Approach to Zoning Code Update paper and review draft standards for Child
Care Facilities
Motion: Committee directed staff to include more prescriptive regulations
for certain land uses to achieve the goals of reducing the number of uses that
would require discretionary approvals, providing a more user friendly code and
providing regulations that increase the level of certainty for applicants and
developers.
Vote: 5 Ayes, 1 Absent
2. Agenda Item No 4 -Zoning Code Rewrite — Non -Conforming Structures and Uses
Discuss attached paper and provide direction to staff
Motion: Committee directed staff to draft non -conforming structure
regulations based on a 50% alteration threshold. The Committee directed staff
to draft the non -conforming use section based on the outcome of the ongoing
group occupancy hearings
Vote: 5 Ayes, 1 Absent
Attachment No. 2
GENERAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION TASKS
Interim Zoning Resolution (including ability to require development
agreements)
Staff, January 9, 2007 -Complete
2. Procedures to implement single- and two-family design policies
Staff, March 27, 2007 -Complete
3. Zoning Code and Specific Plan rewrite
Consultant, with staff input and review, January 2008
4. CLOP amendment
Staff
27, 2007 to Coastal Commission —
5. Housing Element certification by HCD
EIP and staff. TBD
6. Park Dedication Fee (Quimby Act)
Staff, April 10, 2007- Complete
7. ED Strategic Plan
Staff, ADE and EDC, July 10, 2007-orrtplete
8. Fair Share Fee update
Consultant, Se�rrrber2�.2047
9. Airport Area infrastructure study and fee(s)
ROMA and Fair Share Consultant, TBD
10. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and In -lieu fee
Consultant
l�pdated fe��study. September~.20Q7
11. Parking Requirements and Management
Staff, EDC, RFP Issuance September 51 20pZ
12. LCP Implementation Plan
Staff, concurrent with/trailing Zoning Code rewrite
08/24/2007
13. City Council Ordinance on development agreements
Staff, February 27, 2007 - Complete
14.Traffic signal synchronization
Consultant and Public Works staff, master plan 2U07
15. PC rewrite/revisions
Property owners for major ones, their schedule
Staff or consultant for smaller ones, with Zoning rewrite or second phase,
TBD
16. Banning Ranch Pre -Annexation and Development Agreement
City Council, staff and property owners, TBD
17. Harbor Area Management Plan
Consultants, staff and Harbor Commission, September 2008
18. Run-off and Pollution Reduction Plan
Coastal/Bay Water Quality Committee and staff, ongoing
19. Database refinements and maintenance
Staff, refinements TBD, maintenance ongoing
20. Fiscal Impact Model training
ADE and staff, March 29, 2007- Complete
21.Traffic Phasing Ordinance revision re: NBTAM
Staff Jif " 7_ Complete
22. Measure S Guidelines revision re: variable FAR
Staff, October 23, 2007
Lower Priority
■ Municipal Code amendments re: property maintenance standards
■ Building Code amendments re green buildings
EQtedJw6, w
■ Amend City Council Policies on historic, archaeo and paleo resources
■ Funding and priority program for construction of noise barriers along
arterials
Attachment No. 3
GENERAL PLANILOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE
August 29, 2007
TO: MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE
FROM: Public Works Department
Stephen Badum, Public Works Director
949-644-3311
SUBJECT: FAIR SHARE FEE UPDATE
BACKGROUND
The City first enacted the Fair Share Fee in 1984 in recognition of the fact that
there was inadequate funding to complete the arterial highway system and
related components. The necessary improvements included widening existing
arterials, constructing new arterials, and implementing additional lanes at key
intersections. All funding sources including Gas Tax, Measure M, and funding of
frontage improvements by developers were considered in establishing the
funding shortfall. The shortfall is divided by projected increases in traffic from the
future development resulting in a fee per added daily trip. A complete update to
the Fair Share Fee program was approved in 1994 using the same methodology.
The approval of the new General Plan in 2006 includes an Implementation
Program chapter and updating the Fair Share Fee is Implementation Program
7.2. Other Implementation Programs pertinent to the Fair Share Fee are
identified in Implementation Program 16, "Mobility Infrastructure and Traffic
Management".
DISCUSSION
The Fair Share Fee is determined by estimating the cost to complete the arterial
highway system and then subtracting the amount of funding that is anticipated
_from normal sources such as Gas Tax, Measure M, and developer funded
adjacent improvements. This identifies the funding shortfall which is then divided
by the future growth in daily traffic on the circulation system due to new
development to derive the Fair Share Fee.
The Circulation Element of the General Plan includes an updated Master Plan of
Streets and Highways (Exhibit "A") as well as a listing of intersection
improvements (Exhibit "B") necessary to meet the City's Level of Service
standards as build out of the land use is achieved.
The firm of RBF Consulting was retained to prepare detailed preliminary designs
and estimates for the improvements needed to complete the Master Plan of
Streets of Highways and the intersection improvements listed in Exhibit "B". Staff
then projected the anticipated revenues from Gas Tax and Measure M turnback
funds and deducted them from the projected total costs. Costs associated with
frontage developments such as in the Banning Ranch area were also deducted.
The cost of the improvements to boundary intersections in the airport area were
assumed to be shared between the City of Newport Beach and the City of Irvine.
These costs are summarized on Exhibit C. The publicly funded share of the
costs is $139,685,000 and after subtracting the estimated $68,000,000 the City
expects from Gas Tax, Measure M, etc. the unfunded costs were determined to
be $61,685,000.
The number of increased trips over which the fee could be spread was derived
from the Newport Beach Traffic Model (NBTM) that was developed to analyze
alternative land use scenarios as a part of the update to the General Plan. The
total future increase projected is 131,251 daily trips between 2005 and 2025.
This number was decreased to 121,407 assuming linear growth and one and
one-half years of development since 2005. This results in a per -trip fee of $508.
This would be a substantial increase from the existing fee of approximately $177
per trip. Should the Committee be concerned that this fee would impose a
hardship on those developing their property, staff will be prepared to discuss
alternative approaches to how the fee can be determined while maintaining the
purpose and intent of the Fair Share Fee.
Prepared by:
Cl'u 19xOrks Director
� i orks Department
Exhibit A — Master Plan of Streets and Highways
Exhibit B — Intersection Improvements
Exhibit C — Circulation System Buildout Funding
Exhibit D — Fair Share Fee Summary Table
CITY of NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL PUNT
Hgure CE1
MASTER PIAN OF
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS
Legend
e AOOPTFDINTERC/MNGE
e PROPOSEDINTERCRAN(3E
ROUTES REQUIRING
FURTHER COORDINATION
0.76 Ern
COMMUTER ROAONAY
aM UNE UNDIVIDED)
336 MIM.
SECONDARY ROAD
'FOUR LANE UNDIVIDED)
16.66 Mil"
SECONDARY
(NOT BUILT)
6.36 Mlle.
PRIMARY ROAD
'FOUR LANE DIVIDED)
36.93 MR.
PRIMARY ROAD
(NOT BUILT)
1.66 M6..
MAJOR ROAD
'S1% LANE DIVIDED)
70.64 Men,
EIGHT LANE ROAD
'DIVIDED)
261 Mlle
SAN JOAQUIN HILLS
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
6.73 WWII
ADOPTED FRF.EVAY
— ROUTES
664 161..
FUTURE FREEWAY
EXTENSION
0.76161"
0
e o.
nl.
-h a u.wmn e.r� w
I ]RCI ryLAg[11 IUSIYUI
Tn N/'M
�, Fir
(BANNING RANCH)
(BANNING RANCH);
EXISTING LANE
L
NEW IMPROVEMENT
0
ELIMINATE LANE
Bra
�«l�4=
�4r
J161L
�!L
PHASEIMPROVEMENT
FREE RIGHT TURN
COAST HWY.
15TH St
HO P�A P
NE 3xPND Sj:L&\.\
strrttrr
o
e
RIRERSIDE'AV. B.
WAST HWY.
T(LS7INAV.9
COASTNWY:
NIACAMHUR9L&
CAMPUS bR
VON KAI Avl&
:CAMPU5 DR.
I ril'ILL
ttitI
t I t
-ntt1t
jlttlr
Fl
13�_
1 -._:
1 -:
10;-
JAMBOREERO.&:
CAM PUS OR
JAMBOREE NQ.$
'BIRCHST.
CAMPUSDR.&
BRISTOC SL'FIORTN
IRVINEA ;&
ME5A"OR-
�
29 i
32 . �;
IRfIJNE.AV.&'
UNIVERSITY QR,
MACAAT IUR BL:lSi
JAMBOREE AD:
JAMBOREERD,-&
BRISTOL ST, SQUTH.
J,!!!1►U.J,l1l4LL=
r
tiifr
ttt
�i11`
,;
4,9'. ..
SO
53
MACARTHUR Bl. &
FORD RD./BONITA
MACARTHUR BL-&
SAN JOAQUIN HILLS RD.
SR -73 NB RAMPS ,&
BONITACANYON.DR:
CANY N DR:
CITY of NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL PLAN
Figure CE3
RECOMMENDED
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
LEGEND:
�-
EXISTING LANE
L
NEW IMPROVEMENT
0
ELIMINATE LANE
Bra
. RIGHT TURN OVERLAP
®*
m RIGHT TURN OVERLAP
PHASEIMPROVEMENT
FREE RIGHT TURN
Or alternate improvements
that provide acceptable
Level of Service (LOS)
soot,.: U.. Cmsv000s
PRQIEQ NUMBER:I Y,01
Dote: 031IM6
x
w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
l0
mornrnLnvmvmoo
o
(O
(D
O)
r
N
r
m
OJ
0
O>
0
N
M
0
r
'C
O
Ol
N
O
O
N
o
o
r
Ld
w�
v(o
r(o
MMo(ornvr
oorn
�
C
r
M
r
N
M
N
O
W
W
(D
N
V
(O
r
O
n
V
n
m
N
0
of
p
� J
LL
�
LLS
N
.-
M
V
.-
*-
L(j
W
N
N
V
N�
M
V
V
N
N
F
6
N
M
p
U
@
M
J @
EA
LL =
O
O
O
0
0*
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
O
O
O
O
p
N
r
o
0
m
r
@ C
W
@
00
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
T
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
N
O
(O
W
(9
NO
L6
@
O
M
O
O
ll
�
m
O
Qp
G
N
O
Iq
S_
O
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
N
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
N O
w
r
(D
f0
W
n
n
N
M
r
O
V
N
OJ
N
O
O
N
m
O
O
n
n
U
O
N
OJ
m
O
V
N
m
M
6�
o
O
m
M
6]
.-
r
(D
O
M
M
O
(O
rn
m
r
t0
O
O
O
N
O
r
O)
n
fn
c+J
N
N
6)
[O
Ln
ro
m
<O
n
In
O
n
d'
n
W
(D
N
m
O
O
F" @
M
N
c+l
d'
N
r
N
Lo
fD
V
V
N
d'
of
of
d'
V
L6
N
OJ
O
r
(O
L(J
o E
W
LL
N@
W
m
N
G
E
K
F
m
m
m
>
0
d
K
CO mw_
za
(nm
w
°a
p
mQ
o
m
m
ce
m
3
0
o
r
�
06
E
ro
m
mm
o6
�i
w
m
m
o
M
06
Z
n
N
J
F
Z
N
(�!
F
H
Co
m
N
m
w
m
w
m
m
M
p
m
m
m
3
w
m
@@@
o@@
o
m
y
_a
ww
Kxs�
�(n
to
ws
(n
(o
(o
(o
c
o
as
E
nv
2
E
m
m
F-
m
o
0
o
@vv
o
o
m
m
m
m
m
m
z
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
CL
3
3
z
w
w
n
w
o
n
z
z
z
w
z
n
w
3
w
o
ac
ac
c
c
c
c
c
Q
<1<
<1<1<1<1<
Q
<1<
Q
<1<1<1<
'U
Q
O
Q
>
>
»
�
"O
Q>>=
>
>
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
O
U
t
>
T
Go
j`
ae
p
i
C
m
U
_❑
O_
YO
O
o
C
U
m
fn
m
o
a_
cl
Z
U
m
m
Q
U
Z
o
o
of
o
m
O
T
J
d
(n
C
0Q
Y
OO
2
E
E
o2
E
>a¢
>
o
2
>
=U
S
U
Mm
S
°
>
o
U
@
S
M
O
o
S
b
S-6
dCTm3
V
Umm
m
c
s
s
m
m
m
�
LLa
mj>>
E
m@0>>
>
m
@
_
=
6J
`o
b
0
0
m
n
K
N¢
m
�
c
cm@
Q
IO -
EEEcc
?
@
@
@
>J
,6E,@@
K
o
oo
J
rn[
z
�
����
=
�
W
p@
S
a
(O
r
N
O)
m
0
OJ
N
O
O
M
Q
N
LL
(�
S
O
Y
JHd
Z
N
N
M
V
In
IA
m
m
I'll
x
w
FAIR SHARE FEE DETERMINATION
I. FUNDING FOR CIRULATION SYSTEM BUILDOUT
A. Total Cost to buildout system $395,567,000
Funded by other Agencies $75,565,000
Funded by Adjacent Development $180,317,000
Funded by public and Fair Share Funds $139,685,000
B. Public Revenue Sources — 2007 to 2025
Gas Tax - $1,500,000/yr $27,000,000
Measure M Tumback - $1,800,000/yr $32,000,000
Circulation & Transportation Fund Balance $ 0
Unfunded balance $68,000,000
II. FUTURE TRAFFIC GROWTH (From NBTM)
Daily trips generated in 2005 803,993
Daily trips generated at buildout 935,244
Total increase 131,251
Growth from 2005 to mid -2007 9,844
Future growth in daily trips 121,407
III. FAIR SHARE FEE CALCULATION
Unfunded Balance/Future growth = $68,000,000/121,407 = $508/trip
FAIR SHARE FEE SUMMARY TABLE Draft 08/23/2007
FAIR SHARE FEE SUMMARY TABLE
Fair Share Fee Per Trip
$508.00
USE
GEN RATE
UNIT
- FEE/UNIT
1 Res -Low (SFD)
7.50
DU
$3,810
2 Res -Medium (SFA)
6.66
DU
$3,383
3 Apartment
6.12
DU
$3,109
4 Elderly Residential
4.90
DU
$2,489
5 Mobile Home
5.92
DU
$3,007
6 Motel
6.08
ROOM
$3,089
7 Hotel
7.58
ROOM
$3,851
8 Regional Commercial
23.48
TSF
$11,928
9 General Commercial
38.24
TSF
$19,426
10 comm./Recreation
37.07
ACRE
$18,832
11 Restaurant
51.18
TSF
$25,999
12 Fast Food Restaurant
62.78
TSF
$31,892
13 Auto Dealer/Sales
34.84
TSF
$17,699
14 Yacht Club
22.71
TSF
$11,537
15 Health Club
22.71
TSF
$11,537
16 Tennis Club
25.26
CRT
$12,832
17 Marina
2.39
SLIP
$1,214
18 Theater
0.34
SEAT
$173
19 Newport Dunes
20.02
ACRE
$10,170
20 General Office
11.08
TSF
$5,629
21 Medical Office
17.38
TSF
$8,829
22 R & D
7.10
TSF
$3,607
23 Industrial
5.48
TSF
$2,784
24 Mini-Storage/Warehouse
4.61
TSF
$2,342
25 Pre-School/Day Care
29.05
TSF
$14,757
26 Elementary/Private School
1.30
STU
$660
27 Junior/High School
1.30
STU
$660
28 Cultural/Learning Center
15.22
TSF
$7,732
29 Library
15.22
TSF
$7,732
30 Post Office
21.63
TSF
$10,988
31 Hospital
1.3.57
BED
$6,894
32 Nursing/Conv. Home
2.00
BED
$1,016
33 Church
6.09
TSF
$3,094
34 Youth Ctr/service
29.05
TSF
$14,757
35 Park
2.49
ACRE
$1,265
36 Regional Park
5.00
ACRE
$2,540
37 Golf course
6.00
ACRE
$3,048
38 Resort Golf Course
4.55
ACRE
$2,311
F:\USERS\PBW\Shared\TRAFFIC\FSHARErev2OO7
Attachment No. 4
Zoning Code Applicability
Table of Contents
Chapter 20.10 — Purpose and Applicability of the Zoning Code............................................3
20.10.010 — Title......................................................................................................................................
3
20.10.020 — Purpose...............................................................................................................................
3
20.10.030 — Authority, Relationship to General Plan ........................................................................
3
20.10.040 — Applicability of Zoning Code..........................................................................................
4
20.10.050 — Responsibility for Administration..................................................................................
5
Chapter 20.12 — Interpretation of Zoning Code Provisions
....................................................7
20.12.010 — Purpose...............................................................................................................................
7
20.12.020 — Rules of Interpretation......................................................................................................
7
20.12.030 — Procedures for Interpretations.......................................................................................
10
Chapter20.14 — Zoning Map..................................................................................................11
20.14.010 — Zoning Map Adopted by Reference.............................................................................
11
20.14.020 — Zones Established............................................................................................................
11
20.14.030 — District Symbols...............................................................................................................
12
Tables
Table 1-1 Zoning Districts Implementing the General Plan.................................................11
Administrative Draft —August 2007 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
Part 1 — Zoning Code Applicability
— This page intentionally left blank—
Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 Administrative Draft—August 2007
Chapter 20.10 — Purpose and Applicability of the Zoning Code
Sections:
20.10.010 - Title
20.10.020 - Purpose
20.10.030 - Authority, Relationship to General Plan
20.10.040 - Applicability of Zoning Code
20.10.050 - Responsibility for Administration
20.10.010 - Title
This title shall be known as the "City of Newport Beach Zoning Code" and referred to as the
"Zoning Code."
20.10.020 - Purpose
This Zoning Code is intended to carry out the policies of the City of Newport Beach General
Plan by classifying and regulating the uses of land and structures within the City, consistent
with the General Plan. It is also the intent of this Zoning Code to promote the orderly
development of the City, promote and protect the public health, safety, peace, comfort and
general welfare, protect the character, and social and economic vitality of its neighborhoods,
and to ensure the beneficial development of the City.
20.10.030 - Authority, Relationship to General Plan
A. Authority. The regulations within this Zoning Code are enacted based on the authority
vested in the City of Newport Beach by the State of California, including the California
Constitution, the Planning and Zoning Law (Government Code Section 65000 et seq.);
the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Section 66410 et seq.); and the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.).
B. Consistency with General Plan. This Zoning Code is the primary tool used by the City
to carry out the goals, objectives, and policies of the Newport Beach General Plan. It is
intended that all provisions of this Zoning Code be consistent with the General Plan and
that any development, land use, or subdivision, approved in compliance with these
regulations will also be consistent with the General Plan.
Administrative Draft -August 2007 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.10 Purpose and Applicability of the Zoning Code
20.10.040 — Applicability of Zoning Code
This Zoning Code applies to all construction, land uses, subdivisions, and development within
the City of Newport Beach, as provided by this Section.
A. Compliance required. No structure shall be altered, erected, or reconstructed in any
manner, nor shall any structure or land be used for any purpose, other than as allowed
by this Zoning Code.
(NOTE TO STAFF: This would be the appropriate place for the City to exempt itself
from the requirements of this Zoning Code, if so desired. If so, please let us know what
types of projects you want to exempt.)
B. Minimum requirements. The provisions of this Zoning Code shall be considered the
minimum requirements for the promotion of the public health, safety, and general
welfare. When this Zoning Code provides for discretion on the part of a review
authority, the discretion may be exercised to impose more stringent requirements than
required by this Zoning Code in order to promote orderly land use and development,
environmental resource protection, and the other purposes of this Zoning Code.
C. Private agreements. This Zoning Code applies to all land uses and development,
regardless of whether it imposes a greater or lesser restriction on the development or use
of structures or land than a private agreement or restriction (for example, CC&Rs),
without affecting the applicability of any private agreement, covenant, or restriction.
The City shall not enforce any private agreement, covenant, or restriction unless it is a
party to the agreement, covenant, or restriction.
D. Existing agreements, covenants, easements, laws, permits, and regulations.
1. Effect on existing laws, permits, and regulations. It is not intended by the
adoption of this Zoning Code to repeal, impair, or interfere with an existing
provision of law of the City, or any permits, regulations, or rules previously
adopted or issued for the alteration, construction, erection, establishment, or
moving of a legal structure or improvement.
2. Effect on agreements, covenants, and easements. It is not the intended by the
adoption of this Zoning Code to interfere with, abrogate, annul, or repeal any
agreement, covenant, easement, or restriction between private parties.
3. Greater restrictions required. If this Zoning Code imposes greater restrictions
than are imposed or required by other private agreements, covenants, or
easements, then the provisions of this Zoning Code shall control.
Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 Administrative Draft—August 2007
Purpose and Applicability of the Zoning Code 20.10
E. Effect of Zoning Code amendments on projects in progress. The enactment of this
Zoning Code or an amendment shall not impose different standards on a land use after
a planning permit application has been accepted by the Department as complete, or on a
development project after a Building Permit has been issued.
F. Subdivisions. A subdivision of land proposed within the City after the effective date of
this Zoning Code shall be in compliance with the minimum parcel size requirements of
Part 2 (Zoning Districts and Allowable Land Uses), other applicable requirements of this
Zoning Code, and Title 16 (Subdivisions) of the Municipal Code.
G. Other requirements may apply. Nothing in this Zoning Code eliminates the need for
obtaining other permits required by the City, or a permit, approval, or entitlement
required by another special district or agency, and/or the regulations of a State or
Federal agency.
20.10.050 — Responsibility for Administration
A. Responsible bodies and individuals. This Zoning Code shall be administered by:
Newport Beach City Council, hereafter referred to as the "Council" the Planning
Commission, hereafter referred to as the "Commission;' the Planning Director, hereafter
referred to as the "Director;" and the Planning Department, hereafter referred to as the
"Department."
(NOTE TO STAFF: While the Planning Commission will be referred to as the
"Commission," any other City commission identified in this Zoning Code will be
identified using the entire name of the other commission(s) for clarity. Likewise, the
Planning Director and Planning Department will be referred to as the "Director" and
"Department," any other City director or department will be identified using the entire
name of the other director(s) and department(s), e.g., Public Works Director.)
B. Exercise of discretion. In the event that a provision of this Zoning Code allows the
review authority (designated City official or body) to exercise discretion in the
application of a specific standard or requirement to a proposed project, but does not
identify specific criteria for a decision, the discretion shall be based on all of the
following criteria:
1. The proposed project complies with all applicable provisions of this Zoning
Code;
2. The exercise of discretion will act to improve the compatibility of the proposed
project with its site, surrounding properties, and the community, to a greater
extent than if discretion were not exercised;
Administrative Draft —August 2007 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.10 Purpose and Applicability of the Zoning Code
3. The manner in which discretion is exercised will result in a more practical
application of the provisions of this Zoning Code given specific characteristics of
the site and its surroundings; and
4. The decision is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, or
any other applicable regulation or standard.
Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 Administrative Draft —August 2007
Chapter 20.12 — Interpretation of Zoning Code Provisions
Sections:
20.12.010 — Purpose
20.12.020 — Rules of Interpretation
20.12.030 — Procedures for Interpretations
20.12.010 — Purpose
This Chapter provides rules for resolving questions about the meaning or applicability of any
part of this Zoning Code. The provisions of this Chapter are intended to ensure the consistent
interpretation and application of the requirements of this Zoning Code and the General Plan.
20.12.020 — Rules of Interpretation
A. Authority. The Director has the authority to interpret provisions of this Zoning Code.
Whenever the Director determines that the meaning or applicability of a Zoning Code
requirement is subject to interpretation, the Director may issue an official interpretation.
The Director may also refer any issue of interpretation to the Commission for their
determination. A decision of the Director may be appealed to the Commission in
compliance with Chapter 20.xx (Appeals).
B. Language. When used in this Zoning Code, the words "shall," "must," "will," "is to," and
"are to" are always mandatory. "Should" is not mandatory but is strongly
recommended; and "may" is permissive. The present tense includes the past and future
tenses; and the future tense includes the present. The singular number includes the
plural number, and the plural the singular, unless the natural construction of the word
indicates otherwise. The words "includes" and "including" shall mean "including but
not limited to..."
C. Calculations.
1. Residential density. When the number of dwelling units allowed on a site are
calculated based on density limits, any fraction of a unit shall be rounded down
to the next lowest whole number. For example, where a residential zoning
district allows 20 dwelling units per net acre of site area; a site of 8,500 square
feet would be allowed five dwelling units (du).
Example: 8,500 sq.ft. / (43,560 sq.ft. = 0.195 acres;
0.195 acres x 29 du/acre = 5.65 du, rounded down to 5 du
Administrative Draft—August 2007 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.12 Interpretation of Zoning Code Provisions
2. Other calculations. For calculations other than residential density required by
this Zoning Code, the fractional/decimal results of calculations shall be rounded
to the next highest whole number when the fraction/decimal is 0.5 or more, and
to the next lowest whole number when the fraction is less than 0.5, unless
otherwise specified.
3. Time limits. Whenever a number of days is specified in this Zoning Code, or in a
permit, condition of approval, or notice provided in compliance with this Zoning
Code, the number of days shall be construed as calendar days. A time limit shall
extend to 5:00 p.m. on the following working day where the last of the specified
number of days falls on a weekend, holiday, or other day the City is not open for
business.
D. State law requirements. Where this Zoning Code refers to provisions of State law (for
example, the California Government Code, Map Act, Public Resources Code, etc.), the
references shall be interpreted to be to the applicable State law provisions as they may
be amended from time to time.
E. Conflicting requirements.
1. Zoning Code and Municipal Code provisions. If conflicts occur between
requirements of this Zoning Code, or between this Zoning Code and the
Newport Beach Municipal Code, or other regulations of the City, the most
restrictive shall apply.
2. Development agreements or specific plans. If conflicts occur between the
requirements of this Zoning Code and standards adopted as part of a planned
community plan, development agreement, or specific plan, the requirements of
the planned community plan, development agreement, or specific plan shall
apply.
F. Unlisted uses of land. If a proposed use of land is not specifically listed in Table 2-xx
(Allowable Land Uses and Permit Requirements), the use shall not be allowed, except as
provided below for similar uses:
1. Director's determination. The Director may determine that a proposed use not
listed in Table 2-xx may be allowed as a use permitted by right or as a
conditional use, in compliance with Section 20.10.030 (Procedures for
Interpretations), below. In making this determination, the Director shall first find
that all of the following are true:
a. The characteristics of, and activities associated with, the proposed use are
equivalent to those of one or more of the uses listed in the zoning district
as allowable, and will not involve a greater level of activity, population
Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 Administrative Draft—August 2007
Interpretation of Zoning Code Provisions 20.12
density, traffic generation, parking, dust, noise, or intensity than the uses
listed in the zoning district;
b. The proposed use will meet the purpose/intent of the zoning district that
is applied to the site;
C. The proposed use will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and
policies of the General Plan or any applicable specific plan, and
d. The proposed use is not listed as allowable in another zoning district.
2. Applicable standards and permit requirements. When the Director determines
that a proposed but unlisted use is equivalent to a listed use, the proposed use
will be treated in the same manner as the listed use in determining where the use
is allowed, what permits are required, and what other standards and
requirements of this Zoning Code apply.
G. Zoning Map boundaries. If there is uncertainty about the location of a zoning district
boundary shown on the official Zoning Map, the Director shall determine the location of
the boundary in the following mariner.
1. Where a district boundary approximately follows a lot line, alley, or street line,
the lot line, alley or street centerline shall be construed as the district boundary.
2. If a district boundary divides a lot and the boundary line location is not specified
by distances indicated on the Zoning Map, the location of the boundary will be
determined by using the scale appearing on the Zoning Map.
3. Where a public street or alley is officially vacated or abandoned, the property
that was formerly in the street or alley shall be included within the zoning district of the
adjoining property on either side of the vacated or abandoned street or alley.
4. District boundaries shown as approximately following the shoreline of the
Pacific Ocean shall be construed to follow the mean high tide line.
5. District boundaries shown as approximately following the waterfront of
Newport Bay shall be construed to follow the bulkhead line.
H. Illustrations In case of conflict between the Zoning Code text and any diagram,
illustration, or image, the text shall control.
Administrative Draft—August 2007 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.12 Interpretation of Zoning Code Provisions
I. Use of headings. The headings of the Chapters, Sections, and Subsections of this
Zoning Code, together with the accompanying examples and explanatory notes, are
inserted as a matter of convenience and are not intended to define, limit, or enlarge the
scope or meaning of this Zoning Code or its provisions.
20.12.030 — Procedures for Interpretations
A. Request for interpretation. A request for an interpretation or determination shall be
made in writing to the Department and shall include all information described in the
instructions for interpretation requests, available from the Department, subject to the
applicable fee.
B. Findings, basis for interpretation. The issuance of an interpretation by the Director
shall include findings stating the basis for the interpretation. The basis for an
interpretation may include technological changes or new industry standards. The
issuance of an interpretation shall also include a finding documenting the consistency of
the interpretation with the General Plan.
C. Record of interpretations. Official interpretations shall be written, and shall quote the
provisions of this Zoning Code being interpreted, and the applicability in the particular
or general circumstances that caused the need for interpretations, and the determination.
r Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 Administrative Draft—August 2007
Chapter 20.14 — Zoning Map
Sections:
20.14.010
— Zoning Map Adopted by Reference
20.14.020
— Zones Established.
20.14.030
— District Symbols.
20.14.010 — Zoning Map Adopted by Reference
The boundaries, designations, and locations of the zoning districts established by this Zoning
Code shall be shown upon the map, or maps entitled "Zoning Map for the City of Newport
Beach, California" Any additional maps subsequently adopted shall also be a part of this Zoning
Code by reference.
20.14.020 — Zones Established
The City of Newport Beach shall be divided into zoning districts that implement the Newport
Beach General Plan Land Use Plan and the Local Coastal Program. The zoning districts shown
in Table 1-1 are hereby established, and shall be shown on the Zoning Map.
Districts
Zoning Map
Symbol Zoning District Name
Table 1-1
the General Plan
General Plan Land Use Designation
Implemented by Zonin¢ District
R-1
Office - Airport
RS -A Single -Unit Residential Attached
R-1-6,000
Single -Family Residential
CO -G General Commercial Office
R-1-7,200
Office - Medical Commercial
RS -D Single -Unit Residential Detached
R-1-10,000
Office - Regional Commercial
CO -R Regional Commercial Office
R-2
Two -Family Residential
RT Two -Family Residential
R-2-6,000
MFR
Multi -Family Residential
RM Multiple -Unit Residential
MFR -6,000
RM -D Multiple -Unit Residential Detached
OA
Office - Airport
AO Airport Office and Supporting Uses
OG
Office - General Commercial
CO -G General Commercial Office
OM
Office - Medical Commercial
CO -M Medical Commercial Office
OR
Office - Regional Commercial
CO -R Regional Commercial Office
Administrative Draft—August 2007 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.14 Zoning Map
Districts
Zoning Map
Symbol Zoning District Name
Table 1-1
the General Plan
General Plan Land Use Designation
Implemented by Zoning District
CC
Commercial Corridor
CC
Corridor Commercial
CG
Commercial General
CG
General Commercial
PF
Commercial Recreational and
PF
Public Facilities
CM
Private Institutions
CM
Recreational and Marine Commercial
PR
Marine
PR
Parks and Recreation
CN
Commercial Neighborhood
CN
Neighborhood Commercial
CV
Commercial Visitor -Serving
CV
Visitor Serving Commercial
e 8
• �
MU -V
Mixed Use Vertical
MU -V
Mixed Use Vertical
MU -Hl -MM
MU -Hl -DW
Mixed Use Horizontal
MU -H
Mixed Use Horizontal
MU -H4
MU_W1
Mixed Use Water
MU -W
Mixed Use Water Related
MU -W2
IG I Industrial
IG Industrial
OS
Open Space
OS
Open Space
PC
Planned Community
All
PF
Public Facilities
PF
Public Facilities
PI
Private Institutions
PI
Private Institutions
PR
Parks and Recreation
PR
Parks and Recreation
TS
Tidelands and Submerged Lands
TS
Tidelands and Submerged Lands
MHP Mobile Home Park RM Multiple -Unit Residential
PM Parking Management All
SP Specific Plan All
20.14.030 — District Symbols
In addition to the zoning district designations established under Section 20.10.020 (Zones
Established) and the related development standards established in Part 2 (Zoning Districts,
Allowable Land Uses, and Zoning District Standards) symbols are established on the Zoning
Map for the purpose of designating floor area ratio limitations for nonresidential uses and
density limitations or the actual number of allowed units for residential uses. When these
symbols are placed on the Zoning Map, the floor area ratios, dwelling unit limitations, or
residential densities as illustrated shall apply. The symbols and limitations shall be shown in
the following manner:
Em Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 Administrative Draft—August 2007
Zoning Map 20.14
A. Nonresidential districts. A number following the district symbol and enclosed by
parentheses shall designate the maximum floor area ratio allowed for the nonresidential
area designated.
Example: "CG (0.5)" shall indicate that a maximum floor area ratio of 0.5 is allowed.
B. Residential districts. A number following the district symbol and enclosed by
parentheses shall designate either;
1. The maximum density allowed expressed as the number of dwelling units
allowed per net acre for the area designated, or
2. The total number of dwelling units allowed for the area designated.
Examples: "MFR (20 du/ac)" shall indicate that a maximum density of 20
dwelling units are allowed for each net acre of land in the area
specified.
"MFR (388 du)" shall indicate that a maximum of 388 dwelling
units are allowed within the area designated.
Administrative Draft—August 2007 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FAIRSHARE FEE PROGRAM
INTERSECTION IMPRVOEMENT PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES
August 22, 2007
LOCATION NO
LOCATION
(IMPACTED INTERSECTIONS)
MITIGATION(S)
CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL
RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT&
CONTINGENCIES
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL PROJECT COST
la
Bluff Rd & Coast Hwy
WB -Add Rt Turn, EB -Add Dbl Lt Turn,
SB -Add Dbl Lt & Dbl RI Turn
$1,713,000
$2,016,000
$2,052,000
$5,781,000
1 b
15th St & Coast Hwy
WB -Add Rt Turn, EB -Add Dbl Ll Turn,
SB -Add Dbl Lt & Dbl Rt Turn
$10,601,000
$42,273,000
$29,083,000
$81,957,000
4
Newport Blvd & Hospital Rd
NB -Add Lt Turn (21.)
$1,802,000
$0
$994,000
$2,796,000
6, D & E
Newport Blvd & 32nd St
WB -Add Lt Turn, EB -Add Lt Turn (2L)
$1,014,000
$14,500
$567,000
{
$1,596,000
Newport Blvd & 32nd St
SB -Add Thru Lane (3T)
Newport Blvd between 32nd & 30th St
NB -Add Thru Lane (3T)
7&8
Riverside Ave & Coast Hwy
EB -Add Lt Turn (2L) & Thru Lane (3T), WB -Eliminate Rt Turn
$1,448,000
$718,000
$1,193,000
$3,359,000
Tustin Ave & Coast Hwy
EB -Add Thru Lane (3T)
$1,606,000
$1,134,000
$1,507,000 -
$4,247,000
9
MacArthur Blvd & Campus Or
SB -Add Thru/Rt Lane & Eliminate Thru Lane (3.5T) (1.5R),
NB -Add Lt Turn (21.)
$947,000
$420,000
$754,000
$2,121,000
11
Von Karman Ave & Campus Dr
EB -Add Lt Turn (2L) & Eliminate Rt Turn,
NB -Eliminate Free Rt Turn
$1,101,000
$113,000
$670,000
$1,884,000
13 & 14
Jamboree Rd & Campus Or
p
EB -Eliminate Free Rt Turn, NB -Add Rt Turn,
SB -Add Thru Lane (4T)
$1,291,000
$641,000
$1,065,000
$2,997,000
Jamboree Rd & Birch St
SB -Add Thru lane (4T)
$1,857,000
$1,761,000
$1,991,000
$5,609,000
15
Campus Dr & Bristol St North
NB -Add Thru Lane (4T), WB -Add Thru lane (5T),
SB -Add Rt Turn (3R)
$9,624,000
$1,076,000
$5,885,000
$16,585,000
29
MacArthur Blvd & Jamboree Rd
EB -Add Thru Lane (4T), WB -Add Lt Turn (3L)
$2,357,000
$803,000
$1,738,000
$4,898,000
32
IJamboree Rd & Bristol St South
NB -Add Thru Lane (6T), SB -Add Thru Lane (4T)
$4,464,695
$0
$446,470
$4,911,165
49
MacArthur Blvd & Ford Rd/Bonita Cyn
SB -Add Lt Turn (3L)
$1,219,000
$504,000
$950,000
$2,673,000
s0
MacArthur Blvd & San Joaquin Hills Rd
EB -Add Lt Turn (3L), SB -Add Lt Turn (3L),
NB -Add Thru Lane (4T) & Eliminate Rt Turn
$1,789,000
$1,285,000
$1,693,000
$4,767,000
53
SR 73 -NB -Rammer
-
WEI A d , ,Turn ,1,
The cost for this location is not included because it is currently being designed by a developer in the City of Irvine. It is planned
to begin construction in 2008.
A
Coast Highway
Dover to Newport Blvd
$5,579,000
$8,312,000
$7,643,000
$21,534,000
B & 19
County Portion
Irvine Avenue
Mesa Dr to Bristol St
$6,295,900
$5,336,000
$6,400,000
$18,032,000
Irvine Ave & Mesa Or
NB -Add Thru Lane (3T), SB -Add Thru lane (3T),
WB -Add Lt Turn (21.) & Eliminate Rt Turn
B & 20
Remainder
Irvine Avenue
University Dr to Mesa Or
$3,320,700
$2,297,000
$3,091,000
$8,709,000
Irvine Ave & University Or
EB -Add Lt/Thru & Eliminate Thru (1.5L)(1.5T),
NB -Add Thru Lane (3T) & Eliminate Rt Turn,
SB -Add Thru Lane (3T)
C
Coast Highway & Bayside
EB -Add Thru Lane (4T)
$1,644,000
$1,234,000
$1,584,000
$4,462,000
F
Placentia Ave between Hospital Rd & Superior
Widen Placentia to Secondary cross-section
$1,640,500
$1,449,000
$1,700,000
$4,790,000
G -
15th St between Placentia Ave to Monrovia
Widen 15th St to a 4 -lane Secondary cross-section
$2,421,200
$1,370,000
$2,088,000
$5,880,000
H
MacArthur Blvd between Sly of San Miguel to Coast Hwy
Narrow median on MacArthur Blvd to provide a 6 -lane Major
$1,722,000
$0
$950,000
$2,672,000
J
17th St from its westerly terminus to Bluff Rd
Construct 17th St
$963,000
$5,009,000
$3,287,000
$9,259,000
K
Bluff Rd between 17th St to Coast Hwy
Construct Bluff Rd as a Primary
$9,522,000
$49,161,000
$32,278,000
$90,961,000
L
Superior Avenue
Construct median from Coast Hwy to the N'ly City Limit
$1,000,000
$0
$0
$1,000,000
M
Pedestrian r Overcrossings
Construct 6 pedestrian overcrossing along Coast Highway at
West Newport, Newport Shores, Superior Ave, Riverside Ave,
Tustin Ave, and Corona del Mar.
$50,371,000
$0
:.
$27,707,000
$78,078,000
..
N
19th Street to Brookhurst
$55,586,717
$55,586,717
TOTAL PROJECTS
$182,899,712
$126,926,500
$137,316,470
$447,144,881
H: 1pdala110105689VProfect Info\Summary Repodxis
wiz A /�w •� �'�1
AhL
Ar
AS s °Qk7 ° I
,
N/ h Yt
7il fL
li
V
. r
lac. -*..
tyA-,
LES uITIGATIa,t
ADD IH RIGHT TU°I
t MR IWROVEIQR ADO W LEFT TUN
r AM RB THiU
17n1 ST. ADD RLEFT UN
B LT T
IE ,/ ADO EB EFT RIGHT
SCALE: 1' . 50'
°LUT RD.
0 SO 100 150 wrt BY
q11. +
Q G
N L
lyLuU) FF b
W
Z F=A
.,�. = y
s
9
- a
Ilk E
6
RYI ID a
`,�Lollssq,, BLUFF ROAD FROM .9]
MST RAYS 4 RIIICIPIL CIVIL ENQI R 17 TH STREET TO COAST
VST NAVE R.C.E. M,. .....
.
HIGHWAY e
'�iq tm ac' Hs1am 1x p0.11 v CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
US(AIPUW v HY1s1U6 u �o K C,it oco® KK wrz sx/✓a(�,� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ISHOIF 1 w3
Y
�( rI� . �. .. 1 �•�,+;�Y1f air,,, yl�,y.�w� r�y .tpr �--._ _ _ __ _ _ .�_ /l / ,
too
<� r"
VA A po
v
of . •+. * : f ` ` �Q.' 03�
� �r •.. ..�"..., b,::.,. Jae/�
`M V
7
• -s
IN
IN J �
OIV
Iz-
A,G
14
co
r. 5
I % b
6
xlxm
`e<<el sssl�! BLUFF ROAD FROM
a MST MILE n PRIWIP& ClYII MW 17 TH STREET TO COAST �
usr wwc ❑ x.c.c. W....... HIGHWAY
Na iloaat x./ax/xx —
scaie r = oo' cy n_xx-tt arz
�s9!!a m�i� °�bE0® n arz xx/xx/pc
1°F° xx tl0'� xx CITU OF NEWPORT BEACH e
o 50 Too Iso DAR BY rcvxlnlw v rcnslm W'D PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT uxt Q s 3 5
x
P.
* - p
It
STRM Ll
r
rsA�sTD �� - AZ
SRV � 1.A1T
qj>-4
Goo
IST
STREET LtGKWF
/ s
)IN EXIST
/ / / � �� � fir. � � i► ` '�
/ JOIN�
/ % v + + r ` �.
Ial ac\ IT /
TlEFJ'LIA1f
LI (j, JDIN EXIST 0
IXlSF NESIN7 CLARE �.
\1
PfA-ID 'b RAISED 011i f =�.:� ... :. -,. �^ ,", .�..3•C
MEDIAN •o
�\
►� `JOIN
EXIST
Is
REIRME
Vv
S ,
0007
"^".1N r. ; ■ rte,.' , } +)VI.l. i !•. F r •
�i
i 1
NINN 4vN •� � f� 1�" Vr
mp-
1 i 4.p NIXlz
15TH S7Tn:<
' T�tE6T�
10•' r..
�) l �' I� .-i t�j....,., 1�' ...� N' ! 1_.M •-...,.,, f1'
-a
9
11
1 t r
I '.lulu a't�•., 4 4 � �" � ..
r'.
f g
�r
('(tU'06rD ■ ,k
. SL`�+4
sy7w .
16THST49 0
c LES
w
00 40 f COAST M. t NEW JUIRMNENT
1�11�
t
w
MITIGATION
ADD SG RIGHT TLFN
ADD se LEFT TLNN
ADO TO THRU
ADD EO LETT 11AW
ADD " TN3U RIGHT
ADD AO RIGHT TM4
._�Lot
15TH
q ,•
� �� �, i. � ,• .iy 1 � siv
i1
SCALE I' - 50'
0 50 00 0
lid
If
�� 9
3 't''�i1i X11
111 LA
m=
m z --- - -
m m
-a w
o �
15tH ST.
t
401 4 4 ~
�. ~ COAST NIIY.
t
r
-
v
14
LEG , MITIGATION:
ADD SB RIGHT TURN
't HER IUPRO Cww ADD SB LEST TURN
ALO EB T1RU
ADD 0 LEFT TURN
ADO IIB TIRU RIGHT
ADD IR RIGHT TUN
SCALE: I' - 50'
0 50 100 150
LF1�1
...�,,9"Y/
7X I
�.
Ile
1 '° ,t; ` ♦ 1 r%" 1`ter cam
T.:
\ / ym
IX
wp'
y,�t'� `,� •' ,''i . :tom ' pis
as TRIi A d,. _.17 1.
�-n
a A
Mg
Aw
IMF W"
All
I"v
_11
uia
•. y
u
.� * > `\�\,�-.' /i\�. � ` � � ��.� :'mac i�� ,`.- ,'_ ���ii� _� '��1--•_ � I• l aH
HOSPITAL RD.
LEGUIL
o- MITIGATION 4 EXISTING LA•L
rJ 14,4, o- ADD 16 LEFT TLM (M.) HEX I1PRDVELEIl1 ' a01f SJlp
a 44 HEIIPORT Hlw. �NYY Nw l N [[`[
SCALE: I. 50'
� I
0 50 100 I5G
! 4 I
8
./8._4�' it � � ..4
sit
It y �j
&55
'� �% �h, q• i - � � 5 � � I ;'tai � 1-�6
URI
1 '
�T l::
I
3
T
r I L40
`�
� 1i4kw.
A Nl�
e
Ile
fK
r
--God ALM
IEWORi mow' LEGQV2 MITIGATION 5
ADO IIB LEFT TIf.E (21.) IIEYIM
c 4 E%ISTINS LAE ADO EB LEFT TL1bE `N YIBIf SSlppr
bbb i ADD SB TM LAE (3T) oEWPORT BOULEVARD &
•� N7 IIPRDYflENT AOO t8 T14K) LAE (ST) PRIICIP& ClCIYIL INCDEER
3M ST. _ FlRSI NAME
} 44 r usr NWE R.D.c. w.....,. 32ND STREET (6)
$
SCALE: t• - 50• � [q�rn�rr 1 Dart ••/••/••
DATE xx x/xx xx CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH s
0 5o loo ISO DATE w a 1"IN TEE IEYIslm6 rm'D 0ID xx m'TE xx/xx(xx PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 9 T v x
s
a
I.
�r
is
RIVERSIDE AV. �• ' _
EE Alka �.,� toil;
d d
MST NAV. VE
RIRSIDE AV- Y COACT
HR. (T) MITIGATION
a 4
b ADD M LEFT TIMI (7L)
y ADO FB T
ELIMINATE
WS t8 RIGHT lUN
MTIN AV.
?'
fat
F� r r
_y
hr:,F .11'x( �j�'t!�1 1:1'� \' � iF� ">�•)�;
r . r
00
�„ �• i% * �� • Vii—.. f % fIlk
c (—.JiY:.a�. ^ J 1 • ) I t �!!Y' I ,i• .�•r'�' , ,'
LL
dM in
lift
Ek
jd6a
P3 p A01 0
�_ _ _. �� � �� 1, �: � �' . �� .., �� , •��.� �_� ,� . ,, t
�1 A3LL� •
Vii,, ► Y � � I � �! �: .
MTIN AV • COAST M. \
N.T. IR) MITIGATION
ADD EB TMONGI
`a EXISTING LANE
t K• IIPROVEIENT
Q ELIMINATE LAIE
SCALE: V - 50'
�?1�IJ.T•
=E
]9
LIQ ` Ir • �; �e•;'' � � I � •;
yiLVy (. +�. -.t T
`7 geln
;. �� I�'�? ,1 r ' - ' '� � 1� ]. ,: � ,� � � l \ �� �` '�•• Ari .��l::t:'�'tdl! l: _ .. _ .1-L
IIACARTIAR etw.
AV
LEGEtD�
EXISTING LANE YITIGATIM
+ NEV INPROIELENT AU) W LEFT TUN (2L)
CANRR 0R. ELIMINATE SB THROUGH
i fTEE RIGM TUN AIX) SB TNROIAiI/RIGHT lUN
ELIMINATE LANE
SCALL I- - 50'
I
�9
-Iwtw 44 w
I Win, in, 0
1.
7 t, R-1 '4dajD
ME:
'Ift
IR
F IT
or all
will
LEGM MITIGATION
EXISTING LAW ADD EB LEFT TURN (M)
HEA ImROVEJAM ELIMINATE EB RIGHT TURN
ELIMINATE LAW EL NATE M FREE RIGHT TM
FREE RIGHT TUN SCALE: 1' 50'
0 50 100
I 1
or
I
Pam =L-
CI -.-
W
m - -
W
LU
Z
1 / /
JAMM IV.
if: NB RIGNf TURN • \ S /.I I / 888810 MI�NAT HRU SEE RIGHT TUB! �"' r..j%+ . /,.' i'•�{/-' •�`
p
a^4444 GA Fb GR. �i.`\+:r�.. i ,
b
•-- .ale ,.
'�i�1 x �• 1' , y � wR N I le 1 0
Aq
Lu
tL
Lu
Lu
i � •� "J �i� .1 T r
/
A � • '�P TF r� 'I - � - z b
JAMMM W. i
IF MITIGATION k BIRCH 5,.
(14) WLEfdF� S
hA1 TIGATGATIGN 4 EXISTING I" 6
AMD SB THRU LAZE m FETI IIPRBYEAENT Rl'I[,1B JAMBOREE ROAD &
�dddd ELIMINATE EB FREE RIGHT TUN R FREE RIGHT IUN .'1A1tt1'° CAMPUS DRIVE 13 3
444 BIRCH ST. 0 ELIMINATE LAZE r5, N LE ^ g
o, usr RUE — FR'n c i CML I....I JAMBOREE ROAD $X $
SCALE: r' . SG' XooM an "/"/" C STREET 14
. y Q_x,_R, +
rp rm 0FT1°E° xx °V'" xz CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
0 SO 100 Iso wrz v m"Ii1101 M r ISlos w 0 0wT[ xx/xx/u PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT sa, Tx
x
.� ,
A � /
F \�
Ar
3FI4 �.
91 '.?s
-.V
J
44 \ \
79
�• `tib .� ��� , ,. � ��,� 4OIL
'�`.
CR
f �K pRl R BRIST STREET NORTH UQUI
(151 YITIGATIRd
4 EXISTING LAZE RNIERm
ADD NB RIGHTHW LANE t NEI IWRG1'E.OIT XX
ADD SB RIGHT ANE LANE 1\1I13f/A
ADD RB THRV LANE R FREE RIGHT TIRN `�. !4� CAMPUS DRIVE !
66 RAST NUM, r• PRIKIPAL CIVIL MIND
IIQ�TntsTa sr. o ELmINATE LAE J Nsr NAME R.C.E. NO ... BRISTOL STREET NOR'
III SME. r . 50' y. u -u -u wrz .•/xA/xx XX
s,� C usleEo CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
0 50 100 150 wrz ar M"IP1101VRISIM Wo f0.LL� DEO® MR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTFlu xx/XR/zx
4h
v _ y
r.I
LOY
AlAab
# AN!Yv. 1 111, rd
V� 10r �A
7^S'
40; IWO
n.
uITIBATIW
IDD E8 TMV LN (IT)
ADD aB LEFT TURN LAZE (JL)
LEGEND.
S• EXISTING LAtE
6 .f WW INPRDVELENT
Ch 1 I I r/ O FFEE IRl6 TMN
G
O
coQ
LU
UU
Vn
W
z
J
J�Xes[ssll�// ••
IMTT NAYC �� -
- LAST NAPE
Nw % O Mrz
SCALE- I"=
s'"�N [1LL1Q'+e oco
0 w IDD 1w oArz er ocsnt%[a aF gvss[u¢ w•o
i
9
W
m
W
W
rn
w
z
M
x
V
xx
8
8
MACARTHUR BOULEVARD $
JAMBOREE ROAD (29)
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT )9E£T a X I�
91.f A
YL(
L
4 1
IL
i
/ItA•
v _ y
r.I
LOY
AlAab
# AN!Yv. 1 111, rd
V� 10r �A
7^S'
40; IWO
n.
uITIBATIW
IDD E8 TMV LN (IT)
ADD aB LEFT TURN LAZE (JL)
LEGEND.
S• EXISTING LAtE
6 .f WW INPRDVELENT
Ch 1 I I r/ O FFEE IRl6 TMN
G
O
coQ
LU
UU
Vn
W
z
J
J�Xes[ssll�// ••
IMTT NAYC �� -
- LAST NAPE
Nw % O Mrz
SCALE- I"=
s'"�N [1LL1Q'+e oco
0 w IDD 1w oArz er ocsnt%[a aF gvss[u¢ w•o
i
9
W
m
W
W
rn
w
z
M
x
V
xx
8
8
MACARTHUR BOULEVARD $
JAMBOREE ROAD (29)
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT )9E£T a X I�
X
X
V
NOTES:
1. ALL TRAFFIC STRIPES AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS
IN THE CALTRANS RIGHT OF WAY ARE THERMOPLASTIC
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. PLACE ARROWS 20' BEFORE LIMIT LINE OR CROSSWALK.
3. ALL CROSSWALKS SHALL HAVE A 10 FOOT INSIDE WIDTH.
4. REMOVE ALL CONFLICTING PAVEMENT DELINEATION.
�
CA
� J
N
FE 1
L J
LEGEND:
O PAVEMENT DELINEATION DETAIL NUMBER
PM PAVEMENT WO (2)
MK
PAINTCOATS UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE
(T) THERMOPLASTIC
Rp REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKING OR LEGEND AS SHOWN
CW 1' WHITE CROSSWALK LINES
LL 1'WHITE LIMIT LINE
LEJ EXISTING TO REMAIN
-.If CHANGE OF PAVEMENT DELINEATION DETAIL
0.0 PROPOSED WIDTH
p ANGLE POINT
TYPE C OR F DELINEATOR (CLASS 1 FLEXIBLE POST)
(PER PLANS)
--4
IV(L)
FE,
L J
TYPE IV(L)
2-'7+"12,
2'
LIN
_J2_
38 350'
THIS PLAN ACCURATE FOR PAVEMENT DELINEATION ONLY.
IST CWNTY I RWTE TIFUMTT
PIU
2 Oro 73 24.8
REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663
xxx
RBF CONSULTING
14725 ALTON PARKWAY
IRVINE, CA 92618
Tro 5/a� a' Callano a Rs al/ws aa,Ms sroll ml a rup»slNs
17'
CAL
R/W
I ` \
SNS —
4' , <f1
I(2QOIq )l
27B
PM TYPE IV(L)
�I (T) TVp 1 Z I
O
IFEXI~
L J o I
y ,.
1 � I
v
0
N
M
N
ui
w
ww
Z h
J w
Q
H
N
t FE,
2
i o ++; L J i l
'y I. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN
P �1 FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN
H 1� PAVEMENT DELINEATION
SCALE: 1"=40'
PD -1
CU 00000 EA GA9700
DIST COUNTY ROUTE POST MILES SHEET TOTAL
TOTAL PROJECT NO. SHEETS
I 12 Ora 73 24.8 XXX
I
REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER op0.0FE55)ON�)
{ .e MARK J"
CALTRANS I 63P051 TO __
R/W6QQ@t
PLANS APPROVAL DATE ¢
w K I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH rR give
m Z ( NEWPORT3300 WB�ACHBO ALE ZA6R 3 4sr`)f•M aL`P as
w w ~ ( RBF CONSULTING
w M 1 II w ly l— 14725 ALTON PARKWAY
w a N i !I lit IRVINE, CA 92618
~ TMI StWo °r Col)rwWo W Its °'rlmrs wl�MS stall rot bs rss{anslde
F� � I I N I' i `I I ' 1 I _ fOr IM oCIX/l�pr IXaglC)EIa55 Cl Cl@"1!M!C CO(1/85 0( INS (VOR SIEN.
C) I { I[___. ' Con, on row Wu o wm 910 To CIA
I° Ib ".. d 0A yo to
mplrwwoamaa'
0 1. { \i t F- ! L
co
cr
CAL TRANS { II J I
{ 1 R/W
rE� it s m '; l!ii
om >- L J i I I� I 'I
PM TYPE IV(L) rE1 '
m I
TYP J/:� /
JZ w O
Y N LE J I i :.J:: 193+Ot /'\/ !.
aw x i (T) II �'I� Be Trans "J" 197+11/�'L \
I g 4::2
+
38 (3 5 ; ;��I �' I�{j RP PM TYPE VII(L) 25A 9 Trans
25
d 1 T),I \ 278 RP (T) 1'^ ~ .r r`\ - - --_-_ 38 1170') -_-_ RP .✓" ✓' % s� //t/_ `, / "1"
IV�
—� _ _
0 0 ~ 12' CW '- 1 2" c — — — — — — _ __—_—_—___—_ �y_/i�/(12')ww t LL40 ----- — — =��� ._- —._—�zN 2' (T)2' 12 ----- ---- —P (12')
o Jw 9 12" 79 797 _ ______ - ___ _ _ c___ _ LI N
__— -:=:"- 98 , .7.g9 Y ZrT-, 200/ 10')
_____-_______________ _
a u0 (T) LL _----- --- --- —_— ✓0� B REE ROAD E� sa
/ t )
o — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
�-
' m 12 --"— --- 12 r ((12r)
Op /
...�_ _ ___---- ____ _ 19— YJ
a
TYPE IV(U \ \ / \ MA 195+07 — \
�� � MA CH xlst LE J
J-2" 797+6 END Trans �• h , / / /�
TIM ! I I TYP .9 0 % / �� /
g r (T) MA CH xls \ ! �,i \/ / / /" CITY
7B 'J-2" 196+93 R/W
INI g NI IT)
P TYPE IV(R) .:J.' 191+31 �l �� /�. ,'t.\�'/�
z Z M y TYP Beg Trans ` !j ' /r / �j / /`'��j/ /
w ¢ :m, (til TYPE IV(R)
a PM TYPI! 1 rE 1 �E J
gWoct L J
m E�
" j ALL DIMENSIONS ARE S o0
FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN
/ W6
PAVEMENT DELINEATION '
SCALE: I"=40' "moi
\.
O THIS PLAN ACCURATE FOR PAVEMENT DELINEATION ONLY. PD -2 _0
o
RELATIVE BORDER SCALE 0 1 2 ) USERNAME = FUSER CU 00000 EA OA9700
A IS IN INCHES I I I 1 II DGN FILE _> SREOUEsi
C�
MIT IGATIDR
ADD SB LEFT TLIN (X)
ELI(NATE NB FREE RIGHT TUN
FM A0./BONITA ADD NB RIGHT TUN
CANYON DR.
Me i
..
/ y`
x
(.
� r
Ila
LES
�Inm
MACARTHUR BOULEVARD &
a
EXISTING EAJe
AOIISJgJt
t
NEW Iw Nr
o`` wsr NAuc t
FORD ROAD / BONITA CANYON
i
FREE RIGHT TUN
usT RNE
R IR.C.EL CIVIL DC.NU
R.D.E. w. ......
DRIVE (49)
Q
ELIMINATE LAESCALL
I' 50'
y [ypvA ,
D'rz xx/xx/xx
o
„ nx
xx
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
0 50 ID0 Iso
onrz er tEvnvnwwrevlslws w o
aIITII 6°
DEDm xx "xx/xx/xx
PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT
WET I+x $
z
YJk
I�
MAMT" RLYD.
,t.
'
f, ! • 4 ^y
qlft
f
:
I
MITIGATION
ADD SID LEFT TUN (DL)
ADD ER LEFT TUN (OL)
ADD a RIOM TUN
ELIMINATE to RPWT TUN
ADD m TIRO
ELIMINATE \R FREE RIGHT TUN
ADD MR D E RMT TUN
Lc�
'Q E%ISTING LAtE
•\ Kt IMPROVEIENT
Z FREE RIGHT TUN
ELIMINATE LAZE
SCALES I' = 50'
0 50 100 150
M■
IAN*;
IL Yl mP n'�T 4•�, y
s
Lu
Lu
W
U)
IRVIK AV.
LEGEPR
41T IGATT
41T IGATIM
�'IETco
ADD
TE
I
oI+
Ano re Tlnu
p
EXISTING LAK
OM
AVE
EL IYINATE TIFW
I
O
4
s
ram 11P 0 ELEIYT
arTallst/a,
STOL
ry 18 RItNi
KSA DR. InD SB TNRY
.�.� MST NAPE%
TO BRIVENUE
MESA DRIIRVINE
ADD SB iH2U
L
I
Ny fY
ADD W LEFT TUfd!
ELIMINATE LVE
_ LAST NYY[
P�C [ pYl} OG�MSn
ADD EB TING LEFT
=-c+
l l l I
ELIMINATE " RIGHT TI
STREET
SCALE: I' = 50'
d��a
ElA:,"_"x,
CATT xx/n/xx
sq rIrIL
rcsr7zx -' xx
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
0
50 100 150
0.11E W
EESOTIPTIM v 1£VIs106
EAalr
YED>D mwrt xx/xx/r
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
vm Z
n•
r� � r I'♦ w ^> �` .r �-' \ >, is JC
�. Fi Cr, i...a lT �. ..4, a ♦ ��CC
tp
t' ��Jnn . \. Q I �•
ice,ll
pp
—
NnT ` �: r ----- - fit: c ! .;i ►.� ,i
low M
IL
a� .. � r � ------ it-_ -- •/ / I �
Q e
f p: �*• Y
=4�,r of -_ — l.. ��• - &
ILL. AW
1 v Ir w
if
"� " "• �tiai I • a
RMI M[D g
`�,�utrrre� IRVINE AVENUE FROM b
TMST Nut% MII<IPN. CIVIL ENGINEER MESA DRIVE TO BRISTOL
LAST NAVE - IT C.E. w.......
SCALE: r . 5VEo o u°0 -u = arz ../../•. STREET o
aaA\ �.` CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
o 50 10D +5u wrz w p[�IPII(MI m ansl0s u,ro UEO® xx GTE xx/xx/xx PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT sm Q a 2
z
M�f
iff I A I
AL
lk 000
A,,
BAYS IOE CN.
MITICATIM
ADD ATH EB THOUGH
Hffy.
EXISTING LAW
k IEA JWROVEWW
-x wt
,;;Ool
An
au
100
�.m
4r
It 4,, -
I c
177 -
all,
7Tn
y ILI'
via
DEN PLACENTIA AVE 8El`XEEN
HOSPITAL RD AND SIA" [OR AVE PLACENTIA AVENUE -HOSPITAL
TO A SECONDARY CROSS-SECTION REWIPAL Cl IL MIND"
mi TIGATION:
A C.1 Not. 1..... ROAD TO SUPERIOR AVENUE
SCALE: V - 50 DAq
o SO
�,7 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
l
50 100 IMR IT, M"IPTIM 0' RNISIM d�, oE0® A, all
xx/xx/xx PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 9al rcX
.� T � � Vii` t' ; ,°1 '►� �• �:•_�. � �
µ •, M
op
., ., r...-.
aw
i
r
,I
lk
st
W
tom.
If
Aj I � ' � I �4 0�I iy .T Ia_1�r l�.�Z ��, 'i. �4.. 1•. //lA I � �•' 1
Is
41 TIGATIOt
ADEN 15TH STREET FROM FCACENTIAAVE TO AVE TO
TTOIf Sflpp/
SECONDARY GNOSIS-SECTICNA 4 -LANE
Jusr Rw[
Ru K.K�x
SCAN 1` . 50' : [q r - -"
4nT
��� LY (PAVdO
0 SO 100 150 LUR MN R3AIVllbl b 3VISIb6 4P'0
�
�.
ITIGATION
NAM" K JAN GN MACARTMM 6L FROM SAN YIQ[ TO
COAST NIIT TO A 6 -LME MAJOR
M
F
ryy � -r wyawwii' n.
M ', r' •,fit � • .
i x 1;
Tipp, i
SCALE: i' - 50'
0 50 f00 50
w
_ J
w
w
m
LU
w
rn
w
Z
1 J
2
.o
l9
Y
—v. CONEXkNT SYSTEMS, INC.
C 0 N E X A N T 4OaD MacArthur Blvd.
1 Newport Beach, CA 92680
August 28, 2007
BY )!vWL
swood(o,c itV.n ewport-beach.ca. us
Ms. Sharon 'Wood
Assistant City Manager
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92658-8915
Re: General Plan Implementation Committee --Transportation Fair Share Fee
Dear Sharon;
We understand that the General Plan Implementation Committee will be taking up the Fair Sbare
Fee for transportation improvements at its next meeting on August 29. erre have briefly reviewed
the draft report of the Department of Public Works, but use would very much like to have the time
to better understand the proposal (which, as currently proposed we understand would nearly triple
the existing fee) and comment on it, and therefore we request that the Comruittee continue its
consideration of this item after the next meeting to give us time to digest the proposal and discuss it
,,with staff before it is finalized and sent to the City Council,
Thank you for your consideration,
Sincerely,,
Jake Cisneros
Manager
Facilities & Corporate Real Estate
Conexant Systems, Inc.
cc: Tom Muller b`Me-lveny & Meyers
Steve Edwards 0`Melveny & Meyers
Geoff LePlastrier LePlastrier Development Consultimg
Page I of I
Wood, Sharon
From: rluehrs@newportbeach.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 11:00 AM
To: Wood, Sharon
Subject: City's Fair Share Fee
Good Morning Sharon:
In reviewing the Agenda for the General Plan Implementation Committee we read with interest the
Fair Share Fee Update report from Public Works Director Steve Badum. We have identified
concerns over the proposed increase in fees to $508 per trip and respectfully request that this item
be continued until we have an opportunity to fully understand the impacts on development allowed
under the new General Plan.
Thank you.
Richard
Richard R. Luehrs
President and C,E.O.
Newport Beach Chamber of Commerce
The Business and Community Resource
1470 Jamboree Rd.
Newport Beach, CA 92660
PH: (949) 729-4404
FX: (949) 729-4417
htt :,UyJ ww.NewportBeach.com
08/29/2007
August 29. 2007
Sent Via e-mail to �N\ood.a iii\ jwv. 7on-hcadi.l:.u.�
Sent via facsimile to 91,19-644-3020
General Plan/LCP implementation Committee
City of Newport Beach
11
>300 Newport Blvd.
'Newport Beach_ CA 92663
3oCalChapter
:v,vx.naiopsocaLo�g
RG: .August 29, 2007 Agenda Item 3 — Fair Share Pee Update
Honorable Committee Members:
I am writing on behalf of the over 1000 members of the Southern
California Chapter of the National Association of Industrial and Oflice
Properties. Our members represent the owners and clevclopers of
commercial real estate in Newpo't Beach and will he significantly
impacted by the proposed fee increase being discussed at )'our nnceting
today.
\Ve respectfully urge a continuance of this item to allow- NAIOP SnCal
and its members to join with other impacted sial:eholclers to review the
proposal and to meei with city staff to better understand the
recommendation for this extraordinary fee increase.
Thant: you for your consideration.
Sincerely.
Vickie 1A. Talley
Director of Legislative Affairs
August 29, 2007
General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Request for Continuance of Agenda Item 3 "Fair Share" Fee Update.
Committee Members,
I am writing on behalf of the membership of the Building Industry Association of
Southern California, Orange County Chapter (BIA/OC) to request continuance of
item 3 ("Fair Share" Fee Update) on today's General Plan/LCP Implementation
Committee agenda. As affected stakeholders our members request that the
committee continue the item in order that we might have an opportunity to
work with city staff to fully understand the methodology and justification for
the proposed fee increase.
Additionally, this particular fee falls within the category of fees that are subject to
the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000 et seq.) Accordingly, the
city must follow the procedures and make the findings in the Mitigation Fee Act,
including a determination that a reasonable relationship between the fee and the
type of project upon which the fee is imposed as well as the need for a specific
public facility and the project (nexus study). The staff report for agenda item 3 is
absent of a nexus study. The BIA/OC requests that a nexus study be completed to
justify this particular increase. If a nexus study has already been completed, we
would like to request a copy for review.
It is our understanding that other stakeholders have made similar requests of the
Committee. The BIA/OC would like to offer to host a stakeholder meeting during
our regularly scheduled Transportation Committee meeting on Tuesday
September 41h at 3:30pm, All interested stakeholders would be invited to attend.
tNe look forward to working with }rou on this important issue. Thank you for
your thoughtful consideration.
Respect t}',
1
Bryan .Starr
Deputy Executive Officer
Cc: Sharon Wood, Assistant City Manager
orange County
Chapter
1794 Shy Purl. Cinle
Saile ]'0
brink, Califnl'niu 9281=i
949.553.95011
fax 9!1`J.JJ'R 91007
�� ay.hinnr.: inn
PPESIDSIe
till, McsunGS
HE S+OPOEr C:NJJP
VICE PRESIDENS
D,VD GRFKNIVCSR
Wii iONE COMMd'JI 11R$
CONS VCE PRFM)En"
PAUL J0.gfnDN
RANOIIO 1,11INI)N 111E.10
TREASURER
DEBR4 PEM5E1"
.LRN LAING 40MES
SECRETARY
DAVE 5A.PiLETi
;.;,orvri� naar;
IM`:IED.ATE P.45' PRESIDENT
10" GlIt iJLE
gni 1-I4M IYO'J HOMES
TrLD2 CONTRACTOR COJNCIL V.P.
JIM YAIES
GOLDEN ;NEN PLUIJBING
V -CE PRESIDEfi'
EAER PEARCE
LAEI. PEAKI, a ASSOCIATES
MEMBER Ai-IAP.GE
3111 XAr
6.11900:1 DEVELOPMENT
ME1s8ER.AT LARGE
ANDY BERWEIN
JACKSON. DEMARCO.
TIDUS h PECKEHP.AVGi
KRISIINE TA41-16aJQ
ch c LIXECVRVr 0. rICE R
The Knll Company
4313 Von Karman Avenue
Suite 151)
N(,wport BCach, CA 92660
(k)49) 833.300
(949)25U-4344 Fax
August 29, 2007
Mrs. Sharon Wood
Assistant City Manger
3300 Newport Blvd,
Newport Beach, CA 92663
RE: General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee Agenda Item # 3 (Aug. 29, 2007)
Dear Mrs. Wood:
As a property owner/interested party in Newport Beach, we wish to request a continuance of the
above item in order to allow adequate time for review of the assumptions and conclusions in this
report. While we support adequate infrastructure in the City of Newport Beach, we believe that
fee increases must be have adequate stakeholder review. We will appreciate the favorable
consideration of our request.
Sincerely,
"--12�
Scott Meserve
The Koll Company
August 29, 2007
CALIFORNIA BUSINESS PROPERTIES ASSOCIATION
1121 t. Svicet. Suite 909 - S:rrunemo • caIirotiva 9-:514 • 916.443.4676 - Pax 916-4JJ-B 5 • e,%cw.ebpa.com
General Plan Implementation Committee
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Attention: Sharon Wood
Re: Item ##3 (August 29, 2007) Fair Share Fee — Request Postponement
Dear Committee Members,
On behalf of the California Business Properties Association (CBPA), I respectfully
request that you defer taking action on the Fair Share Fee item that is on today's
General Plan Implementation Committee agenda until city staff has had an opportunity
to meet with those stakeholders groups that will be most impacted.
CBPA represents property owners, tenants, developers, retailers, contractors, and
professional service providers that are engaged in the residential, commercial and
industrial real estate industry. With over 10,000 men and worsen, CBPA is the largest
commercial real estate consortium in California.
We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with city staff in order to discus the current
proposal, and explore in detail the methodology that was used. As you know, there must
be a clear nexus between development fees and the impact the development would
create. Therefore it is important that stakeholder groups clearly understand the process
that was undertaken to achieve the proposed fee schedule.
Thank you for your consideration. CBPA looks forward to working with the Committee
and staff on this and other issues that will impact the residents and business community
of Newport Beach.
Sincerely,
Todd Priest
Vice President
Curt Pringle & Associates
on behalf of the California Business Properties Association
I
A I l i e. d R e t a i l P <a r t 11 e r s I. L G
August 29, 2007
Mrs. Sharon Wood
Assistant City Manger
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
RE: General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee Agenda Item # 3 (Aug. 29, 2007)
Dear Mrs. Wood:
As a property owmer in Newport Beach, we wish to request a continuance of the above referenced item
in order to allow adequate time for review of the assumptions and conclusions in the report.
While we support adequate infrastructure in the City of Newport Beach, we believe that fee increases
must have been adequately reviewed by property owners in the City of Newport Beach.
I appreciate the City's favorable consideration of our request.
Sincere]),,
Douglas T. Beiswenger
Managing Partner
500 Newport Center Drive, Ste. 800, Newport Beach, CA 92660
Ph. 949/640-0005 Fax 949/640-0010
THE MURREL_ A
COI\ _ 1_\f_Y
August 29, 2007
Ms. Sharon Wood
Assistant City Manger
3300 Newport Blvd,
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: General Plan/LCP Implementation Committee Agenda Item N 3 (Aug. 29, 2007)
Dear Sharon:
We have recently been advised of the city's plans to increase the Fair Share Fees from
$177/trip to $508/trip for new development projects in the City of Newport Beach. As a
property owner in Newport Beach, we would respectfully request a continuance of the
above referenced item in order to allow adequate time for review of the assumptions and
conclusions in the committee's report.
We are supportive of continued infrastructure investment by the City of Newport Beach,
however, we believe that fee increases must be adequately reviewed by property owners
prior to implementation.
We appreciate your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
THE MURREL COMPANY
Authorized agent of
VMA arineMile, C
Mark G. Murrel
Principal
2439 4VLa Coasr Hwv
Sung -^09
CALIFORNIA,NEIMM) MACH
92663
Tits. 949 •722 •1131
Pns 9,19 -722 -92,14